Access to Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) for Employees of Certain Tribally Controlled Schools, 49461-49466 [2021-19042]
Download as PDF
49461
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 86, No. 169
Friday, September 3, 2021
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 890
RIN 3206–AO18
Access to Federal Employees Health
Benefits (FEHB) for Employees of
Certain Tribally Controlled Schools
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing an
interim final rule to expand eligibility
for enrollment in the Federal Employees
Health Benefits (FEHB) Program to
additional tribal employees. The
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021
(FY21 CAA) amended section 409 of the
Indian Health Care Improvement Act
and expanded entitlement to Indian
tribes or tribal organizations carrying
out programs under the Tribally
Controlled Schools Act of 1988 (TCSA)
to purchase coverage, rights, and
benefits under the FEHB Program for
their employees.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective on
September 3, 2021.
Comment date: OPM must receive
comments on or before November 2,
2021.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
and title, by the following method:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
All submissions received must
include the agency name and docket
number or RIN for this document. The
general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia
Elam, Program Analyst, at julia.elam@
opm.gov or (202) 606–2128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FEHB Program Background
The FEHB Program was established in
1960 and is the largest employersponsored health insurance program in
the United States. As of March 2021,
there were approximately 8.2 million
covered individuals in the FEHB
Program. Covered individuals, as
defined in 5 CFR 890.101, include
employees of the Federal government,
annuitants, members of their families,
former spouses, and miscellaneous
groups, enumerated in 5 U.S.C. 8901;
United States Postal Service employees
and annuitants, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
1005; tribal employees of tribal
employers, pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 1647b;
and separated employees and former
dependents who are eligible for
Temporary Continuation of Coverage
under 5 U.S.C. 8905a.
For the 2021 plan year, there are 276
plan choices across the entire FEHB
Program. The actual number of options
available to any given enrollee depends
on the individual’s geographic location
but will include a minimum of 18
nationwide plan choices, as well as
local and regional plans. OPM
estimates, using the 2020 head count,
that total 2021 premiums are
approximately $59 billion.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Section 1114 of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2021 (Pub. L. 116–
260) amended Section 409 of the Indian
Health Care Improvement Act (25 U.S.C.
1647b) to extend entitlement to Indian
tribes or tribal organizations carrying
out programs under the Tribally
Controlled Schools Act of 1988 (TCSA)
(25 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) to purchase
coverage, rights and benefits under the
FEHB Program for their employees.
The FEHB Program is administered by
OPM in accordance with Title 5 Chapter
89, United States Code and
implementing regulations (title 5, parts
890, 892 and Title 48, Chapter 16).
The Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (ACA) (Pub. L. 111–148) and
the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
152), as amended extended entitlement
to Indian tribes and tribal organizations
carrying out programs under the Indian
Self-Determination and Education
Assistance Act (ISDEAA) (Pub. L. 93–
638), and urban Indian organizations
carrying out programs under Title V of
the Indian Health Care Improvement
Act (IHCIA) to purchase coverage,
rights, and benefits under the FEHB
Program for their employees, defined in
the FEHB regulations as ‘‘tribal
employees.’’ As the administrator of the
FEHB Program, OPM extended
eligibility to tribal employees of entitled
tribal employers within the meaning of
section 409 of the IHCIA. Tribal
employers began purchasing FEHB for
their employees on March 22, 2012 with
coverage effective on May 1, 2012. As of
April 2021, 125 tribes participate in the
FEHB Program, and there are 32,178
tribal employees for a total of 64,208
covered lives.
Tribally Controlled Schools and FEHB
Eligibility
In 2010, section 409 of the IHCIA did
not explicitly extend entitlement to
tribes and tribal organizations operating
schools pursuant to the TCSA. After the
extension of FEHB to tribal employers
in 2012, OPM received applications
from tribal schools carrying out
agreements under Public Law 100–297,
commonly referred to as ‘‘297 grant
schools’’ (hereinafter referred to as
‘‘TCSA grant schools’’). OPM’s
understanding was that Public Law
100–297 contracts did not fall within
the ISDEAA or Title V of the IHCIA. In
April 2012, OPM sent a letter to the
Interior Department’s Office of the
Solicitor seeking the Solicitor’s opinion
regarding its conclusion that tribes or
tribal organizations carrying out
programs under Public Law 100–297
were not entitled to purchase FEHB. In
June 2012, the Office of the Solicitor
within the Interior Department
confirmed that tribal employers who
receive grants pursuant to Public Law
100–297 were not ‘‘ipso facto eligible to
purchase Federal Employee Health
Benefit (FEHB) . . .’’ 1
Under Public Law 116–260, tribes or
tribal organizations carrying out
programs under the TCSA became tribal
1 Sabrina A. McCarthy, Office of the Solicitor,
U.S. Department of the Interior, to John O’ Brien,
Director, Healthcare and Insurance, Office of
Personnel Management (June 1, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
49462
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 169 / Friday, September 3, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
employers within the meaning of
section 409 of the IHCIA and are
entitled to purchase coverage, rights,
and benefits under the FEHB Program
for their tribal employees. Accordingly,
under 25 U.S.C. 1647b, tribally
controlled schools include both TCSA
grant schools and schools operating
under the ISDEAA (Pub. L. 93–638) or
a ‘‘638 contract.’’ Tribes or tribal
organizations operating schools under
638 contracts were already entitled to
purchase FEHB since the extension of
FEHB to tribal employers in 2012.
Currently, there are 128 tribally
controlled schools with approximately
4,533 employees. Three of these tribally
controlled schools operate under 638
contracts schools, and the remainder are
TCSA grant schools. Tribal employees,
as defined at 5 CFR 890.1402, across the
125 TCSA grant schools are now eligible
for FEHB. Section 1114 of the FY21
CAA is expected to make FEHB
accessible to approximately 4,328 tribal
employees of entitled TCSA grant
schools.
Tribal Consultation
Under Executive Order 13175, OPM
has an obligation to engage in ‘‘regular
and meaningful consultation and
collaboration with tribal officials in the
development of Federal policies that
have tribal implications.’’ OPM
continues to be committed to effective
consultation and collaboration with
tribes and tribal organizations.
OPM conducted extensive
consultation with tribes and tribal
organizations in 2011 and 2012 before
implementation of the Tribal FEHB
Program. OPM representatives attended
more than 20 tribal conferences and
meetings to provide information and
consultation about the Program. In
addition, OPM hosted training sessions
for interested tribes and tribal
organizations on numerous occasions.
OPM also published a series of policy
papers regarding the implementation of
the Tribal FEHB Program, and tribes,
tribal organizations, and urban Indian
organizations were given an opportunity
to provide feedback on these papers. A
Tribal Technical Workgroup was
established to support the
implementation of the Tribal FEHB
Program. Other tribal consultative
actions included collaborating with the
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) to conduct in-person
briefings for tribal communities across
the country, focusing on the
implementation of the ACA.
Consultation for the Tribal FEHB
Program is detailed in the proposed
rule, 81 FR 59907, and the final rule, 81
FR 95397, which are the implementing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
regulations for section 409 of the IHCIA,
and set forth the conditions for
coverage, rights, and benefits under the
FEHB Program for certain tribal
employers who are entitled to purchase
FEHB coverage for their tribal
employees. Public Law 116–260 has
tribal implications by broadening the
category of eligible tribal employees of
tribally controlled schools that are
entitled to purchase FEHB coverage for
their tribal employees.
On March 24, 2021, OPM issued a
Dear Tribal Leader Letter (DTLL) that
outlined proposed consultation topics
and provided background on OPM’s
mission and activities. OPM also posted
a public notice of the Consultation on
its website and on the National Congress
of American Indians (NCAI)’s
consultation site, and OPM created a
new page dedicated to current and
future consultation activities. On April
16, 2021, OPM held a virtual tribal
consultation with tribes about federal
human resources policies and programs;
ways to improve consultation and
sustain strong partnerships with Tribal
governments; access to Federal
employee benefits, including the FEHB
Program and the newly eligible tribal
employees of entitled tribally controlled
schools under the FY21 CAA; and
recruitment and hiring. A Dear Tribal
Principals Letter was also issued on
May 20, 2021 announcing a Listening
Session detailing FEHB enrollment,
which was held on June 8, 2021.
