Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection-002 Trusted and Registered Traveler Programs System of Records, 50603-50604 [2021-19472]
Download as PDF
50603
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 86, No. 173
Friday, September 10, 2021
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. USCBP–2021–0031]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection–002 Trusted and
Registered Traveler Programs System
of Records
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
The U.S. Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) is issuing a
final rule to amend its regulations to
exempt portions of a newly updated and
reissued system of records titled, ‘‘DHS/
U.S. Customs and Border Protection–
002 Trusted and Registered Traveler
Programs (TRTP) System of Records’’
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act. Specifically, the Department
exempts portions of this system of
records from one or more provisions of
the Privacy Act because of criminal,
civil, and administrative enforcement
requirements.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective
September 10, 2021.
DATES:
For
general questions please contact: Debra
Danisek, Privacy.CBP@cbp.dhs.gov,
(202) 344–1610, CBP Privacy Officer,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20229. For privacy
issues please contact: Lynn Parker
Dupree, (202) 343–1717, Chief Privacy
Officer, Privacy Office, U.S. Department
of Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20528.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:14 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
I. Background
The U.S. Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) published a
notice of proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register, 85 FR 14176 (March
11, 2020), proposing to exempt portions
of the system of records from one or
more provisions of the Privacy Act
because of criminal, civil, and
administrative enforcement
requirements. DHS issued the ‘‘DHS/
CBP–002 Trusted and Registered
Traveler Programs System of Records’’
in the Federal Register at 85 FR 14214
(March 11, 2020), to provide notice to
the public that (1) DHS/CBP updated
the name of the system of records from
Global Enrollment System (GES); (2)
DHS/CBP provided a more
comprehensive description of the
trusted and registered traveler programs
to include Global Entry, NEXUS, Secure
Electronic Network for Travelers Rapid
Inspection (SENTRI), Free and Secure
Trade (FAST) program, and U.S.-Asia
Economic Cooperation (APEC) Business
Travel Card (ABTC) Program; and (3)
DHS/CBP removed references to CBP
Trusted Worker Programs which are
covered by the DHS/CBP–010 Persons
Engaged in International Trade in
Customs and Border Protection
Licensed/Regulated Activities System of
Records Notice, 73 FR 77753 (December
19, 2008).
DHS/CBP invited comments on both
the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) and System of Records Notice
(SORN).
II. Public Comments
DHS received no comments on the
NPRM and one non-substantive
comment on the SORN. After full
consideration of the public comment,
the Department will implement the
rulemaking as proposed.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS amends chapter I of title
6, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L.
107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Amend appendix C to part 5 by
adding paragraph 84 to read as follows:
■
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
*
*
*
*
*
84. The U.S. Department of Homeland
Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP)-002 Trusted and Registered
Traveler Program (TRTP) System of Records
consists of electronic and paper records and
will be used by DHS and its components. The
DHS/CBP–002 TRTP System of Records
collects and maintains records on individuals
who voluntarily provide personally
identifiable information to U.S. Customs and
Border Protection in return for enrollment in
a program that will make them eligible for
dedicated CBP processing at designated U.S.
border ports of entry and foreign
preclearance facilities. The DHS/CBP–002
TRTP system of records contains personally
identifiable information in biographic
application data, biometric information,
conveyance information, pointer information
to other law enforcement databases that
support the DHS/CBP membership decision,
Law Enforcement risk assessment
worksheets, payment tracking numbers, and
U.S. or foreign trusted traveler membership
decisions in the form of a ‘‘pass/fail.’’
The Secretary of Homeland Security,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted
this system from the following provisions of
the Privacy Act: 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1),
(e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I),
(e)(5), (e)(8); (f); and (g)(1). Additionally, the
Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has exempted records
created during the background check and
vetting process from the following provisions
of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d);
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f).
Also, the Privacy Act requires DHS
maintain an accounting of such disclosures
made pursuant to all routine uses. However,
disclosing the fact that CBP has disclosed
records to an external law enforcement
and/or intelligence agency may affect
ongoing law enforcement, intelligence, or
national security activity. As such, the
Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and (k)(2) has exempted
these records from (c)(3), (e)(8), and (g)(1) of
the Privacy Act, as is necessary and
appropriate to protect this information.
