Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services, 60438-60440 [2021-23696]
Download as PDF
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
60438
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 209 / Tuesday, November 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
guard against the potential for
interference into incumbent operations,
such as altitude restrictions, power
limits, transmitter design
considerations, directional constraints,
additional emission limits, or other
requirements, including new or revised
coordination requirements? To aid other
stakeholders in the bands, and the
adjacent bands, to evaluate potential
interference concerns and submit their
own analyses, the Commission also
seeks specific information about
anticipated stratospheric-based platform
system operating parameters including
transmission direction, deployment
densities, earth station elevation angles,
station heights, antenna characteristics
(e.g., antenna polarization, antenna
pattern mask), station Equivalent
Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP),
and operating bandwidths (including
out-of-band performance).
6. In the 70/80/90 GHz NPRM, the
Commission also sought comment on
the international coordination
implications of the services proposed.
The Wireless Telecommunication
Bureau now specifically seeks comment
on any international implications
related to HAPS or other stratosphericbased platform services in the 70/80/90
GHz bands.
7. If the Commission does authorize
HAPS or other stratospheric-based
services in some or all of the 70/80/90
GHz bands, what service rules should
apply? Could these new services be
registered and coordinated through the
existing third-party database manager
process? The Commission seeks
comments on what changes to the
registration and coordination process
would be necessary to facilitate the
deployment of HAPS or other
stratospheric-based services. The
current 70/80/90 GHz coordination
process only considers fixed systems. If
HAPS is authorized, should it be limited
to nominally fixed stations?
8. Relatedly, the Commission also
seeks to further develop the record on
Aeronet’s proposal to permit the use of
‘‘Scheduled Dynamic Datalinks’’
(SDDLs). In the 70/80/90 GHz NPRM,
the Commission sought comment on
how links to endpoints-in-motion could
affect existing services in the 70/80/90
GHz bands. Several commenters filed
comments and technical analyses
supporting Aeronet’s proposals, while
several commenters express concern
about potential interference to
incumbents. In view of the concerns
expressed, the Commission seeks
further detailed technical studies
demonstrating that deployment of
SDDLs would not cause harmful
interference to incumbents, co-primary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Nov 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
users, adjacent band uses or potential
future uses of the band, including FS,
FSS, HAPS or other stratospheric-based
platform services, and the adjacent band
EESS (passive) and radio astronomy
operations. To aid other stakeholders in
the bands, and the adjacent bands, to
evaluate potential interference concerns
and submit their own analyses, the
Commission also seeks specific
information about anticipated SDDL
system operating parameters, including
station heights, antenna characteristics
(e.g., antenna polarization, antenna
pattern mask), station EIRP, operating
bandwidths (including out-of-band
performance), and ground station gains.
In this context, the Commission notes
that on October 4, 2021, Aeronet filed a
coexistence analysis of its proposed
SDDL system and the Space X satellite
system. The Commission seeks
comments on this filing, including the
extent to which it addresses the
questions raised in this paragraph and
related stakeholder concerns.
Federal Communications Commission.
Amy Brett,
Acting Chief of Staff, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2021–23712 Filed 11–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[WC Docket No. 12–375, DA 21–1297; FRS
54866]
Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling
Services
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
Proposed rule; extension of
reply comment period.
ACTION:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission is
extending the time to file reply
comments in response to the 2021 ICS
Further Notice in this proceeding in
order to afford interested parties
sufficient time to prepare them.
SUMMARY:
Reply Comments in response to
the 2021 ICS Further Notice are due
December 17, 2021.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by WC Docket No. 12–375, by
any of the following methods:
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing.
• Filings can be sent by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
• Effective March 19, 2020, and until
further notice, the Commission no
longer accepts any hand or messenger
delivered filings. This is a temporary
measure taken to help protect the health
and safety of individuals, and to
mitigate the transmission of COVID–19.
See FCC Announces Closure of FCC
Headquarters Open Window and
Change in Hand-Delivery Policy, Public
Notice, DA 20–304 (March 19, 2020).
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcccloses-headquarters-open-window-andchanges-hand-delivery-policy.
