Proposed Addition of Singani to the Standards of Identity for Distilled Spirits, 47429-47433 [2021-18205]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
Leonardo S.p.a.: Docket No. FAA–2021–
0695; Project Identifier MCAI–2021–
00096–R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by October 12,
2021.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Leonardo S.p.a. Model
A109E helicopters, certificated in any
category, with an affected part as identified
in European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2021–0031, dated January 22,
2021 (EASA AD 2021–0031) installed.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6520, Tail Rotor Gearbox.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports that
certain tail rotor gearbox assemblies were
installed on Model A109E helicopters and
those parts are not approved for installation
on that helicopter model. Because tail rotor
gearbox assembly part number (P/N) 109–
0440–01–115 is not part of the type design
for Model A109E helicopters, there are no
overhaul or life limits included in the
applicable maintenance manuals. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address installation of tail
rotor gearbox assembly P/N 109–0440–01–
115 on Model A109E helicopters that do not
have overhaul or life limits for that part. If
a tail rotor gearbox is not properly
maintained it could fail, resulting in reduced
control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2021–0031 specifies
to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
■
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2021–0031.
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(k) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2021–0031, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
This material may be found in the AD docket
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0695.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
COS Program Management Section,
Operational Safety Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600 Stewart
Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone (516) 228–7330; email
andrea.jimenez@faa.gov.
Issued on August 18, 2021.
Ross Landes,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–18257 Filed 8–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021–0031
(1) Where EASA AD 2021–0031 requires
compliance in terms of flight hours, this AD
requires using hours time-in-service.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Aug 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 5
(i) No Reporting Requirement
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
§ 39.13
(2) Where EASA AD 2021–0031 requires
compliance from its effective date, this AD
requires using the effective date of this AD.
(3) This AD does not require the
‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD 2021–0031.
47429
[Docket No. TTB–2021–0008; Notice No.
205]
RIN 1513–AC61
Proposed Addition of Singani to the
Standards of Identity for Distilled
Spirits
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to
amend the regulations that set forth the
standards of identity for distilled spirits
to include Singani as a type of brandy
that is a distinctive product of Bolivia.
This proposal follows a joint petition
submitted by the Plurinational State of
Bolivia and Singani 63, Inc., and
subsequent discussions with the Office
of the United States Trade
Representative. TTB invites comments
on this proposed amendment to its
regulations, including comments on its
proposal to authorize a minimum
bottling proof of 35 percent alcohol by
volume (or 70° proof) for Singani.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before October 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may electronically
submit comments to TTB on this
proposal, and view copies of this
document, its supporting materials, and
any comments TTB receives on it within
Docket No. TTB–2021–0008 as posted at
https://www.regulations.gov. A direct
link to that docket is available on the
TTB website at https://www.ttb.gov/
distilled-spirits/notices-of-proposedrulemaking under Notice No. 205.
Alternatively, you may submit
comments via postal mail to the
Director, Regulations and Ruling
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW, Box
12, Washington, DC 20005. Please see
the Public Participation section of this
document for further information on the
comments requested regarding this
proposal and on the submission,
confidentiality, and public disclosure of
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Trevar D. Kolodny, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
telephone 202–453–2226.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
47430
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Background on the Labeling of Distilled
Spirits
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), codified
in the United States Code at 27 U.S.C.
205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury (the Secretary) to prescribe
regulations relating to the packaging,
marking, branding, labeling, and size
and fill of containers of alcohol
beverages that will prohibit consumer
deception and provide consumers with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. Section
105(e) of the FAA Act also generally
requires bottlers and importers of
alcohol beverages to obtain certificates
of label approval (COLAs) prior to
bottling or importing alcohol beverages
for sale in interstate commerce.
TTB administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01 (Revised),
dated December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Department Order 120–01,
dated January 24, 2003), to the TTB
Administrator to perform the functions
and duties in the administration and
enforcement of this law.
Part 5 of title 27 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (27 CFR part 5) sets
forth the regulations implementing
those provisions of section 105(e) of the
FAA Act as they pertain to distilled
spirits.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Certificates of Label Approval
TTB regulations at 27 CFR 5.51
prohibit the release of bottled distilled
spirits from customs custody for
consumption unless the person
removing the distilled spirits has
obtained and is in possession of a COLA
covering the product. The bottles must
bear labels identical to the labels
appearing on the face of the certificate,
or labels with changes authorized by
TTB. The TTB regulations at 27 CFR
5.55 also generally prohibit the bottling
or removal of distilled spirits from a
distilled spirits plant unless the
proprietor possesses a COLA covering
the labels on the bottle.
Classes and Types of Spirits
The TTB regulations at 27 CFR 5.22
establish standards of identity for
distilled spirits products and categorize
these products according to various
classes and types. As used in § 5.22, the
term ‘‘class’’ refers to a general category
of spirits. Currently, there are 12
different classes of distilled spirits set
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Aug 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
out in § 5.22, such as whisky, rum, gin,
and brandy. As used in § 5.22, the term
‘‘type’’ refers to a subcategory within a
class of spirits. For example, ‘‘Cognac’’
and ‘‘Pisco’’ are types of brandy, and
‘‘Cachac¸a’’ is a type of rum.
The TTB labeling regulations at 27
CFR 5.32(a)(2) and 5.35 require that the
class and type of distilled spirits appear
on the product’s label. These regulations
provide that the class and type must be
stated in conformity with § 5.22 of the
TTB regulations if defined therein.
Otherwise, § 5.35 requires that the
product must be designated in
accordance with trade and consumer
understanding thereof, or, if no such
understanding exists, by a distinctive or
fanciful name, and in either case (with
limited exceptions), followed by a
truthful and adequate statement of
composition.
