Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure for Clothes Dryers, 56608-56644 [2021-21810]
Download as PDF
56608
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
10 CFR Parts 429 and 430
at (202) 287–1445 or by email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
[EERE–2014–BT–TP–0034]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
RIN 1904–AD46
Energy Conservation Program: Test
Procedure for Clothes Dryers
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
On July 23, 2019, the U.S.
Department of Energy (‘‘DOE’’) issued a
notice of proposed rulemaking
(‘‘NOPR’’) to amend the test procedure
for clothes dryers. That proposed
rulemaking serves as the basis for the
final rule. Specifically, this final rule
specifies additional detail for various
provisions within the test procedures;
specifies rounding requirements for all
reported values; applies consistent use
of nomenclature and corrects
typographical errors; and removes
obsolete sections of the test procedures,
including an appendix in its entirety.
DATES: The effective date of this rule is
November 8, 2021. Representations
made on or after April 6, 2022 with
respect to the energy use or energy
efficiency of clothes dryers
manufactured on or after January 1,
2015, must be based on testing
conducted in accordance with this rule.
The incorporation by reference of
certain material listed in the rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register on November 8, 2021. The
incorporation by reference of other
material listed in this rulemaking was
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register on September 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The docket, which includes
Federal Register notices, public meeting
attendee lists and transcripts,
comments, and other supporting
documents/materials, is available for
review at www.regulations.gov. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
However, some documents listed in the
index, such as those containing
information that is exempt from public
disclosure, may not be publicly
available.
A link to the docket web page can be
found at www.regulations.gov/
docket?D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034. The
docket web page contains instructions
on how to access all documents,
including public comments, in the
docket.
For further information on how to
review the docket contact the Appliance
and Equipment Standards Program staff
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
Mr.
Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE–2J, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–
0371. Email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Matthew Ring, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–2555. Email:
Matthew.Ring @hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE
maintains a previously approved
incorporation by reference and
incorporates by reference the following
industry standard into part 430:
International Electrotechnical
Commission (‘‘IEC’’) Standard 62301,
‘‘Household electrical appliancesMeasurement of standby power’’,
(Edition 2.0, 2011–01).
Copies of IEC 62301 can be obtained
from the International Electrotechnical
Commission webstore, by going to
https://webstore.iec.ch.
American Standards Institute
(‘‘ANSI’’)/Association of Home
Appliance Manufacturers (‘‘AHAM’’)
HLD–1–2010 (‘‘AHAM HLD–1’’),
Household Tumble Type Clothes
Dryers, approved 2010.
Copies of ANSI/AHAM HLD–1–2010
can be obtained from the Association of
Home Appliance Manufacturers at 1111
19th Street NW, Suite 402, Washington,
DC 20036, 202–872–5955, or go to
www.aham.org.
For a further discussion of these
standards, see section IV.N.
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
I. Authority and Background
A. Authority
B. Background
II. Synopsis of the Final Rule
III. Discussion
A. Scope of Coverage
B. Definitions
C. Test Setup
1. ‘‘Connected’’ Clothes Dryers
2. Dryness Level Selection for Automatic
Termination Control Dryers
3. Drum Capacity Measurement
4. Test Room Conditions
5. Maintaining Burner Rating for Gas
Clothes Dryers
6. Gas Pressure Tolerance and
Measurement
7. Water Conductivity
D. Test Conduct
1. Test Conditions and Consumer Usage
Patterns
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
2. Inactive and Off Mode Power
Measurements
3. General Test Procedure Provisions at 10
CFR 430.23(d)
4. Rounding Requirements for Reported
Values
5. Optional Usage of Appendix D1 or
Appendix D2
6. Cycle Time Reporting
E. Formatting Changes and Typographical
Errors
1. ‘‘Conventional’’ and ‘‘Vented’’
Nomenclature
2. Symbol Definitions
3. Removal of Duplicate Instructions for
Test Load Preparation
4. Typographical Errors
5. Removal of Obsolete Provisions
F. Removing Obsolete Appendix D
G. Test Procedure Costs and Impact
1. Maintaining Hourly Btu Rating for Gas
Clothes Dryers
2. Final Moisture Content Requirement
3. Additional Amendments
H. Harmonization With Industry Standards
I. Effective and Compliance Dates
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal
Energy Administration Act of 1974
M. Congressional Notification
N. Description of Materials Incorporated by
Reference
V. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
Sfmt 4700
Clothes dryers are included in the list
of ‘‘covered products’’ for which the
DOE is authorized to establish and
amend energy conservation standards
and test procedures. (42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(8)) DOE’s energy conservation
test procedures for clothes dryers are
currently prescribed in the Code of
Federal Regulations (‘‘CFR’’) at 10 CFR
part 430, subpart B, appendix D1 and
appendix D2 (‘‘appendix D1’’ and
‘‘appendix D2’’, respectively). The
following sections discuss DOE’s
authority to establish test procedures for
clothes dryers and relevant background
information regarding DOE’s
consideration of test procedures for this
product.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
A. Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation
Act, as amended (‘‘EPCA’’),1 authorizes
DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of
a number of consumer products and
certain industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C.
6291–6317) Title III, Part B 2 of EPCA
established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles, which sets forth a
variety of provisions designed to
improve energy efficiency. These
products include clothes dryers, the
subject of this document. (42 U.S.C.
6292(a)(8))
The energy conservation program
under EPCA consists essentially of four
parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3)
Federal energy conservation standards,
and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. Relevant provisions of
EPCA specifically include definitions
(42 U.S.C. 6291), test procedures (42
U.S.C. 6293), labeling provisions (42
U.S.C. 6294), energy conservation
standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), and the
authority to require information and
reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C.
6296).
The testing requirements consist of
test procedures that manufacturers of
covered products must use as the basis
for (1) certifying to DOE that their
products comply with the applicable
energy conservation standards adopted
under EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6295(s)), and (2)
making representations about the
efficiency of those products (42 U.S.C.
6293(c)). Similarly, DOE must use these
test procedures to determine whether
the products comply with any relevant
standards promulgated under EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6295(s))
Federal energy efficiency
requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally
supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing,
labeling, and standards. (42 U.S.C. 6297)
DOE may, however, grant waivers of
Federal preemption for particular State
laws or regulations, in accordance with
the procedures and other provisions of
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth
the criteria and procedures DOE must
follow when prescribing or amending
test procedures for covered products.
EPCA provides that any test procedures
prescribed or amended under this
section shall be reasonably designed to
produce test results which measure
energy efficiency, energy use or
1 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the Energy Act
of 2020, Public Law 116–260 (Dec. 27, 2020).
2 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part B was redesignated Part A.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
estimated annual operating cost of a
covered product during a representative
average use cycle or period of use and
shall not be unduly burdensome to
conduct. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
EPCA also requires that, at least once
every 7 years, DOE evaluate test
procedures for each type of covered
product, including clothes dryers, to
determine whether amended test
procedures would more accurately or
fully comply with the requirements for
the test procedures to not be unduly
burdensome to conduct and be
reasonably designed to produce test
results that reflect energy efficiency,
energy use, and estimated operating
costs during a representative average
use cycle or period of use. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(1)(A)) If the Secretary
determines, on his own behalf or in
response to a petition by any interested
person, that a test procedure should be
prescribed or amended, the Secretary
shall promptly publish in the Federal
Register proposed test procedures and
afford interested persons an opportunity
to present oral and written data, views,
and arguments with respect to such
procedures. The comment period on a
proposed rule to amend a test procedure
shall be at least 60 days and may not
exceed 270 days. In prescribing or
amending a test procedure, the
Secretary shall take into account such
information as the Secretary determines
relevant to such procedure, including
technological developments relating to
energy use or energy efficiency of the
type (or class) of covered products
involved. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)) If DOE
determines that test procedure revisions
are not appropriate, DOE must publish
its determination not to amend the test
procedures. DOE is publishing this final
rule in satisfaction of the 7-year review
requirement specified in EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A))
In addition, EPCA requires that DOE
amend its test procedures for all covered
products to integrate measures of
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption into the overall energy
efficiency, energy consumption, or other
energy descriptor, unless the current
test procedure already incorporates the
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption, or if such integration is
technically infeasible. (42 U.S.C.
6295(gg)(2)(A)) If an integrated test
procedure is technically infeasible, DOE
must prescribe separate standby mode
and off mode energy use test procedures
for the covered product, if a separate
test is technically feasible. (Id.) Any
such amendment must consider the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56609
most current versions of the IEC 62301 3
and IEC Standard 62087 4 as applicable.
(42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A))
B. Background
DOE’s test procedures for clothes
dryers manufactured on or after January
1, 2015 appear at appendix D1 and
appendix D2. Manufacturers must use
either appendix D1 or appendix D2 to
show compliance with the applicable
energy conservation standards, and
must use a single appendix for all
representations, including certifications
of compliance.
In its most recent test procedure
rulemaking for clothes dryers, DOE
published a final rule on August 14,
2013 (‘‘August 2013 Final Rule’’),
amending the clothes dryer test
procedure, in which it (1) amended
appendix D1 to update the reference to
the latest edition of IEC Standard 62301,
‘‘Household electrical appliances—
Measurement of standby power,’’
Edition 2.0 2011–01 (‘‘IEC Standard
62301’’); 5 (2) amended appendix D and
appendix D1 to clarify the cycle settings
used for the test cycle, the requirements
for the gas supply for gas clothes dryers,
the installation conditions for console
lights, the method for measuring the
drum capacity, the maximum allowable
weighing scale range, and the allowable
use of a relative humidity (‘‘RH’’) meter;
and (3) established a new appendix D2
that includes procedures reflecting the
amendments discussed above as well as
testing methods for measuring the
effects of automatic cycle termination.
78 FR 49608. (For additional
background on the rulemaking history
for clothes dryer test procedures, please
refer to the August 2013 Final Rule).
DOE published a notice of public
meeting (‘‘NOPM’’) on October 23, 2014
(‘‘October 2014 NOPM’’), and held the
public meeting on November 13, 2014 to
facilitate a discussion among interested
parties about potential changes to the
DOE clothes dryer test procedures to
produce test results that measure energy
use during a representative average use
cycle without being unduly burdensome
to conduct.6 79 FR 63336.
On July 23, 2019, DOE published a
NOPR (‘‘July 2019 NOPR’’) proposing
amendments to the test procedures for
3 IEC 62301, Household electrical appliances—
Measurement of standby power. (Edition 2.0, 2011–
01).
4 IEC 62087, Methods of measurement for the
power consumption of audio, video, and related
equipment (Edition 3.0, 2011–04).
5 IEC Standard 62301 is available online at
https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/6789.
6 A transcript of the public meeting and
submitted comments are available in the docket for
this rulemaking at www.regulations.gov/
docket?D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56610
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
clothes dryers to provide additional
direction in response to questions from
manufacturers and test laboratories. 84
FR 35484. DOE also proposed
amendments to: (1) Specify rounding
requirements for all reported values; (2)
apply consistent use of nomenclature
and correct typographical errors; and (3)
remove obsolete sections of the test
procedures, including appendix D. Id.
DOE also requested comment from
interested parties on issues such as
consumer usage patterns and
‘‘connected’’ clothes dryer features. Id.
The July 2019 NOPR also announced a
webinar to be held on August 14, 2019,
and stated that DOE would hold a
public meeting to discuss the proposals
if one was requested by August 6, 2019.
Id.
On July 29, 2019, DOE received a
comment from the Northwest Energy
Efficiency Alliance (‘‘NEEA’’), the
Natural Resources Defense Council
(‘‘NRDC’’), and Pacific Gas and Electric
Company (‘‘PG&E’’) requesting that DOE
hold an in-person public meeting
regarding the proposed amendments to
the clothes dryers test procedures.7 On
August 2, 2019, DOE issued a prepublication Federal Register
notification announcing a public
meeting and webinar to be held on
August 28, 2019, and cancelled the
previously announced webinar
scheduled for August 14, 2019. 84 FR
39777.
On August 2, 2019, and August 5,
2019, DOE received subsequent
comments from the AHAM requesting to
move the webinar and public meeting
into September 2019.8 On August 21,
2019, DOE published a notification in
the Federal Register changing the
public meeting from August 28, 2019, to
September 17, 2019, and extending the
public comment period for submitting
comments and data on the July 2019
NOPR by 14 days to October 7, 2019. 84
FR 43529.
On September 20, 2019, DOE received
a comment from NEEA, NRDC, and
PG&E requesting an additional 60-day
comment period extension.9 DOE
extended the comment period by 30
days to November 6, 2019. 84 FR 52817
(October 3, 2019).
DOE received comments in response
to the July 2019 NOPR from the
interested parties listed in Table II.1.
TABLE II.1—WRITTEN COMMENTS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO JULY 2019 NOPR
Commenter(s)
Reference in this final rule
Commenter type
Appliance Standards Awareness Project, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Alliance to Save Energy, Natural Resources
Defense Council, Consumer Federation of America, National Consumer Law Center.
California Energy Commission ................................................................
Consortium for Energy Efficiency ............................................................
National Resources Defense Council .....................................................
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance .....................................................
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers ......................................
BSH Home Appliances Corporation ........................................................
GE Appliances, a Haier Company ..........................................................
Samsung Electronics America ................................................................
Whirlpool Corporation ..............................................................................
Pacific Gas and Electric, Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas
and Electric.
Joint Commenters .........................
Efficiency Organizations.
CEC ...............................................
CEE ...............................................
NRDC ............................................
NEEA .............................................
AHAM ............................................
BSH ...............................................
GEA ...............................................
Samsung ........................................
Whirlpool ........................................
California IOUs ..............................
Efficiency Organization,
Efficiency Organization.
Efficiency Organization.
Efficiency Organization.
Trade Association.
Manufacturer.
Manufacturer.
Manufacturer.
Manufacturer.
Investor-Owned Utilities (‘‘IOUs’’).
Note: DOE received other comments outside the scope of the July 2019 NOPR and therefore are not addressed in this final rule.
II. Synopsis of the Final Rule
In this final rule, DOE amends
appendix D1 and appendix D2, both
entitled ‘‘Uniform Test Method for
Measuring the Energy Consumption of
Clothes Dryers,’’ to provide additional
detail in response to questions from
manufacturers and test laboratories,
including additional detail regarding the
testing of ‘‘connected’ models, dryness
level selection, and the procedures for
maintaining the required heat input rate
for gas clothes dryers; additional detail
for the test procedures for performing
inactive and off mode power
measurements; specifications for the
final moisture content (‘‘FMC’’) required
for testing automatic termination control
dryers; specification of a narrower scale
resolution for the weighing scale used to
determine moisture content of test
loads; and specification that the test
load must be weighed within 5 minutes
after a test cycle has terminated. In
addition, DOE amends the test
procedures to update the estimated
number of annual use cycles for clothes
dryers; provide further direction for
additional provisions within the test
procedures; specify rounding
requirements for all reported values;
apply consistent use of nomenclature
and correct typographical errors; remove
obsolete sections of the test procedures,
including appendix D; and update the
reference to the applicable industry test
procedure to the version certified by
ANSI.
DOE’s actions are summarized in
Table II.2 and addressed in detail in
section III of this final rule.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
TABLE II.2—SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN THE AMENDED TEST PROCEDURE
Previous DOE test procedure
Amended test procedure
Does not explicitly address the required configuration for network-connected functionality.
Specifies that clothes dryers with connected
functionality shall be tested with the network-connected functions in the ‘‘off’’ position if it can be disabled by the end-user;
otherwise test in the factory default setting.
7 See document number 17 within docket EERE–
2014–BT–TP–0034, available on
www.regulations.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:34 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
8 See document numbers 18 and 19 within docket
EERE–2014–BT–TP–0034, available on
www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Attribution
Response to test laboratory comment.
9 See document number 22 within docket EERE–
2014–BT–TP–0034, available on
www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
56611
TABLE II.2—SUMMARY OF CHANGES IN THE AMENDED TEST PROCEDURE—Continued
Previous DOE test procedure
Amended test procedure
Silent on selection of the middle dryness level
setting for clothes dryers with an even number of settings.
Specifies using either the next-highest setting
above or next-lowest setting below the midpoint if an even number of discrete settings
are provided.
Specifies the order of adjustment, from least
burdensome to most burdensome, for adjustments that can be made to maintain the
required heat input rate for gas clothes dryers.
Specifies that test load must be weighed within 5 minutes after a test cycle has terminated.
Specifies the use of a spray bottle for achieving the initial moisture content in both appendix D1 and appendix D2.
Specifies a narrower weighing scale resolution of 0.001 pounds to determine moisture
content of test loads.
Defines new terms ‘‘initial moisture content’’
and ‘‘final moisture content’’ to differentiate
moisture content measurements during testing and calculations.
Updates the estimate to 236 clothes dryer cycles per year in appendix D2, based on the
latest available 2015 survey data.
Response to test laboratory comment.
Provides specific procedures for measuring
the low-power modes of a clothes dryer
based on observable characteristics of the
controls.
Specifies that the requirement to achieve a
final dryness level of 2 percent or less also
applies to any subsequent run, if required.
Adds instructions for calculating annual operating cost and CEF using appendix D2;
adds annual energy consumption calculation using either appendix D1 or D2.
Response to test laboratory comment.
Specifies rounding requirements for all reported values.
Applies consistent use of nomenclature, improves formatting, and fixing typographical
errors.
Updates reference to the ANSI-certified
version of AHAM HLD–1–2009, ANSI/
AHAM HLD–1–2010.
To further specify reporting requirements.
Provides adjustments that can be made to
maintain the required heat input rate for gas
clothes dryers.
Does not specify how quickly a test load must
be weighed after a test cycle has terminated.
Specifies the use of a spray bottle for achieving
the initial moisture content in appendix D2
only.
Specifies weighing scale resolution of 0.2
ounces (0.01 pounds) to determine moisture
content of test loads.
Uses the term ‘‘moisture content’’ to refer to
several different measurements of moisture
content throughout testing.
Estimates the number of annual use cycles for
clothes dryer as 283, based on 2005 survey
data, for the purposes of calculating the percycle standby mode and off mode energy
consumption calculation.
Requires distinction between standby mode
and off mode based on control panel
functionality that may not be readily apparent
to a third-party tester.
Does not explicitly provide the FMC requirement for subsequent test runs if the prior run
was deemed invalid.
Does not include instructions for calculating annual operating cost, combined energy factor
‘‘CEF’’, and other measures for clothes dryers optionally tested using appendix D2; does
not include a calculation for annual energy
consumption.
Does not specify rounding requirements for reported values.
Contains nomenclature and formatting inconsistencies and typographical errors.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
References industry standard AHAM HLD–1–
2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
previously approved the following
standard from IEC for incorporation by
reference into appendix D1 and
appendix D2: IEC 62301, ‘‘Household
electrical appliances-Measurement of
standby power’’, (Edition 2.0, 2011–01).
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the following standard from
AHAM for incorporation by reference
into appendix D1 and appendix D2:
ANSI/AHAM HLD–1–2010, ‘‘Household
Tumble Type Clothes Dryers.’’
As described in section III.G of this
document, DOE has determined that the
amendments described in section III and
adopted in this document, other than
the amendment to the number of annual
use cycles in appendix D2, will not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
substantively alter the measured
efficiency of clothes dryers, and that the
test procedures will not be unduly
burdensome to conduct. The
amendment to the number of annual use
cycles specified for calculating per-cycle
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption would alter the measured
energy efficiency of clothes dryers when
using appendix D2, but use of the
amended value in appendix D2 is not
required until such time as DOE were to
amend the energy conservations
standards accounting for such changes
in the test procedure, should such
amended energy conservation standards
be adopted. Discussion of DOE’s actions
are addressed in detail in section III of
this document.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Attribution
Response to test laboratory question.
Response to NOPR comments to improve repeatability and reproducibility.
Response to NOPR comments.
Response to NOPR comments to improve repeatability and reproducibility.
Response to NOPR comments.
Response to industry comment.
Response to industry comment.
To provide consistency between appendices
D1 and D2.
To improve accuracy and readability.
Harmonization with industry standard.
The effective date for the amended
test procedures adopted in this final
rule is 30 days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Representations of energy use or energy
efficiency of clothes dryers must be
based on testing in accordance with the
amended test procedures beginning 180
days after the publication of this final
rule. Manufacturers must use the test
procedures in either appendix D1 or
appendix D2 to demonstrate compliance
with the current energy conservation
standards for clothes dryers.
Manufacturers must use a single
appendix for all representations for a
given model, including certifications of
compliance, and may not use appendix
D1 for certain representations and
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56612
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
appendix D2 for other representations
for that model.
III. Discussion
A. Scope of Coverage
DOE’s clothes dryer test procedures
are applicable to both electric and gas
clothes dryers. DOE regulations define
‘‘electric clothes dryer’’ and ‘‘gas clothes
dryer’’ similarly as a cabinet-like
appliance designed to dry fabrics in a
tumble-type drum with forced air
circulation, with blower(s) driven by an
electric motor(s) and either electricity or
gas, respectively, as the heat source. 10
CFR 430.2. DOE did not propose to
amend the scope of applicability of
DOE’s clothes dryer test procedures in
the July 2019 NOPR. 84 FR 35484,
35487 (July 23, 2019).
AHAM agreed with DOE’s proposal to
not change the scope of applicability of
DOE’s clothes dryer test procedures.
(AHAM, No. 33 at p. 2) 10 DOE received
no other comments on the scope of the
test procedure.
DOE is not amending the scope of
applicability of DOE’s clothes dryer test
procedures in this final rule.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
B. Definitions
Section 1.13 of appendix D1 and
section 1.14 of appendix D2 define the
term ‘‘moisture content’’ as the ratio of
the weight of water contained by the test
load to the bone-dry weight of the test
load, expressed as a percent.
Throughout appendix D1 and appendix
D2, the term ‘‘moisture content’’ is used
in some instances to refer to the
moisture content of the wet load (i.e.,
before initiating the drying cycle),
whereas in other instances the term is
used to refer to the moisture content of
the dry load (i.e., immediately after
completion of the drying cycle). AHAM
suggested using distinct terms and
associated acronyms to clarify the
difference. Specifically, AHAM
suggested the following:
Initial moisture content (‘‘IMC’’)
means the ratio of the weight of water
with the damp test load (prior to drying
cycle) to the bone-dry weight of the test
load, expressed as a percent.
Final moisture content (‘‘FMC’’)
means the ratio of the weight of water
with the final test load (after drying
cycle) to the bone-dry weight of the test
load, expressed as a percent. (AHAM,
No. 33 at p. 11)
10 A notation in the form ‘‘AHAM, No. 33 at p.
2’’ identifies a written comment: (1) Made by the
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers; (2)
recorded in document number 33 that is filed in the
docket of this test procedure rulemaking (Docket
No. EERE–2014–BT–TP–0034) and available for
review at www.regulations.gov; and (3) which
appears on page 2 of document number 33.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
DOE has determined that adding
definitions for ‘‘initial moisture
content’’ and ‘‘final moisture content’’
will appropriately distinguish the
relevant moisture content terms
throughout both appendix D1 and
appendix D2. This change in
nomenclature does not substantively
change the test procedure in appendix
D1 or appendix D2. DOE is therefore
amending appendix D1 and appendix
D2 to adopt these definitions, with nonsubstantive wording changes to
maintain consistent phrasing with the
current definition of ‘‘moisture
content.’’ Additionally, DOE uses the
adopted terminology and acronyms
throughout this final rule to provide
clarity.
C. Test Setup
1. ‘‘Connected’’ Clothes Dryers
Numerous ‘‘connected’’ clothes dryer
models are currently on the market from
multiple major manufacturers. These
products offer wireless network
connectivity to enable features such as
remote monitoring and control via
smartphone, as well as demand
response features 11 available through
partnerships with a small number of
local electric utilities. DOE observes
there are currently a variety of
implementations of these connected
features (i.e., wireless hardware,
connection setup, and wireless control
and programing features) across
different brands, and that the design and
operation of these features is
continuously evolving as the market
continues to grow for these products.
If connected features on a clothes
dryer affect its standby mode power
consumption in the as-shipped
configuration (e.g., by energizing a
wireless communication chip on the
circuit board by default), such impact
would have been measured by the
previous test procedure provisions in
section 3.6 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 for measuring standby
mode and off mode power. Whereas, if
the standby power consumption is not
affected unless the consumer actively
enables the connected functionality on
the unit, any incremental standby power
consumption resulting from the
connected features would not have been
measured by the prior test procedure,
because the test procedure did not
include instructions for activating any
such features before performing the
11 ‘‘Demand response features’’ refers to product
functionality that can be controlled by the ‘‘smart
grid’’ to improve the overall operation of the
electrical grid, for example by reducing energy
consumption during peak periods and/or shifting
power consumption to off-peak periods.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
standby mode and off mode
measurement. Similarly, any
incremental energy consumption in
active mode, or any other modes of
operation impacted by the product’s
connected features, would not have
been measured as part of the prior DOE
test procedure, because the test cycle
requirements within section 3.3 of
appendix D1 and appendix D2 did not
include instructions for activating any
such features before performing the
active mode drying cycle measurements.
To ensure the repeatability and
comparability of test results between
models, especially those with connected
functionality, DOE proposed in the July
2019 NOPR to specify in section 3.3 of
appendix D1, and sections 3.3.1 and
3.3.2 of appendix D2, that units with
network capabilities be tested with the
network-connected functions disabled
throughout testing. 84 FR 35484, 35493–
35494 (July 23, 2019).
AHAM supported DOE’s proposal to
conduct testing with connected features
in the ‘‘off’’ position. AHAM noted that
connected features operate with
different capabilities and many have
energy saving benefits to consumers.
AHAM further commented that
connected appliances can play a critical
role in increasing the energy efficiency
of the grid and can be used by utilities
to increase demand response by peak
load shifting as well as facilitate
increased penetration of renewable
sources of power. AHAM also stated
that connected features are currently in
the early stages of development, and
meaningful data are currently
unavailable on consumer use of
connected features, as there has been
limited market penetration. AHAM
cautioned that regulating energy
consumption associated with connected
features could stifle this area of
innovation and its potential energy
savings benefits, stating that it is not yet
fully known how consumers will use
connected functionality and which
features will be permanently available.
Finally, AHAM noted that testing in the
‘‘off’’ position would be consistent with
the refrigerator/freezer test procedure
and asserted that doing so would
recognize that this category of products
is still developing, as is consumers’ use
and understanding of them. (AHAM,
No. 33 at p. 8)
Whirlpool commented that
incremental standby power
consumption resulting from connected
features should not be measured when
the consumer is actively required to
enable connected functionality (i.e.,
connected functionality is not enabled
in the as-shipped configuration).
Whirlpool also asserted that if a
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
connected feature is enabled in the asshipped position but can be optionally
disabled by the consumer with the
provided manufacturer instructions, the
feature should be disabled before
testing. Whirlpool further commented,
however, that if there is no means to
power off the energized component that
enables connected functionality, nor
manufacturer instructions for powering
it off, then this energy consumption
should be measured. (Whirlpool, No. 32
at pp. 3–4)
The California IOUs, CEC, the Joint
Commenters, and NEEA opposed testing
clothes dryers with network-connected
functions in the ‘‘off’’ position.
(California IOUs, No. 29 at p. 20; CEC,
No. 31 at p. 4; Joint Commenters, No. 34
at pp. 2–3; NEEA, No. 38 at p. 17)
The California IOUs commented that
the ENERGY STAR qualified product
list features five models sold in the
United States that are certified as having
connected features, and that Consumer
Reports have tested approximately 50
clothes dryers with connected
features—including 32 percent of the
top 25-rated electric and gas standardsize clothes dryers and the top two
compact-size clothes dryers—with the
top three recommended dryers costing
less than $800 having connected
capabilities. The California IOUs stated
that with this market penetration and
the overall innovation and growth in the
‘‘Internet of Things’’ market, capturing
the network-connected function energy
usage is important. (California IOUs, No.
29 at p. 20)
CEC commented that if DOE requires
network-connected functions to be in
the ‘‘off’’ position for testing, the test
procedure would fail to require
measurement of energy consumption of
these features, which may contribute
significantly to standby mode and off
mode energy consumption.
Furthermore, CEC stated that DOE
would have insufficient information to
properly consider future energy
conservation standard requirements for
standby mode, as required by 42 U.S.C.
6295(gg), and adequate information may
not be provided to consumers, depriving
them of choice. (CEC, No. 21 at p. 4)
The Joint Commenters stated that
without a measurement of network
mode power consumption, consumers
would have no information about the
additional energy use associated with
the connected functionality. The Joint
Commenters encouraged DOE to
measure the energy associated with
network-connected functionality in
order to better represent the energy
consumption of connected clothes
dryers. The Joint Commenters also
noted that such a measurement would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
not impede innovation, since any
amended standard could account for the
additional energy use associated with
network mode. (Joint Commenters, No.
34 at pp. 2–3)
While a number of connected clothes
dryers are on the market with varying
implementations of connected features,
DOE is not aware of any data available,
nor did interested parties provide any
such data, regarding the consumer use
of connected features. Therefore, DOE is
unable to establish a representative test
configuration for assessing the energy
consumption of connected functionality
for clothes dryers during an average
period of use.
Furthermore, as noted, while DOE’s
prior test procedure did not explicitly
require the measurement of energy use
associated with any connected features,
the previous test procedure, in its
required measurement of standby mode
and off mode power, may have captured
the energy used by features that provide
connected functionality. Specifically,
any energy use of such connected
features may have been measured in
section 3.6 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 if manufacturers’
instructions specify that the features be
turned on, or if the connected
functionality is enabled by default when
the unit is powered on. If, however, a
manufacturer does not provide such an
instruction, and the product ships with
connected features disabled, then such
energy consumption would not have
been measured under the prior test
procedures.
Therefore, to ensure the repeatability
and comparability of test results
between models, especially those with
connected functionality, DOE is
adopting the July 2019 NOPR proposal
regarding the network-connected
function setting position. DOE is also
providing additional detail on the
direction to ‘‘disable’’ the network
function during testing. The direction
adopted in this final rule provides
further specification that a network
function is to be disabled as capable by
the end user pursuant to instructions
provided in the product’s user manual.
DOE has determined that if network
functionality cannot be disabled by the
consumer and the manufacturer’s user
manual does not provide instruction for
disabling the function, including the
energy consumption of the enabled
network function is more representative
than excluding the energy consumption
associated with the network function.
As such, in this final rule DOE is
amending section 3.3 of appendix D1,
and sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 of appendix
D2, to provide that for units with
network capabilities, the network
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56613
settings must be disabled throughout
testing if such settings can be disabled
by the end-user and the product’s user
manual provides instructions on how to
do so. Further, the amendments
explicitly provide that if network
settings cannot be disabled by the enduser, or the product’s user manual does
not provide instruction for disabling
network settings, then the unit must be
tested with the network settings in the
factory default configuration for the test
cycle.
Finally, CEE noted that its
specification for clothes dryers includes
optional connected criteria, which are
designed to recognize units that enable
new benefits to customers and the grid
or energy systems in a diverse range of
regulatory conditions (e.g., load delay,
load reduction, and energy reporting).
CEE stated that connected products
promoted with ratepayer funds should
offer multiple pathways to connect,
including an open, nonproprietary
means for connecting within the
physical bounds of the customer’s home
(i.e., without requiring the use of a
manufacturer’s ‘‘cloud’’). CEE stated
further that these key elements that
need to be addressed are dependent on
the pending ENERGY STAR test method
to validate demand response being
developed by DOE. CEE encouraged
DOE to finalize the ENERGY STAR test
method as soon as possible and stated
that CEE is relying on manufacturer
written submissions that stipulate
compliance with the CEE connected
criteria until the test method becomes
available. (CEE, No. 27 at pp. 3–4)
DOE notes that this final rule
addresses only whether networkconnected functions are disabled during
testing under appendix D1 and
appendix D2, and does not address
testing the demand response
functionality of any such features. DOE
further notes that this final rule is
separate from the process under
ENERGY STAR for validating demand
response.
2. Dryness Level Selection for
Automatic Termination Control Dryers
Section 3.3.2 of appendix D2 states
that where the dryness level setting can
be chosen independently of the
program, it shall be set to the ‘‘normal’’
or ‘‘medium’’ dryness level setting. If
such designation is not provided, then
the dryness level is set at the mid-point
between the minimum and maximum
settings. DOE has received inquiries
from third-party test laboratories
regarding clothes dryers that have
dryness settings such that a single midpoint between the minimum and
maximum settings is not available (e.g.,
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56614
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
a clothes dryer with four dryness
settings).
In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed
to specify in section 3.3.2 of appendix
D2 that if an even number of discrete
settings are provided, either the nexthighest setting above the mid-point, in
the direction of the maximum dryness
setting, or the next-lowest setting below
the mid-point, in the direction of the
minimum dryness setting, is selected.
84 FR 35484, 35497 (July 23, 2019).
AHAM supported DOE’s proposal to
specify in appendix D2 that if an even
number of discrete settings are
provided, the next-highest setting above
the mid-point, in the direction of the
maximum dryness setting, or the next
lowest setting below the mid-point, in
the direction of the minimum dryness
setting should be used. (AHAM, No. 33
at p. 9)
The California IOUs, Joint
Commenters, Energy Solutions on
behalf of the California IOUs (‘‘Energy
Solutions’’), and NEEA recommended
that DOE require that for clothes dryers
that provide an even number of discrete
settings that can be chosen
independently of the drying program,
the dryness level should be set to the
next highest level above the mid-point
between the minimum and maximum
setting. (California IOUs, No. 29 at pp.
20¥21; Energy Solutions, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at p. 45; 12
Joint Commenters No. 34 at p. 3; NEEA,
Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp.
45–46)
The California IOUs provided
examples of two types of control panel
configurations in which an even number
of discrete dryness settings are
provided. In one type, the clothes dryer
includes a ‘‘damp’’ or very low dryness
setting, for which the product manual
identifies ‘‘dry’’ as the ‘‘normal dryness
setting’’, which is one step above the
mid-point. In the second type, the
clothes dryer includes a four-step scale
from ‘‘less’’ to ‘‘more’’ dry. The
California IOUs further commented that
in NEEA’s 2014 Dryer Field Study,13
12 A notation in the form ‘‘Energy Solutions,
Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at p. 45’’
identifies an oral comment that DOE received on
September 17, 2019 during the public meeting, and
was recorded in the public meeting transcript in the
docket for this test procedure rulemaking (Docket
No. EERE–2014–BT– TP–0034). This particular
notation refers to a comment (1) made by Energy
Solutions during the public meeting; (2) recorded
in document number 23, which is the public
meeting transcript that is filed in the docket of this
test procedure rulemaking; and (3) which appears
on page 45 of document number 23.
13 The 2014 NEEA field study surveyed clothes
dryer usage patterns of 50 households in the Pacific
Northwest region. The report is available in the
docket for this rulemaking at: www.regulations.gov/
document?D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034-0010.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
(‘‘2014 NEEA field study’’), the ‘‘less
dry’’ setting was used only 1 percent of
the time, while ‘‘normal’’ and ‘‘more
dry’’ were chosen 65 percent and 34
percent of the time, respectively. Based
on this, the California IOUs stated that
selecting the next highest setting from
the mid-point would best represent an
average use cycle for a clothes dryer
with an even number of discrete dryness
settings. (California IOUs, No. 29 at pp.
20¥21) Energy Solutions commented
that when four (or an even number of)
settings are provided, typically the
lowest is an air-dry feature that provides
no additional drying, such that the order
is air dry, low, medium, and high.
Energy Solutions stated that the
intention is not to have the setting set
to low dryness (i.e., the next-lowest
setting from the mid-point); but rather,
the intention is to have the setting set
to medium (i.e., the next-highest
setting). (Energy Solutions, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at p. 45)
NEEA asserted that using the nexthighest setting would reduce test
burden, as it would decrease the
likelihood that the clothes dryer would
be unable to reach the required
remaining moisture content requirement
and thus need to be retested. Further,
NEEA commented that DOE should
removing ambiguity by providing
definitive guidance one way or the
other, rather than allowing the
laboratory to select either the nexthighest or next-lowest setting. (NEEA,
Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp.
45–46)
BSH recommended that if a clothes
dryer’s controls have an even number of
dryness level settings and therefore do
not have a mid-point that can be
selected, the dryness level should be set
at the next-lower set point below the
mid-point. (BSH, No. 30 at pp. 3–4)
As stated, the previous test procedure
did not provide direction as to the
setting to select if the clothes dryer
provides an even number of dryness
settings, none of which are labeled as
‘‘normal’’ or ‘‘medium.’’ To address
testing of a clothes dryer with such a
configuration, DOE is adopting the
direction as proposed. The direction to
select either the next-highest setting
above the mid-point, or the next-lowest
setting below the mid-point, preserves
the flexibility of manufacturers to assign
the number and dryness level of settings
available on a unit. For example, a
manufacturer may assign the second of
four settings as the selection most
closely equivalent to the ‘‘normal’’
dryness setting. In such an instance, it
would not be appropriate to require
selecting the next-highest above the
mid-point. Additionally, a manufacturer
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
would not be able to select a setting that
did not achieve a valid test cycle (i.e.,
an FMC of 2 percent or less, as required
by section 3.3.2 of appendix D2, which
is representative of the consumeraccepted dryness level, as described
further in section III.D.1.e.iii of this
document). As such, a manufacturer
would not be able to select the nextlowest setting below the mid-point if
such setting did not provide the
necessary dryness level. Furthermore,
while the 2014 NEEA field study
presents a percentage of cycle usage by
dryness setting, the data are limited to
three dryness settings (‘‘less dry’’,
‘‘normal’’, and ‘‘more dry’’) and
therefore do not provide insight into the
frequency of dryness settings selected
for clothes dryers with an even number
of cycle dryness settings.
Given the considerations above, DOE
is amending section 3.3.2 of appendix
D2 to state that either the next-highest
dryness setting above the mid-point or
the next-lowest dryness setting below
the mid-point may be tested. Section
3.4.7 of appendix D2 (which is not
amended by this final rule) requires
recording for each test cycle the cycle
settings selected, in accordance with
section 3.3.2 of appendix D2. The
certification reporting requirements for
clothes dryers at 10 CFR 429.21(b)(2)
require a certification report to include,
for products tested using appendix D2,
a list of the cycle setting selections for
the energy test cycle as recorded in
section 3.4.7 of appendix D2. This
reporting requirement is unchanged by
this final rule. DOE notes that the
settings used for appendix D2
certification are publicly available
through DOE’s compliance certification
database.14
3. Drum Capacity Measurement
Section 3.1 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 requires measurement of
drum capacity by filling the drum with
water and using the weight of water in
the drum to determine the drum
volume. Clothes dryer drum capacity is
reported by manufacturers in cubic feet
(10 CFR 429.21(b)(2)) and is used to
distinguish between compact-size and
standard-size clothes dryer product
classes. See appendix D1, sections 1.6
and 1.16; appendix D2, sections 1.7 and
1.17.
a. Alternative Drum Capacity
Measurement Method
NEEA suggested that, to reduce test
burden, the current drum measurement
14 DOE’s compliance certification database for
appendix D2 is available at
www.regulations.doe.gov/certification-data/CCMS4-Clothes_Dryers_-_Appendix_D2.html.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
approach could be replaced with the
tape measurement method used in a
draft California Commercial Tumble
Dryer Test Protocol.15 NEEA described
this method as taking physical
measurements with a standard tape
measure and calipers, and using a
formula to compute the volume. NEEA
noted that although the tape
measurement method is expected to be
less precise than the water measurement
method, precision is less important, in
NEEA’s opinion, when drum capacities
clearly fall within the range for
compact-size or standard-size product
classes. NEEA further proposed that the
water measurement method could be
retained for clothes dryers with drum
volumes that are near the product class
drum volume threshold. Finally, NEEA
stated that the current water
measurement method completed by a
third-party laboratory can cost up to
$500 to perform. (NEEA, No. 38 at p. 17)
Upon reviewing the draft California
Commercial Tumble Dryer Test
Protocol, DOE noted that the tape
measurement/caliper method suggested
by NEEA is only used to measure drum
capacities for commercial clothes dryers
with drum volumes greater than 9.5
cubic feet according to the California
Commercial Tumble Dryer Test
Protocol. Under the California draft, a
water volume measurement method,
similar to that in the DOE test
procedures at appendix D1 and
appendix D2, would still be required for
clothes dryers with reported drum
capacity less than 9.5 cubic feet.
Nonetheless, DOE investigated the
accuracy and effectiveness of the
56615
California Commercial Tumble Dryer
Test Protocol tape measurement/caliper
method for consumer clothes dryers,
particularly those with rated drum
capacities less than 9.5 cubic feet, by
comparing the drum capacity resulting
from the tape measurement/caliper
method to the rated drum capacity,
which is determined based on the water
volume drum capacity approach in the
DOE test procedures. DOE conducted
the tape measurement/caliper method of
the California Commercial Tumble
Dryer Test Protocol on three compactsize and two standard-size clothes
dryers, and compared the resulting
values to the rated drum capacity. The
results of this investigation are
presented in Table III.1.
TABLE III.1—DRUM CAPACITY MEASUREMENT INVESTIGATION
Rated drum
capacity
(ft3)
Test unit
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
1
2
3
4
5
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................................................................
The results in Table III.1 show a range
of differences between the two methods
(from –4.5 percent to +0.6 percent),
which DOE attributes to the inherently
less precise nature of the California
Commercial Tumble Dryer Test
Protocol, including the inherent
variability in measuring irregular
contours within the drum. Under the
California Commercial Tumble Dryer
Test Protocol, test technicians are
instructed to approximate any irregular
volumes. The tape measurement/caliper
method from the California Commercial
Tumble Dryer Test Protocol is designed
for measuring the capacity of larger
drums associated with commercial
clothes dryers, for which the variability
in approximating irregular volumes has
lesser relative impact on drum capacity
measurements; however, for smaller
consumer clothes dryers, these
approximations may have more
significant impacts on reported drum
capacity.
The results of the tape measurement/
caliper method investigative testing
demonstrate that the draft California
Commercial Tumble Dryer Test Protocol
could yield capacity measurement
values that differ by up to 5 percent
from the current drum capacity
measurement method in the DOE test
procedures. While a difference of this
magnitude could potentially be
acceptable for large-capacity clothes
dryers that are clearly above the 4.4
cubic foot threshold that differentiates
the standard and compact consumer
clothes dryer product classes, further
investigation and analysis would be
required to better understand the
implications of using the tape
measurement/caliper method for
consumer clothes dryers, and to
determine the range of capacities for
which the tape measurement/caliper
method could be appropriate for use as
an alternative to the water volume drum
capacity approach. DOE does not have
sufficient information at this time with
which to implement such an alternative
capacity measurement method.
Therefore, DOE is not amending
appendix D1 and appendix D2 at this
time to include a tape measurement
method for determining consumer
clothes dryer drum capacity.
15 California Commercial Tumble Dryer Test
Protocol 2017 proposal; https://efiling.energy.
ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=219983&
DocumentContentId=26567.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
b. Drum Capacity Measurement Water
Temperature
The clothes dryer test procedures do
not specify a temperature for the water
used in the drum capacity test. AHAM
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2.8
3.6
4.0
5.1
7.4
Measured
drum capacity
(ft3)
2.67
3.63
3.87
5.13
7.32
Percent
difference
¥4.5
0.7
¥2.8
0.6
¥1.1
proposed that DOE establish water
temperature requirements in appendix
D1 and appendix D2 that align with
section 3.1.4 of the clothes washer test
procedure located in 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendix J2 (‘‘appendix J2’’),
which requires either 60 degrees
Fahrenheit (‘‘°F’’) ±5 °F (15.6 degrees
Celsius (‘‘°C’’) ±2.8 °C) or 100 °F ±10 °F
(37.8 °C ±5.5 °C) water. (AHAM No. 33
at p. 12)
DOE recognizes that water density
varies based on water temperature.
Section 3.1.6 of appendix J2 specifies
using a water density of 62.3 pounds per
cubic foot (lb/ft3) for 60 °F water or 62.0
lb/ft3 for 100 °F water. For the clothes
washer test procedure, specifying the
temperature of the water is necessary
because the volume of the clothes
container must be determined to the
nearest 0.01 cubic feet for the purpose
of determining test load sizes. (Section
3.1.7 of appendix J2) Whereas, DOE is
not aware of any instance, and
commenters have provided none, in
which this degree of precision is
required for the clothes dryer test
procedure. For this reason, DOE is not
amending appendix D1 and appendix
D2 to specify the water temperature
during the drum capacity test.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
56616
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
4. Test Room Conditions
Section 2.2.1 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 specify maintaining the
test chamber ambient air temperature at
75 ±3 °F and a room RH of 50 ±10
percent.
The California IOUs and AHAM
recommended that DOE tighten the
tolerances for ambient temperature and
humidity to improve repeatability of
testing results. (California IOUs, No. 29
at pp. 12–13; AHAM, No. 33 at p. 12)
The California IOUs referenced clothes
dryer testing conducted by PG&E in
2019 16 (‘‘2019 PG&E testing’’), for
which three models were tested
according to appendix D2 with the
ambient conditions maintained at an
average of 75 °F and 50 percent RH
(corresponding to the nominal test
conditions specified by appendix D2),
with additional tests performed at an
average of 72.4 °F and 57 percent RH
(remaining within the specified
tolerances of appendix D2). The
California IOUs noted that for the three
models tested, the two models with the
lowest CEF results under the 75 °F and
50 percent RH test conditions switched
rank order when tested at 72.4 °F and 57
percent RH. (California IOUs, No. 29 at
pp. 12–13)
AHAM asserted that operating at
either end of the current humidity level
tolerance range can significantly impact
drying performance. AHAM proposed
tightening the tolerances on these
requirements as follows: Room ambient
air temperature to 75 ±2 °F and room RH
to 50 ±5 percent. AHAM suggested that
this adjustment would not increase test
burden because test laboratories are
already capable of maintaining the
tighter tolerances. (AHAM, No. 33 at p.
12)
GEA supported all requests for tighter
tolerances in the AHAM comments.
GEA stated that its laboratories are
currently able to maintain the tolerances
suggested by AHAM without additional
test burden or cost, and that GEA does
not have any information indicating
other laboratories would not be able to
obtain these same levels of precision
with little to no additional cost or
burden. (GEA, No. 37 at p. 2)
DOE notes that the relevant 2019
PG&E testing was limited to three units,
which is an insufficient sample of units
to demonstrate a quantifiable and
representative trend across all units on
the market. AHAM did not provide any
data in support of its comment on this
issue. DOE does not have sufficient data
16 Test results from the 2019 PG&E testing are
referenced in the California IOUs comment in the
docket for this rulemaking at: www.regulations.gov/
document?D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034-0029.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
at this time to justify making any
changes to the ambient conditions
specified in the test procedure. Further
testing would be required on a broader,
more representative selection of units in
order to assess whether reducing the
temperature and humidity tolerances
would provide more repeatable test
results. For these reasons DOE is not
making any changes to the currently
specified temperature and humidity
tolerances at this time.
Section 2.2.1 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 specifies maintaining the
room RH at 50 ±10 percent. BSH
suggested that the current RH tolerance
in appendix D1 and appendix D2 could
be interpreted as either 10 percent of 50
(i.e., a 5 percent RH range—45 percent
to 55 percent) or a 10 percent RH range
(i.e., 40 percent to 60 percent). BSH
recommended that DOE specify
maintaining the room RH between the
limits of 45 percent to 55 percent. (BSH,
No. 30 at p. 3)
The RH specification requires
maintaining RH in the range of 40
percent to 60 percent. DOE notes that
when it initially established the clothes
dryer test procedure in a final rule
published on September 14, 1977,
section 2.2 of appendix D stated,
‘‘Maintain the . . . room relative
humidity at 40 percent to 60 percent
relative humidity.’’ 42 FR 46145,
46150.17 To address the potential for
misinterpretation identified by BSH,
DOE is amending how the RH
requirement is described in the test
procedures by specifying to maintain
the room RH at 50 percent ±10 percent
RH. This clarification is consistent with
the previous test procedure and does
not constitute a change to that test
procedure.
5. Maintaining Burner Rating for Gas
Clothes Dryers
Section 2.3.2.1 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 requires that natural gas
clothes dryers maintain the hourly
British thermal unit (‘‘Btu’’) rating of the
burner during testing to within ±5
percent of the hourly Btu rating
specified by the manufacturer.18 Section
2.3.2.2 of appendix D1 and appendix D2
provides analogous requirements for
propane clothes dryers. The
requirement to maintain the hourly Btu
rating of the burner provides repeatable
17 DOE revised how the relative humidity
specification was presented in appendix D (i.e.,
presenting the specification as ‘‘50 ± 10 percent’’)
in a final rule published May 19, 1981, but stated
that the substance of the requirement was not being
amended. See 46 FR 27324, 27325.
18 The hourly Btu rating of a gas clothes dryer is
typically specified on the product’s nameplate
sticker.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
test conditions, recognizing that the rate
of heat input into a clothes dryer can
significantly affect its performance.
These sections provide instructions
regarding tolerances and adjustments
that can be made to the inlet gas
pressure,19 gas pressure regulator
setpoint,20 and/or modifications to the
orifice 21 in order to maintain the hourly
Btu rating within ±5 percent of the
rating specified by the manufacturer.
If the required hourly Btu rating
cannot be achieved under the allowable
range in gas inlet pressure, the prior test
procedures provided instruction for
modifying the orifice of the gas burner
as necessary (i.e., adjustments to the gas
inlet pressure should be made before
considering modifications to the
orifice). However, the large majority (if
not all) of clothes dryers currently on
the market include a gas pressure
regulator, which is situated between the
gas inlet and the orifice. Since the
purpose of a gas pressure regulator is to
provide a constant output pressure
regardless of fluctuations in upstream
supply pressure, adjusting the gas inlet
pressure upstream of a pressure
regulator will typically have no impact
on the pressure of the gas exiting the
regulator and entering the orifice, or
likewise the hourly Btu rating.
To provide further direction
applicable to the large majority of gas
clothes dryers on the market that
include a gas pressure regulator, in the
July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed an
order of adjustment for maintaining the
hourly Btu rating within specification as
follows: (First) adjust the supply gas
pressure, (second) adjust the pressure
regulator setpoint, or (third) modify the
orifice as necessary. 84 FR 35484, 35494
(July 23, 2019). The proposed order
specifies using an approach with the
19 For natural gas clothes dryers, section 2.3.2.1
of appendix D1 and appendix D2 specifies
maintaining the gas supply pressure immediately
ahead of all controls within a range of 7 to 10
inches of water column. For propane clothes dryers,
section 2.3.2.2 of appendix D1 and appendix D2
specifies maintaining the gas supply pressure
immediately ahead of all controls within a range of
11 to 13 inches of water column.
20 For both natural gas and propane clothes
dryers, if the clothes dryer is equipped with a gas
appliance pressure regulator for which the
manufacturer specifies an outlet pressure, the
regulator outlet pressure must be maintained within
±10 percent of the value recommended by the
manufacturer in the installation manual, on the
nameplate sticker, or wherever the manufacturer
makes such a recommendation for the basic model.
21 The orifice is an attachment that typically
screws into the outlet of the gas pressure regulator
and has a small-diameter outlet hole, through
which the gas flows into the burner. For both
natural gas and propane clothes dryers, the test
procedures provide for modifying the orifice of the
gas burner as necessary if the required hourly Btu
rating cannot be achieved under the allowable range
in gas inlet pressure.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
least amount of test burden necessary to
achieve the specified test conditions.
This order also corresponds to the least
amount of modification to the unit that
would be necessary to achieve the
specified test conditions. Adjusting the
supply gas inlet pressure requires no
modifications to the clothes dryer itself.
