Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment, 46599-46601 [2021-17675]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 158 / Thursday, August 19, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
§ 117.1
Purpose.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Prescribes that contractors will
implement the provisions of this part no
later than 6 months from February 24,
2021, with the exception of
requirements for reporting foreign travel
to the Department of Defense prescribed
in SEAD 3 and implemented through
this rule. Contractors under the security
cognizance of the Department of
Defense will begin reporting foreign
travel to the Department of Defense no
later than 18 months from February 24,
2021.
Dated: August 12, 2021.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–17688 Filed 8–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 269
[Docket ID: DOD–2016–OS–0045]
RIN 0790–AL18
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation
Adjustment
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense (Comptroller), Department of
Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense is
issuing this final rule to adjust each of
its statutory civil monetary penalties
(CMP) to account for inflation. The
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996 and the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements
Act of 2015 (the 2015 Act), requires the
head of each agency to adjust for
inflation its CMP levels in effect as of
November 2, 2015, under a revised
methodology that was effective for 2016
and for each year thereafter.
DATES: This rule is effective August 19,
2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kellie Allison, 703–614–0410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
Background Information
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990, Public Law
101–410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. 2461,
note), as amended by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Aug 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
Public Law 104–134, April 26, 1996,
and further amended by the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015
Act), Public Law 114–74, November 2,
2015, required agencies to annually
adjust the level of CMPs for inflation to
improve their effectiveness and
maintain their deterrent effect. The 2015
Act required that not later than July 1,
2016, and not later than January 15 of
every year thereafter, the head of each
agency must adjust each CMP within its
jurisdiction by the inflation adjustment
described in the 2015 Act. The inflation
adjustment is determined by increasing
the maximum CMP or the range of
minimum and maximum CMPs, as
applicable, for each CMP by the cost-ofliving adjustment, rounded to the
nearest multiple of $1. The cost-ofliving adjustment is the percentage (if
any) for each CMP by which the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the
month of October preceding the date of
the adjustment, exceeds the CPI for the
month of October in the previous
calendar year.
The initial catch up adjustments for
inflation to the Department of Defense’s
CMPs were published as an interim
final rule in the Federal Register on
May 26, 2016 (81 FR 33389–33391) and
became effective on that date. The
interim final rule was published as a
final rule without change on September
12, 2016 (81 FR 62629–62631), effective
that date. The revised methodology for
agencies for 2017 and each year
thereafter provides for the improvement
of the effectiveness of CMPs and to
maintain their deterrent effect. The
Department of Defense is adjusting the
level of all civil monetary penalties
under its jurisdiction by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
directed cost-of-living adjustment
multiplier for 2021 of 1.01182
prescribed in OMB Memorandum M–
21–10, ‘‘Implementation of Penalty
Inflation Adjustments for 2021,
Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties
Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements
Act of 2015,’’ dated December 16, 2019.
The Department of Defense’s 2021
adjustments for inflation to CMPs apply
only to those CMPs, including those
whose associated violation predated
such adjustment, which are assessed by
the Department of Defense after the
effective date of the new CMP level.
Statement of Authority and Costs and
Benefits
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)B, there is
good cause to issue this rule without
prior public notice or opportunity for
public comment because it would be
impracticable and unnecessary. The
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46599
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (Section 701(b)) requires agencies,
effective 2017, to make annual
adjustments for inflation to CMPs
notwithstanding section 553 of title 5,
United States Code. Additionally, the
methodology used, effective 2017, for
adjusting CMPs for inflation is
established in statute, with no
discretion provided to agencies
regarding the substance of the
adjustments for inflation to CMPs. The
Department of Defense is charged only
with performing ministerial
computations to determine the dollar
amount of adjustments for inflation to
CMPs.
Further, there are no significant costs
associated with the regulatory revisions
that would impose any mandates on the
Department of Defense, Federal, State or
local governments, or the private sector.
Accordingly, prior public notice and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required for this rule. The benefit of this
rule is the Department of Defense
anticipates that civil monetary penalty
collections may increase in the future
due to new penalty authorities and
other changes in this rule. However, it
is difficult to accurately predict the
extent of any increase, if any, due to a
variety of factors, such as budget and
staff resources, the number and quality
of civil penalty referrals or leads, and
the length of time needed to investigate
and resolve a case.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ and was not
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. Chapter 25)
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(2 U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to
assess anticipated costs and benefits
E:\FR\FM\19AUR1.SGM
19AUR1
46600
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 158 / Thursday, August 19, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
before issuing any rule the mandates of
which require spending in any year of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2016, that
threshold is approximately $146
million. This rule will not mandate any
requirements for State, local, or tribal
governments, nor will it affect private
sector costs.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Department of Defense
determined that provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, and its implementing regulations, 5
CFR part 1320, do not apply to this rule
because there are no new or revised
recordkeeping or reporting
requirements.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 269
Administrative practice and
procedure, Penalties.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 269 is
amended as follows.