Classification of Singani
‘‘Singani’’ is a term recognized by the
Plurinational State of Bolivia (Bolivia)
as a designation for an alcohol beverage
product that is distilled from grape wine
or grape pomace and produced in
certain delimited parts of Bolivia. Under
current TTB distilled spirits labeling
regulations, Singani products are
generally classified as brandies. Section
5.22(d) sets forth the standard of
identity for brandy as follows:
Class 4; brandy. ‘‘Brandy’’ is an alcoholic
distillate from the fermented juice, mash, or
wine of fruit, or from the residue thereof,
produced at less than 190° proof in such
manner that the distillate possesses the taste,
aroma, and characteristics generally
attributed to the product, and bottled at not
less than 80° proof. Brandy, or mixtures
thereof, not conforming to any of the
standards in paragraphs (d)(1) through (9) of
this section shall be designated as ‘‘brandy’’,
and such designation shall be immediately
followed by a truthful and adequate
statement of composition.
In § 5.22, paragraphs (d)(1) through (9)
categorize the specific types of brandy.
As described by petitioners Singani 63,
Inc. (Singani 63) and Bolivia, Singani
may meet the criteria of several of these
types of brandy, such as ‘‘fruit brandy’’
under paragraph (d)(1), or ‘‘pomace
brandy’’ (including ‘‘grappa brandy’’)
under paragraph (d)(5), depending on
the amount of pomace used.
In § 5.22, paragraph (d)(1) states that
fruit brandy, derived from grapes, shall
be designated as ‘‘grape brandy’’ or
‘‘brandy.’’ That regulation also generally
requires brandies derived from grapes
(other than neutral brandy, pomace
brandy, marc brandy, grappa brandy,
Pisco, Pisco Peru´, or Pisco Chileno) that
have been aged in oak barrels for less
than two years to be labeled as
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
‘‘immature.’’ The Bolivian standards
submitted by petitioners contain no
aging requirements, and petitioners’
submissions suggest that, unlike many
grape brandies, Singani is generally not
aged in wood. Accordingly, under
current TTB regulations, a Singani
product classified as a grape brandy
under paragraph (d)(1) would need to be
labeled as an immature brandy unless it
was aged in oak barrels for at least two
years.
According to information submitted
by the petitioners, under the standards
set forth by Bolivia, certain categories of
Singani may have a minimum alcohol
content by volume of as low as 35
percent. However, under § 5.22(d), all
brandy must be bottled at not less than
80° proof, or 40 percent alcohol by
volume. Thus, under TTB’s current
regulations, only Singani products
bottled at a minimum alcohol content
by volume of 40 percent may be labeled
as any of the types of brandy
specifically defined under the standard
of identity in § 5.22(d). A Singani
product bottled at less than 40 percent
alcohol by volume could be labeled as
a ‘‘diluted’’ brandy in accordance with
Ruling 75–32 of the Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) (TTB’s
predecessor agency), or as a distilled
spirits specialty product bearing a
statement of composition and fanciful
name as required under § 5.35(a).
Possible statements of composition for
such a specialty product could include
‘‘spirits distilled from grapes’’ or ‘‘grape
spirits.’’
Singani Petitions and Letters
Petitions and Related Letters
TTB received a petition from Singani
63, a distilled spirits importer, dated
November 18, 2014, proposing that TTB
amend its regulations to recognize
Singani as a type of brandy that is a
distinctive product of Bolivia. In
support of this petition, Bolivia
submitted letters to TTB in December
2015 and January 2017. Singani 63 also
submitted a letter to TTB in June 2017
that provided additional information
related to the petition.
In its petition, Singani 63 stated that
TTB’s recognition of Singani as a
distinctive product would benefit
consumers by informing them that the
product was produced and labeled in
compliance with Bolivia’s laws. It also
asserted that Singani is a product that is
distinct from other types of brandy.
Furthermore, both Singani 63 and
Bolivia indicated that Bolivia had
established a legal standard for Singani
as an exclusively Bolivian product.
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
In response to these submissions, TTB
issued letters in February and October
of 2017, in which TTB addressed the
petitioner’s request for rulemaking and
identified several deficiencies in the
petition and its supporting documents.
For instance, TTB noted that the
submitted documents lacked
substantiating information regarding
Bolivia’s standards for the production of
Singani. Accordingly, TTB did not
undertake rulemaking at that time to
amend its regulations as proposed in
Singani 63’s petition.
TTB subsequently received a joint
petition from Singani 63 and Bolivia in
November 2018, again proposing that
TTB recognize Singani as a type of
brandy that is a distinctive product of
Bolivia. The 2018 joint petition
contained additional information in
support of its regulatory proposal,
including official translations of
Bolivian laws and decrees governing the
production of Singani.
2020 U.S.-Bolivian Exchange of Letters
on Unique Distilled Spirits
Following discussions between
officials of Bolivia and the Office of the
United States Trade Representative
(USTR), and after consultations between
USTR and TTB, the United States Trade
Representative and Bolivia’s Minister of
Foreign Affairs exchanged letters on
January 6, 2020. The exchange of letters
agreed upon a procedure that could
potentially lead each party to recognize
as distinctive certain distilled spirits
products produced in the other party’s
territory.
