Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 57149-57151 [2021-22448]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 196 / Thursday, October 14, 2021 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Æ What policies are needed to ensure
that privacy protecting identifiers are
effective?
• What are the premier examples of
public or private sector entities that
aggregate, integrate, and share
information? Think of entities that
operate on the scale of Federal agencies
with broad and diverse missions. In
addition, we are interested in entities
that have moved beyond one-to-one data
sharing to using standardized and
automated data sharing controls.
Æ For the premier entity, can you
outline the policies, frameworks,
strategies, organizational constructs,
operational capabilities, and value
creation model?
• How can the Federal government
engage with private sector data
providers in a way that maximizes the
ability to use the data or data derivatives
across multiple agencies? How might we
achieve this while ensuring a viable
business model for data providers?
Section 5: Value and Maturity
As agencies formulate their data
strategies, they are constantly looking
for ways to deliver and communicate
value. There is broad awareness of the
value of Federal data. However, there is
not a consensus on how to measure the
value of that data.
• What are meaningful approaches to
defining the value of government data?
Æ How can we define the value of
data to different stakeholders or
purposes? (e.g. government agencies in
decision-making, performance
management, and program evaluation,
as well as to researchers, states,
localities, private industry and the
general public)
• What are the best practices and
practical experiences for conducting
useful, high integrity maturity
assessments in large, distributed, and
decentralized federal agencies—
balancing overhead and burden with
utility, coverage, and alignment against
ongoing efforts to implement data
strategies?
Æ Can you describe an example where
mission or business leaders have
championed maturity assessments as
core to transformation initiatives they
championed, why they did so, and how
they did it?
• What approaches or models exist to
calculate the return on investment in
data products, data governance, and
data management?
• How can we raise awareness of the
value of data governance and data
management in support of achieving
agency value?
Æ What steps do we need to take in
order to integrate a data governance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Oct 13, 2021
Jkt 256001
framework into the way of doing
government business?
Æ How should CDOs communicate
progress on and value of data
governance efforts?
Section 6: Ethics and Equity
The Federal Data Strategy, delivered
in December 2019, recognized the
importance of ethics in its founding
principles. The Federal Data Strategy
2020 Action Plan required the
development of a Data Ethics
Framework that is intended to help
agency employees, managers, and
leaders make ethical decisions as they
acquire, manage, and use data. The
Framework and its Tenets are a ‘‘living’’
resource and are to be updated by the
CDO Council and Interagency Council
on Statistical Policy (ICSP) every 24
months to ensure the Framework
remains current.
• How might the Federal Data Ethics
Framework need to evolve to address
racial equity and support for
underserved communities? Does the
Federal Data Ethics Framework
sufficiently address concerns about the
vulnerability of certain populations?
• Are there best practices for agencies
to consider at the intersection of data
ethics and diversity, equity, inclusion,
and accessibility?
• How can we leverage Federal Data
ethics to improve trust and
transparency?
• What steps can the CDO Council
and the ICSP take to ensure the Federal
Data Ethics Framework serves as the
foundation of partnerships between
Federal agencies, academic and research
partners, state, local, and tribal
governments, community and advocacy
groups, and other stakeholders?
• How might the Federal government
encourage the adoption of the Federal
Data Ethics Framework across the
contractor, financial assistance
communities, and other stakeholders?
Section 7: Technology
The Federal CDO Council is
interested in better understanding the
marketplace trends for both operational
and analytic data management use
cases.
• What frameworks should agencies
use to evaluate their existing data
infrastructure and to modernize
technology with capabilities that break
down organizational data silos and
ensure the best available data is
available?
Æ What are the best examples of
where you have seen this happen in the
public and private sectors?
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57149
• Are advances in data management
enabling new models for information
sharing?
Æ How are technologies evolving with
new data management models?
Æ What technology components are
positioned to serve as the source for
operationally authoritative data?
• Technology approaches go through
a cycle of emphasizing integration of
open source or commercial best of breed
for targeted capabilities, or emphasis on
integrated solutions or platforms with
accompanying ecosystems.
