Continuing Education for Licensed Customs Brokers, 50794-50827 [2021-19013]
Download as PDF
50794
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 111
[Docket No. USCBP–2021–0030]
RIN 1651–AB03
Continuing Education for Licensed
Customs Brokers
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document proposes to
amend the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to require
continuing education for individual
customs broker license holders
(individual brokers) and to create a
framework for administering this
requirement. By requiring individual
brokers to remain knowledgeable about
recent developments in customs and
related laws as well as international
trade and supply chains, CBP’s
proposed framework would enhance
professionalism and competency within
the customs broker community. CBP has
determined that the proposed
framework would contribute to
increased trade compliance and better
protection of the revenue of the United
States.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
via Docket No. USCBP 2021–0030.
• Mail: Due to COVID–19-related
restrictions, CBP has temporarily
suspended its ability to receive public
comments by mail.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
Public Participation heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Due to the
relevant COVID–19-related restrictions,
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
CBP has temporarily suspended its onsite public inspections of the public
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elena D. Ryan, Special Advisor,
Programs and Policy Analysis,
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, at (202) 325–0001 or
Broker.Continuing.Education@
cbp.dhs.gov; and, Melba Hubbard, Chief,
Broker Management Branch, Trade
Policy and Programs, Office of Trade,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, at
(202) 325–6986, melba.hubbard@
cbp.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. CBP also invites
comments that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that
might result from this proposed
rulemaking. Comments that will provide
the most assistance to CBP will
reference a specific portion of the
proposed rulemaking, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include data, information, or
authority that support such
recommended change. See ADDRESSES
above for information on how to submit
comments.
II. Executive Summary
This notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) proposes to amend the U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
regulations to require individual
customs broker license holders
(individual brokers) to participate in
continuing education activities
(hereinafter, referred to as the
‘‘continuing broker education
requirement’’) and to create a framework
for administering this requirement. This
section provides a brief summary of the
proposed framework. A more detailed
description of the proposed framework
is contained in section IV of this NPRM.
This NPRM proposes to require
individual brokers to complete at least
36 continuing education credits per
triennial period, with limited
exceptions. Individual brokers
reentering the profession following a
period of voluntary suspension would
be subject to a prorated requirement of
one continuing education credit for each
complete remaining month until the end
of the triennial period. The proposed
framework also exempts two groups of
individual brokers from the continuing
broker education requirement—namely,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
individual brokers who have voluntarily
suspended their license in accordance
with § 111.52 of title 19 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (19 CFR 111.52),
and individual brokers who have not
held their license for an entire triennial
period at the time of the submission of
the status report as required under 19
CFR 111.30(d).
Under the proposed framework,
individual brokers could earn
continuing education credits for a
variety of training or educational
activities, whether in-person or online,
including the completion of
coursework, seminars, workshops,
symposia, or conventions, and, subject
to certain limitations and requirements,
the preparation and presentation of
subject matter as an instructor,
discussion leader, or speaker. Individual
brokers would report and certify their
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement upon the
submission of the status report required
under 19 CFR 111.30(d), which is due
on a triennial basis.
In order to ensure compliance with
the continuing broker education
requirement, this NPRM also proposes
regulatory provisions authorizing CBP
to take disciplinary actions, if an
individual broker submits a triennial
report but fails to report and certify his
or her compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement on the
triennial report. The proposed
framework also includes provisions
addressing other aspects of the
administration of the continuing broker
education requirement, such as
accreditation and the selection of
accreditors.
III. Background
A. Authority for Continuing Broker
Education Requirement
Section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (19 U.S.C. 1641), provides
that individuals and business entities
must hold a valid customs broker’s
license and permit to transact customs
business on behalf of others. The statute
also sets forth standards for the issuance
of broker licenses and permits, provides
for disciplinary action against customs
brokers in the form of suspension or
revocation of such licenses and permits
or assessment of monetary penalties,
and provides for the assessment of
monetary penalties against other
persons for conducting customs
business without the required broker’s
license.
Section 641 authorizes the Secretary
of the U.S. Department of the Treasury
(Treasury) to prescribe rules and
regulations relating to the customs
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
business of brokers as may be necessary
to protect importers and the revenue of
the United States and to carry out the
other provisions of section 641. See 19
U.S.C. 1641(f). That authority was
transferred to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) as a result of the enactment of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L.
107–296, 116 Stat. 2142). The Homeland
Security Act of 2002 generally
transferred the functions of the former
U.S. Customs Service from the Secretary
of the Treasury to the Secretary of DHS,
and provided that the Secretary of the
Treasury retains authority over customs
revenue functions, unless specifically
delegated to the Secretary of DHS. See
6 U.S.C. 212(a)(1). Paragraph 1(a)(i) of
Treasury Department Order No. 100–16
contains a list of subject matters over
which the Secretary of the Treasury
retained authority. See appendix to 19
CFR part 0. The other functions of the
former U.S. Customs Service not
expressly listed in paragraph 1(a)(i) of
Treasury Department Order No. 100–16
were transferred from the Secretary of
the Treasury to the Secretary of DHS. As
paragraph 1(a)(i) of Treasury
Department Order No. 100–16 does not
list the regulation of customs brokers,
the Secretary of the Treasury did not
retain authority over this subject matter.
Accordingly, the Secretary of DHS is
authorized to prescribe rules and
regulations relating to the customs
business of brokers as may be necessary
to protect importers and the revenue of
the United States and to carry out the
other provisions of section 641. See 19
U.S.C. 1641(f).
19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(4) imposes upon
customs brokers the duty to exercise
responsible supervision and control
over the broker’s employees and control
over the customs business that is
conducted. The statute also permits the
Secretary of DHS to test persons for
their knowledge of customs and related
laws prior to issuing a license.
Furthermore, based upon 19 U.S.C.
1641, CBP has promulgated regulations
setting forth additional obligations of
customs brokers pertinent to the
conduct of their customs business. CBP
believes that maintaining current
knowledge of customs laws and
procedures is essential for customs
brokers to meet their legal duties. CBP
proposes that requiring a customs
broker to fulfill a continuing education
requirement is the most effective means
to ensure that the customs broker keeps
up with an ever-changing customs
practice after passing the broker exam
and subsequent receipt of the license.
CBP believes that 19 U.S.C. 1641
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
provides authority to require, by
regulation, continuing education for
individual brokers.
To enhance professionalism and
competency within the customs broker
community, CBP proposes to
promulgate regulations to require
continuing education for individual
brokers and to create a framework for
administering this requirement. CBP
believes that requiring individual
brokers to participate in continuing
education activities would enhance the
credibility and value of a customs
broker’s license and improve a broker’s
skills, performance, and productivity.
This in turn would increase client
service and compliance with customs
laws, which would better protect the
revenue of the United States.
B. Overview of Licensing Requirements
for Individual Customs Brokers
CBP is responsible for administering
the licensing requirements for customs
brokers. See 19 CFR part 111, subpart B.
A prospective customs broker must pass
a broker exam administered by CBP,
which is designed to determine the
individual’s knowledge of customs and
related laws, regulations and
procedures, bookkeeping, accounting,
and all other appropriate matters
necessary to render valuable service to
the broker’s clientele.
After an applicant passes the customs
broker exam, CBP will investigate
whether the applicant is qualified for a
broker’s license, taking into account
information provided by the applicant
and other aspects pertaining to the
applicant, such as his or her business
integrity. If CBP finds that the applicant
is qualified and has paid all applicable
fees, then CBP will issue a broker’s
license. Following the issuance of a
license, a customs broker
administratively maintains a license
primarily through the payment of fees
required in 19 CFR 111.96, and the
filing of reports and notifications to CBP
as set forth in 19 CFR 111.30. Pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(4), a customs
broker has the statutory duty to exercise
responsible supervision and control
over the customs business that he or she
conducts. See also 19 CFR 111.1 and
111.28(a). A customs broker also has
other legal obligations, to CBP and to
the broker’s clientele, including, but not
limited to, the exercising of due
diligence in making financial
settlements, answering correspondence,
and preparing paperwork or filings
related to customs business. See 19 CFR
111.29(a).
While the broker exam provides a
good initial indication of an individual’s
knowledge of customs and related laws,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50795
regulations and procedures,
bookkeeping, accounting, and all other
appropriate matters (hereinafter,
referred to as ‘‘customs matters’’), the
broker exam is, by necessity, limited in
scope. The broker exam only assesses a
person’s knowledge of the state of the
customs and related laws at a certain
point in time. The broker exam does not
test for knowledge of any of the
requirements of the more than 40
Partner Government Agencies (PGAs) 1
involved in regulating imports. The
complex nature of trade and the everchanging and expanding requirements
to comply with U.S. and international
law requires that a customs broker
maintain a high level of functional and
accessible knowledge to ensure that a
broker’s clients remain compliant with
the applicable laws over time. CBP
proposes that requiring a customs
broker to fulfill a continuing education
requirement is the most effective way to
ensure that individual customs brokers
keep abreast of changes in customs and
related laws, which is especially
important because of the constant
evolution of international trade and
supply chains. CBP is proposing that,
once individuals become licensed
customs brokers, they must maintain
sufficient knowledge of customs and
related laws necessary to render
valuable service to importers and
drawback claimants through the
completion of continuing education.
CBP believes this will result in more
competent licensed customs brokers
who are well educated in customs law,
regulations, and critical subject matter.
A more competent customs broker
community will prevent costly errors for
their clients, potentially saving
importers and drawback claimants from
unwanted problems and relieving CBP
from expending valuable examination
and collection resources. The proposed
regulations will create a framework for
continuing broker education that would
contribute to increased trade
compliance and better protection of the
revenue of the United States.
C. Assessment of Compliance Risks
Managed by Customs Brokers in the
Complex and Evolving Realm of
International Trade
Recent developments have
demonstrated the need for key parties
involved in importing and claiming
drawback to keep up-to-date on training
and continuously build and maintain
their knowledge of current
1 CBP enforces over 400 laws on behalf of over 40
other U.S. Government agencies, which are
commonly referred to as Partner Government
Agencies (PGAs).
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
50796
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
requirements. For example, the Trade
Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act
of 2015 (TFTEA) (Pub. L. 114–125, 130
Stat. 122, February 24, 2016) required
the issuance of new rules to protect
domestic industry from dumping by
foreign competitors (19 CFR part 165)
and to modernize the processes
surrounding duty refunds through the
drawback program (19 CFR part 190).
Both of these rules are complicated and
detailed, requiring entities involved in
international trade—particularly,
customs brokers serving as the fiduciary
agents of the affected importers and
drawback claimants—to learn entirely
new legal and technical processes. In
addition to understanding the
implementation of new regulations, a
customs broker also needs to know how
to research answers to complex
questions. For example, determining the
country of origin of imported
merchandise is much less
straightforward than it was in the past,
as traders source inputs from various
countries and may assemble those
inputs in yet another country before a
final product is fully manufactured or
produced.
The past several years, in particular,
have posed challenges for both CBP and
entities involved in international trade,
requiring quick adaption to new
requirements that compelled changes to
operational processes. Low-value
shipments (19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C)), the
volume of which has exploded with the
increase in the de minimis limit from
$200 to $800 as a result of section 901(c)
of TFTEA and the online shopping
revolution, have created multiple levels
of issues for international trade that
implicate security, health, safety,
information collection, timely clearance,
and duty evasion. The 2020 statutory
implementation of the Agreement
between the United States of America,
the United Mexican States and Canada
(the USMCA), which replaced the North
American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), requires a new body of
knowledge to successfully implement
and maintain compliance. See United
States-Mexico-Canada Agreement
Implementation Act, Public Law 116–
113, 134 Stat. 11 (19 U.S.C. Chapter 29).
The ongoing COVID–19 pandemic
created an unprecedented impact on
supply chains and international trade
processes.
The customs broker is at the heart of
the aforementioned challenges, as the
agent of the importer/drawback
claimant who works with CBP to resolve
problems and facilitate the safe and
secure movement of legitimate cargo.
CBP believes that the complex and
evolving nature of international trade
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
requires a mandatory continuing
education framework for individual
brokers involved in these trade
processes. Simply relying on selfinitiated efforts to maintain current
knowledge is insufficient to ensure
compliance with the wide array of
applicable and evolving laws that is
necessary to protect the revenue of the
United States. Brokers who were
assessed penalties by CBP between 2017
and 2020 have held their individual
broker license for, on average, 37 years.
In contrast, the average individual
customs broker license has been held for
just 24 years. This suggests that as more
time passes since the passing of the
customs broker exam, more errors are
made. Additionally, as addressed in
greater detail in section V.A. of this
NPRM, which pertains to the
requirements of Executive Orders 13563
and 12866, CBP has seen a recent
increase in penalties while data
indicates that companies employing
individual brokers who voluntarily
pursue continuing education in the form
of industry certifications generally
commit fewer errors.
Regular continuing education is a
professional requirement for many
dynamic professions, such as in the
accounting, legal, and medical
industries. The Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), for example, has
regulations covering tax professionals
that include both an examination and a
continuing education requirement. See
31 CFR part 10. These regulations were
based, in part, on the Return Preparer
Review report (January 4, 2010), which
recommended continuing education for
tax preparers to ‘‘better leverage the tax
return preparer community with the
twin goals of increasing taxpayer
compliance and ensuring uniform and
high ethical standards of conduct for tax
preparers.’’ 2 The IRS serves as the
primary revenue collector of the U.S.
Government and has a responsibility for
protecting the revenue of the United
States. Similarly, CBP is the second
largest collector of revenue in the
federal government, in the form of
duties, taxes, and fees for imported
merchandise, and likewise has a
responsibility for protecting the revenue
of the United States.
As CBP licenses customs brokers to
conduct customs business, it is in the
best interests of CBP and the PGAs to
have a well-educated customs broker
community. A customs broker’s
involvement in import and/or drawback
2 Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Department of
the Treasury, Return Preparer Review, IRS
Publication No. 4832 (January 4, 2010), available at
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-news/fs-10-01.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
transactions eases the burden of the
government; the customs broker takes
on a large part of the role of educating
importers and drawback claimants on
the technical requirements of filing in
the Automated Broker Interface (ABI) 3
and informing them of regulatory
requirements for the customs
transactions in which they are involved.
While there are some self-filers, the vast
majority of entries of imported
merchandise are filed by customs
brokers on behalf of the importers of
record. This dynamic generally allows
CBP to target a smaller group of
individuals when managing trade
compliance for revised or new filing
requirements. Thus, a customs broker
community that continues to stay
abreast of changes in the customs
practice helps support CBP’s crucial
work. As the quality of such brokerage
services suffers, this would cause CBP
to expend additional resources to assist
entities involved in international trade
with navigating complex import and
drawback requirements, which diverts
limited resources away from other
critical aspects of CBP’s trade mission.
To ameliorate that consequence, CBP
proposes to require customs brokers to
maintain their knowledge and skills
through the completion of continuing
customs broker education.
Importers and drawback claimants
also benefit from well-educated customs
brokers who are aware of current
requirements in the complex and
evolving realm of international trade.
When an importer or drawback claimant
enlists the services of a customs broker,
that customs broker is perceived to be
knowledgeable of customs laws,
regulations, and operational processes;
however, an importer or drawback
claimant does not know with certainty
that the customs broker is in fact
knowledgeable of all newly emerging
requirements. The continuing broker
education requirement would provide
importers and drawback claimants with
greater assurance that their agents are
knowledgeable of customs laws and
regulations, familiar with operational
processes, and can properly exercise a
broker’s fiduciary duties.
In recent years, the need for
continuing broker education has also
attracted the attention of international
intergovernmental organizations, such
as the World Customs Organization
3 The Automated Broker Interface (ABI) is an
electronic data interchange that allows brokers and
entry filers (self-filers) to transmit immediate
delivery, entry, and entry summary data
electronically to, and receive electronic messaging
from, CBP in the Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE). See 19 CFR 143.1 and
143.32(a).
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(WCO). In 2018, the WCO published the
WCO Customs Brokers Guidelines,
which is a guidance document wherein
the WCO recognizes the need for
mandatory continuing education for
customs brokers.4 In the guidance
document, the WCO notes that the
passing of an initial broker exam does
not ensure that customs brokers stay
abreast of changes in customs and
related laws and recommends that, on
their own or in partnership with other
governmental, private, or non-profit
organizations, customs administrations
should take on an active role in
educating the customs broker
community about changes in customs
and related laws and reinforcing
existing knowledge.5 Additionally, in
the guidance document, the WCO notes
that some countries already require
customs brokers to complete continuing
education.6 Accordingly, in proposing
to require individual brokers to
complete continuing education, this
NPRM is generally in line with the
WCO’s recommendations on best
practices for customs administrations.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
D. Development of the Proposed
Continuing Broker Education
Requirement
In recent years, the importance of
continuing broker education has
received attention on a domestic level.
In 2013, the predecessor to the
Commercial Customs Operations
Advisory Committee (COAC) 7
recommended that DHS issue
regulations requiring customs brokers to
complete a minimum of 40 hours of
continuing education during a triennial
reporting cycle, pursuant to CBP’s
authority under 19 U.S.C. 1641(f), on
the condition that there be no
accreditation requirements for such
continuing education.8
4 World Customs Organization, WCO Customs
Brokers Guidelines, at 28 (June 2018), available at
https://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/
instrument-and-tools/tools/wco-customs-brokersguidelines.aspx.
5 Id.
6 Id.
7 COAC is jointly appointed by the Secretary of
the Treasury and the Secretary of DHS and advises
the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of
Homeland Security on all matters involving the
commercial operations of CBP. Meetings of COAC
are presided over jointly by the Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy of the
Department of Treasury and Commissioner of CBP.
See section 109 of TFTEA.
8 For a list of COAC recommendations that were
considered open as of April 27, 2016, see
Commercial Customs Operations Advisory
Committee, Term to Date Recommendations: Trade
Modernization Subcommittee, Recommendation
Nos. 10046–10047 (April 27, 2016), available at
https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/
documents/2019-Dec/_COAC%20
Recommendations%20To%20Date%20010001%20%20010412.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
In September 2019, CBP formed the
Requirements for Customs Broker
Continuing Education Task Force (Task
Force), which was placed within COAC
under the Rapid Response
Subcommittee. The objective was to
develop a proposed framework for
continuing education for individual
brokers. This Task Force was comprised
of representatives throughout CBP and
licensed customs brokers from around
the country with decades of experience
with international trade. Through this
Task Force, members provided valuable
input, advice, and operational
perspectives.
In conjunction with the work of the
Task Force and a previous COAC
recommendation,9 CBP published an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) in the Federal Register (85 FR
68260) on October 28, 2020. The
ANPRM announced that CBP was
considering the adoption of a
continuing education requirement for
licensed customs brokers. The ANPRM
solicited comments on the tentative
framework developed by the Task Force
for purposes of gathering further
information and data from the broader
customs broker community. This
request for information and data
assisted CBP in considering whether,
and if so what type of, requirements
would contribute to increased trade
compliance. The ANPRM solicited
comments on the following issues:
• The number of hours of continuing
education that customs brokers should
be required to complete;
• The customs broker license holders
who should be required to complete
continuing education (including license
holders who should be exempt from the
requirement or required to complete
fewer hours of continuing education);
• The types of training, coursework,
or other educational activities that
should qualify for continuing education
credit;
• The manner in which qualifying
continuing broker education should be
provided (online or in-person);
• Whether subject-matter-specific
education requirements should be
imposed;
• How compliance with the
continuing broker education
requirement should be reported to CBP;
• What recordkeeping obligations
should exist for the purpose of the
continuing broker education
requirement;
• What disciplinary actions should be
taken if customs brokers fail to report
their compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement to CBP,
9 See
PO 00000
id.
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50797
or, in the alternative, fail to satisfy the
continuing broker education
requirement;
• What disciplinary actions should
result from the submission of false or
misleading information in association
with the continuing broker education
requirement;
• Whether disciplinary actions
should be taken immediately upon a
customs broker’s failure to report
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement, or whether
customs brokers should be provided
with an opportunity to take corrective
actions, including the length of such
period;
• Whether there should be an
accreditation process to control the
quality of the content of the various
educational activities (including how
such an accreditation process should be
administered, how accreditors should
be selected, and whether educational
activities offered through certain
content providers should automatically
qualify for continuing education credit);
• The types of training, coursework,
or educational activities that customs
brokers already complete on a regular
basis;
• How often customs brokers
currently participate in continuing
education;
• The costs customs brokers would
anticipate to incur as a result of the
implementation of a continuing broker
education requirement; and
• The benefits customs brokers would
anticipate as a result of the
implementation of a continuing broker
education requirement.
The ANPRM provided for a 60-day
public comment period, which closed
on December 28, 2020. During the 60day public comment period, CBP
received 29 comments.10 Of the 29
submissions, 23 submissions were
generally supportive of the
implementation of a continuing
education requirement and 5
submissions were not supportive of the
adoption of a continuing education
requirement. One submission consisted
of a question, and, thus, neither
expressed the commenter’s support of or
opposition to a continuing education
requirement.
In developing this NPRM, CBP
carefully considered all public
comments submitted in response to the
ANPRM. Below are summaries of
comments on topics that received the
most attention and short descriptions of
10 The public comments can be viewed in their
entirety on the public docket for the ANPRM,
Docket No. USCBP 2020–0042, which can be
accessed through https://www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50798
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
how they affected the formulation of the
framework proposed in this NPRM. CBP
will provide more detailed descriptions
of the comments and responses to the
issues raised therein when responding
to the comments received for this
NPRM.
1. Required Number of Hours of
Continuing Education
Seven commenters recommended that
CBP require customs brokers to
complete, at a maximum, 36 hours of
continuing broker education every three
years, rather than the 40 hours of
continuing broker education per
triennial period that was considered in
the ANPRM. CBP believes that requiring
individual brokers to complete on
average one hour of continuing
education per month will make it easier
for individual brokers to plan their
continuing education. Continuing
education requirements of one hour of
continuing education per month have
been adopted for many other
professions.11 CBP also believes that
requiring more than 36 hours of
continuing broker education per
triennial period could be burdensome
for the customs broker community
(especially individual brokers operating
as or working for small businesses) and
a lower requirement would be
insufficient to ensure that individual
brokers keep abreast of changes in
customs and related laws. Accordingly,
CBP has adopted the commenters’
suggestion in this NPRM and is
proposing to require that individual
brokers complete 36 hours of continuing
broker education per triennial period.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
2. Qualifying Continuing Education
Seven commenters suggested that
corporate, in-house training should be
eligible for continuing education credit.
CBP agrees that corporate, in-house
training can serve as an appropriate
continuing education activity, as it is
routinely given to employees to provide
them with knowledge specifically
11 See, e.g., Ala. R. Mand. Cont. Legal Ed. Rule 3,
available at https://www.alabar.org/assets/2019/02/
MCLE-RULE-BOOK-2017-updated-01-17-2017.pdf
(accessed on July 16, 2021); Ark. R. Minimum Con’t
Legal Educ. Rule 4, available at https://
rules.arcourts.gov/w/ark/rules-for-minimumcontinuing-legal-education#!fragment/zoupio-_
Toc44590166/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWsz
IQewE4BUBTADwBdoAvbRABwEtsBaAfX2zg
BYOBWATgAYAjADZhASgA0ybKUIQAiok
K4AntADk6iRDi5sAG30BhJGmgBCZNs
JhcCRcrWbrthAGU8pAEJqASgFEAGX8ANQBBAD
kjfwlSMAAjaFJ2MTEgA (accessed on July 16, 2021);
Conn. Practice Book § 2–27A, available at https://
www.jud.ct.gov/Publications/PracticeBook/PB.pdf
(accessed on July 16, 2021); Cal Bus & Prof Code
§ 1275, available at https://leginfo.legislature.
ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?
sectionNum=1275&lawCode=BPC (accessed on July
16, 2021).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
tailored to their job functions and
experience levels. As such, CBP’s
proposal would allow customs brokers
to satisfy the continuing education
requirement through corporate, in-house
training if the training receives the
approval of an accreditor. CBP believes
that requiring corporate, in-house
training to be approved by an accreditor
will ensure that it meets the objectives
of the continuing education framework
proposed in this NPRM.
Three commenters also suggested that
any training or educational activity
provided by CBP, or offered by any
other U.S. Government agency that
routinely offers training relevant to
customs business, should automatically
qualify for continuing education credit,
without the need for accreditation. CBP
agrees and believes that these types of
activities should automatically qualify
for continuing education credit, thus
limiting the administrative burden and
overall costs associated with the
implementation of the proposed rule.
Additionally, CBP’s trainings are
designed to educate the public about
important and timely issues facing
entities involved in international trade,
and, thus, by virtue of their design, meet
the objectives of continuing broker
education—that is, to assist individual
brokers in maintaining a sufficient
knowledge of customs matters.
Accordingly, CBP adopted the
commenters’ suggestion in this NPRM.
3. Specific Subject Matter Content
Requirements
Five commenters raised concerns
pertaining to CBP’s proposal to require
customs brokers to complete a specific
number of hours of continuing
education on specific subject matter
areas (content requirements). In the
ANPRM, CBP solicited public
comments on the adoption of a
continuing broker education framework
that would have required the majority
(75 percent) of the required continuing
education credits to pertain to laws
authorizing CBP operations and
processes, as well as CBP regulations
and programs. Under the proposal
considered in the ANPRM, only the
remainder (25 percent) would have been
available for education focusing on
other areas related to international trade
(such as other U.S. Government agency
requirements).
All commenters that addressed
specific subject matter areas raised
concerns about the adoption of the
ANPRM’s stringent content
requirement. These commenters noted
that such a content requirement would
discourage individual brokers from
participating in continuing education
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
specifically tailored to their job
functions and their experience levels,
and, therefore, would inhibit
professionalism and competency within
the customs broker community. In light
of the commenters’ concerns, CBP is not
proposing to require individual brokers
to complete a specific number of hours
of continuing education on laws
authorizing CBP operations and
processes, and CBP regulations and
programs. CBP recognizes that the
educational needs of individual brokers
differ greatly based on each individual
broker’s position, experience level, and
type of employment, and, thus, render
content requirements impractical.
Additionally, CBP believes that, as CBP
and the PGAs offer a sufficient number
of free, online-based trainings for an
individual broker to meet the required
number of continued education credits,
there is little risk that an individual
broker would opt to complete the same
training or educational activity multiple
times solely for the purpose of earning
the required minimum number of
continuing education credits.
4. Recordkeeping Requirements
Four commenters agreed with CBP’s
suggestion that although individual
brokers should maintain records
documenting their compliance with the
continuing broker education
requirement (including specific
information), they should not be
required to maintain records in any
specific format (i.e., electronically or in
paper). Although the commenters
agreed with this suggestion, several of
the commenters requested that a form be
developed in the Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE) where
customs brokers could record their
credits as they are earned and accrued.
In accordance with the commenters’
suggestions, this NPRM does not
propose requiring customs brokers to
maintain records documenting their
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement in any specific
form, although the proposed regulations
require such records to include certain
information and documentation, which
are discussed in further detail in section
IV.C.4. of this NPRM. CBP appreciates
the commenters’ suggestion and will
consider developing such a tool in ACE.
If developed, customs brokers would
not be required to use the ACE tool, but
it would serve as an option for
individuals to track their credits earned.
However, this ACE tool would not be a
substitute for maintaining records
documenting compliance with the
continuing broker education
requirement.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
5. Economic Impact
Four commenters raised concerns
about the costs of requiring continuing
education and the potential impact of a
continuing broker education
requirement on small businesses. CBP
appreciates these comments and has
developed the proposed framework for
continuing broker education with this
concern in mind. In addition to
lowering the originally proposed
number of required hours of continuing
education, CBP is also committed to
providing free, online content that will
satisfy the continuing broker education
requirement. CBP already provides at
least 36 hours of training or
informational webinars on an annual
basis, which would allow individual
brokers to fully satisfy the continuing
broker education requirement through
free, CBP-provided content. As
described in more detail below, CBP is
also proposing that, once accreditation
has been obtained for training or
educational activities, the vast majority
of continuing education currently
obtained at a broker’s expense for
various certificate programs offered by
the private sector would qualify for
continuing education credit.
6. Effectiveness of Continuing Education
Five commenters were opposed to the
introduction of a continuing education
requirement for customs brokers,
arguing that this would not affect
compliance and that customs brokers
demonstrate their knowledge of customs
business on a transactional basis with
their clients. A number of the
commenters also requested that customs
brokers who do not actively file entries
should be exempt from the requirement.
CBP disagrees and is proposing that all
individual brokers, regardless of filing
status, earn continuing education credit,
with the exception of those individual
brokers who have voluntarily
suspended their licenses in accordance
with 19 CFR 111.52. Furthermore, CBP
continues to believe that the complex
and evolving realm of international
trade warrants a continuing education
framework for individual brokers.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
IV. Discussion of Proposed Framework
for Continuing Education for Licensed
Customs Brokers
CBP is proposing amendments to 19
CFR part 111 to require continuing
education for individual customs broker
license holders. CBP’s proposal includes
the addition of a new subpart F to 19
CFR part 111, consisting of §§ 111.101
through 111.104, which will set forth
the continuing broker education
requirement and the framework for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
administering this requirement.
Proposed § 111.101 sets forth the scope
of proposed subpart F, proposed
§ 111.102 sets forth the obligations that
individual customs brokers would have
in conjunction with the continuing
broker education requirement, proposed
§ 111.103 contains the requirements that
educational activities would be required
to meet in order to satisfy the
continuing broker education
requirement and sets forth an
accreditation process for certain training
or educational activities, and proposed
§ 111.104 sets forth the disciplinary
proceedings for the failure to comply
with the continuing broker education
requirement.
CBP is also proposing to amend
several existing provisions in 19 CFR
part 111. CBP is proposing to require
individual brokers to certify and report
their compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement as part of
the submission of the status report,
which is due on a triennial basis
(hereinafter, referred to as ‘‘status
report’’ or ‘‘triennial report’’) by
amending § 111.30(d). Additionally,
CBP is proposing to amend § 111.0,
which sets forth the scope of part 111,
in order to reflect the addition of
proposed subpart F, and amend § 111.1,
which is a definitional provision, in
order to define certain terms as they are
used in the context of the continuing
broker education requirement. Finally,
CBP is proposing to reserve §§ 111.97
through 111.100 for future use. The
proposed changes are described in
detail below.
A. Modifications to the Scope of 19 CFR
Part 111
Section 111.0 sets forth the scope of
the provisions contained in 19 CFR part
111, which currently include the
licensing of, and granting of permits to,
persons desiring to transact customs
business as customs brokers, the duties
and responsibilities of customs brokers,
and the grounds for disciplining
customs brokers. CBP is proposing to
revise the second sentence of § 111.0 to
reflect the proposed addition of
regulatory provisions requiring
individual brokers to satisfy a
continuing education requirement.
B. Definitions for the Proposed
Continuing Broker Education
Framework
Section 111.1 provides definitions for
terms as they appear in 19 CFR part 111.
For purposes of the creation of a
continuing education requirement for
individual brokers, CBP is proposing the
addition of definitions of four terms—
‘‘continuing broker education
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50799
requirement’’, ‘‘continuing education
credit’’, ‘‘qualifying continuing broker
education’’, and ‘‘triennial period’’.
Although amended § 111.1 would
continue to list definitions in
alphabetical order, this section
discusses the proposed definitions in
logical order, for explanatory purposes.
The term ‘‘qualifying continuing
broker education’’ defines any training
or educational activity that is eligible or,
if required, has been approved for
continuing education credit, in
accordance with proposed § 111.103.
This definition indicates that a wide
range of training or educational
activities will meet an individual
broker’s obligation to complete
continuing education, which must
satisfy the requirements set forth in
proposed § 111.103.
The term ‘‘continuing education
credit’’ defines the unit of measurement
used for meeting the continuing broker
education requirement. The smallest
recognized unit is one continuing
education credit, which requires 60
minutes of continuous participation in a
qualifying continuing broker education
program, as defined in proposed
§ 111.103(a). For qualifying continuing
broker education lasting more than 60
minutes, one continuing education
credit may be claimed for the first 60
minutes of continuous participation,
and half of one continuing education
credit may be claimed for every full 30
minutes of continuous participation
thereafter. For example, for a qualifying
continuing broker education program
lasting more than 60 minutes but less
than 90 minutes, only one continuing
education credit may be claimed. In
contrast, for a qualifying continuing
broker education program lasting 90
minutes, 1.5 continuing education
credits may be claimed.
The term ‘‘continuing broker
education requirement’’ defines an
individual customs broker license
holder’s obligation to complete a certain
number of continuing education credits
of qualifying continuing broker
education, as set forth in proposed
subpart F of part 111, in order to
maintain sufficient knowledge of
customs and related laws, regulations,
and procedures, bookkeeping,
accounting, and all other appropriate
matters necessary to render valuable
service to importers and drawback
claimants.
The term ‘‘triennial period’’ defines a
period of three years commencing on
February 1, 1985, or on February 1 in
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50800
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
any third year thereafter.12 As explained
in further detail below, CBP is
proposing to require individual brokers
to report and certify compliance with
the continuing broker education
requirement on the triennial report.
Thus, for purposes of clarification, CBP
is proposing a definition for the 3-year
period between the due dates of two
consecutive status reports.
C. Continuing Education Requirements
for Customs Brokers
In addition to requiring individual
brokers to participate in continuing
education activities, the proposed
framework includes provisions
imposing additional related duties upon
individual brokers, such as reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, that
promote compliance and allow for the
enforcement of the continuing
education requirement. For these
reasons, the proposed framework also
contains provisions authorizing
disciplinary actions upon a broker’s
failure to comply with these
requirements. These requirements are
contained in proposed §§ 111.102 and
111.104, which are discussed in detail
below.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
1. Customs Broker License Holders
Subject to Continuing Broker Education
Requirement
Proposed § 111.102(a) sets forth the
customs broker license holders who will
be subject to the continuing broker
education requirement. Specifically,
proposed § 111.102(a) provides that
only individual customs broker license
holders (individual brokers) will be
required to complete qualifying
continuing broker education. Proposed
§ 111.102(a) also exempts two groups of
individual brokers from this
requirement—namely, individual
brokers who have voluntarily
suspended their license in accordance
with § 111.52, and individual customs
broker license holders who have not
held their license for an entire triennial
period at the time of the submission of
the status report as required under
§ 111.30(d). CBP does not believe that it
is necessary to require continuing
education for individual brokers who
have not held their license for an entire
triennial period at the time that their
first triennial report is due, because
these individual brokers have recently
demonstrated a sufficient baseline
knowledge of customs matters by
12 February 1, 1985, was the first due date for the
triennial reporting requirement, and, thus, February
1 in any third year thereafter is the date on which
the triennial report becomes due. See 19 CFR
111.30(d)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
passing the customs broker
examination.
CBP is proposing to exempt
individual brokers who have voluntarily
suspended their license from the
continuing broker education
requirement because customs brokers
may choose to voluntarily suspend their
licenses for many reasons, including
changes in a broker’s personal life or the
entry into federal service (which
prohibits the customs broker from
concurrently serving as a customs
broker to transact customs business on
behalf of clients in dealings with the
federal government). As some of these
reasons may prevent a broker from
participating in or attending qualifying
continuing broker education programs,
CBP believes that requiring individual
brokers to comply with the continuing
broker education requirement during a
period of voluntary suspension would
be overly burdensome.
At this time, CBP is not proposing to
impose a similar obligation onto
corporation, partnership, or association
brokers (hereinafter, collectively
referred to as ‘‘corporate brokers’’),
because knowledge is held at the
individual level. The reason is because
corporate brokers are comprised of one
or more individual brokers and the
individual brokers will be subject to the
continuing education requirement.
Furthermore, the training required of
the employees of a customs broker is
already taken into consideration when
determining whether the license holder
exercises responsible supervision and
control. Pursuant to 19 CFR 111.28(a),
every licensed member or officer of a
corporate broker that is an individual
broker, as well as every individual
broker operating as a sole proprietor, is
obligated to exercise responsible
supervision and control over the
transaction of the customs business of
the sole proprietorship, partnership,
association, or corporation.13 Therefore,
individual brokers who serve as
members or officials of a corporate
broker, as well as individual brokers
who operate as sole proprietorships
with employees, are already
incentivized to ensure that the
employees of the sole proprietorship,
partnership, association, or corporation
complete continuing education.
Accordingly, CBP does not believe that
13 Section 111.1 defines the phrase ‘‘responsible
supervision and control’’ and provides, in relevant
part, that one of the factors that CBP will consider
in determining whether the customs broker
exercises responsible supervision and control is the
training required of the employees of the broker.
However, the determination of what is necessary to
perform and maintain responsible supervision and
control will vary depending upon the
circumstances in each instance. See 19 CFR 111.1.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
it is necessary to impose a similar
obligation on corporate brokers at the
organizational level.
2. Required Minimum Number of
Continuing Education Credits
Proposed § 111.102(b) sets forth the
number of continuing education credits
that individual brokers, who, pursuant
to proposed § 111.102(a), are subject to
the continuing broker education
requirement, must complete.
Specifically, proposed § 111.102(b)
provides that these individual brokers
are required to complete at least 36
continuing education credits per
triennial period, except upon the
reinstatement of a license following a
period of voluntary suspension as
described in § 111.52. Upon
consideration of the public comments
received on the ANPRM, CBP is no
longer proposing to require 40
continuing education credits per
triennial period, as this will simplify the
proration of continuing education
credits for the purposes discussed
below.
When a broker chooses to reactivate
his or her license following a period of
voluntary suspension, the broker
generally contacts CBP to begin the
reinstatement process. This process
determines the precise date on which
the license will be reinstated, which
may occur at any time during the
triennial period. Thus, after a period of
voluntary suspension, the completion of
the full 36 continuing education credits
within the remainder of the current
triennial period could impose an undue
burden upon the individual broker,
depending on when during the triennial
period the reinstatement occurs. To
address this, proposed § 111.102(b)
provides that, following the
reinstatement of a license after a period
of voluntary suspension, the number of
continuing education credits required
for the triennial period (that is, the
triennial period during which the
reinstatement of the license occurs) is
calculated on a prorated basis, of one
continuing education credit for each
complete remaining month until the end
of the triennial period.
For example, if, following a period of
voluntary suspension, an individual
broker’s license were to be reinstated on
March 21, 2028, the individual broker
would only be required to complete 22
continuing education credits during the
triennial period (February 1, 2027, to
February 1, 2030) in which the license
was reinstated. Effectively, the amount
of continuing education credits required
is prorated for the number of full
months remaining in the triennial
period (April 1, 2028, to February 1,
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
2030). As another example, if the
individual broker’s license were to be
reinstated on February 1, 2027, the
individual broker would be required to
complete all 36 continuing education
credits during the triennial period.
When, following a period of voluntary
suspension, the individual broker
contacts CBP to request the
reinstatement of the license, CBP will
assist the broker in determining the
prorated number of continuing
education credits that he or she will be
required to complete during the current
triennial period.
3. Reporting of Compliance With the
Continuing Broker Education
Requirement
Proposed § 111.102(c) provides that
individual brokers, who are required to
comply with the continuing broker
education requirement, will be subject
to an additional reporting obligation.
Specifically, CBP is proposing to require
individual brokers to report and certify
their compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement upon the
submission of the status report required
under existing § 111.30(d).
Current § 111.30(d)(1) requires both
individual and corporate brokers to file
a status report with CBP. The status
report is due on February 1 of each third
year after 1985, and will be considered
timely filed as long as the report is
received during the month of February.
As part of the submission of the
triennial report, customs brokers are
required to pay a fee, which is
prescribed in paragraph (d) of § 111.96.
Status reports must be addressed to the
director of the port through which the
license was delivered to the licensee
(see § 111.15), or, since the February
2021 triennial period, can be filed in the
eCBP portal (available at https://e.cbp.
dhs.gov/ecbp/#/main). The information
that must be included in a status report
submitted by an individual broker is set
forth in current § 111.30(d)(2).
As proposed § 111.102(c) would
impose upon individual brokers the
obligation to report and certify their
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement upon the
submission of the status report, CBP is
also proposing to amend current
§ 111.30(d)(2) to reflect this obligation
by adding a new paragraph (d)(2)(iv) to
reflect that individual customs brokers
must report and certify their compliance
with the continuing broker education
requirement. CBP is also proposing
minor grammatical changes to existing
paragraphs (d)(2)(ii) and (iii) of § 111.30
in order to allow for the addition of
proposed paragraph (d)(2)(iv); however,
these changes are not substantive.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
Individual brokers who file paper-based
triennial reports with CBP would report
and certify compliance by including a
written statement in the triennial report
that reports and certifies their
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement.
