Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3, 48446-48450 [2021-18600]

Agencies

• NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 165 (Monday, August 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48446-48450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18600]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249; NRC-2021-0155]


Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Dresden Nuclear Power Station, 
Units 2 and 3

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Exemption; issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an 
exemption in response to a September 28, 2020, request from Exelon 
Generation Company, LLC. The exemption allows either a licensed senior 
operator or a certified fuel handler to approve the emergency 
suspension of security measures for Dresden Nuclear Power Station, 
Units 2 and 3 during certain emergency

[[Page 48447]]

conditions or during severe weather after both the certification of 
permanent cessation of operations and the certification of permanent 
fuel removal have been docketed for the facility.

DATES: The exemption was issued on August 23, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2021-0155 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2021-0155. Address 
questions about Docket IDs in Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; 
telephone: 301-415-0624; email: [email protected]. For technical 
questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section of this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS 
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, contact the NRC's Public Document 
Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email 
to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document 
referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time 
that it is mentioned in this document.
     Attention: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies 
of public documents, is currently closed. You may submit your request 
to the PDR via email at [email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209 or 
301-415-4737, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (ET), Monday through 
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joel S. Wiebe, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-6606; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the exemption is attached.

    Dated: August 25, 2021.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joel S. Wiebe,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch III, Division of 
Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

Attachment: Exemption

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249

Exelon Generation Company, LLC; Dresden Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 
and 3

Exemption Related to the Approval Authority for Suspension of Security 
Measures in an Emergency or During Severe Weather

I. Background

    Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) is the holder of Renewed 
Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-19 and DPR-25 for the Dresden 
Nuclear Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (Dresden). The licenses provide, 
among other things, that the facility is subject to all applicable 
rules, regulations, and orders of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission (NRC, the Commission), now or hereafter in effect. The 
Dresden facility consists of two boiling-water reactors located in 
Grundy County, Illinois.
    By letter dated September 2, 2020 (Agencywide Documents Access and 
Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML20246G627), Exelon provided 
formal notification to the NRC pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Sections 50.82(a)(1)(i) and 50.4(b)(8) of 
the intention to permanently cease power operations at Dresden on or 
before November 30, 2021.
    In accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(i)-(ii) and 50.82(a)(2), the 
10 CFR part 50 licenses for the facility will no longer authorize 
reactor operation or emplacement or retention of fuel in the reactor 
vessel after certifications of permanent cessation of operations and 
permanent removal of fuel from the reactor vessel are docketed for 
Dresden. As a result, licensed senior operators (i.e., individuals 
licensed under 10 CFR part 55 to manipulate the controls of a facility 
and to direct the licensed activities of licensed operators) will no 
longer be required to support plant operating activities. Instead, 
certified fuel handlers (CFHs) (i.e., non-licensed operators who have 
qualified in accordance with a fuel handler training program approved 
by the Commission) will perform activities associated with 
decommissioning, irradiated fuel handling, and management. Commission 
approval of a fuel handler training program is needed to facilitate 
these activities.
    By letter dated September 24, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML20269A233), Exelon submitted a request for Commission approval of the 
CFH Training and Retraining Program for Dresden and by letter dated 
August 17, 2021 (ADAMS Accession No. ML21076A371), the Commission 
approved the CFH Training and Retraining Program. The CFH Training and 
Retraining Program is to be used to satisfy training requirements for 
the plant personnel responsible for supervising and directing the 
monitoring, storage, handling, and cooling of irradiated fuel in a 
manner consistent with ensuring the health and safety of the public. As 
stated in 10 CFR 50.2, ``Definitions,'' CFHs are qualified in 
accordance with a Commission-approved training program.

II. Request/Action

    The Commission's regulation at 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1) addresses the 
suspension of security measures in an emergency (10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(i)) 
or during severe weather (10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(ii)) by stating:

    The licensee may suspend implementation of affected requirements 
of this section under the following conditions:
    (i) In accordance with Sec. Sec.  50.54(x) and 50.54(y) of this 
chapter, the licensee may suspend any security measures under this 
section in an emergency when this action is immediately needed to 
protect the public health and safety and no action consistent with 
license conditions and technical specifications that can provide 
adequate or equivalent protection is immediately apparent. This 
suspension of security measures must be approved as a minimum by a 
licensed senior operator before taking this action.
    (ii) During severe weather when the suspension of affected 
security measures is immediately needed to protect the personal 
health and safety of security force personnel and no other 
immediately apparent action consistent with the license conditions 
and technical specifications can provide adequate or equivalent 
protection. This suspension of security measures must be approved, 
as a minimum, by a licensed senior operator, with input from the 
security supervisor or manager, before taking this action.

