Request for Information: Access to Quantum Systems, 45715-45717 [2021-17520]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 155 / Monday, August 16, 2021 / Notices
provisions of the PAA should be
continued, modified, or eliminated.
DOE issued a prior report to Congress
pursuant to section 170p. in 1998 5
(‘‘1998 Report’’) recommending renewal
of the PAA, which was developed and
informed by a public comment process.
On July 26, 2021, DOE published a
NOI in the Federal Register (86 FR
40032) requesting public comment to
assist with its preparation of a report to
Congress on the need for continuation
or modification of the provisions of the
PAA as administered by DOE. In the
NOI, DOE provided an update on
significant changes in law or
circumstances since the 1998 Report,
included a non-exhaustive list of
questions and topics to be considered by
commenters, and requested public
comment to assist with preparation of
the 2021 Report. The NOI requested
public comment from interested persons
to be submitted by August 25, 2021.
On July 29, 2021, DOE received
comments from the Nuclear Energy
Institute (‘‘NEI’’) expressing
appreciation for the opportunity for
public participation in the development
of the 2021 Report while requesting
additional time, a 30-day extension, to
provide comments. NEI stated the
additional time is necessary to collect
views and comments from its members
on the future of the PAA and to enable
those comments to reflect meaningful
and substantive responses to the
specific enumerated questions and
topics posed by DOE in the NOI. NEI
also noted that granting the additional
time is consistent with the extensions in
the public comment deadlines provided
by DOE in connection with the 1998
Report, resulting in a public comment
period equal to 56 calendar days.
DOE also received comments and a
request for a 60-day extension on
August 6, 2021, from the Natural
Resources Defense Council (‘‘NRDC’’),
on behalf of the combined membership
of NRDC, Nuclear Information and
Resources Service, Beyond Nuclear, and
Savannah River Site Watch. NRDC
stated that given the significance of the
PAA to the framework of the nuclear
industry and the range of economic,
technical, policy and legal
considerations raised in the NOI, an
extension of the public period is
warranted to provide its members and
other stakeholders sufficient time to
consider, deliberate and formulate
comments in response to the NOI.
NRDC particularly noted the need for a
5 U.S. Dep’t of Energy, Report to Congress on the
Price-Anderson Act (1998), https://www.energy.gov/
sites/prod/files/gcprod/documents/paa-rep.pdf (to
be referenced as ‘‘1998 Report’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Aug 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
meaningful review period in order to
evaluate and address impacts of the
PAA in regard to the vital topic of
environmental justice, equity, and
inclusion, and the evolving and
developing technologies in the nuclear
industry, such as small modular reactors
and potential as-yet unused nuclear
fuels.
DOE has determined that extension of
the comment period is appropriate
based on the foregoing reasons and is
hereby extending the comment period to
October 25, 2021. Given the importance
of proceeding in a timely manner
toward development of the 2021 Report
that is due to Congress by December 31,
2021, DOE does not intend to grant any
further extensions. Accordingly, DOE
will consider any comments received by
October 25, 2021.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on August 10, 2021,
by John T. Lucas, Acting General
Counsel, Office of the General Counsel,
pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC on August 11,
2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021–17440 Filed 8–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Request for Information: Access to
Quantum Systems
Office of Science, Department
of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
AGENCY:
Congress has requested DOE
to develop a roadmap to provide
researchers access to quantum systems
so as to enhance the U.S. quantum
research enterprise, stimulate the
fledgling U.S. quantum computing
industry, educate the future quantum
computing workforce, and accelerate
advancement of quantum computer
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45715
capabilities. In collaboration with
private sector stakeholders, the research
facility user community, and
interagency partners, the Department of
Energy (DOE), through the Office of
Science, intends to develop such a
roadmap. DOE invites interested parties
to provide input on the quantum
systems that DOE should include in the
roadmap; how the current access
models can meet the needs of quantum
researchers; and the appropriate
timeline and sequencing for
components of the roadmap.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested on or before
September 30, 2021.
