C10-C18-Alkyl Dimethyl Amine Oxides (ADAOs); Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 45888-45892 [2021-17450]
Download as PDF
45888
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0164; FRL–8678–01–
OCSPP]
C10-C18-Alkyl Dimethyl Amine Oxides
(ADAOs); Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of C10-C18-Alkyl
dimethyl amine oxides herein referred
to as ADAOs when used as inert
ingredients (surfactants/foaming agents)
in antimicrobial pesticide formulations
applied to food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, food-processing equipment
and utensils, limited to not more than
1,350 parts per million (ppm) at the
end-use concentration in pesticide
formulations. Technology Sciences
Group Inc. on behalf of Mason Chemical
Company submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an
amendment to an existing requirement
of a tolerance. This regulation
eliminates the need to establish a
maximum permissible level for residues
of ADAOs when used in accordance
with this exemption.
DATES: This regulation is effective
August 17, 2021. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before October 18, 2021, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0164, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
closed to visitors with limited
exceptions. The staff continues to
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC
services and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main
telephone number: (703) 305–7090;
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Publishing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2021–0164 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before
October 18, 2021. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2021–0164, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of March 22,
2021 (86 FR 15162) (FRL–10021–44),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP IN–11435) by Technology
Sciences Group Inc., 1150 18th Street
NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20036,
on behalf of Mason Chemical Company,
9075 Centre Point Dr., Suite 400, West
Chester, OH 45069. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.940(a) be
amended by establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of ADAOs when used as inert
ingredients used as surfactants and
foaming agents in antimicrobial
pesticide formulations applied to foodcontact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy-processing equipment, foodprocessing equipment and utensils. That
document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by Technology
Sciences Group Inc. on behalf of the
Mason Chemical Company, the
petitioner, which is available in the
docket at https://www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
There were no comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition, EPA has limited
the maximum concentration of ADAOs
to not more than 1,350 ppm at the enduse concentration in pesticide
formulations. This limitation is based
on the Agency’s risk assessment, which
can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov in document ‘‘C10C18-Alkyldimethylamine oxides;
Human Health Risk Assessment and
Ecological Effects Assessment to
Support Proposed Exemption from the
Requirement of a Tolerance When Used
as Inert Ingredients in Pesticide
Formulations’’ in docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2021–0164.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue.’’
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be clearly
demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide
chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no
harm to human health. In order to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide inert ingredients,
the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible
exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water,
and through other exposures that occur
as a result of pesticide use in residential
settings. If EPA is able to determine that
a tolerance is not necessary to ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for ADAOs,
including exposure resulting from the
exemption established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with ADAOs follows.
On October 7, 2009, EPA published in
the Federal Register a final rule
establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of ADAOs when used as an inert
ingredient in pesticide formulations
applied to raw agricultural commodities
pre- and post-harvest. See 74 FR 51474
(FRL–8437–3). That document contains
a summary of the toxicological profile,
toxicological points of departure/levels
of concern, certain assumptions for
exposure assessment, and the Agency’s
determination regarding the children’s
safety factor, which have not changed
except as described below.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as
well as the relationship of the results of
the studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. Specific
information on the studies received and
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45889
the nature of the adverse effects caused
by ADAOs as well as the no-observedadverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the
lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level
(LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are
discussed in Unit IV.A of the final rule
published in the Federal Register of
October 7, 2009 (74 FR 51474) (FRL–
8437–3).
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide’s toxicological
profile is determined, EPA identifies
toxicological points of departure (POD)
and levels of concern to use in
evaluating the risk posed by human
exposure to the pesticide. For hazards
that have a threshold below which there
is no appreciable risk, the toxicological
POD is used as the basis for derivation
of reference values for risk assessment.
