Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Highway Improvements in Brunswick County, North Carolina and Horry County, South Carolina, 55905-55907 [2021-21967]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 192 / Thursday, October 7, 2021 / Notices
may apply for economic injury disaster
loans if those employees are ordered to
perform active service for a period of
more than 30 consecutive days, and
those employees are essential to the
success of the small businesses’ daily
operations.
The purpose of the MREIDL program
is to provide funds to an eligible small
business to meet its ordinary and
necessary operating expenses that it
could have met, but is unable to meet,
because an essential employee was
ordered to perform active service for
more than 30 consecutive days in his or
her role as a military reservist. These
loans are intended only to provide the
amount of working capital needed by a
small business to pay its necessary
obligations as they mature until
operations return to normal after the
essential employee is released from
active service. For information/
applications contact 1–800–659–2955 or
visit www.sba.gov.
Applications for the Military Reservist
Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program
may be filed at the above address.
The Interest Rate for eligible small
businesses is 2.855.
The number assigned is 17212 0.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
James Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2021–21968 Filed 10–6–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026–03–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #17206 and #17207;
UTAH Disaster Number UT–00087]
Administrative Declaration of a
Disaster for the State of Utah
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
17:46 Oct 06, 2021
Jkt 256001
For Physical Damage:
Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Homeowners without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere ......................
Businesses without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations with
Credit Available Elsewhere ...
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
For Economic Injury:
Businesses & Small Agricultural
Cooperatives without Credit
Available Elsewhere ..............
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere .....................................
3.125
1.563
5.710
2.855
2.000
2.000
2.855
2.000
The number assigned to this disaster
for physical damage is 17206 6 and for
economic injury is 17207 0.
The States which received an EIDL
Declaration # is Nevada, Utah.
Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
This is a notice of an
Administrative declaration of a disaster
for the State of Utah dated 10/01/2021.
Incident: Severe Storms and Flooding.
Incident Period: 08/01/2021.
DATES: Issued on 10/01/2021.
Physical Loan Application Deadline
Date: 11/30/2021.
Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan
Application Deadline Date: 07/01/2022.
ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan
applications to: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Processing and
Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Percent
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number 59008)
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that as a result of the
Administrator’s disaster declaration,
applications for disaster loans may be
filed at the address listed above or other
locally announced locations.
The following areas have been
determined to be adversely affected by
the disaster:
Primary Counties: Iron.
Contiguous Counties:
Utah: Beaver, Garfield, Kane,
Washington.
Nevada: Lincoln.
The Interest Rates are:
[FR Doc. 2021–21909 Filed 10–6–21; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 8026–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2021–0017]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
Proposed Highway Improvements in
Brunswick County, North Carolina and
Horry County, South Carolina
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S.
Department of Transportation.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55905
Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement.
ACTION:
The FHWA is issuing this
Notice of Intent (NOI) to solicit
comments and advise the public,
agencies, and stakeholders of an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
that will be prepared to study the effects
of a proposed project for improvements
to SC 31 starting near Little River, Horry
County, South Carolina and running
northeast to US 17, in an area between
Calabash and Shallotte, Brunswick
County, North Carolina. This project is
called the ‘‘Carolina Bays Parkway
Extension’’ and is North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Project No. R–5876 and South Carolina
Department of Transportation (SCDOT),
Project No. P029554. NCDOT is
administering the development of this
project in cooperation with SCDOT and
other participating agencies. This notice
contains a summary of the information
as required in the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
regulations. This NOI should be
reviewed together with the
Supplementary NOI Information
document which contains important
details about the proposed project.
DATES: Comments on the NOI or the
Supplementary NOI Information
document must be received on or before
November 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: This NOI and the
Supplementary NOI Information
document are available in the docket
referenced above at
www.regulations.gov and on the project
website located at https://
www.ncdot.gov/projects/carolina-baysparkway. A copy of the NOI and
Supplementary NOI Information
document can also be mailed by sending
a request to the following address: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, Terry Sanford
Federal Building, ATTN: Clarence W.
Coleman, P.E., Preconstruction and
Environment Director, RE: Carolina
Bays Parkway Extension NOI, 310 New
Bern Avenue, Suite 410, Raleigh, NC
27601.