Æ Where are we in the cycle and
why?
Ken Ambrose,
Senior Advisor CDO Council, Office of Shared
Solutions and Performance Improvement,
General Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2021–22267 Filed 10–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[Document Identifiers: CMS–222–17, CMS–
10142 and CMS–10552]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) is announcing
an opportunity for the public to
comment on CMS’ intention to collect
information from the public. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information (including each proposed
extension or reinstatement of an existing
collection of information) and to allow
60 days for public comment on the
proposed action. Interested persons are
invited to send comments regarding our
burden estimates or any other aspect of
this collection of information, including
the necessity and utility of the proposed
information collection for the proper
performance of the agency’s functions,
the accuracy of the estimated burden,
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected, and the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology to minimize the
information collection burden.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
57150
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 196 / Thursday, October 14, 2021 / Notices
Comments must be received by
December 13, 2021.
ADDRESSES: When commenting, please
reference the document identifier or
OMB control number. To be assured
consideration, comments and
recommendations must be submitted in
any one of the following ways:
1. Electronically. You may send your
comments electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for ‘‘Comment or
Submission’’ or ‘‘More Search Options’’
to find the information collection
document(s) that are accepting
comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address: CMS, Office of Strategic
Operations and Regulatory Affairs,
Division of Regulations Development,
Attention: Document Identifier/OMB
Control Numberll: Room C4–26–05,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244–1850.
To obtain copies of a supporting
statement and any related forms for the
proposed collection(s) summarized in
this notice, you may make your request
using one of following:
1. Access CMS’ website address at
website address at https://www.cms.gov/
Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/
PaperworkReductionActof1995/PRAListing.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William N. Parham at (410) 786–4669.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
Contents
This notice sets out a summary of the
use and burden associated with the
following information collections. More
detailed information can be found in
each collection’s supporting statement
and associated materials (see
ADDRESSES).
CMS–222–17 Independent Rural
Health Clinic Cost Report
CMS–10142 Bid Pricing Tool (BPT) for
Medicare Advantage (MA) Plans and
Prescription Drug Plans (PDP)
CMS–10552 Implementation of
Medicare and Medicaid Programs;—
Promoting Interoperability Programs
(Stage 3) (CMS–10552)
Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), federal agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
The term ‘‘collection of information’’ is
defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Oct 13, 2021
Jkt 256001
requires federal agencies to publish a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each proposed
extension or reinstatement of an existing
collection of information, before
submitting the collection to OMB for
approval. To comply with this
requirement, CMS is publishing this
notice.
Information Collection
1. Type of Information Collection
Request: Reinstatement without change
of a previously approved collection;
Title of Information Collection:
Independent Rural Health Clinic Cost
Report; Use: Under the authority of
sections 1815(a) and 1833(e) of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395g),
CMS requires that providers of services
participating in the Medicare program
submit information to determine costs
for health care services rendered to
Medicare beneficiaries. CMS requires
that providers follow reasonable cost
principles under 1861(v)(1)(A) of the
Act when completing the Medicare cost
report. Regulations at 42 CFR 413.20
and 413.24 require that providers
submit acceptable cost reports on an
annual basis and maintain sufficient
financial records and statistical data,
capable of verification by qualified
auditors.
CMS requires Form CMS–222–17 to
determine an RHC’s reasonable costs
incurred in furnishing medical services
to Medicare beneficiaries and
reimbursement due to or from an RHC.
Each RHC submits the cost report to its
contractor for a reimbursement
determination. Section 1874A of the Act
describes the functions of the
contractor.
CMS regulations at 42 CFR
413.24(f)(4)(ii) requires that each RHC
submit an annual cost report to their
contractor in American Standard Code
for Information Interchange (ASCII)
electronic cost report (ECR) format.
