National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Definition of Surviving Spouse for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses and Change to 8(a) Business Development Contracting Thresholds, 61670-61673 [2021-24348]

Download as PDF 61670 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations research, Marketing agreements, Soybeans and soybean products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. * For reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 1220 is amended as follows: [FR Doc. 2021–24302 Filed 11–5–21; 8:45 am] 13 CFR Parts 124, 125, 126, and 127 RIN 3245–AH27 Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6301–6311 and 7 U.S.C. 7401. National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Definition of Surviving Spouse for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses and Change to 8(a) Business Development Contracting Thresholds 2. In § 1220.201, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows: ■ Membership of board. (a) For the purpose of nominating and appointing producers to the Board, the United States shall be divided into 31 geographic units and the number of Board members from each unit, subject to paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section shall be as follows: TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a) lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Nov 05, 2021 Number of members 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Jkt 256001 * SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 1. The authority citation for part 1220 continues to read as follows: South Dakota .................................. Ohio ................................................. North Dakota ................................... Nebraska ......................................... Missouri ........................................... Minnesota ........................................ Iowa ................................................. Indiana ............................................. Illinois .............................................. Wisconsin ........................................ Tennessee ....................................... Mississippi ....................................... Michigan .......................................... Kentucky .......................................... Kansas ............................................ Arkansas ......................................... Virginia ............................................ Pennsylvania ................................... North Carolina ................................. Maryland .......................................... Louisiana ......................................... Alabama .......................................... Texas ............................................... South Carolina ................................ Oklahoma ........................................ New York ......................................... New Jersey ..................................... Georgia ............................................ Delaware ......................................... Unit: Eastern Region (Connecticut, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico) Western Region (Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming) .............. * BILLING CODE P ■ State/unit * Erin Morris, Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. PART 1220—SOYBEAN PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND CONSUMER INFORMATION § 1220.201 * U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Direct final rule. AGENCY: This rule makes technical changes to regulations issued by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to conform those regulations to recent statutory changes. First, the rule incorporates a required change to SBA’s ownership requirements for small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans. The rule adopts changes to the treatment of certain surviving spouses made by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020. In addition, the rule incorporates changes to the dollar thresholds for certain contracting actions authorized for the 8(a) Business Development (BD) program made by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020. Finally, the rule adjusts the competitive threshold dollar levels authorized for SBA’s contracting programs to changes made to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) due to inflation. DATES: This rule is effective on February 7, 2022, without further action, unless significant adverse comment is received by December 8, 2021. If significant adverse comment is received, SBA will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 3245–AH27, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • For mail, paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions: Donna Fudge, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 • Hand Delivery/Courier: Donna Fudge, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416. SBA will post all comments on www.regulations.gov. If you wish to submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in the User Notice at www.regulations.gov, please submit the information to Donna Fudge, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416, or send an email to donna.fudge@sba.gov. Highlight the information that you consider to be CBI and explain why you believe SBA should hold this information as confidential. SBA will review the information and make the final determination on whether it will publish the information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Fudge, Procurement Analyst, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416; donna.fudge@sba.