Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, 59760-59762 [2021-23467]
Download as PDF
59760
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 206 / Thursday, October 28, 2021 / Notices
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–170; NRC–2021–0198]
Armed Forces Radiobiology Research
Institute
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a request
dated September 17, 2021, as
supplemented by a letter dated October
7, 2021, from the Armed Forces
Radiobiology Research Institute
(AFRRI). The exemption allows specific
applicants for an operator or senior
operator license for the AFRRI Training,
Research, Isotopes, General Atomics
(TRIGA) reactor to manipulate the
controls at a similar TRIGA reactor to
satisfy certain training and testing
requirements.
SUMMARY:
The exemption was issued on
October 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2021–0198 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2021–0198. Address
questions about Docket IDs in
Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301–415–0624; email:
Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical
questions, contact the individuals listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The exemption request dated
September 17, 2021 and the
supplemental letter dated October 7,
2021 are available in ADAMS under
Accession Nos. ML21260A184 and
ML21285A025, respectively.
• Attention: The PDR, where you may
examine and order copies of public
documents, is currently closed. You
may submit your request to the PDR via
email at pdr.resource@nrc.gov or call 1–
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737,
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (ET),
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Montgomery, telephone: 301–
415–3398, email: Cindy.Montgomery@
nrc.gov and William Schuster,
telephone: 301–415–1590, email:
William.Schuster@nrc.gov. Both are staff
of the Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation at the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the exemption is attached.
Dated: October 25, 2021.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Patrick G. Boyle,
Project Manager, Non-Power Production and
Utilization Facility Licensing Branch, Division
of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power
Production and Utilization Facilities, Office
of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Attachment—Exemption
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Docket No. 50–170, Armed Forces
Radiobiology Research Institute,
Exemption
I. Background
The Armed Forces Radiobiology
Research Institute (AFRRI, the licensee)
holds the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission)
Renewed Facility Operating License No.
R–84 for the AFRRI Training, Research,
Isotopes, General Atomics (TRIGA)
reactor (the facility), which is a research
reactor located in Montgomery County,
Maryland. Under this license, the
licensee is authorized to operate the
facility up to a steady-state power level
of 1.1 megawatts thermal with pulsing
capability using reactivity insertions up
to 2.45% Dk/k. The license is subject to
the rules, regulations, and orders of the
NRC.
II. Request/Action
By letter dated September 17, 2021, as
supplemented by letter dated October 7,
2021, the licensee requested an
exemption from Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 55.31,
‘‘How to apply,’’ paragraph (a)(5) and 10
CFR 55.45(b), ‘‘Implementation—
Administration.’’ 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5)
requires an applicant for an operator or
senior operator license to provide
evidence that the applicant, as a trainee,
has successfully manipulated the
controls of either the facility for which
the license is sought or a plantreferenced simulator; 10 CFR 55.45(b)
requires an operating test to be
administered to an applicant for an
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
operator or senior operator license in a
facility walkthrough and in either the
facility, a Commission-approved
simulation facility, or a plant-referenced
simulator. According to the licensee,
these requirements cannot be met at the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor because (1) the
facility is in a shutdown state pending
the NRC’s review and approval of a
license amendment request for an
upgrade to the digital instrumentation
and control system and, therefore, is not
capable of control manipulations, (2) the
facility does not have a Commissionapproved simulation facility or a plantreferenced simulator, and (3) there are
currently no licensed operators at the
facility to supervise control
manipulations by applicants for
operator or senior operator licenses.
Under these circumstances, applicants
for operator or senior operator licenses
at the facility cannot be trained or tested
with respect to control manipulations as
is required by 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5) and 10
CFR 55.45(b). In lieu of these
requirements, the licensee seeks, via its
exemption request, that four named
applicants for an AFRRI operator or
senior operator license be allowed to
provide evidence that they, as trainees,
have successfully manipulated the
controls of the Idaho National
Laboratory (INL) Neutron Radiography
(NRAD) TRIGA reactor and be allowed
to take the portion of the operating test
requiring control manipulations at the
INL NRAD TRIGA reactor.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.11, ‘‘Specific
exemptions,’’ the Commission may,
upon application by an interested
person, or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 55, ‘‘Operators’ Licenses,’’ as
it determines (1) are authorized by law,
(2) will not endanger life or property,
and (3) are otherwise in the public
interest.