ADDRESSES: DOE is using the https://
www.regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public
comments in this proceeding. All
comments in response to this RFI are
therefore to be submitted electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov,
via the web form accessed by following
the ‘‘Submit a Formal Comment’’ link
near the top right of the Federal
Register web page for this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information may
be submitted to Quantum-SystemsAccess-RFI@science.doe.gov or Dr.
Ceren Susut, (301) 903–0366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Quantum information science (QIS) is
a potentially transformative emerging
field, with resulting quantum
technologies having significant
implications for scientific discovery as
well as for our Nation’s economic
prosperity and security.1 Widespread
access to a variety of quantum systems
for research, development, testing, and
evaluation is critical to continued rapid
progress and competitiveness in this
field and to accelerate QIS research and
development. Congress, in the Joint
Explanatory Statement accompanying
the Energy and Water Development and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act of
2021, requested DOE to ‘‘develop a
roadmap to provide researchers access
to quantum systems so as to enhance the
U.S. quantum research enterprise,
stimulate the fledgling U.S. quantum
computing industry, educate the future
quantum computing workforce, and
accelerate advancement of quantum
computer capabilities.’’ 2
Types of quantum systems under
consideration: DOE may consider access
models for research and development
1 See
https://www.quantum.gov/.
2 https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20201221/
BILLS-116RCP68-JES-DIVISION-D.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
45716
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 155 / Monday, August 16, 2021 / Notices
(R&D) on a wide range of quantum
systems. For simplicity, these systems
are broadly categorized here, but many
real facilities or capabilities will bridge
across these flexible groups. The scope
of quantum systems to be addressed in
response to this RFI includes, but is not
limited to:
(1) Systems for synthesis,
characterization, and fabrication—
including foundries and testbeds.
(2) Sensors and measurement
systems—including light-matter sensors,
atomic sensors, magnetometers, clocks,
detectors, and imaging systems.
(3) Networking and communication
systems—including interconnects,
transducers, repeaters, switches, routers,
entangled nodes, encrypted systems,
and network testbeds.
(4) Computers, processors, annealers,
and analog simulators—including noisy
intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) and
beyond-NISQ computers, emulators,
conventional computing systems,
hybrid systems, and computing
testbeds.
Existing access models and
approaches, and DOE resources and
programs that support R&D activities on
quantum systems: DOE utilizes a range
of approaches for access to R&D systems
and facilities that it supports, depending
on the nature of the capability, the
scope of the desired interaction, the
extent and composition of the
community that is interested in access,
and other factors.3 (Other federal
agencies may employ similar and/or
additional models.) Direct collaboration
with DOE-supported researchers
(including but not exclusively at DOE
National Laboratories), which may
involve indirect or direct usage of their
systems and instruments, is one
frequent method, and may not require
specific agreements or obligations other
than those applying generally to
laboratory requirements. For instance,
the Microsystems Engineering, Science,
and Applications (MESA) facility 4 at
Sandia National Laboratories offers
advanced fabrication capabilities
relevant to QIS, and Los Alamos
National Laboratory provides a variety
of quantum computing technologies to
scientists and engineers.5
Technology transfer and collaboration
mechanisms include Cooperative
Research and Development Agreements
(CRADAs) that formalize joint R&D
efforts between federal laboratories and
external-to-government partners;
Strategic Partnership Projects (SPPs), in
which work is done for businesses and
3 https://www.labpartnering.org/partnering.
4 https://www.sandia.gov/mesa/.
5 https://www.lanl.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Aug 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
other non-federal entities using
specialized or unique facilities and/or
expertise; as well as Agreements for
Commercializing Technology (ACTs)
and Technology Licensing Agreements,
among others. Another approach used
primarily for major facilities that host
substantial numbers of external
researchers is the user facility model, in
which access is typically provided
competitively via merit- and feasibilitybased review.6 Current and nextgeneration systems at DOE user facilities
that enable breakthrough scientific
discoveries in QIS include but are not
limited to Nanoscale Science Research
Centers,7 High-Performance Computing
and Networking Facilities,8 X-Ray Light
Sources,9 and Neutron Scattering
Facilities.10 Other programs, such as
Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s
Quantum Computing User Program,11
facilitate access to commercial quantum
computing resources via merit-based
review and user agreements.