PART 269—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 269 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Because notice of proposed
rulemaking and opportunity for
comment are not required pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the
analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore, a
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and has not been prepared.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a rule
that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This final rule will not have a
substantial effect on State and local
governments.
2. In § 269.4, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
■
§ 269.4 Cost of living adjustments of civil
monetary penalties.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Inflation adjustment. Maximum
civil monetary penalties within the
jurisdiction of the Department are
adjusted for inflation as follows:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)
New
adjusted
maximum
penalty
amount
United States code
Civil monetary penalty description
National Defense Authorization Act for FY
2005, 10 U.S.C. 113, note.
10 U.S.C. 1094(c)(1) ....................................
10 U.S.C. 1102(k) ........................................
Unauthorized Activities Directed at or Possession of Sunken
Military Craft.
Unlawful Provision of Health Care ................................................
Wrongful Disclosure—Medical Records:
First Offense ..................................................................................
Subsequent Offense .....................................................................
Violation of the Pentagon Reservation Operation and Parking of
Motor Vehicles Rules and Regulations.
Violation Involving False Claim .....................................................
Violation Involving False Statement ..............................................
False claims ..................................................................................
134,807
136,400
11,837
11,977
6,999
46,663
1,928
7,082
47,214
1,951
11,665
11,665
20,866
11,803
11,803
21,112.64
Claims submitted with a false certification of physician license ...
20,866
21,112.64
Claims presented by excluded party ............................................
20,866
21,112.64
Employing or contracting with an excluded individual ..................
20,866
21,112.64
Pattern of claims for medically unnecessary services/supplies ...
20,866
21,112.64
Ordering or prescribing while excluded ........................................
20,866
21,112.64
Known retention of an overpayment .............................................
20,866
21,112.64
Making or using a false record or statement that is material to a
false or fraudulent claim.
Failure to grant timely access to OIG for audits, investigations,
evaluations, or other statutory functions of OIG.
Making false statements, omissions, misrepresentations in an
enrollment application.
Unlawfully offering, paying, soliciting, or receiving remuneration
to induce or in return for the referral of business in violation of
1128B(b) of the Social Security Act.
104,330
105,563.18
31,300
31,669.97
104,330
105,563.18
104,330
105,563.18
10 U.S.C. 2674(c)(2) ....................................
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(1) ...................................
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(2) ...................................
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(1).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(1).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(2).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(2); (b)(2)(ii).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(1).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(2).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(5).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(4).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(6).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR
200.210(a)(3).
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7a(a); 32 CFR 200.310(a)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Maximum
penalty
amount as
of 02/21/20
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Aug 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\19AUR1.SGM
19AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 158 / Thursday, August 19, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 12, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
representative. While within a safety
zone, all vessels shall operate at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course. In addition to this
notification of enforcement in the
Federal Register, the Coast Guard plans
to provide notification of this
enforcement period via the Local Notice
to Mariners and marine information
broadcasts.
[FR Doc. 2021–17675 Filed 8–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
Dated: August 9, 2021.
Lexia M. Littlejohn,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0636]
[FR Doc. 2021–17788 Filed 8–18–21; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Safety Zones; Annual Events in the
Captain of the Port Buffalo Zone
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notification of enforcement of
regulation.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
AGENCY:
Coast Guard
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce
a safety zone located in federal
regulations for the annual D-Day
Conneaut event. This action is necessary
and intended for the safety of life and
property on navigable waters during this
event. During each enforcement period,
no person or vessel may enter the safety
zone without the permission of the
Captain of the Port Buffalo.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR Table
165.939(c)(2) will be enforced from 1:15
p.m. through 6 p.m. each day from
August 19, 2021, through August 21,
2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
enforcement, call or email MST2 Natalie
Smith, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Marine
Safety Unit Cleveland; telephone 216–
937–6004, email D09-SMBMSUCLEVELAND-WWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the safety zone listed
in 33 CFR Table 165.939(c)(2) for D-Day
Conneaut, each day from 1:15 p.m.
through 6 p.m. from August 19, 2021,
through August 21, 2021. This action is
being taken to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waterways during this
multi-day event.
