Safety Zones; Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Expansion Project, Hampton/Norfolk, VA, 42758-42762 [2021-16198]
Download as PDF
42758
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 148 / Thursday, August 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Issued on July 27, 2021.
Ross Landes,
Deputy Director for Regulatory Operations,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Due to the
relevant COVID–19-related restrictions,
CBP has temporarily suspended on-site
public inspection of the public
comments.
[FR Doc. 2021–16468 Filed 8–4–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[USCBP–2021–0025]
RIN 1515–AE63
Non-Preferential Origin Determinations
for Merchandise Imported From
Canada or Mexico for Implementation
of the Agreement Between the United
States of America, the United Mexican
States, and Canada (USMCA)
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
This document provides
additional time for interested parties to
submit comments on the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register on
July 6, 2021, to amend the U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) regulations
regarding non-preferential origin
determinations for merchandise
imported from Canada or Mexico. Based
on a request from the public to provide
additional time to prepare comments on
the proposed rule, CBP is extending the
comment period to September 7, 2021.
DATES: The comment period for the
proposed rule published July 6, 2021
(86 FR 35422), is extended. Comments
must be received on or before
September 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number USCBP–
2021–0025 by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Due to COVID–19-related
restrictions, CBP has temporarily
suspended its ability to receive public
comments by mail.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
16:19 Aug 04, 2021
Dated: August 2, 2021.
Alice A. Kipel,
Executive Director, Regulations and Rulings,
Office of Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2021–16753 Filed 8–4–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
19 CFR Parts 102 and 177
VerDate Sep<11>2014
the proposed rule is extended to
September 7, 2021.
Jkt 253001
Operational Aspects: Queena Fan,
Director, USMCA Center, Office of
Trade, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, (202) 738–8946 or usmca@
cbp.dhs.gov.
Legal Aspects: Craig T. Clark,
Director, Commercial and Trade
Facilitation Division, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of Trade, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection, (202) 325–0276
or craig.t.clark@cbp.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Interested persons are invited to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written data, views, or
arguments on all aspects of the
proposed rule. U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) also invites comments
that relate to the economic,
environmental, or federalism effects that
might result from this proposed rule.
Comments that will provide the most
assistance to CBP will reference a
specific portion of the proposed rule,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include data,
information or authority that support
such recommended change.
II. Background
On July 6, 2021, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) published a
document in the Federal Register (86
FR 35422), that proposes to amend the
CBP regulations regarding nonpreferential origin determinations for
merchandise imported from Canada or
Mexico. The document solicited public
comments on the proposed rule and
requested that commenters submit their
comments on or before August 5, 2021.
Extension of Comment Period
In response to the proposed rule
published in the Federal Register, CBP
has received correspondence from the
public requesting an extension of the
comment period for 30 days. CBP has
decided to grant the extension.
Accordingly, the comment period for
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket Number USCG–2020–0117]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Hampton Roads BridgeTunnel Expansion Project, Hampton/
Norfolk, VA
Coast Guard, Homeland
Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is proposing
to establish safety zones for certain
waters of the Hampton Flats,
Willoughby Bay, a defined area between
Phoebus Channel and the North Trestle
Bridge, and 3 zones around the North
Trestle Bridge including the North
Island, the South Trestle Bridge
including the South Island, and the
north and south side of the Willoughby
Bay Bridge. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on these
navigable waters in support of the
Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel
Expansion Project that will take place
from 2021 through 2025. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from being in the safety zones
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Sector Virginia or a designated
representative or under conditions
specified in this rulemaking. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before September 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2020–0117 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
SUMMARY:
I. Public Participation
PO 00000
33 CFR Part 165
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 148 / Thursday, August 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Ashley
Holm, Waterways Management Division
Chief, Sector Virginia, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 757–668–5580, email
Ashley.E.Holm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
HRBT Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel
HRCP Hampton Roads Connector Partners
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NSRA Navigation Safety Risk Assessment
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
USCG United States Coast Guard
USACE United States Army Corps of
Engineers
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
In April 2019, the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT)
awarded the design and construction of
the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel
(HRBT) Expansion Project to the
Hampton Roads Connector Partners
(HRCP), as the Design-Build contactor.
