Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available Control Technology Determinations for Case-by-Case Sources Under the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 58220-58225 [2021-22570]
Download as PDF
58220
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 201 / Thursday, October 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
essential travel through land ports of
entry and ferry terminals for individuals
who are fully vaccinated and have
appropriate proof of vaccination. Any
such modifications to the restrictions
will be accomplished via a posting to
the DHS website (https://www.dhs.gov)
and followed by a publication in the
Federal Register. Moreover, this
Notification may be amended or
rescinded prior to that time, based on
circumstances associated with the
specific threat.
The CBP Commissioner is hereby
directed to prepare and distribute
appropriate guidance to CBP personnel
on the continued implementation of the
temporary measures set forth in this
Notification including any appropriate
procedures regarding the lifting of
restrictions for fully vaccinated
travelers. The CBP Commissioner may
determine that other forms of travel,
such as travel in furtherance of
economic stability or social order,
constitute ‘‘essential travel’’ under this
Notification. Further, the CBP
Commissioner may, on an
individualized basis and for
humanitarian reasons or for other
purposes in the national interest, permit
the processing of travelers to the United
States not engaged in ‘‘essential travel.’’
Alejandro N. Mayorkas,
Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
[FR Doc. 2021–23006 Filed 10–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9112–FP–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0730]
Special Local Regulations; Recurring
Marine Events, Sector St. Petersburg
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notification of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a special local regulation for the OPA
World Championships/Englewood
Beach Waterfest event on November 19,
2021 through November 21, 2021, to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waterways during this event.
Our regulation for recurring marine
events within Sector St. Petersburg
identifies the regulated area for this
event in Englewood, FL. During the
enforcement periods, the operator of any
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Oct 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
vessel in the regulated area must
comply with directions from the Patrol
Commander or any designated
representative.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
The regulations in 33 CFR
100.703, Table 1 to § 100.703, Line No.
9, will be enforced from 8:00 a.m.
through 7:00 p.m., from November 19,
2021, through November 21, 2021.
[EPA–R03–OAR–2020–0575; FRL–9061–02–
R3]
DATES:
If
you have questions about this
notification of enforcement, call or
email Marine Science Technician First
Class Michael Shackleford, Sector St.
Petersburg Prevention Department,
Coast Guard; telephone (813) 228–2191,
email Michael.d.shackleford@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Coast
Guard will enforce the special local
regulation in 33 CFR 100.703, Table 1 to
§ 100.703, Line No. 9, for the OPA
World Championships/Englewood
Beach Waterfest regulated area from
8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., each day from
November 19, 2021 through November
21, 2021. This action is being taken to
provide for the safety of life on
navigable waterways during this event.
Our regulation for recurring marine
events, Sector St. Petersburg, § 100.703,
Table 1 to § 100.703, Line No. 9,
specifies the location of the regulated
area for the OPA World Championships/
Englewood Beach Waterfest which
encompasses portions of the Gulf of
Mexico near Englewood, FL. During the
enforcement periods, as reflected in
§ 100.703(c), if you are the operator of
a vessel in the regulated area you must
comply with directions from the Patrol
Commander or any designated
representative.
In addition to this notification of
enforcement in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard plans to provide
notification of this enforcement period
via the Local Notice to Mariners and/or
marine information broadcasts.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: October 15, 2021.
Matthew A. Thompson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port St. Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2021–22983 Filed 10–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40 CFR Part 52
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available
Control Technology Determinations for
Case-by-Case Sources Under the 2008
8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving multiple
state implementation plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These
revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for
individual major sources of volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and/or
nitrogen oxides (NOX) pursuant to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s
conditionally approved RACT
regulations. In this rule action, EPA is
only approving source-specific RACT
determinations (‘‘case-by-case’’ or
alternative NOX emissions limits) for
sources at nine major NOX and VOC
emitting facilities located in Allegheny
County. These RACT evaluations were
submitted to meet RACT requirements
for the 2008 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
EPA is approving these revisions to the
Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) and EPA’s implementing
regulations.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective on
November 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2020–0575. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 201 / Thursday, October 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Riley Burger, Permits Branch (3AD10),
Air and Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The
telephone number is (215) 814–2217.
Mr. Burger can also be reached via
electronic mail at burger.riley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
I. Background
On May 7, 2021, EPA published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
86 FR 24564. In the NPRM, EPA
proposed approval of case-by-case
RACT determinations for sources at ten
facilities in Allegheny County, as EPA
found that that the RACT controls for
these sources met the CAA RACT
requirements for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. PADEP, on behalf of Allegheny
County Health Department (ACHD),
initially submitted revisions to its SIP to
address case-by-case NOx and VOC
RACT for these sources on May 7, 2020
and supplemented the submittal on
February 9, 2021.
Under certain circumstances, states
are required to submit SIP revisions to
address RACT requirements for both
major sources of NOX and VOC and any
source covered by control technique
guidelines (CTG) for each ozone
NAAQS. Which NOX and VOC sources
in Pennsylvania are considered ‘‘major,’’
and are therefore subject to RACT, is
dependent on the location of each
source within the Commonwealth.
Sources located in nonattainment areas
would be subject to the ‘‘major source’’
definitions established under the CAA
based on the area’s current
classification(s). In Pennsylvania,
sources located in any ozone
nonattainment areas outside of
moderate or above are subject to the
major source threshold of 50 tons per
year (tpy) because of the Ozone
Transport Region (OTR) requirements in
CAA section 184(b)(2).
On May 16, 2016, PADEP submitted
a SIP revision addressing RACT for both
the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in Pennsylvania. PADEP’s May
16, 2016 SIP revision intended to
address certain outstanding non-CTG
VOC RACT, VOC CTG RACT and major
source VOC and NOX RACT
requirements for both standards. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Oct 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
SIP revision requested approval of
Pennsylvania’s 25 Pa. Code 129.96–100,
Additional RACT Requirements for
Major Sources of NOX and VOCs (the
‘‘presumptive’’ RACT II rule). Prior to
the adoption of the RACT II rule,
Pennsylvania relied on the NOX and
VOC control measures in 25 Pa. Code
129.92–95, Stationary Sources of NOX
and VOCs, (the RACT I rule) to meet
RACT for non-CTG major VOC sources
and major NOX sources. The
requirements of the RACT I rule remain
approved into Pennsylvania’s SIP and
continue to be implemented as RACT.1
On September 26, 2017, PADEP
submitted a letter, dated September 22,
2017, which committed to address
various deficiencies identified by EPA
in PADEP’s May 16, 2016
‘‘presumptive’’ RACT II rule SIP
revision.