CBP is proposing to require
individual brokers to report and certify
compliance on the triennial report for
two reasons. First, as the status report
has been an integral part of maintaining
a customs broker license since 1985,
this mechanism is familiar to customs
brokers and will minimize any
additional burden that the new
reporting obligation would place upon
individual brokers. As individual
brokers are already accustomed to the
submission of status reports, individual
brokers would not need to familiarize
themselves with a new type of
information collection. Second, aligning
the timeframe for continuing education
with the three-year filing timeframe for
the status report will give individual
brokers a number of years to earn the
required number of continuing
education credits. This will provide
them with flexibility and the
opportunity to select qualifying
continuing broker education programs
that best meet their individual
educational needs.
4. Recordkeeping Requirements for
Individual Customs Brokers
In conjunction with the continuing
education requirement, CBP is
proposing to require individual brokers
to maintain records documenting their
completion of the required number of
continuing education credits. This
requirement is set forth in proposed
§ 111.102(d), and is intended to enable
CBP to verify an individual broker’s
compliance with the requirements set
forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
proposed § 111.102.
Proposed § 111.102(d)(1) provides
that, for a period of three years
following the submission of the status
report required under § 111.30(d), an
individual broker must retain certain
information and documentation
pertaining to the qualifying continuing
broker education completed during the
triennial period. Proposed
§ 111.102(d)(1) contains a list of the type
of information and documentation that
must be retained, consisting of: (1) The
title of the qualifying continuing broker
education attended; (2) the name of the
provider or host of the qualifying
continuing broker education; (3) the
date(s) attended; (4) the number of
continuing education credits accrued;
(5) the location of the training or
educational activity, if the training or
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50801
educational activity is offered in person;
and (6) any documentation received
from the provider or host of the
qualifying continuing broker education
that evidences the individual broker’s
registration for, attendance at,
completion of, or other activity bearing
upon the individual broker’s
participation in and completion of the
qualifying continuing broker education.
The last item would include receipts or
confirmations documenting the
individual broker’s intention to attend
the qualifying continuing broker
education program, written or electronic
materials provided as part of the
attendance of the training or educational
activity, or certificates of completion or
attendance. An individual broker would
only be required to retain such
documentation, if such documentation
is made available by the provider or
host of the qualifying continuing broker
education to attendees of the training or
educational activity. Unlike the general
broker record retention requirement in
current 19 CFR 111.23(b), the
recordkeeping requirement in proposed
§ 111.102(d)(1) only requires the records
to be retained for a period of three years
following the submission of the
triennial report (rather than for a fiveyear period).
Upon consideration of the comments
received in response to the ANPRM,
CBP is not proposing to require
individual brokers to maintain the
records in a specific format (i.e.,
electronically or in paper). For example,
if the individual broker received paper
documents in the mail or in person from
an education provider, the individual
broker could retain the information in
that form, or could scan and retain it in
electronic form. Based on several public
comments to the ANPRM, CBP will
explore building a tool in ACE that
would serve as a place to record and
track continuing education credits, but
this would not be a substitute for
document retention by the individual
broker. Individual brokers would not be
required to access or use this tool;
rather, it would provide a means to
record continuing education credits
earned over time if convenient for the
individual broker.
Proposed § 111.102(d)(2) provides
CBP with authority to request the
information and documentation for a
period of three years following the
submission of the status report required
under § 111.30(d)(2). CBP can request
the information and documentation be
made available for in-person inspection,
or be delivered to CBP by either hardcopy or electronic means, or any
combination thereof. Proposed
§ 111.102(d) is intended to enable CBP
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50802
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
to verify an individual broker’s
compliance with the requirements set
forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
proposed section—that is, the
completion of the required number of
continuing education credits during the
triennial period.
5. Disciplinary Actions
Proposed § 111.104 authorizes CBP to
take disciplinary actions, if an
individual broker, who is required to
complete qualifying continuing broker
education, submits a triennial report but
fails to report and certify his or her
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement on the triennial
report. These actions take a path of
‘‘progressive discipline’’ by imposing
increasingly serious measures following
a reasonable time and opportunity to
take corrective actions. This approach is
rooted in CBP’s goal to ensure that all
individual brokers participate in
continuing education activities, but not
to take disciplinary actions against
brokers for mere clerical errors, such as
the failure to report compliance with the
continuing broker education
requirement due to a mere oversight.
Proposed § 111.104(a) provides that, if
an individual broker, who is required to
complete qualifying continuing broker
education, submits a triennial report but
fails to report and certify his or her
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement on the triennial
report, CBP will notify the individual
broker of his or her noncompliance.
Pursuant to proposed § 111.104(a), CBP
would send the notification to the
address reflected in CBP’s records or
transmit it electronically pursuant to
any electronic means authorized by CBP
for that purpose. This language would
authorize CBP to send such notification
to the mailing address that the
individual broker listed on the status
report or via email (if the individual
broker’s email address is on file with
CBP).
Proposed § 111.104(b) requires the
noncompliant individual broker to take
appropriate corrective actions within 30
calendar days upon the issuance of such
notification. During this period, the
individual broker would be provided
with an opportunity to take corrective
actions without being subjected to any
disciplinary consequences for his or her
noncompliance. As reflected in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of proposed
§ 111.104, the nature of the required
corrective actions is determined by the
reason for the individual broker’s failure
to report and certify compliance on the
triennial report. If the individual broker
completed the required number of
continuing education credits, but failed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
to report and certify his or her
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement on the triennial
report, the broker would merely be
required to submit a corrected triennial
report that reflects the broker’s
compliance. If the individual broker did
not report and certify compliance on the
triennial report because the broker did
not complete the required number of
continuing education credits, the broker
would be required to complete the
required number of continuing
education credits and then submit a
corrected triennial report.
Proposed § 111.104(c) provides that, if
the noncompliant individual broker
fails to take the required corrective
actions within 30 calendar days upon
the issuance of the aforementioned
notification, CBP will take actions to
suspend the broker’s individual license.
Upon the suspension of the individual
broker’s license and the issuance of the
order of suspension, the individual
broker would be provided with an
additional opportunity to take the
required corrective actions before CBP
would take more serious disciplinary
measures. Specifically, in paragraph (d),
proposed § 111.104 provides that, if
following the suspension of the license
the noncompliant individual fails to
take the required corrective actions
within 120 calendar days upon the
issuance of the order of suspension, CBP
will take actions to revoke the
individual broker’s license without
prejudice to the filing of an application
for a new license. As proposed
§ 111.104(d) provides that the
individual broker’s license would be
revoked without prejudice to the filing
of an application for a new license, the
individual broker would not be
prevented from seeking a new
individual customs broker license at a
later point in time.
Existing § 111.53(c) provides the
relevant basis for the suspension and/or
revocation of a customs broker’s license
when an individual broker fails to
submit a status report reporting and
certifying his or her compliance with
the continuing broker education
requirement. Section 111.53(c), which
authorizes CBP to initiate proceedings
for the suspension, for a specific period
of time, or revocation of the license or
permit of any broker for any violation of
a statutory provision enforced by CBP or
any rule or regulation issued by CBP,
implements 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(1)(C).
Consequently, pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1641(d)(2)(B), as implemented by
subpart D of part 111 (19 CFR part 111,
subpart D), CBP would be required to
comply with certain formal procedural
requirements in suspending or revoking
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
the individual broker’s license, which
would conclude with the issuance of an
order of suspension or revocation. This
is reflected in paragraphs (c) and (d) of
proposed § 111.104 through the crossreferences to subpart D of part 111. As
such, CBP is not adopting either of the
proposals considered in the ANPRM—
that is, to suspend or revoke an
individual broker’s license by operation
of law.
The provisions of proposed § 111.104
would only apply to cases in which an
individual broker, who is required to
complete qualifying continuing broker
education, submits a triennial report but
fails to report and certify his or her
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement on the triennial
report. CBP believes that any other type
of misconduct could be sufficiently
addressed through existing regulatory
provisions. For example, if an
individual broker were to fail to timely
submit a triennial report, or to submit
no triennial report at all, CBP would
continue to seek the suspension and/or
revocation of the individual broker’s
license in accordance with the
provisions of current § 111.30(d)(4).
Additionally, current § 111.53(a), which
implements 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(1)(A),
authorizes CBP to initiate proceedings
for the suspension, for a specific period
of time, or revocation of the license or
permit of a customs broker, if the broker
has, among others, made in any report
filed with CBP any statement which
was, at the time and in light of the
circumstances under which it was
made, false or misleading with respect
to any material fact, or has omitted to
state in any report any material fact
which was required.
In the context of the proposed
framework, CBP foresees that violations
of § 111.53(a) could arise from the
following misconduct. First, a violation
of § 111.53(a) would occur, if an
individual broker were to falsely report
and certify compliance with the
continuing broker education
requirement on the triennial report
when, at the time of the submission of
the triennial report, the individual
broker had not completed the required
number of continuing education credits.
This would include cases in which an
individual broker, who has not yet
completed the required number of
continuing education credits, submits a
triennial report on which the broker
reports and certifies compliance, but
later completes the required number of
continuing education credits. Second, a
violation of § 111.53(a) would occur, if,
in accordance with proposed
§ 111.102(d)(2), CBP were to request
additional documentation from an
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
individual broker to verify the broker’s
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement, and the
documentation submitted by the broker
were to contain any statement which, at
the time and in light of the
circumstances under which it was
made, is false or misleading with
respect to any material fact, or omitted
a material fact. This would include the
submission of falsified documentation,
documentation containing false or
misleading statements of material fact,
or documentation omitting any material
fact (such as the title or provider of a
continuing education program, if the
training or educational activity did not
meet the requirements for qualifying
continuing broker education). Third, a
violation of § 111.53(a) would occur, if,
in accordance with proposed
§ 111.102(d)(2), CBP were to request
additional documentation from an
individual broker to verify the broker’s
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement, and the
individual broker were to be unable to
submit any documentation in response
to CBP’s request.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
D. Training and Educational Activities
That Qualify as Continuing Broker
Education
Although amended § 111.1 contains a
proposed definition of the term
‘‘qualifying continuing broker
education’’, this definition also provides
that, in order to constitute qualifying
continuing broker education, a training
or educational activity must meet
certain additional requirements. These
requirements are set forth in paragraphs
(a) and (b) of proposed § 111.103.
Specifically, paragraph (a)(1) sets forth
requirements for categories of
educational providers (including both
government and non-government
providers), while paragraph (a)(2) lists
the types of training or educational
activities that are recognized for
purposes of the continuing broker
education requirement. Paragraph (b) of
proposed § 111.103 contains provisions
pertaining to continuing education
credits that are earned as an instructor,
discussion leader, and speaker.
1. Categories of Educational Providers
Proposed § 111.103(a)(1) divides
training or educational activities into
two categories based on the identity of
the content provider offering the
training or educational activity.
Pursuant to proposed paragraph (a)(1)(i),
the first category consists of training or
educational activities offered by U.S.
Government agencies. Specifically,
paragraph (a)(1)(i) provides that
qualifying continuing broker education
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
constitutes any training or educational
activity offered by CBP, whether online
or in-person, and any training or
educational activity offered by another
U.S. Government agency, whether
online or in-person, if the content is
relevant to customs business. These
types of trainings or educational
activities would not require the
approval of a CBP-selected accreditor
and would qualify for continuing
education credit automatically.
CBP is proposing that training or
educational activities offered by U.S.
Government agencies should
automatically qualify for continuing
education credit, without the approval
by a CBP-selected accreditor, because
quality control of the content is less of
a concern with regard to this type of
content provider. Training or
educational activities offered by CBP are
designed to educate the public about
important and timely issues faced by
entities involved in international trade.
Thus, CBP believes that, by virtue of
their design, these training or
educational activities meet the
objectives of the continuing broker
education framework—that is, to assist
individual brokers in maintaining a
sufficient knowledge of customs
matters. Additionally, CBP believes that
other U.S. Government agencies
carefully select educational content
based on timeliness and importance,
and accurately present the content to
members of the public.
CBP believes that allowing training or
educational activities offered by CBP, or
other U.S. Government agencies, if they
provide educational content that is
relevant to customs business, to
automatically qualify for continuing
education credit will limit the
administrative burden and costs
associated with the implementation of
the proposal. CBP’s proposal
deliberately provides individual brokers
with wide latitude when determining
whether a training or educational
activity offered by an U.S. Government
agency other than CBP is relevant to
customs business. This discretion
empowers individual brokers with the
ability to select training or educational
activities based on their individual
educational needs. CBP also anticipates
making a list of recommended U.S.
Government agency provided training or
educational activities publicly available
on the CBP website to allow individual
brokers to easily identify activities that
are free of cost and automatically
qualify for continuing education credit.
Pursuant to proposed paragraph
(a)(1)(ii), the second category of
educational providers consists of
training or educational activities offered
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50803
by a content provider other than a U.S.
Government agency. Any training or
educational activity not offered by a
U.S. Government agency (such as
private-sector entities, non-profit
organizations, and foreign government
agencies), whether online or in-person,
will not be considered qualifying
continuing broker education, unless the
training or educational activity has been
approved for continuing education
credit by a CBP-selected accreditor
before the training or educational
activity is provided. CBP is proposing to
require accreditation for such training or
educational activities to ensure that they
offer educational content that is highquality, current, relevant, and accurate,
and that it is directly tied to customs
business.
As noted previously, CBP is not
proposing the adoption of subjectmatter-specific content requirements at
this time in order to enable individual
brokers to participate in educational
opportunities that provide them with
knowledge directly relevant to their
specific position and experience level.
Additionally, to encourage the creation
of low-cost educational opportunities
that satisfy the continuing broker
education requirement, CBP’s proposal
does not differentiate between
educational opportunities that are
offered online or in-person. CBP intends
for this to minimize the costs to small
businesses and customs brokers in
remote locations so that individual
brokers will not be required to travel to
attend qualifying continuing broker
education programs. CBP believes that
the opportunity for individual brokers
to earn the required number of
continued education credits through
free, online-based trainings would
further incentivize individual brokers to
select training or educational activities
based on their educational needs and,
thereby, limit the risk that individual
brokers complete the same training or
educational activities multiple times
solely for the purpose of earning the
required minimum number of
continuing education credits.
Regardless of who provides the
training or educational activities, CBP
anticipates that providers will issue
certificates to customs brokers upon
completion. CBP will make certificates
of attendance available for all of its
training or educational activities to
those participants who want them. For
online-based training or educational
activities, CBP will make certificates of
attendance available for download or
printing at the conclusion of the
presentation. For in-person activities,
such as the Trade Symposium, CBP will
make paper certificates available to
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50804
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
licensed customs brokers to pick up
prior to the end of the conference.
Additionally, because one of the factors
to become a CBP-selected accreditor
will be to design and develop
certificates for approved education
providers to use as needed, certificates
of attendance will also be available for
any qualifying continuing broker
education offered by private, non-profit,
or foreign government entities.14
CBP will work with its PGAs to make
them aware of the new continuing
education requirements, if finalized, so
that the PGAs can consider making
available certificates of attendance or
completion, whether in electronic or
paper form. However, CBP is unable to
require its PGAs to provide certificates
of attendance or completion. Proposed
§ 111.102(d)(1)(iv) thus only requires an
individual broker to retain any
documentation that the individual
broker received from the provider or
host of the qualifying continuing broker
education that evidences the individual
broker’s registration for, attendance at,
completion of, or other activity bearing
upon the individual broker’s
participation in and completion of the
qualifying continuing broker education.
Therefore, the language in proposed
§ 111.102(d)(1)(iv) accounts for the
possibility that certificates of attendance
or completion may not be issued for all
qualifying training or educational
activities provided by its PGAs.
2. Recognized Training or Educational
Activities
CBP is proposing that only certain
categories of training or educational
activities may be considered qualifying
continuing broker education. The list of
recognized categories of training or
educational activities is contained in
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iv) of
proposed § 111.103. Paragraph (a)(2)(i)
provides that the first category consists
of coursework, seminars, or workshops,
whether online or in-person, that are
conducted by an instructor, discussion
leader, or speaker. This category would
include most webinars, in-house
training, university or college courses,
or similar educational programs.
Paragraph (a)(2)(ii) provides that the
second category includes symposia and
conventions, whether online or inperson. This category would include the
annual CBP Trade Symposium and
similar educational programs. However,
meetings that are conducted in
accordance with the provisions of the
14 As part of the RFP process, applicants will be
required to provide CBP with information how they
plan to handle the post-course certification process
for those course providers who apply for
accreditation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.) (FACA), are
expressly excluded from this category.
As such, individual brokers would not
be permitted to claim continuing
education credit for their participation
in committees, subcommittees,
workgroups, and any other group
organized under the auspices of the
Commercial Customs Operations
Advisory Committee (COAC), as well as
public COAC meetings. CBP is
proposing to exclude FACA meetings
because these meetings do not serve an
educational purpose. FACA meetings
are intended, instead, to solicit advice
from advisory committee members and
to receive input from the public that
may later form the basis for government
decisions.
The last two categories of recognized
training or educational activities are set
forth in paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) and (iv)
which will permit individual brokers
serving as instructors, discussion
leaders, or speakers to receive
continuing education credit for the time
spent preparing a subject matter for
presentation and presenting a subject
matter (hereinafter, referred to as
‘‘special allowance’’). Paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii) and (iv) provide that the
subject matter must be presented as part
of a training or educational activity that
falls within one of the first two
recognized categories of training or
educational activities (that is, the
categories described in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of proposed § 111.103),
and the special allowance for
instructors, discussion leaders, or
speakers is subject to the conditions and
limitations set forth in proposed
§ 111.103(b).
While CBP is proposing to carve out
a special allowance for certain
instructors, discussion leaders, or
speakers, CBP is not proposing to permit
individual brokers to claim continuing
education credit for authoring articles,
books, or other publications. CBP
believes that the learning involved in
the authoring of a publication does not
necessarily equate to the knowledge
derived from a continuing education
program that is current and developed
by an individual or organization
qualified in the relevant subject matter,
as the learning does not necessarily
include an interactive component. For
this reason, CBP is also not including
credit hours for independently reading
articles, books, or other publications or
for paid subscriptions to these types of
materials. If these materials are part of
an accredited course, then the course
hours may be eligible for continuing
education credit.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
3. Special Allowance for Instructors,
Discussion Leaders, and Speakers
Proposed § 111.103(b) sets forth
additional requirements and limitations
pertaining to the special allowance for
instructors, discussion leaders, and
speakers. In proposed paragraph (b)(1),
CBP sets forth that, contingent upon the
approval by a CBP-selected accreditor,
an individual broker may claim one
continuing education credit for each full
60 minutes spent presenting subject
matter, or preparing subject matter for
presentation, as a discussion leader, or
speaker at a training or educational
activity described in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)
and (ii) of this section.
However, the special allowance for
instructors, discussion leaders, and
speakers is subject to limitations, which
are set forth in proposed § 111.103(b)(2)
and (3). Specifically, proposed
§ 111.103(b)(2)(i) provides that, for any
session of presentation given at one
time, regardless of the duration of that
session, an individual broker may claim,
at a maximum, one continuing
education credit for the time spent
preparing subject matter for that
presentation pursuant to paragraph
(b)(1)(ii). Further, proposed
§ 111.103(b)(2)(ii) also imposes a limit
on the total number of continuing
education credits that an individual
broker can earn based on his or her
activities as an instructor, discussion
leader, or speaker. This limit is 12
continuing education credits per
triennial period. CBP is proposing these
limitations to ensure that individual
brokers receive education in a broad
variety of subject matters, not just
provide instructions, possibly
exclusively on the same subject matter.
As specified in proposed
§ 111.103(b)(3), any instructor,
discussion leader, or speaker seeking to
claim continuing education credit for
the preparation of a subject matter for
presentation, or the presentation of a
subject matter, at one of a training or
educational activity described in
paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (ii) of proposed
§ 111.103, must obtain approval by a
CBP-selected accreditor, regardless of
whether the training or educational
activity is offered by a U.S. Government
agency or another provider. CBP is
proposing this requirement in order to
ensure that the effort and quality of the
educational experience derived from the
activities as an instructor, discussion
leader, or speaker is commensurate with
the award of continuing education
credit.
Like content providers, the means by
which an individual broker claiming
continuing education credits under the
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
special allowance would be notified of
an accreditor’s approval would vary
based on the terms of the accreditor’s
contractual relationship with CBP,
which is discussed in further detail in
section IV.E. of this NPRM. Depending
on the terms of the accreditor’s
contractual relationship with CBP, the
individual broker would be notified of
the accreditor’s approval either in
writing or electronically, or both. CBP
anticipates that, as part of the selection
process for the accreditors, it will
require each accreditor to (1) provide
CBP with a running list of activities that
the accreditor approved, and/or (2)
publish this list on its website. A failure
to observe the requirements and
limitations set forth in proposed
§ 111.103(b) would result in a failure to
comply with the continuing broker
education requirement for the triennial
period. Thus, if an individual broker
were to fail to observe the requirements
and limitations set forth in proposed
§ 111.103(b) and to report and certify
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement on the triennial
report, the individual broker would
falsely report and certify compliance on
the triennial report. As a result, CBP
could impose disciplinary actions
pursuant to proposed § 111.104 and
existing § 111.53(a).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
E. Accreditation of Providers of
Continuing Broker Education
CBP believes that it is necessary to
implement an accreditation process for
training or educational activities not
offered by a U.S. Government agency,
including the special allowance for
instructors, discussion leaders, or
speakers, to ensure that such activities
meet the objectives of the continuing
broker education requirement. Due to
resource constraints, CBP is not well
positioned to administer the
accreditation of training and
educational activities. Thus, CBP,
through the Office of Trade, is
proposing to select accreditors who will
review and approve or deny such
training or educational activities for
continuing education credit. Below is a
description of the selection process,
which is outlined in proposed
§ 111.103(c), and the accreditation
process, which is outlined in paragraphs
(d) and (e) of proposed § 111.103.
1. Selection of Accreditors
As reflected in proposed § 111.103(c),
CBP is proposing to select third-party
accreditors using common government
contracting procedures, which would
include the issuance of a Request for
Information (RFI) and a Request for
Proposal (RFP). CBP would administer
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
this process through the Office of Trade
in accordance with the requirements of
the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48
CFR chapter 1) (the FAR). While
selected accreditors would administer
the accreditation of the training or
educational activities as part of their
contractual relationship with CBP,
selected accreditors would not receive a
monetary award from CBP as a result of
this contractual relationship. However,
selected accreditors would be permitted
to charge content providers for their
services to recoup their expenses in
reviewing and approving or denying
training or educational activities for
continuing education credit, as long as
the fees are clearly displayed on the
accreditors’ website and materials. The
remainder of this section lays out the
basic framework that CBP is proposing
for the review and approval of potential
accreditors. The specific obligations that
accreditors under contract with CBP
would be required to meet would be
provided in more detail in the RFI, and
then in even more granular detail, in the
RFP.
Because this is a new program for
both CBP and the customs broker
community, CBP plans to initiate the
selection process through the issuance
of an RFI. The RFI would be posted in
the System for Award Management
(available at https://sam.gov/SAM/)
(SAM).15 The RFI would lay out the
basic criteria that CBP believes a future
accreditor must meet in order to
successfully review activities for
continuing education credit. Currently,
CBP expects to propose the following
criteria:
• At least one key official in the
entity must have a customs broker’s
license;
• A demonstrated knowledge of
international trade laws, customs laws
and regulations, and general customs
practices for imported goods and goods
subject to drawback;
• A demonstrated knowledge of other
U.S. Government agencies that are
involved in transactions of international
trade;
• A list of professional references;
• Resumes for the key personnel who
would be involved in accrediting course
work;
• A description of the process for
how someone would submit a training
or educational activity proposed for
15 SAM is a U.S. Government website operated by
the General Services Administration (GSA), and
there is no cost for any entity to use the system.
Through SAM, any entity can register to do
business with the U.S. Government, update or
renew an entity’s registration, check the status of an
entity registration, and search for any entity
registration and exclusion records.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50805
credit to the accreditor, including
electronic and online methods for
submitting materials for consideration;
• A description of the criteria the
accreditor would use to approve or deny
trainings or educational activities for
continuing education credit;
• A description of how the accreditor
would avoid conflicts of interest;
• A description of how the accreditor
would track accreditation activity for
CBP review;
• A description of how customers can
provide feedback to the accreditor and
CBP on the approval process;
• An estimate of the ‘‘turn around’’
time for approving/denying activities
under consideration for accreditation;
and
• An estimate of the charge, if any, for
approving/denying an activity under
consideration for accreditation.
Based on these criteria, along with
other details that would be provided in
the RFI, CBP would then hold an
‘‘industry day’’ with interested parties.
As CBP-selected accreditors would not
receive a monetary award from CBP,
CBP anticipates that trade associations
and law firms specializing in customs
matters will make up the majority of
parties interested in becoming CBPselected accreditors. However, CBP
encourages all interested parties to
participate in the RFI process as it will
provide interested parties with an
opportunity to provide input that will
shape the accreditation process. As part
of this industry day, CBP would present
its needs and expectations for the
accreditation process and receive input
on its initial proposal from parties that
are potentially interested in providing
accreditation services. This information
would then be used to refine the abovelisted criteria and prepare an RFP. CBP
would then post the RFP in SAM.
Following the publication of the RFP,
interested parties would then respond
with their proposals of how they would
administer the accreditation process
based on the criteria set forth in the
RFP. A party that participated in the RFI
process would be under no obligation to
put forth a response to the RFP.
Conversely, if a party interested in
applying to become an accreditor did
not respond to the RFI or participate in
the industry day process, that party
would not be precluded from
responding to the RFP. CBP is not
proposing an ‘‘application fee’’ for
interested parties to submit a response
to the RFP (fees to submit responses to
RFPs are not permitted under the FAR).
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
50806
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
In addition to the publication of the
RFI and RFP in SAM, CBP is proposing
to announce the availability of the RFI
and RFP through the publication of
notices in the Federal Register by the
Executive Assistant Commissioner,
Office of Trade. This would ensure that
the requests reach as wide an audience
as possible, including parties that do not
traditionally contract with the U.S.
Government. In accordance with the
provisions of proposed § 111.103(c),
these Federal Register notices would
contain information pertaining to the
criteria that the Office of Trade will use
to select an accreditor and the period
during which CBP will accept
applications by potential accreditors.
Following the issuance and
publication of the RFP, CBP would
review the proposals received and rate
them based on the factors provided in
the relevant section of the RFP. Based
on these ratings, CBP would then select
the accreditors approved for that cycle.
Parties not selected for the cycle would
have the opportunity to protest CBP’s
decision in accordance with the
procedures set forth in the FAR.
Following the selection of the approved
accreditors, the Office of Trade will
notify the approved accreditors of their
award, and the Executive Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Trade, will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
to inform the public and the customs
broker community of the parties
approved to provide accreditation
services. In accordance with the
provisions of proposed § 111.103(c), this
Federal Register notice would contain
information pertaining to the selected
accreditors’ period of award.
CBP is not proposing to set a target or
a limit on the number of accreditors.
Rather, the number will be determined
by the strength of the proposals received
and CBP’s needs at the time of the RFP.
CBP is proposing to introduce a period
of award of three years, subject to
renewal. This will provide CBP-selected
accreditors with sufficient time to
establish their accreditation programs
and to begin with the accreditation of
educational content while not creating a
long period of time during which new
interested parties would have to wait for
the next selection cycle. In accordance
with the provisions of the FAR, either
party to the contract—whether the
accreditor or CBP—would be permitted
to terminate the contract with 30-days’
notice. If an accreditor were to leave the
program, the Executive Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Trade, would
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing the departure.
Once awards have been made for the
first cycle of accreditors, CBP envisions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
working closely with them—as a group
and as individual parties—to provide
directions and instructions, set
expectations, develop due dates and
milestones, and create a public outreach
campaign to inform the affected customs
broker community of the new program
and opportunities. Once the program
has been fully implemented, the Broker
Management Branch within the Office
of Trade will meet with the accreditors
periodically to identify and exchange
best practices, address areas of concern,
and develop program metrics that can
be shared with COAC and other
members of the public as needed.
Following the first 3-year cycle, CBP
will announce the opening of a new
application cycle through posts in SAM,
and the Executive Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Trade, will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
to the same effect.
CBP believes the approach outlined
above will meet the following
objectives, which CBP believes to be key
to the program’s success:
1. Multiple approved accreditors,
which will allow for competition and
keep costs at market level without
creating a monopoly;
2. An open and transparent
application process; and,
3. An opportunity for small
businesses, such as law firms that
specialize in customs law, and nonprofit organizations, such as trade
associations, to become approved
accreditors.
2. Accreditation Process
Proposed § 111.103(d) and (e) pertain
to the administration of the
accreditation process, including the
responsibilities of CBP-selected
accreditors. Proposed § 111.103(d)
reflects that CBP-selected accreditors
will administer the accreditation of
training or educational activities offered
by an entity other than a U.S.
Government agency, including the
special allowance for instructors,
discussion leaders, and speakers, by
reviewing and approving or denying
training or educational activities for
continuing education credit. The
accreditation process may vary slightly
among CBP-selected accreditors (e.g.,
fees, timeframe for the review and
issuance of an accreditation decision,
address to which paper-based
accreditation requests must be
submitted, and the documents that must
be submitted as part of the accreditation
request); however, each accreditor will
be required to administer the
accreditation process within the bounds
of a defined set of parameters. These
parameters will be defined as part of the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
RFP. For example, CBP is expecting
that, as a result of this process, CBPselected accreditors will be required to:
(1) Provide an electronic means for a
content provider to submit the details of
an activity under consideration; (2) state
the average or typical processing time
for an accreditation request; and (3)
clearly state any charges for the review
and approval or denial of an
accreditation request.
Although the accreditation process
will be defined in more detail as part of
the selection process, paragraphs (d)
and (e) of proposed § 111.103 contain
two requirements. First, in order to
ensure that qualifying continuing broker
education programs present educational
content that is current and relevant,
proposed § 111.103(d) provides that an
accreditor’s approval of a training or
educational activity for continuing
education credit is only valid for one
year, but can be renewed through any
CBP-selected accreditor. As CBP’s
proposal does not require individual
brokers to complete a specific number of
hours of continuing education on
specific subject matter areas, CBP has
chosen to propose to limit the validity
of accreditations to one year. CBP
believes that this limitation would
ensure that content providers regularly
update educational content, and,
thereby, ensure that qualifying
continuing broker education offers
educational content that is current and
relevant. Second, while a CBP-selected
accreditor could approve a training or
educational activity offered by one of its
officials or members for continuing
education credit, proposed § 111.103(e)
provides a CBP-selected accreditor may
not approve its own trainings or
educational activities for continuing
education credit. This will require CBPselected accreditors who are also
content providers to seek another CBPselected accreditor’s approval in order
for educational content to be eligible for
continuing education credit. CBP is
proposing this limitation to curb the risk
of conflicts of interest and self-dealings.
In order to promote transparency and
the accreditors’ compliance with their
contractual obligations, CBP also
intends to provide content providers
and instructors, discussion leaders, and
speakers seeking to claim continuing
education credits under the special
allowance with an opportunity to
submit complaints and comments to the
Office of Trade at the Headquarters of
U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Attn: Broker Management Branch,
electronically. CBP intends to publish
additional information on how to
submit complaints and comments
concerning specific CBP-selected
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
accreditors, including the email address
to which such electronic
correspondences should be submitted,
on its website. CBP plans to request that
content providers (and instructors,
discussion leaders, and speakers seeking
to claim continuing education credits
under the special allowance) who
submit a complaint pertaining to the
denial of a specific accreditation adhere
to the following procedures. First, the
content provider (and instructors,
discussion leaders, and speakers seeking
to claim continuing education credits
under the special allowance) should
contact the CBP-selected accreditor to
request a detailed explanation as to the
denial of the accreditation request.
Second, if following the receipt of the
detailed explanation, the content
provider (and instructors, discussion
leaders, and speakers seeking to claim
continuing education credits under the
special allowance) continues to believe
that the denial was in error, the content
provider should submit a complaint to
CBP, including (1) a copy of all
materials that were submitted to the
accreditor for consideration, (2) any
materials received from the accreditor
that explain why the activity was
rejected, and (3) a detailed explanation
as to why the content provider believes
the denial decision to be erroneous.
In order to ensure the successful
implementation of the proposed
continuing education requirement, CBP
will also welcome any other type of
feedback, such as feedback on accreditor
performance and customer experience,
positive interactions, and areas for
improvement. CBP plans to compile and
share such feedback during the sessions
that CBP intends to hold with the
accreditors on a periodic basis.
F. Timeframe for the Implementation of
the Proposed Changes
This NPRM provides for a public
comment period of 60 days. Upon the
review of the comments and further
consideration, CBP will prepare a final
rule. The final rule will adopt the
current proposal as final, with or
without changes based on consideration
of the public comments, and will
provide the date on which the changes
will become effective. In addition to the
30-day delayed effective date required
under the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553(c)), CBP anticipates that
there will be an additional delay
between the publication of the final rule
and the effective date to allow for
proper implementation of the
continuing education framework.
As CBP’s proposal requires some
training and educational activities to be
approved for continuing education
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
credit by a CBP-selected accreditor, a
delayed effective date will be needed in
order to permit for sufficient time for
the selection of qualified accreditors, for
CBP-selected accreditors to set up their
processes for reviewing accreditation
requests, and for content providers to
obtain accreditation for their training or
educational activities. CBP will ensure
that there will be adequate time for
compliance by individual brokers if the
proposed rule is adopted. For example,
in addition to a delayed effective date,
CBP may also select an effective date for
the final rule that coincides with the
beginning of a new triennial period or
prorate the number of continuing
education credits individual brokers
must complete by the end of the
triennial period during which the final
rule becomes effective.
V. Statutory and Regulatory
Requirements
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This
proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has not reviewed this regulation.
CBP has prepared the following analysis
to help inform stakeholders of the
impacts of this proposed rule.
1. Purpose of Rule
The proposed rule, if implemented,
would require active 16 individual
customs broker license holders (brokers)
to complete 36 hours of continuing
education every three years. A
continuing education requirement
would increase the knowledge base
from which brokers work, educate them
on changing customs requirements,
regulations, and laws, and reduce the
number of errors in filings and resultant
penalties. CBP believes that requiring
continuing education would enhance
the credibility and value of an
individual customs broker license and
improve a broker’s skills, performance,
and productivity. Furthermore, CBP
16 The term ‘‘active’’ refers to a license that has
not been suspended.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50807
believes that mandating continuing
education would increase the quality of
service for brokers’ clients and
importers’ compliance with customs
laws, which would protect the revenue
of the United States and aid in
maintaining a high standard of
professionalism in the customs broker
community.
2. Background
On October 28, 2020, CBP published
an ANPRM, entitled ‘‘Continuing
Education for Licensed Customs
Brokers’’, in the Federal Register (85 FR
68260). The ANPRM presented a basic
outline for a continuing education
requirement for licensed customs
brokers and posed questions pertaining
to the potential costs and benefits of
such a requirement. Some of the public
comments that CBP received in
response to the ANPRM addressed the
questions pertaining to the potential
costs and benefits of such a
requirement, although very few
contained specific information or data.
Any information that was provided on
these issues was taken into account in
formulating this analysis. In this NPRM,
CBP is proposing a continuing
education requirement for individual
brokers.
i. Customs Brokers
A customs broker assists clients with
the importation of goods into the United
States, and also with the filing of
drawback claims. Customs brokers can
be individuals, partnerships,
associations, or corporations and must
be licensed by CBP. Brokers are
responsible for helping clients to meet
all relevant requirements for importing
and submitting drawback claims,
submitting information and payments to
CBP on their client’s behalf, and
exercising responsible supervision and
control over their employees and
customs business.17 Only licensed
customs brokers may perform customs
business.18 Brokers may have expertise
17 For more details on responsible supervision
and control, see 19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(4), as well as 19
CFR 111.1 and 111.28.
18 Customs business is defined as: those activities
involving transactions with U.S. Customs and
Border Protection concerning the entry and
admissibility of merchandise, its classification and
valuation, the payment of duties, taxes, or other
charges assessed or collected by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection upon merchandise by reason of
its importation, or the refund, rebate, or drawback
thereof. It also includes the preparation of
documents or forms in any format and the
electronic transmission of documents, invoices,
bills, or parts thereof, intended to be filed with U.S.
Customs and Border Protection in furtherance of
such activities, whether or not signed or filed by the
preparer, or activities relating to such preparation,
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
Continued
10SEP2
50808
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
in any number of trade-related areas,
including entry, admissibility,
classification, valuation, and duty rates
for imported goods. Some brokers
specialize in a specific area of customs
business, like drawback or valuation,
while others are more general
practitioners. As of 2021, there are
13,822 active individual brokers in the
United States.19
To become a licensed customs broker,
an eligible individual 20 must pass the
Customs Broker License Examination,
submit a broker license application and
appropriate fees to CBP, and be
approved by CBP.21 Once applicants
have passed the broker exam, they may
apply for an individual, corporate,
partnership, or association license. To
maintain the license, the individual
broker or the licensed entity (for
corporations, partnership, or
associations) must submit a triennial
report and requisite fees. The triennial
report and fees are due on February 28,
every three years, since 1985.22 Once an
individual has been approved as a
licensed customs broker, the primary
ongoing requirement for maintaining the
license under current regulations is the
submission of the triennial report and
appropriate fee in 3-year cycles. Given
the established 3-year cycle of triennial
reporting, CBP employs a 6-year period
of analysis to calculate costs and
benefits that result from this proposed
rule, accounting for two triennial cycles.
A broker license may be suspended or
revoked, or a monetary penalty
assessed, for several violations ranging
from falsifying information on the
license application to willfully and
intentionally deceiving, misleading, or
threating a client.23 CBP generally
assesses monetary penalties for less
but does not include the mere electronic
transmission of data received for transmission to
CBP. See 19 U.S.C. 1641(a)(2).
19 A customs broker may voluntarily suspend his
or her license for a number of reasons and may reactivate the license at a later time. A broker’s
license may also be suspended as part of a penalty.
For more information, see 19 CFR 111.52.
20 To be eligible, an individual must be a United
States citizen at least 21 years of age, in possession
of good moral character, and not be an employee
of the U.S. Government. For more information, see
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Becoming a
Customs Broker (Dec. 12, 2018), available at https://
www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/
customs-brokers/becoming-customs-broker.
21 To be approved, a broker who has passed the
broker exam must also pass an investigation of his
or her relevant background. See section III.B. of this
NPRM.
22 19 CFR 111.30(d). For more information on the
triennial report, see U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, 2021 Customs Broker Triennial Status
Report FAQs (Feb. 26, 2021), available at https://
help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1711?language=en_
US.
23 See, e.g., 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(1) and (g)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
serious infractions, such as the incorrect
filing of entry forms or the
misclassification of goods. However, the
majority of civil monetary penalties
assessed against brokers for violations of
19 U.S.C. 1641 involve egregious
violations or the failure to take
satisfactory corrective actions following
written notice and a reasonable
opportunity to remedy the deficiency as
the penalties process provides
noncompliant brokers with several
opportunities to avoid or mitigate
penalty liability.24 Monetary penalties
may not exceed $30,000 per violation
and averaged $22,697 from 2017–
2020.25
In the fiscal years from 2017 to 2020,
CBP assessed an average of 66 penalties
to brokers per year.26 However, in FY
2017 and FY 2018, CBP assessed 20 and
21 penalties, respectively, while in FY
2019 and FY 2020, CBP assessed over
100 penalties each year (see Table 1).
The significant increase in penalties
from 2018 to 2019 and into 2020 is
likely due to rapid changes in the
international trade environment in those
years. During that time, CBP began
enforcing several significant changes in
the realm of international trade,
including new antidumping and
countervailing duties (AD/CVD) and the
tariffs imposed by the Trump
Administration under section 201 of the
Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2251), as
24 In the case of non-egregious violations, CBP
will first attempt to work with the broker through
the informed compliance process of communication
and education. See U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Electronic Invoice Program (EIP) and
Remote Location Filing (RLF) Handbook (May
2013), p. 22, available at https://www.cbp.gov/sites/
default/files/assets/documents/2016-Dec/Revised_
eip_rlf_handbook_12-15_16.pdf. This is an attempt
to improve the broker’s performance, and precedes
the issuance of a pre-penalty notice, which is a
written notice that advises the broker of the
allegations or complaints against the broker. See id.;
19 CFR 111.92(a). If this process fails to remedy the
deficiencies, or in case of egregious violations, CBP
will issue a pre-penalty notice to the broker, which,
inter alia, explains that the broker has the right to
respond to the allegations or complaints. See 19
CFR 111.92(a). If the broker files a timely response
to the pre-penalty notice, CBP will either cancel the
case, issue a penalty notice in an amount lower
than that provided in the pre-penalty notice, or
issue a penalty notice in the same amount as the
pre-penalty notice. See 19 CFR 111.92(b). Upon the
issuance of the penalty notice, the broker is
afforded the opportunity to file a petition for relief
in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR part
171, which may result in the cancellation or
mitigation of the penalty, and subsequently a
supplemental petition for relief. See 19 CFR 111.93
and 111.95.
