Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 52071-52072 [2021-20221]
Download as PDF
52071
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 86, No. 179
Monday, September 20, 2021
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD–2020–OS–0094]
RIN 0790–AL17
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Office of the Secretary of
Defense (OSD), Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense
(DoD or Department) is issuing a final
rule to amend its regulations to exempt
portions of the DoD–0005, Defense
Training Records system of records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act of
1974. Specifically, the rule exempts
portions of the Defense Training
Records system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act because of
national security requirements and to
preserve the objectivity and fairness of
testing and examination material.
DATES: This final rule is effective
October 20, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lyn Kirby, OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil,
(703) 571–0070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
On December 28, 2020 (85 FR 84316–
84319), DoD published a notice of a new
system of records (SORN) establishing
the DoD–0005, Defense Training
Records system of records. This system
covers DoD’s collection, use, and
maintenance of records about training
delivered to DoD Service members,
civilian personnel, and other DoDaffiliated individuals. The training data
includes enrollment and participation
information, information pertaining to
class schedules, programs, and
instructors, training trends and needs,
testing and examination materials, and
assessments of training efficacy. No
comments on the Routine Uses were
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:36 Sep 17, 2021
Jkt 253001
received during the SORN’s 30-day
public comment period.
II. Privacy Act Exemption
The Privacy Act permits Federal
agencies to exempt eligible records in a
system of records from certain
provisions of the Act, including the
provisions providing individuals with a
right to request access to and
amendment of their own records and
accountings of disclosures of such
records. If an agency intends to exempt
a particular system of records, it must
first go through the rulemaking process
to provide public notice and an
opportunity to comment on the
proposed exemption.
Because this system of records may
contain classified information or
information the release of which could
compromise the fairness or objectivity
of the testing or examination process,
DoD proposed to exempt this system of
records from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act by a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) published at 85 FR
84278–84279 concurrently with the
SORN. The NPRM proposed to modify
DoD’s Privacy Act regulations at 32 CFR
part 310 to exempt portions of records
maintained in DoD–0005 from the
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and
(d)(1)–(4) of the Privacy Act, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (k)(6) of the
Privacy Act. The public comment
period ended on February 26, 2021, and
DoD did not receive any comments on
the NPRM. This final rule adds to the
DoD’s Privacy Act exemptions for
Department-wide systems of records
found in 32 CFR 310.13. Records in this
system of records are only exempt from
the Privacy Act to the extent the
purposes underlying the exemption
pertain to the record.
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
It has been previously determined
that Privacy Act rules for the DoD are
not significant rules. The rules do not:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive Orders.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), it has been
determined that Privacy Act rules for
the DoD are not major rules, as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
It has been determined that the
Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not
involve a Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million
or more and that such rules will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
The Director of Administration and
Management certified that Privacy Act
rules for the DoD do not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because they
are concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of
records within the DoD.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the DoD impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on the public under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
It has been determined that the
Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not
have federalism implications. The rules
do not have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
52072
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 179 / Monday, September 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
It has been determined that Privacy
Act rules for the DoD do not have
substantial effects on Indian tribal
governments. The rules do not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
one or more Indian tribes, preempt
tribal law, or effect the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is
amended as follows:
PART 310—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 310 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Section 310.13 is amended by
adding paragraph (e)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 310.13 Exemptions for DoD-wide
systems.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) System identifier and name. DoD–
0005, ‘‘Defense Training Records.’’
(i) Exemptions. This system of records
is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and
(d)(1), (2), (3), and (4).
(ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and
(6).
(iii) Exemption from the particular
subsections. Exemption from the
particular subsections is justified for the
following reasons:
(A) Subsections (c)(3), (d)(1), and
(d)(2)—(1) Exemption (k)(1). Training
records in this system of records may
contain information concerning DoD
personnel or training materials that is
properly classified pursuant to
executive order. Application of
exemption (k)(1) for such records may
be necessary because access to and
amendment of the records, or release of
the accounting of disclosures for such
records, could reveal classified
information. Disclosure of classified
records to an individual may cause
damage to national security.
