Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old River, Between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, CA, 58827-58829 [2021-23060]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Environmental Review This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final regulatory action. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). The Proposed Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS 1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows: ■ T–381 BIG LAKE, AK TO FORT YUKON, AK [NEW] BIG LAKE, AK (BGQ) VORTAC TALKEETNA, AK (TKA) VOR/DME HUMUB, AK WP WEGNO, AK WP ZALVI, AK WP ZEKLI, AK WP CEKED, AK WP EBIME, AK WP WP JOTSO, AK PAWKY, AK WP WIVEN, AK WP GLOWS, AK WP PERZO, AK WP FAIRBANKS, AK (FAI) VORTAC FORT YUKON, AK (FYU) VORTAC * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC, on October 14, 2021. Michael R. Beckles, Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group. [FR Doc. 2021–22901 Filed 10–22–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [Docket No. USCG–2021–0181] RIN 1625–AA09 Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old River, Between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, CA Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that governs the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, California. This action is proposed due to the infrequent amount of vessels requiring drawbridge openings on the waterway and will reduce unnecessary staffing of the drawbridge during periods of jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Oct 22, 2021 Jkt 256001 (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. (Lat. 61°34′09.96″ 62°17′54.16″ 62°25′20.31″ 62°35′21.42″ 62°43′18.92″ 62°52′38.17″ 63°00′54.03″ 63°14′22.89″ 63°25′34.70″ 63°36′22.32″ 63°49′38.20″ 64°26′15.88″ 64°40′22.99″ 64°48′00.25″ 66°34′27.31″ N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N, long. long. long. long. long. long. long. long. long. long. long. long. long. long. long. navigational inactivity while continuing to meet the reasonable needs of navigation. The proposed rulemaking would require vessels to provide a fourhour advance notification for a bridge opening. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking. DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before December 27, 2021. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG– 2021–0181 using Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Carl T. Hausner, Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District; telephone 510–437– 3516, email Carl.T.Hausner@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CADFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife Caltrans California Department of Transportation CFR Code of Federal Regulations CCCO Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register OMB Office of Management and Budget NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 58827 Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. § 71.1 [Amended] 2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows: ■ Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes. * * 149°58′01.77″ 150°06′18.90″ 150°13′49.23″ 150°18′30.73″ 150°12′13.59″ 149°51′37.24″ 149°40′57.24″ 149°27′15.61″ 148°47′49.87″ 148°42′19.33″ 148°51′51.74″ 148°15′17.88″ 148°07′20.15″ 148°00′43.11″ 145°16′35.97″ * * * W) W) W) W) W) W) W) W) W) W) W) W) W) W) W) § Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis Old River is a tidal distributary of the San Joaquin River that flows for about 40 miles and is navigable in its entirety. It is located in the southern portion of the San Joaquin River Delta. There are approximately 10 marinas on Old River and nearby waterways with two marinas upriver from the bridge. From 2011 through June 2020, the swing span opened for vessels 474 times, an average of 4.27 openings per month. Most openings have been for vessels operated by the CADFW (58%), followed by recreational vessels (22%), towboatvessel assistance (9%), and tug and barge units (6%). Law enforcement and search and rescue vessels also used the waterway. The Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, is a swing span drawbridge. It provides a horizontal clearance of 98 feet and a vertical clearance of 12.7 feet above mean high water in the closed position with unlimited vertical clearance when fully opened. The Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge is currently governed by 33 CFR 117.183, which requires the draw to open on signal from May 1 through October 31 from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from November 1 through April 30 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1 58828 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 draw opens on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8. Due to infrequent calls for drawbridge openings, Caltrans has requested a fourhour notification year-round for drawbridge openings at this location. A four-hour notification will allow Caltrans to use personnel more efficiently and reduce unnecessary staffing of the drawbridge during periods of navigational inactivity while continuing to meet the reasonable needs of navigation on the waterway. In order to gather public comments to the proposed operating schedule change, a test deviation was conducted from May 10, 2021 through August 7, 2021. The notice of this test deviation was published in the Federal Register (83 FR 23278) on May 3, 2021. The purpose of the test deviation was to evaluate the possible impacts to navigation with the bridge operating under a 4-hour advance notice for openings. During the test deviation period CCCO submitted a comment, stating their office responds to calls for service, including emergency situations, south of the Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge on Old River. Most of their patrol vessels exceed