Periodic Reporting, 55548-55549 [2021-21757]
Download as PDF
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
55548
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 6, 2021 / Proposed Rules
SSNs on documents sent by mail by the
Federal Government.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 6, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted through
www.Regulations.gov. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to RIN 2900–AR19–Social
Security Number Fraud Prevention Act
of 2017 Implementation. Comments
received will be available at
www.regulations.gov for public viewing,
inspection or copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy L. Rose, Program Analyst, VA
Privacy Service, 005R1A, 811 Vermont
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202)
237–5070. (This is not a toll-free
telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Social
Security Number Fraud Prevention Act
of 2017 (the Act) (Pub L. 115–59; 42
U.S.C. 405 note), which was signed on
September 15, 2017, restricts federal
agencies from including individuals’
SSNs on documents sent by mail unless
the head of the agency determines that
the inclusion of the SSN on the
document is necessary (section 2(a) of
the Act). The Act requires agency heads
to issue regulations specifying the
circumstances under which inclusion of
an SSN on a document sent by mail is
necessary. These regulations, which
must be issued not later than five years
after the date of enactment, shall
include instructions for the partial
redaction of SSNs where feasible, and
shall require that SSNs not be visible on
the outside of any package sent by mail
(section 2(b) of the Act). This proposed
rule would revise the Department
regulations under the Privacy Act (38
CFR 1.575), consistent with these
requirements in the Act. The proposed
revisions would clarify the language of
procedural requirements pertaining to
the inclusion of SSNs on documents
that the Department sends by mail.
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. The Regulatory
Impact Analysis associated with this
rulemaking can be found as a
supporting document at
www.regulations.gov.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Oct 05, 2021
Jkt 256001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612). The
factual basis for this certification is that
the regulation only governs the
circumstances under which the
Department includes SSNs in mail
issued by the Department. The behavior
of small entities is not addressed in the
regulation and is therefore not
impacted. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule will have
no such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
There are no Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance numbers and titles
for this rule.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 1
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs proposes to amend 38 CFR
1.575, as set forth below:
PART 1—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Revise the authority citation for part
1 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 5101, and as noted
in specific sections.
2. Amend § 1.575 by adding paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
■
§ 1.575 Social Security Numbers in
Veterans’ Benefits Matters.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A document the Department sends
by mail may not include the social
security number of an individual except
as provided below:
(1) The social security number must
be truncated to no more than the last
four digits; or
(2) If truncation of the social security
number is not feasible:
(i) The Senior Agency Official for
Privacy, the Chief Privacy Officer, and
the Social Security Number Advisory
Board (SSNAB) must jointly determine
that inclusion of the social security
number on the document is necessary as
required by law; to comply with another
legal mandate; to identify a specific
individual where no adequate substitute
is available; or to fulfill a compelling
Department business need;
(ii) The document that includes the
complete social security number of an
individual must be listed on the
Complete Social Security Number
Mailed Documents Listing on a publicly
available website; and
(iii) No portion of the social security
number may be visible on the outside of
any mailing.
[FR Doc. 2021–21373 Filed 10–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
Disability benefits, Pensions,
Veterans.
39 CFR Part 3050
Signing Authority
[Docket No. RM2021–9; Order No. 5992]
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on September 24, 2021, and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
Periodic Reporting
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is
acknowledging a recent filing requesting
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 191 / Wednesday, October 6, 2021 / Proposed Rules
the Commission initiate a rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes to
analytical principles relating to periodic
reports (Proposal Six). This document
informs the public of the filing, invites
public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: October 28,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Proposal Six
III. Notice and Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
I. Introduction
On September 28, 2021, the Postal
Service filed a petition pursuant to 39
CFR 3050.11 requesting that the
Commission initiate a rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes to
analytical principles relating to periodic
reports.1 The Petition identifies the
proposed analytical changes filed in this
docket as Proposal Six.
II. Proposal Six
Background. The Postal Service
estimates the mail processing costs
avoided due to mailer workshare
activities for First-Class Mail presort
letters and cards using the First-Class
Mail letters mail processing cost model.
Petition, Proposal Six at 1. The Postal
Service determines the avoided costs for
each workshare discount through
modeling of the typical mail processing
flow of First-Class Mail presort letters
and cards by rate category. Id.