(2) Exemption (k)(6). Training records
in this system of records may contain
information relating to testing or
examination material used solely to
determine individual qualifications for
appointment or promotion in the
Federal service. Application of
exemption (k)(6) for such records may
be necessary when access to and
amendment of the records, or release of
the accounting of disclosure for such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:36 Sep 17, 2021
Jkt 253001
records, may compromise the objectivity
and fairness of the testing or
examination process. Amendment of
such records could also impose a highly
impracticable administrative burden by
requiring testing and examinations to be
continuously re-administered.
(B) Subsections (d)(3) and (4). These
subsections are inapplicable to the
extent an exemption is claimed from
subsection (d)(2). Moreover, applying
the amendment appeal procedures to
training and examination materials
could impose a highly impractical
administrative burden by requiring
testing and examinations to be
continuously re-administered.
(iv) Exempt records from other
systems. In the course of carrying out
the overall purpose for this system,
exempt records from other systems of
records may in turn become part of the
records maintained in this system. To
the extent that copies of exempt records
from those other systems of records are
maintained in this system, the DoD
claims the same exemptions for the
records from those other systems that
are entered into this system, as claimed
for the prior system(s) of which they are
a part, provided the reason for the
exemption remains valid and necessary.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: September 14, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–20221 Filed 9–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AQ31
Elimination of Copayment for Opioid
Antagonists and Education on Use of
Opioid Antagonists
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its medical
regulations that govern copayments to
conform with recent statutory
requirements. VA is eliminating the
copayment requirement for opioid
antagonists furnished to veterans who
are at high risk of overdose of a specific
medication or substance in order to
reverse the effect of such an overdose.
VA is also clarifying that no copayment
is required for the provision of
education on the use of opioid
antagonists. This final rule is an
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
essential part of VA’s attempts to help
veterans at high risk of overdose.
DATES: This rule is effective October 20,
2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Duran, Director of Policy and
Planning. 3773 Cherry Creek North
Drive, Denver, CO 80209. (303) 370–
1637. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 6, 2020, VA published a
proposed rule in the Federal Register
(85 FR 71020) that would eliminate the
copayment requirement for opioid
antagonists furnished to veterans who
are at high risk of overdose of a specific
medication or substance in order to
reverse the effect of such an overdose
and for the provision of education on
the use of opioid antagonists. VA
provided a 60-day comment period,
which ended on January 5, 2021. VA
received 19 comments on the proposed
rule.
In an effort to reduce the incidence of
overdose among the veteran population,
Congress, in two separate statutes, has
required that VA must exempt from
copayment (1) opioid antagonists
furnished under chapter 17 to a veteran
who is at high risk for overdose of a
specific medication or substance in
order to reverse the effect of such an
overdose, and (2) education on the use
of opioid antagonists to reverse the
effects of overdoses of specific
medications or substances. See Public
Law 114–198, sec. 915 (July 22, 2016)
and Public Law 114–223, Division A,
sec. 243 (Sept. 29, 2016). These
provisions were effective upon
enactment and have already been
implemented. These provisions assist
veterans by eliminating copayments for
life-saving medication and education on
the use of such medication, with the
goal of reducing the incidence of
overdose deaths among the veteran
population. This final rule amends two
of VA’s copayment regulations, 38 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) 17.108 and
17.110, to accurately implement these
changes in law. This final rule also adds
an explanation of how VA would
identify a veteran at high risk for
overdose under the new provisions.
Positive Comments
Most commenters were in support of
the proposed rule. One commenter
stated that the rule would be a crucial
part of VA’s efforts to help veterans at
an extreme risk of overdose. Another
commenter stated that the rule is critical
in creating cross-governmental cohesion
in the fight against the opioid crisis in
our veteran population, and it solidifies
the message of a united front against the
E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM
20SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 179 (Monday, September 20, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52071-52072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20221]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 179 / Monday, September 20, 2021 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 52071]]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD-2020-OS-0094]
RIN 0790-AL17
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Department of
Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DoD or Department) is issuing a
final rule to amend its regulations to exempt portions of the DoD-0005,
Defense Training Records system of records from certain provisions of
the Privacy Act of 1974. Specifically, the rule exempts portions of the
Defense Training Records system of records from certain provisions of
the Privacy Act because of national security requirements and to
preserve the objectivity and fairness of testing and examination
material.
