Title VI Implementation, 60735-60737 [2021-23965]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 210 / Wednesday, November 3, 2021 / Notices
agency, will prepare a joint EIR/EIS on
a proposal for improvements along a
portion of I–101 known as ‘‘Last Chance
Grade’’ in Del Norte County, California.
Last Chance Grade is the 3.5-milelong section of I–101 (post mile [PM]
12.0 to 15.5) that runs between Wilson
Creek to about 9 miles south of Crescent
City. The Project area is almost entirely
within portions of Redwood National
and State Parks.
The Project would realign the
highway in response to landslide and
roadway failures which have caused
damage for decades. The purpose of the
project is to:
• Provide a more reliable connection
• Reduce maintenance costs
• Protect the economy, natural
resources, and cultural resources
A geologic study in 2000 conducted
for Caltrans by the California Geological
Survey mapped over 200 historical and
active landslides (both deep-seated and
shallow) within the corridor between
Wilson Creek and Crescent City. Over
the years, Caltrans has conducted a
considerable number of construction
projects and maintenance activities in
the Last Chance Grade area to keep the
roadway open. Since 1997, landslide
mitigation efforts, including retaining
walls, drainage improvements, and
roadway repairs have cost over $85
million. A long-term sustainable
solution at Last Chance Grade is needed
to address:
• Economic ramifications of a long-term
failure and closure
• Risk of delay/detour to traveling
public
• Increasing maintenance and
emergency project costs
• Increase in frequency and severity of
large storm events caused by climate
change
Over the past several years, Caltrans
has considered multiple alignment
alternatives with input from numerous
project partners in seeking a long-term
feasible and sustainable solution
suitable for the unique geologic and
natural features of the project area. As
a result of these past alternatives
screening processes, Caltrans has
elected to move forward with the
environmental review of two action
alternatives, Alternatives X and F.
Alternative X would involve
reengineering the existing roadway.
Within a portion of Alternative X, the
roadway would retreat inland (to the
east) by approximately 130 feet to
improve geotechnical stability and
longevity. Alternative X would involve
constructing a series of retaining walls
(single and terraced) to minimize the
potential for landslides on the roadway.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Nov 02, 2021
Jkt 256001
Depending on feasibility, drainage
improvements might also be included
for this alternative.
Alternative F would construct an
approximately 10,000-foot-long tunnel
that would diverge from the existing
roadway near PM 14.06 and reconnect
to US 101 near PM 15.5, thereby
avoiding the surface portion of existing
roadway most prone to landslides and
geologic instability.
The Draft EIR/EIS will also study a No
Project Alternative, which would entail
no new long-term feasible and
sustainable solution for Last Chance
Grade but would instead be a
continuation of ongoing maintenance
and repair activities needed to enable
ongoing roadway operations.
Letters describing the proposed action
and soliciting comments will be sent to
appropriate Federal, State, Participating
Agencies, Tribal governments, and local
agencies, and to private organizations
and citizens who have previously
expressed or are known to have interest
in this proposal. The Scoping period to
submit comments is from November 5,
2021 to December 6, 2021. A public
scoping meeting will be held virtually
from 6:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. PST on
November 18, 2021 from link at
lastchancegrade.com. Comments on the
NOI may be submitted by email:
ScopingComments@
lastchancegrade.com; or letter to 1656
Union Street, Eureka, CA 95501 with
Attention to Steve Croteau, Senior
Environmental Planner. In addition, a
public hearing will be held once the
Draft EIR/EIS is completed. Public
notice will be given with the time and
place of the meeting and hearing.
To ensure that the full range of issues
related to this proposed action are
addressed and all significant issues
identified, comments and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions concerning this
proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to Caltrans at the address
provided above.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Issued on: October 28, 2021.
Rodney Whitfield,
Director, Financial Services, Federal Highway
Administration, California Division.
[FR Doc. 2021–23910 Filed 11–2–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60735
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No. FTA–2021–0014]
Title VI Implementation
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Request for information on Title
VI implementation.
