Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old River, Between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, CA, 58827-58829 [2021-23060]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
T–381 BIG LAKE, AK TO FORT YUKON, AK [NEW]
BIG LAKE, AK (BGQ)
VORTAC
TALKEETNA, AK (TKA)
VOR/DME
HUMUB, AK
WP
WEGNO, AK
WP
ZALVI, AK
WP
ZEKLI, AK
WP
CEKED, AK
WP
EBIME, AK
WP
WP
JOTSO, AK
PAWKY, AK
WP
WIVEN, AK
WP
GLOWS, AK
WP
PERZO, AK
WP
FAIRBANKS, AK (FAI)
VORTAC
FORT YUKON, AK (FYU)
VORTAC
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 14,
2021.
Michael R. Beckles,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations
Group.
[FR Doc. 2021–22901 Filed 10–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0181]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old
River, Between Victoria Island and
Byron Tract, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
change the operating schedule that
governs the California Department of
Transportation (Route 4) highway
bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8,
between Victoria Island and Byron
Tract, California. This action is
proposed due to the infrequent amount
of vessels requiring drawbridge
openings on the waterway and will
reduce unnecessary staffing of the
drawbridge during periods of
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Oct 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
(Lat.
61°34′09.96″
62°17′54.16″
62°25′20.31″
62°35′21.42″
62°43′18.92″
62°52′38.17″
63°00′54.03″
63°14′22.89″
63°25′34.70″
63°36′22.32″
63°49′38.20″
64°26′15.88″
64°40′22.99″
64°48′00.25″
66°34′27.31″
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
N,
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
navigational inactivity while continuing
to meet the reasonable needs of
navigation. The proposed rulemaking
would require vessels to provide a fourhour advance notification for a bridge
opening. We invite your comments on
this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
December 27, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2021–0181 using Federal e-Rulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Carl T. Hausner,
Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh Coast
Guard District; telephone 510–437–
3516, email Carl.T.Hausner@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CADFW California Department of Fish and
Wildlife
Caltrans California Department of
Transportation
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CCCO Contra Costa County Office of the
Sheriff
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58827
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 10, 2021, and
effective September 15, 2021, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6011 United States Area
Navigation Routes.
*
*
149°58′01.77″
150°06′18.90″
150°13′49.23″
150°18′30.73″
150°12′13.59″
149°51′37.24″
149°40′57.24″
149°27′15.61″
148°47′49.87″
148°42′19.33″
148°51′51.74″
148°15′17.88″
148°07′20.15″
148°00′43.11″
145°16′35.97″
*
*
*
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
W)
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal
Basis
Old River is a tidal distributary of the
San Joaquin River that flows for about
40 miles and is navigable in its entirety.
It is located in the southern portion of
the San Joaquin River Delta. There are
approximately 10 marinas on Old River
and nearby waterways with two marinas
upriver from the bridge. From 2011
through June 2020, the swing span
opened for vessels 474 times, an average
of 4.27 openings per month. Most
openings have been for vessels operated
by the CADFW (58%), followed by
recreational vessels (22%), towboatvessel assistance (9%), and tug and
barge units (6%). Law enforcement and
search and rescue vessels also used the
waterway. The Caltrans (Route 4)
highway bridge across Old River, mile
14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron
Tract, is a swing span drawbridge. It
provides a horizontal clearance of 98
feet and a vertical clearance of 12.7 feet
above mean high water in the closed
position with unlimited vertical
clearance when fully opened. The
Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge is
currently governed by 33 CFR 117.183,
which requires the draw to open on
signal from May 1 through October 31
from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from
November 1 through April 30 from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
58828
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
draw opens on signal if at least four
hours notice is given to the drawtender
at the Rio Vista bridge across the
Sacramento River, mile 12.8.
Due to infrequent calls for drawbridge
openings, Caltrans has requested a fourhour notification year-round for
drawbridge openings at this location. A
four-hour notification will allow
Caltrans to use personnel more
efficiently and reduce unnecessary
staffing of the drawbridge during
periods of navigational inactivity while
continuing to meet the reasonable needs
of navigation on the waterway.
