Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal Communications Commission, 54191-54193 [2021-21262]
Download as PDF
LOTTER on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 187 / Thursday, September 30, 2021 / Notices
In 2007, the Commission also released
the 2007 Cost Recovery Report and
Order and Declaratory Ruling,
published at 73 FR 3197, January 17,
2008, in which the Commission:
(1) Adopted a new cost recovery
methodology for interstate traditional
TRS, interstate speech-to-speech service
(STS), captioned telephone service
(CTS), and Internet Protocol captioned
telephone service (IP CTS) based on the
Multi-state Average Rate Structure
(MARS) plan, under which interstate
TRS compensation rates are determined
by weighted average of the states’
intrastate compensation rates, and
which includes for STS additional
compensation approved by the
Commission for STS outreach;
(2) adopted a cost recovery
methodology for Internet Protocol (IP)
Relay based on a price cap like
methodology;
(3) adopted a cost recovery
methodology for video relay service
(VRS) that adopted tiered rates based on
call volume;
(4) clarified the nature and extent that
certain categories of costs are
compensable from the Fund; and
(5) addressed certain issues
concerning the management and
oversight of the Fund, including
prohibiting financial incentives offered
to consumers to make relay calls.
The 2007 TRS Cost Recovery Order
requires that state relay administrators
and TRS providers submit to the TRS
Fund administrator the following
information annually, for intrastate
traditional TRS, STS, and CTS:
(1) The per-minute compensation
rate(s) and other compensation received
for the provision of TRS;
(2) whether the rate applies to session
minutes or conversation minutes, which
are a subset of session minutes;
(3) the number of intrastate session
minutes; and
(4) the number of intrastate
conversation minutes.
Also, STS providers must file a report
annually with the TRS Fund
administrator and the Commission on
their specific outreach efforts directly
attributable to the additional
compensation approved by the
Commission for STS outreach.
In 2011, to help prevent waste, fraud,
and abuse, the Commission adopted
three VRS orders to curtail these
harmful practices. Each of these orders
(collectively, the 2011 VRS Orders)
included information collection
requirements.
On April 6, 2011, in document FCC
11–54, the Commission released the
2011 Fraud Prevention Order, published
at 76 FR 30841, May 27, 2011, which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Sep 29, 2021
Jkt 253001
included several measures designed to
eliminate the waste, fraud and abuse,
while ensuring that VRS remains a
viable and a valuable communication
tool for Americans who use it on a daily
basis.
On July 28, 2011, in document FCC
11–118 the Commission released the
VRS Certification Order, published at 76
FR 47469, August 5, 2011, amending its
rules for certifying internet-based TRS
providers as eligible for payment from
the Interstate TRS Fund (Fund) for their
provision of internet-based TRS.
On October 17, 2011, in document
FCC 11–155, the Commission released
the Second VRS Certification Order,
published at 76 FR 67070, October 31,
2011, addressing three petitions related
to the VRS Certification Order by
revising the burdens contained in the
requirements for the submission of
documentation of a provider’s VRS
equipment and technologies and the
submission of documentation regarding
sponsorship arrangements.
The following are the final
information collection requirements
contained in the 2011 VRS Orders:
(1) The Chief Executive Officer (CEO),
Chief Financial Officer (CFO), or other
senior executive of a TRS provider shall
certify, under penalty of perjury, that:
(1) Minutes submitted to the Interstate
TRS Fund (Fund) administrator for
compensation were handled in
compliance with the Commission’s
rules and are not the result of
impermissible financial incentives to
generate calls, and (2) cost and demand
data submitted to the Fund
administrator related to the
determination of compensation rates are
true and correct.
(2) VRS providers shall: (a) Submit to
the Commission and the TRS Fund
administrator a call center report twice
a year and (b) notify the Commission
and the TRS Fund administrator at least
30 days prior to any change to their call
centers’ locations.
(3) VRS providers shall submit
detailed call data records (CDRs) and
speed of answer compliance data to the
Fund administrator.
(4) TRS providers shall use an
automated record keeping system to
capture the CDRs and shall submit such
data electronically in standardized form
to the TRS Fund administrator.
(5) internet-based TRS providers shall
retain the CDRs that are used to support
payment claims submitted to the Fund
administrator for a minimum of five
years, in an electronic format.
(6) VRS providers shall: (a) Maintain
copies of all third-party contracts or
agreements and make them available to
the Commission and the TRS Fund
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54191
administrator upon request; and (b)
describe all agreements in connection
with marketing and outreach activities
in their annual submissions to the TRS
Fund administrator.