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
Exemptions are authorized by law
where they are not expressly prohibited
by statute or regulation. A proposed
exemption is implicitly authorized by
law if it will not endanger life or
property and is otherwise in the public
interest and no other provisions in law
prohibit, or otherwise restrict, its
application. As discussed in this section
of the NRC’s evaluation of the
exemption request, no provisions in law
prohibit or restrict an exemption to the
requirements concerning control
manipulations for certain operator
training and testing requirements;
subsequent sections of this evaluation
discuss that the exemption will not
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 206 / Thursday, October 28, 2021 / Notices
endanger life or property and is
otherwise in the public interest.
The regulations in 10 CFR part 55
implement Section 107 of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA),
which sets requirements upon the
Commission concerning operators’
licenses and states, in part, that the
Commission shall (1) prescribe uniform
conditions for licensing individuals as
operators of any of the various classes
of utilization facilities licensed by the
NRC and (2) determine the
qualifications of such individuals.
These requirements in the AEA do not
expressly prohibit exemptions from 10
CFR 55.31(a)(5) and 10 CFR 55.45(b),
which require that control
manipulations related to operator
training and testing be performed at the
facility for which the operator license is
sought, at a plant-referenced simulator,
or at a Commission-approved
simulation facility, as appropriate.
Further, as explained below, the
requested exemption would have little
impact on the uniformity of operator
licensing conditions or on the
determination of operator qualifications.
In its exemption request, the licensee
explained that the use of the INL NRAD
TRIGA reactor would provide reactor
physics and thermal hydraulic response
characteristics sufficiently similar to
those that would be provided at the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor such that the use
of the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor could
stand in the place of the use of the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor with respect to
the required control manipulations for
the training and testing of applicants for
AFRRI operator licenses. Additionally,
the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor uses
similar digital instrumentation and
controls, reactor control rod drive
mechanisms, and TRIGA fuel
assemblies as the AFRRI TRIGA reactor.
Therefore, uniform conditions for
operator licensing would be maintained
by using the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor
in place of the AFRRI TRIGA reactor to
the extent proposed in the exemption
request.
The licensee also explained that using
the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor in place
of the AFRRI TRIGA reactor to the
extent proposed in the exemption
request would not significantly change
how the Commission determines the
qualifications of operator applicants.
Under the exemption, 10 CFR
55.31(a)(5) would continue to require
the applicant to perform, at a minimum,
five significant control manipulations
that affect reactivity or power level and
10 CFR 55.45(b) would continue to
require the administration of the
operating test in a plant walkthrough
that would continue to require the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
applicant to demonstrate an
understanding of and the ability to
perform the actions necessary to
accomplish a representative sample
from among items (1) through (13) in 10
CFR 55.45(a).
Accordingly, because the AFRRI
TRIGA reactor and the INL NRAD
TRIGA reactor have similar operating
and technical characteristics with
respect to control manipulations, an
exemption from 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5) and
10 CFR 55.45(b) allowing the use of the
INL NRAD TRIGA reactor in lieu of the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor for control
manipulations for the training and
testing of specific applicants for AFRRI
operator licenses would satisfy the
applicable AEA requirements that the
Commission prescribe uniform
conditions for licensing individuals as
operators and determine the
qualifications of operators.
Additionally, as discussed below, the
exemption will not endanger life or
property and is otherwise in the public
interest. Therefore, the NRC finds that
the requested exemption is authorized
by law.
B. The Exemption Will Not Endanger
Life or Property
Control manipulations at the INL
NRAD TRIGA reactor would be
sufficiently similar and would provide
sufficiently similar reactor physics and
thermal hydraulic response
characteristics to those at the AFRRI
TRIGA reactor such that the use of the
INL NRAD TRIGA reactor could stand
in the place of the use of the AFRRI
TRIGA reactor with respect to the
required control manipulations for the
training and testing of the specified
applicants for AFRRI operator licenses.
Since its operating and technical
characteristics are similar to those of the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor, the use of the INL
NRAD TRIGA reactor by these
applicants would allow them to
complete the required control
manipulations for their training and
complete the required evolutions that
affect reactivity in 10 CFR 55.45(a)(1)
through (13) for their testing. As part of
the operator licensing application
process, the facility licensee will certify
that these applicants have completed
the required training for the AFRRI
TRIGA reactor. As part of the operator
licensing testing process, the NRC
examiners will ensure that these
applicants are evaluated to ensure that
they are fully capable of operating the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor, while accounting
for any differences between the AFRRI
TRIGA reactor and the INL NRAD
TRIGA reactor. Therefore, the NRC finds
that the training and testing of the
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
59761
specified AFRRI applicants would
satisfy the NRC’s training and testing
requirements. Accordingly, if ultimately
licensed, these applicants would have
learned to operate the AFRRI TRIGA
reactor competently and safely and,
thus, their licensing would be protective
of life and property.
