Response to Vacatur of Certain Provisions of the Mercury Inventory Reporting Rule, 61708-61712 [2021-24209]
Download as PDF
61708
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—REGULATIONS APPROVED STATEWIDE—Continued
[Not applicable in Indian reservations (excluding non-trust land within the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup Indian Reservation) and any other
area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction]
State
effective
date
State citation
Title/subject
173–423–120 .........
Recalls .....................................................
12/29/12
173–423–130 .........
Surveillance ..............................................
12/31/05
173–423–140 .........
Enforcement .............................................
12/31/05
173–423–150 .........
Severability ...............................................
12/31/05
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–24158 Filed 11–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 713
[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2017–0421; FRL–8523–02–
OCSPP]
RIN 2070–AK93
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is revising regulations
associated with persons who must
report data to the Agency’s mercury
inventory established under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA). Those
reporting requirements were set forth in
a final rule entitled ‘‘Reporting
Requirements for TSCA Mercury
Inventory: Mercury’’ (hereafter
‘‘mercury inventory reporting rule’’).
These revisions implement an order
issued by the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit (Second
Circuit), on June 5, 2020.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
December 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPPT–2017–0421, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket),
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC.
The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
21:56 Nov 05, 2021
11/8/21, [INSERT
CITATION].
11/8/21, [INSERT
CITATION].
11/8/21, [INSERT
CITATION].
11/8/21, [INSERT
CITATION].
Jkt 256001
FEDERAL REGISTER
FEDERAL REGISTER
FEDERAL REGISTER
*
*
the telephone number for the OPPT
Docket is (202) 566–0280.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
closed to visitors with limited
exceptions. The staff continues to
provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC
services and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
For technical information contact:
Thomas Groeneveld, Existing Chemicals
Resource Management Division, Office
of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; telephone number: (202)
566–1188; email address:
groeneveld.thomas@epa.gov.
For general information contact: The
TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422
South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY
14620; telephone number: (202) 554–
1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you import mercury-added
products. The following list of North
American Industrial Classification
System (NAICS) codes is not intended
to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether
this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include
the following:
• Gold ore mining (NAICS code
212221).
• Lead ore and zinc ore mining
(NAICS code 212231).
• All other metal ore mining (NAICS
code 212299).
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Explanations
FEDERAL REGISTER
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Response to Vacatur of Certain
Provisions of the Mercury Inventory
Reporting Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
EPA approval date
Sfmt 4700
*
*
• Asphalt shingle and coating
materials manufacturing (NAICS code
324122).
• Synthetic dye and pigment
manufacturing (NAICS code 325130).
• Other basic inorganic chemical
manufacturing (NAICS code 325180).
• All other basic organic chemical
manufacturing (NAICS code 325199).
• Plastics material and resin
manufacturing (NAICS code 325211).
• Pesticide and other agricultural
chemical manufacturing (NAICS code
325320).
• Medicinal and botanical
manufacturing (NAICS code 325411).
• Pharmaceutical preparation
manufacturing (NAICS code 325412).
• Biological product (except
diagnostic) manufacturing (NAICS code
325414).
• Paint and coating manufacturing
(NAICS code 325510).
• Adhesive manufacturing (NAICS
code 325520).
• Custom compounding of purchased
resins (NAICS code 325991).
• Photographic film, paper, plate, and
chemical manufacturing (NAICS code
325992).
• All other miscellaneous chemical
product and preparation manufacturing
(NAICS code 325998).
• Unlaminated plastics film and sheet
(except packaging) manufacturing
(NAICS code 326113).
• Unlaminated plastics profile shape
manufacturing (NAICS code 326121).
• Urethane and other foam product
(except polystyrene) manufacturing
(NAICS code 326150).
• All other plastics product
manufacturing (NAICS code 326199).
• Tire manufacturing (NAICS code
326211).
• All other rubber product
manufacturing (NAICS code 326299).
• Iron and steel mills and ferroalloy
manufacturing (NAICS code 331110).
• Rolled steel shape manufacturing
(NAICS code 331221).
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
• Alumina refining and primary
aluminum production (NAICS code
331313).
• Secondary smelting and alloying of
aluminum (NAICS code 331314).
• Nonferrous metal (except
aluminum) smelting and refining
(NAICS code 331410).
• Secondary smelting, refining, and
alloying of nonferrous metal (except
copper and aluminum) (NAICS code
331492).
• Iron foundries (NAICS code
331511).
• Steel foundries (except investment)
(NAICS code 331513).
• Fabricated structural metal
manufacturing (NAICS code 332312).
• Industrial valve manufacturing
(NAICS code 332911).
• Ammunition except small arms
manufacturing (NAICS code 332993).
• Small arms, ordnance, and
ordnance accessories manufacturing
(NAICS code 332994).
• All other miscellaneous fabricated
metal product manufacturing (NAICS
code 332999).
• Food product machinery
manufacturing (NAICS code 333294).
• Office machinery manufacturing
(NAICS code 333313).
• Other commercial and service
industry machinery manufacturing
(NAICS code 333319).
• Heating equipment (except warm
air furnaces) manufacturing (NAICS
code 333414).
• Air-conditioning and warm air
heating equipment and commercial and
industrial refrigeration equipment
manufacturing (NAICS code 333415).
• Pump and pumping equipment
manufacturing (NAICS code 333911).
• Bare printed circuit board
manufacturing (NAICS code 334412).
• Semiconductor and related device
manufacturing (NAICS code 334413).