The public comment period for the
interim final rule is an important
opportunity to receive meaningful
feedback about the entitlement of
tribally controlled schools to purchase
FEHB coverage for their tribal
employees. Upon publication of the
interim final rule, OPM will provide
notification to Tribal Leaders,
stakeholders, and other interested
parties alerting them of the publication
of the rule and the process for
submitting formal comments. OPM has
begun outreach to and will continue to
assist newly entitled tribally controlled
schools after the final rule is in effect.
Discussion of the Proposed Changes
This rule will clarify that newly
entitled TCSA grant schools are subject
to FEHB regulations, as set forth in
subpart N of 5 CFR 890 by including
them in the definition of ‘‘tribal
employer,’’ and newly eligible tribal
employees are subject to applicable
provisions in the regulations. There are
technical corrections and clarifications
such as amending the definitions of
‘‘billing unit’’ and 5 CFR 890.1402 to
tribe or tribal organization carrying out
programs under the TCSA and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
including the term ‘‘tribally controlled
school’’ in 5 CFR 890.1402. In addition,
the definition of paymaster has been
revised to clarify that OPM may
designate more than one entity to
perform the responsibilities of the
paymaster. There is also the inclusion of
tribally controlled schools throughout
subpart N in Part 890, the regulatory
provisions on FEHB,2 as defined in 5
CFR 890.1402. The newly entitled
tribally controlled schools are also
included throughout section 5 CFR
890.1404, which details a tribal
employer’s election and agreement to
purchase FEHB. These technical
amendments are included at 5 CFR
890.1404(a)(1), (a)(2), (b)(5), (b)(9), and
(e)(1).
Expected Impact of Proposed Changes
While this rule identifies TCSA grant
schools as tribal employers entitled to
purchase FEHB coverage for their tribal
employees, pursuant to Public Law 116–
260, OPM does not believe this
regulation will have a large impact on
the broader health insurance markets.
Currently, there are an estimated 4,533
eligible tribal employees of tribally
controlled schools, including TCSA
grant schools and ‘‘638 contract
schools.’’ Eligible tribal employees are
full-time common law employees as
determined by a tribal employer. There
are an estimated 4,328 newly eligible
tribal employees at TCSA grant schools.
The impact on carriers is relatively
small, as tribal enrollments make up
0.78 percent of enrollments in the FEHB
Program. As of April 2021, the total
tribal enrollment in the FEHB Program
is 32,178 with a total of 64,208 covered
lives. Overall, as of March 2021 there
are over 4.1 million separate
enrollments in the FEHB Program,
providing health insurance to about 8.2
million Federal employees, annuitants,
certain tribal employees, and their
family members covered by the FEHB
Program.
For states with larger AI/AN
populations, OPM does not expect an
outsized impact on local carriers as
local carriers plans generally reflect the
cost of their area. OPM does not
anticipate that the newly eligible tribal
employees will be significantly more
expensive than other current FEHB
enrollees in the same geographic region.
For example, OPM estimates, for tribally
controlled schools in which data is
2 A tribal employer includes an Indian tribe or
tribal organization carrying out at least one program
under the ISDEAA; an Indian tribe or tribal
organization carrying out at least one program
under the TCSA; and an urban Indian organization
carrying out at least one program under title V of
the IHCIA.
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 169 / Friday, September 3, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
available, that in states with large AI/
AN populations, such as New Mexico,
Arizona, and South Dakota, only about
1,899 tribal employees are eligible at
TCSA grant schools. Therefore, OPM
does not anticipate a material impact if
these tribal enrollees were to enroll in
FEHB coverage. For FEHB nationwide
fee-for-service (FFS) plans, there will
not be enough new enrollees in this
group to have a material impact.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
OPM is issuing this rulemaking as an
interim final rule and has determined
that, under the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), it would be impracticable,
unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to delay a final regulation until
a public notice and comment process
has been completed. For the same
reasons, under the Civil Service Reform
Act’s parallel rulemaking provision, 5
U.S.C. 1103(b)(3), OPM is waiving
general notice of proposed rulemaking
because the interim final rule is
temporary in nature and necessary to be
implemented expeditiously as a result
of an emergency. OPM will promulgate
a final rule as soon as is practical after
receiving public comments on the
interim final rule. The conclusion of a
public notice and comment period
before the rule is finalized would be
impracticable because it would impede
due and timely execution of OPM’s
functions:
This rule will facilitate the purchase
of FEHB by entitled tribes or tribal
organizations carrying out programs
under the TCSA that became entitled to
purchase FEHB on December 27, 2020,
pursuant to the enactment of Public Law
116–260. OPM, as administrator of the
FEHB Program and Tribal FEHB
Program, has reached out to the U.S.
Department of Interior’s Bureau of
Indian Education to identify entitled
tribally controlled schools that may
apply for the FEHB Program. Outreach
included identifying the entitled tribally
controlled schools to communicate with
them about tribal employees’ eligibility,
enrollment, and key dates for enrolling
in FEHB; issuing a Dear Tribal Leader
Letter to announce an OPM wide
consultation with Tribal Leaders in
accordance with the Presidential
Memorandum on Tribal Consultation 3
and conducting an OPM wide
consultation with Tribal Leaders to
improve the ways OPM can partner with
3 Memorandum on Tribal Consultation and
Strengthening Nation-to-Nation Relationships,
January 26, 2021, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/26/
memorandum-on-tribal-consultationandstrengthening-nation-to-nation-relationships/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
Tribal governments and provide
services to tribal members and
employees on April 16, 2021; issuing a
separate letter to tribally controlled
school principals about their
entitlement to purchase FEHB for their
tribal employees; and working with the
paymaster to expedite processing of the
newly entitled tribally controlled
schools.
To the extent that a public notice and
comment process would furnish general
public information about the
entitlement of tribes or tribal
organizations carrying out programs
under the TCSA and the conditions for
coverage, rights, and benefits under the
FEHB Program for employees of tribal
employers, it is unnecessary in light of
OPM’s outreach to Tribal Leaders and
tribally controlled schools operated by
tribes and tribal organizations. Four
eligible tribally controlled schools
elected to begin purchasing FEHB
coverage for their tribal employees on
May 1, 2021 with an insurance coverage
effective date of May 1, 2021. As of July
2021, 7 tribally controlled schools have
enrolled in the FEHB Program.
Although OPM has engaged in these
outreach efforts, given the law’s
effective date of December 27, 2020,
there is an immediate need for this
interim final rule in order to establish
and regulate relations between tribal
employees and their employers, and
between tribal employers and OPM, and
to ensure that proper processes for
purchase of FEHB coverage by tribally
controlled schools and enrollment of
tribal employees are followed.
The expeditious implementation of
these rules is necessary to support the
administration of the purchase of FEHB
coverage by TCSA grant schools and
enrollment of their tribal employees. In
addition, implementation of these rules
will serve to protect the rights of newly
eligible tribal employees by placing
TCSA grant schools and tribal
employees on immediate notice that
such processes have been implemented
to eliminate any doubt that might exist
regarding the immediate ability of
tribally controlled schools to purchase
FEHB covered for their tribal employees
and for tribal employees to enroll.
Failure to expeditiously implement
these rules could lead to confusion and
administrative challenges due to a lack
of awareness about the manner in which
this new coverage may be purchased
and tribal employees may enroll, as well
as an unnecessary delay in providing
healthcare coverage.
On December 28, 2016, OPM
promulgated a final rule, 81 FR 95397,
that established how FEHB enrollment
under the Tribal FEHB Program is
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49463
administered, including eligibility;
tribal employer and tribal employee
contribution to premiums; the process
by which tribal employers will access
the program; the process by which tribal
employees will elect coverage, and
circumstances for termination and
cancellation of enrollment; tribal
employers responsibilities such as
communicating notice of termination of
enrollment, and accompanying rights
and obligations, to their tribal
employees. This interim final rule
includes technical amendments to
clarify that newly entitled TCSA grant
schools are now tribal employers, and
tribal employees of those schools are
subject to the regulations in subpart N
in Part 890, setting forth the conditions
for coverage, rights, and benefits under
the FEHB Program for employees of
tribal employers.
This interim final rule is urgently
needed to establish that tribally
controlled schools are newly subject to
the same regulations as existing tribal
employers and to assist them in
understanding the requirements of the
Tribal FEHB Program. The interim final
rule includes TCSA grant schools as
tribal employers who must follow the
same processes as other tribal
employers. For example, they must
provide certification and documentation
demonstrating that the tribal employer
is entitled to purchase FEHB as an
Indian tribe or tribal organization
carrying out at least one program under
Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988.
