2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), Sodium Salt; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 62732-62735 [2021-24710]

Download as PDF 62732 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 216 / Friday, November 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). L. The Congressional Review Act This rule is exempt from the Congressional Review Act (CRA) because it is a rule of agency organization, procedure or practice that does not substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 16 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Government employees, Privacy. Lynnann Hitchens, Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator. For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 16—IMPLEMENTATION OF PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 1. The authority citation for part 16 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552a (as revised). 2. Amend § 16.11 by: a. Revising paragraph (a); b. Removing and reserving paragraph (c)(3); ■ c. Adding paragraph (c)(5); ■ d. Revising the heading and first two sentences of paragraph (d); and ■ e. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (e). The revisions and addition read as follows: ■ ■ ■ lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 § 16.11 General exemptions. (a) Systems of records affected. (1) EPA–17 OCEFT Criminal Investigative Index and Files. (2) EPA–40 Inspector General’s Operation and Reporting (IGOR) System Investigative Files. (3) EPA–63 eDiscovery Enterprise Tool Suite. (4) EPA–79 NEIC Master Tracking System. * * * * * (c) * * * (5) The Agency’s system of records, EPA–79 system of records is maintained by the National Enforcement and Investigations Center, Office of Criminal VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 10, 2021 Jkt 256001 Enforcement, Forensics and Training, a component of EPA which performs as its principal function activities pertaining to the enforcement of criminal laws. Authority for the criminal law enforcement activities comes from Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1970 (5 U.S.C. app. 1), effective December 2, 1970; Powers of Environmental Protection Agency, 18 U.S.C. 3063; Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9603; Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 6928; Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1319, 1321; Toxic Substances Control Act, 15 U.S.C. 2614, 2615; Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136j, 136l; Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 300h–2, 300i–1; Emergency Planning and Community Right-ToKnow Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. 11045; and the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 U.S.C. 1415. (d) Scope of exemption. EPA systems of records 17, 40, 63, and 79 are exempted from the following provisions of the PA: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (4); (d); (e)(1), (2), (3), (4)(G), and (H), (5), and (8); (f)(2) through (5); and (g). To the extent that the exemption for EPA systems of records 17, 40, 63 and 79 claimed under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) of the Act is held to be invalid, then an exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) is claimed for these systems of records from (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f)(2) through (5). * * * (e) Reasons for exemption. EPA systems of records 17, 40, 63, and 79 are exempted from the provisions of the PA in paragraph (d) of this section for the following reasons: * * * * * ■ 3. Amend § 16.12 by: ■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(1); ■ b. Revising the first sentence in paragraph (a)(4)(i); ■ c. Revising paragraph (a)(4)(iii); and ■ d. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (a)(5). The revisions read as follows: § 16.12 Specific exemptions. Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 [FR Doc. 2021–23834 Filed 11–10–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0192; FRL–8652–01– OCSPP] 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), Sodium Salt; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt), when used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide chemical formulation. The Dow Chemical Company submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting SUMMARY: (a) * * * (1) Systems of records affected. (i) EPA–17 OCEFT Criminal Investigative Index and Files. (ii) EPA–21 External Compliance Program Discrimination Complaint Files. (iii) EPA–30 OIG Hotline Allegation System. (iv) EPA–40 Inspector General’s Operation and Reporting (IGOR) System Investigative Files. PO 00000 (v) EPA–41 Inspector General’s Operation and Reporting (IGOR) System Personnel Security Files. (vi) EPA–63 eDiscovery Enterprise Tool Suite. (vii) EPA–79 NEIC Master Tracking System. * * * * * (4) * * * (i) EPA systems of records 17, 30, 40, 41, 63, and 79 are exempted from the following provisions of the PA, subject to the limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2): 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (4)(G) and (4)(H); and (f)(2) through (5). * * * * * * * * (iii) EPA–17 OCEFT Criminal Investigative Index and Files, EPA–40 Inspector General’s Operation and Reporting (IGOR) System Investigative Files, and EPA–79 NEIC Master Tracking System are exempted under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), and these systems are exempted under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) only to the extent that the (j)(2) exemption is held to be invalid. (5) Reasons for exemption. EPA systems of records 17, 21, 30, 40, 41, 63, and 79 are exempted from the provisions of the PA in paragraph (a)(4) of this section for the following reasons: * * * * * E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM 12NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 216 / Friday, November 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues 2Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt) on food or feed commodities. DATES: This regulation is effective November 12, 2021. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before January 11, 2022, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0192, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305–5805. Due to the public health concerns related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001; main telephone number: (703) 305–7090; email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 10, 2021 Jkt 256001 • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Publishing Office’s e-CFR site at https:// www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?& c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_ 02.tpl. C. Can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– OPP–2021–0192 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before January 11, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 2021–0192, by one of the following methods. