Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Contract Authority for Development and Demonstration of Prototypes (DFARS Case 2021-D025), 59951-59953 [2021-23459]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 207 / Friday, October 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(3) The allegation or conduct at issue and,
if fully adjudicated or settled, a brief
description of the outcome.
(c) The Government will safeguard and
treat as confidential all statements provided
pursuant to this provision where the
statement has been marked ‘‘confidential’’ or
‘‘proprietary’’ by the Offeror. Statements so
marked will not be released by the
Government to the public pursuant to a
request under the Freedom of Information
Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, without prior notification
to the Offeror and opportunity for the Offeror
to claim an exemption from release. The
Government will treat any statement
provided pursuant to this provision as
confidential to the extent required by any
other applicable law.
(End of provision)
■ 7. Add section 252.237–70YY to read
as follows:
252.237–70YY Postaward Transparency
Requirements for Firms that Support
Department of Defense Audits.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
As prescribed in 237.270(e)(4), use the
following clause: POSTAWARD
TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS
FOR FIRMS THAT SUPPORT
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AUDITS
(DATE)
(a) Prior to each contract action under this
contract (including renewal or modification),
the Contractor shall disclose the details of
any disciplinary proceedings, with respect to
the firm and/or its principals or employees,
before an entity with the authority to enforce
compliance with rules or laws applying to
audit services or audit remediation services
offered by the Contractor, and whether there
has been any change with regard to
previously reported proceedings since the
last contract action.
(b) The disclosure shall, at a minimum,
include—
(1) The entity hearing the case;
(2) The case or file number; and
(3) A brief description of the allegation or
conduct at issue and, if fully adjudicated or
settled, a brief description of the outcome.
(c) The Government will safeguard and
treat as confidential all statements provided
pursuant to this clause where the statement
has been marked ‘‘confidential’’ or
‘‘proprietary’’ by the Contractor. Statements
so marked will not be released by the
Government to the public pursuant to a
request under the Freedom of Information
Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, without prior notification
to the Contractor and opportunity for the
Contractor to claim an exemption from
release. The Government will treat any
statement provided pursuant to this clause as
confidential to the extent required by any
other applicable law.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2021–23457 Filed 10–28–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Oct 28, 2021
Jkt 256001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 217, 234, and 235
[Docket DARS–2021–0020]
RIN 0750–AL49
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Contract
Authority for Development and
Demonstration of Prototypes (DFARS
Case 2021–D025)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2021 that amends the types of line
items and contract options that may be
included, subject to limitations, in
certain contracts initially awarded
pursuant to competitive solicitations.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
December 28, 2021, to be considered in
the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2021–D025,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
‘‘DFARS Case 2021–D025’’ in the search
box and select ‘‘Search.’’ Select
‘‘Comment’’ and follow the instructions
to submit a comment. Please include
your name, company name (if any), and
‘‘DFARS Case 2021–D025’’ on any
attached document.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2021–D025 in the subject
line of the message.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check https://
www.regulations.gov, approximately
two to three days after submission to
verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS
to implement paragraph (a)(2) of section
831 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59951
Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L. 116–283).
Section 831(a)(2) amends 10 U.S.C.
2302e(a) to revise the type of contract
line items or options that may be
included, without additional
competition, in contracts initially
awarded from the competitive selection
of a proposal resulting from a broad
agency announcement (BAA).
When awarding a contract that results
from the competitive selection of a
proposal received in response to a BAA,
10 U.S.C. 2302e(a) permits the inclusion
of certain contract line items or contract
options that would not otherwise be
covered under the general solicitation
authority of a BAA. These contract line
items or contract options: (1) Must be
for certain services related to the
technology developed under the
contract, or the delivery of initial or
additional items created as a result of
the work performed under the contract;
and (2) are subject to the quantity, term,
and dollar value limitations expressed
at 10 U.S.C. 2302e(b).
