Fluensulfone; Pesticide Tolerances, 60178-60182 [2021-23628]
Download as PDF
60178
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Name of source
Permit No.
*
*
AdvanSix Resins & Chemicals LLC—
Frankford Plant (formerly referenced as
Honeywell
International—Frankford
Plant).
Vicinity Energy Philadelphia—Schuylkill
Station (formerly referenced as Veolia
Energy Philadelphia—Schuylkill Station).
Kinder Morgan Liquid Terminals, LLC—
Philadelphia Terminal (formerly referenced as Kinder Morgan Liquid Terminals, LLC).
Naval Surface Warfare Center—Philadelphia Division (formerly referenced as
Naval
Surface
Warfare
Center—
Carderock Division, Ship Systems Engineering Station (NSWCCD–SSES)).
Newman and Company, Inc (formerly referenced as Paperworks Industries, Inc).
Philadelphia Energy Solutions Refining
and Marketing LLC (formerly referenced
as Philadelphia Energy Solutions—Refining and Marketing, LLC).
Philadelphia Shipyard Inc ..........................
Exelon Generation Company—Richmond
Generating Station.
Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership—
Schuylkill Station.
1 The
*
*
Additional explanations/§§ 52.2063 and
52.2064 citations 1
EPA approval date
*
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
*
52.2064(f)(1).
3/4/2020
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
52.2064(f)(4).
Philadelphia ....
4/20/2020
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
52.2064(f)(5).
IP16–000235 ...
Philadelphia ....
3/20/2020
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
52.2064(f)(6).
IP16–000223 ...
Philadelphia ....
3/31/2020
52.2064(f)(7).
IP–16–00269 ...
Philadelphia ....
4/24/2020
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
IP16–000300 ...
Philadelphia ....
4/8/2020
52.2064(f)(9).
IP16–000246 ...
Philadelphia ....
4/20/2020
IP–16–000250
Philadelphia ....
3/4/2020
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
11/1/2021, [insert Federal Register citation].
IP16–000276 ...
Philadelphia ....
3/5/2020
IP16–000249 ...
Philadelphia ....
IP16–000233 ...
*
52.2064(f)(8).
52.2064(f)(2).
52.2064(f)(3).
cross-references that are not § 52.2064 are to material that pre-date the notebook format. For more information, see § 52.2063.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 52.2064 by adding
paragraph (f) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2064 EPA-Approved Source Specific
Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACT) for Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX).
*
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
State
effective
date
County
*
*
*
*
(f) Approval of source-specific RACT
requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone
national ambient air quality standard for
the facilities listed in this paragraph are
incorporated as specified. (Rulemaking
Docket No. EPA–OAR–2020–0598).
(1) AdvanSix Resins & Chemicals
LLC—Frankford Plant—Incorporating
by reference RACT Plan Approval No.
IP16–000276, revised and effective
March 5, 2020, which supersedes the
prior RACT Plan Approval effective
February 9, 2016. See also the Federal
Register of October 7, 2016, for prior
RACT approval.
(2) Exelon Generation Company—
Richmond Generating Station—
Incorporating by reference RACT Plan
Approval No. IP16–000246, effective
April 20, 2020 which supersedes the
prior RACT Plan Approval, effective
February 9, 2016. See also the Federal
Register of October 7, 2016, for prior
RACT approval.
(3) Grays Ferry Cogeneration
Partnership—Incorporating by reference
RACT Plan Approval No. IP–16–000250,
effective March 4, 2020, which
supersedes RACT Plan Approval,
effective January 9, 2015. See also the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
Federal Register of October 7, 2016, for
prior RACT approval.
(4) Vicinity Energy Philadelphia—
Schuylkill Station—Incorporating by
reference RACT Plan Approval No.
IP16–000249, effective March 4, 2020,
which supersedes RACT Plan Approval,
effective February 9, 2016. See also the
Federal Register of October 7, 2016, for
prior RACT approval.
(5) Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals,
LLC—Philadelphia Terminal—
Incorporating by reference RACT Plan
Approval No. IP16–000233, effective
April 20, 2020, which supersedes RACT
Plan Approval, effective February 9,
2016. See also the Federal Register of
October 7, 2016, for prior RACT
approval.