PODs are developed based on a careful
analysis of the doses in each
toxicological study to determine the
dose at which no adverse effects are
observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest
dose at which adverse effects of concern
are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/
safety factors are used in conjunction
with the POD to calculate a safe
exposure level—generally referred to as
a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a
reference dose (RfD)—and a safe margin
of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold
risks, the Agency assumes that any
amount of exposure will lead to some
degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
estimates risk in terms of the probability
of an occurrence of the adverse effect
expected in a lifetime. For more
information on the general principles
EPA uses in risk characterization and a
complete description of the risk
assessment process, see https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/
riskassess.htm.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to ADAOs, EPA considered
exposure under the proposed exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance. To
assess dietary exposures from ADAOs in
food, the Agency calculated the Daily
Dietary Dose (DDD) and the Estimated
Daily Intake (EDI) using U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) Food
Contact Surface Sanitizing Solution
Dietary Exposure Assessment Model.
EPA’s assessment used FDA’s default
assumptions for the amount of residual
solution or quantity of solution
remaining on the treated surface
without rinsing with potable water
(1 mg/cm2); surface area of the treated
surface which comes into contact with
food (4,000 cm2); and the pesticide
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
45890
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
migration fraction (100%). EPA used an
application rate of ADAOs of 1,350
ppm, which was provided by the
petitioner. EPA also derived exposure
amounts for population subgroups by
accounting for body weights and
adjusting for relative food consumption
using data from the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES) (specifically the 2003–2008
survey data).
ADAOs are currently exempt from the
requirements of a tolerance under 40
CFR 180.910 for use as inert ingredients
in pesticide formulations applied to
growing crops or to raw agricultural
commodities after harvest limited to
15% by weight in pesticide
formulations and use as a surfactant.
One of the ADAO chemicals in the
group, alkyl (C10-16) dimethyl amine
oxide, is also approved as an
antibacterial agent in dishwashing
detergent for residential use. Potential
dietary exposures from these uses were
included in the overall dietary
exposure.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking
water. The proposed use of ADAOs will
not result in measurable levels in
surface water or ground water and
therefore will not contribute to dietary
exposure.
As stated above, ADAOs are approved
for pre- and post-harvest uses and for
use in dishwashing detergent. Dietary
exposures from drinking water due to
these uses are included in the overall
dietary exposure.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers),
carpets, swimming pools, and hard
surface disinfection on walls, floors,
tables).
Indoor residential exposure may
occur from use of ADAOs as inert
ingredients in antimicrobial pesticide
products applied to food contact
surfaces. Indoor and outdoor residential
exposure may also occur as a result of
current approved uses of ADAOs in
pesticide formulations for pre- and postharvest application and in dishwashing
detergent. ADAOs are also used in soap
and hair products. The Agency’s
assessment of residential exposure
combines exposure from all of the
aforementioned uses. A summary of
certain other assumptions for exposure
assessment of ADAOs is discussed in
Unit IV.C. of the final rule published in
the Federal Register of October 7, 2009
(74 FR 51474) (FRL–8437–3).
4. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) and (c)(2)(B) of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
FFDCA requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke
a tolerance or exemption, the Agency
consider ‘‘available information’’
concerning the cumulative effects of a
particular pesticide’s residues and
‘‘other substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found ADAOs to share a
common mechanism of toxicity with
any other substances, and ADAOs do
not appear to produce a toxic metabolite
produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this action, therefore, EPA
has assumed that ADAOs do not have a
common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(B) of
FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply
an additional tenfold (10X) margin of
safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for
prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines
based on reliable data that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants
and children. This additional margin of
safety is commonly referred to as the
FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In applying
this provision, EPA either retains the
default value of 10X, or uses a different
additional safety factor when reliable
data available to EPA support the choice
of a different factor. EPA has
determined that reliable data show the
safety of infants and children would be
adequately protected if the FQPA SF
were reduced to 1X. The rationale for
the Agency’s determination regarding
the children’s safety factor is discussed
in unit IV.D of the final rule published
in the Federal Register of October 7,
2009 (74 FR 51474) (FRL–8437–3).
