Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption for the Insider Threat Program, 51645-51648 [2021-18711]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Proposed Rules
The proposed rule is being withdrawn
due to the regulated area no longer
being necessary following a cancellation
of the power boat racing event by the
event sponsor.
Street NW, Room 7112, Washington, DC
20240.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number [DOI–2018–0012] or RIN
1090–AB15 for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
Authority
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0540]
boat racing event. This rulemaking
would have prohibited persons and
vessels from entering the regulated area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region
or the Coast Guard Event Patrol
Commander.
RIN 1625–AA08
Withdrawal
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
Special Local Regulations; Choptank
River, Cambridge, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
withdrawal.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
withdrawing its proposed rule to
establish temporary special local
regulations for certain waters of the
Choptank River. The rulemaking was
initiated to establish a special local
regulation during the ‘‘Cambridge
Classic Power Boat Regatta,’’ a marine
event to be held on certain waters of the
Choptank River at Cambridge, MD. The
proposed rule is being withdrawn
because it is no longer necessary, as the
event sponsor has cancelled the power
boat racing event.
DATES: The Coast Guard is withdrawing
the proposed rule for the event
scheduled from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on
October 9, 2021, and those same hours
on October 10, 2021 published on
August 3, 2021 (86 FR 41798) as of
September 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view the docket for this
withdrawn rulemaking, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0540 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice,
call or email Mr. Ron Houck, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Maryland-National Capital
Region; telephone 410–576– 2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background Information and
Regulatory History
On August 3, 2021, we published an
NPRM entitled ‘‘Special Local
Regulations; Choptank River,
Cambridge, MD’’ in the Federal Register
(86 FR 41798). The proposed
rulemaking concerned the Coast Guard’s
establishment of a temporary special
local regulation for certain navigable
waters of the Choptank River, effective
from 9 a.m. on October 9, 2021 through
6 p.m. on October 10, 2021. This action
was necessary to provide for the safety
of life on these waters during a power
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
51645
We issue this notice of withdrawal
under the authority of 46 U.S.C. 70041.
Dated: September 13, 2021.
David E. O’Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2021–20007 Filed 9–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 2
[DOI–2018–0012: 201D0102DM,
DS65100000, DLSN00000.000000, DX65103]
RIN 1090–AB15
Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption
for the Insider Threat Program
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the
Interior is proposing to amend its
regulations to exempt certain records in
the INTERIOR/DOI–50, Insider Threat
Program, system of records from one or
more provisions of the Privacy Act of
1974 because of criminal, civil, and
administrative law enforcement
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments on or before
November 15, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number [DOI–
2018–0012] or [Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 1090–AB15], by any of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for sending comments.
• Email: DOI_Privacy@ios.doi.gov.
Include docket number [DOI–2018–
0012] or RIN 1090–AB15 in the subject
line of the message.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Teri
Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer,
U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Teri
Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer,
U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C
Street NW, Room 7112, Washington, DC
20240, DOI_Privacy@ios.doi.gov or (202)
208–1605.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Privacy Act of 1974, as amended,
5 U.S.C. 552a, governs the means by
which the U.S. Government collects,
maintains, uses and disseminates
personally identifiable information. The
Privacy Act applies to records about
individuals that are maintained in a
‘‘system of records.’’ A system of
records is a group of any records under
the control of an agency from which
information about an individual is
retrieved by the name of the individual
or by some identifying number, symbol,
or other identifying particular assigned
to the individual. See 5 U.S.C.
552a(a)(4) and (5).
An individual may request access to
records containing information about
him or herself, 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), (c) and
(d). However, the Privacy Act authorizes
Federal agencies to exempt systems of
records from access by individuals
under certain circumstances, such as
where the access or disclosure of such
information would impede national
security or law enforcement efforts.
Exemptions from Privacy Act provisions
must be established by regulation, 5
U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k).