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001. • Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 62733 Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https:// www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Background and Statutory Findings In the Federal Register of March 22, 2021 (86 FR 15164) (FRL–10021–44), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, announcing the receipt of a pesticide petition (PP IN–11434) filed by the Dow Chemical Company, 2211 HH Dow Way, Midland, MI 48674. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.960 be amended by establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt; CAS Reg. No.115035–53–5. That document included a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner and solicited comments on the petitioner’s request. The Agency did not receive any comments. Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’ Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.’’ This includes exposure through drinking water and use in residential settings but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . . .’’ and specifies factors EPA is to consider in establishing an exemption. III. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only in those cases where it can be shown that the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM 12NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 62734 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 216 / Friday, November 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance may be established. Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. In the case of certain chemical substances that are defined as polymers, the Agency has established a set of criteria to identify categories of polymers expected to present minimal or no risk. The definition of a polymer is given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and the exclusion criteria for identifying these low-risk polymers are described in 40 CFR 723.250(d). 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt), conforms to the definition of a polymer given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and meets the following criteria that are used to identify low-risk polymers. 1. The polymer is not a cationic polymer nor is it reasonably anticipated to become a cationic polymer in a natural aquatic environment. 2. The polymer does contain as an integral part of its composition at least two of the atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, and sulfur. 3. The polymer does not contain as an integral part of its composition, except as impurities, any element other than those listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii). 4. The polymer is neither designed nor can it be reasonably anticipated to substantially degrade, decompose, or depolymerize. 5. The polymer is manufactured or imported from monomers and/or reactants that are already included on the TSCA Chemical Substance VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 10, 2021 Jkt 256001 Inventory or manufactured under an applicable TSCA section 5 exemption. 6. The polymer is not a water absorbing polymer with a number average molecular weight (MW) greater than or equal to 10,000 daltons. 7. The polymer does not contain certain perfluoroalkyl moieties consisting of a CF3- or longer chain length as listed in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(6). Additionally, the polymer also meets as required the following exemption criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e). The polymer’s number average MW of 2,871 is greater than 1,000 and less than 10,000 daltons. The polymer contains less than 10% oligomeric material below MW 500 and less than 25% oligomeric material below MW 1,000, and the polymer does not contain any reactive functional groups. Thus, 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, meets the criteria for a polymer to be considered low risk under 40 CFR 723.250. Based on its conformance to the criteria in this unit, no mammalian toxicity is anticipated from dietary, inhalation, or dermal exposure to 2Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt). IV. Aggregate Exposures For the purposes of assessing potential exposure under this exemption, EPA considered that 2Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, could be present in all raw and processed agricultural commodities and drinking water, and that non-occupational nondietary exposure was possible. The number average MW of 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, is 2,871 daltons. Generally, a polymer of this size would be poorly absorbed through the intact gastrointestinal tract or through intact human skin. Since 2Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, conform to the criteria that identify a low-risk polymer, there are no concerns for risks associated with any potential PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 exposure scenarios that are reasonably foreseeable. The Agency has determined that a tolerance is not necessary to protect the public health. V. Cumulative Effects From Substances With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ‘‘available information’’ concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’ EPA has not found 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt) to share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and 2Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA’s efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA’s website at https:// www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative. VI. Determination of Safety Based on the conformance to the criteria used to identify a low-risk polymer, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt. VII. Other Considerations Analytical Enforcement Methodology An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation. E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM 12NOR1 62735 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 216 / Friday, November 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations VIII. Conclusion Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting residues of 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, from the requirement of a tolerance will be safe. IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require the Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). X. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: September 13, 2021. Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR chapter I as follows: PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. In § 180.960, amend the table by adding in alphabetical order the polymer ‘‘2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt; number average of molecular weight (in amu), 2,871’’ to read as follows: ■ § 180.960 Polymers; exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance. * * * * * Polymer CAS No. * * * * * * 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt; number average of molecular weight (in amu), 2,871 .................. * * * * * * [FR Doc. 2021–24710 Filed 11–10–21; 8:45 am] lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 10, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM 12NOR1 * 115035–53–5 *