The exchange of letters provides that
the United States shall endeavor to
publish a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking to promulgate a regulation
that would provide that Singani is a
type of brandy that is a distinctive
product of Bolivia. The exchange of
letters further provides that if, following
this proposed rule, the United States
publishes a final rule announcing the
promulgation of a regulation
establishing Singani as a type of brandy
that is a distinctive product of Bolivia,
then Bolivia shall, within thirty (30)
days thereafter, recognize Bourbon
Whiskey and Tennessee Whiskey as
distinctive products of the United
States. Following such recognition,
Bolivia shall prohibit the sale within
Bolivia of any product as Bourbon,
Bourbon Whiskey, or Tennessee
Whiskey, if it has not been
manufactured in the United States in
accordance with the laws and
regulations of the United States
governing the manufacture of Bourbon
Whiskey and Tennessee Whiskey. These
protections also apply to products
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Aug 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
spelled as ‘‘Bourbon Whisky’’ or
‘‘Tennessee Whisky.’’
Singani Production
The Bolivian decrees and regulations
submitted with the 2018 joint petition,
which are included in the rulemaking
docket, establish that Bolivia defines
‘‘Singani’’ as a brandy product of
Bolivia. Of the Bolivian decrees and
regulations submitted, Bolivian
Standard NB 324001 contains the most
specific standards for Singani. Among
other requirements, NB 324001 requires
that Singani be obtained exclusively
from vitis vinifera grapes grown in the
traditional ‘‘zones of origin’’ at a
minimum altitude of 1,600 meters above
sea level. NB 324001 lists several
different categories of Singani, some of
which have more specific requirements,
such as requiring the product to be
made from Muscat of Alexandria grapes
specifically. NB 324001 classifies
Singani in the group ‘‘Brandies and
liquors.’’
In a prior rulemaking, TTB has
distinguished Singani from Pisco, which
is a type of grape brandy manufactured
in Peru or Chile in accordance with the
laws and regulations of those countries.
In 2013, TTB updated its labeling
regulations to add Pisco as a type of
brandy that is manufactured only in
Peru and Chile. In regard to brandy
produced in Bolivia, TTB determined
that it would not recognize Pisco as a
type of brandy produced in that
country. See T.D. TTB–113 (78 FR
28739, May 16, 2013). TTB stated that
Bolivia maintains standards for Singani
but not for Pisco, and cited other
evidence suggesting that Pisco and
Singani are different products.
TTB Regulatory Proposal
After reviewing the petitions, the
regulations on the standards of identity
in 27 CFR part 5, TTB’s Certificate of
Label Approval (COLA) database, the
exchange of letters between USTR and
Bolivia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs,
and the relevant laws and regulations of
Bolivia, TTB has determined that
amending the standards of identity
regulations at § 5.22 to recognize
Singani as a distinctive product of
Bolivia merits consideration and public
comment, as invited in this notice of
proposed rulemaking.
TTB believes that Singani generally
meets the U.S. standard for brandy and
should be classified as a type of brandy.
TTB also believes that evidence suggests
that the generally recognized
geographical limits of the Singaniproducing areas do not extend beyond
the boundaries of Bolivia, and that
Singani production is not associated
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47431
with any areas outside of Bolivia.
Moreover, the results of a search of
TTB’s COLA database did not show any
approved COLAs that use the term
‘‘Singani’’ as the brand name or fanciful
name, or as part of the brand name or
fanciful name, for distilled spirits
produced outside Bolivia.
Therefore, this document proposes to
amend the standard of identity in
§ 5.22(d) by adding Singani as a type of
brandy derived from grapes that is
manufactured in Bolivia in compliance
with the laws and regulations of Bolivia
governing the manufacture of Singani
for consumption in that country. If TTB
recognizes Singani as a type of brandy
as proposed, it would be permissible for
Singani imported and sold within the
United States to simply be labeled as
‘‘Singani’’ without the term ‘‘brandy’’ on
the label, in the same way that products
labeled with such type designations as
‘‘Cognac’’ or ‘‘Pisco’’ are not required to
also bear the designation ‘‘brandy.’’
The other geographically distinctive
types of brandy defined in § 5.22(d),
Cognac and Pisco, are defined as grape
brandies distinct to their respective
places of origin. However, given that
Singani could also meet the criteria of
other types of brandies (such as pomace
brandy under § 5.22(d)(5), depending on
the amount of pomace used), the
proposed regulatory language describes
Singani as ‘‘brandy derived from
grapes’’ rather than as a ‘‘grape brandy.’’
TTB notes that the Bolivian standard
allows products designated as Singani
to have an alcohol content ranging from
35 to 45 percent alcohol by volume,
depending on the type of Singani
produced. Because the Bolivian
standard allows Singani to have an
alcohol content as low as 35 percent
alcohol by volume (or 70° proof), TTB
is proposing to exempt Singani from the
general requirement that brandy be
bottled at not less than 80° proof (40
percent alcohol by volume) and is
instead proposing a standard for Singani
that would include products bottled at
not less than 70° proof (35 percent
alcohol by volume) in accordance with
the laws and regulations of Bolivia. TTB
regulations have not previously
authorized bottling proofs for a type of
product that are below the minimum
prescribed for the product’s class
designation, even when a foreign
standard permits a lower proof, so TTB
is soliciting comment on authorizing
this standard for Singani.
In addition, the regulation at
§ 5.22(d)(1) generally requires that
brandy derived from grapes that has
been stored in oak containers for less
than two years must be labeled with the
word ‘‘immature.’’ However, it also lists
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
47432
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
several types of brandy (specifically
neutral brandy, pomace brandy, marc
brandy, grappa brandy, Pisco, Pisco
Peru´, and Pisco Chileno) that are
exempt from this requirement. Because
the Bolivian standards for Singani
contain no specific aging requirements,
TTB is proposing to amend § 5.22(d)(1)
to clarify that Singani is likewise
exempt from the requirement that it be
labeled with the word ‘‘immature.’’
