Election of Officers of the Osage Minerals Council, 54364-54367 [2021-21385]
Download as PDF
54364
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 90
[212A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900]
RIN 1076–AF58
Election of Officers of the Osage
Minerals Council
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) is finalizing revisions to its
regulations governing elections of the
Osage Nation. These revisions update
and limit the Secretary’s role to the task
of compiling a list of voters for Osage
Minerals Council elections. These
changes reaffirm the inherent sovereign
rights of the Osage Nation to determine
its membership and form of
government.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective on
November 1, 2021.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Appel, Office of Regulatory
Affairs & Collaborative Action,
telephone (202) 273–4680,
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Authority
II. History of the Rule
III. Overview of Rule
IV. Changes From Proposed Rule to Final
Rule
V. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866, 13563, and 13771)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
and Fairness Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
I. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
J. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
K. Energy Effects (E.O. 13211)
I. Statutory Authority
BIA is finalizing this rule under the
authority of the Act of June 28, 1906,
Public Law 59–321, 34 Stat. 539, as
amended by the Act of December 3,
2004, Public Law 108–431, 118 Stat.
2609.
II. History of the Rule
The Department of the Interior
provided testimony in support of the
legislation proposed by the Osage
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Sep 30, 2021
Jkt 256001
Nation when the Nation sought to
exercise its inherent sovereign rights.
Thereafter, the United States Congress
reaffirmed in 2004 the Nation’s rights to
determine its membership and form of
government. The following discussion
sets forth a brief historical account of
the relationship between the Osage
Nation and the Federal government.
In 1906, the Congress enacted the
Osage Allotment Act, which is unique
among Federal Indian laws in that it
restricted the Osage Nation from
defining its own membership rules, and
prescribes a particular form of
government, which the Nation could not
change without seeking amendment or
clarification of Federal law. In 2002, the
31st Osage Tribal Council, formed
pursuant to the Osage Allotment Act,
actively began seeking a legislative
remedy to address the restrictions
contained in the Osage Allotment Act.
On July 25, 2003, Congressman Frank
Lucas (R–OK) introduced H.R. 2912, a
bill reaffirming the rights of the Osage
Nation to form its own membership
rules and tribal government, provided
that no rights to any shares in the
mineral estate of the Nation’s
reservation are diminished. The bill also
directs the Secretary of the Interior to
assist the Nation in holding appropriate
elections and referenda at the request of
the Nation.
H.R. 2912 was referred to the
Committee on Resources. On March 15,
2004, that Committee held a hearing on
the bill in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Osage
Nation officials, a BIA representative,
and Osage people testified in favor of
the bill. On May 5, 2004, the bill was
favorably reported to the House of
Representatives by unanimous consent.
See H. Rpt. 108–502. On June 1, 2004,
the House of Representatives passed the
bill and then sent it to the Senate, and
it was referred to the Committee on
Indian Affairs.
On July 14, 2004, the Committee on
Indian Affairs favorably reported H.R.
2912 to the Senate with a ‘‘do pass’’
recommendation. President Bush signed
H.R. 2912 into law on December 3,
2004, and became Public Law 108–431,
118 Stat. 2609.
The Commission began conducting
town hall meetings in April 2005.
Meetings were conducted in all Osage
communities and other geographic areas
with large concentrations of Osages.
This was followed by a written survey
mailed to all Osages with a Certificate
of Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB) card.
Input from the meetings and data
obtained from the survey results were
compiled to formulate key questions put
forward to the Osage people for a vote
in a referendum in November 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The results from the referendum were
used to draft an Osage Constitution,
which was ratified on March 11, 2006,
in a second referendum vote. The Osage
Nation adopted a new constitutional
form of government reorganized from a
Tribal Council system into a tripartite
system, which now includes an
executive, legislative and judicial
branch with a separation of powers
between the three branches.
This was followed on June 5, 2006, by
the election of a Principal Chief and
Assistant Principal Chief, Osage Nation
Congress, and Osage Minerals Council.
