Air Plan Approval; California; Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District, and Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District; Combustion Sources, 50645-50647 [2021-19434]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 9,
2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
§ 52.220
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(207) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(5) Previously approved on November
1, 1996 in paragraph (c)(207)(i)(D)(3) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(518)(i)(A)(6) of this section, Rule
1160, adopted on October 26, 1994.
*
*
*
*
*
(518) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(7) Rule 1160, ‘‘Internal Combustion
Engines,’’ amended on January 22, 2018.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–19435 Filed 9–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0476; FRL–8777–02–
R9]
Dated: September 1, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Air Plan Approval; California; Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District,
Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control
District, and Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District; Combustion
Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District
(AVAQMD), Eastern Kern Air Pollution
Control District (EKAPCD), and YoloSolano Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD) portions of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of oxides of
nitrogen (NOX) from boilers, steam
generating units, process heaters, and
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(207)(i)(D)(5) and
(c)(518)(i)(A)(7) to read as follows:
■
50645
stationary internal combustion engines.
We are approving local rules that
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the ‘‘Act’’).
This rule will be effective on
October 12, 2021.
DATES:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0476. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone at (415) 972–3073 and
by email at gong.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On April 5, 2021 (86 FR 17567), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
rules into the California SIP.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Local agency
Rule #
AVAQMD ...........
1110.2
EKAPCD ............
425.2
YSAQMD ...........
2.27
Rule title
Local action
Emissions from Stationary, Non-Road and Portable Internal Combustion Engines.
Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters (Oxides of Nitrogen).
Large Boilers ....................................................................
Amended 09/18/2018 ........................
10/30/2018
Amended ...........................................
01/11/2018 .........................................
Revised 05/15/2019 ...........................
08/22/2018
In our proposed rule, we erroneously
stated that an earlier version of EKAPCD
Rule 425.2 had been approved into the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:14 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
SIP on October 28, 1999 (64 FR 57991).
That version of the rule was approved
into the SIP on September 24, 1999 (64
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
08/19/2019
FR 51688). We proposed to approve
these rules because we determined that
they comply with the relevant CAA
E:\FR\FM\10SER1.SGM
10SER1
50646
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules
and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving these rules into the California
SIP.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the local
air district rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:14 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by November 9,
2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 31, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(241)(i)(B)(2),
(c)(249)(i)(B)(2), (c)(520)(i)(B),
(c)(521)(i)(A)(2) and (c)(542)(i)(C) to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(241) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Previously approved on June 17,
1997 in paragraph (c)(241)(i)(B)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in (c)(542)(i)(C)(1), Rule
2.27, revised on August 14, 1996.
*
*
*
*
*
(249) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Previously approved on September
24, 1999 in paragraph (c)(249)(i)(B)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in (c)(520)(i)(A)(1), Rule
425.2 adopted on October 13, 1994 and
amended on July 10, 1997.
*
*
*
*
*
(520) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control
District.
(1) Rule 425.2, ‘‘Boilers, Steam
Generators, and Process Heaters (Oxides
of Nitrogen),’’ amended on January 11,
2018.
E:\FR\FM\10SER1.SGM
10SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
*
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
(521) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
*
(2) Rule 1110.2, ‘‘Emissions from
Stationary, Non-Road and Portable
Internal Combustion Engines,’’
amended on September 18, 2018.
*
*
*
*
*
(542) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 2.27, ‘‘Large Boilers,’’ revised
on May 15, 2019.
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–19434 Filed 9–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 261
[EPA–R10–RCRA–2021–0142; FRL–8917–
02–R10]
Hazardous Waste Management
System; Final Exclusion for Identifying
and Listing Hazardous Waste
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
I. Overview Information
II. EPA’s Evaluation of Public Comments
III. Final Rule
A. What are the terms of this exclusion?
B. When is the delisting effective?
C. How does this action affect the states?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) (also, ‘‘the Agency’’ or
‘‘we’’ in this preamble) is taking final
action to finalize technical amendments
to an existing exclusion from the list of
federal hazardous waste (delisting)
issued to the United States Department
of Energy (Energy) under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. These
modifications address changes to the
200-Area Effluent Treatment System
associated with the delisting necessary
to accept liquid effluents expected to be
generated from vitrification of certain
low-activity mixed wastes at the
Hanford Federal Facility, or Hanford
Site, in Richland, Washington.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
September 10, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–RCRA–2021–0142. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
I. Overview Information
Based on a petition submitted to the
EPA, Energy requested technical
amendments to an existing exclusion
from the list of federally listed wastes
set forth in 40 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 261.33 previously
issued to the United States Department
of Energy (Energy) for the Hanford
Federal Facility, or Hanford Site in
Richland, Washington (Current
delisting). See 40 CFR part 261,
appendix IX, Table 2. This existing
exclusion applies to treated effluent
generated by Hanford’s 200 Area
Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). The
requested amendments relate to the
planned startup of the Hanford Waste
Treatment and Immobilization Plant
(WTP). Details of Energy’s requested
technical amendments are more fully
described in EPA’s proposed regulatory
amendments to the existing delisting at
86 (FR) 30237, June 7, 2021. After
consideration of comments received on
the EPA’s proposed regulatory
amendments, the EPA is finalizing these
amendments as proposed. The EPA is
also making one grammatical
clarification identified after the proposal
cited above.