Furthermore, the training and testing
of the specified AFRRI applicants at the
INL NRAD reactor would, itself, be
protective of life and property. In its
exemption request, the licensee
provided that the INL NRAD TRIGA
reactor has been operational since 1977
with a facility safety analysis and design
specifications that meet or exceed NRC
requirements. Additionally, the
specified AFRRI applicants would be
under the instruction of U.S.
Department of Energy qualified reactor
operators and reactor supervisors for all
of their control manipulations.
Lastly, the licensee has identified and
will ensure that the specified AFRRI
applicants are trained on the differences
between the AFRRI TRIGA reactor and
the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor.
Based on the above, the NRC finds
that the requested exemption will not
endanger life or property.
C. The Exemption Is Otherwise in the
Public Interest
The Commission’s values guide the
NRC in maintaining certain principles
of good regulation as it carries out
regulatory activities in furtherance of its
safety and security mission. These
principles focus the NRC on ensuring
safety and security while appropriately
considering the interests of the NRC’s
stakeholders, including the public and
licensees. These principles are
Independence, Openness, Efficiency,
Clarity, and Reliability. Independence
relates to NRC decisions being based on
objective, unbiased assessments of all
information. Openness relates to the
NRC conducting its regulatory activities
publicly and candidly. Efficiency relates
to the NRC ensuring that its regulatory
activities are consistent with the degree
of risk reduction they achieve; adopting
the option, where several effective
alternatives are available, that
minimizes the use of resources; and
making regulatory decisions without
delay. Clarity relates to NRC positions
being readily understood and easily
applied. Reliability relates to
established regulations being perceived
to be reliable and not unjustifiably in a
state of transition. The NRC’s principles
of good regulation can also provide
guidance as to whether the granting of
a particular exemption is otherwise in
the public interest.
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
59762
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 206 / Thursday, October 28, 2021 / Notices
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
On balance, the NRC’s principles of
good regulation demonstrate that the
granting of the requested exemption is
otherwise in the public interest. As an
initial matter, the exemption is
necessary for the restart of the AFRRI
TRIGA reactor. In its exemption request,
the licensee provided that such restart is
critical to national defense. The
licensing of the specified applicants for
AFRRI operator licenses would bring
the facility into compliance with the
staffing and surveillance requirements
of its technical specifications and would
facilitate the maintenance of its critical
systems. Additionally, as clearly,
openly, and independently determined
above, the licensee’s preferred method
of training and testing these applicants
with respect to control manipulations at
the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor will not
endanger life or property because the
operating and technical characteristics
of the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor are
sufficiently similar to those of the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor with respect to
control manipulations. Therefore, it
would be most efficient to approve the
licensee’s preferred method as opposed
to requiring some equally effective
alternative method. The requested
exemption would also maintain
unchanged the substantive requirements
upon the specified AFRRI applicants
with respect to training and testing. This
would further reliability by allowing
these applicants to complete their
applications with the underlying
requirements unchanged and by
allowing the operating test to be
conducted with the underlying
requirements unchanged. Finally, the
exemption would only apply to the
training and testing of the four named
applicants and would expire thereafter;
therefore, the exemption is narrowly
tailored to be efficient and to maintain
the reliability of the AFRRI operator
licensing program.
Based on the above, the NRC finds
that the requested exemption is
otherwise in the public interest.
D. Environmental Considerations
This exemption allows four named
applicants for an AFRRI TRIGA reactor
operator or senior operator license to
perform their training and testing
control manipulations required by 10
CFR 55.31(a)(5) and 10 CFR 55.45(b) at
the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor instead of
at the AFRRI TRIGA reactor.
For the following reasons, this
exemption meets the eligibility criteria
of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25) for a categorical
exclusion. There are no special or
extraordinary circumstances present
that would preclude reliance on this
exclusion. The NRC determined, in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Oct 27, 2021
Jkt 256001
accordance with 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi)(E), that the requirements
from which the exemption is sought
involve education, training, experience,
qualification, requalification, or other
employment suitability requirements.