The HRBT Expansion Project is a major
road transport infrastructure project that
will create an 8-lane facility with 6
consistent use lanes along 9.9 miles of
Interstate 64 (I–64), from Settler’s
Landing Interchange in Hampton,
Virginia, to the Interstate 564 (I–564)
interchange in Norfolk, Virginia. To
better understand the waterways impact
from the project, the USCG and U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
recommended the submission of a
formal Navigation Safety Risk
Assessment (NSRA) and Tunnel
Construction Plan (TCP) prior to any
permit or approval action by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers.1 The NSRA
identified three key objectives for
consideration. The first included
potential impacts to current and
forecasted vessel traffic directly related
to the bridge and tunnel construction
including all on-water operations and
staging areas. The second aimed to
identify the best/least disruptive times
to schedule movement of constructionrelated vessels. Finally, it identified the
measures necessary for implementation
in order to minimize potential hazards
to navigation. On-water construction
activities are expected to last
approximately 5 years (2021–2025). In
support of construction efforts, multiple
surface craft will be necessary on-site,
1 See Memorandum of Agreement between the
United States Army Corps of Engineers and the
United States Coast Guard, dated June 2, 2000
(available at: https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/
getfile/collection/p16021coll11/id/2518).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Aug 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
transiting to and from, as well as prestaged, to ensure continued operations
are maintained. The increase in
waterborne traffic in the vicinity of
construction areas and staging areas will
introduce hazards to waterways users
prior to and throughout the duration of
the construction project. Specific
hazards during the construction project
include the proximity of dozens of
construction-related vessels in the
bridge area and fleeting areas, including
material barges and construction
equipment barges. In addition,
construction of navigable spans by this
equipment, as well as construction
lighting and loud construction activity
noises will make normal passage
through the bridge areas unsafe except
in areas specifically established as safe
transit corridors by the project
contractors, HRCP. The Sector Virginia
Captain of the Port (COTP) has
determined that these potential hazards
associated with the HRBT Expansion
Project will be a safety concern for
anyone transiting in the vicinity of onwater construction activities related to
the project. To discuss these safety
concerns, representatives of the HRCP
along with the COTP’s staff conducted
a series of outreach meetings. These
meetings covered the HRBT Expansion
Project and the notional safety zones
that would mitigate the hazards
discussed above. Due to the COVID–19
pandemic, those outreach meetings
were conducted virtually on May 5th,
6th, and 7th. They were announced
beforehand by a marine safety
information bulletin 2 issued by the
COTP, which is distributed to over
1,000 subscribed maritime stakeholders
by email, along with direct email
notification to community organizations
in the coastal areas of the cities of
Norfolk and Hampton, Virginia, which
are the two cities in the immediate area
of the construction activity. Twenty-six
individuals in addition to Coast Guard
personnel participated in the meetings.
The feedback received was consistent
that the HRBT Expansion Project would
create hazards to navigation for
recreational vessels and that the
suggested safety zones would help
mitigate the risks. Additionally,
community members expressed support
that HRCP would have the ability to
designate safe transit corridors through
the South Trestle Bridge and
Willoughby Bay Bridge to ensure that
coastal property owners could still
access the waters of Hampton Roads and
2 See USCG Sector Virginia Marine Safety
Information Bulletin #20–113 (available at https://
content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCG/
bulletins/289cb80).
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42759
southern Chesapeake Bay during the
duration of the construction project. The
text of the proposed regulation has been
drafted to incorporate feedback from
these sessions.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of waterways users on
the navigable waters within the vicinity
of the HRBT Expansion Project during
the course of this multi-year
construction project. The Coast Guard is
proposing this rulemaking under
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously
33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish
multiple safety zones to promote safety
to waterways users during the HRBT
Expansion Project. The Coast Guard
currently anticipates the need for 6
safety zones. The proposed safety zones
will be used to accommodate pre-staged
waterborne equipment and establish
buffer zones around two marine staging
areas, one safe harbor in case of
anticipated severe weather, and the
marine construction work sites expected
in the vicinity of the North Trestle
Bridge and North Island, South Trestle
Bridge and South Island and the north
and south side of the Willoughby Bay
Bridge.
The first safety zone (Zone 1:
Hampton Flats Mooring Area) would be
established in the Hampton Flats
covering a mooring/staging area to
accommodate 6 barges. Specifically, the
first safety zone would cover all waters
of the Hampton Flats, from surface to
bottom, encompassed by a line
connecting the following points
beginning at 36°59′40.41″ N,
76°22′10.66″ W, thence to 37°00′01.84″
N, 76°21′01.69″ W, thence to
36°59′52.62″ N, 76°20′57.23″ W, thence
to 36°59′31.19″ N, 76°22′06.20″ W, and
back to the beginning point. The
Hampton Flats Mooring Area would
provide critical staging capability
necessary to the project. Once the HRCP
begins the installation of mooring buoys
within the mooring area, the public
would be restricted entry or mooring
within the safety zone. Mariners would
be required to observe lighted marker
buoys along the perimeter and at each
of the corners marking the safety zone.
In the event of inclement weather, this
mooring/staging area would not be able
to be used for safe refuge.
The second safety zone (Zone 2:
Phoebus Safe Harbor Area) would be
established as a safe harbor area
between Phoebus Channel and the
North Trestle Bridge in the event of
anticipated severe weather. Specifically,
all waters west of the Phoebus Channel,
from surface to bottom, encompassed by
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
42760
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 148 / Thursday, August 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
a line connecting the following points
beginning at 37°00′34.26″ N,
76°19′10.58″ W, thence to 37°00′23.97″
N, 76°19′06.16″ W, thence to
37°00′22.52″ N, 76°19′11.41″ W, thence
to 37°00′32.81″ N, 76°19′15.81″ W, and
back to the beginning point. While this
proposed rule is effective, no vessel or
person would be permitted to anchor
within the safety zone during
announced enforcement periods
without first obtaining permission from
the COTP or designated representative.
