Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pink Shrimp and Midwater Trawl Exemptions to Vessel Monitoring System Requirements for the West Coast Groundfish Fishery, 59109-59111 [2021-23261]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
decision to revoke that voice service
provider’s or intermediate provider’s
SPC token need not update its filing on
the basis of that revocation until the
sixty (60) day period to request
Commission review, following
completion of the Governance
Authority’s formal review process,
pursuant to § 64.6308(b)(1) expires or, if
the aggrieved voice service provider or
intermediate provider files an appeal,
until ten business days after the
Wireline Competition Bureau releases a
final decision pursuant to
§ 64.6308(d)(1).
(ii) If a voice service provider or
intermediate provider elects not to file
a formal appeal of the Governance
Authority decision to revoke that voice
service provider’s or intermediate
provider’s SPC token, the provider need
not update its filing on the basis of that
revocation until the thirty (30) day
period to file a formal appeal with the
Governance Authority Board expires.
(d) Certification by gateway providers
in the Robocall Mitigation Database.
(1) Not later than March 1, 2023, a
gateway provider shall certify that it has
fully implemented the STIR/SHAKEN
authentication framework across its
entire network and all calls it carries or
processes are compliant with
§ 64.6302(a) and (c);
(2) A gateway provider shall include
the following information in its
certification:
(i) The specific reasonable steps the
gateway provider has taken to avoid
carrying or processing illegal robocall
traffic as part of its robocall mitigation
program; and
(ii) A statement of the gateway
provider’s commitment to respond fully
and within 24 hours to all traceback
requests from the Commission, law
enforcement, and the industry traceback
consortium, and to cooperate with such
entities in investigating and stopping
any illegal robocallers that use its
service to carry or process calls.
(3) All certifications made pursuant to
paragraph (d)(1) of this section shall:
(i) Be filed in the appropriate portal
on the Commission’s website; and
(ii) Be signed by an officer in
conformity with 47 CFR 1.16.
(4) A gateway provider filing a
certification shall submit the following
information in the appropriate portal on
the Commission’s website.
(i) The gateway provider’s business
name(s) and primary address;
(ii) Other business names in use by
the gateway provider;
(iii) All business names previously
used by the gateway provider;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Oct 25, 2021
Jkt 256001
(iv) Whether the gateway provider or
any affiliate is also a foreign voice
service provider; and
(v) The name, title, department,
business address, telephone number,
and email address of one person within
the company responsible for addressing
robocall mitigation-related issues.
(5) A gateway provider shall update
its filings within 10 business days of
any change to the information it must
provide pursuant to paragraphs (d)(2)
through (4) of this section, subject to the
conditions set forth in paragraphs
(c)(5)(i)–(ii) of this section.
(e) Intermediate provider and voice
service provider obligations.
(1) Beginning September 28, 2021,
intermediate providers and voice
service providers shall accept calls
directly from a voice service provider,
including a foreign voice service
provider that uses North American
Numbering Plan resources that pertain
to the United States to send voice traffic
to residential or business subscribers in
the United States, only if that voice
service provider’s filing appears in the
Robocall Mitigation Database in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section.
(2) Additional intermediate provider
and voice service provider obligations.
Beginning ninety days after the deadline
for filing certifications pursuant to
paragraph (d) of this section,
intermediate providers and voice
service providers shall accept calls
directly from a gateway provider only if
that gateway provider’s filing appears in
the Robocall Mitigation Database in
accordance with paragraph (d) of this
section.
[FR Doc. 2021–23164 Filed 10–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 211020–0214]
RIN 0648–BK73
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pink
Shrimp and Midwater Trawl
Exemptions to Vessel Monitoring
System Requirements for the West
Coast Groundfish Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59109
Proposed rule, request for
comments.
ACTION:
NMFS proposes revisions to
monitoring provisions that specify
exemptions for non-groundfish trawl
vessels participating in the Pacific coast
pink shrimp fishery and for groundfish
midwater trawl vessels. In a final rule
on vessel movement, monitoring, and
declaration management for the Pacific
coast groundfish fishery published on
June 11, 2020, vessels in the pink
shrimp trawl fishery were incorrectly
included with other open access nongroundfish trawl vessels that became
subject to a higher position transmission
rate on their NMFS type-approved
vessel monitoring system (VMS) units.
