Record of Decision for the Proposed Heavy Off-Road Mounted Maneuver Training Area at Fort Benning, Georgia, 48129-48130 [2021-18465]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 164 / Friday, August 27, 2021 / Notices
NSN(s)—Product Name(s): 7520–01–619–
0302—Portable Desktop Clipboard, 91⁄2″
W x 11⁄2″ D x 131⁄2″ H, Army Green
Designated Source of Supply: LC Industries,
Inc., Durham, NC
Contracting Activity: GSA/FAS ADMIN
SVCS ACQUISITION BR(2, NEW YORK,
NY
NSN(s)—Product Name(s): 7530–01–425–
4088—Writing Pad, Self-Stick,
Repositionable, Phone Message, Assorted
Pastel, 4″ x 5″
Designated Source of Supply: Asso. for the
Blind and Visually Impaired-Goodwill
Industries of Greater Rochester, Inc.,
Rochester, NY
Contracting Activity: GSA/FAS ADMIN
SVCS ACQUISITION BR(2, NEW YORK,
NY
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7520–01–451–9180—Pen, Ballpoint,
Retractable, Essential LVX, Red, Medium
Point
7520–01–451–9183—Pen, Ballpoint,
Retractable, Essential LVX, Blue, Fine
Point
Designated Source of Supply: Industries for
the Blind and Visually Impaired, Inc.,
West Allis, WI
Contracting Activity: GSA/FAS ADMIN
SVCS ACQUISITION BR(2, NEW YORK,
NY
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
7930–01–512–7169—Cleaner, Carpet and
Upholstery, 1 Gal
8520–01–512–7757—Soap, Hand,
Biobased, Coconut Oil, 1 Gallon
Designated Source of Supply: The Lighthouse
for the Blind, St. Louis, MO
Contracting Activity: GSA/FSS GREATER
SOUTHWEST ACQUISITI, FORT
WORTH, TX
Service(s)
Service Type: Mailing Services
Mandatory for: Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 52 Corporate Circle,
Albany, NY
Designated Source of Supply: Northeastern
Association of the Blind at Albany, Inc.,
Albany, NY
Contracting Activity: HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
DEPARTMENT OF, DEPT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Michael R. Jurkowski,
Acting Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2021–18494 Filed 8–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Department of the Army
Record of Decision for the Proposed
Heavy Off-Road Mounted Maneuver
Training Area at Fort Benning, Georgia
Department of the Army,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Aug 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
The Department of the Army
(Army) announces the availability of its
Record of Decision (ROD) for the
proposed Heavy Off-Road Mounted
Maneuver Training Area (HOMMTA) at
Fort Benning, Georgia. In accordance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), the ROD identifies the
Army’s Selected Alternative (and basis
for its selection), the Environmentally
Preferred Alternative, and the mitigation
measures the Army commits to
implement with the Selected
Alternative. The ROD is based on the
results of the Army’s Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
that analyzed the potential
environmental and socioeconomic
impacts associated with constructing,
operating, and maintaining a HOMMTA
of at least 2,400 contiguous acres at Fort
Benning to support off-road mounted
maneuver (Proposed Action).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please contact Mr. John Brown, Fort
Benning Environmental Management
Division, at john.e.brown12.civ@
mail.mil or (706) 545–7549 between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m. ET. Fort Benning has
also established a web page that
contains information updates and
background on the HOMMTA Final EIS
and ROD, including the materials
identified in this NOA, at https://
www.benning.army.mil/Garrison/DPW/
EMD/HOMMTA/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Proposed Action will support the
Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCoE)
in its mission to train maneuver soldiers
and leaders of the Army and would
increase the total amount of heavy offroad maneuver training area on Fort
Benning, enabling the Army to conduct
realistic training in accordance with
current Army training requirements.
The Proposed Action will provide a
training area to meet existing training
needs; it will not result in additional
soldiers, traffic, or any training off of the
Installation. Training land development
will occur over a 2- to 3-year period;
development will primarily include
vegetation removal and the construction
of tank trails, culverted water crossings,
and road upgrades, as well as burying
existing overhead utilities. As feasible,
buffers will be used to protect
environmentally sensitive resources
such as streams, wetlands, cemeteries,
and archaeological sites.
Fort Benning serves a critical role in
supporting the Army’s overarching
mission. Fort Benning’s institutional
training provides Army leaders with the
opportunity to respond to a wide variety
of situations that they can expect to
encounter on the modern battlefield.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
48129
Fort Benning must be able to train and
develop highly skilled and cohesive
units capable of conducting operations
across the full spectrum of potential
conflicts. Inherent in and vital to
training Infantry and Armor soldiers
and leaders properly is the requirement
to provide sufficient heavy off-road
mounted maneuver training area.