25 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(B). Penalty information
comes from CBP’s Seized Currency and Asset
Tracking System (SEACATS). Although the average
value of assessed penalty is $22,697, CBP allows
brokers to mitigate penalties, such that the amount
collected is often significantly less, averaging
$2,664 from 2017–2020.
26 SEACATS.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
amended, section 232 of the Trade
Expansion Act of 1962 (19 U.S.C. 1862),
as amended, and sections 301 through
310 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2411 et seq.), as amended.27 These
changes affected a significant number of
imported goods. CBP provided many
opportunities for individual brokers to
learn about the changes, including
webinars, Question and Answer
sessions, public forums, and Federal
Register notices. External organizations,
like regional broker associations, also
provided information regarding these
changes to the customs laws, which
would have led to greater understanding
for individual brokers.
Although CBP sought information in
the ANPRM on the number of
companies employing brokers who
already complete continuing education,
CBP did not receive enough specific
information to estimate the proportion
of companies already providing ongoing
training. However, based on information
gathered via self-reporting by individual
brokers, CBP is aware of about 300
companies that employ at least one
broker who holds an industry
certification that requires annual
continuing education.28 In the fiscal
years from 2017 to 2019, those
companies were responsible for 54
percent of the entries but only 10
percent of the penalties.29 Overall, these
300 companies filed 73,906,967 of
136,466,361 filed entries between 2017
and 2020, but only account for 26 of 267
total penalties assessed in that period.30
For companies outside of this group,
CBP does not know how much
continuing education is currently taken.
27 Trade remedies implemented by CBP include
Section 201 trade remedies on solar cells and
panels, and washing machines and parts; Section
232 trade remedies on aluminum and steel; Section
232 trade remedies on derivatives; Section 301
trade remedies to be assessed on certain goods from
China; and Section 301 trade remedies to enforce
U.S. rights in the large civil aircraft dispute before
the World Trade Organization. See U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, Trade Remedies, available at
https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programsadministration/trade-remedies (last visited on May
11, 2021).
28 Information was provided by the National
Customs Broker and Forwarders Association of
America (NCBFAA). Nine companies employ at
least 48 brokers certified by programs provided by
the NCBFAA’s Education Institute (NEI), and often
employ more. An additional 292 companies
employing at least one broker with an NEI
certification were identified via a survey of NEI’s
students.
29 Significant at the 99 percent confidence level.
30 Entry data was pulled from ACE, and penalty
data from SEACATS.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
customs rules, regulations, and
practices. As stated above, CBP believes
that the vigorous pace and expanding
scope of international trade require a
Number
of
FY
penalties
more stringent continuing education
framework for individual brokers who
2017 ......................................
20 provide guidance to importers and
2018 ......................................
21
drawback claimants.
2019 ......................................
119
The effects of continuing education
2020 ......................................
106
programs are not easily measured and
not often the subject of research.34 Some
ii. Continuing Education
studies show that various licensed
Continuing education refers to the
professions do see a mild increase in
training and learning pursued by
positive perception of their industry,
professionals outside of the formal
performance, and professionalism after
education system, usually as part of
the implementation of continuing
career development. Many licensed
education requirements.35 Studies have
professions have some sort of
also demonstrated a positive link
continuing education requirement for
between continuing education for
license-holders, including accountants,
teachers and student outcomes as well
31
medical professionals, and teachers.
as between continuing medical
Continuing education is particularly
education and patient outcomes.36
important for professions characterized
Additionally, one study found that
by continuously changing rules,
continuing professional education was
standards, and norms. Customs and
correlated to an improvement in
international trade is one such
financial outcomes for accounting firms,
profession. Since 2000, the United
particularly large firms.37 Finally, a
States has added two new preferential
study of IRS-certified tax preparers
trade programs and several new free
found that mandatory continuing
trade agreements, the most recent being
education was potentially linked to
the USMCA, which replaced the
reduced civil penalties, a decrease in
NAFTA.32 Additionally, the logistical
non-compliance, and increased
aspects of customs have changed
accuracy of tax returns.38
significantly over time. For example,
Under the terms of the proposed rule,
CBP introduced the single window,
individual brokers would be required to
enabling most CBP forms to be
complete 36 hours of accredited
submitted electronically through the
continuing education over each 3-year
Automated Commercial Environment
reporting period. Qualifying activities
(ACE), which was fully implemented in
34 ‘‘Evaluation of Current Customs Broker
2016, with added functionalities being
Continuing Education Practices and Literature
deployed on an ongoing basis.
Review of Continuing Education in Other
There have been several other
Professions.’’ Report for CBP prepared by
significant changes to the customs
International Economics, Inc. (IEc) on June 30,
environment, including the
2014. This document is included in the docket for
this NPRM, which is posted on Regulations.gov.
implementation of TFTEA, changes in
35 See Bradley, S., Drapeau, M. and DeStefano, J.
duty rates and tariffs, and the
(2012), The relationship between continuing
modernization of the drawback
education and perceived competence, professional
requirements.33 Customs brokers must
support, and professional value among clinical
psychologists. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof., 32: 31–
maintain awareness of and adapt to
these changes to provide quality service 38; O’Leary, P. F., Quinlan, T. J., & Richards, R. L.
(2011). Insurance Professionals’ Perceptions of
to clients. However, aside from the
Continuing Education Requirements. Journal of
broker exam at the beginning of their
Insurance Regulation, 30, 101–117; and Wessels, S.
(2007). Accountants’ Perceptions of the
careers, brokers do not currently have
Effectiveness of Mandatory Continuing Professional
any requirements ensuring they
Education. Accounting Education, 16(4), 365–378.
maintain up-to-date knowledge of
36
TABLE 1—ANNUAL PENALTIES
ASSESSED BY CBP
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
31 The
number of hours of continuing education
required for many professions varies by state as the
state is the licensing authority.
32 In October 2000, the United States
implemented the Caribbean Basin Trade
Partnership Act, which will expire in 2030 (https://
www.cbp.gov/trade/priority-issues/tradeagreements/special-trade-legislation/caribbeanbasin-initiative/cbtpa). The African Growth and
Opportunity Act was also enacted in 2000 (https://
ustr.gov/issue-areas/trade-development/preferenceprograms/african-growth-and-opportunity-actagoa). See https://www.state.gov/trade-agreements/
outcomes-of-current-u-s-trade-agreements/ for a list
of free trade agreements currently in force.
33 See section III.C. of this NPRM.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., and
Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional
Development. Learning Policy Institute; Cervero, R.
M., & Gaines, J.K. (2014). Effectiveness of
continuing medical education: updated synthesis of
systematic reviews. Accreditation Council for
Continuing Medical Education.
37 Chen, Y.-S., Chang, B.-G., & Lee, C.-C. (2008).
The association between continuing professional
education and financial performance of public
accounting firms. International Journal of Human
Resource Management, 19(9), 1720–1737.
38 Diehl, K. A. (2015). Does Requiring
Registration, Testing, and Continuing Professional
Education for Paid Tax Preparers Improve the
Compliance and Accuracy of Tax Returns?—US
Results. Journal of Business & Accounting, 8(1),
138–147.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50809
would include attending or presenting
at events, such as courses, seminars,
symposia, and conventions.39 Brokers
would be required to self-attest to the
completion of the required continuing
education on each triennial report and
maintain records consisting of certain
documentation received from the
provider or host of the qualifying
continuing broker education, if such
documentation was made available to
the broker, and containing information
pertaining to the dates, titles, providers,
credit hours earned, and location (if
applicable) for each training. The
records can be in any format (i.e.,
electronically or on paper), and the
proposed regulations provide CBP with
authority to conduct a compliance audit
and to request such records for a period
of three years following the submission
of the status report.
iii. Accreditation
To ensure the quality and relevance of
continuing education offerings, they are
often accredited by a leading body
within the field in question. For
example, the American Medical
Association (AMA) is accredited to
provide training by the Accreditation
Council for Continuing Medical
Education.40 An accreditor is
responsible for reviewing course content
and determining the number of credits
or hours to be granted for each course.
Under the proposed rule, after an
application process (using the RFP, as
described above), CBP would designate
entities outside of CBP to act as
accreditors for customs broker
continuing education. Every three years,
CBP would release an RFP soliciting
applications to become an accreditor for
the customs broker continuing
education program. Every three years
following the first cycle, existing
accreditors would also apply for
renewal. To apply, potential and
existing accreditors would submit an
application to CBP detailing their
standards for accreditation, quality
control practices, application process,
and other information. A panel of CBP
experts would convene to review and
approve or deny applications. Once
approved, accreditors could begin
accepting submissions from courses or
companies seeking accreditation. Note
that training or educational activities
offered by U.S. Government agencies,
including CBP, automatically qualify for
39 See
proposed 19 CFR 111.103(a).
American Medical Association, About the
AMA’s CME Accreditation, available at https://
edhub.ama-assn.org/pages/ama-cme (last accessed
on May 11, 2021).
40 See
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50810
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
continuing education credit, without the
approval by a CBP-selected accreditor.41
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
iv. Performance Improvement
Once brokers have passed the broker
exam, thereby proving their basic
knowledge and competency to perform
the duties of a licensed customs broker
at the time of the exam, they are free to
practice in perpetuity unless the license
is suspended or revoked. Statute
dictates that while practicing under the
auspices of his or her broker license, a
customs broker must maintain
responsible supervision and control.42
CBP’s regulations likewise place
additional legal obligations upon
customs brokers, including, but not
limited to, the requirement for
exercising due diligence in making
financial settlements, answering
correspondence, and preparing or
assisting in the preparation and filing of
information relating to customs
business.43 Staying current on
developments in customs law is needed
for customs brokers to comply with
their legal obligations, but presently
there are no standards for how much
continuing education is needed.
Under baseline conditions, meaning
the world as it is now, CBP does not
require brokers to complete any
additional training or prove their
ongoing knowledge. The broker exam
only attests knowledge of customs and
related laws that are in place at the time
of the exam. While the exam ensures
that brokers have a solid base level of
knowledge when they begin practicing,
there is no requirement that they keep
up the knowledge, and evidence
suggests that as more time passes since
brokers took their exam, the more errors
they make. Brokers who were assessed
penalties by CBP between 2017 and
2020 have held their individual broker
license for, on average, 37 years. In
contrast, the average individual broker
license is 24 years old. This suggests
that as more time passes since the
passing of the customs broker exam,
more errors are made. Furthermore, the
exam does not test for any of the
requirements of the more than 40 PGAs
41 Per proposed § 111.103(a)(1)(i), a training or
educational activity offered by a U.S. Government
agency other than CBP must be relevant to customs
business.
42 See 19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(4).
43 See 19 CFR 111.29(a), and 19 CFR part 111
generally for additional obligations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
involved in regulating imports.
Depending on the brokers’ needs, CBP
believes that continuing education
should also include courses relating to
the PGAs’ international trade
requirements, although there is no
minimum requirement for certain
subject matters in this proposed rule.
Given the often fast-paced and
evolving nature of the international
trade environment, CBP believes that a
continuing education requirement
would help to ensure that brokers
remain current with their understanding
of international trade laws and continue
to expand their knowledge of customs
regulations and practices. A more
competent and educated customs broker
community would also prevent costly
errors, potentially saving brokers’
clients time and money, as well as
relieving CBP from expending valuable
audit and penalty assessment and
collection resources.
3. Overview of Assessment
The proposed rule would result in
costs and benefits for customs brokers,
accreditors, providers of continuing
education, and CBP. Many of the costs
for brokers come in the form of time
spent researching, registering for,
attending, and reporting trainings.
Brokers would also experience some
opportunity cost as they forgo time
spent on other tasks in favor of fulfilling
a continuing education requirement.
Accreditors must apply to CBP. Though
CBP would not charge a fee, the
accreditors would need to spend time in
creating their applications. Similarly,
providers of continuing education must
apply to accreditors to have their
coursework certified. Finally, CBP must
designate accreditors, and, following the
full implementation of the proposed
framework, CBP may audit individual
brokers for compliance.
The benefits from the proposed rule
would be largely qualitative. A
continuing education requirement
would help to professionalize and
improve the reputation of the customs
broker community, as well as to
improve customer service and
outcomes. Quantitatively, continuing
education would likely lead to a
reduction in errors in documentation
and associated penalties assessed by
CBP for some infractions and violations.
Not only would individual brokers not
need to pay the associated penalties, but
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
CBP would save the time of identifying,
assessing, and collecting such penalties.
Similarly, CBP would likely see a
reduction in regulatory audits of
individual brokers.
4. Historical and Projected Populations
Affected by the Rule
The proposed rule applies to any
individual holding an active customs
broker license.44 Brokers who have
voluntarily suspended their licenses are
not required to complete continuing
education until they elect to reactivate
their license, at which point the
requirements are pro-rated depending
upon the timing within the triennial
reporting cycle. Brokers who have not
held their license for an entire triennial
period at the time their first triennial
report is due are also exempted from
completing training and reporting in
their first triennial report, though are
bound by the terms of the proposed rule
in the following years. As of 2021, there
are 13,822 active, individual broker
licenses.45 Because 2021 is a reporting
year and triennial reports are due in
February, those brokers who receive
their licenses in 2021, 2022, and 2023
will only be required to complete
continuing education beginning on
February 1, 2024, the next reporting
year.46 Similarly, brokers who receive
licenses in 2024, 2025, and 2026 would
not need to pursue continuing
education until after their first report is
due in 2027.
CBP approves approximately 600 new
licenses per year, although the number
of licenses added annually has been
decreasing since 2015. See Table 2 for
a summary of licensing history for the
previous six years.
44 Entities holding corporate, association, or
partnership licenses must employ at least one
individual broker, who would be required to
comply with the rule. See 19 CFR 111.11(a) and (b).
45 2021 is triennial reporting year. The CBP
Broker Management Branch anticipates that the
number of active, individual customs brokers could
decrease by approximately 600–1,000 in May–July
of 2021 as brokers choose not to renew or to
voluntarily suspend their licenses. This number
would be partially offset by new, individual
customs brokers applying for licenses after passing
the broker exam, which is held bi-annually.
46 Triennial reports are due in February.
Therefore, all those brokers who receive licenses in
2021, 2022, and 2023 will submit their first
triennial reports in February of 2024 and would
then need to complete 36 hours of training before
the triennial report is due in February of 2027.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50811
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—LICENSING HISTORY FROM 2015–2020
Total
licenses 47
Year
Corporate
licenses
Individual
licenses
2015 .............................................................................................................................................
2016 .............................................................................................................................................
2017 .............................................................................................................................................
2018 .............................................................................................................................................
2019 .............................................................................................................................................
2020 48 .........................................................................................................................................
770
653
580
558
464
187
16
21
16
27
15
7
754
632
564
531
449
180
Total ......................................................................................................................................
3,212
102
3,110
Based on an average rate of decline of
12 percent in the number of individual
licenses issued, CBP would likely issue
1,754 new individual licenses over a 6year period of analysis from 2021–2026
(see Table 3), though not all of those
license holders would be required to
complete continuing education during
the 6-year period of analysis. Each of
these new individual license holders
would need to comply with the terms of
the proposed rule once it is in effect and
they have completed their first triennial
report. All 13,822 individual brokers
active at the time the rule is
implemented would be required to
complete continuing education from
February 1, 2021–February 1, 2024.49 In
2024, the 1,045 individual brokers who
CBP projects would receive licenses
from 2021–2023 would need to begin
complying with the terms of the
proposed rule. Brokers who receive
licenses in 2024–2026 would not need
to comply with the proposed rule until
after their first triennial reporting cycle,
which would fall outside of the period
of analysis. In total, therefore, CBP
estimates that 14,867 brokers would be
required to abide by the rule in the six
years from 2021 to 2026.
TABLE 3—PROJECTED LICENSES ISSUED FROM 2021–2026
Total licenses
issued
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Corporate
licenses
Individual
licenses
New licenses
affected by the
rule
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
408
358
315
276
243
213
13
12
10
9
8
7
394
346
304
267
235
206
0
0
0
1,045
0
0
Total ..........................................................................................................
1,812
59
1,754
1,045
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Although the majority of active
individual brokers would be required to
complete continuing education under
the proposed rule, feedback from the
broker community indicates that many
brokers already complete the amount of
continuing education that would satisfy
this requirement.50 Many companies
that employ brokers provide and require
in-house training and continuing
education. Both independent brokers
and brokers employed by brokerages
often attend government-sponsored
webinars, as well as trade conferences
and symposia, which would qualify as
continuing education under the terms of
the proposed rule. Many brokers also
pursue professional certifications like
the National Customs Brokers and
Freight Forwarders Association of
America’s (NCBFAA) Certified Customs
Specialist (CCS) and Certified Export
Specialist (CES).51 Under the baseline,
or the world as it is now, these brokers
likely would be in compliance with the
proposed rule and, assuming similar
activities if a continuing education
requirement is imposed, would not
incur new costs under the new
requirements, except for new reporting
costs.
Overall, CBP estimates that
approximately 60 percent of individual
brokers already pursue continuing
education and would be in compliance
with the rule.52 CBP bases this
estimation on several factors. First, the
NCBFAA estimates that approximately
4,456 brokers hold a CCS or CES in
2020, representing 29 percent of total
47 CBP sometimes issues licenses that are later
suspended or terminated (either voluntarily or as a
penalty). This table includes all licenses issued in
these years that remain active as of 2021, as only
holders of an active license would need to abide by
the terms of the rule.
48 The number of licenses applied for and issued
in 2020 was significantly lower than in previous
years due to the effects of the COVID–19 pandemic
and related closures and delays. CBP excluded this
year from calculations of growth rates due to its
anomalous nature. 2021 may also be affected
similarly, but CBP cannot predict to what extent.
49 The exact timing of the requirement will vary
depending on when the final rule goes into effect,
and the requirement will be prorated based on the
time left until the triennial report is due. For the
purposes of this analysis, we estimate the costs for
the hypothetical period from 2021–2027.
50 Feedback was provided in the form of public
comments on the ANPRM. Additional feedback was
provided in various meetings and discussions
between CBP personnel and customs brokers, as
well as at trade conferences and meetings of the
Task Force for Continuing Education for Licensed
Customs Brokers, a part of the COAC. See II.E.
Development of the Proposed Continuing Broker
Education Requirement, above.
51 We included both brokers qualifying as CCS
and CES in our analysis as the coursework for both
has significant overlap and is relevant to customs
business.
52 CBP requested information about the
proportion of individual brokers already complying
with the rule in the ANPRM. Although CBP did not
receive specific information in the public
comments, several commenters said they would be
compliant and believed that significant numbers of
other brokers would be as well. Many also noted
that their companies require their broker employees
to complete continuing education.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50812
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
individual brokers.53 In order to
maintain these professional
certifications, these brokers are required
to earn 20 continuing education credits
per year.54 Additionally, public
comments in response to the ANPRM,
as well as discussions between CBP and
various broker organizations, indicate
that most large businesses employing
brokers already provide, and often
mandate, internal training and
are less than $16.5 million, regardless of
the number of employees.55 Table 4
shows the receipts per firm, in millions
of dollars, for firms employing each
number of employees.56 The average
firm within Categories 7 and 9 has
annual receipts of greater than $16.5
million and is considered a large
business. These firms employ 161,463
people, or approximately 61 percent of
the total employees in the industry.
continuing education. Based on data
from the U.S. Census Bureau,
approximately 61 percent of those
employed within the Freight
Transportation Arrangement Industry
(North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code 448510) are not
employed by small businesses. A small
business within the Freight
Transportation Arrangement Industry is
defined as one whose annual receipts
TABLE 4—SMALL BUSINESSES IN THE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION ARRANGEMENT INDUSTRY
01:
02:
03:
04:
05:
06:
07:
08:
09:
Total .................................................................................................................
<5 .....................................................................................................................
5–9 ...................................................................................................................
10–19 ...............................................................................................................
<20 ...................................................................................................................
20–99 ...............................................................................................................
100–499 ...........................................................................................................
<500 .................................................................................................................
500+ .................................................................................................................
Given the proportion of brokers
working for larger businesses, the
feedback on the ANPRM indicating high
rates of compliance, the proportion of
brokers pursing certifications, and input
from CBP subject matter experts who
frequently interact with the broker
community, CBP estimates that
approximately 60 percent of individual
brokers are already in compliance with
Preliminary
receipts
(all firms,
$1,000s) 58
Number of
employees
Employment size 57
265,192
15,939
18,025
20,288
54,252
49,477
44,715
148,444
116,748
the requirements of the proposed rule
and would not face new costs, assuming
a continuing level of similar activity,
aside from recordkeeping and reporting,
as a result of the rule’s implementation.
Based on the likely proportion of
brokers already in compliance, CBP
estimates that 5,947 affected brokers, or
approximately 40 percent, would need
to come into compliance with the
Receipts per
firm
($)
67,276,572
6,315,166
5,392,992
5,870,163
17,578,321
13,973,780
10,886,028
42,438,129
24,838,443
Small
business?
4,454,222
708,614
1,974,732
3,851,813
1,335,029
10,397,158
30,493,076
2,854,327
105,247,640
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
Yes.
No.
proposed rule over a 6-year period of
analysis (see Table 5). We request
comment on our assumption that 60
percent of brokers already spend at least
36 hours per 3-year period on
continuing education and that the
remaining 40 percent of brokers would
need to increase their training by the
full 36 hours triennially to meet the
proposed requirement.
TABLE 5—PROJECTION OF BROKERS AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED RULE
Year
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Total licenses
Proportion in
compliance
(%)
Total licensed
brokers
affected
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
13,822
13,822
13,822
14,867
14,867
14,867
60
60
60
60
60
60
5,529
5,529
5,529
5,947
5,947
5,947
Total ......................................................................................................................................
14,867
........................
5,947
Although individual brokers are the
primary party affected by the terms of
the proposed rule, the rule would also
have an impact on CBP, providers of
continuing education, and the bodies
who accredit continuing education.
Each party would see both costs and
benefits under the proposed rule.
53 Discussion with officials at the NCBFAA on
April 5, 2021. This includes brokers renewing their
certification in 2020, as well as those becoming
certified for the first time. The CCS certification
program requires enough hours of continuing
education to comply with the terms of the proposed
rule and the NCBFAA has expressed interest in
becoming an accredited provider.
54 See National Customs Brokers & Forwarders
Association of America, Inc., CES FAQs, available
at https://www.ncbfaa.org/Scripts/4Disapi.dll/
4DCGI/cms/review.html?Action=CMS_Document&
DocID=13806&MenuKey=education (last accessed
on July 2, 2021); National Customs Brokers &
Forwarders Association of America, Inc., CCS
FAQs, available at https://www.ncbfaa.org/Scripts/
4Disapi.dll/4DCGI/cms/review.html?Action=CMS_
Document&DocID=13803&MenuKey=education
(last accessed on July 2, 2021).
55 Small business size standards are defined in 13
CFR 121.
56 United States Census Bureau, ‘‘2017 County
Business Patterns and 2017 Economic Census,’’
Released March 6, 2020, https://www.census.gov/
data/tables/2017/econ/susb/2017-susbannual.html. Accessed March 15, 2021.
57 Note that some of the categories are sums of
other categories. For example, Category 8, <500, is
a sum of Categories 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7. Thus,
Categories 7 and 9 are not consecutive, but
represent all firms employing 100 or more people.
58 The Survey of U.S. Businesses (SUSB) from
which this data is taken is conducted in years
ending in 2 and 7. Note that finalized results from
the 2017 survey are scheduled for release in May
of 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
5. Costs of the Rule
i. To Brokers
The primary cost to individual
brokers upon implementation of the rule
would be those costs associated with
finding and attending 36 hours of
continuing education over a 3-year
period. These costs include time spent
researching reputable and relevant
trainings, travel and incidental expenses
to attend in-person events like
conferences, and the tuition or fees for
the courses themselves. Many brokers
might satisfy the continuing education
requirement with training supplied by
their employers. Other brokers,
particularly those self-employed or
employed by small businesses, would
need to seek external training. For
external training, brokers may attend
free webinars, seminars, and trade
events sponsored by CBP, other
government agencies, and various
related organizations like local freight
forwarder and broker associations.59
Alternatively, brokers might choose
paid trainings, conferences, or
symposia, or seek certifications offered
by trade organizations or educational
institutions.
CBP does not know exactly which
option each individual broker is likely
to choose. Many brokers already hold
certifications, attend webinars, and
fulfill internal training requirements,
though they may need to increase the
number of hours completed to comply
with the proposed rule. Therefore, CBP
has estimated a range of costs. Some
brokers would fulfill their proposed
continuing education requirements with
only free trainings. Others would follow
a medium-cost path by opting for a mix
of free, lower-cost, and internal
trainings. CBP further assumes that
brokers electing the medium-cost path
would travel to attend one major
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
59 For example, the Florida Customs Broker and
Forwarders Association offers both paid and free
events. Information on CBP-hosted webinars can be
found at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/stakeholderengagement/webinars. Many other government
agencies also provide webinars on trade-related
topics. For example, in 2020, the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) hosted a series of webinars
on the importation of medical devices in light of the
COVID–19 pandemic. See https://www.fda.gov/
medical-devices/workshops-conferences-medicaldevices/webinar-series-respirators-and-otherpersonal-protective-equipment-ppe-health-carepersonnel-use.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
conference or symposium in-person per
year. Finally, some would meet
requirements by completing only paid
courses representing the highest-cost
offerings. CBP assumes that brokers
choosing the higher-cost option would
travel to attend an average of two
conferences per year.
There are several organizations that
provide continuing education for
customs brokers, ranging from regional
broker associations to national entities,
such as the American Association of
Exporters and Importers (AAEI).
Continuing education that qualifies
under the terms of the proposed rule
includes webinars, seminars, and trade
conferences. The hourly cost of such
trainings (excluding free events
provided by government agencies and
other organizations) usually ranges from
around $25 to $70. Fees are often tiered
based on membership of the hosting
organization. Members of an
organization may pay $25 while nonmembers pay $45. CBP cannot predict
which organizations would seek
accreditation for their events, although
all free webinars and trainings hosted by
Federal government agencies would be
automatically accredited. Therefore, we
assume that the average hourly
monetary cost would range from $0.00
(low) to $30 (medium) to $50 (high).
This assumption is based on current
fees charged for various continuing
education certifications, webinars, and
trade conferences.60
In addition to fees, individual brokers
would need to spend some time in
researching relevant and accredited
trainings. CBP assumes that a broker
would spend approximately three hours
finding and registering for continuing
education during every triennial period.
Many individual brokers are members of
both local and national organizations
that provide continuing education
opportunities and would likely be
notified of opportunities via newsletters
or listservs. Other individual brokers
would need to spend some time finding
and verifying accreditation for
60 CBP does not have information on the cost for
an employer to provide training internally, although
such information was requested in the ANPRM.
CBP believes the cost for internal training would be
closer to that of attending external trainings as a
member, since member fees are likely much closer
to base cost of provision than non-member fees.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50813
qualifying events. All individual brokers
would spend some time registering for
events. Based on an average fully-loaded
wage rate of $31.27, the process of
researching and registering for trainings
would cost brokers approximately $2.61
per credit hour.61
Many individual brokers also travel to
attend trade conferences each year. CBP
assumes that those brokers electing the
lower-cost options would forgo travel
and either attend virtually (paying only
the fee) or not attend at all. CBP
assumes that brokers in the mediumcost tier would travel to attend one
conference each year, while brokers in
the high-cost tier would travel to attend
two conferences.62 Tuition and fees for
conferences, broken down into an
hourly rate, are already accounted for in
the average costs of $30–$50 per hour.
Traveling to attend a single 3-day
conference costs approximately $245 in
airfare, $288 for lodging, and $165 for
meals and incidentals, for a total of $698
for one conference or $1,396 for two
conferences (see Table 6).63 Spread
across 36 hours of training, travel costs
account for an additional $19.39 per
hour (medium) or $38.78 per hour
(high).
61 Wage rate source: U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Occupational Employment Statistics,
‘‘May 2019 National Occupational Employment and
Wage Estimates, United States.’’ Updated March 31,
2020. Available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/2019/
may/oes_nat.htm. Accessed June 12, 2020; U.S.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation. Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation Historical Listing March
2004–December 2019, ‘‘Table 3. Civilian workers,
by occupational group: employer costs per hours
worked for employee compensation and costs as a
percentage of total compensation, 2004–2019.’’
March 2020. Available at https://www.bls.gov/web/
ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2020. The
wages are in 2019 dollars and CBP assumes an
annual growth rate of 0 percent.
62 Some individual brokers would pay for their
travel out of pocket, while other would have their
travel expenses covered by their employers.
63 CBP bases these costs off the average price of
a domestic flight in 2019 (flight prices in 2020 were
not used due to the disruptions caused by COVID–
19 cancellations), and the General Services
Administration’s per diem cost for lodging and
meals and incidentals. Source for flight costs: The
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, ‘‘Average
Domestic Airline Itinerary Fares,’’ https://
www.transtats.bts.gov/AverageFare/. Accessed
April 13, 2021. Source for per diem costs: U.S.
General Services Administration, ‘‘Per Diem Rates,’’
https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diemrates. Accessed April 13, 2021.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50814
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 6—TRAVEL AND INCIDENTAL COSTS TO ATTEND IN-PERSON EVENTS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Cost
General cost
Low
Medium
High
Transportation ..................................................................................................
Hotel .................................................................................................................
Meals & Incidentals .........................................................................................
$245
288
165
0
0
0
$245
288
165
$490
576
330
Total ..........................................................................................................
698
0
698
1,396
Overall, as a result of the rule, a single
broker would likely incur monetary
costs ranging from $31.27 (low) to $624
(medium) to $1,097 (high) per year to
complete 36 hours of continuing
education in a 3-year period. Over a 6year period of analysis, these costs sum
to $188 (low), $3,744 (medium), or
$6,580 (high). See Table 7 for a
summary of these costs.
TABLE 7—ANNUAL COSTS FOR ONE BROKER
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Low
Costs 65
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Medium
High
Hours 64
Year
Total
Costs
Total
Costs
Total
.........................................................
.........................................................
.........................................................
.........................................................
.........................................................
.........................................................
12
12
12
12
12
12
$2.61
2.61
2.61
2.61
2.61
2.61
$31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
$52
52
52
52
52
52
$624
624
624
624
624
624
$91
91
91
91
91
91
$1,097
1,097
1,097
1,097
1,097
1,097
Total ..................................................
72
15.64
188
312
3,744
548
6,580
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
There were 13,822 active individual
brokers in 2021. CBP estimates that a
total of 5,947 would be required to begin
to complete continuing education under
the terms of the rule in the 6-year period
of analysis, based on a current estimated
compliance rate of 60 percent (see
Historical and Projected Populations
Affected by the Rule, above). Therefore,
CBP estimates that brokers would incur
costs related to searching for training,
fees, travel, and incidentals, ranging
from $1,076,537 (low) to $21,480,353
(medium) to $37,752,913 (high) over the
6-year period of analysis. See Table 8.
TABLE 8—ANNUAL TRAINING COSTS FOR INDIVIDUAL BROKER LICENSE HOLDERS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Low
Cost
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Medium
High
Brokers 66
Year
Total
Cost
Total
Cost
Total
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
5,529
5,529
5,529
5,947
5,947
5,947
$31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
$172,886
172,886
172,886
185,960
185,960
185,960
$624
624
624
624
624
624
$3,449,621
3,449,621
3,449,621
3,710,497
3,710,497
3,710,497
$1,097
1,097
1,097
1,097
1,097
1,097
$6,062,901
6,062,901
6,062,901
6,521,404
6,521,404
6,521,404
Total ......................
5,947
188
1,076,537
3,744
21,480,353
6,580
37,752,913
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
64 Individual brokers may complete whatever
number of hours they prefer during each year, so
long as it totals 36 hours in 3 years. CBP designates
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
12 hours per year both for ease of presentation and
to account for pro-rating for individual brokers who
re-activate their licenses within the triennial period.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
65 Costs include tuition/fees, travel costs, and
research time costs for each level.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
To create a primary estimate, CBP
assumes that approximately one third of
individual brokers would elect the
lowest cost path, one third would elect
the medium-cost path, and one third
would elect the highest cost path once
the rule is in place. Under these
conditions, brokers who begin pursuing
continuing education as a result of the
rule would face $20,103,267 in costs
50815
related to searching for training, fees,
travel, and incidentals over the 6-year
period of analysis. See Table 9.
TABLE 9—PRIMARY ESTIMATE OF COSTS FOR BROKERS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Total brokers
Brokers
choosing each
path
Total cost
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
5,529
5,529
5,529
5,947
5,947
5,947
1,843
1,843
1,843
1,982
1,982
1,982
$3,228,469
3,228,469
3,228,469
3,472,620
3,472,620
3,472,620
Total ......................................................................................................................................
5,947
1,982
20,103,267
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
All individual brokers, including
those who already complete continuing
education and would not face new costs
for research, tuition, and travel, would
also be required to store records of their
completed continuing education and
report their compliance to CBP.67
Record storage would require
maintaining either paper or digital
copies of any documentation received
from the provider or host of the
qualifying continuing broker education
and a document of some kind listing the
date, title, provider, number of credit
hours, and location (if applicable) for
each training. To report and certify
compliance, individual brokers who file
paper-based triennial reports with CBP
would include a written statement in
the triennial report, and individual
brokers who file their triennial reports
electronically through the eCBP portal
would check a box in the eCBP portal
while filing their triennial report
electronically. Brokers would further be
required to produce their records of
compliance if requested by CBP, though
CBP would only require brokers to
maintain their records for the three
years following the submission of the
triennial report.68 CBP estimates that
recordkeeping and reporting would take
each broker 30 minutes (0.5 hours) per
year. After the first triennial reporting
period in which brokers self-attest to
completing their training, 10 percent of
brokers each year would incur the cost
of producing records to submit to CBP
for a compliance audit, which CBP
estimates will take 15 minutes (0.25
hours).69 Therefore, brokers would see
$1,380,538 in new reporting and
recordkeeping costs over the 6-year
period of analysis. See Table 10.
TABLE 10—REPORTING COSTS FOR ALL BROKERS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Brokers
Time
(hours) 70
Wage
Total
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
13,822
13,822
13,822
14,867
14,867
14,867
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5–0.75
0.5–0.75
0.5–0.75
$31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
$216,107
216,107
216,107
244,072
244,072
244,072
Total ..........................................................................................................
14,867
3.0–3.75
........................
1,380,538
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
To comply with the proposed rule,
individual brokers who do not already
do so would be required to spend 36
hours over three years completing
continuing education in whatever form
they choose. Additionally, CBP
estimates they would spend three hours
per 3-year cycle researching and
registering for trainings. Finally, brokers
would need to spend about 30–45
minutes (0.5–0.75 hours) on
recordkeeping during each cycle.
Overall, brokers would need to spend
about 40.5 hours over a 3-year period,
66 Only the 40 percent of brokers who do not
already complete continuing education would face
these costs. The total number of brokers affected in
the final year of analysis (2026) is the same as the
number of brokers overall because each year
represents the same population with a small
amount of growth.
67 Some brokers would likely face additional
time-costs should they fail to complete and/or
report their required continuing education and need
to take corrective action or reapply for their licenses
following revocation (see proposed § 111.104(d) for
details). However, CBP only reports the costs
affected populations would face to maintain
compliance with the proposed rule.
68 Note that many other records must be
maintained for five years. The 3-year standard
applies only to records of continuing education.
69 CBP would randomly select 10 percent of
individual brokers to audit for compliance each
year.
70 Note that only 10 percent of individual brokers
would spend 45 minutes per year, while the
remaining 90 percent would spend 30 minutes per
year. Furthermore, CBP would only begin audits
after the first triennial period during which the rule
is in effect.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50816
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
or 81 hours over a 6-year period of
analysis, to comply with the rule.
Some brokers would choose to
complete their trainings outside of work
hours, while others would complete
training as part of their assigned duties.
Brokers would also spend time in
researching, registering for, and
maintaining records of their continuing
education, for a total of 12 hours per
year of training plus 1.5 to 1.75 hours
per year in research and recordkeeping.
Based on the average wage rate for
brokers of $31.27, the opportunity cost
of researching, registering for, attending,
and reporting continuing education is
approximately $14,547,191 over the 6year period of analysis.71 See Table 11.
TABLE 11—SUMMARY OF OPPORTUNITY COST FOR BROKERS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Brokers
Hours
Wage rate
Cost
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
5,529
5,529
5,529
5,947
5,947
5,947
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
$31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
31.27
$2,333,955
2,333,955
2,333,955
2,515,108
2,515,108
2,515,108
Total ..........................................................................................................
5,947
81
187.62
14,547,191
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Total costs for all individual brokers,
including tuition and travel expenses
for those who must begin continuing
education regimens because of the rule
as well as opportunity and reporting
costs for all brokers, range from
$16,452,050 to $53,128,426. The
primary estimate, which accounts for
one third of brokers choosing each cost
tier, comes to $35,478,781 over the 6year period of analysis. See Table 12.
TABLE 12—TOTAL COSTS FOR ALL BROKERS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Total cost:
low estimate
Year
2021 .................................................................................................................
2022 .................................................................................................................
2023 .................................................................................................................
2024 .................................................................................................................
2025 .................................................................................................................
2026 .................................................................................................................
Total ..........................................................................................................
$2,636,505
2,636,505
2,636,505
2,847,512
2,847,512
2,847,512
16,452,050
Total cost:
medium
estimate
$5,913,241
5,913,241
5,913,241
6,372,048
6,372,048
6,372,048
36,855,867
Total cost:
high estimate
$8,526,520
8,526,520
8,526,520
9,182,956
9,182,956
9,182,956
53,128,426
Total cost:
primary
estimate
$5,692,089
5,692,089
5,692,089
6,134,172
6,134,172
6,134,172
35,478,781
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
To implement the requirements of the
proposed rule, CBP would need to
designate entities or companies as
approved accreditors of customs broker
continuing education. To do so, CBP
would solicit applications from parties
interested in becoming accreditors, or
(following the first application cycle)
accreditors seeking renewal of their
status, by publishing a Request for
Proposal (RFP).72 A panel of CBP
experts would evaluate the applications
and select the entities approved or
renewed as accreditors. CBP estimates
that the process of developing and
submitting the RFP would take two
personnel 10 hours. Application
evaluation would take a further 40
hours and would require four CBP
personnel. The process of designating
accreditors would occur before the
continuing education requirements
went into effect, to allow accreditors to
be ready for the rule’s implementation
and ensure equal footing for all
providers.73 However, because of
uncertainty over timing of the rule’s
implementation, we assumed that
designation of accreditors would occur
in the first year of the period of analysis.
Regardless of when the rule goes into
effect and the designation process
occurs, accreditors and CBP would need
to complete the process two times in a
6-year period. Overall, designation of
accreditors would require six CBP
personnel 180 hours total, twice in a 6year period of analysis, for a cost to CBP
of $26,640 (see Table 13).
71 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational
Employment Statistics, ‘‘May 2019 National
Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates,
United States.’’ Updated March 31, 2020. Available
at https://www.bls.gov/oes/2019/may/oes_nat.htm.
Accessed June 12, 2020; U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation Historical Listing March 2004–
December 2019, ‘‘Table 3. Civilian workers, by
occupational group: Employer costs per hours
worked for employee compensation and costs as a
percentage of total compensation, 2004–2019.’’
March 2020. Available at https://www.bls.gov/web/
ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2020. The
wages are in 2019 dollars and CBP assumes an
annual growth rate of 0 percent.
72 See proposed 19 CFR 111.103(c).
73 See section IV.E.1. of this NPRM.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
ii. To CBP
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50817
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 13—COSTS TO CBP TO DESIGNATE ACCREDITORS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Personnel for
RFP
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Personnel for
evaluation
Wage rate
Hours
Total
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
2
0
0
2
0
0
4
0
0
4
0
0
$74.00
74.00
74.00
74.00
74.00
74.00
50
0
0
50
0
0
$13,320
0
0
13,320
0
0
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
26,640
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
CBP’s Broker Management Branch
(BMB) would also face the costs of
auditing for compliance with the
continuing education requirement.