This proposed rule would correct the
error and return the required
transmission rate for vessels in the pink
shrimp trawl fishery to once every 60
minutes, as recommended by the Pacific
Fishery Management Council. This
proposed rule would also correct a
citation error in the VMS regulations
with regards to exemptions for
midwater trawl vessels, as well as a
typographical error in the trawl fishery
prohibitions.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received on or before November
26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2021–0085,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and enter
NOAA–NMFS–2021–0085 in the Search
box. Click on the ‘‘Comment’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Instructions: NMFS may not consider
comments if they are sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the
comment period ends. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and NMFS will post the comments for
public viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender is
publicly accessible. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Copies of the analytic
document supporting this action, are
available via the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov,
docket NOAA–NMFS–2021–0085, or by
contacting the Pacific Fishery
Management Council, 7700 NE
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26OCP1.SGM
26OCP1
59110
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland,
OR 97220–1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Dunlap, Fishery Policy Analyst, 206–
526–6019, or matthew.dunlap@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 11, 2020, NMFS published a
final rule on vessel movement,
monitoring, and declaration
management that revised reporting and
monitoring provisions for vessels
participating in the Pacific coast
groundfish fishery (85 FR 35594). The
rule increased the vessel position
frequency to increase NMFS’s ability to
enforce fishing activity around
restricted areas. The rule required an
increase in the position transmission
rate from once every 60 minutes to once
every 15 minutes for groundfish vessels
using NMFS type-approved VMS units.
This increase in frequency produces
more course, location, and speed data to
improve NMFS’s ability to identify
whether vessels are continuously
transiting in restricted areas or not.
While the Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) discussed and
recommended an exemption to the
increased transmission rate for vessels
fishing in the pink shrimp trawl fishery
because this fishery is not currently
subject to restricted fishing areas, the
exemption for pink shrimp trawl vessels
was inadvertently not included in the
original proposed or final rule. This
proposed rule would add the exemption
to the increased ping rate for pink
shrimp trawl vessels, as well as correct
a citation error in the midwater trawl
exemption paragraph at 50 CFR
660.14(d)(3)(ii)(B) and correct a
typographical error in the prohibitions
section of the trawl fishery regulations
at 50 CFR 660.112(b)(1)(x).
Between September 2014 and April
2016, the Council developed and
considered management measures to
address a range of vessel and gear
movement issues and aggregated these
issues under a single vessel movement
monitoring agenda item. Additional
details about the Council’s
considerations are included in the
Council’s analytical document (see
ADDRESSES). The Council’s public
scoping document includes several
references to making an exemption for
the increase in ping rate for pink shrimp
trawl vessels, specifically in Section
1.5.6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 25, 2021
Jkt 256001
The Council noted that the pink
shrimp fishery is currently required to
maintain a VMS unit at a ping rate of
one per hour; however, there are no
closed areas for the pink shrimp trawl
fishery. A vessel is required to declare
the type of gear being used for each trip
so enforcement can verify that the vessel
is authorized to fish in the Rockfish
Conservation Area. Therefore the
Council decided that additional
monitoring for vessels participating in
the pink shrimp trawl fishery is not
necessary.
Summary of the Proposed Changes
This section discusses the regulatory
revisions proposed by this rule that are
expected to carry out the Council’s
recommendation. The proposed
measures would:
• Restore the position transmission
rate requirement of once every 60
minutes for vessels participating in the
pink shrimp trawl fishery;
• Correct a citation in the ping rate
exemption for midwater trawl fishing
vessels; and
• Correct a typographical error in the
prohibitions section of the trawl fishery
regulations.
