Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption for the Physical Security Access Files System, 49927-49929 [2021-18575]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 28, 2021.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
49927
‘‘Emissions Statement Certification for
the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard’’ at the end of the table
to read as follows:
§ 52.1070
*
Subpart V—Maryland
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry for
■
Name of non-regulatory
SIP revision
Applicable
geographic
area
*
*
Emissions Statement Certification
for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard.
*
State-wide ........
7/6/20
EPA approval date
Additional explanation
*
*
9/7/21, [insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
Certification that Maryland’s previously approved regulation at
COMAR 26.11.01.05–1 meets
the emission statement requirements for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2021–19084 Filed 9–3–21; 8:45 am]
Background
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
The Department of the Interior (DOI)
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register at 85 FR 7515 (February 10,
2020) proposing to exempt portions of
the INTERIOR/DOI–46, Physical
Security Access Files, system of records
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2),
(k)(3), and (k)(5) due to criminal, civil,
and administrative law enforcement
requirements. The INTERIOR/DOI–46,
Physical Security Access Files, system
of records notice (SORN) was published
in the Federal Register at 85 FR 3406
(January 21, 2020). Comments were
invited on both the Physical Security
Access Files SORN and NPRM. DOI
received one comment on the SORN and
one comment on the NPRM that were
not relevant to the subject. The
rulemaking will be implemented as
proposed with three corrections.
The word ‘‘Access’’ was inadvertently
omitted from the system name in the
NPRM. The system name is corrected to
‘‘Physical Security Access Files’’ in
paragraphs (c)(19), (d)(1), and (e)(5) of
this final rule, which is consistent with
the INTERIOR/DOI–46 SORN published
in the Federal Register at 85 FR 3406
(January 21, 2020). Paragraph (b)(18) of
the NPRM was reserved for the
INTERIOR/BSEE–01, Investigations
Case Management System (CMS), which
became effective when the final rule
was published in the Federal Register at
85 FR 1282 (January 10, 2020).
Paragraph (b)(18) has been redesignated
to (c)(18) for the INTERIOR/BSEE–01,
Investigations Case Management System
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 2
[DOI–2020–0014; DS65100000,
DWSN00000.000000, DP.65106,
21XD4523WS]
RIN 1090–AB13
Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption
for the Physical Security Access Files
System
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the
Interior is issuing a final rule to amend
its regulations to exempt certain records
in the INTERIOR/DOI–46, Physical
Security Access Files, system of records
from one or more provisions of the
Privacy Act because of criminal, civil,
and administrative law enforcement
requirements.
SUMMARY:
The final rule is effective
September 7, 2021.
DATES:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
State
submittal
date
Teri
Barnett, Departmental Privacy Officer,
U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C
Street NW, Room 7112, Washington, DC
20240, DOI_Privacy@ios.doi.gov or (202)
208–1605.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(CMS), as described in this final rule. A
non-substantive editorial change was
made to correct the formatting for the
list of exempt systems in subsection
2.254 paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) to
reflect the SORN number followed by
the SORN title to be consistent with
DOI’s current SORN format.
Procedural Requirements
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. DOI developed this
rule in a manner consistent with these
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\07SER1.SGM
07SER1
49928
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DOI certifies that this document will
not have a significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601, et seq.). This rule does not
impose a requirement for small
businesses to report or keep records on
any of the requirements contained in
this rule. The exemptions to the Privacy
Act apply to individuals, and
individuals are not covered entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
3. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises.
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or
on the private sector, of more than $100
million per year. The rule does not have
a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. This rule makes only
minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
5. Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order
12630, the rule does not have significant
takings implications. The rule is not a
governmental action capable of
interference with constitutionally
protected property rights. This rule
makes only minor changes to 43 CFR
part 2. A takings implication assessment
is not required.
6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, this rule does not have any
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
The rule is not associated with, nor will
it have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. A Federalism
Assessment is not required.
7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Does not unduly burden the
judicial system.
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, DOI has evaluated this rule and
determined that it would have no
substantial effects on federally
recognized Indian Tribes.
9. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not require an
information collection from 10 or more
parties and a submission under the
Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required.
10. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal Action significantly affecting
the quality for the human environment.
A detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because the rule
is covered by a categorical exclusion.
We have determined the rule is
categorically excluded under 43 CFR
46.210(i) because it is administrative,
legal, and technical in nature. We also
have determined the rule does not
involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215
that would require further analysis
under NEPA.
11. Data Quality Act
In developing this rule, there was no
need to conduct or use a study,
experiment, or survey requiring peer
review under the Data Quality Act (Pub.
