Foreign-Trade Zone 240-Martinsburg, West Virginia; Withdrawal of Application for Reorganization Under Alternative Site Framework, 46823 [2021-17856]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 159 / Friday, August 20, 2021 / Notices
Dated: August 17, 2021.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
(202) 482–3683 or (202) 482–0410,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2021–17853 Filed 8–19–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–06–2021]
Foreign-Trade Zone 240—Martinsburg,
West Virginia; Withdrawal of
Application for Reorganization Under
Alternative Site Framework
Notice is hereby given of the
withdrawal of the application submitted
by the West Virginia Economic
Development Authority, grantee of
Foreign-Trade Zone 240, requesting
authority to reorganize the zone under
the alternative site framework. The
application was docketed on February 4,
2021 (86 FR 8762, February 9, 2021).
The withdrawal was requested by the
applicant due to changed
circumstances. The case has been closed
without prejudice.
Dated: August 16, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
1 See
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018–2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that diamond
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond
sawblades) from the People’s Republic
of China (China) were sold at less than
normal value by certain exporters
during the period of review (POR)
November 1, 2018, through October 31,
2019.
DATES: Applicable August 20, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Hansen or Thomas Schauer, AD/
CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:27 Aug 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the
antidumping duty Order 5 are diamond
sawblades. A full description of the
scope of the Order is contained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.6
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties
in this review are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
[FR Doc. 2021–17856 Filed 8–19–21; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
Background
On March 19, 2021, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
preliminary results of the 2018–2019
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof from
China.1 We invited interested parties to
comment on the Preliminary Results
and we received case briefs from the
petitioner, the Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers’ Coalition, and Wuhan
Wanbang Laser Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.
(Wuhan Wanbang),2 and rebuttal briefs
from the petitioner and Chengdu
Huifeng New Material Technology Co.,
Ltd. (Chengdu Huifeng).3 On June 11,
2021, Commerce extended the deadline
for the final results by 60 days to no
later than September 15, 2021.4
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and
Rescission of Review in Part; 2018–2019, 86 FR
14873 (March 19, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
2 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of
China: DSMC’s Case Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2021;
see also Wuhan Wanbang’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China: Submission of Wuhan
Wanbang’s Case Brief,’’ dated April 22, 2021.
3 See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades
and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of
China: DSMC’s Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated April 29,
2021; see also Chengdu Huifeng’s Letter, ‘‘Diamond
Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People’s
Republic of China: Submission of Chengdu
Huifeng’s Rebuttal Case Brief,’’ dated April 29,
2021.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–
2019,’’ dated June 11, 2021.
5 See Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of
Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145
(November 4, 2009) (Order).
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Diamond Sawblades and
Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China:
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–
2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
46823
list of the issues that parties raised, and
to which we responded in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum, follows as
an appendix to this notice. The Issues
and Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Final Determination of No Shipments
We preliminarily found that Bosun
Tools Co., Ltd., Danyang Weiwang Tools
Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Weihai
Xiangguang Mechanical Industrial Co.,
Ltd., which have been eligible for
separate rates in previous segments of
the proceeding and are subject to this
review, did not have any shipments of
subject merchandise during the POR.7
No party commented on the Preliminary
Results regarding our no-shipments
determination. Therefore, for these final
results, we continue to find that these
companies did not have any shipments
of subject merchandise during the POR
and will issue appropriate instructions
to CBP based on these final results.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on a review of the record and
comments received from interested
parties regarding our Preliminary
Results, and for the reasons explained in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
we did not make changes to the
preliminary calculations of the
weighted-average dumping margins for
the mandatory respondents, Chengdu
Huifeng and Wuhan Wanbang, and the
margin assigned to the separate rate
respondents.
Separate Rate for Non-Selected
Companies
In the Preliminary Results, we found
that evidence provided by Chengdu
Huifeng, the Jiangsu Fengtai Single
Entity,8 Wuhan Wanbang, and Zhejiang
Wanli Tools Group Co., Ltd., supported
finding an absence of both de jure and
de facto government control, and,
therefore, we preliminarily granted a
separate rate to each of these
7 See
Preliminary Results, 86 FR at 14874.
Jiangsu Fengtai Single Entity is comprised
of Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tool Manufacturer Co.,
Ltd.; Jiangsu Fengtai Diamond Tools Co., Ltd.; and
Jiangsu Fengtai Sawing Industry Co., Ltd. See
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015, 82 FR 26912, 26913, n. 5 (June 12, 2017).
8 The
E:\FR\FM\20AUN1.SGM
20AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 159 (Friday, August 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 46823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17856]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B-06-2021]
Foreign-Trade Zone 240--Martinsburg, West Virginia; Withdrawal of
Application for Reorganization Under Alternative Site Framework
Notice is hereby given of the withdrawal of the application
submitted by the West Virginia Economic Development Authority, grantee
of Foreign-Trade Zone 240, requesting authority to reorganize the zone
under the alternative site framework. The application was docketed on
February 4, 2021 (86 FR 8762, February 9, 2021). The withdrawal was
requested by the applicant due to changed circumstances. The case has
been closed without prejudice.
Dated: August 16, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-17856 Filed 8-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
