Energy Conservation Program: Notification of Petition for Waiver of GE Appliances, a Haier Company, From the Department of Energy Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products Test Procedure, 63350-63356 [2021-24902]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
63350
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 16, 2021 / Notices
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Katherine Neas,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Office of Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2021–24887 Filed 11–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Case Number 2021–004; EERE–2021–BT–
WAV–0009]
Energy Conservation Program:
Notification of Petition for Waiver of
GE Appliances, a Haier Company,
From the Department of Energy
Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products
Test Procedure
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notification of petition for
waiver; request for comments.
AGENCY:
This notification announces
receipt of and publishes a petition for
waiver from GE Appliances, a Haier
Company, which seeks a waiver for a
specified miscellaneous refrigeration
product basic model from the U.S.
Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’) test
procedure used for determining the
energy consumption of these products.
DOE solicits comments, data, and
information concerning the petition and
its suggested alternate test procedure so
as to inform DOE’s final decision on the
waiver request.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested and will be
accepted on or before December 16,
2021.
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Alternatively,
interested persons may submit
comments, identified by docket number
EERE–2021–BT–WAV–0009, by any of
the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: to AS_Waiver_Requests@
ee.doe.gov. Include docket number
EERE–2021–BT–WAV–0009 in the
subject line of the message.
No telefacsimiles (‘‘faxes’’) will be
accepted. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on this process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Although DOE has routinely accepted
public comment submissions through a
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Nov 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
variety of mechanisms, including postal
mail and hand delivery/courier, the
Department has found it necessary to
make temporary modifications to the
comment submission process in light of
the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019
(‘‘COVID–19’’) pandemic. DOE is
currently suspending receipt of public
comments via postal mail and hand
delivery/courier. If a commenter finds
that this change poses an undue
hardship, please contact Appliance
Standards Program staff at (202) 586–
1445 to discuss the need for alternative
arrangements. Once the COVID–19
pandemic health emergency is resolved,
DOE anticipates resuming all of its
regular options for public comment
submission, including postal mail and
hand delivery/courier.
Docket: The docket, which includes
Federal Register notices, comments,
and other supporting documents/
materials, is available for review at
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information
that is exempt from public disclosure,
may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at
www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE2021-BT-WAV-0009. The docket web
page contains instruction on how to
access all documents, including public
comments, in the docket. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
information on how to submit
comments through
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Julia Hegarty, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. Email:
AS_Waiver_Request@ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
Mail Stop GC–33, Forrestal Building,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0103.
Telephone: (202) 586–8145. Email:
Michael.Kido@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE is
publishing GEA’s petition for waiver in
its entirety, pursuant to 10 CFR
430.27(b)(1)(iv).1 DOE invites all
interested parties to submit in writing
by December 16, 2021, comments and
information on all aspects of the
petition, including the alternate test
procedure. Pursuant to 10 CFR
1 The petition did not identify any of the
information contained therein as confidential
business information.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
430.27(d), any person submitting
written comments to DOE must also
send a copy of such comments to the
petitioner. The contact information for
the petitioner is:
John T. Schlafer, GE Appliances, A
Haier Company, Appliance Park—AP2–
225, Louisville, KY 40225. Email:
john.schlafer@geappliances.com.
Submitting comments via
www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will
require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact
information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your
contact information will not be publicly
viewable except for your first and last
names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any).
If your comment is not processed
properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information
will be publicly viewable if you include
it in the comment or in any documents
attached to your comment. Any
information that you do not want to be
publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment. If
this instruction is followed, persons
viewing comments will see only first
and last names, organization names,
correspondence containing comments,
and any documents submitted with the
comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov
information for which disclosure is
restricted by statute, such as trade
secrets and commercial or financial
information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information
(‘‘CBI’’)). Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed
as CBI. Comments received through the
website will waive any CBI claims for
the information submitted. For
information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be
posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of
comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not
be viewable for up to several weeks.
Please keep the comment tracking
number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully
uploaded your comment.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 16, 2021 / Notices
Submitting comments via email.
Comments and documents submitted
via email also will be posted to
www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be
publicly viewable, do not include it in
your comment or any accompanying
documents. Instead, provide your
contact information on a cover letter.
Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and
optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as
long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time
you submit comments, data, documents,
and other information to DOE. Faxes
will not be accepted.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide documents that are not
secured, written in English and free of
any defects or viruses. Documents
should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible,
they should carry the electronic
signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit
campaign form letters by the originating
organization in batches of between 50 to
500 form letters per PDF or as one form
letter with a list of supporters’ names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This
reduces comment processing and
posting time.
Confidential Business Information.
According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit via email two wellmarked copies: One copy of the
document marked confidential
including all the information believed to
be confidential, and one copy of the
document marked ‘‘non-confidential’’
with the information believed to be
confidential deleted. Submit these
documents via email. DOE will make its
own determination about the
confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its
determination.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Nov 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
I. Background and Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation
Act, as amended (‘‘EPCA’’),2 authorizes
the U.S. Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’)
to regulate the energy efficiency of a
number of consumer products and
certain industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C.
6291–6317) Title III, Part B 3 of EPCA,
Public Law 94–163, as amended (42
U.S.C. 6291–6309, as codified),
established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles, which, in addition
to identifying particular types of
consumer products and commercial
equipment as covered under the statute,
permits the Secretary of Energy to
classify additional types of consumer
products as covered products. (42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(20)) DOE added miscellaneous
refrigeration products (‘‘MREFs’’) as
covered products through a final
determination of coverage published in
the Federal Register on July 18, 2016
(the ‘‘July 2016 Final Rule’’). 81 FR
46768. Id.
The energy conservation program
under EPCA consists essentially of four
parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3)
Federal energy conservation standards,
and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. Relevant provisions of
EPCA include definitions (42 U.S.C.
6291), test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293),
labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294),
energy conservation standards (42
U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to
require information and reports from
manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296).
The Federal testing requirements
consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must
use as the basis for: (1) Certifying to
DOE that their products comply with
the applicable energy conservation
standards adopted pursuant to EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6295(s)), and (2) making
representations about the efficiency of
that product (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)).
Similarly, DOE must use these test
procedures to determine whether the
covered product complies with relevant
standards promulgated under EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6295(s))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth
the criteria and procedures DOE is
required to follow when prescribing or
amending test procedures for covered
products. EPCA requires that any test
procedures prescribed or amended
under this section must be reasonably
designed to produce test results which
reflect the energy efficiency, energy use
2 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the Energy Act
of 2020, Public Law 116–260 (Dec. 27, 2020).
3 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part B was redesignated as Part A.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63351
or estimated annual operating cost of a
covered product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use and
requires that test procedures not be
unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
MREFs are consumer refrigeration
products other than refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, or freezers. These
products include coolers and
combination cooler refrigeration
products. 10 CFR 430.2. A ‘‘cooler’’ is a
cabinet, used with one or more doors,
that has a source of refrigeration capable
of operating on single-phase, alternating
current and is capable of maintaining
compartment temperatures either: (1)
No lower than 39 °F (3.9 °C); or (2) in
a range that extends no lower than 37 °F
(2.8 °C) but at least as high as 60 °F (15.6
°C) as determined according to the
applicable DOE test procedure. The test
procedure for MREFs is contained in the
Code of Federal Regulations (‘‘CFR’’) at
10 CFR part 430, appendix A to subpart
B of part 430—Uniform Test Method for
Measuring the Energy Consumption of
Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and
Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products
(‘‘Appendix A’’).
Under 10 CFR 430.27, any interested
person may submit a petition for waiver
from DOE’s test procedure
requirements. DOE will grant a waiver
from the test procedure requirements if
DOE determines either that the basic
model for which the waiver was
requested contains a design
characteristic that prevents testing of the
basic model according to the prescribed
test procedures, or that the prescribed
test procedures evaluate the basic model
in a manner so unrepresentative of its
true energy consumption characteristics
as to provide materially inaccurate
comparative data. 10 CFR 430.27(f)(2). A
petitioner must include in its petition
any alternate test procedures known to
the petitioner to evaluate the
performance of the product type in a
manner representative of the energy
consumption characteristics of the basic
model. 10 CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iii). DOE
may grant the waiver subject to
conditions, including adherence to
alternate test procedures. 10 CFR
430.27(f)(2).
As soon as practicable after the
granting of any waiver, DOE will
publish in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking to amend its
regulations so as to eliminate any need
for the continuation of such waiver. 10
CFR 430.27(l). As soon thereafter as
practicable, DOE will publish in the
Federal Register a final rule to that
effect. Id.
The waiver process also provides that
DOE may grant an interim waiver if it
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
63352
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 16, 2021 / Notices
appears likely that the underlying
petition for waiver will be granted and/
or if DOE determines that it would be
desirable for public policy reasons to
grant immediate relief pending a
determination on the underlying
petition for waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(e)(2).
Within one year of issuance of an
interim waiver, DOE will either: (i)
Publish in the Federal Register a
determination on the petition for
waiver; or (ii) publish in the Federal
Register a new or amended test
procedure that addresses the issues
presented in the waiver. 10 CFR
430.27(h)(2).