• Other electronic component
manufacturing (NAICS code 334419).
• Electromedical and
electrotherapeutic apparatus
manufacturing (NAICS code 334510).
Search, detection, navigation, guidance,
aeronautical, and nautical system and
instrument manufacturing (NAICS code
334511).
• Automatic environmental control
manufacturing for residential,
commercial, and appliance use (NAICS
code 334512).
• Instruments and related products
manufacturing for measuring,
displaying, and controlling industrial
process variables (NAICS code 334513).
• Totalizing fluid meter and counting
device manufacturing (NAICS code
334514).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Nov 05, 2021
Jkt 256001
• Instrument manufacturing for
measuring and testing electricity and
electrical signals (NAICS code 334515).
• Analytical laboratory instrument
manufacturing (NAICS code 334516).
• Watch, clock, and part
manufacturing (NAICS code 334518).
• Other measuring and controlling
device manufacturing (NAICS code
334519).
• Electric lamp bulb and part
manufacturing (NAICS code 335110).
• Commercial, industrial, and
institutional electric lighting fixture
manufacturing (NAICS code 335122).
• Other lighting equipment
manufacturing (NAICS code 335129).
• Electric house wares and household
fan manufacturing (NAICS code
335211).
• Household vacuum cleaner
manufacturing (NAICS code 335212).
• Household cooking appliance
manufacturing (NAICS code 335221).
• Household refrigerator and home
freezer manufacturing (NAICS code
335222).
• Household laundry equipment
manufacturing (NAICS code 335224).
• Other major household appliance
manufacturing (NAICS code 335228).
• Switchgear and switchboard
apparatus manufacturing (NAICS code
335313).
• Relay and industrial control
manufacturing (NAICS code 335314).
• Primary battery manufacturing
(NAICS code 335912).
• Current-carrying wiring device
manufacturing (NAICS code 335931).
• All other miscellaneous electrical
equipment and component
manufacturing (NAICS code 335999).
• Automobile manufacturing (NAICS
code 336111).
• Light truck and utility vehicle
manufacturing (NAICS code 336112).
• Heavy duty truck manufacturing
(NAICS code 336120).
• Motor home manufacturing (NAICS
code 336213).
• Travel trailer and camper
manufacturing (NAICS code 336214).
• Other aircraft parts and auxiliary
equipment manufacturing (NAICS code
336413).
• Boat building (NAICS code 336612).
• Motorcycles and parts
manufacturing (NAICS code 336991).
• Surgical and medical instrument
manufacturing (NAICS code 339112).
• Costume jewelry and novelty
manufacturing (NAICS code 339914).
• Game, toy, and children’s vehicle
manufacturing (NAICS code 339932).
• Sign manufacturing (NAICS code
339950).
• Other chemical and allied products
merchant wholesalers (NAICS code
424690).
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61709
• Research and development in the
physical, engineering, and life sciences
(except biotechnology) (NAICS code
541712).
• Hazardous waste treatment and
disposal (NAICS code 562211).
• Other nonhazardous waste
treatment and disposal (NAICS code
562219).
• Materials recovery facilities (NAICS
code 562920).
• National security (NAICS code
928110).
B. What action is the Agency taking?
In June 2018, EPA finalized a rule to
require reporting from persons who
manufacture (including import) mercury
or mercury-added products, or
otherwise intentionally use mercury in
a manufacturing process (Ref. 1). That
rule was challenged in the Second
Circuit by the Natural Resources
Defense Council and several state
attorneys general in July 2018. Oral
arguments were held on November 20,
2019, and the court issued its decision
on June 5, 2020. The petitioners argued
that three exemptions to the reporting
requirements violated the statutory
mandate within TSCA section 8(b)(10).
The Agency argued that the three
exemptions were lawful because EPA
determined certain reporting to be
duplicative or burdensome per existing
EPA or other mercury-related reporting
requirements. Duplicative or overly
burdensome reporting requirements are
prohibited under TSCA section 8(a)(5).
The Agency prevailed on two issues, but
the Second Circuit vacated the
exemption at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(2) for
persons who import pre-assembled
products that contain a mercury-added
component (Ref. 2). As a result, such
persons are now required to report
pursuant to 40 CFR 713.7(b). This rule
is effectuating the vacatur ordered by
the Second Circuit by making necessary
amendments to the corresponding text
in 40 CFR 713.7(b).
C. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
EPA is issuing this final rule pursuant
to TSCA section 8(b)(10)(D) (15 U.S.C.
2607(b)(10)(D)), which authorizes EPA
to require reporting in order to assist in
preparing the inventory of mercury
supply, use and trade in the United
States. In addition, section 553 of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when
an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may
issue a rule without providing notice
and an opportunity for public comment.
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
61710
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
EPA has determined that there is good
cause for revising these provisions
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment, because these revisions
simply undertake the ministerial task of
implementing the court order vacating
an exemption at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(2) and
making the necessary amendments to
corresponding text in 40 CFR 713.7(b).
As a matter of law, the order issued by
the Second Circuit on June 5, 2020
vacated the reporting exemption for
persons who manufacture (including
import) a mercury-added product where
that person is ‘‘engaged only in the
import of a product that contains a
component that is a mercury-added
product.’’ It is, therefore, unnecessary to
provide notice and an opportunity for
comment on this action, which merely
carries out the court’s order.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
D. Which regulations is EPA removing
and replacing?
