Screening the Ready Reserve, 60166-60169 [2021-23639]
Download as PDF
60166
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
it is determined that this amendment
does not have sufficient federalism
implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive
Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities do not
apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Because the scope of this rule
implements a governmental policy
limiting defense trade with a country,
and does not impose additional
regulatory requirements or obligations,
the Department believes costs associated
with this rule will be minimal. This rule
has been designated as a nonsignificant
regulatory action by the Office and
Information and Regulatory Affairs
under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
this rulemaking in light of Executive
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not impose or
revise any information collections
subject to 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 126
Arms and munitions, Exports.
For the reasons set forth above, title
22, chapter I, subchapter M, part 126 is
amended as follows:
PART 126—GENERAL POLICIES AND
PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 126
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2780,
2791, and 2797; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C.
287c; Sec. 1225, Pub. L. 108–375; Sec. 7089,
Pub. L. 111–117; Pub. L. 111–266; Sections
7045 and 7046, Pub. L. 112–74; E.O. 13637,
78 FR 16129.
2. Section 126.1 is amended by adding
a heading for the table in paragraph
(d)(1), revising paragraphs (d)(2) and (h),
and adding paragraph (n) to read as
follows:
■
§ 126.1 Prohibited exports, imports, and
sales to or from certain countries.
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
Table 1 to Paragraph (d)(1)
*
*
*
*
*
(2) For defense articles and defense
services, a policy of denial applies as
specified in the associated paragraphs in
the following table:
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(2)
Country
Country specific paragraph location
Afghanistan ...................................................................................................................................
Central African Republic ...............................................................................................................
Cyprus ...........................................................................................................................................
Democratic Republic of Congo .....................................................................................................
Ethiopia .........................................................................................................................................
Eritrea ............................................................................................................................................
Haiti ...............................................................................................................................................
Iraq ................................................................................................................................................
Lebanon ........................................................................................................................................
Libya ..............................................................................................................................................
Russia ...........................................................................................................................................
Somalia .........................................................................................................................................
South Sudan .................................................................................................................................
Sudan ............................................................................................................................................
Zimbabwe ......................................................................................................................................
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Eritrea. It is the policy of the
United States to deny licenses or other
approvals for exports of defense articles
or defense services destined to or for the
armed forces, police, intelligence, or
other internal security forces of Eritrea.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) Ethiopia. It is the policy of the
United States to deny licenses or other
approvals for exports of defense articles
or defense services destined to or for the
armed forces, police, intelligence, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
also
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
paragraph
(g) of this section.
(u) of this section.
(r) of this section.
(i) of this section.
(n) of this section.
(h) of this section.
(j) of this section.
(f) of this section.
(t) of this section.
(k) of this section.
(l) of this section.
(m) of this section.
(w) of this section.
(v) of this section.
(s) of this section.
other internal security forces of
Ethiopia.
*
*
*
*
*
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Bonnie Jenkins,
Under Secretary, Arms Controls and
International Security, Department of State.
32 CFR Part 44
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD–2020–OS–0041]
[FR Doc. 2021–23450 Filed 10–29–21; 8:45 am]
RIN 0790–AL00
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
PO 00000
Screening the Ready Reserve
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
As part of the continuing
response to coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID–19), DoD has revised the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) to aid
civilian employers in more quickly
identifying key employees so the
Department can better understand the
capacity and capability available to
support the response to the current
pandemic and to avoid military-civilian
manpower conflicts in future
Declarations of National Emergency or
in military mobilizations.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
December 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
CAPT Richard Howell, (703) 697–3837.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD’s
internal policy, DoD Directive 1200.07,
‘‘Screening the Ready Reserve’’
(available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/
Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/
dodd/120007p.pdf) establishes
requirements for Federal Government
employers and the rule parallels those
requirements for application to nonFederal employers, i.e., all employers
not of the Federal Government (State,
local, non-profit, private, self-employed,
etc.), hereafter referred to as
‘‘employer.’’
