Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Base Year Emissions Inventory for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Standard, 59073-59075 [2021-23116]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
In addition to public comments that
would assist BIS in evaluating the status
of BCI technology as an emerging
technology, BIS encourages comments
that would help it to determine:
(1) Which aspects of BCI technology
would be more likely to require
monitoring by the U.S. Government
(USG); and
(2) Whether specific USG policies and
regulations, as well as industry
standards, need to be established before
this technology becomes widely
available for use in commercial
applications.
BIS also welcomes comments
concerning whether export controls on
BCI technology should be implemented
multilaterally (rather than unilaterally),
in the interest of increasing their
effectiveness and minimizing their
impact on U.S. industry. As noted
above, a number of respondents who
commented on BIS’s November 19
ANPRM indicated their preference for
multilateral export controls over
unilateral export controls, because the
former typically place U.S. industry on
a more level playing field versus
producers/suppliers in other countries.
In this regard, note that Section 1758(c)
of ECRA (as codified under 50 U.S.C.
4817(c)) provides that ‘‘the Secretary of
State, in consultation with the Secretary
[of Commerce] and the Secretary of
Defense, and the heads of other Federal
agencies, as appropriate, shall propose
that any technology identified pursuant
to subsection (a) [of ECRA] be added to
the list of technologies controlled by the
relevant multilateral export control
regimes.’’ Subsection (a) of section 1758
(as codified under 50 U.S.C. 4817(a))
addresses the interagency process for
identifying emerging technologies.
BIS also encourages comments that
address issues raised in the November
19 emerging technology ANPRM public
comments (as summarized above) and
any other BCI technology topics that
they consider to be relevant to this
inquiry. The information provided by
the respondents in response to this
ANPRM will assist BIS in evaluating
BCI as a potential emerging technology
for the purpose of formulating export
control policies that will be both
effective and appropriate, with respect
to their objective and scope.
Comments should be submitted to BIS
as described in the ADDRESSES section of
this ANPRM and must be received by
BIS no later than December 10, 2021.
This rule has been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ although
not economically significant, under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has been reviewed by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 25, 2021
Jkt 256001
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2021–23256 Filed 10–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2021–0441; FRL–9160–01–
R5]
Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Base
Year Emissions Inventory for the 2010
Sulfur Dioxide Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve,
under the Clean Air Act (CAA),
revisions to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the Michigan
department of Environment, Great
Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) on June 30,
2021. The revisions address the
emission inventory requirements for the
St. Clair County nonattainment area
under the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2)
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS or standard). The CAA
requires states to develop and submit, as
SIP revisions, emission inventories for
all areas designated as nonattainment
for any NAAQS.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2021–0441 at https://
www.regulations.gov or via email to
blakley.pamela@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59073
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Emily Crispell, Environmental Scientist,
Control Strategies Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–8512, crispell.emily@
epa.gov. The EPA Region 5 office is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays and facility closures
due to COVID–19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
I. The 2010 SO2 NAAQS Emissions
Inventory Requirements
On June 22, 2010, EPA promulgated a
revised 1-hour SO2 NAAQS of 75 parts
per billion (ppb) (75 FR 35520). On
September 12, 2016 the partial St. Clair
County area was designated as
nonattainment (St. Clair nonattainment
area) for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.
The St. Clair nonattainment area is
defined by the St. Clair River for the
eastern boundary, an extension from the
St. Clair River directly west to the
intersection of State Highway M–29 and
St. Clair River Drive, continuing west on
State Highway M–29 to Church Road to
Arnold Road to County Line Road for
the southern boundary, County Line
Road and the Macomb/St. Clair County
boundary to Stoddard Road to Wales
Ridge Road for the western boundary,
and Alpine Road to Fitz Road to Smith
Creek Road to Range Road to Huron
Avenue, extending directly east from
the intersection of Huron Road and
River Road to the St. Clair River for the
northern boundary (83 FR 1098, January
9, 2018).
CAA section 172(c)(3), 42 U.S.C.