Adjusting the pressure regulator
setpoint typically requires removing an
access panel on the clothes dryer and
tightening or loosening a screw on the
regulator. Modifying the orifice
typically requires removing an access
panel on the clothes dryer,
disassembling the burner, removing the
orifice, modifying the orifice (e.g., by
drilling a larger-diameter outlet hole),
reinstalling the orifice, and finally
reassembling the burner.
In DOE’s testing experience, any
deviation of the hourly Btu rating
beyond ±5 percent of the rated value can
be remedied with a minor adjustment to
the gas pressure regulator (within the
allowable range of ±10 percent of the
recommended pressure level). Based on
DOE’s experience with third-party test
laboratories, preferentially starting with
the least burdensome adjustments
before trying progressively more
burdensome adjustments is generally
consistent with industry practice.
In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed
to provide this direction in a new
section 2.3.2.3 in both appendix D1 and
appendix D2, which would apply to
both natural gas and propane clothes
dryers. In conjunction, DOE proposed
simplifying the existing provisions
within sections 2.3.2.1 and 2.3.2.2 to
reduce duplication with provisions that
would be included in the new section
2.3.2.3, and therefore improve the
overall readability of the test
procedures.
NEEA supported specifying the order
of specification for adjustment;
however, NEEA urged DOE to remove
the third proposed option to physically
modify the gas orifice. NEEA suggested
that in its experience, such
modifications are not included in
installation manuals supplied with the
product, and physically modifying the
orifice may produce test results that
would not be representative of the
manufactured product as installed in
the field. (NEEA, No. 38 at p. 17) NEEA
further suggested that the test procedure
should specify test conditions that are
achievable, and that if a unit is unable
to stay within those parameters,
modification would need to occur on
the manufacturing side rather than as
the responsibility of the testing
technician to physically modify the
product. (NEEA, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 27–30, 40–41)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
AHAM supported DOE’s proposal,
stating that it is consistent with current
best laboratory practice, would clarify
and simplify the test procedure, would
codify the method that has long been
used to test clothes dryers, and is
needed to ensure test conditions can be
met throughout the test. AHAM also
stated that if these three steps are not
permitted, the test will become unduly
burdensome to conduct. In addition,
AHAM explained that providing for
adjustment of the orifice represents a
balance among test burden and the
accuracy, repeatability, and
reproducibility of the test. (AHAM, No.
33 at p. 8; AHAM, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 29–32)
The purpose for adjustment of the
orifice during testing is to ensure that
the performance of the clothes dryer is
representative of performance at the Btu
rating specified by the manufacturer on
the product’s nameplate, which informs
the field installation conditions.
Allowing for adjustment of the orifice
reduces test burden and improves
repeatability by providing test
laboratories with a last resort to
maintain the hourly Btu rating as
specified by the manufacturer. As stated
in the July 2019 NOPR proposal,
modification of the burner orifice shall
be used as the last choice for
maintaining the hourly Btu rating. 84 FR
35484, 35494 (July 23, 2019).
Based on all the available
information, including the experience of
DOE, industry, and laboratories with
testing, and to ensure the test is
repeatable with minimal test burden as
discussed in the preceding paragraphs,
DOE is amending the test procedure as
proposed in the July 2019 NOPR to
provide the order of the existing
provisions that shall be taken to
maintain the hourly Btu rating within
±5 percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer.
6. Gas Pressure Tolerance and
Measurement
Section 2.3.2.1 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 requires that the natural
gas supply pressure must be maintained
between 7 to 10 inches of water column
ahead of all controls for all gas clothes
dryers using natural gas. The hourly Btu
rating of the gas burner must be
maintained within ±5 percent of the
rating specified by the manufacturer,
and the natural gas supplied must have
a heating value of approximately 1,025
Btu per standard cubic foot. The actual
heating value must be obtained by use
of a standard continuous flow
calorimeter described by section 2.4.6 of
appendix D1 and appendix D2, or by the
purchase of bottled natural gas whose
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56617
Btu rating is certified to be at least as
accurate as that obtained by use of a
standard continuous flow calorimeter.
GEA suggested that the current gas
input pressure tolerance of between 7
and 10 inches water column (‘‘WC’’)
may create unreasonable variance in the
test outcomes. GEA noted that while a
range may be necessary to reach the
rated Btu/hr of a unit for testing, the
procedure should be amended to reduce
variability where possible. Referencing
the process set forth in ANSI Standard
Z21.5.1–2017, ‘‘Gas Clothes Dryers,
Volume I, Type 1 Clothes Dryers,’’ GEA
recommended that DOE adopt 7 inches
WC as the target with a maximum of 10
inches WC in its gas clothes dryer test
procedures.
GEA further suggested that the range
for the target Btu/hour during testing
should be the nominal rating of the
appliance ±2.5 percent rather than the
currently specified ±5 percent, noting
that the current range allows for a 10percent variation in Btu/hr, which is a
key measure used to determine energy
usage by gas clothes dryers. GEA stated
that the current range allows too much
variability in testing results. According
to GEA, the proposed tighter range
would not increase test burden. (GEA,
No. 37 at p. 3)
DOE is unaware of any data that
suggests either the current gas input
pressure tolerance or the current
tolerance of ±5 percent of hourly Btu
rate produces unrepresentative or
unrepeatable test results. GEA did not
provide any such data. In addition, as
discussed previously, the large majority
of (if not all) clothes dryers currently on
the market include a gas pressure
regulator, which is situated between the
gas inlet and the orifice. Adjusting the
gas inlet pressure upstream of a pressure
regulator will typically have no impact
on the pressure of the gas exiting the
regulator, or likewise the hourly Btu
rating. Absent data or other information
demonstrating an issue with the current
natural gas supply conditions, DOE is
not amending these provisions.
GEA further commented that gas flow
meters vary by manufacturer and type
and described the wide variation in
different types of meters. GEA suggested
that given the wide range of issues and
error that can be introduced by the wide
variability in gas flow meters, DOE
should specify type and capacity
standards for the type of gas flow meter
to be used for the gas clothes dryer test
procedures. (GEA, No. 37 at pp. 3–4)
GEA further noted that the gas heating
value (‘‘GEF’’) specified in the
procedures for gas clothes dryers must
be corrected according to the U.S.
Bureau of Standards, circular C417,
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
56618
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
1938 (as specified in section 3.4.6.3 of
appendix D1 and appendix D2), which
requires a series of correction and
conversion factors. GEA commented
that the calculations and corrections
vary according to calorimeter equipment
instructions, type of gage flow meter
used, and may be influenced by gas
supply pressure, barometric pressure,
gas temperature, and gas absolute
pressure (‘‘psia’’). GEA suggested that
all formulas and measurements used in
making GEF calculations should be
clearly specified in the DOE gas clothes
dryer procedures, and that this missing
information increases test uncertainty
and creates reproducibility and
reliability issues for the DOE
verification program. (GEA, No. 37 at p.
4)
Additionally, GEA commented that
the Heat Input Test (required in sections
2.3.2.1 and 2.3.2.1 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2) is an essential part of
determining the hourly Btu rating in the
appendix D1 and appendix D2 test
procedures for gas clothes dryers, but
there is currently no specified
procedure on how the Heat Input Test
is to be performed. GEA requested that
DOE develop a procedure for the
heating input test to determine the Btu/
hr of the clothes dryer under test, and
that the procedure should include
requirements for load size, load
wetness, clothes dryer cycle selection,
clothes dryer run time, and gas flow
verification during the measurement
period. GEA asserted that this would
resolve various issues, including the
need to account for the time for gas flow
to begin after cycle start, the change in
input rate over time for the first several
minutes of burner operation, and the
potential for burner cycling during the
Heat Input Test. GEA recommended that
DOE review the procedure in ANSI
Z21.1–2016/CSA 1.1–2016, ‘‘Household
Cooking Gas Appliances’’ (‘‘ANSI
Z21.1–2016/CSA 1.1–2016’’), which
specifies that measurements not be
taken until 5 minutes after burner
ignition to account for variation in flow
rate caused by heat effects on the
equipment. GEA also recommended that
the Heat Input Test be performed with
a DOE test cloth load wetted in the same
fashion as done for the primary energy
consumption test, to ensure that the
burner in the clothes dryer is running
for the complete measurement time
during the Heat Input Test. (GEA, No.
37 at pp. 4–5)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
DOE understands that test laboratories
do not all use the same gas flow meters;
however, DOE is unaware of data or
other information suggesting any
substantive variation in test results due
to the use of different gas flow meters.
DOE also reviewed ANSI Z21.1–2016/
CSA 1.1–2016 and determined that for
the purposes of measuring the hourly
Btu rating for gas clothes dryers, the
products that are the subject of that test
standard differed too widely in use and
purpose from clothes dryers to warrant
direct application of testing provisions
to appendix D1 and appendix D2.
Although DOE does not currently
specify a particular procedure for
measuring the Btu firing rate of the
burner, DOE is unaware at this time of
any data that would suggest a significant
variation in test results associated with
different methods of measuring the
hourly Btu rating for gas clothes dryers.
GEA did not provide any such data. For
these reasons, DOE is not specifying
type and capacity standards for the gas
flow meter in appendix D1 and
appendix D2, and is not specifying a
procedure to use for determining the
Btu firing rate of the gas clothes dryer
burner at this time.
Were DOE to become aware of data on
any of the topics covered in this section,
DOE would consider such data in a
future evaluation of the clothes dryer
test procedure as appropriate.
7. Water Conductivity
The DOE test procedure does not
specify a requirement for water
conductivity, which is a measurement
of the water’s ability to conduct electric
current and is expressed in
microsiemens per centimeter (‘‘mS/cm’’).
The California IOUs suggested that
while the reproducibility of the
appendix D2 test procedure is
reasonable, variations due to water
conductivity need to be addressed to
ensure reproducible test results. The
California IOUs presented test data from
the 2019 PG&E Testing showing
measured CEF as a function of water
conductivity for six clothes dryer
models. Each model was tested multiple
times, and the data indicates the
measured CEF value and measured
water conductivity for each test. Two of
the models demonstrated a positive
correlation (i.e., CEF increased as water
conductivity increased), whereas four of
the models showed either negative
correlation or no significant correlation
between water conductivity and CEF.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
The California IOUs also presented an
analysis of the repeatability of the
measured CEF values from one of the
models in the PG&E test sample and
concluded that reproducibility improves
when water conductivity is controlled.
(California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 7–9)
The California IOUs stated that water
hardness and water conductivity can be
controlled independent of one another
and have naturally occurring variances
around the United States. The California
IOUs suggested that water conductivity
can play an important role in how
effective a clothes dryer’s automatic
cycle termination feature operates,
particularly for a common automatic
cycle termination method that uses
moisture sensing bars to calculate the
moisture content of the load. Id.
The California IOUs urged DOE to
explore this variable further. The
California IOUs suggested the DOE test
procedure require testing at multiple
water conductivity levels or incorporate
the impact of this variable through other
means in order to encourage
manufacturers to address potential CEF
variability due to water conductivity
and thereby improve CEF
reproducibility and repeatability.
(California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 5–12)
To address these comments, DOE
conducted investigative testing
exploring the effects of water
conductivity on the measured CEF
value. DOE tested a sample of six
consumer clothes dryers representing a
range of product classes and efficiency
levels, varying the water conductivity
between 0 mS/cm (i.e., distilled water)
and 800 mS/cm (i.e., the maximum safe
level in accordance with the water
quality standards cited by the California
IOUs in their comment). The water used
to saturate the test cloth was prepared
using distilled water with added table
salt (sodium chloride), sufficient to
achieve the desired conductivity,
confirmed using a conductivity meter.
Each of the six test units was tested
three times according to appendix D2,
saturating the test cloth in successive
tests with water having a conductivity
level of 0 mS/cm (distilled), 400 mS/cm,
and 800 mS/cm. Figure III.1 presents the
CEF values from the three tests for each
of the six units tested at varying levels
of water conductivity, additionally
including results from previous testing
using tap water. DOE estimated the
conductivity of its tap water as 130 mS/
cm, based on an average of multiple
measurements on different test days.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
The results shown in Figure III.1
indicate no discernable correlation
between CEF and water conductivity,
with minimal change in CEF overserved
for Units 1 through 4. Unit 6 exhibited
a substantially higher CEF at 130 mS/cm
and 400 mS/cm, while Unit 5
demonstrated a lower CEF for only the
distilled water test; in neither case,
however, did the trend in CEF correlate
consistently with water conductivity.
DOE’s data suggest that CEF is not
directly related to water conductivity, as
there is no predictable or consistent
correlation between CEF and water
conductivity.
Similarly, the test results submitted
by PG&E also showed inconsistent
correlations between CEF and water
conductivity (i.e., in some cases a
positive correlation, in some cases a
negative correlation, and in other cases
no clear correlation), and limited
evidence from a single clothes dryer
model suggesting that controlling for
water conductivity may lead to more
repeatable or reproducible results.
(California IOUs, No. 34 at pp. 9–12)
DOE appreciates the information
regarding water conductivity and its
potential effect on repeatability and
reproducibility of the test procedure.
However, the data provided by
commenters and additional data
obtained through DOE’s investigative
testing do not definitively suggest any
clear and predictable correlation
between water conductivity and
measured efficiency, and thus, do not
indicate that including a specification in
the test procedure for water
conductivity would improve the
repeatability or reproducibility of the
test results. For these reasons, DOE is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
not adopting a water conductivity
requirement in this final rule.
D. Test Conduct
1. Test Conditions and Consumer Usage
Patterns
DOE received various comments in
response to the July 2019 NOPR
regarding testing conditions in the DOE
clothes dryer test procedure. The
following sections discuss these issues
and changes to the DOE clothes dryer
test procedure.
a. Test Load Size
Section 2.7 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 specifies a test load weight
of 8.45 pounds ± .085 pounds for
standard-size clothes dryers (i.e., with a
drum capacity of 4.4 cubic feet or
greater) and a test load weight of 3
pounds ± .03 pounds for compact-size
clothes dryers (i.e., with a drum
capacity of less than 4.4 cubic feet).
NEEA, the California IOUs, Joint
Commenters, CEC, NRDC, and Samsung
urged DOE to include additional load
size testing, with priority given to small
load sizes. These commenters generally
stated that small loads represent a large
percentage of clothes dryer cycles in the
field and result in lower measured
efficiency compared to the required load
sizes. These commenters asserted that
adding a smaller load size to the test
procedure would make the test more
representative, and the efficiency ratings
more useful, for consumer purchasing
decisions. The details of each comment
are presented as follows, including
discussion of data sources and each
commenter’s assertions. (NEEA, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 90,
101–104, 105–107, 112–113; California
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56619
IOUs, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23
at pp. 104–105, 139–144; CEC, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 150;
Joint Commenters No. 34 at pp. 1–2;
NRDC, No. 35 at p. 2; Samsung, No. 36
at p. 3)
i. 2014 NEEA Field Study
NEEA and the California IOUs cited
the 2014 NEEA field study as justifying
the use of an additional half-size test
load. NEEA commented that the 2014
NEEA field study and recent national
market research conducted by the
California IOUs suggest that typical load
sizes vary widely, but that small loads
represent 20 to 40 percent of all loads.
The California IOUs cited from the 2014
NEEA field study that the 8.45-pound
test load specified in appendix D1 and
appendix D2 for standard-sized clothes
dryers is close to the average weight of
‘‘simple loads’’ 22 (7.87 pounds), but the
most common load weights were
smaller, with 40.5 percent of loads being
less than 6.5 pounds. The California
IOUs also referenced the 2014 NEEA
field study in commenting that clothes
drying performance at the average load
size is not predictive of performance at
small load sizes. The California IOUs
and NEEA suggested that a test load half
the size of the DOE-specified load could
capture the reduced clothes dryer
performance with small-size loads and
would produce a more representative
efficiency ranking order for clothes
dryers. NEEA suggested that small loads
22 Simple loads are defined in the 2014 NEEA
field study as clothes dryer loads with the following
characteristics: The load is both washed and dried;
the IMC is between 33 percent and 100 percent, the
bone-dry weight is between 3 pounds and 15
pounds; no items are removed between the wash
and dry cycles; the dryer is not run multiple times.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
ER08OC21.023
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
56620
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
result in less energy efficient
performance due to higher relative
startup energy, lower cloth surface area,
reduced contact of the cloth with the
moisture sensing strips, and reduced
effectiveness of using the measured
exhaust temperature to assess the
remaining moisture content. NEEA also
suggested that consumers may separate
garments from the washer into multiple
drying loads, resulting in more clothes
dryer loads per year than washer loads,
with each clothes dryer load being
smaller, on average. (California IOUs,
Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp.
104–105, 139–144; NEEA, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 90,
101–104, 105–107, 112–113)
AHAM commented that although
NEEA’s data showed small clothes dryer
load sizes in the Pacific Northwest, the
data are not representative of national
clothes dryer usage, and that clothes
dryer use may differ from region to
region. (AHAM, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 103–104)
ii. 2019 PG&E Market Survey
The California IOUs asserted that,
based on the survey of clothes dryer
usage in 210 single family households
conducted by PG&E in September 2019
(‘‘2019 PG&E market survey’’),23 clothes
dryer usage (including load sizes and
cycle settings) does not significantly
vary between seasons, with only cycle
settings exhibiting some variation
between the Pacific Northwest and the
rest of the United States. The California
IOUs commented that results for the
typical clothes dryer load size showed
no significant differences when
comparing winter and summer load
operation, while the regional differences
between the Pacific Northwest and the
rest of the United States were minimal.
The California IOUs suggested that the
results provide further context and
validity to the usage patterns presented
in the 2014 NEEA field study.
(California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 1–4, 13–
15)
iii. Other Testing
NEEA commented that its
organization tested 12 electric clothes
dryer models manufactured after 2015
with both the DOE standard load and a
smaller load comprised of what NEEA
stated was ‘‘real clothing.’’ NEEA
presented test data and concluded that
the measured efficiency rank order
among the tested models changed
appreciably from the standard load size
test, with the ENERGY STAR-qualified
units particularly demonstrating lower
efficiency with the smaller load size
relative to the non-ENERGY STARqualified units in its sample for both
electric and gas units. (NEEA, No. 38 at
pp. 1–3, 9–11, 18)
The California IOUs commented that
in the 2019 PG&E testing, PG&E
investigated the impact of smaller load
sizes on three standard-size clothes
dryer models from different brands. The
California IOUs cited the results of the
2019 PG&E testing in which the
efficiency rank order of the three models
changed when tested with smaller
loads. Based on these results, the
California IOUs commented that that the
appendix D2 test procedure may not
accurately represent drying of smaller
loads. The California IOUs
recommended including a smaller load
size as part of the clothes dryer test
procedure in order to capture the rank
order and CEF variability under
commonly used clothes dryer operating
conditions. (California IOUs, No. 29 at
pp. 1–4, 13–15)
NRDC recommended that DOE
consider any updates to the IEC clothes
dryer test procedure regarding smaller
test load sizes, but that DOE should not
wait for IEC before DOE proposes
changes to the DOE test procedure.
(NRDC, No. 35 at p. 2)
iv. DOE Response
DOE appreciates the data provided by
the commenters regarding various study
and survey results relating to the energy
efficiency performance of clothes dryers
when drying smaller load sizes. DOE
notes that the cited studies and surveys
are not conclusively representative of
the entire country, given that they were
limited in scope and geographic
location. The 2019 PG&E market survey
data did not effectively demonstrate that
there were no significant differences
between the Pacific Northwest and the
rest of the United States in clothes dryer
load size. For example, these data
showed fewer ‘‘Mostly Full’’ loads in
the Pacific Northwest (50 percent in the
winter and 50 percent in the summer)
than in the rest of the country (64
percent in the winter and 61 percent in
the summer). The 2019 PG&E market
survey data also showed more ‘‘Less
Than Half Full’’ loads in the Pacific
Northwest (25 percent in the winter and
33 percent in the summer) than in the
rest of the country (18 percent in the
winter and 22 percent in the summer).
These differences also suggest that the
results of the 2014 NEEA field study
may be too limited in geographic scope
to be considered representative of the
entire United States.
However, the national data collected
by the 2019 PG&E market survey may
better represent the United States as a
whole, albeit with a relatively small
sample size of 210 respondents. As
presented by the California IOUs, the
national sample from the 2019 PG&E
market survey indicates that the relative
proportion of very small loads (‘‘Less
Than Half Full’’) is similar in magnitude
to the relative proportion of ‘‘Very Full’’
loads. The data indicate that in the
summer months, 22 percent of loads are
less than half full, while 15 percent of
loads are very full; and in the winter
months, 18 percent of loads are less
than half full and 16 percent of loads are
very full. Given the relatively small
sample size of this national consumer
usage data, DOE is unable to determine
at this time the representativeness of
these load size distributions based on
the provided information.
To supplement and better understand
the results provided in comments, DOE
tested seven standard-size electric
clothes dryers from four manufacturers,
representing a range of capacities,
venting configurations, efficiency
performance, and heating technologies,
to investigate the impact of test load size
on energy use and measured efficiency.
Table III.2 provides the characteristics
of each model in DOE’s test sample.
TABLE III.2—CHARACTERISTICS OF CLOTHES DRYERS IN DOE TEST SAMPLE
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Test unit
1
2
3
4
...................
...................
...................
...................
Capacity
(cubic feet)
7.2
7.0
7.4
7.4
Vented
Vented
Vented
Vented
.............................................................
.............................................................
.............................................................
.............................................................
23 The survey respondents were asked to identify
their typical dryer load size and settings in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Measured
CEF using
appendix D2
Venting configuration
Jkt 256001
2.79
3.15
3.29
3.36
Heating technology
Electric
Electric
Electric
Electric
Resistance.
Resistance.
Resistance.
Resistance.
summer (June through August) and winter
(December through February) seasons.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
56621
TABLE III.2—CHARACTERISTICS OF CLOTHES DRYERS IN DOE TEST SAMPLE—Continued
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
5 ...................
6 ...................
7 ...................
Capacity
(cubic feet)
7.4
7.4
5.1
Measured
CEF using
appendix D2
Venting configuration
Vented .............................................................
Ventless ...........................................................
Ventless ...........................................................
3.92
4.45
7.77
Heating technology
Electric Resistance.
Heat Pump.
Heat Pump.
For each model, DOE tested five load
sizes using DOE test cloth: 3.0, 5.7, 8.45,
11.2, and 13.9 pounds. DOE conducted
each test according to appendix D2,
substituting the load size as noted.
Figure III.2 shows the combined total
energy consumed in each test cycle
(corresponding to ECC as calculated in
section 4.6 of appendix D2) and
indicates an approximately linear
relationship between the weight of the
test load and the per-cycle energy
consumption.
The linearity of the energy
consumption relationships in Figure
III.2 shows that if both a smaller load
size and larger load size (in relation to
the current load size) are additionally
tested in order to calculate the energy
consumption that is representative of an
average use cycle, the lower per-cycle
energy consumption associated with the
smaller load size would essentially be
entirely offset by the higher per-cycle
energy consumption associated with the
larger load size, with little net change to
the resulting average per-cycle energy
consumption; and thus little change to
the CEF value, as compared to the CEF
value obtained from testing with the
current single DOE test load size. With
little expected change to the CEF value
when considering the energy
consumption associated with a range of
load sizes, DOE does not believe the
additional testing would provide
consumers with improved information
that would change their purchasing
decisions compared to the current test
procedure. As such, any incremental
benefit of testing with additional load
sizes would be outweighed by the
significant added burden that would be
imposed by conducting such tests. For
these reasons, DOE is not making any
amendments to the test procedure
requiring additional test load sizes at
this time.
tolerance required for the bone-dry test
load. Section 1.5 of appendix D1 and 1.6
of appendix D2 describe the bonedrying process.
BSH commented that for compact-size
clothes dryers, for which the range of
acceptable bone-dry test load weight is
3.00 pounds ±.03 pounds, it is difficult
to adjust the weight of the test load
because, based on its experience, the
average weight of an individual energy
stuffer cloth is .037 pounds. According
to BSH, this may lead to variability in
test results. BSH recommended that the
maximum allowable weight of the test
load after the first bone-dry run should
be 3.03 pounds for compact-size clothes
dryer loads, and that the test load
weight after every bone-dry run shall be
recorded. BSH also commented that the
bone-dry definition has no maximum
time limit for the bone-drying process.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
b. Test Load Bone-Dry Weight
Section 2.7.1 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 specifies the process by
which a test load is prepared for a
compact-size clothes dryer. Specifically,
it describes the target weight of 3.00
pounds ± .03 pounds, as well as the use
of energy stuffer cloths, of which up to
five may be used, to achieve the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
ER08OC21.024
Test unit
56622
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Without an upper time limit, BSH
argued it would be possible for the
bone-drying process to be used to
reduce the weight of heavy test loads to
meet the maximum weight limits and
not solely for setting the baseline for the
2-percent FMC condition. BSH
recommended that DOE require that any
single bone-dry run shall not exceed 10
minutes and 15 seconds, and that no
more than four bone-dry runs may be
conducted for a single test load, to
ensure that the bone drying process is
used only to set the baseline for the 2percent FMC. (BSH, No. 30 at pp. 2–3)
DOE is unaware of issues regarding
achieving the bone-dry test weight as
specified in section 1.5 of appendix D1
and section 1.6 of appendix D2, which
both define ‘‘bone dry’’ as a condition
of a load of test cloths which has been
dried in a clothes dryer at maximum
temperature for a minimum of 10
minutes, removed, and weighed before
cool down, and then dried again for 10minute periods until the final weight
change of the load is 1 percent or less.
Further, BHS did not explain how the
bone-dry provisions could be used for a
purpose other than establishing the
bone-dry baseline. The bone-drying
process is required to establish the
baseline weight for the FMC condition,
and setting an upper time limit to the
bone-drying process as suggested by
BHS could significantly increase test
burden or require manufacturers to
design clothes dryers with specialized
drying cycles solely for achieving bonedrying specifications outside of the
scope of consumer-driven needs.
Based on the preceding discussion,
DOE is not amending the test procedure
regarding acceptable bone-dry test load
weight or the bone-drying process.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
c. Test Load Composition
Section 2.6 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 specifies a test load
composed of a pure finished bleached
cloth, made with a momie or granite
weave, which is a blended fabric of 50percent cotton and 50-percent polyester.
Appendix D1, section 2.6.1(a); appendix
D2, section 2.6.1(a). The ‘‘energy test
cloth’’ is made from material that is 24
inches by 36 inches, hemmed to 22
inches by 34 inches, and weighs within
10 percent of 5.75 ounces per square
yard. Appendix D1, section 2.6.1(b);
appendix D2, section 2.6.1(b). Smaller
‘‘energy stuffer cloths’’ are made of
material that is 12 inches by 12 inches,
hemmed to 10 inches by 10 inches.24
24 The test procedure specifies that the energy
stuffer cloths are to be used to adjust the test load
to achieve the proper weight, but that no more than
five stuffer cloths may be added per test load.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
Appendix D1, section 2.6.2; appendix
D2, section 2.6.2.
Several industry test procedures
specify clothing loads for measuring the
drying performance of clothes dryers.
ANSI/AHAM’s test procedure, HLD–1–
2010, ‘‘Household Tumble Type Clothes
Dryers’’ (‘‘ANSI/AHAM HLD–1–2010’’)
specifies the use of 100-percent cotton
bed sheets, towels, and pillowcases. The
bedsheets and pillowcases are plain
weave linen, while the towels are
huckaback weave. ANSI/AHAM HLD–
1–2010, Annex A. IEC Standard 61121,
Edition 4.0 2012–02, ‘‘Tumble dryers for
household use—Methods for measuring
the performance’’ (‘‘IEC Standard
61121’’) incorporates by reference from
IEC’s consumer clothes washer test
procedure two different test loads: (1)
the ‘‘Cotton test load,’’ which comprises
100-percent cotton bed sheets, towels,
and pillowcases consistent with ANSI/
AHAM HLD–1–2010; and (2) the
‘‘Synthetics/blends test load,’’ which
comprises pillowcases and buttoned
men’s shirts fabricated from plain weave
35-percent cotton and 65-percent
polyester fabric. IEC Standard 61121,
sections 6.5.6.1–6.5.6.2.
Another procedure that uses a variety
of test cloth materials is the ‘‘Utility
Test Protocol’’ 25 (‘‘UTP’’) developed by
NEEA and the California IOUs, which
utilities and efficiency advocates have
encouraged DOE to consider as a model
for implementing revised test loads.
(California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 1–3) The
UTP is an investigative test method that
was developed based on data collected
in 2012 as part of the 2014 NEEA field
study. It consists of one test using the
appendix D2 test procedure and four
supplemental tests that use a range of
test load compositions, test load sizes,
and cycle settings.26 The UTP generates
a combined energy metric referred to as
the Utility Combined Energy Factor
(‘‘UCEF’’), comprised of a weighted
average of each model’s energy
efficiency performance on each of the
five tests, using weighting factors
determined by a best fit between lab and
field test data.
NEEA, the Joint Commenters, and
CEC urged DOE to consider adopting
25 Available at https://neea.org/resources/energyefficiency-test-procedure-for-residential-clothesdryers-1.
26 The ‘‘Utility Test Protocol’’ consists of a series
of five tests: (1) Using the appendix D2 test method;
(2) using a 4.22-pound ‘‘real-world’’ load with the
medium temperature setting and ‘‘eco’’ mode
deactivated; (3) using a 16.9-pound ‘‘real-world’’
load with the medium temperature setting and
‘‘eco’’ mode deactivated; (4) using an 8.45-pound
‘‘real-world’’ load using the most efficient setting
configuration possible; and (5) using an 8.45-pound
‘‘real-world’’ load using settings that achieves the
fastest rate of drying possible.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
test loads with material more similar to
real clothing, stating that cloth material
has a significant impact on clothes dryer
efficiency. NEEA and the Joint
Commenters recommended that DOE
consider adopting an optional test
procedure that uses a test load with
varied size, thickness, and fabric types,
such as the IEC or AHAM test loads,
which commenters suggested would be
more representative. The Joint
Commenters suggested that DOE
monitor the IEC test procedure
development. CEC referenced a Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory
(‘‘PNNL’’) study 27 that showed
differences in load dryness and drying
rate between the DOE test load and the
AHAM test load. CEC stated that the
AHAM test load, consisting of bed
sheets, pillowcases, and hand towels, is
less uniform and more challenging to
dry, and that PNNL found that the
AHAM test load had a higher moisture
content than the DOE test load as the
clothes dryer entered automatic cycle
termination. NEEA emphasized the
impact of test cloth material on heatpump clothes dryer performance
particularly and also stated that
appendix D2 results for both high
efficiency and low efficiency models
aligned well with the results for test
loads with using fabrics of differing
weights and materials, but failed to
distinguish between moderately
efficient models. (NEEA, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 18, 20, 22–23,
106–109, 117–118; Joint Commenters,
No. 34 at p. 2; CEC, No. 31 at p. 2)
Energy Solutions commented that the
thickness of the test cloth has a large
impact on clothes dryer performance,
regardless of type of material used.
Energy Solutions suggested that DOE
take cloth thickness into consideration
when balancing representativeness and
repeatability in the test procedure.
(Energy Solutions, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 21–22)
GEA commented that there is inherent
variation in natural fibers of a single
uniform cloth, even within specially
manufactured DOE test cloth lots, that
creates variability that impacts the
reliability of the DOE test procedure.
AHAM claimed that the summary of test
data from the 2019 PG&E testing,
prepared by Energy Solutions,28 shows
that changing the test load composition
27 TeGrotenhuis, W, PNNL, Clothes Dryer
Automatic Termination Sensor Evaluation,
September 2014.
28 PG&E Residential Dryer Testing, Residential
Clothes Dryer Test Protocol Investigation, Prepared
by David Jagger, Energy Solutions (Sept. 6, 2019),
Docket No. EERE–2014–BT–TP–0034; RIN 1904–
AD46; ID EERE–2014–BT–TP–0034–0024 (Posted
Sept. 30, 2019).
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
as indicated by the PG&E testing will
introduce significant additional
variation, beyond that of the current
DOE test cloth. AHAM stated that test
procedures with significant variation do
not provide uniform or reliable results
for the purpose of allowing consumers
to make informed purchase decisions
based on energy use/efficiency because
the results of a highly variable test
procedure are not comparable within or
across brands. AHAM and GEA asserted
that the 2014 NEEA field study provides
an insufficient basis on which to amend
the test procedure, and the concept of a
‘‘real-world’’ test load that would
significantly increase test variation is
incompatible with the requirement that
test procedures be ‘‘reasonably
designed,’’ in accordance with EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)). AHAM also stated
that data collected on test load
composition and consumer use would
need to be national to be representative
or to inform rulemaking decisions,
because clothing washed and dried
varies by climate and season. Without
such data, AHAM maintains that it is
impossible and inappropriate to
determine or change the average use/
cycle in a test procedure. AHAM noted
that the DOE clothes dryer test
procedure, including the test load
composition, is based on consumer use
studies and changing the test would
require showing that something has
changed with regard to consumer
behavior or that more accurate
consumer use study data are available.
AHAM asserted that the 2014 NEEA
field study is not a sufficient basis upon
which to make changes to the clothes
dryer test procedure, namely the test
load composition, given that it was
conducted only in the Pacific Northwest
and only during the winter season, and
therefore not representative of the
laundry composition of the entire nation
throughout the year. (AHAM, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 98–99
AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 3–4; GEA, No. 37
at p. 2)
Altering the test cloth composition
would require further investigation into
a suitable representative replacement.
The data provided by the 2014 NEEA
field study (discussed in section
III.D.1.a.i of this document) are
insufficiently representative to justify
the significant cost of developing and
transitioning to a new type of test cloth,
due to the limited sample size, region,
and time of year during which the
studies were conducted, as discussed
previously in AHAM’s comment.
As explained previously, DOE is
unaware of any new information that
would alter its previous determination,
that testing using the IEC and AHAM
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
test loads is less representative than
testing with the DOE test load, to
warrant any modifications to the DOE
test procedure at this time. 78 FR 49608,
49620 (Aug. 14, 2013). DOE therefore is
not making any changes to the test cloth
material requirements in appendix D1
and appendix D2 at this time.
However, in light of the feedback
received regarding test load
composition, DOE will continue to
evaluate the representativeness of test
results obtained through the use of the
current test load composition
requirements in the DOE test procedure.
DOE will also continue to monitor
development of industry standards and
other efforts related to test load
composition.
d. Test Cycle Selections
Section 3.3.2 of appendix D2 specifies
that for automatic termination control
clothes dryers, the ‘‘normal’’ program
shall be selected for the test cycle. For
clothes dryers that do not have a
‘‘normal’’ program, the cycle
recommended by the manufacturer for
drying cotton or linen shall be selected.
If the drying temperature setting can be
chosen independently of the program, it
shall be set to the maximum. If the
dryness level setting can be chosen
independently of the program, it shall
be set to the ‘‘normal’’ or ‘‘medium’’
dryness level setting. After the
completion of the test cycle, the test
load is removed and weighed. If the
FMC is greater than 2 percent, the test
is considered invalid and a new run
shall be conducted using the highest
dryness level setting.
Industry standards address cycle
selection differently from the DOE test
procedure. Section 4.5.1 of ANSI/
AHAM HLD–1–2010 specifies that the
test cycle be run using the maximum
temperature setting without allowing
the clothes dryer to advance into the
cool down period. If the required FMC
specified in the industry standard (6
percent) cannot be met using this
setting, a new test run must be
conducted using a different userselected setting that will achieve the
target FMC, as described in section 4.5.6
of ANSI/AHAM HLD–1–2010. IEC
Standard 61121 requires that the test
cycle for a given load composition be
run using the cycle program and settings
specified in the manufacturer’s
instructions to achieve a target FMC,
which is based on the test load
composition; in the absence of any
instructions from the manufacturer, or if
the specified cycle program and settings
do not achieve the required FMC, the
test shall be run using a user-selected
combination of cycle program and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56623
settings that will achieve the required
FMC, as specified in section 8.2.2 of IEC
Standard 61121 .
In response to the July 2019 NOPR,
NEEA, the Joint Commenters, and the
California IOUs urged DOE to consider
including additional test cycle
selections in the test procedure. NEEA
and the California IOUs suggested that
DOE should capture the impact of ‘‘eco’’
mode settings, since they asserted that
the ‘‘eco’’ mode settings are often only
enabled by default on the ‘‘normal’’
cycle. The California IOUs cited the
2019 PG&E testing and reported that 15
clothes dryers among the 2019 PG&E
testing sample of 22 had an ‘‘eco’’ mode
that was active by default on the
‘‘normal’’ setting, but not active by
default on other cycle programs. For
some units, the ‘‘eco’’ setting was not a
selectable option during a ‘‘high’’ or
‘‘low’’ temperature cycle. The California
IOUs further commented that PG&E
testing at an independent lab in
accordance with appendix D2 with and
without the ‘‘eco’’ mode yielded results
that showed changes in CEF rank order,
performance, and cycle time compared
to the average when the ‘‘eco’’ setting is
on or off. NEEA and the California IOUs
recommended that DOE add additional
cycle selections to the test procedure to
mitigate the impact of ‘‘eco’’ mode
settings, and NEEA stated that this
should be accomplished by adding a
‘‘fast test cycle’’ (i.e., a cycle with a
shorter duration) at the standard load
size. Based on the 2014 NEEA field
study and another NEEA field study
conducted in 2017 that looked
exclusively at load sizes and settings for
the most efficient clothes dryers, NEEA
asserted that 20 percent to 60 percent of
all loads monitored were dried using the
shortest cycle time available on the
machine. NEEA and the Joint
Commenters commented that heat
pump clothes dryers particularly suffer
efficiency losses on shorter cycle time
settings, since much of their efficiency
gain is obtained by drying the clothes at
a lower temperature for a longer period
of time, resulting in changes in
efficiency rank order when a shorter
cycle that uses more electric resistance
heat is tested. The Joint Commenters
also noted that some clothes dryers
default to the most recent cycle used,
which could lead to consumers not
using the normal cycle for extended
periods of time, meaning that testing
additional cycle selections could
increase representativeness. (NEEA, No.
38 at pp. 3, 12–;16, 18; Joint
Commenters, No. 34 at p. 2; California
IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 15–16)
AHAM commented that it is unclear
whether the data presented in the 2014
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56624
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
NEEA field study are an accurate
reflection of consumer cycle settings, as
the study relied on the consumers to log
their data, which may not be accurate.
AHAM further asserted that without
knowledge of the controls of the
monitored clothes dryers, it is difficult
to draw conclusions regarding the
frequency of cycle selections, and those
cycle selections could be impacted by
the type of clothing, which was
potentially heavier during the winter
months. AHAM asserted that the data
from the 2014 NEEA field study may not
be representative of consumer use
across the entire United States over the
course of a year and, on their own, are
not a sufficient basis upon which to
justify significant changes to the test
procedure. (AHAM, No. 33 at p. 3)
While the comments recommending
the inclusion of additional test cycle
selections suggest that changing the
cycle setting could change efficiency
rank order, DOE did not receive
sufficient data and information to
confirm that the current test selections
are unrepresentative of consumer use
and that other or additional test
selections are warranted. DOE notes that
the data presented from the 2014 NEEA
field study may not be representative of
annual national clothes dryer usage, and
the 2019 PG&E market survey showed
differences between the Pacific
Northwest and the rest of the country in
test cycle selections, as discussed in
section III.D.a.iv of this final rule.
Therefore, DOE maintains its prior
determination that the ‘‘normal’’ cycle
test in appendix D2 and the required
temperature and dryness settings are
appropriately representative. See 78 FR
49608, 49612–49613 (Aug. 14, 2013).
For these reasons, DOE maintains the
current approach of requiring a single
cycle test, in section 3.3 of appendix D1
and appendix D2.
e. Moisture Content
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
i. Initial Moisture Content
Sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 of appendix
D1 specify to extract water from the
energy cloths for a test load for a
compact-size dryer load and standardsize dryer load, respectively, so that the
IMC is between 54.0 and 61.0 percent of
the bone-dry weight of the test load.
Sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 of appendix D2
specify that the IMC of energy cloths for
a compact-size dryer load and standardsize dryer load, respectively, after
extraction must be between 52.5 and
57.5 percent of the bone-dry weight of
the test load. Appendix D2 also
provides additional instruction that any
final mass adjustments to achieve the
specified IMC for the energy test cycle
(57.5 percent±0.33 percent) are made by
uniformly adding water to each test
cloth using a spray bottle. Appendix D2,
sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2.
AHAM recommended that the
appendix D1 test load IMC (i.e., 54.0 to
61.0 percent) should be aligned with
that of appendix D2 (i.e., 57.5 percent ±
0.33 percent). AHAM also
recommended specifying in appendix
D1 the same method for test cloth IMC
adjustment that is described in
appendix D2 (i.e., add water uniformly
distributed among all of the test clothes
in a very fine spray using a spray bottle).
AHAM commented that aligning the
method in appendix D1 with that in
appendix D2 would make it easier for
test technicians who conduct both tests.
AHAM also suggested that water
temperature has a significant effect on
drying performance, which can cause
test variation. AHAM suggested that the
test procedure specify that the
temperature of the spray bottle water
must be 60 °F±5 °F, with a nominal
target of 60 °F. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp.
12–13)
Appendix D1 requires, in addition to
an IMC of 54.0 to 61.0 percent (i.e., 57.5
percent ±3.5 percent), an FMC between
2.5 and 5.0 percent for all clothes
dryers. Appendix D1, sections 2.7.1,
2.7.2, and 3.3. The measured test cycle
energy consumption is then normalized
to calculate the energy consumption
required to dry the test load from
exactly 57.5-percent IMC to 2-percent
FMC, which is representative of clothes
dryers currently on the market and of
the maximum consumer-accepted FMC.
Appendix D1, section 4.1. In the August
2013 Final Rule, DOE reduced the
tolerance on the IMC to 0.33 percent to
produce repeatable results specifically
for clothes dryers with automatic
termination controls, for which no such
normalization is required, because the
test cycle is run to completion. 78 FR
49608, 49618 (Aug. 14, 2013). Because
appendix D1 does not specify running
any test cycles to completion and
instead applies normalization of the test
cycle energy consumption for both timer
and automatic termination control
clothes dryers, the IMC requirements for
appendix D1 do not require the more
stringent tolerance of those in appendix
D2, avoiding increased test burden
associated with test load conditioning.
As such, DOE is not amending the
required IMC in appendix D1.
However, DOE agrees with AHAM
that appendix D1 would benefit from
the additional direction for adding
water to the test load using a spray
bottle as provided in appendix D2. The
previous version of appendix D1 does
not instruct what to do if the test load
IMC is too low upon removing the test
load from the extractor. A test laboratory
may interpret, in this case, that the test
load must be re-wet and re-spun until
an acceptable IMC is achieved, which
would add testing burden. Appendix D2
provides means to increase the IMC of
such a test load in a much less
burdensome manner through the use of
a spray bottle.
To quantify the burden associated
with test cloth preparation, DOE
investigated the repeatability of the
extractor to achieve a specified moisture
content. In accordance with appendix
D1 and appendix D2, DOE prepared
three standard-size test loads and two
compact-size test loads, weighed before
and after the extractor cycle. For the
three standard-size test loads, two test
loads were prepared twice and one test
load was prepared once, for a total of
five extractor tests. For the two
compact-size test loads, both were
prepared twice, for a total of four
extractor tests. The North Star
Engineered Products Inc. (formerly
Bock) Model 215 extractor, specified in
section 3.2 of the DOE clothes washer
test procedure at 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendix J3 (‘‘appendix J3’’),
was used in this investigation, with the
same extractor spin setting selected for
all tests. DOE expects that this extractor
is representative of typical clothes dryer
testing equipment at commercial test
laboratories. The IMC values of this
investigation are shown in Table III.3.
Note that these IMC values were
recorded prior to the use of a spray
bottle according to the method in
appendix D2.
TABLE III.3—WATER EXTRACTION RESULTS FROM EXTRACTOR INVESTIGATION
% IMC
(no spray bottle used)
Within range defined by
appendix D1?
Extractor test
Test load
1 ...........................................
Standard #1 .....................................................................
53.13
No.
2 ...........................................
Standard #2 .....................................................................
55.30
Yes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:34 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
56625
TABLE III.3—WATER EXTRACTION RESULTS FROM EXTRACTOR INVESTIGATION—Continued
Extractor test
% IMC
(no spray bottle used)
Test load
3 ...........................................
55.25
Yes.
Standard #3 .....................................................................
54.20
53.63
Yes.
No.
Standard-Size Test Load Range .......................................................................................
53.1–55.3
Appendix D1 Range ..........................................................................................................
54.0–61.0
4 ...........................................
5 ...........................................
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Within range defined by
appendix D1?
5 ...........................................
6 ...........................................
Compact #1 .....................................................................
57.51
56.77
Yes.
Yes.
7 ...........................................
8 ...........................................
Compact #2 .....................................................................
56.81
57.51
Yes.
Yes.
Compact-Size Test Load Range .......................................................................................
56.8–57.5
Appendix D1 Range ..........................................................................................................
54.0–61.0
For all but two test loads, the
extractor produced an IMC within the
range of 54.0 to 61.0 percent, as
specified in appendix D1; however, two
standard-size test loads had IMCs less
than 54 percent (the minimum of the
range defined in appendix D1). These
results confirm that despite the wider
range of target IMC values defined in
appendix D1 compared to those in
appendix D2, the extractor can
sometimes lead to an IMC value lower
than the target IMC range in appendix
D1. Without the moisture content
adjustments provided by use of a spray
bottle as specified in appendix D2, the
previous language of appendix D1
suggests that test loads prepared under
appendix D1 may require re-wetting and
re-spinning.
As summarized, DOE is amending
appendix D1 to allow the use of a spray
bottle as necessary following the
extractor run to achieve the required
IMC range. This will provide a reliable,
validated, and burden-reducing
approach to ‘‘fine-tune’’ IMC values that
fall just below the target range, such as
those seen in DOE’s extractor
investigation. This additional direction
provides a means to achieve allowable
IMC without the need to re-wet and respin the test load if the IMC achieved by
the extractor is below the target range of
IMC.
DOE is not specifying the temperature
of the spray bottle water given the
amount of time and air exposure that
the test load encounters while being
spun in the extractor, sprayed, and
loaded into the clothes dryer. According
to DOE investigative testing, the
moisture content provided by the spray
bottle is approximately 0.03 percentage
points with each spray, up to a
maximum of 5.33 percentage points that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
may be added in the load under
appendix D2 to achieve the specified
moisture content of the test load of 57.5
±0.33 percent. Recognizing that without
such specification, the temperature of
water in the spray bottle could be closer
to room temperature (i.e., only slightly
higher than AHAM’s suggestion of
60 °F), it is implausible that the
temperature of the water in the spray
bottle would change the temperature of
the load enough to impact the dryer
performance.
In summary, DOE is aligning
appendix D1 with appendix D2 by
specifically providing for the use of a
spray bottle to add water to test loads
that are below the acceptable IMC range
minimum of 54.0 percent following the
extractor run. DOE is not adding a
temperature specification for the spray
bottle water.
ii. Final Moisture Content
Section 3.3.1 of appendix D2 specifies
that for timer clothes dryers, the test
load is dried until the FMC is between
1 and 2.5 percent of the bone-dry weight
of the test load. The measured energy
consumption is then normalized to
determine the energy consumption
required to dry the test load to 2-percent
FMC, with a field use factor applied to
account for the over-drying energy
consumption, in section 4.1 of appendix
D2. For automatic termination control
clothes dryers, section 3.3.2 of appendix
D2 specifies that a test is considered
valid if the FMC of the test load is 2
percent or less. DOE did not propose
amending the FMC requirement of
appendix D2 in the July 2019 NOPR.
The California IOUs stated that the 2percent FMC under the DOE test
conditions is appropriate, though
suggested that a higher FMC may be
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
appropriate when accounting for
additional test conditions, such as
changes in clothes dryer settings or a
more realistic clothes dryer load. In the
absence of any changes to these settings
or test load, the California IOUs
recommended maintaining the current
2-percent FMC. (California IOUs, No. 29
at p. 20)
Samsung, AHAM, BSH, and GEA
commented that requiring an FMC of 2
percent or less promotes over-drying
and unnecessary additional energy use;
and further, because clothes that are
over-dried will typically re-absorb
moisture from ambient air during cooldown phases of the drying cycle and
after termination of the drying cycle, a
higher FMC, between 5 percent and 8
percent, results. Samsung suggested a 4percent FMC requirement,
corresponding to estimated moisture uptake from bone-dry conditions on the
100 percent cotton IEC test load. AHAM
and GEA suggested that DOE adopt an
FMC range of 3 to 4 percent, with a
target of 4 percent. (AHAM, No. 33 at
pp. 5, 12; BSH, No. 30 at pp. 1–2, 4;
GEA, No. 37 at p. 2; Samsung, No. 36
at p. 2)
BSH and AHAM also referenced the
December 2015 Underwriters Laboratory
(‘‘UL’’) clothes dryer safety requirement
in UL 2158, ‘‘North American Dryer
Safety Standard’’ that the requirement of
a cool-down period if the temperature at
the clothes dryer’s lint filter exceeds
131 °F (55 °C) at the end of the drying
cycle as a source of difficulty for
ventless condensing clothes dryers in
meeting the current 2-percent FMC
requirement in appendix D2.29 BSH
commented that due to the drying
29 UL 2158 can be accessed at https://standards
catalog.ul.com/standards/en/standard_2158_4.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56626
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
process of a condensing clothes dryer
with a closed-loop process air system,
the FMC increases rapidly during the
cool-down period.30 AHAM and BSH
asserted that due to the UL 2158
requirement, attaining an FMC of 2
percent on condensing clothes dryers is
impractical, and without costly design
changes and adjustments to the test
procedure, ventless condensing clothes
dryers cannot consistently meet both the
new UL 2158 safety limit and the
current FMC requirement. BSH
suggested a separate FMC target of 4
percent for ventless clothes to
compensate for the UL 2158 safety
requirement and otherwise agreed with
the current 2-percent FMC requirement
for vented clothes dryers. (AHAM, No.
33 at pp. 5, 12; BSH, No. 30 at pp. 1–
2, 4)
AHAM and BSH also recommended
that DOE specify a time limit in which
the test load must be weighed after
stopping the test cycle to minimize test
variation and moisture reabsorption.
BSH recommended that the test load be
weighed within 10 seconds of the
drying cycle termination, and AHAM
recommended that the test load be
weighed immediately after and within a
maximum of 2 minutes after cycle
termination. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 5,
12; BSH, No. 30 at pp. 1¥2, 4; GEA, No.
37 at p. 2; Samsung, No. 36 at p. 2)
The current 2-percent FMC
requirement using the DOE test cloth
was adopted as representative of
approximately 5-percent FMC for ‘‘realworld’’ clothing, based on data
submitted in a joint petition for
rulemaking.31 DOE determined in the
ventless condensing clothes dryer
recirculates the air used to remove moisture from
the load during the entire drying cycle. The clothes
dryer uses ambient air or cold water in a heat
exchanger to condense the moisture from the air in
the drum. The dry air exiting the drum is then
reheated and recirculated back into the drum.
31 The petition was submitted by AHAM,
Whirlpool Corporation, General Electric Company,
Electrolux, LG Electronics, Inc., BSH, Alliance
Laundry Systems, Viking Range, Sub-Zero Wolf,
Friedrich A/C, U-Line, Samsung, Sharp Electronics,
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
30 A
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
August 2013 Final Rule that the
specified 2-percent FMC using the DOE
test load was representative of consumer
expectations for dryness of clothing in
field use. 78 FR 49608, 49620–49622,
49610–49611 (Aug. 14, 2013).