These proposed revisions would
relieve vessels participating in the pink
shrimp fishery from the added burden
of more frequent position transmissions,
consistent with the Council’s
recommendation and would clarify a
cross-citation from the previous
rulemaking on this issue.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has made a
preliminary determination that this
proposed rule is consistent with the
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP), other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law. In
making the final determination, NMFS
will consider the data, views, and
comments received during the public
comment period.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866. As
this rule is correcting an oversight in an
earlier rule and would result in no
change to the status quo for regulated
entities, there are not expected to be any
economic or regulatory impacts on these
entities.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Approximately 100 vessels would be
impacted by this rule, all of whom
would be considered small according to
the size standard for commercial fishing
businesses, with a median vessel
revenue of $305,000. Because all
directly regulated entities are small,
these proposed regulations would not be
expected to place small entities at a
significant disadvantage to large
entities. This action would also not be
expected to significantly reduce profit
or result in any change from the status
quo for the approximately 100 vessels
impacted by the rule. As a result, an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required and none has been
prepared.
This proposed rule contains no
information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian fisheries.
Dated: October 20, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16
U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
2. In § 660.14, revise paragraph
(d)(3)(ii)(B) and add paragraph
(d)(3)(ii)(D) to read as follows:
■
§ 660.14 Vessel Monitoring System (VMS)
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Midwater trawl exemption. If a
limited entry trawl vessel is fishing with
midwater trawl gear under declarations
in § 660.13(d)(4)(iv)(A), the mobile
transceiver unit must transmit a signal
at least once every hour.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\26OCP1.SGM
26OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(D) Pink shrimp trawl exemption. If a
vessel is fishing for pink shrimp using
non-groundfish trawl gear under
declarations in § 660.13(d)(4)(iv)(A), the
mobile transceiver unit must transmit a
signal at least once every hour.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 25, 2021
Jkt 256001
3. In § 660.112, revise paragraph
(b)(1)(x) to read as follows:
■
§ 660.112
*
PO 00000
Trawl fishery—prohibitions.
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
Frm 00070
*
*
59111
(x) Use midwater groundfish trawl
gear outside the Pacific whiting IFQ
fishery primary season dates as
specified at § 660.131(b).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–23261 Filed 10–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\26OCP1.SGM
26OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 26, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59109-59111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23261]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 211020-0214]
RIN 0648-BK73
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pink Shrimp and Midwater Trawl
Exemptions to Vessel Monitoring System Requirements for the West Coast
Groundfish Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule, request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes revisions to monitoring provisions that specify
exemptions for non-groundfish trawl vessels participating in the
Pacific coast pink shrimp fishery and for groundfish midwater trawl
vessels. In a final rule on vessel movement, monitoring, and
declaration management for the Pacific coast groundfish fishery
published on June 11, 2020, vessels in the pink shrimp trawl fishery
were incorrectly included with other open access non-groundfish trawl
vessels that became subject to a higher position transmission rate on
their NMFS type-approved vessel monitoring system (VMS) units. This
proposed rule would correct the error and return the required
transmission rate for vessels in the pink shrimp trawl fishery to once
every 60 minutes, as recommended by the Pacific Fishery Management
Council. This proposed rule would also correct a citation error in the
VMS regulations with regards to exemptions for midwater trawl vessels,
as well as a typographical error in the trawl fishery prohibitions.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received on or before
November 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2021-0085, by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and enter NOAA-NMFS-2021-0085 in the Search box.
Click on the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Instructions: NMFS may not consider comments if they are sent by
any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after
the comment period ends. All comments received are a part of the public
record and NMFS will post the comments for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender is publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Copies of the analytic document supporting this action, are
available via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA-NMFS-2021-0085, or by contacting the
Pacific Fishery Management Council, 7700 NE
[[Page 59110]]
Ambassador Place, Suite 101, Portland, OR 97220-1384.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Dunlap, Fishery Policy Analyst,
206-526-6019, or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 11, 2020, NMFS published a final rule on vessel movement,
monitoring, and declaration management that revised reporting and
monitoring provisions for vessels participating in the Pacific coast
groundfish fishery (85 FR 35594). The rule increased the vessel
position frequency to increase NMFS's ability to enforce fishing
activity around restricted areas. The rule required an increase in the
position transmission rate from once every 60 minutes to once every 15
minutes for groundfish vessels using NMFS type-approved VMS units. This
increase in frequency produces more course, location, and speed data to
improve NMFS's ability to identify whether vessels are continuously
transiting in restricted areas or not. While the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) discussed and recommended an exemption to
the increased transmission rate for vessels fishing in the pink shrimp
trawl fishery because this fishery is not currently subject to
restricted fishing areas, the exemption for pink shrimp trawl vessels
was inadvertently not included in the original proposed or final rule.