10 U.S.C. 2302e is intended to help
streamline the process for moving
technologies from science and
technology into production and to
enable the transition of technology for
faster fielding by allowing the
performance of certain work to continue
while a follow-on or production
contract is awarded.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Section 831(a)(2) amends 10 U.S.C.
2302e to replace ‘‘provision of advanced
component development, prototype’’
with ‘‘development and
demonstration.’’ As a result, when
awarding a contract that results from the
competitive selection of a proposal
received in response to a BAA,
contracting officers may now include a
contract line item or contract option for
the ‘‘development and demonstration’’
of technology developed under the
contract. This revision provides a
broader scope of effort and funding for
which these contract line items and
contract options can be awarded.
This proposed rule reflects the
authority provided by section 831(a)(2)
and clarifies for contracting officers that
a contract line item or contract option
included in an award pursuant to 10
U.S.C. 2302e is not limited to the
funding types used for the general
solicitation authority of a BAA, which
are listed at DFARS 235.016.
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
59952
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 207 / Friday, October 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial
Items, Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This rule does not create any new
solicitation provisions or contract
clauses. It does not impact any existing
solicitation provisions or contract
clauses.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
The proposed rule impacts DoD
acquisition planning decisions for
contract awards that will result from the
competitive selection of a proposal in
response to a BAA for which DoD
intends to include a contract line item
or option for the development and
demonstration of technology developed
under the contract. The proposed rule
broadens the scope of effort for which
these contract line items and contract
options can be awarded and the type of
funding that may be used to fund these
line items or options. This proposed
rule also helps streamline the process
for moving technologies developed
under such contracts from science and
technology into production.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
VI. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801–808) before an
interim or final rule takes effect, DoD
will submit a copy of the interim or
final rule with the form, Submission of
Federal Rules under the Congressional
Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule under the
Congressional Review Act cannot take
effect until 60 days after it is published
in the Federal Register. This rule is not
anticipated to be a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Oct 28, 2021
Jkt 256001
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq., because the rule primarily
affects the acquisition planning
decisions made internally by DoD.
However, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis has been performed and is
summarized as follows:
The reason for this proposed rule is to
implement paragraph (a)(2) of section
831 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L. 116–283).
The objective of this rule is to revise
the type of contract line items or options
that may be included, without
additional competition, in contracts
initially awarded from the competitive
selection of a proposal resulting from a
broad agency announcement (BAA).
When awarding such a contract,
contracting officers may now include a
contract line item or contract option for
the ‘‘development and demonstration’’
of technology developed under the
contract. This revision provides a
broader scope of effort and funding for
which these contract line items and
contract options can be awarded, which
in turn helps streamline the process for
moving technologies developed under
such contracts from science and
technology into production. The legal
basis for the rule is paragraph (a)(2) of
section 831 of the NDAA for FY 2021.
Based on data from the Federal
Procurement Data System for FY 2018
through FY 2020, on average, DoD
annually awards 300 contracts to 200
unique small entities using the
competitive selection of proposals
resulting from a BAA.
This rule does not impose any new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
compliance requirements. This rule
does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with any other Federal rules. There are
no significant alternatives to this rule
that would accomplish the objective of
the statute.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2021–D025), in
correspondence.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 217,
234, and 235
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 217, 234, and
235 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 217, 234, and 235 continues to
read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
PART 217—SPECIAL CONTRACTING
METHODS
2. Amend section 217.202 by revising
paragraph (2) to read as follows:
■
217.202
Use of options.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) For a contract that is initially
awarded from the competitive selection
of a proposal resulting from a broad
agency announcement, see 234.005–1
for the use of contract options for the
development and demonstration or
initial production of technology
developed under the contract or the
delivery of initial or additional items.
PART 234—MAJOR SYSTEM
ACQUISITION
3. Amend section 234.005–1 by
revising the introductory text and
paragraph (1) to read as follows:
■
234.005–1
Competition.