If DOE ultimately denies the petition
for waiver, DOE will provide a period of
180 days before the manufacturer is
required to use the DOE test procedure
to make representations of energy
efficiency. 10 CFR 430.27(i). When DOE
amends the test procedure to address
the issues presented in a waiver, the
waiver will automatically terminate on
the date on which use of that test
procedure is required to demonstrate
compliance. 10 CFR 430.27(h)(3).
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
II. GEA’s April 2021 Petition for Waiver
and Interim Waiver
On April 9, 2021, DOE received from
GE Appliances, a Haier Company
(‘‘GEA’’) a petition (dated April 8, 2021)
for waiver and interim waiver from the
test procedure for MREFs set forth at
appendix A to subpart B of 10 CFR part
430. (GEA, No. 1 at p. 1) 4 Pursuant to
10 CFR 430.27(e)(i), DOE posted the
petition on the DOE website at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE2021-BT-WAV-0009-0001.5
The specific basic model subject to
the petition was ‘‘S–IHG–R’’, which
GEA described as an ‘‘In-Home
Grower’’—a product with lighting,
temperature, humidity, and nutrient
water control that allows the user to
grow plants within their home yearround. GEA stated that the average
compartment temperatures of the InHome Grower exceed the 55 °F
standardized temperature required for
testing under the existing DOE test
procedure (see section 3.2 of appendix
A) and, therefore, the product cannot be
tested using the existing test procedure.
GEA also described characteristics of
this basic model that GEA stated would
4 A notation in this form provides a reference for
information that is in the docket for this test
procedure waiver (Docket No. EERE–2021–BT–
WAV–0009) (available at www.regulations.gov/
docket/EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009). This notation
indicates that the statement preceding the reference
is document number 1 in the docket and appears
at page 1 of that document.
5 The petition did not identify any of the
information contained therein as confidential
business information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Nov 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
prevent the use of certain test setup,
stabilization, temperature control, and
energy use determination requirements
in appendix A. (GEA, No. 1 at pp. 3–4)
In its April 8, 2021 petition, GEA
submitted to DOE an alternate test
procedure to determine the energy
consumption of its In-Home Grower.
(GEA, No. 1 at p. 6) GEA stated that its
alternate test procedure would allow for
the measurement of the energy use of
this product where the requirements of
the current DOE test procedure cannot
be met. DOE received a follow-up
correspondence from GEA on April 26,
2021, which provided a revised
alternate test procedure.6 DOE reviewed
the alternate test procedure included in
the April 26, 2021 correspondence as
the requested alternate test approach
when making the initial determination
on the petition for waiver and interim
waiver. GEA also provided additional
correspondence on June 2, 2021, in
which it clarified certain aspects of the
proposed alternate test procedure
included in the April 26, 2021
submission.7 In the April 26, 2021,
correspondence, GEA requested an
alternate test approach in which two
tests would be conducted for the subject
basic model: one with the model
operating as ‘‘normal,’’ and the other
with the refrigeration system disabled to
allow for identifying the energy
contribution of the cooling system. GEA
stated that the main purpose of the
cooling system is to counteract the heat
generated from the internal lighting, and
that the requested alternate test
procedure would be used to determine
the energy consumption of the cooling
system only. (GEA, No. 2 at p. 4)
On July 7, 2021, DOE published a
notification of petition for waiver and
denial of an interim waiver for the
alternative test approach described by
GEA in its April 26, 2021
correspondence. 86 FR 35766. In that
notification, DOE acknowledged that,
based upon GEA’s petition, absent an
interim waiver, GEA’s In-Home Grower
cannot be tested and rated for energy
consumption according to the MREF
test procedure on a basis representative
of its true energy consumption
characteristics. Id. at 86 FR 35768.
However, DOE tentatively determined
that GEA’s proposed alternative test
procedure would not result in a
measurement of the energy use of the
basic model that is representative of an
average use cycle or period of use, and
6 This document can be found in the docket for
this test procedure waiver under Document No.
002.
7 This document can be found in the docket for
this test procedure waiver under Document No.
003.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
therefore the petition for waiver was
unlikely to be granted as submitted. Id.
Specifically, DOE determined that the
requested test approach to isolate the
refrigeration system energy
consumption would not provide a
representative measurement of energy
use for the basic model during an
average use cycle or period of use. 86 FR
35766, 35770. DOE requested comment
on all aspects of the petition, including
the suggested alternate test procedure
and calculation methodology. Id.
III. GEA’s September 2021 Petition for
Waiver
On September 17, 2021, GEA
submitted to DOE a new petition for
waiver (‘‘September 2021 petition for
waiver’’) for the same basic model with
a revised alternate test approach.8 The
following two sections discuss specific
aspects of GEA’s September 2021
petition for waiver.
A. Requirements Sought To Be Waived
GEA requested to waive the current
test procedure, calculations, and
accompanying conditions for testing
coolers as specified in section 6.2.2 of
appendix A. GEA asserted that the InHome Grower is fundamentally different
from all other known miscellaneous
refrigeration products. The primary
assertion of the petition is that the basic
model for which the waiver was
requested contains design
characteristics that prevent testing of the
basic model according to the prescribed
DOE MREF test procedure. GEA states
that the In-Home Grower, when tested at
its coldest setting in a 90 °F ambient
temperature, cannot achieve the 55 °F
standardized temperature required for
the DOE MREF test procedure (see
section 3.2 of appendix A). GEA stated
that its testing in a 90 °F ambient
condition resulted in compartment
temperatures of 79.90 °F and 79.97 °F.
The DOE test procedure at appendix
A simulates typical room conditions
(72 °F) with door openings, by testing at
90 °F without door openings. 10 CFR
430.23(ff)(7). The test procedure directly
measures the energy consumed during
steady-state operation and defrosts, if
applicable. Additionally, the DOE test
procedure incorporates usage
adjustment factors to account for
differences in these user-related thermal
loads for different types of consumer
refrigeration products (i.e., MREFs are
typically used less frequently than a
primary refrigerator-freezer in a
household and thus have an adjustment
8 This document can be found in the docket for
this test procedure waiver under Document No.
006.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 16, 2021 / Notices
factor of 0.55). See section 5.2.1.1 of
appendix A.
GEA states that there is no need to
elevate the ambient temperature for the
test to account for door openings and
loads because the In-Home Grower has
a very low number of door openings
and, after the initial loading with plants,
will typically not have additional loads
introduced. GEA seeks to waive the
requirement for testing the In-Home
Grower at a 90 °F ambient condition.
See section 2.1.1 of appendix A. GEA
instead requests to test the In-Home
Grower in a 72 °F ambient condition,
which it asserts better represents typical
use of the product. GEA further stated
that testing at a 72 °F ambient with the
product temperature set to 60 °F (the
minimum temperature set point) yields
compartment temperatures between
59.15 and 61.41 °F. GEA also seeks to
waive the requirement in section 6.2.2
of appendix A that performance be
calculated at a standardized
compartment temperature of 55 °F, since
the In-home Grower is not capable of
maintaining the 55 °F standardized
compartment temperature specified in
appendix A. Instead, GEA requests that
the model be tested in the 72 °F ambient
condition using default settings.
Additionally, GEA seeks to waive the
existing DOE test procedure
requirement to measure the internal
compartment temperatures of the unit
under test. See section 5.1 of appendix
A. GEA claims that the rotation of the
compartments significantly increases
the test burden of temperature
measurements, as the thermocouple
wires would require a customized
testing setup to avoid tangling of the
wires and movement of the temperature
masses. Under GEA’s requested
approach, compartment temperature
measurements would not be necessary
because no interpolation would be made
to reflect performance at the
standardized 55 °F compartment
temperature. (GEA, No. 6 at p. 4)
GEA also seeks to waive the
stabilization and test period
requirements specified in sections 2.9
and 4 of appendix A, respectively.
Specifically, GEA requests an 8-hour
stabilization period (the duration of
each rotation) and 24-hour test period
(the duration of one full rotation) based
on the rotation of the internal
compartments, rather than based on
compressor cycling as specified in
appendix A. (GEA, No. 6 at p. 4)
B. Requested Alternate Test Procedure
GEA seeks to use an alternate test
procedure to test and rate a specific
MREF basic model. GEA’s requested
alternate test procedure addresses the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Nov 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
test procedure requirements to be
waived as discussed in the previous
section of this document. GEA’s
requested approach also includes
additional test instructions regarding
setup and settings instructions.
Because the In-Home Grower supplies
water and nutrients to plants during
normal operation, GEA’s suggested
alternate test procedure provides
instructions for filling nutrient tanks
with ambient-temperature water prior to
the start of the test.
The proposed alternate test approach
also provides instructions for product
settings, as the suggested test procedure
would not be based on the product
maintaining compartment temperature
to the 55 °F standardized compartment
temperature specified in appendix A.
Specifically, GEA requests that the InHome Grower be controlled via use of
an application on a connected device
and that the product be operated using
default settings.