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 20, 2019, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA 2020), Public Law 116–92, 133 Stat. 1198, was signed into law. Section 876 of NDAA 2020 amended section 3 of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632. This provision made changes to the treatment of surviving spouses with regard to the program’s ownership requirements. The changes require that SBA update its regulations to reflect two new time periods. Specifically, the statute creates a ten-year time period to remain eligible in the case of a surviving spouse of a veteran with a service-connected disability rated as 100 percent disabling or who dies as a result of a serviceconnected disability, and a three-year time period in the case of a surviving spouse of a veteran with a serviceconnected disability rated as less than 100 percent disabling who does not die as a result of a service-connected disability. This rule updates 13 CFR 125.12 to reflect these changes. SBA is changing the language in § 125.12(i)(1)(ii) to match the new statutory language. SBA is adding the ten-year time frame in § 125.12(i)(2)(iii). SBA is adding the three-year time frame in § 125.12(i)(2)(iv). In addition, section 823 of NDAA 2020 changed the threshold for which a justification and approval is needed for Department of Defense (DoD) covered procurements. Section 811 of the NDAA for Fiscal Year 2010, Public Law 111– E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations 84, 123 Stat. 2190, 2405, required the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) to be amended to include a new requirement for a written justification of sole-source 8(a) awards over $20 million. The FAR increased this threshold to $22 million due to inflation on July 2, 2015. 80 FR 38293, 38296. While the section 811 requirement for a justification and approval applied to all civilian and defense agencies, section 823 of NDAA 2020 increased the threshold to $100 million only for the DoD. As such, this rule amends SBA’s regulations to increase the justification and approval requirement to $100 million only with respect to DoD 8(a) contracts. In addition, DoD, the General Services Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) are charged with amending the FAR to adjust statutory acquisition-related thresholds for inflation every five years. On October 2, 2020, DoD, GSA, and NASA published a final rule in the Federal Register amending the FAR to implement new inflationary adjustments. 85 FR 62485. As part of that final rule, the $22 million justification and approval threshold authorized by section 811 of NDAA 2010 was increased to $25 million. Thus, in addition to increasing the threshold to $100 million for DoDrelated 8(a) procurements, this rule also increases the justification and approval threshold from $22 million to $25 million for all other agencies. This rule amends § 124.502(c)(17) and § 124.506(b)(5) to adjust the justification and approval thresholds accordingly. In addition to the justification and approval and 8(a) sole source thresholds identified above that were raised in response to the inflationary adjustments made to the FAR, that same FAR rule also adjusted other SBA-related contacting dollar thresholds for inflation. 85 FR 62485. Section 864 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2021, Public Law 116–283, subsequently amended the Small Business Act to set the 8(a), HUBZone, and WOSB sole source thresholds for manufacturing contracts to $7,000,000. As such, this rule incorporates the FAR changes into SBA’s regulations except where section 864 retained a $7 million sole source threshold amount for manufacturing contracts. Specifically, this rule adopts the inflationary adjustments made to the sole source thresholds in the FAR for the 8(a) BD Program (by amending § 124.506(a)(2)(ii) of SBA’s regulations), the Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concern Program (by VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Nov 05, 2021 Jkt 256001 amending § 125.23(b)(1) of SBA’s regulations), the Historically Underutilized Business Zone Program (by amending § 126.612(b)(1) and (2) of SBA’s regulations), and the WomenOwned Small Business Program (by amending § 127.503(c)(2) and § 127.503(d)(2) of SBA’s regulations). SBA is also updating a threshold for its Small Business Subcontracting Program, which is contained in § 125.3(c). SBA is also making corrections to § 126.200(f) and § 126.700(b)(1). Currently both sections contain an incorrect reference to § 126.5. The correct cross reference should be to § 125.6, and this rule corrects the typographical errors. Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 12988, 13132, 13175, the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801–808), the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), and the Administrative Procedure Act Executive Order 12866 The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this direct final rule does not constitute a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. Executive Order 13563 Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order 12866 while calling for improvements in the nation’s regulatory system to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563 also requires that regulations be based on the open exchange of information and perspectives among state and local officials, affected stakeholders in the private sector, and the public as a whole. SBA has developed this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements. While developing this rule, SBA responded to specific inquiries from