DOE reviewed the UL 2158 safety
requirements and noted that Clause 12
of UL 2158 requires a cool-down period
if the drying cycle air temperature
exceeds 131 °F at the end of the drying
cycle, as measured at the first lint filter.
This cool-down period is required to
reduce the temperature of the clothes
load to a suitable level before the user
is alerted that the drying cycle has
ended. As described in Clause 12.1 of
UL 2158, this safety standard is in place
to reduce the risk of spontaneous
ignition of the clothes load. DOE
acknowledges that the air temperature
limit specified by UL 2158 (i.e.,
requiring a cool-down period to ensure
the temperature at the first lint filter at
the end of the drying cycle does not
exceed 131 °F) may result in moisture
regain by the load. DOE notes that the
safety requirement regarding cool-down
periods was introduced in the fourth
edition of UL 2158 and has been
effective since December 2015. In its
internal testing since that time, DOE has
not identified any systemic problems
with any clothes dryer types, including
ventless condensing clothes dryers,
being able to achieve the required FMC
of 2 percent or less, such that
amendments to the test procedure
would be warranted.
Furthermore, commenters did not
provide any test results or data to
Miele, Heat Controller, AGA Marvel, Brown Stove,
Haier, Fagor America, Airwell Group, Arcelik,
Fisher & Paykel, Scotsman Ice, Indesit,
Kuppersbusch, Kelon, and DeLonghi, American
Council for an Energy Efficient Economy,
Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Natural
Resources Defense Council, Alliance to Save
Energy, Alliance for Water Efficiency, Northwest
Power and Conservation Council, and Northeast
Energy Efficiency Partnerships, Consumer
Federation of America and the National Consumer
Law Center. See Docket No. EERE–2011–BT–TP–
0054, No. 3.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
demonstrate that the maximum 2percent FMC limit is impracticable or
unachievable given the UL 2158 safety
requirements. DOE also notes that
multiple ventless condensing clothes
dryers from various manufacturers have
been certified to DOE under the
appendix D2 test procedure since the
introduction of the safety standard in
2015.
Based on the preceding discussion,
DOE is not amending the FMC
requirement for either appendix D1 or
appendix D2 in this final rule.
Regarding a time limit in which the
test load must be weighed after stopping
the test cycle, section 3.3 of previous
appendix D1 and sections 3.3.1 and
3.3.2 of previous appendix D2 required
that the test load be weighed ‘‘after
stopping the test cycle’’ (for timer
clothes dryers) or ‘‘after the completion
of the test cycle’’ (for automatic
termination control clothes dryers). To
better quantify the potential
reabsorption effects associated with the
interval between completing the clothes
dryer test cycle and weighing the test
cloth, DOE tested seven clothes dryers
according to appendix D2, with five
different time periods for weighing the
test cloth after termination of the drying
cycle. During the waiting period, the
test cloth remained in the clothes dryer
drum with the door closed. These time
periods ranged from weighing the test
cloth as immediately as practicable after
termination of the drying cycle to 30
minutes after termination of the drying
cycle. DOE acknowledges that test load
FMC may change after completion of the
clothes dryer cycle, generally regaining
moisture; however, testing found that
the moisture content for certain units
decreased as the waiting period
increased, relative to the immediate
weighing.
Figure III.4 shows the change in FMC
measured at varying waiting periods
relative to the FMC recorded
immediately upon removal of the test
load after the drying cycle termination.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
As shown in Figure III.4, moisture
regain and loss relative to the
immediately measured FMC were
observed at the various time periods,
with more significant changes in FMC
as the time periods increased. At the 5minute waiting period, however,
variation in FMC was consistently
within 0.1 percentage points of the FMC
recorded immediately after the drying
cycle terminated for all units tested.
According to these results, and in order
to ensure repeatability, reproducibility,
and representativeness of the FMC
measurement, a time limit of 5 minutes,
within which the test load must be
weighed, appears appropriate to
minimize variability in FMC from the
value immediately upon completion of
the cycle.
As best practice would result in
weighing the test load without any
unnecessary delay, and DOE has no
indication that testing is currently
conducted inconsistent with best
practices, DOE does not expect any
increase in test burden associated with
adoption of a reasonable time limit on
weighing the test cloth after termination
of a drying cycle to ensure repeatable,
reproducible, and representative results.
Therefore, to limit any potential
variability in the test procedure
associated with moisture reabsorption
following the test cycle, DOE is
amending section 3.3 of appendix D1
and sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 of appendix
D2 to specify that FMC must be
recorded within 5 minutes following the
termination of the drying test cycle.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
iii. Final Moisture Content
Requirements for Automatic
Termination Control Dryers
Section 3.3.2 of appendix D2 specifies
that for automatic termination control
dryers, the clothes dryer is operated
until the completion of the programmed
cycle, including the cool down period.
The test procedure provides that, if the
FMC is greater than 2 percent, the test
is invalid and a new run must be
conducted using the highest dryness
level setting. In guidance issued on
January 10, 2017 (‘‘2017 Guidance’’),32
DOE provided its interpretation that the
2-percent FMC threshold for a valid test
also applies to a test run conducted
using the highest dryness level setting,
if required. As explained in the 2017
Guidance, DOE’s interpretation that the
2-percent final moisture content
threshold for a valid test should apply
to all test cycles conducted according to
section 3.3.2 of Appendix D2, including
test runs using the highest 2 dryness
level setting, is consistent with the
EPCA requirements that test procedures
must be ‘‘reasonably designed to
produce test results’’ that measure
energy use ‘‘during a representative
average use cycle.’’ 42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3).
Based on the information presented
during the prior rulemaking, during the
representative average use of a clothes
dryer, clothes are dried to an FMC that
32 Clothes Dryer Final Guidance issued January
10, 2017. Available at www1.eere.energy.gov/
guidance/detail_
search.aspx?IDQuestion=665&pid=2&spid=1.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56627
is equivalent to 2-percent FMC in the
DOE test load.
DOE noted in the July 2019 NOPR
that, as part of the August 2013 Final
Rule, interested parties submitted a joint
comment presenting test results that
demonstrate that an FMC of 2 percent
using the DOE test cloth is
representative of the consumer-accepted
dryness level after completion of a
drying cycle. 84 FR 35484, 35497 (July
23, 2019); see also 78 FR 49608, 49614
(Aug. 14, 2013). DOE agreed with this
conclusion and adopted provisions that
specify that a test conducted on the
‘‘normal’’ or ‘‘medium’’ dryness setting
is considered valid only if the FMC is
2 percent or lower. 78 FR 49608, 49621,
49624 (Aug. 14, 2013).
The California IOUs and the Joint
Commenters supported DOE’s
clarification that the second test
following a failed first test in which the
clothes dryer did not achieve an FMC
less than or equal to 2 percent should
be held to the same FMC requirements
as the first test. The California IOUs
stated that the second test should not
provide a ‘‘loophole,’’ whereby a unit
could fail the first test and then use the
results of the second test regardless of
the FMC. The California IOUs suggested
that without this consistency in test
procedure and results, clothes dryers
that are certified to the second test
would not be comparable to those that
passed the first test. (California IOUs,
No. 29 at p. 20; Joint Commenters, No.
34 at p. 3)
AHAM and Whirlpool expressed
concern that it is unclear how
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
ER08OC21.025
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
56628
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
verification and enforcement testing
would address the requirement that a
second test run must meet the required
FMC. They suggested that the existing
test procedure variation could be
enough to cause false findings of noncompliance and may result in a large
number of test procedure waiver
requests. Whirlpool stated that this
requirement would lead manufacturers
to conservatively over-dry loads to well
below 2-percent FMC, which wastes
energy, instead of using the 2-percent
FMC as a design target rather than an
enforceable performance measure.
Whirlpool also suggested that the CEF
in the test run with highest dryness
level be used regardless of FMC, as
Whirlpool asserted that market forces
would ensure manufacturers do not
intentionally design clothes dryers with
unreasonably high FMC. AHAM
suggested raising the FMC for all test
runs to accommodate concerns
regarding non-compliance and test
procedure variation. (AHAM, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 38–39;
AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 5–6; Whirlpool,
No. 32 at p. 2)
GEA suggested that there should be
no FMC requirement for a second run
test under the appendix D2 procedure.
GEA noted that the second test run is
already performed at the maximum
dryness setting, and the clothes dryer is,
therefore, subject to a higher
performance condition and
corresponding increased energy usage.
GEA suggested that using the highest
dryness setting for the second run
ensures appropriate energy usage by a
compliant clothes dryer regardless of
the FMC, as the clothes dryer is unable
to use any more energy for the selected
cycle (given that the highest dryness
setting was selected). GEA further
commented that any remaining moisture
in clothing after a cycle is complete on
the highest dryness setting is a
performance concern, and not an energy
efficiency concern, and is therefore
outside the scope of the appliance
standards program as established under
EPCA. (GEA, No. 37 at pp. 2–3)
As discussed, the 2-percent FMC
requirement was developed through
collaboration with, and consideration of
data submitted by, interested parties as
part of the August 2013 Final Rule. 78
FR 49608, 49614 (Aug. 14, 2013)
Interested parties have not presented
any data or information since then that
would suggest changes in consumer
expectations of dryness levels.
Therefore, DOE continues to agree with
the conclusion from the August 2013
Final Rule that an FMC of 2 percent
using the DOE test cloth is
representative of the consumer-accepted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
dryness level after completion of a
drying cycle. Thus, a test that does not
produce an FMC of 2 percent or less
would not be reflective of representative
energy use, in that FMC values at or
below this threshold represent
consumer-accepted dryness.
DOE notes that clothes dryer models
are certified to DOE and available on the
market representing the entire range of
venting configurations (vented and
ventless), capacity categories (standard
and compact), product configurations
(stand-alone clothes dryer and
combination washer/dryer), energy
sources (120V electric, 240V electric,
and gas), and drying technologies
(electric resistance, water-cooled
condensing, air-cooled condensing, and
electric heat pump) from multiple
manufacturers within each product
attribute. The range of available product
offerings indicates the ability to achieve
a 2-percent FMC across the entire
spectrum of clothes dryer design
characteristics currently available on the
market. Furthermore, DOE has not
received any waiver requests, either
before or after publishing the 2017
Guidance, regarding an inability to
achieve an FMC value of 2 percent or
less.
DOE further notes that 2-percent FMC
is not a design ‘‘target,’’ but rather a
maximum threshold. Any FMC value of
2 percent or less (i.e., 0–2 percent)
would represent a valid test. DOE has
observed in its testing FMC values
spanning the full range of 0–2 percent.
Table III.4 shows the range in FMC
values from DOE’s testing of 30 different
consumer clothes dryers under
appendix D2 at a normal dryness
setting. These units spanned multiple
manufacturers, product classes,
capacities, and drying technologies.
available on the market. For these
reasons, as supported by the preceding
discussion, DOE is amending appendix
D2 as proposed to specify that the 2percent FMC requirement applies to all
appendix D2 test runs (i.e., including
the second test run conducted using the
highest dryness level setting, if
required). If the basic model under test
fails to achieve an FMC of 2 percent or
less when tested at the highest dryness
level setting, the measured energy
consumption of the clothes dryer would
not reflect a representative average use
cycle, since it would not have dried the
clothing to a consumer-accepted
dryness level. Such test results may not
be used for certification of compliance
with energy conservation standards.
Finally, in the July 2019 NOPR, DOE
also proposed to amend the
nomenclature of section 4.1 through
section 4.4 of appendix D2 to clarify
that the measured energy consumption
values represented by Ece, Ege, Egg, and
Ecg, respectively, reflect the energy
required to achieve an FMC of 2 percent
or less. 84 FR 35484, 35496–35497 (July
23, 2019).
Given that there were no comments or
concerns with the nomenclature
proposed in the July 2019 NOPR, in this
final rule DOE is amending the
nomenclature of section 4.1 through
section 4.4 of appendix D2 as proposed
in the July 2019 NOPR.
f. Annual Drying Cycles and Hours Per
Year
Section 4.5 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 assigns the representative
average use for clothes dryers at 283
drying cycles per year. This estimate
was developed based on data provided
by the 2005 Energy Information
Administration’s ‘‘Residential Energy
Consumption Survey’’ (‘‘RECS’’). 76 FR
972, 1010 (Jan. 6, 2011). In the 2019 TP
TABLE III.4—FMC RANGES FROM
NOPR, DOE did not propose an updated
DOE TESTING
value for the annual drying cycles and
hours per year, declining to make
FMC range
Number of
changes based on a limited field study
(%)
units
conducted by NEEA. 84 FR 35484,
0–0.5 .....................................
3 35492 (July 23, 2019). DOE noted that
0.5–1.0 ..................................
8 its current estimate was developed
1.0–1.5 ..................................
10 based on data from the most recent
1.5–2.0 ..................................
9 version of RECS at the time the cyclesper-year value was established. 84 FR
In summary, drying to an FMC of 2
35484, 35491 (July 23, 2019). DOE
percent or less using the DOE test cloth
stated that it was continuing to seek
is representative of the consumerdata regarding the cycles per year. 84 FR
accepted dryness level of a clothing load 35484, 35492, 35504 (July 23, 2019).
after completion of a drying cycle. The
AHAM commented that the 2015
prevalence of certified consumer clothes version of RECS indicates that 238
dryer models spanning the entire
clothes dryer cycles per year would be
spectrum of design characteristics
more appropriate, as it is based on more
indicates no inherent inability to
recent and nationally representative
achieve an FMC of 2 percent or less for
data. AHAM commented that a
any clothes dryer type currently
reduction in number of annual clothes
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
dryer cycles would be consistent with
the trend for the average number of
annual clothes washer cycles, which
based on RECS 2015 data, AHAM
asserted is 241. AHAM suggested that
DOE update the number of annual
clothes dryer cycles based on more
recent national data. (AHAM, No. 33 at
pp. 4–5)
To develop the estimate of 283 clothes
dryer cycles per year previously
specified in the test procedure, DOE
utilized the 2005 RECS data to estimate
the average number of clothes dryer
cycles per year based on clothes washer
cycle data and a clothes dryer usage
factor (the percentage of washer loads
dried in a clothes dryer).33 The 2015
RECS data, which included cycle data
specific to clothes dryers, was first
released in April 2017, and then
subsequently updated multiple times
with the most recent update, Version 4,
released in December 2018.34 DOE
calculated the average number of
clothes dryer cycles per year, using the
reported number of laundry loads
(clothes dryer cycles) dried per week for
each sample home in the 2015 RECS
data set with a clothes dryer, which is
the same methodology DOE used to
develop the estimates of 283 clothes
dryer cycles per year based on the 2005
RECS data set. Using this methodology,
DOE calculated 236 cycles per year from
the 2015 RECS data. Because this
estimate is based on more recent
consumer usage data than the previous
estimate of 283 cycles pear year, DOE
concludes that the estimate of 236
cycles per year is a more representative
estimate of the average number of
annual clothes dryer cycles at this time.
DOE notes that its estimate of 236
clothes dryer cycles per year is very
close to the estimate of 238 cycles per
year presented by AHAM.
DOE is updating the estimate of the
representative average annual number of
clothes dryer cycles per year in section
4.5 of appendix D2. This update
maintains the methodology used to
establish the average number of clothes
dryer cycles per year and updates the
resulting average based on an update to
the underlying data source (i.e., RECS),
as recommended by commenters. The
updated estimate will impact the
measured energy efficiency of clothes
33 The 2005 RECS provided data regarding how
often a clothes dryer was used following a clothes
washer cycle, with answers of ‘‘every time you
wash clothes’’, ‘‘use it for some, but not all loads
of wash’’, ‘‘use it infrequently’’. Using that
information and clothes washer usage data, the
estimate of 283 annual clothes dryer cycles was
developed.
34 The most recent RECS microdata can be
accessed at www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/
data/2015/index.php?view=microdata.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
dryers by reducing the portion of annual
hours in active mode, thereby increasing
the per-cycle standby mode and off
mode energy consumption as
determined in section 4.5 of appendix
D2. Also, DOE notes that the current
energy conservation standards were
developed based on the 283 cycles per
year estimate. As such, the updated
clothes dryer annual cycles per year
estimate will be required beginning on
the compliance date of amended energy
conservation standards for clothes
dryers, should standards be amended.
Prior to any such amendment to the
energy conservation standards, the DOE
test procedure will continue to use the
estimate of 283 clothes dryer cycles per
year in the per-cycle standby mode and
off mode energy consumption
calculation.
2. Inactive and Off Mode Power
Measurements
Section 3.6 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2 35 provides the
instructions for measuring standby
(‘‘inactive’’) mode 36 37 and off mode 38
power on the clothes dryer. The percycle combined total energy
consumption of a clothes dryer includes
the combined representative measures
of inactive mode and off mode power in
sections 4.5 and 4.6, respectively, of
appendix D1 and appendix D2. The test
procedure distinguishes between
inactive mode and off mode. However,
when only one of the low-power modes
35 In this final rule, section 3.6 of appendix D2
is being renumbered as section 3.5, as a result of
removing obsolete provisions from the test
procedures. See section III.E.5 of this final rule for
additional details.
36 Section 1.17 of appendix D1 and section 1.18
of appendix D2 define ‘‘standby mode’’ as any
mode in which the product is connected to a mains
power source and offers one or more of the
following user-oriented or protective functions that
may persist for an indefinite period of time: (1) A
function that facilitates the activation of other
modes (including activation or deactivation of
active mode) by remote switch (including remote
control), internal sensor, or timer; or (2) continuous
functions, including information or status displays
(including clocks) or sensor-based functions. The
definition also specifies that a timer is a continuous
clock function (which may or may not be associated
with a display) that provides regular, scheduled
tasks (e.g., switching) and that operates on a
continuous basis.
37 Section 1.12 of appendix D1 and section 1.13
of appendix D2 define ‘‘inactive mode’’ as a standby
mode that facilitates the activation of active mode
by remote switch (including remote control),
internal sensor, or timer, or that provides
continuous status display.
38 Section 1.15 of appendix D1 and section 1.16
of appendix D2 define ‘‘off mode’’ as a mode in
which the clothes dryer is connected to a mains
power source and is not providing any active mode
or standby function, and where the mode may
persist for an indefinite period of time. The
definition further states that an indicator that only
shows the user that the product is in the off position
is included within the classification of an off mode.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56629
is present, regardless of whether the
low-power mode is considered inactive
mode or off mode, the same
measurement and calculation is
performed.39
The prior test procedure for
measuring inactive and/or off mode
power is as follows. Section 3.6.1 of
appendix D1 and appendix D2 instructs
inactive mode to be measured, if the
clothes dryer has an inactive mode, with
the resulting measurement represented
by the symbol PIA. Similarly, section
3.6.2 of both appendices instructs off
mode power to be measured, if the
clothes dryer has an off mode, with the
resulting distinct power measurement
represented by symbol POFF. In section
4.5 of both appendices, if a clothes dryer
has either inactive mode or off mode
(but not both), the measured power is
multiplied by 8,620, representing the
combined annual hours that the clothes
dryer is not in active mode (i.e., idle).
Alternately, if a clothes dryer has both
inactive mode and off mode (e.g., an
electronic control panel that also
provides a hard off switch that can
completely disconnect all power to the
product), the power of each mode is
measured and multiplied by one-half of
8,620 (i.e., 4,310), and the results are
summed.40 As these sections were
structured, a determination first had to
be made whether the low-power
mode(s) that exists on the clothes dryer
meets the definition of inactive mode or
off mode—even though the same
calculation applies, yielding the same
end result, regardless of the distinction.
As discussed in the July 2019 NOPR,
the ‘‘off’’ state on some appliances is
achieved through a software/firmware
action (i.e., through a ‘‘soft switch’’)
rather than a hard on/off switch (i.e., a
switch that physically breaks the
connection to the mains power supply),
and it may not always be clear whether
the product is providing any active
mode or standby function while in the
‘‘off’’ state. 84 FR 35484, 35495. To
address questions regarding the
potential difficulty in determining
whether the low-power mode is
considered inactive mode or off mode
without needing to remove a product’s
console to access the electrical
schematic and/or determine if the
switch is a ‘‘hard’’ switch or ‘‘soft’’
39 Distinguishing inactive mode from off mode is
not an issue when both are present. When both
modes are present, inactive mode and off mode can
be distinguished from each other based on the
measured energy use; i.e., inactive mode will result
in a higher measured energy use than off mode.
40 This calculation represents an estimate that
such a clothes dryer would spend half of its lowpower mode hours in inactive mode, and the other
half of its low-power mode hours in off mode.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
56630
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
electronic switch, DOE proposed the
following changes to appendix D1 and
appendix D2 in the July 2019 NOPR:
• Replace the symbols PIA and POFF,
for measuring inactive mode 41 and off
mode, respectively, with Pdefault and
Plowest, including revisions to the
calculation symbols in section 3.6.1 of
appendix D1 and 3.5.1 of appendix D2.
Pdefault represents the low-power
measurement if only one power level is
observed. If two power levels are
observed, Plowest represents the off mode
power measurement and Pdefault
represents the inactive mode power
measurement.
• For clothes dryers with both an
inactive mode and off mode (i.e., clothes
dryers with electronic controls that offer
an optional switch (or other means) that
can be selected by the end user to
achieve a lower power state than the
default inactive/off mode state),42
section 3.6.2 of appendix D1 and 3.5.2
of appendix D2 require that, after
performing the measurement in section
3.6.1 of appendix D1 or 3.5.1 of
appendix D2, the switch (or other
means) be activated to the position
resulting in the lowest power
consumption and the measurement
procedure described in section 3.6.1 and
3.5.1, respectively, be repeated. Measure
and record the average power
consumption as the lowest standby/off
mode power, Plowest, in watts.
• Revise section 3.6 of appendix D1
and newly renumbered section 3.5 of
appendix D2 to state that for a clothes
dryer that takes time to automatically
enter a stable inactive/off mode state
from a higher power state, as discussed
in Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, note 1 of
IEC Standard 62301, allow sufficient
time for the clothes dryer to
automatically reach the default inactive/
off mode state before proceeding with
the test measurement. Replace the term
‘‘lower power state’’ with ‘‘default
standby/off mode state,’’ recognizing
that the lower power state that the
clothes dryer reaches by default may be
either a standby (inactive) mode or an
off mode.
• Perform standby mode and off
mode testing after completion of an
active mode drying cycle; after
removing the test load; without
changing the control panel settings used
for the active mode drying cycle; with
the door closed; and without
disconnecting the electrical energy
supply to the clothes dryer. DOE noted
that the order of sections within the
clothes dryer test procedures suggests
41 Inactive mode is the only type of standby mode
required to be measured in appendix D1 and
appendix D2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
that the standby mode and off mode
measurement (section 3.6 of appendix
D1 and section 3.5 of appendix D2) is
performed after the active mode test
cycle (sections 3.3 through 3.5 of
appendix D1 and sections 3.3 and 3.4 of
appendix D2); therefore, the proposed
approach likely reflects current practice
within the industry. 84 FR 35484,
35495–35496 (July 23, 2019).
AHAM supported the proposal to
amend the clothes dryer test procedures
to use nomenclature, symbols, and
structure, procedural instructions, and
assigned annual hours based on
observable and measurable
characteristics of the clothes dryer,
rather than based on knowledge of the
control panel switch type or internal
functionality of the clothes dryers.
AHAM supported DOE’s proposed
modification to the sequence of testing
for standby or off mode power
measurement to perform the standby
mode and off mode testing after the
active mode testing, which reflects
current practice by test laboratories.
(AHAM, No. 33 at p. 9)
In this final rule, DOE is amending
the test procedure in accordance with
the proposals outlined above, adding
new symbols to represent the ‘‘default’’
and ‘‘lowest’’ standby power
measurements, along with instructions
for their applications based on
observable characteristics of the clothes
dryer. DOE is also amending appendix
D1 and appendix D2 to specify that
inactive and off mode tests must be
performed after completion of an active
mode drying cycle, and the unit must be
allowed sufficient time to automatically
reach its default inactive/off mode
power state before performing
measurements. Under the revised
section 3.6 of appendix D1 and newly
renumbered section 3.5 of appendix D2,
DOE is requiring that the same sequence
of measurements be performed as in the
previous section 3.6 in both appendix
D1 and appendix D2, to yield the same
power measurement(s) for clothes
dryers with inactive mode, off mode, or
both. Further, DOE is specifying that the
same annual hours that were previously
specified shall be applied to the average
power measurement(s) in section 4.5 of
both appendix D1 and appendix D2.
DOE has determined that these
amendments to appendix D1 and
appendix D2 will not impact the
measured efficiency of clothes dryers,
because the amendments are
amendments to nomenclature and
provide additional direction.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
3. General Test Procedure Provisions at
10 CFR 430.23(d)
The general test procedure provisions
for clothes dryers in 10 CFR 430.23(d)
include methods for calculating the
estimated annual operating cost, CEF,
and other useful measures of energy
consumption using appendix D1. In the
July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed to
amend the test procedure to provide
explicitly for calculating each of these
metrics using appendix D2 as well as to
include methods of calculating the
estimated annual energy use.
AHAM and the Joint Commenters
supported DOE’s proposal to extend
calculations of energy consumption to
appendix D2 and to add a new
calculation of annual energy use, stating
that this would ensure consistency in
the test procedure. (AHAM, No. 33 at p.
9; Joint Commenters, No. 34 at p. 3)
DOE is adopting the test procedure
amendments as proposed in the July
2019 NOPR to provide explicitly for the
calculation of useful measures of energy
consumption, including estimated
annual energy use, using appendix D2.
4. Rounding Requirements for Reported
Values
In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed
adding a new section at 10 CFR
429.21(c) to specify the rounding
requirements of all numeric reported
values for clothes dryers, including CEF,
capacity, voltage, and hourly Btu rating.
Similarly, DOE proposed adding the
same rounding requirement for the
capacity measurement in section 3.1 of
both appendix D1 and appendix D2,
which would add specificity to the
measurement of drum capacity as it
relates to determining whether a
compact-size load (for a drum capacity
less than 4.4 cubic feet) or standard-size
load must be used for testing. The
proposed rounding requirements for
CEF, capacity, voltage, and Btu rating
would maintain consistency with the
level of precision currently provided in
DOE’s Compliance Certification
Management System (‘‘CCMS’’).
DOE also proposed to specify further
the rounding instructions provided at 10
CFR 430.23(d)(1) (renumbered to
paragraph (d)(2) as amended in this
document) pertaining to estimated
annual operating cost. Previously, the
rounding instructions for an electric
clothes dryer were provided in
paragraph (d)(1)(i)(C). DOE proposed
moving the rounding instructions to
paragraph (d)(1)(i) to clarify that the
rounding provision applies to the
product of all three factors multiplied in
paragraphs (d)(1)(i)(A), (B), and (C).
Similarly, for gas clothes dryers, DOE
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
proposed to move the rounding
instructions from its previous location
embedded within paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B)
to the higher-level paragraph at
paragraph (d)(1)(ii).
AHAM and GEA supported DOE’s
proposal to specify the rounding
requirements of all numeric reported
values for clothes dryers. Additionally,
AHAM and GEA requested that DOE
clarify the rounding requirements for
scale weight measurements. AHAM
recommended the rounding of scale
weight values to the nearest whole
number digit, asserting the absence of
such a specification in conjunction with
the required minimum scale resolution
may result in an unacceptable range of
variation.43 These commenters stated
that rounding to the nearest whole
number for FMC is acceptable based on
the current state of the clothes dryer test
procedure, the measurement error, and
laboratory capabilities. (AHAM, No. 33
at pp. 9–10, 12; GEA, No. 37 at p. 2)
GEA asserted that rounding to the
nearest whole number for moisture
content resolves the instrumentation
resolution issue and is in keeping with
ASTM’s best practice guidance. (GEA,
No. 37 at p. 2) AHAM reported that its
members have noted that there is
inherent measurement variation
(compounded tolerance) that can cause
a theoretical FMC of 2 percent to be
reported as high as 3 percent.44 AHAM
recommended a resolution for scales of
at least 0.005 pounds with a maximum
error of no greater than 0.1 percent of
any measured value. AHAM also
recommended specifying the same scale
be used for bone-dry weight, IMC, and
FMC measurements. AHAM suggested
that this change would not add cost to
the test as it expects laboratories already
have instrumentation capable of this
resolution. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 9–10,
12) As discussed in section III.C.4 of
this document, GEA supported all
requests for tighter tolerances in the
AHAM comments. GEA agreed that the
43 Section 2.4.1 of appendices D1 and D2 specify
that the weighing scale for test cloth shall have a
range of 0 to a maximum of 60 pounds with a
resolution of at least 0.2 ounces, and a maximum
error no greater than 0.3 percent of any measured
value within the range of 3 to 15 pounds. AHAM
suggested that applying this allowable error to the
weight of the bone-dry test cloth and test cloth after
the test cycle, with a measured FMC of 2 percent,
could in fact be as high as 2.4 percent or as low
as 1.6 percent. AHAM suggested that rounding FMC
would eliminate the need to resolve issues with
scale resolution that result in potentially
misreporting FMC.
44 AHAM applied the maximum allowable
measurement error of ±0.3 percent to the bone-dry
test cloth weight and final test cloth weight
measurements. AHAM stated that a final FMC value
of 2 percent could yield a measurement between 1.4
percent and 2.6 percent, given the allowable
measurement error of ±0.3 percent.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
current test procedure allows for
tolerance stacking issues that introduce
variability in the DOE verification
process and reported that the suggested
tolerances would not increase test
burden or cost. (GEA, No. 37 at p. 2)
DOE proposed rounding requirements
in the July 2019 NOPR, which implicate
the weighing scale resolution,45 as noted
by the comments received, in ensuring
repeatable and reproducible test results.
DOE acknowledges that, in the absence
of revised scale resolution requirements,
hypothetically a variation as described
by AHAM could occur. However, under
current testing practice this is not
occurring. Based on interactions with
testing laboratories, DOE is aware that,
in general, test laboratories are currently
measuring test load weight using
instrumentation with a scale resolution
of 0.001 pounds and a maximum error
of no greater than 0.1 (the value
suggested by AHAM) percent of any
measured value. This level of precision
addresses the issue of compounded
tolerance by effectively bounding a 2percent FMC measurement between a
range of 1.8–2.2 percent rather than 1.4–
2.6 percent. Accordingly, instead of
addressing AHAM and GEA’s concern
through further rounding amendments,
DOE is addressing the issue by
codifying the current practice to ensure
that the issue as described by
commenters does not occur in the
future. Also, rounding to the nearest
whole number for FMC as suggested by
these commenters would reduce the
stringency of the requirement, given that
an FMC of 2.4 percent could be rounded
down to 2 percent, effectively raising
the FMC requirement to be less than 2.5
percent as opposed to the prior
requirement of 2 percent. For these
reasons, DOE is not amending FMC
rounding requirements at this time.
Instead, DOE is amending the scale
tolerance and maximum error
requirements to align with the current
capabilities of test laboratories, thereby
codifying this level of precision and
addressing the issues of compounding
tolerance raised by commenters.
Specifically, DOE is amending the scale
resolution requirements to be 0.001
pounds with a maximum error of no
greater than 0.1 percent of any measured
value in section 2.4.1 of both appendix
D1 and appendix D2.
DOE received no comments
pertaining to the other specific rounding
requirements proposed in the July 2019
NOPR. DOE is adopting all proposed
rounding requirement changes from the
45 Rounding requirements relate to the number of
significant digits of the measured value, which are
dictated by the resolution of the weighing scale.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56631
July 2019 NOPR in the newly added 10
CFR 429.21(c).
5. Optional Usage of Appendix D1 or
Appendix D2
As discussed, manufacturers must use
either appendix D1 or appendix D2 to
demonstrate compliance with the
applicable energy conservation
standards, and must use a single
appendix for all representations,
including certifications of compliance.46
The current efficiency standards are
based on appendix D1. Appendix D1
tests timed drying cycles, and accounts
for clothes dryers with automatic
termination controls by applying a
higher field use factor to units that have
this feature. Appendix D2 tests
‘‘normal’’ automatic termination cycles.
NEEA, the California IOUs, NRDC,
CEE, Energy Solutions, and Samsung
recommended that DOE require testing
under appendix D2 only, and delete
appendix D1. NEEA commented that
ENERGY STAR has now labeled 286
clothes dryer models from 18 different
manufacturers with appendix D2 test
procedure data, with an Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’) estimated
ENERGY STAR model market
penetration of 35 percent. NEEA further
commented that DOE reports that 269
unique models (43.5 percent) in its
CCMS database were tested according to
appendix D2 and 350 unique models
(56.5 percent) were tested under
appendix D1. The California IOUs,
NEEA, and Samsung asserted that
manufacturers have had sufficient time
to adapt to appendix D2. These
commenters suggested that the intention
of having both appendix D1 and
appendix D2 available for
manufacturers was to ease the transition
to the more representative automatic
cycle termination test of appendix D2,
and now that the appendix D2 test
procedure has been adopted by
ENERGY STAR and is commonly used,
there no longer appears a need to test a
model to appendix D1. (NRDC, No. 35
at pp. 1–2; CEE, No. 27 at pp. 1–3;
California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 16–19;
Energy Solutions, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at p. 56; Samsung,
No. 36 at p. 2; NEEA, No. 38 at pp. 3–
9, 18)
The California IOUs, CEE, NRDC, and
NEEA further asserted that appendix D1
artificially inflates the efficiency
performance of units with poorly
functioning automatic cycle termination
features, since it applies a uniform field
46 ENERGY STAR certification requires testing
using appendix D2. The ENERGY STAR clothes
dryer specification can be found at
www.energystar.gov/products/appliances/clothes_
dryers/partners.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56632
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
use factor to all units with such a
feature, impacting efficiency rank order.
However, the California IOUs also
suggested that as clothes dryers deploy
improved automatic termination
controls and clothes dryer operations,
results from appendix D1 may not
always be higher than those from
appendix D2, an assertion that the
California IOUs stated is supported by
the 2019 PG&E testing. One unit from
the PG&E test sample of four models
had a higher CEF value using appendix
D2 as compared to appendix D1. NEEA
also cited the PG&E data, and both
NEEA and the California IOUs
commented that recent DOE-funded
clothes dryer testing at Oak Ridge
National Laboratory (‘‘ORNL’’) and
PNNL similarly confirmed that the same
clothes dryer models tend to achieve a
higher efficiency value when tested to
the appendix D1 test procedure than
when tested to the appendix D2 test
procedure, though the observed
differences were not consistent across
all models. Based on those reports,47
NEEA stated that: (1) CEF values
dropped roughly 18 percent when tested
according to appendix D2, and the
efficiency rank order among the tested
models changed as well; (2) on average,
the appendix D1 loads had five times
the FMC than the appendix D2 loads at
termination, but all FMCs were within
acceptable limits for both test
procedures, which implies that the
energy use measured under appendix
D1 will be less than the energy use
measured under appendix D2 for the
same clothes dryer, as clothes dryers
remove more moisture under appendix
D2; and (3) drying times increased by
roughly 80 percent when tested
according to appendix D2. (NRDC, No.
35 at pp. 1–2; CEE, No. 27 at pp. 1–3;
California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 16–19;
NEEA, No. 38 at pp. 3–9, 18)
NEEA, the California IOUs, CEE, and
NRDC stated that testing all models to
the same procedure would facilitate
comparison of performance between
them, increasing the utility of the CCMS
database and ENERGY STAR
certification. NRDC and NEEA also
suggested that using a single, uniform
test procedure would allow for
efficiency labeling of clothes dryers
under the Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘FTC’’) EnergyGuide labelling program.
(NRDC, No. 35 at pp. 1–2; CEE, No. 27
47 Residential Clothes Dryer Performance Under
Timed and Automatic Cycle Termination Test
Procedures, Kyle Gluesencamp, ORNL, October
2014; Clothes Dryer Automatic Termination Sensor
Evaluation: Volume 1: Characterization of Energy
Use in Residential Clothes Dryers, W. TeGrotenhus,
Ph.D., PNNL, September 2014.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
at pp. 1–3; California IOUs, No. 29 at
pp. 16–19; NEEA, No. 38 at pp. 3–9, 18)
NRDC and the California IOUs
suggested that because the current
standards are based on appendix D1, it
might be more appropriate to implement
the retirement of appendix D1 during
the next standards rulemaking, and they
urged DOE to do so if it is not possible
in this final rule. (NRDC, No. 35 at pp.
1–2; California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 16–
19)
AHAM opposed the removal of
appendix D1 and mandatory use of
appendix D2. AHAM did not support
the existence of different test procedures
to demonstrate compliance with the
standard, but recognized that
manufacturers must currently use a
different test procedure to demonstrate
ENERGY STAR eligibility for clothes
dryers than compliance with energy
conservation standards. AHAM stated
that because manufacturers have already
invested in developing products under
this circumstance, it would not be
equitable to change the status quo at this
time. Accordingly, AHAM urged DOE to
maintain both appendices, with
appendix D2 being optional as an
alternative to appendix D1. (AHAM, No.
33 at p. 11)
A majority of the clothes dryers on the
market continue to test under appendix
D1. DOE notes that 746 clothes dryer
models (62.6 percent) listed in the
CCMS database are certified to appendix
D1, as compared to 445 models (37.4
percent) to appendix D2. DOE
recognizes that under appendix D2,
measured CEF values may be lower than
CEF values measured under appendix
D1. As discussed, appendix D2 includes
methods for more accurately measuring
the effects of automatic cycle
termination and represents a
significantly different testing
methodology that may impact the
energy consumption of some clothes
dryers more than others. The current
energy conservation standards are based
on the test procedure in appendix D1,
and to the extent that measured CEF
under appendix D2 is lower than the
measured CEF under appendix D1, this
difference does not result in products
being able to demonstrate compliance
with a lower efficiency. For these
reasons, DOE is maintaining the
appendix D1 and appendix D2 test
procedures and is continuing to allow
certification in accordance with either
test procedure.
6. Cycle Time Reporting
Manufacturers are not currently
required to report cycle time as part of
the certification process. In response to
the July 2019 NOPR, DOE received
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
comments regarding the reporting of
cycle times to inform consumer
purchasing decisions.
AHAM stated that the purpose of the
energy conservation standards program
is to regulate the efficiency of the
product, not to inform consumers about
all of the different factors that could
affect their purchase. AHAM asserted
that, while DOE should consider the
impact of energy conservation standards
on performance factors such as drying
time, it is not appropriate for DOE to
collect data on and create requirements
for performance factors. AHAM
questioned whether collecting data on
drying time was permissible under
EPCA. (AHAM, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 83–84)
NEEA suggested that DOE should
require manufacturers to report drying
time when testing using appendix D2,
because certain efficient clothes dryers
might achieve higher efficiency by
taking a very long time to dry clothes.
(NEEA, Public Meeting Transcript, No.
23 at pp. 79–80) NEEA and PG&E
encouraged DOE to require reporting of
cycle times, suggesting that cycle time is
a performance feature that consumers
value. (NEEA, No. 38 at pp. 3, 12–16,
18; PG&E, Public Meeting Transcript,
No. 23 at pp. 80–81)
As stated, EPCA requires that the test
procedures prescribed or amended by
DOE be reasonably designed to produce
test results which measure energy
efficiency, energy use, or estimated
annual operating cost of a covered
product during a representative average
use cycle or period of use, and not be
unduly burdensome to conduct. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)) DOE may require
each manufacturer of a covered product
to submit information or reports with
respect to energy efficiency or energy
use of such covered products to ensure
compliance with the requirements of
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6296(d)) DOE
recognizes that cycle time is a relevant
consideration under the current product
class structure.
On December 16, 2020, DOE
published a final rule (‘‘December 2020
Final Rule’’) establishing a separate
product class for consumer clothes
dryers that offer cycle times for a normal
cycle of less than 30 minutes. 85 FR
81359.48 On January 19, 2021, the States
of California, Connecticut, Illinois,
Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Nevada,
Oregon, Vermont, and Washington, the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the
District of Columbia, and the City of
48 The December 2020 Final Rule also established
short-cycle product classes for residential clothes
washers.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
New York filed a petition for review of
the December 2020 Final Rule in the
Second Circuit. Shortly thereafter, two
other groups of petitioners filed
petitions for review of the December
2020 Final Rule. The Alliance for Water
Efficiency, the U.S. Public Interest
Research Group, and Environment
America filed a petition for review of
that final rule in the Seventh Circuit on
January 17, 2021, and the Sierra Club
filed a petition for review of that final
rule in the Ninth Circuit on February 12,
2021. After transfer of the Seventh and
Ninth Circuit petitions for review, all
three cases were consolidated in the
Second Circuit. Briefing on the merits is
currently stayed through October 1,
2021, while DOE reviews the December
2020 Final Rule. Additionally, on April
2, 2021, AHAM petitioned DOE to
reconsider the December 2020 Final
Rule that established and amended
standards for short-cycle residential
clothes washers and dryers.49 In its
petition AHAM requested that DOE
withdraw the December 2020 Final
Rule. (Id. at p. 19)
DOE is re-evaluating the analysis in
the short-cycle product class
determination pursuant to Executive
Order 13990, Protecting Public Health
and the Environment and Restoring
Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis. In
light of the on-going review, DOE is not
adopting reporting requirements for
cycle time in this final rule.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
E. Formatting Changes and
Typographical Errors
To improve the readability of the text
in certain sections of appendix D1 and
appendix D2, DOE is making minor
typographical corrections and
formatting modifications as discussed in
the following paragraphs. These minor
modifications do not change the
substance of the test methods and do
not impact the measured energy use.
1. ‘‘Conventional’’ and ‘‘Vented’’
Nomenclature
Previously, appendix D1 and
appendix D2 defined the term
‘‘conventional clothes dryer’’ as a
clothes dryer that exhausts the
evaporated moisture from the cabinet.
Appendix D1, section 1.7; appendix D2,
section 1.8. This definition is
synonymous with a ‘‘vented clothes
dryer.’’ Conversely, ‘‘ventless clothes
dryer’’ is defined as a clothes dryer that
uses a closed-loop system with an
internal condenser to remove the
evaporated moisture from the heated air.
Appendix D1, section 1.19; appendix
49 EERE–2020–BT–STD–0001–0048,
at
www.regulations.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
D2, section 1.21. The moist air is not
discharged from the cabinet. Id.
The product classes in DOE clothes
dryer energy conservation standards use
the terms ‘‘vented’’ and ‘‘ventless’’ to
refer to the different methods used by
the clothes dryer to remove moisture
from the cabinet. 10 CFR 430.32(h)(3).
To provide consistency between these
product classes and the terminology
used in the clothes dryer test
procedures, DOE is replacing the word
‘‘conventional’’ with ‘‘vented’’
throughout both appendix D1 and
appendix D2. This change affects the
nomenclature only and does not affect
the classification of clothes dryers or
conduct of the test procedure for any
clothes dryers.
2. Symbol Definitions
Previously, appendix D1 and
appendix D2 included inconsistent use
of symbol definitions for the measured
bone-dry weight and moisture content
values. DOE is adding the symbol
definition for bone-dry weight (Wbonedry)
to section 3.4.1 of both appendices,
where it is first referenced. DOE is
changing the symbol definitions for
moisture content of the wet test load
(previously Ww) and moisture content of
the dry test load (previously Wd) to IMC
and FMC, respectively, to better
differentiate these percentage values
from Wbonedry, which is a weight value.
See section 4.1 of both appendix D1 and
appendix D2. Similarly, DOE is also
adding the symbol definitions IMC and
FMC to section 3.4.2 and section 3.4.3,
respectively, where these values are first
referenced in both appendix D1 and
appendix D2. DOE is also updating the
symbols used throughout section 4 of
both appendices in each calculation in
which these terms are used. The
additions and revisions of these symbol
definitions will more readily provide an
understanding of the measured values
associated with each of these symbols,
as well as improve the readability of
subsequent sections of the test
procedures where these symbols are
referenced.
3. Removal of Duplicate Instructions for
Test Load Preparation
Section 2.7.1 and section 2.7.2 of both
appendix D1 and appendix D2 provide
instructions for preparing a compactsize clothes dryer load and a standardsize clothes dryer load, respectively.
Each section previously specified the
required load weight and then provided
the same instructions for preparing a
damp test load before loading. DOE is
restructuring section 2.7.1 and section
2.7.2 in each appendix to remove this
duplication. For both appendices, the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56633
revised section 2.7.1 includes a table
specifying the required test loads for
standard-size and compact-size clothes
dryers, in addition to the requirement
that each test load must consist of
energy test cloths and no more than five
energy stuffer cloths. For both
appendices, the revised section 2.7.2
provides the procedure for dampening
the test load. These amendments do not
change the conduct of the test procedure
for either appendix D1 or appendix D2
but improve readability of the test
procedures.
4. Typographical Errors
In this final rule, DOE is correcting
the following typographical errors in
appendix D1 and appendix D2:
Section 1.5 and section 2.6 of
appendix D1 and section 1.6, section
2.7.1, and section 2.7.2 of appendix D2
used the term ‘‘test clothes,’’ where ‘‘test
cloths’’ should have been used instead.
Section 1.16 of appendix D2 misspelled
the term ‘‘classification’’ in the
definition of ‘‘off mode.’’
Section 2.4.1 of both appendix D1 and
appendix D2 contained section
numbering errors. Previously, section
2.4.1 was titled Weighing scale for test
cloth and included specifications for the
scale used to weigh the test loads, and
the section that followed was
incorrectly numbered as section 2.4.1.2
Weighing scale for drum capacity
measurements. DOE is correcting this in
both appendix D1 and appendix D2 by
inserting a new title, section 2.4.1
Weighing scales, and renumbering
existing section 2.4.1 Weighing scale for
test cloth as section 2.4.1.1.
The calculation of the total per-cycle
electric clothes dryer energy
consumption in section 4.1 of appendix
D1 referenced an undefined symbol
‘‘Ett’’, which should instead have been
‘‘Et’’, the total energy consumed during
the test cycle as recorded in section
3.4.5 of appendix D1. The word ‘‘for’’
was also missing from the wording of
the description of the 1.04 field use
factor in section 4.1 of appendix D1.
In addition, section 4.3 of both
appendix D1 and appendix D2
referenced the symbol ‘‘Ege’’, which
should instead have been ‘‘Egg’’, the
calculated gas clothes dryer gas energy
consumption per cycle.
5. Removal of Obsolete Provisions
Section 1.14 of appendix D1 and
section 1.15 of appendix D2 provided a
definition for ‘‘moisture sensing
control;’’ 50 similarly, section 1.18 of
50 ‘‘Moisture sensing control’’ is defined as a
system which utilizes a moisture sensing element
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
Continued
08OCR2
56634
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
appendix D1 and section 1.19 of
appendix D2 provided a definition for
‘‘temperature sensing control.’’ 51 Both
of these definitions were obsolete,
having been incorporated into a broader
term ‘‘automatic termination control’’ 52
in section 1.4 of both appendices as part
of the January 2011 Final Rule. 76 FR
972, 978 (Jan. 6, 2011). In addition, the
terms ‘‘moisture sensing control’’ and
‘‘temperature sensing control’’ were not
referenced anywhere else within
appendix D1 or appendix D2. DOE is
removing these definitions from both
appendices and renumbering the
subsequent sections of the test
procedure accordingly.
Section 3.5 of appendix D2 described
the application of a field use factor for
clothes dryers with automatic
termination controls. In the August 2013
Final Rule, DOE eliminated the field use
factor in appendix D2 for automatic
termination control clothes dryers, in
conjunction with new procedures that
directly measure any over-drying energy
consumption of automatic termination
control clothes dryers. 78 FR 49608,
49611 (Aug. 14, 2013). In the August
2013 Final Rule, DOE erroneously
retained the obsolete section 3.5 of
appendix D2. DOE therefore is removing
section 3.5 of appendix D2 and
adjusting the numbering of subsequent
sections accordingly.
Section 4.7 of both appendix D1 and
appendix D2 provided the equation for
calculating EF. DOE’s energy
conservation standards for clothes
dryers were based on energy factor
(‘‘EF’’) for clothes dryers manufactured
on or after May 14, 1994 and before
January 1, 2015. However, as of January
1, 2015, clothes dryer energy
conservation standards are based on the
CEF metric. Similarly, DOE’s
certification reporting requirements for
clothes dryers at 10 CFR 429.21(b)(2)
required reporting CEF when using
appendix D1 or appendix D2; EF was
required only when using appendix D,
which is obsolete and is removed in this
final rule. Furthermore, ENERGY STAR
within the dryer drum that monitors the amount of
moisture in the clothes and automatically
terminates the dryer cycle.
51 ‘‘Temperature sensing control’’ is defined as a
system which monitors dryer exhaust air
temperature and automatically terminates the dryer
cycle.
52 ‘‘Automatic termination control’’ is defined as
a dryer control system with a sensor which
monitors either the dryer load temperature or its
moisture content and with a controller which
automatically terminates the drying process. A
mark, detent, or other visual indicator or detent
which indicates a preferred automatic termination
control setting must be present if the dryer is to be
classified as having an ‘‘automatic termination
control.’’ A mark is a visible single control setting
on one or more dryer controls.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
qualification is based on the CEF metric.
DOE is not aware of any current
regulatory programs or criteria that use
the EF metric. Therefore, DOE is
removing the obsolete calculation of EF
in section 4.7 of both appendix D1 and
appendix D2, renumbering the
subsequent sections of the test
procedures accordingly, and removing
EF as a measure of energy consumption
described at 10 CFR 430.23(d)(2).
F. Removing Obsolete Appendix D
In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed
to remove appendix D from 10 CFR part
430, since this version of the test
procedure is no longer used. DOE also
proposed to remove the references to
appendix D from 10 CFR 430.23(d), as
well as in the clothes dryer certification
reporting requirements in 10 CFR
429.21(b)(2).
AHAM stated that it did not oppose
DOE’s proposal to remove appendix D,
because this appendix is no longer
mandatory. (AHAM, No. 33 at p. 11) No
other comments were received on the
removal of appendix D.
Given that appendix D is no longer in
use, DOE is removing appendix D and
all associated references throughout 10
CFR 429.21 and 10 CFR 430.23(d).
G. Test Procedure Costs and Impact
EPCA requires that test procedures
adopted by DOE not be unduly
burdensome to conduct. In this
document, DOE amends the existing test
procedure for residential clothes dryers.
DOE has determined that the test
procedure as amended by this final rule
will not be unduly burdensome for
manufacturers to conduct.
In this final rule, DOE adopts a
number of amendments to both
appendix D1 and appendix D2. The
current energy conservation standards
for clothes dryers were developed based
on results obtained using appendix D1.
As discussed in the following sections,
neither the amendments to appendix D1
or appendix D2 will impact the current
costs of the test procedures.
None of the amendments to appendix
D1 or appendix D2 will impact the
scope of the test procedure (i.e., the
amendments will not require
manufacturers to test clothes dryers that
are not already required to be tested).
Additionally, DOE has determined that
none of the amendments will require
manufacturers to re-test or re-certify any
existing models on the market that have
been tested and certified using appendix
D1 or appendix D2.
Based on the discussion that follows,
DOE has determined that these
amendments to the clothes dryer test
procedure in appendix D1 and appendix
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
D2 will not be unduly burdensome for
manufacturers to conduct.
1. Maintaining Hourly Btu Rating for
Gas Clothes Dryers
DOE specifies the order of adjustment,
from least burdensome to most
burdensome, for the three types of
adjustments that can be made to
maintain the required heat input rate for
natural gas and propane clothes dryers.