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
EPA determines whether acute and
chronic dietary pesticide exposures are
safe by comparing aggregate exposure
estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and
chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer
risks, EPA calculates the lifetime
probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-,
intermediate-, and chronic-term risks
are evaluated by comparing the
estimated aggregate food, water, and
residential exposure to the appropriate
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE
exists.
1. Acute risk. An acute aggregate risk
assessment takes into account acute
exposure estimates from dietary
consumption of food and drinking
water. No adverse effect resulting from
a single oral exposure was identified
and no acute dietary endpoint was
selected. Therefore, ADAOs are not
expected to pose an acute risk.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure
assumptions described for chronic
exposure, EPA has concluded that
chronic exposure to ADAOs from food
and water will utilize 91% of the cPAD
for children 1 to 2 years old, the
population group receiving the greatest
exposure.
3. Short-term risk. Short-term
aggregate exposure takes into account
short-term residential exposure plus
chronic exposure to food and water
(considered to be a background
exposure level).
ADAOs are currently used as an inert
ingredient in pesticide products that are
registered for uses that could result in
short-term residential exposure, and the
Agency has determined that it is
appropriate to aggregate chronic
exposure through food and water with
short-term residential exposures to
ADAOs.
Using the exposure assumptions
described in this unit for short-term
exposures, EPA has concluded the
combined short-term food, water, and
residential exposures result in aggregate
MOEs of 171 and 101 for the U.S.
population and children 1 to 2 years
old, respectively. Because EPA’s level of
concern for ADAOs is MOEs of 100 or
below, these MOEs are not of concern.
4. Intermediate-term risk.
Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account intermediate-term
residential exposure plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered
to be a background exposure level).
ADAOs are currently used as inert
ingredients in pesticide products that
are registered for uses that could result
in intermediate-term residential
exposure, and the Agency has
determined that it is appropriate to
aggregate chronic exposure through food
and water with intermediate-term
residential exposures to ADAOs.
Using the exposure assumptions
described in this unit for intermediateterm exposures, EPA has concluded that
the combined intermediate-term food,
water, and residential exposures result
in aggregate MOEs of 322 and 104 for
the U.S. population and children 1 to 2
years old, respectively. Because EPA’s
level of concern for ADAOs are MOEs
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
of 100 or below, these MOEs are not of
concern.
5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S.
population. The Agency has not
identified any concerns for
carcinogenicity relating to ADAOs.
6. Determination of safety. Taking
into consideration all available
information on ADAOs, EPA has
determined that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm to the general
population or any population subgroup,
including infants and children, will
result from aggregate exposure to
residues of ADAOs. Therefore, the
establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance under 40 CFR
180.940(a) for residues of ADAOs when
used as inert ingredients in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations
applied to food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, food-processing equipment,
and utensils limited to not more than
1,350 ppm at the end-use concentration
in pesticide formulations, is safe under
FFDCA section 408.
V. Other Considerations
Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is not establishing a numerical
tolerance for residues of ADAOs in or
on any food commodities. EPA is
establishing limitations on the amount
of ADAOs that may be used in pesticide
formulations applied to food-contact
surfaces in public eating places, dairyprocessing equipment, food-processing
equipment, and utensils. These
limitations will be enforced through the
pesticide registration process under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (‘‘FIFRA’’), 7 U.S.C.
136 et seq. EPA will not register any
pesticide formulation for food use that
exceeds 1350 ppm of ADAOs in the
end-use concentration in pesticide
formulations.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
under 40 CFR 180.940(a) for C10-C18Alkyl dimethyl amine oxides (CAS Reg.