Although individual brokers would selfattest to their completion of the
continuing education requirement with
each triennial report, CBP would
occasionally conduct compliance audits
by randomly selecting a certain subset
of brokers for auditing. To start, CBP
would select 10 percent of brokers per
year, although the audits would only
cover the continuing education reported
for the most recently completed
triennial cycle. A continuing education
compliance audit would involve CBP
personnel reviewing the reported
coursework of the selected broker and
potentially working with brokers to
identify gaps or higher quality training
opportunities. Such an activity would
take approximately one hour, on
average; therefore, CBP estimates that
each compliance audit would cost CBP
approximately $74.00. For the first three
years of the period of analysis, no
compliance audit would take place
because brokers would not yet have
reported their training at the end of the
first triennial cycle. Over the next three
years, CBP would select 10 percent of
active individual brokers to audit.74
With about 1,500 compliance audits
performed per year, costs to CBP would
amount to $330,054 over the 6-year
period of analysis. See Table 14.
TABLE 14—COMPLIANCE AUDITING COSTS FOR CBP
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Audits
Cost per audit
Total
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
0
0
0
1,487
1,487
1,487
$74
74
74
74
74
74
$0
0
0
110,018
110,018
110,018
Total ......................................................................................................................................
4,460
444
330,054
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
iii. To Accreditors
Accrediting bodies interested in
becoming designated accreditors for
customs brokers continuing education
under the terms of proposed rule would
need to apply to CBP during an open
RFP period and then re-apply to confirm
their status every three years. Costs to
respond to the RFP include only the
preparation of the application. Overall,
CBP estimates that the preparation of an
application to CBP to become an
accreditor would take two employees 40
hours, to be completed two times in a
6-year period. Although the application
for accreditor status would likely be
completed before the proposed rule is
officially in effect, because of
uncertainty in the timing, we have used
the same period of analysis.75
Regardless of when the rule goes into
effect, accreditor-applicants would need
to apply twice in a 6-year period.
Therefore, CBP estimates that CBPdesignated accreditors would incur
approximately $11,339 in costs over a 6year period of analysis. See Table 15.
TABLE 15—COSTS TO ACCREDITORS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Year
Personnel
2021 .................................................................................................................
2022 .................................................................................................................
2023 .................................................................................................................
74 Those individual brokers who have not yet
completed a triennial report since taking their
broker exam would be exempt from completing
continuing education until after their first triennial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
Wage rate
2
0
0
report and, therefore, would also be exempt from
continuing education audits during that time.
75 When the proposed rule is first implemented,
CBP would allow accreditor-applicants time to
apply before the requirement is officially in place
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
$70.87
70.87
70.87
Hours
Total
40
0
0
$5,670
0
0
so that they are able to accredit courses as soon as
the rule is in effect, allowing providers equal
footing and giving brokers the largest pool of
potential training.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50818
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 15—COSTS TO ACCREDITORS—Continued
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Year
Personnel
Wage rate
Hours
Total
2024 .................................................................................................................
2025 .................................................................................................................
2026 .................................................................................................................
2
0
0
70.87
70.87
70.87
40
0
0
5,670
0
0
Total ..........................................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
11,339
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
would likely pay a fee and would need
to renew their accreditation annually to
ensure their coursework remains up to
date. The fee for accreditation is likely
to vary based on accreditor, but would
likely average $25.76 Overall, CBP
estimates that providers of continuing
education for customs brokers would
face $300,000 of new costs over a 6-year
period of analysis. See Table 16.
approve approximately 1,000 courses
per year. With the proposed rule in
place, CBP believes the number of
events submitted for accreditation
would increase substantially because
companies’ internal trainings and
external offerings would need to be
accredited. Therefore, CBP estimated
that about 2,000 courses would require
accreditation each year. Providers
iv. To Providers
Providers of continuing education
would also face new costs under the
terms of the proposed rule. Specifically,
providers would need to submit
applications to accreditors to have their
coursework or events accredited.
Officials at the NCBFAA Education
Institute estimate that they currently
TABLE 16—COSTS TO PROVIDERS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Courses
Fee
Total
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,000
$25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
$50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
Total ......................................................................................................................................
........................
........................
300,000
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Based on the primary estimate, costs
total $36,146,814 over the 6-year period
of analysis. Using a three percent
discount rate, the annualized total costs
are $6,012,425. See Table 17 for an
annual breakdown and Table 18 for
discounting.
TABLE 17—TOTAL COSTS TO ALL PARTIES
[2021 U.S. dollars]
Costs to
brokers—
primary
estimate
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Costs to
accreditors
Costs to
providers
Total costs
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
.....................................................................................
$5,692,089
5,692,089
5,692,089
6,134,172
6,134,172
6,134,172
$5,670
0
0
5,670
0
0
$50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
$13,320
0
0
123,338
110,018
110,018
$5,761,078
5,742,089
5,742,089
6,313,179
6,294,190
6,294,190
Total ..............................................................................
35,478,781
11,339
300,000
356,694
36,146,814
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Costs to
CBP—
accrediting
and
auditing
76 This fee is based on that charged by the
NCBFAA. Although CBP sought information in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
ANPRM on how much accreditors might charge,
CBP did not receive specific information.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50819
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 18—DISCOUNTED TOTAL COSTS
[2021 U.S. dollars]
3%
Costs ................................................................................................................
6. Costs Not Estimated in This Analysis
The parties affected by the proposed
rule would also face several, mostly
minor costs that CBP is unable to
quantify. To provide individual brokers
who choose to file their triennial report
electronically through the eCBP portal
the ability to self-attest to their
continuing education completion, CBP
would need to include a field within the
triennial report, which is submitted via
the eCBP portal. The programming to
include this field does not add
significantly to the application
development budget as CBP constantly
makes small changes to many aspects of
CBP’s authorized electronic data
interchanges.
Additionally, some potential
accreditors may face costs related to
protesting CBP’s initial decisions
regarding their proposals to become
accreditors.77 Accreditor-applicants
would have the right to protest in
accordance with procedures set out in
the FAR. CBP expects these costs to be
minor and protests to be rare. Brokers’
clients may see slight price increases for
broker services. As broker costs
increase, they may pass some of these
costs onto their clients in the form of
increased prices. However, CBP believes
that the per transaction increase in
7%
PV
AV
PV
AV
$32,570,459
$6,012,425
$28,584,851
$5,996,982
penalties assessed by CBP. CBP
examined data on broker penalties,
regulatory audits, and validation
activities between a group of companies
who employ one or more individual
brokers known to voluntarily hold an
industry certification that requires
meeting the proposed continuing
education requirement and the broader
population of brokers (which includes
those who voluntarily complete
continuing education and those who do
not). This group of brokers with
continuing education represents about
300 companies, which make up 54
percent of entries filed between 2017
and 2020 and 51 percent of entries filed
between 2015 and 2020. CBP found that
at the 99 percent confidence level, there
is a statistically significant difference
between these groups. Those who
voluntarily hold this certification and
complete continuing education have
significantly lower rates of penalties,
audits, and validation activities. See
Table 19.78 Brokers who are not known
to have continuing education are
assessed 11 times as many penalties per
entry filing, are audited 8 times as often,
and have 5 times as many validation
activities performed by CBP to
investigate discrepancies when
compared to companies that are known
to employ brokers who voluntarily take
continuing education.
prices would be so small as to be
insignificant.
7. Benefits of the Rule
This proposed rule, if finalized,
would have many benefits to brokers,
CBP, and the general public. We are able
to estimate some of the benefits of the
proposed rule, but many others are
qualitative in nature. Brokers would
benefit from improved reputation and a
professionalization of the customs
broker community while their clients
would benefit from better performance
and improved compliance. The
continuing broker education
requirement would provide importers
and drawback claimants with greater
assurance that their agents are
knowledgeable of customs laws and
regulations, familiar with operational
processes, and can properly exercise a
broker’s fiduciary duties. The
requirements would also help maintain
a measure of consistency across all
customs brokers. Providers would
benefit from increased prestige due to
CBP-approved accreditation. Other
benefits of the proposed rule are
quantitative.
CBP would benefit from a reduction
in regulatory audits of broker
compliance. Both CBP and brokers
would benefit from fewer errors
committed by brokers and fewer
TABLE 19—ENFORCEMENT ACTION RATE FOR DIFFERENT GROUPS
Enforcement action
By all other
companies
(%)
Total
Penalty .............................................................................................................
Regulatory Audit ..............................................................................................
Validation Activity .............................................................................................
267
87
311
0.00039
0.000077
0.00026
By 300
companies
with
continuing
education
(%)
0.000035
0.000011
0.000052
Ratio
11 to 1
8 to 1
5 to 1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
* Rates are defined as the number of enforcement actions divided by the number of entries filed.
77 See
section IV.E.1. of this NPRM.
of data of companies with at least one
individual broker with continuing education: Data
78 Source
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
received from NCBFAA on companies participating
in its broker certification program on April 28,
2021. Data on enforcement actions and the number
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
of entries per company was obtained from ACE on
April 11, 2021.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50820
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Aside from penalties, CBP
enforcement often takes the form of a
regulatory audit. Regulatory audits
usually occur because a CBP Officer or
Import Specialist flags unusual or
suspicious activity. CBP then performs
a regulatory audit of the broker’s
activity, investigating the potential
infraction, as well as the broker’s overall
compliance with regulations, rules, and
CBP guidance. These audits may lead to
a settlement agreement in which a
penalty is assessed, but they more often
lead to discussion between the broker
and CBP as to how the broker can
improve compliance and performance.
With continuing education in place,
CBP believes that fewer regulatory
audits would be necessary. From 2015
to 2020, CBP performed 84 regulatory
audits of broker compliance, for an
average of 14 per year.79 The number of
audits holds approximately steady
across the 5-year period, so CBP does
not believe it likely that the number of
audits would grow in the period of
analysis. Therefore, CBP projects 84
audits would be performed during the 6year period of analysis under baseline
conditions, or 14 each year. See Table
20.
TABLE 20—PROJECTION OF AUDITS
AND BROKER SURVEYS UNDER THE
BASELINE
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Audits
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
14
14
14
14
14
14
Total ...............................
84
CBP estimates that a regulatory audit
of broker compliance takes CBP
approximately 559 hours, on average.
Based on the average wage rate for a
CBP Trade and Revenue employee of
$74.00 per hour, we estimate the
average broker audit costs $41,351.
Based on a review of outcomes from the
audits completed from 2015–2020,
approximately 40 percent would likely
have been avoided had a continuing
education requirement been in place.
CBP believes that, had customs brokers
been required to complete continuing
education on an individual level, and,
therefore, stayed current on the rules
and regulations governing customs
business, they would have made fewer
errors and avoided the audits. Over a 6year period of analysis under the terms
of the rule, CBP would avoid 34 audits,
for a cost savings of $1,389,400. See
Table 21.
TABLE 21—CBP COST SAVINGS FROM REDUCED REGULATORY AUDIT ACTIVITIES
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Audits
avoided
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Cost savings
per audit
Total savings
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
6
6
6
6
6
6
$41,351
41,351
41,351
41,351
41,351
41,351
$231,567
231,567
231,567
231,567
231,567
231,567
Total ......................................................................................................................................
34
248,107
1,389,400
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
675 penalties. See Table 22 for an
annual count.
The number of penalties assessed
between 2017 and 2020 grew
significantly. In 2017, CBP assessed 20
penalties while in 2020, that number
jumped to 119 (see Table 1, above).
Between 2017 and 2020, the number of
penalties issued increased with a
compound annual growth rate (CAGR)
of 52 percent. The jump in penalties
between 2019 and 2020 is likely
attributable to changes in the AD/CVD
environment, and CBP does not believe
that penalties per year would continue
to grow at the same rate. Based on
trends before and after the jump, we do
not believe that the number of penalties
assessed per year would consistently
grow at any meaningful rate. Based on
a 0 percent growth rate, CBP estimates
that over the 6-year period of analysis
from 2021 to 2026, CBP would assess
When CBP assesses a penalty against
a broker for a customs violation, CBP
incurs the cost of detecting and
investigating the violation, as well as
79 Data provided by CBP’s Regulatory Audit and
Agency Advisory Services Directorate on April 11,
2021.
80 CBP bases this estimate on an average of 60
hours worked per penalty at an average wage of
$74.00 per hour for a CBP Trade and Revenue
employee. CBP bases this wage on the FY 2020
salary and benefits of the national average of CBP
Trade and Revenue positions, which is equal to a
GS–13, Step 5. Source: Email correspondence with
CBP’s Office of Finance on July 2, 2020.
81 Approximately 20 percent of the penalties
assessed between 2017 and 2020 were for
infractions that CBP believes would have been
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
TABLE 22—PROJECTION OF PENALTIES
ASSESSED
FROM
2021–2026
UNDER THE BASELINE
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
PO 00000
Penalties
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
......................................
113
113
113
113
113
113
Total ...............................
675
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
determining the appropriate monetary
fine and handling any appeals from the
broker. The broker must pay the
penalty, which is capped at $30,000 by
statute. CBP also works with brokers
against whom a fine has been assessed
to mitigate the penalty, resulting in the
collection of amounts that are usually
significantly lower. From 2017–2020,
monetary penalties collected from
individual brokers averaged $2,644. CBP
estimates that the entire process of
assessing a penalty against a broker,
from detection to working through
mitigation, costs CBP approximately
$4,440 per penalty.80 With the proposed
rule implemented, CBP believes that
brokers would commit approximately
20 percent fewer penalizable
violations.81 As a result, brokers would
save approximately $359,640 in fines
avoided had the broker been required to complete
continuing education. The majority of the
remaining penalties were for late filing. Penalty
data is taken from SEACATS.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
avoided, while CBP would save
approximately $599,400 in processing
costs.82 See Tables 23 and 24.
50821
approximately $599,400 in processing
costs.82 See Tables 23 and 24.
TABLE 23—PENALTIES AVOIDED BY BROKERS
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Penalties
avoided
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Fines avoided
per penalty
Total
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
23
23
23
23
23
23
$2,664
2,664
2,664
2,664
2,664
2,664
$59,940
59,940
59,940
59,940
59,940
59,940
Total ......................................................................................................................................
135
15,984
359,640
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
TABLE 24—COSTS AVOIDED BY CBP
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Penalties
avoided
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Cost savings
per penalty
Total
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
23
23
23
23
23
23
$4,440
4,440
4,440
4,440
4,440
4,440
$99,900
99,900
99,900
99,900
99,900
99,900
Total ......................................................................................................................................
135
26,640
599,400
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
8. Net Impact of the Rule
The proposed rule would lead to costs
for brokers in the form of tuition, travel
expenses, opportunity cost, and time
spent researching, registering for,
keeping records of, and reporting
continuing education. CBP would face
the costs of designating accreditors and
auditing broker compliance. Accreditors
would incur the costs of responding to
a CBP-issued RFP, and education
providers would incur the costs of
drafting applications and fees charged
by the accreditors for reviewing their
accreditation requests. CBP would also
see cost savings (benefits) from avoided
penalty assessment and avoided
regulatory audits. CBP has found that
companies employing one or more
brokers who complete continuing
education are statistically less likely to
face enforcement actions. Over a 6-year
period of analysis, the primary estimate
of the net costs totals $34,158,014 (see
Table 25). Using a discount rate of three
percent, annualized costs total
$5,680,959 (see Table 26).
TABLE 25—PRIMARY ESTIMATE OF NET COSTS
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Year
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Benefits
Costs
Net costs 83
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
$331,467
331,467
331,467
331,467
331,467
331,467
$5,761,078
5,742,089
5,742,089
6,313,179
6,294,190
6,294,190
$5,429,611
5,410,622
5,410,622
5,981,713
5,962,723
5,962,723
Total ......................................................................................................................................
1,988,800
36,146,814
34,158,014
82 Penalties are a transfer payment from the
broker to CBP that do not affect total resources
available to society. Accordingly, CBP does not
include penalties or penalties avoided in the final
accounting of costs and benefits this rule. In
addition, penalties are an enforcement tool that are
intended to bring a noncompliant party in line with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
existing requirements. Any costs and benefits that
result from compliance with the underlying
requirement are included in the analysis, but not
the enforcement mechanism. In the same way, if a
rule results in the seizure of illegal merchandise,
CBP does not include the cost of the lost
merchandise to the importers.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
83 Note that we only include costs of remaining
compliant with the proposed rule in the net costs.
Similarly, we do not include penalties avoided in
the final accounting of benefits.
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50822
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 26—PRIMARY ESTIMATE OF NET PRESENT AND ANNUALIZED COSTS
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
3%
7%
PV
AV
PV
AV
Savings ............................................................................................................
Costs ................................................................................................................
$1,795,619
32,570,459
$331,467
6,012,425
$1,579,949
28,584,851
$331,467
5,996,982
Net Costs ..................................................................................................
30,774,841
5,680,959
27,004,902
5,665,515
CBP presents four estimates of the net
costs depending on the cost of training
pursued by each individual broker. The
low-cost path assumes the broker would
pursue only free trainings and forgo
travel. In the medium-cost path, brokers
would pursue a mix of free and paid
trainings and travel to a single
annualized cost ranging from $2,514,956
to $8,617,817, using a 3 percent
discount rate over the 6-year period of
analysis. A summary of net costs under
all four estimates presented in the
analysis can be found in Table 27.
conference or in-person event per year.
In the high-cost path, brokers would
pursue all paid trainings and travel to
two in-person events or conferences per
year. The primary estimate assumes that
one third of brokers would choose each
path. Overall, the quantifiable effects of
the proposed rule result in a net,
TABLE 27—SUMMARY OF NET COSTS
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Estimate
Value
Primary .........................................................................
Low ...............................................................................
Medium .........................................................................
High ..............................................................................
As stated before, many benefits of the
proposed rule are qualitative. Brokers
would benefit from improved reputation
and a professionalization of the customs
broker community while their clients
would benefit from better performance,
less non-compliance, and improved
outcomes. Providers would benefit from
increased prestige due to CBP-approved
accreditation. CBP believes that the
combination of quantified benefits and
unquantified benefits exceed the costs
of this rule. We request comment on this
conclusion.
9. Analysis of Alternatives
Alternative 1: 72 hours every three
years.
Alternative 1 is the same as the
chosen alternative except that the
Net
Net
Net
Net
Net
Net
Net
Net
PV
AV
PV
AV
PV
AV
PV
AV
3%
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
..........................................................................
7%
$30,774,841
5,680,959
13,624,000
2,514,956
32,016,156
5,910,102
46,684,367
8,617,817
$27,004,902
5,665,515
11,945,324
2,506,079
28,094,859
5,894,183
40,974,522
8,596,283
inappropriate for individual brokers.
Were CBP to mandate 72 hours of
continuing education every three years,
brokers who already voluntarily pursue
continuing education would need to
increase the amount of training they
complete, often by 100 percent. Costs
incurred by both brokers who do not
already pursue continuing education
and those who do would be much
greater. Such a requirement would be
too onerous, particularly for small
businesses, which make up a significant
proportion (approximately 39 percent)
of the employers of licensed customs
brokers. CBP estimates that such a
requirement would cost brokers up to
$113,258,739 over a 6-year period of
analysis, or about $7,618 per broker. See
Table 28.
continuing education requirement
would be raised to 72 hours each
triennial cycle instead of 36 hours. This
alternative is modeled on the Internal
Revenue Service’s (IRS) Enrolled Agent
program, which requires 72 hours of
continuing education every three
years.84 An enrolled agent is an
individual who may represent clients in
matters before the IRS and, like a
licensed customs broker, must pass a
rigorous examination to prove his or her
knowledge and competence, making it a
reasonable analog to the proposed CBP
program. Once the agent has passed the
exam, he or she has unlimited practice
rights, providing he or she completes
the requisite continuing education.
CBP has determined that 72 hours
every three years would be
TABLE 28—BROKER COSTS UNDER A 72-HOUR CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENT
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Low
Year
Cost
2021 .............................
2022 .............................
13,822
13,822
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
Total
$62.54
62.54 I
84 See Internal Revenue Service, Enrolled Agent
Information (Apr. 6, 2021), available at https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Medium
High
Brokers
Cost
$518,657
518,657
I
$1,248
1,248 I
Total
Cost
$10,348,863
10,348,863
I
www.irs.gov/tax-professionals/enrolled-agents/
enrolled-agent-information.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
$2,193
2,193 I
Total
$18,188,702
18,188,702
50823
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 28—BROKER COSTS UNDER A 72-HOUR CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENT—Continued
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Low
Year
Cost
2023
2024
2025
2026
Medium
High
Brokers
Total
Cost
Total
Cost
Total
.............................
.............................
.............................
.............................
13,822
14,867
14,867
14,867
62.54
62.54
62.54
62.54
518,657
557,880
557,880
557,880
1,248
1,248
1,248
1,248
10,348,863
11,131,490
11,131,490
11,131,490
2,193
2,193
2,193
2,193
18,188,702
19,564,211
19,564,211
19,564,211
Total ......................
14,867
375
3,229,610
7,487
64,441,059
13,159
113,258,739
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Alternative 2: 36 hours every three
years.
Alternative 2 is the chosen
alternative.
Alternative 3: CBP list of brokers
voluntarily meeting continuing
education standards.
Under Alternative 3, instead of
mandating any kind of continuing
education program, CBP would release
annually a list of brokerages or
companies employing brokers who
voluntarily provide continuing
education to their broker employees. As
with Alternative 1, qualifying events
would include internal training,
government-sponsored webinars, trade
conferences and events, and other
activities. CBP would draft this list each
year by requesting that companies
report whether they provide a
continuing education program. CBP
might request details from the company
to ensure the training provided meets a
certain threshold for quality and
relevance.
Under baseline conditions, CBP
estimates that about 60 percent of
brokers already complete continuing
education on a voluntary basis. CBP
does not believe that publishing a list of
brokerages that provide continuing
education would induce the remaining
40 percent of brokers to pursue
continuing education, though some
brokers might do so. Under Alternative
3, those individual brokers who already
complete ongoing training would
continue to do so, while many of those
brokers who do not, would not, absent
a mandate, be likely to change. CBP
estimates that an additional five percent
of brokers might begin a continuing
education program in order to be
included on CBP’s list, representing
about 186 additional companies.85
While fewer brokers would face the
costs of tuition, travel, and recordkeeping, approximately 743 would face
these costs of continuing education over
the 6-year period of analysis.
Additionally, CBP would incur the costs
of composing the list each year and
companies employing brokers would
face the costs of applying to be included
on the list. Assuming two CBP
personnel spend about 40 hours each,
annually to compose the list, that one
person from each company spends
about 10 hours compiling and
submitting information to CBP annually,
and that one third of affected brokers
choose each cost path, Alternative 3
results in costs of $5,636,739 over the 6year period of analysis. See Table 29.
TABLE 29—TOTAL COSTS UNDER ALTERNATIVE 3
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
CBP cost
Brokerage
costs
Broker costs
Total
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
$11,840
11,840
11,840
11,840
11,840
11,840
$267,605
267,605
267,605
267,605
267,605
267,605
$293,545
695,303
725,822
748,466
748,466
748,466
$572,990
974,748
1,005,267
1,027,911
1,027,911
1,027,911
Total ..........................................................................................................
71,040
1,605,631
3,960,068
5,636,739
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
If only 5 percent more brokers elect to
begin continuing education under the
terms of Alternative 3, fewer noncompliance actions would be avoided.
CBP estimates that only an eighth as
many penalties and audits would be
avoided as compared to Alternative 2.
Therefore, CBP and brokers would avoid
three penalties and one audit annually,
for a total cost savings of $44,955 per
year. However, CBP does not typically
include avoided penalties in the overall
accounting of costs and benefits of a
rule. Therefore, over a 6-year period of
analysis, Alternative 3 leads to $248,600
in cost savings.
85 CBP assumes that large companies employing
more than 100 people already have a continuing
education program. Therefore, those companies that
would need to add continuing education in order
to be included on CBP’s list would likely be small
to medium sized businesses, meaning there would
be a significant number of them, employing a few
brokers each.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50824
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 30—TOTAL SAVINGS UNDER ALTERNATIVE 3
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
Savings
for brokers
Year
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Savings
for CBP
Total
savings
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................
$7,493
7,493
7,493
7,493
7,493
7,493
$41,433
41,433
41,433
41,433
41,433
41,433
$41,433
41,433
41,433
41,433
41,433
41,433
Total ......................................................................................................................................
44,955
248,600
248,600
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
One of the primary goals of the
proposed rule is to reduce compliance
issues, penalties, and regulatory audits,
and CBP does not believe that a system
based on voluntary reporting would do
enough to reach that goal. With only an
additional 5 percent of brokers pursuing
continuing education, Alternative 3
would not do enough to further
professionalize the customs broker
community, nor would their clients see
an appreciable decline in compliance
issues. Additionally, such a system
would still result in a net cost of about
$5.4 million over the 6-year period of
analysis. Therefore, CBP believes that
Alternative 3 is less preferable than the
chosen alternative.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
and Fairness Act of 1996, requires
agencies to assess the impact of
regulations on small entities. A small
entity may be a small business (defined
as any independently owned and
operated business not dominant in its
field that qualifies as a small business
concern per the Small Business Act); a
small organization (defined as any notfor-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and
is not dominant in its field); or a small
governmental jurisdiction (defined as a
locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
A small business within the Freight
Transportation Arrangement Industry,
the industry that employs customs
brokers, is defined as one whose annual
receipts are less than $16.5 million,
regardless of the number of
employees.86 Data from the U.S. Census
Bureau shows that approximately 96
percent of businesses in the
Transportation Arrangement Industry
(NAICS Code 448510) are small
businesses (see Table 31). All businesses
employing brokers under this NAICS
Code are affected by this rule.
Additionally, some small businesses
may elect to become accreditors or
training providers. Therefore, CBP
concludes that this rule will affect a
substantial number of small entities.
TABLE 31—SMALL BUSINESSES IN THE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION ARRANGEMENT INDUSTRY 87
Number of
employees
Employment size 88
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
01:
02:
03:
04:
05:
06:
07:
08:
09:
Total ............................................................................................................
<5 ................................................................................................................
5–9 ..............................................................................................................
10–19 ..........................................................................................................
<20 ..............................................................................................................
20–99 ..........................................................................................................
100–499 ......................................................................................................
<500 ............................................................................................................
500+ ............................................................................................................
265,192
15,939
18,025
20,288
54,252
49,477
44,715
148,444
116,748
Preliminary
receipts
(all firms,
$1,000s) 89
$67,276,572
6,315,166
5,392,992
5,870,163
17,578,321
13,973,780
10,886,028
42,438,129
24,838,443
Receipts
per firm
($)
$4,454,222
708,614
1,974,732
3,851,813
1,335,029
10,397,158
30,493,076
2,854,327
105,247,640
Small
business?
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
No.
Yes.
No.
Some small businesses may choose to
apply to CBP to become accreditors.
Those businesses would face the costs
of applying to CBP, the potential costs
of any protests they choose to file
should they disagree with CBP’s
decision regarding their proposals, and
the costs of being an accreditor. Small
businesses may also choose to become
training providers and to incur the costs
of producing and providing trainings.
However, CBP believes that those costs
would be recouped by tuition and fees.
CBP further expects any costs not
directly covered by fees to be minor and
included in general business expenses.
Individual brokers employed by these
companies would be required to attain
36 hours of continuing education every
three years under the terms of the
proposed rule. They would also face the
opportunity cost of attending trainings
as well as the costs of recordkeeping,
reporting, and participating in any
continuing education compliance audit
initiated by CBP. Accordingly, the
impacts of the rule to individual brokers
86 Small business size standards are defined in 13
CFR part 121.
87 United States Census Bureau, ‘‘2017 County
Business Patterns and 2017 Economic Census,’’
Released March 6, 2020, https://www.census.gov/
data/tables/2017/econ/susb/2017-susbannual.html. Accessed March 15, 2021.
88 Note that some of the categories are sums of
other categories. For example, Category 8, <500, is
a sum of Categories 2, 3, 4, 6, and 7. Thus,
Categories 7 and 9 are not consecutive, but
represent all firms employing 100 or more people.
89 The Survey of U.S. Businesses (SUSB) from
which this data is taken is conducted in years
ending in 2 and 7. Note that finalized results from
the 2017 survey are scheduled for release in May
of 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
and affected businesses will depend on
if the broker currently meets the
proposed training requirements. Based
on public comments in response to the
ANPRM and discussions between CBP
and various broker organizations, CBP
estimates most large businesses
employing brokers already provide, and
often mandate, internal training and
continuing education. CBP estimates
that these 60 percent of individual
brokers already in compliance would
not face new costs aside from
recordkeeping and reporting. CBP
estimates the remaining 40 percent of
brokers, mostly at smaller businesses,
would need to come into compliance
with the proposed rule. Using the
primary estimate under which one third
of brokers selects each cost tier, and
assuming a discount rate of 3 percent,
the annualized cost of the rule to all
affected brokers is $5,903,336. The rule
would affect 5,529 customs brokers in
the first year, for an average annualized
cost of $1,068 per broker. The average
annual receipts for small businesses in
the Freight Transportation Arrangement
Industry, according to the Census data
in Table 28, is $543,589. The number of
brokers employed by each business
would vary among the small businesses
in question, but assuming an average of
four brokers per company,90 the cost of
continuing education for each firm
would be approximately $4,272
annually, or about 0.79 percent of
annual receipts. CBP generally
considers effects of less than 1 percent
of annual receipts not to be a significant
impact. Accordingly, CBP certifies that
this proposed rule does not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. 3507) an agency may not
conduct, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a valid control number
assigned by OMB. The collections of
information contained in these
regulations are provided for by OMB
control number 1651–0034 (CBP
Regulations Pertaining to Customs
Brokers).
The proposed rule would require
individual brokers to maintain records
of completed continuing education
(including, among others, the date, title,
provider, location, and credit hours) and
certify the completion of the required
number of continuing education credits
on the triennial report. Based on these
changes, CBP estimates a small increase
in the burden hours for information
collection related to customs brokers
regulations. CBP would submit to OMB
for review the following adjustments to
the previously approved Information
Collection under OMB control number
1651–0034 to account for this proposed
rule’s changes. The addition of the selfattestation and submission of records
would add about 30–45 minutes (0.5–
0.75 hours) per respondent.
CBP Regulations Pertaining Customs
Brokers
Estimated Number of Respondents:
13,822.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
Estimated Number of Total Annual
Responses: 0.333.
Estimated Time per Response: 31.5
minutes (0.525 hours).
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 2,418.85 hours.
D. Signing Authority
This document is being issued in
accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(b)(1),
which provides that the Secretary of the
Treasury delegated to the Secretary of
DHS authority to prescribe and approve
regulations relating to customs revenue
functions on behalf of the Secretary of
the Treasury for when the subject matter
is not listed as provided by Treasury
Department Order No. 100–16.
Accordingly, this proposed rule may be
signed by the Secretary of DHS (or his
or her delegate).
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and
procedure, Brokers, Penalties, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, CBP proposes to amend 19
CFR part 111 as set forth below:
PART 111—CUSTOMS BROKERS
1. The general authority citation for
part 111 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1624, 1641.
*
*
*
*
*
2. Revise the second sentence of
§ 111.0 to read as follows:
■
90 Many brokerages are sole proprietorships and
many employ individual brokers who supervise
other employees. The average number of employees
per firm is seven. CBP assumes the average firm
employs 4 individual brokers and 3 other
employees, such as human resource managers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
§ 111.0
Scope.
* * * This part also prescribes the
duties and responsibilities of brokers,
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
50825
the grounds and procedures for
disciplining brokers, including the
assessment of monetary penalties, the
revocation or suspension of licenses and
permits, and the obligation for
individual customs broker license
holders to satisfy a continuing
education requirement.
■ 3. In § 111.1, add the definitions
‘‘Continuing broker education
requirement’’, ‘‘Continuing education
credit’’, ‘‘Qualifying continuing broker
education’’, and ‘‘Triennial period’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
§ 111.1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Continuing broker education
requirement. ‘‘Continuing broker
education requirement’’ means an
individual customs broker license
holder’s obligation to complete a certain
number of continuing education credits
of qualifying continuing broker
education, as set forth in subpart F of
this part, in order to maintain sufficient
knowledge of customs and related laws,
regulations, and procedures,
bookkeeping, accounting, and all other
appropriate matters necessary to render
valuable service to importers and
drawback claimants.
Continuing education credit.
‘‘Continuing education credit’’ means
the unit of measurement used for
meeting the continuing broker
education requirement. The smallest
recognized unit is one continuing
education credit, which requires 60
minutes of continuous participation in a
qualifying continuing broker education
program, as defined in § 111.103(a). For
qualifying continuing broker education
lasting more than 60 minutes, one
continuing education credit may be
claimed for the first 60 minutes of
continuous participation, and half of
one continuing education credit may be
claimed for every full 30 minutes of
continuous participation thereafter. For
example, for qualifying continuing
broker education lasting more than 60
minutes but less than 90 minutes, only
one continuing education credit may be
claimed. In contrast, for qualifying
continuing broker education lasting 90
minutes, 1.5 continuing broker
education credits may be claimed.
*
*
*
*
*
Qualifying continuing broker
education. ‘‘Qualifying continuing
broker education’’ means any training or
educational activity that is eligible or, if
required, has been approved for
continuing education credit, in
accordance with § 111.103.
*
*
*
*
*
Triennial period. ‘‘Triennial period’’
means a period of three years
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
50826
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
commencing on February 1, 1985, or on
February 1 in any third year thereafter.
■ 4. In § 111.30, revise paragraphs
(d)(2)(ii) and (iii) and add paragraph
(d)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
§ 111.30 Notification of change of
business address, organization, name, or
location of business records; status report;
termination of brokerage business.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) State the name and address of his
or her employer if he or she is employed
by another broker, unless his or her
employer is a partnership, association,
or corporation broker for which he or
she is a qualifying member or officer for
purposes of § 111.11(b) or (c)(2);
(iii) State whether or not he or she
still meets the applicable requirements
of §§ 111.11 and 111.19 and has not
engaged in any conduct that could
constitute grounds for suspension or
revocation under § 111.53; and
(iv) Report and certify the broker’s
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement as set forth in
§ 111.102.
*
*
*
*
*
§§ 111.97 through 111.100
Reserved]
[Added and
5. Add reserve §§ 111.97 through
111.100.
■ 6. Add subpart F, consisting of
§§ 111.101 through 111.104, to read as
follows:
■
Subpart F—Continuing Education
Requirements for Individual Customs
Broker License Holders
Sec.
111.101 Scope.
111.102 Obligations of individual customs
brokers in conjunction with continuing
broker education requirement.
111.103 Accreditation of qualifying
continuing broker education.
111.104 Failure to report and certify
compliance with continuing broker
education requirement.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
§ 111.101
Scope.
This subpart sets forth regulations
providing for a continuing education
requirement for individual customs
broker license holders and the
framework for administering the
requirements of this subpart. The
continuing broker education
requirement is for individual brokers, in
order to maintain sufficient knowledge
of customs and related laws,
regulations, and procedures,
bookkeeping, accounting, and all other
appropriate matters necessary to render
valuable service to importers and
drawback claimants.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
§ 111.102 Obligations of individual
customs brokers in conjunction with
continuing broker education requirement.
(a) Continuing broker education
requirement. All individual customs
broker license holders must complete
qualifying continuing broker education
as defined in § 111.103(a), except:
(1) During a period of voluntary
suspension as described in § 111.52; or
(2) When individual customs broker
license holders have not held their
license for an entire triennial period at
the time of the submission of the status
report as required under § 111.30(d).
(b) Required minimum number of
continuing education credits. All
individual brokers who are subject to
the continuing broker education
requirement must complete at least 36
continuing education credits of
qualifying continuing broker education
each triennial period, except upon the
reinstatement of a license following a
period of voluntary suspension as
described in § 111.52. Upon the
reinstatement of a license following a
period of voluntary suspension as
described in § 111.52, the number of
continuing education credits that an
individual broker must complete by the
end of the triennial period during which
the reinstatement of the license
occurred will be calculated on a
prorated basis of one continuing
education credit for each complete
remaining month until the end of the
triennial period.
(c) Reporting requirements. Individual
brokers who are subject to the
continuing broker education
requirement must report and certify
their compliance upon submission of
the status report required under
§ 111.30(d).
(d) Recordkeeping requirements—(1)
General. Individual brokers who are
subject to the continuing broker
education requirement must retain the
following information and
documentation pertaining to the
qualifying education completed during
a triennial period for a period of three
years following the submission of the
status report required under § 111.30(d):
(i) The title of the qualifying
continuing broker education attended;
(ii) The name of the provider or host
of the qualifying continuing broker
education;
(iii) The date(s) attended;
(iv) The number of continuing
education credits accrued;
(v) The location of the training or
educational activity, if the training or
educational activity is offered in person;
and
(vi) Any documentation received from
the provider or host of the qualifying
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
continuing broker education that
evidences the individual broker’s
registration for, attendance at,
completion of, or other activity bearing
upon the individual broker’s
participation in and completion of the
qualifying continuing broker education.
(2) Availability of records. In order to
ensure that the individual broker has
met the continuing broker education
requirement, upon CBP’s request, the
individual broker must make available
to CBP the information and
documentation described in paragraph
(d)(1) of this section. CBP can request
the information and documentation be
made available for in-person inspection,
or be delivered to CBP by either hardcopy or electronic means, or any
combination thereof.
§ 111.103 Accreditation of qualifying
continuing broker education.
(a) Qualifying continuing broker
education. In order for a training or
educational activity to be considered
qualifying continuing broker education,
it must meet the following two
requirements:
(1) Providers of qualifying continuing
broker education. The training or
educational activity must be offered by
one of the following providers:
(i) Government agencies. Qualifying
continuing broker education constitutes
any training or educational activity
offered by CBP, whether online or inperson, and training or educational
activity offered by another U.S.
Government agency, whether online or
in-person, but only if the content is
relevant to customs business.
Accreditation is not required for
trainings or educational activities
offered by U.S. Government agencies.
(ii) Other providers requiring
accreditation. Any other training or
educational activity not offered by a
U.S. Government agency, whether
online or in-person, will not be
considered a qualifying continuing
broker education, unless the training or
educational activity has been approved
for continuing education credit by a
CBP-selected accreditor before the
training or educational activity is
provided.
(2) Recognized trainings or
educational activities. The training or
educational activity must constitute one
of the following:
(i) Coursework, a seminar, or a
workshop, whether online or in-person,
that is conducted by an instructor,
discussion leader, or speaker;
(ii) A symposium or convention, with
the exception of the attendance at a
meeting conducted in accordance with
the provisions of the Federal Advisory
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS2
Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C.
App.), whether online or in-person;
(iii) The preparation of a subject
matter for presentation as an instructor,
discussion leader, or speaker at a
training or educational activity
described in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii)
of this section, subject to the
requirements set forth in paragraph (b)
of this section; and
(iv) The presentation of a subject
matter as an instructor, discussion
leader, or speaker at a training or
educational activity described in
paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (ii) of this section,
subject to the requirements set forth in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Special allowance for instructors,
discussion leaders, and speakers. (1)
Contingent upon the approval by a CBPselected accreditor, an individual broker
may claim one continuing education
credit for each full 60 minutes spent:
(i) Presenting subject matter as an
instructor, discussion leader, or speaker
at a training or educational activity
described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (ii) of
this section; or
(ii) Preparing subject matter for
presentation as an instructor, discussion
leader, or speaker at a training or
educational activity described in
paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (ii) of this section.
(2) The special allowance for
instructors, discussion leaders, and
speakers is subject to the following
limitations:
(i) For any session of presentation
given at one time, regardless of the
duration of that session, an individual
broker may claim, at a maximum, one
continuing education credit for the time
spent preparing subject matter for that
presentation pursuant to paragraph
(b)(1)(ii) of this section.
(ii) Per triennial period, an individual
broker may claim, at a maximum, a
combined total of 12 continuing
education credits earned in accordance
with paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section.
(3) Regardless of whether the training
or educational activity is offered by a
U.S. Government agency or another
provider, any instructor, discussion
leader, or speaker seeking to claim
continuing education credit in
accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this
section must obtain the approval of a
CBP-selected accreditor.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:35 Sep 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
(c) Selection of accreditors. The Office
of Trade will select accreditors based on
a Request for Information (RFI) and a
Request for Proposal (RFP) announced
through the System for Award
Management (SAM) or any other
electronic system for award
management approved by the U.S.
General Services Administration, in
accordance with the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1), for a
specific period of award, subject to
renewal. The Executive Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Trade, will
periodically publish notices in the
Federal Register announcing the criteria
that CBP will use to select an accreditor,
the period during which CBP will
accept applications by potential
accreditors, and the period of award for
a CBP-selected accreditor.
(d) Responsibilities of CBP-selected
accreditors. CBP-selected accreditors
administer the accreditation of trainings
or educational activities other than
those described in paragraph (a)(1) of
this section for the purpose of the
continuing broker education
requirement by reviewing and
approving or denying such educational
content for continuing education credit.