They are also subject to the regulations,
including, but not limited to, the
following: election and agreement to
purchase FEHB; current deposit of
premium payments and collection of the
administrative fee; acknowledging that
participation in FEHB makes the tribal
employer subject to Federal Government
audit with respect to such participation;
and administering the program in
accordance with the subpart N.
For these reasons, OPM has
determined that the public notice and
participation that the APA ordinarily
requires would, in this case, be
impracticable, unnecessary, and
contrary to the public interest and that
good cause exists for waiving proposed
rulemaking and delaying its solicitation
of comments from the public until after
it issues an interim final rule. OPM will
promulgate a final rule as soon as
practical after receiving comments on
the interim final rule.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
49464
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 169 / Friday, September 3, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
This rule is a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866. As of July
2021, 7 tribally controlled schools have
enrolled in the FEHB Program.
Currently, there are an estimated 4,328
newly eligible employees of 297 grant
schools and 205 eligible tribal
employees at 638 contract schools.
Need for Regulatory Action
The FY21 CAA amended section 409
of the IHCIA, codified at 25 U.S.C.
1647b, and expanded entitlement to
tribes and tribal organizations carrying
out programs under the TCSA to
purchase coverage, rights and benefits
under the FEHB Program for their tribal
employees. As the administrator of the
FEHB Program, OPM has extended
eligibility to tribal employees of TCSA
grant schools that have purchased FEHB
coverage within the meaning of section
409 as amended. Issuance of Federal
regulations without delay is necessary
to apply the existing rules that govern
the relationship between OPM and
tribal employers, and between the tribal
employers and their tribal employees
who have already elected to enroll in
FEHB. Therefore, OPM has good cause
to issue interim final rules that will
protect the interests of all stakeholders,
memorialize processes and procedures,
and provide transparency.
Currently, there are an estimated
4,328 newly eligible employees of TCSA
grant schools and 205 eligible tribal
employees at three ‘‘638 contract
schools.’’ Of these, 125 are tribally
controlled schools where FEHB was
previously not available, and 3 are other
schools for which FEHB eligibility has
previously been expanded.
At these affected schools,
administrators will potentially take
steps to update their health insurance
offerings in line with expanded FEHB
eligibility. This may include
familiarization with FEHB policies,
planning, enrolling schools, and
providing information to staff on plan
options. To the extent that this results
in effort above and beyond normal effort
associated with administering the health
insurance selection process, this will
generate costs for these schools.
However, OPM lacks data to estimate
the extent to which this rule will
generate such costs.
This rule may affect expenses paid by
tribal employers toward health
insurance premiums for employees.
Under 5 CFR 890.1413(b), tribal
employers are required to contribute to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
the premium for tribal employees at
least the same as the Federal
government does for its employees and
may contribute more, up to 100 percent
of the premium costs. Under 5 U.S.C.
8906, the Federal government
contribution is statutorily defined as the
lesser of 72 percent of the weighted
average of all premiums or 75 percent of
the plan premium. The Senate Report 4
mentioned previously suggests that
some tribal employers currently pay a
substantial fraction of health insurance
premiums, and that access to FEHB will
appreciably reduce premiums. To the
extent that this is the case, there will be
a reduction in premium payments paid
by tribal employers. We lack data to
estimate the magnitude of these effects
since they depend upon the number of
enrollees who shift health insurance
decisions as a result of the rule, the
characteristics of the newly chosen
health plans, and the portion of the
premium paid by the employer.
In addition, tribal employers are
responsible for the costs associated with
administering the Tribal FEHB Program.
The administrative fee covers costs for
the paymaster to process tribal
employee FEHB enrollments and collect
and remit premiums. It also covers costs
associated with dedicated OPM staff
who process new tribe applications;
oversee the paymaster; answer FEHB
Program questions; and issue FEHB
Program guidance through Tribal
Benefits Administration Letters (TBALs)
released and distributed to tribal
employers. For fiscal year 2021, the
administrative fee is $5.63 per enrollee
per month.
There is an immediate need for
affordable health insurance for tribally
controlled schools. According to a 2019
Senate Report,5 many Bureau of Indian
Education (BIE) grant schools face
challenges covering the cost of benefits
for their employees because they do not
have access to lower-cost options
through the FEHB Program. Another
urgent concern is that American Indian/
Alaska Natives (AI/AN) experience
health disparities, and, according to the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), AI/AN have
experienced disproportionate rates of
infection and mortality during the
COVID–19 pandemic.
Furthermore, according to the NCAI
and the National Indian Health Board,
many BIE grant schools utilize a portion
of their educational services funding to
4 Id.
5 See U.S. Senate. To Allow Tribal Grant Schools
to Participate in the Federal Employee Health
Benefits Program (S. Rep. No. 116–54). Available at
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT116srpt54/html/CRPT-116srpt54.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
pay for health insurance and other
benefits, which reduces financial
resources for textbooks, teacher’s aides,
and extracurricular programs.6 Access
to affordable health insurance could
also reduce the financial burden on
tribally controlled schools such that
resources can be redirected for the
benefit of students. Another benefit is
that TCSA grant schools are provided
with equal opportunity to enroll in the
FEHB Program.
Ultimately, tribal schools assess the
cost of participating in the FEHB
Program and decide if it provides net
benefits to their schools. For those
tribally controlled schools that choose
to participate it can be assumed that the
benefits outweigh the costs of
participation, and the Senate Report
referenced above suggests that this may
be the case for many affected schools.
As noted above, we lack data to estimate
the magnitude of these effects, and we
seek public comment on data or
methods to estimate these impacts.
Effects on Tribal Employees
There are an estimated 4,328 newly
eligible employees at tribally controlled
schools. As discussed above, this rule
may result in tribal employers updating
coverage options for employees to
include FEHB plans. To the extent that
this is the case, these employees may
update their health insurance choices.
This may result in some expended effort
by affected employees, although the
extent to which individuals will engage
in effort above and beyond the baseline
effort associated with health plan
selection is unclear. The Senate Report
referenced above suggests that this rule
may result in appreciable differences in
plan offerings and selections, although
we lack data to estimate the potential
impact.
To the extent that individuals adjust
their health insurance choices, they may
experience benefits. While the exact
benefits of health insurance are difficult
to quantify for tribal employees of
tribally controlled schools, evidence
supports that extending access to FEHB
coverage for newly eligible individuals
could have positive benefits. For
example, Cecelia Firethunder, President
of the Oglala Lakota Nation Education
Coalition (OLNEC), provided testimony
at a legislative hearing on H.R. 895, the
Tribal School Federal Insurance Parity
Act, suggesting that access to FEHB
coverage may allow access to lower cost
insurance options for their employees.7
6 Id.
7 See Written Testimony of Cecelia Firethunder,
President of the Oglala Lakota Nation Education
Coalition. House Indigenous Peoples of the United
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 169 / Friday, September 3, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
This may, in turn, increase utilization of
medical services for these individuals,
resulting in net benefits to society to the
extent that they provide benefits net of
the costs of delivering these medical
services. Although this increased
utilization would represent a cost, it
may result in a net benefit depending on
the extent to which it improves health
outcomes. OPM lacks data to estimate
these impacts, and we request comment
on data or methods to estimate potential
impacts.
Access to FEHB for more tribal
employees may help to reduce health
disparities. According to a Kaiser
Family Foundation report published in
2017, among nonelderly adults, AI/AN
are more likely than other adults to
report being in fair or poor health, being
overweight or obese, and having
diabetes.8 In addition, suicide
disproportionately affects AI/AN, and in
a CDC study, AI/AN decedents had
lower odds than did White decedents of
having received a mental health
diagnosis or mental health treatment.9
Recently, health disparities have been
highlighted for AI/AN, who have
experienced disproportionate rates of
infection and mortality during the
COVID–19 pandemic.10 For persons
aged 20–29 years, 30–39 years, and 40–
49 years, the COVID–19 mortality rates
among AI/AN were 10.5, 11.6, and 8.2
times, respectively, those among White
persons.10 Increasing access to
affordable healthcare is a way to
improve access to medical and mental
health services and may mitigate
inequities. This rule may mitigate health
inequities to the extent that it increases
access to medical care.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Effects on Other Parties
As described above, one expected
impact of this rule is that affected tribal
employees will gain access to health
insurance plans with lower health
insurance premiums. A reduction in
those premiums reflects transfers
between various parties involved in
States Subcommittee Legislative Hearing on H.R.