AGENCY:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) is considering
amending Circular 4702.1B, Title VI
Requirements and Guidelines for
Federal Transit Administration
Recipients (Title VI Circular) to
incorporate lessons learned since its
issuance on October 1, 2012. The Title
VI Circular provides guidance and
instructions to FTA recipients of
Federal financial assistance on how to
comply with requirements under Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and
the DOT Title VI regulations at 49 CFR
part 21, which prohibit discrimination
based on race, color, or national origin
in federally funded programs. The
agency is seeking suggestions from all
transit stakeholders—including transit
agencies, transit riders and community
members, planning officials, States,
cities, and the private sector—on
enhancements that could be made to the
Title VI Circular to provide clarity, to
ensure Title VI requirements are met,
and to advance equity. Specifically,
FTA seeks input on requirements
related to public participation, service
and fare equity, facility equity analyses,
implementation of rider conduct
policies, and additional technical
resources for determining and
documenting disparate impact.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
on or before December 3, 2021. FTA will
consider comments filed after this date
to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments
identified by docket number FTA–
2021–0014 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Operations, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9:00
a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
60736
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 210 / Wednesday, November 3, 2021 / Notices
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
All submissions received must
include the agency name and docket
number FTA–2021–0014. All comments
received will be posted without change
to www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. You
may review the U.S. Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477).
For access to the docket to read
background documents or comments
received, go to www.regulations.gov at
any time and search for docket number
FTA–2021–0014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
program questions, Richie Nguyen,
Office of Civil Rights, (202) 366–2689 or
richie.nguyen@dot.gov. For legal
questions, Bonnie Graves, Office of
Chief Counsel, (202) 366–0944 or
bonnie.graves@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: FTA Title VI Circular
provides guidance to FTA recipients of
Federal financial assistance on how to
comply with requirements under Title
VI and the DOT Title VI regulations,
which prohibit discrimination based on
race, color, or national origin in
federally funded programs. The Title VI
Circular provides specific compliance
information for each type of recipient:
Transit providers, States, and
metropolitan planning organizations.
The Title VI Circular also provides
several appendices, including
additional guidance and examples to
help ensure recipients fulfill the
requirements. The Title VI Circular was
last updated in 2012.
Under the Title VI Circular, direct and
primary recipients submit a Title VI
Program demonstrating how the
recipient is complying with Title VI
requirements to FTA once every three
years or as otherwise directed by FTA.
FTA reviews Title VI Programs and their
implementation through various
oversight activities, including complaint
investigations, Title VI Program
Reviews, Specialized Title VI
Compliance Reviews, and as part of
Triennial Reviews and State
Management Reviews. For more
information on the existing Title VI
Circular, please see https://www.transit.
dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/ftacirculars/title-vi-requirements-andguidelines-federal-transit.
Through this request for information
(RFI), FTA seeks input to inform the
development of changes to the existing
Title VI Circular. The timing for
publication of an update to the Title VI
Circular is not certain. FTA poses 13
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Nov 02, 2021
Jkt 256001
questions below and looks forward to
feedback from all interested parties.
The Title VI Circular contains binding
obligations, which 49 U.S.C. 5334(k)
defines as ‘‘a substantive policy
statement, rule, or guidance document
issued by the Federal Transit
Administration that grants rights,
imposes obligations, produces
significant effects on private interests, or
effects a significant change in existing
policy.’’ Under 49 U.S.C. 5334(k), FTA
may issue binding obligations if it
follows notice and comment rulemaking
procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553.
Accordingly, prior to making any
amendments that would create a new
binding obligation or modify an existing
one, FTA will follow such notice and
comment rulemaking procedures.
Public Participation
1. The Title VI Circular currently
requires recipients to submit and
implement a public participation plan
that includes an outreach plan to engage
minority and limited English proficient
(LEP) populations, as well as a summary
of outreach efforts made since the last
Title VI Program submission. In June
2021, U.S. DOT issued a revised Title VI
Order Number DOT 1000.12C on the
U.S. DOT Title VI Program (Order),
which provides policy direction,
practices, and standards to U.S. DOT
Operating Administrations, including
FTA, for establishing and maintaining
an enforcement program that ensures
Title VI compliance. The Order requires
FTA to develop comprehensive
community participation requirements
(Community Participation Plan) that
applicants and recipients must satisfy as
a condition of receiving an award of
Federal financial assistance. The goal of
the Community Participation Plan is to
‘‘facilitate full compliance with Title VI
by requiring meaningful public
participation and engagement to ensure
that applicants and recipients are
adequately informed about how
programs or activities will potentially
impact affected communities, and to
ensure that diverse views are heard and
considered throughout all stages of the
consultation, planning, and decisionmaking process.’’ The Order provides 10
effective practices that ensure proactive
public engagement: establishment of
goals and objectives, identification of
affected communities, focused outreach,
meaningful education, diverse
communications, comprehensive
engagement, meaningful participation,
accessibility, reported outcomes, and
recordkeeping. Which practices
outlined in the Order should FTA
incorporate in its guidance on
promoting inclusive public
PO 00000
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participation? Are there additional
effective practices FTA should
consider?