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 216 (Friday, November 12, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62732-62735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24710]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0192; FRL-8652-01-OCSPP]


2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-
propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-
propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), Sodium Salt; Exemption 
From the Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-
dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-
yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium 
salt), when used as an inert ingredient in a pesticide chemical 
formulation. The Dow Chemical Company submitted a petition to EPA under 
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting

[[Page 62733]]

an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation 
eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for 
residues 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-
propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-
propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt) on food 
or feed commodities.

DATES: This regulation is effective November 12, 2021. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 11, 2022, 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0192, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA 
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with 
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer 
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status 
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration 
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site at 
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. Can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0192 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
January 11, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections 
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0192, by one of 
the following methods.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of March 22, 2021 (86 FR 15164) (FRL-10021-
44), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 
346a, announcing the receipt of a pesticide petition (PP IN-11434) 
filed by the Dow Chemical Company, 2211 HH Dow Way, Midland, MI 48674. 
The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.960 be amended by establishing 
an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of 2-
Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, 
sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) 
and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt; CAS Reg. No.115035-53-5. That 
document included a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner 
and solicited comments on the petitioner's request. The Agency did not 
receive any comments.
    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and use in residential settings but does not include 
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the 
pesticide chemical residue in establishing an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable 
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from 
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . . .'' and 
specifies factors EPA is to consider in establishing an exemption.

III. Risk Assessment and Statutory Findings

    EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only 
in those cases where it can be shown that the risks from aggregate 
exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably foreseeable 
circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human

[[Page 62734]]

health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to 
pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the 
inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert 
ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures 
that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA 
is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure 
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from 
aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance may be established.
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the 
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of 
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability 
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also 
considered available information concerning the variability of the 
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including 
infants and children. In the case of certain chemical substances that 
are defined as polymers, the Agency has established a set of criteria 
to identify categories of polymers expected to present minimal or no 
risk. The definition of a polymer is given in 40 CFR 723.250(b) and the 
exclusion criteria for identifying these low-risk polymers are 
described in 40 CFR 723.250(d). 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-
dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-
yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium 
salt), conforms to the definition of a polymer given in 40 CFR 
723.250(b) and meets the following criteria that are used to identify 
low-risk polymers.
    1. The polymer is not a cationic polymer nor is it reasonably 
anticipated to become a cationic polymer in a natural aquatic 
environment.
    2. The polymer does contain as an integral part of its composition 
at least two of the atomic elements carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, 
silicon, and sulfur.
    3. The polymer does not contain as an integral part of its 
composition, except as impurities, any element other than those listed 
in 40 CFR 723.250(d)(2)(ii).
    4. The polymer is neither designed nor can it be reasonably 
anticipated to substantially degrade, decompose, or depolymerize.
    5. The polymer is manufactured or imported from monomers and/or 
reactants that are already included on the TSCA Chemical Substance 
Inventory or manufactured under an applicable TSCA section 5 exemption.
    6. The polymer is not a water absorbing polymer with a number 
average molecular weight (MW) greater than or equal to 10,000 daltons.
    7. The polymer does not contain certain perfluoroalkyl moieties 
consisting of a CF3- or longer chain length as listed in 40 CFR 
723.250(d)(6).
    Additionally, the polymer also meets as required the following 
exemption criteria specified in 40 CFR 723.250(e).
    The polymer's number average MW of 2,871 is greater than 1,000 and 
less than 10,000 daltons. The polymer contains less than 10% oligomeric 
material below MW 500 and less than 25% oligomeric material below MW 
1,000, and the polymer does not contain any reactive functional groups.
    Thus, 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-
propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-
propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, meets the 
criteria for a polymer to be considered low risk under 40 CFR 723.250. 
Based on its conformance to the criteria in this unit, no mammalian 
toxicity is anticipated from dietary, inhalation, or dermal exposure to 
2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, 
sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) 
and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt).