Pursuant to 33 CFR 165.23, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone during an enforcement
period is prohibited unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or a
designated representative. Those
seeking permission to enter the safety
zone may request permission from the
Captain of Port Buffalo via channel 16,
VHF–FM. Vessels and persons granted
permission to enter the safety zone shall
obey the directions of the Captain of the
Port Buffalo or her designated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Aug 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0519]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; SML Bridge Repairs,
Portsmouth, NH
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain navigable waters on the
Piscataqua River in Portsmouth, New
Hampshire. The safety zone is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment from potential
hazards created by cross-channel repair
work on the submarine cables and
removal of concrete cable mats on the
Sarah Mildred Long Bridge in
Portsmouth, NH. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Northern New
England (COTP) or a Designated
Representative.
This rule is effective without
actual notice from August 19, 2021,
through October 31, 2021. For the
purposes of enforcement, actual notice
will be used from September 1, 2021,
until August 19, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0519 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
DATES:
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Shaun Doyle, Sector Northern
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46601
New England Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
207–347–5015, email Shaun.T.Doyle@
uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Northern New
England
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because we
must establish the temporary safety
zone by September 1, 2021, for this
unscheduled critical repair work and
insufficient time exists to execute the
full NPRM process. Additionally,
delaying the effective date of this rule
would be contrary to the public interest
as it is necessary to establish this safety
zone to protect personnel and vessels
from hazards associated with submarine
cable repairs and concrete mat removal
on the Sarah Mildred Long Bridge.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with submarine cable repairs
and concrete mat removal on the Sarah
Mildred Long Bridge.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port Northern New
England (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with
submarine cable repairs and concrete
mat removal starting September 1, 2021,
will be a safety concern for anyone
within a 100-yard radius of crane barges
E:\FR\FM\19AUR1.SGM
19AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 158 (Thursday, August 19, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46599-46601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17675]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 269
[Docket ID: DOD-2016-OS-0045]
RIN 0790-AL18
Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment
AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller),
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is issuing this final rule to adjust
each of its statutory civil monetary penalties (CMP) to account for
inflation. The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 and the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (the 2015 Act), requires the head of each agency to adjust for
inflation its CMP levels in effect as of November 2, 2015, under a
revised methodology that was effective for 2016 and for each year
thereafter.
DATES: This rule is effective August 19, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kellie Allison, 703-614-0410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information
The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990,
Public Law 101-410, 104 Stat. 890 (28 U.S.C. 2461, note), as amended by
the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, Public Law 104-134, April
26, 1996, and further amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015 Act), Public Law 114-
74, November 2, 2015, required agencies to annually adjust the level of
CMPs for inflation to improve their effectiveness and maintain their
deterrent effect. The 2015 Act required that not later than July 1,
2016, and not later than January 15 of every year thereafter, the head
of each agency must adjust each CMP within its jurisdiction by the
inflation adjustment described in the 2015 Act. The inflation
adjustment is determined by increasing the maximum CMP or the range of
minimum and maximum CMPs, as applicable, for each CMP by the cost-of-
living adjustment, rounded to the nearest multiple of $1. The cost-of-
living adjustment is the percentage (if any) for each CMP by which the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the month of October preceding the date
of the adjustment, exceeds the CPI for the month of October in the
previous calendar year.
The initial catch up adjustments for inflation to the Department of
Defense's CMPs were published as an interim final rule in the Federal
Register on May 26, 2016 (81 FR 33389-33391) and became effective on
that date. The interim final rule was published as a final rule without
change on September 12, 2016 (81 FR 62629-62631), effective that date.
The revised methodology for agencies for 2017 and each year thereafter
provides for the improvement of the effectiveness of CMPs and to
maintain their deterrent effect. The Department of Defense is adjusting
the level of all civil monetary penalties under its jurisdiction by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directed cost-of-living
adjustment multiplier for 2021 of 1.01182 prescribed in OMB Memorandum
M-21-10, ``Implementation of Penalty Inflation Adjustments for 2021,
Pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015,'' dated December 16, 2019. The Department of
Defense's 2021 adjustments for inflation to CMPs apply only to those
CMPs, including those whose associated violation predated such
adjustment, which are assessed by the Department of Defense after the
effective date of the new CMP level.