As described, this amendment is
generally consistent with industry
practice. To the extent that any
deviations from this order may occur in
practice, the additional direction
provided by these amendments will not
require any manufacturers to retest or
re-certify any basic models currently on
the market because the net result of
maintaining the hourly Btu rating
within ±5 percent of the rated value will
not change. Therefore, drying
performance will not be impacted in
comparison to results obtained under
the previous test procedures.
2. Final Moisture Content Requirement
DOE explicitly specifies that any
second test run using the highest
dryness level setting must result in an
FMC of 2 percent or less for the test to
be considered valid. This amendment
impacts only appendix D2, and
therefore has no impact on testing under
appendix D1. As described, this
amendment reflects the current practice
of manufacturers and test laboratories,
and therefore does not impact the cost
of testing.
3. Additional Amendments
DOE has determined that the
remainder of the amendments adopted
in this final rule will not impact test
costs.
DOE provides direction regarding the
required settings for network
capabilities during testing under both
appendix D1 and appendix D2. This
direction will not impact test costs as it
provides further direction to the prior
test procedure and does not require
conducting an additional test. The
amendment will not change the
measured energy use of basic models for
which the consumer is required to turn
on the network capability, as the prior
test procedure provided no direction to
do so. To the extent that there are basic
models with the network capability
enabled in the as shipped condition, the
energy use attributable to the network
function would have been captured
under the prior test procedure. For any
such basic models, the direction
regarding the network capabilities
adopted in this document will result in
lower measured energy use as compared
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
to the prior test procedure. Therefore,
the amendment regarding network
capabilities adopted in this final rule
will not result in a basic model that is
complaint under the prior test
procedure becoming non-compliant.
DOE provides additional direction on
the dryness level setting for clothes
dryers that provide an even number of
discrete dryness settings. This
amendment impacts only appendix D2,
and therefore has no impact on testing
under appendix D1. This amendment
will not impact testing costs, as it
provides direction for the required
setting for the previously required test,
without requiring any additional testing.
DOE is updating the representative
annual number of drying cycles in the
per-cycle standby mode and off mode
energy consumption calculations in
appendix D2 to use the most recently
available data. The updated number of
drying cycles will not be required for
use unless and until such time the
energy conservation standards are
amended taking into account the
updated value. As such, this
amendment will not require retesting or
recertification.
DOE provides revisions regarding the
measurement and accounting of standby
mode and off mode power in both
appendix D1 and appendix D2. DOE has
determined that these revisions
potentially reduce testing costs for
third-party laboratories, as the
amendment does not require any
disassembly of a clothes dryer to
determine the appropriate application of
the test procedure. However, DOE has
not quantified the potential reduction in
testing cost.
DOE provides a variety of formatting
and typographical corrections to both
appendix D1 and appendix D2. These
edits remove confusion that may result
from the errors and improve the
readability of the test procedures.
DOE amends 10 CFR 430.23(d) to
include instructions for calculating
estimated annual operating cost, CEF,
and other useful metrics using appendix
D2. The prior test procedure provision
provided for the calculation of these
values using measurements from
appendix D1. The test procedure as
finalized in this document also
explicitly provides for calculating these
values using measurements from
appendix D2. This amendment provides
additional direction regarding the
calculation of metrics and no additional
testing will be required.
DOE is revising the required weighing
scale resolution for weighing test cloths
to limit test variation consistent with
current test laboratory capabilities. In
DOE’s experience, testing facilities are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
currently using instrumentation that
meet these new instrumentation
requirements, and therefore DOE
concludes that these revisions will not
impact test burden.
Manufacturers will be able to rely on
data generated under the previous test
procedure, and no retesting or
recertification will be required as a
result of this test procedure.
H. Harmonization With Industry
Standards
The test procedures for clothes dryers
in appendix D1 and appendix D2
incorporate by reference AHAM HLD–
1–2009, ‘‘Household Tumble Type
Clothes Dryers,’’ (which was later
certified as ANSI/AHAM HLD–1–2010)
and IEC Standard 62301. Specifically,
both appendices reference an exhaust
simulator specified in AHAM HLD–1–
2009 in their test setup instructions, and
incorporate IEC Standard 62301, which
provides test conditions, testing
equipment, and methods for measuring
standby mode and off mode power
consumption. Appendix D1 and
appendix D2 also require the use of
AHAM Standard Test Detergent
Formula 3 for preconditioning the test
cloths. DOE has determined that the
revisions to the standby and off mode
power provisions do not impact the
existing references to industry standards
and do not alter the applicability of
those referenced industry standards to
the DOE test procedure.
The California IOUs suggested that
DOE review comments they submitted
in response to the NOPR published on
February 13, 2019, proposing
amendments to DOE’s rulemaking
process (84 FR 3910); specifically, their
recommendation that DOE use industrybased test procedures as guidance
documents and that all industry test
procedures should be evaluated
consistent with EPCA. (California IOUs,
No. 29 at p. 21) AHAM supported the
practice of adopting voluntary
consensus-based test procedures
without modification, specifically the
incorporation by reference of the latest
version of AHAM HLD–1, though
AHAM did not support incorporation by
reference of IEC Standard 61121. AHAM
commented that, while there may be
times when it is appropriate to
incorporate European standards by
reference, in this case the European
procedure does not produce results that
are directly comparable to the DOE test
procedure results. (AHAM, No. 33 at p.
13)
In conducting this test procedure
rulemaking, DOE reviewed relevant
industry standards, including AHAM
HLD–1 and IEC Standard 61121. The
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56635
DOE test procedure continues to
reference AHAM HLD–1. Because
adoption of AHAM HLD–1 in its
entirety would impact the measured
energy use of clothes dryers for
purposes of determining compliance
with DOE standards, DOE did not
amend appendix D1 or appendix D2 to
adopt AHAM HLD–1 in its entirety in
this rulemaking. Consistent with its
2020 amendments to the Process Rule at
10 CFR part 430, subpart C, Appendix
A, DOE will, however, consider
adoption of AHAM HLD–1 in its
entirety in a subsequent rulemaking
prior to any rulemaking to consider
whether to amend the energy
conservation standards applicable to
clothes dryers.
As noted, the 2009 version of AHAM
HLD–1 has been certified as ANSI/
AHAM HLD–1–2010. ANSI certification
ensures that the standard has been
developed through a process that meets
ANSI’s requirements for openness,
balance, consensus, and other due
process safeguards.53 The certification
of AHAM HLD–1 as ANSI/AHAM HLD–
1–2010 does not result in any
substantive changes to the industry
standard. In this final rule, DOE is
updating the reference to AHAM HLD–
1 in appendix D1 and appendix D2 to
the 2010 version of ANSI/AHAM HLD–
1. This update to the most recent
version of AHAM HLD–1 does not result
in any changes to the clothes dryer test
procedures at appendix D1 and
appendix D2.
I. Effective and Compliance Dates
The effective date for the adopted test
procedure amendments will be 30 days
after publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. EPCA prescribes that
all representations of energy efficiency
and energy use, including those made
on marketing materials and product
labels, must be made in accordance with
an amended test procedure, beginning
180 days after publication of the final
rule in the Federal Register. (42 U.S.C.
6293(c)(2)) EPCA allows individual
manufacturers to petition DOE for an
extension of the 180-day period if the
manufacturer may experience undue
hardship in meeting the deadline. (42
U.S.C. 6293(c)(3)) To receive such an
extension, petitions must be filed with
DOE no later than 60 days before the
end of the 180-day period and must
detail how the manufacturer will
experience undue hardship. Id. To the
extent the modified test procedure
adopted in this final rule is required
53 More information on ANSI’s standards process
may be found at: www.ansi.org/standards_
activities/overview/overview?menuid=3.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56636
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
only for the evaluation and issuance of
updated efficiency standards,
compliance with the amended test
procedure does not require use of such
modified test procedure provisions until
the implementation date of updated
standards.
In addition, DOE amends the
introductory note in both appendix D1
and appendix D2 to remove reference to
the optional early use of the test
procedures before the compliance date
of the current clothes dryer energy
conservation standards, which was
January 1, 2015.
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory
Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) has determined that this test
procedure rulemaking is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order (‘‘E.O.’’)
12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993). Accordingly,
this action was not subject to review
under the E.O. by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(‘‘OIRA’’) in OMB.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
B. Review Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires preparation
of a final regulatory flexibility analysis
(‘‘FRFA’’) for any final rule where the
agency was first required by law to
publish a proposed rule for public
comment, unless the agency certifies
that the rule, if promulgated, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
As required by E.O. 13272, ‘‘Proper
Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,’’ 67 FR 53461
(August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003 to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the DOE
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990. DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of the General
Counsel’s website: https://energy.gov/
gc/office-general-counsel.
DOE reviewed this final rule under
the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the procedures and
policies published on February 19,
2003. DOE has concluded that this final
rule will not have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The factual basis for this
determination is as follows:
The Small Business Administration
(‘‘SBA’’) considers a business entity to
be a small business, if, together with its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
affiliates, it employs less than a
threshold number of workers or earns
less than the average annual receipts
specified in 13 CFR part 121. The
threshold values set forth in these
regulations use size standards and codes
established by the North American
Industry Classification System
(‘‘NAICS’’) that are available at:
www.sba.gov/document/support--tablesize-standards. The threshold number
for NAICS classification code 335220,
major household appliance
manufacturing, which includes clothes
dryer manufacturers, is 1,500
employees.
Most of the manufacturers supplying
clothes dryers are large multinational
corporations. DOE collected data from
DOE’s compliance certification
database 54 and surveyed the AHAM
member directory to identify
manufacturers of clothes dryers. DOE
then consulted publicly-available data,
purchased company reports from
vendors such as Dun and Bradstreet,
and contacted manufacturers, where
needed, to determine if they meet the
SBA’s definition of a ‘‘small business
manufacturing facility’’ and have their
manufacturing facilities located within
the United States. Based on this
analysis, DOE did not identify any small
businesses that manufacture clothes
dryers covered by the proposed test
procedure amendments.
Additionally, as described in section
III.G of this document, the amendments
proposed in this test procedure will not
increase costs to clothes dryer
manufacturers. Therefore, DOE
concludes that the cost effects accruing
from the final rule will not have a
‘‘significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,’’
and that the preparation of a FRFA is
not warranted. DOE has submitted a
certification and supporting statement
of factual basis to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for review under 5
U.S.C. 605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of clothes dryers must
certify to DOE that their products
comply with any applicable energy
conservation standards. To certify
compliance, manufacturers must first
obtain test data for their products
according to the DOE test procedures,
including any amendments adopted for
those test procedures. DOE has
established regulations for the
certification and recordkeeping
54 www.regulations.doe.gov/certification-data
(Last accessed February 2, 2019).
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
requirements for all covered consumer
products and commercial equipment,
including clothes dryers. (See generally
10 CFR part 429) The collection-ofinformation requirement for the
certification and recordkeeping is
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(‘‘PRA’’). This requirement has been
approved by OMB under OMB control
number 1910–1400. Public reporting
burden for the certification is estimated
to average 35 hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this final rule, DOE establishes test
procedure amendments that it expects
will be used to develop and implement
future energy conservation standards for
clothes dryers. DOE has determined that
this rule falls into a class of actions that
are categorically excluded from review
under the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) and DOE’s implementing
regulations at 10 CFR part 1021.
Specifically, DOE has determined that
adopting test procedures for measuring
energy efficiency of consumer products
and industrial equipment is consistent
with activities identified in 10 CFR part
1021, appendix A to subpart D, A5 and
A6. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
E.O. 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’ 64 FR
43255 (August 4, 1999), imposes certain
requirements on agencies formulating
and implementing policies or
regulations that preempt State law or
that have federalism implications. The
E.O. requires agencies to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. The E.O. also
requires agencies to have an accountable
process to ensure meaningful and timely
input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications. On March
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
14, 2000, DOE published a statement of
policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations. 65 FR
13735. DOE examined this final rule
and determined that it will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. EPCA governs and
prescribes Federal preemption of State
regulations as to energy conservation for
the products that are the subject of this
final rule. States can petition DOE for
exemption from such preemption to the
extent, and based on criteria, set forth in
EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d)) No further
action is required by E.O. 13132.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of E.O.
12988, ‘‘Civil Justice Reform,’’ 61 FR
4729 (Feb. 7, 1996), imposes on Federal
agencies the general duty to adhere to
the following requirements: (1)
Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity;
(2) write regulations to minimize
litigation; (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather
than a general standard; and (4) promote
simplification and burden reduction.
Section 3(b) of E.O. 12988 specifically
requires that executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation (1) clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of E.O. 12988
requires executive agencies to review
regulations in light of applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them. DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this final rule
meets the relevant standards of E.O.
12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (‘‘UMRA’’) requires
each Federal agency to assess the effects
of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and Tribal governments and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
private sector. Public Law 104–4, sec.
201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531). For a
regulatory action resulting in a rule that
may cause the expenditure by State,
local, and Tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section
202 of UMRA requires a Federal agency
to publish a written statement that
estimates the resulting costs, benefits,
and other effects on the national
economy. (2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The
UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit
timely input by elected officers of State,
local, and Tribal governments on a
proposed ‘‘significant intergovernmental
mandate,’’ and requires an agency plan
for giving notice and opportunity for
timely input to potentially affected
small governments before establishing
any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. On March 18, 1997, DOE
published a statement of policy on its
process for intergovernmental
consultation under UMRA. 62 FR
12820; also available at https://
energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel.
DOE examined this final rule according
to UMRA and its statement of policy
and determined that the rule contains
neither an intergovernmental mandate,
nor a mandate that may result in the
expenditure of $100 million or more in
any year, so these requirements do not
apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being. This
final rule will not have any impact on
the autonomy or integrity of the family
as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to
prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under E.O.
12630, ‘‘Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights’’ 53 FR 8859
(March 18, 1988), that this regulation
will not result in any takings that might
require compensation under the Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56637
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides
for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the
public under guidelines established by
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). Pursuant to OMB
Memorandum M–19–15, Improving
Implementation of the Information
Quality Act (April 24, 2019), DOE
published updated guidelines which are
available at www.energy.gov/sites/prod/
files/2019/12/f70/DOE%20Final
%20Updated%20IQA%20Guidelines
%20Dec%202019.pdf. DOE has
reviewed this final rule under the OMB
and DOE guidelines and has concluded
that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
E.O. 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,’’ 66
FR 28355 (May 22, 2001), requires
Federal agencies to prepare and submit
to OMB, a Statement of Energy Effects
for any significant energy action. A
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that (1)
is a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 12866, or any successor order; and
(2) is likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy; or (3) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant
energy action. For any significant energy
action, the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use if the
regulation is implemented, and of
reasonable alternatives to the action and
their expected benefits on energy
supply, distribution, and use.
This regulatory action is not a
significant regulatory action under E.O.
12866. Moreover, it will not have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy, nor has it
been designated as a significant energy
action by the Administrator of OIRA.
Therefore, it is not a significant energy
action, and, accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Review Under Section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
Under section 301 of the Department
of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95–
91; 42 U.S.C. 7101), DOE must comply
with section 32 of the Federal Energy
Administration Act of 1974, as amended
by the Federal Energy Administration
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56638
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Authorization Act of 1977. (15 U.S.C.
788; ‘‘FEAA’’) Section 32 essentially
provides in relevant part that, where a
proposed rule authorizes or requires use
of commercial standards, the notice of
proposed rulemaking must inform the
public of the use and background of
such standards. In addition, section
32(c) requires DOE to consult with the
Attorney General and the Chairman of
the FTC concerning the impact of the
commercial or industry standards on
competition.
The modifications to the test
procedure for clothes dryers adopted in
this final rule incorporates testing
methods contained in the following
commercial standards: AHAM HLD–1–
2010, IEC 62301 (Edition 2.0, 2011–01).
DOE has evaluated these standard and
is unable to conclude whether it fully
complies with the requirements of
section 32(b) of the FEAA (i.e., whether
it was developed in a manner that fully
provides for public participation,
comment, and review.) DOE has
consulted with both the Attorney
General and the Chairman of the FTC
about the impact on competition of
using the methods contained in these
standards and has received no
comments objecting to their use.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
M. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
report to Congress on the promulgation
of this rule before its effective date. The
report will state that it has been
determined that the rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
N. Description of Materials Incorporated
by Reference
In this final rule, DOE incorporates by
reference the industry standard
published by AHAM, titled ‘‘ANSI/
AHAM HLD–1–2010 (‘‘AHAM HLD–1–
2010’’), Household Tumble Type
Clothes Dryers, approved 2010’’ which
provides methods for testing and
evaluating performance (i.e., moisture
removal energy efficiency, drying time,
and clothing load temperatures) of home
laundry clothes drying equipment.
Copies of ANSI/AHAM HLD–1–2010
can be obtained from the Association of
Home Appliance Manufacturers at 1111
19th Street NW, Suite 402, Washington,
DC 20036, 202–872–5955, or go to
www.aham.org. Specifically, the test
procedure codified by this final rule
references section 3.3.5.1 ‘‘Standard
Simulator’’ of AHAM HLD–1–2010,
which provides specifications for an
exhaust simulator.
In this final rule DOE maintains the
incorporation by reference to a test
procedure published by IEC, titled IEC
62301, ‘‘Household electrical
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
appliances-Measurement of standby
power’’, (Edition 2.0, 2011–01) (‘‘IEC
62301’’). Copies of IEC 62301 can be
obtained from the International
Electrotechnical Commission webstore,
by going to https://webstore.iec.ch.
Specifically, the test procedure codified
by this final rule references Section 5,
Paragraph 5.1 ‘‘General,’’ Note 1 and
Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 ‘‘Sampling
Method’’ of IEC 62301, which provides
test conditions, testing equipment, and
methods for measuring standby mode
and off mode power consumption.
V. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this final rule.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 429
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation,
Household appliances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation,
Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on October 1, 2021,
by Kelly Speakes-Backman, Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary and Acting
Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 1,
2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DOE amends parts 429 and
430 of chapter II of title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
PART 429—CERTIFICATION,
COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT
FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
EQUIPMENT
1. The authority citation for part 429
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6317; 28 U.S.C.
2461 note.
2. Section 429.21 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(2) and adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 429.21
Residential clothes dryers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a
certification report shall include the
following public product-specific
information: When using appendix D1
to subpart B of part 430 of this chapter,
the combined energy factor in pounds
per kilowatt hours (lb/kWh), the
capacity in cubic feet (cu ft), the voltage
in volts (V) (for electric dryers only), an
indication if the dryer has automatic
termination controls, and the hourly Btu
rating of the burner (for gas dryers only);
when using appendix D2 to subpart B of
part 430, the combined energy factor in
pounds per kilowatt hours (lb/kWh), the
capacity in cubic feet (cu ft), the voltage
in volts (V) (for electric dryers only), an
indication if the dryer has automatic
termination controls, the hourly Btu
rating of the burner (for gas dryers only),
and a list of the cycle setting selections
for the energy test cycle as recorded in
section 3.4.7 of appendix D2 to subpart
B of part 430.
(c) Reported values. Values reported
pursuant to this section must be
rounded as follows: CEF to the nearest
0.01 lb/kWh, capacity to the nearest 0.1
cu ft, voltage to the nearest V, and
hourly Btu rating to the nearest Btu.
PART 430—ENERGY CONSERVATION
PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS
3. The authority citation for part 430
continues read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291–6309; 28 U.S.C.
2461 note.
4. Section 430.3 is amended by
revising paragraph (i)(3) to read as
follows:
■
§ 430.3 Materials incorporated by
reference.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(3) ANSI/AHAM HLD–1–2010
(‘‘AHAM HLD–1’’), Household Tumble
Type Clothes Dryers, ANSI-approved
June 11, 2010, IBR approved for
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
appendices D1 and D2 to subpart B of
this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 430.23 is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 430.23 Test procedures for the
measurement of energy and water
consumption.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Clothes dryers. (1) The estimated
annual energy consumption for clothes
dryers, expressed in kilowatt-hours per
year, shall be the product of the annual
representative average number of
clothes dryer cycles as specified in
appendix D1 or D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate, and the per-cycle combined
total energy consumption in kilowatthours per cycle, determined according
to section 4.6 of appendix D1 or section
4.6 of appendix D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate.
(2) The estimated annual operating
cost for clothes dryers shall be—
(i) For an electric clothes dryer, the
product of the following three factors,
with the resulting product then being
rounded off to the nearest dollar per
year:
(A) The annual representative average
number of clothes dryer cycles as
specified in appendix D1 or appendix
D2 to this subpart, as appropriate;
(B) The per-cycle combined total
energy consumption in kilowatt-hours
per cycle, determined according to
section 4.6 of appendix D1 or section
4.6 of appendix D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate; and
(C) The representative average unit
cost of electrical energy in dollars per
kilowatt-hour as provided by the
Secretary; and
(ii) For a gas clothes dryer, the
product of the annual representative
average number of clothes dryer cycles
as specified in appendix D1 or D2 to
this subpart, as appropriate, times the
sum of the following three factors, with
the resulting product then being
rounded off to the nearest dollar per
year:
(A) The product of the per-cycle gas
dryer electric energy consumption in
kilowatt-hours per cycle, determined
according to section 4.2 of appendix D1
or section 4.2 of appendix D2 to this
subpart, as appropriate, times the
representative average unit cost of
electrical energy in dollars per kilowatthour as provided by the Secretary; plus,
(B) The product of the per-cycle gas
dryer gas energy consumption, in Btus
per cycle, determined according to
section 4.3 of appendix D1 or section
4.3 of appendix D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate, times the representative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
average unit cost for natural gas or
propane, as appropriate, in dollars per
Btu as provided by the Secretary; plus,
(C) The product of the per-cycle
standby mode and off mode energy
consumption in kilowatt-hours per
cycle, determined according to section
4.5 of appendix D1 or section 4.5 of
appendix D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate, times the representative
average unit cost of electrical energy in
dollars per kilowatt-hour as provided by
the Secretary.
(3) The combined energy factor,
expressed in pounds per kilowatt-hour
is determined in accordance with
section 4.7 of appendix D1 or section
4.7 of appendix D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate, the result then being
rounded off to the nearest hundredth
(0.01).
(4) Other useful measures of energy
consumption for clothes dryers shall be
those measures of energy consumption
for clothes dryers which the Secretary
determines are likely to assist
consumers in making purchasing
decisions and which are derived from
the application of appendix D1 or D2 to
this subpart, as appropriate.
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 430—
[Removed]
6. Appendix D to subpart B of part 430
is removed.
■ 7. Appendix D1 to subpart B of part
430 is amended by:
■ a. Revising the introductory note;
■ b. Adding section 0;
■ c. Revising section 1.3;
■ d. Removing the word ‘‘clothes’’, in
section 1.5, and adding in its place
‘‘cloths’’;
■ e. Removing sections 1.7 and 1.14;
■ f. Redesignating sections 1.8 through
1.11 as sections 1.7 through 1.10,
respectively, and section 1.13 as section
1.14;
■ g. Adding new sections 1.11 and 1.13;
■ h. Revising section 1.18;
■ i. Revising the first sentence of section
2.1.1 and revising section 2.1.2;
■ j. Revising the first sentence of section
2.1.3;
■ k. Revising sections 2.2.1, 2.3.2.1, and
2.3.2.2;
■ l. Adding section 2.3.2.3;
■ m. Redesignating section 2.4.1 as
section 2.4.1.1;
■ n. Adding new section 2.4.1;
■ o. Revising newly redesignated
2.4.1.1;
■ p. Removing the word ‘‘Clothes’’, in
section 2.6, and adding in its place
‘‘Cloths’’;
■ q. Revising sections 2.7.1, 2.7.2, and
2.8.1;
■
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56639
r. In section 3.1, in the last sentence
of the introductory text, adding the text
‘‘to the nearest 0.1 cubic foot’’ following
the text ‘‘is calculated’’;
■ s. Revising sections 3.3, 3.4.1, 3.4.2,
3.4.3, 3.6, 3.6.1, and 3.6.2;
■ t. Adding sections 3.6.3 and 3.6.4;
■ u. Revising sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, and
4.5;
■ v. Removing section 4.7; and
■ w. Redesignating section 4.8 as
section 4.7.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
Appendix D1 to Subpart B of Part 430—
Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Clothes Dryers
Note: The procedures in either this
appendix or appendix D2 to this subpart
must be used to determine compliance with
energy conservation standards for clothes
dryers manufactured on or after January 1,
2015. Manufacturers must use a single
appendix for all representations, including
certifications of compliance, and may not use
this appendix for certain representations and
appendix D2 to this subpart for other
representations.
0. Incorporation by Reference
DOE incorporated by reference in § 430.3
the standards for AHAM HLD–1 and IEC
62301, in their entirety, however, only
enumerated provisions of those documents
are applicable to this appendix. In cases
where there is a conflict between any
industry standard(s) and this appendix, the
language of the test procedure in this
appendix takes precedence over the industry
standard(s).
(1) AHAM HLD–1:
(i) Section 3.3.5.1 ‘‘Standard Simulator’’ as
referenced in sections 2.1.2 through 2.1.3 of
this appendix.
(ii) [Reserved]
(2) IEC 62301:
(i) Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, Note 1 as
referenced in section 3.6.2 of this appendix.
(ii) Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 ‘‘Sampling
Method’’ as referenced in section 3.6.3 of this
appendix.
1. * * *
1.3 ‘‘AHAM HLD–1’’ means the test
standard published by the Association of
Home Appliance Manufacturers, titled
‘‘Household Tumble Type Clothes Dryers,’’
ANSI-approved June 11, 2010, ANSI/AHAM
HLD–1–2010.
*
*
*
*
*
1.11 ‘‘Final moisture content’’ (‘‘FMC’’)
means the ratio of the weight of water
contained by the dry test load (i.e., after
completion of the drying cycle) to the bonedry weight of the test load, expressed as a
percent.
*
*
*
*
*
1.13 ‘‘Initial moisture content’’ (‘‘IMC’’)
means the ratio of the weight of water
contained by the damp test load (i.e., prior
to completion of the drying cycle) to the
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56640
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
bone-dry weight of the test load, expressed as
a percent.
*
*
*
*
*
1.18 ‘‘Vented clothes dryer’’ means a
clothes dryer that exhausts the evaporated
moisture from the cabinet.
*
*
*
*
*
2. * * *
2.1.1 * * * For both vented clothes dryers
and ventless clothes dryers, install the
clothes dryer in accordance with
manufacturer’s instructions as shipped with
the unit. * * *
2.1.2 Vented clothes dryers. For vented
clothes dryers, the dryer exhaust shall be
restricted by adding the AHAM exhaust
simulator described in section 3.3.5.1 of
AHAM HLD–1.
2.1.3 * * * For ventless clothes dryers,
the dryer shall be tested without the AHAM
exhaust simulator. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
2.2.1 For drying testing, maintain the
room ambient air temperature at 75 ±3 °F and
the room relative humidity at 50 percent ±10
percent relative humidity.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
*
*
*
*
2.4.1 Weighing scales.
2.4.1.1 Weighing scale for test cloth. The
scale shall have a range of 0 to a maximum
of 60 pounds with a resolution of at least
0.001 pounds and a maximum error no
greater than 0.1 percent of any measured
value within the range of 3 to 15 pounds.
*
*
*
*
*
2.7.1 Load size. Determine the load size
for the unit under test, according to Table 1
of this section.
TABLE 1—TEST LOADS
*
2.3.2.1 Natural gas supply. Maintain the
gas supply to the clothes dryer immediately
ahead of all controls at a pressure of 7 to 10
inches of water column. The natural gas
supplied should have a heating value of
approximately 1,025 Btus per standard cubic
foot. The actual heating value, Hn2, in Btus
per standard cubic foot, for the natural gas to
be used in the test shall be obtained either
from measurements using a standard
continuous flow calorimeter as described in
section 2.4.6 of this appendix or by the
purchase of bottled natural gas whose Btu
rating is certified to be at least as accurate a
rating as could be obtained from
measurements with a standard continuous
flow calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6
of this appendix.
2.3.2.2 Propane gas supply. Maintain the
gas supply to the clothes dryer immediately
ahead of all controls at a pressure of 11 to
13 inches of water column. The propane gas
supplied should have a heating value of
approximately 2,500 Btus per standard cubic
foot. The actual heating value, Hp, in Btus per
standard cubic foot, for the propane gas to be
used in the test shall be obtained either from
measurements using a standard continuous
flow calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6
of this appendix or by the purchase of bottled
gas whose Btu rating is certified to be at least
as accurate a rating as could be obtained from
measurement with a standard continuous
calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6 of
this appendix.
2.3.2.3 Hourly Btu Rating. Maintain the
hourly Btu rating of the burner within ±5
percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer. If the hourly Btu rating of the
burner cannot be maintained within ±5
percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer, make adjustments in the
following order until an hourly Btu rating of
the burner within ±5 percent of the rating
specified by the manufacturer is achieved:
(1) Modify the gas inlet supply pressure
within the allowable range specified in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
section 2.3.2.1 or 2.3.2.2 of this appendix, as
applicable;
(2) If the clothes dryer is equipped with a
gas pressure regulator, modify the outlet
pressure of the gas pressure regulator within
±10 percent of the value recommended by the
manufacturer in the installation manual, on
the nameplate sticker, or wherever the
manufacturer makes such a recommendation
for the basic model; and
(3) Modify the orifice as necessary to
achieve the required hourly Btu rating.
Test load
(bone dry weight)
Unit under test
Standard size clothes
dryer.
Compact size clothes
dryer.
8.45 pounds ± .085
pounds.
3.00 pounds ± .03
pounds.
Each test load must consist of energy test
cloths and no more than five energy stuffer
cloths.
2.7.2 Test load preparation. Dampen the
load by agitating it in water whose
temperature is 60 °F ± 5 °F and consists of 0
to 17 parts per million hardness for
approximately 2 minutes in order to saturate
the fabric. Then, extract water from the wet
test load by spinning the load to a target
moisture content between 54.0–61.0 percent
of the bone-dry weight of the test load. If after
extraction the moisture content is less than
54.0 percent, make a final mass adjustment,
such that the moisture content is between
54.0–61.0 percent of the bone-dry weight of
the test load, by adding water uniformly
distributed among all of the test cloths in a
very fine spray using a spray bottle.
*
*
*
*
*
2.8.1 Vented clothes dryers. For vented
clothes dryers, before any test cycle, operate
the dryer without a test load in the non-heat
mode for 15 minutes or until the discharge
air temperature is varying less than 1 °F for
10 minutes—whichever is longer—in the test
installation location with the ambient
conditions within the specified test condition
tolerances of section 2.2 of this appendix.
*
*
*
*
*
3. * * *
3.3 Test cycle. Operate the clothes dryer
at the maximum temperature setting and, if
equipped with a timer, at the maximum time
setting. Any other optional cycle settings that
do not affect the temperature or time settings
shall be tested in the as-shipped position,
except that if the clothes dryer has network
capabilities, the network settings must be
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
disabled throughout testing if such settings
can be disabled by the end-user and the
product’s user manual provides instructions
on how to do so. If the network settings
cannot be disabled by the end-user, or the
product’s user manual does not provide
instruction for disabling network settings,
then the unit must be tested with the network
settings in the factory default configuration
for the test cycle. If the clothes dryer does not
have a separate temperature setting selection
on the control panel, the maximum time
setting should be used for the drying test
cycle. Dry the load until the moisture content
of the test load is between 2.5 and 5.0 percent
of the bone-dry weight of the test load, at
which point the test cycle is stopped, but do
not permit the dryer to advance into cool
down. If required, reset the timer to increase
the length of the drying cycle. After stopping
the test cycle, remove and weigh the test load
within 5 minutes following termination of
the test cycle. The clothes dryer shall not be
stopped intermittently in the middle of the
test cycle for any reason. Record the data
specified by section 3.4 of this appendix. If
the dryer automatically stops during a cycle
because the condensation box is full of water,
the test is stopped, and the test run is invalid,
in which case the condensation box shall be
emptied and the test re-run from the
beginning. For ventless clothes dryers, during
the time between two cycles, the door of the
dryer shall be closed except for loading and
unloading.
*
*
*
*
*
3.4.1
Bone-dry weight of the test load,
Wbonedry, as described in section 2.7.1 of this
appendix.
3.4.2 Moisture content of the wet test
load before the test, IMC, as described in
section 2.7.2 of this appendix.
3.4.3 Moisture content of the dry test load
obtained after the test, FMC, as described in
section 3.3 of this appendix.
*
*
*
*
*
3.6 Standby mode and off mode power.
Connect the clothes dryer to a watt meter as
specified in section 2.4.7 of this appendix.
Establish the testing conditions set forth in
section 2 of this appendix.
3.6.1 Perform standby mode and off mode
testing after completion of an active mode
drying cycle included as part of the test
cycle; after removing the test load; without
changing the control panel settings used for
the active mode drying cycle; with the door
closed; and without disconnecting the
electrical energy supply to the clothes dryer
between completion of the active mode
drying cycle and the start of standby mode
and off mode testing.
3.6.2 For clothes dryers that take some
time to automatically enter a stable inactive
mode or off mode state from a higher power
state as discussed in Section 5, Paragraph 5.1,
Note 1 of IEC 62301, allow sufficient time for
the clothes dryer to automatically reach the
default inactive/off mode state before
proceeding with the test measurement.
3.6.3 Once the stable inactive/off mode
state has been reached, measure and record
the default inactive/off mode power, Pdefault,
in watts, following the test procedure for the
sampling method specified in Section 5,
Paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC 62301.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
3.6.4 For a clothes dryer with a switch (or
other means) that can be optionally selected
by the end user to achieve a lower-power
inactive/off mode state than the default
inactive/off mode state measured in section
3.6.3 of this appendix, after performing the
measurement in section 3.6.3 of this
appendix, activate the switch (or other
means) to the position resulting in the lowest
power consumption and repeat the
measurement procedure described in section
3.6.3 of this appendix. Measure and record
the lowest inactive/off mode power, Plowest, in
watts.
4. * * *
4.1 Total per-cycle electric dryer energy
consumption. Calculate the total electric
dryer energy consumption per cycle, Ece,
expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle and
defined as:
Ece = [53.5/(IMC ¥ FMC)] × Et × field use,
Where:
Et = the energy recorded in section 3.4.5 of
this appendix.
53.5 = an experimentally established value
for the percent reduction in the moisture
content of the test load during a
laboratory test cycle expressed as a
percent.
field use = field use factor,
= 1.18 for clothes dryers with time
termination control systems only
without any automatic termination
control functions.
= 1.04 for clothes dryers with automatic
control systems that meet the
requirements of the definition for
automatic termination control in section
1.4 of this appendix, including those that
also have a supplementary timer control,
or that may also be manually controlled.
IMC = the moisture content of the wet test
load as recorded in section 3.4.2 of this
appendix.
FMC = the moisture content of the dry test
load as recorded in section 3.4.3 of this
appendix.
4.2 Per-cycle gas dryer electrical energy
consumption. Calculate the gas dryer
electrical energy consumption per cycle, Ege,
expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle and
defined as:
Ege = [53.5/(IMC ¥ FMC)] × Ete × field use,
Where:
Ete = the energy recorded in section 3.4.6.1
of this appendix.
field use, 53.5, MCw, and MCd as defined in
section 4.1 of this appendix.
4.3 Per-cycle gas dryer gas energy
consumption. Calculate the gas dryer gas
energy consumption per cycle, Egg, expressed
in Btus per cycle and defined as:
Egg = [53.5/(MCw ¥ MCd)] × Etg × field use
× GEF
Where:
Etg = the energy recorded in section 3.4.6.2
of this appendix.
GEF = corrected gas heat value (Btu per cubic
feet) as defined in section 3.4.6.3 of this
appendix.
field use, 53.5, IMC, and FMC as defined in
section 4.1 of this appendix.
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
4.5 Per-cycle standby mode and off mode
energy consumption. Calculate the clothes
dryer per-cycle standby mode and off mode
energy consumption, ETSO, expressed in
kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined as:
ETSO = [(Pdefault × Sdefault) + (Plowest × Slowest)]
× K/283
Where:
Pdefault = Default inactive/off mode power, in
watts, as measured in section 3.6.3 of
this appendix.
Plowest = Lowest inactive/off mode power, in
watts, as measured in section 3.6.4 of
this appendix for clothes dryer with a
switch (or other means) that can be
optionally selected by the end user to
achieve a lower-power inactive/off mode
than the default inactive/off mode;
otherwise, Plowest=0.
Sdefault = Annual hours in default inactive/off
mode, defined as 8,620 if no optional
lowest-power inactive/off mode is
available; otherwise 4,310.
Slowest = Annual hours in lowest-power
inactive/off mode, defined as 0 if no
optional lowest-power inactive/off mode
is available; otherwise 4,310.
K = Conversion factor of watt-hours to
kilowatt-hours = 0.001.
283 = Representative average number of
clothes dryer cycles in a year.
8,620 = Combined annual hours for inactive
and off mode.
4,310 = One-half of the combined annual
hours for inactive and off mode.
*
*
*
*
*
8. Appendix D2 to subpart B of part
430 is amended by:
■ a. Revising the introductory note;
■ b. Adding section 0;
■ c. Revising section 1.3;
■ d. Removing the word ‘‘clothes’’, in
section 1.6, and adding in its place
‘‘cloths’’;
■ e. Removing sections 1.8, 1.15, and
1.19;
■ f. Redesignating sections 1.9 through
1.11 as sections 1.8 through 1.10,
sections 1.13 and 1.14 as sections 1.14
and 1.15, and section 1.20 as section
1.19;
■ g. Adding new sections 1.11, 1.13, and
1.20;
■ h. Removing the word ‘‘clasification’’,
in section 1.16, and adding in its place
‘‘classification’’;
■ i. Revising the first sentence of section
2.1.1 and revising section 2.1.2;
■ j. Revising the first sentence of section
2.1.3;
■ k. Revising sections 2.2.1, 2.3.2.1, and
2.3.2.2;
■ l. Adding section 2.3.2.3;
■ m. Redesignating section 2.4.1 as
section 2.4.1.1;
■ n. Adding new section 2.4.1;
■ o. Revising newly redesignated
2.4.1.1;
■ p. Revising sections 2.7.1, 2.7.2, and
2.8.1;
■ q. In section 3.1, in the last sentence
of the introductory text, adding the text
■
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56641
‘‘to the nearest 0.1 cubic foot’’ following
the text ‘‘is calculated’’;
■ r. Revising sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.4.1,
3.4.2, and 3.4.3;
■ s. Removing section 3.5;
■ t. Redesignating sections 3.6, 3.6.1,
and 3.6.2 as sections 3.5, 3.5.1, and
3.5.2, respectively;
■ u. Revising newly redesignated
sections 3.5, 3.5.1, and 3.5.2;
■ v. Adding sections 3.5.3 and 3.5.4;
■ w. Revising sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4,
and 4.5;
■ x. Adding section 4.5.1;
■ y. Removing section 4.7; and
■ z. Redesignating section 4.8 as section
4.7.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Appendix D2 to Subpart B of Part 430—
Uniform Test Method for Measuring the
Energy Consumption of Clothes Dryer
Note: The procedures in either appendix
D1 to this subpart or this appendix must be
used to determine compliance with energy
conservation standards for clothes dryers
manufactured on or after January 1, 2015.
Manufacturers must use a single appendix for
all representations, including certifications of
compliance, and may not use appendix D1 to
this subpart for certain representations and
this appendix for other representations. Percycle standby mode and off mode energy
consumption in section 4.5 of this appendix
is calculated using the value for the annual
representative average number of clothes
dryer cycles in a year specified in section
4.5.1(a) of this appendix until the compliance
date of any amended energy conservation
standards for these products. Beginning on
the compliance date of any amended energy
conservation standards for these products
per-cycle standby mode and off mode energy
consumption in section 4.5 of this appendix
is calculated using the value for the annual
representative average number of clothes
dryer cycles in a year specified in section
4.5.1(b) of this appendix.
0. Incorporation by Reference
DOE incorporated by reference in § 430.3
the entire standard for AHAM HLD–1 and
IEC 62301, however, only enumerated
provisions of those documents are applicable
to this appendix. In cases where there is a
conflict between any industry standard(s)
and this appendix, the language of the test
procedure in this appendix takes precedence
over the industry standard(s).
(1) AHAM HLD–1:
(i) Section 3.3.5.1 ‘‘Standard Simulator’’ as
referenced in sections 2.1.2 through 2.1.3 of
this appendix.
(ii) [Reserved]
(2) IEC 62301:
(i) Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, Note 1 as
referenced in section 3.5.2 of this appendix.
(ii) Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 ‘‘Sampling
Method’’ as referenced in section 3.5.3 of this
appendix.
*
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
*
*
08OCR2
*
*
56642
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
1. * * *
1.3 ‘‘AHAM HLD–1’’ means the test
standard published by the Association of
Home Appliance Manufacturers, titled
‘‘Household Tumble Type Clothes Dryers,’’
ANSI-approved June 11, 2010, ANSI/AHAM
HLD–1–2010.
*
*
*
*
*
1.11 ‘‘Final moisture content’’ (‘‘FMC’’)
means the ratio of the weight of water
contained by the dry test load (i.e., after
completion of the drying cycle) to the bonedry weight of the test load, expressed as a
percent.
*
*
*
*
*
1.13 ‘‘Initial moisture content’’ (‘‘IMC’’)
means the ratio of the weight of water
contained by the damp test load (i.e., prior
to completion of the drying cycle) to the
bone-dry weight of the test load, expressed as
a percent.
*
*
*
*
*
1.20 ‘‘Vented clothes dryer’’ means a
clothes dryer that exhausts the evaporated
moisture from the cabinet.
*
*
*
*
*
2. * * *
2.1.1 * * * For both vented clothes
dryers and ventless clothes dryers, install the
clothes dryer in accordance with
manufacturer’s instructions as shipped with
the unit. * * *
2.1.2 Vented clothes dryers. For vented
clothes dryers, the dryer exhaust shall be
restricted by adding the AHAM exhaust
simulator described in section 3.3.5.1 of
AHAM HLD–1.
2.1.3 * * * For ventless clothes dryers,
the dryer shall be tested without the AHAM
exhaust simulator. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
2.2.1 For drying testing, maintain the
room ambient air temperature at 75 ±3 F and
the room relative humidity at 50 percent ±10
percent relative humidity.
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
*
*
*
*
2.4.1 Weighing scales.
2.4.1.1 Weighing scale for test cloth. The
scale shall have a range of 0 to a maximum
of 60 pounds with a resolution of at least
0.001 pounds and a maximum error no
greater than 0.1 percent of any measured
value within the range of 3 to 15 pounds.
*
*
*
*
*
2.7.1 Load size. Determine the load size
for the unit under test, according to Table 1
of this section.
TABLE 1—TEST LOADS
*
2.3.2.1 Natural gas supply. Maintain the
gas supply to the clothes dryer immediately
ahead of all controls at a pressure of 7 to 10
inches of water column. The natural gas
supplied should have a heating value of
approximately 1,025 Btus per standard cubic
foot. The actual heating value, Hn2, in Btus
per standard cubic foot, for the natural gas to
be used in the test shall be obtained either
from measurements using a standard
continuous flow calorimeter as described in
section 2.4.6 of this appendix or by the
purchase of bottled natural gas whose Btu
rating is certified to be at least as accurate a
rating as could be obtained from
measurements with a standard continuous
flow calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6
of this appendix.
2.3.2.2 Propane gas supply. Maintain the
gas supply to the clothes dryer immediately
ahead of all controls at a pressure of 11 to
13 inches of water column. The propane gas
supplied should have a heating value of
approximately 2,500 Btus per standard cubic
foot. The actual heating value, Hp, in Btus per
standard cubic foot, for the propane gas to be
used in the test shall be obtained either from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
measurements using a standard continuous
flow calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6
of this appendix or by the purchase of bottled
gas whose Btu rating is certified to be at least
as accurate a rating as could be obtained from
measurement with a standard continuous
calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6 of
this appendix.
2.3.2.3 Hourly Btu Rating. Maintain the
hourly Btu rating of the burner within ±5
percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer. If the hourly Btu rating of the
burner cannot be maintained within ±5
percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer, make adjustments in the
following order until an hourly Btu rating of
the burner within ±5 percent of the rating
specified by the manufacturer is achieved:
(1) Modify the gas inlet supply pressure
within the allowable range specified in
section 2.3.2.1 or 2.3.2.2 of this appendix, as
applicable;
(2) If the clothes dryer is equipped with a
gas pressure regulator, modify the outlet
pressure of the gas pressure regulator within
±10 percent of the value recommended by the
manufacturer in the installation manual, on
the nameplate sticker, or wherever the
manufacturer makes such a recommendation
for the basic model; and
(3) Modify the orifice as necessary to
achieve the required hourly Btu rating.
Test load
(bone dry weight)
Unit under test
Standard size clothes
dryer.
Compact size clothes
dryer.
8.45 pounds ± .085
pounds.
3.00 pounds ± .03
pounds.
Each test load must consist of energy test
cloths and no more than five energy stuffer
cloths.
2.7.2 Test load preparation. Dampen the
load by agitating it in water whose
temperature is 60 °F ±5 °F and consists of 0
to 17 parts per million hardness for
approximately 2 minutes to saturate the
fabric. Then, extract water from the wet test
load by spinning the load until the moisture
content of the load is between 52.5 and 57.5
percent of the bone-dry weight of the test
load. Make a final mass adjustment, such that
the moisture content is 57.5 percent ±0.33
percent by adding water uniformly
distributed among all of the test cloths in a
very fine spray using a spray bottle.
*
*
*
*
*
2.8.1 Vented clothes dryers. For vented
clothes dryers, before any test cycle, operate
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the dryer without a test load in the non-heat
mode for 15 minutes or until the discharge
air temperature is varying less than 1 °F for
10 minutes—whichever is longer—in the test
installation location with the ambient
conditions within the specified test condition
tolerances of section 2.2 of this appendix.
*
*
*
*
*
3. * * *
3.3.1 Timer dryers. For timer dryers,
operate the clothes dryer at the maximum
temperature setting and, if equipped with a
timer, at the maximum time setting. Any
other optional cycle settings that do not affect
the temperature or time settings shall be
tested in the as-shipped position, except that
if the clothes dryer has network capabilities,
the network settings must be disabled
throughout testing if such settings can be
disabled by the end-user and the product’s
user manual provides instructions on how to
do so. If the network settings cannot be
disabled by the end-user, or the product’s
user manual does not provide instruction for
disabling network settings, then the unit
must be tested with the network settings in
the factory default configuration for the test
cycle. If the clothes dryer does not have a
separate temperature setting selection on the
control panel, the maximum time setting
should be used for the drying test cycle. Dry
the load until the moisture content of the test
load is between 1 and 2.5 percent of the
bone-dry weight of the test load, at which
point the test cycle is stopped, but do not
permit the dryer to advance into cool down.
If required, reset the timer to increase the
length of the drying cycle. After stopping the
test cycle, remove and weigh the test load
within 5 minutes following termination of
the test cycle. The clothes dryer shall not be
stopped intermittently in the middle of the
test cycle for any reason. Record the data
specified by section 3.4 of this appendix. If
the dryer automatically stops during a cycle
because the condensation box is full of water,
the test is stopped, and the test run is invalid,
in which case the condensation box shall be
emptied and the test re-run from the
beginning. For ventless clothes dryers, during
the time between two cycles, the door of the
dryer shall be closed except for loading and
unloading.
3.3.2 Automatic termination control
dryers. For automatic termination control
dryers, a ‘‘normal’’ program shall be selected
for the test cycle. For dryers that do not have
a ‘‘normal’’ program, the cycle recommended
by the manufacturer for drying cotton or
linen clothes shall be selected. Where the
drying temperature setting can be chosen
independently of the program, it shall be set
to the maximum. Where the dryness level
setting can be chosen independently of the
program, it shall be set to the ‘‘normal’’ or
‘‘medium’’ dryness level setting. If such
designation is not provided, then the dryness
level shall be set at the mid-point between
the minimum and maximum settings. If an
even number of discrete settings are
provided, use the next-highest setting above
the midpoint, in the direction of the
maximum dryness setting or next-lowest
setting below the midpoint, in the direction
of the minimum dryness setting. Any other
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
optional cycle settings that do not affect the
program, temperature or dryness settings
shall be tested in the as-shipped position,
except that if the clothes dryer has network
capabilities, the network settings must be
disabled throughout testing if such settings
can be disabled by the end-user and the
product’s user manual provides instructions
on how to do so. If the network settings
cannot be disabled by the end-user, or the
product’s user manual does not provide
instruction for disabling network settings,
then the unit must be tested with the network
settings in the factory default configuration
for the test cycle.
Operate the clothes dryer until the
completion of the programmed cycle,
including the cool down period. The cycle
shall be considered complete when the dryer
indicates to the user that the cycle has
finished (by means of a display, indicator
light, audible signal, or other signal) and the
heater and drum/fan motor shuts off for the
final time. If the clothes dryer is equipped
with a wrinkle prevention mode (i.e., that
continuously or intermittently tumbles the
clothes dryer drum after the clothes dryer
indicates to the user that the cycle has
finished) that is activated by default in the
as-shipped position or if manufacturers’
instructions specify that the feature is
recommended to be activated for normal use,
the cycle shall be considered complete after
the end of the wrinkle prevention mode.
After the completion of the test cycle, remove
and weigh the test load within 5 minutes
following termination of the test cycle.
Record the data specified in section 3.4 of
this appendix. If the final moisture content
is greater than 2 percent, the results from the
test are invalid and a second run must be
conducted. Conduct the second run of the
test on the unit using the highest dryness
level setting. If, on this second run, the dryer
does not achieve a final moisture content of
2 percent or lower, the dryer has not
sufficiently dried the clothes and the test
results may not be used for certification of
compliance with energy conservation
standards. If the dryer automatically stops
during a cycle because the condensation box
is full of water, the test is stopped, and the
test run is invalid, in which case the
condensation box shall be emptied and the
test re-run from the beginning. For ventless
clothes dryers, during the time between two
cycles, the door of the dryer shall be closed
except for loading and unloading.
*
*
*
*
*
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
3.4.1 Bone-dry weight of the test load,
Wbonedry, as described in section 2.7.1 of this
appendix.
3.4.2 Moisture content of the wet test load
before the test, IMC, as described in section
2.7.2 of this appendix.
3.4.3 Moisture content of the dry test load
obtained after the test, FMC, as described in
section 3.3 of this appendix.
*
*
*
*
*
3.5 Standby mode and off mode power.
Connect the clothes dryer to a watt meter as
specified in section 2.4.7 of this appendix.
Establish the testing conditions set forth in
section 2 of this appendix.
3.5.1 Perform standby mode and off mode
testing after completion of an active mode
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
drying cycle included as part of the test
cycle; after removing the test load; without
changing the control panel settings used for
the active mode drying cycle; with the door
closed; and without disconnecting the
electrical energy supply to the clothes dryer
between completion of the active mode
drying cycle and the start of standby mode
and off mode testing.
3.5.2 For clothes dryers that take some
time to automatically enter a stable inactive
mode or off mode state from a higher power
state as discussed in Section 5, Paragraph 5.1,
Note 1 of IEC 62301, allow sufficient time for
the clothes dryer to automatically reach the
default inactive/off mode state before
proceeding with the test measurement.
3.5.3 Once the stable inactive/off mode
state has been reached, measure and record
the default inactive/off mode power, Pdefault,
in watts, following the test procedure for the
sampling method specified in Section 5,
Paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC 62301.
