Air Plan Approval; North Carolina: Mecklenburg General Provisions, 64108-64110 [2021-24901]
Download as PDF
64108
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 17, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Region 10 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the EPA
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this proposed action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of the requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rulemaking
would not apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Nov 16, 2021
Jkt 256001
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rulemaking does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 8, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2021–24965 Filed 11–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0705; FRL–9235–01–
R4]
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina:
Mecklenburg General Provisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision to the Mecklenburg County
portion of the North Carolina SIP,
hereinafter referred to as the
Mecklenburg County Local
Implementation Plan (LIP). The revision
was submitted through the North
Carolina Division Air Quality (NCDAQ),
on behalf of Mecklenburg County Air
Quality (MCAQ), via a letter dated April
24, 2020, and was received by EPA on
June 19, 2020. The revision updates
several Mecklenburg County Air
Pollution Control Ordinance (MCAPCO)
rules incorporated into the LIP,
including updating and revising certain
definitions. EPA is proposing to approve
these changes pursuant to the Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 17, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2020–0705, at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pearlene Williams, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
9144. Ms. Williams can also be reached
via electronic mail at
williams.pearlene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Mecklenburg County LIP was
originally submitted to EPA on June 14,
1990, and EPA approved the plan on
May 2, 1991. See 56 FR 20140.
Mecklenburg County prepared three
submittals in order to modify the LIP
for, among other things, general
consistency with the North Carolina
SIP.1 The three submittals were
submitted to EPA as follows: NCDAQ
transmitted the October 25, 2017,
submittal to EPA but withdrew it from
review through a letter dated February
15, 2019. On April 24, 2020, NCDAQ
resubmitted the October 25, 2017,
update to EPA and also submitted the
January 21, 2016, and January 14, 2019,
updates. Due to an inconsistency with
public notice at the local level, these
submittals were withdrawn from EPA
through a letter dated February 15,
2019. Mecklenburg County corrected
this error, and NCDAQ submitted the
1 The Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
revision that is dated April 24, 2020, and received
by EPA on June 19, 2020, is comprised of three
previous submittals—one dated January 21, 2016;
one dated October 25, 2017; and one dated January
14, 2019.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 17, 2021 / Proposed Rules
updates in a revision dated April 24,
2020.2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. What action is EPA proposing to
take?
On April 24, 2020, NCDAQ submitted
to EPA changes to the MCAPCO to be
incorporated into the LIP.3 The January
14, 2019 portion of this submission
includes changes to Rules 1.5102—
Definition of Terms and 1.5111—
General Recordkeeping, Reporting and
Monitoring Requirements of MCAPCO
Article 1.0000—Permitting Provisions
for Air Pollution Sources, Rules and
Operating Regulations for Acid Rain
Sources, Title V and Toxic Air
Pollutants. The January 21, 2016 portion
of this submission includes changes and
updates to Rule 1.5104—General Duties
and Powers of the Director, With the
Approval of the Board of MCAPCO
Article 1.0000. These revisions are
described in more detail below:
1. Rule 1.5102—Definition of Terms is
revised to add several new terms and to
remove several obsolete terms from Rule
1.5102.4 5 The term ‘‘Construction’’ is
added and defined as the change in the
method of operation or any change,
including on-site fabrication, erection,
installation, replacement, demolition, or
modification of a source, that results in
a change in emissions or affects the
compliance status. Some activities
excluded from the definition include
clearing and grading, building access
roads, and other activities. ‘‘EPA
Approves’’ is added and defined as the
full, interim or partial approvals by
EPA. ‘‘Facility’’ is added and defined as
2 The April 24, 2020, submittal was received by
EPA on June 19, 2020.
3 The April 24, 2020, submittal contains changes
to other Mecklenburg LIP-approved rules that are
not addressed in this notice. EPA will be acting on
those rules in separate actions.
4 Although the definitions in Rule 1.5102 are
global definitions that generally apply throughout
the LIP, these definitions do not apply where they
‘‘conflict[ ] with any definition(s) included in
MCAPCO Article 2.0000—‘Air Pollution Control
Regulations and Procedures.’ ’’ For example, the
Rule 1.5102 definitions do not apply where they
conflict with definitions applicable to
Mecklenburg’s prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD) or nonattainment new source
review (NNSR) programs. For Mecklenburg’s PSD
program, ‘‘the definitions contained in 40 CFR
51.166(b) and 40 CFR 51.301 apply’’ pursuant to
Rule 2.0530(a) (unless an exception is explicitly
stated in Rule 2.0530). For Mecklenburg’s NNSR
program, ‘‘the definitions contained in 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1) and 40 CFR 51.301 apply’’ pursuant to
Rule 2.0531(a) (unless an exception is explicitly
stated in Rule 2.0531). Mecklenburg has requested
minor changes to Rule 2.0530 (relating to PSD),
which EPA will address in a separate notice.