RHCs submit the ECR file to contractors
using a compact disk (CD), flash drive,
or the CMS approved Medicare Cost
Report E-filing (MCREF) portal, [URL:
https://mcref.cms.gov]. Form Number:
CMS–222–17 (OMB control number:
0938–0107); Frequency: Yearly; Affected
Public: Private Sector, State, Local, or
Tribal Governments, Federal
Government, Business or other forprofits, Not-for-profits institutions;
Number of Respondents: 1,724; Total
Annual Responses: 1,724; Total Annual
Hours: 94,820. (For policy questions
regarding this collection contact LuAnn
Piccione at (410) 786–5423.
2. Type of Information Collection
Request: Extension without change of a
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
currently approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Bid Pricing Tool
(BPT) for Medicare Advantage (MA)
Plans and Prescription Drug Plans
(PDP); Use: This collection dates back to
2005. Under the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization
Act of 2003 (MMA), and implementing
regulations at 42 CFR, Medicare
Advantage organizations (MAO) and
Prescription Drug Plans (PDP) are
required to submit an actuarial pricing
‘‘bid’’ for each plan offered to Medicare
beneficiaries for approval by the Centers
for Medicare & Medicaid Services
(CMS). MAOs and PDPs use the Bid
Pricing Tool (BPT) software to develop
their actuarial pricing bid. The
competitive bidding process defined by
the ‘‘The Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act’’
(MMA) applies to both the MA and Part
D programs. It is an annual process that
encompasses the release of the MA rate
book in April, the bid’s that plans
submit to CMS in June, and the release
of the Part D and RPPO benchmarks,
which typically occurs in August. Form
Number: CMS–10142 (OMB control
number: 0938–0944); Frequency: Yearly;
Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Governments; Number of Respondents:
555; Total Annual Responses: 4,995;
Total Annual Hours: 149,850. (For
policy questions regarding this
collection contact Rachel Shevland at
410–786–3026.)
3. Type of Information Collection
Request: Revision of a currently
approved collection; Title of
Information Collection: Implementation
of Medicare and Medicaid Programs;—
Promoting Interoperability Programs
(Stage 3) (CMS–10552); Use: As
discussed in the Final Rule published
on October 16, 2016 (80 FR 62762), the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) is requesting approval to
collect information from eligible
hospitals and critical access hospitals
(CAHs). We are making further changes
to this program as proposed in the FY
2022 Inpatient Prospective Payment
System (IPPS)/Long-term Care Hospital
Prospective Payment System (LTCH
PPS) Proposed Rule (86 FR 25628), and
as finalized in the FY 2022 Inpatient
Prospective Payment System (IPPS)/
Long-term Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System (LTCH PPS) Final Rule
(86 FR 45460).
The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery
Act) (Pub. L. 111–5) was enacted on
February 17, 2009. Title IV of Division
B of the Recovery Act amended Titles
XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act
(the Act) by establishing incentive
payments to eligible professionals (EPs),
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 196 / Thursday, October 14, 2021 / Notices
eligible hospitals and critical access
hospitals (CAHs), and Medicare
Advantage (MA) organizations
participating in the Medicare and
Medicaid programs that adopt and
successfully demonstrate meaningful
use of certified EHR technology
(CEHRT). These Recovery Act
provisions, together with Title XIII of
Division A of the Recovery Act, may be
cited as the ‘‘Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical
Health Act’’ or the ‘‘HITECH Act.’’
The HITECH Act created incentive
programs for EPs and eligible hospitals,
including CAHs, in the Medicare Feefor-Service (FFS), MA, and Medicaid
programs that successfully demonstrate
meaningful use of certified EHR
technology. In their first payment year,
Medicaid EPs and eligible hospitals
could adopt, implement, or upgrade to
certified EHR technology. It also
allowed for negative payment
adjustments in the Medicare FFS and
MA programs starting in 2015 for EPs,
eligible hospitals, and CAHs
participating in Medicare that are not
meaningful users of CEHRT. The
Medicaid Promoting Interoperability
Program did not authorize negative
payment adjustments, but its
participants were eligible for positive
incentive payments.