Such announcements would be made by
Sector Virginia Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and broadcasts on VHF–FM
radio. During enforcement periods,
mariners would be required to observe
lighted marker buoys along the
perimeter and at each of the corners
marking the safety zone.
The third safety zone (Zone 3:
Willoughby Safe Harbor/Mooring Area)
would be established as a mooring area/
safe harbor area in Willoughby Bay.
Specifically, all waters of Willoughby
Bay, from surface to bottom,
encompassed by a line connecting the
following five points beginning at
36°57′48.68″ N, 76°17′08.20″ W, thence
to 36°57′44.84″ N, 76°16′44.48″ W,
thence to 36°57′35.31″ N, 76°16′42.80″
W, thence to 36°57′28.78″ N,
76°16′51.75″ W, thence to 36°57′33.17″
N, 76°17′19.43″ W, and back to the
beginning point. Once the HRCP begins
the installation of mooring buoys within
the mooring area, the public would be
restricted entry or mooring within the
safety zone unless permission from the
COTP, HRCP, or their designated
representative is granted on a case-bycase basis. Mariners would be required
to observe lighted marker buoys along
the perimeter and at each of the corners
marking the safety zone.
The fourth safety zone (Zone 4: North
Trestle Bridge and North Island) would
be established from surface to bottom
for the safety of waterways users in the
vicinity of ongoing construction activity
on the east and west sides of the
Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel’s north
bridge trestle and North Island. No
vessel or person at any time would be
permitted within the fixed safety zone,
300 feet from the east or west side of the
North Trestle Bridge or the North Island.
All mariners attempting to enter or
depart the Hampton Creek Approach
Channel or the Phoebus Channel in the
vicinity of the North Island would be
required to proceed with extreme
caution and maintain a safe distance
from construction equipment. Passing
arrangements, if necessary, would be
allowed to be requested from the on-site
foreman via VHF Channel 13 and 16 at
any time.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Aug 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
The fifth safety zone (Zone 5: South
Trestle Bridge and South Island) would
be established, from surface to bottom,
300 feet from the east or west side of the
South Trestle Bridge or the South
Island. This zone is needed for the
safety of waterways users in the vicinity
of ongoing construction activity on the
east and west sides of the Hampton
Roads Bridge-Tunnel’s south bridge
trestle and South Island. No vessel or
person at any time would be permitted
within the fixed safety zone without
permission of the COTP or HRCP, or
their designated representatives. HRCP
may establish and post visual
identification of safe transit corridors
that vessels may use to freely proceed
through the safety zone. All mariners
attempting to enter or depart the
Willoughby Bay Approach Channel in
the vicinity of the South Island would
be required to proceed with extreme
caution and maintain a safe distance
from construction equipment.
The sixth safety zone (Zone 6:
Willoughby Bay Bridge) would be
established, from surface to bottom,
within 50 feet of the north side and 300
feet of the south side of the Willoughby
Bay Bridge. This safety zone is needed
for the safety of waterways users in the
vicinity of ongoing construction activity
on the north and south sides of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge. No vessel or
person may enter or remain in the safety
zone without permission of the COTP,
HRCP, or designated representative,
except that vessels are allowed to transit
through marked safe transit corridors
that HRCP shall establish for the
purpose of providing navigation access
for residents located north of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge through the
safety zone. All mariners attempting to
enter or depart residences or
commercial facilities north of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge through the safe
transit corridors or other areas of the
safety zone when granted permission
shall proceed with caution and maintain
a safe distance from construction
equipment. Mariners requesting to
transit through other areas of the safety
zone may do so at any time by
contacting the on-site foreman via VHF
Channel 13 and 16.
The full proposed regulatory text
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarized our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we discussed
First Amendment rights of protestors.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This NPRM has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on a comprehensive marine
traffic survey conducted for all current
and forecasted vessel traffic in the
vicinity of the HRBT Expansion Project.
The survey was used to inform
mitigation strategies, minimize
disruptions to navigation, reduce risks
of marine casualties and determine the
size, location, duration and time-of-day
of the recommended safety zones.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator because the
ability to transit safely around or
through the impacted area will be
ensured.