5 The reader should refer to the underlying
submittal from MCAQ for the precise language of
each definition. The descriptions of the definitions
in this section are intended merely as a summary,
and not as a complete restatement of each
definition.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Nov 16, 2021
Jkt 256001
all pollutant-emitting activities located
on one or more contiguous or adjacent
properties under common control.
‘‘Insignificant Activities’’ is added and
defined as activities that are
insignificant due to their category, size,
or production rate. ‘‘Potential
Emissions’’ is added and defined as
‘‘emissions of any air pollutant that
would occur at the facility’s maximum
capacity to emit any air pollutant under
its physical and operational design.’’
This term allows Federally enforceable
limitations, placed on the facility’s
physical or operational capacities, to be
considered as part of the facility’s
design, and includes air pollution
control equipment, restriction on hours
of operation or the type or amount of
material combusted, stored, or
processed. This term also includes
fugitive emissions as defined at 40 CFR
70.2, however it does not include a
facility’s secondary emissions nor
emissions from insignificant activities.
‘‘Regulated Air Pollutant’’ is defined as
nitrogen oxides or any volatile organic
compound as defined under 40 CFR
51.100; any pollutant for which there is
an ambient air quality standard as
defined pursuant to 40 CFR part 50; any
pollutant that is regulated pursuant to
MCAPCO Regulation 2.0524—New
Source Performance Standards,
MCAPCO Regulation 2.1110—National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants, MCAPCO Regulation
2.1111—Maximum Achievable Control
Technology, or 40 CFR parts 60, 61, or
63; any pollutant subject to a standard
promulgated pursuant to section 112 of
the CAA or other requirements
established pursuant to section 112 of
the CAA, including section 112(g) (but
only for the facility subject to section
112 (g)(2) of the CAA), section 112 (G)
or (r) of the CAA and any Class I or II
substance listed pursuant to section 602
of the CAA; or any toxic air pollutant
listed in MCAPCO Regulation 2.1104—
Toxic Air Pollutant Guidelines. Rule
1.5102 is also revised to add the
following additional terms:
‘‘Administrator,’’ ‘‘Air Pollutant,’’
‘‘Allowable Emissions,’’ ‘‘Applicable
Requirements,’’ ‘‘Applicant,’’
‘‘Application Package,’’ ‘‘CFR,’’ ‘‘EPA,’’
‘‘Equivalent Unadulterated Fuels,’’
‘‘Federally Enforceable’’ or ‘‘Federal
Enforceable,’’ ‘‘Fuel Combustion
Equipment,’’ ‘‘Green Wood,’’
‘‘Hazardous Air Pollutant,’’ ‘‘Lesser
Quantity Cutoff,’’ ‘‘Major Facility,’’
‘‘Modification,’’ ‘‘Modified Facility,’’
‘‘New Facility,’’ ‘‘Owner’’ or ‘‘Operator,’’
‘‘Peak Shaving Generator,’’ ‘‘Permit,’’
‘‘Permittee,’’ ‘‘Plans and
Specifications,’’ ‘‘Responsible Official,’’
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64109
‘‘Saw Mill,’’ ‘‘Title IV Source,’’ ‘‘Title V
Source,’’ ‘‘Toxic Air Pollutants,’’ and
‘‘Unadulterated Fossil Fuel.’’ These
revisions generally correspond to the
definitions in the state-approved SIP at
15A NCAC 02Q .0103 with minor
exceptions.6 Lastly, Rule 1.5102 is
revised to remove the definitions of
Cleaning Fires, Condensed Fumes, Dustseparating Equipment, Effective Stack
Height, Low Volatile Solid Fuel, Smoke
Density Measuring Device and
Undesirable Level. Each of these terms
are not operative in the currently
approved version of the LIP because
these terms do not appear elsewhere in
the LIP. Therefore, their removal has no
practical effect and will streamline Rule
1.5102.
2. Rule 1.5104—General Duties and
Powers of the Director, With the
Approval of the Board is revised to
make minor changes to wording, such as
removing the word ‘‘to’’ from the
beginning of certain paragraphs
throughout for uniformity, capitalizing
the word ‘‘regulations’’ in paragraph (c),
and capitalizing the first letter of each
word in the paragraphs where the word
‘‘to’’ was removed.
Paragraph (l) adds language to clarify
that the Director makes inspections of
sources and conducts tests as necessary.