In summary, GEA’s suggested
alternate test procedure would measure
the daily energy consumption of the
basic model by providing:
(1) Directions for filling the nutrient
water tanks with water at ambient
temperature;
(2) A specific stabilization period of 8
hours (in place of the requirements of
section 2.9 of appendix A);
(3) A specific test period of 24 hours
(in place of the test period described in
section 4.1 of appendix A);
(4) An ambient test condition of 72 °F
(in place of the requirement in section
2.1.1 of appendix A);
(5) That no compartment temperature
measurements be taken during the test
(in place of the requirements in section
5.1 of appendix A); and
(6) That the product be controlled
using an application from a connected
device and operated using default
settings. (GEA, No. 6 at p. 6)
IV. DOE Response and Request for
Comments
As the September 17, 2021 petition is
for the same basic model that is the
subject of the petition addressed in the
July 7, 2021 Federal Register
notification, DOE is treating the
September 17, 2021 petition as an
amendment to the prior petition. DOE
reiterates its determination from the July
7, 2021 notification that based on GEA’s
description of the In-Home Grower, the
basic model meets the definition of a
cooler in 10 CFR 430.2 for the following
reasons:
1. The product consists of a cabinet
used with one or more glass doors, as
specified by GEA; and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63353
2. The product maintains
compartment temperatures no lower
than 39 °F, as determined when tested
in a 90 °F ambient temperature, as GEA
specified that the compartment
temperatures measured 79.90 °F and
79.97 °F under these conditions at the
minimum temperature setting.
86 FR 35766, 35768.
The definition for cooler at 10 CFR
430.2 does not reference a specific
design intent (such as storage of food or
beverages) and does not require that the
product be capable of maintaining a
compartment temperature of 55 °F when
tested in a 90 °F ambient temperature.
Id. While DOE maintains its
determination that the subject basic
model meets the definition of a cooler
in 10 CFR 430.2, DOE acknowledges the
significant differences between this
basic model and typical MREFs (and
more specifically, coolers).9 Based on
the product design and operation details
provided by GEA, DOE has tentatively
determined that the basic model under
consideration is substantially different
than the coolers considered in the
analysis used to develop the current
cooler standards. DOE considered
products for which the refrigeration
systems were the main source of energy
consumption, and in these products the
primary purpose of the refrigeration
system is to remove heat that enters the
cooler compartment from the outside
(i.e., through the walls of the cabinet) in
order to maintain the compartment at a
temperature lower than the ambient
temperature (see chapter 3 of the
technical support document to the 2016
direct final rule, document number
EERE–2011–BT–STD–0043–0118 found
online at www.regulations.gov).
However, the GEA basic model under
question includes an array of lights that
are used to facilitate plant growth, but
which generate heat, such that the
primary purpose of the refrigeration
system is to remove heat that is
generated internally within the
compartment in order to maintain the
compartment at approximately the same
temperature as the ambient temperature.
Based on this difference in function
from the other cooler products
addressed by DOE’s regulations, the
9 GEA stated in its September 17, 2021, petition
for waiver that the subject basic model is
fundamentally different from all other known
MREFs. Specifically, GEA stated that: (1) The
product has a fundamentally different purpose than
other MREFs, which are for cooling and storing
beverages and food; (2) the primary purpose of the
refrigeration system in the product is humidity
control; (3) because the product operates at or near
ambient temperature, the product is uninsulated,
unlike all other known MREFs, which are insulated;
and (4) the product contains grow lighting, which
both consumes energy and adds heat to the product.
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
63354
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 16, 2021 / Notices
design changes that would improve the
efficiency of the subject basic model
(e.g., reducing lighting energy use,
improving heat transfer through the
cabinet walls to allow heat to be more
easily transferred out of the cabinet) are
significantly different than those
considered for coolers during the 2016
rulemaking analysis (e.g., increasing
refrigeration system efficiency,
improving cabinet insulation to reduce
heat transfer through the cabinet walls).
Therefore, DOE has tentatively
determined that the current cooler
energy conservation standards are not
applicable to the subject basic model.
This approach is not dissimilar from
prior actions taken by DOE to address
products or equipment that had not
been contemplated under the regulatory
framework set out by DOE. For example,
in the case of commercial refrigeration
equipment, DOE has previously
indicated that salad bars, buffet tables,
and other refrigerated holding and
serving equipment meet the definition
of commercial refrigeration equipment.
But these equipment operate in a unique
manner compared to the other
commercial refrigeration equipment that
DOE considered when establishing its
test procedures and standards.
Nevertheless, DOE has determined that
salad bars, buffet tables, and other
refrigerated holding and serving
equipment are covered as commercial
refrigeration equipment, but that the
current energy conservation standards
do not apply to them. 79 FR 22277,
22281 (April 21, 2014).
DOE’s 2009 beverage vending
machines (‘‘BVM’’) energy conservation
standards rulemaking and the 2007
distribution transformer energy
conservation standards rulemaking are
also examples of prior instances where
DOE determined that covered products
or equipment would not be subject to
standards due to their unique design or
operation. 81 FR 44914, 44920 (Aug. 31,
2009); 72 FR 58190, 58197 (Oct. 12,
2007).
When DOE initially considered
energy conservation standards for
BVMs, DOE did not consider
combination vending machines as a
separate equipment class, but instead
considered that equipment with all
other Class A and Class B BVMs. DOE
later recognized that combination
vending machines offered a distinct
utility (i.e., storage and vending of
refrigerated and unrefrigerated
merchandise) and concluded that those
machines were a separate class of
BVMs. DOE decided to not set standards
for the equipment class at that time and
reserved standards for combination
vending machines (indicating that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Nov 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
Class A and Class B BVM standards
were not applicable to combination
vending machines) and modified the
definition of Class A and Class B BVMs
to accommodate a definition for
combination vending machines. 74 FR
44914, 44920 (Aug. 31, 2009).
Similarly, in the 2007 energy
conservation standards rulemaking for
distribution transformers, DOE clarified
that although underground mining
distribution transformers are within the
scope of coverage, it recognized that
mining transformers were subject to
unique and extreme dimensional
constraints that impacted their
efficiency and performance capabilities
and did not establish energy
conservation standards for underground
mining transformers. In the final rule,
DOE established a separate equipment
class for mining transformers with the
intent to develop the analysis required
to establish an appropriate energy
conservation standard in the future. 72
FR 58190, 58197 (Oct. 12, 2007). DOE
later reached a similar conclusion in
2013 when it decided again not to
establish standards for mining
distribution transformers. 78 FR 23336,
23353–23354 (Apr. 18, 2013).
Accordingly, in light of these
examples, DOE’s tentative views with
respect to the applicability of standards
to the products at issue are consistent
with its past approach in addressing
novel products and equipment.
DOE understands, based upon GEA’s
petition, that absent a waiver, GEA’s InHome Grower cannot be tested and
rated for energy consumption according
to the MREF test procedure on a basis
representative of its true energy
consumption characteristics.
DOE has reprinted the September 17,
2021 petition for waiver, including the
suggested alternate test procedure, at the
end of this notification. DOE may
consider including this alternate
procedure, or a modified version of this
alternate procedure, in a subsequent
Decision and Order. DOE solicits
comments from interested parties on all
aspects of the petition, including the
suggested alternate test procedure.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on November 9,
2021, by Kathleen B. Hogan, Acting
Under Secretary for Science and Energy,
pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on November 9,
2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
John Schlafer
Senior Counsel
Appliance Park—AP2
Louisville, KY 40225
T: (502) 452–7603
john.schlafer@geappliances.com
September 17, 2021
Via Email (AS_Waiver_Requests@
ee.doe.gov)
Ms. Lucy deButts
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy
Building Technologies Office
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Mailstop EE–5B
Washington, DC 20585–0121
Re: Petition for Waiver Regarding Test
Procedures for Measuring the Energy
Consumption of an In-Home Grower
Product
Dear Ms. deButts: GE Appliances, a
Haier company (GEA) respectfully
submits this Petition for Waiver
requesting an alternate test procedure
from the Department of Energy’s (DOE)
test procedure for Miscellaneous
Refrigeration Products in 10 CFR 430
Subpart B, Appendix A. GEA’s request
is for a new product that allows users
to grow plants within their home the
entire year, known as an In-Home
Grower. The product is designed to be
used in an indoor, temperaturecontrolled environment with room
temperatures from 60 °F to 80 °F. The
product provides the lighting,
temperature and humidity control, and
nutrient water to grow an array of
plants. As detailed below, there are
numerous reasons that the existing DOE
miscellaneous refrigeration products
test procedures is not appropriate or
impossible to use for the In-Home
Grower.
