Request for Information on Transit Worker Safety, 53143-53144 [2021-20744]

Agencies

• Federal Transit Administration
• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 183 (Friday, September 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53143-53144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Transit Administration

[FTA Docket No. FTA 2021-0012]


Request for Information on Transit Worker Safety

AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration, Department of Transportation 
(DOT).

ACTION: Request for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) administers the 
Public Transportation Safety Program (Safety Program) to improve the 
safety performance of the Nation's transit systems. FTA adopted the 
principles and methods of Safety Management Systems (SMS) as the 
foundation of the Safety Program. FTA uses SMS processes and activities 
to proactively identify and address safety risk at the industry level. 
Through this Request for Information (RFI), FTA solicits public input 
regarding safety topics that affect transit workers in two areas: Rail 
transit Roadway Worker Protection (RWP) and transit worker assault 
prevention. FTA will use this information to evaluate potential actions 
to mitigate the identified safety risk for transit workers.

DATES: Comments are requested by November 23, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by docket number FTA-2021-
0012 by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West Building Ground Floor, 
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. ET, 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
    Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments, see 
the Public Participation heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section of this document. Note that all comments received will be 
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any 
personal information provided.
    Privacy Act: Except as provided below, all comments received into 
the docket will be made public in their entirety. The comments will be 
searchable by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or 
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, 
business, labor union, etc.). You should not include information in 
your comment that you do not want to be made public. You may review 
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published 
on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray Biggs, Office of Transit Safety 
and Oversight--Safety Assurance and Risk Management Division, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Mail Stop TSO-10, Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-
4043 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In August 2016, FTA published the Public 
Transportation Safety Program regulation, 49 CFR part 670, adopting the 
principles and methods of SMS and clarifying that FTA will follow these 
principles and methods in its development of rules, regulations, 
policies, guidance, best practices, and technical assistance 
administered under the authority of 49 U.S.C. 5329.
    FTA expanded its safety oversight capabilities by establishing an 
internal SMS approach for identifying transit safety hazards and 
mitigating safety risk. In 2019, FTA implemented its Safety Risk 
Management (SRM) process to proactively address safety concerns 
impacting the transit industry. The SRM process follows a five-step 
approach: (1) Identify safety concerns; (2) assess safety risk; (3) 
develop mitigation; (4) implement mitigation; and (5) monitor safety 
performance. As a result of the first two steps, FTA may develop and 
advance appropriate mitigations to address a safety risk, such as 
proposed safety regulations, general or special directives, safety 
advisories, or technical assistance and training activities.
    FTA is currently analyzing two safety concerns utilizing its SRM 
process related to transit worker safety: RWP and transit worker 
assault prevention. FTA has observed that transit agencies have worked 
to improve transit worker safety in both safety concern areas through 
new technologies, increased training, and the establishment of new 
rules and procedures.

Rail Transit Roadway Worker Protection

    An RWP program is a rail transit agency's (RTA) approach to 
ensuring worker safety during tasks conducted on or about the transit 
roadway, such as track inspections. These programs are designed to 
protect workers from the movement of trains, as well as other hazards 
on the roadway, like electrified third rail. Some programs include 
redundant protections, or protections beyond the workers' ability to 
detect a train.
    FTA categorizes redundant protection into two main groups, physical 
and procedural. Physical redundant protections are technological or 
mechanical interventions that physically stop a train from striking a 
roadway worker, such as a derailer or shunt in the signal system. 
Procedural redundant protections are rules-based interventions that 
rely on worker training and compliance, such as the use of foul time to 
clear the track for workers.
    The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and Transit 
Advisory Committee for Safety (TRACS) recommended that FTA take action 
to address safety concerns associated with RWP. The NTSB included 
``Improving Rail Worker Safety'' in its 2021-2022 Most Wanted List, 
which identified FTA's lack of RWP regulations, as well as concerns 
about a lack of redundant protections and deficiencies in agency RWP 
training programs. TRACS developed eight RWP recommendations in the 
final report submitted in September 2020, which included minimum safety 
rules and requirements, as well as research and best practices for RWP.

Transit Worker Assault Prevention

    TRACS also recommended actions to address transit worker assault. 
FTA continues to explore options for potential FTA actions to address 
this concern. From 2010 to 2020, FTA has noted an average annual 
increase of 17 percent in the rate of all security events reported to 
the National Transit Database (NTD) per passenger boarding. There also 
has been an increase in the rate of assaults on transit operators, 
defined by the NTD as the personnel (other than security agents) 
scheduled to be aboard vehicles in revenue operations, including 
vehicle operators, conductors, and ticket collectors. Based on a review 
of NTD data, FTA also notes that other transit workers such as station 
managers, who do not meet the NTD definition of operators but are 
public-facing, also experience assaults in transit systems.
    For the purposes of this RFI, in discussing transit worker assault, 
FTA will use definitions established in the NTD. The NTD defines 
assault as ``an

[[Page 53144]]

unlawful attack by one person upon another.''