7502(c)(3), requires states to develop
and submit, as SIP revisions, emission
inventories for all areas designated as
nonattainment for any NAAQS. An
emission inventory for SO2 is an
estimation of actual emissions of sulfur
oxides (SOX) in an area. SO2 is the
component of greatest concern and is
used as the indicator for the larger group
of gaseous SOX. SO2 is a gas that is
formed by the burning of fossil fuels by
E:\FR\FM\26OCP1.SGM
26OCP1
59074
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
power plants and other industrial
facilities such as extracting metal from
ore; natural sources such as volcanoes;
and locomotives, ships and other
vehicles and heavy equipment that burn
fuel with a high sulfur content. Control
measures that reduce SO2 can generally
be expected to reduce people’s
exposures to all gaseous SOX. Therefore,
an emission inventory for SOX focuses
on the emissions of SO2.
Emission inventories provide
emissions data for a variety of air
quality planning tasks, including
establishing baseline emission levels
(anthropogenic [manmade] emissions
associated with SO2 standard
violations), calculating emission
reduction targets needed to attain the
NAAQS, determining emission inputs
for SO2 air quality modeling analyses,
and tracking emissions over time to
determine progress toward achieving air
quality and emission reduction goals.
As stated above, the CAA requires the
states to submit emission inventories for
areas designated as nonattainment for
SO2. For the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS,
EPA specifies that states submit SO2
emission estimates for an inventory
calendar year preceding the year of the
area’s effective date of designation as a
nonattainment area (75 FR 35520).
States are required to submit estimates
of SO2 emissions for four general classes
of anthropogenic sources: stationary
point sources; area sources; on-road
mobile sources; and off-road mobile
sources.
II. EGLE’s Emissions Inventory
On June 30, 2021, EGLE submitted a
SIP revision addressing the emissions
inventory requirement of CAA section
172(c)(3). EGLE also clarified that
Michigan has a fully approved
Nonattainment New Source Review
(NSR) program, which is set forth in
Part 19 of Michigan’s rules (R 336.2901
through R 336.2908). EPA confirms that
this NSR program was approved by the
EPA into the SIP on December 16, 2013
(78 FR 76064). EGLE provided
documentation for the 2014 SO2 base
year emissions inventory for the St.
Clair County nonattainment area. EGLE
selected 2014 because this was one of
the three years of SO2 data indicating a
violation of the SO2 standard that were
used to designate the areas as
nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS
(83 FR 1098). In addition, the 2014
emissions inventory was the most recent
comprehensive, accurate, and quality
assured (QA) triennial emissions
inventory in the National Emissions
Inventory (NEI) database, available at
the time the state began preparing the
emissions inventory submittal for the
partial St. Clair County area. Table 1
summarizes the 2014 SO2 emissions for
the partial St. Clair County area in tons
of emissions per year.
TABLE 1—2014 SO2 EMISSIONS
2014 SO2 Emissions
(tons/year)
County/NAA
EGU 1
Partial St. Clair .............................................................................
1 Electric
Non–EGU
point
51,920
1,632
Area
Non-road
74.4
0.59
On-road
12.2
Total SO2
53,639.19
Generating Units (EGU).
A. Base Year Inventory
III. EPA’s Evaluation
EGLE estimated SO2 emissions for all
source categories in the St. Clair County
SO2 nonattainment area. Emissions for
the St. Clair County SO2 nonattainment
area were totaled by source category.