1. About GE Appliances
GEA is a leading US manufacturer of
home appliances. GEA offers a full suite
of major appliances across seven brands
as well as portable appliances. GEA has
been a participant in and contributor to
the DOE’s home appliance energy
conservation program since its founding
more than 40 years ago. Indeed, GEA
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 16, 2021 / Notices
supports the goal of the appliance
efficiency program: Maximizing energy
savings improvements that offer
consumers real economic benefits and
that do not diminish product
performance. GEA devotes substantial
resources to the development of new
technologies to increase energy
efficiency where they are feasible and
engineering products to meet the
demanding DOE energy efficiency
requirements. GEA manufactures a
substantial portion of its refrigerator
products at its manufacturing facilities
in Louisville, KY, Decatur, AL, and
Selmer, TN. The products covered by
this waiver request will be
manufactured in the United States.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
2. Basic Models for Which a Waiver Is
Requested
There is no existing Product Class for
the In-Home Grower. The Basic Model
is S–IHG–R. The basic model will be
distributed in commerce under the
brand name ‘‘Profile’’.
The In-Home Grower allows the user
to grow plants within their home yearround. The product provides the
lighting, temperature and humidity
control and nutrient water needed to
grow an array of plants. The product is
designed to be in a controlled
environment with room temperature
from 60 to 80 °F.
The product has a circular grow tower
that is in the center of the product. The
tower is divided into three equal-sized
vertical sections, each comprising 1⁄3rd
of a circular cross section (see Figure 1
below).10
[Figure]
Figure 1. Top View of In-Home
Grower.
On each of the three sides of the tower
are gardens. The three sides of the tower
meet up with the curved interior walls
of the product cabinet to create three
chambers within the product. The tower
rotates every eight hours. Each time the
tower rotates, a section of the tower
enters a new chamber. The front
chamber is called the display chamber.
This is the side of the garden the owner
will see through the front glass doors. In
the display chamber, there is no grow
lighting. The back right and back left
chambers are individually controlled for
grow lighting, temperature, and
humidity.
The product is primarily controlled
by a smart-phone application and
connection to the app is obtained
10 Product images provided with petition may be
found at Docket No. EERE–2021–BT–WAV–0009 at
www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2021-BT-WAV0009.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Nov 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
through WiFi networking capabilities
built into the product.
The grow lighting in the product is
LED lighting. The lighting systems uses
lamps with a variety of color spectrums.
The selection and layout of these lamps
is designed to optimize plant growth
while minimizing energy consumption.
The product utilizes a vaporcompression cooling system that is
primarily intended to control humidity
in the product, but which also removes
excess heat generated by the growlighting system in the rear two
chambers.
3. Design Characteristic Constituting
Grounds for the Petition
There are multiple reasons why the
existing MREF test procedure at 10 CFR
430 Subpart B, Appendix A is either
impossible to use or inappropriate to
use for the In-Home Grower.
a. Even at the product’s coldest
setting, the internal compartment
temperature does not reach the
reference temperature of 55 °F for a
miscellaneous refrigeration product
when it is run in a 90 °F ambient. Per
Table 1 in 10 CFR 430 Subpart B,
Appendix A, Section 3.2.1.3, when this
condition occurs, ‘‘No Energy Use
Rating can be established under the
existing test procedure’’. Therefore,
interpolation to 55 °F is not possible,
and the existing DOE interpolation
method cannot be used to establish a
test result.
b. There is no need to test at an
elevated ambient temperature to
account for door openings and loading
as is the case with the current DOE
miscellaneous refrigeration products
test procedure. This is true for the
following reasons.
i. The In-Home Grower is designed to
operate with an internal temperature
between 60 °F and 80 °F.
ii. Once loaded with plants, there are
a minimal amount of door openings as
the product is intended to grow the
plants until they are grown and ready
for use.
iii. Since the internal temperatures are
closer to the ambient temperature, any
door openings that did occur would
only result in minimal heat addition to
the interior.
c. The product has rotating
compartments which makes taking
internal temperature measurements
burdensome if not impossible.
Thermocouple wires for refrigeration
tests run from inside the unit being
tested to a panel box affixed to a wall.
The internal compartments of the InHome Grower rotate during operation.
Unique fixtures and test setup would be
required to avoid tangling of the wires,
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63355
movement of the thermocouples, or
pulling the wires out of the panel box.
d. The test procedure lacks
appropriate setup provisions for this
remotely controlled product that
requires initial cycle selection and
activation.
e. The product is fundamentally
different from all other known
miscellaneous refrigeration products.
These differences include, but are not
limited to, the following.
i. The product has a fundamentally
different purpose than other
miscellaneous refrigeration products,
which are for cooling and storing
beverages and food.
ii. The primary purpose of the
refrigeration system in the product is
humidity control.
iii. Because the product operates at or
near ambient temperature, the product
is uninsulated. This is unlike all other
known miscellaneous refrigeration
products, which are insulated.
iv. The product contains grow
lighting, which both consumes energy
and adds heat to the product.
4. Requirements Sought To Be Waived
GEA seeks to replace the current test
procedure in Appendix A for Coolers,
section 6.2.2, with the accompanying
test conditions specified in Exhibit A,
attached, for the In-Home Grower.
Instead of a 90 °F ambient, GEA has
specified a 72 °F ± 1.0 °F ambient for the
testing. This is representative of usage
as the product is designed to be placed
in an indoor, conditioned space with an
ambient between 60 and 80 °F. Also, as
stated above, there is no need to elevate
the ambient for the test to account for
door openings and loads as the product
has a very low number of door openings
and, after the initial loading with plants,
will typically not have additional loads
introduced.
The proposed test procedure does not
have internal temperature
measurements. Based on internal testing
in a 90 °F environment, the internal
temperatures of the two controlled
compartments, at its coldest setting
were 79.90 °F and 79.97 °F, well above
the 55 °F reference temperature of the
DOE MREF test procedure. Also, the
rotation of the compartments
significantly increases the test burden of
temperature measurements as the
thermocouple wires would require a
setup to avoid tangling of the wires and
movement of the temperature masses.
This product has no defrosting
capabilities and can be tested similarly
to a non-automatic defrost refrigerator.
In order to capture a complete cycling
of the growing chambers, GEA is
proposing a test that has an 8-hour
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
63356
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 16, 2021 / Notices
stabilization period followed by a 24hour test period. The growing chambers
rotate 120° every 8 hours. This
comprises one rotation for stability and
three rotations for the test period.
5. Manufacturers of All Other Basic
Models With Similar Design
Characteristics
To GEA’s knowledge, there are no
products of this type in the marketplace.
6. Notice to Other Manufacturers
Pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27(c)(2), upon
publication of this Petition for Waiver,
GEA will notify in writing all known
manufacturers of domestically marketed
basic models of the same product class
(as specified in 10 CFR 430.32) and of
other product classes known to the
petitioner to use the technology or have
the characteristic at issue in the waiver.
The notice will include a statement that
DOE has published the Petition for
Waiver in the Federal Register and the
date the Petition for Waiver was
published. The notice will also include
a statement that DOE will receive and
consider timely written comments on
the petition for waiver. Within five
working days of publication of this
Petition for Waiver, GEA will file with
DOE a statement certifying the names
and addresses of each person to whom
a notice of the petition for waiver was
sent.
7. Conclusion
GEA respectfully requests that DOE
grant this Petition for Waiver from the
current test procedure for the specified
basic models.
Very truly yours,
/s/
John T. Schlafer
Attachments:
Exhibit A—Alternate Test Procedure
Exhibit A—Alternate Test Procedure for
In-Home Grower
Energy Consumption is Determined
by the Formula:
E = EP * 1440/T
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Where:
• E is the test cycle energy (kWh/day)
• 1440 = number of minutes in a day
• EP is the energy expended during three full
rotations of the growing chambers (kWh)
• T is the length of time for EP (minutes)
Water in Tanks:
Fill the nutrient and supply tanks
with water (72.0 ± 5.0 °F) prior to start
of the stabilization period.
Stabilization:
The test shall start after a minimum
8-hour stabilization run for each
temperature control setting. This
constitutes one rotation of the growing
chambers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Nov 15, 2021
Jkt 256001
Ambient Temperature:
Measure and record the ambient
temperature at points located 3 feet
(91.5 cm) above the floor and 10 inches
(25.4 cm) from the center of the two
sides of the unit under test. The ambient
temperature shall be 72.0 ± 1 °F (21.1 ±
0.6 °C) during the stabilization period
and the test period.
Compartment Temperature
Measurements:
No compartment temperature
measurements are taken during the
stabilization and test period.
Test Procedure:
Run the test using the SmartHQ App
1. Download the SmartHQ app on a
connected device
2. Select ‘‘Connect Appliance’’ and then
‘‘In Home Grower’’
3. Follow the procedures per the
SmartHQ app to set up the
appliance.
4. Fill the nutrient and supply tanks
with 72.0 ± 5.0 °F water.
5. Select ‘‘Let’s Start Planting’’ from the
main screen.
6. Select Garden 1 from the ‘‘Select
Garden’’ screen
a. Select the ‘‘Default’’ growing
region.
b. Select ‘‘Next’’ at the bottom of the
screen
7. At the screen titled ‘‘What do you
want to plant in Garden x?’’, select
‘‘Choose Later’’
8. Repeat this process for Garden 2 and
Garden 3.