2. What effective public participation
practices are transit agencies currently
using? How is meaningful access to
public participation activities provided
to traditionally underserved
communities? How is effectiveness
defined and measured?
Service and Fare Equity Analyses
3. The Title VI Circular currently
requires transit providers that operate
50 or more fixed route vehicles in peak
service and are located in an Urbanized
Area (UZA) of 200,000 or more in
population to prepare and submit
service and fare equity (SAFE) analyses
as described in Chapter IV. These SAFE
analyses are conducted prior to
implementing service or fare changes,
but they are submitted to FTA as part
of a recipient’s Title VI program once
every three years. Due to this gap in
time, FTA may not become aware of
major service changes or fare changes
and the related equity analyses until
years after the changes have been made
and the analyses conducted. Should
FTA require a SAFE analysis be posted
on a recipient’s website or submitted to
FTA prior to the service or fare change
being enacted, in addition to submission
with the recipient’s Title VI program? If
so, how soon after an analysis is
conducted or before a change is
approved or implemented should FTA
require posting or submission?
4. For major service change, disparate
impact, and disproportionate burden
thresholds, the Title VI Circular does
not set values or limits. Regarding major
service change thresholds, the Circular
states, ‘‘The threshold for analysis shall
not be set so high so as to never require
an analysis; rather, agencies shall select
a threshold most likely to yield a
meaningful result in light of the transit
provider’s system characteristics.’’
Should FTA set a value or limit on
major service change, disparate impact,
or disproportionate burden thresholds?
If so, what should that value or limit
be—or what factors should be
evaluated?
5. The Title VI Circular explains
existing public participation
requirements for development of major
service change policies, disparate
impact policies, and disproportionate
burden policies. Should FTA address
public participation where a transit
provider finds a potential disparate
impact or disproportionate burden,
specifically with regard to analysis of
modifications to avoid, minimize, or
mitigate potential disparate impacts?
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 210 / Wednesday, November 3, 2021 / Notices
6. The Title VI Circular provides two
data analysis options for conducting a
service equity analysis: Using
population data or using ridership data.
Should FTA provide additional options
for conducting a service or fare equity
analysis? If so, what alternatives should
FTA consider?
7. The Title VI Circular provides that
service equity is measured based on
access to public transit service. Is this
measure sufficient to ensure equity, or
should it be measured by destinations,
such as how many jobs riders can access
from a particular stop within a specified
time, or how long it takes to get to
grocery stores, medical facilities, and
other critical destinations, or by some
other measure?
8. The Title VI Circular provides that
temporary service changes (12 months
or less) and temporary fare reductions (6
months or less) do not respectively
require service and fare equity analyses.
Should FTA reconsider these
timeframes? Should FTA require some
analysis during temporary changes to
consider the equity impacts of the
temporary changes?
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Facility Equity Analyses
9. The Title VI Circular, with regard
to the determination of site or location
of facilities, requires a Title VI facility
equity analysis, in which a recipient
must analyze the proposed location of
certain facilities to ensure there is no
disparate impact in the siting decision.
FTA provides limited guidance in the
Circular on this topic but does require
a comparison of equity impacts of
various siting alternatives and an
analysis before the selection of the
preferred site. Should FTA provide
additional guidance on facility equity
analyses, including public participation,
disparate impact thresholds, cumulative
effects, or timeframes? Would
stakeholders find it helpful if FTA
published a sample facility equity
analysis, similar to the sample SAFE
analyses, in the Appendix to the
Circular?
10. These facility equity analyses are
conducted prior to site selection, but
they are submitted to FTA as part of a
recipient’s Title VI program once every
three years. Due to this gap in time, FTA
may not become aware of facility siting
and related equity analyses until years
after they have been constructed or
conducted. Should FTA require a
facility equity analysis be posted on a
recipient’s website or submitted to FTA
prior to site selection, in addition to
submission with the recipient’s Title VI
program? If so, how soon after an
analysis is conducted or before a change
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Nov 02, 2021
Jkt 256001
is approved or implemented should
FTA require posting or submission?
Implementation of Rider Conduct
Policies
11. The Title VI Circular currently
makes no mention of equitable
implementation of rider conduct
policies, such as prohibitions on
smoking, littering, loitering, eating on
vehicles, evading fares, or playing music
loudly. Given the potential for disparate
impacts on the basis of race, color, or
national origin in the implementation of
these policies, which is prohibited by
DOT Title VI regulations, FTA is
considering how to address these topics.
