Notice of Information Collection and Request for Public Comment, 54787-54789 [2021-21433]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 189 / Monday, October 4, 2021 / Notices
disclosure. If your comments in
response to this notice contain
commercial or financial information
that is customarily treated as private,
that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to this
notice, it is important that you clearly
designate the submitted comments as
CBI. Pursuant to 49 CFR 190.343, you
may ask PHMSA to provide confidential
treatment to information you give to the
agency by taking the following steps: (1)
Mark each page of the original
document submission containing CBI as
‘‘Confidential;’’ (2) send PHMSA a copy
of the original document with the CBI
deleted along with the original,
unaltered document; and (3) explain
why the information you are submitting
is CBI. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Tewabe Asebe, DOT,
PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
PHP–30, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Also, submission containing CBI can be
emailed to Tewabe Asebe by encrypted
email at tewabe.asebe@dot.gov. Any
commentary PHMSA receives that is not
specifically designated as CBI will be
placed in the public docket.
• Docket: For access to the docket or
to read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets.
Alternatively, this information is
available by visiting DOT at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Building: Room
W12–140, Washington, DC 20590–0001,
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tewabe Asebe, Office of Pipeline Safety,
by phone at 202–366–5523 or by email
at tewabe.asebe@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Meeting Agenda
On October 20, 2021, the GPAC and
LPAC will meet to discuss a variety of
policy issues and topics relevant to both
gas and liquid pipeline safety. On
October 21, 2021, the GPAC and LPAC
will meet to discuss the NPRM titled:
‘‘Periodic Updates of Regulatory
References to Technical Standards and
Miscellaneous Amendments’’ that
PHMSA published in the Federal
Register on January 15, 2021, (86 FR
3938). Comments that have been
submitted on the NPRM can be found
on https://regulations.gov in Docket No.
PHMSA–2016–0002. The GPAC and
LPAC will review the NPRM and its
associated regulatory analysis. PHMSA
will post additional details on the
meeting website in advance of the
meeting.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:52 Oct 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
In the NPRM, PHMSA proposed to
revise the Federal Pipeline Safety
Regulations by updating over 25
consensus standards that are currently
incorporated by reference. PHMSA also
proposed to make non-substantive
corrections to clarify regulatory
language in certain provisions. The
proposed editorial changes are minor
and would not require pipeline
operators to undertake new pipeline
safety initiatives.
II. Background
The GPAC and LPAC are statutorily
mandated advisory committees that
provide PHMSA and the Secretary of
Transportation with recommendations
on proposed standards for the
transportation of natural gas or
hazardous liquids by pipeline. These
committees were established in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 60115 and
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), to review
PHMSA’s regulatory initiatives and
determine their technical feasibility,
reasonableness, cost-effectiveness, and
practicability. Each committee consists
of 15 members, with membership
evenly divided among federal and state
governments, regulated industry, and
the general public.
III. Public Participation
The meeting will be open to the
public. Members of the public who wish
to virtually attend must register on the
meeting website and include their
names and affiliations. PHMSA will
provide members of the public with
opportunities to make a statement
during the course of this meeting.
Additionally, PHMSA will record the
meeting and post a record to the public
docket. PHMSA is committed to
providing all participants with equal
access to this meeting. If you need an
accommodation because of a disability,
please contact Tewabe Asebe by phone
at 202–366–5523 or by email at
tewabe.asebe@dot.gov.
PHMSA is not always able to publish
a notice in the Federal Register quickly
enough to provide timely notice
regarding last-minute issues that impact
a previously announced advisory
committee meeting. Therefore,
individuals should check the meeting
website or contact Tewabe Asebe
regarding any possible changes.
Issued in Washington, DC, on September
28, 2021, under authority delegated in 49
CFR 1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2021–21477 Filed 10–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54787
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund
Notice of Information Collection and
Request for Public Comment
Notice and request for public
comment.