The Coast Guard is aware that there
are some small entities who operate
commercial fishing vessels that do fish
and set traps in some or all of the
proposed safety zones. There is a
possibility that for a very small number
of entities the economic impact of this
proposed rule caused by exclusion from
the safety zone areas they typically fish
could constitute a significant economic
impact. However, the Coast Guard
concludes that the number of small
entities significantly affected would not
be substantial.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 148 / Thursday, August 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this proposed rule would economically
affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule affects your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We analyzed this
proposed rule under that Order and
determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in
Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175 (Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not
have a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please call or email the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Aug 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We analyzed this proposed rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves 6 safety zones that will be
activated for the duration of the HRBT
Expansion Project. Normally such
actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a)
of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42761
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this
document, see DHS’s Correspondence
System of Records notice (84 FR 48645,
September 26, 2018).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
Prior to this notice, HRCP conducted
several maritime community outreach
meetings, with the most recent being
held virtually on May 6th, 7th, and 8th,
2020 as announced by public website
postings and electronic mailing list
distributions, and email. No further
public meetings are anticipated at this
time. Any public meetings held to
discuss this rulemaking would be
hosted in-person, virtually, or a
combination thereof, and would be
announced by website postings and
emailed announcements. For
information on facilities or services for
individuals with disabilities or to
request special assistance, call or email
the person named in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section, above.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.519 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
42762
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 148 / Thursday, August 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 165.519 Safety Zones; Hampton Roads
Bridge-Tunnel Expansion Project, Hampton/
Norfolk, VA.
(a) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Virginia in the enforcement of
the safety zone. The term also includes
an employee or contractor of Hampton
Roads Connector Partners (HRCP) for
the sole purposes of designating and
establishing safe transit corridors, to
permit passage into or through these
safety zones, or to notify vessels and
individuals that they have entered a
safety zone and are required to leave.
(b) Locations and zone-specific
requirements.
(1) Zone 1, Hampton Flats Mooring
Area.
(i) Location: All waters of the
Hampton Flats, from surface to bottom,
encompassed by a line connecting the
following points beginning at
36°59′40.41″ N, 76°22′10.66″ W, thence
to 37°00′01.84″ N, 76°21′01.69″ W,
thence to 36°59′52.62″ N, 76°20′57.23″
W, thence to 36°59′31.19″ N,
76°22′06.20″ W, and back to the
beginning point.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person
may enter or remain in the safety zone
without permission of the COTP, HRCP,
or designated representative. Mariners
must observe lighted marker buoys
along the perimeter and at each of the
corners marking the safety zone.
(2) Zone 2, Phoebus Safe Harbor Area.
(i) Location: All waters west of the
Phoebus Channel, from surface to
bottom, encompassed by a line
connecting the following points
beginning at 37°00′34.26″ N,
76°19′10.58″ W, thence to 37°00′23.97″
N, 76°19′06.16″ W, thence to
37°00′22.52″ N, 76°19′11.41″ W, thence
to 37°00′32.81″ N, 76°19′15.81″ W, and
back to the beginning point.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person
may enter or remain in the safety zone
during announced enforcement periods
without permission of the COTP, HRCP,
or designated representative. Such
enforcement periods will be announced
by Sector Virginia Broadcast Notice to
Mariners and broadcasts on VHF–FM
radio. During enforcement periods,
mariners shall observe lighted marker
buoys along the perimeter and at each
of the corners marking the safety zone.
(3) Zone 3, Willoughby Bay Mooring
Area.
(i) Location: All waters of Willoughby
Bay, from surface to bottom, in the area
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Aug 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
encompassed by a line connecting the
following points beginning at
36°57′48.68″ N, 76°17′08.20″ W, thence
to 36°57′44.84″ N, 76°16′44.48″ W,
thence to 36°57′35.31″ N, 76°16′42.80″
W, thence to 36°57′28.78″ N,
76°16′51.75″ W, thence to 36°57′33.17″
N, 76°17′19.43″ W, and back to the
beginning point.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person
may enter or remain in the safety zone
without permission of the COTP, HRCP,
or designated representative. Mariners
must observe lighted marker buoys
along the perimeter and at each of the
corners marking the safety zone.
(4) Zone 4, North Highway Bridge
Trestle and North Island.
(i) Location: All waters, from surface
to bottom, located within 300 feet of the
east or west side of the Hampton Roads
Bridge-Tunnel’s north highway bridge
trestle, including North Island, to the
shore of the City of Hampton. No vessel
or person may enter or remain in the
safety zone without permission of the
COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative.
(ii) Requirements: All mariners
attempting to enter or depart the
Hampton Creek Approach Channel or
the Phoebus Channel in the vicinity of
the North Island must proceed with
extreme caution and maintain a safe
distance from construction equipment.
(5) Zone 5, South Highway Bridge
Trestle and South Island.
(i) Location: All waters, from surface
to bottom, located within 300 feet from
the east or west side of the Hampton
Roads Bridge-Tunnel’s south highway
bridge trestle, including South Island, to
the shore of the City of Norfolk.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person
may enter or remain in the safety zone
without permission of the COTP, HRCP,
or designated representative. HRCP may
establish and post visual identification
of safe transit corridors that vessels may
use to freely proceed through the safety
zone. All mariners attempting to enter
or depart the Willoughby Bay Approach
Channel in the vicinity of the South
Island shall proceed with extreme
caution and maintain a safe distance
from construction equipment.
