Air Plan Approval; AK; Juneau, Mendenhall Valley Second 10-Year PM10, 58807-58809 [2021-23040]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2020–0649; FRL–8788–02–
R10]
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
2. Add § 165.T13–0798 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–0798 Safety Zone; Hydroplane
and Raceboat Museum Test Area, Lake
Washington, WA.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters within
4000 yards of a line drawn from
47°34′31″ N, 122°16′34′ W, thence to
position 47°34′02″ N, 122°15′44′ W,
located on Lake Washington in the
vicinity of the Stan Sayres Memorial
Park and Boat Launch and the Adams
Street Boat Ramp. These coordinates are
based on World Geodetic System (WGS
84).
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, a designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Sector Puget Sound (COTP) in
the enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by VHF Channel 16.
Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative.
[FR Doc. 2021–23238 Filed 10–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
Dated: October 19, 2021.
P.M. Hilbert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Puget Sound.
Air Plan Approval; AK; Juneau,
Mendenhall Valley Second 10-Year
PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving the Juneau,
Mendenhall Valley, Alaska (AK) limited
maintenance plan (LMP) submitted on
November 10, 2020, by the Alaska
Department of Environmental
Conservation (ADEC or ‘‘the State’’).
This plan addresses the second 10-year
maintenance period after redesignation
for particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter less than or equal
to a nominal 10 micrometers (PM10).
The plan relies upon control measures
contained in the first 10-year
maintenance plan and the
determination that the Mendenhall
Valley area currently monitors PM10
levels well below the PM10 National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS
or ‘‘the standard’’). The EPA is
approving Alaska’s LMP as meeting
Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective
November 24, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2020–0649. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available at https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christi Duboiski, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue (Suite 155), Seattle, WA
98101, at (360) 753–9081, or
duboiski.christi@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it refers to the
EPA.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58807
I. Background
On November 10, 2020, ADEC
submitted to the EPA a second 10-year
PM10 LMP for Juneau, Mendenhall
Valley for approval. The SIP revision,
State effective November 7, 2020, fulfills
the second 10-year planning
requirement of CAA section 175A(b) to
ensure PM10 NAAQS compliance
through 2033. The Mendenhall Valley
area has been meeting the PM10
standard for multiple years and was
redesignated to attainment on July 8,
2013, with an approved 10-year PM10
maintenance plan. The area currently
monitors PM10 levels well below the
PM10 NAAQS.
We proposed to approve the Juneau,
Mendenhall Valley second 10-year LMP
on August 11, 2021 (86 FR 43984). The
reasons for our approval are included in
that proposal and will not be restated
here. The public comment period for
our proposed action closed on
September 10, 2021. We received no
public comments. Therefore, we are
finalizing our rulemaking as proposed.
II. Final Action
In this final action, the EPA is
approving the State’s second 10-year
LMP for the Juneau, Mendenhall Valley
area, submitted on November 10, 2020,
as satisfying the requirements of section
175A of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
58808
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by December 27, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
Dated: October 18, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart C—Alaska
2. In § 52.70, the table in paragraph (e)
is amended by:
■ a. Adding entry ‘‘II.III.D.3.b.
Mendenhall Valley Second 10-year
PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan’’ after
the entry ‘‘II.III.D.3.a Mendenhall Valley
PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan’’; and
■ b. Revising the entry ‘‘III.III.D.3.
Control Plan for the Mendenhall Valley
of Juneau’’.
The addition and revision read as
follows:
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
§ 52.70
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED ALASKA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of SIP provision
State
submittal
date
EPA approval date
Explanations
State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan: Volume II. Analysis of Problems, Control Actions
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Section III. Areawide Pollutant Control Program
*
*
II.III.D.3.b. Mendenhall Valley Second 10year PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan.
*
*
*
*
Mendenhall Valley .................
*
*
*
11/10/2020
*
10//25/2021, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].
*
*
*
*
*
*
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan: Volume III. Appendices
*
*
*
*
*
Section III. Areawide Pollutant Control Program
*
*
III.III.D.3. Control Plan for the Mendenhall
Valley of Juneau.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
*
*
Mendenhall Valley .................
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
11/10/2020
*
10//25/2021, [INSERT Federal Register CITATION].
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
*
58809
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 203 / Monday, October 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED ALASKA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES—Continued
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–23040 Filed 10–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
National Endowment for the Arts
45 CFR Part 1157
RIN 3135–AA35
Procedures for Guidance Documents
National Endowment for the
Arts, National Foundation on the Arts
and the Humanities.
ACTION: Final rule; removal of
regulations.
AGENCY:
This document rescinds the
National Endowment for the Arts’ rule
relating to the issuance of guidance
documents.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
25, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel Fishman, Assistant General
Counsel, National Endowment for the
Arts, 400 7th Street SW, Washington,
DC 20506; fishmand@arts.gov; 202–
682–5418. Please reference RIN 3135–
AA35 in your correspondence.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
1. Background
On August 28, 2020, the National
Endowment for the Arts (NEA)
published an interim final rule
governing the issuance of guidance
documents entitled ‘‘Processes and
Procedures for Issuing Guidance
Documents’’ (85 FR 53186). The rule
implemented the directives set forth in
Executive Order (E.O.) 13891 of October
9, 2019 (Promoting the Rule of Law
Through Improved Agency Guidance
Documents).
E.O. 13992 of January 20, 2021
(Revocation of Certain Executive Orders
Concerning Federal Regulation), revokes
E.O. 13891 and directs the heads of
agencies to promptly take steps to
rescind any orders, rules, regulations,
guidelines, or policies, or portions
thereof implementing or enforcing E.O.