SUMMARY:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Legal Authority
Title 10 U.S.C. 12302 authorizes the
President to recall up to 1 million
reservists for up to 2 years in times of
national emergency. Title 10 U.S.C.
10149, ‘‘Ready Reserve: continuous
screening’’ requires the Secretary to
provide a system of continuous
screening of units and members of the
Ready Reserve to ensure:
(1) No significant attrition of those
members or units during a mobilization.
(2) a proper balance of military skills.
(3) those with military skills for
which there is an overriding
requirement, members having critical
civilian skills are not retained in
numbers beyond the need for those
skills.
(4) recognition will be given to
participation in combat and national
security and military requirements.
(5) members whose mobilization in an
emergency would result in an extreme
personal or community hardship are not
retained in the Ready Reserve.
Background
The Ready Reserve is the category of
reservists most often called to active
duty. It consists of three subcategories:
Selected Reserve, Individual Ready
Reserve (IRR), and Inactive National
Guard.
The Selected Reserve are the first to
be activated. Most reservists are in this
category.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
The IRR is made up mainly of those
who have had training and served in an
Active Component.
The Inactive National Guard are those
who leave active drilling status in the
Army National Guard before completing
their enlistment and will be put in this
category unless they specifically request
a transfer to the IRR. Only the Army
maintains an Inactive National Guard.
If a reservist is unable to meet the
requirements to be recalled, the
respective Military Service shall
discharge, retire, or transfer the member
to the Standby Reserve. The Standby
Reserve are reservists who maintain
their military affiliation but are not
members of the Ready Reserve. This
may include reservists who fill key
Federal positions as well as members
whose civilian employers designate
their job as crucial to national security.
Title 10 U.S.C.12302 also states recall
consideration will be given to:
(1) The length and nature of previous
service, to assure such sharing of
exposure to hazards as the national
security and military requirements will
reasonably allow;
(2) family responsibilities; and
(3) employment necessary to maintain
the national health, safety, or interest.
For example, if a health care
professional can do society more good
as a civilian, that individual may be
exempted from recall. If reservists have
serious family responsibilities, they may
be exempted. The law may also exempt
veterans with some disabilities, medical
conditions, or certain separation codes
from any involuntary recall.
On March 27, 2020, Executive Order
13912, National Emergency Authority
To Order the Selected Reserve and
Certain Members of the Individual
Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to
Active Duty (available at https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2020/04/01/2020-06985/ nationalemergency-authority-to-order-theselected-reserve-and-certain-membersof-the-individual) was issued. While
other authorizations are available for
recall of the Ready Reserve, this
Executive order was required to allow
the Secretary of Defense the maximum
flexibility for this national emergency to
call up Ready Reserve members to help
in the country’s response to COVID–19.
On April 2, 2020, the Secretary of
Defense issued Guidance on Activating
the National Guard, Reserve, and
Individual Ready Reserve for
Coronavirus Disease Response
(available at https://
prhome.defense.gov/Portals/52/
Guidance%20on%20Activating%20
the%20National%20
Guard%20Reserve%20and%20IRR%20
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60167
for%20COVID-19%20OSD00353920%20RES%20Final%201.pdf)
describing how the Military Services
can activate the National Guard and the
Ready Reserve to support the domestic
response to COVID–19.
Expected Impact of the Changes
Finalized by This Rule
DoD’s revisions support military
mobilization without diminishing the
civilian national coronavirus response.
The rule is meant to enhance civilian
employer awareness of the need to
provide early identification of critical
civilian positions within their
organizations and, in coordination with
the Military Services, allow the Service
member to be considered for service not
as a Ready Reserve member who is
factored into military mobilization
planning.
This rule only discusses employee
and employer actions before a
mobilization. After a mobilization is
ordered, no deferment, delay, or
exemption from mobilization will be
granted because of civilian employment.