Nos. 1643–20–5, 2571–88–2, 2605–79–
0, 3332–27–2, 61788–90–7, 68955–55–5,
70592–80–2, 7128–91–8, 85408–48–6,
and 85408–49–7) when used as inert
ingredients (surfactants/foaming agents)
in antimicrobial pesticide formulations
applied to food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, food-processing equipment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Aug 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
and utensils limited to not more than
1,350 ppm at the end-use concentration
in pesticide formulations.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance
exemption under FFDCA section 408(d)
in response to a petition submitted to
the Agency. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because
this action has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866,
this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance exemption in this final
rule, do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45891
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: August 10, 2021.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.940, in paragraph (a),
amend table 180.940(a) by adding in
alphabetical order an entry for the inert
ingredient ‘‘C10-C18-Alkyl dimethyl
amine oxides’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active
and inert ingredients for use in
antimicrobial formulations (Food-contact
surface sanitizing solutions).
*
*
*
(a) * * *
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
*
*
45892
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 180.940(a)
Inert ingredients
CAS reg. No.
Limits
*
*
C10-C18-Alkyl dimethyl amine oxides.
*
*
*
1643–20–5, 2571–88–2, 2605–79–0, 3332–27–2, 61788–90–7,
68955–55–5, 70592–80–2, 7128–91–8, 85408–48–6, and 85408–
49–7.
*
*
When ready for use, the end-use
concentration is not to exceed
1,350 ppm.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[PS Docket Nos. 20–291 and 09–14; FCC
21–80; FR ID 40050]
911 Fee Diversion; New and Emerging
Technologies 911 Improvement Act of
2008
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission (the FCC
or Commission) adopts rules to
implement the Don’t Break Up the TBand Act of 2020, which is section 902
of the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2021, Division FF, Title IX (section 902).
Section 902 directs the Commission to
issue final rules, not later than 180 days
after the date of enactment of section
902, designating the uses of 911 fees by
states and taxing jurisdictions that
constitute 911 fee diversion for
purposes of certain sections of the
United States Code, as amended by
section 902. This Report and Order
adopts rules that implement the
provisions of section 902 requiring
Commission action and that help to
identify those uses of 911 fees by states
and other jurisdictions that support the
provision of 911 services.
DATES:
Effective date: This final rule is
effective October 18, 2021.
Compliance date: Compliance will
not be required for 47 CFR 9.25(b) until
the Commission publishes a document
in the Federal Register announcing that
compliance date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information, contact Brenda
Boykin, Attorney Advisor, Policy and
Licensing Division, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418–
2062 or via email at Brenda.Boykin@
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
16:18 Aug 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
This is a
summary of the Commission’s Report
and Order, FCC 21–80, adopted on June
24, 2021 and released on June 25, 2021,
and the Erratum released on August 12,
2021. The complete text of this
document is available for download at
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/
attachments/FCC-21-80A1.pdf. To
request this document in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (e.g.,
Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format, etc.) or to request
reasonable accommodations (e.g.,
accessible format documents, sign
language interpreters, CART, etc.), send
an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
FCC’s Consumer and Governmental
Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530
(voice), (202) 418–0432 (TTY).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
47 CFR Part 9
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
fcc.gov; or Jill Coogan, Attorney
Advisor, Policy and Licensing Division,
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau, (202) 418–1499 or via email at
Jill.Coogan@fcc.gov.
*
[FR Doc. 2021–17450 Filed 8–16–21; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
*
Paperwork Reduction Act
The requirements in 47 CFR 9.25(b)
constitute a modification of the
information collection with Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Control
No. 3060–1122. This modified
information collection is subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13. The
modified information collection will be
submitted to OMB for review under 47
U.S.C. 3507(d), and compliance with 47
CFR 9.25(b) will not be required until
after approval by OMB.
Congressional Review Act
The Commission has determined, and
the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
concurs, that this is a major rule under
the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C.
804(2). The Commission will send a
copy of this Report and Order to
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Synopsis
I. Background
Congress has had a longstanding
concern about the practice by some
states and local jurisdictions of
diverting 911 fees for non-911 purposes.