13891, as appropriate and consistent
with applicable law, including the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 22, 2021
Jkt 256001
State
submittal
date
*
EPA approval date
*
Explanations
*
*
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
551 et seq. In accordance with E.O.
13992, the NEA is issuing this rule,
which rescinds the rule published at 85
FR 53186.
unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive order. This
rule does not have any federalism
implications, as described above.
2. Compliance
Congressional Review Act
Administrative Procedure Act
This action pertains to agency
management, personnel, and
organization and does not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of
nonagency parties and, accordingly, is
not a ‘‘rule’’ as that term is used by the
Congressional Review Act (Subtitle E of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA)). Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply. However, for each final guidance
document issued pursuant to these
regulations and adopted by the NEA, it
will submit appropriate reports to
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) and
comply with the procedures specified
by 5 U.S.C. 801.
This rule incorporates requirements of
E.O. 13992 and the NEA’s existing
internal policy and procedures into the
CFR. Therefore, in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 553, there is good cause for this
rule of Agency organization, procedure,
or practice, to be enacted without notice
and comment. See 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A).
Executive Order 12866
This rule is an internal rule of agency
procedure and is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605
(b)), the NEA certifies that this rule, if
adopted, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates
For purposes of Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, as well as
Executive Order 12875, this regulatory
action does not contain any Federal
mandate that may result in increased
expenditures in either Federal, state,
local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or impose an annual burden
exceeding $100 million on the private
sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
prohibits an agency from publishing any
rule that has federalism implications if
the rule imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by
statute, or the rule preempts state law,
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Administrative practice and
procedure.
PART 1157—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
and under the authority of 20 U.S.C.
959, the NEA removes and reserves 45
CFR part 1157.
■
Dated: October 19, 2021.
Meghan Jugder,
Support Services Specialist, Office of
Administrative Services & Contracts, National
Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2021–23135 Filed 10–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537–01–P
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
PO 00000
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1157
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[ET Docket No. 19–138, FCC 20–164; FR
ID 53921]
Use of the 5.850–5.925 GHz Band
Federal Communications
Commission.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\25OCR1.SGM
25OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 203 (Monday, October 25, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58807-58809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23040]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2020-0649; FRL-8788-02-R10]
Air Plan Approval; AK; Juneau, Mendenhall Valley Second 10-Year
PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving the
Juneau, Mendenhall Valley, Alaska (AK) limited maintenance plan (LMP)
submitted on November 10, 2020, by the Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation (ADEC or ``the State''). This plan addresses
the second 10-year maintenance period after redesignation for
particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a
nominal 10 micrometers (PM10). The plan relies upon control
measures contained in the first 10-year maintenance plan and the
determination that the Mendenhall Valley area currently monitors
PM10 levels well below the PM10 National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS or ``the standard''). The EPA is approving
Alaska's LMP as meeting Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective November 24, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2020-0649. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christi Duboiski, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue (Suite 155), Seattle, WA 98101, at (360) 753-9081, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'' or
``our'' is used, it refers to the EPA.
I. Background
On November 10, 2020, ADEC submitted to the EPA a second 10-year
PM10 LMP for Juneau, Mendenhall Valley for approval. The SIP
revision, State effective November 7, 2020, fulfills the second 10-year
planning requirement of CAA section 175A(b) to ensure PM10
NAAQS compliance through 2033. The Mendenhall Valley area has been
meeting the PM10 standard for multiple years and was
redesignated to attainment on July 8, 2013, with an approved 10-year
PM10 maintenance plan. The area currently monitors
PM10 levels well below the PM10 NAAQS.
We proposed to approve the Juneau, Mendenhall Valley second 10-year
LMP on August 11, 2021 (86 FR 43984). The reasons for our approval are
included in that proposal and will not be restated here. The public
comment period for our proposed action closed on September 10, 2021. We
received no public comments. Therefore, we are finalizing our
rulemaking as proposed.
II. Final Action
In this final action, the EPA is approving the State's second 10-
year LMP for the Juneau, Mendenhall Valley area, submitted on November
10, 2020, as satisfying the requirements of section 175A of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely
[[Page 58808]]
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated
that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the
rule does not have tribal implications and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 27, 2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: October 18, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart C--Alaska
0
2. In Sec. 52.70, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by:
0
a. Adding entry ``II.III.D.3.b. Mendenhall Valley Second 10-year
PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan'' after the entry
``II.III.D.3.a Mendenhall Valley PM10 Limited Maintenance
Plan''; and
0
b. Revising the entry ``III.III.D.3. Control Plan for the Mendenhall
Valley of Juneau''.
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 52.70 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Alaska Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of SIP provision geographic or State EPA approval date Explanations
nonattainment area submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan: Volume II. Analysis of Problems, Control Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section III. Areawide Pollutant Control Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
II.III.D.3.b. Mendenhall Valley Mendenhall Valley.. 11/10/2020 10//25/2021, .....................
Second 10-year PM10 Limited [INSERT Federal
Maintenance Plan. Register
CITATION].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State of Alaska Air Quality Control Plan: Volume III. Appendices
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section III. Areawide Pollutant Control Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
III.III.D.3. Control Plan for Mendenhall Valley.. 11/10/2020 10//25/2021, .....................
the Mendenhall Valley of Juneau. [INSERT Federal
Register
CITATION].
[[Page 58809]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2021-23040 Filed 10-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P