A contract that is initially awarded
from the competitive selection of a
proposal resulting from a broad agency
announcement (see 235.016) may
contain a contract line item or contract
option using funds not limited to those
identified in 235.016 for the
development and demonstration or
initial production of technology
developed under the contract, or the
delivery of initial or additional items if
the item or a prototype thereof is created
as the result of work performed under
the contract, only when it adheres to the
following limitations:
(1) The contract line item or contract
option shall be limited to the delivery
of the minimal amount of initial or
additional items or prototypes that will
allow for timely competitive solicitation
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 207 / Friday, October 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
and award of a follow-on development
or production contract for those items.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 235—RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
4. Amend section 235.006–71 by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
235.006–71
Competition.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) For a contract that is initially
awarded from the competitive selection
of a proposal resulting from a broad
agency announcement, see 234.005–1
for the use of contract line items or
contract options for the development
and demonstration or initial production
of technology developed under the
contract or the delivery of initial or
additional items.
[FR Doc. 2021–23459 Filed 10–28–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2021–0103;
FXES111302WOLF0–212–FF02ENEH00]
RIN 1018–BE52
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Revision to the
Nonessential Experimental Population
of the Mexican Wolf
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; availability of
draft supplemental environmental
impact statement; announcement of
public information sessions and public
hearings.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), propose new
revisions to the existing experimental
population designation of the Mexican
wolf (Canis lupus baileyi) in the
Mexican Wolf Experimental Population
Area (MWEPA) in Arizona and New
Mexico under section 10(j) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA). We are taking this
action in response to a court-ordered
remand of our January 16, 2015, final
rule revising the regulations for the
nonessential experimental population of
the Mexican wolf. This document
proposes to modify the population
objective, establish a genetic objective,
and temporarily restrict three of the
forms of take of Mexican wolves in the
MWEPA that we adopted in the January
16, 2015, final rule. We are proposing
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:56 Oct 28, 2021
Jkt 256001
these revisions to ensure the long-term
conservation and recovery of the
Mexican wolf. In addition, this
document proposes to maintain the
nonessential designation for the
experimental population. We are not
proposing to revise the geographic
boundaries of the MWEPA. We are
seeking comment from the public on the
proposed regulatory revisions and on a
draft supplemental environmental
impact statement for the proposed
revisions. We also announce public
information sessions and public
hearings on this proposed rule and the
associated draft supplemental
environmental impact statement.
DATES:
Written comments: We will accept
public comments received or
postmarked on or before January 27,
2022. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES)
must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on the closing date. Due to a courtordered deadline, we will not extend
the date for public review and comment
on these documents.
Public information sessions and
public hearings: We are holding three
public information session and two
public hearings, as follows:
• On November 18, 2021, we will
hold a public information session from
5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., Mountain Time.
• On December 8, 2021, we will hold
a public information session from 5:30
p.m. to 7 p.m., Mountain Time,
followed by a public hearing from 7
p.m. to 9 p.m., Mountain Time.
• On January 11, 2022, we will hold
a public information session from 5:30
p.m. to 7 p.m., Mountain Time,
followed by a public hearing from 7
p.m. to 9 p.m., Mountain Time.
ADDRESSES:
Written comments: You may submit
written comments on this proposed rule
and the associated draft supplemental
environmental impact statement by one
of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter the docket number or RIN for this
rulemaking (presented above in the
document headings). For best results, do
not copy and paste either number;
instead, type the docket number or RIN
into the Search box using hyphens.
Then, click on the Search button. On the
resulting page, in the Search panel on
the left side of the screen, under the
Document Type heading, check the
Proposed Rule box to locate this
document. You may submit a comment
by clicking on ‘‘Comment.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59953
(2) By hard copy: Submit comments
by U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS–R2–
ES–2021–0103, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, MS: PRB/3W, 5275 Leesburg
Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803.