(6) Zone 6, Willoughby Bay Bridge.
(i) Location: All waters, from surface
to bottom, located along the Willoughby
Bay Bridge highway trestle and
extending 50 feet to the north side of the
bridge and 300 feet to the south side of
the bridge along the length of the
highway trestle, from shore to shore
within the City of Norfolk.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person
may enter or remain in the safety zone
without permission of the COTP, HRCP,
or designated representative, except that
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
vessels are allowed to transit through
marked safe transit corridors that HRCP
shall establish for the purpose of
providing navigation access for
residents located north of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge through the
safety zone. All mariners attempting to
enter or depart residences or
commercial facilities north of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge through the safe
transit corridors or other areas of the
safety zone when granted permission
shall proceed with caution and maintain
a safe distance from construction
equipment.
(c) General requirements. (1) Under
the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, no vessel or
person may enter or remain in any
safety zone described in paragraph (b) of
this section unless authorized by the
COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative. If a vessel or person is
notified by the COTP, HRCP, or
designated representative that they have
entered one of these safety zones
without permission, they are required to
immediately leave in a safe manner
following the directions given.
(2) Mariners requesting to transit any
of these safety zones must first contact
the HRCP designated representative, the
on-site foreman, via VHF–FM channels
13 and 16. If permission is granted,
mariners must proceed at their own risk
and strictly observe any and all
instructions provided by the COTP,
HRCP, or designated representative to
the mariner regarding the conditions of
entry to and exit from any location
within the fixed safety zones.
(d) Enforcement. The Sector Virginia
COTP may enforce this regulation and
may be assisted by any Federal, state,
county, or municipal law enforcement
agency.
Dated: July 15, 2021.
Samson C. Stevens,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2021–16198 Filed 8–4–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Parts 571 and 575
[Docket No. NHTSA–2020–0067]
RIN 2127–AL92
Standard Reference Test Tire
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\05AUP1.SGM
05AUP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 148 (Thursday, August 5, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42758-42762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16198]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2020-0117]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Expansion Project,
Hampton/Norfolk, VA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish safety zones for
certain waters of the Hampton Flats, Willoughby Bay, a defined area
between Phoebus Channel and the North Trestle Bridge, and 3 zones
around the North Trestle Bridge including the North Island, the South
Trestle Bridge including the South Island, and the north and south side
of the Willoughby Bay Bridge. This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable waters in support of the Hampton
Roads Bridge-Tunnel Expansion Project that will take place from 2021
through 2025. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and
vessels from being in the safety zones unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Sector Virginia or a designated representative or under
conditions specified in this rulemaking. We invite your comments on
this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2020-0117 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed
[[Page 42759]]
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Ashley Holm, Waterways Management
Division Chief, Sector Virginia, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 757-668-
5580, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
HRBT Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel
HRCP Hampton Roads Connector Partners
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
NSRA Navigation Safety Risk Assessment
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
USCG United States Coast Guard
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
In April 2019, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)
awarded the design and construction of the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel
(HRBT) Expansion Project to the Hampton Roads Connector Partners
(HRCP), as the Design-Build contactor. The HRBT Expansion Project is a
major road transport infrastructure project that will create an 8-lane
facility with 6 consistent use lanes along 9.9 miles of Interstate 64
(I-64), from Settler's Landing Interchange in Hampton, Virginia, to the
Interstate 564 (I-564) interchange in Norfolk, Virginia. To better
understand the waterways impact from the project, the USCG and U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) recommended the submission of a formal
Navigation Safety Risk Assessment (NSRA) and Tunnel Construction Plan
(TCP) prior to any permit or approval action by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.\1\ The NSRA identified three key objectives for
consideration. The first included potential impacts to current and
forecasted vessel traffic directly related to the bridge and tunnel
construction including all on-water operations and staging areas. The
second aimed to identify the best/least disruptive times to schedule
movement of construction-related vessels. Finally, it identified the
measures necessary for implementation in order to minimize potential
hazards to navigation. On-water construction activities are expected to
last approximately 5 years (2021-2025). In support of construction
efforts, multiple surface craft will be necessary on-site, transiting
to and from, as well as pre-staged, to ensure continued operations are
maintained. The increase in waterborne traffic in the vicinity of
construction areas and staging areas will introduce hazards to
waterways users prior to and throughout the duration of the
construction project. Specific hazards during the construction project
include the proximity of dozens of construction-related vessels in the
bridge area and fleeting areas, including material barges and
construction equipment barges. In addition, construction of navigable
spans by this equipment, as well as construction lighting and loud
construction activity noises will make normal passage through the
bridge areas unsafe except in areas specifically established as safe
transit corridors by the project contractors, HRCP. The Sector Virginia
Captain of the Port (COTP) has determined that these potential hazards
associated with the HRBT Expansion Project will be a safety concern for
anyone transiting in the vicinity of on-water construction activities
related to the project. To discuss these safety concerns,
representatives of the HRCP along with the COTP's staff conducted a
series of outreach meetings. These meetings covered the HRBT Expansion
Project and the notional safety zones that would mitigate the hazards
discussed above. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, those outreach meetings
were conducted virtually on May 5th, 6th, and 7th. They were announced
beforehand by a marine safety information bulletin \2\ issued by the
COTP, which is distributed to over 1,000 subscribed maritime
stakeholders by email, along with direct email notification to
community organizations in the coastal areas of the cities of Norfolk
and Hampton, Virginia, which are the two cities in the immediate area
of the construction activity. Twenty-six individuals in addition to
Coast Guard personnel participated in the meetings. The feedback
received was consistent that the HRBT Expansion Project would create
hazards to navigation for recreational vessels and that the suggested
safety zones would help mitigate the risks. Additionally, community
members expressed support that HRCP would have the ability to designate
safe transit corridors through the South Trestle Bridge and Willoughby
Bay Bridge to ensure that coastal property owners could still access
the waters of Hampton Roads and southern Chesapeake Bay during the
duration of the construction project. The text of the proposed
regulation has been drafted to incorporate feedback from these
sessions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Memorandum of Agreement between the United States Army
Corps of Engineers and the United States Coast Guard, dated June 2,
2000 (available at: https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll11/id/2518).