To ensure compliance with Title VI,
how should FTA address the equitable
implementation of rider conduct
policies?
Technical Resources for Analyzing
Disparate Impact
12. FTA Regional Civil Rights Officers
and Headquarters staff field many
technical assistance requests from
transit providers asking how to
determine disparate impact and how to
evaluate service and fare changes for
equity. These include transit providers
who do not yet meet the Chapter IV
thresholds that require SAFE analyses
or demographic data collection and
reporting. What commendable practices
are transit providers, and in particular
smaller providers not subject to the
Chapter IV requirements, using to
review their policies and practices to
ensure their service and fare changes do
not result in disparate impacts on the
basis of race, color, or national origin?
Additional Title VI Circular Feedback
13. Should FTA consider
incorporating guidance and instructions
into the Title VI Circular on topics or
policy matters not discussed in the
questions above or not currently
covered in the Circular? If so, what are
those topics or policy matters? What
commendable practices should FTA
consider including? FTA welcomes any
additional feedback on the Title VI
Circular, including topics not listed in
the questions above.
All interested parties are encouraged
to respond to this RFI. Submissions are
strictly voluntary. Individuals or entities
responding to this RFI should state their
role as well as knowledge of and
experience with Title VI and the Title VI
Circular. FTA may request additional
clarifying information from any or all
respondents. If a respondent does not
wish to be contacted by FTA for
additional information, a statement to
that effect should be included in the
response. All information submitted
PO 00000
Frm 00125
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
60737
should be unclassified and should not
contain proprietary information.
FTA is not obligated to officially
respond to the information received, but
the responses will assist FTA in
developing proposed Title VI Circular
changes.
Comments may be submitted and
viewed at Docket No. FTA–2021–0014
at https://www.regulations.gov.
Nuria I. Fernandez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021–23965 Filed 11–2–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names
of one or more persons and vessel that
have been placed on OFAC’s List of
Specially Designated Nationals and
Blocked Persons (SDN List) based on
OFAC’s determination that one or more
applicable legal criteria were satisfied.
All property and interests in property
subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these
persons are blocked, and U.S. persons
are generally prohibited from engaging
in transactions with them. The vessel
placed on the SDN List has been
identified as property in which a
blocked person has an interest.
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for applicable date(s).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.:
202–622–2490; Associate Director for
Global Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420;
Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.:
202–622–2480; Assistant Director for
Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202–622–4855;
or the Assistant Director for Sanctions
Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202–622–
2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Availability
The SDN List and additional
information concerning OFAC sanctions
programs are available on OFAC’s
website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Notice of OFAC Action(s)
On October 29, 2021, OFAC
determined that the property and
interests in property subject to U.S.
jurisdiction of the following persons are
E:\FR\FM\03NON1.SGM
03NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 210 (Wednesday, November 3, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60735-60737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23965]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No. FTA-2021-0014]
Title VI Implementation
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for information on Title VI implementation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is considering
amending Circular 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for
Federal Transit Administration Recipients (Title VI Circular) to
incorporate lessons learned since its issuance on October 1, 2012. The
Title VI Circular provides guidance and instructions to FTA recipients
of Federal financial assistance on how to comply with requirements
under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the DOT Title VI
regulations at 49 CFR part 21, which prohibit discrimination based on
race, color, or national origin in federally funded programs. The
agency is seeking suggestions from all transit stakeholders--including
transit agencies, transit riders and community members, planning
officials, States, cities, and the private sector--on enhancements that
could be made to the Title VI Circular to provide clarity, to ensure
Title VI requirements are met, and to advance equity. Specifically, FTA
seeks input on requirements related to public participation, service
and fare equity, facility equity analyses, implementation of rider
conduct policies, and additional technical resources for determining
and documenting disparate impact.
DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before December 3, 2021. FTA
will consider comments filed after this date to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by docket number FTA-2021-
0014 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
[[Page 60736]]
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
All submissions received must include the agency name and docket
number FTA-2021-0014. All comments received will be posted without
change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. You may review the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT)
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).
For access to the docket to read background documents or comments
received, go to www.regulations.gov at any time and search for docket
number FTA-2021-0014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program questions, Richie Nguyen,
Office of Civil Rights, (202) 366-2689 or [email protected]. For
legal questions, Bonnie Graves, Office of Chief Counsel, (202) 366-0944
or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: FTA Title VI Circular provides guidance to FTA
recipients of Federal financial assistance on how to comply with
requirements under Title VI and the DOT Title VI regulations, which
prohibit discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in
federally funded programs. The Title VI Circular provides specific
compliance information for each type of recipient: Transit providers,
States, and metropolitan planning organizations. The Title VI Circular
also provides several appendices, including additional guidance and
examples to help ensure recipients fulfill the requirements. The Title
VI Circular was last updated in 2012.