In CY 2017, we began collecting data
from eligible hospitals and CAHs to
determine the application of the
Medicare payment adjustments. At this
time, Medicare eligible professionals no
longer reported to the EHR Incentive
Program, as they began reporting under
the Merit-based Incentive Payment
System (MIPS). This information
collected was also used to make
incentive payments to eligible hospitals
and critical access hospitals in Puerto
Rico.
In the FY 2019 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final
Rule (83 FR 41634), we focused on
reducing burden on eligible hospitals
and CAHs. We finalized a new scoring
methodology for eligible hospitals and
CAHs, removing the requirement to
report on and meet the threshold for all
objectives and measures. This approach
required an eligible hospital or CAH to
meet the requirements on six measures,
with scoring based on performance.
This approach reduced burden by
decreasing the amount of time needed to
report on measures. Additionally, we
finalized two new optional opioid
measures and one new care
coordination measure to help address
the opioid epidemic and improve
interoperability.
In the FY 2020 IPPS/LTCH Final Rule
(84 FR 42591), we established the EHR
Reporting Period to be a minimum of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Oct 13, 2021
Jkt 256001
any continuous 90-day period in CY
2021 for new and returning participants
(eligible hospitals and CAHs) in the
Medicare Promoting Interoperability
Program attesting to CMS, as well as
finalizing the removal of the Electronic
Prescribing Objective’s Verify Opioid
Treatment Agreement measure
beginning with the EHR reporting
period in CY 2020.
In the FY 2021 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final
Rule (85 FR 58966), we are finalizing as
proposed changes that we believe will
continue to be a low reporting burden
on eligible hospitals and CAHs in the
Medicare Promoting Interoperability
Program while incentivizing the
advanced use of CEHRT to support
health information exchange,
interoperability, advanced quality
measurement, and maximizing clinical
effectiveness and efficiencies. These
finalized changes include continuing an
EHR reporting period of a minimum of
any continuous 90-day period in CY
2022, and maintaining the Query of
PDMP measure as optional and worth 5
bonus points in CY 2021.
In the FY 2022 IPPS/LTCH PPS
Proposed Rule (86 FR 25628), we
proposed changes that we believe will
continue to be a low reporting burden
on eligible hospitals and CAHs in the
Medicare Promoting Interoperability
Program while incentivizing the
advanced use of CEHRT to support
health information exchange,
interoperability, advance quality
measurement, and maximize clinical
effectiveness and efficiencies. The
proposals include continuing an EHR
reporting period of a minimum of any
continuous 90-day period in CY 2023,
maintaining the Query of PDMP
measure as optional but worth 10 bonus
points in CY 2022, the addition of a new
Health Information Exchange BiDirectional Exchange measure
beginning in CY 2022 as an optional
alternative to the two existing measures,
a requirement of reporting 4 specific
Public Health and Clinical Data
Exchange Objective measures, the
inclusion of a new SAFER Guides
measure attestation response, and to
adopt two new eCQMs to the Medicare
Promoting Interoperability Program’s
eCQM measure set beginning with the
reporting period in CY 2023 (in addition
to removing three eCQMs from the
measure set beginning with the
reporting period in CY 2024, in
alignment with the finalized changes to
the Hospital IQR Program. In the FY
2022 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final Rule (86 FR
45460 through 45498), we finalized
these proposals. We did not finalize a
proposal to update the Provide Patients
Electronic Access to their Health
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57151
Information measure to include a data
retention requirement; however, this
proposal would not have affected our
information collection burden estimate.
We note the previously approved PRA
package under OMB control number
0938–1278 reflecting updates to
information collection burden estimates
based on policies finalized in the FY
2021 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final Rule
include information collection burden
estimates for 2021, which is the last year
for including Medicaid eligible
providers, eligible hospitals, and CAHs
in the burden estimate as the Medicaid
Promoting Interoperability Program
concludes December 31, 2021.