On May 9, 2019, EPA conditionally
approved the RACT II rule based on the
commitments PADEP made in its
September 22, 2017 letter.2 84 FR
20274. In EPA’s final conditional
approval, EPA noted that PADEP would
be required to submit, for EPA’s
approval, SIP revisions to address any
facility-wide or system-wide NOX
emissions averaging plans approved
under 25 Pa. Code 129.98 and any caseby-case RACT determinations under 25
Pa. Code 129.99. PADEP committed to
submitting these additional SIP
revisions within 12 months of EPA’s
final conditional approval (i.e., by May
9, 2020). Through multiple submissions
between 2017 and 2020, PADEP has
submitted to EPA for approval various
SIP submissions to implement its RACT
II case-by-case determinations and NOX
averaging plan limits. This rulemaking
is based on EPA’s review of one of these
SIP submissions.
The SIP revisions in this action only
establish 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
RACT requirements. Applicable RACT
requirements under the CAA for sources
located in Allegheny County for the
1 The
RACT I Rule was approved by EPA into the
Pennsylvania SIP on March 23, 1998. 63 FR 13789.
Through this rule, certain source-specific RACT I
requirements will be superseded by more stringent
requirements. See Section II of the preamble to this
Final Rule.
2 On August 27, 2020, the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals issued a decision vacating EPA’s approval
of three provisions of Pennsylvania’s presumptive
RACT II rule applicable to certain coal-fired power
plants. Sierra Club v. EPA, 972 F.3d 290 (3d Cir.
2020). None of the sources in this rule are subject
to the three presumptive RACT II provisions at
issue in that Sierra Club decision.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58221
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS were
previously satisfied. See 78 FR 34584
(June 10, 2013).
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
A. Summary of SIP Revision
To satisfy a requirement from EPA’s
May 9, 2019 conditional approval,
PADEP submitted to EPA SIP revisions
addressing alternative NOX emissions
limits and/or case-by-case RACT
requirements for major sources in
Pennsylvania subject to 25 Pa. Code
129.98 or 129.99. Among the submitted
SIP revisions were case-by-case RACT
determinations for sources in Allegheny
County, which PADEP submitted on
behalf of ACHD. PADEP’s submission
included SIP revisions pertaining to
case-by-case RACT determinations for
the existing emissions units at each of
the major sources of NOX and/or VOC
that required a case-by-case RACT
determination.
In the case-by-case RACT
determinations submitted by PADEP on
behalf of ACHD, an evaluation was
completed to determine if previously
SIP-approved, case-by-case RACT
emission limits or operational controls
(herein referred to as RACT I and
contained in RACT I permits) were more
stringent than the new RACT II
presumptive or case-by-case
requirements. If more stringent, the
RACT I requirements will continue to
apply to the applicable source. If the
new case-by-case RACT II requirements
are more stringent than the RACT I
requirements, then the RACT II
requirements will supersede the prior
RACT I requirements.3
Here, EPA is approving SIP revisions
pertaining to case-by-case RACT
requirements for sources at nine major
NOX and/or VOC emitting facilities in
Allegheny County, as summarized in
Table 1 in this document.4
3 While the prior SIP-approved RACT I permit
will remain part of the SIP, this RACT II rule will
incorporate by reference the RACT II requirements
through the RACT II permit and clarify the ongoing
applicability of specific conditions in the RACT I
permit.
4 In its May 7, 2021 proposed rulemaking, EPA
had proposed approval of SIP revisions pertaining
to case-by-case RACT requirements for sources at
ten major NOX and/or VOC emitting facilities in
Allegheny County. At this time, EPA is only
approving such SIP revisions at nine of those
facilities and is not taking final action on the SIP
revision related to the PPG Industries Inc.
Springdale Plant.
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
58222
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 201 / Thursday, October 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—NINE MAJOR NOX AND/OR VOC EMITTING FACILITIES IN ALLEGHENY COUNTY SUBJECT TO SOURCE-SPECIFIC
RACT II DETERMINATIONS UNDER THE 1997 AND 2008 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS
Major source
Bellefield Boiler Plant (formerly Bellefield Boiler Plant—Pittsburgh).
Eastman Chemical Resins, Inc Jefferson Site (formerly Hercules, Inc.—West Elizabeth).
Energy Center Pittsburgh LLC North Shore Plant (formerly
NRG Energy Center).
Neville Chemical Company ..........................................................
Pittsburgh Allegheny Co. Thermal, LTD ......................................
Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc ....................................
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Clairton Plant (formerly U.S. Steel
(USX Corporation)—Clairton Works).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Edgar Thomson Plant (formerly
USX Corporation—Edgar Thomson Works).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works—Irvin Plant (formerly USX, Inc.—
Irvin Works).
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
The case-by-case RACT
determinations submitted by PADEP, on
behalf of ACHD, consist of an evaluation
of all reasonably available controls at
the time of evaluation for each affected
emissions unit, resulting in an ACHD
determination of what specific emission
limit or control measures satisfy RACT
for that particular unit. The adoption of
new, additional, or revised emission
limits or control measures to existing
SIP-approved RACT I requirements
were specified as requirements in new
or revised Federally enforceable permits
(hereafter RACT II permits) issued by
ACHD to the source. These RACT II
permits have been submitted as part of
the Pennsylvania RACT SIP revisions
for EPA’s approval into the
Pennsylvania SIP under 40 CFR
52.2020(d)(1). The RACT II permits
submitted by PADEP are listed in the
last column of Table 1 of this preamble,
along with the permit effective date, and
are part of the docket for this rule,
which is available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA–
R03–OAR–2020–0575.5 EPA is
incorporating by reference in the
Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT II
permits, source-specific RACT emission
limits and control measures under the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for certain
major sources of NOX and VOC
emissions.