In addition, when a record received from
another system has been exempted in that
source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), DHS
will claim the same exemptions for those
records that are claimed for the original
primary systems of records from which they
originated and claims any additional
exemptions set forth here.
E:\FR\FM\10SER1.SGM
10SER1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
50604
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Finally, in its discretion, CBP will not
assert any exemptions with regard to
accessing or amending an individual’s
application data in a trusted or registered
traveler program or accessing their final
membership determination in the trusted or
registered traveler programs.
Exemptions from these particular
subsections are justified, on a case-by-case
basis to be determined at the time a request
is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process. When an
investigation has been completed,
information on disclosures made may
continue to be exempted if the fact that an
investigation occurred remains sensitive after
completion.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access and
Amendment to Records) because access to
certain records contained in this system of
records could inform the subject of an
investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the
existence of that investigation and reveal
investigative interest on the part of DHS or
another agency. Access to certain records
could also permit the individual who is the
subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of certain records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities. Further,
permitting amendment to counterintelligence
records after an investigation has been
completed would impose an unmanageable
administrative burden. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear, or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of the
investigation, thereby interfering with that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:14 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
investigation and related law enforcement
activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information could impede law enforcement
by compromising the existence of a
confidential investigation or reveal the
identity of witnesses or confidential
informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f)
(Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons
noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or
procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in
the system of records or otherwise setting up
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may access and view records pertaining to
themselves in the system would undermine
investigative efforts and reveal the identities
of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because with the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(i) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies)
to the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
Lynn Parker Dupree,
Chief Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2021–19472 Filed 9–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
7 CFR Parts 1735 and 1737
[RUS–20–TELECOM–0044]
RIN 0572–AC48
Implementation of
Telecommunications Provisions of the
Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018
Rural Utilities Service,
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) is issuing a final rule with
comment to implement statutory
provisions of the Agriculture
Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bill). The intent of this rule is to modify
existing regulations to include the
statutory revisions authorized by the
2018 Farm Bill.
DATES:
Effective date: This final rule with
comment is effective September 10,
2021.
Comment date: Comments due on or
before November 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number RUS–20–
TELECOM–0044 and Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) number
0572–AC48 through https://
www.regulations.gov.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Agency name and
docket number or RIN for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general inquiries, contact Laurel
Leverrier, Assistant Administrator
Telecommunications Program, Rural
Utilities Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), email:
laurel.leverrier@usda.gov, telephone:
(202) 720–9556.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches to maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health, and safety
advantages; distributive impacts; and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has been determined to be significant
and was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
Executive Order 12866. In accordance
with Executive Order 12866, the Agency
conducted a Regulatory Impact
Analysis, outlining the costs and
benefits of implementing this program
in rural America. The complete analysis
is available in Docket No. RUS–20–
TELECOM–0044. The following is a
summary discussion of the Analysis:
This final rule does not directly
address any specific market failure. The
Agency is publishing this rulemaking
action to codify the mandatory changes
E:\FR\FM\10SER1.SGM
10SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50603-50604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19472]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 50603]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. USCBP-2021-0031]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection-002
Trusted and Registered Traveler Programs System of Records
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is issuing a
final rule to amend its regulations to exempt portions of a newly
updated and reissued system of records titled, ``DHS/U.S. Customs and
Border Protection-002 Trusted and Registered Traveler Programs (TRTP)
System of Records'' from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
Specifically, the Department exempts portions of this system of records
from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal,
civil, and administrative enforcement requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective September 10, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact:
Debra Danisek, [email protected], (202) 344-1610, CBP Privacy
Officer, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20229. For privacy issues please contact: Lynn
Parker Dupree, (202) 343-1717, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) published a notice of proposed rulemaking in
the Federal Register, 85 FR 14176 (March 11, 2020), proposing to exempt
portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the
Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement
requirements. DHS issued the ``DHS/CBP-002 Trusted and Registered
Traveler Programs System of Records'' in the Federal Register at 85 FR
14214 (March 11, 2020), to provide notice to the public that (1) DHS/
CBP updated the name of the system of records from Global Enrollment
System (GES); (2) DHS/CBP provided a more comprehensive description of
the trusted and registered traveler programs to include Global Entry,
NEXUS, Secure Electronic Network for Travelers Rapid Inspection
(SENTRI), Free and Secure Trade (FAST) program, and U.S.-Asia Economic
Cooperation (APEC) Business Travel Card (ABTC) Program; and (3) DHS/CBP
removed references to CBP Trusted Worker Programs which are covered by
the DHS/CBP-010 Persons Engaged in International Trade in Customs and
Border Protection Licensed/Regulated Activities System of Records
Notice, 73 FR 77753 (December 19, 2008).