Historically, the Postal Service has
offered a single price for First-Class Mail
nonautomation presort categories. Id.
However, in Docket No. R2021–2, the
Postal Service restructured its pricing
for the First-Class Mail presort
categories, creating separate prices for
Nonmachinable 5-Digit letters,
Nonmachinable 3-Digit Letters,
Nonmachinable mixed area distribution
center (MADC) Letters, Nonautomation
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service for
the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed
Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Six),
September 28, 2021 (Petition).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 Oct 05, 2021
Jkt 256001
Machinable automated area distribution
center (AADC) Letters, and
Nonautomation Machinable mixed
automation area distribution center
(MAADC) Letters.2
The Commission accepted the
proposed changes to the Mail
Classification Schedule associated with
this new rate structure but determined
that the Metered Letters benchmark was
not appropriate for determining the
costs avoided by the new
Nonautomation Machinable Letters
Mixed AADC and Nonmachinable
Letters Mixed area distribution center
(ADC) workshare discounts.3 For this
reason, the Commission directed the
Postal Service develop a methodology to
disaggregate the Metered Letters
benchmark into the machinable and
nonmachinable components within 90
days of Order No. 5937. Id.
Proposal. With Proposal Six, the
Postal Service seeks to revise the FirstClass Mail letters mail processing cost
model to disaggregate metered mail into
machinable and nonmachinable
categories. Petition, Proposal Six at 2.
Citing data limitations, the Postal
Service proposes to disaggregate the
costs between these pricing categories
through modeling. Id. at 3. The Postal
Service notes that ‘‘[t]he same
methodology that is used to disaggregate
[In-Office Cost System]-derived mail
processing unit costs for First-Class
presorted letter costs by rate category is
used to disaggregate metered mail letter
costs by machinability in this proposal.’’
Id. The Postal Service’s adjusted model
is included with the Petition. See Excel
file USPS–FY20–10 FCM Letters Prop
6.xlsx.
Impact. The impacts of Proposal Six
are outlined in Table 1 and Table 2 of
the proposal. Petition, Proposal Six at
4–5. The Postal Service estimates that
the worksharing related unit costs will
be 13.123 cents for Machinable Metered
Letters and 44.824 cents for
Nonmachinable Metered Letters. Id. at
4. Avoided costs will decrease $0.001
for Automation Mixed AADC Letters
and $0.002 for Nonautomation
Machinable Mixed AADC Letters. Id. at
5. The Postal Service estimates $0.101
in avoided costs for Nonautomation
Nonmachinable Mixed ADC Letters. Id.
2 Docket No. R2021–2, United States Postal
Service Notice of Market-Dominant Price Change,
May 28, 2021, at 8–9.
3 Docket No. R2021–2, Order on Price
Adjustments for First-Class Mail, USPS Marketing
Mail, Periodicals, Package Services, and Special
Services Products and Related Mail Classification
Changes, July 19, 2021, at 82 (Order No. 5937).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55549
III. Notice and Comment
The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2021–9 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition. More
information on the Petition may be
accessed via the Commission’s website
at https://www.prc.gov. Interested
persons may submit comments on the
Petition and Proposal Six no later than
October 28, 2021. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
505, Katalin K. Clendenin is designated
as an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the
interests of the general public in this
proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. RM2021–9 for consideration of the
matters raised by the Petition of the
United States Postal Service for the
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider
Proposed Changes in Analytical
Principles (Proposal Six), filed
September 28, 2021.
2. Comments by interested persons in
this proceeding are due no later than
October 28, 2021.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the
Commission appoints Katalin K.
Clendenin to serve as an officer of the
Commission (Public Representative) to
represent the interests of the general
public in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for
publication of this order in the Federal
Register.