ACTION:
The U.S. Department of the
Treasury, as part of a continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A). Currently,
the Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund (CDFI Fund),
Department of the Treasury, is soliciting
comments concerning the Small Dollar
Loan Program (SDL Program)
Application (Application). The
Application is an online form submitted
through the CDFI Fund’s Award
Management Information System
(AMIS).
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before December 3, 2021,
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments via
email to Tanya McInnis, Program
Manager for the Depository Institutions
Initiatives, CDFI Fund at sdlp@
cdfi.treas.gov.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya McInnis, SDL Program, Program
Manager, CDFI Fund, U.S. Department
of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220,
(202) 653–0241 (not a toll-free number).
Other information regarding the CDFI
Fund and its programs may be obtained
on the CDFI Fund website at https://
www.cdfifund.gov. The SDL Program
Application Template, which presents
the questions that will comprise the
online Application, may be obtained
from the SDL Program page of the CDFI
Fund website at https://
www.cdfifund.gov/sdlp.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Small Dollar Loan Program
Application.
OMB Number: 1559–0051.
Abstract: The Small Dollar Loan
Program (SDL Program) is a new
program, authorized by Title XII—
Improving Access to Mainstream
Financial Institutions Act of the DoddFrank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
203), which amended The Community
Development Banking and Financial
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
54788
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 189 / Monday, October 4, 2021 / Notices
Institutions Act of 1994 to include the
Small Dollar Loan Program (12 U.S.C.
4719). Through the SDL Program, the
CDFI Fund provides grants for loan loss
reserves and technical assistance to
enable award recipients to establish and
maintain small dollar loan programs to
address the issues of expanding
consumer access to mainstream
financial institutions and providing
alternatives to high-cost small dollar
loans. The SDL Program is also intended
to enable award recipients to help
unbanked and underbanked populations
build credit, access affordable capital,
and allow greater access into the
mainstream financial system.
Through the SDL Program, the CDFI
Fund will provide:
Grants for Loan Loss Reserves (LLR):
The awards will enable a Certified
Community Development Financial
Institution (CDFI) to establish a loan
loss reserve fund in order to defray the
costs of establishing or maintaining a
small dollar loan program.
Grants for Technical Assistance (TA):
The awards will support technology,
staff support, and other eligible
activities to enable a Certified CDFI to
establish and maintain a small dollar
loan program.
SDL Program Award Recipients are
selected through a competitive process
involving a careful review of their
Application for program funding. The
Application requires the submission of
numeric data and narrative responses
for two parts: Part 1: Business Strategy
and Community Impact and Part 2:
Organization Capacity, including
Financial Analysis and Compliance Risk
Evaluation. The Award selection
process is described in the Notice of
Funds Availability (NOFA) for each
funding round.
This request for public comment
relates to the SDL Program Application
Form under OMB control number 1559–
0051. Capitalized terms not defined in
this Notice (other than titles) have the
meaning set forth in the fiscal year (FY)
2021 SDL Program NOFA.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
100 (Application).
Estimated Annual Time per
Respondent: 68 hours (Application).
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
5,493 hours (Application).
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this Notice
will be summarized and/or included in
the request for Office of Management
and Budget approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record and
may be published on the CDFI Fund
website at https://www.cdfifund.gov.
The CDFI Fund is seeking input on
the content of the Application with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:52 Oct 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
regard to the following: (a) Whether the
collection of information as proposed is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility in evaluating
Applications; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of technology; and (e) estimates of
capital or start-up costs and costs of
operation, maintenance and purchase of
services required to provide
information.
Additionally, the CDFI Fund
specifically requests comments
concerning the following questions:
1. What, if any, Application questions
and tables are redundant or
unnecessary?
2. What, if any, questions or tables
should be added to ensure collection of
relevant information?
3. Does the data and information
requested in the Application allow an
Applicant to adequately explain its
business strategy, community impact
and ability to meet the program
objectives?
4. In the FY 2021 SDL Program
Application, the CDFI Fund stated that
LLR Awards may be made in amounts
up to 20% of the Applicant’s three-year
projected total of Small Dollar Loans
closed, not to exceed $350,000. Is the
20% cap too high or too low? If so,
please describe and justify.