DHS/CBP invited comments on both the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) and System of Records Notice (SORN).
II. Public Comments
DHS received no comments on the NPRM and one non-substantive
comment on the SORN. After full consideration of the public comment,
the Department will implement the rulemaking as proposed.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of information, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS amends chapter I of
title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat.
2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Amend appendix C to part 5 by adding paragraph 84 to read as
follows:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
84. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS)/U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP)-002 Trusted and Registered Traveler
Program (TRTP) System of Records consists of electronic and paper
records and will be used by DHS and its components. The DHS/CBP-002
TRTP System of Records collects and maintains records on individuals
who voluntarily provide personally identifiable information to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection in return for enrollment in a program
that will make them eligible for dedicated CBP processing at
designated U.S. border ports of entry and foreign preclearance
facilities. The DHS/CBP-002 TRTP system of records contains
personally identifiable information in biographic application data,
biometric information, conveyance information, pointer information
to other law enforcement databases that support the DHS/CBP
membership decision, Law Enforcement risk assessment worksheets,
payment tracking numbers, and U.S. or foreign trusted traveler
membership decisions in the form of a ``pass/fail.''
The Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions
of the Privacy Act: 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8); (f); and (g)(1).
Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has exempted records created during the
background check and vetting process from the following provisions
of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f).
Also, the Privacy Act requires DHS maintain an accounting of
such disclosures made pursuant to all routine uses. However,
disclosing the fact that CBP has disclosed records to an external
law enforcement and/or intelligence agency may affect ongoing law
enforcement, intelligence, or national security activity. As such,
the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2)
and (k)(2) has exempted these records from (c)(3), (e)(8), and
(g)(1) of the Privacy Act, as is necessary and appropriate to
protect this information.
In addition, when a record received from another system has been
exempted in that source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), DHS will
claim the same exemptions for those records that are claimed for the
original primary systems of records from which they originated and
claims any additional exemptions set forth here.
[[Page 50604]]
Finally, in its discretion, CBP will not assert any exemptions
with regard to accessing or amending an individual's application
data in a trusted or registered traveler program or accessing their
final membership determination in the trusted or registered traveler
programs.
Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified, on a
case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a request is made,
for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures)
because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would
therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts
and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would
undermine the entire investigative process. When an investigation
has been completed, information on disclosures made may continue to
be exempted if the fact that an investigation occurred remains
sensitive after completion.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access and Amendment to Records)
because access to certain records contained in this system of
records could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence
of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to certain records could also
permit the individual who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid
detection or apprehension. Amendment of certain records could
interfere with ongoing investigations and law enforcement
activities. Further, permitting amendment to counterintelligence
records after an investigation has been completed would impose an
unmanageable administrative burden. In addition, permitting access
and amendment to such information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In
the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to
retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of
unlawful activity.
(d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from
Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the
nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with
that investigation and related law enforcement activities.
(e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because
providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by
compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal
the identity of witnesses or confidential informants.
(f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency
Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access provisions of
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
(g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because
with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete.
(h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(i) From subsection (g)(1) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that
the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy
Act.
Lynn Parker Dupree,
Chief Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2021-19472 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P