Therefore, this PRA request for
information collection burden in 2022
does not include any burden under the
Medicaid Promoting Interoperability
Program. Form Number: CMS–10552
(OMB control number: 0938–1278);
Frequency: Annually; Affected Public:
State, Local or Private Government;
Business and for-profit and Not-forprofit; Number of Respondents: 3,300;
Total Annual Responses: 3,300; Total
Annual Hours: 21,450. For policy
questions regarding this collection,
contact Jessica Warren at 410–786–
7519.)
Dated: October 8, 2021.
William N. Parham, III,
Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office
of Strategic Operations and Regulatory
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021–22448 Filed 10–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[Document Identifier: CMS–372(S), CMS–
10305, CMS–10148, CMS–10784, CMS–
10715, CMS–10768, CMS–R–43 and CMS–
10417]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) is announcing
an opportunity for the public to
comment on CMS’ intention to collect
information from the public. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM
14OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 196 (Thursday, October 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57149-57151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22448]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[Document Identifiers: CMS-222-17, CMS-10142 and CMS-10552]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is
announcing an opportunity for the public to comment on CMS' intention
to collect information from the public. Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (the PRA), federal agencies are required to publish notice
in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of
information (including each proposed extension or reinstatement of an
existing collection of information) and to allow 60 days for public
comment on the proposed action. Interested persons are invited to send
comments regarding our burden estimates or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including the necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the proper performance of the
agency's functions, the accuracy of the estimated burden, ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected, and the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology to minimize the information collection
burden.
[[Page 57150]]
DATES: Comments must be received by December 13, 2021.
ADDRESSES: When commenting, please reference the document identifier or
OMB control number. To be assured consideration, comments and
recommendations must be submitted in any one of the following ways:
1. Electronically. You may send your comments electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for ``Comment or
Submission'' or ``More Search Options'' to find the information
collection document(s) that are accepting comments.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address: CMS, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs,
Division of Regulations Development, Attention: Document Identifier/OMB
Control Number__: Room C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244-1850.
To obtain copies of a supporting statement and any related forms
for the proposed collection(s) summarized in this notice, you may make
your request using one of following:
1. Access CMS' website address at website address at https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/PaperworkReductionActof1995/PRA-Listing.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William N. Parham at (410) 786-4669.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Contents
This notice sets out a summary of the use and burden associated
with the following information collections. More detailed information
can be found in each collection's supporting statement and associated
materials (see ADDRESSES).
CMS-222-17 Independent Rural Health Clinic Cost Report
CMS-10142 Bid Pricing Tool (BPT) for Medicare Advantage (MA) Plans and
Prescription Drug Plans (PDP)
CMS-10552 Implementation of Medicare and Medicaid Programs;--Promoting
Interoperability Programs (Stage 3) (CMS-10552)
Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), federal agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct or sponsor. The term
``collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA requires federal agencies
to publish a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension
or reinstatement of an existing collection of information, before
submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this
requirement, CMS is publishing this notice.
Information Collection
1. Type of Information Collection Request: Reinstatement without
change of a previously approved collection; Title of Information
Collection: Independent Rural Health Clinic Cost Report; Use: Under the
authority of sections 1815(a) and 1833(e) of the Social Security Act
(42 U.S.C. 1395g), CMS requires that providers of services
participating in the Medicare program submit information to determine
costs for health care services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries. CMS
requires that providers follow reasonable cost principles under
1861(v)(1)(A) of the Act when completing the Medicare cost report.
Regulations at 42 CFR 413.20 and 413.24 require that providers submit
acceptable cost reports on an annual basis and maintain sufficient
financial records and statistical data, capable of verification by
qualified auditors.
CMS requires Form CMS-222-17 to determine an RHC's reasonable costs
incurred in furnishing medical services to Medicare beneficiaries and
reimbursement due to or from an RHC. Each RHC submits the cost report
to its contractor for a reimbursement determination. Section 1874A of
the Act describes the functions of the contractor.