At the request of the Nation, the BIA
provided technical assistance in
conducting the election in accordance
with Public Law 108–431, 118 Stat.
2609. With the elections completed, all
elected officials were sworn into their
respective offices on July 3, 2006. Upon
the swearing in of these elected officials,
governmental authority passed from the
Osage Tribal Council to the Osage
Nation Constitutional Government.
Thereafter, the Osage Tribe of Indians of
Oklahoma became the Osage Nation.
In 2008, the BIA formally
acknowledged the name change of the
Tribe from the Osage Tribe of Indians of
Oklahoma to the Osage Nation and
published the change in the Federal
Register in the list of Indian Entities
Recognized and Eligible to Receive
Services from the United States Bureau
of Indian Affairs. (See, 73 FR 18553,
April 4, 2008). Further communication
between the Nation and the BIA
eventually resulted in an agreement to
begin an informal negotiated rulemaking
process. In February 2010,
representatives from the Osage Nation,
the BIA Eastern Oklahoma Region,
Osage Agency, the BIA Eastern
Oklahoma Region, Eastern Oklahoma
Regional Office, the Tulsa Field
Solicitor’s Office, and the BIA Central
Office convened to form a joint
regulation negotiation team. The team
completed new and revised regulations
to cover 25 CFR parts 90, 91, 117, and
158. The June 2010 Election resulted in
a change of administration of the Osage
Nation, thereby, starting the process
over again with a new vision from Osage
Nation. The Osage Nation formed a new
team in 2019 and they have reviewed
and revised regulations to cover 25 CFR
part 90. The team will continue working
on parts 91, 117, and 158.
III. Overview of Rule
This rule governs BIA’s role in
providing information to the Osage
Minerals Council Election Board for
purposes of notice. The existing 25 CFR
part 90 is the authority for the release
of otherwise potentially confidential
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
information to the Osage Minerals
Council Election Board. The alternative
to these amendments would deprive the
Osage Nation of the information it needs
to accurately identify Osage voters.
Amendments to this part focus on the
BIA’s procedures in compiling a
complete annuitant list with addresses
and headright interests to the Osage
Minerals Council Election Board for
purposes of identifying Osage voters.
This rule deletes most provisions of
part 90 in their entirety because of the
enactment of the Public Law 108–431,
118 Stat. 2609, and subsequent adoption
of the Constitution of the Osage Nation.
Thus, the remaining purpose of this part
is the authority for BIA to provide a list
to the Osage Minerals Council Election
Board of eligible headright interest
owners in the manner requested by the
Osage Nation. The Department may not
generally release this information but
this part provides authority for the
release solely to the Osage Minerals
Council Election Board for purposes of
conducting elections for the Osage
Minerals Council. The Privacy Act does
not prohibit disclosure of the headright
interests of eligible Osage voters for this
54365
purpose. The Department may provide
the list of eligible headright interest
owners as a routine use under the
Privacy Act.
In response to the Constitution of the
Osage Nation, the BIA significantly
reduced its role in the elections of the
Osage Nation as of June 2006. The only
remaining portion in part 90 describes
the current role of the BIA in the Osage
Minerals Council election process.
The following distribution table
indicates where each of the current
regulatory sections in 25 CFR part 90 is
located in the new 25 CFR part 90.
Current 25 CFR §
New 25 CFR §
Title
Description of change
N/A ...............................
90.100 ........................
90.1 ..............................
90.2 ..............................
90.21 ............................
N/A .............................
N/A .............................
N/A .............................
What role does BIA play in the Osage Minerals Council elections?
General, Definitions ........................................
General, Statutory provisions .........................
Eligibility, General ...........................................
90.30 ............................
N/A .............................
Consolidated current §§ 90.21 and 90.35 into
one new section.
Deleted.
Deleted.
Revised and incorporated into the new
§ 90.100.
Deleted.
90.31
90.32
90.33
90.34
90.35
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
90.36
90.37
90.38
90.39
............................
............................
............................
............................