Additionally, DOE supports the
development of quantum computing
and quantum network testbeds for
science. For instance, DOE quantum
computing testbeds provide the research
community with fully transparent
access to novel quantum computing
hardware.12
II. Questions
Input is requested on information the
Department should consider as it
develops a roadmap to provide
researchers access to quantum systems
to enhance the U.S. quantum research
enterprise, stimulate the fledgling U.S.
quantum computing industry, educate
the future quantum computing
workforce, and accelerate advancement
of quantum computer capabilities. Any
information that may be business
proprietary and exempt by law from
public disclosure should be submitted
as described in Section III. Please
provide data, analysis, and/or other
justification for all responses to this RFI,
where applicable. DOE is interested in
receiving input on the following
questions:
6 https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities.
7 https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities/UserFacilities-at-a-Glance/BES/Nanoscale-ScienceResearch-Centers.
8 https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities/UserFacilities-at-a-Glance/ASCR.
9 https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities/UserFacilities-at-a-Glance/BES/X-Ray-Light-Sources.
10 https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities/UserFacilities-at-a-Glance/BES/Neutron-ScatteringFacilities.
11 https://www.olcf.ornl.gov/olcf-resources/
compute-systems/quantum-computing-userprogram/.
12 https://qscout.sandia.gov and https://
aqt.lbl.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(i) What role, if any, should Federal
agencies play in mediating, facilitating,
or coordinating access to non-Federal
quantum systems?
(ii) What special considerations, if
any, should be taken into account in
accommodating the scientific
communities served by these quantum
systems?
(iii) What quantum systems should be
included in this roadmap?
(iv) What mechanisms should be
considered to assure access to quantum
systems to the broadest possible user
base including under-represented
institutions and populations?
(v) What are the needs for user
support to make effective use of access
to quantum systems?
(vi) What should be the metrics for
success in an access model?
(vii) How should software access be
provided in conjunction with hardware
access?
(viii) For competitive proposals
requesting access to quantum systems,
what should be the criteria in the merit
review process?
(ix) What factors should be
considered in adding, expanding, or
reducing access to specific quantum
systems as the field evolves or matures?
(x) With respect to access to various
types of quantum systems, how do nearterm and longer-term priorities differ?
(xi) What standard intellectual
property (IP) provisions are needed to
facilitate broad access to quantum
systems for the public benefit?
(xii) Are there other factors, issues, or
opportunities, not addressed by the
questions above, which should be
considered in the development of such
a roadmap?
Comments containing references,
studies, research, and other empirical
data that are not widely published
should include copies of the referenced
materials. Note that comments will be
made publicly available as submitted.
Any information that may be
confidential and exempt by law from
public disclosure should be submitted
as described below.
III. Request for Information
The Department seeks input from
stakeholders to assist DOE in
developing a roadmap for access to
quantum systems, including the nature
of quantum systems that should be
considered; how the current access
models can meet the needs of quantum
researchers; and the appropriate
timeline and sequencing for
components of this roadmap. The input
received will be considered by DOE in
its development of the roadmap and for
QIS program planning and
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 155 / Monday, August 16, 2021 / Notices
development. Please be aware that this
RFI is not a Funding Opportunity
Announcement, a Request for Proposal,
or other form of solicitation, or bid for
DOE to fund potential research,
development, planning, centers, or other
activity.
Confidential Business Information:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person
submitting information he or she
believes to be confidential and exempt
by law from public disclosure should
submit via email: One copy of the
document marked ‘‘confidential’’
including all the information believed to
be confidential, and one copy of the
document marked ‘‘non-confidential’’
with the information believed to be
confidential deleted. DOE will make its
own determination about the
confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its
determination. Factors of interest to
DOE when evaluating requests to treat
submitted information as confidential
include: (1) A description of the items,
(2) whether and why such items are
customarily treated as confidential
within the industry, (3) whether the
information is generally known by or
available from other sources, (4)
whether the information has previously
been made available to others without
obligation concerning confidentiality,
(5) an explanation of the competitive
injury to the submitting person which
would result from public disclosure, (6)
when such information might lose its
confidential character due to the
passage of time, and (7) why disclosure
of the information would be contrary to
the public interest.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on August 11, 2021,
by Harriet Kung, Deputy Director for
Science Programs, Office of Science,
pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Aug 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 11,
2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021–17520 Filed 8–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Project Nos. 2572–133 2458–247]
Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC;
Notice of Intent To File License
Applications, Filing of Pre-Application
Document, Commencement of PreFiling Process, and Scoping; Request
for Comments on the Pad and Scoping
Document, Identification of Issues and
Associated Study Requests, and
Virtual Public Scoping Meetings and
Virtual Environmental Site Review
a. Type of Filing: Notices of Intent to
File License Applications for New
License and Commencing Pre-filing
Process.