The NRC also determined that granting
the requested exemption involves no
significant hazards consideration
because it does not authorize any
physical changes to the facility or any
of its safety systems or change any of the
assumptions or limits used in the
facility licensee’s safety analyses or
introduce any new failure modes; no
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite because the exemption does not
affect any effluent release limits as
provided in the facility licensee’s
technical specifications or by 10 CFR
part 20, ‘‘Standards for Protection
Against Radiation’’; no significant
increase in individual or cumulative
public or occupational radiation
exposure because the exemption does
not affect limits on the release of any
radioactive material or the limits
provided in 10 CFR part 20 for radiation
exposure to workers or members of the
public; no significant construction
impact because the exemption does not
involve any changes to a construction
permit; and no significant increase in
the potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents because the
exemption does not alter any of the
assumptions or limits in the facility
licensee’s safety analyses. In addition,
the NRC determined that there would be
no significant impacts to biota, water
resources, historic properties, cultural
resources, or socioeconomic conditions
in the region. As such, there are no
extraordinary circumstances present
that would preclude reliance on this
categorical exclusion. Therefore,
pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no
environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment need be
prepared in connection with granting
the requested exemption.
IV. Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
55.11, the exemption is authorized by
law, will not endanger life or property,
and is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, effective immediately, the
Commission hereby grants AFRRI an
exemption from 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5) and
10 CFR 55.45(b) to allow the four
applicants for an AFRRI TRIGA reactor
operator or senior operator license,
specified by name in the licensee’s letter
dated October 7, 2021, to provide
evidence that they, as trainees, have
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
successfully manipulated the controls of
the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor and to be
administered the portion of the
operating test requiring control
manipulations at the INL NRAD TRIGA
reactor. This exemption expires when
the training and initial testing of these
new applicants is completed.
Dated: October 22, 2021.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mohamed Shams,
Director, Division of Advanced Reactors and
Non-Power Production and Utilization
Facilities, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2021–23467 Filed 10–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Sunshine Act Meetings
Tuesday, November 9,
2021, at 10:15 a.m.; and Wednesday,
November 10, 2021, at 9 a.m.
PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal
Service Headquarters, 475 L’Enfant
Plaza SW, in the Benjamin Franklin
Room.
STATUS: Tuesday, November 9, 2021, at
10:15 a.m.—Closed; Wednesday,
November 10, 2021, at 9 a.m.—Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
DATE AND TIME:
Tuesday, November 9, 2021, at 10:15
a.m. (Closed)
1. Strategic Issues.
2. Financial and Operational Matters.
3. Compensation and Personnel Matters.
4. Administrative Items.
Wednesday, November 10, 2021, at 9
a.m. (Open)
1. Remarks of the Chairman of the Board
of Governors.
2. Remarks of the Postmaster General
and CEO.
3. Approval of Minutes of Previous
Meetings.
4. Committee Reports.
5. Financial Matters, including FY2021
and Financial Statements, and
Annual Report to Congress.
6. FY2022 Integrated Financial Plan and
Financing Resolution.
7. FY2023 Congressional
Reimbursement Request.
8. Quarterly Service Performance
Report.
9. Approval of Tentative Agendas for
February 2022 Meetings.
10. Board Leadership.
A public comment period will begin
immediately following the adjournment
of the open session on November 10,
2021. During the public comment
period, which shall not exceed 60
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 206 (Thursday, October 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59760-59762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23467]
[[Page 59760]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-170; NRC-2021-0198]
Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to a request dated September 17, 2021, as
supplemented by a letter dated October 7, 2021, from the Armed Forces
Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI). The exemption allows specific
applicants for an operator or senior operator license for the AFRRI
Training, Research, Isotopes, General Atomics (TRIGA) reactor to
manipulate the controls at a similar TRIGA reactor to satisfy certain
training and testing requirements.
DATES: The exemption was issued on October 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2021-0198 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2021-0198. Address
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann;
telephone: 301-415-0624; email: [email protected]. For technical
questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The exemption request dated September
17, 2021 and the supplemental letter dated October 7, 2021 are
available in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML21260A184 and ML21285A025,
respectively.
Attention: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies
of public documents, is currently closed. You may submit your request
to the PDR via email at [email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or
301-415-4737, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (ET), Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Montgomery, telephone: 301-415-
3398, email: [email protected] and William Schuster, telephone:
301-415-1590, email: [email protected]. Both are staff of the
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation at the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached.