(6) Naval Surface Warfare Center—
Philadelphia Division—Incorporating by
reference RACT Plan Approval No.
IP16–000235, effective March 20, 2020,
which supersedes the prior RACT Plan
Approval, effective February 9, 2016.
See also the Federal Register of October
7, 2016, for prior RACT approval.
(7) Newman and Company, Inc.—
Incorporating by reference RACT Plan
Approval No. IP16–000223, effective
March 31, 2020, which supersedes
RACT Plan Approval, effective January
9, 2015. See also the Federal Register of
October 7, 2016, for prior RACT
approval.
(8) Philadelphia Energy Solutions
Refining and Marketing LLC.—
Incorporating by reference RACT Plan
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Approval No. IP–16–00269, effective
April 24, 2020, which supersedes the
RACT Plan Approval effective February
9, 2016. See also the Federal Register of
October 7, 2016, for prior RACT
approval.
(9) Philadelphia Shipyard Inc.—
Incorporating by reference RACT Plan
Approval No. IP16–000300, effective
April 8, 2020.
[FR Doc. 2021–22571 Filed 10–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0601; FRL–9111–01–
OCSPP]
Fluensulfone; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
and removes tolerances for residues of
fluensulfone in or on multiple crops
that are identified later in this
document. The Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR–4) requested these
tolerance actions under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
November 1, 2021. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
on or before January 3, 2022, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0601, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Due to the public health emergency,
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) and
Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues
to provide customer service via email,
phone, and webform. For the latest
status information on EPA/DC services,
docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director,
Registration Division (7505P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001;
main telephone number: (703) 305–
7090; email address: RDFRNotices@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
the Government Publishing Office’s
e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgibin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/
Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2020–0601 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before
January 3, 2022. Addresses for mail and
hand delivery of objections and hearing
requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2020–0601, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/where-sendcomments-epa-dockets.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of June 28,
2021 (86 FR 33922) (FRL–10025–08)
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60179
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 0E8861) by IR–4,
Rutgers, The State University of New
Jersey, 500 College Road East, Suite
201W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.680 be
amended by establishing tolerances for
residues of the sum of fluensulfone,
5-chloro-2-[(3,4,4- trifluoro-3-buten-1yl)sulfonyl]thiazole and its metabolite,
3,4,4-trifluoro-but-3-ene-1-sulfonic acid,
calculated as the stoichiometric
equivalent of fluensulfone, in or on the
commodities: Beet, sugar, dried pulp at
0.3 parts per million (ppm); Beet, sugar,
leaves at 4 ppm; Beet, sugar, molasses
at 1.5 ppm; Beet, sugar, roots at 0.2
ppm; Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup
4–16B at 20 ppm; Celtuce at 4 ppm;
Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and stalk
at 4 ppm; Kohlrabi at 1.5 ppm; Leafy
greens subgroup 4–16A at 4 ppm; Leaf
petiole vegetable subgroup 22B at 4
ppm; and Vegetable, Brassica, head and
stem, group 5–16 at 1.5 ppm. The
petition also requested to remove
established tolerances for residues of the
sum of fluensulfone, 5-chloro-2-[(3,4,4trifluoro-3-buten-1-yl)sulfonyl]thiazole
and its metabolite, 3,4,4-trifluoro-but-3ene-1-sulfonic acid, calculated as the
stoichiometric equivalent of
fluensulfone, in or on the following
commodities: Brassica, head and stem,
subgroup 5A at 1.5 ppm; Brassica, leafy
greens, subgroup 5B at 20 ppm; and
Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group
4 at 4 ppm because these commodities
would be covered by the new tolerances
established for the crop group
conversions above. That document
referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by IR–4, the petitioner, which
is available in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing one tolerance at a different
level than petitioned for. A discussion
of this revision to the petitioned-for
tolerance can be found in section IV.C.