b. Project Nos.: 2572–133 and 2458–
247.
c. Date Filed: June 11, 2021.
d. Submitted By: Great Lakes Hydro
America, LLC.
e. Name of Projects: Ripogenus
Hydroelectric Project and Penobscot
Mills Hydroelectric Project.
f. Location: On the West Branch of the
Penobscot River and Millinocket Stream
in Piscataquis and Penobscot Counties,
Maine.
g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR part 5 of
the Commission’s Regulations.
h. Licensee Contact: Randall Dorman,
Licensing Manager, Brookfield
Renewable, 150 Main Street, Lewiston,
ME 04240; (207) 755–5605;
randy.dorman@
brookfieldrenewable.com.
i. FERC Contact: Allan Creamer at
(202) 502–8365, or email at
allan.creamer@ferc.gov.
j. Cooperating agencies: Federal, state,
local, and tribal agencies with
jurisdiction and/or special expertise
with respect to environmental issues
that wish to cooperate in the
preparation of the environmental
document should follow the
instructions for filing such requests
described in item o below. Cooperating
agencies should note the Commission’s
policy that agencies that cooperate in
the preparation of the environmental
document cannot also intervene. See 94
FERC 61,076 (2001).
k. With this notice, we are initiating
informal consultation with: (a) The U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45717
Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA
Fisheries under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act and the joint
agency regulations thereunder at 50
CFR, Part 402; and (b) the State Historic
Preservation Officer, as required by
section 106, National Historic
Preservation Act, and the implementing
regulations of the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
l. With this notice, we are designating
Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC as the
Commission’s non-federal
representative for carrying out informal
consultation, pursuant to section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act and section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
m. Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC
filed with the Commission a PreApplication Document (PAD; including
a proposed process plan and schedule),
pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the
Commission’s regulations.
n. In addition to publishing the full
text of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents via the
internet through the Commission’s
Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov), using
the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number(s), excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field, to
access the document. At this time, the
Commission has suspended access to
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room, due to the proclamation
declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus
Disease (COVID–19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For
assistance, contact FERC Online
Support at FERCOnlineSupport@
ferc.gov, or call toll-free, (866) 208–3676
or TYY, (202) 502–8659.
Register online at https://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via
email of new filings and issuances
related to these or other pending
projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
o. With this notice, we are soliciting
comments on the PAD and Commission
staff’s Scoping Document 1 (SD1), as
well as study requests. All comments on
the PAD and SD1, and study requests
should be sent to the address above in
paragraph h. In addition, all comments
on the PAD and SD1, study requests,
requests for cooperating agency status,
and all communications to and from
Commission staff related to the merits of
the potential applications must be filed
with the Commission.
The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing. Please file all
documents using the Commission’s
E:\FR\FM\16AUN1.SGM
16AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 155 (Monday, August 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45715-45717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17520]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Request for Information: Access to Quantum Systems
AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Congress has requested DOE to develop a roadmap to provide
researchers access to quantum systems so as to enhance the U.S. quantum
research enterprise, stimulate the fledgling U.S. quantum computing
industry, educate the future quantum computing workforce, and
accelerate advancement of quantum computer capabilities. In
collaboration with private sector stakeholders, the research facility
user community, and interagency partners, the Department of Energy
(DOE), through the Office of Science, intends to develop such a
roadmap. DOE invites interested parties to provide input on the quantum
systems that DOE should include in the roadmap; how the current access
models can meet the needs of quantum researchers; and the appropriate
timeline and sequencing for components of the roadmap.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested on or before
September 30, 2021.