Please limit any comments or
questions to the information contained
in this notice or the Supplementary NOI
information document. Questions or
comments should be posted to the
docket found at www.regulations.gov
under number FHWA–2021–0017.
Otherwise they may also be submitted
by email to Carolina-Bays-Pkwy@
publicinput.com or by calling (855)
925–2801 and entering project code
7734 when prompted. All comments
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
55906
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 192 / Thursday, October 7, 2021 / Notices
received by the close of comments will
be posted to the docket.
All submissions should include the
agency name and the docket number
that appears in the heading of this
Notice. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clarence W. Coleman, P.E., Director of
Preconstruction, Federal Highway
Administration, 310 New Bern Avenue,
Suite 410, Raleigh, North Carolina
27601–1418, Telephone: (919) 747–
7014; or Mr. D. Chad Kimes, P.E., North
Carolina Department of Transportation,
Division 3 Engineer, 5501 Barbados
Boulevard, Castle Hayne, North Carolina
28429, Telephone: (910) 675–0143.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
environmental review of transportation
alternatives for the US 17 corridor will
be conducted in accordance with the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq.), 23 U.S.C. 139, CEQ regulations
implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1500–
1508), FHWA regulations implementing
NEPA (23 CFR 771.101—771.139), and
all applicable Federal, State, and local
governmental laws and regulations.
FHWA, in cooperation with NCDOT
and SCDOT, will prepare an EIS
addressing proposed improvements
along the US 17 corridor located in the
coastal regions of South Carolina and
North Carolina.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Purpose and Need
The primary purpose of the project is
to improve the transportation network
in the study area by enhancing mobility
and connectivity for traffic moving in
and through the project area. Mobility
refers to the movement of people or
goods, and connectivity refers to the
density of connections in road networks
and the directness of links. Many
intersections and roadway segments in
the study area are expected to either
approach or exceed the roadway
capacity limits by 2040. The population
within Horry and Brunswick counties
has steadily increased, and is expected
to continue to increase, along with the
number of tourists to the area. Growth
in population, tourism, and supporting
services has resulted in an increase in
mixed-purpose traffic on area roads.
Public involvement related to the
project purpose and need has occurred.
A project newsletter requesting input on
the project’s draft purpose and need
statement was distributed to property
owners and residents in the project
study area in December 2018. Overall,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Oct 06, 2021
Jkt 256001
commenters were supportive of the
project and believe there is too much
traffic, particularly in the summer and
during evening rush hour.
The NEPA/Section 404 Merger Team,
a group of representatives from various
environmental, transportation, and local
agencies responsible for coordinating
and participating in the environmental
process for this project, concurred on
the purpose and need for the project at
their March 19, 2019 Concurrence Point
1 (CP1) meeting.
It should be noted these estimated
impacts are based on preliminary
analysis and will be further refined as
more comprehensive information is
obtained through detailed field studies,
environmental analysis, and further
roadway design.
A detailed discussion of build
alternatives, along with a table
describing preliminary impacts for all
resources to be analyzed in the EIS, is
included in the supplemental
document.
Expected Impacts
The EIS will include the
environmental impacts of seven build
alternatives (Corridor Concepts 1, 1A, 2,
4, 4A, 7, and 8) carried forward for
analysis, as well as the no build
alternative. It will include any adverse
environmental effects which cannot be
avoided and any irreversible or
irretrievable commitments of resources
which would be involved in the
proposal should it be implemented. The
following is a brief summary of the
range of estimated preliminary impacts
that could result from the build
alternatives carried forward.
With regard to the natural
environment, Corridor Concepts 1, 1A,
and 2 are on the lower end of the range
of wetland impacts calculated, while
Corridor Concepts 4 and 4A are on the
higher end of the range. Concepts 1A,
4A, and 7 are on the lower end of the
range of stream impacts calculated for
each of the build concepts, while
Concepts 1, 4, and 8 are on the higher
end. Corridor Concept 8 would impact
areas designated as Essential Fish
Habitat. Impacts to the 100-year
floodplain range between 52 acres and
214 acres with Corridor Concepts 1A
and 4A on the lower end of the range
and Corridor Concept 2 on the higher
end. Corridor Concepts 1A and 4A each
would impact approximately one acre of
floodway, while the other corridor
concepts would impact approximately
2.5 acres of floodway.