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov. Due to restrictions
related to COVID–19, docket materials
are not available in hard copy form at
this time. If you have further questions
concerning docket materials, we
recommend you telephone Dr. David
Bartus at (206) 553–2804.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
David Bartus, EPA, Region 10, 1200 6th
Avenue, Suite 155, M/S M/S 15–H04,
Seattle, Washington 98070; telephone
number: (206) 553–2804; email address:
bartus.dave@epa.gov.
As discussed in Section V of this
document, the Washington State
Department of Ecology is making a
separata but parallels decision regarding
the Petitioner’s request for this
modification under state authority.
Information on Ecology’s action may be
found at https://ecology.wa.gov/WasteToxics/Nuclear-waste/Public-commentperiods.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
information in this section is organized
as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:14 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
50647
II. EPA’s Evaluation of Public
Comments
The EPA received one anonymous set
of comments on the proposed regulatory
amendments. These comments, and the
EPA’s evaluation of them, are described
below.
This commenter raises several issues.
One common theme is that there are
data gaps or other uncertainties
regarding the ability of the Effluent
Treatment Facility to manage future
wastes from the WTP. The following
sections address each of the comments
that have a clear nexus to the proposed
modification of the existing 200-Area
ETF delisting.
Uncertainty Regarding the Future
Capability To Treat ‘‘the Future
Unknowns’’
The commenter stated ‘‘It appears that
the current petition revision is solely to
address acetonitrile, but that there are
other unknowns and chemicals of
concern to be submitted at a later date
for future delisting petitions. There is no
guarantee that there will be a future
capability to treat the future unknowns,
leaving a considerable risk of what to do
with non-compliant effluent from the
WTP.’’
In promulgating significant revisions
to the 200–ETF delisting in 2005 (70 FR
44498, July 30, 2012), Ecology and EPA
explicitly intended to broadly expand
the waste streams that the ETF could
process within the scope of the treated
effluent delisting. More specifically, the
final delisting rule stated ‘‘The effect of
these changes is to allow the 200 Area
ETF to fulfill an expanded role in
supporting Hanford Facility cleanup
actions beyond those activities
considered in the 1995 delisting
rulemaking. In particular, these changes
will allow the 200 Area ETF to treat
mixed wastewaters from a number of
additional sources beyond 242–A
Evaporator process condensate (PC)
upon which the original delisting was
based.’’ (See 70 FR 44497, July 30,
2012).
Consistent with this objective, the
2005 delisting modifications established
a detailed mechanism based on the
concept of a treatability envelope,
which defines the ability of the ETF
system overall to treat a wide range of
waste constituents. This mechanism is
based on an engineering model of the
various unit operations within the ETF
treatment train. Additionally,
constituent-specific data for a wide
range of constituents were used on a
waste-stream specific basis to evaluate
the treatability of that waste stream as
part of the waste acceptance process for
E:\FR\FM\10SER1.SGM
10SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50645-50647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19434]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0476; FRL-8777-02-R9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District, Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District, and
Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District; Combustion Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District (AVAQMD), Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control
District (EKAPCD), and Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
These revisions concern emissions of oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) from boilers, steam generating units, process heaters,
and stationary internal combustion engines. We are approving local
rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the ``Act'').
DATES: This rule will be effective on October 12, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0476. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone at (415) 972-3073 and
by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On April 5, 2021 (86 FR 17567), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into the California SIP.
TABLE 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule # Rule title Local action Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AVAQMD......................... 1110.2 Emissions from Amended 09/18/2018....... 10/30/2018
Stationary, Non-Road and
Portable Internal
Combustion Engines.
EKAPCD......................... 425.2 Boilers, Steam Amended.................. 08/22/2018
Generators, and Process 01/11/2018...............
Heaters (Oxides of
Nitrogen).
YSAQMD......................... 2.27 Large Boilers............ Revised 05/15/2019....... 08/19/2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In our proposed rule, we erroneously stated that an earlier version
of EKAPCD Rule 425.2 had been approved into the SIP on October 28, 1999
(64 FR 57991). That version of the rule was approved into the SIP on
September 24, 1999 (64 FR 51688). We proposed to approve these rules
because we determined that they comply with the relevant CAA
[[Page 50646]]
requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the
rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules into the
California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the local
air district rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region
IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 9, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 31, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(241)(i)(B)(2),
(c)(249)(i)(B)(2), (c)(520)(i)(B), (c)(521)(i)(A)(2) and (c)(542)(i)(C)
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(241) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Previously approved on June 17, 1997 in paragraph
(c)(241)(i)(B)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(542)(i)(C)(1), Rule 2.27, revised on August 14, 1996.
* * * * *
(249) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Previously approved on September 24, 1999 in paragraph
(c)(249)(i)(B)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(520)(i)(A)(1), Rule 425.2 adopted on October 13, 1994 and amended
on July 10, 1997.
* * * * *
(520) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 425.2, ``Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters
(Oxides of Nitrogen),'' amended on January 11, 2018.
[[Page 50647]]
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(521) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(2) Rule 1110.2, ``Emissions from Stationary, Non-Road and Portable
Internal Combustion Engines,'' amended on September 18, 2018.
* * * * *
(542) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 2.27, ``Large Boilers,'' revised on May 15, 2019.
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-19434 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P