ADDRESSES: DOE is using the https://www.regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public comments in this proceeding. All
comments in response to this RFI are therefore to be submitted
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov, via the web form
accessed by following the ``Submit a Formal Comment'' link near the top
right of the Federal Register web page for this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
may be submitted to [email protected] or Dr.
Ceren Susut, (301) 903-0366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Quantum information science (QIS) is a potentially transformative
emerging field, with resulting quantum technologies having significant
implications for scientific discovery as well as for our Nation's
economic prosperity and security.\1\ Widespread access to a variety of
quantum systems for research, development, testing, and evaluation is
critical to continued rapid progress and competitiveness in this field
and to accelerate QIS research and development. Congress, in the Joint
Explanatory Statement accompanying the Energy and Water Development and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2021, requested DOE to ``develop
a roadmap to provide researchers access to quantum systems so as to
enhance the U.S. quantum research enterprise, stimulate the fledgling
U.S. quantum computing industry, educate the future quantum computing
workforce, and accelerate advancement of quantum computer
capabilities.'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See https://www.quantum.gov/.
\2\ https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20201221/BILLS-116RCP68-JES-DIVISION-D.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Types of quantum systems under consideration: DOE may consider
access models for research and development
[[Page 45716]]
(R&D) on a wide range of quantum systems. For simplicity, these systems
are broadly categorized here, but many real facilities or capabilities
will bridge across these flexible groups. The scope of quantum systems
to be addressed in response to this RFI includes, but is not limited
to:
(1) Systems for synthesis, characterization, and fabrication--
including foundries and testbeds.
(2) Sensors and measurement systems--including light-matter
sensors, atomic sensors, magnetometers, clocks, detectors, and imaging
systems.
(3) Networking and communication systems--including interconnects,
transducers, repeaters, switches, routers, entangled nodes, encrypted
systems, and network testbeds.
(4) Computers, processors, annealers, and analog simulators--
including noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) and beyond-NISQ
computers, emulators, conventional computing systems, hybrid systems,
and computing testbeds.
Existing access models and approaches, and DOE resources and
programs that support R&D activities on quantum systems: DOE utilizes a
range of approaches for access to R&D systems and facilities that it
supports, depending on the nature of the capability, the scope of the
desired interaction, the extent and composition of the community that
is interested in access, and other factors.\3\ (Other federal agencies
may employ similar and/or additional models.) Direct collaboration with
DOE-supported researchers (including but not exclusively at DOE
National Laboratories), which may involve indirect or direct usage of
their systems and instruments, is one frequent method, and may not
require specific agreements or obligations other than those applying
generally to laboratory requirements. For instance, the Microsystems
Engineering, Science, and Applications (MESA) facility \4\ at Sandia
National Laboratories offers advanced fabrication capabilities relevant
to QIS, and Los Alamos National Laboratory provides a variety of
quantum computing technologies to scientists and engineers.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ https://www.labpartnering.org/partnering.
\4\ https://www.sandia.gov/mesa/.
\5\ https://www.lanl.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technology transfer and collaboration mechanisms include
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) that formalize
joint R&D efforts between federal laboratories and external-to-
government partners; Strategic Partnership Projects (SPPs), in which
work is done for businesses and other non-federal entities using
specialized or unique facilities and/or expertise; as well as
Agreements for Commercializing Technology (ACTs) and Technology
Licensing Agreements, among others. Another approach used primarily for
major facilities that host substantial numbers of external researchers
is the user facility model, in which access is typically provided
competitively via merit- and feasibility-based review.\6\ Current and
next-generation systems at DOE user facilities that enable breakthrough
scientific discoveries in QIS include but are not limited to Nanoscale
Science Research Centers,\7\ High-Performance Computing and Networking
Facilities,\8\ X-Ray Light Sources,\9\ and Neutron Scattering
Facilities.\10\ Other programs, such as Oak Ridge National Laboratory's
Quantum Computing User Program,\11\ facilitate access to commercial
quantum computing resources via merit-based review and user agreements.