895, the Tribal School Federal Insurance Parity Act
(July 16, 2019), available at https://
www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/109791/
witnesses/HHRG-116-II24-Wstate-FirethunderC20190716.pdf.
8 See Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicaid and
American Indians and Alaska Natives, September 7,
2017, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/
medicaid-and-american-indians-and-alaskanatives/.
9 See ‘‘Suicides Among American Indian/Alaska
Natives—National Violent Death Reporting System,
18 States, 2003–2014.’’ Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Reports, 67(8). March 2, 2018. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. Available at
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/pdfs/
mm6708a1-H.pdf.
10 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
these transactions. The clearest effect is
a transfer toward parties paying for
health benefits absent the expansion of
FEHB benefits, which largely include
tribal employers and employees. This
transfer is most likely to come initially
from reductions in payments to health
insurance providers or from offsetting
increases in FEHB health insurance
premiums. We expect that, due to
medical loss ratio13 regulations,
premiums largely reflect medical costs
experienced by those insured by the
plan. As a result, we expect that the rule
will largely initially result in a transfer
from those paying FEHB premiums
(including enrollees and the Federal
government) in the baseline to entities
who experience premium reductions
under this rule. As described above, we
expect these effects to be quite small.
However, we lack data to estimate the
magnitude of these effects, and request
public comment on data or methods to
estimate any potential impacts.
Alternative Regulatory Approaches
OPM is unaware of feasible
alternatives to this rule, as this
regulation aligns FEHB eligibility with
the FY21 CAA, which amended section
409 of the IHCIA. Currently, OPM
regulations do not include FEHB
eligibility for Indian tribes or tribal
organizations carrying out programs
under the TCSA, and this rule expands
eligibility along these lines. We request
public comment on alternative
approaches to this rule which would
generate net benefits for the public.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Federalism
We have examined this rule in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, and have determined that
this rule will not have any negative
impact on the rights, roles and
responsibilities of State, local, or Tribal
governments.
Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standard set forth in Executive Order
12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local or Tribal
governments of more than $100 million
annually. Thus, no written assessment
of unfunded mandates is required.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
49465
Congressional Review Act
Subtitle E of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (also known as the Congressional
Review Act) (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.)
requires rules (as defined in 5 U.S.C.
804) to be submitted to Congress before
taking effect. OPM will submit to
Congress and the Comptroller General of
the United States a report regarding the
issuance of this action before its
effective date, as required by 5 U.S.C.
801. OMB’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by
the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C.
804(2)).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35)
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number.
This rule involves an OMB approved
collection of information subject to the
PRA for the FEHB Program, OMB No.
3206–0160, Health Benefits Election
Form. The public reporting burden for
this collection is estimated to average 30
minutes per response, including time
for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information. The total burden hour
estimate for this form is 9,000 hours.
The systems of record notice for this
collection is: OPM/Central–23, ‘‘FEHB
Program Enrollment Records,’’ available
at https://www.federalregister.gov/d/
2021-01259.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 890
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government employees,
Health facilities, Health insurance,
Health professions, Hostages, Indians,
Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Military
personnel, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Retirement.
Office of Personnel Management.
Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
Accordingly, OPM amends title 5,
Code of Federal Regulations part 890 as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
49466
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 169 / Friday, September 3, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
PART 890—FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 890
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8913; Sec. 890.102 also
issued under sections 11202(f), 11232(e), and
11246 (b) of Pub. L. 105–33, 111 Stat. 251;
Sec. 890.111 also issued under section
1622(b) of Pub. L. 104–106, 110 Stat. 521 (36
U.S.C. 5522); Sec. 890.112 also issued under
section 1 of Pub. L. 110–279, 122 Stat. 2604
(2 U.S.C. 2051); Sec. 890.113 also issued
under section 1110 of Pub. L. 116–92, 133
Stat. 1198 (5 U.S.C. 8702 note); Sec. 890.301
also issued under section 311 of Pub. L. 111–
3, 123 Stat. 64 (26 U.S.C. 9801); Sec.
890.302(b) also issued under section 1001 of
Pub. L. 111–148, 124 Stat. 119, as amended
by Pub. L. 111–152, 124 Stat. 1029 (42 U.S.C.
300gg–14); Sec. 890.803 also issued under 50
U.S.C. 3516 (formerly 50 U.S.C. 403p) and 22
U.S.C. 4069c and 4069c–1; subpart L also
issued under section 599C of Pub. L. 101–
513, 104 Stat. 2064 (5 U.S.C. 5561 note), as
amended; and subpart M also issued under
section 721 of Pub. L. 105–261 (10 U.S.C.
1108), 112 Stat. 2061; 25 U.S.C. 1647b.
Subpart N—Federal Employees Health
Benefits for Employees of Certain
Indian Tribal Employers
2. Amend § 890.1402 in paragraph (a)
by revising the definitions of ‘‘billing
unit,’’ ‘‘paymaster,’’ and ‘‘tribal
employer’’ and adding a definition for
‘‘tribally controlled schools’’ in
alphabetical order to read as follows:
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 890.1402 Definitions and deemed
references.
(a) * * *
Billing unit is a subdivision of the
tribal employer’s workforce that aligns
tribal employees for purposes of
administering FEHB enrollment and
collection of payment. A billing unit
may be either governmental or
commercial or a combination of both. So
long as a tribal employer purchases
FEHB for at least one billing unit that is
an Indian Tribe or tribal organization
carrying out at least one program under
the Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) or
Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988
(TCSA), or an urban Indian organization
carrying out at least one program under
title V of the Indian Health Care
Improvement Act (IHCIA), the tribal
employer may purchase FEHB for other
billing units without regard to its
programs.
*
*
*
*
*
Paymaster is the entity or entities
designated by OPM as responsible for
receiving FEHB premiums from the
tribal employer, forwarding premiums
to the Employees Health Benefits Fund,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Sep 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
and maintaining enrollment records for
all participating tribal employers.
*
*
*
*
*
Tribal employer is an Indian tribe or
tribal organization (as those terms are
defined in 25 U.S.C. chapter 18, ‘‘Indian
Health Care’’) carrying out at least one
program under the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act or the TCSA (25 U.S.C.
2501 et seq.); or an urban Indian
organization (as that term is defined in
25 U.S.C. chapter 18, ‘‘Indian Health
Care’’) carrying out at least one program
under title V of the Indian Health Care
Improvement Act. The tribe, tribal
organization, or urban Indian
organization is a tribal employer
provided that it certifies entitlement to
purchase FEHB according to the process
described in subpart N. FEHB benefits
that tribal employers are entitled to
purchase for their tribal employees are
set forth in this subpart and to the
extent there exists any ambiguity or
inconsistency between this subpart and
other subparts of this part, the terms of
this subpart will govern FEHB benefits
available for purchase by tribal
employers.
Tribally controlled school is a school
(as the term is defined in section 2511
of 25 U.S.C. chapter 27, ‘‘Tribally
Controlled School Grants’’) that is
operated by an Indian tribe or a tribal
organization, enrolling students in
kindergarten through grade 12,
including a preschool; is not a local
educational agency; and is not directly
administered by the Bureau of Indian
Affairs.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 890.1404 by revising
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2), (b)(5) and (9),
and (e)(1) to read as follows:
§ 890.1404 Tribal employer election and
agreement to purchase FEHB.
(a) * * *
(1) A tribal employer must purchase
FEHB for at least one billing unit
carrying out programs or activities
under the tribal employer’s ISDEAA or
IHCIA contract or TCSA grant.
(2) For so long as a tribal employer
continues to purchase FEHB for at least
one billing unit carrying out programs
or activities under a tribal employer’s
ISDEAA or IHCIA contract or TCSA
grant, the tribal employer may purchase
FEHB for one or more billing units
without regard to whether they are
carrying out programs or activities
under the tribal employer’s ISDEAA or
IHCIA contract or TCSA grant.