The Department of the Interior (DOI)
Office of Law Enforcement and Security
published the INTERIOR/DOI–50,
Insider Threat Program, system of
records notice in the Federal Register at
79 FR 52033 on September 2, 2014, in
accordance with Presidential Executive
Order 13587, issued October 7, 2011,
which required Federal agencies to
establish an insider threat detection and
prevention program to ensure the
security of classified networks and the
responsible sharing and safeguarding of
classified information consistent with
appropriate protections for privacy and
civil liberties. This system of records
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
51646
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Proposed Rules
facilitates management of
counterintelligence and insider threat
investigations and activities associated
with counterintelligence complaints,
inquiries and investigations;
identification of potential threats to DOI
resources and information assets; and
referrals of potential insider threats to
internal and external partners. Insider
threats include attempted or actual
espionage, subversion, sabotage,
terrorism or extremist activities directed
against the DOI and its personnel,
facilities, resources, and activities;
unauthorized use of or intrusion into
automated information systems;
unauthorized disclosure of classified,
controlled unclassified, sensitive, or
proprietary-information or technology;
indicators of potential insider threats or
other incidents that may indicate
activities of an insider threat.
The system contains classified and
unclassified intelligence and
investigatory records related to
counterintelligence and insider threat
activities that are exempt from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.
552a(j) and (k). The DOI previously
published a final rule in the Federal
Register at 79 FR 68799 (November 19,
2014) to amend DOI Privacy Act
regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to exempt
certain records in this system from
subsections (c)(3), (c)(4), (d), (e)(1)
through (e)(3), (e)(4)(G) through (e)(4)(I),
(e)(5), (e)(8), (e)(12), (f), and (g) of the
Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2) and (k)(2). In this notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), DOI is
proposing to claim additional
exemptions from certain provisions of
the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1) and (k)(5).
DOI previously published an NPRM
in the Federal Register at 85 FR 7515
(February 10, 2020) to claim exemptions
for the INTERIOR/DOI–46, Physical
Security Access Files, system of records
that proposed a revision of the DOI
Privacy Act regulations at 43 CFR 2.254
to redesignate the existing paragraphs
and add new paragraphs for additional
exemptions under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k). A
new paragraph (b) was reserved for
exemptions claimed under 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1) as indicated in this NPRM for
the INTERIOR/DOI–50, Insider Threat
Program. The previous paragraph (c) for
investigatory records exempt under 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(5) was redesignated to
paragraph (e) to allow for a new
paragraph (d) for exemptions claimed
under 5 U.S.C. 552(k)(3) related to
records maintained in connection with
providing protective services. The new
and redesignated paragraphs proposed
for section 2.254 will be effective upon
publication of the INTERIOR/DOI–46
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
final rule in the Federal Register and
will align with the exemptions proposed
in this NPRM for the INTERIOR/DOI–
50, Insider Threat Program.
Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), the head of
a Federal agency may promulgate rules
to exempt a system of records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, if the system of
records is subject to the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552(b)(1) where the records are
(A) specifically authorized under
criteria established by an Executive
Order to be kept secret in the interest of
national defense or foreign policy, and
(B) are in fact properly classified
pursuant to such Executive Order. Some
records in this system are deemed
classified and subject to Executive
Orders for the maintenance of records
that must be kept secret in the interest
of national security, such as Executive
Order 12333, United States Intelligence
Activities (as amended); Executive
Order 12829, National Industrial
Security Program; Executive Order
12968, Access to Classified Information;
Executive Order 13526, Classified
National Security Information; and
Executive Order 13587, Structural
Reforms to Improve the Security of
Classified Networks and the
Responsible Sharing and Safeguarding
of Classified Information. Additionally,
records in this system may be related to
investigatory material compiled solely
for the purpose of determining
suitability, eligibility, or qualifications
for Federal civilian employment,
military service, Federal contracts, or
access to classified information that are
exempt from one or more provisions of
the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(5).