EPA is effectuating the Second Circuit
vacatur of the exemption for persons
who manufacture (including import) a
mercury-added product where that
person is ‘‘engaged only in the import
of a product that contains a component
that is a mercury-added product.’’
Therefore, the current text at 40 CFR
713.7(b)(2) will be removed and
replaced (with appropriate textual and
numbering updates) with the text
currently found at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(3).
E. What are the estimated burdens
associated with the removed and
replaced regulations?
EPA has prepared an economic
analysis of the potential impacts
associated with this rulemaking (Ref. 3).
This economic analysis estimates and
evaluates the total costs and benefits for
additional reporters to the mercury
inventory reporting rule due to this
rulemaking (i.e., those that import
products that contain a component that
is a mercury-added product). EPA is
considering an estimate of 756 as the
number of sites potentially subject to
the amended rule, which, under the
revised requirements, is now applicable
to imports of products that contain a
component that is a mercury-added
product. EPA estimates that as many as
657 sites will submit reports due to the
revised requirements. This is the
incremental difference between the
number of actual reporters to the
mercury inventory reporting rule during
the 2019 submission period, and the
expected number of total reporters
based on the number of entities that
report to the Interstate Mercury
Education & Reduction Clearinghouse
(IMERC) or to EPA’s Chemical Data
Reporting (CDR) or Toxics Release
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Nov 05, 2021
Jkt 256001
Inventory (TRI). More details on the
methodology used can be found in the
Agency’s economic analysis (Ref. 3).
The chief benefit of the final rule is
the collection of detailed data on
mercury, which will serve as a basis to
recommend actions to further reduce
mercury use in the United States, as
required at TSCA section 8(b)(10)(C).
Another benefit is the use of
information collected under the final
rule to help the United States
implement its obligations under the
Minamata Convention, a multilateral
environmental agreement that addresses
specific human activities that are
contributing to widespread mercury
pollution. While there are no quantified
benefits for the final rule, the statutory
mandates at TSCA sections 8(b)(10)(C)
and (D) (15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(C) and
(D)), specifically call for and authorizes
a rule to support an inventory of
mercury supply, use, and trade in the
United States, to identify any
manufacturing processes or products
that intentionally add mercury, and to
recommend actions to achieve further
reductions in mercury use. As described
in the Agency’s economic analysis,
unquantified benefits include providing
increased information on mercury and
assisting in the reduction of mercury
use (Ref. 3). To the extent that the
information gathered through this rule
is used to reduce mercury use, benefits
to society will result from a reduction in
exposure.
• Benefits: The final rule will provide
information on mercury and mercuryadded products to which the Agency
(and the public) does not currently have
access. To the extent that the
information gathered through this final
rule is used to reduce mercury use,
benefits to society will result from a
reduction in risk.
• Costs: Total reporter (industry)
costs the first year were estimated in
2020$ at $5.1 million, and $3.6 million
in subsequent reporting years.
Annualized over 10 years, the reporter
costs are $1.5 million at both 3% and
7% discount rates. Agency costs are
$729 per report per year, for an
annualized cost of $177,000 and
$181,000 at 3% and 7% discount rates,
respectively. Therefore, the total
annualized costs are expected to be
approximately $1.7 million at both 3%
and 7% discount rates. The total burden
of the rule is expected to be
approximately 212,000 hours over the
10-year analysis period. These estimates
include compliance determination, rule
familiarization, CBI substantiation,
electronic reporting, and recordkeeping,
in addition to completing reporting
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Small Entity Impacts: The final rule
will impact 203 companies that meet
the U.S. Small Business Administration
(SBA) definitions for their respective
NAICS classifications. Among the total
657 sites regulated under the rule, EPA
found that the costs of the rule exceed
3 percent of the value of sales for 2
small businesses, and an additional 3
small businesses may incur costs at
between 1 and 3 percent of the value of
sales. EPA is unable to determine
whether these 5 small businesses
actually import products that contain a
component that is a mercury-added
product.
• Environmental Justice and
Protection of Children: The Agency
believes that the information collected
under this rule, if finalized, will assist
EPA and others in determining the
potential hazards and risks associated
with elemental mercury and mercury
compounds. Although not directly
impacting environmental justice-related
concerns, this information will enable
the Agency to better protect human
health and the environment, including
in low-income and minority
communities. The rule is directed at all
mercury-added products that are
manufactured or imported into the
United States. All consumers of these
chemicals and the products made from
them and all workers who come into
contact with these chemicals could
benefit if data regarding the chemicals’
health and environmental effects were
developed. Therefore, it does not appear
that the costs and the benefits of the rule
will be disproportionately distributed
across different geographic regions or
among different categories of
individuals.
• Effects on State, Local, and Tribal
Governments: Government entities are
not expected to be subject to the rule’s
requirements, which apply to entities
that manufacture (including import)
mercury or mercury-added products, or
otherwise intentionally use mercury in
a manufacturing process. The final rule
does not have a significant
intergovernmental mandate, significant
or unique effect on small governments,
or have Federalism implications.
II. References
The following is a listing of the
documents that are specifically
referenced in this document. The docket
includes these documents and other
information considered by EPA,
including documents that are referenced
within the documents that are included
in the docket, even if the referenced
document is not physically located in
the docket. For assistance in locating
these other documents, please consult
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
the technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
1. EPA. ‘‘Reporting Requirements for TSCA
Mercury Inventory: Mercury;’’ Final
Rule. Federal Register (83 FR 30054,
June 27, 2018) (FRL–9979–74).