L. 106–554, section 515).
12. Effects on Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211, and it is not likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy. A
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
13. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Order
12866 and 12988, the Plain Writing Act
of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–274), and the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means each rule we
publish must:
—Be logically organized;
—Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
—Use clear language rather than jargon;
—Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
—Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential information,
Courts, Freedom of Information Act,
Privacy Act.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the Interior
amends 43 CFR part 2 as follows:
PART 2—FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACT; RECORDS AND TESTIMONY
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 553; 31
U.S.C. 3717; 43 U.S.C. 1460, 1461.
■
2. Revise § 2.254 to read as follows:
§ 2.254
Exemptions.
(a) Criminal law enforcement records
exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2).
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) the
following systems of records are
exempted from all of the provisions of
5 U.S.C. 552a and the regulations in this
subpart except paragraphs (b), (c)(1) and
(2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9),
(10), (11), and (12), and (i) of 5 U.S.C.
552a and the portions of the regulations
in this subpart implementing these
paragraphs:
(1) INTERIOR/FWS–20, Investigative
Case File System.
(2) INTERIOR/BIA–18, Law
Enforcement Services System.
(3) INTERIOR/NPS–19, Law
Enforcement Statistical Reporting
System.
(4) INTERIOR/OIG–02, Investigative
Records.
(5) INTERIOR/DOI–10, Incident
Management, Analysis and Reporting
System.
(6) INTERIOR/DOI–50, Insider Threat
Program.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) Law enforcement records exempt
under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). Pursuant to 5
E:\FR\FM\07SER1.SGM
07SER1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 170 / Tuesday, September 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the following systems
of records are exempted from
paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(H), and (I), and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a and
the provisions of the regulations in this
subpart implementing these paragraphs:
(1) INTERIOR/OIG–2, Investigative
Records.
(2) INTERIOR/FWS–21, Permits
System.
(3) INTERIOR/BLM–18, Criminal Case
Investigation System.
(4) INTERIOR/BLM–19, Civil Trespass
Case Investigations.
(5) INTERIOR/BLM–20, Employee
Conduct Investigations.
(6)–(7) [Reserved]
(8) INTERIOR/NPS–17, Employee
Financial Irregularities.
(9) INTERIOR/Reclamation–37,
Trespass Cases.
(10) INTERIOR/SOL–1, Litigation,
Appeal and Case Files System, to the
extent that it consists of investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement
purposes.
(11) INTERIOR/FWS–19, Endangered
Species Licenses System.
(12) INTERIOR/FWS–20, Investigative
Case File System.
(13) INTERIOR/BIA–24, Timber
Cutting and Trespass Claims Files.
(14) INTERIOR/DOI–11, Debarment
and Suspension Program.
(15) INTERIOR/DOI–10, Incident
Management, Analysis and Reporting
System.
(16) INTERIOR/DOI–50, Insider
Threat Program.
(17) INTERIOR/DOI–24, Indian Arts
and Crafts Board.
(18) INTERIOR/BSEE–01,
Investigations Case Management System
(CMS).
(19) INTERIOR/DOI–46, Physical
Security Access Files.
(d) Records maintained in connection
with providing protective services
exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(3).
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(3), the
following systems of records have been
exempted from paragraphs (c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I) and (f) of 5
U.S.C. 552a and the provisions of the
regulations in this subpart
implementing these paragraphs:
(1) INTERIOR/DOI–46, Physical
Security Access Files.
(2) [Reserved]
(e) Investigatory records exempt under
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(5), the following systems of
records have been exempted from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Sep 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
49929
regulations require annual specification
of a commercial quota that is
apportioned among the coastal states
from Maine through Florida. The
process to set the annual commercial
quota and the percent allocated to each
state is described in § 648.162, and the
final 2021 allocations were published
on December 16, 2020 (85 FR 81421).
The final rule implementing
Amendment 1 to the Bluefish Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) published in
the Federal Register on July 26, 2000
Signed: lllllllllllllllll (65 FR 45844), and provided a
mechanism for transferring bluefish
Teri Barnett,
quota from one state to another. Two or
Departmental Privacy Officer, Department of
more states, under mutual agreement
the Interior.
and with the concurrence of the NMFS
[FR Doc. 2021–18575 Filed 9–3–21; 8:45 am]
Greater Atlantic Regional Administrator,
BILLING CODE 4334–63–P
can request approval to transfer or
combine bluefish commercial quota
under § 648.162(e)(1)(i) through (iii).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
The Regional Administrator must
approve any such transfer based on the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
criteria in § 648.162(e). In evaluating
Administration
requests to transfer a quota or combine
quotas, the Regional Administrator shall
50 CFR Part 648
consider whether: The transfer or
combinations would preclude the
[Docket No. 201209–0332]
overall annual quota from being fully
RTID 0648–XB376
harvested; the transfer addresses an
unforeseen variation or contingency in
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
the fishery; and the transfer is consistent
States; Atlantic Bluefish Fishery;
with the objectives of the FMP and the
Quota Transfer from ME to RI
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Maine is transferring 15,000 lb (6,804
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
kg) of bluefish commercial quota to
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Rhode Island through mutual agreement
Commerce.