This proposed rule would add the exemption to the increased ping rate
for pink shrimp trawl vessels, as well as correct a citation error in
the midwater trawl exemption paragraph at 50 CFR 660.14(d)(3)(ii)(B)
and correct a typographical error in the prohibitions section of the
trawl fishery regulations at 50 CFR 660.112(b)(1)(x).
Between September 2014 and April 2016, the Council developed and
considered management measures to address a range of vessel and gear
movement issues and aggregated these issues under a single vessel
movement monitoring agenda item. Additional details about the Council's
considerations are included in the Council's analytical document (see
ADDRESSES). The Council's public scoping document includes several
references to making an exemption for the increase in ping rate for
pink shrimp trawl vessels, specifically in Section 1.5.6.
The Council noted that the pink shrimp fishery is currently
required to maintain a VMS unit at a ping rate of one per hour;
however, there are no closed areas for the pink shrimp trawl fishery. A
vessel is required to declare the type of gear being used for each trip
so enforcement can verify that the vessel is authorized to fish in the
Rockfish Conservation Area. Therefore the Council decided that
additional monitoring for vessels participating in the pink shrimp
trawl fishery is not necessary.
Summary of the Proposed Changes
This section discusses the regulatory revisions proposed by this
rule that are expected to carry out the Council's recommendation. The
proposed measures would:
Restore the position transmission rate requirement of once
every 60 minutes for vessels participating in the pink shrimp trawl
fishery;
Correct a citation in the ping rate exemption for midwater
trawl fishing vessels; and
Correct a typographical error in the prohibitions section
of the trawl fishery regulations.
These proposed revisions would relieve vessels participating in the
pink shrimp fishery from the added burden of more frequent position
transmissions, consistent with the Council's recommendation and would
clarify a cross-citation from the previous rulemaking on this issue.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has made a preliminary determination that
this proposed rule is consistent with the Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery Management Plan (FMP), other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law. In making the final determination, NMFS
will consider the data, views, and comments received during the public
comment period.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866. As this rule is correcting an
oversight in an earlier rule and would result in no change to the
status quo for regulated entities, there are not expected to be any
economic or regulatory impacts on these entities.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Approximately 100 vessels would be impacted by this rule, all of whom
would be considered small according to the size standard for commercial
fishing businesses, with a median vessel revenue of $305,000. Because
all directly regulated entities are small, these proposed regulations
would not be expected to place small entities at a significant
disadvantage to large entities. This action would also not be expected
to significantly reduce profit or result in any change from the status
quo for the approximately 100 vessels impacted by the rule. As a
result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains no information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian fisheries.
Dated: October 20, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and
16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 660.14, revise paragraph (d)(3)(ii)(B) and add paragraph
(d)(3)(ii)(D) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.14 Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) requirements.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Midwater trawl exemption. If a limited entry trawl vessel is
fishing with midwater trawl gear under declarations in Sec.
660.13(d)(4)(iv)(A), the mobile transceiver unit must transmit a signal
at least once every hour.
* * * * *
[[Page 59111]]
(D) Pink shrimp trawl exemption. If a vessel is fishing for pink
shrimp using non-groundfish trawl gear under declarations in Sec.
660.13(d)(4)(iv)(A), the mobile transceiver unit must transmit a signal
at least once every hour.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 660.112, revise paragraph (b)(1)(x) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.112 Trawl fishery--prohibitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(x) Use midwater groundfish trawl gear outside the Pacific whiting
IFQ fishery primary season dates as specified at Sec. 660.131(b).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-23261 Filed 10-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P