Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; SEVENFACT, 60827-60829 [2021-24065]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 211 / Thursday, November 4, 2021 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
in that instance noted its intention to
refrain from enforcement actions in the
area.2 But today’s initiative marks the
third time in as many months new
agency leadership has issued expansive
policy directives while related
rulemakings proceed.3 Publishing
guidance during the pendency of a
related rulemaking short-circuits the
receipt of public input and conveys
disdain for our stakeholders. I believe
this practice does not constitute good
government, so I dissent.
The FTC currently enforces several
statutes that address negative option
marketing,4 including the Restore
Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act,5 the
Telemarketing Sales Rule,6 the Use of
Prenotification Negative Plans Rule,7
the Postal Reorganization Act (also
known as the Unordered Merchandise
Rule),8 and the Electronic Funds
Transfer Act.9 In addition, the FTC has
brought numerous cases challenging
negative option practices not covered by
these statutes using Section 5 of the FTC
Act.10 Thus, there is a significant body
of law in the form of FTC consents and
litigated cases involving negative option
practices.
In 2019, the Commission published a
Federal Register Notice seeking
comment on whether the Commission
should expand its Prenotification
Negative Option Rule to cover all types
of negative option marketing, noting
2 See Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding
Certain Imported Textile, Wool, and Fur Products
(Jan. 3, 2013), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/
press-releases/2013/01/ftc-announces-enforcementpolicy-statementretailersdirectly; see also 76 FR
68690 (Nov. 7, 2001); Press Release, FTC Seeks
Public Input in Review of Textile Labeling Rules
(Nov. 1, 2011), https://wwwftc.gov/news-events/
press-releases/2011/11/ftc-seeks-publicinputreviewtextile-labeling-rules.
3 See Christine S. Wilson, FTC Comm’r,
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Christine S.
Wilson Regarding the Policy Statement on Breaches
by Health Apps and Other Connected Devices at 6
(Sept. 15, 2021), https://www.ftc.gov/publicstatements/2021/09/dissenting-statementcommissioner-christine-s-wilson-regardingpolicy
(describing issuance of Policy Statement on
Breaches by Health Apps and Other Connected
Devices during a related rulemaking; also
describing rescission of agency guidance on
treatment of debt in premerger notification context
during a rulemaking covering precisely that issue).
4 The Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding
Negative Option Marketing explains that while
negative options can take various forms, the central
feature is ‘‘each contains a term or condition under
which the seller may interpret a consumer’s silence
or failure to take affirmative action to reject a good
or service or to cancel the agreement as acceptance
or continuing acceptance of the offer.’’
5 15 U.S.C. 8401 through 8405.
6 16 CFR 310.
7 16 CFR 425.
8 39 U.S.C. 3009.
9 15 U.S.C. 1693 through 1693r.
10 See 84 FR 52393, 52395–96 (Oct. 2, 2019)
(ANPRM describing the cases the Commission has
brought under Section 5 of the FTC Act).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Nov 03, 2021
Jkt 256001
deceptive practices persist and the
current regulatory patchwork does not
provide a consistent framework for
businesses.11 We received 17 comments
from business groups, consumer groups,
and state attorneys general in response
to that request for comment,
representing a range of views and
containing substantive and insightful
information.
The Policy Statement acknowledges
the ongoing rulemaking and states the
Commission ‘‘will continue to closely
monitor compliance with the rules and
laws applicable to negative option
marketing, and is still considering
various options in the rule review
proceeding for the Negative Option
Rule.’’ A good government approach
would be to publish this proposed
guidance in the Federal Register with a
discussion of how it comports with or
differs from the comments we received
in the rulemaking and seek comment on
the proposed guidance.
Particularly given Chair Khan’s stated
goal of ‘‘democratizing’’ the FTC, one
could be forgiven for viewing this as the
best way in which to proceed.
Alternatively, we could assimilate the
feedback we received, close the
rulemaking, and then publish this
guidance. But the former approach is
preferable—having determined as a
unanimous Commission to embark on
this rulemaking, rendering it moot at
this early stage is akin to the elimination
of opportunities for public input that
the majority undertook in its changes to
the Rules of Practice.12
There is no question the Commission
has the authority to issue policy
statements explaining its interpretation
of the rules and laws it enforces.
Moreover, this practice is a beneficial
one: The FTC’s business guidance
facilitates transparency with respect to
agency priorities and policy preferences,
educates the business community, and
drives compliance with the law. Our
Division of Consumer and Business
Education has received numerous
awards for its publications, and I found
FTC guidance documents helpful for
client counseling purposes when I was
in private practice.13 Here, I agree this
11 84
FR 52393, 52394 (Oct. 2, 2019).
FR 38542 (July 22, 2021); see also Press
Release, FTC Votes to Update Rulemaking
Procedures, Sets Stage for Stronger Deterrence of
Corporate Misconduct (July 1, 2021), https://
www.ftc.gov/news-events/pressreleases/2021/07/ftcvotes-update-rulemaking-procedures-sets-stagestronger.
13 While in private practice, I also found
informative the business guidance provided by
expert FTC staff during speeches and panels.
Unfortunately, our staff has been prohibited from
delivering public remarks since Chair Khan’s arrival
in June.
12 86
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60827
Policy Statement provides information
that will be useful to businesses, and I
largely support the guidance contained
in the document. I believe, however, the
Commission should either provide this
guidance within the context of the open
rulemaking or close the rulemaking and
then issue the guidance.
For these reasons, I dissent.