(b) * * *
(5) A certification and documentation
demonstrating that the tribal employer
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is entitled to purchase FEHB as either:
An Indian tribe or tribal organization
carrying out at least one program under
the Indian Self-Determination and
Education Assistance Act or Tribally
Controlled Schools Act of 1988; or an
urban Indian organization carrying out
at least one program under Title V of the
Indian Health Care Improvement Act;
*
*
*
*
*
(9) Agreement to provide notice to
OPM in the event that the tribal
employer is no longer carrying out at
least one program under the ISDEAA or
title V of IHCIA or the Tribally
Controlled Schools Act of 1988; and
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) An Indian tribe or tribal
organization carrying out at least one
program under the Indian SelfDetermination and Education
Assistance Act or under the Tribally
Controlled Schools Act of 1988; or
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–19042 Filed 9–2–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–64–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 800
[Doc. No. AMS–FGIS–20–0001]
RIN 0581–AD94
Fees for Supervision of Official
Inspection and Weighing Services
Performed by Delegated States and
Designated Agencies, Miscellaneous
Fees for Other Services, and Removal
of Specific Fee References
Agricultural Marketing Service,
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule revises
regulations under authority of the
United States Grain Standards Act
(USGSA) by implementing a
standardized formula model for
calculating Federal Grain Inspection
Service (FGIS) supervision fees. The
revision enables FGIS to adjust
supervision fees annually in order to
maintain an appropriate operating
reserve as required by the USGSA. As
with other Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) fee-based programs, AMS
will publish annual FGIS fee updates in
the Federal Register and post updated
fee schedules on its website. The
revision also eliminates or revises
certain registration and duplication fees
charged by FGIS.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03SER1.SGM
03SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 169 (Friday, September 3, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49461-49466]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19042]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 169 / Friday, September 3, 2021 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 49461]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 890
RIN 3206-AO18
Access to Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) for Employees
of Certain Tribally Controlled Schools
AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing an interim
final rule to expand eligibility for enrollment in the Federal
Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program to additional tribal
employees. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (FY21 CAA) amended
section 409 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act and expanded
entitlement to Indian tribes or tribal organizations carrying out
programs under the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988 (TCSA) to
purchase coverage, rights, and benefits under the FEHB Program for
their employees.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective on September 3, 2021.
Comment date: OPM must receive comments on or before November 2,
2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title, by the following method:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
All submissions received must include the agency name and docket
number or RIN for this document. The general policy for comments and
other submissions from members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public viewing at https://www.regulations.gov
as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers
or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia Elam, Program Analyst, at
[email protected] or (202) 606-2128.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FEHB Program Background
The FEHB Program was established in 1960 and is the largest
employer-sponsored health insurance program in the United States. As of
March 2021, there were approximately 8.2 million covered individuals in
the FEHB Program. Covered individuals, as defined in 5 CFR 890.101,
include employees of the Federal government, annuitants, members of
their families, former spouses, and miscellaneous groups, enumerated in
5 U.S.C. 8901; United States Postal Service employees and annuitants,
pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 1005; tribal employees of tribal employers,
pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 1647b; and separated employees and former
dependents who are eligible for Temporary Continuation of Coverage
under 5 U.S.C. 8905a.
For the 2021 plan year, there are 276 plan choices across the
entire FEHB Program. The actual number of options available to any
given enrollee depends on the individual's geographic location but will
include a minimum of 18 nationwide plan choices, as well as local and
regional plans. OPM estimates, using the 2020 head count, that total
2021 premiums are approximately $59 billion.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Section 1114 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Pub. L.
116-260) amended Section 409 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act
(25 U.S.C. 1647b) to extend entitlement to Indian tribes or tribal
organizations carrying out programs under the Tribally Controlled
Schools Act of 1988 (TCSA) (25 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.) to purchase
coverage, rights and benefits under the FEHB Program for their
employees.
The FEHB Program is administered by OPM in accordance with Title 5
Chapter 89, United States Code and implementing regulations (title 5,
parts 890, 892 and Title 48, Chapter 16).
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (Pub. L. 111-
148) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111-152), as amended extended entitlement to Indian tribes and
tribal organizations carrying out programs under the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) (Pub. L. 93-638),
and urban Indian organizations carrying out programs under Title V of
the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA) to purchase coverage,
rights, and benefits under the FEHB Program for their employees,
defined in the FEHB regulations as ``tribal employees.'' As the
administrator of the FEHB Program, OPM extended eligibility to tribal
employees of entitled tribal employers within the meaning of section
409 of the IHCIA. Tribal employers began purchasing FEHB for their
employees on March 22, 2012 with coverage effective on May 1, 2012. As
of April 2021, 125 tribes participate in the FEHB Program, and there
are 32,178 tribal employees for a total of 64,208 covered lives.
Tribally Controlled Schools and FEHB Eligibility
In 2010, section 409 of the IHCIA did not explicitly extend
entitlement to tribes and tribal organizations operating schools
pursuant to the TCSA. After the extension of FEHB to tribal employers
in 2012, OPM received applications from tribal schools carrying out
agreements under Public Law 100-297, commonly referred to as ``297
grant schools'' (hereinafter referred to as ``TCSA grant schools'').
OPM's understanding was that Public Law 100-297 contracts did not fall
within the ISDEAA or Title V of the IHCIA. In April 2012, OPM sent a
letter to the Interior Department's Office of the Solicitor seeking the
Solicitor's opinion regarding its conclusion that tribes or tribal
organizations carrying out programs under Public Law 100-297 were not
entitled to purchase FEHB. In June 2012, the Office of the Solicitor
within the Interior Department confirmed that tribal employers who
receive grants pursuant to Public Law 100-297 were not ``ipso facto
eligible to purchase Federal Employee Health Benefit (FEHB) . . .'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Sabrina A. McCarthy, Office of the Solicitor, U.S.
Department of the Interior, to John O' Brien, Director, Healthcare
and Insurance, Office of Personnel Management (June 1, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under Public Law 116-260, tribes or tribal organizations carrying
out programs under the TCSA became tribal
[[Page 49462]]
employers within the meaning of section 409 of the IHCIA and are
entitled to purchase coverage, rights, and benefits under the FEHB
Program for their tribal employees. Accordingly, under 25 U.S.C. 1647b,
tribally controlled schools include both TCSA grant schools and schools
operating under the ISDEAA (Pub. L. 93-638) or a ``638 contract.''
Tribes or tribal organizations operating schools under 638 contracts
were already entitled to purchase FEHB since the extension of FEHB to
tribal employers in 2012. Currently, there are 128 tribally controlled
schools with approximately 4,533 employees. Three of these tribally
controlled schools operate under 638 contracts schools, and the
remainder are TCSA grant schools. Tribal employees, as defined at 5 CFR
890.1402, across the 125 TCSA grant schools are now eligible for FEHB.
Section 1114 of the FY21 CAA is expected to make FEHB accessible to
approximately 4,328 tribal employees of entitled TCSA grant schools.
Tribal Consultation
Under Executive Order 13175, OPM has an obligation to engage in
``regular and meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal
officials in the development of Federal policies that have tribal
implications.'' OPM continues to be committed to effective consultation
and collaboration with tribes and tribal organizations.
OPM conducted extensive consultation with tribes and tribal
organizations in 2011 and 2012 before implementation of the Tribal FEHB
Program. OPM representatives attended more than 20 tribal conferences
and meetings to provide information and consultation about the Program.
In addition, OPM hosted training sessions for interested tribes and
tribal organizations on numerous occasions. OPM also published a series
of policy papers regarding the implementation of the Tribal FEHB
Program, and tribes, tribal organizations, and urban Indian
organizations were given an opportunity to provide feedback on these
papers. A Tribal Technical Workgroup was established to support the
implementation of the Tribal FEHB Program. Other tribal consultative
actions included collaborating with the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) to conduct in-person briefings for tribal communities
across the country, focusing on the implementation of the ACA.
Consultation for the Tribal FEHB Program is detailed in the proposed
rule, 81 FR 59907, and the final rule, 81 FR 95397, which are the
implementing regulations for section 409 of the IHCIA, and set forth
the conditions for coverage, rights, and benefits under the FEHB
Program for certain tribal employers who are entitled to purchase FEHB
coverage for their tribal employees. Public Law 116-260 has tribal
implications by broadening the category of eligible tribal employees of
tribally controlled schools that are entitled to purchase FEHB coverage
for their tribal employees.