The Uniformed Services Employment
and Reemployment Rights Act
(USERRA), 1994, Public Law 103–353,
as amended at 38 U.S.C. 4301–4335,
affords reservists and employers various
rights and responsibilities regarding
reemployment of their civilian position.
Employers must ensure key position
determinations are not undertaken in a
manner that would violate USERRA, its
implementing regulations at 20 CFR part
1002, or other Federal statutes and
regulations.
Civilian employers, usually through
their onboarding programs, identify key
employees to ensure the Military
Services have an accurate assessment of
Ready Reserve members. This
assessment of employees who have a
Ready Reserve affiliation is meant to
preclude conflicts between a member’s
mobilization requirements and nonFederal civilian employment obligations
during times of war or national
emergency. Ready Reserve members
with critical civilian skills should work
with their employer before mobilization.
The efforts of civilian employers and
their employees pre-mobilization will
help identify employees who are
required for the ongoing civilian
response to the pandemic. While Ready
Reserve members are already required to
be screened by their respective Military
Service per 10 U.S.C. 10149 and to work
with their employer to ensure those
with critical civilian skills are
identified, these updates to the CFR will
ensure a more accurate accounting of
capability and capacity of the specialties
required for COVID–19 response.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
60168
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
This rule updates the naming of
current offices within the Office of the
Secretary of Defense (OSD), provides
current information on service points of
contact, and removes previous language
pertaining to Federal Government
employers to more succinctly clarify
employer responsibilities to petition the
respective Military Service of Ready
Reserve members that may have a
conflict with their employment prior to
a military mobilization. These changes
highlight how a civilian employer,
based on their capability and capacity
during either normal or extenuating
circumstances such as the ongoing
COVID–19 response, petitions a Military
Service on behalf of a Ready Reserve
employee who occupies a key position
within a company or occupies a
position where military mobilization
would create an extreme personal or
community hardship. Employers are
encouraged to assess the internal
capabilities of their own positions and
the organic capacity to sustain
emergency manpower needs prior to a
military mobilization which can
produce an accurate listing of what they
consider key positions to their
organization.
Comments and Responses
On Monday, December 28, 2020 (85
FR 84237–84243), the DoD published an
interim final rule titled ‘‘Screening the
Ready Reserve’’ for a 60-day public
comment period. No public comments
were received and this rule is being
finalized with no changes from the
published in interim final rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. The final rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and has not been
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Costs
DoD believes the economic impact to
civilian employers is minimal,
estimating a cumulative total of $11K
across all employers nationwide.
Employers are already required to
identify employees who are Ready
Reserve members. The cost to employers
of screening is already imbedded in
their HR processes. The estimated costs
if an employer submits a petition to a
Military Service is calculated below and
will vary based on the automation of
human resource processes and the
number of employees of an organization
who are Ready Reserve members with
critical skills. Ready Reserve members
are already required to be screened by
their respective Military Service per 10
U.S.C. 10149 and to work with their
employers to address any concerns. The
benefit of screening to the employer is
to ensure those with critical civilian
skills are identified in order to prevent
conflicts between the emergency
manpower needs of civilian and
military activities during a mobilization.
The following describes how the
estimated sum total of $11K was derived
using existing costs to project costs of a
petition. Using data from the U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Census,
DoD Total Military Strength report, and
the DoD Status of Forces survey, less
than 0.3 percent of the U.S. population
is in the Reserve, including the National
Guard, with 51 percent employed by the
public [Federal (36 percent), State (9
percent), or Local (6 percent)]. There
were 1,020,156 Military Service
members in the Ready Reserve as of
March 2020 and over 782,000 of those
members are estimated to have civilian
employment. Approximately 0.3 percent
of the 782,000, or 2,346 members, may
be identified as key civilian employees
and may require a petition. The 2019
median hourly wage for an HR
professional or manager is $34.92 an
hour. The cost to screen one employee
as part of an onboarding process
questionnaire or through an annual
recertification process, which is
estimated at less than 10 minutes or
$5.82, is already imbedded in their HR
processes and thus not included here.