Effect on Currently Approved Labels
If finalized, this amendment to the
TTB regulations would revoke by
operation of regulation any COLA that
uses the term ‘‘Singani’’ as a designation
for a distilled spirits product that was
not manufactured in Bolivia in
accordance with the laws and
regulations of Bolivia governing the
manufacture of Singani for consumption
in that country. TTB has searched its
COLA database and does not believe
that this rulemaking will affect any
existing labels.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
TTB invites comments from interested
members of the public on this proposed
rule, including on whether the proposed
amendment would have an adverse
impact on owners of U.S. trademarks
and on the extent to which distilled
spirits labeled as ‘‘Singani’’ are
produced outside Bolivia. Although
information currently before TTB
suggests that all distilled spirits
currently sold in the United States with
‘‘Singani’’ on the label are produced in
Bolivia, comments on the extent of
production of Singani outside Bolivia,
and on whether any existing labels will
be affected by this proposal, will assist
TTB in determining whether Singani
should be recognized as a distinctive
product of Bolivia.
TTB is also soliciting comments on its
proposal to authorize a minimum
bottling proof of 35 percent alcohol by
volume (or 70° proof) for Singani.
Because Bolivian standards authorize
this 70° proof minimum, TTB is
proposing to authorize the same
minimum for purposes of the TTB
regulations, even though § 5.22(d)
generally requires that brandies be
bottled at not less than 80° proof.
Submitting Comments
You may submit comments on this
proposal as an individual or on behalf
of a business or other organization via
the Regulations.gov website or via
postal mail, as described in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
Your comment must reference Notice
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Aug 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
No. 205 and must be submitted or
postmarked by the closing date shown
in the DATES section of this document.
You may upload or include attachments
with your comment. You also may
submit a comment requesting a public
hearing on this proposal. The TTB
Administrator reserves the right to
determine whether to hold a public
hearing. If TTB schedules a public
hearing, it will publish a notice of the
date, time, and place for the hearing in
the Federal Register.
Confidentiality and Disclosure of
Comments
All submitted comments and
attachments are part of the rulemaking
record and are subject to public
disclosure. Do not enclose any material
in your comments that you consider
confidential or that is inappropriate for
disclosure.
TTB will post, and you may view,
copies of this document, its supporting
materials, and any comments TTB
receives about this proposal within the
related Regulations.gov docket. In
general, TTB will post comments as
submitted, and it will not redact any
identifying or contact information from
the body of a comment or attachment.
Please contact TTB’s Regulations and
Rulings division by email using the web
form available at https://www.ttb.gov/
contact-rrd, or by telephone at 202–453–
2265, if you have any questions
regarding comments on this proposal or
to request copies of this document, its
supporting materials, or the comments
received in response.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6), TTB certifies that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule only amends the
standards of identity for brandy at 27
CFR 5.22(d) and imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirements. Therefore,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory
assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Trevar D. Kolodny of the Regulations
and Rulings Division, Alcohol and
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, drafted
this notice of proposed rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 5
Advertising, Alcohol and alcoholic
beverages, Consumer protection,
Customs duties and inspection, Imports,
Labeling, Liquors, Packaging and
containers, and Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB proposes to amend title
27, chapter I, part 5, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—LABELING AND
ADVERTISING OF DISTILLED SPIRITS
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 5301, 7805, 27 U.S.C.
205.
Subpart C—Standards of Identity for
Distilled Spirits
2. Section 5.22 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (d) introductory
text;
■ b. In paragraph (d)(1), revising the
third sentence; and
■ c. Adding new paragraph (d)(10).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
§ 5.22
The standards of identity.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Class 4; brandy. ‘‘Brandy’’ is an
alcoholic distillate from the fermented
juice, mash, or wine of fruit, or from the
residue thereof, produced at less than
190° proof in such manner that the
distillate possesses the taste, aroma, and
characteristics generally attributed to
the product, and bottled at not less than
80° proof except as otherwise provided
in paragraph (d)(10) of this section.
Brandy, or mixtures thereof, not
conforming to any of the standards in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (10) of this
section shall be designated as ‘‘brandy’’,
and such designation shall be
immediately followed by a truthful and
adequate statement of composition.
(1) * * * Fruit brandy, derived from
grapes, shall be designated as ‘‘grape
brandy’’ or ‘‘brandy’’, except that in the
case of brandy (other than neutral
brandy, pomace brandy, marc brandy,
grappa brandy, Pisco, Pisco Peru´, Pisco
Chileno, or Singani) distilled from the
fermented juice, mash, or wine of
grapes, or the residue thereof, which has
been stored in oak containers for less
than 2 years, the statement of class and
type shall be immediately preceded, in
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 162 / Wednesday, August 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
the same size and kind of type, by the
word ‘‘immature’’. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(10) ‘‘Singani’’ is brandy derived from
grapes that is manufactured in Bolivia
in accordance with the laws and
regulations of Bolivia governing the
manufacture of Singani for consumption
in that country, and includes Singani
bottled at not less than 70° proof in
accordance with such laws and
regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed: July 21, 2021.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
Approved: July 23, 2021.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2021–18205 Filed 8–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0344]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Piscataqua River Turning
Basin Dredge Project, Portsmouth, NH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish two temporary safety zones
for the navigable waters of the
Piscataqua River in Portsmouth Harbor.
The first safety zone will be a 100-yard
radius around any vessel, barge, or
dredging equipment engaged in
dredging operations. The second safety
zone will be a 500-yard radius around
any vessel, barge, or dredging
equipment engaged in blasting
operations and any blasting worksites.