    By letter dated September 28, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML20272A212), Exelon requested an exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(i) 
and (ii), pursuant to 10 CFR 73.5, ``Specific exemptions.'' Consistent 
with 10 CFR 50.54(y), the proposed exemption would authorize a CFH, in 
addition to a licensed senior operator, to approve the suspension of 
security measures in an emergency or during severe weather at Dresden.

[[Page 48448]]

III. Discussion

    The NRC's security rules have long recognized the potential need to 
suspend security or safeguards measures under certain conditions. 
Accordingly, 10 CFR 50.54(x) and (y), first published in 1983, allow a 
licensee to take reasonable actions in an emergency that depart from 
license conditions or technical specifications when those actions are 
immediately ``needed to protect the public health and safety'' and no 
actions consistent with license conditions and technical specifications 
that can provide adequate or equivalent protection are immediately 
apparent (48 FR 13970; April 1, 1983). This departure from license 
conditions or technical specifications must be approved, as a minimum, 
by a licensed senior operator. In 1986, in its final rule, 
``Miscellaneous Amendments Concerning the Physical Protection of 
Nuclear Power Plants'' (51 FR 27817; August 4, 1986), the Commission 
issued 10 CFR 73.55(a), stating, in part:

    In accordance with Sec.  50.54 (x) and (y) of Part 50, the 
licensee may suspend any safeguards measures pursuant to Sec.  73.55 
in an emergency when this action is immediately needed to protect 
the public health and safety and no action consistent with license 
conditions and technical specification that can provide adequate or 
equivalent protection is immediately apparent. This suspension must 
be approved as a minimum by a licensed senior operator prior to 
taking the action.

    In 1996, the NRC made a number of regulatory changes to address 
decommissioning. One of the changes was to amend 10 CFR 50.54(x) and 
(y) to authorize a non-licensed operator called a ``certified fuel 
handler,'' in addition to a licensed senior operator, to approve such 
protective actions in an emergency situation at a permanently shutdown 
facility. Specifically, in addressing the role of the CFH during 
emergencies, the Commission stated in the proposed rule, 
``Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors'' (60 FR 37379; July 20, 
1995):

    The Commission is proposing to amend 10 CFR 50.54(y) to permit a 
certified fuel handler at nuclear power reactors that have 
permanently ceased operations and permanently removed fuel from the 
reactor vessel, subject to the requirements of Sec.  50.82(a) and 
consistent with the proposed definition of ``Certified Fuel 
Handler'' specified in Sec.  50.2, to make these evaluations and 
judgments. A nuclear power reactor that has permanently ceased 
operations and no longer has fuel in the reactor vessel does not 
require a licensed individual to monitor core conditions. A 
certified fuel handler at a permanently shutdown and defueled 
nuclear power reactor undergoing decommissioning is an individual 
who has the requisite knowledge and experience to evaluate plant 
conditions and make these judgments.

    In the final rule (61 FR 39298; July 29, 1996), the NRC added the 
following definition to 10 CFR 50.2: ``Certified fuel handler means, 
for a nuclear power reactor facility, a non-licensed operator who has 
qualified in accordance with a fuel handler training program approved 
by the Commission.'' However, the decommissioning rule did not propose 
or make parallel changes to 10 CFR 73.55(a), and did not discuss the 
role of a non-licensed CFH at a permanently shutdown facility.
    In the final rule, ``Power Reactor Security Requirements'' (74 FR 
13926; March 27, 2009), the NRC relocated the security suspension 
requirements from 10 CFR 73.55(a) to 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(i) and (ii). 
The role of a CFH was not discussed in the rulemaking; therefore, the 
suspension of security measures in accordance with 10 CFR 73.55(p) 
continues to require approval, as a minimum, by a licensed senior 
operator, even for a permanently shutdown facility.
    Under 10 CFR 73.5, the Commission may, upon application of any 
interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the 
requirements of 10 CFR part 73, as it determines are authorized by law, 
will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, 
and are otherwise in the public interest. As explained below, the 
proposed exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or 
property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the 
public interest.

A. The Exemption Is Authorized by Law

    The proposed exemption from 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(i) and (ii) would 
permit, as a minimum, a CFH, in addition to a licensed senior operator, 
to approve the suspension of security measures in an emergency or 
during severe weather at Dresden when it is permanently shutdown. 
Although the exemption is effective upon receipt, the actions permitted 
by the proposed exemption may not be implemented at Dresden until the 
10 CFR part 50 licenses no longer authorize operation of the reactors 
or emplacement or retention of fuel in the reactor vessels in 
accordance with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(2). The intent of the proposed 
exemption is to align these regulations with 10 CFR 50.54(y) by using 
the authority of either a licensed senior operator or a CFH to approve 
the suspension of security measures during an emergency or during 
severe weather.
    Per 10 CFR 73.5, the NRC is authorized to grant specific exemptions 
from the regulations in 10 CFR part 73, as are authorized by law. The 
NRC staff has determined that granting the proposed exemption is 
consistent with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and not 
otherwise inconsistent with NRC regulations or other applicable laws. 
Therefore, the exemption is authorized by law.