Currently, the only training area at
Fort Benning suitable for heavy off-road
mounted maneuver training is the Good
Hope Maneuver Training Area
(GHMTA), which contains various
environmental constraints that cannot
support the maneuver training
requirements of the MCoE. As such, Fort
Benning proposed to construct a new
HOMMTA with sufficient contiguous
area to enable all units and courses to
complete required cross-domain
movement and maneuver training.
The Final EIS, published on February
26, 2021 and supported by other
studies, analyses, and permit
applications to meet Federal
requirements (e.g., the Endangered
Species Act and Clean Water Act),
analyzed the potential environmental
and socioeconomic impacts associated
with the Proposed Action, including
direct, indirect, and cumulative effects.
The Final EIS responded to comments
received on the Draft EIS. The Final EIS
also identified mitigation measures that
the Army may implement to reduce
potential adverse impacts.
The Army studied three reasonable
Action Alternatives (i.e., three distinct
locations on Fort Benning where a
HOMMTA could be constructed) that
would meet the purpose of and need for
the Proposed Action:
Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative):
Northern Mounted Maneuver Training
Area Alternative: This alternative
includes approximately 4,724 acres and
is located adjacent to and east of the
current Northern Maneuver Training
Area and west of and near Fort
Benning’s Digital Multi-Purpose Range
Complex (DMPRC).
Of the Action Alternatives,
Alternative 1 would provide the most
preferable size and configuration to
enable high-quality heavy off-road
mounted maneuver training.
Accordingly, the Army identified
Alternative 1 as the Preferred
Alternative to implement the Proposed
Action in the Draft and Final EIS.
Alternative 2: Red Diamond
Alternative: This alternative includes
approximately 3,744 acres and is
located south of the Southern Maneuver
Training Area (SMTA) near the
Installation’s southern boundary.
Alternative 3: Eastern Boundary
Alternative: This alternative includes
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
48130
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 164 / Friday, August 27, 2021 / Notices
approximately 2,405 acres and is
located between the northern dudded
impact area and the Installation’s
eastern boundary.
The Army also analyzed the No
Action Alternative in detail. While the
No Action Alternative would not satisfy
the purpose of or need for the Proposed
Action, it was retained to provide a
comparative baseline against which to
analyze the effects of the Action
Alternatives as required under the
Council on Environmental Quality’s
NEPA Regulations.
During formal consultation with the
US Fish and Wildlife Service, the Army
determined that potential moderate
adverse impacts on the federally listed
red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) would
occur primarily from removal of clusters
and habitat during HOMMTA
construction, resulting in up to 11
‘‘incidental takes.’’ The HOMMTA
Biological Opinion, however, reached
the conclusion that the Army can
reduce those potential adverse impacts
through mitigation, and implementation
of the HOMMTA with Alternative 1
would not jeopardize recovery of the
RCW.
Potential impacts to Unique
Ecological Areas, a subcomponent of
biological resources, may be significant
if they cannot be fully avoided with
implementation of Alternative 1. No
other resource is anticipated to
experience significant adverse impacts.
Based on the analysis presented in the
Final EIS, the No Action Alternative is
the Environmentally Preferred
Alternative. Of the Action Alternatives,
Alternative 2 is the Environmentally
Preferred Alternative. Considering
potential environmental and
socioeconomic impacts, national
defense needs, Fort Benning’s mission
requirements, and the purpose of and
need for the Proposed Action, however,
the Army has selected Alternative 1 (i.e.,
the Army’s Preferred Alternative) to
implement the Proposed Action. The
Army determined that Alternative 1
strikes a proper balance between
providing environmental protection and
achieving the Army’s training
requirements.
The Army received several comments
during the Final EIS waiting period. The
Army took these comments into account
in making its decision; however, the
comments do not present information
that constitutes significant new
circumstances or information relevant to
environmental concerns that would
require supplementation of the EIS.
The ROD formally adopts numerous
mitigation measures that the Army will
implement to reduce potential adverse
environmental impacts under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:52 Aug 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
Alternative 1. All practicable means to
avoid or minimize environmental harm
from the Selected Alternative have been
adopted. Mitigation measures that the
Army considered but does not adopt at
this time are listed in the Draft
Mitigation and Monitoring Plan in the
Final EIS with explanations of why
those mitigation measures were
considered not practical or necessary.
An electronic copy of the ROD is
posted on the HOMMTA EIS web page
at https://www.benning.army.mil/
Garrison/DPW/EMD/HOMMTA.