In addition, IR–4 initially petitioned for
tolerances for multiple sugar beet
commodities but withdrew their request
for these tolerances and the new use on
sugar beet on April 8, 2021. EPA is
therefore not establishing tolerances for
the sugar beet commodities.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
60180
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified
therein, EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant
information in support of this action.
EPA has sufficient data to assess the
hazards of and to make a determination
on aggregate exposure for fluensulfone
including exposure resulting from the
tolerances established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with fluensulfone follows.
In an effort to streamline its
publications in the Federal Register,
EPA is not reprinting sections that
repeat what has been previously
published for tolerance rulemakings of
the same pesticide chemical. Where
scientific information concerning a
particular chemical remains unchanged,
the content of those sections would not
vary between tolerance rulemaking, and
EPA considers referral back to those
sections as sufficient to provide an
explanation of the information EPA
considered in making its safety
determination for the new rulemaking.
EPA has previously published a
number of tolerance rulemakings for
fluensulfone, in which EPA concluded,
based on the available information, that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm would result from aggregate
exposure to fluensulfone and
established tolerances for residues of
that chemical. EPA is incorporating
previously published sections from
those rulemakings that remain
unchanged as described further in this
rulemaking.
Toxicological profile. For a discussion
of the Toxicological Profile of
fluensulfone, see Unit III.A. of the
fluensulfone tolerance rulemaking
published in the Federal Register of
April 13, 2018 (83 FR 15971) (FRL–
9975–76).
Toxicological points of departure/
Levels of concern. For a summary of the
Toxicological Points of Departure/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
Levels of Concern for fluensulfone used
for human risk assessment, see Unit
III.B. of the fluensulfone tolerance
rulemaking published in the Federal
Register of June 1, 2016 (81 FR 34896)
(FRL–9946–07).
Exposure assessment. This action
converts existing crop group tolerances
for Brassica, head and stem, subgroup
5A; Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B;
and Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica,
group 4, which were established in the
fluensulfone tolerance rulemaking
published in the Federal Register of
May 24, 2019 (84 FR 24042) (FRL–9992–
69), to new tolerances for Brassica, leafy
greens, subgroup 4–16B; Celtuce;
Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and stalk;
Kohlrabi; Leaf petiole vegetable
subgroup 22B; Leafy greens subgroup
4–16A; and Vegetable, Brassica, head
and stem, group 5–16. Although
tolerance levels for some commodities
have changed as a result of these crop
group conversions, they have not
impacted the residue estimates or
Estimated Drinking Water
Concentrations (EDWCs) used in the
dietary exposure assessment for the May
24, 2019 rulemaking for these
commodities. Therefore, the dietary
exposure assessment remains the same.
For a description of the rest of the EPA
approach to and assumptions for the
exposure assessment, including with
respect to dietary exposure, residential
exposure, and cumulative effects, see
Unit III.C. of the May 24, 2019
rulemaking.
Safety factor for infants and children.
EPA continues to conclude that there
are reliable data to support the
reduction of the Food Quality Protection
Act (FQPA) safety factor. See Unit III.D.
of the May 24, 2019 rulemaking for a
discussion of the Agency’s rationale for
that determination.
Aggregate risks and determination of
safety. EPA determines whether acute
and chronic dietary pesticide exposures
are safe by comparing aggregate
exposure estimates to the acute
population adjusted dose (aPAD) and
chronic population adjusted dose
(cPAD). Short-, intermediate-, and
chronic risks are evaluated by
comparing the estimated aggregate food,
water, and residential exposure to the
appropriate points of departure to
ensure that an adequate margin of
exposure (MOE) exists. For linear cancer
risks, EPA calculates the lifetime
probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure.
Acute dietary risks are below the
Agency’s level of concern of 100% of
the aPAD; they are 21% of the aPAD for
infants (<1 year old), the group with the
highest estimated exposure. Chronic
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
dietary risks are below the Agency’s
level of concern of 100% of the cPAD;
they are 4.8% of the cPAD for infants
(<1 year old), the group with the highest
estimated exposure. EPA concluded that
the combined food, water, and
residential exposures result in aggregate
MOEs above the level of concern of 100
for all relevant exposure scenarios and
are not of concern. As the chronic
dietary endpoint and dose are protective
of potential cancer effects, fluensulfone
is not expected to pose a dietary or
aggregate cancer risk of concern.
