Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners: Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of Columbia Codes, 51272-51273 [2021-19884]

Agencies

• Department of Justice
• Parole Commission

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 15, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51272-51273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Parole Commission

28 CFR Part 2

[Docket No. USPC-2021-05]
RIN 1104-AA10


Paroling, Recommitting, and Supervising Federal Prisoners: 
Prisoners Serving Sentences Under the United States and District of 
Columbia Codes

AGENCY: United States Parole Commission, Justice.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Parole Commission is adopting a final rule 
to conform with the District of Columbia Council's amendment to medical 
and geriatric parole law which removed an exception that excluded 
prisoners convicted of certain violent offenses from medical parole 
consideration.

DATES: Effective September 15, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen H. Krapels, General Counsel, 
U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, Third Floor, Washington, DC 
20530, telephone (202) 346-7030. Questions about this publication are 
welcome, but inquiries concerning individual cases cannot be answered 
over the telephone.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Background: The U.S. Parole Commission is responsible for medical 
parole release decisions for District of

[[Page 51273]]

Columbia felony offenders who are eligible for parole. The Commission 
took over this responsibility on August 5, 1998 as a result of the 
National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 
1997, Public Law 105-33. 11231(a)(1), 111 Stat. 712, 745 (effective 
August 5, 1998). The Commission's new duties included medical parole 
determinations for D.C. offenders previously made by the D.C. Board of 
Parole pursuant to the Medical and Geriatric Parole Act of 1992, D.C. 
Law 9-271; D.C. Official Code 24-461, et seq. (effective May 15, 1993).
    The Commission promptly enacted regulations to implement its new 
duties, which included the rule that set forth criteria and procedures 
for implementing the medical parole provisions in D.C. Code 24-261-64, 
267 at 28 CFR 2.77. 63 FR 39172-39183 (July 21, 1998). Regulation 28 
CFR 2.77 governs the Commission's decision to release a D.C. prisoner 
on medical parole. The Commission exercises its discretion to grant 
medical parole to eligible prisoners on the basis of either terminal 
illness or permanent and irreversible incapacitation if the Commission 
determines the prisoner meets certain eligibility criteria. Originally, 
prisoners convicted of certain violent offenses were excluded from 
benefits of medical parole. (D.C. Law 9-271; D.C. Official Code 24-
467.)
    In 2012, the D.C. Council amended D.C. Code 24-267 when it approved 
the Compassionate Release Authorization Amendment Act of 2012, D.C. Law 
19-318 (Act 19-479). D.C. Law 19-318 rewrote section 24-467, which 
formerly read: ``Persons convicted of first degree murder or persons 
sentenced for crimes committed when armed under 22-4502, or under 22-
4504(b), and 22-2803, shall not be eligible for geriatric or medical 
parole.'' Effective June 15, 2013, D.C. Law 19-318 removed the 
exception for medical parole.
    The Revitalization Act requires the Commission to follow District 
of Columbia parole law and regulations and authorizes the Commission to 
``amend or supplement'' the parole regulations of the District of 
Columbia as it sees fit. See D.C. Code 24-1231(a)(1)(2001). As part of 
that authority, the Parole Commission has decided to update its 
regulation in light of the change in D.C. law that relates to the 
medical parole exception by promulgating a final rule to amend 28 CFR 
2.77 to remove paragraph (g)(1). As a result, prisoners convicted of 
certain violent offenses will not be excluded from the benefit of 
medical parole and 28 CFR 2.77 will comport with current D.C. law. See 
D.C. Code 24-267.
    The rule change does not impact the sole discretion and 
jurisdiction of the Commission to grant medical parole. See D.C. Code 
24-1231(a)(1)(2001); D.C. Code 24-463. Following the rule change, the 
Commission will still consider whether to exercise its discretion to 
grant medical parole for those prisoners previously excluded from 
medical parole as it will any other prisoner.
    Because this action is being taken to conform with a change in D.C. 
statute, it is being published as a final rule.

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with 
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulation Planning and Review,'' section 
1(b), Principles of Regulation, and in accordance with Executive Order 
13565, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' section 1(b), 
General Principles of Regulation. The Commission has determined that 
this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and 
accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management 
and Budget.

Executive Order 13132

    This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, 
on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government. Under Executive Order 13132, this rule does not 
have sufficient federalism implications requiring a Federalism 
Assessment.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    This rule will not have a significant economic impact upon a 
substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This rule will not cause State, local, or tribal governments, or 
the private sector, to spend $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and 
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. No action 
under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 is necessary.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Subtitle 
E--Congressional Review Act)

    This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by Section 804 of the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 Subtitle E--
Congressional Review Act, now codified at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule 
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or 
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse 
effects on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with 
foreign-based companies. Moreover, this is a rule of agency practice or 
procedure that does not substantially affect the rights or obligations 
of non-agency parties, and does not come within the meaning of the term 
``rule'' as used in Section 804(3)(C), now codified at 5 U.S.C. 
804(3)(C). Therefore, the reporting requirement of 5 U.S.C. 801 does 
not apply.

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 2

    Administrative practice and procedure, Prisoners, Probation and 
parole.

The Final Rule

    Accordingly, the U.S. Parole Commission amends 28 CFR part 2 as 
follows:

PART 2--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for 28 CFR part 2 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 18 U.S.C. 4203(a)(1) and 4204(a)(6).


0
2. Revise Sec.  2.77(g) to read as follows:


Sec.  2.77  Medical parole.

* * * * *
    (g) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a prisoner 
shall not be eligible for medical parole on the basis of a physical or 
medical condition that existed at the time the prisoner was sentenced 
(D.C. Code 24-462).

Patricia K. Cushwa,
Chairman (Acting), U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-19884 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-31-P