9. Select ‘‘Start the Growing Cycle’’
10. The first rotation (8 hours) is the
stabilization period.
11. The next three rotations (24 hours)
is the period where EP and T data
are taken.
[FR Doc. 2021–24902 Filed 11–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory
Committee
Office of Science, Department
of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of open virtual meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice announces a
meeting of the Basic Energy Sciences
Advisory Committee (BESAC). The
Federal Advisory Committee Act
requires that public notice of these
meetings be announced in the Federal
Register.
DATES: Monday, December 6, 2021;
11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: This meeting is open to the
public. This meeting will be held
digitally via Zoom. Information to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participate can be found on the website
closer to the meeting date at: https://
science.osti.gov/bes/besac/Meetings.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kerry Hochberger; Office of Basic
Energy Sciences; U.S. Department of
Energy; Germantown Building, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585; Telephone: 301–903–7661 or
email: kerry.hochberger@
science.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of the Committee: The
purpose of this Committee is to make
recommendation to DOE–SC with
respect to the basic energy sciences
research program.
Tentative Agenda
• Call to Order, Introductions, Review
of the Agenda
• News from the Office of Science
• News from the Office of Basic Energy
Sciences
• Office of Science Distinguished
Scientist Fellow Presentation
• Office of Science QIS Centers
Presentation
• Roundtable on Foundational Science
for Carbon-Neutral Hydrogen
Technologies Presentation
• Panel Discussion: Science and Energy
Technology Teams
• Facility Updates: LCLS, Neutron
Scattering, NSRCs Presentations
• Pre-Committee of Visitors Overview:
Workforce Development for Teachers
and Scientists (WDTS) Presentation
• Public Comments
• Adjourn
Breaks taken as appropriate
Public Participation: The meeting is
open to the public. A webcast of this
meeting will be available. Please check
the website below for updates and
information on how to view the
meeting. If you would like to file a
written statement with the Committee,
you may do so either before or after the
meeting. If you would like to make oral
statements regarding any of the items on
the agenda, you should contact Kerry
Hochberger at kerry.hochberger@
science.doe.gov. You must make your
request for an oral statement at least five
business days before the meeting.
Reasonable provision will be made to
include the scheduled oral statements
on the agenda. The Chairperson of the
Committee will conduct the meeting to
facilitate the orderly conduct of
business. Public comment will follow
the 10-minute rule. Information about
the committee can be found at: https://
science.osti.gov/bes/besac.
Minutes: The minutes of this meeting
will be available for public review on
the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office
E:\FR\FM\16NON1.SGM
16NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63350-63356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24902]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Case Number 2021-004; EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009]
Energy Conservation Program: Notification of Petition for Waiver
of GE Appliances, a Haier Company, From the Department of Energy
Miscellaneous Refrigeration Products Test Procedure
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Notification of petition for waiver; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notification announces receipt of and publishes a
petition for waiver from GE Appliances, a Haier Company, which seeks a
waiver for a specified miscellaneous refrigeration product basic model
from the U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'') test procedure used for
determining the energy consumption of these products. DOE solicits
comments, data, and information concerning the petition and its
suggested alternate test procedure so as to inform DOE's final decision
on the waiver request.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested and will be
accepted on or before December 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Alternatively,
interested persons may submit comments, identified by docket number
EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009, by any of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: to [email protected]. Include docket number
EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009 in the subject line of the message.
No telefacsimiles (``faxes'') will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this
process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Although DOE has routinely accepted public comment submissions
through a variety of mechanisms, including postal mail and hand
delivery/courier, the Department has found it necessary to make
temporary modifications to the comment submission process in light of
the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (``COVID-19'') pandemic. DOE is
currently suspending receipt of public comments via postal mail and
hand delivery/courier. If a commenter finds that this change poses an
undue hardship, please contact Appliance Standards Program staff at
(202) 586-1445 to discuss the need for alternative arrangements. Once
the COVID-19 pandemic health emergency is resolved, DOE anticipates
resuming all of its regular options for public comment submission,
including postal mail and hand delivery/courier.
Docket: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices,
comments, and other supporting documents/materials, is available for
review at www.regulations.gov. All documents in the docket are listed
in the www.regulations.gov index. However, some documents listed in the
index, such as those containing information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009. The docket web page contains instruction on how
to access all documents, including public comments, in the docket. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for information on how to submit
comments through www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Julia Hegarty, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, Mailstop
EE-5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Email:
[email protected].
Mr. Michael Kido, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, Mail Stop GC-33, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20585-0103. Telephone: (202) 586-8145. Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE is publishing GEA's petition for waiver
in its entirety, pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iv).\1\ DOE invites
all interested parties to submit in writing by December 16, 2021,
comments and information on all aspects of the petition, including the
alternate test procedure. Pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27(d), any person
submitting written comments to DOE must also send a copy of such
comments to the petitioner. The contact information for the petitioner
is:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The petition did not identify any of the information
contained therein as confidential business information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
John T. Schlafer, GE Appliances, A Haier Company, Appliance Park--
AP2-225, Louisville, KY 40225. Email: [email protected].
Submitting comments via www.regulations.gov. The
www.regulations.gov web page will require you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. If this instruction is followed, persons viewing comments will
see only first and last names, organization names, correspondence
containing comments, and any documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (``CBI'')). Comments submitted
through www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received
through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential
Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through www.regulations.gov before
posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of being
submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being processed
simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to several
weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that www.regulations.gov
provides after you have successfully uploaded your comment.
[[Page 63351]]
Submitting comments via email. Comments and documents submitted via
email also will be posted to www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not
include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information on a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it
does not include any comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. Faxes will not be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English and free of any defects or viruses.
Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. According to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked
confidential including all the information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked ``non-confidential'' with the
information believed to be confidential deleted. Submit these documents
via email. DOE will make its own determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it according to its determination.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
I. Background and Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (``EPCA''),\2\
authorizes the U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'') to regulate the
energy efficiency of a number of consumer products and certain
industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291-6317) Title III, Part B \3\ of
EPCA, Public Law 94-163, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309, as codified),
established the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles, which, in addition to identifying particular types of
consumer products and commercial equipment as covered under the
statute, permits the Secretary of Energy to classify additional types
of consumer products as covered products. (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(20)) DOE
added miscellaneous refrigeration products (``MREFs'') as covered
products through a final determination of coverage published in the
Federal Register on July 18, 2016 (the ``July 2016 Final Rule''). 81 FR
46768. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Energy Act of 2020, Public Law 116-260 (Dec.
27, 2020).
\3\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated as Part A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The energy conservation program under EPCA consists essentially of
four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. Relevant
provisions of EPCA include definitions (42 U.S.C. 6291), test
procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293), labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294),
energy conservation standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to
require information and reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296).
The Federal testing requirements consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must use as the basis for: (1)
Certifying to DOE that their products comply with the applicable energy
conservation standards adopted pursuant to EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6295(s)),
and (2) making representations about the efficiency of that product (42
U.S.C. 6293(c)). Similarly, DOE must use these test procedures to
determine whether the covered product complies with relevant standards
promulgated under EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth the criteria and procedures
DOE is required to follow when prescribing or amending test procedures
for covered products. EPCA requires that any test procedures prescribed
or amended under this section must be reasonably designed to produce
test results which reflect the energy efficiency, energy use or
estimated annual operating cost of a covered product during a
representative average use cycle or period of use and requires that
test procedures not be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3))
MREFs are consumer refrigeration products other than refrigerators,
refrigerator-freezers, or freezers. These products include coolers and
combination cooler refrigeration products. 10 CFR 430.2. A ``cooler''
is a cabinet, used with one or more doors, that has a source of
refrigeration capable of operating on single-phase, alternating current
and is capable of maintaining compartment temperatures either: (1) No
lower than 39 [deg]F (3.9 [deg]C); or (2) in a range that extends no
lower than 37 [deg]F (2.8 [deg]C) but at least as high as 60 [deg]F
(15.6 [deg]C) as determined according to the applicable DOE test
procedure. The test procedure for MREFs is contained in the Code of
Federal Regulations (``CFR'') at 10 CFR part 430, appendix A to subpart
B of part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring the Energy Consumption
of Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers, and Miscellaneous
Refrigeration Products (``Appendix A'').
Under 10 CFR 430.27, any interested person may submit a petition
for waiver from DOE's test procedure requirements. DOE will grant a
waiver from the test procedure requirements if DOE determines either
that the basic model for which the waiver was requested contains a
design characteristic that prevents testing of the basic model
according to the prescribed test procedures, or that the prescribed
test procedures evaluate the basic model in a manner so
unrepresentative of its true energy consumption characteristics as to
provide materially inaccurate comparative data. 10 CFR 430.27(f)(2). A
petitioner must include in its petition any alternate test procedures
known to the petitioner to evaluate the performance of the product type
in a manner representative of the energy consumption characteristics of
the basic model. 10 CFR 430.27(b)(1)(iii). DOE may grant the waiver
subject to conditions, including adherence to alternate test
procedures. 10 CFR 430.27(f)(2).