Therefore, based on the risk
assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to
infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to fluensulfone residues. More
detailed information on this action can
be found in the document entitled,
‘‘Fluensulfone. Petition for Crop Group
Conversions to Brassica Head and Stem
Vegetable Group 5–16, Brassica Leafy
Greens Subgroup 4–16B, Leafy Greens
Subgroup 4–16A, Leaf Petiole Vegetable
Subgroup 22B, Kohlrabi, Celtuce, and
Florence Fennel’’ by going to the docket
established by this action, which is
described under ADDRESSES.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
For a discussion of the available
analytical enforcement method, see Unit
IV.A. of the May 24, 2019 rulemaking.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
EPA may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The tolerance for crop subgroup 4–
16B (20 ppm) is harmonized with the
Codex MRLs for mizuna and mustard
greens; all other Codex MRLs for crops
within crop subgroup 4–16B are lower
than 20 ppm. The tolerance for kohlrabi
(1.5 ppm) is harmonized with the Codex
MRL for kohlrabi. The tolerance for crop
subgroup 4–16A (4 ppm) is harmonized
with the Codex MRL for spinach; all
other Codex MRLs for commodities
within crop subgroup 4–16A are lower
than 4 ppm. The tolerance for crop
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
subgroup 22B (2 ppm) is harmonized
with the Codex MRL for celery. The
tolerance for crop group 5–16 (1.5 ppm)
is harmonized with all Codex
commodities within the crop group
except Chinese cabbage, napa, which
has a Codex MRL of 1 ppm. There are
no Codex MRLs for Florence fennel and
celtuce.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
The petitioner proposed a tolerance
value of 4 ppm for leaf petiole vegetable
subgroup 22B based on the existing
tolerance for vegetables, leafy, except
Brassica, crop group 4. Instead, EPA is
establishing a tolerance value of 2 ppm
for crop subgroup 22B to harmonize
with the Codex MRL for celery. EPA
analyzed the existing celery data, which
supports a tolerance of 2 ppm according
to the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD)
tolerance calculation procedure.
D. International Trade Considerations
In this rule, EPA is establishing
tolerances for fluensulfone residues in
or on the leaf petiole vegetable subgroup
22B at 2 ppm, which is lower than the
existing tolerance in or on vegetables,
leafy, except Brassica, group 4, which
includes cardoon; celery; celery,
Chinese; and rhubarb (all at 4 ppm and
all part of the leaf petiole vegetable
subgroup 22B). The Agency believes
this revised, lower tolerance is
appropriate because it is harmonized
with the Codex MRL for celery and is
supported by available residue data.
In accordance with the World Trade
Organization’s (WTO) Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Measures (SPS)
Agreement, EPA intends to notify the
WTO of the changes to these tolerances
in order to satisfy its obligations under
the Agreement. In addition, the SPS
Agreement requires that Members
provide a ‘‘reasonable interval’’ between
the publication of a regulation subject to
the Agreement and its entry into force
to allow time for producers in exporting
Member countries to adapt to the new
requirement. Accordingly, EPA is
establishing an expiration date for the
existing tolerance for residues of
fluensulfone in or on vegetables, leafy,
except Brassica, group 4 to allow it to
remain in effect for a period of six
months after the effective date of this
final rule. After the six-month period
ends, this tolerance will expire, as
indicated in the regulatory text, and
allowable residues on cardoon; celery;
celery, Chinese; and rhubarb must
conform to the new tolerance for leaf
petiole vegetable subgroup 22B. This
reduction in the tolerance level is not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
discriminatory; the same food safety
standard contained in the FFDCA
applies equally to domestically
produced and imported foods. The new
tolerance level is supported by available
residue data.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of fluensulfone in or on
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B
at 20 ppm; Celtuce at 4 ppm; Fennel,
Florence, fresh leaves and stalk at 4
ppm; Kohlrabi at 1.5 ppm; Leaf petiole
vegetable subgroup 22B at 2 ppm; Leafy
greens subgroup 4–16A at 4 ppm; and
Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem,
group 5–16 at 1.5 ppm.