The safety zones are necessary to protect
persons and vessels from hazards
associated with dredging, drilling, and
blasting operations for overall widening
of the uppermost turning basin of the
Piscataqua River. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from being in the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Northern New England or a
Designated Representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 24, 2021.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Aug 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2021–0344 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Shaun Doyle, Sector Northern
New England Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
207–347–5015, email Shaun.T.Doyle@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port Northern New
England
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On February 12, 2021, the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers notified the Coast
Guard of plans to fund dredging
operations on the uppermost turning
basin of the Piscataqua River in
Portsmouth Harbor. The project consists
of widening the uppermost turning
basin of the Piscataqua River from 800
feet to 1,200 feet to improve navigation
maneuverability and safety.
The project includes dredging
approximately 12–14 million cubic
yards of silt, blue clay, till and
weathered rock from the uppermost
turning basin of the Piscataqua River in
Portsmouth Harbor. The project will
include mechanical dredging, drilling,
and blasting operations. The extent of
drilling and blasting operations will not
be known until the top material has
been removed and contractors can
locate hard rock spots. The Captain of
the Port Northern New England (COTP)
has determined that potential hazards
associated with dredging operations
would be a safety concern for anyone
within a 100-yard radius around any
vessel, barge, or dredging equipment
engaged in dredging operations.
Additionally, the COTP has determined
that potential hazards associated with
the explosives to be used in this
operation would be a safety concern for
anyone within a 500-yard radius around
any vessel, barge, or dredging
equipment engaged in blasting
operations and any blasting worksites.
The Coast Guard is proposing this rule
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
47433
to be effective, and enforceable, from
October 15, 2021, through April 15,
2022. If the project is completed prior to
April 15, 2022, enforcement of the
safety zone will be terminated and
notice given via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, Local Notice to Mariners, or
both.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within a 100-yard
radius around any vessel, barge, or
dredging equipment engaged in
dredging operations and within a 500yard radius around any vessel, barge, or
dredging equipment engaged in blasting
operations and any blasting worksites.
The Coast Guard is proposing this
rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish
two safety zones from October 15, 2021,
through April 15, 2022. The first safety
zone will be a 100-yard radius around
any vessel, barge, or dredging
equipment actively engaged in dredging
operations. The second safety zone will
be a 500-yard radius around any vessel,
barge, or dredging equipment engaged
in blasting operations and any blasting
worksites. The 500-yard safety zone will
be enforced during active blasting
operations and will be suspended once
successful detonation has been
confirmed and blasting operations have
been secured. The Coast Guard will
notify the public and local mariners of
the 500-yard safety zone through
appropriate means, which may include,
but are not limited to, publication in the
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine
channel 16 in advance of any
enforcement. No vessel or person would
be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This NPRM has not been designated a
E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM
25AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 25, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47429-47433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18205]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. TTB-2021-0008; Notice No. 205]
RIN 1513-AC61
Proposed Addition of Singani to the Standards of Identity for
Distilled Spirits
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to
amend the regulations that set forth the standards of identity for
distilled spirits to include Singani as a type of brandy that is a
distinctive product of Bolivia. This proposal follows a joint petition
submitted by the Plurinational State of Bolivia and Singani 63, Inc.,
and subsequent discussions with the Office of the United States Trade
Representative. TTB invites comments on this proposed amendment to its
regulations, including comments on its proposal to authorize a minimum
bottling proof of 35 percent alcohol by volume (or 70[deg] proof) for
Singani.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may electronically submit comments to TTB on this
proposal, and view copies of this document, its supporting materials,
and any comments TTB receives on it within Docket No. TTB-2021-0008 as
posted at https://www.regulations.gov. A direct link to that docket is
available on the TTB website at https://www.ttb.gov/distilled-spirits/notices-of-proposed-rulemaking under Notice No. 205. Alternatively, you
may submit comments via postal mail to the Director, Regulations and
Ruling Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005. Please see the Public
Participation section of this document for further information on the
comments requested regarding this proposal and on the submission,
confidentiality, and public disclosure of comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Trevar D. Kolodny, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; telephone 202-453-2226.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 47430]]
Background on the Labeling of Distilled Spirits
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
codified in the United States Code at 27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury (the Secretary) to prescribe regulations
relating to the packaging, marking, branding, labeling, and size and
fill of containers of alcohol beverages that will prohibit consumer
deception and provide consumers with adequate information as to the
identity and quality of the product. Section 105(e) of the FAA Act also
generally requires bottlers and importers of alcohol beverages to
obtain certificates of label approval (COLAs) prior to bottling or
importing alcohol beverages for sale in interstate commerce.
TTB administers the FAA Act pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various authorities through Treasury Department
Order 120-01 (Revised), dated December 10, 2013 (superseding Treasury
Department Order 120-01, dated January 24, 2003), to the TTB
Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the administration
and enforcement of this law.
Part 5 of title 27 of the Code of Federal Regulations (27 CFR part
5) sets forth the regulations implementing those provisions of section
105(e) of the FAA Act as they pertain to distilled spirits.
Certificates of Label Approval
TTB regulations at 27 CFR 5.51 prohibit the release of bottled
distilled spirits from customs custody for consumption unless the
person removing the distilled spirits has obtained and is in possession
of a COLA covering the product. The bottles must bear labels identical
to the labels appearing on the face of the certificate, or labels with
changes authorized by TTB. The TTB regulations at 27 CFR 5.55 also
generally prohibit the bottling or removal of distilled spirits from a
distilled spirits plant unless the proprietor possesses a COLA covering
the labels on the bottle.