CMS regulations at 42 CFR 413.24(f)(4)(ii) requires that each RHC
submit an annual cost report to their contractor in American Standard
Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) electronic cost report (ECR)
format. RHCs submit the ECR file to contractors using a compact disk
(CD), flash drive, or the CMS approved Medicare Cost Report E-filing
(MCREF) portal, [URL: https://mcref.cms.gov]. Form Number: CMS-222-17
(OMB control number: 0938-0107); Frequency: Yearly; Affected Public:
Private Sector, State, Local, or Tribal Governments, Federal
Government, Business or other for-profits, Not-for-profits
institutions; Number of Respondents: 1,724; Total Annual Responses:
1,724; Total Annual Hours: 94,820. (For policy questions regarding this
collection contact LuAnn Piccione at (410) 786-5423.
2. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension without change
of a currently approved collection; Title of Information Collection:
Bid Pricing Tool (BPT) for Medicare Advantage (MA) Plans and
Prescription Drug Plans (PDP); Use: This collection dates back to 2005.
Under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization
Act of 2003 (MMA), and implementing regulations at 42 CFR, Medicare
Advantage organizations (MAO) and Prescription Drug Plans (PDP) are
required to submit an actuarial pricing ``bid'' for each plan offered
to Medicare beneficiaries for approval by the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS). MAOs and PDPs use the Bid Pricing Tool (BPT)
software to develop their actuarial pricing bid. The competitive
bidding process defined by the ``The Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act'' (MMA) applies to both the MA and
Part D programs. It is an annual process that encompasses the release
of the MA rate book in April, the bid's that plans submit to CMS in
June, and the release of the Part D and RPPO benchmarks, which
typically occurs in August. Form Number: CMS-10142 (OMB control number:
0938-0944); Frequency: Yearly; Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal
Governments; Number of Respondents: 555; Total Annual Responses: 4,995;
Total Annual Hours: 149,850. (For policy questions regarding this
collection contact Rachel Shevland at 410-786-3026.)
3. Type of Information Collection Request: Revision of a currently
approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Implementation of
Medicare and Medicaid Programs;--Promoting Interoperability Programs
(Stage 3) (CMS-10552); Use: As discussed in the Final Rule published on
October 16, 2016 (80 FR 62762), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) is requesting approval to collect information from
eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs). We are making
further changes to this program as proposed in the FY 2022 Inpatient
Prospective Payment System (IPPS)/Long-term Care Hospital Prospective
Payment System (LTCH PPS) Proposed Rule (86 FR 25628), and as finalized
in the FY 2022 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS)/Long-term
Care Hospital Prospective Payment System (LTCH PPS) Final Rule (86 FR
45460).
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act)
(Pub. L. 111-5) was enacted on February 17, 2009. Title IV of Division
B of the Recovery Act amended Titles XVIII and XIX of the Social
Security Act (the Act) by establishing incentive payments to eligible
professionals (EPs),
[[Page 57151]]
eligible hospitals and critical access hospitals (CAHs), and Medicare
Advantage (MA) organizations participating in the Medicare and Medicaid
programs that adopt and successfully demonstrate meaningful use of
certified EHR technology (CEHRT). These Recovery Act provisions,
together with Title XIII of Division A of the Recovery Act, may be
cited as the ``Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical
Health Act'' or the ``HITECH Act.''
The HITECH Act created incentive programs for EPs and eligible
hospitals, including CAHs, in the Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS), MA,
and Medicaid programs that successfully demonstrate meaningful use of
certified EHR technology. In their first payment year, Medicaid EPs and
eligible hospitals could adopt, implement, or upgrade to certified EHR
technology. It also allowed for negative payment adjustments in the
Medicare FFS and MA programs starting in 2015 for EPs, eligible
hospitals, and CAHs participating in Medicare that are not meaningful
users of CEHRT. The Medicaid Promoting Interoperability Program did not
authorize negative payment adjustments, but its participants were
eligible for positive incentive payments.
In CY 2017, we began collecting data from eligible hospitals and
CAHs to determine the application of the Medicare payment adjustments.
At this time, Medicare eligible professionals no longer reported to the
EHR Incentive Program, as they began reporting under the Merit-based
Incentive Payment System (MIPS). This information collected was also
used to make incentive payments to eligible hospitals and critical
access hospitals in Puerto Rico.