Additionally, the following existing
tolerances are unnecessary due to the
establishment of the above tolerances:
Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A;
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B; and
Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group
4. Therefore, existing tolerances for
residues of fluensulfone in or on
Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A
and Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B
are removed, and to satisfy international
trade obligations, the existing tolerance
for residues of fluensulfone in or on
Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group
4 expires six months after the effective
date of this final rule.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or to
Executive Order 13045, entitled
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60181
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerances in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides,
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
60182
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 208 / Monday, November 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: October 22, 2021.
Catherine Aubee,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
TABLE 1 TO § 180.680—Continued
Parts per
million
Commodity
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter 1 as follows:
*
*
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
*
1 This
*
*
*
tolerance expires on May 2, 2022.
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–23628 Filed 10–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.680, amend table 1 to
§ 180.680 following paragraph (a) by:
■ a. Adding in alphanumerical order to
the table entries for ‘‘Brassica, leafy
greens, subgroup 4–16B’’; ‘‘Celtuce’’;
‘‘Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and
stalk’’; ‘‘Kohlrabi’’; ‘‘Leaf petiole
vegetable subgroup 22B’’; ‘‘Leafy greens
subgroup 4–16A’’; and ‘‘Vegetable,
Brassica, head and stem, group 5–16’’;
■ b. Removing the entries for ‘‘Brassica,
head and stem, subgroup 5A’’; and
‘‘Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B’’;
and
■ c. Revising the entry for ‘‘Vegetables,
leafy, except Brassica, group 4’’.
The additions read as follows:
■
§ 180.680 Fluensulfone; tolerances for
residues.
TABLE 1 TO § 180.680
Parts per
million
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4–16B .........................
Celtuce ......................................
Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves
and stalk ................................
*
20
4
4
*
*
*
*
Kohlrabi .....................................
Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B .............................
Leafy greens subgroup 4–16A
*
*
*
*
*
Vegetable, Brassica, head and
stem, group 5–16 ..................
*
*
*
*
*
Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group 41 ........................
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Oct 29, 2021
Jkt 256001
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 211025–0216]
RIN 0648–BK29
List of Subjects in 50 CFR 665
Pacific Island Fisheries; Electronic
Logbooks for Hawaii and American
Samoa Pelagic Longline Fisheries;
Correction
Administrative practice and
procedure, Bottomfish, Fisheries,
Fishing, Hawaii, Pacific Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
This document corrects an
inadvertent drafting error in final
regulations published in the Federal
Register on August 5, 2021, and
effective on September 7, 2021. NMFS
is reinstating a reporting requirement for
the main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) noncommercial bottomfish fishery that was
removed inadvertently in the final rule.
The intent of this rule is to ensure
continued timely monitoring and
reporting of catch and other
information.