B. EPA’s Final Action
PADEP’s SIP revisions incorporate
ACHD’s determinations of sourcespecific RACT II controls for individual
emission units at major sources of NOX
5 The RACT II permits included in the docket for
this rule are redacted versions of the facilities’
Federally enforceable permits. They reflect the
specific RACT requirements being approved into
the Pennsylvania SIP via this final action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Oct 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
1997 8-hour ozone
RACT source?
(RACT I)
Major source
pollutant
(NOX and/or VOC)
Yes ...........................
NOX ..........................
0047–I003a (11/30/20).
Yes ...........................
VOC ..........................
0058–I026a (9/30/20).
Yes ...........................
NOX ..........................
0022–I003a (11/30/20).
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
VOC
NOX
NOX
VOC
0060d (11/10/20).
0044–I001a (11/30/20).
0027a (2/20/20).
0052–I020b (12/11/20).
...........................
...........................
...........................
...........................
Yes ...........................
VOC and NOX ..........
0051–I008a (12/7/20).
Yes ...........................
VOC and NOX ..........
0050–OP16c (12/7/20).
and/or VOC in Allegheny County,
where those units are not covered by or
cannot meet Pennsylvania’s
presumptive RACT regulation. After
thorough review and evaluation of the
information provided by ACHD in the
SIP revision submittals for sources at
nine major NOX and/or VOC emitting
facilities in Allegheny County, EPA
found that (1) ACHD’s case-by-case
RACT determinations and conclusions
establish limits and/or controls on
individual sources that are reasonable
and appropriately considered
technically and economically feasible
controls and (2) ACHD’s determinations
are consistent with the CAA, EPA
regulations, and applicable EPA
guidance.
ACHD, in its RACT II determinations,
considered the prior source-specific
RACT requirements and, where more
stringent, retained those prior RACT
requirements as part of its new RACT
determinations. In the NPRM, EPA
proposed to find that all the proposed
revisions to previously SIP-approved
RACT requirements would result in
equivalent or additional reductions of
NOX and/or VOC emissions. The
proposed revisions should not interfere
with any applicable requirements
concerning attainment of the NAAQS,
reasonable further progress, or other
applicable requirements under section
110(l) of the CAA.
Other specific requirements of the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS case-by-case
RACT determinations and the rationale
for EPA’s proposed action are explained
more thoroughly in the NPRM, and its
associated technical support document
(TSD), and will not be restated here.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
..........................
..........................
..........................
and NOX ..........
RACT II permit
(effective date)
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
III. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA received comments from three
commenters on the May 7, 2021 NPRM.
86 FR 24564. A summary of the
comments and EPA’s responses are
discussed in this section. A copy of the
comments can be found in the docket
for this rule action.
Comment 1: Two commenters
indicated that the permit for U.S Steel
Mon Valley Works—Clairton listed in
the table of the document should be
Permit No. 0052–I020b effective,
December 11, 2021 rather than Permit
No., 0052–I020a effective, December 7,
2021.
Response 1: EPA agrees with
commenters and has corrected the
permit number and effective date
indicated in the tables of this preamble.
Comment 2: One commenter
identified that there is an appeal of the
RACT II permit for the PPG Springdale
facility pending before ACHD’s Hearing
Officer and, therefore, requested EPA
not take final action on the SIP revision.
Response 2: EPA is not taking final
action on the PPG Springdale RACT
determination at this time and will act
on this SIP revision in a later
rulemaking. EPA will respond to the
comment at that time.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving case-by-case RACT
determinations for sources at nine major
NOX and VOC emitting facilities in
Allegheny County, as required to meet
obligations pursuant to the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS, as revisions to the
Pennsylvania SIP.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 201 / Thursday, October 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation
by reference of source-specific RACT
determinations and NOx averaging plan
limits under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for certain major sources
of VOC and NOX in Allegheny County.
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally
available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region III Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully Federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rule of
EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.6
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
6 62
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Oct 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804,
however, exempts from section 801 the
following types of rules: Rules of
particular applicability; rules relating to
agency management or personnel; and
rules of agency organization, procedure,
or practice that do not substantially
affect the rights or obligations of nonagency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because
this is a rule of particular applicability,
EPA is not required to submit a rule
report regarding this action under
section 801.
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by December 20, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
58223
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action.
This action approving Pennsylvania’s
NOX and VOC RACT requirements for
nine facilities for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: October 8, 2021.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN—Pennsylvania
2. In § 52.2020, the table in paragraph
(d)(1) is amended by:
■ a. Revising the entries for ‘‘Hercules,
Inc.—West Elizabeth’’ (Permit No. E.O.216); ‘‘Hercules, Inc.—West Elizabeth’’
(Permit No. CO–257); ‘‘Neville Chemical
Company’’; ‘‘Universal Stainless & Alloy
Products, Inc’’; ‘‘U.S. Steel (USX
Corporation.)—Clairton Works)’’; ‘‘USX
Corporation—Edgar Thomson Works’’;
‘‘USX, Inc.—Irvin Works’’; ‘‘Bellefield
Boiler Plant—Pittsburgh’’; and
‘‘Pittsburgh Allegheny County Thermal,
Ltd’’; ‘‘NRG Energy Center (formerly
Pittsburgh Thermal Limited
Partnership)’’;
■ b. Adding entries, in the following
order, at the end of the table for
‘‘Bellefield Boiler Plant (formerly
referenced as Bellefield Boiler Plant—
Pittsburgh) ’’; ‘‘Eastman Chemical
Resins, Inc. Jefferson Site (formerly
referenced as Hercules, Inc.—West
Elizabeth)’’; ‘‘Energy Center Pittsburgh
LLC North Shore Plant (formerly
referenced as NRG Energy Center)’’;
‘‘U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Clairton
Plant (formerly referenced as U.S. Steel
(USX Corporation)—Clairton Works)’’;
‘‘U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Edgar
Thomson Plant (formerly referenced as
USX Corporation—Edgar Thomson
Works)’’; and ‘‘U.S. Steel Mon Valley
Works—Irvin Plant (formerly referenced
as USX, Inc.—Irvin Works)’’; ‘‘Neville
Chemical Company’’; ‘‘Pittsburgh
Allegheny Co. Thermal, LTD’’; and
■
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
58224
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 201 / Thursday, October 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
‘‘Universal Stainless & Alloy Products,
Inc.’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 52.2020
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
(1) * * *
*
Name of source
Permit No.