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
90.40
90.41
90.42
90.43
90.44
90.46
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
............................
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
90.47 ............................
90.48 ............................
90.49 ............................
N/A .............................
N/A .............................
N/A .............................
IV. Changes From Proposed Rule to
Final Rule
On December 4, 2020 (85 FR 78300),
the BIA published a proposed rule to
update Federal regulations related
specifically to the Osage Nation so that
the regulations align with the Osage
Nation’s new form of government and
address outdated regulations. The
proposed rule was developed through a
consensus-oriented process conducted
between the BIA and the Osage Nation.
During the public comment period on
the proposed rule, the BIA received two
comments: One from an individual in
support of the rule, the other from the
Osage Minerals Council expressing
general support for the proposed rule
but requesting a change in the
nomenclature of the titles and entities
that conduct the elections to reflect the
sovereign authority of the Osage Nation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Sep 30, 2021
Jkt 256001
Elections, Nominating conventions and petitions.
Elections, Applicability ....................................
Elections, Election Board ................................
Elections, Watchers and challengers .............
None (Apparently omitted).
Elections, List of voters ...................................
Elections,
Elections,
Elections,
Elections,
dence.
Elections,
Elections,
Elections,
Elections,
Elections,
Elections,
cers.
Elections,
Elections,
Elections,
Disputes on eligibility of voters ......
Election Notices .............................
Opening and closing of poll ...........
Voters to announce name and resi-
Revised and redesignated as § 90.100 (see
first row).
Deleted.
Deleted.
Deleted.
Deleted.
Ballots .............................................
Absentee voting .............................
Absentee ballots .............................
Canvass of election returns ...........
Statement of supervisor .................
Notification of election of tribal offi-
Deleted.
Deleted.
Deleted.
Deleted.
Deleted.
Deleted.
Contesting elections .......................
Notice of Contest ...........................
Expenses of elections ....................
Deleted.
Deleted.
Deleted.
and the Osage Minerals Council to
change that nomenclature. Specifically,
the Osage Minerals Council requested
that ‘‘supervisor of the Osage Minerals
Council Election Board’’ be changed to
the ‘‘Osage Minerals Council’s designee
charged with carrying out Osage
Minerals Council elections.’’ The final
rule makes this change.
The Osage Nation also requested
clarification that the list of names the
Osage Agency Superintendent provides
be based on the quarterly annuity roll at
the Osage Agency as of the last quarterly
payment ‘‘of the last full quarter’’
immediately preceding the date of the
election. To clarify which quarterly
annuity roll is intended as the basis for
the list, the final rule specifies that it
will be the March quarterly annuity
payment. Elections are held in June so
the voters list would reflect the March
PO 00000
Deleted.
Deleted.
Deleted.
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
annuity payment. This revision avoids
the potential for misinterpretation of
which quarter’s annuity roll is intended.
V. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866, 13563, and 13771)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation’s regulatory
system to promote predictability, to
reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory ends. The
E.O. directs agencies to consider
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
54366
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. A federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the
criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate
errors and ambiguity and be written to
minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that
all regulations be written in clear
language and contain clear legal
standards.
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
Because this rule is exclusively
confined to the Federal Government,
Osage Indians, and the Osage Nation,
this rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a monetarily
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with federally
recognized Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with these
Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and Tribal
sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule
under the Department’s consultation
policy and under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have
determined that it has substantial direct
effects on one federally recognized
Indian Tribe because the rule directly
addresses the Osage Nation. The
Department consulted with the Osage
Nation on this rule. This rulemaking is
a result of a consensus-oriented process
conducted between the Department of
the Interior and the Osage Nation to
identify a rulemaking strategy to address
issues and concerns contained in the
regulations related specifically to the
Osage Nation, which no longer align
with the Nation’s form of government.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
allow the Department of the Interior to
better meet its fiduciary trust
responsibilities and to carry out the
policies established by the Congress to
strengthen Tribal sovereignty with
regard to elections of Osage Nation
officers.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630 because this rule does not
affect individual property rights
protected by the Fifth Amendment or
involve a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) is not required.