Because this system of records
contains classified and investigative
material within the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (k)(5), the DOI
proposes to exempt the system of
records from one or more of the
following provisions: 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) through
(e)(4)(I), and (f). Where a release would
not interfere with or adversely affect
investigations or law enforcement
activities, including but not limited to
revealing sensitive information or
compromising confidential sources, the
exemption may be waived on a case-bycase basis. Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified for
the following reasons:
1. 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). This section
requires an agency to make the
accounting of each disclosure of records
available to the individual named in the
record upon request. Release of
accounting of disclosures would alert
the subjects of an investigation to the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
existence of the investigation and the
fact that they are subjects of the
investigation. The release of such
information to the subjects of an
investigation would provide them with
significant information concerning the
nature of the investigation, and could
seriously impede or compromise the
investigation, endanger the physical
safety of confidential sources, witnesses
and their families, and lead to the
improper influencing of witnesses, the
destruction of evidence, or the
fabrication of testimony.
2. 5 U.S.C. 552a(d); (e)(4)(G) and
(e)(4)(H); and (f). These sections require
an agency to provide notice and
disclosure to individuals that a system
contains records pertaining to the
individual, as well as providing rights of
access and amendment. Granting access
to records in the Insider Threat Program
system could inform the subject of an
investigation of an actual or potential
criminal violation of the existence of
that investigation, of the nature and
scope of the information and evidence
obtained, of the identity of confidential
sources, witnesses, and law enforcement
personnel, and could provide
information to enable the subject to
avoid detection or apprehension.
Granting access to such information
could seriously impede or compromise
an investigation; endanger the physical
safety of confidential sources, witnesses,
and law enforcement personnel, as well
as their families; lead to the improper
influencing of witnesses, the destruction
of evidence, or the fabrication of
testimony; and disclose investigative
techniques and procedures. In addition,
granting access to such information
could disclose classified, securitysensitive, or confidential information
and could constitute an unwarranted
invasion of the personal privacy of
others.
3. 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This section
requires the agency to maintain
information about an individual only to
the extent that such information is
relevant or necessary. The application of
this provision could impair
investigations and law enforcement,
because it is not always possible to
determine the relevance or necessity of
specific information in the early stages
of an investigation. Relevance and
necessity are often questions of
judgment and timing, and it is only after
the information is evaluated that the
relevance and necessity of such
information can be established. In
addition, during the course of the
investigation, the investigator may
obtain information that is incidental to
the main purpose of the investigation
but which may relate to matters under
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Proposed Rules
51647
(a) Does not unduly burden the
judicial system.
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
the investigative jurisdiction of another
agency. Such information cannot readily
be segregated. Furthermore, during the
course of the investigation, an
investigator may obtain information
concerning the violation of laws outside
the scope of the investigator’s
jurisdiction. In the interest of effective
law enforcement, DOI investigators
should retain this information, since it
can aid in establishing patterns of
criminal activity and can provide
valuable leads for other law
enforcement agencies.
4. 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This section
requires an agency to provide public
notice of the categories of sources of
records in the system. The application
of this section could disclose
investigative techniques and procedures
and cause sources to refrain from giving
such information because of fear of
reprisal, or fear of breach of promise(s)
of anonymity and confidentiality. This
could compromise DOI’s ability to
conduct investigations and to identify,
detect and apprehend violators.
impose a requirement for small
businesses to report or keep records on
any of the requirements contained in
this rule. The exemptions to the Privacy
Act apply to individuals, and
individuals are not covered entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Procedural Requirements
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
10. National Environmental Policy Act
1. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866 and E.O. 13563)
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or
on the private sector, of more than $100
million per year. The rule does not have
a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. This rule makes only
minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal Action significantly affecting
the quality for the human environment.
A detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because the rule
is covered by a categorical exclusion.
We have determined the rule is
categorically excluded under 43 CFR
46.210(i) because it is administrative,
legal, and technical in nature. We also
have determined the rule does not
involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215
that would require further analysis
under NEPA.
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of Executive Order 12866
while calling for improvements in the
nation’s regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process
must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have
developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this document will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601, et seq.). This rule does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
3. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises.
5. Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. This rule makes
only minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, this rule does not have any
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
The rule is not associated with, nor will
it have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. A Federalism
Assessment is not required.
7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, the Department of the Interior
has evaluated this rule and determined
that it would have no substantial effects
on federally recognized Indian Tribes.
9. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not require an
information collection from 10 or more
parties and a submission under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required.