government officials and the public regarding the implementation of the statutory required changes. Executive Order 12988 This action meets applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 61671 burden. The action does not have retroactive or preemptive effect. Executive Order 13132 A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. This direct final rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. SBA has analyzed this direct final rule and has determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Executive Order 13175 This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801– 808 OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not a major rule under subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (also known as the Congressional Review Act), 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35 SBA has determined that this direct final rule does not impose additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., chapter 35. Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601– 612 The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601, requires administrative agencies to consider the effect of their actions on small entities, small nonprofit enterprises, and small local governments. Pursuant to the RFA, when an agency issues a rulemaking, the agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis, which describes the impact of the rule on small entities. E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1 61672 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations However, section 605 of the RFA allows an agency to certify a rule, in lieu of preparing an analysis, if the rulemaking is not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Within the meaning of RFA, SBA certifies that this direct final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. It does not add any new requirements to SBA’s regulations, but merely adjusts specified thresholds to conform to statutory changes and changes made by the FAR. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Administrative Procedure Act— Justification for Direct Final Rule In general, SBA publishes a rule for public comment before issuing a final rule, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 U.S.C. 553. The Administrative Procedure Act provides an exception to this standard rulemaking process, however, where an agency finds good cause to adopt a rule without prior public participation. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). The good cause requirement is satisfied when prior public participation is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. SBA is publishing this rule as a direct final rule because public participation is unnecessary. SBA views this as a noncontroversial administrative action because it merely implements a change required by the Small Business Act, as amended by section 876 of NDAA 2020. This rule will be effective on the date shown in the DATES section unless SBA receives significant adverse comment on or before the deadline for comments. Significant adverse comments are comments that provide strong justifications why the rule should not be adopted or for changing the rule. SBA does not expect to receive any significant adverse comments because the rule simply mirrors the statutory language contained in section 876 of NDAA 2020, with no extraneous interpretation or other expanded text. The remaining technical changes merely conform SBA regulations with the updated thresholds in the FAR. If SBA receives significant adverse comment, SBA will publish a notice in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule before the effective date. If SBA receives no significant adverse comments, the rule will be effective 90 days after publication without further notice. List of Subjects 13 CFR Part 124 Administrative practice and procedure, Government procurement, Government property, Small businesses. 13 CFR Part 125 Government contracts, Government procurement, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses, Technical assistance. 13 CFR Part 126 Administrative practice and procedure, Government procurement, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses. 13 CFR Part 127 Government contracts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA amends 13 CFR parts 124, 125, 126, and 127 as follows: PART 124—8(a) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS STATUS DETERMINATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 124 is revised to read as follows: ■ Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6), 636(j), 637(a), 637(d), 644, 42 U.S.C. 9815; and Pub. L. 99–661, 100 Stat. 3816; Sec. 1207, Pub. L. 100–656, 102 Stat. 3853; Pub. L. 101–37, 103 Stat. 70; Pub. L. 101–574, 104 Stat. 2814; Sec. 8021, Pub. L. 108–87, 117 Stat. 1054; and Sec. 330, Pub. L. 116–260. 