3.5.4 For a clothes dryer with a switch (or
other means) that can be optionally selected
by the end user to achieve a lower-power
inactive/off mode state than the default
inactive/off mode state measured in section
3.5.3 of this appendix, after performing the
measurement in section 3.5.3 of this
appendix, activate the switch (or other
means) to the position resulting in the lowest
power consumption and repeat the
measurement procedure described in section
3.5.3 of this appendix. Measure and record
the lowest inactive/off mode power, Plowest, in
watts.
4. * * *
4.1 Total per-cycle electric dryer energy
consumption. Calculate the total per-cycle
electric dryer energy consumption required
to achieve a final moisture content of 2
percent or less, Ece, expressed in kilowatthours per cycle and defined as:
Ece = Et,
for automatic termination control dryers,
and,
Ece = [55.5/(IMC¥FMC)] × Et × field use,
for timer dryers
Where:
55.5 = an experimentally established value
for the percent reduction in the moisture
content of the test load during a
laboratory test cycle expressed as a
percent.
Et = the energy recorded in section 3.4.5 of
this appendix.
field use = 1.18, the field use factor for
clothes dryers with time termination
control systems only without any
automatic termination control functions.
IMC = the moisture content of the wet test
load as recorded in section 3.4.2 of this
appendix.
FMC = the moisture content of the dry test
load as recorded in section 3.4.3 of this
appendix.
4.2 Per-cycle gas dryer electrical energy
consumption. Calculate the per-cycle gas
dryer electrical energy consumption required
to achieve a final moisture content of 2
percent or less, Ege, expressed in kilowatthours per cycle and defined as:
Ege = Ete,
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
56643
for automatic termination control dryers,
and,
Ege = [55.5/(IMC¥FMC)] × Ete × field use,
for timer dryers
Where:
Ete = the energy recorded in section 3.4.6.1
of this appendix.
field use, 55.5, IMC, and FMC as defined in
section 4.1 of this appendix.
4.3 Per-cycle gas dryer gas energy
consumption. Calculate the per-cycle gas
dryer gas energy consumption required to
achieve a final moisture content of 2 percent
or less, Egg, expressed in Btus per cycle and
defined as:
Egg = Etg × GEF
for automatic termination control dryers,
and,
Egg = [55.5/(IMC¥FMC)] × Etg × field use ×
GEF
for timer dryers
Where:
Etg = the energy recorded in section 3.4.6.2
of this appendix.
GEF = corrected gas heat value (Btu per cubic
foot) as defined in section 3.4.6.3 of this
appendix,
field use, 55.5, IMC, and FMC as defined in
section 4.1 of this appendix.
4.4 Total per-cycle gas dryer energy
consumption expressed in kilowatt-hours.
Calculate the total per-cycle gas dryer energy
consumption required to achieve a final
moisture content of 2 percent or less, Ecg,
expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle and
defined as:
Ecg = Ege + (Egg/3412 Btu/kWh)
Where:
Ege = the energy calculated in section 4.2 of
this appendix
Egg = the energy calculated in section 4.3 of
this appendix
4.5 Per-cycle standby mode and off mode
energy consumption. Calculate the clothes
dryer per-cycle standby mode and off mode
energy consumption, ETSO, expressed in
kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined as:
ETSO = [(Pdefault × Sdefault) + (Plowest × Slowest)]
× K/Cannual
Where:
Pdefault = Default inactive/off mode power, in
watts, as measured in section 3.5.3 of
this appendix.
Plowest = Lowest inactive/off mode power, in
watts, as measured in section 3.5.4 of
this appendix for clothes dryer with a
switch (or other means) that can be
optionally selected by the end user to
achieve a lower-power inactive/off mode
than the default inactive/off mode;
otherwise, Plowest =0.
Sdefault = Annual hours in default inactive/off
mode, defined as 8,620 if no optional
lowest-power inactive/off mode is
available; otherwise 4,310.
Slowest = Annual hours in lowest-power
inactive/off mode, defined as 0 if no
optional lowest-power inactive/off mode
is available; otherwise 4,310.
K = Conversion factor of watt-hours to
kilowatt-hours = 0.001.
Cannual = Representative average number of
clothes dryer cycles in a year as specified
in section 4.5.1.
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
56644
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES2
8,620 = Combined annual hours for inactive
and off mode.
4,310 = One-half of the combined annual
hours for inactive and off mode.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:49 Oct 07, 2021
Jkt 256001
4.5.1 Representative average number of
clothes dryer cycles in a year. Per the
Introductory Note:
(1) Cannual = 283
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
(2) Cannual = 236
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–21810 Filed 10–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
E:\FR\FM\08OCR2.SGM
08OCR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 193 (Friday, October 8, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56608-56644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21810]
[[Page 56607]]
Vol. 86
Friday,
No. 193
October 8, 2021
Part III
Department of Energy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 CFR Parts 429 and 430
Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure for Clothes Dryers; Final
Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 193 / Friday, October 8, 2021 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 56608]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Parts 429 and 430
[EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034]
RIN 1904-AD46
Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure for Clothes Dryers
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On July 23, 2019, the U.S. Department of Energy (``DOE'')
issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (``NOPR'') to amend the test
procedure for clothes dryers. That proposed rulemaking serves as the
basis for the final rule. Specifically, this final rule specifies
additional detail for various provisions within the test procedures;
specifies rounding requirements for all reported values; applies
consistent use of nomenclature and corrects typographical errors; and
removes obsolete sections of the test procedures, including an appendix
in its entirety.
DATES: The effective date of this rule is November 8, 2021.
Representations made on or after April 6, 2022 with respect to the
energy use or energy efficiency of clothes dryers manufactured on or
after January 1, 2015, must be based on testing conducted in accordance
with this rule. The incorporation by reference of certain material
listed in the rule is approved by the Director of the Federal Register
on November 8, 2021. The incorporation by reference of other material
listed in this rulemaking was approved by the Director of the Federal
Register on September 13, 2013.
ADDRESSES: The docket, which includes Federal Register notices, public
meeting attendee lists and transcripts, comments, and other supporting
documents/materials, is available for review at www.regulations.gov.
All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. However, some documents listed in the index, such as those
containing information that is exempt from public disclosure, may not
be publicly available.
A link to the docket web page can be found at www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034. The docket web page contains
instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments,
in the docket.
For further information on how to review the docket contact the
Appliance and Equipment Standards Program staff at (202) 287-1445 or by
email: [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20585-0121. Telephone: (202) 586-0371. Email:
[email protected].
Mr. Matthew Ring, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121.
Telephone: (202) 586-2555. Email: Matthew.Ring @hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE maintains a previously approved
incorporation by reference and incorporates by reference the following
industry standard into part 430:
International Electrotechnical Commission (``IEC'') Standard 62301,
``Household electrical appliances-Measurement of standby power'',
(Edition 2.0, 2011-01).
Copies of IEC 62301 can be obtained from the International
Electrotechnical Commission webstore, by going to https://webstore.iec.ch.
American Standards Institute (``ANSI'')/Association of Home
Appliance Manufacturers (``AHAM'') HLD-1-2010 (``AHAM HLD-1''),
Household Tumble Type Clothes Dryers, approved 2010.
Copies of ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010 can be obtained from the Association
of Home Appliance Manufacturers at 1111 19th Street NW, Suite 402,
Washington, DC 20036, 202-872-5955, or go to www.aham.org.
For a further discussion of these standards, see section IV.N.
Table of Contents
I. Authority and Background
A. Authority
B. Background
II. Synopsis of the Final Rule
III. Discussion
A. Scope of Coverage
B. Definitions
C. Test Setup
1. ``Connected'' Clothes Dryers
2. Dryness Level Selection for Automatic Termination Control
Dryers
3. Drum Capacity Measurement
4. Test Room Conditions
5. Maintaining Burner Rating for Gas Clothes Dryers
6. Gas Pressure Tolerance and Measurement
7. Water Conductivity
D. Test Conduct
1. Test Conditions and Consumer Usage Patterns
2. Inactive and Off Mode Power Measurements
3. General Test Procedure Provisions at 10 CFR 430.23(d)
4. Rounding Requirements for Reported Values
5. Optional Usage of Appendix D1 or Appendix D2
6. Cycle Time Reporting
E. Formatting Changes and Typographical Errors
1. ``Conventional'' and ``Vented'' Nomenclature
2. Symbol Definitions
3. Removal of Duplicate Instructions for Test Load Preparation
4. Typographical Errors
5. Removal of Obsolete Provisions
F. Removing Obsolete Appendix D
G. Test Procedure Costs and Impact
1. Maintaining Hourly Btu Rating for Gas Clothes Dryers
2. Final Moisture Content Requirement
3. Additional Amendments
H. Harmonization With Industry Standards
I. Effective and Compliance Dates
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration
Act of 1974
M. Congressional Notification
N. Description of Materials Incorporated by Reference
V. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Authority and Background
Clothes dryers are included in the list of ``covered products'' for
which the DOE is authorized to establish and amend energy conservation
standards and test procedures. (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(8)) DOE's energy
conservation test procedures for clothes dryers are currently
prescribed in the Code of Federal Regulations (``CFR'') at 10 CFR part
430, subpart B, appendix D1 and appendix D2 (``appendix D1'' and
``appendix D2'', respectively). The following sections discuss DOE's
authority to establish test procedures for clothes dryers and relevant
background information regarding DOE's consideration of test procedures
for this product.
[[Page 56609]]
A. Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (``EPCA''),\1\
authorizes DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of a number of
consumer products and certain industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291-
6317) Title III, Part B \2\ of EPCA established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles, which sets forth
a variety of provisions designed to improve energy efficiency. These
products include clothes dryers, the subject of this document. (42
U.S.C. 6292(a)(8))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Energy Act of 2020, Public Law 116-260 (Dec.
27, 2020).
\2\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated Part A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The energy conservation program under EPCA consists essentially of
four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and enforcement procedures. Relevant
provisions of EPCA specifically include definitions (42 U.S.C. 6291),
test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293), labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294),
energy conservation standards (42 U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to
require information and reports from manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296).
The testing requirements consist of test procedures that
manufacturers of covered products must use as the basis for (1)
certifying to DOE that their products comply with the applicable energy
conservation standards adopted under EPCA (42 U.S.C. 6295(s)), and (2)
making representations about the efficiency of those products (42
U.S.C. 6293(c)). Similarly, DOE must use these test procedures to
determine whether the products comply with any relevant standards
promulgated under EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(s))
Federal energy efficiency requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing, labeling, and standards. (42
U.S.C. 6297) DOE may, however, grant waivers of Federal preemption for
particular State laws or regulations, in accordance with the procedures
and other provisions of EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d))
Under 42 U.S.C. 6293, EPCA sets forth the criteria and procedures
DOE must follow when prescribing or amending test procedures for
covered products. EPCA provides that any test procedures prescribed or
amended under this section shall be reasonably designed to produce test
results which measure energy efficiency, energy use or estimated annual
operating cost of a covered product during a representative average use
cycle or period of use and shall not be unduly burdensome to conduct.
(42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3))
EPCA also requires that, at least once every 7 years, DOE evaluate
test procedures for each type of covered product, including clothes
dryers, to determine whether amended test procedures would more
accurately or fully comply with the requirements for the test
procedures to not be unduly burdensome to conduct and be reasonably
designed to produce test results that reflect energy efficiency, energy
use, and estimated operating costs during a representative average use
cycle or period of use. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A)) If the Secretary
determines, on his own behalf or in response to a petition by any
interested person, that a test procedure should be prescribed or
amended, the Secretary shall promptly publish in the Federal Register
proposed test procedures and afford interested persons an opportunity
to present oral and written data, views, and arguments with respect to
such procedures. The comment period on a proposed rule to amend a test
procedure shall be at least 60 days and may not exceed 270 days. In
prescribing or amending a test procedure, the Secretary shall take into
account such information as the Secretary determines relevant to such
procedure, including technological developments relating to energy use
or energy efficiency of the type (or class) of covered products
involved. (42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(2)) If DOE determines that test procedure
revisions are not appropriate, DOE must publish its determination not
to amend the test procedures. DOE is publishing this final rule in
satisfaction of the 7-year review requirement specified in EPCA. (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(1)(A))
In addition, EPCA requires that DOE amend its test procedures for
all covered products to integrate measures of standby mode and off mode
energy consumption into the overall energy efficiency, energy
consumption, or other energy descriptor, unless the current test
procedure already incorporates the standby mode and off mode energy
consumption, or if such integration is technically infeasible. (42
U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) If an integrated test procedure is technically
infeasible, DOE must prescribe separate standby mode and off mode
energy use test procedures for the covered product, if a separate test
is technically feasible. (Id.) Any such amendment must consider the
most current versions of the IEC 62301 \3\ and IEC Standard 62087 \4\
as applicable. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ IEC 62301, Household electrical appliances--Measurement of
standby power. (Edition 2.0, 2011-01).
\4\ IEC 62087, Methods of measurement for the power consumption
of audio, video, and related equipment (Edition 3.0, 2011-04).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Background
DOE's test procedures for clothes dryers manufactured on or after
January 1, 2015 appear at appendix D1 and appendix D2. Manufacturers
must use either appendix D1 or appendix D2 to show compliance with the
applicable energy conservation standards, and must use a single
appendix for all representations, including certifications of
compliance.
In its most recent test procedure rulemaking for clothes dryers,
DOE published a final rule on August 14, 2013 (``August 2013 Final
Rule''), amending the clothes dryer test procedure, in which it (1)
amended appendix D1 to update the reference to the latest edition of
IEC Standard 62301, ``Household electrical appliances--Measurement of
standby power,'' Edition 2.0 2011-01 (``IEC Standard 62301''); \5\ (2)
amended appendix D and appendix D1 to clarify the cycle settings used
for the test cycle, the requirements for the gas supply for gas clothes
dryers, the installation conditions for console lights, the method for
measuring the drum capacity, the maximum allowable weighing scale
range, and the allowable use of a relative humidity (``RH'') meter; and
(3) established a new appendix D2 that includes procedures reflecting
the amendments discussed above as well as testing methods for measuring
the effects of automatic cycle termination. 78 FR 49608. (For
additional background on the rulemaking history for clothes dryer test
procedures, please refer to the August 2013 Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ IEC Standard 62301 is available online at https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/6789.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE published a notice of public meeting (``NOPM'') on October 23,
2014 (``October 2014 NOPM''), and held the public meeting on November
13, 2014 to facilitate a discussion among interested parties about
potential changes to the DOE clothes dryer test procedures to produce
test results that measure energy use during a representative average
use cycle without being unduly burdensome to conduct.\6\ 79 FR 63336.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ A transcript of the public meeting and submitted comments
are available in the docket for this rulemaking at
www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 23, 2019, DOE published a NOPR (``July 2019 NOPR'')
proposing amendments to the test procedures for
[[Page 56610]]
clothes dryers to provide additional direction in response to questions
from manufacturers and test laboratories. 84 FR 35484. DOE also
proposed amendments to: (1) Specify rounding requirements for all
reported values; (2) apply consistent use of nomenclature and correct
typographical errors; and (3) remove obsolete sections of the test
procedures, including appendix D. Id. DOE also requested comment from
interested parties on issues such as consumer usage patterns and
``connected'' clothes dryer features. Id. The July 2019 NOPR also
announced a webinar to be held on August 14, 2019, and stated that DOE
would hold a public meeting to discuss the proposals if one was
requested by August 6, 2019. Id.
On July 29, 2019, DOE received a comment from the Northwest Energy
Efficiency Alliance (``NEEA''), the Natural Resources Defense Council
(``NRDC''), and Pacific Gas and Electric Company (``PG&E'') requesting
that DOE hold an in-person public meeting regarding the proposed
amendments to the clothes dryers test procedures.\7\ On August 2, 2019,
DOE issued a pre-publication Federal Register notification announcing a
public meeting and webinar to be held on August 28, 2019, and cancelled
the previously announced webinar scheduled for August 14, 2019. 84 FR
39777.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See document number 17 within docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034,
available on www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 2, 2019, and August 5, 2019, DOE received subsequent
comments from the AHAM requesting to move the webinar and public
meeting into September 2019.\8\ On August 21, 2019, DOE published a
notification in the Federal Register changing the public meeting from
August 28, 2019, to September 17, 2019, and extending the public
comment period for submitting comments and data on the July 2019 NOPR
by 14 days to October 7, 2019. 84 FR 43529.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See document numbers 18 and 19 within docket EERE-2014-BT-
TP-0034, available on www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 20, 2019, DOE received a comment from NEEA, NRDC, and
PG&E requesting an additional 60-day comment period extension.\9\ DOE
extended the comment period by 30 days to November 6, 2019. 84 FR 52817
(October 3, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See document number 22 within docket EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034,
available on www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE received comments in response to the July 2019 NOPR from the
interested parties listed in Table II.1.
Table II.1--Written Comments Received in Response to July 2019 NOPR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference in this
Commenter(s) final rule Commenter type
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appliance Standards Awareness Joint Commenters.. Efficiency
Project, American Council for Organizations.
an Energy-Efficient Economy,
Alliance to Save Energy,
Natural Resources Defense
Council, Consumer Federation of
America, National Consumer Law
Center.
California Energy Commission.... CEC............... Efficiency
Organization,
Consortium for Energy Efficiency CEE............... Efficiency
Organization.
National Resources Defense NRDC.............. Efficiency
Council. Organization.
Northwest Energy Efficiency NEEA.............. Efficiency
Alliance. Organization.
Association of Home Appliance AHAM.............. Trade Association.
Manufacturers.
BSH Home Appliances Corporation. BSH............... Manufacturer.
GE Appliances, a Haier Company.. GEA............... Manufacturer.
Samsung Electronics America..... Samsung........... Manufacturer.
Whirlpool Corporation........... Whirlpool......... Manufacturer.
Pacific Gas and Electric, California IOUs... Investor-Owned
Southern California Edison, San Utilities
Diego Gas and Electric. (``IOUs'').
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: DOE received other comments outside the scope of the July 2019
NOPR and therefore are not addressed in this final rule.
II. Synopsis of the Final Rule
In this final rule, DOE amends appendix D1 and appendix D2, both
entitled ``Uniform Test Method for Measuring the Energy Consumption of
Clothes Dryers,'' to provide additional detail in response to questions
from manufacturers and test laboratories, including additional detail
regarding the testing of ``connected' models, dryness level selection,
and the procedures for maintaining the required heat input rate for gas
clothes dryers; additional detail for the test procedures for
performing inactive and off mode power measurements; specifications for
the final moisture content (``FMC'') required for testing automatic
termination control dryers; specification of a narrower scale
resolution for the weighing scale used to determine moisture content of
test loads; and specification that the test load must be weighed within
5 minutes after a test cycle has terminated. In addition, DOE amends
the test procedures to update the estimated number of annual use cycles
for clothes dryers; provide further direction for additional provisions
within the test procedures; specify rounding requirements for all
reported values; apply consistent use of nomenclature and correct
typographical errors; remove obsolete sections of the test procedures,
including appendix D; and update the reference to the applicable
industry test procedure to the version certified by ANSI.
DOE's actions are summarized in Table II.2 and addressed in detail
in section III of this final rule.
Table II.2--Summary of Changes in the Amended Test Procedure
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended test
Previous DOE test procedure procedure Attribution
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does not explicitly address Specifies that Response to test
the required configuration clothes dryers with laboratory comment.
for network-connected connected
functionality. functionality shall
be tested with the
network-connected
functions in the
``off'' position if
it can be disabled
by the end-user;
otherwise test in
the factory default
setting.
[[Page 56611]]
Silent on selection of the Specifies using Response to test
middle dryness level either the next- laboratory comment.
setting for clothes dryers highest setting
with an even number of above or next-
settings. lowest setting
below the midpoint
if an even number
of discrete
settings are
provided.
Provides adjustments that Specifies the order Response to test
can be made to maintain the of adjustment, from laboratory
required heat input rate least burdensome to question.
for gas clothes dryers. most burdensome,
for adjustments
that can be made to
maintain the
required heat input
rate for gas
clothes dryers.
Does not specify how quickly Specifies that test Response to NOPR
a test load must be weighed load must be comments to improve
after a test cycle has weighed within 5 repeatability and
terminated. minutes after a reproducibility.
test cycle has
terminated.
Specifies the use of a spray Specifies the use of Response to NOPR
bottle for achieving the a spray bottle for comments.
initial moisture content in achieving the
appendix D2 only. initial moisture
content in both
appendix D1 and
appendix D2.
Specifies weighing scale Specifies a narrower Response to NOPR
resolution of 0.2 ounces weighing scale comments to improve
(0.01 pounds) to determine resolution of 0.001 repeatability and
moisture content of test pounds to determine reproducibility.
loads. moisture content of
test loads.
Uses the term ``moisture Defines new terms Response to NOPR
content'' to refer to ``initial moisture comments.
several different content'' and
measurements of moisture ``final moisture
content throughout testing. content'' to
differentiate
moisture content
measurements during
testing and
calculations.
Estimates the number of Updates the estimate Response to industry
annual use cycles for to 236 clothes comment.
clothes dryer as 283, based dryer cycles per
on 2005 survey data, for year in appendix
the purposes of calculating D2, based on the
the per-cycle standby mode latest available
and off mode energy 2015 survey data.
consumption calculation.
Requires distinction between Provides specific Response to test
standby mode and off mode procedures for laboratory comment.
based on control panel measuring the low-
functionality that may not power modes of a
be readily apparent to a clothes dryer based
third-party tester. on observable
characteristics of
the controls.
Does not explicitly provide Specifies that the Response to industry
the FMC requirement for requirement to comment.
subsequent test runs if the achieve a final
prior run was deemed dryness level of 2
invalid. percent or less
also applies to any
subsequent run, if
required.
Does not include Adds instructions To provide
instructions for for calculating consistency between
calculating annual annual operating appendices D1 and
operating cost, combined cost and CEF using D2.
energy factor ``CEF'', and appendix D2; adds
other measures for clothes annual energy
dryers optionally tested consumption
using appendix D2; does not calculation using
include a calculation for either appendix D1
annual energy consumption. or D2.
Does not specify rounding Specifies rounding To further specify
requirements for reported requirements for reporting
values. all reported values. requirements.
Contains nomenclature and Applies consistent To improve accuracy
formatting inconsistencies use of and readability.
and typographical errors. nomenclature,
improves
formatting, and
fixing
typographical
errors.
References industry standard Updates reference to Harmonization with
AHAM HLD-1-2009. the ANSI-certified industry standard.
version of AHAM HLD-
1-2009, ANSI/AHAM
HLD-1-2010.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
following standard from IEC for incorporation by reference into
appendix D1 and appendix D2: IEC 62301, ``Household electrical
appliances-Measurement of standby power'', (Edition 2.0, 2011-01). The
Director of the Federal Register approved the following standard from
AHAM for incorporation by reference into appendix D1 and appendix D2:
ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010, ``Household Tumble Type Clothes Dryers.''
As described in section III.G of this document, DOE has determined
that the amendments described in section III and adopted in this
document, other than the amendment to the number of annual use cycles
in appendix D2, will not substantively alter the measured efficiency of
clothes dryers, and that the test procedures will not be unduly
burdensome to conduct. The amendment to the number of annual use cycles
specified for calculating per-cycle standby mode and off mode energy
consumption would alter the measured energy efficiency of clothes
dryers when using appendix D2, but use of the amended value in appendix
D2 is not required until such time as DOE were to amend the energy
conservations standards accounting for such changes in the test
procedure, should such amended energy conservation standards be
adopted. Discussion of DOE's actions are addressed in detail in section
III of this document.
The effective date for the amended test procedures adopted in this
final rule is 30 days after publication of this document in the Federal
Register. Representations of energy use or energy efficiency of clothes
dryers must be based on testing in accordance with the amended test
procedures beginning 180 days after the publication of this final rule.
Manufacturers must use the test procedures in either appendix D1 or
appendix D2 to demonstrate compliance with the current energy
conservation standards for clothes dryers. Manufacturers must use a
single appendix for all representations for a given model, including
certifications of compliance, and may not use appendix D1 for certain
representations and
[[Page 56612]]
appendix D2 for other representations for that model.
III. Discussion
A. Scope of Coverage
DOE's clothes dryer test procedures are applicable to both electric
and gas clothes dryers. DOE regulations define ``electric clothes
dryer'' and ``gas clothes dryer'' similarly as a cabinet-like appliance
designed to dry fabrics in a tumble-type drum with forced air
circulation, with blower(s) driven by an electric motor(s) and either
electricity or gas, respectively, as the heat source. 10 CFR 430.2. DOE
did not propose to amend the scope of applicability of DOE's clothes
dryer test procedures in the July 2019 NOPR. 84 FR 35484, 35487 (July
23, 2019).
AHAM agreed with DOE's proposal to not change the scope of
applicability of DOE's clothes dryer test procedures. (AHAM, No. 33 at
p. 2) \10\ DOE received no other comments on the scope of the test
procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ A notation in the form ``AHAM, No. 33 at p. 2'' identifies
a written comment: (1) Made by the Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers; (2) recorded in document number 33 that is filed in
the docket of this test procedure rulemaking (Docket No. EERE-2014-
BT-TP-0034) and available for review at www.regulations.gov; and (3)
which appears on page 2 of document number 33.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE is not amending the scope of applicability of DOE's clothes
dryer test procedures in this final rule.
B. Definitions
Section 1.13 of appendix D1 and section 1.14 of appendix D2 define
the term ``moisture content'' as the ratio of the weight of water
contained by the test load to the bone-dry weight of the test load,
expressed as a percent. Throughout appendix D1 and appendix D2, the
term ``moisture content'' is used in some instances to refer to the
moisture content of the wet load (i.e., before initiating the drying
cycle), whereas in other instances the term is used to refer to the
moisture content of the dry load (i.e., immediately after completion of
the drying cycle). AHAM suggested using distinct terms and associated
acronyms to clarify the difference. Specifically, AHAM suggested the
following:
Initial moisture content (``IMC'') means the ratio of the weight of
water with the damp test load (prior to drying cycle) to the bone-dry
weight of the test load, expressed as a percent.
Final moisture content (``FMC'') means the ratio of the weight of
water with the final test load (after drying cycle) to the bone-dry
weight of the test load, expressed as a percent. (AHAM, No. 33 at p.
11)
DOE has determined that adding definitions for ``initial moisture
content'' and ``final moisture content'' will appropriately distinguish
the relevant moisture content terms throughout both appendix D1 and
appendix D2. This change in nomenclature does not substantively change
the test procedure in appendix D1 or appendix D2. DOE is therefore
amending appendix D1 and appendix D2 to adopt these definitions, with
non-substantive wording changes to maintain consistent phrasing with
the current definition of ``moisture content.'' Additionally, DOE uses
the adopted terminology and acronyms throughout this final rule to
provide clarity.
C. Test Setup
1. ``Connected'' Clothes Dryers
Numerous ``connected'' clothes dryer models are currently on the
market from multiple major manufacturers. These products offer wireless
network connectivity to enable features such as remote monitoring and
control via smartphone, as well as demand response features \11\
available through partnerships with a small number of local electric
utilities. DOE observes there are currently a variety of
implementations of these connected features (i.e., wireless hardware,
connection setup, and wireless control and programing features) across
different brands, and that the design and operation of these features
is continuously evolving as the market continues to grow for these
products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ ``Demand response features'' refers to product
functionality that can be controlled by the ``smart grid'' to
improve the overall operation of the electrical grid, for example by
reducing energy consumption during peak periods and/or shifting
power consumption to off-peak periods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If connected features on a clothes dryer affect its standby mode
power consumption in the as-shipped configuration (e.g., by energizing
a wireless communication chip on the circuit board by default), such
impact would have been measured by the previous test procedure
provisions in section 3.6 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 for measuring
standby mode and off mode power. Whereas, if the standby power
consumption is not affected unless the consumer actively enables the
connected functionality on the unit, any incremental standby power
consumption resulting from the connected features would not have been
measured by the prior test procedure, because the test procedure did
not include instructions for activating any such features before
performing the standby mode and off mode measurement. Similarly, any
incremental energy consumption in active mode, or any other modes of
operation impacted by the product's connected features, would not have
been measured as part of the prior DOE test procedure, because the test
cycle requirements within section 3.3 of appendix D1 and appendix D2
did not include instructions for activating any such features before
performing the active mode drying cycle measurements.
To ensure the repeatability and comparability of test results
between models, especially those with connected functionality, DOE
proposed in the July 2019 NOPR to specify in section 3.3 of appendix
D1, and sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 of appendix D2, that units with
network capabilities be tested with the network-connected functions
disabled throughout testing. 84 FR 35484, 35493-35494 (July 23, 2019).
AHAM supported DOE's proposal to conduct testing with connected
features in the ``off'' position. AHAM noted that connected features
operate with different capabilities and many have energy saving
benefits to consumers. AHAM further commented that connected appliances
can play a critical role in increasing the energy efficiency of the
grid and can be used by utilities to increase demand response by peak
load shifting as well as facilitate increased penetration of renewable
sources of power. AHAM also stated that connected features are
currently in the early stages of development, and meaningful data are
currently unavailable on consumer use of connected features, as there
has been limited market penetration. AHAM cautioned that regulating
energy consumption associated with connected features could stifle this
area of innovation and its potential energy savings benefits, stating
that it is not yet fully known how consumers will use connected
functionality and which features will be permanently available.
Finally, AHAM noted that testing in the ``off'' position would be
consistent with the refrigerator/freezer test procedure and asserted
that doing so would recognize that this category of products is still
developing, as is consumers' use and understanding of them. (AHAM, No.
33 at p. 8)
Whirlpool commented that incremental standby power consumption
resulting from connected features should not be measured when the
consumer is actively required to enable connected functionality (i.e.,
connected functionality is not enabled in the as-shipped
configuration). Whirlpool also asserted that if a
[[Page 56613]]
connected feature is enabled in the as-shipped position but can be
optionally disabled by the consumer with the provided manufacturer
instructions, the feature should be disabled before testing. Whirlpool
further commented, however, that if there is no means to power off the
energized component that enables connected functionality, nor
manufacturer instructions for powering it off, then this energy
consumption should be measured. (Whirlpool, No. 32 at pp. 3-4)
The California IOUs, CEC, the Joint Commenters, and NEEA opposed
testing clothes dryers with network-connected functions in the ``off''
position. (California IOUs, No. 29 at p. 20; CEC, No. 31 at p. 4; Joint
Commenters, No. 34 at pp. 2-3; NEEA, No. 38 at p. 17)
The California IOUs commented that the ENERGY STAR qualified
product list features five models sold in the United States that are
certified as having connected features, and that Consumer Reports have
tested approximately 50 clothes dryers with connected features--
including 32 percent of the top 25-rated electric and gas standard-size
clothes dryers and the top two compact-size clothes dryers--with the
top three recommended dryers costing less than $800 having connected
capabilities. The California IOUs stated that with this market
penetration and the overall innovation and growth in the ``Internet of
Things'' market, capturing the network-connected function energy usage
is important. (California IOUs, No. 29 at p. 20)
CEC commented that if DOE requires network-connected functions to
be in the ``off'' position for testing, the test procedure would fail
to require measurement of energy consumption of these features, which
may contribute significantly to standby mode and off mode energy
consumption. Furthermore, CEC stated that DOE would have insufficient
information to properly consider future energy conservation standard
requirements for standby mode, as required by 42 U.S.C. 6295(gg), and
adequate information may not be provided to consumers, depriving them
of choice. (CEC, No. 21 at p. 4)
The Joint Commenters stated that without a measurement of network
mode power consumption, consumers would have no information about the
additional energy use associated with the connected functionality. The
Joint Commenters encouraged DOE to measure the energy associated with
network-connected functionality in order to better represent the energy
consumption of connected clothes dryers. The Joint Commenters also
noted that such a measurement would not impede innovation, since any
amended standard could account for the additional energy use associated
with network mode. (Joint Commenters, No. 34 at pp. 2-3)
While a number of connected clothes dryers are on the market with
varying implementations of connected features, DOE is not aware of any
data available, nor did interested parties provide any such data,
regarding the consumer use of connected features. Therefore, DOE is
unable to establish a representative test configuration for assessing
the energy consumption of connected functionality for clothes dryers
during an average period of use.
Furthermore, as noted, while DOE's prior test procedure did not
explicitly require the measurement of energy use associated with any
connected features, the previous test procedure, in its required
measurement of standby mode and off mode power, may have captured the
energy used by features that provide connected functionality.
Specifically, any energy use of such connected features may have been
measured in section 3.6 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 if
manufacturers' instructions specify that the features be turned on, or
if the connected functionality is enabled by default when the unit is
powered on. If, however, a manufacturer does not provide such an
instruction, and the product ships with connected features disabled,
then such energy consumption would not have been measured under the
prior test procedures.
Therefore, to ensure the repeatability and comparability of test
results between models, especially those with connected functionality,
DOE is adopting the July 2019 NOPR proposal regarding the network-
connected function setting position. DOE is also providing additional
detail on the direction to ``disable'' the network function during
testing. The direction adopted in this final rule provides further
specification that a network function is to be disabled as capable by
the end user pursuant to instructions provided in the product's user
manual.
DOE has determined that if network functionality cannot be disabled
by the consumer and the manufacturer's user manual does not provide
instruction for disabling the function, including the energy
consumption of the enabled network function is more representative than
excluding the energy consumption associated with the network function.
As such, in this final rule DOE is amending section 3.3 of appendix
D1, and sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 of appendix D2, to provide that for
units with network capabilities, the network settings must be disabled
throughout testing if such settings can be disabled by the end-user and
the product's user manual provides instructions on how to do so.
Further, the amendments explicitly provide that if network settings
cannot be disabled by the end-user, or the product's user manual does
not provide instruction for disabling network settings, then the unit
must be tested with the network settings in the factory default
configuration for the test cycle.
Finally, CEE noted that its specification for clothes dryers
includes optional connected criteria, which are designed to recognize
units that enable new benefits to customers and the grid or energy
systems in a diverse range of regulatory conditions (e.g., load delay,
load reduction, and energy reporting). CEE stated that connected
products promoted with ratepayer funds should offer multiple pathways
to connect, including an open, nonproprietary means for connecting
within the physical bounds of the customer's home (i.e., without
requiring the use of a manufacturer's ``cloud''). CEE stated further
that these key elements that need to be addressed are dependent on the
pending ENERGY STAR test method to validate demand response being
developed by DOE. CEE encouraged DOE to finalize the ENERGY STAR test
method as soon as possible and stated that CEE is relying on
manufacturer written submissions that stipulate compliance with the CEE
connected criteria until the test method becomes available. (CEE, No.
27 at pp. 3-4)
DOE notes that this final rule addresses only whether network-
connected functions are disabled during testing under appendix D1 and
appendix D2, and does not address testing the demand response
functionality of any such features. DOE further notes that this final
rule is separate from the process under ENERGY STAR for validating
demand response.
2. Dryness Level Selection for Automatic Termination Control Dryers
Section 3.3.2 of appendix D2 states that where the dryness level
setting can be chosen independently of the program, it shall be set to
the ``normal'' or ``medium'' dryness level setting. If such designation
is not provided, then the dryness level is set at the mid-point between
the minimum and maximum settings. DOE has received inquiries from
third-party test laboratories regarding clothes dryers that have
dryness settings such that a single mid-point between the minimum and
maximum settings is not available (e.g.,
[[Page 56614]]
a clothes dryer with four dryness settings).
In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed to specify in section 3.3.2 of
appendix D2 that if an even number of discrete settings are provided,
either the next-highest setting above the mid-point, in the direction
of the maximum dryness setting, or the next-lowest setting below the
mid-point, in the direction of the minimum dryness setting, is
selected. 84 FR 35484, 35497 (July 23, 2019).
AHAM supported DOE's proposal to specify in appendix D2 that if an
even number of discrete settings are provided, the next-highest setting
above the mid-point, in the direction of the maximum dryness setting,
or the next lowest setting below the mid-point, in the direction of the
minimum dryness setting should be used. (AHAM, No. 33 at p. 9)
The California IOUs, Joint Commenters, Energy Solutions on behalf
of the California IOUs (``Energy Solutions''), and NEEA recommended
that DOE require that for clothes dryers that provide an even number of
discrete settings that can be chosen independently of the drying
program, the dryness level should be set to the next highest level
above the mid-point between the minimum and maximum setting.
(California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 20-21; Energy Solutions, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at p. 45; \12\ Joint Commenters No. 34 at p. 3;
NEEA, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 45-46)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ A notation in the form ``Energy Solutions, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at p. 45'' identifies an oral comment that DOE
received on September 17, 2019 during the public meeting, and was
recorded in the public meeting transcript in the docket for this
test procedure rulemaking (Docket No. EERE-2014-BT- TP-0034). This
particular notation refers to a comment (1) made by Energy Solutions
during the public meeting; (2) recorded in document number 23, which
is the public meeting transcript that is filed in the docket of this
test procedure rulemaking; and (3) which appears on page 45 of
document number 23.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The California IOUs provided examples of two types of control panel
configurations in which an even number of discrete dryness settings are
provided. In one type, the clothes dryer includes a ``damp'' or very
low dryness setting, for which the product manual identifies ``dry'' as
the ``normal dryness setting'', which is one step above the mid-point.
In the second type, the clothes dryer includes a four-step scale from
``less'' to ``more'' dry. The California IOUs further commented that in
NEEA's 2014 Dryer Field Study,\13\ (``2014 NEEA field study''), the
``less dry'' setting was used only 1 percent of the time, while
``normal'' and ``more dry'' were chosen 65 percent and 34 percent of
the time, respectively. Based on this, the California IOUs stated that
selecting the next highest setting from the mid-point would best
represent an average use cycle for a clothes dryer with an even number
of discrete dryness settings. (California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 20-21)
Energy Solutions commented that when four (or an even number of)
settings are provided, typically the lowest is an air-dry feature that
provides no additional drying, such that the order is air dry, low,
medium, and high. Energy Solutions stated that the intention is not to
have the setting set to low dryness (i.e., the next-lowest setting from
the mid-point); but rather, the intention is to have the setting set to
medium (i.e., the next-highest setting). (Energy Solutions, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at p. 45)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The 2014 NEEA field study surveyed clothes dryer usage
patterns of 50 households in the Pacific Northwest region. The
report is available in the docket for this rulemaking at:
www.regulations.gov/document?D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034-0010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEEA asserted that using the next-highest setting would reduce test
burden, as it would decrease the likelihood that the clothes dryer
would be unable to reach the required remaining moisture content
requirement and thus need to be retested. Further, NEEA commented that
DOE should removing ambiguity by providing definitive guidance one way
or the other, rather than allowing the laboratory to select either the
next-highest or next-lowest setting. (NEEA, Public Meeting Transcript,
No. 23 at pp. 45-46)
BSH recommended that if a clothes dryer's controls have an even
number of dryness level settings and therefore do not have a mid-point
that can be selected, the dryness level should be set at the next-lower
set point below the mid-point. (BSH, No. 30 at pp. 3-4)
As stated, the previous test procedure did not provide direction as
to the setting to select if the clothes dryer provides an even number
of dryness settings, none of which are labeled as ``normal'' or
``medium.'' To address testing of a clothes dryer with such a
configuration, DOE is adopting the direction as proposed. The direction
to select either the next-highest setting above the mid-point, or the
next-lowest setting below the mid-point, preserves the flexibility of
manufacturers to assign the number and dryness level of settings
available on a unit. For example, a manufacturer may assign the second
of four settings as the selection most closely equivalent to the
``normal'' dryness setting. In such an instance, it would not be
appropriate to require selecting the next-highest above the mid-point.
Additionally, a manufacturer would not be able to select a setting that
did not achieve a valid test cycle (i.e., an FMC of 2 percent or less,
as required by section 3.3.2 of appendix D2, which is representative of
the consumer-accepted dryness level, as described further in section
III.D.1.e.iii of this document). As such, a manufacturer would not be
able to select the next-lowest setting below the mid-point if such
setting did not provide the necessary dryness level. Furthermore, while
the 2014 NEEA field study presents a percentage of cycle usage by
dryness setting, the data are limited to three dryness settings (``less
dry'', ``normal'', and ``more dry'') and therefore do not provide
insight into the frequency of dryness settings selected for clothes
dryers with an even number of cycle dryness settings.
Given the considerations above, DOE is amending section 3.3.2 of
appendix D2 to state that either the next-highest dryness setting above
the mid-point or the next-lowest dryness setting below the mid-point
may be tested. Section 3.4.7 of appendix D2 (which is not amended by
this final rule) requires recording for each test cycle the cycle
settings selected, in accordance with section 3.3.2 of appendix D2. The
certification reporting requirements for clothes dryers at 10 CFR
429.21(b)(2) require a certification report to include, for products
tested using appendix D2, a list of the cycle setting selections for
the energy test cycle as recorded in section 3.4.7 of appendix D2. This
reporting requirement is unchanged by this final rule. DOE notes that
the settings used for appendix D2 certification are publicly available
through DOE's compliance certification database.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ DOE's compliance certification database for appendix D2 is
available at www.regulations.doe.gov/certification-data/CCMS-4-Clothes_Dryers_-_Appendix_D2.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Drum Capacity Measurement
Section 3.1 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 requires measurement of
drum capacity by filling the drum with water and using the weight of
water in the drum to determine the drum volume. Clothes dryer drum
capacity is reported by manufacturers in cubic feet (10 CFR
429.21(b)(2)) and is used to distinguish between compact-size and
standard-size clothes dryer product classes. See appendix D1, sections
1.6 and 1.16; appendix D2, sections 1.7 and 1.17.
a. Alternative Drum Capacity Measurement Method
NEEA suggested that, to reduce test burden, the current drum
measurement
[[Page 56615]]
approach could be replaced with the tape measurement method used in a
draft California Commercial Tumble Dryer Test Protocol.\15\ NEEA
described this method as taking physical measurements with a standard
tape measure and calipers, and using a formula to compute the volume.
NEEA noted that although the tape measurement method is expected to be
less precise than the water measurement method, precision is less
important, in NEEA's opinion, when drum capacities clearly fall within
the range for compact-size or standard-size product classes. NEEA
further proposed that the water measurement method could be retained
for clothes dryers with drum volumes that are near the product class
drum volume threshold. Finally, NEEA stated that the current water
measurement method completed by a third-party laboratory can cost up to
$500 to perform. (NEEA, No. 38 at p. 17)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ California Commercial Tumble Dryer Test Protocol 2017
proposal; https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/GetDocument.aspx?tn=219983&DocumentContentId=26567.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon reviewing the draft California Commercial Tumble Dryer Test
Protocol, DOE noted that the tape measurement/caliper method suggested
by NEEA is only used to measure drum capacities for commercial clothes
dryers with drum volumes greater than 9.5 cubic feet according to the
California Commercial Tumble Dryer Test Protocol. Under the California
draft, a water volume measurement method, similar to that in the DOE
test procedures at appendix D1 and appendix D2, would still be required
for clothes dryers with reported drum capacity less than 9.5 cubic
feet. Nonetheless, DOE investigated the accuracy and effectiveness of
the California Commercial Tumble Dryer Test Protocol tape measurement/
caliper method for consumer clothes dryers, particularly those with
rated drum capacities less than 9.5 cubic feet, by comparing the drum
capacity resulting from the tape measurement/caliper method to the
rated drum capacity, which is determined based on the water volume drum
capacity approach in the DOE test procedures. DOE conducted the tape
measurement/caliper method of the California Commercial Tumble Dryer
Test Protocol on three compact-size and two standard-size clothes
dryers, and compared the resulting values to the rated drum capacity.
The results of this investigation are presented in Table III.1.
Table III.1--Drum Capacity Measurement Investigation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rated drum Measured drum
Test unit capacity capacity Percent
(ft[sup3]) (ft[sup3]) difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................................................... 2.8 2.67 -4.5
2............................................................... 3.6 3.63 0.7
3............................................................... 4.0 3.87 -2.8
4............................................................... 5.1 5.13 0.6
5............................................................... 7.4 7.32 -1.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The results in Table III.1 show a range of differences between the
two methods (from -4.5 percent to +0.6 percent), which DOE attributes
to the inherently less precise nature of the California Commercial
Tumble Dryer Test Protocol, including the inherent variability in
measuring irregular contours within the drum. Under the California
Commercial Tumble Dryer Test Protocol, test technicians are instructed
to approximate any irregular volumes. The tape measurement/caliper
method from the California Commercial Tumble Dryer Test Protocol is
designed for measuring the capacity of larger drums associated with
commercial clothes dryers, for which the variability in approximating
irregular volumes has lesser relative impact on drum capacity
measurements; however, for smaller consumer clothes dryers, these
approximations may have more significant impacts on reported drum
capacity.
The results of the tape measurement/caliper method investigative
testing demonstrate that the draft California Commercial Tumble Dryer
Test Protocol could yield capacity measurement values that differ by up
to 5 percent from the current drum capacity measurement method in the
DOE test procedures. While a difference of this magnitude could
potentially be acceptable for large-capacity clothes dryers that are
clearly above the 4.4 cubic foot threshold that differentiates the
standard and compact consumer clothes dryer product classes, further
investigation and analysis would be required to better understand the
implications of using the tape measurement/caliper method for consumer
clothes dryers, and to determine the range of capacities for which the
tape measurement/caliper method could be appropriate for use as an
alternative to the water volume drum capacity approach. DOE does not
have sufficient information at this time with which to implement such
an alternative capacity measurement method. Therefore, DOE is not
amending appendix D1 and appendix D2 at this time to include a tape
measurement method for determining consumer clothes dryer drum
capacity.
b. Drum Capacity Measurement Water Temperature
The clothes dryer test procedures do not specify a temperature for
the water used in the drum capacity test. AHAM proposed that DOE
establish water temperature requirements in appendix D1 and appendix D2
that align with section 3.1.4 of the clothes washer test procedure
located in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix J2 (``appendix J2''),
which requires either 60 degrees Fahrenheit (``[deg]F'') 5
[deg]F (15.6 degrees Celsius (``[deg]C'') 2.8 [deg]C) or
100 [deg]F 10 [deg]F (37.8 [deg]C 5.5 [deg]C)
water. (AHAM No. 33 at p. 12)
DOE recognizes that water density varies based on water
temperature. Section 3.1.6 of appendix J2 specifies using a water
density of 62.3 pounds per cubic foot (lb/ft\3\) for 60 [deg]F water or
62.0 lb/ft\3\ for 100 [deg]F water. For the clothes washer test
procedure, specifying the temperature of the water is necessary because
the volume of the clothes container must be determined to the nearest
0.01 cubic feet for the purpose of determining test load sizes.
(Section 3.1.7 of appendix J2) Whereas, DOE is not aware of any
instance, and commenters have provided none, in which this degree of
precision is required for the clothes dryer test procedure. For this
reason, DOE is not amending appendix D1 and appendix D2 to specify the
water temperature during the drum capacity test.
[[Page 56616]]
4. Test Room Conditions
Section 2.2.1 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 specify maintaining
the test chamber ambient air temperature at 75 3 [deg]F and
a room RH of 50 10 percent.
The California IOUs and AHAM recommended that DOE tighten the
tolerances for ambient temperature and humidity to improve
repeatability of testing results. (California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 12-
13; AHAM, No. 33 at p. 12) The California IOUs referenced clothes dryer
testing conducted by PG&E in 2019 \16\ (``2019 PG&E testing''), for
which three models were tested according to appendix D2 with the
ambient conditions maintained at an average of 75 [deg]F and 50 percent
RH (corresponding to the nominal test conditions specified by appendix
D2), with additional tests performed at an average of 72.4 [deg]F and
57 percent RH (remaining within the specified tolerances of appendix
D2). The California IOUs noted that for the three models tested, the
two models with the lowest CEF results under the 75 [deg]F and 50
percent RH test conditions switched rank order when tested at 72.4
[deg]F and 57 percent RH. (California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 12-13)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Test results from the 2019 PG&E testing are referenced in
the California IOUs comment in the docket for this rulemaking at:
www.regulations.gov/document?D=EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034-0029.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AHAM asserted that operating at either end of the current humidity
level tolerance range can significantly impact drying performance. AHAM
proposed tightening the tolerances on these requirements as follows:
Room ambient air temperature to 75 2 [deg]F and room RH to
50 5 percent. AHAM suggested that this adjustment would not
increase test burden because test laboratories are already capable of
maintaining the tighter tolerances. (AHAM, No. 33 at p. 12)
GEA supported all requests for tighter tolerances in the AHAM
comments. GEA stated that its laboratories are currently able to
maintain the tolerances suggested by AHAM without additional test
burden or cost, and that GEA does not have any information indicating
other laboratories would not be able to obtain these same levels of
precision with little to no additional cost or burden. (GEA, No. 37 at
p. 2)
DOE notes that the relevant 2019 PG&E testing was limited to three
units, which is an insufficient sample of units to demonstrate a
quantifiable and representative trend across all units on the market.
AHAM did not provide any data in support of its comment on this issue.
DOE does not have sufficient data at this time to justify making any
changes to the ambient conditions specified in the test procedure.
Further testing would be required on a broader, more representative
selection of units in order to assess whether reducing the temperature
and humidity tolerances would provide more repeatable test results. For
these reasons DOE is not making any changes to the currently specified
temperature and humidity tolerances at this time.
Section 2.2.1 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 specifies maintaining
the room RH at 50 10 percent. BSH suggested that the
current RH tolerance in appendix D1 and appendix D2 could be
interpreted as either 10 percent of 50 (i.e., a 5 percent RH range--45
percent to 55 percent) or a 10 percent RH range (i.e., 40 percent to 60
percent). BSH recommended that DOE specify maintaining the room RH
between the limits of 45 percent to 55 percent. (BSH, No. 30 at p. 3)
The RH specification requires maintaining RH in the range of 40
percent to 60 percent. DOE notes that when it initially established the
clothes dryer test procedure in a final rule published on September 14,
1977, section 2.2 of appendix D stated, ``Maintain the . . . room
relative humidity at 40 percent to 60 percent relative humidity.'' 42
FR 46145, 46150.\17\ To address the potential for misinterpretation
identified by BSH, DOE is amending how the RH requirement is described
in the test procedures by specifying to maintain the room RH at 50
percent 10 percent RH. This clarification is consistent
with the previous test procedure and does not constitute a change to
that test procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ DOE revised how the relative humidity specification was
presented in appendix D (i.e., presenting the specification as ``50
10 percent'') in a final rule published May 19, 1981,
but stated that the substance of the requirement was not being
amended. See 46 FR 27324, 27325.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Maintaining Burner Rating for Gas Clothes Dryers
Section 2.3.2.1 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 requires that
natural gas clothes dryers maintain the hourly British thermal unit
(``Btu'') rating of the burner during testing to within 5
percent of the hourly Btu rating specified by the manufacturer.\18\
Section 2.3.2.2 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 provides analogous
requirements for propane clothes dryers. The requirement to maintain
the hourly Btu rating of the burner provides repeatable test
conditions, recognizing that the rate of heat input into a clothes
dryer can significantly affect its performance. These sections provide
instructions regarding tolerances and adjustments that can be made to
the inlet gas pressure,\19\ gas pressure regulator setpoint,\20\ and/or
modifications to the orifice \21\ in order to maintain the hourly Btu
rating within 5 percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The hourly Btu rating of a gas clothes dryer is typically
specified on the product's nameplate sticker.
\19\ For natural gas clothes dryers, section 2.3.2.1 of appendix
D1 and appendix D2 specifies maintaining the gas supply pressure
immediately ahead of all controls within a range of 7 to 10 inches
of water column. For propane clothes dryers, section 2.3.2.2 of
appendix D1 and appendix D2 specifies maintaining the gas supply
pressure immediately ahead of all controls within a range of 11 to
13 inches of water column.