Congress initially enacted measures to
limit 911 fee diversion, codified in 47
U.S.C. 615a–1 (section 615a–1).1
Specifically, section 615a–1(f)(1)
provided that nothing in the New and
Emerging Technologies (NET) 911 Act,
the Communications Act of 1934, or any
Commission regulation or order shall
prevent the imposition and collection of
a fee or charge applicable to commercial
mobile services or IP-enabled voice
services specifically designated by a
State, political subdivision thereof,
Indian tribe, or village or regional
corporation for the support or
implementation of 9–1–1 or enhanced
9–1–1 services, provided that the fee or
charge is obligated or expended only in
support of 9–1–1 and enhanced 9–1–1
services, or enhancements of such
services, as specified in the provision of
State or local law adopting the fee or
charge. The NET 911 Act also required
the Commission to report annually on
the collection and distribution of fees in
each state for the support or
implementation of 911 or E911 services,
including findings on the amount of
revenues obligated or expended by each
state ‘‘for any purpose other than the
purpose for which any such fees or
charges are specified.’’ 2 Pursuant to this
provision, the Commission has reported
annually to Congress on 911 fee
diversion every year since 2009. In
October 2020, the Commission released
a Notice of Inquiry seeking comment on
the effects of fee diversion and the most
effective ways to dissuade states and
jurisdictions from continuing or
instituting the diversion of 911/E911
1 New and Emerging Technologies 911
Improvement Act of 2008, Public Law 110–283, 122
Stat. 2620 (NET 911 Act). The NET 911 Act enacted
47 U.S.C. 615a–1 and also amended 47 U.S.C. 222,
615a, 615b, and 942. See 47 U.S.C. 615a–1 Editorial
Notes.
2 These annual reports can be viewed at viewed
at https://www.fcc.gov/general/911-fee-reports.
E:\FR\FM\17AUR1.SGM
17AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45888-45892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17450]
[[Page 45888]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0164; FRL-8678-01-OCSPP]
C10-C18-Alkyl Dimethyl Amine Oxides (ADAOs); Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of C10-C18-Alkyl dimethyl amine oxides
herein referred to as ADAOs when used as inert ingredients
(surfactants/foaming agents) in antimicrobial pesticide formulations
applied to food-contact surfaces in public eating places, dairy-
processing equipment, food-processing equipment and utensils, limited
to not more than 1,350 parts per million (ppm) at the end-use
concentration in pesticide formulations. Technology Sciences Group Inc.
on behalf of Mason Chemical Company submitted a petition to EPA under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an
amendment to an existing requirement of a tolerance. This regulation
eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for
residues of ADAOs when used in accordance with this exemption.
DATES: This regulation is effective August 17, 2021. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 18, 2021,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0164, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site at
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0164 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
October 18, 2021. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0164, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of March 22, 2021 (86 FR 15162) (FRL-10021-
44), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C.
346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-11435) by
Technology Sciences Group Inc., 1150 18th Street NW, Suite 1000,
Washington, DC 20036, on behalf of Mason Chemical Company, 9075 Centre
Point Dr., Suite 400, West Chester, OH 45069. The petition requested
that 40 CFR 180.940(a) be amended by establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues of ADAOs when used as inert
ingredients used as surfactants and foaming agents in antimicrobial
pesticide formulations applied to food-contact surfaces in public
eating places, dairy-processing equipment, food-processing equipment
and utensils. That document referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by Technology Sciences Group Inc. on behalf of the Mason
Chemical Company, the petitioner, which is available in the docket at
https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 45889]]
There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has
limited the maximum concentration of ADAOs to not more than 1,350 ppm
at the end-use concentration in pesticide formulations. This limitation
is based on the Agency's risk assessment, which can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in document ``C10-C18-Alkyldimethylamine oxides;
Human Health Risk Assessment and Ecological Effects Assessment to
Support Proposed Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance When
Used as Inert Ingredients in Pesticide Formulations'' in docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2021-0164.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue.''
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no harm to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for ADAOs, including exposure
resulting from the exemption established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with ADAOs follows.