11. Effects on Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
12. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Order
12866 and 12988, the Plain Writing Act
of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–274), and the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means each rule we
publish must:
—Be logically organized;
—Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
—Use clear language rather than jargon;
—Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
—Use lists and table wherever possible.
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
51648
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 177 / Thursday, September 16, 2021 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential information,
Courts, Freedom of Information Act,
Privacy Act.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the Interior
proposes to amend 43 CFR part 2 as
follows:
PART 2—FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACT; RECORDS AND TESTIMONY
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 553;
31 U.S.C. 3717; 43 U.S.C. 1460, 1461.
2. Amend § 2.254 by:
a. Revising paragraphs (b)
introductory text and (b)(1);
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Sep 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
b. Reserving paragraph (b)(2);
c. Revising paragraph (c) introductory
text;
■ d. Reserving paragraph (c)(5); and
■ e. Adding paragraph (c)(6).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 2.254
Exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Classified records exempt under 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(1). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1), the following systems of
records have been exempted from
paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4) (G),
(H), and (I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a and
the provisions of the regulations in this
subpart implementing these paragraphs:
(1) INTERIOR/DOI–50, Insider Threat
Program.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
(c) Investigatory records exempt under
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(5), the following systems of
records have been exempted from
paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4) (G),
(H), and (I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a and
the provisions of the regulations in this
subpart implementing these paragraphs:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) [Reserved]
(6) INTERIOR/DOI–50, Insider Threat
Program.
*
Teri Barnett,
Departmental Privacy Officer, Department of
the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2021–18711 Filed 9–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334–63–P
E:\FR\FM\16SEP1.SGM
16SEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 177 (Thursday, September 16, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51645-51648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18711]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 2
[DOI-2018-0012: 201D0102DM, DS65100000, DLSN00000.000000, DX65103]
RIN 1090-AB15
Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption for the Insider Threat Program
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior is proposing to amend its
regulations to exempt certain records in the INTERIOR/DOI-50, Insider
Threat Program, system of records from one or more provisions of the
Privacy Act of 1974 because of criminal, civil, and administrative law
enforcement requirements.
DATES: Submit comments on or before November 15, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number [DOI-
2018-0012] or [Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 1090-AB15], by any
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for sending comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include docket number
[DOI-2018-0012] or RIN 1090-AB15 in the subject line of the message.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Teri Barnett, Departmental
Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW,
Room 7112, Washington, DC 20240.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number [DOI-2018-0012] or RIN 1090-AB15 for this rulemaking.
All comments received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy
Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Room 7112,
Washington, DC 20240, [email protected] or (202) 208-1605.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 552a, governs the
means by which the U.S. Government collects, maintains, uses and
disseminates personally identifiable information. The Privacy Act
applies to records about individuals that are maintained in a ``system
of records.'' A system of records is a group of any records under the
control of an agency from which information about an individual is
retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number,
symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual. See
5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(4) and (5).
An individual may request access to records containing information
about him or herself, 5 U.S.C. 552a(b), (c) and (d). However, the
Privacy Act authorizes Federal agencies to exempt systems of records
from access by individuals under certain circumstances, such as where
the access or disclosure of such information would impede national
security or law enforcement efforts. Exemptions from Privacy Act
provisions must be established by regulation, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k).
The Department of the Interior (DOI) Office of Law Enforcement and
Security published the INTERIOR/DOI-50, Insider Threat Program, system
of records notice in the Federal Register at 79 FR 52033 on September
2, 2014, in accordance with Presidential Executive Order 13587, issued
October 7, 2011, which required Federal agencies to establish an
insider threat detection and prevention program to ensure the security
of classified networks and the responsible sharing and safeguarding of
classified information consistent with appropriate protections for
privacy and civil liberties. This system of records
[[Page 51646]]
facilitates management of counterintelligence and insider threat
investigations and activities associated with counterintelligence
complaints, inquiries and investigations; identification of potential
threats to DOI resources and information assets; and referrals of
potential insider threats to internal and external partners. Insider
threats include attempted or actual espionage, subversion, sabotage,
terrorism or extremist activities directed against the DOI and its
personnel, facilities, resources, and activities; unauthorized use of
or intrusion into automated information systems; unauthorized
disclosure of classified, controlled unclassified, sensitive, or
proprietary-information or technology; indicators of potential insider
threats or other incidents that may indicate activities of an insider
threat.