Additionally, interested parties may
contact Mr. John Brown (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) to
request a printed copy.
Publication of the ROD formally
concludes the NEPA planning process
for this Proposed Action,
acknowledging that the Army will
implement the adopted mitigation
measures as identified in the ROD. The
Army will implement Alternative 1,
including all mitigation measures
identified in the ROD, as described in
the Final EIS.
James W. Satterwhite, Jr.,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–18465 Filed 8–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5061–AP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD–2021–OS–0035]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Intelligence, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: 30-Day information collection
notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense
has submitted to OMB for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by September 27,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Duncan, 571–372–7574, or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dodinformation-collections@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Federal Background
Investigation and Personnel Vetting
Investigative Request Forms (INV 40–
44); INV Forms 40–44; OMB Control
Number 0705–0003.
Type of Request: Revision.
Number of Respondents: 2,591,229.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 2,591,229.
Average Burden per Response: 5
minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 215,935.75.
Needs and Uses: The information
collected on the INV Forms 40–44 is
used for Federal and Federal contract
employment. The forms are used to
collect information from a multitude of
record sources to support federal
background investigation and personnel
vetting processes such as: investigations
and determinations of eligibility for
access to classified national security
information, and for access to special
access programs; suitability for federal
employment; fitness of contractor
personnel to perform work for or on
behalf of the U.S. Government; and
Homeland Security Presidential
Directive (HSPD)-12 determinations for
Personal Identity Verification (PIV)
credentials to gain logical or physical
access to government facilities and
systems. The content of the INV forms
is also designed to meet notice
requirements for personnel
investigations specified by 5 CFR
736.102(c). These notice requirements
apply to any ‘‘investigation . . . to
determine the suitability, eligibility, or
qualifications of individuals for Federal
employment, for work on Federal
contracts, or for access to classified
information or restricted areas.’’ None of
the forms are used for any purpose other
than a personnel background
investigation, as described above.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; Businesses or other forprofit; Not-for-profit Institutions; State,
Local or Tribal Government.
Frequency: As Required.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet
Seehra.
You may also submit comments and
recommendations, identified by Docket
ID number and title, by the following
method:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, Docket
ID number, and title for this Federal
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 164 (Friday, August 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48129-48130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18465]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Record of Decision for the Proposed Heavy Off-Road Mounted
Maneuver Training Area at Fort Benning, Georgia
AGENCY: Department of the Army, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army (Army) announces the availability
of its Record of Decision (ROD) for the proposed Heavy Off-Road Mounted
Maneuver Training Area (HOMMTA) at Fort Benning, Georgia. In accordance
with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the ROD identifies
the Army's Selected Alternative (and basis for its selection), the
Environmentally Preferred Alternative, and the mitigation measures the
Army commits to implement with the Selected Alternative. The ROD is
based on the results of the Army's Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) that analyzed the potential environmental and socioeconomic
impacts associated with constructing, operating, and maintaining a
HOMMTA of at least 2,400 contiguous acres at Fort Benning to support
off-road mounted maneuver (Proposed Action).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Mr. John Brown, Fort
Benning Environmental Management Division, at
[email protected] or (706) 545-7549 between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.
ET. Fort Benning has also established a web page that contains
information updates and background on the HOMMTA Final EIS and ROD,
including the materials identified in this NOA, at https://www.benning.army.mil/Garrison/DPW/EMD/HOMMTA/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Proposed Action will support the
Maneuver Center of Excellence (MCoE) in its mission to train maneuver
soldiers and leaders of the Army and would increase the total amount of
heavy off-road maneuver training area on Fort Benning, enabling the
Army to conduct realistic training in accordance with current Army
training requirements.
The Proposed Action will provide a training area to meet existing
training needs; it will not result in additional soldiers, traffic, or
any training off of the Installation. Training land development will
occur over a 2- to 3-year period; development will primarily include
vegetation removal and the construction of tank trails, culverted water
crossings, and road upgrades, as well as burying existing overhead
utilities. As feasible, buffers will be used to protect environmentally
sensitive resources such as streams, wetlands, cemeteries, and
archaeological sites.
Fort Benning serves a critical role in supporting the Army's
overarching mission. Fort Benning's institutional training provides
Army leaders with the opportunity to respond to a wide variety of
situations that they can expect to encounter on the modern battlefield.
Fort Benning must be able to train and develop highly skilled and
cohesive units capable of conducting operations across the full
spectrum of potential conflicts. Inherent in and vital to training
Infantry and Armor soldiers and leaders properly is the requirement to
provide sufficient heavy off-road mounted maneuver training area.