of the states. This transfer was requested
ACTION: Notification; quota transfer.
to ensure that Rhode Island would not
exceed its 2021 state quota. The revised
SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the
bluefish quotas for 2021 are: Maine,
State of Maine is transferring a portion
3,503 lb (1,589 kg); and Rhode Island,
of its 2021 commercial bluefish quota to 203,434 lb (92,276 kg).
the State of Rhode Island. This quota
Classification
adjustment is necessary to comply with
the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery
NMFS issues this action pursuant to
Management Plan quota transfer
provisions. This announcement informs section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. This action is required by 50 CFR
the public of the revised commercial
648.162(e)(1)(i) through (iii), which was
bluefish quotas for Maine and Rhode
issued pursuant to section 304(b), and is
Island.
exempted from review under Executive
DATES: Effective September 1, 2021,
Order 12866.
through December 31, 2021.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated:
September 1, 2021.
Laura Hansen, Fishery Management
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Specialist, (978) 281–9225.
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
Regulations governing the Atlantic
[FR Doc. 2021–19208 Filed 9–1–21; 4:15 pm]
bluefish fishery are found in 50 CFR
648.160 through 648.167. These
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(H), and (I) and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a and
the provisions of the regulations in this
subpart implementing these paragraphs:
(1) [Reserved]
(2) INTERIOR/GS–9, National
Research Council Grants Program.
(3) INTERIOR/OS–68, Committee
Management Files.
(4) INTERIOR/DOI–11, Debarment
and Suspension Program.
(5) INTERIOR/DOI–46, Physical
Security Access Files.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\07SER1.SGM
07SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 7, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49927-49929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18575]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
43 CFR Part 2
[DOI-2020-0014; DS65100000, DWSN00000.000000, DP.65106, 21XD4523WS]
RIN 1090-AB13
Privacy Act Regulations; Exemption for the Physical Security
Access Files System
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior is issuing a final rule to
amend its regulations to exempt certain records in the INTERIOR/DOI-46,
Physical Security Access Files, system of records from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and
administrative law enforcement requirements.
DATES: The final rule is effective September 7, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teri Barnett, Departmental Privacy
Officer, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW, Room 7112,
Washington, DC 20240, [email protected] or (202) 208-1605.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department of the Interior (DOI) published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register at 85 FR 7515 (February 10,
2020) proposing to exempt portions of the INTERIOR/DOI-46, Physical
Security Access Files, system of records from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), (k)(3), and (k)(5) due to
criminal, civil, and administrative law enforcement requirements. The
INTERIOR/DOI-46, Physical Security Access Files, system of records
notice (SORN) was published in the Federal Register at 85 FR 3406
(January 21, 2020). Comments were invited on both the Physical Security
Access Files SORN and NPRM. DOI received one comment on the SORN and
one comment on the NPRM that were not relevant to the subject. The
rulemaking will be implemented as proposed with three corrections.
The word ``Access'' was inadvertently omitted from the system name
in the NPRM. The system name is corrected to ``Physical Security Access
Files'' in paragraphs (c)(19), (d)(1), and (e)(5) of this final rule,
which is consistent with the INTERIOR/DOI-46 SORN published in the
Federal Register at 85 FR 3406 (January 21, 2020). Paragraph (b)(18) of
the NPRM was reserved for the INTERIOR/BSEE-01, Investigations Case
Management System (CMS), which became effective when the final rule was
published in the Federal Register at 85 FR 1282 (January 10, 2020).
Paragraph (b)(18) has been redesignated to (c)(18) for the INTERIOR/
BSEE-01, Investigations Case Management System (CMS), as described in
this final rule. A non-substantive editorial change was made to correct
the formatting for the list of exempt systems in subsection 2.254
paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) to reflect the SORN number followed by the
SORN title to be consistent with DOI's current SORN format.
Procedural Requirements
1. Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. DOI developed this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
[[Page 49928]]
2. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DOI certifies that this document will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.). This rule does not
impose a requirement for small businesses to report or keep records on
any of the requirements contained in this rule. The exemptions to the
Privacy Act apply to individuals, and individuals are not covered
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
3. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more.
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments in the aggregate, or on the private sector, of more
than $100 million per year. The rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. This rule makes only minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
5. Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have
significant takings implications. The rule is not a governmental action
capable of interference with constitutionally protected property
rights. This rule makes only minor changes to 43 CFR part 2. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
6. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, this rule does not have
any federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment. The rule is not associated with, nor will it have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. A
Federalism Assessment is not required.
7. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Does not unduly burden the judicial system.
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(c) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
8. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, DOI has evaluated this
rule and determined that it would have no substantial effects on
federally recognized Indian Tribes.
9. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not require an information collection from 10 or
more parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not
required.
10. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969
This rule does not constitute a major Federal Action significantly
affecting the quality for the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because the rule is covered by a categorical exclusion. We
have determined the rule is categorically excluded under 43 CFR
46.210(i) because it is administrative, legal, and technical in nature.
We also have determined the rule does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require
further analysis under NEPA.
11. Data Quality Act
In developing this rule, there was no need to conduct or use a
study, experiment, or survey requiring peer review under the Data
Quality Act (Pub. L. 106-554, section 515).
12. Effects on Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211, and it is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. A
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
13. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Order 12866 and 12988, the Plain
Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274), and the Presidential Memorandum
of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means each
rule we publish must:
--Be logically organized;
--Use the active voice to address readers directly;
--Use clear language rather than jargon;
--Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
--Use lists and tables wherever possible.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 2
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential information,
Courts, Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Interior amends 43 CFR part 2 as follows:
PART 2--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT; RECORDS AND TESTIMONY
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 553; 31 U.S.C. 3717; 43
U.S.C. 1460, 1461.
0
2. Revise Sec. 2.254 to read as follows:
Sec. 2.254 Exemptions.
(a) Criminal law enforcement records exempt under 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) the following systems of
records are exempted from all of the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a and
the regulations in this subpart except paragraphs (b), (c)(1) and (2),
(e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), (11), and (12), and (i)
of 5 U.S.C. 552a and the portions of the regulations in this subpart
implementing these paragraphs:
(1) INTERIOR/FWS-20, Investigative Case File System.
(2) INTERIOR/BIA-18, Law Enforcement Services System.
(3) INTERIOR/NPS-19, Law Enforcement Statistical Reporting System.
(4) INTERIOR/OIG-02, Investigative Records.
(5) INTERIOR/DOI-10, Incident Management, Analysis and Reporting
System.
(6) INTERIOR/DOI-50, Insider Threat Program.
(b) [Reserved]
(c) Law enforcement records exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
Pursuant to 5
[[Page 49929]]
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the following systems of records are exempted from
paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f) of 5
U.S.C. 552a and the provisions of the regulations in this subpart
implementing these paragraphs:
(1) INTERIOR/OIG-2, Investigative Records.
(2) INTERIOR/FWS-21, Permits System.
(3) INTERIOR/BLM-18, Criminal Case Investigation System.
(4) INTERIOR/BLM-19, Civil Trespass Case Investigations.
(5) INTERIOR/BLM-20, Employee Conduct Investigations.
(6)-(7) [Reserved]
(8) INTERIOR/NPS-17, Employee Financial Irregularities.
(9) INTERIOR/Reclamation-37, Trespass Cases.
(10) INTERIOR/SOL-1, Litigation, Appeal and Case Files System, to
the extent that it consists of investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes.
(11) INTERIOR/FWS-19, Endangered Species Licenses System.
(12) INTERIOR/FWS-20, Investigative Case File System.
(13) INTERIOR/BIA-24, Timber Cutting and Trespass Claims Files.
(14) INTERIOR/DOI-11, Debarment and Suspension Program.
(15) INTERIOR/DOI-10, Incident Management, Analysis and Reporting
System.
(16) INTERIOR/DOI-50, Insider Threat Program.
(17) INTERIOR/DOI-24, Indian Arts and Crafts Board.
(18) INTERIOR/BSEE-01, Investigations Case Management System (CMS).
(19) INTERIOR/DOI-46, Physical Security Access Files.
(d) Records maintained in connection with providing protective
services exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(3). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(3), the following systems of records have been exempted from
paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I) and (f) of 5
U.S.C. 552a and the provisions of the regulations in this subpart
implementing these paragraphs:
(1) INTERIOR/DOI-46, Physical Security Access Files.
(2) [Reserved]
(e) Investigatory records exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5).
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), the following systems of records have
been exempted from paragraphs (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and
(I) and (f) of 5 U.S.C. 552a and the provisions of the regulations in
this subpart implementing these paragraphs:
(1) [Reserved]
(2) INTERIOR/GS-9, National Research Council Grants Program.
(3) INTERIOR/OS-68, Committee Management Files.
(4) INTERIOR/DOI-11, Debarment and Suspension Program.
(5) INTERIOR/DOI-46, Physical Security Access Files.
Signed:----------------------------------------------------------------
Teri Barnett,
Departmental Privacy Officer, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2021-18575 Filed 9-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334-63-P