A CBP-selected accreditor’s approval of
a training or educational activity for
continuing education credit is valid for
one year, and the accreditation may be
renewed through any CBP-selected
accreditor.
(e) Prohibition of self-certification by
an accreditor. CBP-selected accreditors
may not approve their own trainings or
educational activities for continuing
education credit.
§ 111.104 Failure to report and certify
compliance with continuing broker
education requirement.
(a) Notification by CBP. If an
individual broker is subject to the
continuing broker education
requirement pursuant to § 111.102 and
submits a status report as required
under § 111.30(d)(2), but fails to report
and certify compliance with the
continuing broker education
requirement as part of the submission of
the status report, then CBP will notify
the individual broker of the broker’s
failure to report and certify compliance
in accordance with § 111.30(d). The
notification will be sent to the address
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
50827
reflected in CBP’s records, or
transmitted electronically pursuant to
any electronic means authorized by CBP
for that purpose.
(b) Required response to notice. Upon
the issuance of such notification, the
individual broker must within 30
calendar days:
(1) Submit a corrected status report
that, in accordance with § 111.30(d),
reflects the individual broker’s
compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement, if the individual
broker completed the required number
of continuing education credits but
failed to report and certify compliance
with the requirement as part of the
submission of the status report; or
(2) Complete the required number of
continuing education credits of
qualifying continuing broker education
and submit a corrected status report
that, in accordance with § 111.30(d),
reflects the broker’s compliance with
the continuing broker education
requirement, if the individual broker
had not completed the required number
of continuing education credits at the
time the status report was due.
(c) Suspension of license. Unless the
individual broker takes the corrective
actions described in paragraph (b)(1) or
(2) of this section within 30 calendar
days of the issuance of the notification
described in paragraph (a) of this
section, CBP will take actions to
suspend the individual broker’s license
in accordance with subpart D of this
part.
(d) Revocation of license. If the
individual broker’s license has been
suspended pursuant to paragraph (c) of
this section and the individual broker
fails to take the corrective actions
described in paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of
this section within 120 calendar days
upon the issuance of the order of
suspension, CBP will take actions to
revoke the individual broker’s license
without prejudice to the filing of an
application for a new license in
accordance with subpart D of this part.
Alejandro N. Mayorkas,
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2021–19013 Filed 9–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
E:\FR\FM\10SEP2.SGM
10SEP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 173 (Friday, September 10, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 50794-50827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19013]
[[Page 50793]]
Vol. 86
Friday,
No. 173
September 10, 2021
Part II
Department of Homeland Security
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
19 CFR Part 111
Continuing Education for Licensed Customs Brokers; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 173 / Friday, September 10, 2021 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 50794]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 111
[Docket No. USCBP-2021-0030]
RIN 1651-AB03
Continuing Education for Licensed Customs Brokers
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes to amend the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) regulations to require continuing education for
individual customs broker license holders (individual brokers) and to
create a framework for administering this requirement. By requiring
individual brokers to remain knowledgeable about recent developments in
customs and related laws as well as international trade and supply
chains, CBP's proposed framework would enhance professionalism and
competency within the customs broker community. CBP has determined that
the proposed framework would contribute to increased trade compliance
and better protection of the revenue of the United States.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number, by one
of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments via Docket No. USCBP
2021-0030.
Mail: Due to COVID-19-related restrictions, CBP has
temporarily suspended its ability to receive public comments by mail.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the
Public Participation heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Due to the
relevant COVID-19-related restrictions, CBP has temporarily suspended
its on-site public inspections of the public comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elena D. Ryan, Special Advisor,
Programs and Policy Analysis, Regulations and Rulings, Office of Trade,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, at (202) 325-0001 or
[email protected]; and, Melba Hubbard, Chief,
Broker Management Branch, Trade Policy and Programs, Office of Trade,
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, at (202) 325-6986,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
Interested persons are invited to participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. CBP also invites comments that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that might result from this
proposed rulemaking. Comments that will provide the most assistance to
CBP will reference a specific portion of the proposed rulemaking,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include data,
information, or authority that support such recommended change. See
ADDRESSES above for information on how to submit comments.
II. Executive Summary
This notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) proposes to amend the
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations to require
individual customs broker license holders (individual brokers) to
participate in continuing education activities (hereinafter, referred
to as the ``continuing broker education requirement'') and to create a
framework for administering this requirement. This section provides a
brief summary of the proposed framework. A more detailed description of
the proposed framework is contained in section IV of this NPRM.
This NPRM proposes to require individual brokers to complete at
least 36 continuing education credits per triennial period, with
limited exceptions. Individual brokers reentering the profession
following a period of voluntary suspension would be subject to a
prorated requirement of one continuing education credit for each
complete remaining month until the end of the triennial period. The
proposed framework also exempts two groups of individual brokers from
the continuing broker education requirement--namely, individual brokers
who have voluntarily suspended their license in accordance with Sec.
111.52 of title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR 111.52),
and individual brokers who have not held their license for an entire
triennial period at the time of the submission of the status report as
required under 19 CFR 111.30(d).
Under the proposed framework, individual brokers could earn
continuing education credits for a variety of training or educational
activities, whether in-person or online, including the completion of
coursework, seminars, workshops, symposia, or conventions, and, subject
to certain limitations and requirements, the preparation and
presentation of subject matter as an instructor, discussion leader, or
speaker. Individual brokers would report and certify their compliance
with the continuing broker education requirement upon the submission of
the status report required under 19 CFR 111.30(d), which is due on a
triennial basis.
In order to ensure compliance with the continuing broker education
requirement, this NPRM also proposes regulatory provisions authorizing
CBP to take disciplinary actions, if an individual broker submits a
triennial report but fails to report and certify his or her compliance
with the continuing broker education requirement on the triennial
report. The proposed framework also includes provisions addressing
other aspects of the administration of the continuing broker education
requirement, such as accreditation and the selection of accreditors.
III. Background
A. Authority for Continuing Broker Education Requirement
Section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1641),
provides that individuals and business entities must hold a valid
customs broker's license and permit to transact customs business on
behalf of others. The statute also sets forth standards for the
issuance of broker licenses and permits, provides for disciplinary
action against customs brokers in the form of suspension or revocation
of such licenses and permits or assessment of monetary penalties, and
provides for the assessment of monetary penalties against other persons
for conducting customs business without the required broker's license.
Section 641 authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the
Treasury (Treasury) to prescribe rules and regulations relating to the
customs
[[Page 50795]]
business of brokers as may be necessary to protect importers and the
revenue of the United States and to carry out the other provisions of
section 641. See 19 U.S.C. 1641(f). That authority was transferred to
the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) as a
result of the enactment of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L.
107-296, 116 Stat. 2142). The Homeland Security Act of 2002 generally
transferred the functions of the former U.S. Customs Service from the
Secretary of the Treasury to the Secretary of DHS, and provided that
the Secretary of the Treasury retains authority over customs revenue
functions, unless specifically delegated to the Secretary of DHS. See 6
U.S.C. 212(a)(1). Paragraph 1(a)(i) of Treasury Department Order No.
100-16 contains a list of subject matters over which the Secretary of
the Treasury retained authority. See appendix to 19 CFR part 0. The
other functions of the former U.S. Customs Service not expressly listed
in paragraph 1(a)(i) of Treasury Department Order No. 100-16 were
transferred from the Secretary of the Treasury to the Secretary of DHS.
As paragraph 1(a)(i) of Treasury Department Order No. 100-16 does not
list the regulation of customs brokers, the Secretary of the Treasury
did not retain authority over this subject matter. Accordingly, the
Secretary of DHS is authorized to prescribe rules and regulations
relating to the customs business of brokers as may be necessary to
protect importers and the revenue of the United States and to carry out
the other provisions of section 641. See 19 U.S.C. 1641(f).
19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(4) imposes upon customs brokers the duty to
exercise responsible supervision and control over the broker's
employees and control over the customs business that is conducted. The
statute also permits the Secretary of DHS to test persons for their
knowledge of customs and related laws prior to issuing a license.
Furthermore, based upon 19 U.S.C. 1641, CBP has promulgated regulations
setting forth additional obligations of customs brokers pertinent to
the conduct of their customs business. CBP believes that maintaining
current knowledge of customs laws and procedures is essential for
customs brokers to meet their legal duties. CBP proposes that requiring
a customs broker to fulfill a continuing education requirement is the
most effective means to ensure that the customs broker keeps up with an
ever-changing customs practice after passing the broker exam and
subsequent receipt of the license. CBP believes that 19 U.S.C. 1641
provides authority to require, by regulation, continuing education for
individual brokers.
To enhance professionalism and competency within the customs broker
community, CBP proposes to promulgate regulations to require continuing
education for individual brokers and to create a framework for
administering this requirement. CBP believes that requiring individual
brokers to participate in continuing education activities would enhance
the credibility and value of a customs broker's license and improve a
broker's skills, performance, and productivity. This in turn would
increase client service and compliance with customs laws, which would
better protect the revenue of the United States.
B. Overview of Licensing Requirements for Individual Customs Brokers
CBP is responsible for administering the licensing requirements for
customs brokers. See 19 CFR part 111, subpart B. A prospective customs
broker must pass a broker exam administered by CBP, which is designed
to determine the individual's knowledge of customs and related laws,
regulations and procedures, bookkeeping, accounting, and all other
appropriate matters necessary to render valuable service to the
broker's clientele.
After an applicant passes the customs broker exam, CBP will
investigate whether the applicant is qualified for a broker's license,
taking into account information provided by the applicant and other
aspects pertaining to the applicant, such as his or her business
integrity. If CBP finds that the applicant is qualified and has paid
all applicable fees, then CBP will issue a broker's license. Following
the issuance of a license, a customs broker administratively maintains
a license primarily through the payment of fees required in 19 CFR
111.96, and the filing of reports and notifications to CBP as set forth
in 19 CFR 111.30. Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(4), a customs broker
has the statutory duty to exercise responsible supervision and control
over the customs business that he or she conducts. See also 19 CFR
111.1 and 111.28(a). A customs broker also has other legal obligations,
to CBP and to the broker's clientele, including, but not limited to,
the exercising of due diligence in making financial settlements,
answering correspondence, and preparing paperwork or filings related to
customs business. See 19 CFR 111.29(a).
While the broker exam provides a good initial indication of an
individual's knowledge of customs and related laws, regulations and
procedures, bookkeeping, accounting, and all other appropriate matters
(hereinafter, referred to as ``customs matters''), the broker exam is,
by necessity, limited in scope. The broker exam only assesses a
person's knowledge of the state of the customs and related laws at a
certain point in time. The broker exam does not test for knowledge of
any of the requirements of the more than 40 Partner Government Agencies
(PGAs) \1\ involved in regulating imports. The complex nature of trade
and the ever-changing and expanding requirements to comply with U.S.
and international law requires that a customs broker maintain a high
level of functional and accessible knowledge to ensure that a broker's
clients remain compliant with the applicable laws over time. CBP
proposes that requiring a customs broker to fulfill a continuing
education requirement is the most effective way to ensure that
individual customs brokers keep abreast of changes in customs and
related laws, which is especially important because of the constant
evolution of international trade and supply chains. CBP is proposing
that, once individuals become licensed customs brokers, they must
maintain sufficient knowledge of customs and related laws necessary to
render valuable service to importers and drawback claimants through the
completion of continuing education. CBP believes this will result in
more competent licensed customs brokers who are well educated in
customs law, regulations, and critical subject matter. A more competent
customs broker community will prevent costly errors for their clients,
potentially saving importers and drawback claimants from unwanted
problems and relieving CBP from expending valuable examination and
collection resources. The proposed regulations will create a framework
for continuing broker education that would contribute to increased
trade compliance and better protection of the revenue of the United
States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CBP enforces over 400 laws on behalf of over 40 other U.S.
Government agencies, which are commonly referred to as Partner
Government Agencies (PGAs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Assessment of Compliance Risks Managed by Customs Brokers in the
Complex and Evolving Realm of International Trade
Recent developments have demonstrated the need for key parties
involved in importing and claiming drawback to keep up-to-date on
training and continuously build and maintain their knowledge of current
[[Page 50796]]
requirements. For example, the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement
Act of 2015 (TFTEA) (Pub. L. 114-125, 130 Stat. 122, February 24, 2016)
required the issuance of new rules to protect domestic industry from
dumping by foreign competitors (19 CFR part 165) and to modernize the
processes surrounding duty refunds through the drawback program (19 CFR
part 190). Both of these rules are complicated and detailed, requiring
entities involved in international trade--particularly, customs brokers
serving as the fiduciary agents of the affected importers and drawback
claimants--to learn entirely new legal and technical processes. In
addition to understanding the implementation of new regulations, a
customs broker also needs to know how to research answers to complex
questions. For example, determining the country of origin of imported
merchandise is much less straightforward than it was in the past, as
traders source inputs from various countries and may assemble those
inputs in yet another country before a final product is fully
manufactured or produced.
The past several years, in particular, have posed challenges for
both CBP and entities involved in international trade, requiring quick
adaption to new requirements that compelled changes to operational
processes. Low-value shipments (19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C)), the volume of
which has exploded with the increase in the de minimis limit from $200
to $800 as a result of section 901(c) of TFTEA and the online shopping
revolution, have created multiple levels of issues for international
trade that implicate security, health, safety, information collection,
timely clearance, and duty evasion. The 2020 statutory implementation
of the Agreement between the United States of America, the United
Mexican States and Canada (the USMCA), which replaced the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), requires a new body of knowledge
to successfully implement and maintain compliance. See United States-
Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act, Public Law 116-113, 134
Stat. 11 (19 U.S.C. Chapter 29). The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic created
an unprecedented impact on supply chains and international trade
processes.
The customs broker is at the heart of the aforementioned
challenges, as the agent of the importer/drawback claimant who works
with CBP to resolve problems and facilitate the safe and secure
movement of legitimate cargo. CBP believes that the complex and
evolving nature of international trade requires a mandatory continuing
education framework for individual brokers involved in these trade
processes. Simply relying on self-initiated efforts to maintain current
knowledge is insufficient to ensure compliance with the wide array of
applicable and evolving laws that is necessary to protect the revenue
of the United States. Brokers who were assessed penalties by CBP
between 2017 and 2020 have held their individual broker license for, on
average, 37 years. In contrast, the average individual customs broker
license has been held for just 24 years. This suggests that as more
time passes since the passing of the customs broker exam, more errors
are made. Additionally, as addressed in greater detail in section V.A.
of this NPRM, which pertains to the requirements of Executive Orders
13563 and 12866, CBP has seen a recent increase in penalties while data
indicates that companies employing individual brokers who voluntarily
pursue continuing education in the form of industry certifications
generally commit fewer errors.
Regular continuing education is a professional requirement for many
dynamic professions, such as in the accounting, legal, and medical
industries. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), for example, has
regulations covering tax professionals that include both an examination
and a continuing education requirement. See 31 CFR part 10. These
regulations were based, in part, on the Return Preparer Review report
(January 4, 2010), which recommended continuing education for tax
preparers to ``better leverage the tax return preparer community with
the twin goals of increasing taxpayer compliance and ensuring uniform
and high ethical standards of conduct for tax preparers.'' \2\ The IRS
serves as the primary revenue collector of the U.S. Government and has
a responsibility for protecting the revenue of the United States.
Similarly, CBP is the second largest collector of revenue in the
federal government, in the form of duties, taxes, and fees for imported
merchandise, and likewise has a responsibility for protecting the
revenue of the United States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Internal Revenue Service, U.S. Department of the Treasury,
Return Preparer Review, IRS Publication No. 4832 (January 4, 2010),
available at https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-news/fs-10-01.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As CBP licenses customs brokers to conduct customs business, it is
in the best interests of CBP and the PGAs to have a well-educated
customs broker community. A customs broker's involvement in import and/
or drawback transactions eases the burden of the government; the
customs broker takes on a large part of the role of educating importers
and drawback claimants on the technical requirements of filing in the
Automated Broker Interface (ABI) \3\ and informing them of regulatory
requirements for the customs transactions in which they are involved.
While there are some self-filers, the vast majority of entries of
imported merchandise are filed by customs brokers on behalf of the
importers of record. This dynamic generally allows CBP to target a
smaller group of individuals when managing trade compliance for revised
or new filing requirements. Thus, a customs broker community that
continues to stay abreast of changes in the customs practice helps
support CBP's crucial work. As the quality of such brokerage services
suffers, this would cause CBP to expend additional resources to assist
entities involved in international trade with navigating complex import
and drawback requirements, which diverts limited resources away from
other critical aspects of CBP's trade mission. To ameliorate that
consequence, CBP proposes to require customs brokers to maintain their
knowledge and skills through the completion of continuing customs
broker education.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Automated Broker Interface (ABI) is an electronic data
interchange that allows brokers and entry filers (self-filers) to
transmit immediate delivery, entry, and entry summary data
electronically to, and receive electronic messaging from, CBP in the
Automated Commercial Environment (ACE). See 19 CFR 143.1 and
143.32(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Importers and drawback claimants also benefit from well-educated
customs brokers who are aware of current requirements in the complex
and evolving realm of international trade. When an importer or drawback
claimant enlists the services of a customs broker, that customs broker
is perceived to be knowledgeable of customs laws, regulations, and
operational processes; however, an importer or drawback claimant does
not know with certainty that the customs broker is in fact
knowledgeable of all newly emerging requirements. The continuing broker
education requirement would provide importers and drawback claimants
with greater assurance that their agents are knowledgeable of customs
laws and regulations, familiar with operational processes, and can
properly exercise a broker's fiduciary duties.
In recent years, the need for continuing broker education has also
attracted the attention of international intergovernmental
organizations, such as the World Customs Organization
[[Page 50797]]
(WCO). In 2018, the WCO published the WCO Customs Brokers Guidelines,
which is a guidance document wherein the WCO recognizes the need for
mandatory continuing education for customs brokers.\4\ In the guidance
document, the WCO notes that the passing of an initial broker exam does
not ensure that customs brokers stay abreast of changes in customs and
related laws and recommends that, on their own or in partnership with
other governmental, private, or non-profit organizations, customs
administrations should take on an active role in educating the customs
broker community about changes in customs and related laws and
reinforcing existing knowledge.\5\ Additionally, in the guidance
document, the WCO notes that some countries already require customs
brokers to complete continuing education.\6\ Accordingly, in proposing
to require individual brokers to complete continuing education, this
NPRM is generally in line with the WCO's recommendations on best
practices for customs administrations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ World Customs Organization, WCO Customs Brokers Guidelines,
at 28 (June 2018), available at https://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/instrument-and-tools/tools/wco-customs-brokers-guidelines.aspx.
\5\ Id.
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Development of the Proposed Continuing Broker Education Requirement
In recent years, the importance of continuing broker education has
received attention on a domestic level. In 2013, the predecessor to the
Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee (COAC) \7\ recommended
that DHS issue regulations requiring customs brokers to complete a
minimum of 40 hours of continuing education during a triennial
reporting cycle, pursuant to CBP's authority under 19 U.S.C. 1641(f),
on the condition that there be no accreditation requirements for such
continuing education.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ COAC is jointly appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury
and the Secretary of DHS and advises the Secretary of the Treasury
and the Secretary of Homeland Security on all matters involving the
commercial operations of CBP. Meetings of COAC are presided over
jointly by the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tax, Trade, and Tariff
Policy of the Department of Treasury and Commissioner of CBP. See
section 109 of TFTEA.
\8\ For a list of COAC recommendations that were considered open
as of April 27, 2016, see Commercial Customs Operations Advisory
Committee, Term to Date Recommendations: Trade Modernization
Subcommittee, Recommendation Nos. 10046-10047 (April 27, 2016),
available at https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2019-Dec/_COAC%20Recommendations%20To%20Date%20010001%20-%20010412.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In September 2019, CBP formed the Requirements for Customs Broker
Continuing Education Task Force (Task Force), which was placed within
COAC under the Rapid Response Subcommittee. The objective was to
develop a proposed framework for continuing education for individual
brokers. This Task Force was comprised of representatives throughout
CBP and licensed customs brokers from around the country with decades
of experience with international trade. Through this Task Force,
members provided valuable input, advice, and operational perspectives.
In conjunction with the work of the Task Force and a previous COAC
recommendation,\9\ CBP published an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal Register (85 FR 68260) on October 28,
2020. The ANPRM announced that CBP was considering the adoption of a
continuing education requirement for licensed customs brokers. The
ANPRM solicited comments on the tentative framework developed by the
Task Force for purposes of gathering further information and data from
the broader customs broker community. This request for information and
data assisted CBP in considering whether, and if so what type of,
requirements would contribute to increased trade compliance. The ANPRM
solicited comments on the following issues:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number of hours of continuing education that customs
brokers should be required to complete;
The customs broker license holders who should be required
to complete continuing education (including license holders who should
be exempt from the requirement or required to complete fewer hours of
continuing education);
The types of training, coursework, or other educational
activities that should qualify for continuing education credit;
The manner in which qualifying continuing broker education
should be provided (online or in-person);
Whether subject-matter-specific education requirements
should be imposed;
How compliance with the continuing broker education
requirement should be reported to CBP;
What recordkeeping obligations should exist for the
purpose of the continuing broker education requirement;
What disciplinary actions should be taken if customs
brokers fail to report their compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement to CBP, or, in the alternative, fail to satisfy
the continuing broker education requirement;
What disciplinary actions should result from the
submission of false or misleading information in association with the
continuing broker education requirement;
Whether disciplinary actions should be taken immediately
upon a customs broker's failure to report compliance with the
continuing broker education requirement, or whether customs brokers
should be provided with an opportunity to take corrective actions,
including the length of such period;
Whether there should be an accreditation process to
control the quality of the content of the various educational
activities (including how such an accreditation process should be
administered, how accreditors should be selected, and whether
educational activities offered through certain content providers should
automatically qualify for continuing education credit);
The types of training, coursework, or educational
activities that customs brokers already complete on a regular basis;
How often customs brokers currently participate in
continuing education;
The costs customs brokers would anticipate to incur as a
result of the implementation of a continuing broker education
requirement; and
The benefits customs brokers would anticipate as a result
of the implementation of a continuing broker education requirement.
The ANPRM provided for a 60-day public comment period, which closed
on December 28, 2020. During the 60-day public comment period, CBP
received 29 comments.\10\ Of the 29 submissions, 23 submissions were
generally supportive of the implementation of a continuing education
requirement and 5 submissions were not supportive of the adoption of a
continuing education requirement. One submission consisted of a
question, and, thus, neither expressed the commenter's support of or
opposition to a continuing education requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The public comments can be viewed in their entirety on the
public docket for the ANPRM, Docket No. USCBP 2020-0042, which can
be accessed through https://www.regulations.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In developing this NPRM, CBP carefully considered all public
comments submitted in response to the ANPRM. Below are summaries of
comments on topics that received the most attention and short
descriptions of
[[Page 50798]]
how they affected the formulation of the framework proposed in this
NPRM. CBP will provide more detailed descriptions of the comments and
responses to the issues raised therein when responding to the comments
received for this NPRM.
1. Required Number of Hours of Continuing Education
Seven commenters recommended that CBP require customs brokers to
complete, at a maximum, 36 hours of continuing broker education every
three years, rather than the 40 hours of continuing broker education
per triennial period that was considered in the ANPRM. CBP believes
that requiring individual brokers to complete on average one hour of
continuing education per month will make it easier for individual
brokers to plan their continuing education. Continuing education
requirements of one hour of continuing education per month have been
adopted for many other professions.\11\ CBP also believes that
requiring more than 36 hours of continuing broker education per
triennial period could be burdensome for the customs broker community
(especially individual brokers operating as or working for small
businesses) and a lower requirement would be insufficient to ensure
that individual brokers keep abreast of changes in customs and related
laws. Accordingly, CBP has adopted the commenters' suggestion in this
NPRM and is proposing to require that individual brokers complete 36
hours of continuing broker education per triennial period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See, e.g., Ala. R. Mand. Cont. Legal Ed. Rule 3, available
at https://www.alabar.org/assets/2019/02/MCLE-RULE-BOOK-2017-updated-01-17-2017.pdf (accessed on July 16, 2021); Ark. R. Minimum
Con't Legal Educ. Rule 4, available at https://rules.arcourts.gov/w/ark/rules-for-minimum-continuing-legal-education#!fragment/zoupio-_Toc44590166/BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4BUBTADwBdoAvbRABwEtsBaAfX2zgBYOBWATgAYAjADZhASgA0ybKUIQAiokK4AntADk6iRDi5sAG30BhJGmgBCZNsJhcCRcrWbrthAGU8pAEJqASgFEAGX8ANQBBADkjfwlSMAAjaFJ2MTEgA (accessed on July 16, 2021);
Conn. Practice Book Sec. 2-27A, available at https://www.jud.ct.gov/Publications/PracticeBook/PB.pdf (accessed on July
16, 2021); Cal Bus & Prof Code Sec. 1275, available at https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=1275&lawCode=BPC (accessed on
July 16, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Qualifying Continuing Education
Seven commenters suggested that corporate, in-house training should
be eligible for continuing education credit. CBP agrees that corporate,
in-house training can serve as an appropriate continuing education
activity, as it is routinely given to employees to provide them with
knowledge specifically tailored to their job functions and experience
levels. As such, CBP's proposal would allow customs brokers to satisfy
the continuing education requirement through corporate, in-house
training if the training receives the approval of an accreditor. CBP
believes that requiring corporate, in-house training to be approved by
an accreditor will ensure that it meets the objectives of the
continuing education framework proposed in this NPRM.
Three commenters also suggested that any training or educational
activity provided by CBP, or offered by any other U.S. Government
agency that routinely offers training relevant to customs business,
should automatically qualify for continuing education credit, without
the need for accreditation. CBP agrees and believes that these types of
activities should automatically qualify for continuing education
credit, thus limiting the administrative burden and overall costs
associated with the implementation of the proposed rule. Additionally,
CBP's trainings are designed to educate the public about important and
timely issues facing entities involved in international trade, and,
thus, by virtue of their design, meet the objectives of continuing
broker education--that is, to assist individual brokers in maintaining
a sufficient knowledge of customs matters. Accordingly, CBP adopted the
commenters' suggestion in this NPRM.
3. Specific Subject Matter Content Requirements
Five commenters raised concerns pertaining to CBP's proposal to
require customs brokers to complete a specific number of hours of
continuing education on specific subject matter areas (content
requirements). In the ANPRM, CBP solicited public comments on the
adoption of a continuing broker education framework that would have
required the majority (75 percent) of the required continuing education
credits to pertain to laws authorizing CBP operations and processes, as
well as CBP regulations and programs. Under the proposal considered in
the ANPRM, only the remainder (25 percent) would have been available
for education focusing on other areas related to international trade
(such as other U.S. Government agency requirements).
All commenters that addressed specific subject matter areas raised
concerns about the adoption of the ANPRM's stringent content
requirement. These commenters noted that such a content requirement
would discourage individual brokers from participating in continuing
education specifically tailored to their job functions and their
experience levels, and, therefore, would inhibit professionalism and
competency within the customs broker community. In light of the
commenters' concerns, CBP is not proposing to require individual
brokers to complete a specific number of hours of continuing education
on laws authorizing CBP operations and processes, and CBP regulations
and programs. CBP recognizes that the educational needs of individual
brokers differ greatly based on each individual broker's position,
experience level, and type of employment, and, thus, render content
requirements impractical. Additionally, CBP believes that, as CBP and
the PGAs offer a sufficient number of free, online-based trainings for
an individual broker to meet the required number of continued education
credits, there is little risk that an individual broker would opt to
complete the same training or educational activity multiple times
solely for the purpose of earning the required minimum number of
continuing education credits.
4. Recordkeeping Requirements
Four commenters agreed with CBP's suggestion that although
individual brokers should maintain records documenting their compliance
with the continuing broker education requirement (including specific
information), they should not be required to maintain records in any
specific format (i.e., electronically or in paper). Although the
commenters agreed with this suggestion, several of the commenters
requested that a form be developed in the Automated Commercial
Environment (ACE) where customs brokers could record their credits as
they are earned and accrued. In accordance with the commenters'
suggestions, this NPRM does not propose requiring customs brokers to
maintain records documenting their compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement in any specific form, although the
proposed regulations require such records to include certain
information and documentation, which are discussed in further detail in
section IV.C.4. of this NPRM. CBP appreciates the commenters'
suggestion and will consider developing such a tool in ACE. If
developed, customs brokers would not be required to use the ACE tool,
but it would serve as an option for individuals to track their credits
earned. However, this ACE tool would not be a substitute for
maintaining records documenting compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement.
[[Page 50799]]
5. Economic Impact
Four commenters raised concerns about the costs of requiring
continuing education and the potential impact of a continuing broker
education requirement on small businesses. CBP appreciates these
comments and has developed the proposed framework for continuing broker
education with this concern in mind. In addition to lowering the
originally proposed number of required hours of continuing education,
CBP is also committed to providing free, online content that will
satisfy the continuing broker education requirement. CBP already
provides at least 36 hours of training or informational webinars on an
annual basis, which would allow individual brokers to fully satisfy the
continuing broker education requirement through free, CBP-provided
content. As described in more detail below, CBP is also proposing that,
once accreditation has been obtained for training or educational
activities, the vast majority of continuing education currently
obtained at a broker's expense for various certificate programs offered
by the private sector would qualify for continuing education credit.
6. Effectiveness of Continuing Education
Five commenters were opposed to the introduction of a continuing
education requirement for customs brokers, arguing that this would not
affect compliance and that customs brokers demonstrate their knowledge
of customs business on a transactional basis with their clients. A
number of the commenters also requested that customs brokers who do not
actively file entries should be exempt from the requirement. CBP
disagrees and is proposing that all individual brokers, regardless of
filing status, earn continuing education credit, with the exception of
those individual brokers who have voluntarily suspended their licenses
in accordance with 19 CFR 111.52. Furthermore, CBP continues to believe
that the complex and evolving realm of international trade warrants a
continuing education framework for individual brokers.
IV. Discussion of Proposed Framework for Continuing Education for
Licensed Customs Brokers
CBP is proposing amendments to 19 CFR part 111 to require
continuing education for individual customs broker license holders.
CBP's proposal includes the addition of a new subpart F to 19 CFR part
111, consisting of Sec. Sec. 111.101 through 111.104, which will set
forth the continuing broker education requirement and the framework for
administering this requirement. Proposed Sec. 111.101 sets forth the
scope of proposed subpart F, proposed Sec. 111.102 sets forth the
obligations that individual customs brokers would have in conjunction
with the continuing broker education requirement, proposed Sec.
111.103 contains the requirements that educational activities would be
required to meet in order to satisfy the continuing broker education
requirement and sets forth an accreditation process for certain
training or educational activities, and proposed Sec. 111.104 sets
forth the disciplinary proceedings for the failure to comply with the
continuing broker education requirement.
CBP is also proposing to amend several existing provisions in 19
CFR part 111. CBP is proposing to require individual brokers to certify
and report their compliance with the continuing broker education
requirement as part of the submission of the status report, which is
due on a triennial basis (hereinafter, referred to as ``status report''
or ``triennial report'') by amending Sec. 111.30(d). Additionally, CBP
is proposing to amend Sec. 111.0, which sets forth the scope of part
111, in order to reflect the addition of proposed subpart F, and amend
Sec. 111.1, which is a definitional provision, in order to define
certain terms as they are used in the context of the continuing broker
education requirement. Finally, CBP is proposing to reserve Sec. Sec.
111.97 through 111.100 for future use. The proposed changes are
described in detail below.
A. Modifications to the Scope of 19 CFR Part 111
Section 111.0 sets forth the scope of the provisions contained in
19 CFR part 111, which currently include the licensing of, and granting
of permits to, persons desiring to transact customs business as customs
brokers, the duties and responsibilities of customs brokers, and the
grounds for disciplining customs brokers. CBP is proposing to revise
the second sentence of Sec. 111.0 to reflect the proposed addition of
regulatory provisions requiring individual brokers to satisfy a
continuing education requirement.
B. Definitions for the Proposed Continuing Broker Education Framework
Section 111.1 provides definitions for terms as they appear in 19
CFR part 111. For purposes of the creation of a continuing education
requirement for individual brokers, CBP is proposing the addition of
definitions of four terms--``continuing broker education requirement'',
``continuing education credit'', ``qualifying continuing broker
education'', and ``triennial period''. Although amended Sec. 111.1
would continue to list definitions in alphabetical order, this section
discusses the proposed definitions in logical order, for explanatory
purposes.
The term ``qualifying continuing broker education'' defines any
training or educational activity that is eligible or, if required, has
been approved for continuing education credit, in accordance with
proposed Sec. 111.103. This definition indicates that a wide range of
training or educational activities will meet an individual broker's
obligation to complete continuing education, which must satisfy the
requirements set forth in proposed Sec. 111.103.
The term ``continuing education credit'' defines the unit of
measurement used for meeting the continuing broker education
requirement. The smallest recognized unit is one continuing education
credit, which requires 60 minutes of continuous participation in a
qualifying continuing broker education program, as defined in proposed
Sec. 111.103(a). For qualifying continuing broker education lasting
more than 60 minutes, one continuing education credit may be claimed
for the first 60 minutes of continuous participation, and half of one
continuing education credit may be claimed for every full 30 minutes of
continuous participation thereafter. For example, for a qualifying
continuing broker education program lasting more than 60 minutes but
less than 90 minutes, only one continuing education credit may be
claimed. In contrast, for a qualifying continuing broker education
program lasting 90 minutes, 1.5 continuing education credits may be
claimed.
The term ``continuing broker education requirement'' defines an
individual customs broker license holder's obligation to complete a
certain number of continuing education credits of qualifying continuing
broker education, as set forth in proposed subpart F of part 111, in
order to maintain sufficient knowledge of customs and related laws,
regulations, and procedures, bookkeeping, accounting, and all other
appropriate matters necessary to render valuable service to importers
and drawback claimants.
The term ``triennial period'' defines a period of three years
commencing on February 1, 1985, or on February 1 in
[[Page 50800]]
any third year thereafter.\12\ As explained in further detail below,
CBP is proposing to require individual brokers to report and certify
compliance with the continuing broker education requirement on the
triennial report. Thus, for purposes of clarification, CBP is proposing
a definition for the 3-year period between the due dates of two
consecutive status reports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ February 1, 1985, was the first due date for the triennial
reporting requirement, and, thus, February 1 in any third year
thereafter is the date on which the triennial report becomes due.
See 19 CFR 111.30(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Continuing Education Requirements for Customs Brokers
In addition to requiring individual brokers to participate in
continuing education activities, the proposed framework includes
provisions imposing additional related duties upon individual brokers,
such as reporting and recordkeeping requirements, that promote
compliance and allow for the enforcement of the continuing education
requirement. For these reasons, the proposed framework also contains
provisions authorizing disciplinary actions upon a broker's failure to
comply with these requirements. These requirements are contained in
proposed Sec. Sec. 111.102 and 111.104, which are discussed in detail
below.
1. Customs Broker License Holders Subject to Continuing Broker
Education Requirement
Proposed Sec. 111.102(a) sets forth the customs broker license
holders who will be subject to the continuing broker education
requirement. Specifically, proposed Sec. 111.102(a) provides that only
individual customs broker license holders (individual brokers) will be
required to complete qualifying continuing broker education. Proposed
Sec. 111.102(a) also exempts two groups of individual brokers from
this requirement--namely, individual brokers who have voluntarily
suspended their license in accordance with Sec. 111.52, and individual
customs broker license holders who have not held their license for an
entire triennial period at the time of the submission of the status
report as required under Sec. 111.30(d). CBP does not believe that it
is necessary to require continuing education for individual brokers who
have not held their license for an entire triennial period at the time
that their first triennial report is due, because these individual
brokers have recently demonstrated a sufficient baseline knowledge of
customs matters by passing the customs broker examination.
CBP is proposing to exempt individual brokers who have voluntarily
suspended their license from the continuing broker education
requirement because customs brokers may choose to voluntarily suspend
their licenses for many reasons, including changes in a broker's
personal life or the entry into federal service (which prohibits the
customs broker from concurrently serving as a customs broker to
transact customs business on behalf of clients in dealings with the
federal government). As some of these reasons may prevent a broker from
participating in or attending qualifying continuing broker education
programs, CBP believes that requiring individual brokers to comply with
the continuing broker education requirement during a period of
voluntary suspension would be overly burdensome.
At this time, CBP is not proposing to impose a similar obligation
onto corporation, partnership, or association brokers (hereinafter,
collectively referred to as ``corporate brokers''), because knowledge
is held at the individual level. The reason is because corporate
brokers are comprised of one or more individual brokers and the
individual brokers will be subject to the continuing education
requirement. Furthermore, the training required of the employees of a
customs broker is already taken into consideration when determining
whether the license holder exercises responsible supervision and
control. Pursuant to 19 CFR 111.28(a), every licensed member or officer
of a corporate broker that is an individual broker, as well as every
individual broker operating as a sole proprietor, is obligated to
exercise responsible supervision and control over the transaction of
the customs business of the sole proprietorship, partnership,
association, or corporation.\13\ Therefore, individual brokers who
serve as members or officials of a corporate broker, as well as
individual brokers who operate as sole proprietorships with employees,
are already incentivized to ensure that the employees of the sole
proprietorship, partnership, association, or corporation complete
continuing education. Accordingly, CBP does not believe that it is
necessary to impose a similar obligation on corporate brokers at the
organizational level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Section 111.1 defines the phrase ``responsible supervision
and control'' and provides, in relevant part, that one of the
factors that CBP will consider in determining whether the customs
broker exercises responsible supervision and control is the training
required of the employees of the broker. However, the determination
of what is necessary to perform and maintain responsible supervision
and control will vary depending upon the circumstances in each
instance. See 19 CFR 111.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Required Minimum Number of Continuing Education Credits
Proposed Sec. 111.102(b) sets forth the number of continuing
education credits that individual brokers, who, pursuant to proposed
Sec. 111.102(a), are subject to the continuing broker education
requirement, must complete. Specifically, proposed Sec. 111.102(b)
provides that these individual brokers are required to complete at
least 36 continuing education credits per triennial period, except upon
the reinstatement of a license following a period of voluntary
suspension as described in Sec. 111.52. Upon consideration of the
public comments received on the ANPRM, CBP is no longer proposing to
require 40 continuing education credits per triennial period, as this
will simplify the proration of continuing education credits for the
purposes discussed below.
When a broker chooses to reactivate his or her license following a
period of voluntary suspension, the broker generally contacts CBP to
begin the reinstatement process. This process determines the precise
date on which the license will be reinstated, which may occur at any
time during the triennial period. Thus, after a period of voluntary
suspension, the completion of the full 36 continuing education credits
within the remainder of the current triennial period could impose an
undue burden upon the individual broker, depending on when during the
triennial period the reinstatement occurs. To address this, proposed
Sec. 111.102(b) provides that, following the reinstatement of a
license after a period of voluntary suspension, the number of
continuing education credits required for the triennial period (that
is, the triennial period during which the reinstatement of the license
occurs) is calculated on a prorated basis, of one continuing education
credit for each complete remaining month until the end of the triennial
period.
For example, if, following a period of voluntary suspension, an
individual broker's license were to be reinstated on March 21, 2028,
the individual broker would only be required to complete 22 continuing
education credits during the triennial period (February 1, 2027, to
February 1, 2030) in which the license was reinstated. Effectively, the
amount of continuing education credits required is prorated for the
number of full months remaining in the triennial period (April 1, 2028,
to February 1,
[[Page 50801]]
2030). As another example, if the individual broker's license were to
be reinstated on February 1, 2027, the individual broker would be
required to complete all 36 continuing education credits during the
triennial period. When, following a period of voluntary suspension, the
individual broker contacts CBP to request the reinstatement of the
license, CBP will assist the broker in determining the prorated number
of continuing education credits that he or she will be required to
complete during the current triennial period.
3. Reporting of Compliance With the Continuing Broker Education
Requirement
Proposed Sec. 111.102(c) provides that individual brokers, who are
required to comply with the continuing broker education requirement,
will be subject to an additional reporting obligation. Specifically,
CBP is proposing to require individual brokers to report and certify
their compliance with the continuing broker education requirement upon
the submission of the status report required under existing Sec.
111.30(d).
Current Sec. 111.30(d)(1) requires both individual and corporate
brokers to file a status report with CBP. The status report is due on
February 1 of each third year after 1985, and will be considered timely
filed as long as the report is received during the month of February.
As part of the submission of the triennial report, customs brokers are
required to pay a fee, which is prescribed in paragraph (d) of Sec.
111.96. Status reports must be addressed to the director of the port
through which the license was delivered to the licensee (see Sec.