On March 24, 2021, OPM issued a Dear Tribal Leader Letter (DTLL)
that outlined proposed consultation topics and provided background on
OPM's mission and activities. OPM also posted a public notice of the
Consultation on its website and on the National Congress of American
Indians (NCAI)'s consultation site, and OPM created a new page
dedicated to current and future consultation activities. On April 16,
2021, OPM held a virtual tribal consultation with tribes about federal
human resources policies and programs; ways to improve consultation and
sustain strong partnerships with Tribal governments; access to Federal
employee benefits, including the FEHB Program and the newly eligible
tribal employees of entitled tribally controlled schools under the FY21
CAA; and recruitment and hiring. A Dear Tribal Principals Letter was
also issued on May 20, 2021 announcing a Listening Session detailing
FEHB enrollment, which was held on June 8, 2021.
The public comment period for the interim final rule is an
important opportunity to receive meaningful feedback about the
entitlement of tribally controlled schools to purchase FEHB coverage
for their tribal employees. Upon publication of the interim final rule,
OPM will provide notification to Tribal Leaders, stakeholders, and
other interested parties alerting them of the publication of the rule
and the process for submitting formal comments. OPM has begun outreach
to and will continue to assist newly entitled tribally controlled
schools after the final rule is in effect.
Discussion of the Proposed Changes
This rule will clarify that newly entitled TCSA grant schools are
subject to FEHB regulations, as set forth in subpart N of 5 CFR 890 by
including them in the definition of ``tribal employer,'' and newly
eligible tribal employees are subject to applicable provisions in the
regulations. There are technical corrections and clarifications such as
amending the definitions of ``billing unit'' and 5 CFR 890.1402 to
tribe or tribal organization carrying out programs under the TCSA and
including the term ``tribally controlled school'' in 5 CFR 890.1402. In
addition, the definition of paymaster has been revised to clarify that
OPM may designate more than one entity to perform the responsibilities
of the paymaster. There is also the inclusion of tribally controlled
schools throughout subpart N in Part 890, the regulatory provisions on
FEHB,\2\ as defined in 5 CFR 890.1402. The newly entitled tribally
controlled schools are also included throughout section 5 CFR 890.1404,
which details a tribal employer's election and agreement to purchase
FEHB. These technical amendments are included at 5 CFR 890.1404(a)(1),
(a)(2), (b)(5), (b)(9), and (e)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A tribal employer includes an Indian tribe or tribal
organization carrying out at least one program under the ISDEAA; an
Indian tribe or tribal organization carrying out at least one
program under the TCSA; and an urban Indian organization carrying
out at least one program under title V of the IHCIA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expected Impact of Proposed Changes
While this rule identifies TCSA grant schools as tribal employers
entitled to purchase FEHB coverage for their tribal employees, pursuant
to Public Law 116-260, OPM does not believe this regulation will have a
large impact on the broader health insurance markets. Currently, there
are an estimated 4,533 eligible tribal employees of tribally controlled
schools, including TCSA grant schools and ``638 contract schools.''
Eligible tribal employees are full-time common law employees as
determined by a tribal employer. There are an estimated 4,328 newly
eligible tribal employees at TCSA grant schools. The impact on carriers
is relatively small, as tribal enrollments make up 0.78 percent of
enrollments in the FEHB Program. As of April 2021, the total tribal
enrollment in the FEHB Program is 32,178 with a total of 64,208 covered
lives. Overall, as of March 2021 there are over 4.1 million separate
enrollments in the FEHB Program, providing health insurance to about
8.2 million Federal employees, annuitants, certain tribal employees,
and their family members covered by the FEHB Program.
For states with larger AI/AN populations, OPM does not expect an
outsized impact on local carriers as local carriers plans generally
reflect the cost of their area. OPM does not anticipate that the newly
eligible tribal employees will be significantly more expensive than
other current FEHB enrollees in the same geographic region. For
example, OPM estimates, for tribally controlled schools in which data
is
[[Page 49463]]
available, that in states with large AI/AN populations, such as New
Mexico, Arizona, and South Dakota, only about 1,899 tribal employees
are eligible at TCSA grant schools. Therefore, OPM does not anticipate
a material impact if these tribal enrollees were to enroll in FEHB
coverage. For FEHB nationwide fee-for-service (FFS) plans, there will
not be enough new enrollees in this group to have a material impact.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
OPM is issuing this rulemaking as an interim final rule and has
determined that, under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), it would be impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the
public interest to delay a final regulation until a public notice and
comment process has been completed. For the same reasons, under the
Civil Service Reform Act's parallel rulemaking provision, 5 U.S.C.
1103(b)(3), OPM is waiving general notice of proposed rulemaking
because the interim final rule is temporary in nature and necessary to
be implemented expeditiously as a result of an emergency. OPM will
promulgate a final rule as soon as is practical after receiving public
comments on the interim final rule. The conclusion of a public notice
and comment period before the rule is finalized would be impracticable
because it would impede due and timely execution of OPM's functions:
This rule will facilitate the purchase of FEHB by entitled tribes
or tribal organizations carrying out programs under the TCSA that
became entitled to purchase FEHB on December 27, 2020, pursuant to the
enactment of Public Law 116-260. OPM, as administrator of the FEHB
Program and Tribal FEHB Program, has reached out to the U.S. Department
of Interior's Bureau of Indian Education to identify entitled tribally
controlled schools that may apply for the FEHB Program. Outreach
included identifying the entitled tribally controlled schools to
communicate with them about tribal employees' eligibility, enrollment,
and key dates for enrolling in FEHB; issuing a Dear Tribal Leader
Letter to announce an OPM wide consultation with Tribal Leaders in
accordance with the Presidential Memorandum on Tribal Consultation \3\
and conducting an OPM wide consultation with Tribal Leaders to improve
the ways OPM can partner with Tribal governments and provide services
to tribal members and employees on April 16, 2021; issuing a separate
letter to tribally controlled school principals about their entitlement
to purchase FEHB for their tribal employees; and working with the
paymaster to expedite processing of the newly entitled tribally
controlled schools.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Memorandum on Tribal Consultation and Strengthening Nation-
to-Nation Relationships, January 26, 2021, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/26/memorandum-on-tribal-consultation-andstrengthening-nation-to-nation-relationships/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent that a public notice and comment process would
furnish general public information about the entitlement of tribes or
tribal organizations carrying out programs under the TCSA and the
conditions for coverage, rights, and benefits under the FEHB Program
for employees of tribal employers, it is unnecessary in light of OPM's
outreach to Tribal Leaders and tribally controlled schools operated by
tribes and tribal organizations. Four eligible tribally controlled
schools elected to begin purchasing FEHB coverage for their tribal
employees on May 1, 2021 with an insurance coverage effective date of
May 1, 2021. As of July 2021, 7 tribally controlled schools have
enrolled in the FEHB Program.
Although OPM has engaged in these outreach efforts, given the law's
effective date of December 27, 2020, there is an immediate need for
this interim final rule in order to establish and regulate relations
between tribal employees and their employers, and between tribal
employers and OPM, and to ensure that proper processes for purchase of
FEHB coverage by tribally controlled schools and enrollment of tribal
employees are followed.
The expeditious implementation of these rules is necessary to
support the administration of the purchase of FEHB coverage by TCSA
grant schools and enrollment of their tribal employees. In addition,
implementation of these rules will serve to protect the rights of newly
eligible tribal employees by placing TCSA grant schools and tribal
employees on immediate notice that such processes have been implemented
to eliminate any doubt that might exist regarding the immediate ability
of tribally controlled schools to purchase FEHB covered for their
tribal employees and for tribal employees to enroll. Failure to
expeditiously implement these rules could lead to confusion and
administrative challenges due to a lack of awareness about the manner
in which this new coverage may be purchased and tribal employees may
enroll, as well as an unnecessary delay in providing healthcare
coverage.
On December 28, 2016, OPM promulgated a final rule, 81 FR 95397,
that established how FEHB enrollment under the Tribal FEHB Program is
administered, including eligibility; tribal employer and tribal
employee contribution to premiums; the process by which tribal
employers will access the program; the process by which tribal
employees will elect coverage, and circumstances for termination and
cancellation of enrollment; tribal employers responsibilities such as
communicating notice of termination of enrollment, and accompanying
rights and obligations, to their tribal employees. This interim final
rule includes technical amendments to clarify that newly entitled TCSA
grant schools are now tribal employers, and tribal employees of those
schools are subject to the regulations in subpart N in Part 890,
setting forth the conditions for coverage, rights, and benefits under
the FEHB Program for employees of tribal employers.