Finally, the word ‘‘and’’ is also
removed at the end of paragraph (k) to
allow for the addition of a new
paragraph, paragraph (m), which
identifies the Director’s duty to require
the facility to conduct tests and gather
information to document compliance
with emission standards and to
effectuate the purpose of the Ordinance.
3. Rule 1.5111—General
Recordkeeping, Reporting and
Monitoring Requirements is revised to
make minor edits to punctuation,
changing commas to semi-colons, and
changing the word ‘‘under’’ to
‘‘pursuant to.’’ Additionally, the phrase
‘‘and transportation facilities’’ is
removed from Rule 1.5111(f) and the
reporting threshold in Rule 1.5111(f) is
reduced from 25 tons per year to 5 tons
per year of actual emissions of nitrogen
oxides or volatile organic compounds
for sources that emit these pollutants.
EPA is proposing to approve the
incorporation of the aforementioned
revisions to the MCAPCO rules into the
Mecklenburg LIP because these rules
add clarity to the LIP and are consistent
6 The SIP-approved statewide rules for North
Carolina include a related ‘‘Definitions’’ section at
15A NCAC 02Q .0103. Due to differences between
the LIP and the SIP, MCAPCO Rule 1.5102 and 15A
NCAC 02Q .0103 are not identical, with each
containing certain definitions that do not exist in
the other version.
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
64110
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 17, 2021 / Proposed Rules
with the CAA and applicable
regulations.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
MCAPCO Rules 1.5102—Definition of
Terms and 1.5111—General
Recordkeeping, Reporting and
Monitoring Requirements, both which
have an effective date of December 18,
2018; as well as Rule 1.5104—General
Duties and Powers of the Director, With
the Approval of the Board, with an
effective date of December 15, 2015, into
the Mecklenburg County portion of the
North Carolina SIP. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve and
incorporate into the Mecklenburg
County LIP revisions to MCAPCO Rules
1.5102—Definition of Terms and
1.5111—General Recordkeeping,
Reporting and Monitoring
Requirements, effective on December
18, 2018, as well as Rule 1.5104—
General Duties and Powers of the
Director, With the Approval of the
Board, effective on December 15, 2015.
EPA is proposing to approve these
changes because they are consistent
with the CAA.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the
CAA. This proposed action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 1356–3 (76 FR
3821, January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Nov 16, 2021
Jkt 256001
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 8, 2021.
John Blevins,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2021–24901 Filed 11–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R05–OAR–2021–0540; FRL–9201–01–
R5]
Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin;
Redesignation of the Rhinelander
Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to
redesignate the Rhinelander
nonattainment area, which consists of a
portion of Oneida County (Crescent
Township, Newbold Township, Pine
Lake Township, Pelican Township, and
the City of Rhinelander), to attainment
for the 2010 primary, health-based 1hour sulfur dioxide (SO2) National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). EPA is also proposing to
approve Wisconsin’s maintenance plan
for the Rhinelander SO2 nonattainment
area. Wisconsin submitted the request
for approval of the Rhinelander area’s
redesignation and maintenance plan on
July 28, 2021. EPA proposed to approve
Wisconsin’s attainment plan for the
Rhinelander area on July 22, 2021, and
EPA will not finalize this action until
the attainment plan is approved.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 17, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2021–0540 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
arra.sarah@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17NOP1.SGM
17NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 17, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64108-64110]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24901]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0705; FRL-9235-01-R4]
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina: Mecklenburg General Provisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to the Mecklenburg
County portion of the North Carolina SIP, hereinafter referred to as
the Mecklenburg County Local Implementation Plan (LIP). The revision
was submitted through the North Carolina Division Air Quality (NCDAQ),
on behalf of Mecklenburg County Air Quality (MCAQ), via a letter dated
April 24, 2020, and was received by EPA on June 19, 2020. The revision
updates several Mecklenburg County Air Pollution Control Ordinance
(MCAPCO) rules incorporated into the LIP, including updating and
revising certain definitions. EPA is proposing to approve these changes
pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 17, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2020-0705, at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pearlene Williams, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-9144. Ms. Williams can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Mecklenburg County LIP was originally submitted to EPA on June
14, 1990, and EPA approved the plan on May 2, 1991. See 56 FR 20140.