(7) TRS providers shall provide
information about their TRS
whistleblower protections to all
employees and contractors, in writing.
In 2018, the Commission released the
IP CTS Modernization Order, published
at 83 FR 30082, June 27, 2018, in which
the Commission:
(1) Determined that it would
transition the methodology for IP CTS
cost recovery from the MARS plan to
cost-based rates and adopted interim
rates; and
(2) added two cost reporting
requirements for IP CTS providers: (i) In
annual cost data filings and
supplementary information provided to
the TRS Fund administrator, IP CTS
providers that contract for the supply of
services used in the provision of TRS,
shall include information about
payments under such contracts,
classified according to the substantive
cost categories specified by the TRS
Fund administrator; and (ii) in the
course of an audit or otherwise upon
demand, IP CTS providers must make
available any relevant documentation.
47 CFR 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(D)(1), (6).
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–21271 Filed 9–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–XXXX; FR ID 50436]
Information Collection Being Reviewed
by the Federal Communications
Commission
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burdens, and as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA), the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following information collections.
Comments are requested concerning:
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
LOTTER on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
54192
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 187 / Thursday, September 30, 2021 / Notices
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the Commission’s
burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and ways to
further reduce the information
collection burden on small business
concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
number. No person shall be subject to
any penalty for failing to comply with
a collection of information subject to the
PRA that does not display a valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before November 29,
2021. If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to
Cathy Williams, FCC, via email to PRA@
fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: XXXX–XXXX.
Title: Section 20.23(b)(1), (3)–(5), (7);
(c)(1)–(2), (3), (3)(iii)–(iv), (4)(i)–(ii), (v);
and (d), Contraband wireless devices in
correctional facilities.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: New information
collection.
Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities, and state, local or tribal
governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents
and Responses: 531 respondents and
16,389 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1–10
hours.
Frequency of Response: One-time
application and self-certification
response, one-time DCFO authorization
request response, on occasion qualifying
request response, on occasion reversal
response, recordkeeping requirement,
third party notification requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to
obtain or retain benefits. Statutory
authority for the currently approved
information collection is contained in
sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 301, 302, 303,
307, 308, 309, 310, and 332 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Sep 29, 2021
Jkt 253001
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i),
154(j), 301, 302a, 303, 307, 308, 309,
310, and 332.
Estimated Total Annual Burden:
142,568 hours.
Total Annual Costs: No costs.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
Certain information collected during the
CIS application and certification process
will be treated as confidential from
public inspection. To the extent
necessary, respondents may request
confidential treatment of information
collected. See 47 CFR 0.459.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No
impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On July 13, 2021, the
Commission released a Second Report
and Order and Second Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, Promoting
Technological Solutions to Combat
Contraband Wireless Devices in
Correctional Facilities, GN Docket No.
13–111, in which the Commission took
further steps to facilitate the
deployment and viability of
technological solutions used to combat
contraband wireless devices in
correctional facilities. In the Second
Report and Order, the Commission
adopted a framework requiring the
disabling of contraband wireless devices
detected in correctional facilities upon
satisfaction of certain criteria. The
Commission further addressed issues
involving oversight, wireless provider
liability, and treatment of 911 calls.
Finally, the Commission adopted rules
requiring advance notice of certain
wireless provider network changes to
promote and maintain contraband
interdiction system effectiveness.
In establishing rules requiring
wireless providers to disable contraband
wireless devices in correctional
facilities and adopting a framework to
enable designated correctional facility
officials (DCFOs) relying on an
authorized Contraband Interdiction
System (CIS) to submit qualifying
requests to wireless providers to disable
contraband wireless devices in
qualifying correctional facilities, the
Commission found that a rules-based
process will provide a valuable
additional tool for departments of
corrections to address contraband
wireless device use. The framework
includes a two-phase authorization
process: (1) CIS applicants will submit
applications to the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau)
describing the legal and technical
qualifications of the systems; and (2)
CIS applicants will perform on-site
testing of approved CISs at individual
correctional facilities and file a selfcertification with the Commission. After
both phases are complete, DCFOs will
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
be authorized to submit qualifying
requests to wireless providers to disable
contraband devices using approved CISs
at each correctional facility. In addition,
the Commission adopted rules requiring
wireless providers to notify certain
types of CIS operators of major technical
changes to ensure that CIS effectiveness
is maintained. The Commission found
that these rules will provide law
enforcement with the tools necessary to
disable contraband wireless devices,
which, in turn, will help combat the
serious threats posed by the illegal use
of such devices.
