Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 52071-52072 [2021-20221]

Download as PDF 52071 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 86, No. 179 Monday, September 20, 2021 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary 32 CFR Part 310 [Docket ID: DoD–2020–OS–0094] RIN 0790–AL17 Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Department of Defense. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Department of Defense (DoD or Department) is issuing a final rule to amend its regulations to exempt portions of the DoD–0005, Defense Training Records system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. Specifically, the rule exempts portions of the Defense Training Records system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act because of national security requirements and to preserve the objectivity and fairness of testing and examination material. DATES: This final rule is effective October 20, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lyn Kirby, OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil, (703) 571–0070. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Background On December 28, 2020 (85 FR 84316– 84319), DoD published a notice of a new system of records (SORN) establishing the DoD–0005, Defense Training Records system of records. This system covers DoD’s collection, use, and maintenance of records about training delivered to DoD Service members, civilian personnel, and other DoDaffiliated individuals. The training data includes enrollment and participation information, information pertaining to class schedules, programs, and instructors, training trends and needs, testing and examination materials, and assessments of training efficacy. No comments on the Routine Uses were VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:36 Sep 17, 2021 Jkt 253001 received during the SORN’s 30-day public comment period. II. Privacy Act Exemption The Privacy Act permits Federal agencies to exempt eligible records in a system of records from certain provisions of the Act, including the provisions providing individuals with a right to request access to and amendment of their own records and accountings of disclosures of such records. If an agency intends to exempt a particular system of records, it must first go through the rulemaking process to provide public notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed exemption. Because this system of records may contain classified information or information the release of which could compromise the fairness or objectivity of the testing or examination process, DoD proposed to exempt this system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act by a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published at 85 FR 84278–84279 concurrently with the SORN. The NPRM proposed to modify DoD’s Privacy Act regulations at 32 CFR part 310 to exempt portions of records maintained in DoD–0005 from the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (d)(1)–(4) of the Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (k)(6) of the Privacy Act. The public comment period ended on February 26, 2021, and DoD did not receive any comments on the NPRM. This final rule adds to the DoD’s Privacy Act exemptions for Department-wide systems of records found in 32 CFR 310.13. Records in this system of records are only exempt from the Privacy Act to the extent the purposes underlying the exemption pertain to the record. Regulatory Analysis Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ and Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ It has been previously determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD are not significant rules. The rules do not: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal governments or PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in these Executive Orders. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), it has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD are not major rules, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Section 202, Public Law 104–4, ‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’ It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rules will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6) The Director of Administration and Management certified that Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the DoD. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD impose no additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on the public under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’ It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1 52072 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 179 / Monday, September 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments’’ It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not have substantial effects on Indian tribal governments. The rules do not impose substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian tribes, preempt tribal law, or effect the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310 Privacy. Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is amended as follows: PART 310—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a. 2. Section 310.13 is amended by adding paragraph (e)(4) to read as follows: ■ § 310.13 Exemptions for DoD-wide systems. * * * * * (e) * * * (4) System identifier and name. DoD– 0005, ‘‘Defense Training Records.’’ (i) Exemptions. This system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) and (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4). (ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (6). (iii) Exemption from the particular subsections. Exemption from the particular subsections is justified for the following reasons: (A) Subsections (c)(3), (d)(1), and (d)(2)—(1) Exemption (k)(1). Training records in this system of records may contain information concerning DoD personnel or training materials that is properly classified pursuant to executive order. Application of exemption (k)(1) for such records may be necessary because access to and amendment of the records, or release of the accounting of disclosures for such records, could reveal classified information. Disclosure of classified records to an individual may cause damage to national security. (2) Exemption (k)(6). Training records in this system of records may contain information relating to testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service. Application of exemption (k)(6) for such records may be necessary when access to and amendment of the records, or release of the accounting of disclosure for such VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:36 Sep 17, 2021 Jkt 253001 records, may compromise the objectivity and fairness of the testing or examination process. Amendment of such records could also impose a highly impracticable administrative burden by requiring testing and examinations to be continuously re-administered. (B) Subsections (d)(3) and (4). These subsections are inapplicable to the extent an exemption is claimed from subsection (d)(2). Moreover, applying the amendment appeal procedures to training and examination materials could impose a highly impractical administrative burden by requiring testing and examinations to be continuously re-administered. (iv) Exempt records from other systems. In the course of carrying out the overall purpose for this system, exempt records from other systems of records may in turn become part of the records maintained in this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those other systems of records are maintained in this system, the DoD claims the same exemptions for the records from those other systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the prior system(s) of which they are a part, provided the reason for the exemption remains valid and necessary. * * * * * Dated: September 14, 2021. Aaron T. Siegel, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2021–20221 Filed 9–17–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 38 CFR Part 17 RIN 2900–AQ31 Elimination of Copayment for Opioid Antagonists and Education on Use of Opioid Antagonists Department of Veterans Affairs. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its medical regulations that govern copayments to conform with recent statutory requirements. VA is eliminating the copayment requirement for opioid antagonists furnished to veterans who are at high risk of overdose of a specific medication or substance in order to reverse the effect of such an overdose. VA is also clarifying that no copayment is required for the provision of education on the use of opioid antagonists. This final rule is an SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 essential part of VA’s attempts to help veterans at high risk of overdose. DATES: This rule is effective October 20, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Duran, Director of Policy and Planning. 3773 Cherry Creek North Drive, Denver, CO 80209. (303) 370– 1637. (This is not a toll-free number.) SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 6, 2020, VA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (85 FR 71020) that would eliminate the copayment requirement for opioid antagonists furnished to veterans who are at high risk of overdose of a specific medication or substance in order to reverse the effect of such an overdose and for the provision of education on the use of opioid antagonists. VA provided a 60-day comment period, which ended on January 5, 2021. VA received 19 comments on the proposed rule. In an effort to reduce the incidence of overdose among the veteran population, Congress, in two separate statutes, has required that VA must exempt from copayment (1) opioid antagonists furnished under chapter 17 to a veteran who is at high risk for overdose of a specific medication or substance in order to reverse the effect of such an overdose, and (2) education on the use of opioid antagonists to reverse the effects of overdoses of specific medications or substances. See Public Law 114–198, sec. 915 (July 22, 2016) and Public Law 114–223, Division A, sec. 243 (Sept. 29, 2016). These provisions were effective upon enactment and have already been implemented. These provisions assist veterans by eliminating copayments for life-saving medication and education on the use of such medication, with the goal of reducing the incidence of overdose deaths among the veteran population. This final rule amends two of VA’s copayment regulations, 38 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 17.108 and 17.110, to accurately implement these changes in law. This final rule also adds an explanation of how VA would identify a veteran at high risk for overdose under the new provisions. Positive Comments Most commenters were in support of the proposed rule. One commenter stated that the rule would be a crucial part of VA’s efforts to help veterans at an extreme risk of overdose. Another commenter stated that the rule is critical in creating cross-governmental cohesion in the fight against the opioid crisis in our veteran population, and it solidifies the message of a united front against the E:\FR\FM\20SER1.SGM 20SER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 179 (Monday, September 20, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52071-52072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20221]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 179 / Monday, September 20, 2021 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 52071]]



DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 310

[Docket ID: DoD-2020-OS-0094]
RIN 0790-AL17


Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), Department of 
Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (DoD or Department) is issuing a 
final rule to amend its regulations to exempt portions of the DoD-0005, 
Defense Training Records system of records from certain provisions of 
the Privacy Act of 1974. Specifically, the rule exempts portions of the 
Defense Training Records system of records from certain provisions of 
the Privacy Act because of national security requirements and to 
preserve the objectivity and fairness of testing and examination 
material.

DATES: This final rule is effective October 20, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lyn Kirby, [email protected], 
(703) 571-0070.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On December 28, 2020 (85 FR 84316-84319), DoD published a notice of 
a new system of records (SORN) establishing the DoD-0005, Defense 
Training Records system of records. This system covers DoD's 
collection, use, and maintenance of records about training delivered to 
DoD Service members, civilian personnel, and other DoD-affiliated 
individuals. The training data includes enrollment and participation 
information, information pertaining to class schedules, programs, and 
instructors, training trends and needs, testing and examination 
materials, and assessments of training efficacy. No comments on the 
Routine Uses were received during the SORN's 30-day public comment 
period.

II. Privacy Act Exemption

    The Privacy Act permits Federal agencies to exempt eligible records 
in a system of records from certain provisions of the Act, including 
the provisions providing individuals with a right to request access to 
and amendment of their own records and accountings of disclosures of 
such records. If an agency intends to exempt a particular system of 
records, it must first go through the rulemaking process to provide 
public notice and an opportunity to comment on the proposed exemption.
    Because this system of records may contain classified information 
or information the release of which could compromise the fairness or 
objectivity of the testing or examination process, DoD proposed to 
exempt this system of records from certain provisions of the Privacy 
Act by a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published at 85 FR 84278-
84279 concurrently with the SORN. The NPRM proposed to modify DoD's 
Privacy Act regulations at 32 CFR part 310 to exempt portions of 
records maintained in DoD-0005 from the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 
552a(c)(3) and (d)(1)-(4) of the Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
552a(k)(1) and (k)(6) of the Privacy Act. The public comment period 
ended on February 26, 2021, and DoD did not receive any comments on the 
NPRM. This final rule adds to the DoD's Privacy Act exemptions for 
Department-wide systems of records found in 32 CFR 310.13. Records in 
this system of records are only exempt from the Privacy Act to the 
extent the purposes underlying the exemption pertain to the record.

Regulatory Analysis

Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive 
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''

    It has been previously determined that Privacy Act rules for the 
DoD are not significant rules. The rules do not: (1) Have an annual 
effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a 
material way the economy; a sector of the economy; productivity; 
competition; jobs; the environment; public health or safety; or State, 
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious 
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by 
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of 
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and 
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy 
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or 
the principles set forth in these Executive Orders.

Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), it 
has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD are not major 
rules, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''

    It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the DoD do 
not involve a Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by 
State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the 
private sector, of $100 million or more and that such rules will not 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments.

Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)

    The Director of Administration and Management certified that 
Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not have significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities because they are concerned 
only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within 
the DoD.

Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD impose no 
additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements on the public under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''

    It has been determined that the Privacy Act rules for the DoD do 
not have federalism implications. The rules do not have substantial 
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National 
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.

[[Page 52072]]

Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments''

    It has been determined that Privacy Act rules for the DoD do not 
have substantial effects on Indian tribal governments. The rules do not 
impose substantial direct compliance costs on one or more Indian 
tribes, preempt tribal law, or effect the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310

    Privacy.

    Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is amended as follows:

PART 310--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.


0
2. Section 310.13 is amended by adding paragraph (e)(4) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  310.13   Exemptions for DoD-wide systems.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (4) System identifier and name. DoD-0005, ``Defense Training 
Records.''
    (i) Exemptions. This system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 
552a(c)(3) and (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4).
    (ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (6).
    (iii) Exemption from the particular subsections. Exemption from the 
particular subsections is justified for the following reasons:
    (A) Subsections (c)(3), (d)(1), and (d)(2)--(1) Exemption (k)(1). 
Training records in this system of records may contain information 
concerning DoD personnel or training materials that is properly 
classified pursuant to executive order. Application of exemption (k)(1) 
for such records may be necessary because access to and amendment of 
the records, or release of the accounting of disclosures for such 
records, could reveal classified information. Disclosure of classified 
records to an individual may cause damage to national security.
    (2) Exemption (k)(6). Training records in this system of records 
may contain information relating to testing or examination material 
used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or 
promotion in the Federal service. Application of exemption (k)(6) for 
such records may be necessary when access to and amendment of the 
records, or release of the accounting of disclosure for such records, 
may compromise the objectivity and fairness of the testing or 
examination process. Amendment of such records could also impose a 
highly impracticable administrative burden by requiring testing and 
examinations to be continuously re-administered.
    (B) Subsections (d)(3) and (4). These subsections are inapplicable 
to the extent an exemption is claimed from subsection (d)(2). Moreover, 
applying the amendment appeal procedures to training and examination 
materials could impose a highly impractical administrative burden by 
requiring testing and examinations to be continuously re-administered.
    (iv) Exempt records from other systems. In the course of carrying 
out the overall purpose for this system, exempt records from other 
systems of records may in turn become part of the records maintained in 
this system. To the extent that copies of exempt records from those 
other systems of records are maintained in this system, the DoD claims 
the same exemptions for the records from those other systems that are 
entered into this system, as claimed for the prior system(s) of which 
they are a part, provided the reason for the exemption remains valid 
and necessary.
* * * * *

    Dated: September 14, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-20221 Filed 9-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.