With regard to the human
environment, Corridor Concept 8 has
greater impacts to single-family
residential and commercial/industrial
resources than the other corridor
concepts, while Corridor Concepts 7
and 8 have greater impacts to multifamily residential resources. There is a
range of impacts when considering
other elements of the human
environment such as churches,
cemeteries, and golf courses. There are
no trends which would distinguish the
corridor concepts when analyzing the
data for physical resources such as
hazardous waste sites, underground
storage tanks, and electrical substations.
Anticipated Permits and Other
Authorizations
Due to anticipated impacts to streams
and wetlands, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers will need to issue a Section
404 of the Clean Water Act permit.
FHWA will authorize the use of Federal
funds for right of way and construction
when all requirements, including NEPA
compliance, are satisfied.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1502.16, a
description of the environmental
impacts of the proposed action and
reasonable alternatives to the proposed
action and the significance of those
impacts will be disclosed in the DEIS,
including information on compliance
with the Endangered Species Act and
Section 106 of the Historic Preservation
Act of 1966. The comparison of the
proposed action and reasonable
alternatives will be based on this
discussion of the impacts.
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Environmental Coordination Schedule
Environmental coordination will
involve utilization of NCDOT’s NEPA/
Section 404 Merger Process, a
synchronized review process with
various Federal, State, and local
agencies performing the various
environmental review and permitting
procedures or consultation requirements
necessary for a proposed project
concurrently. The process provides a
forum for appropriate agency
representatives to discuss and reach
consensus on ways to facilitate meeting
the regulatory requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)
during the NEPA decision-making phase
of transportation projects. The Merger
Process involves interagency meetings
that include FHWA as the lead Federal
agency, the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers as a cooperating agency, and
the following additional concurring
agencies: NCDOT, SCDOT, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
(USFWS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Fisheries, North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality—Division of
Water Resources (NCDEQ DWR), South
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 192 / Thursday, October 7, 2021 / Notices
Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control (SCDHEC),
North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality—Division of
Coastal Management (NCDEQ DCM),
SCDHEC—Ocean & Coastal Resource
Management (OCRM), North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission
(NCWRC), South Carolina Department
of Natural Resources (SCDNR),
SCDHEC—Bureau of Water, North
Carolina State Historic Preservation
Office (NC SHPO), South Carolina State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO),
Cape Fear Rural Transportation
Planning Organization (Cape Fear RPO),
Grand Strand Area Transportation
Study—Metropolitan Planning
Organization (GSATS MPO), and Horry
County (SC).
During the Merger Process, these
agencies coordinate on seven (7)
concurrence points: Concurrence Point
1, Purpose and Need and Study Area
Defined; Concurrence Point 2, Detailed
Study Alternatives Carried Forward
(DSA); Concurrence Point 2A, Bridging
Decisions and Alignment Review;
Concurrence Point 3: LEDPA/Preferred
Alternative Selection; Concurrence
Point 4A: Avoidance and Minimization;
Concurrence Point 4B: 30 Percent
Hydraulic Review; and Concurrence
Point 4C: Permit Drawings Review.
Additional information on the NCDOT
NEPA/Section 404 Merger Process may
be access via the following link: https://
connect.ncdot.gov/resources/
Environmental/EPU/Merger/Pages/
default.aspx. The publication date of
the NOI will start a two-year time clock
for the agency to reach its final decision
on the project (40 CFR 1501.10(a) and
(b)(2)).