2. United States Court of Appeals for the
Second Circuit. Natural Resources
Defense Council, Inc. and State of
Vermont v. United States Environmental
Protection Agency, 961 F.3d 160 (2d. Cir.
2020).
3. EPA. ‘‘Economic Analysis for the Final
Rule on Revisions to the Reporting
Requirements for the TSCA Mercury
Inventory.’’
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The revised information collection
activities in this rule have been
submitted for approval to OMB under
the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., as part
of a request to renew the existing
approval under OMB Control No. 2070–
0207. The renewal Information
Collection Request (ICR) document that
EPA prepared has been assigned EPA
ICR No. 2567.04. You can find a copy
of the ICR in the docket for this rule,
and it is briefly summarized here. The
revised information collection
requirements are not enforceable until
OMB approves them.
The ICR renewal request explains the
necessary adjustments related to the
Second Circuit vacatur. Applying the
reporting requirements identified in the
2018 final rule to persons who
manufacture (including import) a
mercury-added product will provide
EPA with more complete information
necessary to prepare and periodically
update an inventory of mercury supply,
use, and trade in the United States, as
required by TSCA section 8(b)(10)(D).
These reporting requirements will help
the Agency to prepare subsequent,
triennial publications of the inventory,
as well as to carry out the requirement
of TSCA section 8(b)(10)(C) to identify
any manufacturing processes or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Nov 05, 2021
Jkt 256001
products that intentionally add mercury
and recommend actions, including
proposed revisions of Federal law or
regulations, to achieve further
reductions in mercury use. EPA intends
to use information collected under the
rule to assist in efforts to reduce the use
of mercury in products and processes
and to facilitate reporting on
implementation of the Minamata
Convention by the United States.
Respondents may claim some of the
information reported to EPA under the
final rule as CBI under TSCA section 14.
TSCA section 14(c) requires a
supporting statement and certification
for confidentiality claims asserted after
June 22, 2016.
Respondents/affected entities:
Manufacturers, importers, and
processors of mercury and mercuryadded products.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(D)).
Estimated number of respondents:
756.
Frequency of response: Triennially.
Total estimated annual burden:
17,348 hours (averaged over 3 years).
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Total estimated annual cost:
$1,384,999 (averaged over 3 years),
includes $0 annualized capital or
operation and maintenance costs.
Change in burden estimates: Based on
the numbers of reporters of mercury
data to the IMERC Mercury-added
Products Database, as well as EPA’s TRI
program and CDR rule, there will be a
change in manufacturers (including
importers) or processors that could
respond to this information collection.
The annual public burden for this
collection of information is estimated
about 23 hours per respondent. This
request represents a decrease of 9 hours
per respondent from that currently in
the OMB inventory, or a total decrease
of 20,522 hours (from 72,567 to 52,045
hours). This change reflects a decrease
in rule familiarization burden, a
decrease in form completion burden due
to mercury export prohibitions, and
changes in the number of estimated
respondents.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for the EPA regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. When
OMB approves the renewal ICR, the
Agency will announce that approval in
the Federal Register and publish a
technical amendment to 40 CFR part 9
to display the OMB control number for
the approved information collection
activities contained in this final rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61711
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This action is not subject to the RFA,
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The RFA applies
only to rules subject to notice and
comment rulemaking requirements
under the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any
other statute. This rule is not subject to
notice and comment requirements
because the Agency has invoked the
APA ‘‘good cause’’ exemption under 5
U.S.C. 553(b).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C.
1531 through 1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. As such, the requirements
of sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 of
UMRA do not apply to this action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). It will not have substantial direct
effects on the states, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the states, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). It will not have any effect on
tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
the Indian tribes, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities between
the Federal government and Indian
tribes, as specified in the Order. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern environmental
health or safety risks that EPA has
reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
61712
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 213 / Monday, November 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This final rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) because it is not expected
to affect energy supply, distribution, or
use and has not otherwise been
designated by the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs as a significant energy action.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve any
technical standards. Therefore, section
12(d) of NTTAA, 15 U.S.C. 272 note,
does not apply to this action.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994) because it does not establish an
environmental health or safety standard.
This action establishes an information
requirement and does not affect the
level of protection provided to human
health or the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA will submit
a rule report to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. This action is not
a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 713
Environmental protection, Exports,
Imports, Manufacturing, Mercury, Trade
practices.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth in
the preamble, 40 CFR Chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 713—REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TSCA
INVENTORY OF MERCURY SUPPLY,
USE, AND TRADE
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(D).
2. In § 713.7, paragraph (b) is revised
to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 713.7
Persons who must report.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Any person who manufactures
(including imports) a mercury-added
product, except:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Nov 05, 2021
Jkt 256001
[FR Doc. 2021–24209 Filed 11–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 223
[Docket No. 211029–0220]
RIN 0648–BK98
Temporary Rule Authorizing Limited
Tow Times in Lieu of Turtle Excluder
Devices by Shrimp Trawlers in Specific
Louisiana Waters
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Temporary rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues this temporary
rule for a period of 30 days, to allow
shrimp fishers to use limited tow times
as an alternative to Turtle Excluder
Devices (TEDs) in specific Louisiana
state waters (from 91° 23′ West
longitude eastward to the Louisiana/
Mississippi border, and seaward out 3
nautical miles (5.6 kilometers)). This
action is necessary because
environmental conditions resulting from
Hurricane Ida are preventing fishers
from using TEDs effectively.