\20\ For both natural gas and propane clothes dryers, if the
clothes dryer is equipped with a gas appliance pressure regulator
for which the manufacturer specifies an outlet pressure, the
regulator outlet pressure must be maintained within 10
percent of the value recommended by the manufacturer in the
installation manual, on the nameplate sticker, or wherever the
manufacturer makes such a recommendation for the basic model.
\21\ The orifice is an attachment that typically screws into the
outlet of the gas pressure regulator and has a small-diameter outlet
hole, through which the gas flows into the burner. For both natural
gas and propane clothes dryers, the test procedures provide for
modifying the orifice of the gas burner as necessary if the required
hourly Btu rating cannot be achieved under the allowable range in
gas inlet pressure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the required hourly Btu rating cannot be achieved under the
allowable range in gas inlet pressure, the prior test procedures
provided instruction for modifying the orifice of the gas burner as
necessary (i.e., adjustments to the gas inlet pressure should be made
before considering modifications to the orifice). However, the large
majority (if not all) of clothes dryers currently on the market include
a gas pressure regulator, which is situated between the gas inlet and
the orifice. Since the purpose of a gas pressure regulator is to
provide a constant output pressure regardless of fluctuations in
upstream supply pressure, adjusting the gas inlet pressure upstream of
a pressure regulator will typically have no impact on the pressure of
the gas exiting the regulator and entering the orifice, or likewise the
hourly Btu rating.
To provide further direction applicable to the large majority of
gas clothes dryers on the market that include a gas pressure regulator,
in the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed an order of adjustment for
maintaining the hourly Btu rating within specification as follows:
(First) adjust the supply gas pressure, (second) adjust the pressure
regulator setpoint, or (third) modify the orifice as necessary. 84 FR
35484, 35494 (July 23, 2019). The proposed order specifies using an
approach with the
[[Page 56617]]
least amount of test burden necessary to achieve the specified test
conditions. This order also corresponds to the least amount of
modification to the unit that would be necessary to achieve the
specified test conditions. Adjusting the supply gas inlet pressure
requires no modifications to the clothes dryer itself. Adjusting the
pressure regulator setpoint typically requires removing an access panel
on the clothes dryer and tightening or loosening a screw on the
regulator. Modifying the orifice typically requires removing an access
panel on the clothes dryer, disassembling the burner, removing the
orifice, modifying the orifice (e.g., by drilling a larger-diameter
outlet hole), reinstalling the orifice, and finally reassembling the
burner.
In DOE's testing experience, any deviation of the hourly Btu rating
beyond 5 percent of the rated value can be remedied with a
minor adjustment to the gas pressure regulator (within the allowable
range of 10 percent of the recommended pressure level).
Based on DOE's experience with third-party test laboratories,
preferentially starting with the least burdensome adjustments before
trying progressively more burdensome adjustments is generally
consistent with industry practice.
In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed to provide this direction in a
new section 2.3.2.3 in both appendix D1 and appendix D2, which would
apply to both natural gas and propane clothes dryers. In conjunction,
DOE proposed simplifying the existing provisions within sections
2.3.2.1 and 2.3.2.2 to reduce duplication with provisions that would be
included in the new section 2.3.2.3, and therefore improve the overall
readability of the test procedures.
NEEA supported specifying the order of specification for
adjustment; however, NEEA urged DOE to remove the third proposed option
to physically modify the gas orifice. NEEA suggested that in its
experience, such modifications are not included in installation manuals
supplied with the product, and physically modifying the orifice may
produce test results that would not be representative of the
manufactured product as installed in the field. (NEEA, No. 38 at p. 17)
NEEA further suggested that the test procedure should specify test
conditions that are achievable, and that if a unit is unable to stay
within those parameters, modification would need to occur on the
manufacturing side rather than as the responsibility of the testing
technician to physically modify the product. (NEEA, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 27-30, 40-41)
AHAM supported DOE's proposal, stating that it is consistent with
current best laboratory practice, would clarify and simplify the test
procedure, would codify the method that has long been used to test
clothes dryers, and is needed to ensure test conditions can be met
throughout the test. AHAM also stated that if these three steps are not
permitted, the test will become unduly burdensome to conduct. In
addition, AHAM explained that providing for adjustment of the orifice
represents a balance among test burden and the accuracy, repeatability,
and reproducibility of the test. (AHAM, No. 33 at p. 8; AHAM, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 29-32)
The purpose for adjustment of the orifice during testing is to
ensure that the performance of the clothes dryer is representative of
performance at the Btu rating specified by the manufacturer on the
product's nameplate, which informs the field installation conditions.
Allowing for adjustment of the orifice reduces test burden and improves
repeatability by providing test laboratories with a last resort to
maintain the hourly Btu rating as specified by the manufacturer. As
stated in the July 2019 NOPR proposal, modification of the burner
orifice shall be used as the last choice for maintaining the hourly Btu
rating. 84 FR 35484, 35494 (July 23, 2019).
Based on all the available information, including the experience of
DOE, industry, and laboratories with testing, and to ensure the test is
repeatable with minimal test burden as discussed in the preceding
paragraphs, DOE is amending the test procedure as proposed in the July
2019 NOPR to provide the order of the existing provisions that shall be
taken to maintain the hourly Btu rating within 5 percent of
the rating specified by the manufacturer.
6. Gas Pressure Tolerance and Measurement
Section 2.3.2.1 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 requires that the
natural gas supply pressure must be maintained between 7 to 10 inches
of water column ahead of all controls for all gas clothes dryers using
natural gas. The hourly Btu rating of the gas burner must be maintained
within 5 percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer, and the natural gas supplied must have a heating value of
approximately 1,025 Btu per standard cubic foot. The actual heating
value must be obtained by use of a standard continuous flow calorimeter
described by section 2.4.6 of appendix D1 and appendix D2, or by the
purchase of bottled natural gas whose Btu rating is certified to be at
least as accurate as that obtained by use of a standard continuous flow
calorimeter.
GEA suggested that the current gas input pressure tolerance of
between 7 and 10 inches water column (``WC'') may create unreasonable
variance in the test outcomes. GEA noted that while a range may be
necessary to reach the rated Btu/hr of a unit for testing, the
procedure should be amended to reduce variability where possible.
Referencing the process set forth in ANSI Standard Z21.5.1-2017, ``Gas
Clothes Dryers, Volume I, Type 1 Clothes Dryers,'' GEA recommended that
DOE adopt 7 inches WC as the target with a maximum of 10 inches WC in
its gas clothes dryer test procedures.
GEA further suggested that the range for the target Btu/hour during
testing should be the nominal rating of the appliance 2.5
percent rather than the currently specified 5 percent,
noting that the current range allows for a 10-percent variation in Btu/
hr, which is a key measure used to determine energy usage by gas
clothes dryers. GEA stated that the current range allows too much
variability in testing results. According to GEA, the proposed tighter
range would not increase test burden. (GEA, No. 37 at p. 3)
DOE is unaware of any data that suggests either the current gas
input pressure tolerance or the current tolerance of 5
percent of hourly Btu rate produces unrepresentative or unrepeatable
test results. GEA did not provide any such data. In addition, as
discussed previously, the large majority of (if not all) clothes dryers
currently on the market include a gas pressure regulator, which is
situated between the gas inlet and the orifice. Adjusting the gas inlet
pressure upstream of a pressure regulator will typically have no impact
on the pressure of the gas exiting the regulator, or likewise the
hourly Btu rating. Absent data or other information demonstrating an
issue with the current natural gas supply conditions, DOE is not
amending these provisions.
GEA further commented that gas flow meters vary by manufacturer and
type and described the wide variation in different types of meters. GEA
suggested that given the wide range of issues and error that can be
introduced by the wide variability in gas flow meters, DOE should
specify type and capacity standards for the type of gas flow meter to
be used for the gas clothes dryer test procedures. (GEA, No. 37 at pp.
3-4) GEA further noted that the gas heating value (``GEF'') specified
in the procedures for gas clothes dryers must be corrected according to
the U.S. Bureau of Standards, circular C417,
[[Page 56618]]
1938 (as specified in section 3.4.6.3 of appendix D1 and appendix D2),
which requires a series of correction and conversion factors. GEA
commented that the calculations and corrections vary according to
calorimeter equipment instructions, type of gage flow meter used, and
may be influenced by gas supply pressure, barometric pressure, gas
temperature, and gas absolute pressure (``psia''). GEA suggested that
all formulas and measurements used in making GEF calculations should be
clearly specified in the DOE gas clothes dryer procedures, and that
this missing information increases test uncertainty and creates
reproducibility and reliability issues for the DOE verification
program. (GEA, No. 37 at p. 4)
Additionally, GEA commented that the Heat Input Test (required in
sections 2.3.2.1 and 2.3.2.1 of appendix D1 and appendix D2) is an
essential part of determining the hourly Btu rating in the appendix D1
and appendix D2 test procedures for gas clothes dryers, but there is
currently no specified procedure on how the Heat Input Test is to be
performed. GEA requested that DOE develop a procedure for the heating
input test to determine the Btu/hr of the clothes dryer under test, and
that the procedure should include requirements for load size, load
wetness, clothes dryer cycle selection, clothes dryer run time, and gas
flow verification during the measurement period. GEA asserted that this
would resolve various issues, including the need to account for the
time for gas flow to begin after cycle start, the change in input rate
over time for the first several minutes of burner operation, and the
potential for burner cycling during the Heat Input Test. GEA
recommended that DOE review the procedure in ANSI Z21.1-2016/CSA 1.1-
2016, ``Household Cooking Gas Appliances'' (``ANSI Z21.1-2016/CSA 1.1-
2016''), which specifies that measurements not be taken until 5 minutes
after burner ignition to account for variation in flow rate caused by
heat effects on the equipment. GEA also recommended that the Heat Input
Test be performed with a DOE test cloth load wetted in the same fashion
as done for the primary energy consumption test, to ensure that the
burner in the clothes dryer is running for the complete measurement
time during the Heat Input Test. (GEA, No. 37 at pp. 4-5)
DOE understands that test laboratories do not all use the same gas
flow meters; however, DOE is unaware of data or other information
suggesting any substantive variation in test results due to the use of
different gas flow meters. DOE also reviewed ANSI Z21.1-2016/CSA 1.1-
2016 and determined that for the purposes of measuring the hourly Btu
rating for gas clothes dryers, the products that are the subject of
that test standard differed too widely in use and purpose from clothes
dryers to warrant direct application of testing provisions to appendix
D1 and appendix D2. Although DOE does not currently specify a
particular procedure for measuring the Btu firing rate of the burner,
DOE is unaware at this time of any data that would suggest a
significant variation in test results associated with different methods
of measuring the hourly Btu rating for gas clothes dryers. GEA did not
provide any such data. For these reasons, DOE is not specifying type
and capacity standards for the gas flow meter in appendix D1 and
appendix D2, and is not specifying a procedure to use for determining
the Btu firing rate of the gas clothes dryer burner at this time.
Were DOE to become aware of data on any of the topics covered in
this section, DOE would consider such data in a future evaluation of
the clothes dryer test procedure as appropriate.
7. Water Conductivity
The DOE test procedure does not specify a requirement for water
conductivity, which is a measurement of the water's ability to conduct
electric current and is expressed in microsiemens per centimeter
(``[mu]S/cm''). The California IOUs suggested that while the
reproducibility of the appendix D2 test procedure is reasonable,
variations due to water conductivity need to be addressed to ensure
reproducible test results. The California IOUs presented test data from
the 2019 PG&E Testing showing measured CEF as a function of water
conductivity for six clothes dryer models. Each model was tested
multiple times, and the data indicates the measured CEF value and
measured water conductivity for each test. Two of the models
demonstrated a positive correlation (i.e., CEF increased as water
conductivity increased), whereas four of the models showed either
negative correlation or no significant correlation between water
conductivity and CEF. The California IOUs also presented an analysis of
the repeatability of the measured CEF values from one of the models in
the PG&E test sample and concluded that reproducibility improves when
water conductivity is controlled. (California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 7-9)
The California IOUs stated that water hardness and water
conductivity can be controlled independent of one another and have
naturally occurring variances around the United States. The California
IOUs suggested that water conductivity can play an important role in
how effective a clothes dryer's automatic cycle termination feature
operates, particularly for a common automatic cycle termination method
that uses moisture sensing bars to calculate the moisture content of
the load. Id.
The California IOUs urged DOE to explore this variable further. The
California IOUs suggested the DOE test procedure require testing at
multiple water conductivity levels or incorporate the impact of this
variable through other means in order to encourage manufacturers to
address potential CEF variability due to water conductivity and thereby
improve CEF reproducibility and repeatability. (California IOUs, No. 29
at pp. 5-12)
To address these comments, DOE conducted investigative testing
exploring the effects of water conductivity on the measured CEF value.
DOE tested a sample of six consumer clothes dryers representing a range
of product classes and efficiency levels, varying the water
conductivity between 0 [mu]S/cm (i.e., distilled water) and 800 [mu]S/
cm (i.e., the maximum safe level in accordance with the water quality
standards cited by the California IOUs in their comment). The water
used to saturate the test cloth was prepared using distilled water with
added table salt (sodium chloride), sufficient to achieve the desired
conductivity, confirmed using a conductivity meter. Each of the six
test units was tested three times according to appendix D2, saturating
the test cloth in successive tests with water having a conductivity
level of 0 [mu]S/cm (distilled), 400 [mu]S/cm, and 800 [mu]S/cm. Figure
III.1 presents the CEF values from the three tests for each of the six
units tested at varying levels of water conductivity, additionally
including results from previous testing using tap water. DOE estimated
the conductivity of its tap water as 130 [mu]S/cm, based on an average
of multiple measurements on different test days.
[[Page 56619]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR08OC21.023
The results shown in Figure III.1 indicate no discernable
correlation between CEF and water conductivity, with minimal change in
CEF overserved for Units 1 through 4. Unit 6 exhibited a substantially
higher CEF at 130 [mu]S/cm and 400 [mu]S/cm, while Unit 5 demonstrated
a lower CEF for only the distilled water test; in neither case,
however, did the trend in CEF correlate consistently with water
conductivity. DOE's data suggest that CEF is not directly related to
water conductivity, as there is no predictable or consistent
correlation between CEF and water conductivity.
Similarly, the test results submitted by PG&E also showed
inconsistent correlations between CEF and water conductivity (i.e., in
some cases a positive correlation, in some cases a negative
correlation, and in other cases no clear correlation), and limited
evidence from a single clothes dryer model suggesting that controlling
for water conductivity may lead to more repeatable or reproducible
results. (California IOUs, No. 34 at pp. 9-12) DOE appreciates the
information regarding water conductivity and its potential effect on
repeatability and reproducibility of the test procedure. However, the
data provided by commenters and additional data obtained through DOE's
investigative testing do not definitively suggest any clear and
predictable correlation between water conductivity and measured
efficiency, and thus, do not indicate that including a specification in
the test procedure for water conductivity would improve the
repeatability or reproducibility of the test results. For these
reasons, DOE is not adopting a water conductivity requirement in this
final rule.
D. Test Conduct
1. Test Conditions and Consumer Usage Patterns
DOE received various comments in response to the July 2019 NOPR
regarding testing conditions in the DOE clothes dryer test procedure.
The following sections discuss these issues and changes to the DOE
clothes dryer test procedure.
a. Test Load Size
Section 2.7 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 specifies a test load
weight of 8.45 pounds .085 pounds for standard-size
clothes dryers (i.e., with a drum capacity of 4.4 cubic feet or
greater) and a test load weight of 3 pounds .03 pounds for
compact-size clothes dryers (i.e., with a drum capacity of less than
4.4 cubic feet).
NEEA, the California IOUs, Joint Commenters, CEC, NRDC, and Samsung
urged DOE to include additional load size testing, with priority given
to small load sizes. These commenters generally stated that small loads
represent a large percentage of clothes dryer cycles in the field and
result in lower measured efficiency compared to the required load
sizes. These commenters asserted that adding a smaller load size to the
test procedure would make the test more representative, and the
efficiency ratings more useful, for consumer purchasing decisions. The
details of each comment are presented as follows, including discussion
of data sources and each commenter's assertions. (NEEA, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 90, 101-104, 105-107, 112-113; California
IOUs, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 104-105, 139-144; CEC,
Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 150; Joint Commenters No. 34
at pp. 1-2; NRDC, No. 35 at p. 2; Samsung, No. 36 at p. 3)
i. 2014 NEEA Field Study
NEEA and the California IOUs cited the 2014 NEEA field study as
justifying the use of an additional half-size test load. NEEA commented
that the 2014 NEEA field study and recent national market research
conducted by the California IOUs suggest that typical load sizes vary
widely, but that small loads represent 20 to 40 percent of all loads.
The California IOUs cited from the 2014 NEEA field study that the 8.45-
pound test load specified in appendix D1 and appendix D2 for standard-
sized clothes dryers is close to the average weight of ``simple loads''
\22\ (7.87 pounds), but the most common load weights were smaller, with
40.5 percent of loads being less than 6.5 pounds. The California IOUs
also referenced the 2014 NEEA field study in commenting that clothes
drying performance at the average load size is not predictive of
performance at small load sizes. The California IOUs and NEEA suggested
that a test load half the size of the DOE-specified load could capture
the reduced clothes dryer performance with small-size loads and would
produce a more representative efficiency ranking order for clothes
dryers. NEEA suggested that small loads
[[Page 56620]]
result in less energy efficient performance due to higher relative
startup energy, lower cloth surface area, reduced contact of the cloth
with the moisture sensing strips, and reduced effectiveness of using
the measured exhaust temperature to assess the remaining moisture
content. NEEA also suggested that consumers may separate garments from
the washer into multiple drying loads, resulting in more clothes dryer
loads per year than washer loads, with each clothes dryer load being
smaller, on average. (California IOUs, Public Meeting Transcript, No.
23 at pp. 104-105, 139-144; NEEA, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at
pp. 90, 101-104, 105-107, 112-113)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Simple loads are defined in the 2014 NEEA field study as
clothes dryer loads with the following characteristics: The load is
both washed and dried; the IMC is between 33 percent and 100
percent, the bone-dry weight is between 3 pounds and 15 pounds; no
items are removed between the wash and dry cycles; the dryer is not
run multiple times.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AHAM commented that although NEEA's data showed small clothes dryer
load sizes in the Pacific Northwest, the data are not representative of
national clothes dryer usage, and that clothes dryer use may differ
from region to region. (AHAM, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp.
103-104)
ii. 2019 PG&E Market Survey
The California IOUs asserted that, based on the survey of clothes
dryer usage in 210 single family households conducted by PG&E in
September 2019 (``2019 PG&E market survey''),\23\ clothes dryer usage
(including load sizes and cycle settings) does not significantly vary
between seasons, with only cycle settings exhibiting some variation
between the Pacific Northwest and the rest of the United States. The
California IOUs commented that results for the typical clothes dryer
load size showed no significant differences when comparing winter and
summer load operation, while the regional differences between the
Pacific Northwest and the rest of the United States were minimal. The
California IOUs suggested that the results provide further context and
validity to the usage patterns presented in the 2014 NEEA field study.
(California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 1-4, 13-15)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ The survey respondents were asked to identify their typical
dryer load size and settings in the summer (June through August) and
winter (December through February) seasons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iii. Other Testing
NEEA commented that its organization tested 12 electric clothes
dryer models manufactured after 2015 with both the DOE standard load
and a smaller load comprised of what NEEA stated was ``real clothing.''
NEEA presented test data and concluded that the measured efficiency
rank order among the tested models changed appreciably from the
standard load size test, with the ENERGY STAR-qualified units
particularly demonstrating lower efficiency with the smaller load size
relative to the non-ENERGY STAR-qualified units in its sample for both
electric and gas units. (NEEA, No. 38 at pp. 1-3, 9-11, 18)
The California IOUs commented that in the 2019 PG&E testing, PG&E
investigated the impact of smaller load sizes on three standard-size
clothes dryer models from different brands. The California IOUs cited
the results of the 2019 PG&E testing in which the efficiency rank order
of the three models changed when tested with smaller loads. Based on
these results, the California IOUs commented that that the appendix D2
test procedure may not accurately represent drying of smaller loads.
The California IOUs recommended including a smaller load size as part
of the clothes dryer test procedure in order to capture the rank order
and CEF variability under commonly used clothes dryer operating
conditions. (California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 1-4, 13-15)
NRDC recommended that DOE consider any updates to the IEC clothes
dryer test procedure regarding smaller test load sizes, but that DOE
should not wait for IEC before DOE proposes changes to the DOE test
procedure. (NRDC, No. 35 at p. 2)
iv. DOE Response
DOE appreciates the data provided by the commenters regarding
various study and survey results relating to the energy efficiency
performance of clothes dryers when drying smaller load sizes. DOE notes
that the cited studies and surveys are not conclusively representative
of the entire country, given that they were limited in scope and
geographic location. The 2019 PG&E market survey data did not
effectively demonstrate that there were no significant differences
between the Pacific Northwest and the rest of the United States in
clothes dryer load size. For example, these data showed fewer ``Mostly
Full'' loads in the Pacific Northwest (50 percent in the winter and 50
percent in the summer) than in the rest of the country (64 percent in
the winter and 61 percent in the summer). The 2019 PG&E market survey
data also showed more ``Less Than Half Full'' loads in the Pacific
Northwest (25 percent in the winter and 33 percent in the summer) than
in the rest of the country (18 percent in the winter and 22 percent in
the summer). These differences also suggest that the results of the
2014 NEEA field study may be too limited in geographic scope to be
considered representative of the entire United States.
However, the national data collected by the 2019 PG&E market survey
may better represent the United States as a whole, albeit with a
relatively small sample size of 210 respondents. As presented by the
California IOUs, the national sample from the 2019 PG&E market survey
indicates that the relative proportion of very small loads (``Less Than
Half Full'') is similar in magnitude to the relative proportion of
``Very Full'' loads. The data indicate that in the summer months, 22
percent of loads are less than half full, while 15 percent of loads are
very full; and in the winter months, 18 percent of loads are less than
half full and 16 percent of loads are very full. Given the relatively
small sample size of this national consumer usage data, DOE is unable
to determine at this time the representativeness of these load size
distributions based on the provided information.
To supplement and better understand the results provided in
comments, DOE tested seven standard-size electric clothes dryers from
four manufacturers, representing a range of capacities, venting
configurations, efficiency performance, and heating technologies, to
investigate the impact of test load size on energy use and measured
efficiency. Table III.2 provides the characteristics of each model in
DOE's test sample.
Table III.2--Characteristics of Clothes Dryers in DOE Test Sample
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured CEF
Test unit Capacity Venting configuration using Heating technology
(cubic feet) appendix D2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1......................... 7.2 Vented................... 2.79 Electric Resistance.
2......................... 7.0 Vented................... 3.15 Electric Resistance.
3......................... 7.4 Vented................... 3.29 Electric Resistance.
4......................... 7.4 Vented................... 3.36 Electric Resistance.
[[Page 56621]]
5......................... 7.4 Vented................... 3.92 Electric Resistance.
6......................... 7.4 Ventless................. 4.45 Heat Pump.
7......................... 5.1 Ventless................. 7.77 Heat Pump.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each model, DOE tested five load sizes using DOE test cloth:
3.0, 5.7, 8.45, 11.2, and 13.9 pounds. DOE conducted each test
according to appendix D2, substituting the load size as noted. Figure
III.2 shows the combined total energy consumed in each test cycle
(corresponding to ECC as calculated in section 4.6 of
appendix D2) and indicates an approximately linear relationship between
the weight of the test load and the per-cycle energy consumption.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR08OC21.024
The linearity of the energy consumption relationships in Figure
III.2 shows that if both a smaller load size and larger load size (in
relation to the current load size) are additionally tested in order to
calculate the energy consumption that is representative of an average
use cycle, the lower per-cycle energy consumption associated with the
smaller load size would essentially be entirely offset by the higher
per-cycle energy consumption associated with the larger load size, with
little net change to the resulting average per-cycle energy
consumption; and thus little change to the CEF value, as compared to
the CEF value obtained from testing with the current single DOE test
load size. With little expected change to the CEF value when
considering the energy consumption associated with a range of load
sizes, DOE does not believe the additional testing would provide
consumers with improved information that would change their purchasing
decisions compared to the current test procedure. As such, any
incremental benefit of testing with additional load sizes would be
outweighed by the significant added burden that would be imposed by
conducting such tests. For these reasons, DOE is not making any
amendments to the test procedure requiring additional test load sizes
at this time.
b. Test Load Bone-Dry Weight
Section 2.7.1 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 specifies the process
by which a test load is prepared for a compact-size clothes dryer.
Specifically, it describes the target weight of 3.00 pounds .03 pounds, as well as the use of energy stuffer cloths, of
which up to five may be used, to achieve the tolerance required for the
bone-dry test load. Section 1.5 of appendix D1 and 1.6 of appendix D2
describe the bone-drying process.
BSH commented that for compact-size clothes dryers, for which the
range of acceptable bone-dry test load weight is 3.00 pounds .03 pounds, it is difficult to adjust the weight of the test load
because, based on its experience, the average weight of an individual
energy stuffer cloth is .037 pounds. According to BSH, this may lead to
variability in test results. BSH recommended that the maximum allowable
weight of the test load after the first bone-dry run should be 3.03
pounds for compact-size clothes dryer loads, and that the test load
weight after every bone-dry run shall be recorded. BSH also commented
that the bone-dry definition has no maximum time limit for the bone-
drying process.
[[Page 56622]]
Without an upper time limit, BSH argued it would be possible for the
bone-drying process to be used to reduce the weight of heavy test loads
to meet the maximum weight limits and not solely for setting the
baseline for the 2-percent FMC condition. BSH recommended that DOE
require that any single bone-dry run shall not exceed 10 minutes and 15
seconds, and that no more than four bone-dry runs may be conducted for
a single test load, to ensure that the bone drying process is used only
to set the baseline for the 2-percent FMC. (BSH, No. 30 at pp. 2-3)
DOE is unaware of issues regarding achieving the bone-dry test
weight as specified in section 1.5 of appendix D1 and section 1.6 of
appendix D2, which both define ``bone dry'' as a condition of a load of
test cloths which has been dried in a clothes dryer at maximum
temperature for a minimum of 10 minutes, removed, and weighed before
cool down, and then dried again for 10-minute periods until the final
weight change of the load is 1 percent or less. Further, BHS did not
explain how the bone-dry provisions could be used for a purpose other
than establishing the bone-dry baseline. The bone-drying process is
required to establish the baseline weight for the FMC condition, and
setting an upper time limit to the bone-drying process as suggested by
BHS could significantly increase test burden or require manufacturers
to design clothes dryers with specialized drying cycles solely for
achieving bone-drying specifications outside of the scope of consumer-
driven needs.
Based on the preceding discussion, DOE is not amending the test
procedure regarding acceptable bone-dry test load weight or the bone-
drying process.
c. Test Load Composition
Section 2.6 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 specifies a test load
composed of a pure finished bleached cloth, made with a momie or
granite weave, which is a blended fabric of 50-percent cotton and 50-
percent polyester. Appendix D1, section 2.6.1(a); appendix D2, section
2.6.1(a). The ``energy test cloth'' is made from material that is 24
inches by 36 inches, hemmed to 22 inches by 34 inches, and weighs
within 10 percent of 5.75 ounces per square yard. Appendix D1, section
2.6.1(b); appendix D2, section 2.6.1(b). Smaller ``energy stuffer
cloths'' are made of material that is 12 inches by 12 inches, hemmed to
10 inches by 10 inches.\24\ Appendix D1, section 2.6.2; appendix D2,
section 2.6.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ The test procedure specifies that the energy stuffer cloths
are to be used to adjust the test load to achieve the proper weight,
but that no more than five stuffer cloths may be added per test
load.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several industry test procedures specify clothing loads for
measuring the drying performance of clothes dryers. ANSI/AHAM's test
procedure, HLD-1-2010, ``Household Tumble Type Clothes Dryers''
(``ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010'') specifies the use of 100-percent cotton bed
sheets, towels, and pillowcases. The bedsheets and pillowcases are
plain weave linen, while the towels are huckaback weave. ANSI/AHAM HLD-
1-2010, Annex A. IEC Standard 61121, Edition 4.0 2012-02, ``Tumble
dryers for household use--Methods for measuring the performance''
(``IEC Standard 61121'') incorporates by reference from IEC's consumer
clothes washer test procedure two different test loads: (1) the
``Cotton test load,'' which comprises 100-percent cotton bed sheets,
towels, and pillowcases consistent with ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010; and (2)
the ``Synthetics/blends test load,'' which comprises pillowcases and
buttoned men's shirts fabricated from plain weave 35-percent cotton and
65-percent polyester fabric. IEC Standard 61121, sections 6.5.6.1-
6.5.6.2.
Another procedure that uses a variety of test cloth materials is
the ``Utility Test Protocol'' \25\ (``UTP'') developed by NEEA and the
California IOUs, which utilities and efficiency advocates have
encouraged DOE to consider as a model for implementing revised test
loads. (California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 1-3) The UTP is an investigative
test method that was developed based on data collected in 2012 as part
of the 2014 NEEA field study. It consists of one test using the
appendix D2 test procedure and four supplemental tests that use a range
of test load compositions, test load sizes, and cycle settings.\26\ The
UTP generates a combined energy metric referred to as the Utility
Combined Energy Factor (``UCEF''), comprised of a weighted average of
each model's energy efficiency performance on each of the five tests,
using weighting factors determined by a best fit between lab and field
test data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ Available at https://neea.org/resources/energy-efficiency-test-procedure-for-residential-clothes-dryers-1.
\26\ The ``Utility Test Protocol'' consists of a series of five
tests: (1) Using the appendix D2 test method; (2) using a 4.22-pound
``real-world'' load with the medium temperature setting and ``eco''
mode deactivated; (3) using a 16.9-pound ``real-world'' load with
the medium temperature setting and ``eco'' mode deactivated; (4)
using an 8.45-pound ``real-world'' load using the most efficient
setting configuration possible; and (5) using an 8.45-pound ``real-
world'' load using settings that achieves the fastest rate of drying
possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEEA, the Joint Commenters, and CEC urged DOE to consider adopting
test loads with material more similar to real clothing, stating that
cloth material has a significant impact on clothes dryer efficiency.
NEEA and the Joint Commenters recommended that DOE consider adopting an
optional test procedure that uses a test load with varied size,
thickness, and fabric types, such as the IEC or AHAM test loads, which
commenters suggested would be more representative. The Joint Commenters
suggested that DOE monitor the IEC test procedure development. CEC
referenced a Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (``PNNL'') study
\27\ that showed differences in load dryness and drying rate between
the DOE test load and the AHAM test load. CEC stated that the AHAM test
load, consisting of bed sheets, pillowcases, and hand towels, is less
uniform and more challenging to dry, and that PNNL found that the AHAM
test load had a higher moisture content than the DOE test load as the
clothes dryer entered automatic cycle termination. NEEA emphasized the
impact of test cloth material on heat-pump clothes dryer performance
particularly and also stated that appendix D2 results for both high
efficiency and low efficiency models aligned well with the results for
test loads with using fabrics of differing weights and materials, but
failed to distinguish between moderately efficient models. (NEEA,
Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 18, 20, 22-23, 106-109, 117-
118; Joint Commenters, No. 34 at p. 2; CEC, No. 31 at p. 2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ TeGrotenhuis, W, PNNL, Clothes Dryer Automatic Termination
Sensor Evaluation, September 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Energy Solutions commented that the thickness of the test cloth has
a large impact on clothes dryer performance, regardless of type of
material used. Energy Solutions suggested that DOE take cloth thickness
into consideration when balancing representativeness and repeatability
in the test procedure. (Energy Solutions, Public Meeting Transcript,
No. 23 at pp. 21-22)
GEA commented that there is inherent variation in natural fibers of
a single uniform cloth, even within specially manufactured DOE test
cloth lots, that creates variability that impacts the reliability of
the DOE test procedure. AHAM claimed that the summary of test data from
the 2019 PG&E testing, prepared by Energy Solutions,\28\ shows that
changing the test load composition
[[Page 56623]]
as indicated by the PG&E testing will introduce significant additional
variation, beyond that of the current DOE test cloth. AHAM stated that
test procedures with significant variation do not provide uniform or
reliable results for the purpose of allowing consumers to make informed
purchase decisions based on energy use/efficiency because the results
of a highly variable test procedure are not comparable within or across
brands. AHAM and GEA asserted that the 2014 NEEA field study provides
an insufficient basis on which to amend the test procedure, and the
concept of a ``real-world'' test load that would significantly increase
test variation is incompatible with the requirement that test
procedures be ``reasonably designed,'' in accordance with EPCA (42
U.S.C. 6293(b)(3)). AHAM also stated that data collected on test load
composition and consumer use would need to be national to be
representative or to inform rulemaking decisions, because clothing
washed and dried varies by climate and season. Without such data, AHAM
maintains that it is impossible and inappropriate to determine or
change the average use/cycle in a test procedure. AHAM noted that the
DOE clothes dryer test procedure, including the test load composition,
is based on consumer use studies and changing the test would require
showing that something has changed with regard to consumer behavior or
that more accurate consumer use study data are available. AHAM asserted
that the 2014 NEEA field study is not a sufficient basis upon which to
make changes to the clothes dryer test procedure, namely the test load
composition, given that it was conducted only in the Pacific Northwest
and only during the winter season, and therefore not representative of
the laundry composition of the entire nation throughout the year.
(AHAM, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 98-99 AHAM, No. 33 at
pp. 3-4; GEA, No. 37 at p. 2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ PG&E Residential Dryer Testing, Residential Clothes Dryer
Test Protocol Investigation, Prepared by David Jagger, Energy
Solutions (Sept. 6, 2019), Docket No. EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034; RIN
1904-AD46; ID EERE-2014-BT-TP-0034-0024 (Posted Sept. 30, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Altering the test cloth composition would require further
investigation into a suitable representative replacement. The data
provided by the 2014 NEEA field study (discussed in section III.D.1.a.i
of this document) are insufficiently representative to justify the
significant cost of developing and transitioning to a new type of test
cloth, due to the limited sample size, region, and time of year during
which the studies were conducted, as discussed previously in AHAM's
comment.
As explained previously, DOE is unaware of any new information that
would alter its previous determination, that testing using the IEC and
AHAM test loads is less representative than testing with the DOE test
load, to warrant any modifications to the DOE test procedure at this
time. 78 FR 49608, 49620 (Aug. 14, 2013). DOE therefore is not making
any changes to the test cloth material requirements in appendix D1 and
appendix D2 at this time.
However, in light of the feedback received regarding test load
composition, DOE will continue to evaluate the representativeness of
test results obtained through the use of the current test load
composition requirements in the DOE test procedure. DOE will also
continue to monitor development of industry standards and other efforts
related to test load composition.
d. Test Cycle Selections
Section 3.3.2 of appendix D2 specifies that for automatic
termination control clothes dryers, the ``normal'' program shall be
selected for the test cycle. For clothes dryers that do not have a
``normal'' program, the cycle recommended by the manufacturer for
drying cotton or linen shall be selected. If the drying temperature
setting can be chosen independently of the program, it shall be set to
the maximum. If the dryness level setting can be chosen independently
of the program, it shall be set to the ``normal'' or ``medium'' dryness
level setting. After the completion of the test cycle, the test load is
removed and weighed. If the FMC is greater than 2 percent, the test is
considered invalid and a new run shall be conducted using the highest
dryness level setting.
Industry standards address cycle selection differently from the DOE
test procedure. Section 4.5.1 of ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010 specifies that
the test cycle be run using the maximum temperature setting without
allowing the clothes dryer to advance into the cool down period. If the
required FMC specified in the industry standard (6 percent) cannot be
met using this setting, a new test run must be conducted using a
different user-selected setting that will achieve the target FMC, as
described in section 4.5.6 of ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010. IEC Standard 61121
requires that the test cycle for a given load composition be run using
the cycle program and settings specified in the manufacturer's
instructions to achieve a target FMC, which is based on the test load
composition; in the absence of any instructions from the manufacturer,
or if the specified cycle program and settings do not achieve the
required FMC, the test shall be run using a user-selected combination
of cycle program and settings that will achieve the required FMC, as
specified in section 8.2.2 of IEC Standard 61121 .
In response to the July 2019 NOPR, NEEA, the Joint Commenters, and
the California IOUs urged DOE to consider including additional test
cycle selections in the test procedure. NEEA and the California IOUs
suggested that DOE should capture the impact of ``eco'' mode settings,
since they asserted that the ``eco'' mode settings are often only
enabled by default on the ``normal'' cycle. The California IOUs cited
the 2019 PG&E testing and reported that 15 clothes dryers among the
2019 PG&E testing sample of 22 had an ``eco'' mode that was active by
default on the ``normal'' setting, but not active by default on other
cycle programs. For some units, the ``eco'' setting was not a
selectable option during a ``high'' or ``low'' temperature cycle. The
California IOUs further commented that PG&E testing at an independent
lab in accordance with appendix D2 with and without the ``eco'' mode
yielded results that showed changes in CEF rank order, performance, and
cycle time compared to the average when the ``eco'' setting is on or
off. NEEA and the California IOUs recommended that DOE add additional
cycle selections to the test procedure to mitigate the impact of
``eco'' mode settings, and NEEA stated that this should be accomplished
by adding a ``fast test cycle'' (i.e., a cycle with a shorter duration)
at the standard load size. Based on the 2014 NEEA field study and
another NEEA field study conducted in 2017 that looked exclusively at
load sizes and settings for the most efficient clothes dryers, NEEA
asserted that 20 percent to 60 percent of all loads monitored were
dried using the shortest cycle time available on the machine. NEEA and
the Joint Commenters commented that heat pump clothes dryers
particularly suffer efficiency losses on shorter cycle time settings,
since much of their efficiency gain is obtained by drying the clothes
at a lower temperature for a longer period of time, resulting in
changes in efficiency rank order when a shorter cycle that uses more
electric resistance heat is tested. The Joint Commenters also noted
that some clothes dryers default to the most recent cycle used, which
could lead to consumers not using the normal cycle for extended periods
of time, meaning that testing additional cycle selections could
increase representativeness. (NEEA, No. 38 at pp. 3, 12-;16, 18; Joint
Commenters, No. 34 at p. 2; California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 15-16)
AHAM commented that it is unclear whether the data presented in the
2014
[[Page 56624]]
NEEA field study are an accurate reflection of consumer cycle settings,
as the study relied on the consumers to log their data, which may not
be accurate. AHAM further asserted that without knowledge of the
controls of the monitored clothes dryers, it is difficult to draw
conclusions regarding the frequency of cycle selections, and those
cycle selections could be impacted by the type of clothing, which was
potentially heavier during the winter months. AHAM asserted that the
data from the 2014 NEEA field study may not be representative of
consumer use across the entire United States over the course of a year
and, on their own, are not a sufficient basis upon which to justify
significant changes to the test procedure. (AHAM, No. 33 at p. 3)
While the comments recommending the inclusion of additional test
cycle selections suggest that changing the cycle setting could change
efficiency rank order, DOE did not receive sufficient data and
information to confirm that the current test selections are
unrepresentative of consumer use and that other or additional test
selections are warranted. DOE notes that the data presented from the
2014 NEEA field study may not be representative of annual national
clothes dryer usage, and the 2019 PG&E market survey showed differences
between the Pacific Northwest and the rest of the country in test cycle
selections, as discussed in section III.D.a.iv of this final rule.
Therefore, DOE maintains its prior determination that the ``normal''
cycle test in appendix D2 and the required temperature and dryness
settings are appropriately representative. See 78 FR 49608, 49612-49613
(Aug. 14, 2013). For these reasons, DOE maintains the current approach
of requiring a single cycle test, in section 3.3 of appendix D1 and
appendix D2.
e. Moisture Content
i. Initial Moisture Content
Sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 of appendix D1 specify to extract water
from the energy cloths for a test load for a compact-size dryer load
and standard-size dryer load, respectively, so that the IMC is between
54.0 and 61.0 percent of the bone-dry weight of the test load. Sections
2.7.1 and 2.7.2 of appendix D2 specify that the IMC of energy cloths
for a compact-size dryer load and standard-size dryer load,
respectively, after extraction must be between 52.5 and 57.5 percent of
the bone-dry weight of the test load. Appendix D2 also provides
additional instruction that any final mass adjustments to achieve the
specified IMC for the energy test cycle (57.5 percent0.33
percent) are made by uniformly adding water to each test cloth using a
spray bottle. Appendix D2, sections 2.7.1 and 2.7.2.
AHAM recommended that the appendix D1 test load IMC (i.e., 54.0 to
61.0 percent) should be aligned with that of appendix D2 (i.e., 57.5
percent 0.33 percent). AHAM also recommended specifying in
appendix D1 the same method for test cloth IMC adjustment that is
described in appendix D2 (i.e., add water uniformly distributed among
all of the test clothes in a very fine spray using a spray bottle).
AHAM commented that aligning the method in appendix D1 with that in
appendix D2 would make it easier for test technicians who conduct both
tests. AHAM also suggested that water temperature has a significant
effect on drying performance, which can cause test variation. AHAM
suggested that the test procedure specify that the temperature of the
spray bottle water must be 60 [deg]F5 [deg]F, with a
nominal target of 60 [deg]F. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 12-13)
Appendix D1 requires, in addition to an IMC of 54.0 to 61.0 percent
(i.e., 57.5 percent 3.5 percent), an FMC between 2.5 and
5.0 percent for all clothes dryers. Appendix D1, sections 2.7.1, 2.7.2,
and 3.3. The measured test cycle energy consumption is then normalized
to calculate the energy consumption required to dry the test load from
exactly 57.5-percent IMC to 2-percent FMC, which is representative of
clothes dryers currently on the market and of the maximum consumer-
accepted FMC. Appendix D1, section 4.1. In the August 2013 Final Rule,
DOE reduced the tolerance on the IMC to 0.33 percent to produce
repeatable results specifically for clothes dryers with automatic
termination controls, for which no such normalization is required,
because the test cycle is run to completion. 78 FR 49608, 49618 (Aug.
14, 2013). Because appendix D1 does not specify running any test cycles
to completion and instead applies normalization of the test cycle
energy consumption for both timer and automatic termination control
clothes dryers, the IMC requirements for appendix D1 do not require the
more stringent tolerance of those in appendix D2, avoiding increased
test burden associated with test load conditioning. As such, DOE is not
amending the required IMC in appendix D1.
However, DOE agrees with AHAM that appendix D1 would benefit from
the additional direction for adding water to the test load using a
spray bottle as provided in appendix D2. The previous version of
appendix D1 does not instruct what to do if the test load IMC is too
low upon removing the test load from the extractor. A test laboratory
may interpret, in this case, that the test load must be re-wet and re-
spun until an acceptable IMC is achieved, which would add testing
burden. Appendix D2 provides means to increase the IMC of such a test
load in a much less burdensome manner through the use of a spray
bottle.
To quantify the burden associated with test cloth preparation, DOE
investigated the repeatability of the extractor to achieve a specified
moisture content. In accordance with appendix D1 and appendix D2, DOE
prepared three standard-size test loads and two compact-size test
loads, weighed before and after the extractor cycle. For the three
standard-size test loads, two test loads were prepared twice and one
test load was prepared once, for a total of five extractor tests. For
the two compact-size test loads, both were prepared twice, for a total
of four extractor tests. The North Star Engineered Products Inc.
(formerly Bock) Model 215 extractor, specified in section 3.2 of the
DOE clothes washer test procedure at 10 CFR part 430, subpart B,
appendix J3 (``appendix J3''), was used in this investigation, with the
same extractor spin setting selected for all tests. DOE expects that
this extractor is representative of typical clothes dryer testing
equipment at commercial test laboratories. The IMC values of this
investigation are shown in Table III.3. Note that these IMC values were
recorded prior to the use of a spray bottle according to the method in
appendix D2.
Table III.3--Water Extraction Results From Extractor Investigation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extractor test Test load % IMC (no spray bottle used) Within range defined by appendix D1?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................... Standard #1.................. 53.13................................... No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.................................... Standard #2.................. 55.30................................... Yes.
[[Page 56625]]
3.................................... 55.25................................... Yes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.................................... Standard #3.................. 54.20................................... Yes.
5.................................... 53.63................................... No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard-Size Test Load Range....................................... 53.1-55.3............................... ........................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix D1 Range................................................... 54.0-61.0............................... ........................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.................................... Compact #1................... 57.51................................... Yes.
6.................................... 56.77................................... Yes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.................................... Compact #2................... 56.81................................... Yes.
8.................................... 57.51................................... Yes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compact-Size Test Load Range........................................ 56.8-57.5............................... ........................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix D1 Range................................................... 54.0-61.0............................... ........................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For all but two test loads, the extractor produced an IMC within
the range of 54.0 to 61.0 percent, as specified in appendix D1;
however, two standard-size test loads had IMCs less than 54 percent
(the minimum of the range defined in appendix D1). These results
confirm that despite the wider range of target IMC values defined in
appendix D1 compared to those in appendix D2, the extractor can
sometimes lead to an IMC value lower than the target IMC range in
appendix D1. Without the moisture content adjustments provided by use
of a spray bottle as specified in appendix D2, the previous language of
appendix D1 suggests that test loads prepared under appendix D1 may
require re-wetting and re-spinning.
As summarized, DOE is amending appendix D1 to allow the use of a
spray bottle as necessary following the extractor run to achieve the
required IMC range. This will provide a reliable, validated, and
burden-reducing approach to ``fine-tune'' IMC values that fall just
below the target range, such as those seen in DOE's extractor
investigation. This additional direction provides a means to achieve
allowable IMC without the need to re-wet and re-spin the test load if
the IMC achieved by the extractor is below the target range of IMC.
DOE is not specifying the temperature of the spray bottle water
given the amount of time and air exposure that the test load encounters
while being spun in the extractor, sprayed, and loaded into the clothes
dryer. According to DOE investigative testing, the moisture content
provided by the spray bottle is approximately 0.03 percentage points
with each spray, up to a maximum of 5.33 percentage points that may be
added in the load under appendix D2 to achieve the specified moisture
content of the test load of 57.5 0.33 percent. Recognizing
that without such specification, the temperature of water in the spray
bottle could be closer to room temperature (i.e., only slightly higher
than AHAM's suggestion of 60 [deg]F), it is implausible that the
temperature of the water in the spray bottle would change the
temperature of the load enough to impact the dryer performance.
In summary, DOE is aligning appendix D1 with appendix D2 by
specifically providing for the use of a spray bottle to add water to
test loads that are below the acceptable IMC range minimum of 54.0
percent following the extractor run. DOE is not adding a temperature
specification for the spray bottle water.
ii. Final Moisture Content
Section 3.3.1 of appendix D2 specifies that for timer clothes
dryers, the test load is dried until the FMC is between 1 and 2.5
percent of the bone-dry weight of the test load. The measured energy
consumption is then normalized to determine the energy consumption
required to dry the test load to 2-percent FMC, with a field use factor
applied to account for the over-drying energy consumption, in section
4.1 of appendix D2. For automatic termination control clothes dryers,
section 3.3.2 of appendix D2 specifies that a test is considered valid
if the FMC of the test load is 2 percent or less. DOE did not propose
amending the FMC requirement of appendix D2 in the July 2019 NOPR.
The California IOUs stated that the 2-percent FMC under the DOE
test conditions is appropriate, though suggested that a higher FMC may
be appropriate when accounting for additional test conditions, such as
changes in clothes dryer settings or a more realistic clothes dryer
load. In the absence of any changes to these settings or test load, the
California IOUs recommended maintaining the current 2-percent FMC.
(California IOUs, No. 29 at p. 20)
Samsung, AHAM, BSH, and GEA commented that requiring an FMC of 2
percent or less promotes over-drying and unnecessary additional energy
use; and further, because clothes that are over-dried will typically
re-absorb moisture from ambient air during cool-down phases of the
drying cycle and after termination of the drying cycle, a higher FMC,
between 5 percent and 8 percent, results. Samsung suggested a 4-percent
FMC requirement, corresponding to estimated moisture up-take from bone-
dry conditions on the 100 percent cotton IEC test load. AHAM and GEA
suggested that DOE adopt an FMC range of 3 to 4 percent, with a target
of 4 percent. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 5, 12; BSH, No. 30 at pp. 1-2, 4;
GEA, No. 37 at p. 2; Samsung, No. 36 at p. 2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ UL 2158 can be accessed at https://standardscatalog.ul.com/standards/en/standard_2158_4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BSH and AHAM also referenced the December 2015 Underwriters
Laboratory (``UL'') clothes dryer safety requirement in UL 2158,
``North American Dryer Safety Standard'' that the requirement of a
cool-down period if the temperature at the clothes dryer's lint filter
exceeds 131 [deg]F (55 [deg]C) at the end of the drying cycle as a
source of difficulty for ventless condensing clothes dryers in meeting
the current 2-percent FMC requirement in appendix D2.\29\ BSH commented
that due to the drying
[[Page 56626]]
process of a condensing clothes dryer with a closed-loop process air
system, the FMC increases rapidly during the cool-down period.\30\ AHAM
and BSH asserted that due to the UL 2158 requirement, attaining an FMC
of 2 percent on condensing clothes dryers is impractical, and without
costly design changes and adjustments to the test procedure, ventless
condensing clothes dryers cannot consistently meet both the new UL 2158
safety limit and the current FMC requirement. BSH suggested a separate
FMC target of 4 percent for ventless clothes to compensate for the UL
2158 safety requirement and otherwise agreed with the current 2-percent
FMC requirement for vented clothes dryers. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 5, 12;
BSH, No. 30 at pp. 1-2, 4)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ A ventless condensing clothes dryer recirculates the air
used to remove moisture from the load during the entire drying
cycle. The clothes dryer uses ambient air or cold water in a heat
exchanger to condense the moisture from the air in the drum. The dry
air exiting the drum is then reheated and recirculated back into the
drum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AHAM and BSH also recommended that DOE specify a time limit in
which the test load must be weighed after stopping the test cycle to
minimize test variation and moisture reabsorption. BSH recommended that
the test load be weighed within 10 seconds of the drying cycle
termination, and AHAM recommended that the test load be weighed
immediately after and within a maximum of 2 minutes after cycle
termination. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 5, 12; BSH, No. 30 at pp. 1-2, 4;
GEA, No. 37 at p. 2; Samsung, No. 36 at p. 2)
The current 2-percent FMC requirement using the DOE test cloth was
adopted as representative of approximately 5-percent FMC for ``real-
world'' clothing, based on data submitted in a joint petition for
rulemaking.\31\ DOE determined in the August 2013 Final Rule that the
specified 2-percent FMC using the DOE test load was representative of
consumer expectations for dryness of clothing in field use. 78 FR
49608, 49620-49622, 49610-49611 (Aug. 14, 2013).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ The petition was submitted by AHAM, Whirlpool Corporation,
General Electric Company, Electrolux, LG Electronics, Inc., BSH,
Alliance Laundry Systems, Viking Range, Sub-Zero Wolf, Friedrich A/
C, U-Line, Samsung, Sharp Electronics, Miele, Heat Controller, AGA
Marvel, Brown Stove, Haier, Fagor America, Airwell Group, Arcelik,
Fisher & Paykel, Scotsman Ice, Indesit, Kuppersbusch, Kelon, and
DeLonghi, American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy,
Appliance Standards Awareness Project, Natural Resources Defense
Council, Alliance to Save Energy, Alliance for Water Efficiency,
Northwest Power and Conservation Council, and Northeast Energy
Efficiency Partnerships, Consumer Federation of America and the
National Consumer Law Center. See Docket No. EERE-2011-BT-TP-0054,
No. 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE reviewed the UL 2158 safety requirements and noted that Clause
12 of UL 2158 requires a cool-down period if the drying cycle air
temperature exceeds 131 [deg]F at the end of the drying cycle, as
measured at the first lint filter. This cool-down period is required to
reduce the temperature of the clothes load to a suitable level before
the user is alerted that the drying cycle has ended. As described in
Clause 12.1 of UL 2158, this safety standard is in place to reduce the
risk of spontaneous ignition of the clothes load. DOE acknowledges that
the air temperature limit specified by UL 2158 (i.e., requiring a cool-
down period to ensure the temperature at the first lint filter at the
end of the drying cycle does not exceed 131 [deg]F) may result in
moisture regain by the load. DOE notes that the safety requirement
regarding cool-down periods was introduced in the fourth edition of UL
2158 and has been effective since December 2015. In its internal
testing since that time, DOE has not identified any systemic problems
with any clothes dryer types, including ventless condensing clothes
dryers, being able to achieve the required FMC of 2 percent or less,
such that amendments to the test procedure would be warranted.