A. Emissions Inventory
a. Point Sources
To develop the SO2 point source
emissions inventory, EGLE used the
annual emissions data contained in
EPA’s Clean Air Markets Division
database for emissions from EGU point
sources and annual emissions data
reported by facility operators to EGLE’s
air emissions inventory database for
non-EGU point sources.
b. Area Sources
To develop the SO2 area source
emissions inventories, EGLE used the
annual emissions data contained in
EPA’s 2014 NEI to estimate 2014
emissions.
c. On-Road and Non-Road Sources
To develop the SO2 non-road and onroad source emissions inventories,
EGLE used the annual emissions data
contained in EPA’s 2014 NEI to estimate
2014 emissions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 25, 2021
Jkt 256001
EPA has reviewed EGLE’s June 30,
2021, requested SIP revision for
consistency with section 172(c)(3) CAA
and with EPA’s emission inventory
requirements. In particular, EPA has
reviewed the techniques used by EGLE
to quantify and quality assure the
emission estimates. EPA has also
considered whether EGLE has provided
the public with the opportunity to
review and comment on the
development of the emission estimates,
and whether the State has addressed all
public comments. EGLE received no
comments during the comment period
but did receive a comment from EPA
Region 5. The comment asked that the
emission inventory include the 2014
NEI emissions for 3 other categories of
sources: on-road, non-road, and area.
EGLE addressed this comment by
adding on-road, non-road, and area SO2
emissions estimates for the St. Clair
County nonattainment area to their
emissions inventory submittal. EGLE
documented the procedures used to
estimate the emissions for each of the
major source types. Our review finds
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that EGLE followed acceptable
procedures to estimate the emissions.
Accordingly, we propose to conclude
that EGLE has developed an inventory
of SO2 sources that is comprehensive
and complete. EGLE’s submittal of a
complete emission inventory and
certification of an approved NSR
program in addition to a Clean Data
Determination, proposed in a separate
action on August 17, 2021 (86 FR
45947), addresses deficiencies identified
in the September 20, 2019 (84 FR 49463)
finding of failure to submit a
nonattainment plan for the St. Clair
area, and will stop the sanctions clocks
applicable to those deficiencies.
IV. EPA Action
EPA is proposing to approve EGLE’s
SIP revision submitted to address the
SO2-related emission inventory and
NSR certification requirements for the
partial St. Clair County SO2
nonattainment area for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS. The emission inventory we are
approving into the SIP is specified in
Table 1. We are also proposing to
approve the emission inventory because
it contains comprehensive, accurate,
and current inventories of actual
emissions for all relevant sources in
E:\FR\FM\26OCP1.SGM
26OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
accordance with CAA section 172(c)(3),
and because EGLE adopted the emission
inventories after providing for
reasonable public notice. EPA also
proposes to approve the certification of
Michigan’s fully approved NSR
program, which was approved by the
EPA into the SIP on December 16, 2013
(78 FR 76064) and meets the
requirements of CAA section 172(c)(5).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Oct 25, 2021
Jkt 256001
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, sulfur oxides.
Dated: October 19, 2021.
Cheryl Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2021–23116 Filed 10–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0667; FRL–9105–01–
R7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri
Redesignation Request and
Associated Maintenance Plan for the
Jackson County 2010 SO2 1-Hour
NAAQS Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On February 18, 2021, the
State of Missouri submitted a request for
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to redesignate the Jackson
County, Missouri, 2010 1-hour sulfur
dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS)
nonattainment area to attainment and
approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision containing a maintenance
plan for the area. The State provided a
supplement to the maintenance plan on
September 7, 2021. In response to these
submittals, the EPA is proposing to take
the following actions: Approve the
State’s plan for maintaining attainment
of the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary
standard in the area; and approve the
State’s request to redesignate the
Jackson County SO2 nonattainment area
to attainment for the 2010 1-hour SO2
primary standard. This redesignation
action, if finalized, will address the
EPA’s obligation under a consent decree
which establishes a deadline of March
31, 2022 for the EPA to determine under
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 179(c)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
59075
whether the Jackson County SO2
nonattainment area attained the NAAQS
by the October 4, 2018 attainment date.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2021–0667 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wendy Vit, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7697 or by email at
vit.wendy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What is the background for the EPA’s
proposed actions?
IV. What are the criteria for redesignation?
V. What is the EPA’s analysis of the request?
VI. What are the actions the EPA is proposing
to take?