Classes and Types of Spirits
The TTB regulations at 27 CFR 5.22 establish standards of identity
for distilled spirits products and categorize these products according
to various classes and types. As used in Sec. 5.22, the term ``class''
refers to a general category of spirits. Currently, there are 12
different classes of distilled spirits set out in Sec. 5.22, such as
whisky, rum, gin, and brandy. As used in Sec. 5.22, the term ``type''
refers to a subcategory within a class of spirits. For example,
``Cognac'' and ``Pisco'' are types of brandy, and ``Cacha[ccedil]a'' is
a type of rum.
The TTB labeling regulations at 27 CFR 5.32(a)(2) and 5.35 require
that the class and type of distilled spirits appear on the product's
label. These regulations provide that the class and type must be stated
in conformity with Sec. 5.22 of the TTB regulations if defined
therein. Otherwise, Sec. 5.35 requires that the product must be
designated in accordance with trade and consumer understanding thereof,
or, if no such understanding exists, by a distinctive or fanciful name,
and in either case (with limited exceptions), followed by a truthful
and adequate statement of composition.
Classification of Singani
``Singani'' is a term recognized by the Plurinational State of
Bolivia (Bolivia) as a designation for an alcohol beverage product that
is distilled from grape wine or grape pomace and produced in certain
delimited parts of Bolivia. Under current TTB distilled spirits
labeling regulations, Singani products are generally classified as
brandies. Section 5.22(d) sets forth the standard of identity for
brandy as follows:
Class 4; brandy. ``Brandy'' is an alcoholic distillate from the
fermented juice, mash, or wine of fruit, or from the residue
thereof, produced at less than 190[deg] proof in such manner that
the distillate possesses the taste, aroma, and characteristics
generally attributed to the product, and bottled at not less than
80[deg] proof. Brandy, or mixtures thereof, not conforming to any of
the standards in paragraphs (d)(1) through (9) of this section shall
be designated as ``brandy'', and such designation shall be
immediately followed by a truthful and adequate statement of
composition.
In Sec. 5.22, paragraphs (d)(1) through (9) categorize the
specific types of brandy. As described by petitioners Singani 63, Inc.
(Singani 63) and Bolivia, Singani may meet the criteria of several of
these types of brandy, such as ``fruit brandy'' under paragraph (d)(1),
or ``pomace brandy'' (including ``grappa brandy'') under paragraph
(d)(5), depending on the amount of pomace used.
In Sec. 5.22, paragraph (d)(1) states that fruit brandy, derived
from grapes, shall be designated as ``grape brandy'' or ``brandy.''
That regulation also generally requires brandies derived from grapes
(other than neutral brandy, pomace brandy, marc brandy, grappa brandy,
Pisco, Pisco Per[uacute], or Pisco Chileno) that have been aged in oak
barrels for less than two years to be labeled as ``immature.'' The
Bolivian standards submitted by petitioners contain no aging
requirements, and petitioners' submissions suggest that, unlike many
grape brandies, Singani is generally not aged in wood. Accordingly,
under current TTB regulations, a Singani product classified as a grape
brandy under paragraph (d)(1) would need to be labeled as an immature
brandy unless it was aged in oak barrels for at least two years.
According to information submitted by the petitioners, under the
standards set forth by Bolivia, certain categories of Singani may have
a minimum alcohol content by volume of as low as 35 percent. However,
under Sec. 5.22(d), all brandy must be bottled at not less than
80[deg] proof, or 40 percent alcohol by volume. Thus, under TTB's
current regulations, only Singani products bottled at a minimum alcohol
content by volume of 40 percent may be labeled as any of the types of
brandy specifically defined under the standard of identity in Sec.
5.22(d). A Singani product bottled at less than 40 percent alcohol by
volume could be labeled as a ``diluted'' brandy in accordance with
Ruling 75-32 of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF)
(TTB's predecessor agency), or as a distilled spirits specialty product
bearing a statement of composition and fanciful name as required under
Sec. 5.35(a). Possible statements of composition for such a specialty
product could include ``spirits distilled from grapes'' or ``grape
spirits.''
Singani Petitions and Letters
Petitions and Related Letters
TTB received a petition from Singani 63, a distilled spirits
importer, dated November 18, 2014, proposing that TTB amend its
regulations to recognize Singani as a type of brandy that is a
distinctive product of Bolivia. In support of this petition, Bolivia
submitted letters to TTB in December 2015 and January 2017. Singani 63
also submitted a letter to TTB in June 2017 that provided additional
information related to the petition.
In its petition, Singani 63 stated that TTB's recognition of
Singani as a distinctive product would benefit consumers by informing
them that the product was produced and labeled in compliance with
Bolivia's laws. It also asserted that Singani is a product that is
distinct from other types of brandy. Furthermore, both Singani 63 and
Bolivia indicated that Bolivia had established a legal standard for
Singani as an exclusively Bolivian product.
[[Page 47431]]
In response to these submissions, TTB issued letters in February
and October of 2017, in which TTB addressed the petitioner's request
for rulemaking and identified several deficiencies in the petition and
its supporting documents. For instance, TTB noted that the submitted
documents lacked substantiating information regarding Bolivia's
standards for the production of Singani. Accordingly, TTB did not
undertake rulemaking at that time to amend its regulations as proposed
in Singani 63's petition.
TTB subsequently received a joint petition from Singani 63 and
Bolivia in November 2018, again proposing that TTB recognize Singani as
a type of brandy that is a distinctive product of Bolivia. The 2018
joint petition contained additional information in support of its
regulatory proposal, including official translations of Bolivian laws
and decrees governing the production of Singani.