This interim final rule is urgently needed to establish that
tribally controlled schools are newly subject to the same regulations
as existing tribal employers and to assist them in understanding the
requirements of the Tribal FEHB Program. The interim final rule
includes TCSA grant schools as tribal employers who must follow the
same processes as other tribal employers. For example, they must
provide certification and documentation demonstrating that the tribal
employer is entitled to purchase FEHB as an Indian tribe or tribal
organization carrying out at least one program under Tribally
Controlled Schools Act of 1988. They are also subject to the
regulations, including, but not limited to, the following: election and
agreement to purchase FEHB; current deposit of premium payments and
collection of the administrative fee; acknowledging that participation
in FEHB makes the tribal employer subject to Federal Government audit
with respect to such participation; and administering the program in
accordance with the subpart N.
For these reasons, OPM has determined that the public notice and
participation that the APA ordinarily requires would, in this case, be
impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest and
that good cause exists for waiving proposed rulemaking and delaying its
solicitation of comments from the public until after it issues an
interim final rule. OPM will promulgate a final rule as soon as
practical after receiving comments on the interim final rule.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is
[[Page 49464]]
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity). This rule is a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866. As of July 2021, 7 tribally
controlled schools have enrolled in the FEHB Program. Currently, there
are an estimated 4,328 newly eligible employees of 297 grant schools
and 205 eligible tribal employees at 638 contract schools.
Need for Regulatory Action
The FY21 CAA amended section 409 of the IHCIA, codified at 25
U.S.C. 1647b, and expanded entitlement to tribes and tribal
organizations carrying out programs under the TCSA to purchase
coverage, rights and benefits under the FEHB Program for their tribal
employees. As the administrator of the FEHB Program, OPM has extended
eligibility to tribal employees of TCSA grant schools that have
purchased FEHB coverage within the meaning of section 409 as amended.
Issuance of Federal regulations without delay is necessary to apply the
existing rules that govern the relationship between OPM and tribal
employers, and between the tribal employers and their tribal employees
who have already elected to enroll in FEHB. Therefore, OPM has good
cause to issue interim final rules that will protect the interests of
all stakeholders, memorialize processes and procedures, and provide
transparency.
Currently, there are an estimated 4,328 newly eligible employees of
TCSA grant schools and 205 eligible tribal employees at three ``638
contract schools.'' Of these, 125 are tribally controlled schools where
FEHB was previously not available, and 3 are other schools for which
FEHB eligibility has previously been expanded.
At these affected schools, administrators will potentially take
steps to update their health insurance offerings in line with expanded
FEHB eligibility. This may include familiarization with FEHB policies,
planning, enrolling schools, and providing information to staff on plan
options. To the extent that this results in effort above and beyond
normal effort associated with administering the health insurance
selection process, this will generate costs for these schools. However,
OPM lacks data to estimate the extent to which this rule will generate
such costs.
This rule may affect expenses paid by tribal employers toward
health insurance premiums for employees. Under 5 CFR 890.1413(b),
tribal employers are required to contribute to the premium for tribal
employees at least the same as the Federal government does for its
employees and may contribute more, up to 100 percent of the premium
costs. Under 5 U.S.C. 8906, the Federal government contribution is
statutorily defined as the lesser of 72 percent of the weighted average
of all premiums or 75 percent of the plan premium. The Senate Report
\4\ mentioned previously suggests that some tribal employers currently
pay a substantial fraction of health insurance premiums, and that
access to FEHB will appreciably reduce premiums. To the extent that
this is the case, there will be a reduction in premium payments paid by
tribal employers. We lack data to estimate the magnitude of these
effects since they depend upon the number of enrollees who shift health
insurance decisions as a result of the rule, the characteristics of the
newly chosen health plans, and the portion of the premium paid by the
employer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, tribal employers are responsible for the costs
associated with administering the Tribal FEHB Program. The
administrative fee covers costs for the paymaster to process tribal
employee FEHB enrollments and collect and remit premiums. It also
covers costs associated with dedicated OPM staff who process new tribe
applications; oversee the paymaster; answer FEHB Program questions; and
issue FEHB Program guidance through Tribal Benefits Administration
Letters (TBALs) released and distributed to tribal employers. For
fiscal year 2021, the administrative fee is $5.63 per enrollee per
month.
There is an immediate need for affordable health insurance for
tribally controlled schools. According to a 2019 Senate Report,\5\ many
Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) grant schools face challenges covering
the cost of benefits for their employees because they do not have
access to lower-cost options through the FEHB Program. Another urgent
concern is that American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) experience
health disparities, and, according to the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), AI/AN have experienced disproportionate rates of
infection and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See U.S. Senate. To Allow Tribal Grant Schools to
Participate in the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (S. Rep.
No. 116-54). Available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CRPT-116srpt54/html/CRPT-116srpt54.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Furthermore, according to the NCAI and the National Indian Health
Board, many BIE grant schools utilize a portion of their educational
services funding to pay for health insurance and other benefits, which
reduces financial resources for textbooks, teacher's aides, and
extracurricular programs.\6\ Access to affordable health insurance
could also reduce the financial burden on tribally controlled schools
such that resources can be redirected for the benefit of students.
Another benefit is that TCSA grant schools are provided with equal
opportunity to enroll in the FEHB Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultimately, tribal schools assess the cost of participating in the
FEHB Program and decide if it provides net benefits to their schools.
For those tribally controlled schools that choose to participate it can
be assumed that the benefits outweigh the costs of participation, and
the Senate Report referenced above suggests that this may be the case
for many affected schools. As noted above, we lack data to estimate the
magnitude of these effects, and we seek public comment on data or
methods to estimate these impacts.
Effects on Tribal Employees
There are an estimated 4,328 newly eligible employees at tribally
controlled schools. As discussed above, this rule may result in tribal
employers updating coverage options for employees to include FEHB
plans. To the extent that this is the case, these employees may update
their health insurance choices. This may result in some expended effort
by affected employees, although the extent to which individuals will
engage in effort above and beyond the baseline effort associated with
health plan selection is unclear. The Senate Report referenced above
suggests that this rule may result in appreciable differences in plan
offerings and selections, although we lack data to estimate the
potential impact.
To the extent that individuals adjust their health insurance
choices, they may experience benefits. While the exact benefits of
health insurance are difficult to quantify for tribal employees of
tribally controlled schools, evidence supports that extending access to
FEHB coverage for newly eligible individuals could have positive
benefits. For example, Cecelia Firethunder, President of the Oglala
Lakota Nation Education Coalition (OLNEC), provided testimony at a
legislative hearing on H.R. 895, the Tribal School Federal Insurance
Parity Act, suggesting that access to FEHB coverage may allow access to
lower cost insurance options for their employees.\7\
[[Page 49465]]
This may, in turn, increase utilization of medical services for these
individuals, resulting in net benefits to society to the extent that
they provide benefits net of the costs of delivering these medical
services. Although this increased utilization would represent a cost,
it may result in a net benefit depending on the extent to which it
improves health outcomes. OPM lacks data to estimate these impacts, and
we request comment on data or methods to estimate potential impacts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Written Testimony of Cecelia Firethunder, President of
the Oglala Lakota Nation Education Coalition. House Indigenous
Peoples of the United States Subcommittee Legislative Hearing on
H.R. 895, the Tribal School Federal Insurance Parity Act (July 16,
2019), available at https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/109791/witnesses/HHRG-116-II24-Wstate-FirethunderC-20190716.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Access to FEHB for more tribal employees may help to reduce health
disparities. According to a Kaiser Family Foundation report published
in 2017, among nonelderly adults, AI/AN are more likely than other
adults to report being in fair or poor health, being overweight or
obese, and having diabetes.\8\ In addition, suicide disproportionately
affects AI/AN, and in a CDC study, AI/AN decedents had lower odds than
did White decedents of having received a mental health diagnosis or
mental health treatment.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Kaiser Family Foundation, Medicaid and American Indians
and Alaska Natives, September 7, 2017, https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-and-american-indians-and-alaska-natives/.
\9\ See ``Suicides Among American Indian/Alaska Natives--
National Violent Death Reporting System, 18 States, 2003-2014.''