County
State
effective
date
EPA approval date
*
Hercules, Inc.—West Elizabeth.
Hercules, Inc.—West Elizabeth.
Neville Chemical Company
*
EO–216 ............
*
Allegheny ..........
*
3/8/96 .............
*
*
10/16/01, 66 FR 52506 ......
*
See also 52.2064(e)(2).
CO–257 ............
Allegheny ..........
10/16/01, 66 FR 52506 ......
See also 52.2064(e)(2).
CO–230 ............
Allegheny ..........
1/14/97 11/1/
99.
12/13/96 .........
10/16/01, 66 FR 52506 ......
See also 52.2064(e)(4).
*
Universal Stainless & Alloy
Products, Inc.
*
CO–241 ............
*
Allegheny ..........
*
12/19/96 .........
*
*
10/16/01, 66 FR 52511 ......
*
See also 52.2064(e)(6).
*
*
U.S. Steel (USX CorporaCO–234 ............
tion.)—Clairton Works.
USX Corporation—Edgar
CO–235 ............
Thomson Works.
USX, Inc.—Irvin Works ........ CO–258 ............
*
Allegheny ..........
*
12/30/96 .........
*
*
10/16/01, 66 FR 52511 ......
*
See also 52.2064(e)(7).
Allegheny ..........
12/30/96 .........
10/16/01, 66 FR 52511 ......
See also 52.2064(e)(8).
Allegheny ..........
12/30/96 .........
10/16/01, 66 FR 52511 ......
See also 52.2064(e)(9).
*
*
Bellefield Boiler Plant—Pitts- EO–248 ............
burgh.
*
Allegheny ..........
*
12/19/96 .........
*
*
10/12/01, 66 FR 52044 ......
*
See also 52.2064(e)(1).
*
*
Pittsburgh Allegheny County CO–265 ............
Thermal, Ltd.
*
Allegheny ..........
*
11/9/98 ...........
*
*
10/12/01, 66 FR 52044 ......
*
See also 52.2064(e)(5).
*
NRG Energy Center (formerly Pittsburgh Thermal
Limited Partnership).
*
CO220 ..............
*
Allegheny ..........
*
3/4/96 .............
*
*
05/11/06, 71 FR 27394 ......
*
See also 52.2064(e)(3).
*
*
Bellefield Boiler Plant (for0047–I003a ......
merly referenced as
Bellefield Boiler Plant—
Pittsburgh).
Eastman Chemical Resins,
0058–I026a ......
Inc. Jefferson Site (formerly referenced as Hercules, Inc.—West Elizabeth).
Energy Center Pittsburgh
0022–I003a ......
LLC North Shore Plant
(formerly referenced as
NRG Energy Center).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley
0052–I020b ......
Works Clairton Plant (formerly referenced as U.S.
Steel (USX Corporation)—
Clairton Works).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley
0051–I008a ......
Works Edgar Thomson
Plant (formerly referenced
as USX Corporation—
Edgar Thomson Works).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley
0050–OP16c ....
Works—Irvin Plant (formerly referenced as USX,
Inc.—Irvin Works).
Neville Chemical Company
0060d ...............
*
Allegheny ..........
*
11/30/20 .........
*
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
52.2064(e)(1).
Allegheny ..........
9/30/20 ...........
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
52.2064(e)(2).
Allegheny ..........
11/30/20 .........
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
52.2064(e)(3).
Allegheny ..........
12/11/20 .........
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
52.2064(e)(7).
Allegheny ..........
12/7/20 ...........
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
52.2064(e)(8).
Allegheny ..........
12/7/20 ...........
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
52.2064(e)(9).
Allegheny ..........
11/10/20 .........
52.2064(e)(4).
Allegheny ..........
11/30/20 .........
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
Pittsburgh Allegheny Co.
Thermal, LTD.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Oct 20, 2021
0044–I001a ......
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Additional explanations/
§§ 52.2063 and 52.2064
citations 1
*
*
52.2064(e)(5).
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 201 / Thursday, October 21, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Name of source
Universal Stainless & Alloy
Products, Inc..
1
Permit No.
County
State
effective
date
0027a ...............
Allegheny ..........
2/20/20 ...........
10/21/21, [insert Federal
Register citation].
Additional explanations/
§§ 52.2063 and 52.2064
citations 1
52.2064(e)(6).
The cross-references that are not § 52.2064 are to material that pre-date the notebook format. For more information, see § 52.2063.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 52.2064 by adding
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2064 EPA-approved Source-Specific
Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACT) for Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX).
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Approval of source-specific RACT
requirements for 2008 8-hour ozone
national ambient air quality standards
for the facilities listed in this paragraph
are incorporated as specified.
(Rulemaking Docket No. EPA–OAR–
2020–0575).
(1) Bellefield Boiler Plant—
Incorporating by reference Installation
Permit No. 0047–I003a, issued on April
14, 2020 and amended on November 30,
2020 as redacted by ACHD, which
supersedes RACT Enforcement Order
No. 248, effective December 19, 1996,
except for Conditions 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5
and 1.7A through E, which remain as
RACT requirements. See also
§ 52.2063(c)(177)(i)(B)(3) for prior RACT
approval.
(2) Eastman Chemical Resins, Inc.
Jefferson Site—Installation Permit No.
0058–I026 issued April 21, 2020, as
redacted by ACHD, which supersedes
Consent Order No. 257, issued on
January 14, 1997, except for Conditions
1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.7, which remain
as RACT requirements. The
requirements of Enforcement Order No.
216, issued March 8, 1996, also
continue to apply to identified sources
that continue to operate. See also
§§ 52.2063(c)(166)(i)(B)(2) and
52.2063(c)(166)(i)(B)(3), respectively, for
prior RACT approval.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
EPA approval date
58225
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:29 Oct 20, 2021
Jkt 256001
(3) Energy Center Pittsburgh LLC,
North Shore Plant— Incorporating by
reference Installation Permit No. 0022–
I003a, issued on March 18, 2020 and
amended on November 30, 2020, as
redacted by ACHD. All permit
conditions in the prior RACT Permit,
CO No. 220, effective March 4, 1996,
remain as RACT requirements. See also
§ 52.2063(d)(1)(o) for prior RACT
approval.