2020 U.S.-Bolivian Exchange of Letters on Unique Distilled Spirits
Following discussions between officials of Bolivia and the Office
of the United States Trade Representative (USTR), and after
consultations between USTR and TTB, the United States Trade
Representative and Bolivia's Minister of Foreign Affairs exchanged
letters on January 6, 2020. The exchange of letters agreed upon a
procedure that could potentially lead each party to recognize as
distinctive certain distilled spirits products produced in the other
party's territory.
The exchange of letters provides that the United States shall
endeavor to publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to promulgate a
regulation that would provide that Singani is a type of brandy that is
a distinctive product of Bolivia. The exchange of letters further
provides that if, following this proposed rule, the United States
publishes a final rule announcing the promulgation of a regulation
establishing Singani as a type of brandy that is a distinctive product
of Bolivia, then Bolivia shall, within thirty (30) days thereafter,
recognize Bourbon Whiskey and Tennessee Whiskey as distinctive products
of the United States. Following such recognition, Bolivia shall
prohibit the sale within Bolivia of any product as Bourbon, Bourbon
Whiskey, or Tennessee Whiskey, if it has not been manufactured in the
United States in accordance with the laws and regulations of the United
States governing the manufacture of Bourbon Whiskey and Tennessee
Whiskey. These protections also apply to products spelled as ``Bourbon
Whisky'' or ``Tennessee Whisky.''
Singani Production
The Bolivian decrees and regulations submitted with the 2018 joint
petition, which are included in the rulemaking docket, establish that
Bolivia defines ``Singani'' as a brandy product of Bolivia. Of the
Bolivian decrees and regulations submitted, Bolivian Standard NB 324001
contains the most specific standards for Singani. Among other
requirements, NB 324001 requires that Singani be obtained exclusively
from vitis vinifera grapes grown in the traditional ``zones of origin''
at a minimum altitude of 1,600 meters above sea level. NB 324001 lists
several different categories of Singani, some of which have more
specific requirements, such as requiring the product to be made from
Muscat of Alexandria grapes specifically. NB 324001 classifies Singani
in the group ``Brandies and liquors.''
In a prior rulemaking, TTB has distinguished Singani from Pisco,
which is a type of grape brandy manufactured in Peru or Chile in
accordance with the laws and regulations of those countries. In 2013,
TTB updated its labeling regulations to add Pisco as a type of brandy
that is manufactured only in Peru and Chile. In regard to brandy
produced in Bolivia, TTB determined that it would not recognize Pisco
as a type of brandy produced in that country. See T.D. TTB-113 (78 FR
28739, May 16, 2013). TTB stated that Bolivia maintains standards for
Singani but not for Pisco, and cited other evidence suggesting that
Pisco and Singani are different products.
TTB Regulatory Proposal
After reviewing the petitions, the regulations on the standards of
identity in 27 CFR part 5, TTB's Certificate of Label Approval (COLA)
database, the exchange of letters between USTR and Bolivia's Minister
of Foreign Affairs, and the relevant laws and regulations of Bolivia,
TTB has determined that amending the standards of identity regulations
at Sec. 5.22 to recognize Singani as a distinctive product of Bolivia
merits consideration and public comment, as invited in this notice of
proposed rulemaking.
TTB believes that Singani generally meets the U.S. standard for
brandy and should be classified as a type of brandy. TTB also believes
that evidence suggests that the generally recognized geographical
limits of the Singani-producing areas do not extend beyond the
boundaries of Bolivia, and that Singani production is not associated
with any areas outside of Bolivia. Moreover, the results of a search of
TTB's COLA database did not show any approved COLAs that use the term
``Singani'' as the brand name or fanciful name, or as part of the brand
name or fanciful name, for distilled spirits produced outside Bolivia.
Therefore, this document proposes to amend the standard of identity
in Sec. 5.22(d) by adding Singani as a type of brandy derived from
grapes that is manufactured in Bolivia in compliance with the laws and
regulations of Bolivia governing the manufacture of Singani for
consumption in that country. If TTB recognizes Singani as a type of
brandy as proposed, it would be permissible for Singani imported and
sold within the United States to simply be labeled as ``Singani''
without the term ``brandy'' on the label, in the same way that products
labeled with such type designations as ``Cognac'' or ``Pisco'' are not
required to also bear the designation ``brandy.''
The other geographically distinctive types of brandy defined in
Sec. 5.22(d), Cognac and Pisco, are defined as grape brandies distinct
to their respective places of origin. However, given that Singani could
also meet the criteria of other types of brandies (such as pomace
brandy under Sec. 5.22(d)(5), depending on the amount of pomace used),
the proposed regulatory language describes Singani as ``brandy derived
from grapes'' rather than as a ``grape brandy.''
TTB notes that the Bolivian standard allows products designated as
Singani to have an alcohol content ranging from 35 to 45 percent
alcohol by volume, depending on the type of Singani produced. Because
the Bolivian standard allows Singani to have an alcohol content as low
as 35 percent alcohol by volume (or 70[deg] proof), TTB is proposing to
exempt Singani from the general requirement that brandy be bottled at
not less than 80[deg] proof (40 percent alcohol by volume) and is
instead proposing a standard for Singani that would include products
bottled at not less than 70[deg] proof (35 percent alcohol by volume)
in accordance with the laws and regulations of Bolivia. TTB regulations
have not previously authorized bottling proofs for a type of product
that are below the minimum prescribed for the product's class
designation, even when a foreign standard permits a lower proof, so TTB
is soliciting comment on authorizing this standard for Singani.