NCDOT is currently conducting
detailed environmental analysis and
preparing conceptual design plans on
the alternatives carried forward for
detailed study. The DEIS is scheduled to
be approved and published during fall
2021, with public hearings scheduled to
occur in late 2021. The Merger Team is
scheduled to select the Least
Environmentally Damaging Practicable
Alternative during spring 2022. The
Combined Final EIS is scheduled for
completion early 2023 and the ROD in
mid-2023. The USACE is anticipated to
issue the Section 404 of the CWA permit
in fall 2023. NCDOT has developed a
permitting timetable that includes a
schedule of decision-making milestones
and EIS documentation that has been
shared with Merger Team
representatives. The permitting
timetable for the project may be
accessed in the NOI supplementary
document.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Oct 06, 2021
Jkt 256001
Project Scoping and Alternatives
Considered
Coordination with on the project
began shortly following the USACE
issuance of the original notice of intent
to issue a Draft EIS in the Federal
Register on January 27, 2017. A scoping
meeting was on September 13, 2017.
After NCDOT decided to utilize Federal
funds for this project, USACE issued a
Notice in the Federal Register to
withdraw the prior Notice of Intent, and
to notify the public that it would no
longer be the lead Federal agency, and
would not be issuing a DEIS for this
project on November 29, 2018. The
USACE indicated in the Notice that the
project will be federally funded, and
that another lead agency would issue a
Notice of Intent to prepare a DEIS.
Since that time, FHWA has notified
all Federal, State, local agencies on the
NEPA/Section 404 Merger Team that it
is the lead Federal agency. The general
public has also been notified about
FHWA’s Federal lead agency status. The
purpose of the project is to improve the
transportation network in the study area
by enhancing mobility and connectivity
for traffic moving in and through the
project area. The NEPA/Section 404
merger team concurred with the stated
purpose for the project and the initial
project study area in the Concurrence
Point 1 meeting held on March 19, 2019.
To accommodate the study corridor
footprint at some proposed interchanges
and after receiving and responding to
public and local officials’ input,
expanding the previously approved
project study area is recommended. The
proposed study area will allow
consideration of alignments suggested
during the public input process for
alternatives that could achieve the
project’s purpose and satisfy specific
transportation needs while minimizing
potential impacts to important
environmental features.
NCDOT and SCDOT held two public
meetings in December 2019 to present
and received comments on the project
alternatives, corridor options developed
by NCDOT and its consultant and
refined by local officials and the Merger
Team. The first meeting was held on
December 3, 2019, in Sunset Beach,
North Carolina followed by a second
meeting on December 4, 2019, in Little
River, South Carolina. Over 1,000
people attended the meetings and more
than 1,800 comments were received.
Most of the comments received
reflected corridor concept preference for
the build concepts, identified potential
project impacts, or suggested variations
to and additional corridor concepts. A
summary of the public meetings held in
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55907
December 2019 is included in the NOI
Supplementary Information document.
The Merger Team reviewed several
build alternative corridor concepts, and
the following alternatives were carried
forward for detail study at the
Concurrence Point 2 meeting that
occurred on May 4, 2020: Alternative 1,
1A, 2, 4, 4A, 7, and 8. Build Alternative
Corridor Concepts 3, 5, 6, and 9 were
eliminated from further study. The
Merger Team also decided to eliminate
the Transportation System Management
(TSM), Transportation Demand
Management (TDM), and Mass Transit
Alternatives from detailed study.
Request for Comments on Information
in This Notice
With this Notice, FHWA and NCDOT
requests on potential alternatives and
impacts, and identification of any
relevant information, studies, or
analyses of any kind concerning impacts
affecting the quality of the human
environment. Comments may be posted
to the docket found at
www.regulations.gov under number
FHWA–2021–0017. Otherwise they may
also be submitted by email to CarolinaBays-Pkwy@publicinput.com or by
calling (855) 925–2801 and entering
project code 7734 when prompted.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; 23
CFR part 771.
Clarence W. Coleman,
Director of Preconstruction, Raleigh, North
Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2021–21967 Filed 10–6–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Fiscal Year 2021 Competitive Funding
Opportunity: Innovative Coordinated
Access and Mobility (ICAM) Pilot
Program
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Funding Opportunity
(NOFO).