As soon as practicable after the granting of any waiver, DOE will
publish in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking to
amend its regulations so as to eliminate any need for the continuation
of such waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(l). As soon thereafter as practicable,
DOE will publish in the Federal Register a final rule to that effect.
Id.
The waiver process also provides that DOE may grant an interim
waiver if it
[[Page 63352]]
appears likely that the underlying petition for waiver will be granted
and/or if DOE determines that it would be desirable for public policy
reasons to grant immediate relief pending a determination on the
underlying petition for waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(e)(2). Within one year of
issuance of an interim waiver, DOE will either: (i) Publish in the
Federal Register a determination on the petition for waiver; or (ii)
publish in the Federal Register a new or amended test procedure that
addresses the issues presented in the waiver. 10 CFR 430.27(h)(2).
If DOE ultimately denies the petition for waiver, DOE will provide
a period of 180 days before the manufacturer is required to use the DOE
test procedure to make representations of energy efficiency. 10 CFR
430.27(i). When DOE amends the test procedure to address the issues
presented in a waiver, the waiver will automatically terminate on the
date on which use of that test procedure is required to demonstrate
compliance. 10 CFR 430.27(h)(3).
II. GEA's April 2021 Petition for Waiver and Interim Waiver
On April 9, 2021, DOE received from GE Appliances, a Haier Company
(``GEA'') a petition (dated April 8, 2021) for waiver and interim
waiver from the test procedure for MREFs set forth at appendix A to
subpart B of 10 CFR part 430. (GEA, No. 1 at p. 1) \4\ Pursuant to 10
CFR 430.27(e)(i), DOE posted the petition on the DOE website at:
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009-0001.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ A notation in this form provides a reference for information
that is in the docket for this test procedure waiver (Docket No.
EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009) (available at www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009). This notation indicates that the statement
preceding the reference is document number 1 in the docket and
appears at page 1 of that document.
\5\ The petition did not identify any of the information
contained therein as confidential business information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The specific basic model subject to the petition was ``S-IHG-R'',
which GEA described as an ``In-Home Grower''--a product with lighting,
temperature, humidity, and nutrient water control that allows the user
to grow plants within their home year-round. GEA stated that the
average compartment temperatures of the In-Home Grower exceed the 55
[deg]F standardized temperature required for testing under the existing
DOE test procedure (see section 3.2 of appendix A) and, therefore, the
product cannot be tested using the existing test procedure. GEA also
described characteristics of this basic model that GEA stated would
prevent the use of certain test setup, stabilization, temperature
control, and energy use determination requirements in appendix A. (GEA,
No. 1 at pp. 3-4)
In its April 8, 2021 petition, GEA submitted to DOE an alternate
test procedure to determine the energy consumption of its In-Home
Grower. (GEA, No. 1 at p. 6) GEA stated that its alternate test
procedure would allow for the measurement of the energy use of this
product where the requirements of the current DOE test procedure cannot
be met. DOE received a follow-up correspondence from GEA on April 26,
2021, which provided a revised alternate test procedure.\6\ DOE
reviewed the alternate test procedure included in the April 26, 2021
correspondence as the requested alternate test approach when making the
initial determination on the petition for waiver and interim waiver.
GEA also provided additional correspondence on June 2, 2021, in which
it clarified certain aspects of the proposed alternate test procedure
included in the April 26, 2021 submission.\7\ In the April 26, 2021,
correspondence, GEA requested an alternate test approach in which two
tests would be conducted for the subject basic model: one with the
model operating as ``normal,'' and the other with the refrigeration
system disabled to allow for identifying the energy contribution of the
cooling system. GEA stated that the main purpose of the cooling system
is to counteract the heat generated from the internal lighting, and
that the requested alternate test procedure would be used to determine
the energy consumption of the cooling system only. (GEA, No. 2 at p. 4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ This document can be found in the docket for this test
procedure waiver under Document No. 002.
\7\ This document can be found in the docket for this test
procedure waiver under Document No. 003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 7, 2021, DOE published a notification of petition for
waiver and denial of an interim waiver for the alternative test
approach described by GEA in its April 26, 2021 correspondence. 86 FR
35766. In that notification, DOE acknowledged that, based upon GEA's
petition, absent an interim waiver, GEA's In-Home Grower cannot be
tested and rated for energy consumption according to the MREF test
procedure on a basis representative of its true energy consumption
characteristics. Id. at 86 FR 35768. However, DOE tentatively
determined that GEA's proposed alternative test procedure would not
result in a measurement of the energy use of the basic model that is
representative of an average use cycle or period of use, and therefore
the petition for waiver was unlikely to be granted as submitted. Id.
Specifically, DOE determined that the requested test approach to
isolate the refrigeration system energy consumption would not provide a
representative measurement of energy use for the basic model during an
average use cycle or period of use. 86 FR 35766, 35770. DOE requested
comment on all aspects of the petition, including the suggested
alternate test procedure and calculation methodology. Id.
III. GEA's September 2021 Petition for Waiver
On September 17, 2021, GEA submitted to DOE a new petition for
waiver (``September 2021 petition for waiver'') for the same basic
model with a revised alternate test approach.\8\ The following two
sections discuss specific aspects of GEA's September 2021 petition for
waiver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ This document can be found in the docket for this test
procedure waiver under Document No. 006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Requirements Sought To Be Waived
GEA requested to waive the current test procedure, calculations,
and accompanying conditions for testing coolers as specified in section
6.2.2 of appendix A. GEA asserted that the In-Home Grower is
fundamentally different from all other known miscellaneous
refrigeration products. The primary assertion of the petition is that
the basic model for which the waiver was requested contains design
characteristics that prevent testing of the basic model according to
the prescribed DOE MREF test procedure. GEA states that the In-Home
Grower, when tested at its coldest setting in a 90 [deg]F ambient
temperature, cannot achieve the 55 [deg]F standardized temperature
required for the DOE MREF test procedure (see section 3.2 of appendix
A). GEA stated that its testing in a 90 [deg]F ambient condition
resulted in compartment temperatures of 79.90 [deg]F and 79.97 [deg]F.
The DOE test procedure at appendix A simulates typical room
conditions (72 [deg]F) with door openings, by testing at 90 [deg]F
without door openings. 10 CFR 430.23(ff)(7). The test procedure
directly measures the energy consumed during steady-state operation and
defrosts, if applicable. Additionally, the DOE test procedure
incorporates usage adjustment factors to account for differences in
these user-related thermal loads for different types of consumer
refrigeration products (i.e., MREFs are typically used less frequently
than a primary refrigerator-freezer in a household and thus have an
adjustment
[[Page 63353]]
factor of 0.55). See section 5.2.1.1 of appendix A.
GEA states that there is no need to elevate the ambient temperature
for the test to account for door openings and loads because the In-Home
Grower has a very low number of door openings and, after the initial
loading with plants, will typically not have additional loads
introduced. GEA seeks to waive the requirement for testing the In-Home
Grower at a 90 [deg]F ambient condition. See section 2.1.1 of appendix
A. GEA instead requests to test the In-Home Grower in a 72 [deg]F
ambient condition, which it asserts better represents typical use of
the product. GEA further stated that testing at a 72 [deg]F ambient
with the product temperature set to 60 [deg]F (the minimum temperature
set point) yields compartment temperatures between 59.15 and 61.41
[deg]F. GEA also seeks to waive the requirement in section 6.2.2 of
appendix A that performance be calculated at a standardized compartment
temperature of 55 [deg]F, since the In-home Grower is not capable of
maintaining the 55 [deg]F standardized compartment temperature
specified in appendix A. Instead, GEA requests that the model be tested
in the 72 [deg]F ambient condition using default settings.
Additionally, GEA seeks to waive the existing DOE test procedure
requirement to measure the internal compartment temperatures of the
unit under test. See section 5.1 of appendix A. GEA claims that the
rotation of the compartments significantly increases the test burden of
temperature measurements, as the thermocouple wires would require a
customized testing setup to avoid tangling of the wires and movement of
the temperature masses. Under GEA's requested approach, compartment
temperature measurements would not be necessary because no
interpolation would be made to reflect performance at the standardized
55 [deg]F compartment temperature. (GEA, No. 6 at p. 4)
GEA also seeks to waive the stabilization and test period
requirements specified in sections 2.9 and 4 of appendix A,
respectively. Specifically, GEA requests an 8-hour stabilization period
(the duration of each rotation) and 24-hour test period (the duration
of one full rotation) based on the rotation of the internal
compartments, rather than based on compressor cycling as specified in
appendix A. (GEA, No. 6 at p. 4)
B. Requested Alternate Test Procedure
GEA seeks to use an alternate test procedure to test and rate a
specific MREF basic model. GEA's requested alternate test procedure
addresses the test procedure requirements to be waived as discussed in
the previous section of this document. GEA's requested approach also
includes additional test instructions regarding setup and settings
instructions.