In order to gather public comments to
the proposed operating schedule
change, a test deviation was conducted
from May 10, 2021 through August 7,
2021. The notice of this test deviation
was published in the Federal Register
(83 FR 23278) on May 3, 2021. The
purpose of the test deviation was to
evaluate the possible impacts to
navigation with the bridge operating
under a 4-hour advance notice for
openings. During the test deviation
period CCCO submitted a comment,
stating their office responds to calls for
service, including emergency situations,
south of the Caltrans (Route 4) highway
bridge on Old River. Most of their patrol
vessels exceed the bridge vertical
clearance at mean high water, and
cannot transit through the bridge in the
closed position. CCCO concluded that a
4-hour advance notice for bridge
openings would limit their ability to
respond quickly to emergencies, thus
jeopardizing public safety. In response,
the Coast Guard cited 33 CFR 117.31(b)
‘‘Drawbridge operations for emergency
vessels,’’ which states the drawtender
shall take all reasonable measures to
have the draw opened, regardless of the
operating schedule of the draw, for
passage of Federal, State, and local
government vessels used for public
safety. Drawtender logs, during the test
deviation, recorded four CADFW vessels
requested openings in May, eight
CADFW vessels requested openings in
June, four CADFW vessels and one
survey vessel requested openings in July
and two CADFW vessels requested
openings in August. No recreational or
commercial vessels requested an
opening of the swing span during the 90
day test deviation.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change
the operating schedule that governs the
California Department of Transportation
(Route 4) highway bridge, across Old
River, mile 14.8, between Victoria
Island and Byron Tract, California.
This proposed rule would implement
regulations for the bridge to open on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Oct 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
signal if at least four hours notice is
given to the drawtender at the Rio Vista
bridge across the Sacramento River,
mile 12.8.
This proposed rule change would
meet the reasonable needs of navigation
on this portion of Old River.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
Orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the ability that vessels can
still transit the bridge given advanced
notice.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01, Rev.1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning Policy
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f). The Coast Guard has determined
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter
3, Table 3–1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental
Consideration nor a Memorandum for
the Record are required for this rule. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
DHS Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 117.183 to read as follows:
G. Protest Activities
§ 117.183
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
The draw of the California
Department of Transportation (Route 4)
highway bridge, mile 14.8 between
Victoria Island and Byron Tract, shall
open on signal if at least four hours
notice is given to the drawtender at the
Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento
River, mile 12.8.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this
document, see DHS’s eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified.
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Oct 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
Old River
Dated: October 18, 2021.
Brian K. Penoyer,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2021–23060 Filed 10–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
33 CFR Part 328
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 120
Notification of Regional Roundtable
Discussions Regarding ‘‘Waters of the
United States’’
Department of the Army, Corps
of Engineers, Department of Defense;
AGENCY:
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
and Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA).
ACTION: Notice of events; request for
nominations.
On June 9, 2021, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the U.S. Department of the Army
(hereafter, ‘‘the agencies’’) announced
their intent to revise the definition of
‘‘waters of the United States’’ under the
Clean Water Act through two
rulemakings—first, a foundational rule
that will propose to restore longstanding
protections, and a second rulemaking
process that builds on that regulatory
foundation. On July 30, 2021, the
agencies announced stakeholder
engagement opportunities, including the
agencies’ intent to host ten regionally
focused roundtables. EPA and Army are
announcing a process for stakeholders
to submit nomination letters to the
agencies to potentially be selected for
one of these ten geographically focused
roundtables. Each roundtable should
include diverse perspectives and
highlight the experience of individual
participants with the definition of
‘‘waters of the United States.’’ The
agencies intend to livestream each
roundtable to make them available for
public viewing.