In addition, the regulation at Sec. 5.22(d)(1) generally requires
that brandy derived from grapes that has been stored in oak containers
for less than two years must be labeled with the word ``immature.''
However, it also lists
[[Page 47432]]
several types of brandy (specifically neutral brandy, pomace brandy,
marc brandy, grappa brandy, Pisco, Pisco Per[uacute], and Pisco
Chileno) that are exempt from this requirement. Because the Bolivian
standards for Singani contain no specific aging requirements, TTB is
proposing to amend Sec. 5.22(d)(1) to clarify that Singani is likewise
exempt from the requirement that it be labeled with the word
``immature.''
Effect on Currently Approved Labels
If finalized, this amendment to the TTB regulations would revoke by
operation of regulation any COLA that uses the term ``Singani'' as a
designation for a distilled spirits product that was not manufactured
in Bolivia in accordance with the laws and regulations of Bolivia
governing the manufacture of Singani for consumption in that country.
TTB has searched its COLA database and does not believe that this
rulemaking will affect any existing labels.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
TTB invites comments from interested members of the public on this
proposed rule, including on whether the proposed amendment would have
an adverse impact on owners of U.S. trademarks and on the extent to
which distilled spirits labeled as ``Singani'' are produced outside
Bolivia. Although information currently before TTB suggests that all
distilled spirits currently sold in the United States with ``Singani''
on the label are produced in Bolivia, comments on the extent of
production of Singani outside Bolivia, and on whether any existing
labels will be affected by this proposal, will assist TTB in
determining whether Singani should be recognized as a distinctive
product of Bolivia.
TTB is also soliciting comments on its proposal to authorize a
minimum bottling proof of 35 percent alcohol by volume (or 70[deg]
proof) for Singani. Because Bolivian standards authorize this 70[deg]
proof minimum, TTB is proposing to authorize the same minimum for
purposes of the TTB regulations, even though Sec. 5.22(d) generally
requires that brandies be bottled at not less than 80[deg] proof.
Submitting Comments
You may submit comments on this proposal as an individual or on
behalf of a business or other organization via the Regulations.gov
website or via postal mail, as described in the ADDRESSES section of
this document. Your comment must reference Notice No. 205 and must be
submitted or postmarked by the closing date shown in the DATES section
of this document. You may upload or include attachments with your
comment. You also may submit a comment requesting a public hearing on
this proposal. The TTB Administrator reserves the right to determine
whether to hold a public hearing. If TTB schedules a public hearing, it
will publish a notice of the date, time, and place for the hearing in
the Federal Register.
Confidentiality and Disclosure of Comments
All submitted comments and attachments are part of the rulemaking
record and are subject to public disclosure. Do not enclose any
material in your comments that you consider confidential or that is
inappropriate for disclosure.
TTB will post, and you may view, copies of this document, its
supporting materials, and any comments TTB receives about this proposal
within the related Regulations.gov docket. In general, TTB will post
comments as submitted, and it will not redact any identifying or
contact information from the body of a comment or attachment.
Please contact TTB's Regulations and Rulings division by email
using the web form available at https://www.ttb.gov/contact-rrd, or by
telephone at 202-453-2265, if you have any questions regarding comments
on this proposal or to request copies of this document, its supporting
materials, or the comments received in response.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 6), TTB certifies that this proposed rule, if adopted,
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. The proposed rule only amends the standards of identity
for brandy at 27 CFR 5.22(d) and imposes no new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other administrative requirements. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Trevar D. Kolodny of the Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, drafted this notice of proposed
rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 5
Advertising, Alcohol and alcoholic beverages, Consumer protection,
Customs duties and inspection, Imports, Labeling, Liquors, Packaging
and containers, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB proposes to amend
title 27, chapter I, part 5, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--LABELING AND ADVERTISING OF DISTILLED SPIRITS
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 5301, 7805, 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Standards of Identity for Distilled Spirits
0
2. Section 5.22 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (d) introductory text;
0
b. In paragraph (d)(1), revising the third sentence; and
0
c. Adding new paragraph (d)(10).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 5.22 The standards of identity.
* * * * *
(d) Class 4; brandy. ``Brandy'' is an alcoholic distillate from the
fermented juice, mash, or wine of fruit, or from the residue thereof,
produced at less than 190[deg] proof in such manner that the distillate
possesses the taste, aroma, and characteristics generally attributed to
the product, and bottled at not less than 80[deg] proof except as
otherwise provided in paragraph (d)(10) of this section. Brandy, or
mixtures thereof, not conforming to any of the standards in paragraphs
(d)(1) through (10) of this section shall be designated as ``brandy'',
and such designation shall be immediately followed by a truthful and
adequate statement of composition.
(1) * * * Fruit brandy, derived from grapes, shall be designated as
``grape brandy'' or ``brandy'', except that in the case of brandy
(other than neutral brandy, pomace brandy, marc brandy, grappa brandy,
Pisco, Pisco Per[uacute], Pisco Chileno, or Singani) distilled from the
fermented juice, mash, or wine of grapes, or the residue thereof, which
has been stored in oak containers for less than 2 years, the statement
of class and type shall be immediately preceded, in
[[Page 47433]]
the same size and kind of type, by the word ``immature''. * * *
* * * * *
(10) ``Singani'' is brandy derived from grapes that is manufactured
in Bolivia in accordance with the laws and regulations of Bolivia
governing the manufacture of Singani for consumption in that country,
and includes Singani bottled at not less than 70[deg] proof in
accordance with such laws and regulations.
* * * * *
Signed: July 21, 2021.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
Approved: July 23, 2021.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2021-18205 Filed 8-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P