Dated: October 25, 2021.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Patrick G. Boyle,
Project Manager, Non-Power Production and Utilization Facility
Licensing Branch, Division of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power
Production and Utilization Facilities, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
Attachment--Exemption
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Docket No. 50-170, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute,
Exemption
I. Background
The Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (AFRRI, the
licensee) holds the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the
Commission) Renewed Facility Operating License No. R-84 for the AFRRI
Training, Research, Isotopes, General Atomics (TRIGA) reactor (the
facility), which is a research reactor located in Montgomery County,
Maryland. Under this license, the licensee is authorized to operate the
facility up to a steady-state power level of 1.1 megawatts thermal with
pulsing capability using reactivity insertions up to 2.45% [Delta]k/k.
The license is subject to the rules, regulations, and orders of the
NRC.
II. Request/Action
By letter dated September 17, 2021, as supplemented by letter dated
October 7, 2021, the licensee requested an exemption from Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 55.31, ``How to apply,''
paragraph (a)(5) and 10 CFR 55.45(b), ``Implementation--
Administration.'' 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5) requires an applicant for an
operator or senior operator license to provide evidence that the
applicant, as a trainee, has successfully manipulated the controls of
either the facility for which the license is sought or a plant-
referenced simulator; 10 CFR 55.45(b) requires an operating test to be
administered to an applicant for an operator or senior operator license
in a facility walkthrough and in either the facility, a Commission-
approved simulation facility, or a plant-referenced simulator.
According to the licensee, these requirements cannot be met at the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor because (1) the facility is in a shutdown state
pending the NRC's review and approval of a license amendment request
for an upgrade to the digital instrumentation and control system and,
therefore, is not capable of control manipulations, (2) the facility
does not have a Commission-approved simulation facility or a plant-
referenced simulator, and (3) there are currently no licensed operators
at the facility to supervise control manipulations by applicants for
operator or senior operator licenses. Under these circumstances,
applicants for operator or senior operator licenses at the facility
cannot be trained or tested with respect to control manipulations as is
required by 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5) and 10 CFR 55.45(b). In lieu of these
requirements, the licensee seeks, via its exemption request, that four
named applicants for an AFRRI operator or senior operator license be
allowed to provide evidence that they, as trainees, have successfully
manipulated the controls of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Neutron
Radiography (NRAD) TRIGA reactor and be allowed to take the portion of
the operating test requiring control manipulations at the INL NRAD
TRIGA reactor.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.11, ``Specific exemptions,'' the Commission
may, upon application by an interested person, or upon its own
initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of 10 CFR part 55,
``Operators' Licenses,'' as it determines (1) are authorized by law,
(2) will not endanger life or property, and (3) are otherwise in the
public interest.
A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
Exemptions are authorized by law where they are not expressly
prohibited by statute or regulation. A proposed exemption is implicitly
authorized by law if it will not endanger life or property and is
otherwise in the public interest and no other provisions in law
prohibit, or otherwise restrict, its application. As discussed in this
section of the NRC's evaluation of the exemption request, no provisions
in law prohibit or restrict an exemption to the requirements concerning
control manipulations for certain operator training and testing
requirements; subsequent sections of this evaluation discuss that the
exemption will not
[[Page 59761]]
endanger life or property and is otherwise in the public interest.
The regulations in 10 CFR part 55 implement Section 107 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA), which sets requirements
upon the Commission concerning operators' licenses and states, in part,
that the Commission shall (1) prescribe uniform conditions for
licensing individuals as operators of any of the various classes of
utilization facilities licensed by the NRC and (2) determine the
qualifications of such individuals. These requirements in the AEA do
not expressly prohibit exemptions from 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5) and 10 CFR
55.45(b), which require that control manipulations related to operator
training and testing be performed at the facility for which the
operator license is sought, at a plant-referenced simulator, or at a
Commission-approved simulation facility, as appropriate. Further, as
explained below, the requested exemption would have little impact on
the uniformity of operator licensing conditions or on the determination
of operator qualifications.
In its exemption request, the licensee explained that the use of
the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor would provide reactor physics and thermal
hydraulic response characteristics sufficiently similar to those that
would be provided at the AFRRI TRIGA reactor such that the use of the
INL NRAD TRIGA reactor could stand in the place of the use of the AFRRI
TRIGA reactor with respect to the required control manipulations for
the training and testing of applicants for AFRRI operator licenses.