Because the In-Home Grower supplies water and nutrients to plants
during normal operation, GEA's suggested alternate test procedure
provides instructions for filling nutrient tanks with ambient-
temperature water prior to the start of the test.
The proposed alternate test approach also provides instructions for
product settings, as the suggested test procedure would not be based on
the product maintaining compartment temperature to the 55 [deg]F
standardized compartment temperature specified in appendix A.
Specifically, GEA requests that the In-Home Grower be controlled via
use of an application on a connected device and that the product be
operated using default settings.
In summary, GEA's suggested alternate test procedure would measure
the daily energy consumption of the basic model by providing:
(1) Directions for filling the nutrient water tanks with water at
ambient temperature;
(2) A specific stabilization period of 8 hours (in place of the
requirements of section 2.9 of appendix A);
(3) A specific test period of 24 hours (in place of the test period
described in section 4.1 of appendix A);
(4) An ambient test condition of 72 [deg]F (in place of the
requirement in section 2.1.1 of appendix A);
(5) That no compartment temperature measurements be taken during
the test (in place of the requirements in section 5.1 of appendix A);
and
(6) That the product be controlled using an application from a
connected device and operated using default settings. (GEA, No. 6 at p.
6)
IV. DOE Response and Request for Comments
As the September 17, 2021 petition is for the same basic model that
is the subject of the petition addressed in the July 7, 2021 Federal
Register notification, DOE is treating the September 17, 2021 petition
as an amendment to the prior petition. DOE reiterates its determination
from the July 7, 2021 notification that based on GEA's description of
the In-Home Grower, the basic model meets the definition of a cooler in
10 CFR 430.2 for the following reasons:
1. The product consists of a cabinet used with one or more glass
doors, as specified by GEA; and
2. The product maintains compartment temperatures no lower than 39
[deg]F, as determined when tested in a 90 [deg]F ambient temperature,
as GEA specified that the compartment temperatures measured 79.90
[deg]F and 79.97 [deg]F under these conditions at the minimum
temperature setting.
86 FR 35766, 35768.
The definition for cooler at 10 CFR 430.2 does not reference a
specific design intent (such as storage of food or beverages) and does
not require that the product be capable of maintaining a compartment
temperature of 55 [deg]F when tested in a 90 [deg]F ambient
temperature. Id. While DOE maintains its determination that the subject
basic model meets the definition of a cooler in 10 CFR 430.2, DOE
acknowledges the significant differences between this basic model and
typical MREFs (and more specifically, coolers).\9\ Based on the product
design and operation details provided by GEA, DOE has tentatively
determined that the basic model under consideration is substantially
different than the coolers considered in the analysis used to develop
the current cooler standards. DOE considered products for which the
refrigeration systems were the main source of energy consumption, and
in these products the primary purpose of the refrigeration system is to
remove heat that enters the cooler compartment from the outside (i.e.,
through the walls of the cabinet) in order to maintain the compartment
at a temperature lower than the ambient temperature (see chapter 3 of
the technical support document to the 2016 direct final rule, document
number EERE-2011-BT-STD-0043-0118 found online at www.regulations.gov).
However, the GEA basic model under question includes an array of lights
that are used to facilitate plant growth, but which generate heat, such
that the primary purpose of the refrigeration system is to remove heat
that is generated internally within the compartment in order to
maintain the compartment at approximately the same temperature as the
ambient temperature. Based on this difference in function from the
other cooler products addressed by DOE's regulations, the
[[Page 63354]]
design changes that would improve the efficiency of the subject basic
model (e.g., reducing lighting energy use, improving heat transfer
through the cabinet walls to allow heat to be more easily transferred
out of the cabinet) are significantly different than those considered
for coolers during the 2016 rulemaking analysis (e.g., increasing
refrigeration system efficiency, improving cabinet insulation to reduce
heat transfer through the cabinet walls). Therefore, DOE has
tentatively determined that the current cooler energy conservation
standards are not applicable to the subject basic model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ GEA stated in its September 17, 2021, petition for waiver
that the subject basic model is fundamentally different from all
other known MREFs. Specifically, GEA stated that: (1) The product
has a fundamentally different purpose than other MREFs, which are
for cooling and storing beverages and food; (2) the primary purpose
of the refrigeration system in the product is humidity control; (3)
because the product operates at or near ambient temperature, the
product is uninsulated, unlike all other known MREFs, which are
insulated; and (4) the product contains grow lighting, which both
consumes energy and adds heat to the product.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This approach is not dissimilar from prior actions taken by DOE to
address products or equipment that had not been contemplated under the
regulatory framework set out by DOE. For example, in the case of
commercial refrigeration equipment, DOE has previously indicated that
salad bars, buffet tables, and other refrigerated holding and serving
equipment meet the definition of commercial refrigeration equipment.
But these equipment operate in a unique manner compared to the other
commercial refrigeration equipment that DOE considered when
establishing its test procedures and standards. Nevertheless, DOE has
determined that salad bars, buffet tables, and other refrigerated
holding and serving equipment are covered as commercial refrigeration
equipment, but that the current energy conservation standards do not
apply to them. 79 FR 22277, 22281 (April 21, 2014).
DOE's 2009 beverage vending machines (``BVM'') energy conservation
standards rulemaking and the 2007 distribution transformer energy
conservation standards rulemaking are also examples of prior instances
where DOE determined that covered products or equipment would not be
subject to standards due to their unique design or operation. 81 FR
44914, 44920 (Aug. 31, 2009); 72 FR 58190, 58197 (Oct. 12, 2007).
When DOE initially considered energy conservation standards for
BVMs, DOE did not consider combination vending machines as a separate
equipment class, but instead considered that equipment with all other
Class A and Class B BVMs. DOE later recognized that combination vending
machines offered a distinct utility (i.e., storage and vending of
refrigerated and unrefrigerated merchandise) and concluded that those
machines were a separate class of BVMs. DOE decided to not set
standards for the equipment class at that time and reserved standards
for combination vending machines (indicating that the Class A and Class
B BVM standards were not applicable to combination vending machines)
and modified the definition of Class A and Class B BVMs to accommodate
a definition for combination vending machines. 74 FR 44914, 44920 (Aug.
31, 2009).
Similarly, in the 2007 energy conservation standards rulemaking for
distribution transformers, DOE clarified that although underground
mining distribution transformers are within the scope of coverage, it
recognized that mining transformers were subject to unique and extreme
dimensional constraints that impacted their efficiency and performance
capabilities and did not establish energy conservation standards for
underground mining transformers. In the final rule, DOE established a
separate equipment class for mining transformers with the intent to
develop the analysis required to establish an appropriate energy
conservation standard in the future. 72 FR 58190, 58197 (Oct. 12,
2007). DOE later reached a similar conclusion in 2013 when it decided
again not to establish standards for mining distribution transformers.
78 FR 23336, 23353-23354 (Apr. 18, 2013).
Accordingly, in light of these examples, DOE's tentative views with
respect to the applicability of standards to the products at issue are
consistent with its past approach in addressing novel products and
equipment.
DOE understands, based upon GEA's petition, that absent a waiver,
GEA's In-Home Grower cannot be tested and rated for energy consumption
according to the MREF test procedure on a basis representative of its
true energy consumption characteristics.
DOE has reprinted the September 17, 2021 petition for waiver,
including the suggested alternate test procedure, at the end of this
notification. DOE may consider including this alternate procedure, or a
modified version of this alternate procedure, in a subsequent Decision
and Order. DOE solicits comments from interested parties on all aspects
of the petition, including the suggested alternate test procedure.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on November 9,
2021, by Kathleen B. Hogan, Acting Under Secretary for Science and
Energy, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy.
That document with the original signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE
Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit
the document in electronic format for publication, as an official
document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no
way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on November 9, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
John Schlafer
Senior Counsel
Appliance Park--AP2
Louisville, KY 40225
T: (502) 452-7603
[email protected]
September 17, 2021
Via Email ([email protected])
Ms. Lucy deButts
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Building Technologies Office
1000 Independence Avenue SW
Mailstop EE-5B
Washington, DC 20585-0121
Re: Petition for Waiver Regarding Test Procedures for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of an In-Home Grower Product
Dear Ms. deButts: GE Appliances, a Haier company (GEA) respectfully
submits this Petition for Waiver requesting an alternate test procedure
from the Department of Energy's (DOE) test procedure for Miscellaneous
Refrigeration Products in 10 CFR 430 Subpart B, Appendix A. GEA's
request is for a new product that allows users to grow plants within
their home the entire year, known as an In-Home Grower. The product is
designed to be used in an indoor, temperature-controlled environment
with room temperatures from 60 [deg]F to 80 [deg]F. The product
provides the lighting, temperature and humidity control, and nutrient
water to grow an array of plants. As detailed below, there are numerous
reasons that the existing DOE miscellaneous refrigeration products test
procedures is not appropriate or impossible to use for the In-Home
Grower.