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports, 67(8). March 2, 2018.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/wr/pdfs/mm6708a1-H.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recently, health disparities have been highlighted for AI/AN, who
have experienced disproportionate rates of infection and mortality
during the COVID-19 pandemic.\10\ For persons aged 20-29 years, 30-39
years, and 40-49 years, the COVID-19 mortality rates among AI/AN were
10.5, 11.6, and 8.2 times, respectively, those among White persons.\10\
Increasing access to affordable healthcare is a way to improve access
to medical and mental health services and may mitigate inequities. This
rule may mitigate health inequities to the extent that it increases
access to medical care.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effects on Other Parties
As described above, one expected impact of this rule is that
affected tribal employees will gain access to health insurance plans
with lower health insurance premiums. A reduction in those premiums
reflects transfers between various parties involved in these
transactions. The clearest effect is a transfer toward parties paying
for health benefits absent the expansion of FEHB benefits, which
largely include tribal employers and employees. This transfer is most
likely to come initially from reductions in payments to health
insurance providers or from offsetting increases in FEHB health
insurance premiums. We expect that, due to medical loss ratio\13\
regulations, premiums largely reflect medical costs experienced by
those insured by the plan. As a result, we expect that the rule will
largely initially result in a transfer from those paying FEHB premiums
(including enrollees and the Federal government) in the baseline to
entities who experience premium reductions under this rule. As
described above, we expect these effects to be quite small. However, we
lack data to estimate the magnitude of these effects, and request
public comment on data or methods to estimate any potential impacts.
Alternative Regulatory Approaches
OPM is unaware of feasible alternatives to this rule, as this
regulation aligns FEHB eligibility with the FY21 CAA, which amended
section 409 of the IHCIA. Currently, OPM regulations do not include
FEHB eligibility for Indian tribes or tribal organizations carrying out
programs under the TCSA, and this rule expands eligibility along these
lines. We request public comment on alternative approaches to this rule
which would generate net benefits for the public.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that this regulation will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Federalism
We have examined this rule in accordance with Executive Order
13132, Federalism, and have determined that this rule will not have any
negative impact on the rights, roles and responsibilities of State,
local, or Tribal governments.
Civil Justice Reform
This regulation meets the applicable standard set forth in
Executive Order 12988.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local or
Tribal governments of more than $100 million annually. Thus, no written
assessment of unfunded mandates is required.
Congressional Review Act
Subtitle E of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 (also known as the Congressional Review Act) (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.) requires rules (as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804) to be submitted to
Congress before taking effect. OPM will submit to Congress and the
Comptroller General of the United States a report regarding the
issuance of this action before its effective date, as required by 5
U.S.C. 801. OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this is not a ``major rule'' as defined by the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2)).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number.
This rule involves an OMB approved collection of information
subject to the PRA for the FEHB Program, OMB No. 3206-0160, Health
Benefits Election Form. The public reporting burden for this collection
is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. The total burden hour estimate for this form
is 9,000 hours. The systems of record notice for this collection is:
OPM/Central-23, ``FEHB Program Enrollment Records,'' available at
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-01259.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 890
Administrative practice and procedure, Government employees, Health
facilities, Health insurance, Health professions, Hostages, Indians,
Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Military personnel, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Retirement.
Office of Personnel Management.
Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
Accordingly, OPM amends title 5, Code of Federal Regulations part
890 as follows:
[[Page 49466]]
PART 890--FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for part 890 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8913; Sec. 890.102 also issued under
sections 11202(f), 11232(e), and 11246 (b) of Pub. L. 105-33, 111
Stat. 251; Sec. 890.111 also issued under section 1622(b) of Pub. L.
104-106, 110 Stat. 521 (36 U.S.C. 5522); Sec. 890.112 also issued
under section 1 of Pub. L. 110-279, 122 Stat. 2604 (2 U.S.C. 2051);
Sec. 890.113 also issued under section 1110 of Pub. L. 116-92, 133
Stat. 1198 (5 U.S.C. 8702 note); Sec. 890.301 also issued under
section 311 of Pub. L. 111-3, 123 Stat. 64 (26 U.S.C. 9801); Sec.
890.302(b) also issued under section 1001 of Pub. L. 111-148, 124
Stat. 119, as amended by Pub. L. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029 (42 U.S.C.
300gg-14); Sec. 890.803 also issued under 50 U.S.C. 3516 (formerly
50 U.S.C. 403p) and 22 U.S.C. 4069c and 4069c-1; subpart L also
issued under section 599C of Pub. L. 101-513, 104 Stat. 2064 (5
U.S.C. 5561 note), as amended; and subpart M also issued under
section 721 of Pub. L. 105-261 (10 U.S.C. 1108), 112 Stat. 2061; 25
U.S.C. 1647b.
Subpart N--Federal Employees Health Benefits for Employees of
Certain Indian Tribal Employers
0
2. Amend Sec. 890.1402 in paragraph (a) by revising the definitions of
``billing unit,'' ``paymaster,'' and ``tribal employer'' and adding a
definition for ``tribally controlled schools'' in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
Sec. 890.1402 Definitions and deemed references.
(a) * * *
Billing unit is a subdivision of the tribal employer's workforce
that aligns tribal employees for purposes of administering FEHB
enrollment and collection of payment. A billing unit may be either
governmental or commercial or a combination of both. So long as a
tribal employer purchases FEHB for at least one billing unit that is an
Indian Tribe or tribal organization carrying out at least one program
under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act
(ISDEAA) or Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988 (TCSA), or an urban
Indian organization carrying out at least one program under title V of
the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA), the tribal employer may
purchase FEHB for other billing units without regard to its programs.
* * * * *
Paymaster is the entity or entities designated by OPM as
responsible for receiving FEHB premiums from the tribal employer,
forwarding premiums to the Employees Health Benefits Fund, and
maintaining enrollment records for all participating tribal employers.
* * * * *
Tribal employer is an Indian tribe or tribal organization (as those
terms are defined in 25 U.S.C. chapter 18, ``Indian Health Care'')
carrying out at least one program under the Indian Self-Determination
and Education Assistance Act or the TCSA (25 U.S.C. 2501 et seq.); or
an urban Indian organization (as that term is defined in 25 U.S.C.
chapter 18, ``Indian Health Care'') carrying out at least one program
under title V of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act. The tribe,
tribal organization, or urban Indian organization is a tribal employer
provided that it certifies entitlement to purchase FEHB according to
the process described in subpart N. FEHB benefits that tribal employers
are entitled to purchase for their tribal employees are set forth in
this subpart and to the extent there exists any ambiguity or
inconsistency between this subpart and other subparts of this part, the
terms of this subpart will govern FEHB benefits available for purchase
by tribal employers.
Tribally controlled school is a school (as the term is defined in
section 2511 of 25 U.S.C. chapter 27, ``Tribally Controlled School
Grants'') that is operated by an Indian tribe or a tribal organization,
enrolling students in kindergarten through grade 12, including a
preschool; is not a local educational agency; and is not directly
administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 890.1404 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (2), (b)(5)
and (9), and (e)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 890.1404 Tribal employer election and agreement to purchase
FEHB.
(a) * * *
(1) A tribal employer must purchase FEHB for at least one billing
unit carrying out programs or activities under the tribal employer's
ISDEAA or IHCIA contract or TCSA grant.
(2) For so long as a tribal employer continues to purchase FEHB for
at least one billing unit carrying out programs or activities under a
tribal employer's ISDEAA or IHCIA contract or TCSA grant, the tribal
employer may purchase FEHB for one or more billing units without regard
to whether they are carrying out programs or activities under the
tribal employer's ISDEAA or IHCIA contract or TCSA grant.
(b) * * *
(5) A certification and documentation demonstrating that the tribal
employer is entitled to purchase FEHB as either: An Indian tribe or
tribal organization carrying out at least one program under the Indian
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act or Tribally Controlled
Schools Act of 1988; or an urban Indian organization carrying out at
least one program under Title V of the Indian Health Care Improvement
Act;
* * * * *
(9) Agreement to provide notice to OPM in the event that the tribal
employer is no longer carrying out at least one program under the
ISDEAA or title V of IHCIA or the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of
1988; and
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) An Indian tribe or tribal organization carrying out at least
one program under the Indian Self-Determination and Education
Assistance Act or under the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988; or
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-19042 Filed 9-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-64-P