Additionally, the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor uses similar digital
instrumentation and controls, reactor control rod drive mechanisms, and
TRIGA fuel assemblies as the AFRRI TRIGA reactor. Therefore, uniform
conditions for operator licensing would be maintained by using the INL
NRAD TRIGA reactor in place of the AFRRI TRIGA reactor to the extent
proposed in the exemption request.
The licensee also explained that using the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor
in place of the AFRRI TRIGA reactor to the extent proposed in the
exemption request would not significantly change how the Commission
determines the qualifications of operator applicants. Under the
exemption, 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5) would continue to require the applicant
to perform, at a minimum, five significant control manipulations that
affect reactivity or power level and 10 CFR 55.45(b) would continue to
require the administration of the operating test in a plant walkthrough
that would continue to require the applicant to demonstrate an
understanding of and the ability to perform the actions necessary to
accomplish a representative sample from among items (1) through (13) in
10 CFR 55.45(a).
Accordingly, because the AFRRI TRIGA reactor and the INL NRAD TRIGA
reactor have similar operating and technical characteristics with
respect to control manipulations, an exemption from 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5)
and 10 CFR 55.45(b) allowing the use of the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor in
lieu of the AFRRI TRIGA reactor for control manipulations for the
training and testing of specific applicants for AFRRI operator licenses
would satisfy the applicable AEA requirements that the Commission
prescribe uniform conditions for licensing individuals as operators and
determine the qualifications of operators. Additionally, as discussed
below, the exemption will not endanger life or property and is
otherwise in the public interest. Therefore, the NRC finds that the
requested exemption is authorized by law.
B. The Exemption Will Not Endanger Life or Property
Control manipulations at the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor would be
sufficiently similar and would provide sufficiently similar reactor
physics and thermal hydraulic response characteristics to those at the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor such that the use of the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor
could stand in the place of the use of the AFRRI TRIGA reactor with
respect to the required control manipulations for the training and
testing of the specified applicants for AFRRI operator licenses. Since
its operating and technical characteristics are similar to those of the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor, the use of the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor by these
applicants would allow them to complete the required control
manipulations for their training and complete the required evolutions
that affect reactivity in 10 CFR 55.45(a)(1) through (13) for their
testing. As part of the operator licensing application process, the
facility licensee will certify that these applicants have completed the
required training for the AFRRI TRIGA reactor. As part of the operator
licensing testing process, the NRC examiners will ensure that these
applicants are evaluated to ensure that they are fully capable of
operating the AFRRI TRIGA reactor, while accounting for any differences
between the AFRRI TRIGA reactor and the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor.
Therefore, the NRC finds that the training and testing of the specified
AFRRI applicants would satisfy the NRC's training and testing
requirements. Accordingly, if ultimately licensed, these applicants
would have learned to operate the AFRRI TRIGA reactor competently and
safely and, thus, their licensing would be protective of life and
property.
Furthermore, the training and testing of the specified AFRRI
applicants at the INL NRAD reactor would, itself, be protective of life
and property. In its exemption request, the licensee provided that the
INL NRAD TRIGA reactor has been operational since 1977 with a facility
safety analysis and design specifications that meet or exceed NRC
requirements. Additionally, the specified AFRRI applicants would be
under the instruction of U.S. Department of Energy qualified reactor
operators and reactor supervisors for all of their control
manipulations.
Lastly, the licensee has identified and will ensure that the
specified AFRRI applicants are trained on the differences between the
AFRRI TRIGA reactor and the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor.
Based on the above, the NRC finds that the requested exemption will
not endanger life or property.
C. The Exemption Is Otherwise in the Public Interest
The Commission's values guide the NRC in maintaining certain
principles of good regulation as it carries out regulatory activities
in furtherance of its safety and security mission. These principles
focus the NRC on ensuring safety and security while appropriately
considering the interests of the NRC's stakeholders, including the
public and licensees. These principles are Independence, Openness,
Efficiency, Clarity, and Reliability. Independence relates to NRC
decisions being based on objective, unbiased assessments of all
information. Openness relates to the NRC conducting its regulatory
activities publicly and candidly. Efficiency relates to the NRC
ensuring that its regulatory activities are consistent with the degree
of risk reduction they achieve; adopting the option, where several
effective alternatives are available, that minimizes the use of
resources; and making regulatory decisions without delay. Clarity
relates to NRC positions being readily understood and easily applied.