In the FY 2019 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final Rule (83 FR 41634), we focused
on reducing burden on eligible hospitals and CAHs. We finalized a new
scoring methodology for eligible hospitals and CAHs, removing the
requirement to report on and meet the threshold for all objectives and
measures. This approach required an eligible hospital or CAH to meet
the requirements on six measures, with scoring based on performance.
This approach reduced burden by decreasing the amount of time needed to
report on measures. Additionally, we finalized two new optional opioid
measures and one new care coordination measure to help address the
opioid epidemic and improve interoperability.
In the FY 2020 IPPS/LTCH Final Rule (84 FR 42591), we established
the EHR Reporting Period to be a minimum of any continuous 90-day
period in CY 2021 for new and returning participants (eligible
hospitals and CAHs) in the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program
attesting to CMS, as well as finalizing the removal of the Electronic
Prescribing Objective's Verify Opioid Treatment Agreement measure
beginning with the EHR reporting period in CY 2020.
In the FY 2021 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final Rule (85 FR 58966), we are
finalizing as proposed changes that we believe will continue to be a
low reporting burden on eligible hospitals and CAHs in the Medicare
Promoting Interoperability Program while incentivizing the advanced use
of CEHRT to support health information exchange, interoperability,
advanced quality measurement, and maximizing clinical effectiveness and
efficiencies. These finalized changes include continuing an EHR
reporting period of a minimum of any continuous 90-day period in CY
2022, and maintaining the Query of PDMP measure as optional and worth 5
bonus points in CY 2021.
In the FY 2022 IPPS/LTCH PPS Proposed Rule (86 FR 25628), we
proposed changes that we believe will continue to be a low reporting
burden on eligible hospitals and CAHs in the Medicare Promoting
Interoperability Program while incentivizing the advanced use of CEHRT
to support health information exchange, interoperability, advance
quality measurement, and maximize clinical effectiveness and
efficiencies. The proposals include continuing an EHR reporting period
of a minimum of any continuous 90-day period in CY 2023, maintaining
the Query of PDMP measure as optional but worth 10 bonus points in CY
2022, the addition of a new Health Information Exchange Bi-Directional
Exchange measure beginning in CY 2022 as an optional alternative to the
two existing measures, a requirement of reporting 4 specific Public
Health and Clinical Data Exchange Objective measures, the inclusion of
a new SAFER Guides measure attestation response, and to adopt two new
eCQMs to the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program's eCQM measure
set beginning with the reporting period in CY 2023 (in addition to
removing three eCQMs from the measure set beginning with the reporting
period in CY 2024, in alignment with the finalized changes to the
Hospital IQR Program. In the FY 2022 IPPS/LTCH PPS Final Rule (86 FR
45460 through 45498), we finalized these proposals. We did not finalize
a proposal to update the Provide Patients Electronic Access to their
Health Information measure to include a data retention requirement;
however, this proposal would not have affected our information
collection burden estimate.
We note the previously approved PRA package under OMB control
number 0938-1278 reflecting updates to information collection burden
estimates based on policies finalized in the FY 2021 IPPS/LTCH PPS
Final Rule include information collection burden estimates for 2021,
which is the last year for including Medicaid eligible providers,
eligible hospitals, and CAHs in the burden estimate as the Medicaid
Promoting Interoperability Program concludes December 31, 2021.
Therefore, this PRA request for information collection burden in 2022
does not include any burden under the Medicaid Promoting
Interoperability Program. Form Number: CMS-10552 (OMB control number:
0938-1278); Frequency: Annually; Affected Public: State, Local or
Private Government; Business and for-profit and Not-for-profit; Number
of Respondents: 3,300; Total Annual Responses: 3,300; Total Annual
Hours: 21,450. For policy questions regarding this collection, contact
Jessica Warren at 410-786-7519.)
Dated: October 8, 2021.
William N. Parham, III,
Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office of Strategic Operations and
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021-22448 Filed 10-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P