People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Simon Solemani, Pricing Policy
Division of the Wireline Competition
Bureau, at (202) 418–2270 or via email
at simon.solemani@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the FCC’s Order, DA 21–
1297, released October 15, 2021. The
full text of this Order is available at:
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/
attachments/DA-21-1297A1.pdf. The
full text of Global Tel*Link Corporation
(GTL)’s motion is available at: https://
ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1007291601627/
GTL%20Extension%20Request%20(106-21).pdf.
1. By this Order, the Wireline
Competition Bureau (Bureau) of the
Federal Communications Commission
grants in part and denies in part a
motion filed by Global Tel*Link
Corporation (GTL) seeking extensions of
time for (1) filing Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) comments on new
information collection requirements
adopted in the 2021 ICS Order currently
due October 25, 2021, (2) reply
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 209 / Tuesday, November 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
comments in response to the 2021 ICS
Further Notice, currently due October
27, 2021, and (3) comments and reply
comments regarding the Third
Mandatory Data Collection, currently
due November 4 and November 19,
2021. In view of GTL’s Extension
Request and the record developed in
response to it, we grant an extension of
time to file reply comments in response
to the 2021 ICS Further Notice and deny
GTL’s other extension requests as set
forth below. As a result, reply comments
in response to the 2021 ICS Further
Notice are now due on December 17,
2021. All other comment and reply
comment deadlines in this proceeding
remain unchanged.
2. On May 24, 2021, the Commission
released the ICS Third Report and
Order, Order on Reconsideration, and
Fifth Further Notice of Proposed in this
proceeding. In the 2021 ICS Order, the
Commission adopted various rules,
some of which require approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the PRA. On August 25,
2021, the Federal Register published a
notice setting a comment date of
October 25, 2021 on the rules adopted
in the 2021 ICS Order that require OMB
approval under the PRA.
3. The 2021 ICS Further Notice set
deadlines for filing comments and reply
comments at 30 and 60 days,
respectively, after a summary of the
item was published in the Federal
Register. The Federal Register
published that summary on July 28,
2021, establishing an August 27, 2021
comment deadline and a September 27,
2021 reply comment deadline. In
response to a prior motion for extension
of time, the Bureau released an order
extending those deadlines to September
27, 2021 and October 27, 2021,
respectively.
4. As part of the 2021 ICS Order, the
Commission also adopted a Third
Mandatory Data Collection. The
Commission directed WCB and the
Office of Economics and Analytics
(collectively WCB/OEA) to develop
instructions and a template for the data
collection to be submitted to OMB for
its approval under the PRA no later than
90 days after the 2021 ICS Order
becomes effective. We interpret this
reference to the effective date of the
2021 ICS Order as referring to the
effective date of the rules not requiring
OMB approval under the PRA. That
effective date is October 26, 2021. As
the 2021 ICS Order will be effective on
October 26, 2021, WCB/OEA must
submit a template and instructions to
OMB no later than January 24, 2022. On
September 22, 2021, WCB/OEA released
a public notice seeking comment on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Nov 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
proposed instructions, a template, and
certification forms for the Third
Mandatory Data Collection. The Third
MDC Public Notice set the comment
deadline at 30 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register and
the reply comment deadline at 45 days
after the date of publication in the
Federal Register. The Federal Register
published a summary of the public
notice on October 5, 2021 and
established deadlines of November 4,
2021 for comments and November 19,
2021 for reply comments on the Third
MDC Public Notice.