111.15), or, since the February 2021 triennial period, can be filed in
the eCBP portal (available at https://e.cbp.dhs.gov/ecbp/#/main). The
information that must be included in a status report submitted by an
individual broker is set forth in current Sec. 111.30(d)(2).
As proposed Sec. 111.102(c) would impose upon individual brokers
the obligation to report and certify their compliance with the
continuing broker education requirement upon the submission of the
status report, CBP is also proposing to amend current Sec.
111.30(d)(2) to reflect this obligation by adding a new paragraph
(d)(2)(iv) to reflect that individual customs brokers must report and
certify their compliance with the continuing broker education
requirement. CBP is also proposing minor grammatical changes to
existing paragraphs (d)(2)(ii) and (iii) of Sec. 111.30 in order to
allow for the addition of proposed paragraph (d)(2)(iv); however, these
changes are not substantive. Individual brokers who file paper-based
triennial reports with CBP would report and certify compliance by
including a written statement in the triennial report that reports and
certifies their compliance with the continuing broker education
requirement.
CBP is proposing to require individual brokers to report and
certify compliance on the triennial report for two reasons. First, as
the status report has been an integral part of maintaining a customs
broker license since 1985, this mechanism is familiar to customs
brokers and will minimize any additional burden that the new reporting
obligation would place upon individual brokers. As individual brokers
are already accustomed to the submission of status reports, individual
brokers would not need to familiarize themselves with a new type of
information collection. Second, aligning the timeframe for continuing
education with the three-year filing timeframe for the status report
will give individual brokers a number of years to earn the required
number of continuing education credits. This will provide them with
flexibility and the opportunity to select qualifying continuing broker
education programs that best meet their individual educational needs.
4. Recordkeeping Requirements for Individual Customs Brokers
In conjunction with the continuing education requirement, CBP is
proposing to require individual brokers to maintain records documenting
their completion of the required number of continuing education
credits. This requirement is set forth in proposed Sec. 111.102(d),
and is intended to enable CBP to verify an individual broker's
compliance with the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of
proposed Sec. 111.102.
Proposed Sec. 111.102(d)(1) provides that, for a period of three
years following the submission of the status report required under
Sec. 111.30(d), an individual broker must retain certain information
and documentation pertaining to the qualifying continuing broker
education completed during the triennial period. Proposed Sec.
111.102(d)(1) contains a list of the type of information and
documentation that must be retained, consisting of: (1) The title of
the qualifying continuing broker education attended; (2) the name of
the provider or host of the qualifying continuing broker education; (3)
the date(s) attended; (4) the number of continuing education credits
accrued; (5) the location of the training or educational activity, if
the training or educational activity is offered in person; and (6) any
documentation received from the provider or host of the qualifying
continuing broker education that evidences the individual broker's
registration for, attendance at, completion of, or other activity
bearing upon the individual broker's participation in and completion of
the qualifying continuing broker education. The last item would include
receipts or confirmations documenting the individual broker's intention
to attend the qualifying continuing broker education program, written
or electronic materials provided as part of the attendance of the
training or educational activity, or certificates of completion or
attendance. An individual broker would only be required to retain such
documentation, if such documentation is made available by the provider
or host of the qualifying continuing broker education to attendees of
the training or educational activity. Unlike the general broker record
retention requirement in current 19 CFR 111.23(b), the recordkeeping
requirement in proposed Sec. 111.102(d)(1) only requires the records
to be retained for a period of three years following the submission of
the triennial report (rather than for a five-year period).
Upon consideration of the comments received in response to the
ANPRM, CBP is not proposing to require individual brokers to maintain
the records in a specific format (i.e., electronically or in paper).
For example, if the individual broker received paper documents in the
mail or in person from an education provider, the individual broker
could retain the information in that form, or could scan and retain it
in electronic form. Based on several public comments to the ANPRM, CBP
will explore building a tool in ACE that would serve as a place to
record and track continuing education credits, but this would not be a
substitute for document retention by the individual broker. Individual
brokers would not be required to access or use this tool; rather, it
would provide a means to record continuing education credits earned
over time if convenient for the individual broker.
Proposed Sec. 111.102(d)(2) provides CBP with authority to request
the information and documentation for a period of three years following
the submission of the status report required under Sec. 111.30(d)(2).
CBP can request the information and documentation be made available for
in-person inspection, or be delivered to CBP by either hard-copy or
electronic means, or any combination thereof. Proposed Sec. 111.102(d)
is intended to enable CBP
[[Page 50802]]
to verify an individual broker's compliance with the requirements set
forth in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this proposed section--that is, the
completion of the required number of continuing education credits
during the triennial period.
5. Disciplinary Actions
Proposed Sec. 111.104 authorizes CBP to take disciplinary actions,
if an individual broker, who is required to complete qualifying
continuing broker education, submits a triennial report but fails to
report and certify his or her compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement on the triennial report. These actions take a
path of ``progressive discipline'' by imposing increasingly serious
measures following a reasonable time and opportunity to take corrective
actions. This approach is rooted in CBP's goal to ensure that all
individual brokers participate in continuing education activities, but
not to take disciplinary actions against brokers for mere clerical
errors, such as the failure to report compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement due to a mere oversight.
Proposed Sec. 111.104(a) provides that, if an individual broker,
who is required to complete qualifying continuing broker education,
submits a triennial report but fails to report and certify his or her
compliance with the continuing broker education requirement on the
triennial report, CBP will notify the individual broker of his or her
noncompliance. Pursuant to proposed Sec. 111.104(a), CBP would send
the notification to the address reflected in CBP's records or transmit
it electronically pursuant to any electronic means authorized by CBP
for that purpose. This language would authorize CBP to send such
notification to the mailing address that the individual broker listed
on the status report or via email (if the individual broker's email
address is on file with CBP).
Proposed Sec. 111.104(b) requires the noncompliant individual
broker to take appropriate corrective actions within 30 calendar days
upon the issuance of such notification. During this period, the
individual broker would be provided with an opportunity to take
corrective actions without being subjected to any disciplinary
consequences for his or her noncompliance. As reflected in paragraphs
(b)(1) and (2) of proposed Sec. 111.104, the nature of the required
corrective actions is determined by the reason for the individual
broker's failure to report and certify compliance on the triennial
report. If the individual broker completed the required number of
continuing education credits, but failed to report and certify his or
her compliance with the continuing broker education requirement on the
triennial report, the broker would merely be required to submit a
corrected triennial report that reflects the broker's compliance. If
the individual broker did not report and certify compliance on the
triennial report because the broker did not complete the required
number of continuing education credits, the broker would be required to
complete the required number of continuing education credits and then
submit a corrected triennial report.
Proposed Sec. 111.104(c) provides that, if the noncompliant
individual broker fails to take the required corrective actions within
30 calendar days upon the issuance of the aforementioned notification,
CBP will take actions to suspend the broker's individual license. Upon
the suspension of the individual broker's license and the issuance of
the order of suspension, the individual broker would be provided with
an additional opportunity to take the required corrective actions
before CBP would take more serious disciplinary measures. Specifically,
in paragraph (d), proposed Sec. 111.104 provides that, if following
the suspension of the license the noncompliant individual fails to take
the required corrective actions within 120 calendar days upon the
issuance of the order of suspension, CBP will take actions to revoke
the individual broker's license without prejudice to the filing of an
application for a new license. As proposed Sec. 111.104(d) provides
that the individual broker's license would be revoked without prejudice
to the filing of an application for a new license, the individual
broker would not be prevented from seeking a new individual customs
broker license at a later point in time.
Existing Sec. 111.53(c) provides the relevant basis for the
suspension and/or revocation of a customs broker's license when an
individual broker fails to submit a status report reporting and
certifying his or her compliance with the continuing broker education
requirement. Section 111.53(c), which authorizes CBP to initiate
proceedings for the suspension, for a specific period of time, or
revocation of the license or permit of any broker for any violation of
a statutory provision enforced by CBP or any rule or regulation issued
by CBP, implements 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(1)(C). Consequently, pursuant to
19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(B), as implemented by subpart D of part 111 (19
CFR part 111, subpart D), CBP would be required to comply with certain
formal procedural requirements in suspending or revoking the individual
broker's license, which would conclude with the issuance of an order of
suspension or revocation. This is reflected in paragraphs (c) and (d)
of proposed Sec. 111.104 through the cross-references to subpart D of
part 111. As such, CBP is not adopting either of the proposals
considered in the ANPRM--that is, to suspend or revoke an individual
broker's license by operation of law.
The provisions of proposed Sec. 111.104 would only apply to cases
in which an individual broker, who is required to complete qualifying
continuing broker education, submits a triennial report but fails to
report and certify his or her compliance with the continuing broker
education requirement on the triennial report. CBP believes that any
other type of misconduct could be sufficiently addressed through
existing regulatory provisions. For example, if an individual broker
were to fail to timely submit a triennial report, or to submit no
triennial report at all, CBP would continue to seek the suspension and/
or revocation of the individual broker's license in accordance with the
provisions of current Sec. 111.30(d)(4). Additionally, current Sec.
111.53(a), which implements 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(1)(A), authorizes CBP to
initiate proceedings for the suspension, for a specific period of time,
or revocation of the license or permit of a customs broker, if the
broker has, among others, made in any report filed with CBP any
statement which was, at the time and in light of the circumstances
under which it was made, false or misleading with respect to any
material fact, or has omitted to state in any report any material fact
which was required.
In the context of the proposed framework, CBP foresees that
violations of Sec. 111.53(a) could arise from the following
misconduct. First, a violation of Sec. 111.53(a) would occur, if an
individual broker were to falsely report and certify compliance with
the continuing broker education requirement on the triennial report
when, at the time of the submission of the triennial report, the
individual broker had not completed the required number of continuing
education credits. This would include cases in which an individual
broker, who has not yet completed the required number of continuing
education credits, submits a triennial report on which the broker
reports and certifies compliance, but later completes the required
number of continuing education credits. Second, a violation of Sec.
111.53(a) would occur, if, in accordance with proposed Sec.
111.102(d)(2), CBP were to request additional documentation from an
[[Page 50803]]
individual broker to verify the broker's compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement, and the documentation submitted by the
broker were to contain any statement which, at the time and in light of
the circumstances under which it was made, is false or misleading with
respect to any material fact, or omitted a material fact. This would
include the submission of falsified documentation, documentation
containing false or misleading statements of material fact, or
documentation omitting any material fact (such as the title or provider
of a continuing education program, if the training or educational
activity did not meet the requirements for qualifying continuing broker
education). Third, a violation of Sec. 111.53(a) would occur, if, in
accordance with proposed Sec. 111.102(d)(2), CBP were to request
additional documentation from an individual broker to verify the
broker's compliance with the continuing broker education requirement,
and the individual broker were to be unable to submit any documentation
in response to CBP's request.
D. Training and Educational Activities That Qualify as Continuing
Broker Education
Although amended Sec. 111.1 contains a proposed definition of the
term ``qualifying continuing broker education'', this definition also
provides that, in order to constitute qualifying continuing broker
education, a training or educational activity must meet certain
additional requirements. These requirements are set forth in paragraphs
(a) and (b) of proposed Sec. 111.103. Specifically, paragraph (a)(1)
sets forth requirements for categories of educational providers
(including both government and non-government providers), while
paragraph (a)(2) lists the types of training or educational activities
that are recognized for purposes of the continuing broker education
requirement. Paragraph (b) of proposed Sec. 111.103 contains
provisions pertaining to continuing education credits that are earned
as an instructor, discussion leader, and speaker.
1. Categories of Educational Providers
Proposed Sec. 111.103(a)(1) divides training or educational
activities into two categories based on the identity of the content
provider offering the training or educational activity. Pursuant to
proposed paragraph (a)(1)(i), the first category consists of training
or educational activities offered by U.S. Government agencies.
Specifically, paragraph (a)(1)(i) provides that qualifying continuing
broker education constitutes any training or educational activity
offered by CBP, whether online or in-person, and any training or
educational activity offered by another U.S. Government agency, whether
online or in-person, if the content is relevant to customs business.
These types of trainings or educational activities would not require
the approval of a CBP-selected accreditor and would qualify for
continuing education credit automatically.
CBP is proposing that training or educational activities offered by
U.S. Government agencies should automatically qualify for continuing
education credit, without the approval by a CBP-selected accreditor,
because quality control of the content is less of a concern with regard
to this type of content provider. Training or educational activities
offered by CBP are designed to educate the public about important and
timely issues faced by entities involved in international trade. Thus,
CBP believes that, by virtue of their design, these training or
educational activities meet the objectives of the continuing broker
education framework--that is, to assist individual brokers in
maintaining a sufficient knowledge of customs matters. Additionally,
CBP believes that other U.S. Government agencies carefully select
educational content based on timeliness and importance, and accurately
present the content to members of the public.
CBP believes that allowing training or educational activities
offered by CBP, or other U.S. Government agencies, if they provide
educational content that is relevant to customs business, to
automatically qualify for continuing education credit will limit the
administrative burden and costs associated with the implementation of
the proposal. CBP's proposal deliberately provides individual brokers
with wide latitude when determining whether a training or educational
activity offered by an U.S. Government agency other than CBP is
relevant to customs business. This discretion empowers individual
brokers with the ability to select training or educational activities
based on their individual educational needs. CBP also anticipates
making a list of recommended U.S. Government agency provided training
or educational activities publicly available on the CBP website to
allow individual brokers to easily identify activities that are free of
cost and automatically qualify for continuing education credit.
Pursuant to proposed paragraph (a)(1)(ii), the second category of
educational providers consists of training or educational activities
offered by a content provider other than a U.S. Government agency. Any
training or educational activity not offered by a U.S. Government
agency (such as private-sector entities, non-profit organizations, and
foreign government agencies), whether online or in-person, will not be
considered qualifying continuing broker education, unless the training
or educational activity has been approved for continuing education
credit by a CBP-selected accreditor before the training or educational
activity is provided. CBP is proposing to require accreditation for
such training or educational activities to ensure that they offer
educational content that is high-quality, current, relevant, and
accurate, and that it is directly tied to customs business.
As noted previously, CBP is not proposing the adoption of subject-
matter-specific content requirements at this time in order to enable
individual brokers to participate in educational opportunities that
provide them with knowledge directly relevant to their specific
position and experience level. Additionally, to encourage the creation
of low-cost educational opportunities that satisfy the continuing
broker education requirement, CBP's proposal does not differentiate
between educational opportunities that are offered online or in-person.
CBP intends for this to minimize the costs to small businesses and
customs brokers in remote locations so that individual brokers will not
be required to travel to attend qualifying continuing broker education
programs. CBP believes that the opportunity for individual brokers to
earn the required number of continued education credits through free,
online-based trainings would further incentivize individual brokers to
select training or educational activities based on their educational
needs and, thereby, limit the risk that individual brokers complete the
same training or educational activities multiple times solely for the
purpose of earning the required minimum number of continuing education
credits.
Regardless of who provides the training or educational activities,
CBP anticipates that providers will issue certificates to customs
brokers upon completion. CBP will make certificates of attendance
available for all of its training or educational activities to those
participants who want them. For online-based training or educational
activities, CBP will make certificates of attendance available for
download or printing at the conclusion of the presentation. For in-
person activities, such as the Trade Symposium, CBP will make paper
certificates available to
[[Page 50804]]
licensed customs brokers to pick up prior to the end of the conference.
Additionally, because one of the factors to become a CBP-selected
accreditor will be to design and develop certificates for approved
education providers to use as needed, certificates of attendance will
also be available for any qualifying continuing broker education
offered by private, non-profit, or foreign government entities.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ As part of the RFP process, applicants will be required to
provide CBP with information how they plan to handle the post-course
certification process for those course providers who apply for
accreditation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP will work with its PGAs to make them aware of the new
continuing education requirements, if finalized, so that the PGAs can
consider making available certificates of attendance or completion,
whether in electronic or paper form. However, CBP is unable to require
its PGAs to provide certificates of attendance or completion. Proposed
Sec. 111.102(d)(1)(iv) thus only requires an individual broker to
retain any documentation that the individual broker received from the
provider or host of the qualifying continuing broker education that
evidences the individual broker's registration for, attendance at,
completion of, or other activity bearing upon the individual broker's
participation in and completion of the qualifying continuing broker
education. Therefore, the language in proposed Sec. 111.102(d)(1)(iv)
accounts for the possibility that certificates of attendance or
completion may not be issued for all qualifying training or educational
activities provided by its PGAs.
2. Recognized Training or Educational Activities
CBP is proposing that only certain categories of training or
educational activities may be considered qualifying continuing broker
education. The list of recognized categories of training or educational
activities is contained in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iv) of
proposed Sec. 111.103. Paragraph (a)(2)(i) provides that the first
category consists of coursework, seminars, or workshops, whether online
or in-person, that are conducted by an instructor, discussion leader,
or speaker. This category would include most webinars, in-house
training, university or college courses, or similar educational
programs.
Paragraph (a)(2)(ii) provides that the second category includes
symposia and conventions, whether online or in-person. This category
would include the annual CBP Trade Symposium and similar educational
programs. However, meetings that are conducted in accordance with the
provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C.
App.) (FACA), are expressly excluded from this category. As such,
individual brokers would not be permitted to claim continuing education
credit for their participation in committees, subcommittees,
workgroups, and any other group organized under the auspices of the
Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee (COAC), as well as
public COAC meetings. CBP is proposing to exclude FACA meetings because
these meetings do not serve an educational purpose. FACA meetings are
intended, instead, to solicit advice from advisory committee members
and to receive input from the public that may later form the basis for
government decisions.
The last two categories of recognized training or educational
activities are set forth in paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) and (iv) which will
permit individual brokers serving as instructors, discussion leaders,
or speakers to receive continuing education credit for the time spent
preparing a subject matter for presentation and presenting a subject
matter (hereinafter, referred to as ``special allowance''). Paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii) and (iv) provide that the subject matter must be presented
as part of a training or educational activity that falls within one of
the first two recognized categories of training or educational
activities (that is, the categories described in paragraphs (a)(2)(i)
and (ii) of proposed Sec. 111.103), and the special allowance for
instructors, discussion leaders, or speakers is subject to the
conditions and limitations set forth in proposed Sec. 111.103(b).
While CBP is proposing to carve out a special allowance for certain
instructors, discussion leaders, or speakers, CBP is not proposing to
permit individual brokers to claim continuing education credit for
authoring articles, books, or other publications. CBP believes that the
learning involved in the authoring of a publication does not
necessarily equate to the knowledge derived from a continuing education
program that is current and developed by an individual or organization
qualified in the relevant subject matter, as the learning does not
necessarily include an interactive component. For this reason, CBP is
also not including credit hours for independently reading articles,
books, or other publications or for paid subscriptions to these types
of materials. If these materials are part of an accredited course, then
the course hours may be eligible for continuing education credit.
3. Special Allowance for Instructors, Discussion Leaders, and Speakers
Proposed Sec. 111.103(b) sets forth additional requirements and
limitations pertaining to the special allowance for instructors,
discussion leaders, and speakers. In proposed paragraph (b)(1), CBP
sets forth that, contingent upon the approval by a CBP-selected
accreditor, an individual broker may claim one continuing education
credit for each full 60 minutes spent presenting subject matter, or
preparing subject matter for presentation, as a discussion leader, or
speaker at a training or educational activity described in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section.
However, the special allowance for instructors, discussion leaders,
and speakers is subject to limitations, which are set forth in proposed
Sec. 111.103(b)(2) and (3). Specifically, proposed Sec.
111.103(b)(2)(i) provides that, for any session of presentation given
at one time, regardless of the duration of that session, an individual
broker may claim, at a maximum, one continuing education credit for the
time spent preparing subject matter for that presentation pursuant to
paragraph (b)(1)(ii). Further, proposed Sec. 111.103(b)(2)(ii) also
imposes a limit on the total number of continuing education credits
that an individual broker can earn based on his or her activities as an
instructor, discussion leader, or speaker. This limit is 12 continuing
education credits per triennial period. CBP is proposing these
limitations to ensure that individual brokers receive education in a
broad variety of subject matters, not just provide instructions,
possibly exclusively on the same subject matter.
As specified in proposed Sec. 111.103(b)(3), any instructor,
discussion leader, or speaker seeking to claim continuing education
credit for the preparation of a subject matter for presentation, or the
presentation of a subject matter, at one of a training or educational
activity described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (ii) of proposed Sec.
111.103, must obtain approval by a CBP-selected accreditor, regardless
of whether the training or educational activity is offered by a U.S.
Government agency or another provider. CBP is proposing this
requirement in order to ensure that the effort and quality of the
educational experience derived from the activities as an instructor,
discussion leader, or speaker is commensurate with the award of
continuing education credit.
Like content providers, the means by which an individual broker
claiming continuing education credits under the
[[Page 50805]]
special allowance would be notified of an accreditor's approval would
vary based on the terms of the accreditor's contractual relationship
with CBP, which is discussed in further detail in section IV.E. of this
NPRM. Depending on the terms of the accreditor's contractual
relationship with CBP, the individual broker would be notified of the
accreditor's approval either in writing or electronically, or both. CBP
anticipates that, as part of the selection process for the accreditors,
it will require each accreditor to (1) provide CBP with a running list
of activities that the accreditor approved, and/or (2) publish this
list on its website. A failure to observe the requirements and
limitations set forth in proposed Sec. 111.103(b) would result in a
failure to comply with the continuing broker education requirement for
the triennial period. Thus, if an individual broker were to fail to
observe the requirements and limitations set forth in proposed Sec.
111.103(b) and to report and certify compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement on the triennial report, the individual
broker would falsely report and certify compliance on the triennial
report. As a result, CBP could impose disciplinary actions pursuant to
proposed Sec. 111.104 and existing Sec. 111.53(a).
E. Accreditation of Providers of Continuing Broker Education
CBP believes that it is necessary to implement an accreditation
process for training or educational activities not offered by a U.S.
Government agency, including the special allowance for instructors,
discussion leaders, or speakers, to ensure that such activities meet
the objectives of the continuing broker education requirement. Due to
resource constraints, CBP is not well positioned to administer the
accreditation of training and educational activities. Thus, CBP,
through the Office of Trade, is proposing to select accreditors who
will review and approve or deny such training or educational activities
for continuing education credit. Below is a description of the
selection process, which is outlined in proposed Sec. 111.103(c), and
the accreditation process, which is outlined in paragraphs (d) and (e)
of proposed Sec. 111.103.
1. Selection of Accreditors
As reflected in proposed Sec. 111.103(c), CBP is proposing to
select third-party accreditors using common government contracting
procedures, which would include the issuance of a Request for
Information (RFI) and a Request for Proposal (RFP). CBP would
administer this process through the Office of Trade in accordance with
the requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter
1) (the FAR). While selected accreditors would administer the
accreditation of the training or educational activities as part of
their contractual relationship with CBP, selected accreditors would not
receive a monetary award from CBP as a result of this contractual
relationship. However, selected accreditors would be permitted to
charge content providers for their services to recoup their expenses in
reviewing and approving or denying training or educational activities
for continuing education credit, as long as the fees are clearly
displayed on the accreditors' website and materials. The remainder of
this section lays out the basic framework that CBP is proposing for the
review and approval of potential accreditors. The specific obligations
that accreditors under contract with CBP would be required to meet
would be provided in more detail in the RFI, and then in even more
granular detail, in the RFP.
Because this is a new program for both CBP and the customs broker
community, CBP plans to initiate the selection process through the
issuance of an RFI. The RFI would be posted in the System for Award
Management (available at https://sam.gov/SAM/) (SAM).\15\ The RFI would
lay out the basic criteria that CBP believes a future accreditor must
meet in order to successfully review activities for continuing
education credit. Currently, CBP expects to propose the following
criteria:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ SAM is a U.S. Government website operated by the General
Services Administration (GSA), and there is no cost for any entity
to use the system. Through SAM, any entity can register to do
business with the U.S. Government, update or renew an entity's
registration, check the status of an entity registration, and search
for any entity registration and exclusion records.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At least one key official in the entity must have a
customs broker's license;
A demonstrated knowledge of international trade laws,
customs laws and regulations, and general customs practices for
imported goods and goods subject to drawback;
A demonstrated knowledge of other U.S. Government agencies
that are involved in transactions of international trade;
A list of professional references;
Resumes for the key personnel who would be involved in
accrediting course work;
A description of the process for how someone would submit
a training or educational activity proposed for credit to the
accreditor, including electronic and online methods for submitting
materials for consideration;
A description of the criteria the accreditor would use to
approve or deny trainings or educational activities for continuing
education credit;
A description of how the accreditor would avoid conflicts
of interest;
A description of how the accreditor would track
accreditation activity for CBP review;
A description of how customers can provide feedback to the
accreditor and CBP on the approval process;
An estimate of the ``turn around'' time for approving/
denying activities under consideration for accreditation; and
An estimate of the charge, if any, for approving/denying
an activity under consideration for accreditation.
Based on these criteria, along with other details that would be
provided in the RFI, CBP would then hold an ``industry day'' with
interested parties. As CBP-selected accreditors would not receive a
monetary award from CBP, CBP anticipates that trade associations and
law firms specializing in customs matters will make up the majority of
parties interested in becoming CBP-selected accreditors. However, CBP
encourages all interested parties to participate in the RFI process as
it will provide interested parties with an opportunity to provide input
that will shape the accreditation process. As part of this industry
day, CBP would present its needs and expectations for the accreditation
process and receive input on its initial proposal from parties that are
potentially interested in providing accreditation services. This
information would then be used to refine the above-listed criteria and
prepare an RFP. CBP would then post the RFP in SAM. Following the
publication of the RFP, interested parties would then respond with
their proposals of how they would administer the accreditation process
based on the criteria set forth in the RFP. A party that participated
in the RFI process would be under no obligation to put forth a response
to the RFP. Conversely, if a party interested in applying to become an
accreditor did not respond to the RFI or participate in the industry
day process, that party would not be precluded from responding to the
RFP. CBP is not proposing an ``application fee'' for interested parties
to submit a response to the RFP (fees to submit responses to RFPs are
not permitted under the FAR).
[[Page 50806]]
In addition to the publication of the RFI and RFP in SAM, CBP is
proposing to announce the availability of the RFI and RFP through the
publication of notices in the Federal Register by the Executive
Assistant Commissioner, Office of Trade. This would ensure that the
requests reach as wide an audience as possible, including parties that
do not traditionally contract with the U.S. Government. In accordance
with the provisions of proposed Sec. 111.103(c), these Federal
Register notices would contain information pertaining to the criteria
that the Office of Trade will use to select an accreditor and the
period during which CBP will accept applications by potential
accreditors.
Following the issuance and publication of the RFP, CBP would review
the proposals received and rate them based on the factors provided in
the relevant section of the RFP. Based on these ratings, CBP would then
select the accreditors approved for that cycle. Parties not selected
for the cycle would have the opportunity to protest CBP's decision in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the FAR. Following the
selection of the approved accreditors, the Office of Trade will notify
the approved accreditors of their award, and the Executive Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Trade, will publish a notice in the Federal
Register to inform the public and the customs broker community of the
parties approved to provide accreditation services. In accordance with
the provisions of proposed Sec. 111.103(c), this Federal Register
notice would contain information pertaining to the selected
accreditors' period of award.
CBP is not proposing to set a target or a limit on the number of
accreditors. Rather, the number will be determined by the strength of
the proposals received and CBP's needs at the time of the RFP. CBP is
proposing to introduce a period of award of three years, subject to
renewal. This will provide CBP-selected accreditors with sufficient
time to establish their accreditation programs and to begin with the
accreditation of educational content while not creating a long period
of time during which new interested parties would have to wait for the
next selection cycle. In accordance with the provisions of the FAR,
either party to the contract--whether the accreditor or CBP--would be
permitted to terminate the contract with 30-days' notice. If an
accreditor were to leave the program, the Executive Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Trade, would publish a notice in the Federal
Register announcing the departure.
Once awards have been made for the first cycle of accreditors, CBP
envisions working closely with them--as a group and as individual
parties--to provide directions and instructions, set expectations,
develop due dates and milestones, and create a public outreach campaign
to inform the affected customs broker community of the new program and
opportunities. Once the program has been fully implemented, the Broker
Management Branch within the Office of Trade will meet with the
accreditors periodically to identify and exchange best practices,
address areas of concern, and develop program metrics that can be
shared with COAC and other members of the public as needed. Following
the first 3-year cycle, CBP will announce the opening of a new
application cycle through posts in SAM, and the Executive Assistant
Commissioner, Office of Trade, will publish a notice in the Federal
Register to the same effect.
CBP believes the approach outlined above will meet the following
objectives, which CBP believes to be key to the program's success:
1. Multiple approved accreditors, which will allow for competition
and keep costs at market level without creating a monopoly;
2. An open and transparent application process; and,
3. An opportunity for small businesses, such as law firms that
specialize in customs law, and non-profit organizations, such as trade
associations, to become approved accreditors.
2. Accreditation Process
Proposed Sec. 111.103(d) and (e) pertain to the administration of
the accreditation process, including the responsibilities of CBP-
selected accreditors. Proposed Sec. 111.103(d) reflects that CBP-
selected accreditors will administer the accreditation of training or
educational activities offered by an entity other than a U.S.
Government agency, including the special allowance for instructors,
discussion leaders, and speakers, by reviewing and approving or denying
training or educational activities for continuing education credit. The
accreditation process may vary slightly among CBP-selected accreditors
(e.g., fees, timeframe for the review and issuance of an accreditation
decision, address to which paper-based accreditation requests must be
submitted, and the documents that must be submitted as part of the
accreditation request); however, each accreditor will be required to
administer the accreditation process within the bounds of a defined set
of parameters. These parameters will be defined as part of the RFP. For
example, CBP is expecting that, as a result of this process, CBP-
selected accreditors will be required to: (1) Provide an electronic
means for a content provider to submit the details of an activity under
consideration; (2) state the average or typical processing time for an
accreditation request; and (3) clearly state any charges for the review
and approval or denial of an accreditation request.
Although the accreditation process will be defined in more detail
as part of the selection process, paragraphs (d) and (e) of proposed
Sec. 111.103 contain two requirements. First, in order to ensure that
qualifying continuing broker education programs present educational
content that is current and relevant, proposed Sec. 111.103(d)
provides that an accreditor's approval of a training or educational
activity for continuing education credit is only valid for one year,
but can be renewed through any CBP-selected accreditor. As CBP's
proposal does not require individual brokers to complete a specific
number of hours of continuing education on specific subject matter
areas, CBP has chosen to propose to limit the validity of
accreditations to one year. CBP believes that this limitation would
ensure that content providers regularly update educational content,
and, thereby, ensure that qualifying continuing broker education offers
educational content that is current and relevant. Second, while a CBP-
selected accreditor could approve a training or educational activity
offered by one of its officials or members for continuing education
credit, proposed Sec. 111.103(e) provides a CBP-selected accreditor
may not approve its own trainings or educational activities for
continuing education credit. This will require CBP-selected accreditors
who are also content providers to seek another CBP-selected
accreditor's approval in order for educational content to be eligible
for continuing education credit. CBP is proposing this limitation to
curb the risk of conflicts of interest and self-dealings.
In order to promote transparency and the accreditors' compliance
with their contractual obligations, CBP also intends to provide content
providers and instructors, discussion leaders, and speakers seeking to
claim continuing education credits under the special allowance with an
opportunity to submit complaints and comments to the Office of Trade at
the Headquarters of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Attn: Broker
Management Branch, electronically. CBP intends to publish additional
information on how to submit complaints and comments concerning
specific CBP-selected
[[Page 50807]]
accreditors, including the email address to which such electronic
correspondences should be submitted, on its website. CBP plans to
request that content providers (and instructors, discussion leaders,
and speakers seeking to claim continuing education credits under the
special allowance) who submit a complaint pertaining to the denial of a
specific accreditation adhere to the following procedures. First, the
content provider (and instructors, discussion leaders, and speakers
seeking to claim continuing education credits under the special
allowance) should contact the CBP-selected accreditor to request a
detailed explanation as to the denial of the accreditation request.
Second, if following the receipt of the detailed explanation, the
content provider (and instructors, discussion leaders, and speakers
seeking to claim continuing education credits under the special
allowance) continues to believe that the denial was in error, the
content provider should submit a complaint to CBP, including (1) a copy
of all materials that were submitted to the accreditor for
consideration, (2) any materials received from the accreditor that
explain why the activity was rejected, and (3) a detailed explanation
as to why the content provider believes the denial decision to be
erroneous.
In order to ensure the successful implementation of the proposed
continuing education requirement, CBP will also welcome any other type
of feedback, such as feedback on accreditor performance and customer
experience, positive interactions, and areas for improvement. CBP plans
to compile and share such feedback during the sessions that CBP intends
to hold with the accreditors on a periodic basis.
F. Timeframe for the Implementation of the Proposed Changes
This NPRM provides for a public comment period of 60 days. Upon the
review of the comments and further consideration, CBP will prepare a
final rule. The final rule will adopt the current proposal as final,
with or without changes based on consideration of the public comments,
and will provide the date on which the changes will become effective.
In addition to the 30-day delayed effective date required under the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(c)), CBP anticipates that
there will be an additional delay between the publication of the final
rule and the effective date to allow for proper implementation of the
continuing education framework.
As CBP's proposal requires some training and educational activities
to be approved for continuing education credit by a CBP-selected
accreditor, a delayed effective date will be needed in order to permit
for sufficient time for the selection of qualified accreditors, for
CBP-selected accreditors to set up their processes for reviewing
accreditation requests, and for content providers to obtain
accreditation for their training or educational activities. CBP will
ensure that there will be adequate time for compliance by individual
brokers if the proposed rule is adopted. For example, in addition to a
delayed effective date, CBP may also select an effective date for the
final rule that coincides with the beginning of a new triennial period
or prorate the number of continuing education credits individual
brokers must complete by the end of the triennial period during which
the final rule becomes effective.
V. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements
A. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory
action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed this regulation.
CBP has prepared the following analysis to help inform stakeholders of
the impacts of this proposed rule.
1. Purpose of Rule
The proposed rule, if implemented, would require active \16\
individual customs broker license holders (brokers) to complete 36
hours of continuing education every three years. A continuing education
requirement would increase the knowledge base from which brokers work,
educate them on changing customs requirements, regulations, and laws,
and reduce the number of errors in filings and resultant penalties. CBP
believes that requiring continuing education would enhance the
credibility and value of an individual customs broker license and
improve a broker's skills, performance, and productivity. Furthermore,
CBP believes that mandating continuing education would increase the
quality of service for brokers' clients and importers' compliance with
customs laws, which would protect the revenue of the United States and
aid in maintaining a high standard of professionalism in the customs
broker community.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ The term ``active'' refers to a license that has not been
suspended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Background
On October 28, 2020, CBP published an ANPRM, entitled ``Continuing
Education for Licensed Customs Brokers'', in the Federal Register (85
FR 68260). The ANPRM presented a basic outline for a continuing
education requirement for licensed customs brokers and posed questions
pertaining to the potential costs and benefits of such a requirement.
Some of the public comments that CBP received in response to the ANPRM
addressed the questions pertaining to the potential costs and benefits
of such a requirement, although very few contained specific information
or data. Any information that was provided on these issues was taken
into account in formulating this analysis. In this NPRM, CBP is
proposing a continuing education requirement for individual brokers.
i. Customs Brokers
A customs broker assists clients with the importation of goods into
the United States, and also with the filing of drawback claims. Customs
brokers can be individuals, partnerships, associations, or corporations
and must be licensed by CBP. Brokers are responsible for helping
clients to meet all relevant requirements for importing and submitting
drawback claims, submitting information and payments to CBP on their
client's behalf, and exercising responsible supervision and control
over their employees and customs business.\17\ Only licensed customs
brokers may perform customs business.\18\ Brokers may have expertise
[[Page 50808]]
in any number of trade-related areas, including entry, admissibility,
classification, valuation, and duty rates for imported goods. Some
brokers specialize in a specific area of customs business, like
drawback or valuation, while others are more general practitioners. As
of 2021, there are 13,822 active individual brokers in the United
States.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ For more details on responsible supervision and control,
see 19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(4), as well as 19 CFR 111.1 and 111.28.
\18\ Customs business is defined as: those activities involving
transactions with U.S. Customs and Border Protection concerning the
entry and admissibility of merchandise, its classification and
valuation, the payment of duties, taxes, or other charges assessed
or collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection upon merchandise
by reason of its importation, or the refund, rebate, or drawback
thereof. It also includes the preparation of documents or forms in
any format and the electronic transmission of documents, invoices,
bills, or parts thereof, intended to be filed with U.S. Customs and
Border Protection in furtherance of such activities, whether or not
signed or filed by the preparer, or activities relating to such
preparation, but does not include the mere electronic transmission
of data received for transmission to CBP. See 19 U.S.C. 1641(a)(2).
\19\ A customs broker may voluntarily suspend his or her license
for a number of reasons and may re-activate the license at a later
time. A broker's license may also be suspended as part of a penalty.
For more information, see 19 CFR 111.52.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To become a licensed customs broker, an eligible individual \20\
must pass the Customs Broker License Examination, submit a broker
license application and appropriate fees to CBP, and be approved by
CBP.\21\ Once applicants have passed the broker exam, they may apply
for an individual, corporate, partnership, or association license. To
maintain the license, the individual broker or the licensed entity (for
corporations, partnership, or associations) must submit a triennial
report and requisite fees. The triennial report and fees are due on
February 28, every three years, since 1985.\22\ Once an individual has
been approved as a licensed customs broker, the primary ongoing
requirement for maintaining the license under current regulations is
the submission of the triennial report and appropriate fee in 3-year
cycles. Given the established 3-year cycle of triennial reporting, CBP
employs a 6-year period of analysis to calculate costs and benefits
that result from this proposed rule, accounting for two triennial
cycles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ To be eligible, an individual must be a United States
citizen at least 21 years of age, in possession of good moral
character, and not be an employee of the U.S. Government. For more
information, see U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Becoming a
Customs Broker (Dec. 12, 2018), available at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/customs-brokers/becoming-customs-broker.
\21\ To be approved, a broker who has passed the broker exam
must also pass an investigation of his or her relevant background.
See section III.B. of this NPRM.
\22\ 19 CFR 111.30(d). For more information on the triennial
report, see U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 2021 Customs Broker
Triennial Status Report FAQs (Feb. 26, 2021), available at https://help.cbp.gov/s/article/Article-1711?language=en_US.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A broker license may be suspended or revoked, or a monetary penalty
assessed, for several violations ranging from falsifying information on
the license application to willfully and intentionally deceiving,
misleading, or threating a client.\23\ CBP generally assesses monetary
penalties for less serious infractions, such as the incorrect filing of
entry forms or the misclassification of goods. However, the majority of
civil monetary penalties assessed against brokers for violations of 19
U.S.C. 1641 involve egregious violations or the failure to take
satisfactory corrective actions following written notice and a
reasonable opportunity to remedy the deficiency as the penalties
process provides noncompliant brokers with several opportunities to
avoid or mitigate penalty liability.\24\ Monetary penalties may not
exceed $30,000 per violation and averaged $22,697 from 2017-2020.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See, e.g., 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(1) and (g)(2).
\24\ In the case of non-egregious violations, CBP will first
attempt to work with the broker through the informed compliance
process of communication and education. See U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Electronic Invoice Program (EIP) and Remote Location
Filing (RLF) Handbook (May 2013), p. 22, available at https://www.cbp.gov/sites/default/files/assets/documents/2016-Dec/Revised_eip_rlf_handbook_12-15_16.pdf. This is an attempt to improve
the broker's performance, and precedes the issuance of a pre-penalty
notice, which is a written notice that advises the broker of the
allegations or complaints against the broker. See id.; 19 CFR
111.92(a). If this process fails to remedy the deficiencies, or in
case of egregious violations, CBP will issue a pre-penalty notice to
the broker, which, inter alia, explains that the broker has the
right to respond to the allegations or complaints. See 19 CFR
111.92(a). If the broker files a timely response to the pre-penalty
notice, CBP will either cancel the case, issue a penalty notice in
an amount lower than that provided in the pre-penalty notice, or
issue a penalty notice in the same amount as the pre-penalty notice.
See 19 CFR 111.92(b). Upon the issuance of the penalty notice, the
broker is afforded the opportunity to file a petition for relief in
accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR part 171, which may result
in the cancellation or mitigation of the penalty, and subsequently a
supplemental petition for relief. See 19 CFR 111.93 and 111.95.