2. Amend § 124.502 by revising paragraph (c)(17) to read as follows: ■ § 124.502 How does an agency offer a procurement to SBA for award through the 8(a) BD program? * * * * * (c) * * * (17) A statement that the necessary justification and approval under the Federal Acquisition Regulation has occurred where a requirement whose estimated contract value exceeds $25,000,000, or $100,000,000 in the case of Department of Defense contracts, is offered to SBA as a sole source requirement on behalf of a specific Participant; and * * * * * ■ 3. Amend § 124.506 in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) by removing the figure ‘‘$4,000,000’’ and adding in its place the figure ‘‘$4,500,000’’ and by revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows: § 124.506 At what dollar threshold must an 8(a) procurement be competed among eligible Participants? * VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Nov 05, 2021 Jkt 256001 PO 00000 * * Frm 00008 * Fmt 4700 * Sfmt 4700 (b) * * * (5) An agency may not award an 8(a) sole source contract for an amount exceeding $25,000,000, or $100,000,000 for an agency of the Department of Defense, unless the contracting officer justifies the use of a sole source contract in writing and has obtained the necessary approval under the Federal Acquisition Regulation. * * * * * PART 125—GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING PROGRAMS 4. The authority citation for part 125 is revised to read as follows: ■ Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632(p), (q), 634(b)(6), 637, 644, 657b, 657(f), and 657r. § 125.3 [Amended] 5. Amend § 125.3 in paragraphs (c)(1) introductory text and (c)(1)(x) by removing the figure ‘‘$700,000’’ and adding in its place the figure ‘‘$750,000’’. ■ 6. Amend § 125.12 by revising paragraphs (i)(1)(ii) and (i)(2)(iii) and adding paragraph (i)(2)(iv) to read as follows: ■ § 125.12 Who does SBA consider to own an SDVO SBC? * * * * * (i) * * * (1) * * * (ii) Such veteran had a serviceconnected disability (as defined in section 101(16) of title 38, United States Code); and * * * * * (2) * * * (iii) In the case of a surviving spouse of a veteran with a service-connected disability rated as 100 percent disabling or who dies as a result of a serviceconnected disability, is 10 years after the date of the death of the veteran; or (iv) In the case of a surviving spouse of a veteran with a service-connected disability rated as less than 100 percent disabling who does not die as a result of a service-connected disability, is 3 years after the date of the death of the veteran. § 125.23 [Amended] 7. Amend § 125.23 in paragraph (b)(1) by removing the figure ‘‘$6,500,000’’ and adding in its place the figure ‘‘$7,000,000’’. ■ PART 126—HUBZONE PROGRAM 8. The authority citation for part 126 is revised to read as follows: ■ Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632(a), 632(j), 632(p), 644 and 657a; Pub. L. 111–240, 124 Stat. 2504. E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations § 126.200 [Amended] 9. Amend § 126.200 in paragraph (f) by removing the reference ‘‘§§ 126.5’’ and adding in its place the reference ‘‘§§ 125.6’’. ■ § 126.612 [Amended] 10. Amend § 126.612 in paragraph (b)(2) by removing the figure ‘‘4,000,000’’ and adding in its place the figure ‘‘$4,500,000’’. ■ § 126.700 [Amended] 11. Amend § 126.700 in paragraph (b)(1) by removing the reference ‘‘§ 126.5’’ and adding in its place the reference ‘‘§ 125.6’’. ■ PART 127—WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS FEDERAL CONTRACT PROGRAM 12. The authority citation for part 127 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 637(m), 644 and 657r. § 127.503 [Amended] 13. Amend § 127.503 in paragraphs (c)(2) and (d)(2) by removing the figures ‘‘$6,500,000’’ and ‘‘$4,000,000’’ and adding in their place the figures ‘‘$7,000,000’’ and ‘‘$4,500,000’’, respectively. ■ Isabella Casillas Guzman, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2021–24348 Filed 11–5–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026–03–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2021–0950; Project Identifier MCAI–2021–01075–T; Amendment 39–21803; AD 2021–23–05] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. AGENCY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2021–18– 08, which applied to all Airbus SAS Model A319–171N airplanes; Model A320–271N, –272N, and –273N airplanes; and Model A321–271N, –272N, –271NX, and –272NX airplanes. AD 2021–18–08 required repetitive inspections of the pylon/engine lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:24 Nov 05, 2021 Jkt 256001 interface rods for damage, and applicable corrective actions, as specified in European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2021–0177. AD 2021–18–08 also provided for limited installation of affected parts under certain conditions. Since the FAA issued AD 2021–18–08, operators reported that the requirements of EASA AD 2021–0177 were unclear. This AD retains the requirements of AD 2021– 18–08, with clarified instructions, as specified in an EASA AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD is effective November 23, 2021. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 23, 2021. The FAA must receive comments on this AD by December 23, 2021. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202–493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD, contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. It is also available in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0950. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0950; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 61673 AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA, International Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206–231–3223; email Sanjay.Ralhan@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2021–0950; Project Identifier MCA–2021–01075–T’’ at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this final rule because of those comments. Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this final rule. Confidential Business Information CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA, International Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 213 (Monday, November 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61670-61673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24348]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Parts 124, 125, 126, and 127