The new information collection in 47
CFR 20.23(b)(1) regarding the
application to obtain new CIS
certification will be used by the Bureau
to determine whether to certify a system
and ensure that the systems are
designed to support operational
readiness and minimize the risk of
disabling a non-contraband device, and
ensure, to the greatest extent possible,
that only devices that are in fact
contraband will be identified for
disabling. Bureau certification will also
enable targeted industry review of
solutions by allowing interested
stakeholders to provide feedback on the
application for certification, including
the proposed test plan.
The new collections in 47 CFR
20.23(b)(3) include the requirement that
the CIS operator must file with the
Bureau a self-certification that complies
with paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of section
20.23, confirming that the testing at that
specific correctional facility is complete
and successful, and the CIS operator
must serve notice of the testing on all
relevant wireless providers prior to
testing and provide such wireless
providers a reasonable opportunity to
participate in the tests. Self-certification
will help the Bureau to ensure that
qualifying requests identify contraband
wireless devices accurately and in
accordance with legal requirements. In
addition to being used by the Bureau,
the self-certification will be relied upon
by the DCFO in conjunction with
qualifying requests for disabling at a
particular correctional facility. The
serving of notice to the wireless
providers will give them awareness and
an opportunity to participate in the
process.
The new information collections in 47
CFR 20.23(b)(4) requires that wireless
providers objecting to the certification
filing submit objections to the Bureau
within five business days and serve the
DCFO and the CIS operator, which
allows all stakeholders to participate in
the process and raise objections. Section
20.23(b)(5) requires that CIS operators
retest and recertify their systems at least
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
LOTTER on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 187 / Thursday, September 30, 2021 / Notices
every three years and comply with the
same requirements as for initial selfcertification. This requirement will
enable the Bureau to ensure the ongoing
accuracy and reliability of a given CIS
at a particular facility. Section
20.23(b)(7) requires that a CIS operator
retain records for at least five years and
provide them upon request to the
Bureau, which will support the Bureau’s
efforts to identify issues with CIS
operations, resolve interference issues,
and resolve complaints related to
misidentification of contraband devices.
The new collections in 47 CFR
20.23(c)(1)–(2) include the requirement
that individuals that seek to be
recognized on the Commission’s DCFO
list must sent a letter to the Contraband
Ombudsperson in order for the
Commission to approve that person for
the qualified DCFO list and provide
certainty to wireless providers that
disabling requests are made by duly
authorized individuals. Qualifying
requests that include the required
information will be used by wireless
carriers to prevent use of contraband
devices on their network and on other
wireless provider networks.
The new collections 47 CFR
20.23(c)(3)(iii)–(iv) provide that, upon
receiving a disabling request from a
DCFO, the wireless provider must verify
the request, may reject the request and
must notify the DCFO whether it is
accepting or rejecting the request. This
process ensures that a wireless provider
responds to a DCFO within a reasonable
timeframe—while giving the provider
an opportunity to determine if there is
an error—and to give the DCFO time to
respond quickly if the request has been
rejected. The wireless provider may
contact the customer of record to notify
them of the disabling and involve them
in the process.
The new collections in 47 CFR
20.23(c)(4) provide that a wireless
provider may reverse a disabled device
where it determines that the device was
erroneously identified as contraband,
and the wireless provider must notify
the DCFO of the reversal. The wireless
provider may choose to involve the
DCFO in the review and reversal
process. The DCFO must also provide
notice to the Contraband Ombudsperson
of the number of erroneously disabled
devices. This process ensures the
integrity of the contraband device
disabling process by giving the wireless
provider the opportunity to reverse a
disabled device—with the ability to
extend review to the DCFO—and by
creating safeguards to make sure that the
process is efficient and reliable.
The new collections in 47 CFR
20.23(d) regarding notification from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Sep 29, 2021
Jkt 253001
CMRS licensees to MAS operators of
technical changes to their network are
required so that MAS operators are
given sufficient time to make necessary
adjustments to maintain the
effectiveness of their interdiction
systems. In order to ensure that issues
regarding notification to solutions
providers of more frequent, localized
wireless provider network changes are
appropriately considered, CMRS
licensees and MAS operators must
negotiate in good faith to reach an
agreement for notification for those
types of network adjustments not
covered by the notice requirement.
CMRS licensees must provide notice of
technical changes associated with an
emergency immediately after the
exigency to ensure that MAS operators
continue to be notified of network
changes that could impact MAS
effectiveness.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–21262 Filed 9–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[OMB 3060–XXXX; FR ID 50167]
Information Collection Being
Submitted for Review and Approval to
Office of Management and Budget
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
As part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork burdens, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
the Commission) invites the general
public and other Federal Agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on the
following information collection.
Pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC
seeks specific comment on how it might
‘‘further reduce the information
collection burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees.’’ The Commission may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) control number. No
person shall be subject to any penalty
for failing to comply with a collection
of information subject to the PRA that
does not display a valid OMB control
number.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
54193
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted on or before November 1,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
30-day Review—Open for Public
Comments’’ or by using the search
function. Your comment must be
submitted into www.reginfo.gov per the
above instructions for it to be
considered. In addition to submitting in
www.reginfo.gov also send a copy of
your comment on the proposed
information collection to Nicole Ongele,
FCC, via email to PRA@fcc.gov and to
Nicole.Ongele@fcc.gov. Include in the
comments the OMB control number as
shown in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or copies of the
information collection, contact Nicole
Ongele at (202) 418–2991. To view a
copy of this information collection
request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go
to the web page https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the
section of the web page called
‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on
the downward-pointing arrow in the
‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the
‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4)
select ‘‘Federal Communications
Commission’’ from the list of agencies
presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box,
(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the
right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6)
when the list of FCC ICRs currently
under review appears, look for the Title
of this ICR and then click on the ICR
Reference Number. A copy of the FCC
submission to OMB will be displayed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of
its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork burdens, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the FCC invited
the general public and other Federal
Agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the following information
collection. Comments are requested
concerning: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Commission, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Commission’s burden estimates; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM
30SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 187 (Thursday, September 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54191-54193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21262]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[OMB 3060-XXXX; FR ID 50436]
Information Collection Being Reviewed by the Federal
Communications Commission
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens,
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) invites the
general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the following information collections. Comments are
requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
[[Page 54192]]
information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the
Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection
burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC
may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing
to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does
not display a valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before November
29, 2021. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments but
find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this
notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email to
[email protected] and to [email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-2918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control Number: XXXX-XXXX.
Title: Section 20.23(b)(1), (3)-(5), (7); (c)(1)-(2), (3),
(3)(iii)-(iv), (4)(i)-(ii), (v); and (d), Contraband wireless devices
in correctional facilities.
Form Number: N/A.
Type of Review: New information collection.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities, and state,
local or tribal governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents and Responses: 531 respondents and
16,389 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 1-10 hours.
Frequency of Response: One-time application and self-certification
response, one-time DCFO authorization request response, on occasion
qualifying request response, on occasion reversal response,
recordkeeping requirement, third party notification requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Statutory authority for the currently approved information collection
is contained in sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(j), 301, 302, 303, 307, 308,
309, 310, and 332 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 154(j), 301, 302a, 303, 307, 308, 309, 310,
and 332.
Estimated Total Annual Burden: 142,568 hours.
Total Annual Costs: No costs.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Certain information collected
during the CIS application and certification process will be treated as
confidential from public inspection. To the extent necessary,
respondents may request confidential treatment of information
collected. See 47 CFR 0.459.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s).
Needs and Uses: On July 13, 2021, the Commission released a Second
Report and Order and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
Promoting Technological Solutions to Combat Contraband Wireless Devices
in Correctional Facilities, GN Docket No. 13-111, in which the
Commission took further steps to facilitate the deployment and
viability of technological solutions used to combat contraband wireless
devices in correctional facilities. In the Second Report and Order, the
Commission adopted a framework requiring the disabling of contraband
wireless devices detected in correctional facilities upon satisfaction
of certain criteria. The Commission further addressed issues involving
oversight, wireless provider liability, and treatment of 911 calls.
Finally, the Commission adopted rules requiring advance notice of
certain wireless provider network changes to promote and maintain
contraband interdiction system effectiveness.
In establishing rules requiring wireless providers to disable
contraband wireless devices in correctional facilities and adopting a
framework to enable designated correctional facility officials (DCFOs)
relying on an authorized Contraband Interdiction System (CIS) to submit
qualifying requests to wireless providers to disable contraband
wireless devices in qualifying correctional facilities, the Commission
found that a rules-based process will provide a valuable additional
tool for departments of corrections to address contraband wireless
device use. The framework includes a two-phase authorization process:
(1) CIS applicants will submit applications to the Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) describing the legal and technical
qualifications of the systems; and (2) CIS applicants will perform on-
site testing of approved CISs at individual correctional facilities and
file a self-certification with the Commission. After both phases are
complete, DCFOs will be authorized to submit qualifying requests to
wireless providers to disable contraband devices using approved CISs at
each correctional facility. In addition, the Commission adopted rules
requiring wireless providers to notify certain types of CIS operators
of major technical changes to ensure that CIS effectiveness is
maintained. The Commission found that these rules will provide law
enforcement with the tools necessary to disable contraband wireless
devices, which, in turn, will help combat the serious threats posed by
the illegal use of such devices.