Furthermore, commenters did not provide any test results or data to
demonstrate that the maximum 2-percent FMC limit is impracticable or
unachievable given the UL 2158 safety requirements. DOE also notes that
multiple ventless condensing clothes dryers from various manufacturers
have been certified to DOE under the appendix D2 test procedure since
the introduction of the safety standard in 2015.
Based on the preceding discussion, DOE is not amending the FMC
requirement for either appendix D1 or appendix D2 in this final rule.
Regarding a time limit in which the test load must be weighed after
stopping the test cycle, section 3.3 of previous appendix D1 and
sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 of previous appendix D2 required that the test
load be weighed ``after stopping the test cycle'' (for timer clothes
dryers) or ``after the completion of the test cycle'' (for automatic
termination control clothes dryers). To better quantify the potential
reabsorption effects associated with the interval between completing
the clothes dryer test cycle and weighing the test cloth, DOE tested
seven clothes dryers according to appendix D2, with five different time
periods for weighing the test cloth after termination of the drying
cycle. During the waiting period, the test cloth remained in the
clothes dryer drum with the door closed. These time periods ranged from
weighing the test cloth as immediately as practicable after termination
of the drying cycle to 30 minutes after termination of the drying
cycle. DOE acknowledges that test load FMC may change after completion
of the clothes dryer cycle, generally regaining moisture; however,
testing found that the moisture content for certain units decreased as
the waiting period increased, relative to the immediate weighing.
Figure III.4 shows the change in FMC measured at varying waiting
periods relative to the FMC recorded immediately upon removal of the
test load after the drying cycle termination.
[[Page 56627]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR08OC21.025
As shown in Figure III.4, moisture regain and loss relative to the
immediately measured FMC were observed at the various time periods,
with more significant changes in FMC as the time periods increased. At
the 5-minute waiting period, however, variation in FMC was consistently
within 0.1 percentage points of the FMC recorded immediately after the
drying cycle terminated for all units tested. According to these
results, and in order to ensure repeatability, reproducibility, and
representativeness of the FMC measurement, a time limit of 5 minutes,
within which the test load must be weighed, appears appropriate to
minimize variability in FMC from the value immediately upon completion
of the cycle.
As best practice would result in weighing the test load without any
unnecessary delay, and DOE has no indication that testing is currently
conducted inconsistent with best practices, DOE does not expect any
increase in test burden associated with adoption of a reasonable time
limit on weighing the test cloth after termination of a drying cycle to
ensure repeatable, reproducible, and representative results. Therefore,
to limit any potential variability in the test procedure associated
with moisture reabsorption following the test cycle, DOE is amending
section 3.3 of appendix D1 and sections 3.3.1 and 3.3.2 of appendix D2
to specify that FMC must be recorded within 5 minutes following the
termination of the drying test cycle.
iii. Final Moisture Content Requirements for Automatic Termination
Control Dryers
Section 3.3.2 of appendix D2 specifies that for automatic
termination control dryers, the clothes dryer is operated until the
completion of the programmed cycle, including the cool down period. The
test procedure provides that, if the FMC is greater than 2 percent, the
test is invalid and a new run must be conducted using the highest
dryness level setting. In guidance issued on January 10, 2017 (``2017
Guidance''),\32\ DOE provided its interpretation that the 2-percent FMC
threshold for a valid test also applies to a test run conducted using
the highest dryness level setting, if required. As explained in the
2017 Guidance, DOE's interpretation that the 2-percent final moisture
content threshold for a valid test should apply to all test cycles
conducted according to section 3.3.2 of Appendix D2, including test
runs using the highest 2 dryness level setting, is consistent with the
EPCA requirements that test procedures must be ``reasonably designed to
produce test results'' that measure energy use ``during a
representative average use cycle.'' 42 U.S.C. 6293(b)(3). Based on the
information presented during the prior rulemaking, during the
representative average use of a clothes dryer, clothes are dried to an
FMC that is equivalent to 2-percent FMC in the DOE test load.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ Clothes Dryer Final Guidance issued January 10, 2017.
Available at www1.eere.energy.gov/guidance/detail_search.aspx?IDQuestion=665&pid=2&spid=1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE noted in the July 2019 NOPR that, as part of the August 2013
Final Rule, interested parties submitted a joint comment presenting
test results that demonstrate that an FMC of 2 percent using the DOE
test cloth is representative of the consumer-accepted dryness level
after completion of a drying cycle. 84 FR 35484, 35497 (July 23, 2019);
see also 78 FR 49608, 49614 (Aug. 14, 2013). DOE agreed with this
conclusion and adopted provisions that specify that a test conducted on
the ``normal'' or ``medium'' dryness setting is considered valid only
if the FMC is 2 percent or lower. 78 FR 49608, 49621, 49624 (Aug. 14,
2013).
The California IOUs and the Joint Commenters supported DOE's
clarification that the second test following a failed first test in
which the clothes dryer did not achieve an FMC less than or equal to 2
percent should be held to the same FMC requirements as the first test.
The California IOUs stated that the second test should not provide a
``loophole,'' whereby a unit could fail the first test and then use the
results of the second test regardless of the FMC. The California IOUs
suggested that without this consistency in test procedure and results,
clothes dryers that are certified to the second test would not be
comparable to those that passed the first test. (California IOUs, No.
29 at p. 20; Joint Commenters, No. 34 at p. 3)
AHAM and Whirlpool expressed concern that it is unclear how
[[Page 56628]]
verification and enforcement testing would address the requirement that
a second test run must meet the required FMC. They suggested that the
existing test procedure variation could be enough to cause false
findings of non-compliance and may result in a large number of test
procedure waiver requests. Whirlpool stated that this requirement would
lead manufacturers to conservatively over-dry loads to well below 2-
percent FMC, which wastes energy, instead of using the 2-percent FMC as
a design target rather than an enforceable performance measure.
Whirlpool also suggested that the CEF in the test run with highest
dryness level be used regardless of FMC, as Whirlpool asserted that
market forces would ensure manufacturers do not intentionally design
clothes dryers with unreasonably high FMC. AHAM suggested raising the
FMC for all test runs to accommodate concerns regarding non-compliance
and test procedure variation. (AHAM, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23
at pp. 38-39; AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 5-6; Whirlpool, No. 32 at p. 2)
GEA suggested that there should be no FMC requirement for a second
run test under the appendix D2 procedure. GEA noted that the second
test run is already performed at the maximum dryness setting, and the
clothes dryer is, therefore, subject to a higher performance condition
and corresponding increased energy usage. GEA suggested that using the
highest dryness setting for the second run ensures appropriate energy
usage by a compliant clothes dryer regardless of the FMC, as the
clothes dryer is unable to use any more energy for the selected cycle
(given that the highest dryness setting was selected). GEA further
commented that any remaining moisture in clothing after a cycle is
complete on the highest dryness setting is a performance concern, and
not an energy efficiency concern, and is therefore outside the scope of
the appliance standards program as established under EPCA. (GEA, No. 37
at pp. 2-3)
As discussed, the 2-percent FMC requirement was developed through
collaboration with, and consideration of data submitted by, interested
parties as part of the August 2013 Final Rule. 78 FR 49608, 49614 (Aug.
14, 2013) Interested parties have not presented any data or information
since then that would suggest changes in consumer expectations of
dryness levels. Therefore, DOE continues to agree with the conclusion
from the August 2013 Final Rule that an FMC of 2 percent using the DOE
test cloth is representative of the consumer-accepted dryness level
after completion of a drying cycle. Thus, a test that does not produce
an FMC of 2 percent or less would not be reflective of representative
energy use, in that FMC values at or below this threshold represent
consumer-accepted dryness.
DOE notes that clothes dryer models are certified to DOE and
available on the market representing the entire range of venting
configurations (vented and ventless), capacity categories (standard and
compact), product configurations (stand-alone clothes dryer and
combination washer/dryer), energy sources (120V electric, 240V
electric, and gas), and drying technologies (electric resistance,
water-cooled condensing, air-cooled condensing, and electric heat pump)
from multiple manufacturers within each product attribute. The range of
available product offerings indicates the ability to achieve a 2-
percent FMC across the entire spectrum of clothes dryer design
characteristics currently available on the market. Furthermore, DOE has
not received any waiver requests, either before or after publishing the
2017 Guidance, regarding an inability to achieve an FMC value of 2
percent or less.
DOE further notes that 2-percent FMC is not a design ``target,''
but rather a maximum threshold. Any FMC value of 2 percent or less
(i.e., 0-2 percent) would represent a valid test. DOE has observed in
its testing FMC values spanning the full range of 0-2 percent. Table
III.4 shows the range in FMC values from DOE's testing of 30 different
consumer clothes dryers under appendix D2 at a normal dryness setting.
These units spanned multiple manufacturers, product classes,
capacities, and drying technologies.
Table III.4--FMC Ranges From DOE Testing
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
FMC range (%) units
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0-0.5................................................... 3
0.5-1.0................................................. 8
1.0-1.5................................................. 10
1.5-2.0................................................. 9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In summary, drying to an FMC of 2 percent or less using the DOE
test cloth is representative of the consumer-accepted dryness level of
a clothing load after completion of a drying cycle. The prevalence of
certified consumer clothes dryer models spanning the entire spectrum of
design characteristics indicates no inherent inability to achieve an
FMC of 2 percent or less for any clothes dryer type currently available
on the market. For these reasons, as supported by the preceding
discussion, DOE is amending appendix D2 as proposed to specify that the
2-percent FMC requirement applies to all appendix D2 test runs (i.e.,
including the second test run conducted using the highest dryness level
setting, if required). If the basic model under test fails to achieve
an FMC of 2 percent or less when tested at the highest dryness level
setting, the measured energy consumption of the clothes dryer would not
reflect a representative average use cycle, since it would not have
dried the clothing to a consumer-accepted dryness level. Such test
results may not be used for certification of compliance with energy
conservation standards.
Finally, in the July 2019 NOPR, DOE also proposed to amend the
nomenclature of section 4.1 through section 4.4 of appendix D2 to
clarify that the measured energy consumption values represented by
Ece, Ege, Egg, and Ecg,
respectively, reflect the energy required to achieve an FMC of 2
percent or less. 84 FR 35484, 35496-35497 (July 23, 2019).
Given that there were no comments or concerns with the nomenclature
proposed in the July 2019 NOPR, in this final rule DOE is amending the
nomenclature of section 4.1 through section 4.4 of appendix D2 as
proposed in the July 2019 NOPR.
f. Annual Drying Cycles and Hours Per Year
Section 4.5 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 assigns the
representative average use for clothes dryers at 283 drying cycles per
year. This estimate was developed based on data provided by the 2005
Energy Information Administration's ``Residential Energy Consumption
Survey'' (``RECS''). 76 FR 972, 1010 (Jan. 6, 2011). In the 2019 TP
NOPR, DOE did not propose an updated value for the annual drying cycles
and hours per year, declining to make changes based on a limited field
study conducted by NEEA. 84 FR 35484, 35492 (July 23, 2019). DOE noted
that its current estimate was developed based on data from the most
recent version of RECS at the time the cycles-per-year value was
established. 84 FR 35484, 35491 (July 23, 2019). DOE stated that it was
continuing to seek data regarding the cycles per year. 84 FR 35484,
35492, 35504 (July 23, 2019).
AHAM commented that the 2015 version of RECS indicates that 238
clothes dryer cycles per year would be more appropriate, as it is based
on more recent and nationally representative data. AHAM commented that
a reduction in number of annual clothes
[[Page 56629]]
dryer cycles would be consistent with the trend for the average number
of annual clothes washer cycles, which based on RECS 2015 data, AHAM
asserted is 241. AHAM suggested that DOE update the number of annual
clothes dryer cycles based on more recent national data. (AHAM, No. 33
at pp. 4-5)
To develop the estimate of 283 clothes dryer cycles per year
previously specified in the test procedure, DOE utilized the 2005 RECS
data to estimate the average number of clothes dryer cycles per year
based on clothes washer cycle data and a clothes dryer usage factor
(the percentage of washer loads dried in a clothes dryer).\33\ The 2015
RECS data, which included cycle data specific to clothes dryers, was
first released in April 2017, and then subsequently updated multiple
times with the most recent update, Version 4, released in December
2018.\34\ DOE calculated the average number of clothes dryer cycles per
year, using the reported number of laundry loads (clothes dryer cycles)
dried per week for each sample home in the 2015 RECS data set with a
clothes dryer, which is the same methodology DOE used to develop the
estimates of 283 clothes dryer cycles per year based on the 2005 RECS
data set. Using this methodology, DOE calculated 236 cycles per year
from the 2015 RECS data. Because this estimate is based on more recent
consumer usage data than the previous estimate of 283 cycles pear year,
DOE concludes that the estimate of 236 cycles per year is a more
representative estimate of the average number of annual clothes dryer
cycles at this time. DOE notes that its estimate of 236 clothes dryer
cycles per year is very close to the estimate of 238 cycles per year
presented by AHAM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ The 2005 RECS provided data regarding how often a clothes
dryer was used following a clothes washer cycle, with answers of
``every time you wash clothes'', ``use it for some, but not all
loads of wash'', ``use it infrequently''. Using that information and
clothes washer usage data, the estimate of 283 annual clothes dryer
cycles was developed.
\34\ The most recent RECS microdata can be accessed at
www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2015/index.php?view=microdata.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE is updating the estimate of the representative average annual
number of clothes dryer cycles per year in section 4.5 of appendix D2.
This update maintains the methodology used to establish the average
number of clothes dryer cycles per year and updates the resulting
average based on an update to the underlying data source (i.e., RECS),
as recommended by commenters. The updated estimate will impact the
measured energy efficiency of clothes dryers by reducing the portion of
annual hours in active mode, thereby increasing the per-cycle standby
mode and off mode energy consumption as determined in section 4.5 of
appendix D2. Also, DOE notes that the current energy conservation
standards were developed based on the 283 cycles per year estimate. As
such, the updated clothes dryer annual cycles per year estimate will be
required beginning on the compliance date of amended energy
conservation standards for clothes dryers, should standards be amended.
Prior to any such amendment to the energy conservation standards, the
DOE test procedure will continue to use the estimate of 283 clothes
dryer cycles per year in the per-cycle standby mode and off mode energy
consumption calculation.
2. Inactive and Off Mode Power Measurements
Section 3.6 of appendix D1 and appendix D2 \35\ provides the
instructions for measuring standby (``inactive'') mode 36 37
and off mode \38\ power on the clothes dryer. The per-cycle combined
total energy consumption of a clothes dryer includes the combined
representative measures of inactive mode and off mode power in sections
4.5 and 4.6, respectively, of appendix D1 and appendix D2. The test
procedure distinguishes between inactive mode and off mode. However,
when only one of the low-power modes is present, regardless of whether
the low-power mode is considered inactive mode or off mode, the same
measurement and calculation is performed.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ In this final rule, section 3.6 of appendix D2 is being
renumbered as section 3.5, as a result of removing obsolete
provisions from the test procedures. See section III.E.5 of this
final rule for additional details.
\36\ Section 1.17 of appendix D1 and section 1.18 of appendix D2
define ``standby mode'' as any mode in which the product is
connected to a mains power source and offers one or more of the
following user-oriented or protective functions that may persist for
an indefinite period of time: (1) A function that facilitates the
activation of other modes (including activation or deactivation of
active mode) by remote switch (including remote control), internal
sensor, or timer; or (2) continuous functions, including information
or status displays (including clocks) or sensor-based functions. The
definition also specifies that a timer is a continuous clock
function (which may or may not be associated with a display) that
provides regular, scheduled tasks (e.g., switching) and that
operates on a continuous basis.
\37\ Section 1.12 of appendix D1 and section 1.13 of appendix D2
define ``inactive mode'' as a standby mode that facilitates the
activation of active mode by remote switch (including remote
control), internal sensor, or timer, or that provides continuous
status display.
\38\ Section 1.15 of appendix D1 and section 1.16 of appendix D2
define ``off mode'' as a mode in which the clothes dryer is
connected to a mains power source and is not providing any active
mode or standby function, and where the mode may persist for an
indefinite period of time. The definition further states that an
indicator that only shows the user that the product is in the off
position is included within the classification of an off mode.
\39\ Distinguishing inactive mode from off mode is not an issue
when both are present. When both modes are present, inactive mode
and off mode can be distinguished from each other based on the
measured energy use; i.e., inactive mode will result in a higher
measured energy use than off mode.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The prior test procedure for measuring inactive and/or off mode
power is as follows. Section 3.6.1 of appendix D1 and appendix D2
instructs inactive mode to be measured, if the clothes dryer has an
inactive mode, with the resulting measurement represented by the symbol
PIA. Similarly, section 3.6.2 of both appendices instructs
off mode power to be measured, if the clothes dryer has an off mode,
with the resulting distinct power measurement represented by symbol
POFF. In section 4.5 of both appendices, if a clothes dryer
has either inactive mode or off mode (but not both), the measured power
is multiplied by 8,620, representing the combined annual hours that the
clothes dryer is not in active mode (i.e., idle). Alternately, if a
clothes dryer has both inactive mode and off mode (e.g., an electronic
control panel that also provides a hard off switch that can completely
disconnect all power to the product), the power of each mode is
measured and multiplied by one-half of 8,620 (i.e., 4,310), and the
results are summed.\40\ As these sections were structured, a
determination first had to be made whether the low-power mode(s) that
exists on the clothes dryer meets the definition of inactive mode or
off mode--even though the same calculation applies, yielding the same
end result, regardless of the distinction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ This calculation represents an estimate that such a clothes
dryer would spend half of its low-power mode hours in inactive mode,
and the other half of its low-power mode hours in off mode.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed in the July 2019 NOPR, the ``off'' state on some
appliances is achieved through a software/firmware action (i.e.,
through a ``soft switch'') rather than a hard on/off switch (i.e., a
switch that physically breaks the connection to the mains power
supply), and it may not always be clear whether the product is
providing any active mode or standby function while in the ``off''
state. 84 FR 35484, 35495. To address questions regarding the potential
difficulty in determining whether the low-power mode is considered
inactive mode or off mode without needing to remove a product's console
to access the electrical schematic and/or determine if the switch is a
``hard'' switch or ``soft''
[[Page 56630]]
electronic switch, DOE proposed the following changes to appendix D1
and appendix D2 in the July 2019 NOPR:
Replace the symbols PIA and POFF,
for measuring inactive mode \41\ and off mode, respectively, with
Pdefault and Plowest, including revisions to the
calculation symbols in section 3.6.1 of appendix D1 and 3.5.1 of
appendix D2. Pdefault represents the low-power measurement
if only one power level is observed. If two power levels are observed,
Plowest represents the off mode power measurement and
Pdefault represents the inactive mode power measurement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ Inactive mode is the only type of standby mode required to
be measured in appendix D1 and appendix D2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For clothes dryers with both an inactive mode and off mode
(i.e., clothes dryers with electronic controls that offer an optional
switch (or other means) that can be selected by the end user to achieve
a lower power state than the default inactive/off mode state),\42\
section 3.6.2 of appendix D1 and 3.5.2 of appendix D2 require that,
after performing the measurement in section 3.6.1 of appendix D1 or
3.5.1 of appendix D2, the switch (or other means) be activated to the
position resulting in the lowest power consumption and the measurement
procedure described in section 3.6.1 and 3.5.1, respectively, be
repeated. Measure and record the average power consumption as the
lowest standby/off mode power, Plowest, in watts.
Revise section 3.6 of appendix D1 and newly renumbered
section 3.5 of appendix D2 to state that for a clothes dryer that takes
time to automatically enter a stable inactive/off mode state from a
higher power state, as discussed in Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, note 1 of
IEC Standard 62301, allow sufficient time for the clothes dryer to
automatically reach the default inactive/off mode state before
proceeding with the test measurement. Replace the term ``lower power
state'' with ``default standby/off mode state,'' recognizing that the
lower power state that the clothes dryer reaches by default may be
either a standby (inactive) mode or an off mode.
Perform standby mode and off mode testing after completion
of an active mode drying cycle; after removing the test load; without
changing the control panel settings used for the active mode drying
cycle; with the door closed; and without disconnecting the electrical
energy supply to the clothes dryer. DOE noted that the order of
sections within the clothes dryer test procedures suggests that the
standby mode and off mode measurement (section 3.6 of appendix D1 and
section 3.5 of appendix D2) is performed after the active mode test
cycle (sections 3.3 through 3.5 of appendix D1 and sections 3.3 and 3.4
of appendix D2); therefore, the proposed approach likely reflects
current practice within the industry. 84 FR 35484, 35495-35496 (July
23, 2019).
AHAM supported the proposal to amend the clothes dryer test
procedures to use nomenclature, symbols, and structure, procedural
instructions, and assigned annual hours based on observable and
measurable characteristics of the clothes dryer, rather than based on
knowledge of the control panel switch type or internal functionality of
the clothes dryers. AHAM supported DOE's proposed modification to the
sequence of testing for standby or off mode power measurement to
perform the standby mode and off mode testing after the active mode
testing, which reflects current practice by test laboratories. (AHAM,
No. 33 at p. 9)
In this final rule, DOE is amending the test procedure in
accordance with the proposals outlined above, adding new symbols to
represent the ``default'' and ``lowest'' standby power measurements,
along with instructions for their applications based on observable
characteristics of the clothes dryer. DOE is also amending appendix D1
and appendix D2 to specify that inactive and off mode tests must be
performed after completion of an active mode drying cycle, and the unit
must be allowed sufficient time to automatically reach its default
inactive/off mode power state before performing measurements. Under the
revised section 3.6 of appendix D1 and newly renumbered section 3.5 of
appendix D2, DOE is requiring that the same sequence of measurements be
performed as in the previous section 3.6 in both appendix D1 and
appendix D2, to yield the same power measurement(s) for clothes dryers
with inactive mode, off mode, or both. Further, DOE is specifying that
the same annual hours that were previously specified shall be applied
to the average power measurement(s) in section 4.5 of both appendix D1
and appendix D2. DOE has determined that these amendments to appendix
D1 and appendix D2 will not impact the measured efficiency of clothes
dryers, because the amendments are amendments to nomenclature and
provide additional direction.
3. General Test Procedure Provisions at 10 CFR 430.23(d)
The general test procedure provisions for clothes dryers in 10 CFR
430.23(d) include methods for calculating the estimated annual
operating cost, CEF, and other useful measures of energy consumption
using appendix D1. In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed to amend the
test procedure to provide explicitly for calculating each of these
metrics using appendix D2 as well as to include methods of calculating
the estimated annual energy use.
AHAM and the Joint Commenters supported DOE's proposal to extend
calculations of energy consumption to appendix D2 and to add a new
calculation of annual energy use, stating that this would ensure
consistency in the test procedure. (AHAM, No. 33 at p. 9; Joint
Commenters, No. 34 at p. 3)
DOE is adopting the test procedure amendments as proposed in the
July 2019 NOPR to provide explicitly for the calculation of useful
measures of energy consumption, including estimated annual energy use,
using appendix D2.
4. Rounding Requirements for Reported Values
In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed adding a new section at 10 CFR
429.21(c) to specify the rounding requirements of all numeric reported
values for clothes dryers, including CEF, capacity, voltage, and hourly
Btu rating. Similarly, DOE proposed adding the same rounding
requirement for the capacity measurement in section 3.1 of both
appendix D1 and appendix D2, which would add specificity to the
measurement of drum capacity as it relates to determining whether a
compact-size load (for a drum capacity less than 4.4 cubic feet) or
standard-size load must be used for testing. The proposed rounding
requirements for CEF, capacity, voltage, and Btu rating would maintain
consistency with the level of precision currently provided in DOE's
Compliance Certification Management System (``CCMS'').
DOE also proposed to specify further the rounding instructions
provided at 10 CFR 430.23(d)(1) (renumbered to paragraph (d)(2) as
amended in this document) pertaining to estimated annual operating
cost. Previously, the rounding instructions for an electric clothes
dryer were provided in paragraph (d)(1)(i)(C). DOE proposed moving the
rounding instructions to paragraph (d)(1)(i) to clarify that the
rounding provision applies to the product of all three factors
multiplied in paragraphs (d)(1)(i)(A), (B), and (C). Similarly, for gas
clothes dryers, DOE
[[Page 56631]]
proposed to move the rounding instructions from its previous location
embedded within paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B) to the higher-level paragraph
at paragraph (d)(1)(ii).
AHAM and GEA supported DOE's proposal to specify the rounding
requirements of all numeric reported values for clothes dryers.
Additionally, AHAM and GEA requested that DOE clarify the rounding
requirements for scale weight measurements. AHAM recommended the
rounding of scale weight values to the nearest whole number digit,
asserting the absence of such a specification in conjunction with the
required minimum scale resolution may result in an unacceptable range
of variation.\43\ These commenters stated that rounding to the nearest
whole number for FMC is acceptable based on the current state of the
clothes dryer test procedure, the measurement error, and laboratory
capabilities. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 9-10, 12; GEA, No. 37 at p. 2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ Section 2.4.1 of appendices D1 and D2 specify that the
weighing scale for test cloth shall have a range of 0 to a maximum
of 60 pounds with a resolution of at least 0.2 ounces, and a maximum
error no greater than 0.3 percent of any measured value within the
range of 3 to 15 pounds. AHAM suggested that applying this allowable
error to the weight of the bone-dry test cloth and test cloth after
the test cycle, with a measured FMC of 2 percent, could in fact be
as high as 2.4 percent or as low as 1.6 percent. AHAM suggested that
rounding FMC would eliminate the need to resolve issues with scale
resolution that result in potentially misreporting FMC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GEA asserted that rounding to the nearest whole number for moisture
content resolves the instrumentation resolution issue and is in keeping
with ASTM's best practice guidance. (GEA, No. 37 at p. 2) AHAM reported
that its members have noted that there is inherent measurement
variation (compounded tolerance) that can cause a theoretical FMC of 2
percent to be reported as high as 3 percent.\44\ AHAM recommended a
resolution for scales of at least 0.005 pounds with a maximum error of
no greater than 0.1 percent of any measured value. AHAM also
recommended specifying the same scale be used for bone-dry weight, IMC,
and FMC measurements. AHAM suggested that this change would not add
cost to the test as it expects laboratories already have
instrumentation capable of this resolution. (AHAM, No. 33 at pp. 9-10,
12) As discussed in section III.C.4 of this document, GEA supported all
requests for tighter tolerances in the AHAM comments. GEA agreed that
the current test procedure allows for tolerance stacking issues that
introduce variability in the DOE verification process and reported that
the suggested tolerances would not increase test burden or cost. (GEA,
No. 37 at p. 2)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ AHAM applied the maximum allowable measurement error of
0.3 percent to the bone-dry test cloth weight and final
test cloth weight measurements. AHAM stated that a final FMC value
of 2 percent could yield a measurement between 1.4 percent and 2.6
percent, given the allowable measurement error of 0.3
percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE proposed rounding requirements in the July 2019 NOPR, which
implicate the weighing scale resolution,\45\ as noted by the comments
received, in ensuring repeatable and reproducible test results. DOE
acknowledges that, in the absence of revised scale resolution
requirements, hypothetically a variation as described by AHAM could
occur. However, under current testing practice this is not occurring.
Based on interactions with testing laboratories, DOE is aware that, in
general, test laboratories are currently measuring test load weight
using instrumentation with a scale resolution of 0.001 pounds and a
maximum error of no greater than 0.1 (the value suggested by AHAM)
percent of any measured value. This level of precision addresses the
issue of compounded tolerance by effectively bounding a 2-percent FMC
measurement between a range of 1.8-2.2 percent rather than 1.4-2.6
percent. Accordingly, instead of addressing AHAM and GEA's concern
through further rounding amendments, DOE is addressing the issue by
codifying the current practice to ensure that the issue as described by
commenters does not occur in the future. Also, rounding to the nearest
whole number for FMC as suggested by these commenters would reduce the
stringency of the requirement, given that an FMC of 2.4 percent could
be rounded down to 2 percent, effectively raising the FMC requirement
to be less than 2.5 percent as opposed to the prior requirement of 2
percent. For these reasons, DOE is not amending FMC rounding
requirements at this time. Instead, DOE is amending the scale tolerance
and maximum error requirements to align with the current capabilities
of test laboratories, thereby codifying this level of precision and
addressing the issues of compounding tolerance raised by commenters.
Specifically, DOE is amending the scale resolution requirements to be
0.001 pounds with a maximum error of no greater than 0.1 percent of any
measured value in section 2.4.1 of both appendix D1 and appendix D2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ Rounding requirements relate to the number of significant
digits of the measured value, which are dictated by the resolution
of the weighing scale.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE received no comments pertaining to the other specific rounding
requirements proposed in the July 2019 NOPR. DOE is adopting all
proposed rounding requirement changes from the July 2019 NOPR in the
newly added 10 CFR 429.21(c).
5. Optional Usage of Appendix D1 or Appendix D2
As discussed, manufacturers must use either appendix D1 or appendix
D2 to demonstrate compliance with the applicable energy conservation
standards, and must use a single appendix for all representations,
including certifications of compliance.\46\ The current efficiency
standards are based on appendix D1. Appendix D1 tests timed drying
cycles, and accounts for clothes dryers with automatic termination
controls by applying a higher field use factor to units that have this
feature. Appendix D2 tests ``normal'' automatic termination cycles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ ENERGY STAR certification requires testing using appendix
D2. The ENERGY STAR clothes dryer specification can be found at
www.energystar.gov/products/appliances/clothes_dryers/partners.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEEA, the California IOUs, NRDC, CEE, Energy Solutions, and Samsung
recommended that DOE require testing under appendix D2 only, and delete
appendix D1. NEEA commented that ENERGY STAR has now labeled 286
clothes dryer models from 18 different manufacturers with appendix D2
test procedure data, with an Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'')
estimated ENERGY STAR model market penetration of 35 percent. NEEA
further commented that DOE reports that 269 unique models (43.5
percent) in its CCMS database were tested according to appendix D2 and
350 unique models (56.5 percent) were tested under appendix D1. The
California IOUs, NEEA, and Samsung asserted that manufacturers have had
sufficient time to adapt to appendix D2. These commenters suggested
that the intention of having both appendix D1 and appendix D2 available
for manufacturers was to ease the transition to the more representative
automatic cycle termination test of appendix D2, and now that the
appendix D2 test procedure has been adopted by ENERGY STAR and is
commonly used, there no longer appears a need to test a model to
appendix D1. (NRDC, No. 35 at pp. 1-2; CEE, No. 27 at pp. 1-3;
California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 16-19; Energy Solutions, Public Meeting
Transcript, No. 23 at p. 56; Samsung, No. 36 at p. 2; NEEA, No. 38 at
pp. 3-9, 18)
The California IOUs, CEE, NRDC, and NEEA further asserted that
appendix D1 artificially inflates the efficiency performance of units
with poorly functioning automatic cycle termination features, since it
applies a uniform field
[[Page 56632]]
use factor to all units with such a feature, impacting efficiency rank
order. However, the California IOUs also suggested that as clothes
dryers deploy improved automatic termination controls and clothes dryer
operations, results from appendix D1 may not always be higher than
those from appendix D2, an assertion that the California IOUs stated is
supported by the 2019 PG&E testing. One unit from the PG&E test sample
of four models had a higher CEF value using appendix D2 as compared to
appendix D1. NEEA also cited the PG&E data, and both NEEA and the
California IOUs commented that recent DOE-funded clothes dryer testing
at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (``ORNL'') and PNNL similarly
confirmed that the same clothes dryer models tend to achieve a higher
efficiency value when tested to the appendix D1 test procedure than
when tested to the appendix D2 test procedure, though the observed
differences were not consistent across all models. Based on those
reports,\47\ NEEA stated that: (1) CEF values dropped roughly 18
percent when tested according to appendix D2, and the efficiency rank
order among the tested models changed as well; (2) on average, the
appendix D1 loads had five times the FMC than the appendix D2 loads at
termination, but all FMCs were within acceptable limits for both test
procedures, which implies that the energy use measured under appendix
D1 will be less than the energy use measured under appendix D2 for the
same clothes dryer, as clothes dryers remove more moisture under
appendix D2; and (3) drying times increased by roughly 80 percent when
tested according to appendix D2. (NRDC, No. 35 at pp. 1-2; CEE, No. 27
at pp. 1-3; California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 16-19; NEEA, No. 38 at pp.
3-9, 18)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ Residential Clothes Dryer Performance Under Timed and
Automatic Cycle Termination Test Procedures, Kyle Gluesencamp, ORNL,
October 2014; Clothes Dryer Automatic Termination Sensor Evaluation:
Volume 1: Characterization of Energy Use in Residential Clothes
Dryers, W. TeGrotenhus, Ph.D., PNNL, September 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NEEA, the California IOUs, CEE, and NRDC stated that testing all
models to the same procedure would facilitate comparison of performance
between them, increasing the utility of the CCMS database and ENERGY
STAR certification. NRDC and NEEA also suggested that using a single,
uniform test procedure would allow for efficiency labeling of clothes
dryers under the Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'') EnergyGuide
labelling program. (NRDC, No. 35 at pp. 1-2; CEE, No. 27 at pp. 1-3;
California IOUs, No. 29 at pp. 16-19; NEEA, No. 38 at pp. 3-9, 18)
NRDC and the California IOUs suggested that because the current
standards are based on appendix D1, it might be more appropriate to
implement the retirement of appendix D1 during the next standards
rulemaking, and they urged DOE to do so if it is not possible in this
final rule. (NRDC, No. 35 at pp. 1-2; California IOUs, No. 29 at pp.
16-19)
AHAM opposed the removal of appendix D1 and mandatory use of
appendix D2. AHAM did not support the existence of different test
procedures to demonstrate compliance with the standard, but recognized
that manufacturers must currently use a different test procedure to
demonstrate ENERGY STAR eligibility for clothes dryers than compliance
with energy conservation standards. AHAM stated that because
manufacturers have already invested in developing products under this
circumstance, it would not be equitable to change the status quo at
this time. Accordingly, AHAM urged DOE to maintain both appendices,
with appendix D2 being optional as an alternative to appendix D1.
(AHAM, No. 33 at p. 11)
A majority of the clothes dryers on the market continue to test
under appendix D1. DOE notes that 746 clothes dryer models (62.6
percent) listed in the CCMS database are certified to appendix D1, as
compared to 445 models (37.4 percent) to appendix D2. DOE recognizes
that under appendix D2, measured CEF values may be lower than CEF
values measured under appendix D1. As discussed, appendix D2 includes
methods for more accurately measuring the effects of automatic cycle
termination and represents a significantly different testing
methodology that may impact the energy consumption of some clothes
dryers more than others. The current energy conservation standards are
based on the test procedure in appendix D1, and to the extent that
measured CEF under appendix D2 is lower than the measured CEF under
appendix D1, this difference does not result in products being able to
demonstrate compliance with a lower efficiency. For these reasons, DOE
is maintaining the appendix D1 and appendix D2 test procedures and is
continuing to allow certification in accordance with either test
procedure.
6. Cycle Time Reporting
Manufacturers are not currently required to report cycle time as
part of the certification process. In response to the July 2019 NOPR,
DOE received comments regarding the reporting of cycle times to inform
consumer purchasing decisions.
AHAM stated that the purpose of the energy conservation standards
program is to regulate the efficiency of the product, not to inform
consumers about all of the different factors that could affect their
purchase. AHAM asserted that, while DOE should consider the impact of
energy conservation standards on performance factors such as drying
time, it is not appropriate for DOE to collect data on and create
requirements for performance factors. AHAM questioned whether
collecting data on drying time was permissible under EPCA. (AHAM,
Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 83-84)
NEEA suggested that DOE should require manufacturers to report
drying time when testing using appendix D2, because certain efficient
clothes dryers might achieve higher efficiency by taking a very long
time to dry clothes. (NEEA, Public Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp.
79-80) NEEA and PG&E encouraged DOE to require reporting of cycle
times, suggesting that cycle time is a performance feature that
consumers value. (NEEA, No. 38 at pp. 3, 12-16, 18; PG&E, Public
Meeting Transcript, No. 23 at pp. 80-81)
As stated, EPCA requires that the test procedures prescribed or
amended by DOE be reasonably designed to produce test results which
measure energy efficiency, energy use, or estimated annual operating
cost of a covered product during a representative average use cycle or
period of use, and not be unduly burdensome to conduct. (42 U.S.C.
6293(b)(3)) DOE may require each manufacturer of a covered product to
submit information or reports with respect to energy efficiency or
energy use of such covered products to ensure compliance with the
requirements of EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6296(d)) DOE recognizes that cycle
time is a relevant consideration under the current product class
structure.
On December 16, 2020, DOE published a final rule (``December 2020
Final Rule'') establishing a separate product class for consumer
clothes dryers that offer cycle times for a normal cycle of less than
30 minutes. 85 FR 81359.\48\ On January 19, 2021, the States of
California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New
Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington,
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the District of Columbia, and the
City of
[[Page 56633]]
New York filed a petition for review of the December 2020 Final Rule in
the Second Circuit. Shortly thereafter, two other groups of petitioners
filed petitions for review of the December 2020 Final Rule. The
Alliance for Water Efficiency, the U.S. Public Interest Research Group,
and Environment America filed a petition for review of that final rule
in the Seventh Circuit on January 17, 2021, and the Sierra Club filed a
petition for review of that final rule in the Ninth Circuit on February
12, 2021. After transfer of the Seventh and Ninth Circuit petitions for
review, all three cases were consolidated in the Second Circuit.
Briefing on the merits is currently stayed through October 1, 2021,
while DOE reviews the December 2020 Final Rule. Additionally, on April
2, 2021, AHAM petitioned DOE to reconsider the December 2020 Final Rule
that established and amended standards for short-cycle residential
clothes washers and dryers.\49\ In its petition AHAM requested that DOE
withdraw the December 2020 Final Rule. (Id. at p. 19)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ The December 2020 Final Rule also established short-cycle
product classes for residential clothes washers.
\49\ EERE-2020-BT-STD-0001-0048, at www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE is re-evaluating the analysis in the short-cycle product class
determination pursuant to Executive Order 13990, Protecting Public
Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate
Crisis. In light of the on-going review, DOE is not adopting reporting
requirements for cycle time in this final rule.
E. Formatting Changes and Typographical Errors
To improve the readability of the text in certain sections of
appendix D1 and appendix D2, DOE is making minor typographical
corrections and formatting modifications as discussed in the following
paragraphs. These minor modifications do not change the substance of
the test methods and do not impact the measured energy use.
1. ``Conventional'' and ``Vented'' Nomenclature
Previously, appendix D1 and appendix D2 defined the term
``conventional clothes dryer'' as a clothes dryer that exhausts the
evaporated moisture from the cabinet. Appendix D1, section 1.7;
appendix D2, section 1.8. This definition is synonymous with a ``vented
clothes dryer.'' Conversely, ``ventless clothes dryer'' is defined as a
clothes dryer that uses a closed-loop system with an internal condenser
to remove the evaporated moisture from the heated air. Appendix D1,
section 1.19; appendix D2, section 1.21. The moist air is not
discharged from the cabinet. Id.
The product classes in DOE clothes dryer energy conservation
standards use the terms ``vented'' and ``ventless'' to refer to the
different methods used by the clothes dryer to remove moisture from the
cabinet. 10 CFR 430.32(h)(3). To provide consistency between these
product classes and the terminology used in the clothes dryer test
procedures, DOE is replacing the word ``conventional'' with ``vented''
throughout both appendix D1 and appendix D2. This change affects the
nomenclature only and does not affect the classification of clothes
dryers or conduct of the test procedure for any clothes dryers.
2. Symbol Definitions
Previously, appendix D1 and appendix D2 included inconsistent use
of symbol definitions for the measured bone-dry weight and moisture
content values. DOE is adding the symbol definition for bone-dry weight
(Wbonedry) to section 3.4.1 of both appendices, where it is
first referenced. DOE is changing the symbol definitions for moisture
content of the wet test load (previously Ww) and moisture
content of the dry test load (previously Wd) to IMC and FMC,
respectively, to better differentiate these percentage values from
Wbonedry, which is a weight value. See section 4.1 of both
appendix D1 and appendix D2. Similarly, DOE is also adding the symbol
definitions IMC and FMC to section 3.4.2 and section 3.4.3,
respectively, where these values are first referenced in both appendix
D1 and appendix D2. DOE is also updating the symbols used throughout
section 4 of both appendices in each calculation in which these terms
are used. The additions and revisions of these symbol definitions will
more readily provide an understanding of the measured values associated
with each of these symbols, as well as improve the readability of
subsequent sections of the test procedures where these symbols are
referenced.
3. Removal of Duplicate Instructions for Test Load Preparation
Section 2.7.1 and section 2.7.2 of both appendix D1 and appendix D2
provide instructions for preparing a compact-size clothes dryer load
and a standard-size clothes dryer load, respectively. Each section
previously specified the required load weight and then provided the
same instructions for preparing a damp test load before loading. DOE is
restructuring section 2.7.1 and section 2.7.2 in each appendix to
remove this duplication. For both appendices, the revised section 2.7.1
includes a table specifying the required test loads for standard-size
and compact-size clothes dryers, in addition to the requirement that
each test load must consist of energy test cloths and no more than five
energy stuffer cloths. For both appendices, the revised section 2.7.2
provides the procedure for dampening the test load. These amendments do
not change the conduct of the test procedure for either appendix D1 or
appendix D2 but improve readability of the test procedures.
4. Typographical Errors
In this final rule, DOE is correcting the following typographical
errors in appendix D1 and appendix D2:
Section 1.5 and section 2.6 of appendix D1 and section 1.6, section
2.7.1, and section 2.7.2 of appendix D2 used the term ``test clothes,''
where ``test cloths'' should have been used instead. Section 1.16 of
appendix D2 misspelled the term ``classification'' in the definition of
``off mode.''
Section 2.4.1 of both appendix D1 and appendix D2 contained section
numbering errors. Previously, section 2.4.1 was titled Weighing scale
for test cloth and included specifications for the scale used to weigh
the test loads, and the section that followed was incorrectly numbered
as section 2.4.1.2 Weighing scale for drum capacity measurements. DOE
is correcting this in both appendix D1 and appendix D2 by inserting a
new title, section 2.4.1 Weighing scales, and renumbering existing
section 2.4.1 Weighing scale for test cloth as section 2.4.1.1.
The calculation of the total per-cycle electric clothes dryer
energy consumption in section 4.1 of appendix D1 referenced an
undefined symbol ``Ett'', which should instead have been
``Et'', the total energy consumed during the test cycle as
recorded in section 3.4.5 of appendix D1. The word ``for'' was also
missing from the wording of the description of the 1.04 field use
factor in section 4.1 of appendix D1.
In addition, section 4.3 of both appendix D1 and appendix D2
referenced the symbol ``Ege'', which should instead have
been ``Egg'', the calculated gas clothes dryer gas energy
consumption per cycle.
5. Removal of Obsolete Provisions
Section 1.14 of appendix D1 and section 1.15 of appendix D2
provided a definition for ``moisture sensing control;'' \50\ similarly,
section 1.18 of
[[Page 56634]]
appendix D1 and section 1.19 of appendix D2 provided a definition for
``temperature sensing control.'' \51\ Both of these definitions were
obsolete, having been incorporated into a broader term ``automatic
termination control'' \52\ in section 1.4 of both appendices as part of
the January 2011 Final Rule. 76 FR 972, 978 (Jan. 6, 2011). In
addition, the terms ``moisture sensing control'' and ``temperature
sensing control'' were not referenced anywhere else within appendix D1
or appendix D2. DOE is removing these definitions from both appendices
and renumbering the subsequent sections of the test procedure
accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ ``Moisture sensing control'' is defined as a system which
utilizes a moisture sensing element within the dryer drum that
monitors the amount of moisture in the clothes and automatically
terminates the dryer cycle.
\51\ ``Temperature sensing control'' is defined as a system
which monitors dryer exhaust air temperature and automatically
terminates the dryer cycle.
\52\ ``Automatic termination control'' is defined as a dryer
control system with a sensor which monitors either the dryer load
temperature or its moisture content and with a controller which
automatically terminates the drying process. A mark, detent, or
other visual indicator or detent which indicates a preferred
automatic termination control setting must be present if the dryer
is to be classified as having an ``automatic termination control.''
A mark is a visible single control setting on one or more dryer
controls.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 3.5 of appendix D2 described the application of a field use
factor for clothes dryers with automatic termination controls. In the
August 2013 Final Rule, DOE eliminated the field use factor in appendix
D2 for automatic termination control clothes dryers, in conjunction
with new procedures that directly measure any over-drying energy
consumption of automatic termination control clothes dryers. 78 FR
49608, 49611 (Aug. 14, 2013). In the August 2013 Final Rule, DOE
erroneously retained the obsolete section 3.5 of appendix D2. DOE
therefore is removing section 3.5 of appendix D2 and adjusting the
numbering of subsequent sections accordingly.
Section 4.7 of both appendix D1 and appendix D2 provided the
equation for calculating EF. DOE's energy conservation standards for
clothes dryers were based on energy factor (``EF'') for clothes dryers
manufactured on or after May 14, 1994 and before January 1, 2015.
However, as of January 1, 2015, clothes dryer energy conservation
standards are based on the CEF metric. Similarly, DOE's certification
reporting requirements for clothes dryers at 10 CFR 429.21(b)(2)
required reporting CEF when using appendix D1 or appendix D2; EF was
required only when using appendix D, which is obsolete and is removed
in this final rule. Furthermore, ENERGY STAR qualification is based on
the CEF metric. DOE is not aware of any current regulatory programs or
criteria that use the EF metric. Therefore, DOE is removing the
obsolete calculation of EF in section 4.7 of both appendix D1 and
appendix D2, renumbering the subsequent sections of the test procedures
accordingly, and removing EF as a measure of energy consumption
described at 10 CFR 430.23(d)(2).
F. Removing Obsolete Appendix D
In the July 2019 NOPR, DOE proposed to remove appendix D from 10
CFR part 430, since this version of the test procedure is no longer
used. DOE also proposed to remove the references to appendix D from 10
CFR 430.23(d), as well as in the clothes dryer certification reporting
requirements in 10 CFR 429.21(b)(2).
AHAM stated that it did not oppose DOE's proposal to remove
appendix D, because this appendix is no longer mandatory. (AHAM, No. 33
at p. 11) No other comments were received on the removal of appendix D.
Given that appendix D is no longer in use, DOE is removing appendix
D and all associated references throughout 10 CFR 429.21 and 10 CFR
430.23(d).
G. Test Procedure Costs and Impact
EPCA requires that test procedures adopted by DOE not be unduly
burdensome to conduct. In this document, DOE amends the existing test
procedure for residential clothes dryers. DOE has determined that the
test procedure as amended by this final rule will not be unduly
burdensome for manufacturers to conduct.
In this final rule, DOE adopts a number of amendments to both
appendix D1 and appendix D2. The current energy conservation standards
for clothes dryers were developed based on results obtained using
appendix D1. As discussed in the following sections, neither the
amendments to appendix D1 or appendix D2 will impact the current costs
of the test procedures.
None of the amendments to appendix D1 or appendix D2 will impact
the scope of the test procedure (i.e., the amendments will not require
manufacturers to test clothes dryers that are not already required to
be tested). Additionally, DOE has determined that none of the
amendments will require manufacturers to re-test or re-certify any
existing models on the market that have been tested and certified using
appendix D1 or appendix D2.
Based on the discussion that follows, DOE has determined that these
amendments to the clothes dryer test procedure in appendix D1 and
appendix D2 will not be unduly burdensome for manufacturers to conduct.
1. Maintaining Hourly Btu Rating for Gas Clothes Dryers
DOE specifies the order of adjustment, from least burdensome to
most burdensome, for the three types of adjustments that can be made to
maintain the required heat input rate for natural gas and propane
clothes dryers. As described, this amendment is generally consistent
with industry practice. To the extent that any deviations from this
order may occur in practice, the additional direction provided by these
amendments will not require any manufacturers to retest or re-certify
any basic models currently on the market because the net result of
maintaining the hourly Btu rating within 5 percent of the
rated value will not change. Therefore, drying performance will not be
impacted in comparison to results obtained under the previous test
procedures.
2. Final Moisture Content Requirement
DOE explicitly specifies that any second test run using the highest
dryness level setting must result in an FMC of 2 percent or less for
the test to be considered valid. This amendment impacts only appendix
D2, and therefore has no impact on testing under appendix D1. As
described, this amendment reflects the current practice of
manufacturers and test laboratories, and therefore does not impact the
cost of testing.
3. Additional Amendments
DOE has determined that the remainder of the amendments adopted in
this final rule will not impact test costs.
DOE provides direction regarding the required settings for network
capabilities during testing under both appendix D1 and appendix D2.
This direction will not impact test costs as it provides further
direction to the prior test procedure and does not require conducting
an additional test. The amendment will not change the measured energy
use of basic models for which the consumer is required to turn on the
network capability, as the prior test procedure provided no direction
to do so. To the extent that there are basic models with the network
capability enabled in the as shipped condition, the energy use
attributable to the network function would have been captured under the
prior test procedure. For any such basic models, the direction
regarding the network capabilities adopted in this document will result
in lower measured energy use as compared
[[Page 56635]]
to the prior test procedure. Therefore, the amendment regarding network
capabilities adopted in this final rule will not result in a basic
model that is complaint under the prior test procedure becoming non-
compliant.
DOE provides additional direction on the dryness level setting for
clothes dryers that provide an even number of discrete dryness
settings. This amendment impacts only appendix D2, and therefore has no
impact on testing under appendix D1. This amendment will not impact
testing costs, as it provides direction for the required setting for
the previously required test, without requiring any additional testing.
DOE is updating the representative annual number of drying cycles
in the per-cycle standby mode and off mode energy consumption
calculations in appendix D2 to use the most recently available data.
The updated number of drying cycles will not be required for use unless
and until such time the energy conservation standards are amended
taking into account the updated value. As such, this amendment will not
require retesting or recertification.
DOE provides revisions regarding the measurement and accounting of
standby mode and off mode power in both appendix D1 and appendix D2.
DOE has determined that these revisions potentially reduce testing
costs for third-party laboratories, as the amendment does not require
any disassembly of a clothes dryer to determine the appropriate
application of the test procedure. However, DOE has not quantified the
potential reduction in testing cost.
DOE provides a variety of formatting and typographical corrections
to both appendix D1 and appendix D2. These edits remove confusion that
may result from the errors and improve the readability of the test
procedures.
DOE amends 10 CFR 430.23(d) to include instructions for calculating
estimated annual operating cost, CEF, and other useful metrics using
appendix D2. The prior test procedure provision provided for the
calculation of these values using measurements from appendix D1. The
test procedure as finalized in this document also explicitly provides
for calculating these values using measurements from appendix D2. This
amendment provides additional direction regarding the calculation of
metrics and no additional testing will be required.