Additionally, DOE supports the development of quantum computing and
quantum network testbeds for science. For instance, DOE quantum
computing testbeds provide the research community with fully
transparent access to novel quantum computing hardware.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities.
\7\ https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities/User-Facilities-at-a-Glance/BES/Nanoscale-Science-Research-Centers.
\8\ https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities/User-Facilities-at-a-Glance/ASCR.
\9\ https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities/User-Facilities-at-a-Glance/BES/X-Ray-Light-Sources.
\10\ https://science.osti.gov/User-Facilities/User-Facilities-at-a-Glance/BES/Neutron-Scattering-Facilities.
\11\ https://www.olcf.ornl.gov/olcf-resources/compute-systems/quantum-computing-user-program/.
\12\ https://qscout.sandia.gov and https://aqt.lbl.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Questions
Input is requested on information the Department should consider as
it develops a roadmap to provide researchers access to quantum systems
to enhance the U.S. quantum research enterprise, stimulate the
fledgling U.S. quantum computing industry, educate the future quantum
computing workforce, and accelerate advancement of quantum computer
capabilities. Any information that may be business proprietary and
exempt by law from public disclosure should be submitted as described
in Section III. Please provide data, analysis, and/or other
justification for all responses to this RFI, where applicable. DOE is
interested in receiving input on the following questions:
(i) What role, if any, should Federal agencies play in mediating,
facilitating, or coordinating access to non-Federal quantum systems?
(ii) What special considerations, if any, should be taken into
account in accommodating the scientific communities served by these
quantum systems?
(iii) What quantum systems should be included in this roadmap?
(iv) What mechanisms should be considered to assure access to
quantum systems to the broadest possible user base including under-
represented institutions and populations?
(v) What are the needs for user support to make effective use of
access to quantum systems?
(vi) What should be the metrics for success in an access model?
(vii) How should software access be provided in conjunction with
hardware access?
(viii) For competitive proposals requesting access to quantum
systems, what should be the criteria in the merit review process?
(ix) What factors should be considered in adding, expanding, or
reducing access to specific quantum systems as the field evolves or
matures?
(x) With respect to access to various types of quantum systems, how
do near-term and longer-term priorities differ?
(xi) What standard intellectual property (IP) provisions are needed
to facilitate broad access to quantum systems for the public benefit?
(xii) Are there other factors, issues, or opportunities, not
addressed by the questions above, which should be considered in the
development of such a roadmap?
Comments containing references, studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely published should include copies of
the referenced materials. Note that comments will be made publicly
available as submitted. Any information that may be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure should be submitted as described
below.
III. Request for Information
The Department seeks input from stakeholders to assist DOE in
developing a roadmap for access to quantum systems, including the
nature of quantum systems that should be considered; how the current
access models can meet the needs of quantum researchers; and the
appropriate timeline and sequencing for components of this roadmap. The
input received will be considered by DOE in its development of the
roadmap and for QIS program planning and
[[Page 45717]]
development. Please be aware that this RFI is not a Funding Opportunity
Announcement, a Request for Proposal, or other form of solicitation, or
bid for DOE to fund potential research, development, planning, centers,
or other activity.
Confidential Business Information: Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information he or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via email: One copy
of the document marked ``confidential'' including all the information
believed to be confidential, and one copy of the document marked ``non-
confidential'' with the information believed to be confidential
deleted. DOE will make its own determination about the confidential
status of the information and treat it according to its determination.
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat submitted
information as confidential include: (1) A description of the items,
(2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as confidential
within the industry, (3) whether the information is generally known by
or available from other sources, (4) whether the information has
previously been made available to others without obligation concerning
confidentiality, (5) an explanation of the competitive injury to the
submitting person which would result from public disclosure, (6) when
such information might lose its confidential character due to the
passage of time, and (7) why disclosure of the information would be
contrary to the public interest.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on August 11,
2021, by Harriet Kung, Deputy Director for Science Programs, Office of
Science, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy.
That document with the original signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE
Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit
the document in electronic format for publication, as an official
document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no
way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on August 11, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-17520 Filed 8-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P