Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners: Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of Columbia Codes, 51611-51612 [2021-19917]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–19826 Filed 9–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
28 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. USPC–2021–03]
RIN 1104–AA08
Paroling, Recommitting, and
Supervising Federal Prisoners:
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under
the United States and District of
Columbia Codes
United States Parole
Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The United States Parole
Commission is revising its regulation to
reopen and advance a parole date to
explicitly reference medical and
compassionate reasons as bases for
reopening.
SUMMARY:
This regulation is effective
September 16, 2021. Comments due on
or before October 18, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification
number USPC–2021–03 by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Mail: Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Parole Commission, attention:
USPC Rules Group, 90 K Street NE,
Washington, DC 20530.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Helen H. Krapels, General Counsel, U.S.
Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE,
Third Floor, Washington, DC 20530,
telephone (202) 346–7030. Questions
about this publication are welcome, but
inquiries concerning individual cases
cannot be answered over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Parole
Commission’s regulation at 28 CFR 2.15
provides that after the prisoner has
served the minimum term, the Bureau of
Prisons (‘‘BOP’’) may petition the
Commission to reopen the case under 28
CFR 2.28(a) to consider the case for
parole prior to the date set by the
Commission at the initial or review
hearing. The regulation requires that the
BOP’s request show cause for earlier
release and provides examples such as
‘‘an emergency, hardship, or the
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Sep 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
existence of other extraordinary
circumstances that would warrant
consideration of early parole.’’ These
examples encompass a very broad set of
circumstances that the Commission
could consider, which would include
illness and aging.
The Commission is not limited to
only considering requests from the BOP,
the regulation at 28 CFR 2.28(a), which
is used for reopening a case for
favorable information, can be used to
consider a request from other sources,
such as the prisoner or a family
member. Revising the heading of the
regulation will help to highlight its use
to consider prisoners for compassionate
release in addition to the ‘‘favorable
information’’ that the Commission
usually considers, such as program
achievement in the institution. Revising
the text of the regulation to include
medical and other ‘‘extraordinary and
compelling’’ information will broaden
the circumstances that the Commission
can consider for possible advancement
of the release date.
Section 2.28(a) permits advancement
of a presumptive parole date to an
earlier presumptive parole date,
advancement of a presumptive parole
date to an earlier effective parole date,
advancement of a continue to expiration
decision to a presumptive or effective
parole date, and advancement of a 15year reconsideration hearing to a
presumptive or effective parole date
without conducting a hearing. The
Commissioner reopening the decision
does have the option of ordering a
reconsideration hearing to consider this
new information.
The Commission is promulgating this
rule as an interim rule and is providing
a 30-day period for public comment.
The revised rule will take effect upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulation Planning and
Review,’’ section 1(b), Principles of
Regulation, and in accordance with
Executive Order 13565, ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’
section 1(b), General Principles of
Regulation. The Commission has
determined that this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f),
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
accordingly this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
51611
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive
Order 13132, this rule does not have
sufficient federalism implications
requiring a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact upon a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not cause State, local,
or tribal governments, or the private
sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in
any one year, and they will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. No action under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle E—
Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by Section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E—
Congressional Review Act, now codified
at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on the ability
of United States-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies.
Moreover, this is a rule of agency
practice or procedure that does not
substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties, and
does not come within the meaning of
the term ‘‘rule’’ as used in Section
804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does not
apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and
procedure, Prisoners, Probation and
parole.
The Interim Rule
Accordingly, the U. S. Parole
Commission amends 28 CFR part 2 as
follows:
PART 2—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR
part 2 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1) and
4204(a)(6).
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
51612
■
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
2. Revise § 2.28(a) to read as follows:
§ 2.28
Reopening of cases.
(a) Favorable information or
information supporting medical parole
or compassionate release. Upon the
receipt of new information of
substantial significance favorable to the
prisoner, including medical
information, or other extraordinary and
compelling information, a
Commissioner may reopen a case
(including an original jurisdiction case),
and order a special reconsideration
hearing on the next available docket, or
modify the previous decision. The
advancement of a presumptive release
date or a decision to continue to a 15year reconsideration hearing requires
the concurrence of two Commissioners.