On October 7, 2009, EPA published in the Federal Register a final
rule establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of ADAOs when used as an inert ingredient in pesticide
formulations applied to raw agricultural commodities pre- and post-
harvest. See 74 FR 51474 (FRL-8437-3). That document contains a summary
of the toxicological profile, toxicological points of departure/levels
of concern, certain assumptions for exposure assessment, and the
Agency's determination regarding the children's safety factor, which
have not changed except as described below.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by ADAOs as well as the no-observed-
adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-
level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies are discussed in Unit IV.A of
the final rule published in the Federal Register of October 7, 2009 (74
FR 51474) (FRL-8437-3).
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL)
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/riskassess.htm.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to ADAOs, EPA considered exposure under the proposed exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance. To assess dietary exposures from
ADAOs in food, the Agency calculated the Daily Dietary Dose (DDD) and
the Estimated Daily Intake (EDI) using U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) Food Contact Surface Sanitizing Solution Dietary
Exposure Assessment Model. EPA's assessment used FDA's default
assumptions for the amount of residual solution or quantity of solution
remaining on the treated surface without rinsing with potable water (1
mg/cm\2\); surface area of the treated surface which comes into contact
with food (4,000 cm\2\); and the pesticide
[[Page 45890]]
migration fraction (100%). EPA used an application rate of ADAOs of
1,350 ppm, which was provided by the petitioner. EPA also derived
exposure amounts for population subgroups by accounting for body
weights and adjusting for relative food consumption using data from the
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (specifically
the 2003-2008 survey data).
ADAOs are currently exempt from the requirements of a tolerance
under 40 CFR 180.910 for use as inert ingredients in pesticide
formulations applied to growing crops or to raw agricultural
commodities after harvest limited to 15% by weight in pesticide
formulations and use as a surfactant. One of the ADAO chemicals in the
group, alkyl (C10-16) dimethyl amine oxide, is also approved as an
antibacterial agent in dishwashing detergent for residential use.
Potential dietary exposures from these uses were included in the
overall dietary exposure.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The proposed use of ADAOs
will not result in measurable levels in surface water or ground water
and therefore will not contribute to dietary exposure.
As stated above, ADAOs are approved for pre- and post-harvest uses
and for use in dishwashing detergent. Dietary exposures from drinking
water due to these uses are included in the overall dietary exposure.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming
pools, and hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, tables).
Indoor residential exposure may occur from use of ADAOs as inert
ingredients in antimicrobial pesticide products applied to food contact
surfaces. Indoor and outdoor residential exposure may also occur as a
result of current approved uses of ADAOs in pesticide formulations for
pre- and post-harvest application and in dishwashing detergent. ADAOs
are also used in soap and hair products. The Agency's assessment of
residential exposure combines exposure from all of the aforementioned
uses. A summary of certain other assumptions for exposure assessment of
ADAOs is discussed in Unit IV.C. of the final rule published in the
Federal Register of October 7, 2009 (74 FR 51474) (FRL-8437-3).
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) and (c)(2)(B) of FFDCA requires that,
when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance or
exemption, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other
substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found ADAOs to share a common mechanism of toxicity
with any other substances, and ADAOs do not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this
action, therefore, EPA has assumed that ADAOs do not have a common
mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding
EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of
toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see
EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(B) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall
apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and
children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and
postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and
exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different
margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional
margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety Factor
(SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value
of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data
available to EPA support the choice of a different factor. EPA has
determined that reliable data show the safety of infants and children
would be adequately protected if the FQPA SF were reduced to 1X. The
rationale for the Agency's determination regarding the children's
safety factor is discussed in unit IV.D of the final rule published in
the Federal Register of October 7, 2009 (74 FR 51474) (FRL-8437-3).
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water,
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an
adequate MOE exists.
1. Acute risk. An acute aggregate risk assessment takes into
account acute exposure estimates from dietary consumption of food and
drinking water. No adverse effect resulting from a single oral exposure
was identified and no acute dietary endpoint was selected. Therefore,
ADAOs are not expected to pose an acute risk.