We may not conduct or sponsor and you
are not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Sep 30, 2021
Jkt 256001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because this is
an administrative and procedural
regulation. (For further information see
43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also
determined that the rule does not
involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215
that would require further analysis
under NEPA.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 90
Elections, Indians—tribal government.
For the reasons given in the preamble,
the Department of the Interior revises 25
CFR part 90 to read as follows:
■
PART 90—ELECTIONS OF OSAGE
MINERALS COUNCIL
Sec.
90.100 What role does the Bureau of Indian
Affairs (BIA) play in the Osage Minerals
Council’s elections?
90.101 [Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9;
Sec. 9, Pub. L. 59–321, 34 Stat. 539; Pub. L.
108–431, 118 Stat. 2609, 118 Stat. 2609.
§ 90.100 What role does the Bureau of
India Affairs (BIA) play in the Osage
Minerals Council’s elections?
(a) The Superintendent of the Osage
Agency must compile, at the request of
the Chair of the Osage Minerals Council,
a list of the voters of Osage descent who
will be 18 years of age or over on the
election day designated by the Osage
Minerals Council and whose names
appear on the March quarterly annuity
roll at the Osage Agency as of the March
quarterly payment immediately
preceding the date of the election. Such
list must set forth only the name and
last known address of each voter.
(b) For purposes of calculating votes,
the Superintendent must furnish to the
Osage Minerals Council designee
charged with carrying out Osage
Minerals Council elections a separate
list containing the name and last known
address of each eligible voter and
including the voter’s headright interest
shown on the last March quarterly
annuity roll.
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 188 / Friday, October 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
§ 90.101
[Reserved]
issued under sections 861, 881, 904, and
905 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
Need for Correction
[FR Doc. 2021–21385 Filed 9–30–21; 8:45 am]
As published on Thursday, November
12, 2020 (85 FR 71998), the final
regulations (TD 9922) contain errors that
need to be corrected.
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Internal Revenue Service
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 1
RIN 1545–BP21; 1545–BP22
Guidance Related to the Allocation and
Apportionment of Deductions and
Foreign Taxes, Foreign Tax
Redeterminations, Foreign Tax Credit
Disallowance Under Section 965(g),
Consolidated Groups, Hybrid
Arrangements and Certain Payments
Under Section 951A; Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correcting amendments.
AGENCY:
This document contains
corrections to the final regulations
(Treasury Decision 9922) that were
published in the Federal Register on
Thursday, November 12, 2020. Treasury
Decision 9922 provided guidance
relating to the allocation and
apportionment of deductions and
creditable foreign taxes, the definition of
financial services income, foreign tax
redeterminations, availability of foreign
tax credits under the transition tax, the
application of the foreign tax credit
limitation to consolidated groups,
adjustments to hybrid deduction
accounts to take into account certain
inclusions in income by a United States
shareholder, conduit financing
arrangements involving hybrid
instruments, and the treatment of
certain payments under the global
intangible low-taxed income provisions.
DATES: Effective on October 1, 2021, and
applicable as of November 12, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning §§ 1.861–8 and 1.861–17,
Jeffrey P. Cowan, (202) 317–4924;
concerning §§ 1.861–20, 1.904–4, and
1.904–6, Suzanne M. Walsh, (202) 317–
4908; concerning § 1.881–3, Richard F.