DATES: Effective from November 5, 2021
through December 6, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Barnette, 727–551–5794.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
1. The authority citation for part 713
continues to read as follows:
■
■
(1) A person who does not
manufacture (including import) a
mercury-added product with the
purpose of obtaining an immediate or
eventual commercial advantage; or
(2) A person engaged only in the
manufacture (other than import) of a
product that contains a component that
is a mercury-added product who did not
first manufacture (including import) the
component that is a mercury-added
product; and
*
*
*
*
*
All sea turtles that occur in U.S.
waters are listed as either endangered or
threatened under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (ESA). The Kemp’s
ridley (Lepidochelys kempii),
leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea), and
hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata)
turtles are listed as endangered. The
loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and green
(Chelonia mydas) turtles are listed as
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
threatened, except for breeding
populations of green turtles in Florida
and on the Pacific coast of Mexico,
which are listed as endangered.
Sea turtles are incidentally taken, and
some are killed, as a result of numerous
activities, including fishery-related
trawling activities in the Gulf of Mexico
and along the Atlantic seaboard. Under
the ESA and its implementing
regulations, the taking of sea turtles is
prohibited, with exceptions identified
in 50 CFR 223.206(d), or according to
the terms and conditions of a biological
opinion issued under section 7 of the
ESA, or according to an incidental take
permit issued under section 10 of the
ESA. The incidental taking of turtles
during shrimp or summer flounder
trawling is exempted from the taking
prohibition of section 9 of the ESA, if
the conservation measures specified in
the sea turtle conservation regulations
(50 CFR part 223) are followed. The
regulations require most shrimp
trawlers and summer flounder trawlers
operating in the southeastern United
States (Atlantic area, Gulf area, and
summer flounder sea turtle protection
area, see 50 CFR 223.206) to have a
NMFS-approved TED installed in each
net that is rigged for fishing to allow sea
turtles to escape. TEDs currently
approved by NMFS include single-grid
hard TEDs and hooped hard TEDs
conforming to a generic description, the
flounder TED, and one type of soft
TED—the Parker soft TED (see 50 CFR
223.207).
TEDs incorporate an escape opening,
usually covered by a webbing flap,
which allows sea turtles to escape from
trawl nets. To be approved by NMFS, a
TED design must be shown to be 97
percent effective in excluding sea turtles
during testing based upon specific
testing protocols (50 CFR 223.207(e)(1)).
Approved hard TEDs are described in
the regulations (50 CFR 223.207(a))
according to generic criteria based upon
certain parameters of TED design,
configuration, and installation,
including height and width dimensions
of the TED opening through which the
turtles escape.
The regulations governing sea turtle
take prohibitions and exemptions
provide for the use of limited tow times
as an alternative to the use of TEDs for
vessels with certain specified
characteristics or under certain special
circumstances. The provisions of 50
CFR 223.206(d)(3)(ii) specify that the
NOAA Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries (AA) may authorize
compliance with tow time restrictions
as an alternative to the TED requirement
if the AA determines that the presence
of algae, seaweed, debris, or other
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 213 (Monday, November 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61708-61712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24209]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 713
[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0421; FRL-8523-02-OCSPP]
RIN 2070-AK93
Response to Vacatur of Certain Provisions of the Mercury
Inventory Reporting Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is revising
regulations associated with persons who must report data to the
Agency's mercury inventory established under the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA). Those reporting requirements were set forth in a
final rule entitled ``Reporting Requirements for TSCA Mercury
Inventory: Mercury'' (hereafter ``mercury inventory reporting rule'').
These revisions implement an order issued by the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit (Second Circuit), on June 5, 2020.
DATES: This final rule is effective on December 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2017-0421, is available at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the
OPPT Docket is (202) 566-0280.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For technical information contact: Thomas Groeneveld, Existing
Chemicals Resource Management Division, Office of Pollution Prevention
and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 566-1188; email
address: [email protected].
For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you import
mercury-added products. The following list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive,
but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this
document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include the
following:
Gold ore mining (NAICS code 212221).
Lead ore and zinc ore mining (NAICS code 212231).
All other metal ore mining (NAICS code 212299).
Asphalt shingle and coating materials manufacturing (NAICS
code 324122).
Synthetic dye and pigment manufacturing (NAICS code
325130).
Other basic inorganic chemical manufacturing (NAICS code
325180).
All other basic organic chemical manufacturing (NAICS code
325199).
Plastics material and resin manufacturing (NAICS code
325211).
Pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing
(NAICS code 325320).
Medicinal and botanical manufacturing (NAICS code 325411).
Pharmaceutical preparation manufacturing (NAICS code
325412).
Biological product (except diagnostic) manufacturing
(NAICS code 325414).
Paint and coating manufacturing (NAICS code 325510).
Adhesive manufacturing (NAICS code 325520).
Custom compounding of purchased resins (NAICS code
325991).
Photographic film, paper, plate, and chemical
manufacturing (NAICS code 325992).
All other miscellaneous chemical product and preparation
manufacturing (NAICS code 325998).
Unlaminated plastics film and sheet (except packaging)
manufacturing (NAICS code 326113).
Unlaminated plastics profile shape manufacturing (NAICS
code 326121).
Urethane and other foam product (except polystyrene)
manufacturing (NAICS code 326150).
All other plastics product manufacturing (NAICS code
326199).
Tire manufacturing (NAICS code 326211).
All other rubber product manufacturing (NAICS code
326299).
