Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes, 41794-41798 [2021-16431]

Download as PDF 41794 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Proposed Rules Revision 4, dated July 26, 2017 (SB 44301– 10–17). If the elastomeric energy absorber has taken a permanent compression set, replace the elastomeric energy absorber before the next hoist operation. (2) Replace the retaining ring by following the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 2.D through 2.K, of SB 44301–10–17. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS (h) New Requirements Except as specified in paragraph (i) of this AD: Comply with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in accordance with, EASA AD 2021–0011. request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(5) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (i) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021–0011 (1) Where EASA AD 2021–0011 refers to its effective date, this AD requires using the effective date of this AD. (2) Paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA AD 2021–0011 do not apply to this AD. The equivalent FAA requirements are specified in paragraph (g) of this AD. (3) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD 2021–0011 does not apply to this AD. (4) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2021–0011 specifies to discard certain parts, this AD requires removing those parts from service. (5) Where paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2021– 0011 specifies to modify using ‘‘the instructions of the modification ASB,’’ this AD requires using ‘‘paragraph 3.B.1 and 3.B.2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the modification ASB.’’ (6) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2021–0011 specifies to use tooling, equivalent tooling may be used. (7) Accomplishing the modification specified in paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2021– 0011 or the replacement specified in paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2021–0011 terminates the repetitive actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD. (8) Where paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2021– 0011 refers to October 25, 2017 (the effective date of EASA AD 2017–0199), this AD requires using the effective date of this AD; and where paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2021– 0011 specified to do actions ‘‘as required by paragraph (1) of this [EASA] AD,’’ for this AD, do the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD. (9) Paragraph (7) of EASA AD 2021–0011 does not apply to this AD. For this AD, for helicopters that do not have an affected hoist identified in paragraph (c) of this AD installed: As of the effective date of this AD, do not install an affected hoist identified in paragraph (c) of this AD on any helicopter. (l) Related Information (j) Special Flight Permit Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the helicopter to a location where the required actions can be done to the helicopter (if the operator elects to do so), provided the hoist is not used. [FR Doc. 2021–16467 Filed 8–2–21; 8:45 am] (1) For EASA AD 2021–0011, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https:// ad.easa.europa.eu. (2) For Goodrich service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone (972) 641–0000 or (800) 232–0323; fax (972) 641–3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/ technical-support.html. (3) You may view this material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N– 321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 817–222–5110. This material may be found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0611. (4) Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB EC135–85A–069, Revision 0, dated August 2, 2017, which is not incorporated by reference, contains additional information about the actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD. (5) For more information about this AD, contact Jacob Fitch, Aerospace Engineer, COS Program Management Section, Operational Safety Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; phone: (817) 222–4130; email: jacob.fitch@faa.gov. Issued on July 27, 2021. Lance T. Gant, Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 16:59 Aug 02, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2021–0613; Project Identifier MCAI–2020–01431–T] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). AGENCY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC–8–400, –401, and –402 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of cracking found on a main landing gear (MLG) drag strut assembly. This proposed AD would require a records review to determine if an affected MLG drag strut assembly is installed, repetitive detailed inspections for cracking of affected strut assemblies, a one-time magnetic particle inspection for cracking, and on-condition actions if necessary. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 17, 2021. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202–493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. SUMMARY: Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0613; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above. (k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your VerDate Sep<11>2014 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Frm 00036 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM 03AUP1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Proposed Rules Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7329; fax 516–794– 5531; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Comments Invited The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2021–0613; Project Identifier MCAI–2020–01431–T’’ at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposal because of those comments. Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM. Confidential Business Information CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7329; fax 516–794– 5531; email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. Background Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued TCCA AD CF– 2020–43, dated October 21, 2020 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC– 8–400, –401, and –402 airplanes. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0613. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of cracking found on an MLG drag strut assembly. The MLG drag strut had accumulated a total of 26,968 flight cycles and 12,392 flight hours since new, of which 2,830 flight cycles and 1,420 flight hours had accumulated since the last overhaul. The last overhaul had been conducted one year prior to the crack finding. It is suspected that the cracking was caused by the clamping method used by the repair facility during the most recent overhaul, and was missed during subsequent non- 41795 destructive testing (NDT) inspections required as part of the refurbishment process. The FAA is proposing this AD to address cracking of the MLG drag strut assembly and possible failure under compression loads during landing or ground operations, which could result in asymmetric MLG configuration and potential runway excursion. See the MCAI for additional background information. FAA’s Determination This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA’s bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM This proposed AD would require a records review to determine if an affected MLG drag strut assembly is installed, repetitive detailed inspections for cracking of affected strut assemblies, a one-time magnetic particle inspection for cracking, and on-condition actions if necessary. On-condition actions include replacing the MLG drag strut assembly and re-identifying the MLG drag strut assembly. Costs of Compliance The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would affect 34 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed AD: ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Up to 11 work-hours × $85 per hour = Up to $935 ................................ $0 Up to $935 ...................................... jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-condition actions that would be required based on VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 Aug 02, 2021 Jkt 253001 the results of any required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Cost on U.S. operators Up to $31,790. number of aircraft that might need these on-condition actions: E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM 03AUP1 41796 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Proposed Rules ESTIMATED COSTS OF ON-CONDITION ACTIONS Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Up to 10 work-hours × $85 per hour = Up to $850 ................................ $* Up to $850 ...................................... Cost on U.S. operators Up to $850. * The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the agency to provide parts cost estimates for the actions specified in this proposed AD. The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate. According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected operators. Authority for This Rulemaking jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Regulatory Findings § 39.13 The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 Aug 02, 2021 Jkt 253001 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive: De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.): Docket No. FAA– 2021–0613; Project Identifier MCAI– 2020–01431–T. PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (a) Comments Due Date The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) by September 17, 2021. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC–8–400, –401, and –402 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 4001, 4003, and subsequent. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing Gear. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by a report of cracking found on a main landing gear (MLG) drag strut assembly. The FAA is issuing this AD to address cracking of the MLG drag strut assembly and possible failure under compression loads during landing or ground operations, which could result in asymmetric MLG configuration and potential runway excursion. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Records Review, Repetitive Inspections, and On-Condition Actions Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Review the applicable airplane maintenance records to determine if any affected MLG drag strut assembly identified in figure 1 to the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD is installed. If any affected MLG drag strut assembly is installed, do the actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD. BILLING CODE 4910–13–P E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM 03AUP1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Proposed Rules 41797 Figure 1 to the introductory text of paragraph (g) - Affected MLG Drag Strut Assembly Part Number Serial N um her MBM0056 MBM0073 MBM0076 MBM0130 MBM0136 MBM0145 MBM0179 MBM0204 MBM0208 46301-13 MBM0302 MBM0303 MBM0324 MBM0405 MBM0408 MBM0412 MBM0417 MBM0423 (1) Within 80 flight hours after accomplishing the records review required by paragraph (g) of this AD, do a detailed inspection for cracking of the affected MLG drag strut assembly, and do all applicable oncondition actions before further flight, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 80 flight hours until the magnetic particle inspection required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD is done. Note 1 to paragraph (g)(1): Guidance on the inspections and on-condition actions required by this AD can be found in Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) AD CF–2020–43, dated October 21, 2020. (2) Within 1,600 flight hours or 12 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform a magnetic particle inspection for cracks of the entire tubular section of the affected MLG drag strut assembly, and do all on-condition actions before further flight, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA. Performing the magnetic particle inspection required by this paragraph terminates the repetitive detailed inspections required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 Aug 02, 2021 Jkt 253001 (h) Parts Installation Prohibition As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an affected MLG drag strut assembly identified in figure 1 to the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD on any airplane unless the inspections and applicable on-conditions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD are done before further flight. (i) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited’s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature. (j) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) TCCA AD CF–2020–43, dated October 21, 2020, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0613. (2) For more information about this AD, contact Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–7329; fax 516–794–5531; email 9avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. (3) For information about TCCA AD CF– 2020–43, dated October 21, 2020, contact E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM 03AUP1 EP03AU21.001</GPH> jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS BILLING CODE 4910–13–C 41798 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 146 / Tuesday, August 3, 2021 / Proposed Rules TCCA, Transport Canada National Aircraft Certification, 159 Cleopatra Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada; telephone 888– 663–3639; email AD-CN@tc.gc.ca; internet https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation. You may view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. Issued on July 28, 2021. Lance T. Gant, Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2021–16431 Filed 8–2–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100 [Docket Number USCG–2021–0540] RIN 1625–AA08 Special Local Regulations, Choptank River, Cambridge, MD Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish special local regulations for certain waters of the Choptank River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters located at Cambridge, MD, during a high-speed power boat racing event on October 9, 2021, and October 10, 2021. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port MarylandNational Capital Region or Coast Guard Event Patrol Commander. We invite your comments on this proposed rulemaking. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before September 2, 2021. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG– 2021–0540 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https:// www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ron Houck, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 Aug 02, 2021 Jkt 253001 410–576–2674, email D05-DGSectorMD-NCR-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port DHS Department of Homeland Security Event PATCOM Event Patrol Commander FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis The Cambridge Power Boat Regatta Association of Cambridge, MD, notified the Coast Guard that it will be conducting the Cambridge Classic Power Boat Regatta from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on October 9, 2021, and from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. on October 10, 2021. The high-speed power boat racing event consists of approximately 60 participating inboard and outboard hydroplane and runabout race boats of various classes, 16 to 24 feet in length. The vessels will be competing on a designated, marked 1-mile oval course located in the Choptank River in a cove located between Hambrooks Bar and the shoreline at Cambridge, MD. Hazards from the power boat racing event include risks of injury or death resulting from near or actual contact among participant vessels and spectator vessels or waterway users if normal vessel traffic were to interfere with the event. Additionally, such hazards include participants operating near designated navigation channels, as well as operating near approaches to local public boat ramps, private marinas and yacht clubs, and waterfront businesses. The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region has determined that potential hazards associated with the power boat races would be a safety concern for anyone intending to operate within certain waters of the Choptank River at Cambridge, MD. The purpose of this rulemaking is to protect event participants, spectators, and transiting vessels on certain waters of Choptank River before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70041. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule The COTP Maryland-National Capital Region is proposing to establish special local regulations from 9 a.m. on October 9, 2021, until 6 p.m. on October 10, 2021. The special local regulations would be enforced from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 9th and those same hours on October 10th. The regulated area would PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 cover all navigable waters within Choptank River and Hambrooks Bay bounded by a line connecting the following coordinates: Commencing at the shoreline at Long Wharf Park, Cambridge, MD, at position latitude 38°34′30″ N, longitude 076°04′16″ W; thence east to latitude 38°34′20″ N, longitude 076°03′46″ W; thence northeast across the Choptank River along the Senator Frederick C. Malkus, Jr. (US–50) Memorial Bridge, at mile 15.5, to latitude 38°35′30″ N, longitude 076°02′52″ W; thence west along the shoreline to latitude 38°35′38″ N, longitude 076°03′09″ W; thence north and west along the shoreline to latitude 38°36′42″ N, longitude 076°04′15″ W; thence southwest across the Choptank River to latitude 38°35′31″ N, longitude 076°04′57″ W; thence west along the Hambrooks Bay breakwall to latitude 38°35′33″ N, longitude 076°05′17″ W; thence south and east along the shoreline to and terminating at the point of origin in Dorchester County, MD. This proposed rule provides additional information about areas within the regulated area, and the restrictions that apply to mariners. These areas include a ‘‘Race Area,’’ ‘‘Buffer Area’’ and ‘‘Spectator Area’’. The proposed duration of the rule and size of the regulated area are intended to ensure the safety of life on these navigable waters before, during, and after the high-speed power boat races, scheduled from 10 a.m. until 5 p.m. on October 9, 2021 and October 10, 2021. The COTP and Coast Guard Event Patrol Commander (Event PATCOM) would have authority to forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons, including event participants, in the regulated area. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol, a vessel or person in the regulated area would be required to immediately comply with the directions given by the COTP or Event PATCOM. If a person or vessel fails to follow such directions, the Coast Guard may expel them from the area, issue them a citation for failure to comply, or both. Except for Cambridge Classic Power Boat Regatta participants and vessels already at berth, a vessel or person would be required to get permission from the COTP or Event PATCOM before entering the regulated area while the rule is being enforced. Vessel operators could request permission to enter and transit through the regulated area by contacting the Event PATCOM on VHF–FM channel 16. Vessel traffic would be able to safely transit the regulated area once the Event PATCOM deems it safe to do so. A person or vessel not registered with the event E:\FR\FM\03AUP1.SGM 03AUP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 146 (Tuesday, August 3, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41794-41798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16431]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0613; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01431-T]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited 
(Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) 
for certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC-8-400, -
401, and -402 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of 
cracking found on a main landing gear (MLG) drag strut assembly. This 
proposed AD would require a records review to determine if an affected 
MLG drag strut assembly is installed, repetitive detailed inspections 
for cracking of affected strut assemblies, a one-time magnetic particle 
inspection for cracking, and on-condition actions if necessary. The FAA 
is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 
17, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-493-2251.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket 
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by 
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0613; or in person at 
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments 
received, and other information. The street address for Docket 
Operations is listed above.