The cost to prepare a petition on one
employee is estimated at 2 hours, or
$69.84. Applying a more appropriate
and realistic planning factor of 0.3
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
percent to reflect key positions in
civilian organizations reflects a
projected annual cost, collectively from
all employers, of $11,095.
Cost Benefit Analysis Assumptions and
Sources
It should be noted, not every Ready
Reserve member in a company would be
considered in a ‘‘key position’’ and
therefore, a petition would not be
needed on every member. The estimated
cost presented encompasses all
1,020,156 Ready Reserve members and
a 0.3 percent planning factor.
Assumptions in cost calculation
include: U.S. population: 329,648,880
(as of May 14, 2020, source: https://
www.census.gov/); Ready Reserve:
1,020,156 (as of March 31, 2020, source:
Total Military Strength report obtained
from the Defense Manpower Data Center
from each Military Service HR system of
record); Percent of U.S. population in
the Ready Reserve (Reserve/U.S.
population): 0.0030947 or 0.3 percent.
Based on these data points, a projected
0.3 percent of employers in the country
employ a Ready Reserve member. The
Bureau of Labor Statistics at the end of
March 2020 reported a U.S. working
population of 155,167,000 with
16,294,000 working office/admin
(human resources/HR). Applying the
projected 0.3 percent of employers with
Ready Reserve members (HR*0.3
percent) reflects 48,882 HR employees
to address Ready Reserve members for
their employer. With a median salary for
HR Manager/Specialist of $34.92/hour,
an annual screening is estimated to take
10 min (Rate/6) or $5.82 and to prepare
a petition package to take 2 hours
(Rate*2) or $69.84. Only the petition
calculation is include as the annual
screening is already imbedded in HR
processes.
Data from 2018 DoD Status of Forces
Survey reflects the following breakdown
of principal civilian employment before
most recent activation: Federal
Government 36 percent; State
government 9 percent; Local
government 6 percent; Private/public
company 43 percent; Non-profit 3
percent; Self-employed 2 percent; and
Family business/farm/unemployed 1
percent. The below table reflects the
costs of the 48,882 HR employees who
would be preparing petitions on the
Ready Reserve members in their
organization.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
60169
SCREENING READY RESERVE/NATIONAL GUARD COST ANALYSIS
Number of
employees
%
Private ..........................................................................................................................................
Federal .........................................................................................................................................
State .............................................................................................................................................
Local ............................................................................................................................................
49
36
9
6
23,952
17,598
4,399
2,933
$5,018.46
3,687.03
921.76
614.51
Grand Total ...........................................................................................................................
100
48,882
11,095.24
Cost to the DoD. These estimates (0.3
percent of 782,000 Ready Reserve
members fill key positions) indicate the
Military Services would adjudicate
approximately 2,346 members, a
number well within the normal
processing by all Military Service
Reserve centers and therefore would not
add additional costs.
Benefits
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
2-hr at 0.3%
planning factor
Civilian Employer processes and
military screening actions ensure
civilian employers and the Military
Services have the appropriate balance of
civilian and military skills required for
both parties in case of a mobilization.
The challenges faced today in
communities as well as in the DoD
require dynamic and timely
employment of our service members
while reducing the conflict of those
members to meet both military and or
civilian requirements. Ultimately, the
response to military mobilization and
civilian planning will be greatly
enhanced when the essential projected
response needs have been equitably
calculated for a Ready Reserve member
and employee. Military Service annual
screening provides a vital Ready
Reserve force composed of members
who meet Military Service readiness
standards of mental, moral,
professional, and physical fitness and
possess the military qualifications
required in the various grades, ratings,
and specialties of their Military Service;
and are available immediately for active
duty during a mobilization or as
otherwise required by law. The tasking
of a Ready Reserve member who is
known to be critical to civilian response
in a key position that was not
previously adjudicated through the
Military Service could create a delay in
the civilian response and in turn create
potential harm to the local community.