The system contains classified and unclassified intelligence and
investigatory records related to counterintelligence and insider threat
activities that are exempt from certain provisions of the Privacy Act,
5 U.S.C. 552a(j) and (k). The DOI previously published a final rule in
the Federal Register at 79 FR 68799 (November 19, 2014) to amend DOI
Privacy Act regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to exempt certain records in
this system from subsections (c)(3), (c)(4), (d), (e)(1) through
(e)(3), (e)(4)(G) through (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8), (e)(12), (f), and
(g) of the Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2). In
this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), DOI is proposing to claim
additional exemptions from certain provisions of the Privacy Act
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and (k)(5).
DOI previously published an NPRM in the Federal Register at 85 FR
7515 (February 10, 2020) to claim exemptions for the INTERIOR/DOI-46,
Physical Security Access Files, system of records that proposed a
revision of the DOI Privacy Act regulations at 43 CFR 2.254 to
redesignate the existing paragraphs and add new paragraphs for
additional exemptions under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k). A new paragraph (b) was
reserved for exemptions claimed under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) as indicated
in this NPRM for the INTERIOR/DOI-50, Insider Threat Program. The
previous paragraph (c) for investigatory records exempt under 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(5) was redesignated to paragraph (e) to allow for a new
paragraph (d) for exemptions claimed under 5 U.S.C. 552(k)(3) related
to records maintained in connection with providing protective services.
The new and redesignated paragraphs proposed for section 2.254 will be
effective upon publication of the INTERIOR/DOI-46 final rule in the
Federal Register and will align with the exemptions proposed in this
NPRM for the INTERIOR/DOI-50, Insider Threat Program.
Under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), the head of a Federal agency may
promulgate rules to exempt a system of records from certain provisions
of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, if the system of records is
subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1) where the records are
(A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive
Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign
policy, and (B) are in fact properly classified pursuant to such
Executive Order. Some records in this system are deemed classified and
subject to Executive Orders for the maintenance of records that must be
kept secret in the interest of national security, such as Executive
Order 12333, United States Intelligence Activities (as amended);
Executive Order 12829, National Industrial Security Program; Executive
Order 12968, Access to Classified Information; Executive Order 13526,
Classified National Security Information; and Executive Order 13587,
Structural Reforms to Improve the Security of Classified Networks and
the Responsible Sharing and Safeguarding of Classified Information.
Additionally, records in this system may be related to investigatory
material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability,
eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment,
military service, Federal contracts, or access to classified
information that are exempt from one or more provisions of the Privacy
Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
Because this system of records contains classified and
investigative material within the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1) and
(k)(5), the DOI proposes to exempt the system of records from one or
more of the following provisions: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G) through (e)(4)(I), and (f). Where a release would not
interfere with or adversely affect investigations or law enforcement
activities, including but not limited to revealing sensitive
information or compromising confidential sources, the exemption may be
waived on a case-by-case basis. Exemptions from these particular
subsections are justified for the following reasons:
1. 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3). This section requires an agency to make the
accounting of each disclosure of records available to the individual
named in the record upon request. Release of accounting of disclosures
would alert the subjects of an investigation to the existence of the
investigation and the fact that they are subjects of the investigation.
The release of such information to the subjects of an investigation
would provide them with significant information concerning the nature
of the investigation, and could seriously impede or compromise the
investigation, endanger the physical safety of confidential sources,
witnesses and their families, and lead to the improper influencing of
witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the fabrication of
testimony.
2. 5 U.S.C. 552a(d); (e)(4)(G) and (e)(4)(H); and (f). These
sections require an agency to provide notice and disclosure to
individuals that a system contains records pertaining to the
individual, as well as providing rights of access and amendment.