(4) Neville Chemical Company—
Incorporating by reference Installation
Permit No. 00060d issued September 28,
2015 and amended on November 10,
2020, as redacted by ACHD, which
supersedes Consent Order No. 230,
issued on December 13, 1996, except for
Conditions 1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7. 1.9,
and 1.10, which remain as RACT
requirements. See also
§ 52.2063(c)(166)(i)(B)(4) for prior RACT
approval.
(5) Pittsburgh Allegheny County
Thermal, Ltd—Incorporating by
reference Permit No. 0044–I001a, issued
on March 25, 2020 and amended on
November 30, 2020, as redacted by
ACHD. All permit conditions in the
prior RACT Permit, CO No. 265,
effective November 9, 1998, remain as
RACT requirements. See also
§ 52.2063(c)(177)(i)(B)(8) for prior RACT
approval.
(6) Universal Stainless & Alloy
Products, Inc.—Incorporating by
reference Title V Operating Permit No.
0027a, issued on November 21, 2017
and amended on February 20, 2020, as
redacted by ACHD, which supersedes
Consent Order No. 241 issued on
December 19, 1996, except for
Conditions 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3, which
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
remain as RACT requirements. See also
§ 52.2063(c)(172)(i)(B)(2) for prior RACT
approval.
(7) U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works
Clairton Plant—Incorporating by
reference Installation Permit No. 0052–
I020b, revised and issued December 11,
2020, as redacted by ACHD, which
supersedes RACT Consent Order No.
234, issued December 30, 1996, except
for Conditions 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6,
which remain as RACT requirements.
See also § 52.2063(c)(172)(i)(B)(5) for
prior RACT approval.
(8) U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works
Edgar Thompson Plant—Incorporating
by reference Installation Permit 0051–
I008a, revised and effective on
(December 7, 2020), which supersedes
the RACT Consent Order No. 235,
issued December 30, 1996, except for
Conditions 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, and
1.7, which remain as RACT
requirements. See also
§ 52.2063(c)(172)(i)(B)(6) for prior RACT
approval.
(9) U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works—
Irvin Plant—Incorporating by reference
Title V Operating Permit No. 0050–
OP16c, issued on December 7, 2020, as
redacted by ACHD, which supersedes
RACT Consent Order No. 258, issued
December 30, 1996, except for
Conditions 1.1 and 1.2 and for Source
ID P008 (No. 3 Five Stand Cold
Reduction Mill) Condition 1.3, which
remain as RACT requirements. See also
§ 52.2063(c)(172)(i)(B)(7) for prior RACT
approval.
[FR Doc. 2021–22570 Filed 10–20–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM
21OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 201 (Thursday, October 21, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58220-58225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22570]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0575; FRL-9061-02-R3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available Control Technology Determinations
for Case-by-Case Sources Under the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
multiple state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably available control technology (RACT)
for individual major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and/or
nitrogen oxides (NOX) pursuant to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania's conditionally approved RACT regulations. In this rule
action, EPA is only approving source-specific RACT determinations
(``case-by-case'' or alternative NOX emissions limits) for
sources at nine major NOX and VOC emitting facilities
located in Allegheny County. These RACT evaluations were submitted to
meet RACT requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS). EPA is approving these revisions to the
Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA) and EPA's implementing regulations.
DATES: This final rule is effective on November 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0575. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact
[[Page 58221]]
the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section
for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Riley Burger, Permits Branch
(3AD10), Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
The telephone number is (215) 814-2217. Mr. Burger can also be reached
via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 7, 2021, EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM). 86 FR 24564. In the NPRM, EPA proposed approval of case-by-case
RACT determinations for sources at ten facilities in Allegheny County,
as EPA found that that the RACT controls for these sources met the CAA
RACT requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. PADEP, on behalf of
Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD), initially submitted
revisions to its SIP to address case-by-case NOx and VOC RACT for these
sources on May 7, 2020 and supplemented the submittal on February 9,
2021.
Under certain circumstances, states are required to submit SIP
revisions to address RACT requirements for both major sources of
NOX and VOC and any source covered by control technique
guidelines (CTG) for each ozone NAAQS. Which NOX and VOC
sources in Pennsylvania are considered ``major,'' and are therefore
subject to RACT, is dependent on the location of each source within the
Commonwealth. Sources located in nonattainment areas would be subject
to the ``major source'' definitions established under the CAA based on
the area's current classification(s). In Pennsylvania, sources located
in any ozone nonattainment areas outside of moderate or above are
subject to the major source threshold of 50 tons per year (tpy) because
of the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) requirements in CAA section
184(b)(2).
On May 16, 2016, PADEP submitted a SIP revision addressing RACT for
both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in Pennsylvania. PADEP's May
16, 2016 SIP revision intended to address certain outstanding non-CTG
VOC RACT, VOC CTG RACT and major source VOC and NOX RACT
requirements for both standards. The SIP revision requested approval of
Pennsylvania's 25 Pa. Code 129.96-100, Additional RACT Requirements for
Major Sources of NOX and VOCs (the ``presumptive'' RACT II
rule). Prior to the adoption of the RACT II rule, Pennsylvania relied
on the NOX and VOC control measures in 25 Pa. Code 129.92-
95, Stationary Sources of NOX and VOCs, (the RACT I rule) to
meet RACT for non-CTG major VOC sources and major NOX
sources. The requirements of the RACT I rule remain approved into
Pennsylvania's SIP and continue to be implemented as RACT.\1\ On
September 26, 2017, PADEP submitted a letter, dated September 22, 2017,
which committed to address various deficiencies identified by EPA in
PADEP's May 16, 2016 ``presumptive'' RACT II rule SIP revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The RACT I Rule was approved by EPA into the Pennsylvania
SIP on March 23, 1998. 63 FR 13789. Through this rule, certain
source-specific RACT I requirements will be superseded by more
stringent requirements. See Section II of the preamble to this Final
Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 9, 2019, EPA conditionally approved the RACT II rule based
on the commitments PADEP made in its September 22, 2017 letter.\2\ 84
FR 20274. In EPA's final conditional approval, EPA noted that PADEP
would be required to submit, for EPA's approval, SIP revisions to
address any facility-wide or system-wide NOX emissions
averaging plans approved under 25 Pa. Code 129.98 and any case-by-case
RACT determinations under 25 Pa. Code 129.99. PADEP committed to
submitting these additional SIP revisions within 12 months of EPA's
final conditional approval (i.e., by May 9, 2020). Through multiple
submissions between 2017 and 2020, PADEP has submitted to EPA for
approval various SIP submissions to implement its RACT II case-by-case
determinations and NOX averaging plan limits. This
rulemaking is based on EPA's review of one of these SIP submissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On August 27, 2020, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals
issued a decision vacating EPA's approval of three provisions of
Pennsylvania's presumptive RACT II rule applicable to certain coal-
fired power plants. Sierra Club v. EPA, 972 F.3d 290 (3d Cir. 2020).