The benefit of this rule fosters a
partnership in the appropriate balance
of civilian and military assessments to
meet needed requirements for a
response while not decrementing each
other’s capacity and capability.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
The DoD certifies that this final rule
is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
would not, if promulgated, have a
significant economic impact creating a
substantial cost to a number of small
entities. There are a small percentage of
defined critical employees in the
civilian sector, regardless of the national
emergency, that are required to support
their civilian employer. As the response
to the pandemic evolved, the need for
certain specialties in the response
evolved. In the case of COVID–19, the
immediate need was for medical
providers and the situation evolved
requiring additional specialties for
support. In other non-Federal
employment areas, a critical employee
may stay consistent, as in the example
of a sole nuclear reactor chief within a
plant who should not be in the Ready
Reserve as he or she would be required
to mobilize if called upon and not be
able to perform the critical civilian skill.
Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, as amended, does not require us to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The DoD will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States. A major
rule cannot take effect until 60 days
after it is published in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Sec. 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act’’
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
1532) requires agencies to assess
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates
require spending in any 1 year of $167
million in 2019 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. It is estimated
this final rule will not substantially
affect State, local, or tribal governments
and private sector costs any more than
the previous rule requirements.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that 32 CFR
part 44 does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates an
interim final rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has federalism implications.
It is estimated this final rule will not
have a substantial effect on State and
local governments, where 9 percent and
6 percent respectively employ Ready
Reserve, including the National Guard,
members.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 44
Armed forces reserves.
PART 44—SCREENING THE READY
RESERVE
Accordingly, the interim final rule
revising 32 CFR part 44, which
published at 85 FR 84237 on December
28, 2020, is adopted as final without
change.
■
Dated: October 26, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–23639 Filed 10–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 208 (Monday, November 1, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60166-60169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23639]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 44
[Docket ID: DOD-2020-OS-0041]
RIN 0790-AL00
Screening the Ready Reserve
AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and
Readiness, Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60167]]
SUMMARY: As part of the continuing response to coronavirus disease 2019
(COVID-19), DoD has revised the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to
aid civilian employers in more quickly identifying key employees so the
Department can better understand the capacity and capability available
to support the response to the current pandemic and to avoid military-
civilian manpower conflicts in future Declarations of National
Emergency or in military mobilizations.
DATES: This final rule is effective on December 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CAPT Richard Howell, (703) 697-3837.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD's internal policy, DoD Directive
1200.07, ``Screening the Ready Reserve'' (available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/120007p.pdf)
establishes requirements for Federal Government employers and the rule
parallels those requirements for application to non-Federal employers,
i.e., all employers not of the Federal Government (State, local, non-
profit, private, self-employed, etc.), hereafter referred to as
``employer.''
Legal Authority
Title 10 U.S.C. 12302 authorizes the President to recall up to 1
million reservists for up to 2 years in times of national emergency.
Title 10 U.S.C. 10149, ``Ready Reserve: continuous screening'' requires
the Secretary to provide a system of continuous screening of units and
members of the Ready Reserve to ensure:
(1) No significant attrition of those members or units during a
mobilization.
(2) a proper balance of military skills.
(3) those with military skills for which there is an overriding
requirement, members having critical civilian skills are not retained
in numbers beyond the need for those skills.
(4) recognition will be given to participation in combat and
national security and military requirements.
(5) members whose mobilization in an emergency would result in an
extreme personal or community hardship are not retained in the Ready
Reserve.
Background
The Ready Reserve is the category of reservists most often called
to active duty. It consists of three subcategories: Selected Reserve,
Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), and Inactive National Guard.
The Selected Reserve are the first to be activated. Most reservists
are in this category.
The IRR is made up mainly of those who have had training and served
in an Active Component.