Statement of Authority and Costs and Benefits
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)B, there is good cause to issue this
rule without prior public notice or opportunity for public comment
because it would be impracticable and unnecessary. The Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Section
701(b)) requires agencies, effective 2017, to make annual adjustments
for inflation to CMPs notwithstanding section 553 of title 5, United
States Code. Additionally, the methodology used, effective 2017, for
adjusting CMPs for inflation is established in statute, with no
discretion provided to agencies regarding the substance of the
adjustments for inflation to CMPs. The Department of Defense is charged
only with performing ministerial computations to determine the dollar
amount of adjustments for inflation to CMPs.
Further, there are no significant costs associated with the
regulatory revisions that would impose any mandates on the Department
of Defense, Federal, State or local governments, or the private sector.
Accordingly, prior public notice and an opportunity for public comment
are not required for this rule. The benefit of this rule is the
Department of Defense anticipates that civil monetary penalty
collections may increase in the future due to new penalty authorities
and other changes in this rule. However, it is difficult to accurately
predict the extent of any increase, if any, due to a variety of
factors, such as budget and staff resources, the number and quality of
civil penalty referrals or leads, and the length of time needed to
investigate and resolve a case.
Regulatory Procedures
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action,'' and
was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. Chapter 25)
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits
[[Page 46600]]
before issuing any rule the mandates of which require spending in any
year of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation.
In 2016, that threshold is approximately $146 million. This rule will
not mandate any requirements for State, local, or tribal governments,
nor will it affect private sector costs.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
Because notice of proposed rulemaking and opportunity for comment
are not required pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other law, the
analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601, et seq.) are inapplicable. Therefore, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and has not been prepared.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Department of Defense determined that provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35, and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, do not apply to
this rule because there are no new or revised recordkeeping or
reporting requirements.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a rule that imposes substantial
direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State
law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. This final rule will not
have a substantial effect on State and local governments.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 269
Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 269 is amended as follows.
PART 269--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 269 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note.
0
2. In Sec. 269.4, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 269.4 Cost of living adjustments of civil monetary penalties.
* * * * *
(d) Inflation adjustment. Maximum civil monetary penalties within
the jurisdiction of the Department are adjusted for inflation as
follows:
Table 1 to Paragraph (d)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum New adjusted
United States code Civil monetary penalty description penalty amount maximum
as of 02/21/20 penalty amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Defense Authorization Act for Unauthorized Activities Directed at or 134,807 136,400
FY 2005, 10 U.S.C. 113, note. Possession of Sunken Military Craft.
10 U.S.C. 1094(c)(1).................. Unlawful Provision of Health Care....... 11,837 11,977
10 U.S.C. 1102(k)..................... Wrongful Disclosure--Medical Records:
First Offense........................... 6,999 7,082
Subsequent Offense...................... 46,663 47,214
10 U.S.C. 2674(c)(2).................. Violation of the Pentagon Reservation 1,928 1,951
Operation and Parking of Motor Vehicles
Rules and Regulations.
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(1).................. Violation Involving False Claim......... 11,665 11,803
31 U.S.C. 3802(a)(2).................. Violation Involving False Statement..... 11,665 11,803
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR False claims............................ 20,866 21,112.64
200.210(a)(1).
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Claims submitted with a false 20,866 21,112.64
200.210(a)(1). certification of physician license.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Claims presented by excluded party...... 20,866 21,112.64
200.210(a)(2).
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Employing or contracting with an 20,866 21,112.64
200.210(a)(2); (b)(2)(ii). excluded individual.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Pattern of claims for medically 20,866 21,112.64
200.210(a)(1). unnecessary services/supplies.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Ordering or prescribing while excluded.. 20,866 21,112.64
200.210(a)(2).
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Known retention of an overpayment....... 20,866 21,112.64
200.210(a)(5).
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Making or using a false record or 104,330 105,563.18
200.210(a)(4). statement that is material to a false
or fraudulent claim.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Failure to grant timely access to OIG 31,300 31,669.97
200.210(a)(6). for audits, investigations,
evaluations, or other statutory
functions of OIG.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Making false statements, omissions, 104,330 105,563.18
200.210(a)(3). misrepresentations in an enrollment
application.
42 U.S.C. 1320a-7a(a); 32 CFR Unlawfully offering, paying, soliciting, 104,330 105,563.18
200.310(a). or receiving remuneration to induce or
in return for the referral of business
in violation of 1128B(b) of the Social
Security Act.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 46601]]
Dated: August 12, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-17675 Filed 8-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P