[[Page 41795]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, 
Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart 
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7329; fax 516-
794-5531; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or 
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed 
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0613; Project Identifier 
MCAI-2020-01431-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful 
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the 
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA 
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend 
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in 
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to 
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you 
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each 
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily 
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public 
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial 
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that 
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to 
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted 
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing 
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as 
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public 
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Aziz 
Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New 
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; 
telephone 516-228-7329; fax 516-794-5531; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not 
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for 
this rulemaking.

Background

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation 
authority for Canada, has issued TCCA AD CF-2020-43, dated October 21, 
2020 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness 
Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for 
certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC-8-400, -401, 
and -402 airplanes. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at 
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. 
FAA-2021-0613.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a report of cracking found on an 
MLG drag strut assembly. The MLG drag strut had accumulated a total of 
26,968 flight cycles and 12,392 flight hours since new, of which 2,830 
flight cycles and 1,420 flight hours had accumulated since the last 
overhaul. The last overhaul had been conducted one year prior to the 
crack finding. It is suspected that the cracking was caused by the 
clamping method used by the repair facility during the most recent 
overhaul, and was missed during subsequent non-destructive testing 
(NDT) inspections required as part of the refurbishment process. The 
FAA is proposing this AD to address cracking of the MLG drag strut 
assembly and possible failure under compression loads during landing or 
ground operations, which could result in asymmetric MLG configuration 
and potential runway excursion. See the MCAI for additional background 
information.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another 
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant 
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, 
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI 
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD 
because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined 
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop 
on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require a records review to determine if an 
affected MLG drag strut assembly is installed, repetitive detailed 
inspections for cracking of affected strut assemblies, a one-time 
magnetic particle inspection for cracking, and on-condition actions if 
necessary. On-condition actions include replacing the MLG drag strut 
assembly and re-identifying the MLG drag strut assembly.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would 
affect 34 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following 
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        Cost per product          Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 11 work-hours x $85 per hour =                $0   Up to $935..............  Up to $31,790.
 Up to $935.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any 
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of 
aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:

[[Page 41796]]



                                     Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        Cost per product          Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 10 work-hours x $85 per hour =               $ *   Up to $850..............  Up to $850.
 Up to $850.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the agency to provide parts cost estimates for the
  actions specified in this proposed AD.

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate. 
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of 
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the 
cost impact on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. 
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight 
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for 
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary 
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that 
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to 
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed 
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness 
directive:

De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate Previously 
Held by Bombardier, Inc.): Docket No. FAA-2021-0613; Project 
Identifier MCAI-2020-01431-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive 
(AD) by September 17, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model 
DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 airplanes, certificated in any category, 
serial numbers 4001, 4003, and subsequent.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing 
Gear.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report of cracking found on a main 
landing gear (MLG) drag strut assembly. The FAA is issuing this AD 
to address cracking of the MLG drag strut assembly and possible 
failure under compression loads during landing or ground operations, 
which could result in asymmetric MLG configuration and potential 
runway excursion.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

(g) Records Review, Repetitive Inspections, and On-Condition Actions

    Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Review the 
applicable airplane maintenance records to determine if any affected 
MLG drag strut assembly identified in figure 1 to the introductory 
text of paragraph (g) of this AD is installed. If any affected MLG 
drag strut assembly is installed, do the actions specified in 
paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

[[Page 41797]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP03AU21.001

BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
    (1) Within 80 flight hours after accomplishing the records 
review required by paragraph (g) of this AD, do a detailed 
inspection for cracking of the affected MLG drag strut assembly, and 
do all applicable on-condition actions before further flight, in 
accordance with a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO 
Branch, FAA. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to 
exceed 80 flight hours until the magnetic particle inspection 
required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD is done.
    Note 1 to paragraph (g)(1): Guidance on the inspections and on-
condition actions required by this AD can be found in Transport 
Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) AD CF-2020-43, dated October 21, 2020.
    (2) Within 1,600 flight hours or 12 months after the effective 
date of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform a magnetic particle 
inspection for cracks of the entire tubular section of the affected 
MLG drag strut assembly, and do all on-condition actions before 
further flight, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, 
New York ACO Branch, FAA. Performing the magnetic particle 
inspection required by this paragraph terminates the repetitive 
detailed inspections required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.

(h) Parts Installation Prohibition

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an 
affected MLG drag strut assembly identified in figure 1 to the 
introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD on any airplane unless 
the inspections and applicable on-conditions specified in paragraphs 
(g)(1) and (2) of this AD are done before further flight.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New 
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In 
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal 
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If 
sending information directly to the manager of the certification 
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational 
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, 
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before 
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal 
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the 
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD 
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be 
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO 
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or De 
Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited's TCCA Design Approval 
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must 
include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information 
(MCAI) TCCA AD CF-2020-43, dated October 21, 2020, for related 
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet 
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket 
No. FAA-2021-0613.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Aziz Ahmed, 
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York 
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; 
telephone 516-228-7329; fax 516-794-5531; email [email protected].
    (3) For information about TCCA AD CF-2020-43, dated October 21, 
2020, contact

[[Page 41798]]

TCCA, Transport Canada National Aircraft Certification, 159 
Cleopatra Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada; telephone 888-663-
3639; email [email protected]; internet https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation. You may view this service information at the FAA, 
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability 
of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.

    Issued on July 28, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification 
Service.

[FR Doc. 2021-16431 Filed 8-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.