5. On October 6, 2021, GTL filed its
Extension Request, seeking to extend
the filing deadlines for (1) PRA
comments for the new information
collection requirements adopted in the
2021 ICS Order from October 25, 2021
to November 8, 2021; (2) reply
comments on the 2021 ICS Further
Notice from October 27, 2021 to
November 17, 2021; and (3) comments
and reply comments on the Third
Mandatory Data Collection from
November 4, 2021 and November 19,
2021 to November 24, 2021 and
December 9, 2021, respectively. GTL
explains that it is ‘‘in the process of
implementing the interim rates,
ancillary service charges, and other
changes’’ adopted in the 2021 ICS Order
that will become effective October 26,
2021. GTL highlights that the October
26 implementation deadline in
conjunction with the other comments
deadlines present a ‘‘perfect storm’’ of
deadlines and argues that ‘‘changing
only one comment date will just
continue to perpetuate the problem
given the successive comment
deadlines.’’ GTL submits that its
extension requests are in the public
interest because they would allow GTL
and other providers to focus on the
October 26, 2021 implementation
deadline while allowing stakeholders
time to evaluate the information
submitted in initial comments on the
2021 ICS Further Notice and to respond
to the questions in the Third MDC
Public Notice. GTL explains that the
National Sheriffs’ Association, Securus
Technologies, Pay Tel Communications,
and NCIC Inmate Communications do
not oppose its extension requests and
that several advocacy groups support
extending the reply comment deadline
on the 2021 ICS Further Notice to
December 10, 2021. GTL notes that the
Prison Policy Initiative does not support
extending that reply comment deadline
but does not object to extending the
PRA comment deadline and the
deadlines on the Mandatory Data
Collection.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60439
6. On October 8, 2021, the Wright
Petitioners, Benton Institute for
Broadband & Society, Free Press, New
America’s Open Technology Institute,
Public Knowledge, and the United
Church of Christ, OC Inc. (the Public
Interest Parties) filed a reply to GTL’s
Extension Request. The Public Interest
Parties support extending the deadline
to file reply comments in connection
with the 2021 ICS Further Notice but
oppose GTL’s request for extensions of
the PRA and Third Mandatory Data
Collection deadlines. The Public
Interest Parties also propose further
extending the deadline for reply
comments on the 2021 ICS Further
Notice to December 17, 2021, arguing
that such an extension ‘‘will allow
interested parties to fully evaluate and
respond to issues raised in the
comments while also submitting PRA
and Third Mandatory Data Collection
comments.’’ The Public Interest Parties
emphasize that ‘‘[g]iven the importance
of obtaining updated cost data as soon
as possible . . . it is critical that the
Third Mandatory Data Collection is
finalized ‘not later than 90 days’ after
the effective date of the 2021 ICS Order,
as required by the Commission’’ and
argue that extending deadlines related
to the Third Mandatory Data Collection
‘‘is unnecessary, could harm the public
interest, and risks delaying the
collection itself.’’
7. As set forth in section 1.46 of the
Commission’s rules, it is the policy of
the Commission that extensions of time
shall not be routinely granted. However,
extensions may be considered ‘‘to the
extent that good cause for an extension
is demonstrated.’’ The criteria for
granting requests for extensions of time
‘‘are that the extension be in the public
interest, cause no harm to any party in
the proceeding, and cause no significant
delay.’’ The Commission has previously
found that an extension of time is
warranted when it is ‘‘necessary to
ensure that the Commission receives
full and informed responses and that
affected parties have a meaningful
opportunity to develop a complete
record for the Commission’s
consideration.’’
8. Here, we find good cause to extend
the deadline to file reply comments in
response to the 2021 ICS Further Notice,
as proposed by both GTL and the Public
Interest Parties. As an initial matter, we
are sensitive to GTL’s concern that the
flow of implementation and comment
deadlines in this proceeding create a
‘‘perfect storm’’ that, without some
adjustment, would make it difficult for
GTL and other parties to meaningfully
participate in each comment process.
We appreciate what appears to be the
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
60440
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 209 / Tuesday, November 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
unanimous support of interested parties
for the goal of more fully developing the
record in this proceeding. By moving
the deadline to file reply comments on
the 2021 ICS Further Notice to well after
both the deadline for reply comments
on the Third MDC Public Notice and the
December 6, 2021 deadline for PRA
comments on the Third Mandatory Data
Collection, we are persuaded that all
interested parties will be granted
sufficient time to meaningfully respond
to each of the relevant deadlines.
Accordingly, we extend the deadline to
file reply comments in response to the
2021 ICS Further Notice to December
17, 2021.
9. However, we do not find good
cause to extend the deadline for
commenting on the paperwork
implications of the consumer disclosure
requirements and requirements for
providers seeking waiver of the
Commission’s rate cap and ancillary
charge fee caps adopted in the 2021 ICS
Order. Parties have known that those
requirements would be subject to OMB
approval since the Commission released
the 2021 ICS Order on May 24, 2021.