AGENCY:
The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) announces the
opportunity to apply for $3.5 million in
Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 funds under the
Innovative Coordinated Access and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 192 (Thursday, October 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55905-55907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21967]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA-2021-0017]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
Proposed Highway Improvements in Brunswick County, North Carolina and
Horry County, South Carolina
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), U.S. Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this Notice of Intent (NOI) to solicit
comments and advise the public, agencies, and stakeholders of an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that will be prepared to study the
effects of a proposed project for improvements to SC 31 starting near
Little River, Horry County, South Carolina and running northeast to US
17, in an area between Calabash and Shallotte, Brunswick County, North
Carolina. This project is called the ``Carolina Bays Parkway
Extension'' and is North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Project No. R-5876 and South Carolina Department of Transportation
(SCDOT), Project No. P029554. NCDOT is administering the development of
this project in cooperation with SCDOT and other participating
agencies. This notice contains a summary of the information as required
in the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) regulations. This NOI should be reviewed together
with the Supplementary NOI Information document which contains
important details about the proposed project.
DATES: Comments on the NOI or the Supplementary NOI Information
document must be received on or before November 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: This NOI and the Supplementary NOI Information document are
available in the docket referenced above at www.regulations.gov and on
the project website located at https://www.ncdot.gov/projects/carolina-bays-parkway. A copy of the NOI and Supplementary NOI Information
document can also be mailed by sending a request to the following
address: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway
Administration, Terry Sanford Federal Building, ATTN: Clarence W.
Coleman, P.E., Preconstruction and Environment Director, RE: Carolina
Bays Parkway Extension NOI, 310 New Bern Avenue, Suite 410, Raleigh, NC
27601.
Please limit any comments or questions to the information contained
in this notice or the Supplementary NOI information document. Questions
or comments should be posted to the docket found at www.regulations.gov
under number FHWA-2021-0017. Otherwise they may also be submitted by
email to [email protected] or by calling (855) 925-
2801 and entering project code 7734 when prompted. All comments
[[Page 55906]]
received by the close of comments will be posted to the docket.
All submissions should include the agency name and the docket
number that appears in the heading of this Notice. All comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clarence W. Coleman, P.E., Director of
Preconstruction, Federal Highway Administration, 310 New Bern Avenue,
Suite 410, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1418, Telephone: (919) 747-
7014; or Mr. D. Chad Kimes, P.E., North Carolina Department of
Transportation, Division 3 Engineer, 5501 Barbados Boulevard, Castle
Hayne, North Carolina 28429, Telephone: (910) 675-0143.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The environmental review of transportation
alternatives for the US 17 corridor will be conducted in accordance
with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), 23 U.S.C. 139, CEQ
regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508), FHWA regulations
implementing NEPA (23 CFR 771.101--771.139), and all applicable
Federal, State, and local governmental laws and regulations.
FHWA, in cooperation with NCDOT and SCDOT, will prepare an EIS
addressing proposed improvements along the US 17 corridor located in
the coastal regions of South Carolina and North Carolina.
Purpose and Need
The primary purpose of the project is to improve the transportation
network in the study area by enhancing mobility and connectivity for
traffic moving in and through the project area. Mobility refers to the
movement of people or goods, and connectivity refers to the density of
connections in road networks and the directness of links. Many
intersections and roadway segments in the study area are expected to
either approach or exceed the roadway capacity limits by 2040. The
population within Horry and Brunswick counties has steadily increased,
and is expected to continue to increase, along with the number of
tourists to the area. Growth in population, tourism, and supporting
services has resulted in an increase in mixed[hyphen]purpose traffic on
area roads.
Public involvement related to the project purpose and need has
occurred. A project newsletter requesting input on the project's draft
purpose and need statement was distributed to property owners and
residents in the project study area in December 2018. Overall,
commenters were supportive of the project and believe there is too much
traffic, particularly in the summer and during evening rush hour.
The NEPA/Section 404 Merger Team, a group of representatives from
various environmental, transportation, and local agencies responsible
for coordinating and participating in the environmental process for
this project, concurred on the purpose and need for the project at
their March 19, 2019 Concurrence Point 1 (CP1) meeting.