DATES: Effective on November 1, 2021,
and applicable beginning September 7,
2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Cronin, Sustainable Fisheries,
NMFS Pacific Islands Regional Office,
808–725–5179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
5, 2021, NMFS published a final rule
that required the use of electronic
logbooks in the Hawaii pelagic longline
fisheries and on Class C and D vessels
in the American Samoa pelagic longline
fishery (86 FR 42744). In that final rule,
SUMMARY:
(a) * * *
Commodity
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
1.5
2
4
1.5
4
NMFS inadvertently removed an
unrelated regulation at 50 CFR
665.14(b)(2)(ii). That section requires
permit holders in the MHI noncommercial bottomfish fishery to submit
logbook reports within 72 hours of the
end of the fishing trip. That reporting
requirement was established in
Amendment 14 to the Fishery
Management Plan for the Bottomfish
and Seamount Groundfish Fisheries of
the Western Pacific Region (replaced in
part by the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for
the Hawaiian Archipelago). The
requirement has been in place since
2008 and should not have been removed
(see 73 FR 18450, April 4, 2008; 73 FR
41296, July 18, 2008; and 75 FR 2198,
January 10, 2010). This correcting
amendment reinstates the requirement.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Dated: October 26, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part
665 as follows:
PART 665—FISHERIES IN THE
WESTERN PACIFIC
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 665 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 665.14, add paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
to read as follows:
■
§ 665.14
Reporting and recordkeeping.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) If fishing was authorized under a
permit pursuant to § 665.203(a)(2), the
vessel operator or vessel owner must
submit the original logbook form for
each day of the fishing trip to the
Regional Administrator within 72 hours
of the end of each fishing trip.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–23636 Filed 10–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 208 (Monday, November 1, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60178-60182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23628]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0601; FRL-9111-01-OCSPP]
Fluensulfone; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes and removes tolerances for
residues of fluensulfone in or on multiple crops that are identified
later in this document. The Interregional Research Project Number 4
(IR-4) requested these tolerance actions under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective November 1, 2021. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
[[Page 60179]]
on or before January 3, 2022, and must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0601, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health emergency, the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC)
and Reading Room is closed to visitors with limited exceptions. The
staff continues to provide customer service via email, phone, and
webform. For the latest status information on EPA/DC services, docket
access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Acting Director,
Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0601 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
January 3, 2022. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0601, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/where-send-comments-epa-dockets.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of June 28, 2021 (86 FR 33922) (FRL-10025-
08) EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
0E8861) by IR-4, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 500
College Road East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.680 be amended by establishing tolerances for
residues of the sum of fluensulfone, 5-chloro-2-[(3,4,4- trifluoro-3-
buten-1-yl)sulfonyl]thiazole and its metabolite, 3,4,4-trifluoro-but-3-
ene-1-sulfonic acid, calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of
fluensulfone, in or on the commodities: Beet, sugar, dried pulp at 0.3
parts per million (ppm); Beet, sugar, leaves at 4 ppm; Beet, sugar,
molasses at 1.5 ppm; Beet, sugar, roots at 0.2 ppm; Brassica, leafy
greens, subgroup 4-16B at 20 ppm; Celtuce at 4 ppm; Fennel, Florence,
fresh leaves and stalk at 4 ppm; Kohlrabi at 1.5 ppm; Leafy greens
subgroup 4-16A at 4 ppm; Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B at 4 ppm;
and Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16 at 1.5 ppm. The
petition also requested to remove established tolerances for residues
of the sum of fluensulfone, 5-chloro-2-[(3,4,4- trifluoro-3-buten-1-
yl)sulfonyl]thiazole and its metabolite, 3,4,4-trifluoro-but-3- ene-1-
sulfonic acid, calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of
fluensulfone, in or on the following commodities: Brassica, head and
stem, subgroup 5A at 1.5 ppm; Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B at 20
ppm; and Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group 4 at 4 ppm because
these commodities would be covered by the new tolerances established
for the crop group conversions above. That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by IR-4, the petitioner, which is
available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA is
establishing one tolerance at a different level than petitioned for. A
discussion of this revision to the petitioned-for tolerance can be
found in section IV.C. In addition, IR-4 initially petitioned for
tolerances for multiple sugar beet commodities but withdrew their
request for these tolerances and the new use on sugar beet on April 8,
2021. EPA is therefore not establishing tolerances for the sugar beet
commodities.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
[[Page 60180]]
defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other
exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes
exposure through drinking water and in residential settings but does
not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA
requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance
and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified therein, EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and
other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for fluensulfone including exposure resulting from
the tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of
exposures and risks associated with fluensulfone follows.
In an effort to streamline its publications in the Federal
Register, EPA is not reprinting sections that repeat what has been
previously published for tolerance rulemakings of the same pesticide
chemical. Where scientific information concerning a particular chemical
remains unchanged, the content of those sections would not vary between
tolerance rulemaking, and EPA considers referral back to those sections
as sufficient to provide an explanation of the information EPA
considered in making its safety determination for the new rulemaking.
EPA has previously published a number of tolerance rulemakings for
fluensulfone, in which EPA concluded, based on the available
information, that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm would
result from aggregate exposure to fluensulfone and established
tolerances for residues of that chemical. EPA is incorporating
previously published sections from those rulemakings that remain
unchanged as described further in this rulemaking.
