Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department, 54628-54630 [2021-21213]
Download as PDF
54628
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 189 / Monday, October 4, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED ILLINOIS REGULATIONS AND STATUTES—Continued
State effective
date
Illinois citation
Title/subject
*
*
243.126 .......................................
*
Lead ...........................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
DATES:
40 CFR Part 52
ADDRESSES:
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the Maricopa
County Air Quality Department’s
(MCAQD) Rule 510 as part of the
Arizona State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These rule revisions concern
updates to the maximum levels of
ambient air pollution for the protection
SUMMARY:
Local agency
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0369. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
Rule No.
MCAQD ...........................................................
We proposed to approve this rule
because we determined that it complies
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving this rule into the Arizona SIP.
The December 11, 2019 version of Rule
510 will replace the previously
approved version of this rule in the
Arizona SIP.
16:13 Oct 01, 2021
*
This rule will be effective on
November 3, 2021.
[EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0369; FRL–8996–02–
R9]
Jkt 256001
510
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 947–4152 or by
email at buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On June 23, 2021 (86 FR 32848), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
rule into the Arizona SIP:
Amended
Air Quality Standards .....................................
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
MCAQD rule described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. Therefore, these materials have
been approved by the EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by the EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking
of the EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.1 The
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents available
PO 00000
*
Rule title
IV. Incorporation by Reference
1 62
Comments
*
*
10/4/2021, [INSERT FEDERAL
REGISTER CITATION].
of public health and welfare. We are
finalizing our proposed approval of this
rule to regulate ambient air emissions
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the
Act).
*
[FR Doc. 2021–21188 Filed 10–1–21; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
8/18/2020
EPA approval date
12/11/2019
Submitted
12/20/2019
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
54629
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 189 / Monday, October 4, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by December 3,
2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 22, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. In § 52.120(c), amend table 4 by
revising the entry ‘‘Rule 510’’ after the
heading ‘‘Regulation V—Air Quality
Standards and Area Classification’’.
■
§ 52.120
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 4—EPA-APPROVED MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS
County citation
*
Title/subject
State effective date
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Additional explanation
*
*
*
Regulation V—Air Quality Standards and Area Classification
Rule 510 .....................
Air Quality Standards
*
*
*
*
*
*
December 11, 2019 ...
*
October 4, 2021, [INSERT FEDERAL
REGISTER CITATION].
*
The December 11, 2019 version of Rule 510
replaces the November 30, 2016 version
that had been approved on November 1,
2006 (74 FR 57612).
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–21213 Filed 10–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Oct 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
*
54630
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 189 / Monday, October 4, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
41 CFR Parts 300–90, 301–74,
Appendix E to Chapter 301
[FTR Case 2021–301–01; Docket No. GSA–
FTR–2021–0011, Sequence No. 2]
RIN 3090–AK41
Federal Travel Regulation; Removal
and Reservation Telework Travel
Expenses Test Programs and
Suggested Guidance for Conference
Planning
Office of Government-wide
Policy (OGP), General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
GSA is amending the Federal
Travel Regulation (FTR) to remove and
reserve the regulations implementing
the Administrator of General Services’
authority to authorize agencies to
conduct telework travel expenses test
programs. The Administrator’s authority
to authorize agencies to conduct such
test programs expired in accordance
with the William M. (Mac) Thornberry
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2021. GSA is also removing
and reserving regulations, that contain
suggested guidance for conference
planning.
DATES: Effective November 3, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Jill Denning, Program Analyst, at 202–
208–7642 or travelpolicy@gsa.gov for
clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication
schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at 202–501–4755 or
GSARegSec@gsa.gov. Please cite FTR
Case 2021–301–01.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
This final rule, published as a
proposed rule on May 14, 2021 (86 FR
26455), first amends the FTR to remove
and reserve part 300–90. Originally, this
part was included in the FTR due to the
enactment of Public Law (Pub. L.) 111–
292, the ‘‘Telework Enhancement Act of
2010,’’ codified at 5 U.S.C. 5711, which
authorized the creation of agency
telework travel expenses test programs
subject to approval by the Administrator
of General Services.