Owens, (202) 317–6501; concerning
§ 1.904(g)-3, Jeffrey L. Parry, (202) 317
4916; concerning § 1.905–4T, Corina
Braun, (202) 317–5004 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUMMARY:
Background
The final regulations (TD 9922) that
are the subject of this correction are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Sep 30, 2021
Jkt 256001
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.861–8 is amended by
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(e)(5)(ii) and the first and second
sentences of paragraph (e)(8)(ii) to read
as follows:
■
§ 1.861–8 Computation of taxable income
from sources within the United States and
from other sources and activities.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(5) * * *
(ii) * * * The deductions are
apportioned among the statutory and
residual groupings on the basis of the
relative values (as determined under the
asset method in § 1.861–9 for purposes
of allocating and apportioning the
taxpayer’s interest expense) of the assets
that were involved in the event or (if the
taxpayer no longer owns the assets
involved in the event) the assets that are
used to produce or sell products or
services in the relevant class in each
grouping; such values are determined in
the year the deductions are allowed.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) * * *
(ii) * * * A net operating loss taken
as a deduction in computing taxable
income for a particular taxable year as
allowed under section 172 is allocated
and apportioned to statutory and
residual groupings by reference to the
statutory and residual groupings of the
components of the net operating loss (as
determined under paragraph (e)(8)(i) of
this section) that is deducted in the
taxable year. Except as provided under
the rules for an operative section, if the
full net operating loss carryover is not
taken as a deduction in a taxable year,
the partial net operating loss deduction
is treated as ratably comprising the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
components of a net operating loss.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 3. Section 1.861–17 is amended
in paragraph (d)(4)(iv), by revising the
first sentence and adding a sentence at
the end of the paragraph to read as
follows:
§ 1.861–17 Allocation and apportionment
of research and experimental expenditures.
*
Correction of Publication
[TD 9922]
54367
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(iv) * * * If the controlled party has
entered into a cost sharing arrangement,
in accordance with the provisions of
§ 1.482–7, with the taxpayer for the
purpose of developing intangible
property, then ordinarily the controlled
party is not reasonably expected to
acquire rights in intangible property that
would arise from the taxpayer’s share of
the R&E expenditures with respect to
the cost shared intangibles as defined in
§ 1.482–7(j)(1)(i); acquire products in
which such intangible property is
embedded or used in connection with
the manufacture or sale of such
products; or receive services that
incorporate or directly or indirectly
benefit from such intangible property.
* * * However, the rule in this
paragraph (d)(4)(iv) does not apply, and
the controlled party’s sales are taken
into account, to the extent the taxpayer
licenses, or has licensed, to the
controlled party intangible property
resulting from a cost sharing
arrangement with the controlled party.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 4. Section 1.861–20 is amended
by revising the first sentence of
paragraph (d)(3)(i)(B)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 1.861–20 Allocation and apportionment
of foreign income taxes.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) * * * The foreign dividend
amount is, to the extent of the U.S.
dividend amount, assigned to the same
statutory and residual grouping (or
ratably to the groupings) to which a
distribution of the U.S. dividend
amount is assigned under Federal
income tax law. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.881–3
[Amended]
■ Par. 5. For each entry in § 1.881–3 in
the ‘‘Paragraph Heading’’ column,
remove the language in ‘‘Remove’’
column and add in its place the
E:\FR\FM\01OCR1.SGM
01OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 188 (Friday, October 1, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54364-54367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21385]
[[Page 54364]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 90
[212A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]
RIN 1076-AF58
Election of Officers of the Osage Minerals Council
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is finalizing revisions to
its regulations governing elections of the Osage Nation. These
revisions update and limit the Secretary's role to the task of
compiling a list of voters for Osage Minerals Council elections. These
changes reaffirm the inherent sovereign rights of the Osage Nation to
determine its membership and form of government.
DATES: This rule is effective on November 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Appel, Office of Regulatory
Affairs & Collaborative Action, telephone (202) 273-4680,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Statutory Authority
II. History of the Rule
III. Overview of Rule
IV. Changes From Proposed Rule to Final Rule
V. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866, 13563, and 13771)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Paperwork Reduction Act
I. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
J. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
K. Energy Effects (E.O. 13211)
I. Statutory Authority
BIA is finalizing this rule under the authority of the Act of June
28, 1906, Public Law 59-321, 34 Stat. 539, as amended by the Act of
December 3, 2004, Public Law 108-431, 118 Stat. 2609.