The Inactive National Guard are those who leave active drilling
status in the Army National Guard before completing their enlistment
and will be put in this category unless they specifically request a
transfer to the IRR. Only the Army maintains an Inactive National
Guard.
If a reservist is unable to meet the requirements to be recalled,
the respective Military Service shall discharge, retire, or transfer
the member to the Standby Reserve. The Standby Reserve are reservists
who maintain their military affiliation but are not members of the
Ready Reserve. This may include reservists who fill key Federal
positions as well as members whose civilian employers designate their
job as crucial to national security.
Title 10 U.S.C.12302 also states recall consideration will be given
to:
(1) The length and nature of previous service, to assure such
sharing of exposure to hazards as the national security and military
requirements will reasonably allow;
(2) family responsibilities; and
(3) employment necessary to maintain the national health, safety,
or interest.
For example, if a health care professional can do society more good
as a civilian, that individual may be exempted from recall. If
reservists have serious family responsibilities, they may be exempted.
The law may also exempt veterans with some disabilities, medical
conditions, or certain separation codes from any involuntary recall.
On March 27, 2020, Executive Order 13912, National Emergency
Authority To Order the Selected Reserve and Certain Members of the
Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty (available
at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/01/2020-06985/
national-emergency-authority-to-order-the-selected-reserve-and-certain-
members-of-the-individual) was issued. While other authorizations are
available for recall of the Ready Reserve, this Executive order was
required to allow the Secretary of Defense the maximum flexibility for
this national emergency to call up Ready Reserve members to help in the
country's response to COVID-19. On April 2, 2020, the Secretary of
Defense issued Guidance on Activating the National Guard, Reserve, and
Individual Ready Reserve for Coronavirus Disease Response (available at
https://prhome.defense.gov/Portals/52/Guidance%20on%20Activating%20the%20National%20Guard%20Reserve%20and%20IRR%20for%20COVID-19%20OSD003539-20%20RES%20Final%201.pdf) describing how
the Military Services can activate the National Guard and the Ready
Reserve to support the domestic response to COVID-19.
Expected Impact of the Changes Finalized by This Rule
DoD's revisions support military mobilization without diminishing
the civilian national coronavirus response. The rule is meant to
enhance civilian employer awareness of the need to provide early
identification of critical civilian positions within their
organizations and, in coordination with the Military Services, allow
the Service member to be considered for service not as a Ready Reserve
member who is factored into military mobilization planning.
This rule only discusses employee and employer actions before a
mobilization. After a mobilization is ordered, no deferment, delay, or
exemption from mobilization will be granted because of civilian
employment. The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights
Act (USERRA), 1994, Public Law 103-353, as amended at 38 U.S.C. 4301-
4335, affords reservists and employers various rights and
responsibilities regarding reemployment of their civilian position.
Employers must ensure key position determinations are not undertaken in
a manner that would violate USERRA, its implementing regulations at 20
CFR part 1002, or other Federal statutes and regulations.
Civilian employers, usually through their onboarding programs,
identify key employees to ensure the Military Services have an accurate
assessment of Ready Reserve members. This assessment of employees who
have a Ready Reserve affiliation is meant to preclude conflicts between
a member's mobilization requirements and non-Federal civilian
employment obligations during times of war or national emergency. Ready
Reserve members with critical civilian skills should work with their
employer before mobilization. The efforts of civilian employers and
their employees pre-mobilization will help identify employees who are
required for the ongoing civilian response to the pandemic. While Ready
Reserve members are already required to be screened by their respective
Military Service per 10 U.S.C. 10149 and to work with their employer to
ensure those with critical civilian skills are identified, these
updates to the CFR will ensure a more accurate accounting of capability
and capacity of the specialties required for COVID-19 response.