RIN 3245-AH27


National Defense Authorization Act of 2020, Definition of 
Surviving Spouse for Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses 
and Change to 8(a) Business Development Contracting Thresholds

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule makes technical changes to regulations issued by the 
U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) to conform those regulations 
to recent statutory changes. First, the rule incorporates a required 
change to SBA's ownership requirements for small business concerns 
owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans. The rule adopts 
changes to the treatment of certain surviving spouses made by the 
National Defense Authorization Act of 2020. In addition, the rule 
incorporates changes to the dollar thresholds for certain contracting 
actions authorized for the 8(a) Business Development (BD) program made 
by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2020. Finally, the rule 
adjusts the competitive threshold dollar levels authorized for SBA's 
contracting programs to changes made to the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation (FAR) due to inflation.

DATES: This rule is effective on February 7, 2022, without further 
action, unless significant adverse comment is received by December 8, 
2021. If significant adverse comment is received, SBA will publish a 
timely withdrawal of the rule in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN 3245-AH27, by any 
of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     For mail, paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions: Donna Fudge, 
U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and 
Liaison, 409 Third Street SW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: Donna Fudge, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, 409 Third 
Street SW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
    SBA will post all comments on www.regulations.gov. If you wish to 
submit confidential business information (CBI) as defined in the User 
Notice at www.regulations.gov, please submit the information to Donna 
Fudge, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Policy, Planning 
and Liaison, 409 Third Street SW, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416, or 
send an email to [email protected]. Highlight the information that 
you consider to be CBI and explain why you believe SBA should hold this 
information as confidential. SBA will review the information and make 
the final determination on whether it will publish the information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Fudge, Procurement Analyst, 
Office of Policy, Planning and Liaison, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416; 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 20, 2019, the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (NDAA 2020), Public Law 116-92, 
133 Stat. 1198, was signed into law. Section 876 of NDAA 2020 amended 
section 3 of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632. This provision made 
changes to the treatment of surviving spouses with regard to the 
program's ownership requirements. The changes require that SBA update 
its regulations to reflect two new time periods. Specifically, the 
statute creates a ten-year time period to remain eligible in the case 
of a surviving spouse of a veteran with a service-connected disability 
rated as 100 percent disabling or who dies as a result of a service-
connected disability, and a three-year time period in the case of a 
surviving spouse of a veteran with a service-connected disability rated 
as less than 100 percent disabling who does not die as a result of a 
service-connected disability. This rule updates 13 CFR 125.12 to 
reflect these changes. SBA is changing the language in Sec.  
125.12(i)(1)(ii) to match the new statutory language. SBA is adding the 
ten-year time frame in Sec.  125.12(i)(2)(iii). SBA is adding the 
three-year time frame in Sec.  125.12(i)(2)(iv).
    In addition, section 823 of NDAA 2020 changed the threshold for 
which a justification and approval is needed for Department of Defense 
(DoD) covered procurements. Section 811 of the NDAA for Fiscal Year 
2010, Public Law 111-

[[Page 61671]]

84, 123 Stat. 2190, 2405, required the Federal Acquisition Regulations 
(FAR) to be amended to include a new requirement for a written 
justification of sole-source 8(a) awards over $20 million. The FAR 
increased this threshold to $22 million due to inflation on July 2, 
2015. 80 FR 38293, 38296. While the section 811 requirement for a 
justification and approval applied to all civilian and defense 
agencies, section 823 of NDAA 2020 increased the threshold to $100 
million only for the DoD. As such, this rule amends SBA's regulations 
to increase the justification and approval requirement to $100 million 
only with respect to DoD 8(a) contracts. In addition, DoD, the General 
Services Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) are charged with amending the FAR to adjust 
statutory acquisition-related thresholds for inflation every five 
years. On October 2, 2020, DoD, GSA, and NASA published a final rule in 
the Federal Register amending the FAR to implement new inflationary 
adjustments. 85 FR 62485. As part of that final rule, the $22 million 
justification and approval threshold authorized by section 811 of NDAA 
2010 was increased to $25 million. Thus, in addition to increasing the 
threshold to $100 million for DoD-related 8(a) procurements, this rule 
also increases the justification and approval threshold from $22 
million to $25 million for all other agencies. This rule amends Sec.  
124.502(c)(17) and Sec.  124.506(b)(5) to adjust the justification and 
approval thresholds accordingly.
    In addition to the justification and approval and 8(a) sole source 
thresholds identified above that were raised in response to the 
inflationary adjustments made to the FAR, that same FAR rule also 
adjusted other SBA-related contacting dollar thresholds for inflation. 
85 FR 62485. Section 864 of the National Defense Authorization Act of 
2021, Public Law 116-283, subsequently amended the Small Business Act 
to set the 8(a), HUBZone, and WOSB sole source thresholds for 
manufacturing contracts to $7,000,000. As such, this rule incorporates 
the FAR changes into SBA's regulations except where section 864 
retained a $7 million sole source threshold amount for manufacturing 
contracts. Specifically, this rule adopts the inflationary adjustments 
made to the sole source thresholds in the FAR for the 8(a) BD Program 
(by amending Sec.  124.506(a)(2)(ii) of SBA's regulations), the 
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concern Program (by 
amending Sec.  125.23(b)(1) of SBA's regulations), the Historically 
Underutilized Business Zone Program (by amending Sec.  126.612(b)(1) 
and (2) of SBA's regulations), and the Women-Owned Small Business 
Program (by amending Sec.  127.503(c)(2) and Sec.  127.503(d)(2) of 
SBA's regulations). SBA is also updating a threshold for its Small 
Business Subcontracting Program, which is contained in Sec.  125.3(c).
    SBA is also making corrections to Sec.  126.200(f) and Sec.  
126.700(b)(1). Currently both sections contain an incorrect reference 
to Sec.  126.5. The correct cross reference should be to Sec.  125.6, 
and this rule corrects the typographical errors.

Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 12988, 13132, 13175, the 
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808), the Paperwork Reduction 
Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), and the Administrative Procedure Act

Executive Order 12866

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this 
direct final rule does not constitute a significant regulatory action 
under Executive Order 12866.

Executive Order 13563

    Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order 
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system 
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, 
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory 
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory 
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of 
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, 
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563 also 
requires that regulations be based on the open exchange of information 
and perspectives among state and local officials, affected stakeholders 
in the private sector, and the public as a whole. SBA has developed 
this rule in a manner consistent with these requirements. While 
developing this rule, SBA responded to specific inquiries from 
government officials and the public regarding the implementation of the 
statutory required changes.

Executive Order 12988

    This action meets applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) 
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize 
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action does not 
have retroactive or preemptive effect.

Executive Order 13132

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. This direct final rule will not have substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the National 
Government and the States, or the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    SBA has analyzed this direct final rule and has determined that it 
is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption 
requirements described in Executive Order 13132.

Executive Order 13175

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801-808

    OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined 
that this rule is not a major rule under subtitle E of the Small 
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (also known as the 
Congressional Review Act), 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35

    SBA has determined that this direct final rule does not impose 
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., chapter 35.

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601, requires 
administrative agencies to consider the effect of their actions on 
small entities, small non-profit enterprises, and small local 
governments. Pursuant to the RFA, when an agency issues a rulemaking, 
the agency must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis, which 
describes the impact of the rule on small entities.

[[Page 61672]]

However, section 605 of the RFA allows an agency to certify a rule, in 
lieu of preparing an analysis, if the rulemaking is not expected to 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities. Within the meaning of RFA, SBA certifies that this direct 
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. It does not add any new requirements to SBA's 
regulations, but merely adjusts specified thresholds to conform to 
statutory changes and changes made by the FAR.

Administrative Procedure Act--Justification for Direct Final Rule

    In general, SBA publishes a rule for public comment before issuing 
a final rule, in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act. 5 
U.S.C. 553. The Administrative Procedure Act provides an exception to 
this standard rulemaking process, however, where an agency finds good 
cause to adopt a rule without prior public participation. 5 U.S.C. 
553(b)(3)(B). The good cause requirement is satisfied when prior public 
participation is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.
    SBA is publishing this rule as a direct final rule because public 
participation is unnecessary. SBA views this as a non-controversial 
administrative action because it merely implements a change required by 
the Small Business Act, as amended by section 876 of NDAA 2020. This 
rule will be effective on the date shown in the DATES section unless 
SBA receives significant adverse comment on or before the deadline for 
comments. Significant adverse comments are comments that provide strong 
justifications why the rule should not be adopted or for changing the 
rule. SBA does not expect to receive any significant adverse comments 
because the rule simply mirrors the statutory language contained in 
section 876 of NDAA 2020, with no extraneous interpretation or other 
expanded text. The remaining technical changes merely conform SBA 
regulations with the updated thresholds in the FAR.
    If SBA receives significant adverse comment, SBA will publish a 
notice in the Federal Register withdrawing this rule before the 
effective date. If SBA receives no significant adverse comments, the 
rule will be effective 90 days after publication without further 
notice.

List of Subjects

13 CFR Part 124

    Administrative practice and procedure, Government procurement, 
Government property, Small businesses.

13 CFR Part 125

    Government contracts, Government procurement, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses, Technical assistance.

13 CFR Part 126

    Administrative practice and procedure, Government procurement, 
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small businesses.

13 CFR Part 127

    Government contracts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Small businesses.

    Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA amends 13 
CFR parts 124, 125, 126, and 127 as follows:

PART 124--8(a) BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT/SMALL DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS 
STATUS DETERMINATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 124 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6), 636(j), 637(a), 637(d), 644, 42 
U.S.C. 9815; and Pub. L. 99-661, 100 Stat. 3816; Sec. 1207, Pub. L. 
100-656, 102 Stat. 3853; Pub. L. 101-37, 103 Stat. 70; Pub. L. 101-
574, 104 Stat. 2814; Sec. 8021, Pub. L. 108-87, 117 Stat. 1054; and 
Sec. 330, Pub. L. 116-260.


0
2. Amend Sec.  124.502 by revising paragraph (c)(17) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  124.502   How does an agency offer a procurement to SBA for award 
through the 8(a) BD program?

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (17) A statement that the necessary justification and approval 
under the Federal Acquisition Regulation has occurred where a 
requirement whose estimated contract value exceeds $25,000,000, or 
$100,000,000 in the case of Department of Defense contracts, is offered 
to SBA as a sole source requirement on behalf of a specific 
Participant; and
* * * * *

0
3. Amend Sec.  124.506 in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) by removing the figure 
``$4,000,000'' and adding in its place the figure ``$4,500,000'' and by 
revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows:


Sec.  124.506   At what dollar threshold must an 8(a) procurement be 
competed among eligible Participants?

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (5) An agency may not award an 8(a) sole source contract for an 
amount exceeding $25,000,000, or $100,000,000 for an agency of the 
Department of Defense, unless the contracting officer justifies the use 
of a sole source contract in writing and has obtained the necessary 
approval under the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
* * * * *

PART 125--GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING PROGRAMS

0
4. The authority citation for part 125 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 632(p), (q), 634(b)(6), 637, 644, 657b, 
657(f), and 657r.


Sec.  125.3  [Amended]

0
5. Amend Sec.  125.3 in paragraphs (c)(1) introductory text and 
(c)(1)(x) by removing the figure ``$700,000'' and adding in its place 
the figure ``$750,000''.

0
6. Amend Sec.  125.12 by revising paragraphs (i)(1)(ii) and (i)(2)(iii) 
and adding paragraph (i)(2)(iv) to read as follows:


Sec.  125.12   Who does SBA consider to own an SDVO SBC?

* * * * *
    (i) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) Such veteran had a service-connected disability (as defined in 
section 101(16) of title 38, United States Code); and
* * * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iii) In the case of a surviving spouse of a veteran with a 
service-connected disability rated as 100 percent disabling or who dies 
as a result of a service-connected disability, is 10 years after the 
date of the death of the veteran; or
    (iv) In the case of a surviving spouse of a veteran with a service-
connected disability rated as less than 100 percent disabling who does 
not die as a result of a service-connected disability, is 3 years after 
the date of the death of the veteran.


Sec.  125.23  [Amended]

0
7. Amend Sec.  125.23 in paragraph (b)(1) by removing the figure 
``$6,500,000'' and adding in its place the figure ``$7,000,000''.

PART 126--HUBZONE PROGRAM

0
8. The authority citation for part 126 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 632(a), 632(j), 632(p), 644 and 657a; Pub. 
L. 111-240, 124 Stat. 2504.

[[Page 61673]]

Sec.  126.200  [Amended]

0
9. Amend Sec.  126.200 in paragraph (f) by removing the reference 
``Sec. Sec.  126.5'' and adding in its place the reference ``Sec. Sec.  
125.6''.


Sec.  126.612  [Amended]

0
10. Amend Sec.  126.612 in paragraph (b)(2) by removing the figure 
``4,000,000'' and adding in its place the figure ``$4,500,000''.


Sec.  126.700  [Amended]

0
11. Amend Sec.  126.700 in paragraph (b)(1) by removing the reference 
``Sec.  126.5'' and adding in its place the reference ``Sec.  125.6''.

PART 127--WOMEN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS FEDERAL CONTRACT PROGRAM

0
12. The authority citation for part 127 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 637(m), 644 and 657r.


Sec.  127.503  [Amended]

0
13. Amend Sec.  127.503 in paragraphs (c)(2) and (d)(2) by removing the 
figures ``$6,500,000'' and ``$4,000,000'' and adding in their place the 
figures ``$7,000,000'' and ``$4,500,000'', respectively.

Isabella Casillas Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-24348 Filed 11-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.