VII. Environmental Justice Concerns
VIII. Incorporation by Reference
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2021–
0667, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
E:\FR\FM\26OCP1.SGM
26OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 26, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59073-59075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23116]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2021-0441; FRL-9160-01-R5]
Air Plan Approval; Michigan; Base Year Emissions Inventory for
the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the Michigan department of
Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) on June 30, 2021. The
revisions address the emission inventory requirements for the St. Clair
County nonattainment area under the 2010 sulfur dioxide
(SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS or
standard). The CAA requires states to develop and submit, as SIP
revisions, emission inventories for all areas designated as
nonattainment for any NAAQS.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2021-0441 at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Crispell, Environmental
Scientist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8512, [email protected]. The
EPA Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays and facility closures due to COVID-
19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
I. The 2010 SO2 NAAQS Emissions Inventory Requirements
On June 22, 2010, EPA promulgated a revised 1-hour SO2
NAAQS of 75 parts per billion (ppb) (75 FR 35520). On September 12,
2016 the partial St. Clair County area was designated as nonattainment
(St. Clair nonattainment area) for the 2010 1-hour SO2
NAAQS. The St. Clair nonattainment area is defined by the St. Clair
River for the eastern boundary, an extension from the St. Clair River
directly west to the intersection of State Highway M-29 and St. Clair
River Drive, continuing west on State Highway M-29 to Church Road to
Arnold Road to County Line Road for the southern boundary, County Line
Road and the Macomb/St. Clair County boundary to Stoddard Road to Wales
Ridge Road for the western boundary, and Alpine Road to Fitz Road to
Smith Creek Road to Range Road to Huron Avenue, extending directly east
from the intersection of Huron Road and River Road to the St. Clair
River for the northern boundary (83 FR 1098, January 9, 2018).
CAA section 172(c)(3), 42 U.S.C. 7502(c)(3), requires states to
develop and submit, as SIP revisions, emission inventories for all
areas designated as nonattainment for any NAAQS. An emission inventory
for SO2 is an estimation of actual emissions of sulfur
oxides (SOX) in an area. SO2 is the component of
greatest concern and is used as the indicator for the larger group of
gaseous SOX. SO2 is a gas that is formed by the
burning of fossil fuels by
[[Page 59074]]
power plants and other industrial facilities such as extracting metal
from ore; natural sources such as volcanoes; and locomotives, ships and
other vehicles and heavy equipment that burn fuel with a high sulfur
content. Control measures that reduce SO2 can generally be
expected to reduce people's exposures to all gaseous SOX.
Therefore, an emission inventory for SOX focuses on the
emissions of SO2.
Emission inventories provide emissions data for a variety of air
quality planning tasks, including establishing baseline emission levels
(anthropogenic [manmade] emissions associated with SO2
standard violations), calculating emission reduction targets needed to
attain the NAAQS, determining emission inputs for SO2 air
quality modeling analyses, and tracking emissions over time to
determine progress toward achieving air quality and emission reduction
goals. As stated above, the CAA requires the states to submit emission
inventories for areas designated as nonattainment for SO2.
For the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, EPA specifies that states
submit SO2 emission estimates for an inventory calendar year
preceding the year of the area's effective date of designation as a
nonattainment area (75 FR 35520). States are required to submit
estimates of SO2 emissions for four general classes of
anthropogenic sources: stationary point sources; area sources; on-road
mobile sources; and off-road mobile sources.
II. EGLE's Emissions Inventory
On June 30, 2021, EGLE submitted a SIP revision addressing the
emissions inventory requirement of CAA section 172(c)(3). EGLE also
clarified that Michigan has a fully approved Nonattainment New Source
Review (NSR) program, which is set forth in Part 19 of Michigan's rules
(R 336.2901 through R 336.2908). EPA confirms that this NSR program was
approved by the EPA into the SIP on December 16, 2013 (78 FR 76064).