II. History of the Rule
The Department of the Interior provided testimony in support of the
legislation proposed by the Osage Nation when the Nation sought to
exercise its inherent sovereign rights. Thereafter, the United States
Congress reaffirmed in 2004 the Nation's rights to determine its
membership and form of government. The following discussion sets forth
a brief historical account of the relationship between the Osage Nation
and the Federal government.
In 1906, the Congress enacted the Osage Allotment Act, which is
unique among Federal Indian laws in that it restricted the Osage Nation
from defining its own membership rules, and prescribes a particular
form of government, which the Nation could not change without seeking
amendment or clarification of Federal law. In 2002, the 31st Osage
Tribal Council, formed pursuant to the Osage Allotment Act, actively
began seeking a legislative remedy to address the restrictions
contained in the Osage Allotment Act.
On July 25, 2003, Congressman Frank Lucas (R-OK) introduced H.R.
2912, a bill reaffirming the rights of the Osage Nation to form its own
membership rules and tribal government, provided that no rights to any
shares in the mineral estate of the Nation's reservation are
diminished. The bill also directs the Secretary of the Interior to
assist the Nation in holding appropriate elections and referenda at the
request of the Nation.
H.R. 2912 was referred to the Committee on Resources. On March 15,
2004, that Committee held a hearing on the bill in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Osage Nation officials, a BIA representative, and Osage people
testified in favor of the bill. On May 5, 2004, the bill was favorably
reported to the House of Representatives by unanimous consent. See H.
Rpt. 108-502. On June 1, 2004, the House of Representatives passed the
bill and then sent it to the Senate, and it was referred to the
Committee on Indian Affairs.
On July 14, 2004, the Committee on Indian Affairs favorably
reported H.R. 2912 to the Senate with a ``do pass'' recommendation.
President Bush signed H.R. 2912 into law on December 3, 2004, and
became Public Law 108-431, 118 Stat. 2609.
The Commission began conducting town hall meetings in April 2005.
Meetings were conducted in all Osage communities and other geographic
areas with large concentrations of Osages. This was followed by a
written survey mailed to all Osages with a Certificate of Degree of
Indian Blood (CDIB) card. Input from the meetings and data obtained
from the survey results were compiled to formulate key questions put
forward to the Osage people for a vote in a referendum in November
2005.
The results from the referendum were used to draft an Osage
Constitution, which was ratified on March 11, 2006, in a second
referendum vote. The Osage Nation adopted a new constitutional form of
government reorganized from a Tribal Council system into a tripartite
system, which now includes an executive, legislative and judicial
branch with a separation of powers between the three branches.
This was followed on June 5, 2006, by the election of a Principal
Chief and Assistant Principal Chief, Osage Nation Congress, and Osage
Minerals Council. At the request of the Nation, the BIA provided
technical assistance in conducting the election in accordance with
Public Law 108-431, 118 Stat. 2609. With the elections completed, all
elected officials were sworn into their respective offices on July 3,
2006. Upon the swearing in of these elected officials, governmental
authority passed from the Osage Tribal Council to the Osage Nation
Constitutional Government. Thereafter, the Osage Tribe of Indians of
Oklahoma became the Osage Nation.
In 2008, the BIA formally acknowledged the name change of the Tribe
from the Osage Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma to the Osage Nation and
published the change in the Federal Register in the list of Indian
Entities Recognized and Eligible to Receive Services from the United
States Bureau of Indian Affairs. (See, 73 FR 18553, April 4, 2008).
Further communication between the Nation and the BIA eventually
resulted in an agreement to begin an informal negotiated rulemaking
process. In February 2010, representatives from the Osage Nation, the
BIA Eastern Oklahoma Region, Osage Agency, the BIA Eastern Oklahoma
Region, Eastern Oklahoma Regional Office, the Tulsa Field Solicitor's
Office, and the BIA Central Office convened to form a joint regulation
negotiation team. The team completed new and revised regulations to
cover 25 CFR parts 90, 91, 117, and 158. The June 2010 Election
resulted in a change of administration of the Osage Nation, thereby,
starting the process over again with a new vision from Osage Nation.