We request that you send written
comments only by the methods
described above. We will post all
comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see
Information Requested, below, for more
information).
Public information sessions and
public hearings: The public information
sessions and public hearings will be
held virtually via the Zoom online video
platform and via teleconference so that
participants can attend remotely. See
Public Information Sessions and Public
Hearings, below, for more information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brady McGee, Mexican Wolf Recovery
Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, New Mexico Ecological
Services Field Office, 2105 Osuna Road
NE, Albuquerque, NM 87113; by
telephone at 505–761–4704; or by
facsimile 505–761–2542. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), call the Federal Relay Service at
800–877–8339. You may visit the
Mexican Wolf Recovery Program’s
website at https://www.fws.gov/
southwest/es/mexicanwolf/ for
additional information about the
Mexican wolf recovery effort, and
https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/
mexicanwolf/10j-revision for
information about our proposed
revision.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Why We Need To Publish a Rule
Under section 10(j) of the ESA, the
USFWS may designate a population of
an endangered or threatened species as
an experimental population prior to its
reintroduction. Experimental
populations can only be designated by
issuing a rule.
On January 12, 1998, we published a
final rule (63 FR 1752) adopting
regulations that designate a nonessential
experimental population of the Mexican
wolf. On January 16, 2015, we
published a final rule (80 FR 2512; the
‘‘2015 10(j) rule’’) revising those
experimental population regulations
based on two decades of implementing
Mexican wolf reintroduction in the
Mexican Wolf Experimental Population
Area (MWEPA) in portions of Arizona
and New Mexico. The 2015 10(j) rule
expanded the geographic boundaries of
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 207 (Friday, October 29, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59951-59953]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23459]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 217, 234, and 235
[Docket DARS-2021-0020]
RIN 0750-AL49
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Contract
Authority for Development and Demonstration of Prototypes (DFARS Case
2021-D025)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 that amends the types of
line items and contract options that may be included, subject to
limitations, in certain contracts initially awarded pursuant to
competitive solicitations.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before December 28, 2021, to be
considered in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2021-D025, using
any of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for ``DFARS Case 2021-D025'' in the search box and select
``Search.'' Select ``Comment'' and follow the instructions to submit a
comment. Please include your name, company name (if any), and ``DFARS
Case 2021-D025'' on any attached document.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2021-D025 in
the subject line of the message.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission
to verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Moore, telephone 571-372-6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS to implement paragraph (a)(2)
of section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283). Section 831(a)(2) amends 10
U.S.C. 2302e(a) to revise the type of contract line items or options
that may be included, without additional competition, in contracts
initially awarded from the competitive selection of a proposal
resulting from a broad agency announcement (BAA).
When awarding a contract that results from the competitive
selection of a proposal received in response to a BAA, 10 U.S.C.
2302e(a) permits the inclusion of certain contract line items or
contract options that would not otherwise be covered under the general
solicitation authority of a BAA. These contract line items or contract
options: (1) Must be for certain services related to the technology
developed under the contract, or the delivery of initial or additional
items created as a result of the work performed under the contract; and
(2) are subject to the quantity, term, and dollar value limitations
expressed at 10 U.S.C. 2302e(b).
10 U.S.C. 2302e is intended to help streamline the process for
moving technologies from science and technology into production and to
enable the transition of technology for faster fielding by allowing the
performance of certain work to continue while a follow-on or production
contract is awarded.
II. Discussion and Analysis
Section 831(a)(2) amends 10 U.S.C. 2302e to replace ``provision of
advanced component development, prototype'' with ``development and
demonstration.'' As a result, when awarding a contract that results
from the competitive selection of a proposal received in response to a
BAA, contracting officers may now include a contract line item or
contract option for the ``development and demonstration'' of technology
developed under the contract. This revision provides a broader scope of
effort and funding for which these contract line items and contract
options can be awarded.
This proposed rule reflects the authority provided by section
831(a)(2) and clarifies for contracting officers that a contract line
item or contract option included in an award pursuant to 10 U.S.C.