*
*
*
*
*
Patricia K. Cushwa,
Chairman (Acting), U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–19917 Filed 9–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2020–0117]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Hampton Roads BridgeTunnel Expansion Project, Hampton/
Norfolk, VA
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing safety zones for certain
waters of the Hampton Flats,
Willoughby Bay, a defined area between
Phoebus Channel and the North Trestle
Bridge, and 3 zones around the North
Trestle Bridge including the North
Island, the South Trestle Bridge
including the South Island, and the
north and south side of the Willoughby
Bay Bridge. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters in support of the
Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel
Expansion Project that will take place
from 2021 through 2025. This rule
prohibits persons and vessels from
being in the safety zones unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Virginia or a designated
representative or under conditions
specified in this rule.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice September 16, 2021,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Sep 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
though December 25, 2025. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from September 10, 2021,
until September 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2020–
0117 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LCDR Ashley Holm, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector
Virginia, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
757–668–5580, email Ashley.E.Holm@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
HRBT Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel
HRCP Hampton Roads Connector Partners
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NSRA Navigation Safety Risk Assessment
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
USCG United States Coast Guard
USACE United States Army Corps of
Engineers
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
In April 2019, the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT)
awarded the design and construction of
the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel
(HRBT) Expansion Project to the
Hampton Roads Connector Partners
(HRCP), as the Design-Build contactor.
The HRBT Expansion Project is a major
road transport infrastructure project that
will create an 8-lane facility with 6
consistent use lanes along 9.9 miles of
Interstate 64 (I–64), from Settler’s
Landing Interchange in Hampton,
Virginia, to the Interstate 564 (I–564)
interchange in Norfolk, Virginia. To
better understand the waterways impact
from the project, the USCG and U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
recommended the submission of a
formal Navigation Safety Risk
Assessment (NSRA) and Tunnel
Construction Plan (TCP) prior to any
permit or approval action by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers.1 The NSRA
identified three key objectives for
consideration. The first included
1 See Memorandum of Agreement between the
United States Army Corps of Engineers and the
United States Coast Guard, dated June 2, 2000
(available at: https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/
getfile/collection/p16021coll11/id/2518).
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
potential impacts to current and
forecasted vessel traffic directly related
to the bridge and tunnel construction
including all on-water operations and
staging areas. The second aimed to
identify the best/least disruptive times
to schedule movement of constructionrelated vessels. Finally, it identified the
measures necessary for implementation
in order to minimize potential hazards
to navigation. On-water construction
activities are expected to last
approximately 5 years (2021–2025). In
support of construction efforts, multiple
surface craft will be necessary on-site,
transiting to and from, as well as prestaged, to ensure continued operations
are maintained. The increase in
waterborne traffic in the vicinity of
construction areas and staging areas will
introduce hazards to waterways users
prior to and throughout the duration of
the construction project. Specific
hazards during the construction project
include the proximity of dozens of
construction-related vessels in the
bridge area and fleeting areas, including
material barges and construction
equipment barges. In addition,
construction of navigable spans by this
equipment, as well as construction
lighting and loud construction activity
noises will make normal passage
through the bridge areas unsafe except
in areas specifically established as safe
transit corridors by the project
contractors, HRCP. The Sector Virginia
Captain of the Port (COTP) has
determined that these potential hazards
associated with the HRBT Expansion
Project will be a safety concern for
anyone transiting in the vicinity of onwater construction activities related to
the project. To discuss these safety
concerns, representatives of the HRCP
along with the COTP’s staff conducted
a series of outreach meetings. These
meetings covered the HRBT Expansion
Project and the notional safety zones
that would mitigate the hazards
discussed above. Due to the COVID–19
pandemic, those outreach meetings
were conducted virtually on May 5th,
6th, and 7th, 2020. They were
announced beforehand by a marine
safety information bulletin 2 issued by
the COTP, which is distributed to over
1,000 subscribed maritime stakeholders
by email, along with direct email
notification to community organizations
in the coastal areas of the cities of
Norfolk and Hampton, Virginia, which
are the two cities in the immediate area
of the construction activity. Twenty-six
2 See USCG Sector Virginia Marine Safety
Information Bulletin #20–113 (available at https://
content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCG/
bulletins/289cb80).