[FR Doc. 2021–24094 Filed 11–3–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2020–E–2124]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; SEVENFACT
Food and Drug Administration,
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for SEVENFACT and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
patent which claims that human
biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by January 3, 2022.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
May 3, 2022. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before January 3,
2022. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
at the end of January 3, 2022. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier
(for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
60828
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 211 / Thursday, November 4, 2021 / Notices
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2020–E–2124 for ‘‘Determination of
Regulatory Review Period for Purposes
of Patent Extension; SEVENFACT.’’
Received comments, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will
be placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Nov 03, 2021
Jkt 256001
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with § 10.20 (21
CFR 10.20) and other applicable
disclosure law. For more information
about FDA’s posting of comments to
public dockets, see 80 FR 56469,
September 18, 2015, or access the
information at: https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug or biologic product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: a testing phase and
an approval phase. For human
biological products, the testing phase
begins when the exemption to permit
the clinical investigations of the
biological product becomes effective
and runs until the approval phase
begins. The approval phase starts with
the initial submission of an application
to market the human biological product
and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the biological
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of USPTO may award
(for example, half the testing phase must
be subtracted as well as any time that
may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human biological product will include
all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
human biologic product SEVENFACT
(coagulation factor VIIa (recombinant)jncw (eptacog beta)). SEVENFACT is
indicated for the treatment and control
of bleeding episodes occurring in adults
and adolescents (12 years of age and
older) with hemophilia A or B with
inhibitors. Subsequent to this approval,
the USPTO received a patent term
restoration application for SEVENFACT
(U.S. Patent No. 9,029,316) from
Laboratoire Francais du Fractionnement
et des Biotechnologies S.A. (LFB S.A.),
and the USPTO requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated January 4, 2021, FDA
advised the USPTO that this human
biological product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of SEVENFACT represented
the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product.
Thereafter, the USPTO requested that
FDA determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
SEVENFACT is 2,785 days. Of this time,
1,518 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 1,267 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i))
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 211 / Thursday, November 4, 2021 / Notices
became effective: August 18, 2012. The
applicant claims August 17, 2012, as the
date the investigational new drug
application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was August 18, 2012,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of
the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human biological product under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262): October 13, 2016. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that the
biologics license application (BLA) for
SEVENFACT (BLA 125641) was initially
submitted on October 13, 2016.
3. The date the application was
approved: April 1, 2020. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that BLA
125641 was approved on April 1, 2020.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 482 days of patent
term extension.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask
for a redetermination (see DATES).
Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21
CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period. To
meet its burden, the petition must
comply with all the requirements of
§ 60.30, including but not limited to:
Must be timely (see DATES), must be
filed in accordance with § 10.20, must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition
has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Nov 03, 2021
Jkt 256001
Dated: October 28, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–24065 Filed 11–3–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA–2020–E–1327 and FDA–
2020–E–1333]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ADAKVEO
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for ADAKVEO and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of applications to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
patent which claims that human
biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by January 3, 2022.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
May 3, 2022. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before January 3,
2022. The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
at the end of January 3, 2022. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier
(for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date.
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60829
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket Nos. FDA–
2020–E–1327 and FDA–2020–E–1333
for ‘‘Determination of Regulatory
Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ADAKVEO.’’ Received
comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
E:\FR\FM\04NON1.SGM
04NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 211 (Thursday, November 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60827-60829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24065]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2020-E-2124]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; SEVENFACT
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period for SEVENFACT and is publishing
this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that human
biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (see
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION) are incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a redetermination by January 3, 2022.
Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by May 3, 2022. See ``Petitions''
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before January 3, 2022. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of January 3, 2022. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions)
will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery
service
[[Page 60828]]
acceptance receipt is on or before that date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2020-E-2124 for ``Determination of Regulatory Review Period for
Purposes of Patent Extension; SEVENFACT.'' Received comments, those
filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-
402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with Sec. 10.20 (21 CFR 10.20) and
other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's
posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18,
2015, or access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug or biologic product, animal drug product, medical device,
food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by
FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's
regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of
extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: a
testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the biological product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human biological
product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the
biological product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review
period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the
Director of USPTO may award (for example, half the testing phase must
be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory
review period for a human biological product will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the human biologic product SEVENFACT
(coagulation factor VIIa (recombinant)-jncw (eptacog beta)). SEVENFACT
is indicated for the treatment and control of bleeding episodes
occurring in adults and adolescents (12 years of age and older) with
hemophilia A or B with inhibitors. Subsequent to this approval, the
USPTO received a patent term restoration application for SEVENFACT
(U.S. Patent No. 9,029,316) from Laboratoire Francais du Fractionnement
et des Biotechnologies S.A. (LFB S.A.), and the USPTO requested FDA's
assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated January 4, 2021, FDA advised the USPTO
that this human biological product had undergone a regulatory review
period and that the approval of SEVENFACT represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the
USPTO requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review
period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
SEVENFACT is 2,785 days. Of this time, 1,518 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,267 days
occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived
from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i))
[[Page 60829]]
became effective: August 18, 2012. The applicant claims August 17,
2012, as the date the investigational new drug application (IND) became
effective. However, FDA records indicate that the IND effective date
was August 18, 2012, which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): October 13, 2016. FDA has verified the
applicant's claim that the biologics license application (BLA) for
SEVENFACT (BLA 125641) was initially submitted on October 13, 2016.
3. The date the application was approved: April 1, 2020. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that BLA 125641 was approved on April 1,
2020.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 482 days of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and, under
21 CFR 60.24, ask for a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, as
specified in Sec. 60.30 (21 CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must comply with all the requirements
of Sec. 60.30, including but not limited to: Must be timely (see
DATES), must be filed in accordance with Sec. 10.20, must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42,
1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: October 28, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-24065 Filed 11-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P