Accordingly, we believe there has been
ample time to consider the paperwork
implications of those requirements, and
no party has provided an explanation as
to why an extension of this deadline
would be reasonable or in the public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:38 Nov 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
interest in light of that fact. We find
especially meaningful the fact that an
extension of this deadline would only
delay the effective date of the
information collection requirements
adopted in the 2021 ICS Order. The
consumer disclosure requirements, for
example, are grounded in the ‘‘strong
public interest in facilitating greater
transparency’’ with respect to inmate
calling services rates for incarcerated
people and their loved ones who
‘‘ultimately bear the burden of these
payments.’’ As such, we conclude that
an extension of this deadline would not
serve the public interest.
10. We also do not find good cause to
delay deadlines associated with the
Third Mandatory Data Collection. As
the Commission explained in the 2021
ICS Order, the Third Mandatory Data
Collection ‘‘is essential to enable [it] to
adopt permanent interstate and
international rate caps,’’ and that ‘‘the
benefits of conducting a third collection
far outweigh any burden on providers.’’
GTL’s proposal to extend the comment
deadline risks delaying the Third
Mandatory Data Collection. Moreover,
delaying these comment deadlines
could endanger the Commissionestablished January 24, 2022 deadline
for WCB/OEA to submit the template
and instructions for the Third
Mandatory Data Collection to OMB, as
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
any delays in these comment deadlines
would significantly limit the time WCB/
OEA have to review the comments prior
to the January 24, 2022 deadline or
alternatively would result in adversely
delaying the submission of the data
collection to OMB. In light of the clear
importance and time constraints of the
Third Mandatory Data Collection, we
conclude that GTL has not shown good
cause to extend these deadlines nor
would it serve the public interest to do
so.
11. On balance, we conclude that
extending the reply comment deadline
for the 2021 ICS Further Notice to
December 17, 2021 will provide
interested parties the time needed to
participate in each comment or reply
cycle as desired without unnecessarily
impeding or delaying the Third
Mandatory Data Collection or
implementation of the transparency
rules.
12. This action is taken pursuant to
delegated authority 47 CFR 0.291.
Federal Communications Commission.
Daniel Kahn,
Associate Bureau Chief, Wireline Competition
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2021–23696 Filed 11–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 209 (Tuesday, November 2, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60438-60440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23696]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[WC Docket No. 12-375, DA 21-1297; FRS 54866]
Rates for Interstate Inmate Calling Services
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of reply comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission is
extending the time to file reply comments in response to the 2021 ICS
Further Notice in this proceeding in order to afford interested parties
sufficient time to prepare them.
DATES: Reply Comments in response to the 2021 ICS Further Notice are
due December 17, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by WC Docket No. 12-375,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing.
Filings can be sent by commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive,
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.
Effective March 19, 2020, and until further notice, the
Commission no longer accepts any hand or messenger delivered filings.
This is a temporary measure taken to help protect the health and safety
of individuals, and to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19. See FCC
Announces Closure of FCC Headquarters Open Window and Change in Hand-
Delivery Policy, Public Notice, DA 20-304 (March 19, 2020). https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-closes-headquarters-open-window-and-changes-hand-delivery-policy.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or call the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-
418-0432 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Simon Solemani, Pricing Policy
Division of the Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-2270 or via
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the FCC's Order, DA 21-
1297, released October 15, 2021. The full text of this Order is
available at: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-21-1297A1.pdf.
The full text of Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL)'s motion is
available at: https://ecfsapi.fcc.gov/file/1007291601627/GTL%20Extension%20Request%20(10-6-21).pdf.
1. By this Order, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) of the
Federal Communications Commission grants in part and denies in part a
motion filed by Global Tel*Link Corporation (GTL) seeking extensions of
time for (1) filing Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) comments on new
information collection requirements adopted in the 2021 ICS Order
currently due October 25, 2021, (2) reply
[[Page 60439]]
comments in response to the 2021 ICS Further Notice, currently due
October 27, 2021, and (3) comments and reply comments regarding the
Third Mandatory Data Collection, currently due November 4 and November
19, 2021. In view of GTL's Extension Request and the record developed
in response to it, we grant an extension of time to file reply comments
in response to the 2021 ICS Further Notice and deny GTL's other
extension requests as set forth below. As a result, reply comments in
response to the 2021 ICS Further Notice are now due on December 17,
2021. All other comment and reply comment deadlines in this proceeding
remain unchanged.