By the Commission.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–21757 Filed 10–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 82
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2019–0698; FRL–7826.1–
02–OAR]
RIN 2060–AV31
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:
Listing of Substitutes Under the
Significant New Alternatives Policy
Program; Supplemental Proposal
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency’s
Significant New Alternatives Policy
program, the Agency is proposing, as an
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM
06OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 6, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55548-55549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21757]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2021-9; Order No. 5992]
Periodic Reporting
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission is acknowledging a recent filing requesting
[[Page 55549]]
the Commission initiate a rulemaking proceeding to consider changes to
analytical principles relating to periodic reports (Proposal Six). This
document informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and
takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: October 28, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202-789-6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Proposal Six
III. Notice and Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On September 28, 2021, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant
to 39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate a rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to
periodic reports.\1\ The Petition identifies the proposed analytical
changes filed in this docket as Proposal Six.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Petition of the United States Postal Service for the
Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes in
Analytical Principles (Proposal Six), September 28, 2021 (Petition).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Proposal Six
Background. The Postal Service estimates the mail processing costs
avoided due to mailer workshare activities for First-Class Mail presort
letters and cards using the First-Class Mail letters mail processing
cost model. Petition, Proposal Six at 1. The Postal Service determines
the avoided costs for each workshare discount through modeling of the
typical mail processing flow of First-Class Mail presort letters and
cards by rate category. Id.
Historically, the Postal Service has offered a single price for
First-Class Mail nonautomation presort categories. Id. However, in
Docket No. R2021-2, the Postal Service restructured its pricing for the
First-Class Mail presort categories, creating separate prices for
Nonmachinable 5-Digit letters, Nonmachinable 3-Digit Letters,
Nonmachinable mixed area distribution center (MADC) Letters,
Nonautomation Machinable automated area distribution center (AADC)
Letters, and Nonautomation Machinable mixed automation area
distribution center (MAADC) Letters.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Docket No. R2021-2, United States Postal Service Notice of
Market-Dominant Price Change, May 28, 2021, at 8-9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission accepted the proposed changes to the Mail
Classification Schedule associated with this new rate structure but
determined that the Metered Letters benchmark was not appropriate for
determining the costs avoided by the new Nonautomation Machinable
Letters Mixed AADC and Nonmachinable Letters Mixed area distribution
center (ADC) workshare discounts.\3\ For this reason, the Commission
directed the Postal Service develop a methodology to disaggregate the
Metered Letters benchmark into the machinable and nonmachinable
components within 90 days of Order No. 5937. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Docket No. R2021-2, Order on Price Adjustments for First-
Class Mail, USPS Marketing Mail, Periodicals, Package Services, and
Special Services Products and Related Mail Classification Changes,
July 19, 2021, at 82 (Order No. 5937).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposal. With Proposal Six, the Postal Service seeks to revise the
First-Class Mail letters mail processing cost model to disaggregate
metered mail into machinable and nonmachinable categories. Petition,
Proposal Six at 2. Citing data limitations, the Postal Service proposes
to disaggregate the costs between these pricing categories through
modeling. Id. at 3. The Postal Service notes that ``[t]he same
methodology that is used to disaggregate [In-Office Cost System]-
derived mail processing unit costs for First-Class presorted letter
costs by rate category is used to disaggregate metered mail letter
costs by machinability in this proposal.'' Id. The Postal Service's
adjusted model is included with the Petition. See Excel file USPS-FY20-
10 FCM Letters Prop 6.xlsx.
Impact. The impacts of Proposal Six are outlined in Table 1 and
Table 2 of the proposal. Petition, Proposal Six at 4-5. The Postal
Service estimates that the worksharing related unit costs will be
13.123 cents for Machinable Metered Letters and 44.824 cents for
Nonmachinable Metered Letters. Id. at 4. Avoided costs will decrease
$0.001 for Automation Mixed AADC Letters and $0.002 for Nonautomation
Machinable Mixed AADC Letters. Id. at 5. The Postal Service estimates
$0.101 in avoided costs for Nonautomation Nonmachinable Mixed ADC
Letters. Id.
III. Notice and Comment
The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2021-9 for consideration of
matters raised by the Petition. More information on the Petition may be
accessed via the Commission's website at https://www.prc.gov. Interested
persons may submit comments on the Petition and Proposal Six no later
than October 28, 2021. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Katalin K. Clendenin
is designated as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative)
to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2021-9 for consideration
of the matters raised by the Petition of the United States Postal
Service for the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed Changes
in Analytical Principles (Proposal Six), filed September 28, 2021.
2. Comments by interested persons in this proceeding are due no
later than October 28, 2021.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Katalin K.
Clendenin to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public
Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in
this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the
Federal Register.
By the Commission.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-21757 Filed 10-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P