the bridge vertical clearance at mean high water, and cannot transit through the bridge in the closed position. CCCO concluded that a 4-hour advance notice for bridge openings would limit their ability to respond quickly to emergencies, thus jeopardizing public safety. In response, the Coast Guard cited 33 CFR 117.31(b) ‘‘Drawbridge operations for emergency vessels,’’ which states the drawtender shall take all reasonable measures to have the draw opened, regardless of the operating schedule of the draw, for passage of Federal, State, and local government vessels used for public safety. Drawtender logs, during the test deviation, recorded four CADFW vessels requested openings in May, eight CADFW vessels requested openings in June, four CADFW vessels and one survey vessel requested openings in July and two CADFW vessels requested openings in August. No recreational or commercial vessels requested an opening of the swing span during the 90 day test deviation. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that governs the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, California. This proposed rule would implement regulations for the bridge to open on VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Oct 22, 2021 Jkt 256001 signal if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8. This proposed rule change would meet the reasonable needs of navigation on this portion of Old River. IV. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132 (Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble. E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01, Rev.1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321– 4370f). The Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3–1 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures. Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117 Bridges. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows: PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1; DHS Delegation No. 0170.1. ■ 2. Revise § 117.183 to read as follows: G. Protest Activities § 117.183 The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. The draw of the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway bridge, mile 14.8 between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8. V. Public Participation and Request for Comments jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1 www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this document, see DHS’s eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website’s instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified. We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using https:// www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions. We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:14 Oct 22, 2021 Jkt 256001 Old River Dated: October 18, 2021. Brian K. Penoyer, Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District. [FR Doc. 2021–23060 Filed 10–22–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers 33 CFR Part 328 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 120 Notification of Regional Roundtable Discussions Regarding ‘‘Waters of the United States’’ Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense; AGENCY: Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of events; request for nominations. On June 9, 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of the Army (hereafter, ‘‘the agencies’’) announced their intent to revise the definition of ‘‘waters of the United States’’ under the Clean Water Act through two rulemakings—first, a foundational rule that will propose to restore longstanding protections, and a second rulemaking process that builds on that regulatory foundation. On July 30, 2021, the agencies announced stakeholder engagement opportunities, including the agencies’ intent to host ten regionally focused roundtables. EPA and Army are announcing a process for stakeholders to submit nomination letters to the agencies to potentially be selected for one of these ten geographically focused roundtables. Each roundtable should include diverse perspectives and highlight the experience of individual participants with the definition of ‘‘waters of the United States.’’ The agencies intend to livestream each roundtable to make them available for public viewing. DATES: Nomination letters for the roundtables must be received on or before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on November 3, 2021. EPA anticipates that roundtables will be held in December 2021 and potentially January 2022. Specific dates will be coordinated with selected nominees based on availability. Please refer to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for additional information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kate Balasa, Office of Water, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (312) 886–6027; email address: WOTUS-outreach@ epa.gov, or Stacey Jensen, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, Department of the Army, 108 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310–0104; telephone number: (703) 459–6026; email address: usarmy.pentagon.hqda-asa-cw.mbx.asacw-reporting@mail.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. General Information [FRL–6027.4–04–OW] PO 00000 58829 Sfmt 4702 In the last six years, the agencies have implemented three different definitions of ‘‘waters of the United States’’—the pre-2015 regulatory regime, the 2015 Clean Water Rule, and the 2020 Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR). The agencies’ experience E:\FR\FM\25OCP1.SGM 25OCP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 203 (Monday, October 25, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58827-58829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23060]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0181]
RIN 1625-AA09


Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Old River, Between Victoria 
Island and Byron Tract, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that 
governs the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway 
bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron 
Tract, California. This action is proposed due to the infrequent amount 
of vessels requiring drawbridge openings on the waterway and will 
reduce unnecessary staffing of the drawbridge during periods of 
navigational inactivity while continuing to meet the reasonable needs 
of navigation. The proposed rulemaking would require vessels to provide 
a four-hour advance notification for a bridge opening. We invite your 
comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or 
before December 27, 2021.

ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2021-0181 using Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion 
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on 
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed 
rule, call or email Carl T. Hausner, Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh 
Coast Guard District; telephone 510-437-3516, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CADFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CCCO Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose and Legal Basis

    Old River is a tidal distributary of the San Joaquin River that 
flows for about 40 miles and is navigable in its entirety. It is 
located in the southern portion of the San Joaquin River Delta. There 
are approximately 10 marinas on Old River and nearby waterways with two 
marinas upriver from the bridge. From 2011 through June 2020, the swing 
span opened for vessels 474 times, an average of 4.27 openings per 
month. Most openings have been for vessels operated by the CADFW (58%), 
followed by recreational vessels (22%), towboat-vessel assistance (9%), 
and tug and barge units (6%). Law enforcement and search and rescue 
vessels also used the waterway. The Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge 
across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, 
is a swing span drawbridge. It provides a horizontal clearance of 98 
feet and a vertical clearance of 12.7 feet above mean high water in the 
closed position with unlimited vertical clearance when fully opened. 
The Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge is currently governed by 33 CFR 
117.183, which requires the draw to open on signal from May 1 through 
October 31 from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., and from November 1 through April 30 
from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. At all other times, the

[[Page 58828]]

draw opens on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the 
drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 
12.8.
    Due to infrequent calls for drawbridge openings, Caltrans has 
requested a four- hour notification year-round for drawbridge openings 
at this location. A four-hour notification will allow Caltrans to use 
personnel more efficiently and reduce unnecessary staffing of the 
drawbridge during periods of navigational inactivity while continuing 
to meet the reasonable needs of navigation on the waterway.
    In order to gather public comments to the proposed operating 
schedule change, a test deviation was conducted from May 10, 2021 
through August 7, 2021. The notice of this test deviation was published 
in the Federal Register (83 FR 23278) on May 3, 2021. The purpose of 
the test deviation was to evaluate the possible impacts to navigation 
with the bridge operating under a 4-hour advance notice for openings. 
During the test deviation period CCCO submitted a comment, stating 
their office responds to calls for service, including emergency 
situations, south of the Caltrans (Route 4) highway bridge on Old 
River. Most of their patrol vessels exceed the bridge vertical 
clearance at mean high water, and cannot transit through the bridge in 
the closed position. CCCO concluded that a 4-hour advance notice for 
bridge openings would limit their ability to respond quickly to 
emergencies, thus jeopardizing public safety. In response, the Coast 
Guard cited 33 CFR 117.31(b) ``Drawbridge operations for emergency 
vessels,'' which states the drawtender shall take all reasonable 
measures to have the draw opened, regardless of the operating schedule 
of the draw, for passage of Federal, State, and local government 
vessels used for public safety. Drawtender logs, during the test 
deviation, recorded four CADFW vessels requested openings in May, eight 
CADFW vessels requested openings in June, four CADFW vessels and one 
survey vessel requested openings in July and two CADFW vessels 
requested openings in August. No recreational or commercial vessels 
requested an opening of the swing span during the 90 day test 
deviation.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating schedule that 
governs the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) highway 
bridge, across Old River, mile 14.8, between Victoria Island and Byron 
Tract, California.
    This proposed rule would implement regulations for the bridge to 
open on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the drawtender 
at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8.
    This proposed rule change would meet the reasonable needs of 
navigation on this portion of Old River.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes 
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our 
analyses based on these statutes and Executive Orders and we discuss 
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM 
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that 
vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A 
above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact 
on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect 
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you 
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that 
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action 
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132 
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on 
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels 
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and 
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under 
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or 
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not 
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this 
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

[[Page 58829]]

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01, Rev.1, associated implementing 
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1 
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The 
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of 
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant 
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule promulgates the 
operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. Normally such 
actions are categorically excluded from further review, under paragraph 
L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental 
Planning Implementation Procedures.
    Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum 
for the Record are required for this rule. We seek any comments or 
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant 
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, 
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment 
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If 
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this 
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which 
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or 
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be 
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted 
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any 
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and 
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System 
of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in this docket 
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's 
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up 
for email alerts, you will be notified.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes 
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; DHS Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Revise Sec.  117.183 to read as follows:


Sec.  117.183  Old River

    The draw of the California Department of Transportation (Route 4) 
highway bridge, mile 14.8 between Victoria Island and Byron Tract, 
shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given to the 
drawtender at the Rio Vista bridge across the Sacramento River, mile 
12.8.

    Dated: October 18, 2021.
Brian K. Penoyer,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 2021-23060 Filed 10-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.