\2\ See USCG Sector Virginia Marine Safety Information Bulletin
#20-113 (available at https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCG/bulletins/289cb80).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of waterways
users on the navigable waters within the vicinity of the HRBT Expansion
Project during the course of this multi-year construction project. The
Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP is proposing to establish multiple safety zones to promote
safety to waterways users during the HRBT Expansion Project. The Coast
Guard currently anticipates the need for 6 safety zones. The proposed
safety zones will be used to accommodate pre-staged waterborne
equipment and establish buffer zones around two marine staging areas,
one safe harbor in case of anticipated severe weather, and the marine
construction work sites expected in the vicinity of the North Trestle
Bridge and North Island, South Trestle Bridge and South Island and the
north and south side of the Willoughby Bay Bridge.
The first safety zone (Zone 1: Hampton Flats Mooring Area) would be
established in the Hampton Flats covering a mooring/staging area to
accommodate 6 barges. Specifically, the first safety zone would cover
all waters of the Hampton Flats, from surface to bottom, encompassed by
a line connecting the following points beginning at 36[deg]59'40.41''
N, 76[deg]22'10.66'' W, thence to 37[deg]00'01.84'' N,
76[deg]21'01.69'' W, thence to 36[deg]59'52.62'' N, 76[deg]20'57.23''
W, thence to 36[deg]59'31.19'' N, 76[deg]22'06.20'' W, and back to the
beginning point. The Hampton Flats Mooring Area would provide critical
staging capability necessary to the project. Once the HRCP begins the
installation of mooring buoys within the mooring area, the public would
be restricted entry or mooring within the safety zone. Mariners would
be required to observe lighted marker buoys along the perimeter and at
each of the corners marking the safety zone. In the event of inclement
weather, this mooring/staging area would not be able to be used for
safe refuge.
The second safety zone (Zone 2: Phoebus Safe Harbor Area) would be
established as a safe harbor area between Phoebus Channel and the North
Trestle Bridge in the event of anticipated severe weather.
Specifically, all waters west of the Phoebus Channel, from surface to
bottom, encompassed by
[[Page 42760]]
a line connecting the following points beginning at 37[deg]00'34.26''
N, 76[deg]19'10.58'' W, thence to 37[deg]00'23.97'' N,
76[deg]19'06.16'' W, thence to 37[deg]00'22.52'' N, 76[deg]19'11.41''
W, thence to 37[deg]00'32.81'' N, 76[deg]19'15.81'' W, and back to the
beginning point. While this proposed rule is effective, no vessel or
person would be permitted to anchor within the safety zone during
announced enforcement periods without first obtaining permission from
the COTP or designated representative. Such announcements would be made
by Sector Virginia Broadcast Notice to Mariners and broadcasts on VHF-
FM radio. During enforcement periods, mariners would be required to
observe lighted marker buoys along the perimeter and at each of the
corners marking the safety zone.
The third safety zone (Zone 3: Willoughby Safe Harbor/Mooring Area)
would be established as a mooring area/safe harbor area in Willoughby
Bay. Specifically, all waters of Willoughby Bay, from surface to
bottom, encompassed by a line connecting the following five points
beginning at 36[deg]57'48.68'' N, 76[deg]17'08.20'' W, thence to
36[deg]57'44.84'' N, 76[deg]16'44.48'' W, thence to 36[deg]57'35.31''
N, 76[deg]16'42.80'' W, thence to 36[deg]57'28.78'' N,
76[deg]16'51.75'' W, thence to 36[deg]57'33.17'' N, 76[deg]17'19.43''
W, and back to the beginning point. Once the HRCP begins the
installation of mooring buoys within the mooring area, the public would
be restricted entry or mooring within the safety zone unless permission
from the COTP, HRCP, or their designated representative is granted on a
case-by-case basis. Mariners would be required to observe lighted
marker buoys along the perimeter and at each of the corners marking the
safety zone.