2. On May 24, 2021, the Commission released the ICS Third Report
and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Fifth Further Notice of
Proposed in this proceeding. In the 2021 ICS Order, the Commission
adopted various rules, some of which require approval from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) under the PRA. On August 25, 2021, the
Federal Register published a notice setting a comment date of October
25, 2021 on the rules adopted in the 2021 ICS Order that require OMB
approval under the PRA.
3. The 2021 ICS Further Notice set deadlines for filing comments
and reply comments at 30 and 60 days, respectively, after a summary of
the item was published in the Federal Register. The Federal Register
published that summary on July 28, 2021, establishing an August 27,
2021 comment deadline and a September 27, 2021 reply comment deadline.
In response to a prior motion for extension of time, the Bureau
released an order extending those deadlines to September 27, 2021 and
October 27, 2021, respectively.
4. As part of the 2021 ICS Order, the Commission also adopted a
Third Mandatory Data Collection. The Commission directed WCB and the
Office of Economics and Analytics (collectively WCB/OEA) to develop
instructions and a template for the data collection to be submitted to
OMB for its approval under the PRA no later than 90 days after the 2021
ICS Order becomes effective. We interpret this reference to the
effective date of the 2021 ICS Order as referring to the effective date
of the rules not requiring OMB approval under the PRA. That effective
date is October 26, 2021. As the 2021 ICS Order will be effective on
October 26, 2021, WCB/OEA must submit a template and instructions to
OMB no later than January 24, 2022. On September 22, 2021, WCB/OEA
released a public notice seeking comment on the proposed instructions,
a template, and certification forms for the Third Mandatory Data
Collection. The Third MDC Public Notice set the comment deadline at 30
days after the date of publication in the Federal Register and the
reply comment deadline at 45 days after the date of publication in the
Federal Register. The Federal Register published a summary of the
public notice on October 5, 2021 and established deadlines of November
4, 2021 for comments and November 19, 2021 for reply comments on the
Third MDC Public Notice.
5. On October 6, 2021, GTL filed its Extension Request, seeking to
extend the filing deadlines for (1) PRA comments for the new
information collection requirements adopted in the 2021 ICS Order from
October 25, 2021 to November 8, 2021; (2) reply comments on the 2021
ICS Further Notice from October 27, 2021 to November 17, 2021; and (3)
comments and reply comments on the Third Mandatory Data Collection from
November 4, 2021 and November 19, 2021 to November 24, 2021 and
December 9, 2021, respectively. GTL explains that it is ``in the
process of implementing the interim rates, ancillary service charges,
and other changes'' adopted in the 2021 ICS Order that will become
effective October 26, 2021. GTL highlights that the October 26
implementation deadline in conjunction with the other comments
deadlines present a ``perfect storm'' of deadlines and argues that
``changing only one comment date will just continue to perpetuate the
problem given the successive comment deadlines.'' GTL submits that its
extension requests are in the public interest because they would allow
GTL and other providers to focus on the October 26, 2021 implementation
deadline while allowing stakeholders time to evaluate the information
submitted in initial comments on the 2021 ICS Further Notice and to
respond to the questions in the Third MDC Public Notice. GTL explains
that the National Sheriffs' Association, Securus Technologies, Pay Tel
Communications, and NCIC Inmate Communications do not oppose its
extension requests and that several advocacy groups support extending
the reply comment deadline on the 2021 ICS Further Notice to December
10, 2021. GTL notes that the Prison Policy Initiative does not support
extending that reply comment deadline but does not object to extending
the PRA comment deadline and the deadlines on the Mandatory Data
Collection.
6. On October 8, 2021, the Wright Petitioners, Benton Institute for
Broadband & Society, Free Press, New America's Open Technology
Institute, Public Knowledge, and the United Church of Christ, OC Inc.
(the Public Interest Parties) filed a reply to GTL's Extension Request.
The Public Interest Parties support extending the deadline to file
reply comments in connection with the 2021 ICS Further Notice but
oppose GTL's request for extensions of the PRA and Third Mandatory Data
Collection deadlines. The Public Interest Parties also propose further
extending the deadline for reply comments on the 2021 ICS Further
Notice to December 17, 2021, arguing that such an extension ``will
allow interested parties to fully evaluate and respond to issues raised
in the comments while also submitting PRA and Third Mandatory Data
Collection comments.'' The Public Interest Parties emphasize that
``[g]iven the importance of obtaining updated cost data as soon as
possible . . . it is critical that the Third Mandatory Data Collection
is finalized `not later than 90 days' after the effective date of the
2021 ICS Order, as required by the Commission'' and argue that
extending deadlines related to the Third Mandatory Data Collection ``is
unnecessary, could harm the public interest, and risks delaying the
collection itself.''