5. The FY 2021 SDL Program
Application states that the Awards will
not be made to organizations that engage
in the Prohibited Practices listed in the
NOFA. Are the Prohibited Practices
reasonable? Should any of the listed
Prohibited Practices be modified or
removed? Are there Prohibited Practices
that should be added to the list? Please
describe and justify your responses to
these sub-questions.
6. The CDFI Fund will prioritize
funding for Applications that propose to
offer small dollar loan programs that
include any of the following prioritized
lending practices and characteristics: (i)
Offer small dollar loan terms that are at
least ninety (90) days; (ii) use ability to
repay underwriting that considers the
borrower’s ability to repay a loan based
on both the borrower’s income and
expenses; (iii) make loan decisions
within one business day (or twenty-four
(24) hours) after receipt of required
documents; (iv) offer a reduction in the
borrower’s loan rate if the borrower
elects to use automatic debit payments;
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(v) offer automatic savings features that
are built into the regularly-scheduled
payments on a loan—provided that the
resulting payment is still affordable—or,
at a minimum, loans that can be
structured so that, subject to the
borrower’s consent, payments continue
for a period of time after the loan is
repaid with all of the payments going
into a savings vehicle; and (vi) offer
access to financial education, including
credit counseling. Are the prioritized
lending practices and characteristics
reasonable? Should any of the listed
prioritized lending practices and
characteristics be modified or removed?
Are there prioritized lending practices
and characteristics that should be added
to the list? Please describe and justify
your responses to these sub-questions.
7. Are any of the questions
particularly burdensome or difficult to
answer? If so, please be specific as to the
type of CDFI (e.g., regulated, non-profit)
that finds it difficult.
8. Are the character limitations for
narrative responses appropriate? Should
certain questions allow additional or
fewer characters? If so, please specify.
9. Are there questions that lack clarity
as to intent or purpose? If so, which
questions, and what needs to be
clarified in order for Applicants to
provide a comprehensive response?
10. The Application includes
questions about the intended impact of
an Applicant’s small dollar lending
strategy. (a) How should the CDFI Fund
assess the impact of SDL Program
Awards on Low-Income Families and
communities? (b) The CDFI Fund has
identified a set of impacts for
Applicants to choose in the Application
(see FY 2021 SDL Program Application
Question 7. (c). Are the current impact
choices sufficiently comprehensive? Are
there impacts that should be added or
modified?
11. The statute governing the SDL
Program states that there are three
eligible Applicant types. Per the Statute,
Applicants can be either (a) a Certified
CDFI that applies individually for an
LLR Award or for a TA Award or for a
combination of an LLR Award and TA
Award; or (b) a Certified CDFI that
applies as a partnership with a federally
insured depository institution that has a
primary mission to serve targeted
Investment Areas (FIDI) for an LLR
Award or (c) a Certified CDFI that
applies as a partnership with two or
more Certified CDFIs for a TA Award.
The CDFI Fund has two questions
related to these different Applicant
types: (i) Are additional questions or
revisions to existing questions needed
in the Application to further clarify and
differentiate the three eligible Applicant
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 189 / Monday, October 4, 2021 / Notices
types? If so, please describe and justify.
(ii) The Application currently asks
Applicants that apply as a partnership
with a FIDI for an LLR Award to submit
an attestation form that is signed by the
FIDI that the FIDI has a mission to serve
targeted Investment Areas. Should the
CDFI Fund make revisions to the
attestation form that the FIDI must sign?
If yes, what are the revisions? Should
the CDFI Fund request any other
documentation that the FIDI must
submit in order to demonstrate its
primary mission to serve targeted
Investment Areas? If so, please describe
and justify.
12. In future funding rounds, new
priorities may emerge, such as disaster
response, an economic downturn, or
new initiatives. How should the CDFI
Fund address changing priorities on a
round-by-round basis? What approaches
would be preferred?
