Safety Zone; Lake Tahoe Dive Operations, Lake Tahoe, CA, 56206-56207 [2021-22040]
Download as PDF
56206
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0780]
RIN 1625–AA08
Safety Zone; Lake Tahoe Dive
Operations, Lake Tahoe, CA
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone, within Lake
Tahoe in Lake Tahoe, CA, in support of
Navy Special Warfare Group (NSWG–1)
dive operations. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
divers while performing dive operations
and to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment from potential
hazards created by the NSWG–1 onwater training and associated
operations. The regulation restricts
vessel traffic movement and protects
divers from the hazards associated with
the operation and vessel traffic. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector San Francisco.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from October 8, 2021,
through 11:59 p.m. on October 14, 2021.
For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from 12:01 a.m.
October 5, 2021, until October 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0780 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email Lieutenant Anthony I. Solares,
U.S. Coast Guard District 11, Sector San
Francisco, at 415–399–3585,
SFWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
COTP Captain of the Port
PATCOM Patrol Commander
U.S.C. United States Code
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable. We must establish this
regulation by October 5, 2021, and lack
sufficient time to provide a reasonable
comment period and then consider
those comments before issuing this rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public
interest because immediate action is
needed to ensure the safety of divers
and to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment from potential
hazards created by the NSWG–1 dive
operations starting October 5, 2021.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port San Francisco has
determined that potential hazards
associated with dive operations will
exist between October 5, 2021, and
October 14, 2021. There will be a safety
concern for anyone within a 100-yard
radius of dive operations. For this
reason, the rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in the navigable waters
surrounding the dive operations.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone in
the navigable waters around the dive
operations occurring in Lake Tahoe, CA.
The safety zone will be in effect
between October 5, 2021, and October
14, 2021, while NSWG–1 is conducting
on-water dive operations and associated
activities. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters of Lake Tahoe, from
surface to bottom, within a circle
formed by connecting all points 100
yards out from the location of the dive
operations at approximate position
39°9′52.8″ N, 120°7′49.4″ W to
approximate position 39°10′50.9″ N,
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
120°5′37.4″ W or as announced via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners. The
duration of the zone is intended to
protect divers, personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment in the
navigable waters surrounding the dive
operations while dive operations are
being conducted. No vessel or person
will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the limited duration and
narrowly tailored geographic area of the
safety zone. Although this rule restricts
access to the water encompassed by the
safety zone, the effect of this rule will
not be significant because the local
waterway users will be notified to
ensure the safety zone will result in
minimum impact. The vessels desiring
to transit through or around the safety
zone may do so upon express
permission from the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A. above,
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
E:\FR\FM\08OCR1.SGM
08OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it will not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone in the navigable
waters that will only extend 100-yards
out from active NSWG–1 dive
operations and associated activities
occurring in Lake Tahoe, CA. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
56207
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
2. Add § 165.T11–071 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T11–071 Safety Zone; Lake Tahoe
Dive Operations, Lake Tahoe, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of Lake
Tahoe, from surface to bottom, within
the area formed by connecting all points
100 yards out from the location of the
dive operation at approximate position
39°9′52.8″ N, 120°7′49.4″ W to
approximate position 39°10′50.9″ N,
120°5′37.4″ W or as announced via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel or a
Federal, State, or local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative. Persons and
vessels may request permission to enter
the safety zone on VHF–23A or through
the 24-hour Command Center at
telephone (415) 399–3547.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from October 5, 2021,
at 12:01 a.m. until October 14, 2021, at
11:59 p.m., or as announced via marine
information broadcast.
(e) Information broadcasts. The COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative
will notify the maritime community of
periods during which this zone will be
enforced in accordance with § 165.7.
Dated: October 4, 2021.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2021–22040 Filed 10–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\08OCR1.SGM
08OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 193 (Friday, October 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56206-56207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22040]
[[Page 56206]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2021-0780]
RIN 1625-AA08
Safety Zone; Lake Tahoe Dive Operations, Lake Tahoe, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone, within
Lake Tahoe in Lake Tahoe, CA, in support of Navy Special Warfare Group
(NSWG-1) dive operations. This safety zone is necessary to provide for
the safety of the divers while performing dive operations and to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential
hazards created by the NSWG-1 on-water training and associated
operations. The regulation restricts vessel traffic movement and
protects divers from the hazards associated with the operation and
vessel traffic. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector San Francisco.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from October 8,
2021, through 11:59 p.m. on October 14, 2021. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 12:01 a.m. October 5,
2021, until October 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0780 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Anthony I. Solares, U.S. Coast Guard District
11, Sector San Francisco, at 415-399-3585, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
COTP Captain of the Port
PATCOM Patrol Commander
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. We must
establish this regulation by October 5, 2021, and lack sufficient time
to provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those comments
before issuing this rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public interest because immediate action
is needed to ensure the safety of divers and to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards created by
the NSWG-1 dive operations starting October 5, 2021.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port San
Francisco has determined that potential hazards associated with dive
operations will exist between October 5, 2021, and October 14, 2021.
There will be a safety concern for anyone within a 100-yard radius of
dive operations. For this reason, the rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters
surrounding the dive operations.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone in the navigable waters around
the dive operations occurring in Lake Tahoe, CA. The safety zone will
be in effect between October 5, 2021, and October 14, 2021, while NSWG-
1 is conducting on-water dive operations and associated activities. The
safety zone will cover all navigable waters of Lake Tahoe, from surface
to bottom, within a circle formed by connecting all points 100 yards
out from the location of the dive operations at approximate position
39[deg]9'52.8'' N, 120[deg]7'49.4'' W to approximate position
39[deg]10'50.9'' N, 120[deg]5'37.4'' W or as announced via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners. The duration of the zone is intended to protect
divers, personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable
waters surrounding the dive operations while dive operations are being
conducted. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits.
This regulatory action determination is based on the limited
duration and narrowly tailored geographic area of the safety zone.
Although this rule restricts access to the water encompassed by the
safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant because
the local waterway users will be notified to ensure the safety zone
will result in minimum impact. The vessels desiring to transit through
or around the safety zone may do so upon express permission from the
COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
[[Page 56207]]
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it will not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
temporary safety zone in the navigable waters that will only extend
100-yards out from active NSWG-1 dive operations and associated
activities occurring in Lake Tahoe, CA. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of
DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-071 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-071 Safety Zone; Lake Tahoe Dive Operations, Lake
Tahoe, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of Lake Tahoe, from surface to bottom, within the area formed by
connecting all points 100 yards out from the location of the dive
operation at approximate position 39[deg]9'52.8'' N, 120[deg]7'49.4'' W
to approximate position 39[deg]10'50.9'' N, 120[deg]5'37.4'' W or as
announced via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or the COTP's designated representative to
obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative. Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the
safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at
telephone (415) 399-3547.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from October
5, 2021, at 12:01 a.m. until October 14, 2021, at 11:59 p.m., or as
announced via marine information broadcast.
(e) Information broadcasts. The COTP or the COTP's designated
representative will notify the maritime community of periods during
which this zone will be enforced in accordance with Sec. 165.7.
Dated: October 4, 2021.
Taylor Q. Lam,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2021-22040 Filed 10-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P