B. The Exemption Will Not Endanger Life or Property or the Common 
Defense and Security

    Permitting, as a minimum, a CFH, in addition to a licensed senior 
operator, to approve the suspension of security measures in an 
emergency or during severe weather at Dresden when it is permanently 
shutdown will not endanger life or property or the common defense and 
security for the reasons discussed below.
    First, 10 CFR 73.55(p)(2) will continue to require that 
``[s]uspended security measures must be reinstated as soon as 
conditions permit.''
    Second, the suspension of security measures for non-weather 
emergencies under 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(i) will continue to be invoked 
only ``when this action is immediately needed to protect the public 
health and safety and no action consistent with license conditions and 
technical specifications that can provide adequate or equivalent 
protection is immediately apparent.'' Thus, the exemption would not 
prevent the licensee from meeting the underlying purpose of 10 CFR 
73.55(p)(1)(i) to protect the public health and safety.
    Third, the suspension of security measures for severe weather under 
10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(ii) will continue to be used only when ``the 
suspension of affected security measures is immediately needed to 
protect the personal health and safety of security force personnel and 
no other immediately apparent action consistent with the license 
conditions and technical specifications can provide adequate or 
equivalent protection.'' The requirement in 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(ii) to 
receive input from the security supervisor or manager will remain. 
Therefore, the exemption would not prevent the licensee from meeting 
the underlying purpose of 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(ii) to protect the health 
and safety of the security force.
    Additionally, by letter dated August 17, 2021, the NRC approved the 
Dresden CFH Training and Retraining Program. The NRC staff found that, 
among other things, the program addresses the safe conduct of 
decommissioning activities, the safe handling and storage of spent 
fuel, and the appropriate response to plant emergencies. Because a CFH 
at Dresden will be sufficiently trained and

[[Page 48449]]

qualified under an NRC-approved program, the NRC staff considers the 
CFH to have sufficient knowledge of operational and safety concerns, 
such that allowing the CFH to suspend security measures in an emergency 
or during severe weather will not result in undue risk to the public 
health and safety.
    In addition, since the exemption allows a CFH the same authority 
currently given to the licensed senior operator under 10 CFR 
73.55(p)(1)(i) and (ii), no change is required to physical security. 
Since no change is required to physical security, the exemption would 
not reduce the overall effectiveness of the Dresden physical security 
plan and would not adversely impact the licensee's ability to 
physically secure the site or protect special nuclear material at 
Dresden and, thus, would not have an effect on the common defense and 
security. The NRC staff has determined that the exemption would not 
reduce security measures currently in place to protect against 
radiological sabotage. Instead, the exemption would align the 
requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(i) and (ii) with the existing 
requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(y).
    For these reasons, granting the exemption from the requirements in 
10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(i) and (ii) to permit, as a minimum, a CFH, in 
addition to a licensed senior operator, to approve the suspension of 
security measures in an emergency or during severe weather at Dresden 
when it is permanently shutdown will not endanger life or property or 
the common defense and security.

C. The Exemption Is Otherwise in the Public Interest

    The proposed exemption would allow a CFH, in addition to a licensed 
senior operator, to approve the suspension of security measures in an 
emergency when ``immediately needed to protect the public health and 
safety'' or during severe weather when ``immediately needed to protect 
the personal health and safety of security force personnel'' at Dresden 
when it is permanently shutdown. If the exemption is not granted, 
Dresden will be required to have a licensed senior operator available 
to approve the suspension of security measures in an emergency or 
during severe weather for a permanently shutdown plant, even though 
there would no longer be an NRC requirement for Exelon to maintain a 
licensed senior operator at Dresden after the certifications required 
by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(i) and (ii) are submitted.
    This proposed exemption is in the public interest for the following 
reasons. Without the exemption there would be uncertainty regarding how 
the licensee would invoke the temporary suspension of security measures 
that may be needed for protecting the public health and safety or the 
personal health and safety of the security force personnel in 
emergencies or during severe weather, given the differences between the 
requirements in 10 CFR 73.55(p)(1)(i) and (ii) and 10 CFR 50.54(y). The 
exemption would allow the licensee to make decisions pursuant to 10 CFR 
73.55(p)(1)(i) and (ii) without having to maintain a staff of licensed 
senior operators at a nuclear power reactor that has permanently ceased 
operations and permanently removed fuel from the reactor vessel. The 
exemption would also allow the licensee to have an established 
procedure in place to allow either a licensed senior operator or a CFH 
to suspend security measures in an emergency or during severe weather 
after the certifications required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(i) and (ii) 
have been submitted. Finally, the consistent and efficient regulation 
of nuclear power plants serves the public interest and this exemption 
would assure consistency between the regulations in 10 CFR part 73 and 
10 CFR 50.54(y) and the requirements concerning licensed operators in 
10 CFR part 55.
    The NRC staff has determined that granting the proposed exemption 
would allow the licensee to designate a CFH with qualifications 
appropriate for a permanently shutdown and defueled reactor to approve 
the suspension of security measures in an emergency to protect the 
public health and safety and during severe weather to protect the 
personal health and safety of the security force personnel. The actions 
permitted by the exemption may be implemented at Dresden when both the 
certification of permanent cessation of operations and the 
certification of permanent fuel removal are submitted in accordance 
with 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(i) and (ii), which is consistent with the 
similar authority provided by 10 CFR 50.54(y). Therefore, the exemption 
is in the public interest.