The Osage Nation formed a new team in 2019 and they have reviewed and
revised regulations to cover 25 CFR part 90. The team will continue
working on parts 91, 117, and 158.
III. Overview of Rule
This rule governs BIA's role in providing information to the Osage
Minerals Council Election Board for purposes of notice. The existing 25
CFR part 90 is the authority for the release of otherwise potentially
confidential
[[Page 54365]]
information to the Osage Minerals Council Election Board. The
alternative to these amendments would deprive the Osage Nation of the
information it needs to accurately identify Osage voters. Amendments to
this part focus on the BIA's procedures in compiling a complete
annuitant list with addresses and headright interests to the Osage
Minerals Council Election Board for purposes of identifying Osage
voters.
This rule deletes most provisions of part 90 in their entirety
because of the enactment of the Public Law 108-431, 118 Stat. 2609, and
subsequent adoption of the Constitution of the Osage Nation. Thus, the
remaining purpose of this part is the authority for BIA to provide a
list to the Osage Minerals Council Election Board of eligible headright
interest owners in the manner requested by the Osage Nation. The
Department may not generally release this information but this part
provides authority for the release solely to the Osage Minerals Council
Election Board for purposes of conducting elections for the Osage
Minerals Council. The Privacy Act does not prohibit disclosure of the
headright interests of eligible Osage voters for this purpose. The
Department may provide the list of eligible headright interest owners
as a routine use under the Privacy Act.
In response to the Constitution of the Osage Nation, the BIA
significantly reduced its role in the elections of the Osage Nation as
of June 2006. The only remaining portion in part 90 describes the
current role of the BIA in the Osage Minerals Council election process.
The following distribution table indicates where each of the
current regulatory sections in 25 CFR part 90 is located in the new 25
CFR part 90.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current 25 CFR Sec. New 25 CFR Sec. Title Description of change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N/A.................................. 90.100................. What role does BIA play Consolidated current
in the Osage Minerals Sec. Sec. 90.21 and
Council elections? 90.35 into one new
section.
90.1................................. N/A.................... General, Definitions... Deleted.
90.2................................. N/A.................... General, Statutory Deleted.
provisions.
90.21................................ N/A.................... Eligibility, General... Revised and
incorporated into the
new Sec. 90.100.
90.30................................ N/A.................... Elections, Nominating Deleted.
conventions and
petitions.
90.31................................ N/A.................... Elections, Deleted.
Applicability.
90.32................................ N/A.................... Elections, Election Deleted.
Board.
90.33................................ N/A.................... Elections, Watchers and Deleted.
challengers.
90.34................................ N/A.................... None (Apparently
omitted).
90.35................................ N/A.................... Elections, List of Revised and
voters. redesignated as Sec.
90.100 (see first
row).
90.36................................ N/A.................... Elections, Disputes on Deleted.
eligibility of voters.
90.37................................ N/A.................... Elections, Election Deleted.
Notices.
90.38................................ N/A.................... Elections, Opening and Deleted.
closing of poll.
90.39................................ N/A.................... Elections, Voters to Deleted.
announce name and
residence.
90.40................................ N/A.................... Elections, Ballots..... Deleted.
90.41................................ N/A.................... Elections, Absentee Deleted.
voting.
90.42................................ N/A.................... Elections, Absentee Deleted.
ballots.
90.43................................ N/A.................... Elections, Canvass of Deleted.
election returns.
90.44................................ N/A.................... Elections, Statement of Deleted.
supervisor.
90.46................................ N/A.................... Elections, Notification Deleted.
of election of tribal
officers.
90.47................................ N/A.................... Elections, Contesting Deleted.
elections.
90.48................................ N/A.................... Elections, Notice of Deleted.
Contest.
90.49................................ N/A.................... Elections, Expenses of Deleted.
elections.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Changes From Proposed Rule to Final Rule
On December 4, 2020 (85 FR 78300), the BIA published a proposed
rule to update Federal regulations related specifically to the Osage
Nation so that the regulations align with the Osage Nation's new form
of government and address outdated regulations. The proposed rule was
developed through a consensus-oriented process conducted between the
BIA and the Osage Nation.
