Air Plan Approval; AK; Eagle River Second 10-Year PM10, 62096-62098 [2021-24258]
Download as PDF
62096
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
§ 4.104 Schedule of ratings—
cardiovascular system.
*
*
*
*
*
DISEASES OF THE HEART
Rating
7114
*
*
Peripheral arterial disease:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Note (2): If AP, TP, and TcPO2 testing are not of record, evaluate based on ABI unless the examiner states that an AP, TP, or
TcPO2 test is needed in a particular case because ABI does not sufficiently reflect the severity of the veteran’s peripheral arterial disease. In all other cases, evaluate based on the test that provides the highest impairment value.
*
*
*
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021–24419 Filed 11–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2020–0648; FRL–8787–02–
R10]
Air Plan Approval; AK; Eagle River
Second 10-Year PM10 Limited
Maintenance Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving the Eagle
River, Alaska (AK) limited maintenance
plan (LMP) submitted on November 10,
2020, by the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation (ADEC or
‘‘the State’’). This plan addresses the
second 10-year maintenance period after
redesignation for particulate matter with
an aerodynamic diameter less than or
equal to a nominal 10 micrometers
(PM10). The plan relies upon control
measures contained in the first 10-year
maintenance plan and the
determination that the Eagle River area
currently monitors PM10 levels well
below the PM10 National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS or ‘‘the
standard’’). The EPA is approving
Alaska’s LMP as meeting Clean Air Act
(CAA) requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective
December 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2020–0648. All
documents in the docket are listed on
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Nov 08, 2021
Jkt 256001
*
*
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available at https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christi Duboiski, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue (Suite 155), Seattle, WA
98101, at (360) 753–9081, or
duboiski.christi@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it refers to the
EPA.
I. Background
On November 10, 2020, ADEC
submitted to the EPA for approval a
second 10-year PM10 LMP for Eagle
River. The SIP revision, State effective
November 7, 2020, fulfills the second
10-year planning requirement of CAA
section 175A(b) to ensure PM10 NAAQS
compliance through 2033. The Eagle
River area has been meeting the PM10
standard for multiple years and was
redesignated to attainment on March 8,
2013 with an approved 10-year PM10
maintenance plan. The area currently
monitors PM10 levels well below the
PM10 NAAQS.
We proposed to approve the Eagle
River second 10-year LMP on September
2, 2021 (86 FR 49278). The reasons for
our approval are included in that
proposal and will not be restated here.
The public comment period for our
proposed action closed on October 4,
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
2021. We received no public comments.
Therefore, we are finalizing our action
as proposed.
II. Final Action
In this final action, the EPA is
approving Alaska’s second 10-year LMP
for Eagle River submitted on November
10, 2020, as satisfying the requirements
of section 175A of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
62097
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 10, 2022. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: November 1, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart C—Alaska
2. In § 52.70, the table in paragraph (e)
is amended by:
■ a. Adding entry ‘‘II.III.D.2.b. Eagle
River Second 10-year PM10 Limited
Maintenance Plan’’ after the entry
‘‘II.III.D.2.a. Eagle River PM10 Limited
Maintenance Plan’’; and
■ b. Revising the entry ‘‘III.III.D.2. Eagle
River PM10 Control Plan’’.
The addition and revision read as
follow:
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
§ 52.70
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED ALASKA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of SIP provision
State
submittal
date
EPA approval date
Explanations
State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan: Volume II. Analysis of Problems, Control Actions
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Section III. Areawide Pollutant Control Program
*
*
II.III.D.2.b. Eagle River Second 10-year
PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan.
*
*
*
Eagle River .......
*
*
11/10/2020
*
*
*
11/9/2021, [INSERT FEDERAL REGISTER
CITATION].
*
*
*
*
*
*
State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan: Volume II. Appendices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
Section III. Areawide Pollutant Control Program
*
*
III.III.D.2. Eagle River PM10 Control Plan ......
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Nov 08, 2021
Jkt 256001
*
Eagle River .......
PO 00000
Frm 00017
*
11/10/2020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
11/9/2021, [INSERT FEDERAL REGISTER
CITATION].
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
*
62098
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED ALASKA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES—Continued
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–24258 Filed 11–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0004; FRL–8789–02–
R8]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants; Colorado; Control of
Emissions From Existing Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a Clean Air
Act (CAA or the ‘‘Act’’) section 111(d)
state plan submitted by the Colorado
Department of Public Health and
Environment (CDPHE or the
‘‘Department’’) on March 23, 2021. This
state plan was submitted to fulfill the
requirements of the CAA and is
responsive to the EPA’s promulgation of
Emission Guidelines and Compliance
Times (EG) for existing municipal solid
waste (MSW) landfills. The Colorado
state plan establishes performance
standards and other operating
requirements for existing MSW landfills
within the State of Colorado and
provides for the implementation and
enforcement of those standards and
requirements by the Department. The
EPA is taking this action pursuant to the
CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on
December 9, 2021. The incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed
in the rule is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of December
9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2021–0004. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Nov 08, 2021
Jkt 256001
State
submittal
date
*
EPA approval date
*
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Reibach, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8ARD–TRM, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303)
312–6949, reibach.allison@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is
discussed in detail in our July 1, 2021
proposed rule (86 FR 35044). In that
document we proposed to approve the
Colorado CAA section 111(d) state plan
for existing MSW landfills as the plan
was submitted by the CDPHE on March
23, 2021. The EPA’s analysis of the
Colorado state plan may be found in the
aforementioned proposed rule and the
technical support document (TSD)
associated with the docket for today’s
action. Comments on the EPA’s
proposed approval of the state plan for
existing MSW landfills were due on or
before August 2, 2021. We received
feedback from two commenters during
the public comment period opened by
the proposed rule. Our responses to the
comments are addressed in section II.
below.