None of the sources in this rule are subject to the three
presumptive RACT II provisions at issue in that Sierra Club
decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SIP revisions in this action only establish 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS RACT requirements. Applicable RACT requirements under the CAA for
sources located in Allegheny County for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
were previously satisfied. See 78 FR 34584 (June 10, 2013).
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
A. Summary of SIP Revision
To satisfy a requirement from EPA's May 9, 2019 conditional
approval, PADEP submitted to EPA SIP revisions addressing alternative
NOX emissions limits and/or case-by-case RACT requirements
for major sources in Pennsylvania subject to 25 Pa. Code 129.98 or
129.99. Among the submitted SIP revisions were case-by-case RACT
determinations for sources in Allegheny County, which PADEP submitted
on behalf of ACHD. PADEP's submission included SIP revisions pertaining
to case-by-case RACT determinations for the existing emissions units at
each of the major sources of NOX and/or VOC that required a
case-by-case RACT determination.
In the case-by-case RACT determinations submitted by PADEP on
behalf of ACHD, an evaluation was completed to determine if previously
SIP-approved, case-by-case RACT emission limits or operational controls
(herein referred to as RACT I and contained in RACT I permits) were
more stringent than the new RACT II presumptive or case-by-case
requirements. If more stringent, the RACT I requirements will continue
to apply to the applicable source. If the new case-by-case RACT II
requirements are more stringent than the RACT I requirements, then the
RACT II requirements will supersede the prior RACT I requirements.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ While the prior SIP-approved RACT I permit will remain part
of the SIP, this RACT II rule will incorporate by reference the RACT
II requirements through the RACT II permit and clarify the ongoing
applicability of specific conditions in the RACT I permit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here, EPA is approving SIP revisions pertaining to case-by-case
RACT requirements for sources at nine major NOX and/or VOC
emitting facilities in Allegheny County, as summarized in Table 1 in
this document.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ In its May 7, 2021 proposed rulemaking, EPA had proposed
approval of SIP revisions pertaining to case-by-case RACT
requirements for sources at ten major NOX and/or VOC
emitting facilities in Allegheny County. At this time, EPA is only
approving such SIP revisions at nine of those facilities and is not
taking final action on the SIP revision related to the PPG
Industries Inc. Springdale Plant.
[[Page 58222]]
Table 1--Nine Major NOX and/or VOC Emitting Facilities in Allegheny County Subject to Source-Specific Ract II Determinations Under the 1997 and 2008 8-
Hour Ozone NAAQS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1997 8-hour ozone RACT source? Major source pollutant (NOX and/
Major source (RACT I) or VOC) RACT II permit (effective date)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bellefield Boiler Plant (formerly Yes............................... NOX.............................. 0047-I003a (11/30/20).
Bellefield Boiler Plant--
Pittsburgh).
Eastman Chemical Resins, Inc Yes............................... VOC.............................. 0058-I026a (9/30/20).
Jefferson Site (formerly Hercules,
Inc.--West Elizabeth).
Energy Center Pittsburgh LLC North Yes............................... NOX.............................. 0022-I003a (11/30/20).
Shore Plant (formerly NRG Energy
Center).
Neville Chemical Company............ Yes............................... VOC.............................. 0060d (11/10/20).
Pittsburgh Allegheny Co. Thermal, Yes............................... NOX.............................. 0044-I001a (11/30/20).
LTD.
Universal Stainless & Alloy Yes............................... NOX.............................. 0027a (2/20/20).
Products, Inc.
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Clairton Yes............................... VOC and NOX...................... 0052-I020b (12/11/20).
Plant (formerly U.S. Steel (USX
Corporation)--Clairton Works).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Edgar Yes............................... VOC and NOX...................... 0051-I008a (12/7/20).
Thomson Plant (formerly USX
Corporation--Edgar Thomson Works).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works--Irvin Yes............................... VOC and NOX...................... 0050-OP16c (12/7/20).
Plant (formerly USX, Inc.--Irvin
Works).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The case-by-case RACT determinations submitted by PADEP, on behalf
of ACHD, consist of an evaluation of all reasonably available controls
at the time of evaluation for each affected emissions unit, resulting
in an ACHD determination of what specific emission limit or control
measures satisfy RACT for that particular unit. The adoption of new,
additional, or revised emission limits or control measures to existing
SIP-approved RACT I requirements were specified as requirements in new
or revised Federally enforceable permits (hereafter RACT II permits)
issued by ACHD to the source. These RACT II permits have been submitted
as part of the Pennsylvania RACT SIP revisions for EPA's approval into
the Pennsylvania SIP under 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1). The RACT II permits
submitted by PADEP are listed in the last column of Table 1 of this
preamble, along with the permit effective date, and are part of the
docket for this rule, which is available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0575.\5\ EPA is
incorporating by reference in the Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT II
permits, source-specific RACT emission limits and control measures
under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for certain major sources of
NOX and VOC emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The RACT II permits included in the docket for this rule are
redacted versions of the facilities' Federally enforceable permits.
They reflect the specific RACT requirements being approved into the
Pennsylvania SIP via this final action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. EPA's Final Action
PADEP's SIP revisions incorporate ACHD's determinations of source-
specific RACT II controls for individual emission units at major
sources of NOX and/or VOC in Allegheny County, where those
units are not covered by or cannot meet Pennsylvania's presumptive RACT
regulation. After thorough review and evaluation of the information
provided by ACHD in the SIP revision submittals for sources at nine
major NOX and/or VOC emitting facilities in Allegheny
County, EPA found that (1) ACHD's case-by-case RACT determinations and
conclusions establish limits and/or controls on individual sources that
are reasonable and appropriately considered technically and
economically feasible controls and (2) ACHD's determinations are
consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and applicable EPA guidance.