DOE is revising the required weighing scale resolution for weighing
test cloths to limit test variation consistent with current test
laboratory capabilities. In DOE's experience, testing facilities are
currently using instrumentation that meet these new instrumentation
requirements, and therefore DOE concludes that these revisions will not
impact test burden.
Manufacturers will be able to rely on data generated under the
previous test procedure, and no retesting or recertification will be
required as a result of this test procedure.
H. Harmonization With Industry Standards
The test procedures for clothes dryers in appendix D1 and appendix
D2 incorporate by reference AHAM HLD-1-2009, ``Household Tumble Type
Clothes Dryers,'' (which was later certified as ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010)
and IEC Standard 62301. Specifically, both appendices reference an
exhaust simulator specified in AHAM HLD-1-2009 in their test setup
instructions, and incorporate IEC Standard 62301, which provides test
conditions, testing equipment, and methods for measuring standby mode
and off mode power consumption. Appendix D1 and appendix D2 also
require the use of AHAM Standard Test Detergent Formula 3 for
preconditioning the test cloths. DOE has determined that the revisions
to the standby and off mode power provisions do not impact the existing
references to industry standards and do not alter the applicability of
those referenced industry standards to the DOE test procedure.
The California IOUs suggested that DOE review comments they
submitted in response to the NOPR published on February 13, 2019,
proposing amendments to DOE's rulemaking process (84 FR 3910);
specifically, their recommendation that DOE use industry-based test
procedures as guidance documents and that all industry test procedures
should be evaluated consistent with EPCA. (California IOUs, No. 29 at
p. 21) AHAM supported the practice of adopting voluntary consensus-
based test procedures without modification, specifically the
incorporation by reference of the latest version of AHAM HLD-1, though
AHAM did not support incorporation by reference of IEC Standard 61121.
AHAM commented that, while there may be times when it is appropriate to
incorporate European standards by reference, in this case the European
procedure does not produce results that are directly comparable to the
DOE test procedure results. (AHAM, No. 33 at p. 13)
In conducting this test procedure rulemaking, DOE reviewed relevant
industry standards, including AHAM HLD-1 and IEC Standard 61121. The
DOE test procedure continues to reference AHAM HLD-1. Because adoption
of AHAM HLD-1 in its entirety would impact the measured energy use of
clothes dryers for purposes of determining compliance with DOE
standards, DOE did not amend appendix D1 or appendix D2 to adopt AHAM
HLD-1 in its entirety in this rulemaking. Consistent with its 2020
amendments to the Process Rule at 10 CFR part 430, subpart C, Appendix
A, DOE will, however, consider adoption of AHAM HLD-1 in its entirety
in a subsequent rulemaking prior to any rulemaking to consider whether
to amend the energy conservation standards applicable to clothes
dryers.
As noted, the 2009 version of AHAM HLD-1 has been certified as
ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010. ANSI certification ensures that the standard has
been developed through a process that meets ANSI's requirements for
openness, balance, consensus, and other due process safeguards.\53\ The
certification of AHAM HLD-1 as ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010 does not result in
any substantive changes to the industry standard. In this final rule,
DOE is updating the reference to AHAM HLD-1 in appendix D1 and appendix
D2 to the 2010 version of ANSI/AHAM HLD-1. This update to the most
recent version of AHAM HLD-1 does not result in any changes to the
clothes dryer test procedures at appendix D1 and appendix D2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\53\ More information on ANSI's standards process may be found
at: www.ansi.org/standards_activities/overview/overview?menuid=3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Effective and Compliance Dates
The effective date for the adopted test procedure amendments will
be 30 days after publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. EPCA prescribes that all representations of energy efficiency
and energy use, including those made on marketing materials and product
labels, must be made in accordance with an amended test procedure,
beginning 180 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal
Register. (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)(2)) EPCA allows individual manufacturers
to petition DOE for an extension of the 180-day period if the
manufacturer may experience undue hardship in meeting the deadline. (42
U.S.C. 6293(c)(3)) To receive such an extension, petitions must be
filed with DOE no later than 60 days before the end of the 180-day
period and must detail how the manufacturer will experience undue
hardship. Id. To the extent the modified test procedure adopted in this
final rule is required
[[Page 56636]]
only for the evaluation and issuance of updated efficiency standards,
compliance with the amended test procedure does not require use of such
modified test procedure provisions until the implementation date of
updated standards.
In addition, DOE amends the introductory note in both appendix D1
and appendix D2 to remove reference to the optional early use of the
test procedures before the compliance date of the current clothes dryer
energy conservation standards, which was January 1, 2015.
IV. Procedural Issues and Regulatory Review
A. Review Under Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') has determined that
this test procedure rulemaking is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order (``E.O.'') 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR 51735 (Oct. 4, 1993).
Accordingly, this action was not subject to review under the E.O. by
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (``OIRA'') in OMB.
B. Review Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of a final regulatory flexibility analysis (``FRFA'') for
any final rule where the agency was first required by law to publish a
proposed rule for public comment, unless the agency certifies that the
rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. As required by E.O. 13272,
``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' 67 FR
53461 (August 16, 2002), DOE published procedures and policies on
February 19, 2003 to ensure that the potential impacts of its rules on
small entities are properly considered during the DOE rulemaking
process. 68 FR 7990. DOE has made its procedures and policies available
on the Office of the General Counsel's website: https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel.
DOE reviewed this final rule under the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on February
19, 2003. DOE has concluded that this final rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
factual basis for this determination is as follows:
The Small Business Administration (``SBA'') considers a business
entity to be a small business, if, together with its affiliates, it
employs less than a threshold number of workers or earns less than the
average annual receipts specified in 13 CFR part 121. The threshold
values set forth in these regulations use size standards and codes
established by the North American Industry Classification System
(``NAICS'') that are available at: www.sba.gov/document/support--table-size-standards. The threshold number for NAICS classification code
335220, major household appliance manufacturing, which includes clothes
dryer manufacturers, is 1,500 employees.
Most of the manufacturers supplying clothes dryers are large
multinational corporations. DOE collected data from DOE's compliance
certification database \54\ and surveyed the AHAM member directory to
identify manufacturers of clothes dryers. DOE then consulted publicly-
available data, purchased company reports from vendors such as Dun and
Bradstreet, and contacted manufacturers, where needed, to determine if
they meet the SBA's definition of a ``small business manufacturing
facility'' and have their manufacturing facilities located within the
United States. Based on this analysis, DOE did not identify any small
businesses that manufacture clothes dryers covered by the proposed test
procedure amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ www.regulations.doe.gov/certification-data (Last accessed
February 2, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, as described in section III.G of this document, the
amendments proposed in this test procedure will not increase costs to
clothes dryer manufacturers. Therefore, DOE concludes that the cost
effects accruing from the final rule will not have a ``significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,'' and that
the preparation of a FRFA is not warranted. DOE has submitted a
certification and supporting statement of factual basis to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for review
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
C. Review Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Manufacturers of clothes dryers must certify to DOE that their
products comply with any applicable energy conservation standards. To
certify compliance, manufacturers must first obtain test data for their
products according to the DOE test procedures, including any amendments
adopted for those test procedures. DOE has established regulations for
the certification and recordkeeping requirements for all covered
consumer products and commercial equipment, including clothes dryers.
(See generally 10 CFR part 429) The collection-of-information
requirement for the certification and recordkeeping is subject to
review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA'').
This requirement has been approved by OMB under OMB control number
1910-1400. Public reporting burden for the certification is estimated
to average 35 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
D. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
In this final rule, DOE establishes test procedure amendments that
it expects will be used to develop and implement future energy
conservation standards for clothes dryers. DOE has determined that this
rule falls into a class of actions that are categorically excluded from
review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) and DOE's implementing regulations at 10 CFR part 1021.
Specifically, DOE has determined that adopting test procedures for
measuring energy efficiency of consumer products and industrial
equipment is consistent with activities identified in 10 CFR part 1021,
appendix A to subpart D, A5 and A6. Accordingly, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required.
E. Review Under Executive Order 13132
E.O. 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999), imposes
certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or that have federalism
implications. The E.O. requires agencies to examine the constitutional
and statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the
policymaking discretion of the States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. The E.O. also requires agencies to have an
accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by State and
local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications. On March
[[Page 56637]]
14, 2000, DOE published a statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations. 65 FR 13735. DOE examined this final
rule and determined that it will not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government. EPCA governs and prescribes Federal
preemption of State regulations as to energy conservation for the
products that are the subject of this final rule. States can petition
DOE for exemption from such preemption to the extent, and based on
criteria, set forth in EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d)) No further action is
required by E.O. 13132.
F. Review Under Executive Order 12988
Regarding the review of existing regulations and the promulgation
of new regulations, section 3(a) of E.O. 12988, ``Civil Justice
Reform,'' 61 FR 4729 (Feb. 7, 1996), imposes on Federal agencies the
general duty to adhere to the following requirements: (1) Eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write regulations to minimize
litigation; (3) provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct
rather than a general standard; and (4) promote simplification and
burden reduction. Section 3(b) of E.O. 12988 specifically requires that
executive agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation (1) clearly specifies the preemptive effect, if any; (2)
clearly specifies any effect on existing Federal law or regulation; (3)
provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive
effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity and general draftsmanship
under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General. Section 3(c) of
E.O. 12988 requires executive agencies to review regulations in light
of applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine whether
they are met or it is unreasonable to meet one or more of them. DOE has
completed the required review and determined that, to the extent
permitted by law, this final rule meets the relevant standards of E.O.
12988.
G. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``UMRA'')
requires each Federal agency to assess the effects of Federal
regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the
private sector. Public Law 104-4, sec. 201 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1531).
For a regulatory action resulting in a rule that may cause the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year
(adjusted annually for inflation), section 202 of UMRA requires a
Federal agency to publish a written statement that estimates the
resulting costs, benefits, and other effects on the national economy.
(2 U.S.C. 1532(a), (b)) The UMRA also requires a Federal agency to
develop an effective process to permit timely input by elected officers
of State, local, and Tribal governments on a proposed ``significant
intergovernmental mandate,'' and requires an agency plan for giving
notice and opportunity for timely input to potentially affected small
governments before establishing any requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. On March 18, 1997,
DOE published a statement of policy on its process for
intergovernmental consultation under UMRA. 62 FR 12820; also available
at https://energy.gov/gc/office-general-counsel. DOE examined this
final rule according to UMRA and its statement of policy and determined
that the rule contains neither an intergovernmental mandate, nor a
mandate that may result in the expenditure of $100 million or more in
any year, so these requirements do not apply.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This final rule will not have any impact on the autonomy or integrity
of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking Assessment.
I. Review Under Executive Order 12630
DOE has determined, under E.O. 12630, ``Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights'' 53 FR
8859 (March 18, 1988), that this regulation will not result in any
takings that might require compensation under the Fifth Amendment to
the U.S. Constitution.
J. Review Under Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act,
2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the public under guidelines
established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (Feb. 22, 2002), and
DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (Oct. 7, 2002). Pursuant
to OMB Memorandum M-19-15, Improving Implementation of the Information
Quality Act (April 24, 2019), DOE published updated guidelines which
are available at www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/12/f70/DOE%20Final%20Updated%20IQA%20Guidelines%20Dec%202019.pdf. DOE has
reviewed this final rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in those
guidelines.
K. Review Under Executive Order 13211
E.O. 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly
Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to OMB, a
Statement of Energy Effects for any significant energy action. A
``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an agency
that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a final
rule, and that (1) is a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866,
or any successor order; and (2) is likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy; or (3) is
designated by the Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action.
For any significant energy action, the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on energy supply, distribution, or use
if the regulation is implemented, and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on energy supply, distribution, and
use.
This regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action under
E.O. 12866. Moreover, it will not have a significant adverse effect on
the supply, distribution, or use of energy, nor has it been designated
as a significant energy action by the Administrator of OIRA. Therefore,
it is not a significant energy action, and, accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
L. Review Under Section 32 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of
1974
Under section 301 of the Department of Energy Organization Act
(Pub. L. 95-91; 42 U.S.C. 7101), DOE must comply with section 32 of the
Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, as amended by the Federal
Energy Administration
[[Page 56638]]
Authorization Act of 1977. (15 U.S.C. 788; ``FEAA'') Section 32
essentially provides in relevant part that, where a proposed rule
authorizes or requires use of commercial standards, the notice of
proposed rulemaking must inform the public of the use and background of
such standards. In addition, section 32(c) requires DOE to consult with
the Attorney General and the Chairman of the FTC concerning the impact
of the commercial or industry standards on competition.
The modifications to the test procedure for clothes dryers adopted
in this final rule incorporates testing methods contained in the
following commercial standards: AHAM HLD-1-2010, IEC 62301 (Edition
2.0, 2011-01). DOE has evaluated these standard and is unable to
conclude whether it fully complies with the requirements of section
32(b) of the FEAA (i.e., whether it was developed in a manner that
fully provides for public participation, comment, and review.) DOE has
consulted with both the Attorney General and the Chairman of the FTC
about the impact on competition of using the methods contained in these
standards and has received no comments objecting to their use.
M. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will report to Congress on the
promulgation of this rule before its effective date. The report will
state that it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
N. Description of Materials Incorporated by Reference
In this final rule, DOE incorporates by reference the industry
standard published by AHAM, titled ``ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010 (``AHAM HLD-
1-2010''), Household Tumble Type Clothes Dryers, approved 2010'' which
provides methods for testing and evaluating performance (i.e., moisture
removal energy efficiency, drying time, and clothing load temperatures)
of home laundry clothes drying equipment. Copies of ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-
2010 can be obtained from the Association of Home Appliance
Manufacturers at 1111 19th Street NW, Suite 402, Washington, DC 20036,
202-872-5955, or go to www.aham.org. Specifically, the test procedure
codified by this final rule references section 3.3.5.1 ``Standard
Simulator'' of AHAM HLD-1-2010, which provides specifications for an
exhaust simulator.
In this final rule DOE maintains the incorporation by reference to
a test procedure published by IEC, titled IEC 62301, ``Household
electrical appliances-Measurement of standby power'', (Edition 2.0,
2011-01) (``IEC 62301''). Copies of IEC 62301 can be obtained from the
International Electrotechnical Commission webstore, by going to https://webstore.iec.ch. Specifically, the test procedure codified by this
final rule references Section 5, Paragraph 5.1 ``General,'' Note 1 and
Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 ``Sampling Method'' of IEC 62301, which
provides test conditions, testing equipment, and methods for measuring
standby mode and off mode power consumption.
V. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this final
rule.
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 429
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
10 CFR Part 430
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Energy conservation, Household appliances, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Small
businesses.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on October 1,
2021, by Kelly Speakes-Backman, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
and Acting Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy.
That document with the original signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE
Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit
the document in electronic format for publication, as an official
document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no
way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 1, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DOE amends parts 429 and
430 of chapter II of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations as set forth
below:
PART 429--CERTIFICATION, COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT FOR CONSUMER
PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT
0
1. The authority citation for part 429 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
2. Section 429.21 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(2) and adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 429.21 Residential clothes dryers.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Pursuant to Sec. 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall
include the following public product-specific information: When using
appendix D1 to subpart B of part 430 of this chapter, the combined
energy factor in pounds per kilowatt hours (lb/kWh), the capacity in
cubic feet (cu ft), the voltage in volts (V) (for electric dryers
only), an indication if the dryer has automatic termination controls,
and the hourly Btu rating of the burner (for gas dryers only); when
using appendix D2 to subpart B of part 430, the combined energy factor
in pounds per kilowatt hours (lb/kWh), the capacity in cubic feet (cu
ft), the voltage in volts (V) (for electric dryers only), an indication
if the dryer has automatic termination controls, the hourly Btu rating
of the burner (for gas dryers only), and a list of the cycle setting
selections for the energy test cycle as recorded in section 3.4.7 of
appendix D2 to subpart B of part 430.
(c) Reported values. Values reported pursuant to this section must
be rounded as follows: CEF to the nearest 0.01 lb/kWh, capacity to the
nearest 0.1 cu ft, voltage to the nearest V, and hourly Btu rating to
the nearest Btu.
PART 430--ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS
0
3. The authority citation for part 430 continues read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
4. Section 430.3 is amended by revising paragraph (i)(3) to read as
follows:
Sec. 430.3 Materials incorporated by reference.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(3) ANSI/AHAM HLD-1-2010 (``AHAM HLD-1''), Household Tumble Type
Clothes Dryers, ANSI-approved June 11, 2010, IBR approved for
[[Page 56639]]
appendices D1 and D2 to subpart B of this part.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 430.23 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 430.23 Test procedures for the measurement of energy and water
consumption.
* * * * *
(d) Clothes dryers. (1) The estimated annual energy consumption for
clothes dryers, expressed in kilowatt-hours per year, shall be the
product of the annual representative average number of clothes dryer
cycles as specified in appendix D1 or D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate, and the per-cycle combined total energy consumption in
kilowatt-hours per cycle, determined according to section 4.6 of
appendix D1 or section 4.6 of appendix D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate.
(2) The estimated annual operating cost for clothes dryers shall
be--
(i) For an electric clothes dryer, the product of the following
three factors, with the resulting product then being rounded off to the
nearest dollar per year:
(A) The annual representative average number of clothes dryer
cycles as specified in appendix D1 or appendix D2 to this subpart, as
appropriate;
(B) The per-cycle combined total energy consumption in kilowatt-
hours per cycle, determined according to section 4.6 of appendix D1 or
section 4.6 of appendix D2 to this subpart, as appropriate; and
(C) The representative average unit cost of electrical energy in
dollars per kilowatt-hour as provided by the Secretary; and
(ii) For a gas clothes dryer, the product of the annual
representative average number of clothes dryer cycles as specified in
appendix D1 or D2 to this subpart, as appropriate, times the sum of the
following three factors, with the resulting product then being rounded
off to the nearest dollar per year:
(A) The product of the per-cycle gas dryer electric energy
consumption in kilowatt-hours per cycle, determined according to
section 4.2 of appendix D1 or section 4.2 of appendix D2 to this
subpart, as appropriate, times the representative average unit cost of
electrical energy in dollars per kilowatt-hour as provided by the
Secretary; plus,
(B) The product of the per-cycle gas dryer gas energy consumption,
in Btus per cycle, determined according to section 4.3 of appendix D1
or section 4.3 of appendix D2 to this subpart, as appropriate, times
the representative average unit cost for natural gas or propane, as
appropriate, in dollars per Btu as provided by the Secretary; plus,
(C) The product of the per-cycle standby mode and off mode energy
consumption in kilowatt-hours per cycle, determined according to
section 4.5 of appendix D1 or section 4.5 of appendix D2 to this
subpart, as appropriate, times the representative average unit cost of
electrical energy in dollars per kilowatt-hour as provided by the
Secretary.
(3) The combined energy factor, expressed in pounds per kilowatt-
hour is determined in accordance with section 4.7 of appendix D1 or
section 4.7 of appendix D2 to this subpart, as appropriate, the result
then being rounded off to the nearest hundredth (0.01).
(4) Other useful measures of energy consumption for clothes dryers
shall be those measures of energy consumption for clothes dryers which
the Secretary determines are likely to assist consumers in making
purchasing decisions and which are derived from the application of
appendix D1 or D2 to this subpart, as appropriate.
* * * * *
Appendix D to Subpart B of Part 430--[Removed]
0
6. Appendix D to subpart B of part 430 is removed.
0
7. Appendix D1 to subpart B of part 430 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the introductory note;
0
b. Adding section 0;
0
c. Revising section 1.3;
0
d. Removing the word ``clothes'', in section 1.5, and adding in its
place ``cloths'';
0
e. Removing sections 1.7 and 1.14;
0
f. Redesignating sections 1.8 through 1.11 as sections 1.7 through
1.10, respectively, and section 1.13 as section 1.14;
0
g. Adding new sections 1.11 and 1.13;
0
h. Revising section 1.18;
0
i. Revising the first sentence of section 2.1.1 and revising section
2.1.2;
0
j. Revising the first sentence of section 2.1.3;
0
k. Revising sections 2.2.1, 2.3.2.1, and 2.3.2.2;
0
l. Adding section 2.3.2.3;
0
m. Redesignating section 2.4.1 as section 2.4.1.1;
0
n. Adding new section 2.4.1;
0
o. Revising newly redesignated 2.4.1.1;
0
p. Removing the word ``Clothes'', in section 2.6, and adding in its
place ``Cloths'';
0
q. Revising sections 2.7.1, 2.7.2, and 2.8.1;
0
r. In section 3.1, in the last sentence of the introductory text,
adding the text ``to the nearest 0.1 cubic foot'' following the text
``is calculated'';
0
s. Revising sections 3.3, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3, 3.6, 3.6.1, and 3.6.2;
0
t. Adding sections 3.6.3 and 3.6.4;
0
u. Revising sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, and 4.5;
0
v. Removing section 4.7; and
0
w. Redesignating section 4.8 as section 4.7.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix D1 to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Clothes Dryers
Note: The procedures in either this appendix or appendix D2 to
this subpart must be used to determine compliance with energy
conservation standards for clothes dryers manufactured on or after
January 1, 2015. Manufacturers must use a single appendix for all
representations, including certifications of compliance, and may not
use this appendix for certain representations and appendix D2 to
this subpart for other representations.
0. Incorporation by Reference
DOE incorporated by reference in Sec. 430.3 the standards for
AHAM HLD-1 and IEC 62301, in their entirety, however, only
enumerated provisions of those documents are applicable to this
appendix. In cases where there is a conflict between any industry
standard(s) and this appendix, the language of the test procedure in
this appendix takes precedence over the industry standard(s).
(1) AHAM HLD-1:
(i) Section 3.3.5.1 ``Standard Simulator'' as referenced in
sections 2.1.2 through 2.1.3 of this appendix.
(ii) [Reserved]
(2) IEC 62301:
(i) Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, Note 1 as referenced in section
3.6.2 of this appendix.
(ii) Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 ``Sampling Method'' as
referenced in section 3.6.3 of this appendix.
1. * * *
1.3 ``AHAM HLD-1'' means the test standard published by the
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, titled ``Household
Tumble Type Clothes Dryers,'' ANSI-approved June 11, 2010, ANSI/AHAM
HLD-1-2010.
* * * * *
1.11 ``Final moisture content'' (``FMC'') means the ratio of the
weight of water contained by the dry test load (i.e., after
completion of the drying cycle) to the bone-dry weight of the test
load, expressed as a percent.
* * * * *
1.13 ``Initial moisture content'' (``IMC'') means the ratio of
the weight of water contained by the damp test load (i.e., prior to
completion of the drying cycle) to the
[[Page 56640]]
bone-dry weight of the test load, expressed as a percent.
* * * * *
1.18 ``Vented clothes dryer'' means a clothes dryer that
exhausts the evaporated moisture from the cabinet.
* * * * *
2. * * *
2.1.1 * * * For both vented clothes dryers and ventless clothes
dryers, install the clothes dryer in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions as shipped with the unit. * * *
2.1.2 Vented clothes dryers. For vented clothes dryers, the
dryer exhaust shall be restricted by adding the AHAM exhaust
simulator described in section 3.3.5.1 of AHAM HLD-1.
2.1.3 * * * For ventless clothes dryers, the dryer shall be
tested without the AHAM exhaust simulator. * * *
* * * * *
2.2.1 For drying testing, maintain the room ambient air
temperature at 75 3 [deg]F and the room relative
humidity at 50 percent 10 percent relative humidity.
* * * * *
2.3.2.1 Natural gas supply. Maintain the gas supply to the
clothes dryer immediately ahead of all controls at a pressure of 7
to 10 inches of water column. The natural gas supplied should have a
heating value of approximately 1,025 Btus per standard cubic foot.
The actual heating value, Hn2, in Btus per standard cubic
foot, for the natural gas to be used in the test shall be obtained
either from measurements using a standard continuous flow
calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6 of this appendix or by the
purchase of bottled natural gas whose Btu rating is certified to be
at least as accurate a rating as could be obtained from measurements
with a standard continuous flow calorimeter as described in section
2.4.6 of this appendix.
2.3.2.2 Propane gas supply. Maintain the gas supply to the
clothes dryer immediately ahead of all controls at a pressure of 11
to 13 inches of water column. The propane gas supplied should have a
heating value of approximately 2,500 Btus per standard cubic foot.
The actual heating value, Hp, in Btus per standard cubic
foot, for the propane gas to be used in the test shall be obtained
either from measurements using a standard continuous flow
calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6 of this appendix or by the
purchase of bottled gas whose Btu rating is certified to be at least
as accurate a rating as could be obtained from measurement with a
standard continuous calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6 of
this appendix.
2.3.2.3 Hourly Btu Rating. Maintain the hourly Btu rating of the
burner within 5 percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer. If the hourly Btu rating of the burner cannot be
maintained within 5 percent of the rating specified by
the manufacturer, make adjustments in the following order until an
hourly Btu rating of the burner within 5 percent of the
rating specified by the manufacturer is achieved:
(1) Modify the gas inlet supply pressure within the allowable
range specified in section 2.3.2.1 or 2.3.2.2 of this appendix, as
applicable;
(2) If the clothes dryer is equipped with a gas pressure
regulator, modify the outlet pressure of the gas pressure regulator
within 10 percent of the value recommended by the
manufacturer in the installation manual, on the nameplate sticker,
or wherever the manufacturer makes such a recommendation for the
basic model; and
(3) Modify the orifice as necessary to achieve the required
hourly Btu rating.
* * * * *
2.4.1 Weighing scales.
2.4.1.1 Weighing scale for test cloth. The scale shall have a
range of 0 to a maximum of 60 pounds with a resolution of at least
0.001 pounds and a maximum error no greater than 0.1 percent of any
measured value within the range of 3 to 15 pounds.
* * * * *
2.7.1 Load size. Determine the load size for the unit under
test, according to Table 1 of this section.
Table 1--Test Loads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unit under test Test load (bone dry weight)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard size clothes dryer............... 8.45 pounds
.085 pounds.
Compact size clothes dryer................ 3.00 pounds .03
pounds.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each test load must consist of energy test cloths and no more
than five energy stuffer cloths.
2.7.2 Test load preparation. Dampen the load by agitating it in
water whose temperature is 60 [deg]F 5 [deg]F and
consists of 0 to 17 parts per million hardness for approximately 2
minutes in order to saturate the fabric. Then, extract water from
the wet test load by spinning the load to a target moisture content
between 54.0-61.0 percent of the bone-dry weight of the test load.
If after extraction the moisture content is less than 54.0 percent,
make a final mass adjustment, such that the moisture content is
between 54.0-61.0 percent of the bone-dry weight of the test load,
by adding water uniformly distributed among all of the test cloths
in a very fine spray using a spray bottle.
* * * * *
2.8.1 Vented clothes dryers. For vented clothes dryers, before
any test cycle, operate the dryer without a test load in the non-
heat mode for 15 minutes or until the discharge air temperature is
varying less than 1 [deg]F for 10 minutes--whichever is longer--in
the test installation location with the ambient conditions within
the specified test condition tolerances of section 2.2 of this
appendix.
* * * * *
3. * * *
3.3 Test cycle. Operate the clothes dryer at the maximum
temperature setting and, if equipped with a timer, at the maximum
time setting. Any other optional cycle settings that do not affect
the temperature or time settings shall be tested in the as-shipped
position, except that if the clothes dryer has network capabilities,
the network settings must be disabled throughout testing if such
settings can be disabled by the end-user and the product's user
manual provides instructions on how to do so. If the network
settings cannot be disabled by the end-user, or the product's user
manual does not provide instruction for disabling network settings,
then the unit must be tested with the network settings in the
factory default configuration for the test cycle. If the clothes
dryer does not have a separate temperature setting selection on the
control panel, the maximum time setting should be used for the
drying test cycle. Dry the load until the moisture content of the
test load is between 2.5 and 5.0 percent of the bone-dry weight of
the test load, at which point the test cycle is stopped, but do not
permit the dryer to advance into cool down. If required, reset the
timer to increase the length of the drying cycle. After stopping the
test cycle, remove and weigh the test load within 5 minutes
following termination of the test cycle. The clothes dryer shall not
be stopped intermittently in the middle of the test cycle for any
reason. Record the data specified by section 3.4 of this appendix.
If the dryer automatically stops during a cycle because the
condensation box is full of water, the test is stopped, and the test
run is invalid, in which case the condensation box shall be emptied
and the test re-run from the beginning. For ventless clothes dryers,
during the time between two cycles, the door of the dryer shall be
closed except for loading and unloading.
* * * * *
3.4.1 Bone-dry weight of the test load, Wbonedry, as
described in section 2.7.1 of this appendix.
3.4.2 Moisture content of the wet test load before the test,
IMC, as described in section 2.7.2 of this appendix.
3.4.3 Moisture content of the dry test load obtained after the
test, FMC, as described in section 3.3 of this appendix.
* * * * *
3.6 Standby mode and off mode power. Connect the clothes dryer
to a watt meter as specified in section 2.4.7 of this appendix.
Establish the testing conditions set forth in section 2 of this
appendix.
3.6.1 Perform standby mode and off mode testing after completion
of an active mode drying cycle included as part of the test cycle;
after removing the test load; without changing the control panel
settings used for the active mode drying cycle; with the door
closed; and without disconnecting the electrical energy supply to
the clothes dryer between completion of the active mode drying cycle
and the start of standby mode and off mode testing.
3.6.2 For clothes dryers that take some time to automatically
enter a stable inactive mode or off mode state from a higher power
state as discussed in Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, Note 1 of IEC 62301,
allow sufficient time for the clothes dryer to automatically reach
the default inactive/off mode state before proceeding with the test
measurement.
3.6.3 Once the stable inactive/off mode state has been reached,
measure and record the default inactive/off mode power,
Pdefault, in watts, following the test procedure for the
sampling method specified in Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC
62301.
[[Page 56641]]
3.6.4 For a clothes dryer with a switch (or other means) that
can be optionally selected by the end user to achieve a lower-power
inactive/off mode state than the default inactive/off mode state
measured in section 3.6.3 of this appendix, after performing the
measurement in section 3.6.3 of this appendix, activate the switch
(or other means) to the position resulting in the lowest power
consumption and repeat the measurement procedure described in
section 3.6.3 of this appendix. Measure and record the lowest
inactive/off mode power, Plowest, in watts.
4. * * *
4.1 Total per-cycle electric dryer energy consumption. Calculate
the total electric dryer energy consumption per cycle,
Ece, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined
as:
Ece = [53.5/(IMC - FMC)] x Et x field use,
Where:
Et = the energy recorded in section 3.4.5 of this
appendix.
53.5 = an experimentally established value for the percent reduction
in the moisture content of the test load during a laboratory test
cycle expressed as a percent.
field use = field use factor,
= 1.18 for clothes dryers with time termination control systems only
without any automatic termination control functions.
= 1.04 for clothes dryers with automatic control systems that meet
the requirements of the definition for automatic termination control
in section 1.4 of this appendix, including those that also have a
supplementary timer control, or that may also be manually
controlled.
IMC = the moisture content of the wet test load as recorded in
section 3.4.2 of this appendix.
FMC = the moisture content of the dry test load as recorded in
section 3.4.3 of this appendix.
4.2 Per-cycle gas dryer electrical energy consumption. Calculate
the gas dryer electrical energy consumption per cycle,
Ege, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined
as:
Ege = [53.5/(IMC - FMC)] x Ete x field use,
Where:
Ete = the energy recorded in section 3.4.6.1 of this
appendix.
field use, 53.5, MCw, and MCd as defined in
section 4.1 of this appendix.
4.3 Per-cycle gas dryer gas energy consumption. Calculate the
gas dryer gas energy consumption per cycle, Egg,
expressed in Btus per cycle and defined as:
Egg = [53.5/(MCw - MCd)] x
Etg x field use x GEF
Where:
Etg = the energy recorded in section 3.4.6.2 of this
appendix.
GEF = corrected gas heat value (Btu per cubic feet) as defined in
section 3.4.6.3 of this appendix.
field use, 53.5, IMC, and FMC as defined in section 4.1 of this
appendix.
* * * * *
4.5 Per-cycle standby mode and off mode energy consumption.
Calculate the clothes dryer per-cycle standby mode and off mode
energy consumption, ETSO, expressed in kilowatt-hours per
cycle and defined as:
ETSO = [(Pdefault x Sdefault) +
(Plowest x Slowest)] x K/283
Where:
Pdefault = Default inactive/off mode power, in watts, as
measured in section 3.6.3 of this appendix.
Plowest = Lowest inactive/off mode power, in watts, as
measured in section 3.6.4 of this appendix for clothes dryer with a
switch (or other means) that can be optionally selected by the end
user to achieve a lower-power inactive/off mode than the default
inactive/off mode; otherwise, Plowest=0.
Sdefault = Annual hours in default inactive/off mode,
defined as 8,620 if no optional lowest-power inactive/off mode is
available; otherwise 4,310.
Slowest = Annual hours in lowest-power inactive/off mode,
defined as 0 if no optional lowest-power inactive/off mode is
available; otherwise 4,310.
K = Conversion factor of watt-hours to kilowatt-hours = 0.001.
283 = Representative average number of clothes dryer cycles in a
year.
8,620 = Combined annual hours for inactive and off mode.
4,310 = One-half of the combined annual hours for inactive and off
mode.
* * * * *
0
8. Appendix D2 to subpart B of part 430 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the introductory note;
0
b. Adding section 0;
0
c. Revising section 1.3;
0
d. Removing the word ``clothes'', in section 1.6, and adding in its
place ``cloths'';
0
e. Removing sections 1.8, 1.15, and 1.19;
0
f. Redesignating sections 1.9 through 1.11 as sections 1.8 through
1.10, sections 1.13 and 1.14 as sections 1.14 and 1.15, and section
1.20 as section 1.19;
0
g. Adding new sections 1.11, 1.13, and 1.20;
0
h. Removing the word ``clasification'', in section 1.16, and adding in
its place ``classification'';
0
i. Revising the first sentence of section 2.1.1 and revising section
2.1.2;
0
j. Revising the first sentence of section 2.1.3;
0
k. Revising sections 2.2.1, 2.3.2.1, and 2.3.2.2;
0
l. Adding section 2.3.2.3;
0
m. Redesignating section 2.4.1 as section 2.4.1.1;
0
n. Adding new section 2.4.1;
0
o. Revising newly redesignated 2.4.1.1;
0
p. Revising sections 2.7.1, 2.7.2, and 2.8.1;
0
q. In section 3.1, in the last sentence of the introductory text,
adding the text ``to the nearest 0.1 cubic foot'' following the text
``is calculated'';
0
r. Revising sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, and 3.4.3;
0
s. Removing section 3.5;
0
t. Redesignating sections 3.6, 3.6.1, and 3.6.2 as sections 3.5, 3.5.1,
and 3.5.2, respectively;
0
u. Revising newly redesignated sections 3.5, 3.5.1, and 3.5.2;
0
v. Adding sections 3.5.3 and 3.5.4;
0
w. Revising sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, and 4.5;
0
x. Adding section 4.5.1;
0
y. Removing section 4.7; and
0
z. Redesignating section 4.8 as section 4.7.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix D2 to Subpart B of Part 430--Uniform Test Method for Measuring
the Energy Consumption of Clothes Dryer
Note: The procedures in either appendix D1 to this subpart or
this appendix must be used to determine compliance with energy
conservation standards for clothes dryers manufactured on or after
January 1, 2015. Manufacturers must use a single appendix for all
representations, including certifications of compliance, and may not
use appendix D1 to this subpart for certain representations and this
appendix for other representations. Per-cycle standby mode and off
mode energy consumption in section 4.5 of this appendix is
calculated using the value for the annual representative average
number of clothes dryer cycles in a year specified in section
4.5.1(a) of this appendix until the compliance date of any amended
energy conservation standards for these products. Beginning on the
compliance date of any amended energy conservation standards for
these products per-cycle standby mode and off mode energy
consumption in section 4.5 of this appendix is calculated using the
value for the annual representative average number of clothes dryer
cycles in a year specified in section 4.5.1(b) of this appendix.
0. Incorporation by Reference
DOE incorporated by reference in Sec. 430.3 the entire standard
for AHAM HLD-1 and IEC 62301, however, only enumerated provisions of
those documents are applicable to this appendix. In cases where
there is a conflict between any industry standard(s) and this
appendix, the language of the test procedure in this appendix takes
precedence over the industry standard(s).
(1) AHAM HLD-1:
(i) Section 3.3.5.1 ``Standard Simulator'' as referenced in
sections 2.1.2 through 2.1.3 of this appendix.
(ii) [Reserved]
(2) IEC 62301:
(i) Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, Note 1 as referenced in section
3.5.2 of this appendix.
(ii) Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 ``Sampling Method'' as
referenced in section 3.5.3 of this appendix.
* * * * *
[[Page 56642]]
1. * * *
1.3 ``AHAM HLD-1'' means the test standard published by the
Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, titled ``Household
Tumble Type Clothes Dryers,'' ANSI-approved June 11, 2010, ANSI/AHAM
HLD-1-2010.
* * * * *
1.11 ``Final moisture content'' (``FMC'') means the ratio of the
weight of water contained by the dry test load (i.e., after
completion of the drying cycle) to the bone-dry weight of the test
load, expressed as a percent.
* * * * *
1.13 ``Initial moisture content'' (``IMC'') means the ratio of
the weight of water contained by the damp test load (i.e., prior to
completion of the drying cycle) to the bone-dry weight of the test
load, expressed as a percent.
* * * * *
1.20 ``Vented clothes dryer'' means a clothes dryer that
exhausts the evaporated moisture from the cabinet.
* * * * *
2. * * *
2.1.1 * * * For both vented clothes dryers and ventless clothes
dryers, install the clothes dryer in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions as shipped with the unit. * * *
2.1.2 Vented clothes dryers. For vented clothes dryers, the
dryer exhaust shall be restricted by adding the AHAM exhaust
simulator described in section 3.3.5.1 of AHAM HLD-1.
2.1.3 * * * For ventless clothes dryers, the dryer shall be
tested without the AHAM exhaust simulator. * * *
* * * * *
2.2.1 For drying testing, maintain the room ambient air
temperature at 75 3 F and the room relative humidity at
50 percent 10 percent relative humidity.
* * * * *
2.3.2.1 Natural gas supply. Maintain the gas supply to the
clothes dryer immediately ahead of all controls at a pressure of 7
to 10 inches of water column. The natural gas supplied should have a
heating value of approximately 1,025 Btus per standard cubic foot.
The actual heating value, Hn2, in Btus per standard cubic
foot, for the natural gas to be used in the test shall be obtained
either from measurements using a standard continuous flow
calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6 of this appendix or by the
purchase of bottled natural gas whose Btu rating is certified to be
at least as accurate a rating as could be obtained from measurements
with a standard continuous flow calorimeter as described in section
2.4.6 of this appendix.
2.3.2.2 Propane gas supply. Maintain the gas supply to the
clothes dryer immediately ahead of all controls at a pressure of 11
to 13 inches of water column. The propane gas supplied should have a
heating value of approximately 2,500 Btus per standard cubic foot.
The actual heating value, Hp, in Btus per standard cubic
foot, for the propane gas to be used in the test shall be obtained
either from measurements using a standard continuous flow
calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6 of this appendix or by the
purchase of bottled gas whose Btu rating is certified to be at least
as accurate a rating as could be obtained from measurement with a
standard continuous calorimeter as described in section 2.4.6 of
this appendix.
2.3.2.3 Hourly Btu Rating. Maintain the hourly Btu rating of the
burner within 5 percent of the rating specified by the
manufacturer. If the hourly Btu rating of the burner cannot be
maintained within 5 percent of the rating specified by
the manufacturer, make adjustments in the following order until an
hourly Btu rating of the burner within 5 percent of the
rating specified by the manufacturer is achieved:
(1) Modify the gas inlet supply pressure within the allowable
range specified in section 2.3.2.1 or 2.3.2.2 of this appendix, as
applicable;
(2) If the clothes dryer is equipped with a gas pressure
regulator, modify the outlet pressure of the gas pressure regulator
within 10 percent of the value recommended by the
manufacturer in the installation manual, on the nameplate sticker,
or wherever the manufacturer makes such a recommendation for the
basic model; and
(3) Modify the orifice as necessary to achieve the required
hourly Btu rating.
* * * * *
2.4.1 Weighing scales.
2.4.1.1 Weighing scale for test cloth. The scale shall have a
range of 0 to a maximum of 60 pounds with a resolution of at least
0.001 pounds and a maximum error no greater than 0.1 percent of any
measured value within the range of 3 to 15 pounds.
* * * * *
2.7.1 Load size. Determine the load size for the unit under
test, according to Table 1 of this section.
Table 1--Test Loads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unit under test Test load (bone dry weight)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard size clothes dryer............... 8.45 pounds
.085 pounds.
Compact size clothes dryer................ 3.00 pounds .03
pounds.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each test load must consist of energy test cloths and no more
than five energy stuffer cloths.
2.7.2 Test load preparation. Dampen the load by agitating it in
water whose temperature is 60 [deg]F 5 [deg]F and
consists of 0 to 17 parts per million hardness for approximately 2
minutes to saturate the fabric. Then, extract water from the wet
test load by spinning the load until the moisture content of the
load is between 52.5 and 57.5 percent of the bone-dry weight of the
test load. Make a final mass adjustment, such that the moisture
content is 57.5 percent 0.33 percent by adding water
uniformly distributed among all of the test cloths in a very fine
spray using a spray bottle.
* * * * *
2.8.1 Vented clothes dryers. For vented clothes dryers, before
any test cycle, operate the dryer without a test load in the non-
heat mode for 15 minutes or until the discharge air temperature is
varying less than 1 [deg]F for 10 minutes--whichever is longer--in
the test installation location with the ambient conditions within
the specified test condition tolerances of section 2.2 of this
appendix.
* * * * *
3. * * *
3.3.1 Timer dryers. For timer dryers, operate the clothes dryer
at the maximum temperature setting and, if equipped with a timer, at
the maximum time setting. Any other optional cycle settings that do
not affect the temperature or time settings shall be tested in the
as-shipped position, except that if the clothes dryer has network
capabilities, the network settings must be disabled throughout
testing if such settings can be disabled by the end-user and the
product's user manual provides instructions on how to do so. If the
network settings cannot be disabled by the end-user, or the
product's user manual does not provide instruction for disabling
network settings, then the unit must be tested with the network
settings in the factory default configuration for the test cycle. If
the clothes dryer does not have a separate temperature setting
selection on the control panel, the maximum time setting should be
used for the drying test cycle. Dry the load until the moisture
content of the test load is between 1 and 2.5 percent of the bone-
dry weight of the test load, at which point the test cycle is
stopped, but do not permit the dryer to advance into cool down. If
required, reset the timer to increase the length of the drying
cycle. After stopping the test cycle, remove and weigh the test load
within 5 minutes following termination of the test cycle. The
clothes dryer shall not be stopped intermittently in the middle of
the test cycle for any reason. Record the data specified by section
3.4 of this appendix. If the dryer automatically stops during a
cycle because the condensation box is full of water, the test is
stopped, and the test run is invalid, in which case the condensation
box shall be emptied and the test re-run from the beginning. For
ventless clothes dryers, during the time between two cycles, the
door of the dryer shall be closed except for loading and unloading.
3.3.2 Automatic termination control dryers. For automatic
termination control dryers, a ``normal'' program shall be selected
for the test cycle. For dryers that do not have a ``normal''
program, the cycle recommended by the manufacturer for drying cotton
or linen clothes shall be selected. Where the drying temperature
setting can be chosen independently of the program, it shall be set
to the maximum. Where the dryness level setting can be chosen
independently of the program, it shall be set to the ``normal'' or
``medium'' dryness level setting. If such designation is not
provided, then the dryness level shall be set at the mid-point
between the minimum and maximum settings. If an even number of
discrete settings are provided, use the next-highest setting above
the midpoint, in the direction of the maximum dryness setting or
next-lowest setting below the midpoint, in the direction of the
minimum dryness setting. Any other
[[Page 56643]]
optional cycle settings that do not affect the program, temperature
or dryness settings shall be tested in the as-shipped position,
except that if the clothes dryer has network capabilities, the
network settings must be disabled throughout testing if such
settings can be disabled by the end-user and the product's user
manual provides instructions on how to do so. If the network
settings cannot be disabled by the end-user, or the product's user
manual does not provide instruction for disabling network settings,
then the unit must be tested with the network settings in the
factory default configuration for the test cycle.
Operate the clothes dryer until the completion of the programmed
cycle, including the cool down period. The cycle shall be considered
complete when the dryer indicates to the user that the cycle has
finished (by means of a display, indicator light, audible signal, or
other signal) and the heater and drum/fan motor shuts off for the
final time. If the clothes dryer is equipped with a wrinkle
prevention mode (i.e., that continuously or intermittently tumbles
the clothes dryer drum after the clothes dryer indicates to the user
that the cycle has finished) that is activated by default in the as-
shipped position or if manufacturers' instructions specify that the
feature is recommended to be activated for normal use, the cycle
shall be considered complete after the end of the wrinkle prevention
mode. After the completion of the test cycle, remove and weigh the
test load within 5 minutes following termination of the test cycle.
Record the data specified in section 3.4 of this appendix. If the
final moisture content is greater than 2 percent, the results from
the test are invalid and a second run must be conducted. Conduct the
second run of the test on the unit using the highest dryness level
setting. If, on this second run, the dryer does not achieve a final
moisture content of 2 percent or lower, the dryer has not
sufficiently dried the clothes and the test results may not be used
for certification of compliance with energy conservation standards.
If the dryer automatically stops during a cycle because the
condensation box is full of water, the test is stopped, and the test
run is invalid, in which case the condensation box shall be emptied
and the test re-run from the beginning. For ventless clothes dryers,
during the time between two cycles, the door of the dryer shall be
closed except for loading and unloading.
* * * * *
3.4.1 Bone-dry weight of the test load, Wbonedry, as
described in section 2.7.1 of this appendix.
3.4.2 Moisture content of the wet test load before the test,
IMC, as described in section 2.7.2 of this appendix.
3.4.3 Moisture content of the dry test load obtained after the
test, FMC, as described in section 3.3 of this appendix.
* * * * *
3.5 Standby mode and off mode power. Connect the clothes dryer
to a watt meter as specified in section 2.4.7 of this appendix.
Establish the testing conditions set forth in section 2 of this
appendix.
3.5.1 Perform standby mode and off mode testing after completion
of an active mode drying cycle included as part of the test cycle;
after removing the test load; without changing the control panel
settings used for the active mode drying cycle; with the door
closed; and without disconnecting the electrical energy supply to
the clothes dryer between completion of the active mode drying cycle
and the start of standby mode and off mode testing.
3.5.2 For clothes dryers that take some time to automatically
enter a stable inactive mode or off mode state from a higher power
state as discussed in Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, Note 1 of IEC 62301,
allow sufficient time for the clothes dryer to automatically reach
the default inactive/off mode state before proceeding with the test
measurement.
3.5.3 Once the stable inactive/off mode state has been reached,
measure and record the default inactive/off mode power,
Pdefault, in watts, following the test procedure for the
sampling method specified in Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC
62301.
3.5.4 For a clothes dryer with a switch (or other means) that
can be optionally selected by the end user to achieve a lower-power
inactive/off mode state than the default inactive/off mode state
measured in section 3.5.3 of this appendix, after performing the
measurement in section 3.5.3 of this appendix, activate the switch
(or other means) to the position resulting in the lowest power
consumption and repeat the measurement procedure described in
section 3.5.3 of this appendix. Measure and record the lowest
inactive/off mode power, Plowest, in watts.
4. * * *
4.1 Total per-cycle electric dryer energy consumption. Calculate
the total per-cycle electric dryer energy consumption required to
achieve a final moisture content of 2 percent or less,
Ece, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined
as:
Ece = Et,
for automatic termination control dryers, and,
Ece = [55.5/(IMC-FMC)] x Et x field use,
for timer dryers
Where:
55.5 = an experimentally established value for the percent reduction
in the moisture content of the test load during a laboratory test
cycle expressed as a percent.
Et = the energy recorded in section 3.4.5 of this
appendix.
field use = 1.18, the field use factor for clothes dryers with time
termination control systems only without any automatic termination
control functions.
IMC = the moisture content of the wet test load as recorded in
section 3.4.2 of this appendix.
FMC = the moisture content of the dry test load as recorded in
section 3.4.3 of this appendix.
4.2 Per-cycle gas dryer electrical energy consumption. Calculate
the per-cycle gas dryer electrical energy consumption required to
achieve a final moisture content of 2 percent or less,
Ege, expressed in kilowatt-hours per cycle and defined
as:
Ege = Ete,
for automatic termination control dryers, and,
Ege = [55.5/(IMC-FMC)] x Ete x field use,
for timer dryers
Where:
Ete = the energy recorded in section 3.4.6.1 of this
appendix.
field use, 55.5, IMC, and FMC as defined in section 4.1 of this
appendix.
4.3 Per-cycle gas dryer gas energy consumption. Calculate the
per-cycle gas dryer gas energy consumption required to achieve a
final moisture content of 2 percent or less, Egg,
expressed in Btus per cycle and defined as:
Egg = Etg x GEF
for automatic termination control dryers, and,
Egg = [55.5/(IMC-FMC)] x Etg x field use x GEF
for timer dryers
Where:
Etg = the energy recorded in section 3.4.6.2 of this
appendix.
GEF = corrected gas heat value (Btu per cubic foot) as defined in
section 3.4.6.3 of this appendix,
field use, 55.5, IMC, and FMC as defined in section 4.1 of this
appendix.
4.4 Total per-cycle gas dryer energy consumption expressed in
kilowatt-hours. Calculate the total per-cycle gas dryer energy
consumption required to achieve a final moisture content of 2
percent or less, Ecg, expressed in kilowatt-hours per
cycle and defined as:
Ecg = Ege + (Egg/3412 Btu/kWh)
Where:
Ege = the energy calculated in section 4.2 of this
appendix
Egg = the energy calculated in section 4.3 of this
appendix
4.5 Per-cycle standby mode and off mode energy consumption.
Calculate the clothes dryer per-cycle standby mode and off mode
energy consumption, ETSO, expressed in kilowatt-hours per
cycle and defined as:
ETSO = [(Pdefault x Sdefault) +
(Plowest x Slowest)] x K/Cannual
Where:
Pdefault = Default inactive/off mode power, in watts, as
measured in section 3.5.3 of this appendix.
Plowest = Lowest inactive/off mode power, in watts, as
measured in section 3.5.4 of this appendix for clothes dryer with a
switch (or other means) that can be optionally selected by the end
user to achieve a lower-power inactive/off mode than the default
inactive/off mode; otherwise, Plowest =0.
Sdefault = Annual hours in default inactive/off mode,
defined as 8,620 if no optional lowest-power inactive/off mode is
available; otherwise 4,310.
Slowest = Annual hours in lowest-power inactive/off mode,
defined as 0 if no optional lowest-power inactive/off mode is
available; otherwise 4,310.
K = Conversion factor of watt-hours to kilowatt-hours = 0.001.
Cannual = Representative average number of clothes dryer
cycles in a year as specified in section 4.5.1.
[[Page 56644]]
8,620 = Combined annual hours for inactive and off mode.
4,310 = One-half of the combined annual hours for inactive and off
mode.
4.5.1 Representative average number of clothes dryer cycles in a
year. Per the Introductory Note:
(1) Cannual = 283
(2) Cannual = 236
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-21810 Filed 10-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P