When submitting a test program
proposal to GSA, agencies were directed
to include an analysis of the expected
cost and benefits and a set of criteria for
evaluating the effectiveness of the
program. Once approved, participating
agencies were required to submit an
annual report on the results of the test
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:51 Oct 01, 2021
Jkt 256001
program, including overall costs and
benefits.
Only one Federal agency, the United
States Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO), requested and then
implemented a telework travel expenses
test program under this authority. When
Public Law 116–283 became effective on
January 1, 2021, it made the USPTO
telework travel expenses program
permanent. At that time, the law did not
extend the Administrator of General
Services’ authority to approve telework
travel expenses test programs, so it
expired as of December 31, 2020,
making part 300–90 no longer
necessary.
GSA is also removing and reserving
Appendix E to Chapter 301 of the FTR,
‘‘Suggested Guidance for Conference
Planning,’’ first published January 10,
2000 (65 FR 1329). As noted in the title,
the guidance is suggested, not a
mandatory set of instructions agencies
must follow when planning a
conference. Some readers have found
the word ‘‘suggested’’ in the title
confusing and duplicative, considering
similar regulatory instructions regarding
conference planning are located in FTR
part 301–74. GSA believes that general
information on how to plan a
conference, the focus of Appendix E, is
now more widely available through
non-Governmental and professional
resources than it was when the
Appendix was first published.
Finally, one reference to Appendix E
that was in regulatory text is also
removed in accordance with the above.
IV. Congressional Review Act
II. Discussion of Final Rule
List of Subjects in 41 CFR Parts 300–90
and 301–74, and Appendix E to Chapter
301
This rule removes and reserves both
part 300–90 and Appendix E to Chapter
301 of the FTR. GSA received no
comments in response to the proposed
rule.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives, and if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, is not
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Subtitle E of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (codified at 5 U.S.C. 801–808), also
known as the Congressional Review Act
or CRA, generally provides that before a
rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not a major rule under
5 U.S.C. 804(2), therefore, GSA did not
submit a rule report.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. This
final rule is also exempt from the
Administrative Procedure Act pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2) because it applies
to agency management or personnel.
Therefore, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis was not performed.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply because the changes to the
FTR do not impose recordkeeping or
information collection requirements, or
the collection of information from
offerors, contractors, or members of the
public that require the approval of the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
Government employees, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Travel
and transportation expenses.
Robin Carnahan,
Administrator of General Services.
Therefore, under the authority 5
U.S.C. 5707 and 5711, GSA removes 41
CFR parts 300–90, amends 301–74, and
removes Appendix E to Chapter 301 as
set forth below:
PART 300–90—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
■
1. Remove and reserve part 300–90.
PART 301–74–CONFERENCE
PLANNING
2. The authority citation for 41 CFR
301–74 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5707.
E:\FR\FM\04OCR1.SGM
04OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 189 (Monday, October 4, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54628-54630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21213]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0369; FRL-8996-02-R9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality
Department
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the Maricopa County Air Quality
Department's (MCAQD) Rule 510 as part of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These rule revisions concern updates to the
maximum levels of ambient air pollution for the protection of public
health and welfare. We are finalizing our proposed approval of this
rule to regulate ambient air emissions under the Clean Air Act (CAA or
the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on November 3, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0369. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 947-4152 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On June 23, 2021 (86 FR 32848), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the Arizona SIP:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD................................. 510 Air Quality Standards... 12/11/2019 12/20/2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into the
Arizona SIP. The December 11, 2019 version of Rule 510 will replace the
previously approved version of this rule in the Arizona SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the MCAQD
rule described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below.
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that
plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the
CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the EPA's
approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next update to
the SIP compilation.\1\ The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
[[Page 54629]]
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 3, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: September 22, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. In Sec. 52.120(c), amend table 4 by revising the entry ``Rule 510''
after the heading ``Regulation V--Air Quality Standards and Area
Classification''.
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 4--EPA-Approved Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective
County citation Title/subject date EPA approval date Additional explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation V--Air Quality Standards and Area Classification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 510....................... Air Quality December 11, 2019 October 4, 2021, The December 11, 2019
Standards. [INSERT FEDERAL version of Rule 510
REGISTER replaces the November
CITATION]. 30, 2016 version that
had been approved on
November 1, 2006 (74
FR 57612).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-21213 Filed 10-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P