7. As set forth in section 1.46 of the Commission's rules, it is
the policy of the Commission that extensions of time shall not be
routinely granted. However, extensions may be considered ``to the
extent that good cause for an extension is demonstrated.'' The criteria
for granting requests for extensions of time ``are that the extension
be in the public interest, cause no harm to any party in the
proceeding, and cause no significant delay.'' The Commission has
previously found that an extension of time is warranted when it is
``necessary to ensure that the Commission receives full and informed
responses and that affected parties have a meaningful opportunity to
develop a complete record for the Commission's consideration.''
8. Here, we find good cause to extend the deadline to file reply
comments in response to the 2021 ICS Further Notice, as proposed by
both GTL and the Public Interest Parties. As an initial matter, we are
sensitive to GTL's concern that the flow of implementation and comment
deadlines in this proceeding create a ``perfect storm'' that, without
some adjustment, would make it difficult for GTL and other parties to
meaningfully participate in each comment process. We appreciate what
appears to be the
[[Page 60440]]
unanimous support of interested parties for the goal of more fully
developing the record in this proceeding. By moving the deadline to
file reply comments on the 2021 ICS Further Notice to well after both
the deadline for reply comments on the Third MDC Public Notice and the
December 6, 2021 deadline for PRA comments on the Third Mandatory Data
Collection, we are persuaded that all interested parties will be
granted sufficient time to meaningfully respond to each of the relevant
deadlines. Accordingly, we extend the deadline to file reply comments
in response to the 2021 ICS Further Notice to December 17, 2021.
9. However, we do not find good cause to extend the deadline for
commenting on the paperwork implications of the consumer disclosure
requirements and requirements for providers seeking waiver of the
Commission's rate cap and ancillary charge fee caps adopted in the 2021
ICS Order. Parties have known that those requirements would be subject
to OMB approval since the Commission released the 2021 ICS Order on May
24, 2021. Accordingly, we believe there has been ample time to consider
the paperwork implications of those requirements, and no party has
provided an explanation as to why an extension of this deadline would
be reasonable or in the public interest in light of that fact. We find
especially meaningful the fact that an extension of this deadline would
only delay the effective date of the information collection
requirements adopted in the 2021 ICS Order. The consumer disclosure
requirements, for example, are grounded in the ``strong public interest
in facilitating greater transparency'' with respect to inmate calling
services rates for incarcerated people and their loved ones who
``ultimately bear the burden of these payments.'' As such, we conclude
that an extension of this deadline would not serve the public interest.
10. We also do not find good cause to delay deadlines associated
with the Third Mandatory Data Collection. As the Commission explained
in the 2021 ICS Order, the Third Mandatory Data Collection ``is
essential to enable [it] to adopt permanent interstate and
international rate caps,'' and that ``the benefits of conducting a
third collection far outweigh any burden on providers.'' GTL's proposal
to extend the comment deadline risks delaying the Third Mandatory Data
Collection. Moreover, delaying these comment deadlines could endanger
the Commission-established January 24, 2022 deadline for WCB/OEA to
submit the template and instructions for the Third Mandatory Data
Collection to OMB, as any delays in these comment deadlines would
significantly limit the time WCB/OEA have to review the comments prior
to the January 24, 2022 deadline or alternatively would result in
adversely delaying the submission of the data collection to OMB. In
light of the clear importance and time constraints of the Third
Mandatory Data Collection, we conclude that GTL has not shown good
cause to extend these deadlines nor would it serve the public interest
to do so.
11. On balance, we conclude that extending the reply comment
deadline for the 2021 ICS Further Notice to December 17, 2021 will
provide interested parties the time needed to participate in each
comment or reply cycle as desired without unnecessarily impeding or
delaying the Third Mandatory Data Collection or implementation of the
transparency rules.
12. This action is taken pursuant to delegated authority 47 CFR
0.291.
Federal Communications Commission.
Daniel Kahn,
Associate Bureau Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2021-23696 Filed 11-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P