Granting access to records in the Insider Threat Program system could
inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential
criminal violation of the existence of that investigation, of the
nature and scope of the information and evidence obtained, of the
identity of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement
personnel, and could provide information to enable the subject to avoid
detection or apprehension. Granting access to such information could
seriously impede or compromise an investigation; endanger the physical
safety of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement
personnel, as well as their families; lead to the improper influencing
of witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the fabrication of
testimony; and disclose investigative techniques and procedures. In
addition, granting access to such information could disclose
classified, security-sensitive, or confidential information and could
constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of others.
3. 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1). This section requires the agency to
maintain information about an individual only to the extent that such
information is relevant or necessary. The application of this provision
could impair investigations and law enforcement, because it is not
always possible to determine the relevance or necessity of specific
information in the early stages of an investigation. Relevance and
necessity are often questions of judgment and timing, and it is only
after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of
such information can be established. In addition, during the course of
the investigation, the investigator may obtain information that is
incidental to the main purpose of the investigation but which may
relate to matters under
[[Page 51647]]
the investigative jurisdiction of another agency. Such information
cannot readily be segregated. Furthermore, during the course of the
investigation, an investigator may obtain information concerning the
violation of laws outside the scope of the investigator's jurisdiction.
In the interest of effective law enforcement, DOI investigators should
retain this information, since it can aid in establishing patterns of
criminal activity and can provide valuable leads for other law
enforcement agencies.
4. 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I). This section requires an agency to
provide public notice of the categories of sources of records in the
system. The application of this section could disclose investigative
techniques and procedures and cause sources to refrain from giving such
information because of fear of reprisal, or fear of breach of
promise(s) of anonymity and confidentiality. This could compromise
DOI's ability to conduct investigations and to identify, detect and
apprehend violators.
Procedural Requirements
1. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of Executive Order
12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system
to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
ends. The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. Executive Order 13563
emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available
science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public
participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these requirements.
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this document will
not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.).
This rule does not impose a requirement for small businesses to report
or keep records on any of the requirements contained in this rule. The
exemptions to the Privacy Act apply to individuals, and individuals are
not covered entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
3. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or on the private sector, of more
than $100 million per year. The rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. This rule makes only minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
5. Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have
significant takings implications. This rule makes only minor changes to
43 CFR part 2. A takings implication assessment is not required.
6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have
any federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment. The rule is not associated with, nor will it have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. A
Federalism Assessment is not required.
7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Does not unduly burden the judicial system.
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the Department of the
Interior has evaluated this rule and determined that it would have no
substantial effects on federally recognized Indian Tribes.
9. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not require an information collection from 10 or
more parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required.
10. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal Action significantly
affecting the quality for the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because the rule is covered by a categorical exclusion. We
have determined the rule is categorically excluded under 43 CFR
46.210(i) because it is administrative, legal, and technical in nature.
We also have determined the rule does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require
further analysis under NEPA.
11. Effects on Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
12. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Order 12866 and 12988, the Plain
Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274), and the Presidential Memorandum
of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means each
rule we publish must:
--Be logically organized;
--Use the active voice to address readers directly;
--Use clear language rather than jargon;
--Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
--Use lists and table wherever possible.
[[Page 51648]]
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential information,
Courts, Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Interior proposes to amend 43 CFR part 2 as follows:
PART 2--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT; RECORDS AND TESTIMONY
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 553; 31 U.S.C. 3717; 43
U.S.C. 1460, 1461.
0
2. Amend Sec. 2.254 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (b) introductory text and (b)(1);
0
b. Reserving paragraph (b)(2);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c) introductory text;
0
d. Reserving paragraph (c)(5); and
0
e. Adding paragraph (c)(6).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 2.254 Exemptions.
* * * * *
(b) Classified records exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1). Pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), the following systems of records have been
exempted from paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4) (G), (H), and (I),
and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a and the provisions of the regulations in this
subpart implementing these paragraphs:
(1) INTERIOR/DOI-50, Insider Threat Program.
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(c) Investigatory records exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), the following systems of records have
been exempted from paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4) (G), (H), and
(I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a and the provisions of the regulations in
this subpart implementing these paragraphs:
* * * * *
(5) [Reserved]
(6) INTERIOR/DOI-50, Insider Threat Program.
Teri Barnett,
Departmental Privacy Officer, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2021-18711 Filed 9-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334-63-P