2302e is not limited to the funding types used for the general
solicitation authority of a BAA, which are listed at DFARS 235.016.
[[Page 59952]]
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT) and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items
This rule does not create any new solicitation provisions or
contract clauses. It does not impact any existing solicitation
provisions or contract clauses.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
The proposed rule impacts DoD acquisition planning decisions for
contract awards that will result from the competitive selection of a
proposal in response to a BAA for which DoD intends to include a
contract line item or option for the development and demonstration of
technology developed under the contract. The proposed rule broadens the
scope of effort for which these contract line items and contract
options can be awarded and the type of funding that may be used to fund
these line items or options. This proposed rule also helps streamline
the process for moving technologies developed under such contracts from
science and technology into production.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993.
VI. Congressional Review Act
As required by the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801-808)
before an interim or final rule takes effect, DoD will submit a copy of
the interim or final rule with the form, Submission of Federal Rules
under the Congressional Review Act, to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A
major rule under the Congressional Review Act cannot take effect until
60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This rule is not
anticipated to be a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule primarily affects the acquisition planning decisions
made internally by DoD. However, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis has been performed and is summarized as follows:
The reason for this proposed rule is to implement paragraph (a)(2)
of section 831 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283).
The objective of this rule is to revise the type of contract line
items or options that may be included, without additional competition,
in contracts initially awarded from the competitive selection of a
proposal resulting from a broad agency announcement (BAA). When
awarding such a contract, contracting officers may now include a
contract line item or contract option for the ``development and
demonstration'' of technology developed under the contract. This
revision provides a broader scope of effort and funding for which these
contract line items and contract options can be awarded, which in turn
helps streamline the process for moving technologies developed under
such contracts from science and technology into production. The legal
basis for the rule is paragraph (a)(2) of section 831 of the NDAA for
FY 2021.
Based on data from the Federal Procurement Data System for FY 2018
through FY 2020, on average, DoD annually awards 300 contracts to 200
unique small entities using the competitive selection of proposals
resulting from a BAA.
This rule does not impose any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements. This rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules. There are no significant
alternatives to this rule that would accomplish the objective of the
statute.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2021-D025), in
correspondence.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 217, 234, and 235
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 217, 234, and 235 are proposed to be
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 217, 234, and 235 continues
to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
PART 217--SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS
0
2. Amend section 217.202 by revising paragraph (2) to read as follows:
217.202 Use of options.
* * * * *
(2) For a contract that is initially awarded from the competitive
selection of a proposal resulting from a broad agency announcement, see
234.005-1 for the use of contract options for the development and
demonstration or initial production of technology developed under the
contract or the delivery of initial or additional items.
PART 234--MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION
0
3. Amend section 234.005-1 by revising the introductory text and
paragraph (1) to read as follows:
234.005-1 Competition.
A contract that is initially awarded from the competitive selection
of a proposal resulting from a broad agency announcement (see 235.016)
may contain a contract line item or contract option using funds not
limited to those identified in 235.016 for the development and
demonstration or initial production of technology developed under the
contract, or the delivery of initial or additional items if the item or
a prototype thereof is created as the result of work performed under
the contract, only when it adheres to the following limitations:
(1) The contract line item or contract option shall be limited to
the delivery of the minimal amount of initial or additional items or
prototypes that will allow for timely competitive solicitation
[[Page 59953]]
and award of a follow-on development or production contract for those
items.
* * * * *
PART 235--RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
0
4. Amend section 235.006-71 by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
235.006-71 Competition.
* * * * *
(b) For a contract that is initially awarded from the competitive
selection of a proposal resulting from a broad agency announcement, see
234.005-1 for the use of contract line items or contract options for
the development and demonstration or initial production of technology
developed under the contract or the delivery of initial or additional
items.
[FR Doc. 2021-23459 Filed 10-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P