Toxicological profile. For a discussion of the Toxicological
Profile of fluensulfone, see Unit III.A. of the fluensulfone tolerance
rulemaking published in the Federal Register of April 13, 2018 (83 FR
15971) (FRL-9975-76).
Toxicological points of departure/Levels of concern. For a summary
of the Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern for
fluensulfone used for human risk assessment, see Unit III.B. of the
fluensulfone tolerance rulemaking published in the Federal Register of
June 1, 2016 (81 FR 34896) (FRL-9946-07).
Exposure assessment. This action converts existing crop group
tolerances for Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A; Brassica, leafy
greens, subgroup 5B; and Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group 4,
which were established in the fluensulfone tolerance rulemaking
published in the Federal Register of May 24, 2019 (84 FR 24042) (FRL-
9992-69), to new tolerances for Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B;
Celtuce; Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and stalk; Kohlrabi; Leaf
petiole vegetable subgroup 22B; Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A; and
Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16. Although tolerance
levels for some commodities have changed as a result of these crop
group conversions, they have not impacted the residue estimates or
Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations (EDWCs) used in the dietary
exposure assessment for the May 24, 2019 rulemaking for these
commodities. Therefore, the dietary exposure assessment remains the
same. For a description of the rest of the EPA approach to and
assumptions for the exposure assessment, including with respect to
dietary exposure, residential exposure, and cumulative effects, see
Unit III.C. of the May 24, 2019 rulemaking.
Safety factor for infants and children. EPA continues to conclude
that there are reliable data to support the reduction of the Food
Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor. See Unit III.D. of the May
24, 2019 rulemaking for a discussion of the Agency's rationale for that
determination.
Aggregate risks and determination of safety. EPA determines whether
acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing
aggregate exposure estimates to the acute population adjusted dose
(aPAD) and chronic population adjusted dose (cPAD). Short-,
intermediate-, and chronic risks are evaluated by comparing the
estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the
appropriate points of departure to ensure that an adequate margin of
exposure (MOE) exists. For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the
lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate
exposure.
Acute dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern of 100%
of the aPAD; they are 21% of the aPAD for infants (<1 year old), the
group with the highest estimated exposure. Chronic dietary risks are
below the Agency's level of concern of 100% of the cPAD; they are 4.8%
of the cPAD for infants (<1 year old), the group with the highest
estimated exposure. EPA concluded that the combined food, water, and
residential exposures result in aggregate MOEs above the level of
concern of 100 for all relevant exposure scenarios and are not of
concern. As the chronic dietary endpoint and dose are protective of
potential cancer effects, fluensulfone is not expected to pose a
dietary or aggregate cancer risk of concern.
Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to infants and children, from
aggregate exposure to fluensulfone residues. More detailed information
on this action can be found in the document entitled, ``Fluensulfone.
Petition for Crop Group Conversions to Brassica Head and Stem Vegetable
Group 5-16, Brassica Leafy Greens Subgroup 4-16B, Leafy Greens Subgroup
4-16A, Leaf Petiole Vegetable Subgroup 22B, Kohlrabi, Celtuce, and
Florence Fennel'' by going to the docket established by this action,
which is described under ADDRESSES.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
For a discussion of the available analytical enforcement method,
see Unit IV.A. of the May 24, 2019 rulemaking.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The tolerance for crop subgroup 4-16B (20 ppm) is harmonized with
the Codex MRLs for mizuna and mustard greens; all other Codex MRLs for
crops within crop subgroup 4-16B are lower than 20 ppm. The tolerance
for kohlrabi (1.5 ppm) is harmonized with the Codex MRL for kohlrabi.