[[Page 60168]]
This rule updates the naming of current offices within the Office
of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), provides current information on
service points of contact, and removes previous language pertaining to
Federal Government employers to more succinctly clarify employer
responsibilities to petition the respective Military Service of Ready
Reserve members that may have a conflict with their employment prior to
a military mobilization. These changes highlight how a civilian
employer, based on their capability and capacity during either normal
or extenuating circumstances such as the ongoing COVID-19 response,
petitions a Military Service on behalf of a Ready Reserve employee who
occupies a key position within a company or occupies a position where
military mobilization would create an extreme personal or community
hardship. Employers are encouraged to assess the internal capabilities
of their own positions and the organic capacity to sustain emergency
manpower needs prior to a military mobilization which can produce an
accurate listing of what they consider key positions to their
organization.
Comments and Responses
On Monday, December 28, 2020 (85 FR 84237-84243), the DoD published
an interim final rule titled ``Screening the Ready Reserve'' for a 60-
day public comment period. No public comments were received and this
rule is being finalized with no changes from the published in interim
final rule.
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. The final rule is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 and has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Costs
DoD believes the economic impact to civilian employers is minimal,
estimating a cumulative total of $11K across all employers nationwide.
Employers are already required to identify employees who are Ready
Reserve members. The cost to employers of screening is already imbedded
in their HR processes. The estimated costs if an employer submits a
petition to a Military Service is calculated below and will vary based
on the automation of human resource processes and the number of
employees of an organization who are Ready Reserve members with
critical skills. Ready Reserve members are already required to be
screened by their respective Military Service per 10 U.S.C. 10149 and
to work with their employers to address any concerns. The benefit of
screening to the employer is to ensure those with critical civilian
skills are identified in order to prevent conflicts between the
emergency manpower needs of civilian and military activities during a
mobilization.
The following describes how the estimated sum total of $11K was
derived using existing costs to project costs of a petition. Using data
from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Census, DoD Total
Military Strength report, and the DoD Status of Forces survey, less
than 0.3 percent of the U.S. population is in the Reserve, including
the National Guard, with 51 percent employed by the public [Federal (36
percent), State (9 percent), or Local (6 percent)]. There were
1,020,156 Military Service members in the Ready Reserve as of March
2020 and over 782,000 of those members are estimated to have civilian
employment. Approximately 0.3 percent of the 782,000, or 2,346 members,
may be identified as key civilian employees and may require a petition.
The 2019 median hourly wage for an HR professional or manager is $34.92
an hour. The cost to screen one employee as part of an onboarding
process questionnaire or through an annual recertification process,
which is estimated at less than 10 minutes or $5.82, is already
imbedded in their HR processes and thus not included here. The cost to
prepare a petition on one employee is estimated at 2 hours, or $69.84.
Applying a more appropriate and realistic planning factor of 0.3
percent to reflect key positions in civilian organizations reflects a
projected annual cost, collectively from all employers, of $11,095.
Cost Benefit Analysis Assumptions and Sources
It should be noted, not every Ready Reserve member in a company
would be considered in a ``key position'' and therefore, a petition
would not be needed on every member. The estimated cost presented
encompasses all 1,020,156 Ready Reserve members and a 0.3 percent
planning factor.
Assumptions in cost calculation include: U.S. population:
329,648,880 (as of May 14, 2020, source: https://www.census.gov/);
Ready Reserve: 1,020,156 (as of March 31, 2020, source: Total Military
Strength report obtained from the Defense Manpower Data Center from
each Military Service HR system of record); Percent of U.S. population
in the Ready Reserve (Reserve/U.S. population): 0.0030947 or 0.3
percent. Based on these data points, a projected 0.3 percent of
employers in the country employ a Ready Reserve member. The Bureau of
Labor Statistics at the end of March 2020 reported a U.S. working
population of 155,167,000 with 16,294,000 working office/admin (human
resources/HR). Applying the projected 0.3 percent of employers with
Ready Reserve members (HR*0.3 percent) reflects 48,882 HR employees to
address Ready Reserve members for their employer. With a median salary
for HR Manager/Specialist of $34.92/hour, an annual screening is
estimated to take 10 min (Rate/6) or $5.82 and to prepare a petition
package to take 2 hours (Rate*2) or $69.84. Only the petition
calculation is include as the annual screening is already imbedded in
HR processes.