DATES: Nomination letters for the
roundtables must be received on or
before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time
on November 3, 2021. EPA anticipates
that roundtables will be held in
December 2021 and potentially January
2022. Specific dates will be coordinated
with selected nominees based on
availability. Please refer to the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate
Balasa, Office of Water, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (312) 886–6027;
email address: WOTUS-outreach@
epa.gov, or Stacey Jensen, Office of the
Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil
Works, Department of the Army, 108
Army Pentagon, Washington, DC
20310–0104; telephone number: (703)
459–6026; email address:
usarmy.pentagon.hqda-asa-cw.mbx.asacw-reporting@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. General Information
[FRL–6027.4–04–OW]
PO 00000
58829
Sfmt 4702
In the last six years, the agencies have
implemented three different definitions
of ‘‘waters of the United States’’—the
pre-2015 regulatory regime, the 2015
Clean Water Rule, and the 2020
Navigable Waters Protection Rule
(NWPR). The agencies’ experience
E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM
25OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 203 (Monday, October 25, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58827-58829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23060]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2021-0181]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old River, Between Victoria
Island and Byron Tract, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
governs the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway
bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron
Tract, California. This action is proposed due to the infrequent amount
of vessels requiring drawbridge openings on the waterway and will
reduce unnecessary staffing of the drawbridge during periods of
navigational inactivity while continuing to meet the reasonable needs
of navigation. The proposed rulemaking would require vessels to provide
a four-hour advance notification for a bridge opening. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before December 27, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2021-0181 using Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Carl T. Hausner, Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh
Coast Guard District; telephone 510-437-3516, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CADFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CCCO Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis
Old River is a tidal distributary of the San Joaquin River that
flows for about 40 miles and is navigable in its entirety. It is
located in the southern portion of the San Joaquin River Delta. There
are approximately 10 marinas on Old River and nearby waterways with two
marinas upriver from the bridge. From 2011 through June 2020, the swing
span opened for vessels 474 times, an average of 4.27 openings per
month. Most openings have been for vessels operated by the CADFW (58%),
followed by recreational vessels (22%), towboat-vessel assistance (9%),
and tug and barge units (6%). Law enforcement and search and rescue
vessels also used the waterway. The Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge
across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron Tract,
is a swing span drawbridge. It provides a horizontal clearance of 98
feet and a vertical clearance of 12.7 feet above mean high water in the
closed position with unlimited vertical clearance when fully opened.
The Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge is currently governed by 33 CFR
117.183, which requires the draw to open on signal from May 1 through
October 31 from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from November 1 through April 30
from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the
[[Page 58828]]
draw opens on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the
drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile
12.8.
Due to infrequent calls for drawbridge openings, Caltrans has
requested a four- hour notification year-round for drawbridge openings
at this location. A four-hour notification will allow Caltrans to use
personnel more efficiently and reduce unnecessary staffing of the
drawbridge during periods of navigational inactivity while continuing
to meet the reasonable needs of navigation on the waterway.
In order to gather public comments to the proposed operating
schedule change, a test deviation was conducted from May 10, 2021
through August 7, 2021. The notice of this test deviation was published
in the Federal Register (83 FR 23278) on May 3, 2021. The purpose of
the test deviation was to evaluate the possible impacts to navigation
with the bridge operating under a 4-hour advance notice for openings.
During the test deviation period CCCO submitted a comment, stating
their office responds to calls for service, including emergency
situations, south of the Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge on Old
River. Most of their patrol vessels exceed the bridge vertical
clearance at mean high water, and cannot transit through the bridge in
the closed position. CCCO concluded that a 4-hour advance notice for
bridge openings would limit their ability to respond quickly to
emergencies, thus jeopardizing public safety. In response, the Coast
Guard cited 33 CFR 117.31(b) ``Drawbridge operations for emergency
vessels,'' which states the drawtender shall take all reasonable
measures to have the draw opened, regardless of the operating schedule
of the draw, for passage of Federal, State, and local government
vessels used for public safety. Drawtender logs, during the test
deviation, recorded four CADFW vessels requested openings in May, eight
CADFW vessels requested openings in June, four CADFW vessels and one
survey vessel requested openings in July and two CADFW vessels
requested openings in August. No recreational or commercial vessels
requested an opening of the swing span during the 90 day test
deviation.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that
governs the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway
bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron
Tract, California.
This proposed rule would implement regulations for the bridge to
open on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender
at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8.
This proposed rule change would meet the reasonable needs of
navigation on this portion of Old River.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A
above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.
[[Page 58829]]
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule promulgates the
operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph
L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System
of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; DHS Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.183 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.183 Old River
The draw of the California Department of Transportation (Route 4)
highway bridge, mile 14.8 between Victoria Island and Byron Tract,
shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the
drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile
12.8.
Dated: October 18, 2021.
Brian K. Penoyer,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2021-23060 Filed 10-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P