Authority: Pub. L. 110–289, 12 CFR
1807.
Jodie L. Harris,
Director, Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund.
[FR Doc. 2021–21433 Filed 9–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Information Collection
Renewal; Submission for OMB Review;
Appraisal Management Companies
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency (OCC), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
AGENCY:
The OCC, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on a continuing information
collection as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). In
accordance with the requirements of the
PRA, the OCC may not conduct or
sponsor, and the respondent is not
required to respond to, an information
collection unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The OCC is
soliciting comment concerning the
renewal of its information collection
titled, ‘‘Appraisal Management
Companies.’’ The OCC also is giving
notice that it has sent the collection to
OMB for review.
DATES: You should submit written
comments by November 3, 2021.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:52 Oct 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
Commenters are encouraged
to submit comments by email, if
possible. You may submit comments by
any of the following methods:
• Email: prainfo@occ.treas.gov.
• Mail: Chief Counsel’s Office,
Attention: Comment Processing, 1557–
0324, Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E–
218, Washington, DC 20219.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 400 7th
Street SW, Suite 3E–218, Washington,
DC 20219.
• Fax: (571) 465–4326.
Instructions: You must include
‘‘OCC’’ as the agency name and ‘‘1557–
0324’’ in your comment. In general, the
OCC will publish comments on
www.reginfo.gov without change,
including any business or personal
information provided, such as name and
address information, email addresses, or
phone numbers. Comments received,
including attachments and other
supporting materials, are part of the
public record and subject to public
disclosure. Do not include any
information in your comment or
supporting materials that you consider
confidential or inappropriate for public
disclosure.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
You may review comments and other
related materials that pertain to this
information collection following the
close of the 30-day comment period for
this notice by the method set forth in
the next bullet. On July 29, 2021, the
OCC published a 60-day notice for this
information collection, 86 FR 40898.
• Viewing Comments Electronically:
Go to www.reginfo.gov. Hover over the
‘‘Information Collection Review’’ tab
and click on the ‘‘Information Collection
Review’’ dropdown. Underneath the
‘‘Currently under Review’’ section
heading, from the drop-down menu
select ‘‘Department of Treasury’’ and
then click ‘‘submit.’’ This information
collection can be located by searching
by OMB control number ‘‘1557–0324’’
or ‘‘Appraisal Management Companies.’’
Upon finding the appropriate
information collection, click on the
related ‘‘ICR Reference Number.’’ On the
next screen, select ‘‘View Supporting
Statement and Other Documents’’ and
then click on the link to any comment
listed at the bottom of the screen.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00117
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54789
• For assistance in navigating
www.reginfo.gov, please contact the
Regulatory Information Service Center
at (202) 482–7340.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shaquita Merritt, OCC Clearance
Officer, (202) 649–5490, Chief Counsel’s
Office, Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, 400 7th Street SW, Suite 3E–
218, Washington, DC 20219.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
OMB for each collection of information
that they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
§ 1320.3(c) to include agency requests or
requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide
information to a third party. The OCC
asks that OMB extend its approval of the
information collection in this document.
Title: Appraisal Management
Companies.
OMB Control No.: 1557–0324.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit.
Type of Review: Regular review.
Abstract: The OCC, Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System (FRB), Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), National
Credit Union Administration (NCUA),
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
(Bureau), and Federal Housing Finance
Agency (FHFA) (collectively, Agencies)
have rules implementing the minimum
requirements in section 1473 of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank
Act) 1 to be applied by States in the
registration and supervision of appraisal
management companies (AMCs). The
Agencies also have implemented the
requirement in section 1473 of the
Dodd-Frank Act for States to report to
the Appraisal Subcommittee of the
Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council (ASC) the
information required by the ASC to
administer the new national registry of
appraisal management companies (AMC
National Registry or Registry).
State Recordkeeping Requirements
States seeking to register AMCs must
have an AMC registration and
supervision program. Twelve CFR
34.213(a) requires each participating
State to establish and maintain within
its appraiser certifying and licensing
agency a licensing program with the
legal authority and mechanisms to: (i)
Review and approve or deny an
application for initial registration; (ii)
1 Public Law 111–203, sec. 1473, 124 Stat. 1376,
2190 (2010).