Data from 2018 DoD Status of Forces Survey reflects the following
breakdown of principal civilian employment before most recent
activation: Federal Government 36 percent; State government 9 percent;
Local government 6 percent; Private/public company 43 percent; Non-
profit 3 percent; Self-employed 2 percent; and Family business/farm/
unemployed 1 percent. The below table reflects the costs of the 48,882
HR employees who would be preparing petitions on the Ready Reserve
members in their organization.
[[Page 60169]]
Screening Ready Reserve/National Guard Cost Analysis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-hr at 0.3%
% Number of planning
employees factor
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private......................................................... 49 23,952 $5,018.46
Federal......................................................... 36 17,598 3,687.03
State........................................................... 9 4,399 921.76
Local........................................................... 6 2,933 614.51
-----------------------------------------------
Grand Total................................................. 100 48,882 11,095.24
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost to the DoD. These estimates (0.3 percent of 782,000 Ready
Reserve members fill key positions) indicate the Military Services
would adjudicate approximately 2,346 members, a number well within the
normal processing by all Military Service Reserve centers and therefore
would not add additional costs.
Benefits
Civilian Employer processes and military screening actions ensure
civilian employers and the Military Services have the appropriate
balance of civilian and military skills required for both parties in
case of a mobilization. The challenges faced today in communities as
well as in the DoD require dynamic and timely employment of our service
members while reducing the conflict of those members to meet both
military and or civilian requirements. Ultimately, the response to
military mobilization and civilian planning will be greatly enhanced
when the essential projected response needs have been equitably
calculated for a Ready Reserve member and employee. Military Service
annual screening provides a vital Ready Reserve force composed of
members who meet Military Service readiness standards of mental, moral,
professional, and physical fitness and possess the military
qualifications required in the various grades, ratings, and specialties
of their Military Service; and are available immediately for active
duty during a mobilization or as otherwise required by law. The tasking
of a Ready Reserve member who is known to be critical to civilian
response in a key position that was not previously adjudicated through
the Military Service could create a delay in the civilian response and
in turn create potential harm to the local community. The benefit of
this rule fosters a partnership in the appropriate balance of civilian
and military assessments to meet needed requirements for a response
while not decrementing each other's capacity and capability.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
The DoD certifies that this final rule is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it would not, if
promulgated, have a significant economic impact creating a substantial
cost to a number of small entities. There are a small percentage of
defined critical employees in the civilian sector, regardless of the
national emergency, that are required to support their civilian
employer. As the response to the pandemic evolved, the need for certain
specialties in the response evolved. In the case of COVID-19, the
immediate need was for medical providers and the situation evolved
requiring additional specialties for support. In other non-Federal
employment areas, a critical employee may stay consistent, as in the
example of a sole nuclear reactor chief within a plant who should not
be in the Ready Reserve as he or she would be required to mobilize if
called upon and not be able to perform the critical civilian skill.
Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended, does not require
us to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis.
Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. The DoD will submit a report containing
this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is
published in the Federal Register. This final rule is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Sec. 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1532) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $167
million in 2019 dollars, updated annually for inflation. It is
estimated this final rule will not substantially affect State, local,
or tribal governments and private sector costs any more than the
previous rule requirements.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that 32 CFR part 44 does not impose
reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates an interim final rule (and
subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement
costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise
has federalism implications. It is estimated this final rule will not
have a substantial effect on State and local governments, where 9
percent and 6 percent respectively employ Ready Reserve, including the
National Guard, members.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 44
Armed forces reserves.
PART 44--SCREENING THE READY RESERVE
0
Accordingly, the interim final rule revising 32 CFR part 44, which
published at 85 FR 84237 on December 28, 2020, is adopted as final
without change.
Dated: October 26, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-23639 Filed 10-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P