Currently, the only training area at Fort Benning suitable for
heavy off-road mounted maneuver training is the Good Hope Maneuver
Training Area (GHMTA), which contains various environmental constraints
that cannot support the maneuver training requirements of the MCoE. As
such, Fort Benning proposed to construct a new HOMMTA with sufficient
contiguous area to enable all units and courses to complete required
cross-domain movement and maneuver training.
The Final EIS, published on February 26, 2021 and supported by
other studies, analyses, and permit applications to meet Federal
requirements (e.g., the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act),
analyzed the potential environmental and socioeconomic impacts
associated with the Proposed Action, including direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects. The Final EIS responded to comments received on the
Draft EIS. The Final EIS also identified mitigation measures that the
Army may implement to reduce potential adverse impacts.
The Army studied three reasonable Action Alternatives (i.e., three
distinct locations on Fort Benning where a HOMMTA could be constructed)
that would meet the purpose of and need for the Proposed Action:
Alternative 1 (Preferred Alternative): Northern Mounted Maneuver
Training Area Alternative: This alternative includes approximately
4,724 acres and is located adjacent to and east of the current Northern
Maneuver Training Area and west of and near Fort Benning's Digital
Multi-Purpose Range Complex (DMPRC).
Of the Action Alternatives, Alternative 1 would provide the most
preferable size and configuration to enable high-quality heavy off-road
mounted maneuver training. Accordingly, the Army identified Alternative
1 as the Preferred Alternative to implement the Proposed Action in the
Draft and Final EIS.
Alternative 2: Red Diamond Alternative: This alternative includes
approximately 3,744 acres and is located south of the Southern Maneuver
Training Area (SMTA) near the Installation's southern boundary.
Alternative 3: Eastern Boundary Alternative: This alternative
includes
[[Page 48130]]
approximately 2,405 acres and is located between the northern dudded
impact area and the Installation's eastern boundary.
The Army also analyzed the No Action Alternative in detail. While
the No Action Alternative would not satisfy the purpose of or need for
the Proposed Action, it was retained to provide a comparative baseline
against which to analyze the effects of the Action Alternatives as
required under the Council on Environmental Quality's NEPA Regulations.
During formal consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service,
the Army determined that potential moderate adverse impacts on the
federally listed red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) would occur primarily
from removal of clusters and habitat during HOMMTA construction,
resulting in up to 11 ``incidental takes.'' The HOMMTA Biological
Opinion, however, reached the conclusion that the Army can reduce those
potential adverse impacts through mitigation, and implementation of the
HOMMTA with Alternative 1 would not jeopardize recovery of the RCW.
Potential impacts to Unique Ecological Areas, a subcomponent of
biological resources, may be significant if they cannot be fully
avoided with implementation of Alternative 1. No other resource is
anticipated to experience significant adverse impacts.
Based on the analysis presented in the Final EIS, the No Action
Alternative is the Environmentally Preferred Alternative. Of the Action
Alternatives, Alternative 2 is the Environmentally Preferred
Alternative. Considering potential environmental and socioeconomic
impacts, national defense needs, Fort Benning's mission requirements,
and the purpose of and need for the Proposed Action, however, the Army
has selected Alternative 1 (i.e., the Army's Preferred Alternative) to
implement the Proposed Action. The Army determined that Alternative 1
strikes a proper balance between providing environmental protection and
achieving the Army's training requirements.
The Army received several comments during the Final EIS waiting
period. The Army took these comments into account in making its
decision; however, the comments do not present information that
constitutes significant new circumstances or information relevant to
environmental concerns that would require supplementation of the EIS.
The ROD formally adopts numerous mitigation measures that the Army
will implement to reduce potential adverse environmental impacts under
Alternative 1. All practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental
harm from the Selected Alternative have been adopted. Mitigation
measures that the Army considered but does not adopt at this time are
listed in the Draft Mitigation and Monitoring Plan in the Final EIS
with explanations of why those mitigation measures were considered not
practical or necessary.
An electronic copy of the ROD is posted on the HOMMTA EIS web page
at https://www.benning.army.mil/Garrison/DPW/EMD/HOMMTA. Additionally,
interested parties may contact Mr. John Brown (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) to request a printed copy.
Publication of the ROD formally concludes the NEPA planning process
for this Proposed Action, acknowledging that the Army will implement
the adopted mitigation measures as identified in the ROD. The Army will
implement Alternative 1, including all mitigation measures identified
in the ROD, as described in the Final EIS.
James W. Satterwhite, Jr.,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-18465 Filed 8-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5061-AP-P