E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM
04OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 189 (Monday, October 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54787-54789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21433]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
Notice of Information Collection and Request for Public Comment
ACTION: Notice and request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury, as part of a continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Currently, the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI
Fund), Department of the Treasury, is soliciting comments concerning
the Small Dollar Loan Program (SDL Program) Application (Application).
The Application is an online form submitted through the CDFI Fund's
Award Management Information System (AMIS).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 3, 2021,
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments via email to Tanya McInnis, Program
Manager for the Depository Institutions Initiatives, CDFI Fund at
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya McInnis, SDL Program, Program
Manager, CDFI Fund, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220, (202) 653-0241 (not a toll-free
number). Other information regarding the CDFI Fund and its programs may
be obtained on the CDFI Fund website at https://www.cdfifund.gov. The
SDL Program Application Template, which presents the questions that
will comprise the online Application, may be obtained from the SDL
Program page of the CDFI Fund website at https://www.cdfifund.gov/sdlp.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Small Dollar Loan Program Application.
OMB Number: 1559-0051.
Abstract: The Small Dollar Loan Program (SDL Program) is a new
program, authorized by Title XII--Improving Access to Mainstream
Financial Institutions Act of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-203), which amended The
Community Development Banking and Financial
[[Page 54788]]
Institutions Act of 1994 to include the Small Dollar Loan Program (12
U.S.C. 4719). Through the SDL Program, the CDFI Fund provides grants
for loan loss reserves and technical assistance to enable award
recipients to establish and maintain small dollar loan programs to
address the issues of expanding consumer access to mainstream financial
institutions and providing alternatives to high-cost small dollar
loans. The SDL Program is also intended to enable award recipients to
help unbanked and underbanked populations build credit, access
affordable capital, and allow greater access into the mainstream
financial system.
Through the SDL Program, the CDFI Fund will provide:
Grants for Loan Loss Reserves (LLR): The awards will enable a
Certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) to
establish a loan loss reserve fund in order to defray the costs of
establishing or maintaining a small dollar loan program.
Grants for Technical Assistance (TA): The awards will support
technology, staff support, and other eligible activities to enable a
Certified CDFI to establish and maintain a small dollar loan program.
SDL Program Award Recipients are selected through a competitive
process involving a careful review of their Application for program
funding. The Application requires the submission of numeric data and
narrative responses for two parts: Part 1: Business Strategy and
Community Impact and Part 2: Organization Capacity, including Financial
Analysis and Compliance Risk Evaluation. The Award selection process is
described in the Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) for each funding
round.
This request for public comment relates to the SDL Program
Application Form under OMB control number 1559-0051. Capitalized terms
not defined in this Notice (other than titles) have the meaning set
forth in the fiscal year (FY) 2021 SDL Program NOFA.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 100 (Application).
Estimated Annual Time per Respondent: 68 hours (Application).
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 5,493 hours (Application).
Request for Comments: Comments submitted in response to this Notice
will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval. All comments will become a matter of
public record and may be published on the CDFI Fund website at https://www.cdfifund.gov.
The CDFI Fund is seeking input on the content of the Application
with regard to the following: (a) Whether the collection of information
as proposed is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility in evaluating Applications; (b) the accuracy of the agency's
estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of technology;
and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance and purchase of services required to provide information.
Additionally, the CDFI Fund specifically requests comments
concerning the following questions:
1. What, if any, Application questions and tables are redundant or
unnecessary?
2. What, if any, questions or tables should be added to ensure
collection of relevant information?
3. Does the data and information requested in the Application allow
an Applicant to adequately explain its business strategy, community
impact and ability to meet the program objectives?
4. In the FY 2021 SDL Program Application, the CDFI Fund stated
that LLR Awards may be made in amounts up to 20% of the Applicant's
three-year projected total of Small Dollar Loans closed, not to exceed
$350,000. Is the 20% cap too high or too low? If so, please describe
and justify.