2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described for
chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to ADAOs from
food and water will utilize 91% of the cPAD for children 1 to 2 years
old, the population group receiving the greatest exposure.
3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food
and water (considered to be a background exposure level).
ADAOs are currently used as an inert ingredient in pesticide
products that are registered for uses that could result in short-term
residential exposure, and the Agency has determined that it is
appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water with
short-term residential exposures to ADAOs.
Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for short-
term exposures, EPA has concluded the combined short-term food, water,
and residential exposures result in aggregate MOEs of 171 and 101 for
the U.S. population and children 1 to 2 years old, respectively.
Because EPA's level of concern for ADAOs is MOEs of 100 or below, these
MOEs are not of concern.
4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure
level).
ADAOs are currently used as inert ingredients in pesticide products
that are registered for uses that could result in intermediate-term
residential exposure, and the Agency has determined that it is
appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water with
intermediate-term residential exposures to ADAOs.
Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for
intermediate-term exposures, EPA has concluded that the combined
intermediate-term food, water, and residential exposures result in
aggregate MOEs of 322 and 104 for the U.S. population and children 1 to
2 years old, respectively. Because EPA's level of concern for ADAOs are
MOEs
[[Page 45891]]
of 100 or below, these MOEs are not of concern.
5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. The Agency has not
identified any concerns for carcinogenicity relating to ADAOs.
6. Determination of safety. Taking into consideration all available
information on ADAOs, EPA has determined that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm to the general population or any population
subgroup, including infants and children, will result from aggregate
exposure to residues of ADAOs. Therefore, the establishment of an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance under 40 CFR 180.940(a)
for residues of ADAOs when used as inert ingredients in antimicrobial
pesticide formulations applied to food-contact surfaces in public
eating places, dairy-processing equipment, food-processing equipment,
and utensils limited to not more than 1,350 ppm at the end-use
concentration in pesticide formulations, is safe under FFDCA section
408.
V. Other Considerations
Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is not establishing a numerical tolerance for residues of
ADAOs in or on any food commodities. EPA is establishing limitations on
the amount of ADAOs that may be used in pesticide formulations applied
to food-contact surfaces in public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, food-processing equipment, and utensils. These limitations
will be enforced through the pesticide registration process under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (``FIFRA''), 7
U.S.C. 136 et seq. EPA will not register any pesticide formulation for
food use that exceeds 1350 ppm of ADAOs in the end-use concentration in
pesticide formulations.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established under 40 CFR 180.940(a) for C10-C18-Alkyl dimethyl amine
oxides (CAS Reg. Nos. 1643-20-5, 2571-88-2, 2605-79-0, 3332-27-2,
61788-90-7, 68955-55-5, 70592-80-2, 7128-91-8, 85408-48-6, and 85408-
49-7) when used as inert ingredients (surfactants/foaming agents) in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations applied to food-contact surfaces
in public eating places, dairy-processing equipment, food-processing
equipment and utensils limited to not more than 1,350 ppm at the end-
use concentration in pesticide formulations.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section
408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance
exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: August 10, 2021.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.940, in paragraph (a), amend table 180.940(a) by adding
in alphabetical order an entry for the inert ingredient ``C10-C18-Alkyl
dimethyl amine oxides'' to read as follows:
Sec. 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active and inert ingredients
for use in antimicrobial formulations (Food-contact surface sanitizing
solutions).
* * * * *
(a) * * *
[[Page 45892]]
Table 180.940(a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inert ingredients CAS reg. No. Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
C10-C18-Alkyl dimethyl amine 1643-20-5, 2571-88-2, When ready for
oxides. 2605-79-0, 3332-27-2, use, the end-
61788-90-7, 68955-55- use
5, 70592-80-2, 7128- concentration
91-8, 85408-48-6, and is not to
85408-49-7. exceed 1,350
ppm.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-17450 Filed 8-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P