ACHD, in its RACT II determinations, considered the prior source-
specific RACT requirements and, where more stringent, retained those
prior RACT requirements as part of its new RACT determinations. In the
NPRM, EPA proposed to find that all the proposed revisions to
previously SIP-approved RACT requirements would result in equivalent or
additional reductions of NOX and/or VOC emissions. The
proposed revisions should not interfere with any applicable
requirements concerning attainment of the NAAQS, reasonable further
progress, or other applicable requirements under section 110(l) of the
CAA.
Other specific requirements of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS case-by-
case RACT determinations and the rationale for EPA's proposed action
are explained more thoroughly in the NPRM, and its associated technical
support document (TSD), and will not be restated here.
III. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA received comments from three commenters on the May 7, 2021
NPRM. 86 FR 24564. A summary of the comments and EPA's responses are
discussed in this section. A copy of the comments can be found in the
docket for this rule action.
Comment 1: Two commenters indicated that the permit for U.S Steel
Mon Valley Works--Clairton listed in the table of the document should
be Permit No. 0052-I020b effective, December 11, 2021 rather than
Permit No., 0052-I020a effective, December 7, 2021.
Response 1: EPA agrees with commenters and has corrected the permit
number and effective date indicated in the tables of this preamble.
Comment 2: One commenter identified that there is an appeal of the
RACT II permit for the PPG Springdale facility pending before ACHD's
Hearing Officer and, therefore, requested EPA not take final action on
the SIP revision.
Response 2: EPA is not taking final action on the PPG Springdale
RACT determination at this time and will act on this SIP revision in a
later rulemaking. EPA will respond to the comment at that time.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving case-by-case RACT determinations for sources at
nine major NOX and VOC emitting facilities in Allegheny
County, as required to meet obligations pursuant to the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS, as revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
[[Page 58223]]
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of source-
specific RACT determinations and NOx averaging plan limits under the
1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for certain major sources of VOC and
NOX in Allegheny County. EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact
the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of
this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have
been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated
by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully Federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the
final rule of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 804, however, exempts from section 801 the
following types of rules: Rules of particular applicability; rules
relating to agency management or personnel; and rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3).
Because this is a rule of particular applicability, EPA is not required
to submit a rule report regarding this action under section 801.
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by December 20, 2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action.
This action approving Pennsylvania's NOX and VOC RACT
requirements for nine facilities for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS may
not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: October 8, 2021.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart NN--Pennsylvania
0
2. In Sec. 52.2020, the table in paragraph (d)(1) is amended by:
0
a. Revising the entries for ``Hercules, Inc.--West Elizabeth'' (Permit
No. E.O.-216); ``Hercules, Inc.--West Elizabeth'' (Permit No. CO-257);
``Neville Chemical Company''; ``Universal Stainless & Alloy Products,
Inc''; ``U.S. Steel (USX Corporation.)--Clairton Works)''; ``USX
Corporation--Edgar Thomson Works''; ``USX, Inc.--Irvin Works'';
``Bellefield Boiler Plant--Pittsburgh''; and ``Pittsburgh Allegheny
County Thermal, Ltd''; ``NRG Energy Center (formerly Pittsburgh Thermal
Limited Partnership)'';
0
b. Adding entries, in the following order, at the end of the table for
``Bellefield Boiler Plant (formerly referenced as Bellefield Boiler
Plant--Pittsburgh) ''; ``Eastman Chemical Resins, Inc. Jefferson Site
(formerly referenced as Hercules, Inc.--West Elizabeth)''; ``Energy
Center Pittsburgh LLC North Shore Plant (formerly referenced as NRG
Energy Center)''; ``U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Clairton Plant
(formerly referenced as U.S. Steel (USX Corporation)--Clairton
Works)''; ``U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Edgar Thomson Plant (formerly
referenced as USX Corporation--Edgar Thomson Works)''; and ``U.S. Steel
Mon Valley Works--Irvin Plant (formerly referenced as USX, Inc.--Irvin
Works)''; ``Neville Chemical Company''; ``Pittsburgh Allegheny Co.
Thermal, LTD''; and
[[Page 58224]]
``Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc.''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.2020 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional
explanations/Sec.
Name of source Permit No. County State effective date EPA approval date Sec. 52.2063 and
52.2064 citations
\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Hercules, Inc.--West Elizabeth... EO-216................... Allegheny............... 3/8/96................ 10/16/01, 66 FR See also
52506. 52.2064(e)(2).
Hercules, Inc.--West Elizabeth... CO-257................... Allegheny............... 1/14/97 11/1/99....... 10/16/01, 66 FR See also
52506. 52.2064(e)(2).
Neville Chemical Company......... CO-230................... Allegheny............... 12/13/96.............. 10/16/01, 66 FR See also
52506. 52.2064(e)(4).
* * * * * * *
Universal Stainless & Alloy CO-241................... Allegheny............... 12/19/96.............. 10/16/01, 66 FR See also
Products, Inc. 52511. 52.2064(e)(6).
* * * * * * *
U.S. Steel (USX Corporation.)-- CO-234................... Allegheny............... 12/30/96.............. 10/16/01, 66 FR See also
Clairton Works. 52511. 52.2064(e)(7).
USX Corporation--Edgar Thomson CO-235................... Allegheny............... 12/30/96.............. 10/16/01, 66 FR See also
Works. 52511. 52.2064(e)(8).
USX, Inc.--Irvin Works........... CO-258................... Allegheny............... 12/30/96.............. 10/16/01, 66 FR See also
52511. 52.2064(e)(9).
* * * * * * *
Bellefield Boiler Plant-- EO-248................... Allegheny............... 12/19/96.............. 10/12/01, 66 FR See also
Pittsburgh. 52044. 52.2064(e)(1).
* * * * * * *
Pittsburgh Allegheny County CO-265................... Allegheny............... 11/9/98............... 10/12/01, 66 FR See also
Thermal, Ltd. 52044. 52.2064(e)(5).