5. The FY 2021 SDL Program Application states that the Awards will
not be made to organizations that engage in the Prohibited Practices
listed in the NOFA. Are the Prohibited Practices reasonable? Should any
of the listed Prohibited Practices be modified or removed? Are there
Prohibited Practices that should be added to the list? Please describe
and justify your responses to these sub-questions.
6. The CDFI Fund will prioritize funding for Applications that
propose to offer small dollar loan programs that include any of the
following prioritized lending practices and characteristics: (i) Offer
small dollar loan terms that are at least ninety (90) days; (ii) use
ability to repay underwriting that considers the borrower's ability to
repay a loan based on both the borrower's income and expenses; (iii)
make loan decisions within one business day (or twenty-four (24) hours)
after receipt of required documents; (iv) offer a reduction in the
borrower's loan rate if the borrower elects to use automatic debit
payments; (v) offer automatic savings features that are built into the
regularly-scheduled payments on a loan--provided that the resulting
payment is still affordable--or, at a minimum, loans that can be
structured so that, subject to the borrower's consent, payments
continue for a period of time after the loan is repaid with all of the
payments going into a savings vehicle; and (vi) offer access to
financial education, including credit counseling. Are the prioritized
lending practices and characteristics reasonable? Should any of the
listed prioritized lending practices and characteristics be modified or
removed? Are there prioritized lending practices and characteristics
that should be added to the list? Please describe and justify your
responses to these sub-questions.
7. Are any of the questions particularly burdensome or difficult to
answer? If so, please be specific as to the type of CDFI (e.g.,
regulated, non-profit) that finds it difficult.
8. Are the character limitations for narrative responses
appropriate? Should certain questions allow additional or fewer
characters? If so, please specify.
9. Are there questions that lack clarity as to intent or purpose?
If so, which questions, and what needs to be clarified in order for
Applicants to provide a comprehensive response?
10. The Application includes questions about the intended impact of
an Applicant's small dollar lending strategy. (a) How should the CDFI
Fund assess the impact of SDL Program Awards on Low-Income Families and
communities? (b) The CDFI Fund has identified a set of impacts for
Applicants to choose in the Application (see FY 2021 SDL Program
Application Question 7. (c). Are the current impact choices
sufficiently comprehensive? Are there impacts that should be added or
modified?
11. The statute governing the SDL Program states that there are
three eligible Applicant types. Per the Statute, Applicants can be
either (a) a Certified CDFI that applies individually for an LLR Award
or for a TA Award or for a combination of an LLR Award and TA Award; or
(b) a Certified CDFI that applies as a partnership with a federally
insured depository institution that has a primary mission to serve
targeted Investment Areas (FIDI) for an LLR Award or (c) a Certified
CDFI that applies as a partnership with two or more Certified CDFIs for
a TA Award. The CDFI Fund has two questions related to these different
Applicant types: (i) Are additional questions or revisions to existing
questions needed in the Application to further clarify and
differentiate the three eligible Applicant
[[Page 54789]]
types? If so, please describe and justify. (ii) The Application
currently asks Applicants that apply as a partnership with a FIDI for
an LLR Award to submit an attestation form that is signed by the FIDI
that the FIDI has a mission to serve targeted Investment Areas. Should
the CDFI Fund make revisions to the attestation form that the FIDI must
sign? If yes, what are the revisions? Should the CDFI Fund request any
other documentation that the FIDI must submit in order to demonstrate
its primary mission to serve targeted Investment Areas? If so, please
describe and justify.
12. In future funding rounds, new priorities may emerge, such as
disaster response, an economic downturn, or new initiatives. How should
the CDFI Fund address changing priorities on a round-by-round basis?
What approaches would be preferred?
Authority: Pub. L. 110-289, 12 CFR 1807.
Jodie L. Harris,
Director, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.
[FR Doc. 2021-21433 Filed 9-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-05-P