Questions to the Public

    FTA seeks to gather information to support the identification and 
evaluation of transit worker safety concerns. Respondents to this RFI 
may respond to any question and do not need to respond to all 
questions. This RFI offers labor unions, transit industry personnel, 
researchers, contractors, government entities, safety advocates, 
transit users, railway operators, and other interested parties the 
opportunity to inform FTA's potential action on these topics.
    The following list of questions and topic areas are intended to 
guide respondents in this effort:
Rail Transit Roadway Worker Protection
    (1) How often do RTA workers work on or about the roadway while 
passenger trains or other equipment moves are made?
    (2) Which RTAs currently have an RWP program?
    a. How are these programs implemented?
    b. What types of training and certifications are required?
    c. What costs are associated with various programs?
    (3) What types of redundant protections (physical or procedural, as 
categorized by FTA) do RTAs use?
    a. How do RTAs implement the requirements for redundant protections 
or what steps do RTAs take to determine what kinds of redundancies to 
implement?
    i. Should physical redundant protections, such as shunts or 
derailers, be required when train or equipment moves are permitted?
    ii. Should procedural redundant protections, such as foul time, be 
permitted in lieu of physical redundant protections?
    (4) How should RWP effectiveness be reviewed and measured by an RTA 
or other safety stakeholder?
    a. How does an RTA review and measure RWP effectiveness?
    (5) What approaches to RWP have been most effective and least 
effective?
    (6) If FTA pursues RWP program requirements, what minimum 
requirements should be included?
    a. Should the same requirements apply to each rail transit mode, as 
defined by the NTD?
    (7) What other types of FTA actions might be beneficial to support 
roadway worker safety?
    (8) What information do RTAs collect on RWP that is not reportable 
to the NTD?
    a. What internal thresholds do RTAs use for tracking roadway worker 
safety events other than those reportable to the NTD?
    b. On average, how many additional roadway worker safety events 
occur per year that do not meet a current NTD reporting requirement?
    c. What are or would be the costs associated with collecting and 
tracking these additional safety events?
    (9) What technology is available to improve roadway worker safety?
    a. How can FTA better support the development and implementation of 
these technologies?
Transit Worker Assault Prevention
    (10) What types of interactions typically lead to transit worker 
assaults, including operator assaults?
    a. What actions could address and limit these types of 
interactions?
    b. What approaches could prevent transit worker assaults?
    c. What differences, if any, are there in approaches to preventing 
transit worker assaults across different types of transit systems or 
modes?
    (11) If FTA pursues requirements to address transit worker 
assaults, what minimum requirements should be included?
    a. How should the requirements apply to different transit system 
types or modes?
    (12) What other types of FTA actions might be beneficial to support 
transit worker assault prevention?
    (13) What information is collected on transit worker assaults that 
is not reportable to the NTD?
    a. What internal threshold do RTAs use for tracking transit worker 
assaults other than those reportable to the NTD?
    b. On average, how many additional transit worker assaults occur 
per year that do not meet a current NTD reporting requirement?
    i. How many of these additional transit worker assaults are 
operator assaults?
    c. What are or would be the costs associated with tracking these 
additional assaults?
    (14) What technology is available to address transit worker 
assaults, including operator assaults?
    a. How can FTA better support the development and implementation of 
these technologies?
    Please clearly indicate which question(s) you address in your 
response and any evidence to support assertions, where practicable.

Public Participation

How do I prepare and submit comments?

    To ensure that your comments are filed correctly, please include 
the docket number provided in (FTA-2021-0012) in your comments.
    Please submit one copy of your comments, including any attachments, 
to the docket following the instructions given above under ADDRESSES. 
Please note, if you are submitting comments electronically as a PDF 
(Adobe) file, these documents must be scanned using an Optical 
Character Recognition process, thus allowing the Agency to search and 
copy certain portions of submissions.

Will FTA consider late comments?

    FTA will consider all comments received before the close of 
business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To 
the extent practicable, the Agency may also consider comments received 
after that date.

How can comments submitted by other people be read?

    Comments received may be read at the Docket Management Facility, 
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, West 
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. The 
hours of the docket are indicated above in the same location. Comments 
may also be located on the internet, identified by the docket number at 
the heading of this notice, at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Please note, this RFI will serve as a planning document. The RFI 
should not be construed as policy, a solicitation for applications, or 
an obligation on the part of the Government.

Nuria I. Fernandez,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021-20744 Filed 9-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P