During the public comment period on the proposed rule, the BIA
received two comments: One from an individual in support of the rule,
the other from the Osage Minerals Council expressing general support
for the proposed rule but requesting a change in the nomenclature of
the titles and entities that conduct the elections to reflect the
sovereign authority of the Osage Nation and the Osage Minerals Council
to change that nomenclature. Specifically, the Osage Minerals Council
requested that ``supervisor of the Osage Minerals Council Election
Board'' be changed to the ``Osage Minerals Council's designee charged
with carrying out Osage Minerals Council elections.'' The final rule
makes this change.
The Osage Nation also requested clarification that the list of
names the Osage Agency Superintendent provides be based on the
quarterly annuity roll at the Osage Agency as of the last quarterly
payment ``of the last full quarter'' immediately preceding the date of
the election. To clarify which quarterly annuity roll is intended as
the basis for the list, the final rule specifies that it will be the
March quarterly annuity payment. Elections are held in June so the
voters list would reflect the March annuity payment. This revision
avoids the potential for misinterpretation of which quarter's annuity
roll is intended.
V. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866, 13563, and 13771)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The E.O. directs agencies to consider
[[Page 54366]]
regulatory approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. Because this rule is
exclusively confined to the Federal Government, Osage Indians, and the
Osage Nation, this rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a monetarily significant or unique effect
on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 because this rule
does not affect individual property rights protected by the Fifth
Amendment or involve a compensable ``taking.'' A takings implication
assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. A federalism
summary impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with federally recognized Indian
Tribes through a commitment to consultation with these Indian Tribes
and recognition of their right to self-governance and Tribal
sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule under the Department's
consultation policy and under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 and
have determined that it has substantial direct effects on one federally
recognized Indian Tribe because the rule directly addresses the Osage
Nation. The Department consulted with the Osage Nation on this rule.
This rulemaking is a result of a consensus-oriented process conducted
between the Department of the Interior and the Osage Nation to identify
a rulemaking strategy to address issues and concerns contained in the
regulations related specifically to the Osage Nation, which no longer
align with the Nation's form of government. The purpose of this
rulemaking is to allow the Department of the Interior to better meet
its fiduciary trust responsibilities and to carry out the policies
established by the Congress to strengthen Tribal sovereignty with
regard to elections of Osage Nation officers.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) is not
required. We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because this is an administrative and procedural regulation.
(For further information see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also determined
that the rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances
listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 90
Elections, Indians--tribal government.
0
For the reasons given in the preamble, the Department of the Interior
revises 25 CFR part 90 to read as follows:
PART 90--ELECTIONS OF OSAGE MINERALS COUNCIL
Sec.
90.100 What role does the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) play in the
Osage Minerals Council's elections?
90.101 [Reserved]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9; Sec. 9, Pub. L. 59-
321, 34 Stat. 539; Pub. L. 108-431, 118 Stat. 2609, 118 Stat. 2609.
Sec. 90.100 What role does the Bureau of India Affairs (BIA) play in
the Osage Minerals Council's elections?
(a) The Superintendent of the Osage Agency must compile, at the
request of the Chair of the Osage Minerals Council, a list of the
voters of Osage descent who will be 18 years of age or over on the
election day designated by the Osage Minerals Council and whose names
appear on the March quarterly annuity roll at the Osage Agency as of
the March quarterly payment immediately preceding the date of the
election. Such list must set forth only the name and last known address
of each voter.
(b) For purposes of calculating votes, the Superintendent must
furnish to the Osage Minerals Council designee charged with carrying
out Osage Minerals Council elections a separate list containing the
name and last known address of each eligible voter and including the
voter's headright interest shown on the last March quarterly annuity
roll.
[[Page 54367]]
Sec. 90.101 [Reserved]
Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021-21385 Filed 9-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P