Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Batch Process Operations, 43459-43461 [2021-16739]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 150 / Monday, August 9, 2021 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 51
Passports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, 22 CFR part 51 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 51—PASSPORTS
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1504; 18 U.S.C. 1621;
22 U.S.C. 211a, 212, 212b, 213, 213n (Pub. L.
106–113 Div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(7) [Div. A, Title
II, Sec. 236], 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–430);
214, 214a, 217a, 218, 2651a, 2671(d)(3), 2705,
2714, 2714a, 2721, & 3926; 26 U.S.C. 6039E;
31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 652(k) [Div. B, Title
V of Pub. L. 103–317, 108 Stat. 1760]; E.O.
11295, Aug. 6, 1966, FR 10603, 3 CFR, 1966–
1970 Comp., p. 570; Pub. L. 114–119, 130
Stat. 15; Sec. 1 of Pub. L. 109–210, 120 Stat.
319; Sec. 2 of Pub. L. 109–167, 119 Stat.
3578; Sec. 5 of Pub. L. 109–472, 120 Stat.
3554; Pub. L. 108–447, Div. B, Title IV, Dec.
8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2809; Pub. L. 108–458, 118
Stat. 3638, 3823 (Dec. 17, 2004).
2. Section 51.8 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 51.8 Submission of currently valid
passport.
(a) When applying for a new passport
in person or by mail, an applicant must
submit for cancellation any currently
valid passport of the same type.
(b) When applying for a new passport
on-line, an applicant must have the
currently valid passport of the same
type available for cancellation via the
on-line process.
(c) If an applicant is unable to
produce a passport under paragraph (a)
or (b) of this section, he or she must
submit a signed statement in the form
prescribed by the Department setting
forth the circumstances regarding the
disposition of the passport.
(d) The Department may deny or limit
a passport if the applicant has failed to
provide a sufficient and credible
explanation for lost, stolen, altered or
mutilated passport(s) previously issued
to the applicant, after being given a
reasonable opportunity to do so.
■ 3. Section 51.21 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) subject heading
and paragraph (b)(2), and adding
paragraph (b)(3) to read as follows:
§ 51.21
Execution of passport application.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Application by mail or on-line—
persons in the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) A person in the United States who
previously has been issued a passport
valid for 10 years in their own name
may apply for a new passport by filling
out, signing, and submitting an on-line
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
application via the Department’s official
website if:
(i) The applicant’s most recently
issued passport of the same type was
issued when the applicant was 16 years
of age or older, and has one year or less
of validity remaining;
(ii) The application is submitted not
more than 15 years following the issue
date of the most recently issued
passport of the same type;
(iii) The first release of the OPR
system will require that the application
be submitted in the same name, sex
marker, date of birth, and place of birth
as the most recently issued passport of
the same type with the intent that future
releases will permit changes; and
(iv) The most recently issued passport
of the same type is available for
verification via the on-line process.
(3) The applicant must also provide
photographs as prescribed by the
Department and pay the applicable fees
prescribed in the Schedule of Fees for
Consular Services (22 CFR 22.1).
*
*
*
*
*
Rachel Arndt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021–16928 Filed 8–6–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0474; FRL–8755–01–
R7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Emissions From Batch Process
Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by Missouri on
January 19, 2021. Missouri requests that
the EPA approve into Missouri’s SIP
revisions to its rule related to control of
emissions from batch process
operations. These revisions update
references to the appropriate state rule
for New Source Performance
Regulations. These revisions are
administrative in nature and do not
reduce the stringency of the SIP or have
an adverse impact to air quality. The
EPA’s proposed approval of this rule
revision is being done in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
43459
Comments must be received on
or before September 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2021–0474 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert F. Webber, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Permitting and Standards Branch, 11201
Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas
66219; telephone number: (913) 551–
7251; email address: webber.robert@
epa.gov.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA proposing to take?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2021–
0474, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
43460
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 150 / Monday, August 9, 2021 / Proposed Rules
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the Missouri SIP received
on January 19, 2021. The revisions are
to Title 10, Division 10 of the Code of
State Regulations (CSR), 10 CSR 10–
5.540 ‘‘Control of Emissions From Batch
Process Operations’’ which limits the
volatile organic compound (VOC)
emissions from batch process operations
by incorporating reasonably available
control technology (RACT) requirements
in the St. Louis 1997 ozone
nonattainment area as required by the
Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of
1990. These revisions remove references
to state rule 10 CSR 10–6.030,
‘‘Sampling Methods for Air Pollution
Sources,’’ and replaces them with
references to 10 CSR 10–6.070, ‘‘New
Source Performance Regulations,’’
where the new source performance
standards in 40 CFR part 60 are
appropriately incorporated by reference.
These revisions are described in detail
in the technical support document
(TSD) included in the docket for this
action.
Missouri received no comments
during the state public comment period
on the proposed rule revisions. The EPA
is proposing to approve the revisions to
this rule because it will not have a
negative impact on air quality.
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
December 16, 2019 to February 6, 2020
and received no comments on this
rulemaking. As explained above and in
the TSD included in the docket, the
revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing
regulations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
IV. What action is the EPA proposing to
take?
The EPA is proposing to approve
Missouri’s request to revise 10 CSR 10–
5.540. The EPA is soliciting comment
on the substantive and administrative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
revisions detailed in this proposal and
the TSD. The EPA is not soliciting
comment on existing rule text that has
been previously approved by the EPA
into the SIP. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any
comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to include regulatory text in
an EPA final rule that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri
Regulation described in the proposed
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 7 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 30, 2021.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA-Missouri
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘10–5.540’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1320
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
*
*
43461
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 150 / Monday, August 9, 2021 / Proposed Rules
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA approval date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 5—Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
*
10–5.540 .................