E:\FR\FM\16SER1.SGM
16SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 177 (Thursday, September 16, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51611-51612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19917]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parole Commission
28 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. USPC-2021-03]
RIN 1104-AA08
Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners:
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of
Columbia Codes
AGENCY: United States Parole Commission, Justice.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Parole Commission is revising its regulation
to reopen and advance a parole date to explicitly reference medical and
compassionate reasons as bases for reopening.
DATES: This regulation is effective September 16, 2021. Comments due on
or before October 18, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
number USPC-2021-03 by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
2. Mail: Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission,
attention: USPC Rules Group, 90 K Street NE, Washington, DC 20530.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen H. Krapels, General Counsel,
U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, Third Floor, Washington, DC
20530, telephone (202) 346-7030. Questions about this publication are
welcome, but inquiries concerning individual cases cannot be answered
over the telephone.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Parole Commission's regulation at 28 CFR
2.15 provides that after the prisoner has served the minimum term, the
Bureau of Prisons (``BOP'') may petition the Commission to reopen the
case under 28 CFR 2.28(a) to consider the case for parole prior to the
date set by the Commission at the initial or review hearing. The
regulation requires that the BOP's request show cause for earlier
release and provides examples such as ``an emergency, hardship, or the
existence of other extraordinary circumstances that would warrant
consideration of early parole.'' These examples encompass a very broad
set of circumstances that the Commission could consider, which would
include illness and aging.
The Commission is not limited to only considering requests from the
BOP, the regulation at 28 CFR 2.28(a), which is used for reopening a
case for favorable information, can be used to consider a request from
other sources, such as the prisoner or a family member. Revising the
heading of the regulation will help to highlight its use to consider
prisoners for compassionate release in addition to the ``favorable
information'' that the Commission usually considers, such as program
achievement in the institution. Revising the text of the regulation to
include medical and other ``extraordinary and compelling'' information
will broaden the circumstances that the Commission can consider for
possible advancement of the release date.
Section 2.28(a) permits advancement of a presumptive parole date to
an earlier presumptive parole date, advancement of a presumptive parole
date to an earlier effective parole date, advancement of a continue to
expiration decision to a presumptive or effective parole date, and
advancement of a 15-year reconsideration hearing to a presumptive or
effective parole date without conducting a hearing. The Commissioner
reopening the decision does have the option of ordering a
reconsideration hearing to consider this new information.
The Commission is promulgating this rule as an interim rule and is
providing a 30-day period for public comment. The revised rule will
take effect upon publication in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulation Planning and Review,'' section
1(b), Principles of Regulation, and in accordance with Executive Order
13565, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1(b),
General Principles of Regulation. The Commission has determined that
this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and
accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Executive Order 13132
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications requiring a Federalism
Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not cause State, local, or tribal governments, or
the private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and
they will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. No
action under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle
E--Congressional Review Act)
This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by Section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E--
Congressional Review Act, now codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with
foreign-based companies. Moreover, this is a rule of agency practice or
procedure that does not substantially affect the rights or obligations
of non-agency parties, and does not come within the meaning of the term
``rule'' as used in Section 804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does
not apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and procedure, Prisoners, Probation and
parole.
The Interim Rule
Accordingly, the U. S. Parole Commission amends 28 CFR part 2 as
follows:
PART 2--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 2 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1) and 4204(a)(6).
[[Page 51612]]
0
2. Revise Sec. 2.28(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 2.28 Reopening of cases.
(a) Favorable information or information supporting medical parole
or compassionate release. Upon the receipt of new information of
substantial significance favorable to the prisoner, including medical
information, or other extraordinary and compelling information, a
Commissioner may reopen a case (including an original jurisdiction
case), and order a special reconsideration hearing on the next
available docket, or modify the previous decision. The advancement of a
presumptive release date or a decision to continue to a 15-year
reconsideration hearing requires the concurrence of two Commissioners.
* * * * *
Patricia K. Cushwa,
Chairman (Acting), U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-19917 Filed 9-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P