DATES: This final rule is effective October 20, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lyn Kirby, [email protected],
(703) 571-0070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On December 28, 2020 (85 FR 84316-84319), DoD published a notice of
a new system of records (SORN) establishing the DoD-0005, Defense
Training Records system of records. This system covers DoD's
collection, use, and maintenance of records about training delivered to
DoD Service members, civilian personnel, and other DoD-affiliated
individuals. The training data includes enrollment and participation
information, information pertaining to class schedules, programs, and
instructors, training trends and needs, testing and examination
materials, and assessments of training efficacy. No comments on the
Routine Uses were received during the SORN's 30-day public comment
period.
II. Privacy Act Exemption
The Privacy Act permits Federal agencies to exempt eligible records
in a system of records from certain provisions of the Act, including
the provisions providing individuals with a right to request access to
and amendment of their own records and accountings of disclosures of
such records. If an agency intends to exempt a particular system of
records, it must first go through the rulemaking process to provide
public notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed exemption.
Because this system of records may contain classified information
or information the release of which could compromise the fairness or
objectivity of the testing or examination process, DoD proposed to
exempt this system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act by a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published at 85 FR 84278-
84279 concurrently with the SORN. The NPRM proposed to modify DoD's
Privacy Act regulations at 32 CFR part 310 to exempt portions of
records maintained in DoD-0005 from the requirements of 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3) and (d)(1)-(4) of the Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1) and (k)(6) of the Privacy Act. The public comment period
ended on February 26, 2021, and DoD did not receive any comments on the
NPRM. This final rule adds to the DoD's Privacy Act exemptions for
Department-wide systems of records found in 32 CFR 310.13. Records in
this system of records are only exempt from the Privacy Act to the
extent the purposes underlying the exemption pertain to the record.
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
It has been previously determined that Privacy Act rules for the
DoD are not significant rules. The rules do not: (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity;
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in these Executive Orders.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), it
has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD are not major
rules, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the DoD do
not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rules will not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
The Director of Administration and Management certified that
Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not have significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned
only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within
the DoD.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on the public under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the DoD do
not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
[[Page 52072]]
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments''
It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not
have substantial effects on Indian tribal governments. The rules do not
impose substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian
tribes, preempt tribal law, or effect the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is amended as follows:
PART 310--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Section 310.13 is amended by adding paragraph (e)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 310.13 Exemptions for DoD-wide systems.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) System identifier and name. DoD-0005, ``Defense Training
Records.''
(i) Exemptions. This system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3) and (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4).
(ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (6).
(iii) Exemption from the particular subsections. Exemption from the
particular subsections is justified for the following reasons:
(A) Subsections (c)(3), (d)(1), and (d)(2)--(1) Exemption (k)(1).
Training records in this system of records may contain information
concerning DoD personnel or training materials that is properly
classified pursuant to executive order. Application of exemption (k)(1)
for such records may be necessary because access to and amendment of
the records, or release of the accounting of disclosures for such
records, could reveal classified information. Disclosure of classified
records to an individual may cause damage to national security.
(2) Exemption (k)(6). Training records in this system of records
may contain information relating to testing or examination material
used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or
promotion in the Federal service. Application of exemption (k)(6) for
such records may be necessary when access to and amendment of the
records, or release of the accounting of disclosure for such records,
may compromise the objectivity and fairness of the testing or
examination process. Amendment of such records could also impose a
highly impracticable administrative burden by requiring testing and
examinations to be continuously re-administered.
(B) Subsections (d)(3) and (4). These subsections are inapplicable
to the extent an exemption is claimed from subsection (d)(2). Moreover,
applying the amendment appeal procedures to training and examination
materials could impose a highly impractical administrative burden by
requiring testing and examinations to be continuously re-administered.
(iv) Exempt records from other systems. In the course of carrying
out the overall purpose for this system, exempt records from other
systems of records may in turn become part of the records maintained in
this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those
other systems of records are maintained in this system, the DoD claims
the same exemptions for the records from those other systems that are
entered into this system, as claimed for the prior system(s) of which
they are a part, provided the reason for the exemption remains valid
and necessary.
* * * * *
Dated: September 14, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-20221 Filed 9-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P