Expected Impacts
The EIS will include the environmental impacts of seven build
alternatives (Corridor Concepts 1, 1A, 2, 4, 4A, 7, and 8) carried
forward for analysis, as well as the no build alternative. It will
include any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided and
any irreversible or irretrievable commitments of resources which would
be involved in the proposal should it be implemented. The following is
a brief summary of the range of estimated preliminary impacts that
could result from the build alternatives carried forward.
With regard to the natural environment, Corridor Concepts 1, 1A,
and 2 are on the lower end of the range of wetland impacts calculated,
while Corridor Concepts 4 and 4A are on the higher end of the range.
Concepts 1A, 4A, and 7 are on the lower end of the range of stream
impacts calculated for each of the build concepts, while Concepts 1, 4,
and 8 are on the higher end. Corridor Concept 8 would impact areas
designated as Essential Fish Habitat. Impacts to the 100-year
floodplain range between 52 acres and 214 acres with Corridor Concepts
1A and 4A on the lower end of the range and Corridor Concept 2 on the
higher end. Corridor Concepts 1A and 4A each would impact approximately
one acre of floodway, while the other corridor concepts would impact
approximately 2.5 acres of floodway.
With regard to the human environment, Corridor Concept 8 has
greater impacts to single-family residential and commercial/industrial
resources than the other corridor concepts, while Corridor Concepts 7
and 8 have greater impacts to multi-family residential resources. There
is a range of impacts when considering other elements of the human
environment such as churches, cemeteries, and golf courses. There are
no trends which would distinguish the corridor concepts when analyzing
the data for physical resources such as hazardous waste sites,
underground storage tanks, and electrical substations. It should be
noted these estimated impacts are based on preliminary analysis and
will be further refined as more comprehensive information is obtained
through detailed field studies, environmental analysis, and further
roadway design.
A detailed discussion of build alternatives, along with a table
describing preliminary impacts for all resources to be analyzed in the
EIS, is included in the supplemental document.
Anticipated Permits and Other Authorizations
Due to anticipated impacts to streams and wetlands, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers will need to issue a Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act permit. FHWA will authorize the use of Federal funds for right of
way and construction when all requirements, including NEPA compliance,
are satisfied.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1502.16, a description of the environmental
impacts of the proposed action and reasonable alternatives to the
proposed action and the significance of those impacts will be disclosed
in the DEIS, including information on compliance with the Endangered
Species Act and Section 106 of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966.
The comparison of the proposed action and reasonable alternatives will
be based on this discussion of the impacts.
Environmental Coordination Schedule
Environmental coordination will involve utilization of NCDOT's
NEPA/Section 404 Merger Process, a synchronized review process with
various Federal, State, and local agencies performing the various
environmental review and permitting procedures or consultation
requirements necessary for a proposed project concurrently. The process
provides a forum for appropriate agency representatives to discuss and
reach consensus on ways to facilitate meeting the regulatory
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) during the
NEPA decision-making phase of transportation projects. The Merger
Process involves interagency meetings that include FHWA as the lead
Federal agency, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers as a cooperating
agency, and the following additional concurring agencies: NCDOT, SCDOT,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (USFWS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Fisheries, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality--Division
of Water Resources (NCDEQ DWR), South
[[Page 55907]]
Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC), North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality--Division of Coastal
Management (NCDEQ DCM), SCDHEC--Ocean & Coastal Resource Management
(OCRM), North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC), South
Carolina Department of Natural Resources (SCDNR), SCDHEC--Bureau of
Water, North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (NC SHPO),
South Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Cape Fear
Rural Transportation Planning Organization (Cape Fear RPO), Grand
Strand Area Transportation Study--Metropolitan Planning Organization
(GSATS MPO), and Horry County (SC).
During the Merger Process, these agencies coordinate on seven (7)
concurrence points: Concurrence Point 1, Purpose and Need and Study
Area Defined; Concurrence Point 2, Detailed Study Alternatives Carried
Forward (DSA); Concurrence Point 2A, Bridging Decisions and Alignment
Review; Concurrence Point 3: LEDPA/Preferred Alternative Selection;
Concurrence Point 4A: Avoidance and Minimization; Concurrence Point 4B:
30 Percent Hydraulic Review; and Concurrence Point 4C: Permit Drawings
Review. Additional information on the NCDOT NEPA/Section 404 Merger
Process may be access via the following link: https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental/EPU/Merger/Pages/default.aspx. The publication date of the NOI will start a two-year
time clock for the agency to reach its final decision on the project
(40 CFR 1501.10(a) and (b)(2)).