The fourth safety zone (Zone 4: North Trestle Bridge and North
Island) would be established from surface to bottom for the safety of
waterways users in the vicinity of ongoing construction activity on the
east and west sides of the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel's north bridge
trestle and North Island. No vessel or person at any time would be
permitted within the fixed safety zone, 300 feet from the east or west
side of the North Trestle Bridge or the North Island. All mariners
attempting to enter or depart the Hampton Creek Approach Channel or the
Phoebus Channel in the vicinity of the North Island would be required
to proceed with extreme caution and maintain a safe distance from
construction equipment. Passing arrangements, if necessary, would be
allowed to be requested from the on-site foreman via VHF Channel 13 and
16 at any time.
The fifth safety zone (Zone 5: South Trestle Bridge and South
Island) would be established, from surface to bottom, 300 feet from the
east or west side of the South Trestle Bridge or the South Island. This
zone is needed for the safety of waterways users in the vicinity of
ongoing construction activity on the east and west sides of the Hampton
Roads Bridge-Tunnel's south bridge trestle and South Island. No vessel
or person at any time would be permitted within the fixed safety zone
without permission of the COTP or HRCP, or their designated
representatives. HRCP may establish and post visual identification of
safe transit corridors that vessels may use to freely proceed through
the safety zone. All mariners attempting to enter or depart the
Willoughby Bay Approach Channel in the vicinity of the South Island
would be required to proceed with extreme caution and maintain a safe
distance from construction equipment.
The sixth safety zone (Zone 6: Willoughby Bay Bridge) would be
established, from surface to bottom, within 50 feet of the north side
and 300 feet of the south side of the Willoughby Bay Bridge. This
safety zone is needed for the safety of waterways users in the vicinity
of ongoing construction activity on the north and south sides of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge. No vessel or person may enter or remain in the
safety zone without permission of the COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative, except that vessels are allowed to transit through
marked safe transit corridors that HRCP shall establish for the purpose
of providing navigation access for residents located north of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge through the safety zone. All mariners attempting
to enter or depart residences or commercial facilities north of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge through the safe transit corridors or other areas
of the safety zone when granted permission shall proceed with caution
and maintain a safe distance from construction equipment. Mariners
requesting to transit through other areas of the safety zone may do so
at any time by contacting the on-site foreman via VHF Channel 13 and
16.
The full proposed regulatory text appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarized our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and
we discussed First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on a comprehensive
marine traffic survey conducted for all current and forecasted vessel
traffic in the vicinity of the HRBT Expansion Project. The survey was
used to inform mitigation strategies, minimize disruptions to
navigation, reduce risks of marine casualties and determine the size,
location, duration and time-of-day of the recommended safety zones.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator because the ability to transit
safely around or through the impacted area will be ensured.
The Coast Guard is aware that there are some small entities who
operate commercial fishing vessels that do fish and set traps in some
or all of the proposed safety zones. There is a possibility that for a
very small number of entities the economic impact of this proposed rule
caused by exclusion from the safety zone areas they typically fish
could constitute a significant economic impact. However, the Coast
Guard concludes that the number of small entities significantly
affected would not be substantial.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
[[Page 42761]]
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this proposed rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
affects your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and made a
preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves 6 safety
zones that will be activated for the duration of the HRBT Expansion
Project. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's Correspondence
System of Records notice (84 FR 48645, September 26, 2018).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
Prior to this notice, HRCP conducted several maritime community
outreach meetings, with the most recent being held virtually on May
6th, 7th, and 8th, 2020 as announced by public website postings and
electronic mailing list distributions, and email. No further public
meetings are anticipated at this time. Any public meetings held to
discuss this rulemaking would be hosted in-person, virtually, or a
combination thereof, and would be announced by website postings and
emailed announcements. For information on facilities or services for
individuals with disabilities or to request special assistance, call or
email the person named in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section,
above.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.519 to read as follows:
[[Page 42762]]
Sec. 165.519 Safety Zones; Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel Expansion
Project, Hampton/Norfolk, VA.
(a) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Virginia in the enforcement of the safety zone. The
term also includes an employee or contractor of Hampton Roads Connector
Partners (HRCP) for the sole purposes of designating and establishing
safe transit corridors, to permit passage into or through these safety
zones, or to notify vessels and individuals that they have entered a
safety zone and are required to leave.
(b) Locations and zone-specific requirements.
(1) Zone 1, Hampton Flats Mooring Area.