II. Response to Comments
Comment: Commenter, which
represents solid waste management
professionals, stated that Colorado’s
state plan should include all standards
outlined in the Federal Plan
Requirements for MSW Landfills (40
CFR part 62, subpart OOO), as the
Colorado state plan currently includes
standards from the Emission Guidelines
and Compliance Times for MSW
Landfills (40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf).
The commenter cites significant
differences for ‘‘legacy controlled
landfills,’’ between the state plan and
the federal plan, with the federal plan
exempting ‘‘legacy-controlled landfills’’
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Explanations
*
from tasks that they completed under 40
CFR part 60, subpart WWW; subpart
GGG of this part; or a state plan
implementing 40 CFR part 60, subpart
Cc. Without these exemptions, the
commenter asserts that Colorado’s plan
indirectly imposes additional
administrative requirements for these
‘‘legacy controlled landfills’’ that would
not apply if Colorado adopted the
language of the federal plan. The
commenter urges EPA to ask the CDPHE
to adopt the federal plan standards and
withdraw their state plan.
Response: Section 111(d) of the CAA
gives EPA the authority to prescribe
regulations for states to submit plans
that establish standards of performance
for certain existing sources of air
pollutants. Section 111(d) plans adress
existing sources for any air pollutant for
which air quality criteria have not been
issued or which is not included on a list
published under section 108(a) of the
CAA, but to which a standard of
performance would apply if such
existing source were a new source. CAA
Section 111(d) also requires states to
provide in their plans the
implementation and enforcement of
such standards of performance. In
addition, CAA section 111(d)(2)(A)
provides EPA with the authority to
establish and enforce a plan in cases
where the state fails to submit a
satisfactory plan. 40 CFR 62.13
addresses instances where a state has
failed to submit a satisfactory plan.
Commenter should reference 40 CFR
62.13(b) which states, ‘‘[a]fter June 21,
2021, per paragraph (j) of this section,
the substantive requirements of the
MSW landfills Federal plan are
contained in subpart OOO of this part
and owners and operators of MSW
landfills must comply with subpart
OOO of this part or a state/tribal plan
implementing 40 CFR part 60, subpart
Cf of this chapter . . .’’
As stated in our proposal, Colorado’s
111(d) state plan for MSW landfills
meets all requirements under 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Cf of this chapter. The
commenter does not state that
Colorado’s 111(d) state plan for MSW
landfills does not meet the requirements
under 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf of this
chapter, but asks EPA to request that
Colorado withdraw their state plan
E:\FR\FM\09NOR1.SGM
09NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 9, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 62096-62098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24258]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2020-0648; FRL-8787-02-R10]
Air Plan Approval; AK; Eagle River Second 10-Year PM10 Limited
Maintenance Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the
Eagle River, Alaska (AK) limited maintenance plan (LMP) submitted on
November 10, 2020, by the Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation (ADEC or ``the State''). This plan addresses the second
10-year maintenance period after redesignation for particulate matter
with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10
micrometers (PM10). The plan relies upon control measures
contained in the first 10-year maintenance plan and the determination
that the Eagle River area currently monitors PM10 levels
well below the PM10 National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS or ``the standard''). The EPA is approving Alaska's LMP as
meeting Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective December 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2020-0648. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christi Duboiski, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue (Suite 155), Seattle, WA 98101, at (360) 753-9081, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'' or
``our'' is used, it refers to the EPA.
I. Background
On November 10, 2020, ADEC submitted to the EPA for approval a
second 10-year PM10 LMP for Eagle River. The SIP revision,
State effective November 7, 2020, fulfills the second 10-year planning
requirement of CAA section 175A(b) to ensure PM10 NAAQS
compliance through 2033. The Eagle River area has been meeting the
PM10 standard for multiple years and was redesignated to
attainment on March 8, 2013 with an approved 10-year PM10
maintenance plan. The area currently monitors PM10 levels
well below the PM10 NAAQS.
We proposed to approve the Eagle River second 10-year LMP on
September 2, 2021 (86 FR 49278). The reasons for our approval are
included in that proposal and will not be restated here. The public
comment period for our proposed action closed on October 4, 2021. We
received no public comments. Therefore, we are finalizing our action as
proposed.
II. Final Action
In this final action, the EPA is approving Alaska's second 10-year
LMP for Eagle River submitted on November 10, 2020, as satisfying the
requirements of section 175A of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive
[[Page 62097]]
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 10, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 1, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart C--Alaska
0
2. In Sec. 52.70, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by:
0
a. Adding entry ``II.III.D.2.b. Eagle River Second 10-year
PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan'' after the entry
``II.III.D.2.a. Eagle River PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan'';
and
0
b. Revising the entry ``III.III.D.2. Eagle River PM10
Control Plan''.
The addition and revision read as follow:
Sec. 52.70 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Alaska Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic or State
Name of SIP provision nonattainment area submittal date EPA approval date Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan: Volume II. Analysis of Problems, Control Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section III. Areawide Pollutant Control Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
II.III.D.2.b. Eagle River Second Eagle River............. 11/10/2020 11/9/2021, [INSERT
10-year PM10 Limited Maintenance FEDERAL REGISTER
Plan. CITATION].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan: Volume II. Appendices
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section III. Areawide Pollutant Control Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
III.III.D.2. Eagle River PM10 Eagle River............. 11/10/2020 11/9/2021, [INSERT
Control Plan. FEDERAL REGISTER
CITATION].
[[Page 62098]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2021-24258 Filed 11-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P