Mecklenburg County prepared three submittals in order to modify the LIP
for, among other things, general consistency with the North Carolina
SIP.\1\ The three submittals were submitted to EPA as follows: NCDAQ
transmitted the October 25, 2017, submittal to EPA but withdrew it from
review through a letter dated February 15, 2019. On April 24, 2020,
NCDAQ resubmitted the October 25, 2017, update to EPA and also
submitted the January 21, 2016, and January 14, 2019, updates. Due to
an inconsistency with public notice at the local level, these
submittals were withdrawn from EPA through a letter dated February 15,
2019. Mecklenburg County corrected this error, and NCDAQ submitted the
[[Page 64109]]
updates in a revision dated April 24, 2020.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Mecklenburg County, North Carolina revision that is
dated April 24, 2020, and received by EPA on June 19, 2020, is
comprised of three previous submittals--one dated January 21, 2016;
one dated October 25, 2017; and one dated January 14, 2019.
\2\ The April 24, 2020, submittal was received by EPA on June
19, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. What action is EPA proposing to take?
On April 24, 2020, NCDAQ submitted to EPA changes to the MCAPCO to
be incorporated into the LIP.\3\ The January 14, 2019 portion of this
submission includes changes to Rules 1.5102--Definition of Terms and
1.5111--General Recordkeeping, Reporting and Monitoring Requirements of
MCAPCO Article 1.0000--Permitting Provisions for Air Pollution Sources,
Rules and Operating Regulations for Acid Rain Sources, Title V and
Toxic Air Pollutants. The January 21, 2016 portion of this submission
includes changes and updates to Rule 1.5104--General Duties and Powers
of the Director, With the Approval of the Board of MCAPCO Article
1.0000. These revisions are described in more detail below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The April 24, 2020, submittal contains changes to other
Mecklenburg LIP-approved rules that are not addressed in this
notice. EPA will be acting on those rules in separate actions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Rule 1.5102--Definition of Terms is revised to add several new
terms and to remove several obsolete terms from Rule
1.5102.4 5 The term ``Construction'' is added and defined as
the change in the method of operation or any change, including on-site
fabrication, erection, installation, replacement, demolition, or
modification of a source, that results in a change in emissions or
affects the compliance status. Some activities excluded from the
definition include clearing and grading, building access roads, and
other activities. ``EPA Approves'' is added and defined as the full,
interim or partial approvals by EPA. ``Facility'' is added and defined
as all pollutant-emitting activities located on one or more contiguous
or adjacent properties under common control. ``Insignificant
Activities'' is added and defined as activities that are insignificant
due to their category, size, or production rate. ``Potential
Emissions'' is added and defined as ``emissions of any air pollutant
that would occur at the facility's maximum capacity to emit any air
pollutant under its physical and operational design.'' This term allows
Federally enforceable limitations, placed on the facility's physical or
operational capacities, to be considered as part of the facility's
design, and includes air pollution control equipment, restriction on
hours of operation or the type or amount of material combusted, stored,
or processed. This term also includes fugitive emissions as defined at
40 CFR 70.2, however it does not include a facility's secondary
emissions nor emissions from insignificant activities. ``Regulated Air
Pollutant'' is defined as nitrogen oxides or any volatile organic
compound as defined under 40 CFR 51.100; any pollutant for which there
is an ambient air quality standard as defined pursuant to 40 CFR part
50; any pollutant that is regulated pursuant to MCAPCO Regulation
2.0524--New Source Performance Standards, MCAPCO Regulation 2.1110--
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, MCAPCO
Regulation 2.1111--Maximum Achievable Control Technology, or 40 CFR
parts 60, 61, or 63; any pollutant subject to a standard promulgated
pursuant to section 112 of the CAA or other requirements established
pursuant to section 112 of the CAA, including section 112(g) (but only
for the facility subject to section 112 (g)(2) of the CAA), section 112
(G) or (r) of the CAA and any Class I or II substance listed pursuant
to section 602 of the CAA; or any toxic air pollutant listed in MCAPCO
Regulation 2.1104--Toxic Air Pollutant Guidelines. Rule 1.5102 is also
revised to add the following additional terms: ``Administrator,'' ``Air
Pollutant,'' ``Allowable Emissions,'' ``Applicable Requirements,''
``Applicant,'' ``Application Package,'' ``CFR,'' ``EPA,'' ``Equivalent
Unadulterated Fuels,'' ``Federally Enforceable'' or ``Federal
Enforceable,'' ``Fuel Combustion Equipment,'' ``Green Wood,''
``Hazardous Air Pollutant,'' ``Lesser Quantity Cutoff,'' ``Major
Facility,'' ``Modification,'' ``Modified Facility,'' ``New Facility,''
``Owner'' or ``Operator,'' ``Peak Shaving Generator,'' ``Permit,''
``Permittee,'' ``Plans and Specifications,'' ``Responsible Official,''