*
*
Control of Emissions From Batch Process Operations.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–16739 Filed 8–6–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0368; FRL–8716–01–
R9 ]
Air Plan Approval; Nevada; Revisions
to Clark County Ozone Maintenance
Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the State of Nevada’s state
implementation plan (SIP) for Clark
County. The revision consists of an
update to certain elements of the
maintenance plan for the Clark County
air quality planning area for the 1997 8hour ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS or ‘‘standards’’),
including certain emissions inventories
and motor vehicle emissions budgets.
The EPA is proposing to approve the
SIP revision because the Clark County
ozone maintenance plan, as revised,
continues to provide for maintenance of
the 1997 ozone NAAQS and will not
interfere with attainment or reasonable
further progress of the other NAAQS,
and the motor vehicle emissions
budgets meet the applicable
transportation conformity requirements.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2021–0368, at https://
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Aug 06, 2021
*
7/30/2020
Jkt 253001
*
*
[Date of publication of the final rule in
the Federal Register], [Federal Register citation of the final rule].
*
*
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. If you need
assistance in a language other than
English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karina O’Connor, Air Planning Office
(AIR–2), EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; By
phone: (775) 434–8176 or by email at
oconnor.karina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What action is the EPA proposing?
II. Background
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
A. NAAQS, SIPs, Designations, and Clark
County
B. 2008 and 2015 Ozone NAAQS
C. Transportation Conformity and the 2018
Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision
III. What did the State submit?
IV. Procedural Requirements for Adoption
and Submittal of SIP Revisions
V. The EPA’s Evaluation of the 2020 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision
A. Emission Inventories
B. Revised Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets
C. CAA Section 110(l) Evaluation
VI. Proposed Action and Request for Public
Comment
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What action is the EPA proposing?
Under section 110(k) of the Clean Air
Act (‘‘Act’’ or CAA), the EPA is required
to take action by approving,
disapproving, or conditionally
approving, in whole or in part, SIPs and
SIP revisions submitted by the states. In
today’s action, the EPA is proposing to
approve a SIP revision titled ‘‘Revision
to Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for
the 1997 Ozone NAAQS, Clark County,
Nevada’’ (August 2020) (herein, referred
to as the ‘‘2020 Ozone Maintenance Plan
Revision’’), submitted by the Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection
(NDEP) on September 30, 2020.1 The
2020 Ozone Maintenance Plan Revision
updates certain elements of the
maintenance plan for Clark County for
the 1997 ozone NAAQS, including
certain emissions inventories and the
motor vehicle emissions budgets
(‘‘budgets’’ or MVEBs). The 2020 Ozone
Maintenance Plan Revision was
prepared in response to the EPA’s
conditional approval of the ‘‘Revision to
Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in
Ozone Redesignation Request and
Maintenance Plan: Clark County,
1 NDEP submitted the 2020 Ozone Maintenance
Plan Revision electronically on September 30, 2020,
as an attachment to a transmittal letter dated
September 25, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\09AUP1.SGM
09AUP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 150 (Monday, August 9, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 43459-43461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16739]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2021-0474; FRL-8755-01-R7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Batch
Process Operations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by
Missouri on January 19, 2021. Missouri requests that the EPA approve
into Missouri's SIP revisions to its rule related to control of
emissions from batch process operations. These revisions update
references to the appropriate state rule for New Source Performance
Regulations. These revisions are administrative in nature and do not
reduce the stringency of the SIP or have an adverse impact to air
quality. The EPA's proposed approval of this rule revision is being
done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2021-0474 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert F. Webber, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Permitting and Standards
Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number:
(913) 551-7251; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is the EPA proposing to take?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2021-
0474, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit
[[Page 43460]]
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Missouri SIP
received on January 19, 2021. The revisions are to Title 10, Division
10 of the Code of State Regulations (CSR), 10 CSR 10-5.540 ``Control of
Emissions From Batch Process Operations'' which limits the volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions from batch process operations by
incorporating reasonably available control technology (RACT)
requirements in the St. Louis 1997 ozone nonattainment area as required
by the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990. These revisions remove
references to state rule 10 CSR 10-6.030, ``Sampling Methods for Air
Pollution Sources,'' and replaces them with references to 10 CSR 10-
6.070, ``New Source Performance Regulations,'' where the new source
performance standards in 40 CFR part 60 are appropriately incorporated
by reference. These revisions are described in detail in the technical
support document (TSD) included in the docket for this action.
Missouri received no comments during the state public comment
period on the proposed rule revisions. The EPA is proposing to approve
the revisions to this rule because it will not have a negative impact
on air quality.
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from December 16,
2019 to February 6, 2020 and received no comments on this rulemaking.
As explained above and in the TSD included in the docket, the revision
meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section
110 and implementing regulations.
IV. What action is the EPA proposing to take?
The EPA is proposing to approve Missouri's request to revise 10 CSR
10-5.540. The EPA is soliciting comment on the substantive and
administrative revisions detailed in this proposal and the TSD. The EPA
is not soliciting comment on existing rule text that has been
previously approved by the EPA into the SIP. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any comments.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to include regulatory text
in an EPA final rule that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference the Missouri Regulation described in the
proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 7 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 30, 2021.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA-Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``10-5.540'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 43461]]
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 5--Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
10-5.540...................... Control of Emissions 7/30/2020 [Date of publication
From Batch Process of the final rule in
Operations. the Federal
Register], [Federal
Register citation of
the final rule].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-16739 Filed 8-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