Under the Title VI Circular, direct and primary recipients submit a
Title VI Program demonstrating how the recipient is complying with
Title VI requirements to FTA once every three years or as otherwise
directed by FTA. FTA reviews Title VI Programs and their implementation
through various oversight activities, including complaint
investigations, Title VI Program Reviews, Specialized Title VI
Compliance Reviews, and as part of Triennial Reviews and State
Management Reviews. For more information on the existing Title VI
Circular, please see https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/fta-circulars/title-vi-requirements-and-guidelines-federal-transit.
Through this request for information (RFI), FTA seeks input to
inform the development of changes to the existing Title VI Circular.
The timing for publication of an update to the Title VI Circular is not
certain. FTA poses 13 questions below and looks forward to feedback
from all interested parties.
The Title VI Circular contains binding obligations, which 49 U.S.C.
5334(k) defines as ``a substantive policy statement, rule, or guidance
document issued by the Federal Transit Administration that grants
rights, imposes obligations, produces significant effects on private
interests, or effects a significant change in existing policy.'' Under
49 U.S.C. 5334(k), FTA may issue binding obligations if it follows
notice and comment rulemaking procedures under 5 U.S.C. 553.
Accordingly, prior to making any amendments that would create a new
binding obligation or modify an existing one, FTA will follow such
notice and comment rulemaking procedures.
Public Participation
1. The Title VI Circular currently requires recipients to submit
and implement a public participation plan that includes an outreach
plan to engage minority and limited English proficient (LEP)
populations, as well as a summary of outreach efforts made since the
last Title VI Program submission. In June 2021, U.S. DOT issued a
revised Title VI Order Number DOT 1000.12C on the U.S. DOT Title VI
Program (Order), which provides policy direction, practices, and
standards to U.S. DOT Operating Administrations, including FTA, for
establishing and maintaining an enforcement program that ensures Title
VI compliance. The Order requires FTA to develop comprehensive
community participation requirements (Community Participation Plan)
that applicants and recipients must satisfy as a condition of receiving
an award of Federal financial assistance. The goal of the Community
Participation Plan is to ``facilitate full compliance with Title VI by
requiring meaningful public participation and engagement to ensure that
applicants and recipients are adequately informed about how programs or
activities will potentially impact affected communities, and to ensure
that diverse views are heard and considered throughout all stages of
the consultation, planning, and decision-making process.'' The Order
provides 10 effective practices that ensure proactive public
engagement: establishment of goals and objectives, identification of
affected communities, focused outreach, meaningful education, diverse
communications, comprehensive engagement, meaningful participation,
accessibility, reported outcomes, and recordkeeping. Which practices
outlined in the Order should FTA incorporate in its guidance on
promoting inclusive public participation? Are there additional
effective practices FTA should consider?
2. What effective public participation practices are transit
agencies currently using? How is meaningful access to public
participation activities provided to traditionally underserved
communities? How is effectiveness defined and measured?
Service and Fare Equity Analyses
3. The Title VI Circular currently requires transit providers that
operate 50 or more fixed route vehicles in peak service and are located
in an Urbanized Area (UZA) of 200,000 or more in population to prepare
and submit service and fare equity (SAFE) analyses as described in
Chapter IV. These SAFE analyses are conducted prior to implementing
service or fare changes, but they are submitted to FTA as part of a
recipient's Title VI program once every three years. Due to this gap in
time, FTA may not become aware of major service changes or fare changes
and the related equity analyses until years after the changes have been
made and the analyses conducted. Should FTA require a SAFE analysis be
posted on a recipient's website or submitted to FTA prior to the
service or fare change being enacted, in addition to submission with
the recipient's Title VI program? If so, how soon after an analysis is
conducted or before a change is approved or implemented should FTA
require posting or submission?
4. For major service change, disparate impact, and disproportionate
burden thresholds, the Title VI Circular does not set values or limits.
Regarding major service change thresholds, the Circular states, ``The
threshold for analysis shall not be set so high so as to never require
an analysis; rather, agencies shall select a threshold most likely to
yield a meaningful result in light of the transit provider's system
characteristics.'' Should FTA set a value or limit on major service
change, disparate impact, or disproportionate burden thresholds? If so,
what should that value or limit be--or what factors should be
evaluated?