``Saw Mill,'' ``Title IV Source,'' ``Title V Source,'' ``Toxic Air
Pollutants,'' and ``Unadulterated Fossil Fuel.'' These revisions
generally correspond to the definitions in the state-approved SIP at
15A NCAC 02Q .0103 with minor exceptions.\6\ Lastly, Rule 1.5102 is
revised to remove the definitions of Cleaning Fires, Condensed Fumes,
Dust-separating Equipment, Effective Stack Height, Low Volatile Solid
Fuel, Smoke Density Measuring Device and Undesirable Level. Each of
these terms are not operative in the currently approved version of the
LIP because these terms do not appear elsewhere in the LIP. Therefore,
their removal has no practical effect and will streamline Rule 1.5102.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Although the definitions in Rule 1.5102 are global
definitions that generally apply throughout the LIP, these
definitions do not apply where they ``conflict[ ] with any
definition(s) included in MCAPCO Article 2.0000--`Air Pollution
Control Regulations and Procedures.' '' For example, the Rule 1.5102
definitions do not apply where they conflict with definitions
applicable to Mecklenburg's prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD) or nonattainment new source review (NNSR) programs. For
Mecklenburg's PSD program, ``the definitions contained in 40 CFR
51.166(b) and 40 CFR 51.301 apply'' pursuant to Rule 2.0530(a)
(unless an exception is explicitly stated in Rule 2.0530). For
Mecklenburg's NNSR program, ``the definitions contained in 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1) and 40 CFR 51.301 apply'' pursuant to Rule 2.0531(a)
(unless an exception is explicitly stated in Rule 2.0531).
Mecklenburg has requested minor changes to Rule 2.0530 (relating to
PSD), which EPA will address in a separate notice.
\5\ The reader should refer to the underlying submittal from
MCAQ for the precise language of each definition. The descriptions
of the definitions in this section are intended merely as a summary,
and not as a complete restatement of each definition.
\6\ The SIP-approved statewide rules for North Carolina include
a related ``Definitions'' section at 15A NCAC 02Q .0103. Due to
differences between the LIP and the SIP, MCAPCO Rule 1.5102 and 15A
NCAC 02Q .0103 are not identical, with each containing certain
definitions that do not exist in the other version.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Rule 1.5104--General Duties and Powers of the Director, With the
Approval of the Board is revised to make minor changes to wording, such
as removing the word ``to'' from the beginning of certain paragraphs
throughout for uniformity, capitalizing the word ``regulations'' in
paragraph (c), and capitalizing the first letter of each word in the
paragraphs where the word ``to'' was removed.
Paragraph (l) adds language to clarify that the Director makes
inspections of sources and conducts tests as necessary.
Finally, the word ``and'' is also removed at the end of paragraph
(k) to allow for the addition of a new paragraph, paragraph (m), which
identifies the Director's duty to require the facility to conduct tests
and gather information to document compliance with emission standards
and to effectuate the purpose of the Ordinance.
3. Rule 1.5111--General Recordkeeping, Reporting and Monitoring
Requirements is revised to make minor edits to punctuation, changing
commas to semi-colons, and changing the word ``under'' to ``pursuant
to.'' Additionally, the phrase ``and transportation facilities'' is
removed from Rule 1.5111(f) and the reporting threshold in Rule
1.5111(f) is reduced from 25 tons per year to 5 tons per year of actual
emissions of nitrogen oxides or volatile organic compounds for sources
that emit these pollutants.
EPA is proposing to approve the incorporation of the aforementioned
revisions to the MCAPCO rules into the Mecklenburg LIP because these
rules add clarity to the LIP and are consistent
[[Page 64110]]
with the CAA and applicable regulations.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference MCAPCO Rules 1.5102--Definition of Terms and 1.5111--General
Recordkeeping, Reporting and Monitoring Requirements, both which have
an effective date of December 18, 2018; as well as Rule 1.5104--General
Duties and Powers of the Director, With the Approval of the Board, with
an effective date of December 15, 2015, into the Mecklenburg County
portion of the North Carolina SIP. EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve and incorporate into the Mecklenburg
County LIP revisions to MCAPCO Rules 1.5102--Definition of Terms and
1.5111--General Recordkeeping, Reporting and Monitoring Requirements,
effective on December 18, 2018, as well as Rule 1.5104--General Duties
and Powers of the Director, With the Approval of the Board, effective
on December 15, 2015. EPA is proposing to approve these changes because
they are consistent with the CAA.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided they meet the criteria of the CAA. This proposed action merely
proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 1356-3 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 8, 2021.
John Blevins,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2021-24901 Filed 11-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P