The tolerance for crop subgroup 4-16A (4 ppm) is harmonized with the
Codex MRL for spinach; all other Codex MRLs for commodities within crop
subgroup 4-16A are lower than 4 ppm. The tolerance for crop
[[Page 60181]]
subgroup 22B (2 ppm) is harmonized with the Codex MRL for celery. The
tolerance for crop group 5-16 (1.5 ppm) is harmonized with all Codex
commodities within the crop group except Chinese cabbage, napa, which
has a Codex MRL of 1 ppm. There are no Codex MRLs for Florence fennel
and celtuce.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
The petitioner proposed a tolerance value of 4 ppm for leaf petiole
vegetable subgroup 22B based on the existing tolerance for vegetables,
leafy, except Brassica, crop group 4. Instead, EPA is establishing a
tolerance value of 2 ppm for crop subgroup 22B to harmonize with the
Codex MRL for celery. EPA analyzed the existing celery data, which
supports a tolerance of 2 ppm according to the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) tolerance calculation
procedure.
D. International Trade Considerations
In this rule, EPA is establishing tolerances for fluensulfone
residues in or on the leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B at 2 ppm,
which is lower than the existing tolerance in or on vegetables, leafy,
except Brassica, group 4, which includes cardoon; celery; celery,
Chinese; and rhubarb (all at 4 ppm and all part of the leaf petiole
vegetable subgroup 22B). The Agency believes this revised, lower
tolerance is appropriate because it is harmonized with the Codex MRL
for celery and is supported by available residue data.
In accordance with the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Sanitary
and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Agreement, EPA intends to notify the
WTO of the changes to these tolerances in order to satisfy its
obligations under the Agreement. In addition, the SPS Agreement
requires that Members provide a ``reasonable interval'' between the
publication of a regulation subject to the Agreement and its entry into
force to allow time for producers in exporting Member countries to
adapt to the new requirement. Accordingly, EPA is establishing an
expiration date for the existing tolerance for residues of fluensulfone
in or on vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group 4 to allow it to
remain in effect for a period of six months after the effective date of
this final rule. After the six-month period ends, this tolerance will
expire, as indicated in the regulatory text, and allowable residues on
cardoon; celery; celery, Chinese; and rhubarb must conform to the new
tolerance for leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B. This reduction in
the tolerance level is not discriminatory; the same food safety
standard contained in the FFDCA applies equally to domestically
produced and imported foods. The new tolerance level is supported by
available residue data.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of fluensulfone
in or on Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B at 20 ppm; Celtuce at 4
ppm; Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and stalk at 4 ppm; Kohlrabi at 1.5
ppm; Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B at 2 ppm; Leafy greens
subgroup 4-16A at 4 ppm; and Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group
5-16 at 1.5 ppm.
Additionally, the following existing tolerances are unnecessary due
to the establishment of the above tolerances: Brassica, head and stem,
subgroup 5A; Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B; and Vegetables,
leafy, except Brassica, group 4. Therefore, existing tolerances for
residues of fluensulfone in or on Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A
and Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B are removed, and to satisfy
international trade obligations, the existing tolerance for residues of
fluensulfone in or on Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group 4
expires six months after the effective date of this final rule.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or to Executive Order 13045,
entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides, and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 60182]]
Dated: October 22, 2021.
Catherine Aubee,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter 1 as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.680, amend table 1 to Sec. 180.680 following paragraph
(a) by:
0
a. Adding in alphanumerical order to the table entries for ``Brassica,
leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B''; ``Celtuce''; ``Fennel, Florence, fresh
leaves and stalk''; ``Kohlrabi''; ``Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup
22B''; ``Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A''; and ``Vegetable, Brassica, head
and stem, group 5-16'';
0
b. Removing the entries for ``Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A'';
and ``Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B''; and
0
c. Revising the entry for ``Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group
4''.
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 180.680 Fluensulfone; tolerances for residues.
(a) * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 180.680
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B..................... 20
Celtuce.................................................... 4
Fennel, Florence, fresh leaves and stalk................... 4
* * * * *
Kohlrabi................................................... 1.5
Leaf petiole vegetable subgroup 22B........................ 2
Leafy greens subgroup 4-16A................................ 4
* * * * *
Vegetable, Brassica, head and stem, group 5-16............. 1.5
* * * * *
Vegetables, leafy, except Brassica, group 4\1\............. 4
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This tolerance expires on May 2, 2022.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-23628 Filed 10-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P