\25\ 19 U.S.C. 1641(d)(2)(B). Penalty information comes from
CBP's Seized Currency and Asset Tracking System (SEACATS). Although
the average value of assessed penalty is $22,697, CBP allows brokers
to mitigate penalties, such that the amount collected is often
significantly less, averaging $2,664 from 2017-2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the fiscal years from 2017 to 2020, CBP assessed an average of
66 penalties to brokers per year.\26\ However, in FY 2017 and FY 2018,
CBP assessed 20 and 21 penalties, respectively, while in FY 2019 and FY
2020, CBP assessed over 100 penalties each year (see Table 1). The
significant increase in penalties from 2018 to 2019 and into 2020 is
likely due to rapid changes in the international trade environment in
those years. During that time, CBP began enforcing several significant
changes in the realm of international trade, including new antidumping
and countervailing duties (AD/CVD) and the tariffs imposed by the Trump
Administration under section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C.
2251), as amended, section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (19
U.S.C. 1862), as amended, and sections 301 through 310 of the Trade Act
of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2411 et seq.), as amended.\27\ These changes
affected a significant number of imported goods. CBP provided many
opportunities for individual brokers to learn about the changes,
including webinars, Question and Answer sessions, public forums, and
Federal Register notices. External organizations, like regional broker
associations, also provided information regarding these changes to the
customs laws, which would have led to greater understanding for
individual brokers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ SEACATS.
\27\ Trade remedies implemented by CBP include Section 201 trade
remedies on solar cells and panels, and washing machines and parts;
Section 232 trade remedies on aluminum and steel; Section 232 trade
remedies on derivatives; Section 301 trade remedies to be assessed
on certain goods from China; and Section 301 trade remedies to
enforce U.S. rights in the large civil aircraft dispute before the
World Trade Organization. See U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
Trade Remedies, available at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies (last visited on May 11, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although CBP sought information in the ANPRM on the number of
companies employing brokers who already complete continuing education,
CBP did not receive enough specific information to estimate the
proportion of companies already providing ongoing training. However,
based on information gathered via self-reporting by individual brokers,
CBP is aware of about 300 companies that employ at least one broker who
holds an industry certification that requires annual continuing
education.\28\ In the fiscal years from 2017 to 2019, those companies
were responsible for 54 percent of the entries but only 10 percent of
the penalties.\29\ Overall, these 300 companies filed 73,906,967 of
136,466,361 filed entries between 2017 and 2020, but only account for
26 of 267 total penalties assessed in that period.\30\ For companies
outside of this group, CBP does not know how much continuing education
is currently taken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Information was provided by the National Customs Broker and
Forwarders Association of America (NCBFAA). Nine companies employ at
least 48 brokers certified by programs provided by the NCBFAA's
Education Institute (NEI), and often employ more. An additional 292
companies employing at least one broker with an NEI certification
were identified via a survey of NEI's students.
\29\ Significant at the 99 percent confidence level.
\30\ Entry data was pulled from ACE, and penalty data from
SEACATS.
[[Page 50809]]
Table 1--Annual Penalties Assessed by CBP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
FY penalties
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017.................................................... 20
2018.................................................... 21
2019.................................................... 119
2020.................................................... 106
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ii. Continuing Education
Continuing education refers to the training and learning pursued by
professionals outside of the formal education system, usually as part
of career development. Many licensed professions have some sort of
continuing education requirement for license-holders, including
accountants, medical professionals, and teachers.\31\ Continuing
education is particularly important for professions characterized by
continuously changing rules, standards, and norms. Customs and
international trade is one such profession. Since 2000, the United
States has added two new preferential trade programs and several new
free trade agreements, the most recent being the USMCA, which replaced
the NAFTA.\32\ Additionally, the logistical aspects of customs have
changed significantly over time. For example, CBP introduced the single
window, enabling most CBP forms to be submitted electronically through
the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE), which was fully implemented
in 2016, with added functionalities being deployed on an ongoing basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ The number of hours of continuing education required for
many professions varies by state as the state is the licensing
authority.
\32\ In October 2000, the United States implemented the
Caribbean Basin Trade Partnership Act, which will expire in 2030
(https://www.cbp.gov/trade/priority-issues/trade-agreements/special-trade-legislation/caribbean-basin-initiative/cbtpa). The African
Growth and Opportunity Act was also enacted in 2000 (https://ustr.gov/issue-areas/trade-development/preference-programs/african-growth-and-opportunity-act-agoa). See https://www.state.gov/trade-agreements/outcomes-of-current-u-s-trade-agreements/ for a list of
free trade agreements currently in force.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There have been several other significant changes to the customs
environment, including the implementation of TFTEA, changes in duty
rates and tariffs, and the modernization of the drawback
requirements.\33\ Customs brokers must maintain awareness of and adapt
to these changes to provide quality service to clients. However, aside
from the broker exam at the beginning of their careers, brokers do not
currently have any requirements ensuring they maintain up-to-date
knowledge of customs rules, regulations, and practices. As stated
above, CBP believes that the vigorous pace and expanding scope of
international trade require a more stringent continuing education
framework for individual brokers who provide guidance to importers and
drawback claimants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See section III.C. of this NPRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The effects of continuing education programs are not easily
measured and not often the subject of research.\34\ Some studies show
that various licensed professions do see a mild increase in positive
perception of their industry, performance, and professionalism after
the implementation of continuing education requirements.\35\ Studies
have also demonstrated a positive link between continuing education for
teachers and student outcomes as well as between continuing medical
education and patient outcomes.\36\ Additionally, one study found that
continuing professional education was correlated to an improvement in
financial outcomes for accounting firms, particularly large firms.\37\
Finally, a study of IRS-certified tax preparers found that mandatory
continuing education was potentially linked to reduced civil penalties,
a decrease in non-compliance, and increased accuracy of tax
returns.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ ``Evaluation of Current Customs Broker Continuing Education
Practices and Literature Review of Continuing Education in Other
Professions.'' Report for CBP prepared by International Economics,
Inc. (IEc) on June 30, 2014. This document is included in the docket
for this NPRM, which is posted on Regulations.gov.
\35\ See Bradley, S., Drapeau, M. and DeStefano, J. (2012), The
relationship between continuing education and perceived competence,
professional support, and professional value among clinical
psychologists. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof., 32: 31-38; O'Leary, P.
F., Quinlan, T. J., & Richards, R. L. (2011). Insurance
Professionals' Perceptions of Continuing Education Requirements.
Journal of Insurance Regulation, 30, 101-117; and Wessels, S.
(2007). Accountants' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Mandatory
Continuing Professional Education. Accounting Education, 16(4), 365-
378.
\36\ Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M.E., and Gardner, M. (2017).
Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy
Institute; Cervero, R. M., & Gaines, J.K. (2014). Effectiveness of
continuing medical education: updated synthesis of systematic
reviews. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education.
\37\ Chen, Y.-S., Chang, B.-G., & Lee, C.-C. (2008). The
association between continuing professional education and financial
performance of public accounting firms. International Journal of
Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1720-1737.
\38\ Diehl, K. A. (2015). Does Requiring Registration, Testing,
and Continuing Professional Education for Paid Tax Preparers Improve
the Compliance and Accuracy of Tax Returns?--US Results. Journal of
Business & Accounting, 8(1), 138-147.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the terms of the proposed rule, individual brokers would be
required to complete 36 hours of accredited continuing education over
each 3-year reporting period. Qualifying activities would include
attending or presenting at events, such as courses, seminars, symposia,
and conventions.\39\ Brokers would be required to self-attest to the
completion of the required continuing education on each triennial
report and maintain records consisting of certain documentation
received from the provider or host of the qualifying continuing broker
education, if such documentation was made available to the broker, and
containing information pertaining to the dates, titles, providers,
credit hours earned, and location (if applicable) for each training.
The records can be in any format (i.e., electronically or on paper),
and the proposed regulations provide CBP with authority to conduct a
compliance audit and to request such records for a period of three
years following the submission of the status report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\39\ See proposed 19 CFR 111.103(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iii. Accreditation
To ensure the quality and relevance of continuing education
offerings, they are often accredited by a leading body within the field
in question. For example, the American Medical Association (AMA) is
accredited to provide training by the Accreditation Council for
Continuing Medical Education.\40\ An accreditor is responsible for
reviewing course content and determining the number of credits or hours
to be granted for each course.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See American Medical Association, About the AMA's CME
Accreditation, available at https://edhub.ama-assn.org/pages/ama-cme
(last accessed on May 11, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposed rule, after an application process (using the
RFP, as described above), CBP would designate entities outside of CBP
to act as accreditors for customs broker continuing education. Every
three years, CBP would release an RFP soliciting applications to become
an accreditor for the customs broker continuing education program.
Every three years following the first cycle, existing accreditors would
also apply for renewal. To apply, potential and existing accreditors
would submit an application to CBP detailing their standards for
accreditation, quality control practices, application process, and
other information. A panel of CBP experts would convene to review and
approve or deny applications. Once approved, accreditors could begin
accepting submissions from courses or companies seeking accreditation.
Note that training or educational activities offered by U.S. Government
agencies, including CBP, automatically qualify for
[[Page 50810]]
continuing education credit, without the approval by a CBP-selected
accreditor.\41\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ Per proposed Sec. 111.103(a)(1)(i), a training or
educational activity offered by a U.S. Government agency other than
CBP must be relevant to customs business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iv. Performance Improvement
Once brokers have passed the broker exam, thereby proving their
basic knowledge and competency to perform the duties of a licensed
customs broker at the time of the exam, they are free to practice in
perpetuity unless the license is suspended or revoked. Statute dictates
that while practicing under the auspices of his or her broker license,
a customs broker must maintain responsible supervision and control.\42\
CBP's regulations likewise place additional legal obligations upon
customs brokers, including, but not limited to, the requirement for
exercising due diligence in making financial settlements, answering
correspondence, and preparing or assisting in the preparation and
filing of information relating to customs business.\43\ Staying current
on developments in customs law is needed for customs brokers to comply
with their legal obligations, but presently there are no standards for
how much continuing education is needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See 19 U.S.C. 1641(b)(4).
\43\ See 19 CFR 111.29(a), and 19 CFR part 111 generally for
additional obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under baseline conditions, meaning the world as it is now, CBP does
not require brokers to complete any additional training or prove their
ongoing knowledge. The broker exam only attests knowledge of customs
and related laws that are in place at the time of the exam. While the
exam ensures that brokers have a solid base level of knowledge when
they begin practicing, there is no requirement that they keep up the
knowledge, and evidence suggests that as more time passes since brokers
took their exam, the more errors they make. Brokers who were assessed
penalties by CBP between 2017 and 2020 have held their individual
broker license for, on average, 37 years. In contrast, the average
individual broker license is 24 years old. This suggests that as more
time passes since the passing of the customs broker exam, more errors
are made. Furthermore, the exam does not test for any of the
requirements of the more than 40 PGAs involved in regulating imports.
Depending on the brokers' needs, CBP believes that continuing education
should also include courses relating to the PGAs' international trade
requirements, although there is no minimum requirement for certain
subject matters in this proposed rule.
Given the often fast-paced and evolving nature of the international
trade environment, CBP believes that a continuing education requirement
would help to ensure that brokers remain current with their
understanding of international trade laws and continue to expand their
knowledge of customs regulations and practices. A more competent and
educated customs broker community would also prevent costly errors,
potentially saving brokers' clients time and money, as well as
relieving CBP from expending valuable audit and penalty assessment and
collection resources.
3. Overview of Assessment
The proposed rule would result in costs and benefits for customs
brokers, accreditors, providers of continuing education, and CBP. Many
of the costs for brokers come in the form of time spent researching,
registering for, attending, and reporting trainings. Brokers would also
experience some opportunity cost as they forgo time spent on other
tasks in favor of fulfilling a continuing education requirement.
Accreditors must apply to CBP. Though CBP would not charge a fee, the
accreditors would need to spend time in creating their applications.
Similarly, providers of continuing education must apply to accreditors
to have their coursework certified. Finally, CBP must designate
accreditors, and, following the full implementation of the proposed
framework, CBP may audit individual brokers for compliance.
The benefits from the proposed rule would be largely qualitative. A
continuing education requirement would help to professionalize and
improve the reputation of the customs broker community, as well as to
improve customer service and outcomes. Quantitatively, continuing
education would likely lead to a reduction in errors in documentation
and associated penalties assessed by CBP for some infractions and
violations. Not only would individual brokers not need to pay the
associated penalties, but CBP would save the time of identifying,
assessing, and collecting such penalties. Similarly, CBP would likely
see a reduction in regulatory audits of individual brokers.
4. Historical and Projected Populations Affected by the Rule
The proposed rule applies to any individual holding an active
customs broker license.\44\ Brokers who have voluntarily suspended
their licenses are not required to complete continuing education until
they elect to reactivate their license, at which point the requirements
are pro-rated depending upon the timing within the triennial reporting
cycle. Brokers who have not held their license for an entire triennial
period at the time their first triennial report is due are also
exempted from completing training and reporting in their first
triennial report, though are bound by the terms of the proposed rule in
the following years. As of 2021, there are 13,822 active, individual
broker licenses.\45\ Because 2021 is a reporting year and triennial
reports are due in February, those brokers who receive their licenses
in 2021, 2022, and 2023 will only be required to complete continuing
education beginning on February 1, 2024, the next reporting year.\46\
Similarly, brokers who receive licenses in 2024, 2025, and 2026 would
not need to pursue continuing education until after their first report
is due in 2027.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ Entities holding corporate, association, or partnership
licenses must employ at least one individual broker, who would be
required to comply with the rule. See 19 CFR 111.11(a) and (b).
\45\ 2021 is triennial reporting year. The CBP Broker Management
Branch anticipates that the number of active, individual customs
brokers could decrease by approximately 600-1,000 in May-July of
2021 as brokers choose not to renew or to voluntarily suspend their
licenses. This number would be partially offset by new, individual
customs brokers applying for licenses after passing the broker exam,
which is held bi-annually.
\46\ Triennial reports are due in February. Therefore, all those
brokers who receive licenses in 2021, 2022, and 2023 will submit
their first triennial reports in February of 2024 and would then
need to complete 36 hours of training before the triennial report is
due in February of 2027.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP approves approximately 600 new licenses per year, although the
number of licenses added annually has been decreasing since 2015. See
Table 2 for a summary of licensing history for the previous six years.
[[Page 50811]]
Table 2--Licensing History From 2015-2020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total licenses Corporate Individual
Year \47\ licenses licenses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015............................................................ 770 16 754
2016............................................................ 653 21 632
2017............................................................ 580 16 564
2018............................................................ 558 27 531
2019............................................................ 464 15 449
2020 \48\....................................................... 187 7 180
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 3,212 102 3,110
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on an average rate of decline of 12 percent in the number of
individual licenses issued, CBP would likely issue 1,754 new individual
licenses over a 6-year period of analysis from 2021-2026 (see Table 3),
though not all of those license holders would be required to complete
continuing education during the 6-year period of analysis. Each of
these new individual license holders would need to comply with the
terms of the proposed rule once it is in effect and they have completed
their first triennial report. All 13,822 individual brokers active at
the time the rule is implemented would be required to complete
continuing education from February 1, 2021-February 1, 2024.\49\ In
2024, the 1,045 individual brokers who CBP projects would receive
licenses from 2021-2023 would need to begin complying with the terms of
the proposed rule. Brokers who receive licenses in 2024-2026 would not
need to comply with the proposed rule until after their first triennial
reporting cycle, which would fall outside of the period of analysis. In
total, therefore, CBP estimates that 14,867 brokers would be required
to abide by the rule in the six years from 2021 to 2026.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ CBP sometimes issues licenses that are later suspended or
terminated (either voluntarily or as a penalty). This table includes
all licenses issued in these years that remain active as of 2021, as
only holders of an active license would need to abide by the terms
of the rule.
\48\ The number of licenses applied for and issued in 2020 was
significantly lower than in previous years due to the effects of the
COVID-19 pandemic and related closures and delays. CBP excluded this
year from calculations of growth rates due to its anomalous nature.
2021 may also be affected similarly, but CBP cannot predict to what
extent.
\49\ The exact timing of the requirement will vary depending on
when the final rule goes into effect, and the requirement will be
prorated based on the time left until the triennial report is due.
For the purposes of this analysis, we estimate the costs for the
hypothetical period from 2021-2027.
Table 3--Projected Licenses Issued from 2021-2026
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New licenses
Year Total licenses Corporate Individual affected by
issued licenses licenses the rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................ 408 13 394 0
2022............................................ 358 12 346 0
2023............................................ 315 10 304 0
2024............................................ 276 9 267 1,045
2025............................................ 243 8 235 0
2026............................................ 213 7 206 0
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 1,812 59 1,754 1,045
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Although the majority of active individual brokers would be
required to complete continuing education under the proposed rule,
feedback from the broker community indicates that many brokers already
complete the amount of continuing education that would satisfy this
requirement.\50\ Many companies that employ brokers provide and require
in-house training and continuing education. Both independent brokers
and brokers employed by brokerages often attend government-sponsored
webinars, as well as trade conferences and symposia, which would
qualify as continuing education under the terms of the proposed rule.
Many brokers also pursue professional certifications like the National
Customs Brokers and Freight Forwarders Association of America's
(NCBFAA) Certified Customs Specialist (CCS) and Certified Export
Specialist (CES).\51\ Under the baseline, or the world as it is now,
these brokers likely would be in compliance with the proposed rule and,
assuming similar activities if a continuing education requirement is
imposed, would not incur new costs under the new requirements, except
for new reporting costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ Feedback was provided in the form of public comments on the
ANPRM. Additional feedback was provided in various meetings and
discussions between CBP personnel and customs brokers, as well as at
trade conferences and meetings of the Task Force for Continuing
Education for Licensed Customs Brokers, a part of the COAC. See
II.E. Development of the Proposed Continuing Broker Education
Requirement, above.
\51\ We included both brokers qualifying as CCS and CES in our
analysis as the coursework for both has significant overlap and is
relevant to customs business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall, CBP estimates that approximately 60 percent of individual
brokers already pursue continuing education and would be in compliance
with the rule.\52\ CBP bases this estimation on several factors. First,
the NCBFAA estimates that approximately 4,456 brokers hold a CCS or CES
in 2020, representing 29 percent of total
[[Page 50812]]
individual brokers.\53\ In order to maintain these professional
certifications, these brokers are required to earn 20 continuing
education credits per year.\54\ Additionally, public comments in
response to the ANPRM, as well as discussions between CBP and various
broker organizations, indicate that most large businesses employing
brokers already provide, and often mandate, internal training and
continuing education. Based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau,
approximately 61 percent of those employed within the Freight
Transportation Arrangement Industry (North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code 448510) are not employed by small
businesses. A small business within the Freight Transportation
Arrangement Industry is defined as one whose annual receipts are less
than $16.5 million, regardless of the number of employees.\55\ Table 4
shows the receipts per firm, in millions of dollars, for firms
employing each number of employees.\56\ The average firm within
Categories 7 and 9 has annual receipts of greater than $16.5 million
and is considered a large business. These firms employ 161,463 people,
or approximately 61 percent of the total employees in the industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ CBP requested information about the proportion of
individual brokers already complying with the rule in the ANPRM.
Although CBP did not receive specific information in the public
comments, several commenters said they would be compliant and
believed that significant numbers of other brokers would be as well.
Many also noted that their companies require their broker employees
to complete continuing education.
\53\ Discussion with officials at the NCBFAA on April 5, 2021.
This includes brokers renewing their certification in 2020, as well
as those becoming certified for the first time. The CCS
certification program requires enough hours of continuing education
to comply with the terms of the proposed rule and the NCBFAA has
expressed interest in becoming an accredited provider.
\54\ See National Customs Brokers & Forwarders Association of
America, Inc., CES FAQs, available at https://www.ncbfaa.org/Scripts/4Disapi.dll/4DCGI/cms/review.html?Action=CMS_Document&DocID=13806&MenuKey=education (last
accessed on July 2, 2021); National Customs Brokers & Forwarders
Association of America, Inc., CCS FAQs, available at https://www.ncbfaa.org/Scripts/4Disapi.dll/4DCGI/cms/review.html?Action=CMS_Document&DocID=13803&MenuKey=education (last
accessed on July 2, 2021).
\55\ Small business size standards are defined in 13 CFR 121.
\56\ United States Census Bureau, ``2017 County Business
Patterns and 2017 Economic Census,'' Released March 6, 2020, https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/econ/susb/2017-susb-annual.html.
Accessed March 15, 2021.
\57\ Note that some of the categories are sums of other
categories. For example, Category 8, <500, is a sum of Categories 2,
3, 4, 6, and 7. Thus, Categories 7 and 9 are not consecutive, but
represent all firms employing 100 or more people.
\58\ The Survey of U.S. Businesses (SUSB) from which this data
is taken is conducted in years ending in 2 and 7. Note that
finalized results from the 2017 survey are scheduled for release in
May of 2021.
Table 4--Small Businesses in the Freight Transportation Arrangement Industry
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary
Number of receipts (all Receipts per
Employment size \57\ employees firms, firm ($) Small business?
$1,000s) \58\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01: Total.............................. 265,192 67,276,572 4,454,222 .......................
02: <5................................. 15,939 6,315,166 708,614 Yes.
03: 5-9................................ 18,025 5,392,992 1,974,732 Yes.
04: 10-19.............................. 20,288 5,870,163 3,851,813 Yes.
05: <20................................ 54,252 17,578,321 1,335,029 Yes.
06: 20-99.............................. 49,477 13,973,780 10,397,158 Yes.
07: 100-499............................ 44,715 10,886,028 30,493,076 No.
08: <500............................... 148,444 42,438,129 2,854,327 Yes.
09: 500+............................... 116,748 24,838,443 105,247,640 No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given the proportion of brokers working for larger businesses, the
feedback on the ANPRM indicating high rates of compliance, the
proportion of brokers pursing certifications, and input from CBP
subject matter experts who frequently interact with the broker
community, CBP estimates that approximately 60 percent of individual
brokers are already in compliance with the requirements of the proposed
rule and would not face new costs, assuming a continuing level of
similar activity, aside from recordkeeping and reporting, as a result
of the rule's implementation. Based on the likely proportion of brokers
already in compliance, CBP estimates that 5,947 affected brokers, or
approximately 40 percent, would need to come into compliance with the
proposed rule over a 6-year period of analysis (see Table 5). We
request comment on our assumption that 60 percent of brokers already
spend at least 36 hours per 3-year period on continuing education and
that the remaining 40 percent of brokers would need to increase their
training by the full 36 hours triennially to meet the proposed
requirement.
Table 5--Projection of Brokers Affected by the Proposed Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total licensed
Year Total licenses Proportion in brokers
compliance (%) affected
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ 13,822 60 5,529
2022............................................................ 13,822 60 5,529
2023............................................................ 13,822 60 5,529
2024............................................................ 14,867 60 5,947
2025............................................................ 14,867 60 5,947
2026............................................................ 14,867 60 5,947
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 14,867 .............. 5,947
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although individual brokers are the primary party affected by the
terms of the proposed rule, the rule would also have an impact on CBP,
providers of continuing education, and the bodies who accredit
continuing education. Each party would see both costs and benefits
under the proposed rule.
[[Page 50813]]
5. Costs of the Rule
i. To Brokers
The primary cost to individual brokers upon implementation of the
rule would be those costs associated with finding and attending 36
hours of continuing education over a 3-year period. These costs include
time spent researching reputable and relevant trainings, travel and
incidental expenses to attend in-person events like conferences, and
the tuition or fees for the courses themselves. Many brokers might
satisfy the continuing education requirement with training supplied by
their employers. Other brokers, particularly those self-employed or
employed by small businesses, would need to seek external training. For
external training, brokers may attend free webinars, seminars, and
trade events sponsored by CBP, other government agencies, and various
related organizations like local freight forwarder and broker
associations.\59\ Alternatively, brokers might choose paid trainings,
conferences, or symposia, or seek certifications offered by trade
organizations or educational institutions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ For example, the Florida Customs Broker and Forwarders
Association offers both paid and free events. Information on CBP-
hosted webinars can be found at https://www.cbp.gov/trade/stakeholder-engagement/webinars. Many other government agencies also
provide webinars on trade-related topics. For example, in 2020, the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) hosted a series of webinars on
the importation of medical devices in light of the COVID-19
pandemic. See https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/workshops-conferences-medical-devices/webinar-series-respirators-and-other-personal-protective-equipment-ppe-health-care-personnel-use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP does not know exactly which option each individual broker is
likely to choose. Many brokers already hold certifications, attend
webinars, and fulfill internal training requirements, though they may
need to increase the number of hours completed to comply with the
proposed rule. Therefore, CBP has estimated a range of costs. Some
brokers would fulfill their proposed continuing education requirements
with only free trainings. Others would follow a medium-cost path by
opting for a mix of free, lower-cost, and internal trainings. CBP
further assumes that brokers electing the medium-cost path would travel
to attend one major conference or symposium in-person per year.
Finally, some would meet requirements by completing only paid courses
representing the highest-cost offerings. CBP assumes that brokers
choosing the higher-cost option would travel to attend an average of
two conferences per year.
There are several organizations that provide continuing education
for customs brokers, ranging from regional broker associations to
national entities, such as the American Association of Exporters and
Importers (AAEI). Continuing education that qualifies under the terms
of the proposed rule includes webinars, seminars, and trade
conferences. The hourly cost of such trainings (excluding free events
provided by government agencies and other organizations) usually ranges
from around $25 to $70. Fees are often tiered based on membership of
the hosting organization. Members of an organization may pay $25 while
non-members pay $45. CBP cannot predict which organizations would seek
accreditation for their events, although all free webinars and
trainings hosted by Federal government agencies would be automatically
accredited. Therefore, we assume that the average hourly monetary cost
would range from $0.00 (low) to $30 (medium) to $50 (high). This
assumption is based on current fees charged for various continuing
education certifications, webinars, and trade conferences.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ CBP does not have information on the cost for an employer
to provide training internally, although such information was
requested in the ANPRM. CBP believes the cost for internal training
would be closer to that of attending external trainings as a member,
since member fees are likely much closer to base cost of provision
than non-member fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to fees, individual brokers would need to spend some
time in researching relevant and accredited trainings. CBP assumes that
a broker would spend approximately three hours finding and registering
for continuing education during every triennial period. Many individual
brokers are members of both local and national organizations that
provide continuing education opportunities and would likely be notified
of opportunities via newsletters or listservs. Other individual brokers
would need to spend some time finding and verifying accreditation for
qualifying events. All individual brokers would spend some time
registering for events. Based on an average fully-loaded wage rate of
$31.27, the process of researching and registering for trainings would
cost brokers approximately $2.61 per credit hour.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ Wage rate source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Occupational Employment Statistics, ``May 2019 National Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates, United States.'' Updated March 31,
2020. Available at https://www.bls.gov/oes/2019/may/oes_nat.htm.
Accessed June 12, 2020; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer
Costs for Employee Compensation. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation Historical Listing March 2004-December 2019, ``Table 3.
Civilian workers, by occupational group: employer costs per hours
worked for employee compensation and costs as a percentage of total
compensation, 2004-2019.'' March 2020. Available at https://www.bls.gov/web/ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2020. The wages
are in 2019 dollars and CBP assumes an annual growth rate of 0
percent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Many individual brokers also travel to attend trade conferences
each year. CBP assumes that those brokers electing the lower-cost
options would forgo travel and either attend virtually (paying only the
fee) or not attend at all. CBP assumes that brokers in the medium-cost
tier would travel to attend one conference each year, while brokers in
the high-cost tier would travel to attend two conferences.\62\ Tuition
and fees for conferences, broken down into an hourly rate, are already
accounted for in the average costs of $30-$50 per hour. Traveling to
attend a single 3-day conference costs approximately $245 in airfare,
$288 for lodging, and $165 for meals and incidentals, for a total of
$698 for one conference or $1,396 for two conferences (see Table
6).\63\ Spread across 36 hours of training, travel costs account for an
additional $19.39 per hour (medium) or $38.78 per hour (high).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\62\ Some individual brokers would pay for their travel out of
pocket, while other would have their travel expenses covered by
their employers.
\63\ CBP bases these costs off the average price of a domestic
flight in 2019 (flight prices in 2020 were not used due to the
disruptions caused by COVID-19 cancellations), and the General
Services Administration's per diem cost for lodging and meals and
incidentals. Source for flight costs: The Bureau of Transportation
Statistics, ``Average Domestic Airline Itinerary Fares,'' https://www.transtats.bts.gov/AverageFare/. Accessed April 13, 2021. Source
for per diem costs: U.S. General Services Administration, ``Per Diem
Rates,'' https://www.gsa.gov/travel/plan-book/per-diem-rates.
Accessed April 13, 2021.
[[Page 50814]]
Table 6--Travel and Incidental Costs To Attend In-Person Events
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost General cost Low Medium High
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation.................................. $245 0 $245 $490
Hotel........................................... 288 0 288 576
Meals & Incidentals............................. 165 0 165 330
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 698 0 698 1,396
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall, as a result of the rule, a single broker would likely
incur monetary costs ranging from $31.27 (low) to $624 (medium) to
$1,097 (high) per year to complete 36 hours of continuing education in
a 3-year period. Over a 6-year period of analysis, these costs sum to
$188 (low), $3,744 (medium), or $6,580 (high). See Table 7 for a
summary of these costs.
Table 7--Annual Costs for One Broker
[2021 U.S. dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low Medium High
Year Hours \64\ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs \65\ Total Costs Total Costs Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021......................................................... 12 $2.61 $31.27 $52 $624 $91 $1,097
2022......................................................... 12 2.61 31.27 52 624 91 1,097
2023......................................................... 12 2.61 31.27 52 624 91 1,097
2024......................................................... 12 2.61 31.27 52 624 91 1,097
2025......................................................... 12 2.61 31.27 52 624 91 1,097
2026......................................................... 12 2.61 31.27 52 624 91 1,097
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................... 72 15.64 188 312 3,744 548 6,580
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
There were 13,822 active individual brokers in 2021. CBP
estimates that a total of 5,947 would be required to begin to complete
continuing education under the terms of the rule in the 6-year period
of analysis, based on a current estimated compliance rate of 60 percent
(see Historical and Projected Populations Affected by the Rule, above).
Therefore, CBP estimates that brokers would incur costs related to
searching for training, fees, travel, and incidentals, ranging from
$1,076,537 (low) to $21,480,353 (medium) to $37,752,913 (high) over the
6-year period of analysis. See Table 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\64\ Individual brokers may complete whatever number of hours
they prefer during each year, so long as it totals 36 hours in 3
years. CBP designates 12 hours per year both for ease of
presentation and to account for pro-rating for individual brokers
who re-activate their licenses within the triennial period.
\65\ Costs include tuition/fees, travel costs, and research time
costs for each level.
Table 8--Annual Training Costs for Individual Broker License Holders
[2021 U.S. dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low Medium High
Year Brokers \66\ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021.................................... 5,529 $31.27 $172,886 $624 $3,449,621 $1,097 $6,062,901
2022.................................... 5,529 31.27 172,886 624 3,449,621 1,097 6,062,901
2023.................................... 5,529 31.27 172,886 624 3,449,621 1,097 6,062,901
2024.................................... 5,947 31.27 185,960 624 3,710,497 1,097 6,521,404
2025.................................... 5,947 31.27 185,960 624 3,710,497 1,097 6,521,404
2026.................................... 5,947 31.27 185,960 624 3,710,497 1,097 6,521,404
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 5,947 188 1,076,537 3,744 21,480,353 6,580 37,752,913
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
[[Page 50815]]
To create a primary estimate, CBP assumes that approximately one
third of individual brokers would elect the lowest cost path, one third
would elect the medium-cost path, and one third would elect the highest
cost path once the rule is in place. Under these conditions, brokers
who begin pursuing continuing education as a result of the rule would
face $20,103,267 in costs related to searching for training, fees,
travel, and incidentals over the 6-year period of analysis. See Table
9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\66\ Only the 40 percent of brokers who do not already complete
continuing education would face these costs. The total number of
brokers affected in the final year of analysis (2026) is the same as
the number of brokers overall because each year represents the same
population with a small amount of growth.
Table 9--Primary Estimate of Costs for Brokers
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brokers
Year Total brokers choosing each Total cost
path
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ 5,529 1,843 $3,228,469
2022............................................................ 5,529 1,843 3,228,469
2023............................................................ 5,529 1,843 3,228,469
2024............................................................ 5,947 1,982 3,472,620
2025............................................................ 5,947 1,982 3,472,620
2026............................................................ 5,947 1,982 3,472,620
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 5,947 1,982 20,103,267
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
All individual brokers, including those who already complete
continuing education and would not face new costs for research,
tuition, and travel, would also be required to store records of their
completed continuing education and report their compliance to CBP.\67\
Record storage would require maintaining either paper or digital copies
of any documentation received from the provider or host of the
qualifying continuing broker education and a document of some kind
listing the date, title, provider, number of credit hours, and location
(if applicable) for each training. To report and certify compliance,
individual brokers who file paper-based triennial reports with CBP
would include a written statement in the triennial report, and
individual brokers who file their triennial reports electronically
through the eCBP portal would check a box in the eCBP portal while
filing their triennial report electronically. Brokers would further be
required to produce their records of compliance if requested by CBP,
though CBP would only require brokers to maintain their records for the
three years following the submission of the triennial report.\68\ CBP
estimates that recordkeeping and reporting would take each broker 30
minutes (0.5 hours) per year. After the first triennial reporting
period in which brokers self-attest to completing their training, 10
percent of brokers each year would incur the cost of producing records
to submit to CBP for a compliance audit, which CBP estimates will take
15 minutes (0.25 hours).\69\ Therefore, brokers would see $1,380,538 in
new reporting and recordkeeping costs over the 6-year period of
analysis. See Table 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\67\ Some brokers would likely face additional time-costs should
they fail to complete and/or report their required continuing
education and need to take corrective action or reapply for their
licenses following revocation (see proposed Sec. 111.104(d) for
details). However, CBP only reports the costs affected populations
would face to maintain compliance with the proposed rule.
\68\ Note that many other records must be maintained for five
years. The 3-year standard applies only to records of continuing
education.
\69\ CBP would randomly select 10 percent of individual brokers
to audit for compliance each year.
Table 10--Reporting Costs for All Brokers
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time (hours)
Year Brokers \70\ Wage Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................ 13,822 0.5 $31.27 $216,107
2022............................................ 13,822 0.5 31.27 216,107
2023............................................ 13,822 0.5 31.27 216,107
2024............................................ 14,867 0.5-0.75 31.27 244,072
2025............................................ 14,867 0.5-0.75 31.27 244,072
2026............................................ 14,867 0.5-0.75 31.27 244,072
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 14,867 3.0-3.75 .............. 1,380,538
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
To comply with the proposed rule, individual brokers who do not
already do so would be required to spend 36 hours over three years
completing continuing education in whatever form they choose.
Additionally, CBP estimates they would spend three hours per 3-year
cycle researching and registering for trainings. Finally, brokers would
need to spend about 30-45 minutes (0.5-0.75 hours) on recordkeeping
during each cycle. Overall, brokers would need to spend about 40.5
hours over a 3-year period,
[[Page 50816]]
or 81 hours over a 6-year period of analysis, to comply with the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\70\ Note that only 10 percent of individual brokers would spend
45 minutes per year, while the remaining 90 percent would spend 30
minutes per year. Furthermore, CBP would only begin audits after the
first triennial period during which the rule is in effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some brokers would choose to complete their trainings outside of
work hours, while others would complete training as part of their
assigned duties. Brokers would also spend time in researching,
registering for, and maintaining records of their continuing education,
for a total of 12 hours per year of training plus 1.5 to 1.75 hours per
year in research and recordkeeping. Based on the average wage rate for
brokers of $31.27, the opportunity cost of researching, registering
for, attending, and reporting continuing education is approximately
$14,547,191 over the 6-year period of analysis.\71\ See Table 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\71\ U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Employment
Statistics, ``May 2019 National Occupational Employment and Wage
Estimates, United States.'' Updated March 31, 2020. Available at
https://www.bls.gov/oes/2019/may/oes_nat.htm. Accessed June 12,
2020; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation. Employer Costs for Employee Compensation Historical
Listing March 2004-December 2019, ``Table 3. Civilian workers, by
occupational group: Employer costs per hours worked for employee
compensation and costs as a percentage of total compensation, 2004-
2019.'' March 2020. Available at https://www.bls.gov/web/ecec/ececqrtn.pdf. Accessed June 12, 2020. The wages are in 2019 dollars
and CBP assumes an annual growth rate of 0 percent.
Table 11--Summary of Opportunity Cost for Brokers
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Brokers Hours Wage rate Cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................ 5,529 13.5 $31.27 $2,333,955
2022............................................ 5,529 13.5 31.27 2,333,955
2023............................................ 5,529 13.5 31.27 2,333,955
2024............................................ 5,947 13.5 31.27 2,515,108
2025............................................ 5,947 13.5 31.27 2,515,108
2026............................................ 5,947 13.5 31.27 2,515,108
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 5,947 81 187.62 14,547,191
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Total costs for all individual brokers, including tuition and
travel expenses for those who must begin continuing education regimens
because of the rule as well as opportunity and reporting costs for all
brokers, range from $16,452,050 to $53,128,426. The primary estimate,
which accounts for one third of brokers choosing each cost tier, comes
to $35,478,781 over the 6-year period of analysis. See Table 12.
Table 12--Total Costs for All Brokers
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total cost: Total cost:
Year Total cost: medium Total cost: primary
low estimate estimate high estimate estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................ $2,636,505 $5,913,241 $8,526,520 $5,692,089
2022............................................ 2,636,505 5,913,241 8,526,520 5,692,089
2023............................................ 2,636,505 5,913,241 8,526,520 5,692,089
2024............................................ 2,847,512 6,372,048 9,182,956 6,134,172
2025............................................ 2,847,512 6,372,048 9,182,956 6,134,172
2026............................................ 2,847,512 6,372,048 9,182,956 6,134,172
Total....................................... 16,452,050 36,855,867 53,128,426 35,478,781
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
ii. To CBP
To implement the requirements of the proposed rule, CBP would need
to designate entities or companies as approved accreditors of customs
broker continuing education. To do so, CBP would solicit applications
from parties interested in becoming accreditors, or (following the
first application cycle) accreditors seeking renewal of their status,
by publishing a Request for Proposal (RFP).\72\ A panel of CBP experts
would evaluate the applications and select the entities approved or
renewed as accreditors. CBP estimates that the process of developing
and submitting the RFP would take two personnel 10 hours. Application
evaluation would take a further 40 hours and would require four CBP
personnel. The process of designating accreditors would occur before
the continuing education requirements went into effect, to allow
accreditors to be ready for the rule's implementation and ensure equal
footing for all providers.\73\ However, because of uncertainty over
timing of the rule's implementation, we assumed that designation of
accreditors would occur in the first year of the period of analysis.
Regardless of when the rule goes into effect and the designation
process occurs, accreditors and CBP would need to complete the process
two times in a 6-year period. Overall, designation of accreditors would
require six CBP personnel 180 hours total, twice in a 6-year period of
analysis, for a cost to CBP of $26,640 (see Table 13).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\72\ See proposed 19 CFR 111.103(c).
\73\ See section IV.E.1. of this NPRM.
[[Page 50817]]
Table 13--Costs to CBP To Designate Accreditors
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Personnel for Personnel for
Year RFP evaluation Wage rate Hours Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................ 2 4 $74.00 50 $13,320
2022............................ 0 0 74.00 0 0
2023............................ 0 0 74.00 0 0
2024............................ 2 4 74.00 50 13,320
2025............................ 0 0 74.00 0 0
2026............................ 0 0 74.00 0 0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 26,640
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
CBP's Broker Management Branch (BMB) would also face the costs of
auditing for compliance with the continuing education requirement.
Although individual brokers would self-attest to their completion of
the continuing education requirement with each triennial report, CBP
would occasionally conduct compliance audits by randomly selecting a
certain subset of brokers for auditing. To start, CBP would select 10
percent of brokers per year, although the audits would only cover the
continuing education reported for the most recently completed triennial
cycle. A continuing education compliance audit would involve CBP
personnel reviewing the reported coursework of the selected broker and
potentially working with brokers to identify gaps or higher quality
training opportunities. Such an activity would take approximately one
hour, on average; therefore, CBP estimates that each compliance audit
would cost CBP approximately $74.00. For the first three years of the
period of analysis, no compliance audit would take place because
brokers would not yet have reported their training at the end of the
first triennial cycle. Over the next three years, CBP would select 10
percent of active individual brokers to audit.\74\ With about 1,500
compliance audits performed per year, costs to CBP would amount to
$330,054 over the 6-year period of analysis. See Table 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\74\ Those individual brokers who have not yet completed a
triennial report since taking their broker exam would be exempt from
completing continuing education until after their first triennial
report and, therefore, would also be exempt from continuing
education audits during that time.