Iron and steel mills and ferroalloy manufacturing (NAICS
code 331110).
Rolled steel shape manufacturing (NAICS code 331221).
[[Page 61709]]
Alumina refining and primary aluminum production (NAICS
code 331313).
Secondary smelting and alloying of aluminum (NAICS code
331314).
Nonferrous metal (except aluminum) smelting and refining
(NAICS code 331410).
Secondary smelting, refining, and alloying of nonferrous
metal (except copper and aluminum) (NAICS code 331492).
Iron foundries (NAICS code 331511).
Steel foundries (except investment) (NAICS code 331513).
Fabricated structural metal manufacturing (NAICS code
332312).
Industrial valve manufacturing (NAICS code 332911).
Ammunition except small arms manufacturing (NAICS code
332993).
Small arms, ordnance, and ordnance accessories
manufacturing (NAICS code 332994).
All other miscellaneous fabricated metal product
manufacturing (NAICS code 332999).
Food product machinery manufacturing (NAICS code 333294).
Office machinery manufacturing (NAICS code 333313).
Other commercial and service industry machinery
manufacturing (NAICS code 333319).
Heating equipment (except warm air furnaces) manufacturing
(NAICS code 333414).
Air-conditioning and warm air heating equipment and
commercial and industrial refrigeration equipment manufacturing (NAICS
code 333415).
Pump and pumping equipment manufacturing (NAICS code
333911).
Bare printed circuit board manufacturing (NAICS code
334412).
Semiconductor and related device manufacturing (NAICS code
334413).
Other electronic component manufacturing (NAICS code
334419).
Electromedical and electrotherapeutic apparatus
manufacturing (NAICS code 334510). Search, detection, navigation,
guidance, aeronautical, and nautical system and instrument
manufacturing (NAICS code 334511).
Automatic environmental control manufacturing for
residential, commercial, and appliance use (NAICS code 334512).
Instruments and related products manufacturing for
measuring, displaying, and controlling industrial process variables
(NAICS code 334513).
Totalizing fluid meter and counting device manufacturing
(NAICS code 334514).
Instrument manufacturing for measuring and testing
electricity and electrical signals (NAICS code 334515).
Analytical laboratory instrument manufacturing (NAICS code
334516).
Watch, clock, and part manufacturing (NAICS code 334518).
Other measuring and controlling device manufacturing
(NAICS code 334519).
Electric lamp bulb and part manufacturing (NAICS code
335110).
Commercial, industrial, and institutional electric
lighting fixture manufacturing (NAICS code 335122).
Other lighting equipment manufacturing (NAICS code
335129).
Electric house wares and household fan manufacturing
(NAICS code 335211).
Household vacuum cleaner manufacturing (NAICS code
335212).
Household cooking appliance manufacturing (NAICS code
335221).
Household refrigerator and home freezer manufacturing
(NAICS code 335222).
Household laundry equipment manufacturing (NAICS code
335224).
Other major household appliance manufacturing (NAICS code
335228).
Switchgear and switchboard apparatus manufacturing (NAICS
code 335313).
Relay and industrial control manufacturing (NAICS code
335314).
Primary battery manufacturing (NAICS code 335912).
Current-carrying wiring device manufacturing (NAICS code
335931).
All other miscellaneous electrical equipment and component
manufacturing (NAICS code 335999).
Automobile manufacturing (NAICS code 336111).
Light truck and utility vehicle manufacturing (NAICS code
336112).
Heavy duty truck manufacturing (NAICS code 336120).
Motor home manufacturing (NAICS code 336213).
Travel trailer and camper manufacturing (NAICS code
336214).
Other aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing
(NAICS code 336413).
Boat building (NAICS code 336612).
Motorcycles and parts manufacturing (NAICS code 336991).
Surgical and medical instrument manufacturing (NAICS code
339112).
Costume jewelry and novelty manufacturing (NAICS code
339914).
Game, toy, and children's vehicle manufacturing (NAICS
code 339932).
Sign manufacturing (NAICS code 339950).
Other chemical and allied products merchant wholesalers
(NAICS code 424690).
Research and development in the physical, engineering, and
life sciences (except biotechnology) (NAICS code 541712).
Hazardous waste treatment and disposal (NAICS code
562211).
Other nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal (NAICS
code 562219).
Materials recovery facilities (NAICS code 562920).
National security (NAICS code 928110).
B. What action is the Agency taking?
In June 2018, EPA finalized a rule to require reporting from
persons who manufacture (including import) mercury or mercury-added
products, or otherwise intentionally use mercury in a manufacturing
process (Ref. 1). That rule was challenged in the Second Circuit by the
Natural Resources Defense Council and several state attorneys general
in July 2018. Oral arguments were held on November 20, 2019, and the
court issued its decision on June 5, 2020. The petitioners argued that
three exemptions to the reporting requirements violated the statutory
mandate within TSCA section 8(b)(10). The Agency argued that the three
exemptions were lawful because EPA determined certain reporting to be
duplicative or burdensome per existing EPA or other mercury-related
reporting requirements. Duplicative or overly burdensome reporting
requirements are prohibited under TSCA section 8(a)(5). The Agency
prevailed on two issues, but the Second Circuit vacated the exemption
at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(2) for persons who import pre-assembled products
that contain a mercury-added component (Ref. 2). As a result, such
persons are now required to report pursuant to 40 CFR 713.7(b). This
rule is effectuating the vacatur ordered by the Second Circuit by
making necessary amendments to the corresponding text in 40 CFR
713.7(b).
C. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
EPA is issuing this final rule pursuant to TSCA section 8(b)(10)(D)
(15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(D)), which authorizes EPA to require reporting
in order to assist in preparing the inventory of mercury supply, use
and trade in the United States. In addition, section 553 of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B), provides
that, when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public
procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment.
[[Page 61710]]
EPA has determined that there is good cause for revising these
provisions without prior proposal and opportunity for comment, because
these revisions simply undertake the ministerial task of implementing
the court order vacating an exemption at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(2) and making
the necessary amendments to corresponding text in 40 CFR 713.7(b). As a
matter of law, the order issued by the Second Circuit on June 5, 2020
vacated the reporting exemption for persons who manufacture (including
import) a mercury-added product where that person is ``engaged only in
the import of a product that contains a component that is a mercury-
added product.'' It is, therefore, unnecessary to provide notice and an
opportunity for comment on this action, which merely carries out the
court's order.
D. Which regulations is EPA removing and replacing?
EPA is effectuating the Second Circuit vacatur of the exemption for
persons who manufacture (including import) a mercury-added product
where that person is ``engaged only in the import of a product that
contains a component that is a mercury-added product.'' Therefore, the
current text at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(2) will be removed and replaced (with
appropriate textual and numbering updates) with the text currently
found at 40 CFR 713.7(b)(3).
E. What are the estimated burdens associated with the removed and
replaced regulations?
EPA has prepared an economic analysis of the potential impacts
associated with this rulemaking (Ref. 3). This economic analysis
estimates and evaluates the total costs and benefits for additional
reporters to the mercury inventory reporting rule due to this
rulemaking (i.e., those that import products that contain a component
that is a mercury-added product). EPA is considering an estimate of 756
as the number of sites potentially subject to the amended rule, which,
under the revised requirements, is now applicable to imports of
products that contain a component that is a mercury-added product. EPA
estimates that as many as 657 sites will submit reports due to the
revised requirements. This is the incremental difference between the
number of actual reporters to the mercury inventory reporting rule
during the 2019 submission period, and the expected number of total
reporters based on the number of entities that report to the Interstate
Mercury Education & Reduction Clearinghouse (IMERC) or to EPA's
Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) or Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). More
details on the methodology used can be found in the Agency's economic
analysis (Ref. 3).
The chief benefit of the final rule is the collection of detailed
data on mercury, which will serve as a basis to recommend actions to
further reduce mercury use in the United States, as required at TSCA
section 8(b)(10)(C). Another benefit is the use of information
collected under the final rule to help the United States implement its
obligations under the Minamata Convention, a multilateral environmental
agreement that addresses specific human activities that are
contributing to widespread mercury pollution. While there are no
quantified benefits for the final rule, the statutory mandates at TSCA
sections 8(b)(10)(C) and (D) (15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(C) and (D)),
specifically call for and authorizes a rule to support an inventory of
mercury supply, use, and trade in the United States, to identify any
manufacturing processes or products that intentionally add mercury, and
to recommend actions to achieve further reductions in mercury use. As
described in the Agency's economic analysis, unquantified benefits
include providing increased information on mercury and assisting in the
reduction of mercury use (Ref. 3). To the extent that the information
gathered through this rule is used to reduce mercury use, benefits to
society will result from a reduction in exposure.
Benefits: The final rule will provide information on
mercury and mercury-added products to which the Agency (and the public)
does not currently have access. To the extent that the information
gathered through this final rule is used to reduce mercury use,
benefits to society will result from a reduction in risk.
Costs: Total reporter (industry) costs the first year were
estimated in 2020$ at $5.1 million, and $3.6 million in subsequent
reporting years. Annualized over 10 years, the reporter costs are $1.5
million at both 3% and 7% discount rates. Agency costs are $729 per
report per year, for an annualized cost of $177,000 and $181,000 at 3%
and 7% discount rates, respectively. Therefore, the total annualized
costs are expected to be approximately $1.7 million at both 3% and 7%
discount rates. The total burden of the rule is expected to be
approximately 212,000 hours over the 10-year analysis period. These
estimates include compliance determination, rule familiarization, CBI
substantiation, electronic reporting, and recordkeeping, in addition to
completing reporting requirements.
Small Entity Impacts: The final rule will impact 203
companies that meet the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA)
definitions for their respective NAICS classifications. Among the total
657 sites regulated under the rule, EPA found that the costs of the
rule exceed 3 percent of the value of sales for 2 small businesses, and
an additional 3 small businesses may incur costs at between 1 and 3
percent of the value of sales. EPA is unable to determine whether these
5 small businesses actually import products that contain a component
that is a mercury-added product.
Environmental Justice and Protection of Children: The
Agency believes that the information collected under this rule, if
finalized, will assist EPA and others in determining the potential
hazards and risks associated with elemental mercury and mercury
compounds. Although not directly impacting environmental justice-
related concerns, this information will enable the Agency to better
protect human health and the environment, including in low-income and
minority communities. The rule is directed at all mercury-added
products that are manufactured or imported into the United States. All
consumers of these chemicals and the products made from them and all
workers who come into contact with these chemicals could benefit if
data regarding the chemicals' health and environmental effects were
developed. Therefore, it does not appear that the costs and the
benefits of the rule will be disproportionately distributed across
different geographic regions or among different categories of
individuals.
