Safety Zone; Columbia River Outfall Project, Columbia River, Vancouver, WA, 47611-47613 [2021-18388]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
category, as identified in European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020–
0256, dated November 17, 2020 (EASA AD
2020–0256).
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 5300, Fuselage Structure.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracking in the center fuselage frame
assembly in the intersection of the lateral
pylon and floor spar at station (STA) 1815 on
the left- and right-hand sides. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address cracking in the
intersection of the lateral pylon and floor
spar at STA 1815 on the left- and right-hand
sides, which, if not addressed, could affect
the structural integrity of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2020–0256.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020–0256
(1) Where EASA AD 2020–0256 requires
compliance in terms of flight hours, this AD
requires using hours time-in-service.
(2) Where EASA AD 2020–0256 AD refers
to its effective date, this AD requires using
the effective date of this AD.
(3) Where Figure 1 of the service
information referenced in EASA AD 2020–
0256 depicts the AFT bulkhead twice, for
clarification, the FWD bulkhead is
mislabeled as AFT and depicted on the left
side of Figure 1, below 109–0320–96 POST
ASSY (REF) and above FWD CAP.
(4) Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0256 specifies
discarding parts, this AD requires removing
those parts from service.
(5) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2020–
0256 or the service information referenced in
EASA AD 2020–0256 specifies to contact the
manufacturer for repair information, for this
AD: Before further flight, do the repair using
a method approved by the Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
EASA; or Leonardo S.p.a.’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(6) This AD does not require the
‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD 2020–0256.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0256 specifies
to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Aug 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(k) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2020–0256, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
This material may be found in the AD docket
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0697.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
COS Program Management Section,
Operational Safety Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600 Stewart
Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone (516) 228–7330; email
andrea.jimenez@faa.gov.
Issued on August 18, 2021.
Ross Landes,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–18256 Filed 8–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0201]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Columbia River Outfall
Project, Columbia River, Vancouver,
WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish a temporary safety zone for
certain navigable waters of the
Columbia River. This action is necessary
to provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters near Knapp, WA, at
Columbia River Mile 95.8 from October
1, 2021, through March 15, 2022. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47611
persons and vessels from being in the
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Sector Columbia
River or a designated representative. We
invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 10, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2021–0201 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Dixon
Whitley, Waterways Management
Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–
9319, email D13-SMBMSUPortlandWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On November 18, 2020, the Discovery
Clean Water Alliance notified the Coast
Guard that it would begin construction
for their Phase 5A Project: Columbia
River Outfall and Effluent Pipeline from
12:01 a.m. on October 1, 2021, through
11:59 p.m. on March 15, 2022, to
remove and replace existing pipeline.
The construction project includes the
removal and replacement of an existing
navigation marker (3-pile dolphin),
installation of a 48″ pipeline in the
riverbed outside the navigation channel,
and removal of an existing 30″ pipeline
from the riverbed. The scope of work
may include the need to construct
temporary pile-supported work
platforms, or dredge, to access shallow
water areas. Lighted barges will be used
in deeper water. The Captain of the Port
Sector Columbia River (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the construction project
would be a safety concern for anyone
within the designated area of the
Columbia River Outfall and Effluent
Pipeline construction project.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
47612
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
navigable waters within the designated
area of the Columbia River Outfall and
Effluent Pipeline construction project.
The Coast Guard is proposing this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a
safety zone from October 1, 2021,
through March 15, 2022. The safety
zone would cover all navigable waters
of the Columbia River, surface to
bottom, encompassed by a line
connecting the following points
beginning at the shoreline at 45°43′57.0″
N/122°45′21.0″ W, west to 45°43′58.0″
N/122°45′33.0″ W, south to 45°43′39.0″
N/122°45′35.0″ W, thence east to
45°43′39.0″ N/122°45′21″ W, and along
the shoreline back to the beginning
point. The duration of the zone is
intended to ensure the safety of vessels
and these navigable waters while the
pipeline construction is underway. No
vessel or person would be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. A designated
representative means any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been authorized by the COTP
to act on his behalf, or a Federal, State,
and local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port Sector
Columbia River in the enforcement of
the safety zone. Vessel operators
desiring to enter or operate with the
safety zone would contact the COTP’s
on-scene designated representative by
calling (503) 209–2468 or the Sector
Columbia River Command Center on
Channel 16 VHF–FM. Those in the
safety zone would comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Aug 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-year of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
would impact a small designated area of
the Columbia River during the
construction project. Moreover, the
Coast Guard would issue a Notice to
Mariners about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission
to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves a safety zone lasting 166
days that would prohibit vessel traffic to
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 163 / Thursday, August 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
transit the area during construction
operations. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments.