D. Environmental Consideration

    The NRC's approval of the proposed exemption belongs to a category 
of actions that the Commission, by rule or regulation, has declared to 
be a categorical exclusion, after first finding that the category of 
actions does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect 
on the human environment. Specifically, the NRC's approval of the 
exemption is categorically excluded from further environmental analysis 
under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25).
    Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), the granting of an exemption from the 
requirements of any regulation of Chapter I to 10 CFR is a categorical 
exclusion provided that: (i) There is no significant hazards 
consideration; (ii) there is no significant change in the types or 
significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be 
released offsite; (iii) there is no significant increase in individual 
or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure; (iv) there is 
no significant construction impact; (v) there is no significant 
increase in the potential for or consequences from radiological 
accidents; and (vi) the requirements from which the exemption is sought 
involve, among others: Safeguard plans, and materials control and 
accounting inventory scheduling requirements or other requirements of 
an administrative, managerial, or organizational nature. The basis for 
the NRC's determination is provided in the following evaluation of the 
requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)-(vi).
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)
    To qualify for a categorical exclusion under 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(i), the exemption must involve a no significant hazards 
consideration. The criteria for making a no significant hazards 
consideration determination are found in 10 CFR 50.92(c). The NRC staff 
has determined that granting the proposed exemption involves no 
significant hazards consideration because allowing a CFH, in addition 
to a licensed senior operator, to approve the security suspension at a 
permanently shutdown and defueled power plant does not (1) involve a 
significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident 
previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new or 
different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or 
(3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The proposed 
exemption is unrelated to any operational restriction. Therefore, the 
requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i) are met.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii) and (iii)
    The proposed exemption would not change radioactive effluents or 
emissions that affect radiation exposures to plant workers and members 
of the public. Accordingly, there is no significant change in the types 
or significant increase in the

[[Page 48450]]

amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite and no 
significant increase in individual or cumulative public or occupational 
radiation exposure. Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(ii) and (iii) are met.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv)
    The proposed exemption is not associated with construction or major 
renovations of any buildings or structures. Therefore, the requirements 
of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv) are met because there is no significant 
construction impact.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v)
    The proposed exemption does not concern the source term (i.e., 
potential amount of radiation in an accident) or mitigation. Thus, 
there is no significant increase in the potential for or consequences 
from radiological accidents. Therefore, the requirements of 10 CFR 
51.22(c)(25)(v) are met.
Requirements in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)
    The proposed exemption is from the requirement to have a licensed 
senior operator approve suspensions of security measures in an 
emergency or during severe weather. Therefore, the requirement from 
which the exemption is sought involves safeguard plans, materials 
control, and managerial and organizational matters and, thus, the 
requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi) are met.
Determination Regarding 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25) Requirements
    Based on the above, the NRC staff determines that the proposed 
exemption meets the eligibility criteria for a categorical exclusion 
set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 
51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment 
need be prepared in connection with the approval of the proposed 
exemption.

IV. Conclusion

    Accordingly, the Commission has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 
73.5, the proposed exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger 
life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise 
in the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby grants the 
licensee's request for an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 
73.55(p)(1)(i) and (ii) to allow either a licensed senior operator or a 
CFH to approve the suspension of security measures in an emergency or 
during severe weather at Dresden once the certifications required under 
10 CFR 50.82(a)(1) have been submitted.
    The exemption is effective upon receipt.

    Dated: August 23, 2021.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Caroline L. Carusone,
Deputy Director, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2021-18600 Filed 8-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P