1. About GE Appliances
GEA is a leading US manufacturer of home appliances. GEA offers a
full suite of major appliances across seven brands as well as portable
appliances. GEA has been a participant in and contributor to the DOE's
home appliance energy conservation program since its founding more than
40 years ago. Indeed, GEA
[[Page 63355]]
supports the goal of the appliance efficiency program: Maximizing
energy savings improvements that offer consumers real economic benefits
and that do not diminish product performance. GEA devotes substantial
resources to the development of new technologies to increase energy
efficiency where they are feasible and engineering products to meet the
demanding DOE energy efficiency requirements. GEA manufactures a
substantial portion of its refrigerator products at its manufacturing
facilities in Louisville, KY, Decatur, AL, and Selmer, TN. The products
covered by this waiver request will be manufactured in the United
States.
2. Basic Models for Which a Waiver Is Requested
There is no existing Product Class for the In-Home Grower. The
Basic Model is S-IHG-R. The basic model will be distributed in commerce
under the brand name ``Profile''.
The In-Home Grower allows the user to grow plants within their home
year-round. The product provides the lighting, temperature and humidity
control and nutrient water needed to grow an array of plants. The
product is designed to be in a controlled environment with room
temperature from 60 to 80 [deg]F.
The product has a circular grow tower that is in the center of the
product. The tower is divided into three equal-sized vertical sections,
each comprising \1/3\rd of a circular cross section (see Figure 1
below).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Product images provided with petition may be found at
Docket No. EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009 at www.regulations.gov/docket/EERE-2021-BT-WAV-0009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Figure]
Figure 1. Top View of In-Home Grower.
On each of the three sides of the tower are gardens. The three
sides of the tower meet up with the curved interior walls of the
product cabinet to create three chambers within the product. The tower
rotates every eight hours. Each time the tower rotates, a section of
the tower enters a new chamber. The front chamber is called the display
chamber. This is the side of the garden the owner will see through the
front glass doors. In the display chamber, there is no grow lighting.
The back right and back left chambers are individually controlled for
grow lighting, temperature, and humidity.
The product is primarily controlled by a smart-phone application
and connection to the app is obtained through WiFi networking
capabilities built into the product.
The grow lighting in the product is LED lighting. The lighting
systems uses lamps with a variety of color spectrums. The selection and
layout of these lamps is designed to optimize plant growth while
minimizing energy consumption.
The product utilizes a vapor-compression cooling system that is
primarily intended to control humidity in the product, but which also
removes excess heat generated by the grow-lighting system in the rear
two chambers.
3. Design Characteristic Constituting Grounds for the Petition
There are multiple reasons why the existing MREF test procedure at
10 CFR 430 Subpart B, Appendix A is either impossible to use or
inappropriate to use for the In-Home Grower.
a. Even at the product's coldest setting, the internal compartment
temperature does not reach the reference temperature of 55 [deg]F for a
miscellaneous refrigeration product when it is run in a 90 [deg]F
ambient. Per Table 1 in 10 CFR 430 Subpart B, Appendix A, Section
3.2.1.3, when this condition occurs, ``No Energy Use Rating can be
established under the existing test procedure''. Therefore,
interpolation to 55 [deg]F is not possible, and the existing DOE
interpolation method cannot be used to establish a test result.
b. There is no need to test at an elevated ambient temperature to
account for door openings and loading as is the case with the current
DOE miscellaneous refrigeration products test procedure. This is true
for the following reasons.
i. The In-Home Grower is designed to operate with an internal
temperature between 60 [deg]F and 80 [deg]F.
ii. Once loaded with plants, there are a minimal amount of door
openings as the product is intended to grow the plants until they are
grown and ready for use.
iii. Since the internal temperatures are closer to the ambient
temperature, any door openings that did occur would only result in
minimal heat addition to the interior.
c. The product has rotating compartments which makes taking
internal temperature measurements burdensome if not impossible.
Thermocouple wires for refrigeration tests run from inside the unit
being tested to a panel box affixed to a wall. The internal
compartments of the In-Home Grower rotate during operation. Unique
fixtures and test setup would be required to avoid tangling of the
wires, movement of the thermocouples, or pulling the wires out of the
panel box.
d. The test procedure lacks appropriate setup provisions for this
remotely controlled product that requires initial cycle selection and
activation.
e. The product is fundamentally different from all other known
miscellaneous refrigeration products. These differences include, but
are not limited to, the following.
i. The product has a fundamentally different purpose than other
miscellaneous refrigeration products, which are for cooling and storing
beverages and food.
ii. The primary purpose of the refrigeration system in the product
is humidity control.
iii. Because the product operates at or near ambient temperature,
the product is uninsulated. This is unlike all other known
miscellaneous refrigeration products, which are insulated.
iv. The product contains grow lighting, which both consumes energy
and adds heat to the product.
4. Requirements Sought To Be Waived
GEA seeks to replace the current test procedure in Appendix A for
Coolers, section 6.2.2, with the accompanying test conditions specified
in Exhibit A, attached, for the In-Home Grower.
Instead of a 90 [deg]F ambient, GEA has specified a 72 [deg]F
1.0 [deg]F ambient for the testing. This is representative
of usage as the product is designed to be placed in an indoor,
conditioned space with an ambient between 60 and 80 [deg]F. Also, as
stated above, there is no need to elevate the ambient for the test to
account for door openings and loads as the product has a very low
number of door openings and, after the initial loading with plants,
will typically not have additional loads introduced.
The proposed test procedure does not have internal temperature
measurements. Based on internal testing in a 90 [deg]F environment, the
internal temperatures of the two controlled compartments, at its
coldest setting were 79.90 [deg]F and 79.97 [deg]F, well above the 55
[deg]F reference temperature of the DOE MREF test procedure. Also, the
rotation of the compartments significantly increases the test burden of
temperature measurements as the thermocouple wires would require a
setup to avoid tangling of the wires and movement of the temperature
masses.
This product has no defrosting capabilities and can be tested
similarly to a non-automatic defrost refrigerator. In order to capture
a complete cycling of the growing chambers, GEA is proposing a test
that has an 8-hour
[[Page 63356]]
stabilization period followed by a 24-hour test period. The growing
chambers rotate 120[deg] every 8 hours. This comprises one rotation for
stability and three rotations for the test period.
5. Manufacturers of All Other Basic Models With Similar Design
Characteristics
To GEA's knowledge, there are no products of this type in the
marketplace.
6. Notice to Other Manufacturers
Pursuant to 10 CFR 430.27(c)(2), upon publication of this Petition
for Waiver, GEA will notify in writing all known manufacturers of
domestically marketed basic models of the same product class (as
specified in 10 CFR 430.32) and of other product classes known to the
petitioner to use the technology or have the characteristic at issue in
the waiver. The notice will include a statement that DOE has published
the Petition for Waiver in the Federal Register and the date the
Petition for Waiver was published. The notice will also include a
statement that DOE will receive and consider timely written comments on
the petition for waiver. Within five working days of publication of
this Petition for Waiver, GEA will file with DOE a statement certifying
the names and addresses of each person to whom a notice of the petition
for waiver was sent.
7. Conclusion
GEA respectfully requests that DOE grant this Petition for Waiver
from the current test procedure for the specified basic models.
Very truly yours,
/s/
John T. Schlafer
Attachments:
Exhibit A--Alternate Test Procedure
Exhibit A--Alternate Test Procedure for In-Home Grower
Energy Consumption is Determined by the Formula:
E = EP * 1440/T
Where:
E is the test cycle energy (kWh/day)
1440 = number of minutes in a day
EP is the energy expended during three full rotations of
the growing chambers (kWh)
T is the length of time for EP (minutes)
Water in Tanks:
Fill the nutrient and supply tanks with water (72.0
5.0 [deg]F) prior to start of the stabilization period.
Stabilization:
The test shall start after a minimum 8-hour stabilization run for
each temperature control setting. This constitutes one rotation of the
growing chambers.
Ambient Temperature:
Measure and record the ambient temperature at points located 3 feet
(91.5 cm) above the floor and 10 inches (25.4 cm) from the center of
the two sides of the unit under test. The ambient temperature shall be
72.0 1 [deg]F (21.1 0.6 [deg]C) during the
stabilization period and the test period.
Compartment Temperature Measurements:
No compartment temperature measurements are taken during the
stabilization and test period.
Test Procedure:
Run the test using the SmartHQ App
1. Download the SmartHQ app on a connected device
2. Select ``Connect Appliance'' and then ``In Home Grower''
3. Follow the procedures per the SmartHQ app to set up the appliance.
4. Fill the nutrient and supply tanks with 72.0 5.0 [deg]F
water.
5. Select ``Let's Start Planting'' from the main screen.
6. Select Garden 1 from the ``Select Garden'' screen
a. Select the ``Default'' growing region.
b. Select ``Next'' at the bottom of the screen
7. At the screen titled ``What do you want to plant in Garden x?'',
select ``Choose Later''
8. Repeat this process for Garden 2 and Garden 3.
9. Select ``Start the Growing Cycle''
10. The first rotation (8 hours) is the stabilization period.
11. The next three rotations (24 hours) is the period where EP and T
data are taken.
[FR Doc. 2021-24902 Filed 11-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