IV. Aggregate Exposures

    For the purposes of assessing potential exposure under this 
exemption, EPA considered that 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-
dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-
yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium 
salt, could be present in all raw and processed agricultural 
commodities and drinking water, and that non-occupational non-dietary 
exposure was possible. The number average MW of 2-Propenoic acid, 
telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-
[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium 
sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, is 2,871 daltons. Generally, a polymer of 
this size would be poorly absorbed through the intact gastrointestinal 
tract or through intact human skin. Since 2-Propenoic acid, telomer 
with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-
propen-1-yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), 
sodium salt, conform to the criteria that identify a low-risk polymer, 
there are no concerns for risks associated with any potential exposure 
scenarios that are reasonably foreseeable. The Agency has determined 
that a tolerance is not necessary to protect the public health.

V. Cumulative Effects From Substances With a Common Mechanism of 
Toxicity

    Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering 
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency 
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of 
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a 
common mechanism of toxicity.'' EPA has not found 2-Propenoic acid, 
telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-
[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium 
sulfite (1:1), sodium salt) to share a common mechanism of toxicity 
with any other substances, and 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-
dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-
yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium 
salt, does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other 
substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA 
has assumed 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-
propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-
propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, does not 
have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For 
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a 
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of 
such chemicals, see EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.

VI. Determination of Safety

    Based on the conformance to the criteria used to identify a low-
risk polymer, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no 
harm to the U.S. population, including infants and children, from 
aggregate exposure to residues of 2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-
(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-
1-yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium 
salt.

VII. Other Considerations

Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since 
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance without any numerical limitation.

[[Page 62735]]

VIII. Conclusion

    Accordingly, EPA finds that exempting residues of 2-Propenoic acid, 
telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-
[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium 
sulfite (1:1), sodium salt, from the requirement of a tolerance will be 
safe.

IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in 
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any 
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal 
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and 
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government 
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power 
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between 
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require the Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards 
pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 
Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

X. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: September 13, 2021.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 
40 CFR chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES 
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. In Sec.  180.960, amend the table by adding in alphabetical order 
the polymer ``2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-
propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-yl)amino]-1-
propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite (1:1), sodium salt; number 
average of molecular weight (in amu), 2,871'' to read as follows:


Sec.  180.960  Polymers; exemptions from the requirement of a 
tolerance.

* * * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Polymer                              CAS No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                              * * * * * * *
2-Propenoic acid, telomer with N-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-2-      115035-53-5
 propenamide, sodium 2-methyl-2-[(1-oxo-2-propen-1-
 yl)amino]-1-propanesulfonate (1:1) and sodium sulfite
 (1:1), sodium salt; number average of molecular weight
 (in amu), 2,871........................................
 
                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-24710 Filed 11-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.