Reliability relates to established regulations being perceived to be
reliable and not unjustifiably in a state of transition. The NRC's
principles of good regulation can also provide guidance as to whether
the granting of a particular exemption is otherwise in the public
interest.
[[Page 59762]]
On balance, the NRC's principles of good regulation demonstrate
that the granting of the requested exemption is otherwise in the public
interest. As an initial matter, the exemption is necessary for the
restart of the AFRRI TRIGA reactor. In its exemption request, the
licensee provided that such restart is critical to national defense.
The licensing of the specified applicants for AFRRI operator licenses
would bring the facility into compliance with the staffing and
surveillance requirements of its technical specifications and would
facilitate the maintenance of its critical systems. Additionally, as
clearly, openly, and independently determined above, the licensee's
preferred method of training and testing these applicants with respect
to control manipulations at the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor will not
endanger life or property because the operating and technical
characteristics of the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor are sufficiently similar
to those of the AFRRI TRIGA reactor with respect to control
manipulations. Therefore, it would be most efficient to approve the
licensee's preferred method as opposed to requiring some equally
effective alternative method. The requested exemption would also
maintain unchanged the substantive requirements upon the specified
AFRRI applicants with respect to training and testing. This would
further reliability by allowing these applicants to complete their
applications with the underlying requirements unchanged and by allowing
the operating test to be conducted with the underlying requirements
unchanged. Finally, the exemption would only apply to the training and
testing of the four named applicants and would expire thereafter;
therefore, the exemption is narrowly tailored to be efficient and to
maintain the reliability of the AFRRI operator licensing program.
Based on the above, the NRC finds that the requested exemption is
otherwise in the public interest.
D. Environmental Considerations
This exemption allows four named applicants for an AFRRI TRIGA
reactor operator or senior operator license to perform their training
and testing control manipulations required by 10 CFR 55.31(a)(5) and 10
CFR 55.45(b) at the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor instead of at the AFRRI
TRIGA reactor.
For the following reasons, this exemption meets the eligibility
criteria of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25) for a categorical exclusion. There are
no special or extraordinary circumstances present that would preclude
reliance on this exclusion. The NRC determined, in accordance with 10
CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(E), that the requirements from which the exemption
is sought involve education, training, experience, qualification,
requalification, or other employment suitability requirements. The NRC
also determined that granting the requested exemption involves no
significant hazards consideration because it does not authorize any
physical changes to the facility or any of its safety systems or change
any of the assumptions or limits used in the facility licensee's safety
analyses or introduce any new failure modes; no significant change in
the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that
may be released offsite because the exemption does not affect any
effluent release limits as provided in the facility licensee's
technical specifications or by 10 CFR part 20, ``Standards for
Protection Against Radiation''; no significant increase in individual
or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure because the
exemption does not affect limits on the release of any radioactive
material or the limits provided in 10 CFR part 20 for radiation
exposure to workers or members of the public; no significant
construction impact because the exemption does not involve any changes
to a construction permit; and no significant increase in the potential
for or consequences from radiological accidents because the exemption
does not alter any of the assumptions or limits in the facility
licensee's safety analyses. In addition, the NRC determined that there
would be no significant impacts to biota, water resources, historic
properties, cultural resources, or socioeconomic conditions in the
region. As such, there are no extraordinary circumstances present that
would preclude reliance on this categorical exclusion. Therefore,
pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or
environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with granting
the requested exemption.
IV. Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
55.11, the exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or
property, and is otherwise in the public interest. Therefore, effective
immediately, the Commission hereby grants AFRRI an exemption from 10
CFR 55.31(a)(5) and 10 CFR 55.45(b) to allow the four applicants for an
AFRRI TRIGA reactor operator or senior operator license, specified by
name in the licensee's letter dated October 7, 2021, to provide
evidence that they, as trainees, have successfully manipulated the
controls of the INL NRAD TRIGA reactor and to be administered the
portion of the operating test requiring control manipulations at the
INL NRAD TRIGA reactor. This exemption expires when the training and
initial testing of these new applicants is completed.
Dated: October 22, 2021.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Mohamed Shams,
Director, Division of Advanced Reactors and Non-Power Production and
Utilization Facilities, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2021-23467 Filed 10-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P