Table 14--Compliance Auditing Costs for CBP
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Audits Cost per audit Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ 0 $74 $0
2022............................................................ 0 74 0
2023............................................................ 0 74 0
2024............................................................ 1,487 74 110,018
2025............................................................ 1,487 74 110,018
2026............................................................ 1,487 74 110,018
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 4,460 444 330,054
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
iii. To Accreditors
Accrediting bodies interested in becoming designated accreditors
for customs brokers continuing education under the terms of proposed
rule would need to apply to CBP during an open RFP period and then re-
apply to confirm their status every three years. Costs to respond to
the RFP include only the preparation of the application. Overall, CBP
estimates that the preparation of an application to CBP to become an
accreditor would take two employees 40 hours, to be completed two times
in a 6-year period. Although the application for accreditor status
would likely be completed before the proposed rule is officially in
effect, because of uncertainty in the timing, we have used the same
period of analysis.\75\ Regardless of when the rule goes into effect,
accreditor-applicants would need to apply twice in a 6-year period.
Therefore, CBP estimates that CBP-designated accreditors would incur
approximately $11,339 in costs over a 6-year period of analysis. See
Table 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\75\ When the proposed rule is first implemented, CBP would
allow accreditor-applicants time to apply before the requirement is
officially in place so that they are able to accredit courses as
soon as the rule is in effect, allowing providers equal footing and
giving brokers the largest pool of potential training.
Table 15--Costs to Accreditors
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Personnel Wage rate Hours Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................ 2 $70.87 40 $5,670
2022............................................ 0 70.87 0 0
2023............................................ 0 70.87 0 0
[[Page 50818]]
2024............................................ 2 70.87 40 5,670
2025............................................ 0 70.87 0 0
2026............................................ 0 70.87 0 0
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... .............. .............. .............. 11,339
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
iv. To Providers
Providers of continuing education would also face new costs under
the terms of the proposed rule. Specifically, providers would need to
submit applications to accreditors to have their coursework or events
accredited. Officials at the NCBFAA Education Institute estimate that
they currently approve approximately 1,000 courses per year. With the
proposed rule in place, CBP believes the number of events submitted for
accreditation would increase substantially because companies' internal
trainings and external offerings would need to be accredited.
Therefore, CBP estimated that about 2,000 courses would require
accreditation each year. Providers would likely pay a fee and would
need to renew their accreditation annually to ensure their coursework
remains up to date. The fee for accreditation is likely to vary based
on accreditor, but would likely average $25.\76\ Overall, CBP estimates
that providers of continuing education for customs brokers would face
$300,000 of new costs over a 6-year period of analysis. See Table 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\76\ This fee is based on that charged by the NCBFAA. Although
CBP sought information in the ANPRM on how much accreditors might
charge, CBP did not receive specific information.
Table 16--Costs to Providers
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Courses Fee Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ 2,000 $25.00 $50,000
2022............................................................ 2,000 25.00 50,000
2023............................................................ 2,000 25.00 50,000
2024............................................................ 2,000 25.00 50,000
2025............................................................ 2,000 25.00 50,000
2026............................................................ 2,000 25.00 50,000
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... .............. .............. 300,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Based on the primary estimate, costs total $36,146,814 over the 6-
year period of analysis. Using a three percent discount rate, the
annualized total costs are $6,012,425. See Table 17 for an annual
breakdown and Table 18 for discounting.
Table 17--Total Costs to All Parties
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs to
brokers-- Costs to Costs to Costs to CBP--
Year primary accreditors providers accrediting Total costs
estimate and auditing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................ $5,692,089 $5,670 $50,000 $13,320 $5,761,078
2022............................ 5,692,089 0 50,000 0 5,742,089
2023............................ 5,692,089 0 50,000 0 5,742,089
2024............................ 6,134,172 5,670 50,000 123,338 6,313,179
2025............................ 6,134,172 0 50,000 110,018 6,294,190
2026............................ 6,134,172 0 50,000 110,018 6,294,190
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 35,478,781 11,339 300,000 356,694 36,146,814
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
[[Page 50819]]
Table 18--Discounted Total Costs
[2021 U.S. dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3% 7%
-------------------------------------------------------------------
PV AV PV AV
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs....................................... $32,570,459 $6,012,425 $28,584,851 $5,996,982
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Costs Not Estimated in This Analysis
The parties affected by the proposed rule would also face several,
mostly minor costs that CBP is unable to quantify. To provide
individual brokers who choose to file their triennial report
electronically through the eCBP portal the ability to self-attest to
their continuing education completion, CBP would need to include a
field within the triennial report, which is submitted via the eCBP
portal. The programming to include this field does not add
significantly to the application development budget as CBP constantly
makes small changes to many aspects of CBP's authorized electronic data
interchanges.
Additionally, some potential accreditors may face costs related to
protesting CBP's initial decisions regarding their proposals to become
accreditors.\77\ Accreditor-applicants would have the right to protest
in accordance with procedures set out in the FAR. CBP expects these
costs to be minor and protests to be rare. Brokers' clients may see
slight price increases for broker services. As broker costs increase,
they may pass some of these costs onto their clients in the form of
increased prices. However, CBP believes that the per transaction
increase in prices would be so small as to be insignificant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\77\ See section IV.E.1. of this NPRM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Benefits of the Rule
This proposed rule, if finalized, would have many benefits to
brokers, CBP, and the general public. We are able to estimate some of
the benefits of the proposed rule, but many others are qualitative in
nature. Brokers would benefit from improved reputation and a
professionalization of the customs broker community while their clients
would benefit from better performance and improved compliance. The
continuing broker education requirement would provide importers and
drawback claimants with greater assurance that their agents are
knowledgeable of customs laws and regulations, familiar with
operational processes, and can properly exercise a broker's fiduciary
duties. The requirements would also help maintain a measure of
consistency across all customs brokers. Providers would benefit from
increased prestige due to CBP-approved accreditation. Other benefits of
the proposed rule are quantitative.
CBP would benefit from a reduction in regulatory audits of broker
compliance. Both CBP and brokers would benefit from fewer errors
committed by brokers and fewer penalties assessed by CBP. CBP examined
data on broker penalties, regulatory audits, and validation activities
between a group of companies who employ one or more individual brokers
known to voluntarily hold an industry certification that requires
meeting the proposed continuing education requirement and the broader
population of brokers (which includes those who voluntarily complete
continuing education and those who do not). This group of brokers with
continuing education represents about 300 companies, which make up 54
percent of entries filed between 2017 and 2020 and 51 percent of
entries filed between 2015 and 2020. CBP found that at the 99 percent
confidence level, there is a statistically significant difference
between these groups. Those who voluntarily hold this certification and
complete continuing education have significantly lower rates of
penalties, audits, and validation activities. See Table 19.\78\ Brokers
who are not known to have continuing education are assessed 11 times as
many penalties per entry filing, are audited 8 times as often, and have
5 times as many validation activities performed by CBP to investigate
discrepancies when compared to companies that are known to employ
brokers who voluntarily take continuing education.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\78\ Source of data of companies with at least one individual
broker with continuing education: Data received from NCBFAA on
companies participating in its broker certification program on April
28, 2021. Data on enforcement actions and the number of entries per
company was obtained from ACE on April 11, 2021.
Table 19--Enforcement Action Rate for Different Groups
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By 300
By all other companies with
Enforcement action Total companies (%) continuing Ratio
education (%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Penalty......................................... 267 0.00039 0.000035 11 to 1
Regulatory Audit................................ 87 0.000077 0.000011 8 to 1
Validation Activity............................. 311 0.00026 0.000052 5 to 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Rates are defined as the number of enforcement actions divided by the number of entries filed.
[[Page 50820]]
Aside from penalties, CBP enforcement often takes the form of a
regulatory audit. Regulatory audits usually occur because a CBP Officer
or Import Specialist flags unusual or suspicious activity. CBP then
performs a regulatory audit of the broker's activity, investigating the
potential infraction, as well as the broker's overall compliance with
regulations, rules, and CBP guidance. These audits may lead to a
settlement agreement in which a penalty is assessed, but they more
often lead to discussion between the broker and CBP as to how the
broker can improve compliance and performance. With continuing
education in place, CBP believes that fewer regulatory audits would be
necessary. From 2015 to 2020, CBP performed 84 regulatory audits of
broker compliance, for an average of 14 per year.\79\ The number of
audits holds approximately steady across the 5-year period, so CBP does
not believe it likely that the number of audits would grow in the
period of analysis. Therefore, CBP projects 84 audits would be
performed during the 6-year period of analysis under baseline
conditions, or 14 each year. See Table 20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\79\ Data provided by CBP's Regulatory Audit and Agency Advisory
Services Directorate on April 11, 2021.
Table 20--Projection of Audits and Broker Surveys Under the Baseline
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Audits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021.................................................... 14
2022.................................................... 14
2023.................................................... 14
2024.................................................... 14
2025.................................................... 14
2026.................................................... 14
---------------
Total............................................... 84
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP estimates that a regulatory audit of broker compliance takes
CBP approximately 559 hours, on average. Based on the average wage rate
for a CBP Trade and Revenue employee of $74.00 per hour, we estimate
the average broker audit costs $41,351. Based on a review of outcomes
from the audits completed from 2015-2020, approximately 40 percent
would likely have been avoided had a continuing education requirement
been in place. CBP believes that, had customs brokers been required to
complete continuing education on an individual level, and, therefore,
stayed current on the rules and regulations governing customs business,
they would have made fewer errors and avoided the audits. Over a 6-year
period of analysis under the terms of the rule, CBP would avoid 34
audits, for a cost savings of $1,389,400. See Table 21.
Table 21--CBP Cost Savings From Reduced Regulatory Audit Activities
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost savings
Year Audits avoided per audit Total savings
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ 6 $41,351 $231,567
2022............................................................ 6 41,351 231,567
2023............................................................ 6 41,351 231,567
2024............................................................ 6 41,351 231,567
2025............................................................ 6 41,351 231,567
2026............................................................ 6 41,351 231,567
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 34 248,107 1,389,400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
The number of penalties assessed between 2017 and 2020 grew
significantly. In 2017, CBP assessed 20 penalties while in 2020, that
number jumped to 119 (see Table 1, above). Between 2017 and 2020, the
number of penalties issued increased with a compound annual growth rate
(CAGR) of 52 percent. The jump in penalties between 2019 and 2020 is
likely attributable to changes in the AD/CVD environment, and CBP does
not believe that penalties per year would continue to grow at the same
rate. Based on trends before and after the jump, we do not believe that
the number of penalties assessed per year would consistently grow at
any meaningful rate. Based on a 0 percent growth rate, CBP estimates
that over the 6-year period of analysis from 2021 to 2026, CBP would
assess 675 penalties. See Table 22 for an annual count.
Table 22--Projection of Penalties Assessed From 2021-2026 Under the
Baseline
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Penalties
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021.................................................... 113
2022.................................................... 113
2023.................................................... 113
2024.................................................... 113
2025.................................................... 113
2026.................................................... 113
---------------
Total............................................... 675
------------------------------------------------------------------------
When CBP assesses a penalty against a broker for a customs
violation, CBP incurs the cost of detecting and investigating the
violation, as well as determining the appropriate monetary fine and
handling any appeals from the broker. The broker must pay the penalty,
which is capped at $30,000 by statute. CBP also works with brokers
against whom a fine has been assessed to mitigate the penalty,
resulting in the collection of amounts that are usually significantly
lower. From 2017-2020, monetary penalties collected from individual
brokers averaged $2,644. CBP estimates that the entire process of
assessing a penalty against a broker, from detection to working through
mitigation, costs CBP approximately $4,440 per penalty.\80\ With the
proposed rule implemented, CBP believes that brokers would commit
approximately 20 percent fewer penalizable violations.\81\ As a result,
brokers would save approximately $359,640 in fines
[[Page 50821]]
avoided, while CBP would save approximately $599,400 in processing
costs.\82\ See Tables 23 and 24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\80\ CBP bases this estimate on an average of 60 hours worked
per penalty at an average wage of $74.00 per hour for a CBP Trade
and Revenue employee. CBP bases this wage on the FY 2020 salary and
benefits of the national average of CBP Trade and Revenue positions,
which is equal to a GS-13, Step 5. Source: Email correspondence with
CBP's Office of Finance on July 2, 2020.
\81\ Approximately 20 percent of the penalties assessed between
2017 and 2020 were for infractions that CBP believes would have been
avoided had the broker been required to complete continuing
education. The majority of the remaining penalties were for late
filing. Penalty data is taken from SEACATS.
\82\ Penalties are a transfer payment from the broker to CBP
that do not affect total resources available to society.
Accordingly, CBP does not include penalties or penalties avoided in
the final accounting of costs and benefits this rule. In addition,
penalties are an enforcement tool that are intended to bring a
noncompliant party in line with existing requirements. Any costs and
benefits that result from compliance with the underlying requirement
are included in the analysis, but not the enforcement mechanism. In
the same way, if a rule results in the seizure of illegal
merchandise, CBP does not include the cost of the lost merchandise
to the importers.
Table 23--Penalties Avoided by Brokers
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Penalties Fines avoided
Year avoided per penalty Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ 23 $2,664 $59,940
2022............................................................ 23 2,664 59,940
2023............................................................ 23 2,664 59,940
2024............................................................ 23 2,664 59,940
2025............................................................ 23 2,664 59,940
2026............................................................ 23 2,664 59,940
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 135 15,984 359,640
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Table 24--Costs Avoided by CBP
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Penalties Cost savings
Year avoided per penalty Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ 23 $4,440 $99,900
2022............................................................ 23 4,440 99,900
2023............................................................ 23 4,440 99,900
2024............................................................ 23 4,440 99,900
2025............................................................ 23 4,440 99,900
2026............................................................ 23 4,440 99,900
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 135 26,640 599,400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
8. Net Impact of the Rule
The proposed rule would lead to costs for brokers in the form of
tuition, travel expenses, opportunity cost, and time spent researching,
registering for, keeping records of, and reporting continuing
education. CBP would face the costs of designating accreditors and
auditing broker compliance. Accreditors would incur the costs of
responding to a CBP-issued RFP, and education providers would incur the
costs of drafting applications and fees charged by the accreditors for
reviewing their accreditation requests. CBP would also see cost savings
(benefits) from avoided penalty assessment and avoided regulatory
audits. CBP has found that companies employing one or more brokers who
complete continuing education are statistically less likely to face
enforcement actions. Over a 6-year period of analysis, the primary
estimate of the net costs totals $34,158,014 (see Table 25). Using a
discount rate of three percent, annualized costs total $5,680,959 (see
Table 26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\83\ Note that we only include costs of remaining compliant with
the proposed rule in the net costs. Similarly, we do not include
penalties avoided in the final accounting of benefits.
Table 25--Primary Estimate of Net Costs
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Benefits Costs Net costs \83\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ $331,467 $5,761,078 $5,429,611
2022............................................................ 331,467 5,742,089 5,410,622
2023............................................................ 331,467 5,742,089 5,410,622
2024............................................................ 331,467 6,313,179 5,981,713
2025............................................................ 331,467 6,294,190 5,962,723
2026............................................................ 331,467 6,294,190 5,962,723
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 1,988,800 36,146,814 34,158,014
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 50822]]
Table 26--Primary Estimate of Net Present and Annualized Costs
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3% 7%
---------------------------------------------------------------
PV AV PV AV
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Savings......................................... $1,795,619 $331,467 $1,579,949 $331,467
Costs........................................... 32,570,459 6,012,425 28,584,851 5,996,982
---------------------------------------------------------------
Net Costs................................... 30,774,841 5,680,959 27,004,902 5,665,515
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP presents four estimates of the net costs depending on the cost
of training pursued by each individual broker. The low-cost path
assumes the broker would pursue only free trainings and forgo travel.
In the medium-cost path, brokers would pursue a mix of free and paid
trainings and travel to a single conference or in-person event per
year. In the high-cost path, brokers would pursue all paid trainings
and travel to two in-person events or conferences per year. The primary
estimate assumes that one third of brokers would choose each path.
Overall, the quantifiable effects of the proposed rule result in a net,
annualized cost ranging from $2,514,956 to $8,617,817, using a 3
percent discount rate over the 6-year period of analysis. A summary of
net costs under all four estimates presented in the analysis can be
found in Table 27.
Table 27--Summary of Net Costs
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimate Value 3% 7%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary....................................... Net PV.......................... $30,774,841 $27,004,902
Net AV.......................... 5,680,959 5,665,515
Low........................................... Net PV.......................... 13,624,000 11,945,324
Net AV.......................... 2,514,956 2,506,079
Medium........................................ Net PV.......................... 32,016,156 28,094,859
Net AV.......................... 5,910,102 5,894,183
High.......................................... Net PV.......................... 46,684,367 40,974,522
Net AV.......................... 8,617,817 8,596,283
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As stated before, many benefits of the proposed rule are
qualitative. Brokers would benefit from improved reputation and a
professionalization of the customs broker community while their clients
would benefit from better performance, less non-compliance, and
improved outcomes. Providers would benefit from increased prestige due
to CBP-approved accreditation. CBP believes that the combination of
quantified benefits and unquantified benefits exceed the costs of this
rule. We request comment on this conclusion.
9. Analysis of Alternatives
Alternative 1: 72 hours every three years.
Alternative 1 is the same as the chosen alternative except that the
continuing education requirement would be raised to 72 hours each
triennial cycle instead of 36 hours. This alternative is modeled on the
Internal Revenue Service's (IRS) Enrolled Agent program, which requires
72 hours of continuing education every three years.\84\ An enrolled
agent is an individual who may represent clients in matters before the
IRS and, like a licensed customs broker, must pass a rigorous
examination to prove his or her knowledge and competence, making it a
reasonable analog to the proposed CBP program. Once the agent has
passed the exam, he or she has unlimited practice rights, providing he
or she completes the requisite continuing education.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\84\ See Internal Revenue Service, Enrolled Agent Information
(Apr. 6, 2021), available at https://www.irs.gov/tax-professionals/enrolled-agents/enrolled-agent-information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CBP has determined that 72 hours every three years would be
inappropriate for individual brokers. Were CBP to mandate 72 hours of
continuing education every three years, brokers who already voluntarily
pursue continuing education would need to increase the amount of
training they complete, often by 100 percent. Costs incurred by both
brokers who do not already pursue continuing education and those who do
would be much greater. Such a requirement would be too onerous,
particularly for small businesses, which make up a significant
proportion (approximately 39 percent) of the employers of licensed
customs brokers. CBP estimates that such a requirement would cost
brokers up to $113,258,739 over a 6-year period of analysis, or about
$7,618 per broker. See Table 28.
Table 28--Broker Costs Under a 72-Hour Continuing Education Requirement
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low Medium High
Year Brokers -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost Total Cost Total Cost Total
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021.................................... 13,822 $62.54 $518,657 $1,248 $10,348,863 $2,193 $18,188,702
2022.................................... 13,822 62.54 518,657 1,248 10,348,863 2,193 18,188,702
[[Page 50823]]
2023.................................... 13,822 62.54 518,657 1,248 10,348,863 2,193 18,188,702
2024.................................... 14,867 62.54 557,880 1,248 11,131,490 2,193 19,564,211
2025.................................... 14,867 62.54 557,880 1,248 11,131,490 2,193 19,564,211
2026.................................... 14,867 62.54 557,880 1,248 11,131,490 2,193 19,564,211
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 14,867 375 3,229,610 7,487 64,441,059 13,159 113,258,739
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Alternative 2: 36 hours every three years.
Alternative 2 is the chosen alternative.
Alternative 3: CBP list of brokers voluntarily meeting continuing
education standards.
Under Alternative 3, instead of mandating any kind of continuing
education program, CBP would release annually a list of brokerages or
companies employing brokers who voluntarily provide continuing
education to their broker employees. As with Alternative 1, qualifying
events would include internal training, government-sponsored webinars,
trade conferences and events, and other activities. CBP would draft
this list each year by requesting that companies report whether they
provide a continuing education program. CBP might request details from
the company to ensure the training provided meets a certain threshold
for quality and relevance.
Under baseline conditions, CBP estimates that about 60 percent of
brokers already complete continuing education on a voluntary basis. CBP
does not believe that publishing a list of brokerages that provide
continuing education would induce the remaining 40 percent of brokers
to pursue continuing education, though some brokers might do so. Under
Alternative 3, those individual brokers who already complete ongoing
training would continue to do so, while many of those brokers who do
not, would not, absent a mandate, be likely to change. CBP estimates
that an additional five percent of brokers might begin a continuing
education program in order to be included on CBP's list, representing
about 186 additional companies.\85\ While fewer brokers would face the
costs of tuition, travel, and record-keeping, approximately 743 would
face these costs of continuing education over the 6-year period of
analysis. Additionally, CBP would incur the costs of composing the list
each year and companies employing brokers would face the costs of
applying to be included on the list. Assuming two CBP personnel spend
about 40 hours each, annually to compose the list, that one person from
each company spends about 10 hours compiling and submitting information
to CBP annually, and that one third of affected brokers choose each
cost path, Alternative 3 results in costs of $5,636,739 over the 6-year
period of analysis. See Table 29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\85\ CBP assumes that large companies employing more than 100
people already have a continuing education program. Therefore, those
companies that would need to add continuing education in order to be
included on CBP's list would likely be small to medium sized
businesses, meaning there would be a significant number of them,
employing a few brokers each.
Table 29--Total Costs Under Alternative 3
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brokerage
Year CBP cost costs Broker costs Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................ $11,840 $267,605 $293,545 $572,990
2022............................................ 11,840 267,605 695,303 974,748
2023............................................ 11,840 267,605 725,822 1,005,267
2024............................................ 11,840 267,605 748,466 1,027,911
2025............................................ 11,840 267,605 748,466 1,027,911
2026............................................ 11,840 267,605 748,466 1,027,911
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 71,040 1,605,631 3,960,068 5,636,739
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
If only 5 percent more brokers elect to begin continuing education
under the terms of Alternative 3, fewer non-compliance actions would be
avoided. CBP estimates that only an eighth as many penalties and audits
would be avoided as compared to Alternative 2. Therefore, CBP and
brokers would avoid three penalties and one audit annually, for a total
cost savings of $44,955 per year. However, CBP does not typically
include avoided penalties in the overall accounting of costs and
benefits of a rule. Therefore, over a 6-year period of analysis,
Alternative 3 leads to $248,600 in cost savings.
[[Page 50824]]
Table 30--Total Savings Under Alternative 3
[2021 U.S. Dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Savings for Savings for
Year brokers CBP Total savings
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021............................................................ $7,493 $41,433 $41,433
2022............................................................ 7,493 41,433 41,433
2023............................................................ 7,493 41,433 41,433
2024............................................................ 7,493 41,433 41,433
2025............................................................ 7,493 41,433 41,433
2026............................................................ 7,493 41,433 41,433
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 44,955 248,600 248,600
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Totals may not sum due to rounding.
One of the primary goals of the proposed rule is to reduce
compliance issues, penalties, and regulatory audits, and CBP does not
believe that a system based on voluntary reporting would do enough to
reach that goal. With only an additional 5 percent of brokers pursuing
continuing education, Alternative 3 would not do enough to further
professionalize the customs broker community, nor would their clients
see an appreciable decline in compliance issues. Additionally, such a
system would still result in a net cost of about $5.4 million over the
6-year period of analysis. Therefore, CBP believes that Alternative 3
is less preferable than the chosen alternative.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996,
requires agencies to assess the impact of regulations on small
entities. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field
that qualifies as a small business concern per the Small Business Act);
a small organization (defined as any not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field); or
a small governmental jurisdiction (defined as a locality with fewer
than 50,000 people). A small business within the Freight Transportation
Arrangement Industry, the industry that employs customs brokers, is
defined as one whose annual receipts are less than $16.5 million,
regardless of the number of employees.\86\ Data from the U.S. Census
Bureau shows that approximately 96 percent of businesses in the
Transportation Arrangement Industry (NAICS Code 448510) are small
businesses (see Table 31). All businesses employing brokers under this
NAICS Code are affected by this rule. Additionally, some small
businesses may elect to become accreditors or training providers.
Therefore, CBP concludes that this rule will affect a substantial
number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\86\ Small business size standards are defined in 13 CFR part
121.
Table 31--Small Businesses in the Freight Transportation Arrangement Industry \87\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary
Number of receipts (all Receipts per
Employment size \88\ employees firms, firm ($) Small business?
$1,000s) \89\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01: Total............................ 265,192 $67,276,572 $4,454,222
02: <5............................... 15,939 6,315,166 708,614 Yes.
03: 5-9.............................. 18,025 5,392,992 1,974,732 Yes.
04: 10-19............................ 20,288 5,870,163 3,851,813 Yes.
05: <20.............................. 54,252 17,578,321 1,335,029 Yes.
06: 20-99............................ 49,477 13,973,780 10,397,158 Yes.
07: 100-499.......................... 44,715 10,886,028 30,493,076 No.
08: <500............................. 148,444 42,438,129 2,854,327 Yes.
09: 500+............................. 116,748 24,838,443 105,247,640 No.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some small businesses may choose to apply to CBP to become
accreditors. Those businesses would face the costs of applying to CBP,
the potential costs of any protests they choose to file should they
disagree with CBP's decision regarding their proposals, and the costs
of being an accreditor. Small businesses may also choose to become
training providers and to incur the costs of producing and providing
trainings. However, CBP believes that those costs would be recouped by
tuition and fees. CBP further expects any costs not directly covered by
fees to be minor and included in general business expenses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\87\ United States Census Bureau, ``2017 County Business
Patterns and 2017 Economic Census,'' Released March 6, 2020, https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/econ/susb/2017-susb-annual.html.
Accessed March 15, 2021.
\88\ Note that some of the categories are sums of other
categories. For example, Category 8, <500, is a sum of Categories 2,
3, 4, 6, and 7. Thus, Categories 7 and 9 are not consecutive, but
represent all firms employing 100 or more people.
\89\ The Survey of U.S. Businesses (SUSB) from which this data
is taken is conducted in years ending in 2 and 7. Note that
finalized results from the 2017 survey are scheduled for release in
May of 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individual brokers employed by these companies would be required to
attain 36 hours of continuing education every three years under the
terms of the proposed rule. They would also face the opportunity cost
of attending trainings as well as the costs of recordkeeping,
reporting, and participating in any continuing education compliance
audit initiated by CBP. Accordingly, the impacts of the rule to
individual brokers
[[Page 50825]]
and affected businesses will depend on if the broker currently meets
the proposed training requirements. Based on public comments in
response to the ANPRM and discussions between CBP and various broker
organizations, CBP estimates most large businesses employing brokers
already provide, and often mandate, internal training and continuing
education. CBP estimates that these 60 percent of individual brokers
already in compliance would not face new costs aside from recordkeeping
and reporting. CBP estimates the remaining 40 percent of brokers,
mostly at smaller businesses, would need to come into compliance with
the proposed rule. Using the primary estimate under which one third of
brokers selects each cost tier, and assuming a discount rate of 3
percent, the annualized cost of the rule to all affected brokers is
$5,903,336. The rule would affect 5,529 customs brokers in the first
year, for an average annualized cost of $1,068 per broker. The average
annual receipts for small businesses in the Freight Transportation
Arrangement Industry, according to the Census data in Table 28, is
$543,589. The number of brokers employed by each business would vary
among the small businesses in question, but assuming an average of four
brokers per company,\90\ the cost of continuing education for each firm
would be approximately $4,272 annually, or about 0.79 percent of annual
receipts. CBP generally considers effects of less than 1 percent of
annual receipts not to be a significant impact. Accordingly, CBP
certifies that this proposed rule does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\90\ Many brokerages are sole proprietorships and many employ
individual brokers who supervise other employees. The average number
of employees per firm is seven. CBP assumes the average firm employs
4 individual brokers and 3 other employees, such as human resource
managers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-13, 44 U.S.C. 3507) an agency may not conduct, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a valid control number assigned by
OMB. The collections of information contained in these regulations are
provided for by OMB control number 1651-0034 (CBP Regulations
Pertaining to Customs Brokers).
The proposed rule would require individual brokers to maintain
records of completed continuing education (including, among others, the
date, title, provider, location, and credit hours) and certify the
completion of the required number of continuing education credits on
the triennial report. Based on these changes, CBP estimates a small
increase in the burden hours for information collection related to
customs brokers regulations. CBP would submit to OMB for review the
following adjustments to the previously approved Information Collection
under OMB control number 1651-0034 to account for this proposed rule's
changes. The addition of the self-attestation and submission of records
would add about 30-45 minutes (0.5-0.75 hours) per respondent.
CBP Regulations Pertaining Customs Brokers
Estimated Number of Respondents: 13,822.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 1.
Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses: 0.333.
Estimated Time per Response: 31.5 minutes (0.525 hours).
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,418.85 hours.
D. Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with 19 CFR 0.1(b)(1),
which provides that the Secretary of the Treasury delegated to the
Secretary of DHS authority to prescribe and approve regulations
relating to customs revenue functions on behalf of the Secretary of the
Treasury for when the subject matter is not listed as provided by
Treasury Department Order No. 100-16. Accordingly, this proposed rule
may be signed by the Secretary of DHS (or his or her delegate).
List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and procedure, Brokers, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, CBP proposes to amend 19
CFR part 111 as set forth below:
PART 111--CUSTOMS BROKERS
0
1. The general authority citation for part 111 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1624, 1641.
* * * * *
0
2. Revise the second sentence of Sec. 111.0 to read as follows:
Sec. 111.0 Scope.
* * * This part also prescribes the duties and responsibilities of
brokers, the grounds and procedures for disciplining brokers, including
the assessment of monetary penalties, the revocation or suspension of
licenses and permits, and the obligation for individual customs broker
license holders to satisfy a continuing education requirement.
0
3. In Sec. 111.1, add the definitions ``Continuing broker education
requirement'', ``Continuing education credit'', ``Qualifying continuing
broker education'', and ``Triennial period'' in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
Sec. 111.1 Definitions.
* * * * *
Continuing broker education requirement. ``Continuing broker
education requirement'' means an individual customs broker license
holder's obligation to complete a certain number of continuing
education credits of qualifying continuing broker education, as set
forth in subpart F of this part, in order to maintain sufficient
knowledge of customs and related laws, regulations, and procedures,
bookkeeping, accounting, and all other appropriate matters necessary to
render valuable service to importers and drawback claimants.
Continuing education credit. ``Continuing education credit'' means
the unit of measurement used for meeting the continuing broker
education requirement. The smallest recognized unit is one continuing
education credit, which requires 60 minutes of continuous participation
in a qualifying continuing broker education program, as defined in
Sec. 111.103(a). For qualifying continuing broker education lasting
more than 60 minutes, one continuing education credit may be claimed
for the first 60 minutes of continuous participation, and half of one
continuing education credit may be claimed for every full 30 minutes of
continuous participation thereafter. For example, for qualifying
continuing broker education lasting more than 60 minutes but less than
90 minutes, only one continuing education credit may be claimed. In
contrast, for qualifying continuing broker education lasting 90
minutes, 1.5 continuing broker education credits may be claimed.
* * * * *
Qualifying continuing broker education. ``Qualifying continuing
broker education'' means any training or educational activity that is
eligible or, if required, has been approved for continuing education
credit, in accordance with Sec. 111.103.
* * * * *
Triennial period. ``Triennial period'' means a period of three
years
[[Page 50826]]
commencing on February 1, 1985, or on February 1 in any third year
thereafter.
0
4. In Sec. 111.30, revise paragraphs (d)(2)(ii) and (iii) and add
paragraph (d)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.30 Notification of change of business address, organization,
name, or location of business records; status report; termination of
brokerage business.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) State the name and address of his or her employer if he or she
is employed by another broker, unless his or her employer is a
partnership, association, or corporation broker for which he or she is
a qualifying member or officer for purposes of Sec. 111.11(b) or
(c)(2);
(iii) State whether or not he or she still meets the applicable
requirements of Sec. Sec. 111.11 and 111.19 and has not engaged in any
conduct that could constitute grounds for suspension or revocation
under Sec. 111.53; and
(iv) Report and certify the broker's compliance with the continuing
broker education requirement as set forth in Sec. 111.102.
* * * * *
Sec. Sec. 111.97 through 111.100 [Added and Reserved]
0
5. Add reserve Sec. Sec. 111.97 through 111.100.
0
6. Add subpart F, consisting of Sec. Sec. 111.101 through 111.104, to
read as follows:
Subpart F--Continuing Education Requirements for Individual Customs
Broker License Holders
Sec.
111.101 Scope.
111.102 Obligations of individual customs brokers in conjunction
with continuing broker education requirement.
111.103 Accreditation of qualifying continuing broker education.
111.104 Failure to report and certify compliance with continuing
broker education requirement.
Sec. 111.101 Scope.
This subpart sets forth regulations providing for a continuing
education requirement for individual customs broker license holders and
the framework for administering the requirements of this subpart. The
continuing broker education requirement is for individual brokers, in
order to maintain sufficient knowledge of customs and related laws,
regulations, and procedures, bookkeeping, accounting, and all other
appropriate matters necessary to render valuable service to importers
and drawback claimants.
Sec. 111.102 Obligations of individual customs brokers in
conjunction with continuing broker education requirement.
(a) Continuing broker education requirement. All individual customs
broker license holders must complete qualifying continuing broker
education as defined in Sec. 111.103(a), except:
(1) During a period of voluntary suspension as described in Sec.
111.52; or
(2) When individual customs broker license holders have not held
their license for an entire triennial period at the time of the
submission of the status report as required under Sec. 111.30(d).
(b) Required minimum number of continuing education credits. All
individual brokers who are subject to the continuing broker education
requirement must complete at least 36 continuing education credits of
qualifying continuing broker education each triennial period, except
upon the reinstatement of a license following a period of voluntary
suspension as described in Sec. 111.52. Upon the reinstatement of a
license following a period of voluntary suspension as described in
Sec. 111.52, the number of continuing education credits that an
individual broker must complete by the end of the triennial period
during which the reinstatement of the license occurred will be
calculated on a prorated basis of one continuing education credit for
each complete remaining month until the end of the triennial period.
(c) Reporting requirements. Individual brokers who are subject to
the continuing broker education requirement must report and certify
their compliance upon submission of the status report required under
Sec. 111.30(d).
(d) Recordkeeping requirements--(1) General. Individual brokers who
are subject to the continuing broker education requirement must retain
the following information and documentation pertaining to the
qualifying education completed during a triennial period for a period
of three years following the submission of the status report required
under Sec. 111.30(d):
(i) The title of the qualifying continuing broker education
attended;
(ii) The name of the provider or host of the qualifying continuing
broker education;
(iii) The date(s) attended;
(iv) The number of continuing education credits accrued;
(v) The location of the training or educational activity, if the
training or educational activity is offered in person; and
(vi) Any documentation received from the provider or host of the
qualifying continuing broker education that evidences the individual
broker's registration for, attendance at, completion of, or other
activity bearing upon the individual broker's participation in and
completion of the qualifying continuing broker education.
(2) Availability of records. In order to ensure that the individual
broker has met the continuing broker education requirement, upon CBP's
request, the individual broker must make available to CBP the
information and documentation described in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. CBP can request the information and documentation be made
available for in-person inspection, or be delivered to CBP by either
hard-copy or electronic means, or any combination thereof.
Sec. 111.103 Accreditation of qualifying continuing broker
education.
(a) Qualifying continuing broker education. In order for a training
or educational activity to be considered qualifying continuing broker
education, it must meet the following two requirements:
(1) Providers of qualifying continuing broker education. The
training or educational activity must be offered by one of the
following providers:
(i) Government agencies. Qualifying continuing broker education
constitutes any training or educational activity offered by CBP,
whether online or in-person, and training or educational activity
offered by another U.S. Government agency, whether online or in-person,
but only if the content is relevant to customs business. Accreditation
is not required for trainings or educational activities offered by U.S.
Government agencies.
(ii) Other providers requiring accreditation. Any other training or
educational activity not offered by a U.S. Government agency, whether
online or in-person, will not be considered a qualifying continuing
broker education, unless the training or educational activity has been
approved for continuing education credit by a CBP-selected accreditor
before the training or educational activity is provided.
(2) Recognized trainings or educational activities. The training or
educational activity must constitute one of the following:
(i) Coursework, a seminar, or a workshop, whether online or in-
person, that is conducted by an instructor, discussion leader, or
speaker;
(ii) A symposium or convention, with the exception of the
attendance at a meeting conducted in accordance with the provisions of
the Federal Advisory
[[Page 50827]]
Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), whether online or in-person;
(iii) The preparation of a subject matter for presentation as an
instructor, discussion leader, or speaker at a training or educational
activity described in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section,
subject to the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section;
and
(iv) The presentation of a subject matter as an instructor,
discussion leader, or speaker at a training or educational activity
described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (ii) of this section, subject to
the requirements set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
(b) Special allowance for instructors, discussion leaders, and
speakers. (1) Contingent upon the approval by a CBP-selected
accreditor, an individual broker may claim one continuing education
credit for each full 60 minutes spent:
(i) Presenting subject matter as an instructor, discussion leader,
or speaker at a training or educational activity described in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) or (ii) of this section; or
(ii) Preparing subject matter for presentation as an instructor,
discussion leader, or speaker at a training or educational activity
described in paragraph (a)(2)(i) or (ii) of this section.
(2) The special allowance for instructors, discussion leaders, and
speakers is subject to the following limitations:
(i) For any session of presentation given at one time, regardless
of the duration of that session, an individual broker may claim, at a
maximum, one continuing education credit for the time spent preparing
subject matter for that presentation pursuant to paragraph (b)(1)(ii)
of this section.
(ii) Per triennial period, an individual broker may claim, at a
maximum, a combined total of 12 continuing education credits earned in
accordance with paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section.
(3) Regardless of whether the training or educational activity is
offered by a U.S. Government agency or another provider, any
instructor, discussion leader, or speaker seeking to claim continuing
education credit in accordance with paragraph (b)(1) of this section
must obtain the approval of a CBP-selected accreditor.
(c) Selection of accreditors. The Office of Trade will select
accreditors based on a Request for Information (RFI) and a Request for
Proposal (RFP) announced through the System for Award Management (SAM)
or any other electronic system for award management approved by the
U.S. General Services Administration, in accordance with the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1), for a specific period of
award, subject to renewal. The Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office
of Trade, will periodically publish notices in the Federal Register
announcing the criteria that CBP will use to select an accreditor, the
period during which CBP will accept applications by potential
accreditors, and the period of award for a CBP-selected accreditor.
(d) Responsibilities of CBP-selected accreditors. CBP-selected
accreditors administer the accreditation of trainings or educational
activities other than those described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section for the purpose of the continuing broker education requirement
by reviewing and approving or denying such educational content for
continuing education credit. A CBP-selected accreditor's approval of a
training or educational activity for continuing education credit is
valid for one year, and the accreditation may be renewed through any
CBP-selected accreditor.
(e) Prohibition of self-certification by an accreditor. CBP-
selected accreditors may not approve their own trainings or educational
activities for continuing education credit.
Sec. 111.104 Failure to report and certify compliance with
continuing broker education requirement.
(a) Notification by CBP. If an individual broker is subject to the
continuing broker education requirement pursuant to Sec. 111.102 and
submits a status report as required under Sec. 111.30(d)(2), but fails
to report and certify compliance with the continuing broker education
requirement as part of the submission of the status report, then CBP
will notify the individual broker of the broker's failure to report and
certify compliance in accordance with Sec. 111.30(d). The notification
will be sent to the address reflected in CBP's records, or transmitted
electronically pursuant to any electronic means authorized by CBP for
that purpose.
(b) Required response to notice. Upon the issuance of such
notification, the individual broker must within 30 calendar days:
(1) Submit a corrected status report that, in accordance with Sec.
111.30(d), reflects the individual broker's compliance with the
continuing broker education requirement, if the individual broker
completed the required number of continuing education credits but
failed to report and certify compliance with the requirement as part of
the submission of the status report; or
(2) Complete the required number of continuing education credits of
qualifying continuing broker education and submit a corrected status
report that, in accordance with Sec. 111.30(d), reflects the broker's
compliance with the continuing broker education requirement, if the
individual broker had not completed the required number of continuing
education credits at the time the status report was due.
(c) Suspension of license. Unless the individual broker takes the
corrective actions described in paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section
within 30 calendar days of the issuance of the notification described
in paragraph (a) of this section, CBP will take actions to suspend the
individual broker's license in accordance with subpart D of this part.
(d) Revocation of license. If the individual broker's license has
been suspended pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section and the
individual broker fails to take the corrective actions described in
paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section within 120 calendar days upon
the issuance of the order of suspension, CBP will take actions to
revoke the individual broker's license without prejudice to the filing
of an application for a new license in accordance with subpart D of
this part.
Alejandro N. Mayorkas,
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2021-19013 Filed 9-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P