Effects on State, Local, and Tribal Governments:
Government entities are not expected to be subject to the rule's
requirements, which apply to entities that manufacture (including
import) mercury or mercury-added products, or otherwise intentionally
use mercury in a manufacturing process. The final rule does not have a
significant intergovernmental mandate, significant or unique effect on
small governments, or have Federalism implications.
II. References
The following is a listing of the documents that are specifically
referenced in this document. The docket includes these documents and
other information considered by EPA, including documents that are
referenced within the documents that are included in the docket, even
if the referenced document is not physically located in the docket. For
assistance in locating these other documents, please consult
[[Page 61711]]
the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
1. EPA. ``Reporting Requirements for TSCA Mercury Inventory:
Mercury;'' Final Rule. Federal Register (83 FR 30054, June 27, 2018)
(FRL-9979-74).
2. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Natural
Resources Defense Council, Inc. and State of Vermont v. United
States Environmental Protection Agency, 961 F.3d 160 (2d. Cir.
2020).
3. EPA. ``Economic Analysis for the Final Rule on Revisions to the
Reporting Requirements for the TSCA Mercury Inventory.''
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
The revised information collection activities in this rule have
been submitted for approval to OMB under the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., as part of a request to renew the existing approval under OMB
Control No. 2070-0207. The renewal Information Collection Request (ICR)
document that EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR No. 2567.04. You
can find a copy of the ICR in the docket for this rule, and it is
briefly summarized here. The revised information collection
requirements are not enforceable until OMB approves them.
The ICR renewal request explains the necessary adjustments related
to the Second Circuit vacatur. Applying the reporting requirements
identified in the 2018 final rule to persons who manufacture (including
import) a mercury-added product will provide EPA with more complete
information necessary to prepare and periodically update an inventory
of mercury supply, use, and trade in the United States, as required by
TSCA section 8(b)(10)(D). These reporting requirements will help the
Agency to prepare subsequent, triennial publications of the inventory,
as well as to carry out the requirement of TSCA section 8(b)(10)(C) to
identify any manufacturing processes or products that intentionally add
mercury and recommend actions, including proposed revisions of Federal
law or regulations, to achieve further reductions in mercury use. EPA
intends to use information collected under the rule to assist in
efforts to reduce the use of mercury in products and processes and to
facilitate reporting on implementation of the Minamata Convention by
the United States. Respondents may claim some of the information
reported to EPA under the final rule as CBI under TSCA section 14. TSCA
section 14(c) requires a supporting statement and certification for
confidentiality claims asserted after June 22, 2016.
Respondents/affected entities: Manufacturers, importers, and
processors of mercury and mercury-added products.
Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (15 U.S.C.
2607(b)(10)(D)).
Estimated number of respondents: 756.
Frequency of response: Triennially.
Total estimated annual burden: 17,348 hours (averaged over 3
years). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Total estimated annual cost: $1,384,999 (averaged over 3 years),
includes $0 annualized capital or operation and maintenance costs.
Change in burden estimates: Based on the numbers of reporters of
mercury data to the IMERC Mercury-added Products Database, as well as
EPA's TRI program and CDR rule, there will be a change in manufacturers
(including importers) or processors that could respond to this
information collection. The annual public burden for this collection of
information is estimated about 23 hours per respondent. This request
represents a decrease of 9 hours per respondent from that currently in
the OMB inventory, or a total decrease of 20,522 hours (from 72,567 to
52,045 hours). This change reflects a decrease in rule familiarization
burden, a decrease in form completion burden due to mercury export
prohibitions, and changes in the number of estimated respondents.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the EPA
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. When OMB approves
the renewal ICR, the Agency will announce that approval in the Federal
Register and publish a technical amendment to 40 CFR part 9 to display
the OMB control number for the approved information collection
activities contained in this final rule.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This action is not subject to the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. The RFA
applies only to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. This
rule is not subject to notice and comment requirements because the
Agency has invoked the APA ``good cause'' exemption under 5 U.S.C.
553(b).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531 through 1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. As such, the
requirements of sections 202, 203, 204, or 205 of UMRA do not apply to
this action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). It will not have
any effect on tribal governments, on the relationship between the
Federal government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian
tribes, as specified in the Order. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental
health or safety risks that EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered
regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not
concern an environmental health risk or safety risk.
[[Page 61712]]
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not expected to affect energy
supply, distribution, or use and has not otherwise been designated by
the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
as a significant energy action.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This action does not involve any technical standards. Therefore,
section 12(d) of NTTAA, 15 U.S.C. 272 note, does not apply to this
action.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
This action is not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an environmental
health or safety standard. This action establishes an information
requirement and does not affect the level of protection provided to
human health or the environment.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., and EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a major
rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 713
Environmental protection, Exports, Imports, Manufacturing, Mercury,
Trade practices.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR
Chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 713--REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TSCA INVENTORY OF MERCURY
SUPPLY, USE, AND TRADE
0
1. The authority citation for part 713 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2607(b)(10)(D).
0
2. In Sec. 713.7, paragraph (b) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 713.7 Persons who must report.
* * * * *
(b) Any person who manufactures (including imports) a mercury-added
product, except:
(1) A person who does not manufacture (including import) a mercury-
added product with the purpose of obtaining an immediate or eventual
commercial advantage; or
(2) A person engaged only in the manufacture (other than import) of
a product that contains a component that is a mercury-added product who
did not first manufacture (including import) the component that is a
mercury-added product; and
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-24209 Filed 11-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P