(i) Location: All waters of the Hampton Flats, from surface to
bottom, encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning
at 36[deg]59'40.41'' N, 76[deg]22'10.66'' W, thence to
37[deg]00'01.84'' N, 76[deg]21'01.69'' W, thence to 36[deg]59'52.62''
N, 76[deg]20'57.23'' W, thence to 36[deg]59'31.19'' N,
76[deg]22'06.20'' W, and back to the beginning point.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person may enter or remain in the
safety zone without permission of the COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative. Mariners must observe lighted marker buoys along the
perimeter and at each of the corners marking the safety zone.
(2) Zone 2, Phoebus Safe Harbor Area.
(i) Location: All waters west of the Phoebus Channel, from surface
to bottom, encompassed by a line connecting the following points
beginning at 37[deg]00'34.26'' N, 76[deg]19'10.58'' W, thence to
37[deg]00'23.97'' N, 76[deg]19'06.16'' W, thence to 37[deg]00'22.52''
N, 76[deg]19'11.41'' W, thence to 37[deg]00'32.81'' N,
76[deg]19'15.81'' W, and back to the beginning point.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person may enter or remain in the
safety zone during announced enforcement periods without permission of
the COTP, HRCP, or designated representative. Such enforcement periods
will be announced by Sector Virginia Broadcast Notice to Mariners and
broadcasts on VHF-FM radio. During enforcement periods, mariners shall
observe lighted marker buoys along the perimeter and at each of the
corners marking the safety zone.
(3) Zone 3, Willoughby Bay Mooring Area.
(i) Location: All waters of Willoughby Bay, from surface to bottom,
in the area encompassed by a line connecting the following points
beginning at 36[deg]57'48.68'' N, 76[deg]17'08.20'' W, thence to
36[deg]57'44.84'' N, 76[deg]16'44.48'' W, thence to 36[deg]57'35.31''
N, 76[deg]16'42.80'' W, thence to 36[deg]57'28.78'' N,
76[deg]16'51.75'' W, thence to 36[deg]57'33.17'' N, 76[deg]17'19.43''
W, and back to the beginning point.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person may enter or remain in the
safety zone without permission of the COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative. Mariners must observe lighted marker buoys along the
perimeter and at each of the corners marking the safety zone.
(4) Zone 4, North Highway Bridge Trestle and North Island.
(i) Location: All waters, from surface to bottom, located within
300 feet of the east or west side of the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel's
north highway bridge trestle, including North Island, to the shore of
the City of Hampton. No vessel or person may enter or remain in the
safety zone without permission of the COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative.
(ii) Requirements: All mariners attempting to enter or depart the
Hampton Creek Approach Channel or the Phoebus Channel in the vicinity
of the North Island must proceed with extreme caution and maintain a
safe distance from construction equipment.
(5) Zone 5, South Highway Bridge Trestle and South Island.
(i) Location: All waters, from surface to bottom, located within
300 feet from the east or west side of the Hampton Roads Bridge-
Tunnel's south highway bridge trestle, including South Island, to the
shore of the City of Norfolk.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person may enter or remain in the
safety zone without permission of the COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative. HRCP may establish and post visual identification of
safe transit corridors that vessels may use to freely proceed through
the safety zone. All mariners attempting to enter or depart the
Willoughby Bay Approach Channel in the vicinity of the South Island
shall proceed with extreme caution and maintain a safe distance from
construction equipment.
(6) Zone 6, Willoughby Bay Bridge.
(i) Location: All waters, from surface to bottom, located along the
Willoughby Bay Bridge highway trestle and extending 50 feet to the
north side of the bridge and 300 feet to the south side of the bridge
along the length of the highway trestle, from shore to shore within the
City of Norfolk.
(ii) Requirements: No vessel or person may enter or remain in the
safety zone without permission of the COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative, except that vessels are allowed to transit through
marked safe transit corridors that HRCP shall establish for the purpose
of providing navigation access for residents located north of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge through the safety zone. All mariners attempting
to enter or depart residences or commercial facilities north of the
Willoughby Bay Bridge through the safe transit corridors or other areas
of the safety zone when granted permission shall proceed with caution
and maintain a safe distance from construction equipment.
(c) General requirements. (1) Under the general safety zone
regulations in subpart C of this part, no vessel or person may enter or
remain in any safety zone described in paragraph (b) of this section
unless authorized by the COTP, HRCP, or designated representative. If a
vessel or person is notified by the COTP, HRCP, or designated
representative that they have entered one of these safety zones without
permission, they are required to immediately leave in a safe manner
following the directions given.
(2) Mariners requesting to transit any of these safety zones must
first contact the HRCP designated representative, the on-site foreman,
via VHF-FM channels 13 and 16. If permission is granted, mariners must
proceed at their own risk and strictly observe any and all instructions
provided by the COTP, HRCP, or designated representative to the mariner
regarding the conditions of entry to and exit from any location within
the fixed safety zones.
(d) Enforcement. The Sector Virginia COTP may enforce this
regulation and may be assisted by any Federal, state, county, or
municipal law enforcement agency.
Dated: July 15, 2021.
Samson C. Stevens,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2021-16198 Filed 8-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P