The new information collection in 47 CFR 20.23(b)(1) regarding the
application to obtain new CIS certification will be used by the Bureau
to determine whether to certify a system and ensure that the systems
are designed to support operational readiness and minimize the risk of
disabling a non-contraband device, and ensure, to the greatest extent
possible, that only devices that are in fact contraband will be
identified for disabling. Bureau certification will also enable
targeted industry review of solutions by allowing interested
stakeholders to provide feedback on the application for certification,
including the proposed test plan.
The new collections in 47 CFR 20.23(b)(3) include the requirement
that the CIS operator must file with the Bureau a self-certification
that complies with paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of section 20.23, confirming
that the testing at that specific correctional facility is complete and
successful, and the CIS operator must serve notice of the testing on
all relevant wireless providers prior to testing and provide such
wireless providers a reasonable opportunity to participate in the
tests. Self-certification will help the Bureau to ensure that
qualifying requests identify contraband wireless devices accurately and
in accordance with legal requirements. In addition to being used by the
Bureau, the self-certification will be relied upon by the DCFO in
conjunction with qualifying requests for disabling at a particular
correctional facility. The serving of notice to the wireless providers
will give them awareness and an opportunity to participate in the
process.
The new information collections in 47 CFR 20.23(b)(4) requires that
wireless providers objecting to the certification filing submit
objections to the Bureau within five business days and serve the DCFO
and the CIS operator, which allows all stakeholders to participate in
the process and raise objections. Section 20.23(b)(5) requires that CIS
operators retest and recertify their systems at least
[[Page 54193]]
every three years and comply with the same requirements as for initial
self-certification. This requirement will enable the Bureau to ensure
the ongoing accuracy and reliability of a given CIS at a particular
facility. Section 20.23(b)(7) requires that a CIS operator retain
records for at least five years and provide them upon request to the
Bureau, which will support the Bureau's efforts to identify issues with
CIS operations, resolve interference issues, and resolve complaints
related to misidentification of contraband devices.
The new collections in 47 CFR 20.23(c)(1)-(2) include the
requirement that individuals that seek to be recognized on the
Commission's DCFO list must sent a letter to the Contraband
Ombudsperson in order for the Commission to approve that person for the
qualified DCFO list and provide certainty to wireless providers that
disabling requests are made by duly authorized individuals. Qualifying
requests that include the required information will be used by wireless
carriers to prevent use of contraband devices on their network and on
other wireless provider networks.
The new collections 47 CFR 20.23(c)(3)(iii)-(iv) provide that, upon
receiving a disabling request from a DCFO, the wireless provider must
verify the request, may reject the request and must notify the DCFO
whether it is accepting or rejecting the request. This process ensures
that a wireless provider responds to a DCFO within a reasonable
timeframe--while giving the provider an opportunity to determine if
there is an error--and to give the DCFO time to respond quickly if the
request has been rejected. The wireless provider may contact the
customer of record to notify them of the disabling and involve them in
the process.
The new collections in 47 CFR 20.23(c)(4) provide that a wireless
provider may reverse a disabled device where it determines that the
device was erroneously identified as contraband, and the wireless
provider must notify the DCFO of the reversal. The wireless provider
may choose to involve the DCFO in the review and reversal process. The
DCFO must also provide notice to the Contraband Ombudsperson of the
number of erroneously disabled devices. This process ensures the
integrity of the contraband device disabling process by giving the
wireless provider the opportunity to reverse a disabled device--with
the ability to extend review to the DCFO--and by creating safeguards to
make sure that the process is efficient and reliable.
The new collections in 47 CFR 20.23(d) regarding notification from
CMRS licensees to MAS operators of technical changes to their network
are required so that MAS operators are given sufficient time to make
necessary adjustments to maintain the effectiveness of their
interdiction systems. In order to ensure that issues regarding
notification to solutions providers of more frequent, localized
wireless provider network changes are appropriately considered, CMRS
licensees and MAS operators must negotiate in good faith to reach an
agreement for notification for those types of network adjustments not
covered by the notice requirement. CMRS licensees must provide notice
of technical changes associated with an emergency immediately after the
exigency to ensure that MAS operators continue to be notified of
network changes that could impact MAS effectiveness.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-21262 Filed 9-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P