EGLE provided documentation for the 2014 SO2 base year
emissions inventory for the St. Clair County nonattainment area. EGLE
selected 2014 because this was one of the three years of SO2
data indicating a violation of the SO2 standard that were
used to designate the areas as nonattainment for the 2010
SO2 NAAQS (83 FR 1098). In addition, the 2014 emissions
inventory was the most recent comprehensive, accurate, and quality
assured (QA) triennial emissions inventory in the National Emissions
Inventory (NEI) database, available at the time the state began
preparing the emissions inventory submittal for the partial St. Clair
County area. Table 1 summarizes the 2014 SO2 emissions for
the partial St. Clair County area in tons of emissions per year.
Table 1--2014 SO2 Emissions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 SO2 Emissions (tons/year)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
County/NAA Non-EGU Total SO2
EGU \1\ point Area Non-road On-road
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial St. Clair....................... 51,920 1,632 74.4 0.59 12.2 53,639.19
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Electric Generating Units (EGU).
A. Base Year Inventory
EGLE estimated SO2 emissions for all source categories
in the St. Clair County SO2 nonattainment area. Emissions
for the St. Clair County SO2 nonattainment area were totaled
by source category.
a. Point Sources
To develop the SO2 point source emissions inventory,
EGLE used the annual emissions data contained in EPA's Clean Air
Markets Division database for emissions from EGU point sources and
annual emissions data reported by facility operators to EGLE's air
emissions inventory database for non-EGU point sources.
b. Area Sources
To develop the SO2 area source emissions inventories,
EGLE used the annual emissions data contained in EPA's 2014 NEI to
estimate 2014 emissions.
c. On-Road and Non-Road Sources
To develop the SO2 non-road and on-road source emissions
inventories, EGLE used the annual emissions data contained in EPA's
2014 NEI to estimate 2014 emissions.
III. EPA's Evaluation
A. Emissions Inventory
EPA has reviewed EGLE's June 30, 2021, requested SIP revision for
consistency with section 172(c)(3) CAA and with EPA's emission
inventory requirements. In particular, EPA has reviewed the techniques
used by EGLE to quantify and quality assure the emission estimates. EPA
has also considered whether EGLE has provided the public with the
opportunity to review and comment on the development of the emission
estimates, and whether the State has addressed all public comments.
EGLE received no comments during the comment period but did receive a
comment from EPA Region 5. The comment asked that the emission
inventory include the 2014 NEI emissions for 3 other categories of
sources: on-road, non-road, and area. EGLE addressed this comment by
adding on-road, non-road, and area SO2 emissions estimates
for the St. Clair County nonattainment area to their emissions
inventory submittal. EGLE documented the procedures used to estimate
the emissions for each of the major source types. Our review finds that
EGLE followed acceptable procedures to estimate the emissions.
Accordingly, we propose to conclude that EGLE has developed an
inventory of SO2 sources that is comprehensive and complete.
EGLE's submittal of a complete emission inventory and certification of
an approved NSR program in addition to a Clean Data Determination,
proposed in a separate action on August 17, 2021 (86 FR 45947),
addresses deficiencies identified in the September 20, 2019 (84 FR
49463) finding of failure to submit a nonattainment plan for the St.
Clair area, and will stop the sanctions clocks applicable to those
deficiencies.
IV. EPA Action
EPA is proposing to approve EGLE's SIP revision submitted to
address the SO2-related emission inventory and NSR
certification requirements for the partial St. Clair County
SO2 nonattainment area for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS.
The emission inventory we are approving into the SIP is specified in
Table 1. We are also proposing to approve the emission inventory
because it contains comprehensive, accurate, and current inventories of
actual emissions for all relevant sources in
[[Page 59075]]
accordance with CAA section 172(c)(3), and because EGLE adopted the
emission inventories after providing for reasonable public notice. EPA
also proposes to approve the certification of Michigan's fully approved
NSR program, which was approved by the EPA into the SIP on December 16,
2013 (78 FR 76064) and meets the requirements of CAA section 172(c)(5).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, sulfur oxides.
Dated: October 19, 2021.
Cheryl Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2021-23116 Filed 10-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P