Comments we post to https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Aug 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
www.regulations.gov will include any
personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this
document, see DHS’s eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. We review all
comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of
the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive. If
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
2. Add § 165.T13–0201 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T13–0201 Safety Zones: Safety Zone;
Columbia River Outfall and Effluent Pipeline
Construction Project, Columbia River,
Vancouver, WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Columbia River, surface to bottom,
encompassed by a line connecting the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
47613
following points beginning at the
shoreline at 45°43′57.0″ N/122°45′21.0″
W, west to 45°43′58.0″ N/122°45′33.0″
W, south to 45°43′39.0″ N/122°45′35.0″
W, thence east to 45°43′39.0″ N/
122°45′21″ W, and along the shoreline
back to the beginning point.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Columbia River (COTP) to act on
his behalf, or a Federal, State, and local
officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Sector Columbia
River in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate with the safety zone may
contact the COTP’s on-scene designated
representative by calling (503) 209–2468
or the Sector Columbia River Command
Center on Channel 16 VHF–FM. Those
in the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This safety
zone is in effect from 12:01 a.m. on
October 1, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. on
March 15, 2022. It will be subject to
enforcement this entire period unless
the Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia
River determines it is no longer needed.
The Coast Guard will inform mariners of
any change to this period of
enforcement via Notice to Mariners.
Dated: August 17, 2021.
M. Scott Jackson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2021–18388 Filed 8–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM
26AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 163 (Thursday, August 26, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47611-47613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18388]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2021-0201]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Columbia River Outfall Project, Columbia River,
Vancouver, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone for certain navigable waters of the Columbia River. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters
near Knapp, WA, at Columbia River Mile 95.8 from October 1, 2021,
through March 15, 2022. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons
and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River or a designated
representative. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 10, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2021-0201 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Dixon Whitley, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 503-240-9319, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On November 18, 2020, the Discovery Clean Water Alliance notified
the Coast Guard that it would begin construction for their Phase 5A
Project: Columbia River Outfall and Effluent Pipeline from 12:01 a.m.
on October 1, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. on March 15, 2022, to remove and
replace existing pipeline. The construction project includes the
removal and replacement of an existing navigation marker (3-pile
dolphin), installation of a 48'' pipeline in the riverbed outside the
navigation channel, and removal of an existing 30'' pipeline from the
riverbed. The scope of work may include the need to construct temporary
pile-supported work platforms, or dredge, to access shallow water
areas. Lighted barges will be used in deeper water. The Captain of the
Port Sector Columbia River (COTP) has determined that potential hazards
associated with the construction project would be a safety concern for
anyone within the designated area of the Columbia River Outfall and
Effluent Pipeline construction project.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the
[[Page 47612]]
navigable waters within the designated area of the Columbia River
Outfall and Effluent Pipeline construction project. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish a safety zone from October 1,
2021, through March 15, 2022. The safety zone would cover all navigable
waters of the Columbia River, surface to bottom, encompassed by a line
connecting the following points beginning at the shoreline at
45[deg]43'57.0'' N/122[deg]45'21.0'' W, west to 45[deg]43'58.0'' N/
122[deg]45'33.0'' W, south to 45[deg]43'39.0'' N/122[deg]45'35.0'' W,
thence east to 45[deg]43'39.0'' N/122[deg]45'21'' W, and along the
shoreline back to the beginning point. The duration of the zone is
intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters
while the pipeline construction is underway. No vessel or person would
be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated representative. A designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has
been authorized by the COTP to act on his behalf, or a Federal, State,
and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port
Sector Columbia River in the enforcement of the safety zone. Vessel
operators desiring to enter or operate with the safety zone would
contact the COTP's on-scene designated representative by calling (503)
209-2468 or the Sector Columbia River Command Center on Channel 16 VHF-
FM. Those in the safety zone would comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end
of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the Columbia River during the
construction project. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a Notice to
Mariners about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting 166 days that would prohibit vessel traffic to
[[Page 47613]]
transit the area during construction operations. Normally such actions
are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and submissions in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. We review all comments received, but we will only post
comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we
receive. If you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts,
you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is
published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1,
Revision No. 01.2.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T13-0201 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-0201 Safety Zones: Safety Zone; Columbia River Outfall
and Effluent Pipeline Construction Project, Columbia River, Vancouver,
WA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Columbia River, surface to bottom, encompassed by a line
connecting the following points beginning at the shoreline at
45[deg]43'57.0'' N/122[deg]45'21.0'' W, west to 45[deg]43'58.0'' N/
122[deg]45'33.0'' W, south to 45[deg]43'39.0'' N/122[deg]45'35.0'' W,
thence east to 45[deg]43'39.0'' N/122[deg]45'21'' W, and along the
shoreline back to the beginning point.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has
been authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River (COTP)
to act on his behalf, or a Federal, State, and local officer designated
by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate with the safety
zone may contact the COTP's on-scene designated representative by
calling (503) 209-2468 or the Sector Columbia River Command Center on
Channel 16 VHF-FM. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful
orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This safety zone is in effect from 12:01
a.m. on October 1, 2021, through 11:59 p.m. on March 15, 2022. It will
be subject to enforcement this entire period unless the Captain of the
Port, Sector Columbia River determines it is no longer needed. The
Coast Guard will inform mariners of any change to this period of
enforcement via Notice to Mariners.
Dated: August 17, 2021.
M. Scott Jackson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2021-18388 Filed 8-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P