NCDOT is currently conducting detailed environmental analysis and
preparing conceptual design plans on the alternatives carried forward
for detailed study. The DEIS is scheduled to be approved and published
during fall 2021, with public hearings scheduled to occur in late 2021.
The Merger Team is scheduled to select the Least Environmentally
Damaging Practicable Alternative during spring 2022. The Combined Final
EIS is scheduled for completion early 2023 and the ROD in mid-2023. The
USACE is anticipated to issue the Section 404 of the CWA permit in fall
2023. NCDOT has developed a permitting timetable that includes a
schedule of decision-making milestones and EIS documentation that has
been shared with Merger Team representatives. The permitting timetable
for the project may be accessed in the NOI supplementary document.
Project Scoping and Alternatives Considered
Coordination with on the project began shortly following the USACE
issuance of the original notice of intent to issue a Draft EIS in the
Federal Register on January 27, 2017. A scoping meeting was on
September 13, 2017. After NCDOT decided to utilize Federal funds for
this project, USACE issued a Notice in the Federal Register to withdraw
the prior Notice of Intent, and to notify the public that it would no
longer be the lead Federal agency, and would not be issuing a DEIS for
this project on November 29, 2018. The USACE indicated in the Notice
that the project will be federally funded, and that another lead agency
would issue a Notice of Intent to prepare a DEIS.
Since that time, FHWA has notified all Federal, State, local
agencies on the NEPA/Section 404 Merger Team that it is the lead
Federal agency. The general public has also been notified about FHWA's
Federal lead agency status. The purpose of the project is to improve
the transportation network in the study area by enhancing mobility and
connectivity for traffic moving in and through the project area. The
NEPA/Section 404 merger team concurred with the stated purpose for the
project and the initial project study area in the Concurrence Point 1
meeting held on March 19, 2019.
To accommodate the study corridor footprint at some proposed
interchanges and after receiving and responding to public and local
officials' input, expanding the previously approved project study area
is recommended. The proposed study area will allow consideration of
alignments suggested during the public input process for alternatives
that could achieve the project's purpose and satisfy specific
transportation needs while minimizing potential impacts to important
environmental features.
NCDOT and SCDOT held two public meetings in December 2019 to
present and received comments on the project alternatives, corridor
options developed by NCDOT and its consultant and refined by local
officials and the Merger Team. The first meeting was held on December
3, 2019, in Sunset Beach, North Carolina followed by a second meeting
on December 4, 2019, in Little River, South Carolina. Over 1,000 people
attended the meetings and more than 1,800 comments were received.
Most of the comments received reflected corridor concept preference
for the build concepts, identified potential project impacts, or
suggested variations to and additional corridor concepts. A summary of
the public meetings held in December 2019 is included in the NOI
Supplementary Information document.
The Merger Team reviewed several build alternative corridor
concepts, and the following alternatives were carried forward for
detail study at the Concurrence Point 2 meeting that occurred on May 4,
2020: Alternative 1, 1A, 2, 4, 4A, 7, and 8. Build Alternative Corridor
Concepts 3, 5, 6, and 9 were eliminated from further study. The Merger
Team also decided to eliminate the Transportation System Management
(TSM), Transportation Demand Management (TDM), and Mass Transit
Alternatives from detailed study.
Request for Comments on Information in This Notice
With this Notice, FHWA and NCDOT requests on potential alternatives
and impacts, and identification of any relevant information, studies,
or analyses of any kind concerning impacts affecting the quality of the
human environment. Comments may be posted to the docket found at
www.regulations.gov under number FHWA-2021-0017. Otherwise they may
also be submitted by email to [email protected] or by
calling (855) 925-2801 and entering project code 7734 when prompted.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; 23 CFR part 771.
Clarence W. Coleman,
Director of Preconstruction, Raleigh, North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2021-21967 Filed 10-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P