5. The Title VI Circular explains existing public participation
requirements for development of major service change policies,
disparate impact policies, and disproportionate burden policies. Should
FTA address public participation where a transit provider finds a
potential disparate impact or disproportionate burden, specifically
with regard to analysis of modifications to avoid, minimize, or
mitigate potential disparate impacts?
[[Page 60737]]
6. The Title VI Circular provides two data analysis options for
conducting a service equity analysis: Using population data or using
ridership data. Should FTA provide additional options for conducting a
service or fare equity analysis? If so, what alternatives should FTA
consider?
7. The Title VI Circular provides that service equity is measured
based on access to public transit service. Is this measure sufficient
to ensure equity, or should it be measured by destinations, such as how
many jobs riders can access from a particular stop within a specified
time, or how long it takes to get to grocery stores, medical
facilities, and other critical destinations, or by some other measure?
8. The Title VI Circular provides that temporary service changes
(12 months or less) and temporary fare reductions (6 months or less) do
not respectively require service and fare equity analyses. Should FTA
reconsider these timeframes? Should FTA require some analysis during
temporary changes to consider the equity impacts of the temporary
changes?
Facility Equity Analyses
9. The Title VI Circular, with regard to the determination of site
or location of facilities, requires a Title VI facility equity
analysis, in which a recipient must analyze the proposed location of
certain facilities to ensure there is no disparate impact in the siting
decision. FTA provides limited guidance in the Circular on this topic
but does require a comparison of equity impacts of various siting
alternatives and an analysis before the selection of the preferred
site. Should FTA provide additional guidance on facility equity
analyses, including public participation, disparate impact thresholds,
cumulative effects, or timeframes? Would stakeholders find it helpful
if FTA published a sample facility equity analysis, similar to the
sample SAFE analyses, in the Appendix to the Circular?
10. These facility equity analyses are conducted prior to site
selection, but they are submitted to FTA as part of a recipient's Title
VI program once every three years. Due to this gap in time, FTA may not
become aware of facility siting and related equity analyses until years
after they have been constructed or conducted. Should FTA require a
facility equity analysis be posted on a recipient's website or
submitted to FTA prior to site selection, in addition to submission
with the recipient's Title VI program? If so, how soon after an
analysis is conducted or before a change is approved or implemented
should FTA require posting or submission?
Implementation of Rider Conduct Policies
11. The Title VI Circular currently makes no mention of equitable
implementation of rider conduct policies, such as prohibitions on
smoking, littering, loitering, eating on vehicles, evading fares, or
playing music loudly. Given the potential for disparate impacts on the
basis of race, color, or national origin in the implementation of these
policies, which is prohibited by DOT Title VI regulations, FTA is
considering how to address these topics. To ensure compliance with
Title VI, how should FTA address the equitable implementation of rider
conduct policies?
Technical Resources for Analyzing Disparate Impact
12. FTA Regional Civil Rights Officers and Headquarters staff field
many technical assistance requests from transit providers asking how to
determine disparate impact and how to evaluate service and fare changes
for equity. These include transit providers who do not yet meet the
Chapter IV thresholds that require SAFE analyses or demographic data
collection and reporting. What commendable practices are transit
providers, and in particular smaller providers not subject to the
Chapter IV requirements, using to review their policies and practices
to ensure their service and fare changes do not result in disparate
impacts on the basis of race, color, or national origin?
Additional Title VI Circular Feedback
13. Should FTA consider incorporating guidance and instructions
into the Title VI Circular on topics or policy matters not discussed in
the questions above or not currently covered in the Circular? If so,
what are those topics or policy matters? What commendable practices
should FTA consider including? FTA welcomes any additional feedback on
the Title VI Circular, including topics not listed in the questions
above.
All interested parties are encouraged to respond to this RFI.
Submissions are strictly voluntary. Individuals or entities responding
to this RFI should state their role as well as knowledge of and
experience with Title VI and the Title VI Circular. FTA may request
additional clarifying information from any or all respondents. If a
respondent does not wish to be contacted by FTA for additional
information, a statement to that effect should be included in the
response. All information submitted should be unclassified and should
not contain proprietary information.
FTA is not obligated to officially respond to the information
received, but the responses will assist FTA in developing proposed
Title VI Circular changes.
Comments may be submitted and viewed at Docket No. FTA-2021-0014 at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Nuria I. Fernandez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-23965 Filed 11-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P