* * * * * * *
NRG Energy Center (formerly CO220.................... Allegheny............... 3/4/96................ 05/11/06, 71 FR See also
Pittsburgh Thermal Limited 27394. 52.2064(e)(3).
Partnership).
* * * * * * *
Bellefield Boiler Plant (formerly 0047-I003a............... Allegheny............... 11/30/20.............. 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(1).
referenced as Bellefield Boiler Federal Register
Plant--Pittsburgh). citation].
Eastman Chemical Resins, Inc. 0058-I026a............... Allegheny............... 9/30/20............... 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(2).
Jefferson Site (formerly Federal Register
referenced as Hercules, Inc.-- citation].
West Elizabeth).
Energy Center Pittsburgh LLC 0022-I003a............... Allegheny............... 11/30/20.............. 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(3).
North Shore Plant (formerly Federal Register
referenced as NRG Energy Center). citation].
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works 0052-I020b............... Allegheny............... 12/11/20.............. 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(7).
Clairton Plant (formerly Federal Register
referenced as U.S. Steel (USX citation].
Corporation)--Clairton Works).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Edgar 0051-I008a............... Allegheny............... 12/7/20............... 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(8).
Thomson Plant (formerly Federal Register
referenced as USX Corporation-- citation].
Edgar Thomson Works).
U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works-- 0050-OP16c............... Allegheny............... 12/7/20............... 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(9).
Irvin Plant (formerly referenced Federal Register
as USX, Inc.--Irvin Works). citation].
Neville Chemical Company......... 0060d.................... Allegheny............... 11/10/20.............. 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(4).
Federal Register
citation].
Pittsburgh Allegheny Co. Thermal, 0044-I001a............... Allegheny............... 11/30/20.............. 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(5).
LTD. Federal Register
citation].
[[Page 58225]]
Universal Stainless & Alloy 0027a.................... Allegheny............... 2/20/20............... 10/21/21, [insert 52.2064(e)(6).
Products, Inc.. Federal Register
citation].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The cross-references that are not Sec. 52.2064 are to material that pre-date the notebook format. For more information, see Sec. 52.2063.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 52.2064 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2064 EPA-approved Source-Specific Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX).
* * * * *
(e) Approval of source-specific RACT requirements for 2008 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality standards for the facilities listed
in this paragraph are incorporated as specified. (Rulemaking Docket No.
EPA-OAR-2020-0575).
(1) Bellefield Boiler Plant--Incorporating by reference
Installation Permit No. 0047-I003a, issued on April 14, 2020 and
amended on November 30, 2020 as redacted by ACHD, which supersedes RACT
Enforcement Order No. 248, effective December 19, 1996, except for
Conditions 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.7A through E, which remain as RACT
requirements. See also Sec. 52.2063(c)(177)(i)(B)(3) for prior RACT
approval.
(2) Eastman Chemical Resins, Inc. Jefferson Site--Installation
Permit No. 0058-I026 issued April 21, 2020, as redacted by ACHD, which
supersedes Consent Order No. 257, issued on January 14, 1997, except
for Conditions 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.7, which remain as RACT
requirements. The requirements of Enforcement Order No. 216, issued
March 8, 1996, also continue to apply to identified sources that
continue to operate. See also Sec. Sec. 52.2063(c)(166)(i)(B)(2) and
52.2063(c)(166)(i)(B)(3), respectively, for prior RACT approval.
(3) Energy Center Pittsburgh LLC, North Shore Plant-- Incorporating
by reference Installation Permit No. 0022-I003a, issued on March 18,
2020 and amended on November 30, 2020, as redacted by ACHD. All permit
conditions in the prior RACT Permit, CO No. 220, effective March 4,
1996, remain as RACT requirements. See also Sec. 52.2063(d)(1)(o) for
prior RACT approval.
(4) Neville Chemical Company--Incorporating by reference
Installation Permit No. 00060d issued September 28, 2015 and amended on
November 10, 2020, as redacted by ACHD, which supersedes Consent Order
No. 230, issued on December 13, 1996, except for Conditions 1.1, 1.3,
1.5, 1.6, 1.7. 1.9, and 1.10, which remain as RACT requirements. See
also Sec. 52.2063(c)(166)(i)(B)(4) for prior RACT approval.
(5) Pittsburgh Allegheny County Thermal, Ltd--Incorporating by
reference Permit No. 0044-I001a, issued on March 25, 2020 and amended
on November 30, 2020, as redacted by ACHD. All permit conditions in the
prior RACT Permit, CO No. 265, effective November 9, 1998, remain as
RACT requirements. See also Sec. 52.2063(c)(177)(i)(B)(8) for prior
RACT approval.
(6) Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc.--Incorporating by
reference Title V Operating Permit No. 0027a, issued on November 21,
2017 and amended on February 20, 2020, as redacted by ACHD, which
supersedes Consent Order No. 241 issued on December 19, 1996, except
for Conditions 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3, which remain as RACT requirements.
See also Sec. 52.2063(c)(172)(i)(B)(2) for prior RACT approval.
(7) U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Clairton Plant--Incorporating by
reference Installation Permit No. 0052-I020b, revised and issued
December 11, 2020, as redacted by ACHD, which supersedes RACT Consent
Order No. 234, issued December 30, 1996, except for Conditions 1.1,
1.3, 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6, which remain as RACT requirements. See also
Sec. 52.2063(c)(172)(i)(B)(5) for prior RACT approval.
(8) U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Edgar Thompson Plant--Incorporating
by reference Installation Permit 0051-I008a, revised and effective on
(December 7, 2020), which supersedes the RACT Consent Order No. 235,
issued December 30, 1996, except for Conditions 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5,
1.6, and 1.7, which remain as RACT requirements. See also Sec.
52.2063(c)(172)(i)(B)(6) for prior RACT approval.
(9) U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works--Irvin Plant--Incorporating by
reference Title V Operating Permit No. 0050-OP16c, issued on December
7, 2020, as redacted by ACHD, which supersedes RACT Consent Order No.
258, issued December 30, 1996, except for Conditions 1.1 and 1.2 and
for Source ID P008 (No. 3 Five Stand Cold Reduction Mill) Condition
1.3, which remain as RACT requirements. See also Sec.
52.2063(c)(172)(i)(B)(7) for prior RACT approval.
[FR Doc. 2021-22570 Filed 10-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P