Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Plans; Pennsylvania; Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Determinations for Case-by-Case Sources Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 41426-41432 [2021-16279]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
41426
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
facility but not others, EPA may take
separate, final action on the remaining
facilities.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
source specific RACT determinations
via the RACT II permits as described in
Sections II and III—Summary of SIP
Revisions and EPA’s Evaluation of SIP
Revisions. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region III Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jul 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed
rulemaking, addressing the
Pennsylvania NOX and VOC RACT caseby-case requirements for individual
sources at fourteen facilities for the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: July 26, 2021.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2021–16284 Filed 7–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2021–0380; FRL–8694–01–
R3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Plans; Pennsylvania;
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) Determinations for
Case-by-Case Sources Under the 1997
and 2008 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
multiple state implementation plan
(SIP) revisions submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably
available control technology (RACT) for
twenty-four major sources of volatile
organic compounds (VOC) and/or
nitrogen oxides (NOX) pursuant to the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s
conditionally approved RACT
regulations. In this rulemaking action,
EPA is proposing to approve sourcespecific (also referred to as ‘‘case-bycase’’) RACT determinations for sources
at twenty-four major NOX and VOC
emitting facilities submitted by PADEP.
These RACT evaluations were
submitted to meet RACT requirements
for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS). This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before September 1,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2021–0380 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
opila.marycate@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.,
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Riley Burger, Permits Branch (3AD10),
Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The
telephone number is (215) 814–2217.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Mr. Burger can also be reached via
electronic mail at burger.riley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 7,
2020, PADEP submitted a revision to its
SIP to address case-by-case NOX and/or
VOC RACT for sources at numerous
major NOX and VOC emitting facilities
located in the Commonwealth,
including the twenty-four facilities in
this action. This SIP revision is
intended to address the NOX and/or
VOC RACT requirements under sections
182 and 184 of the CAA for the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Table
1 of this document lists the SIP
submittal date and the facilities
included in PADEP’s submittal.
Although submitted in one SIP revision
by PADEP, EPA views each facility as a
separable SIP revision and may take
separate final action on one or more
facilities.
41427
For additional background
information on Pennsylvania’s
‘‘presumptive’’ RACT II SIP see 84 FR
20274 (May 9, 2019) and on
Pennsylvania’s source-specific or ‘‘caseby-case’’ RACT determinations see the
appropriate technical support document
(TSD) which is available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No.
EPA–R03–OAR–2021–0380.
TABLE 1—PADEP SIP SUBMITTALS FOR MAJOR NOX AND/OR VOC SOURCES IN PENNSYLVANIA SUBJECT TO SOURCESPECIFIC RACT UNDER THE 1997 AND 2008 8-HOUR OZONE STANDARD
SIP submittal date
Major source
(county)
5/7/2020 .................
Anvil International, LLC (formerly Grinnell Corporation) (Lancaster).
ArcelorMittal Plate LLC Conshohocken Plant (formerly Bethlehem Lukens Plate) (Montgomery).
Braskem America Inc. Marcus Hook (formerly Epsilon Products Co.—Marcus Hook) (Delaware).
Buck Co Inc. Quarryville (formerly Buck Company Inc) (Lancaster).
Calumet Karns City Refining LLC (formerly Penreco—Karns City) (Butler).
Clarion Bathware Marble (Clarion).
Domtar Paper Company Johnsonburg Mill (formerly Willamette Industries, Johnsonburgh Mill) (Elk).
Exelon Generation Company LLC Croydon Generating Station (formerly PECO Energy Co.—Croydon Generating Station)
(Bucks).
Georgia-Pacific Panel Products LLC Mt. Jewell MDF Plant (McKean).
GE Transportation Grove City Engine (formerly GE Transportation Systems) (Mercer).
GrafTech USA LLC St Marys (formerly The Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc) (Elk).
Haysite Reinforced Plastics LLC Erie (Erie).
INMETCO Ellwood City (formerly The International Metals Reclamation Co) (Lawrence).
International Waxes Inc Farmers Valley (formerly Petrowax Refining) (McKean).
Jeld Wen Fiber Division PA (Bradford).
Mars Wrigley Confectionery US LLC Elizabethtown (Lancaster).
Molded Fiber Glass Company Union City (formerly Molded Fiber Glass) (Erie).
Monroe Energy LLC Trainer (formerly Conoco Phillips Company) (Delaware).
Nova Chemicals Company Beaver (formerly Nova Chemicals, Inc.) (Beaver).
Sasol Chemicals USA LLC (formerly Merisol Antioxidants LLC) (Venango).
Silberline Manufacturing Company Lincoln Drive Plant (formerly Silberline Manufacturing Co) (Schuylkill).
Superior Tube Company Lower Providence (formerly Superior Tube Company) (Montgomery).
Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility (Lehigh).
Victaulic Forks Facility (Northampton).
I. Background
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
A. 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS
Ground level ozone is not emitted
directly into the air but is created by
chemical reactions between NOX and
VOC in the presence of sunlight.
Emissions from industrial facilities,
electric utilities, motor vehicle exhaust,
gasoline vapors, and chemical solvents
are some of the major sources of NOX
and VOC. Breathing ozone can trigger a
variety of health problems, particularly
for children, the elderly, and people of
all ages who have lung diseases such as
asthma. Ground level ozone can also
have harmful effects on sensitive
vegetation and ecosystems.
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a
standard for ground level ozone based
on 8-hour average concentrations. 62 FR
38856. The 8-hour averaging period
replaced the previous 1-hour averaging
period, and the level of the NAAQS was
changed from 0.12 parts per million
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jul 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
(ppm) to 0.08 ppm. EPA has designated
two moderate nonattainment areas in
Pennsylvania under the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS, namely PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MDDE (the Philadelphia Area) and
Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley (the Pittsburgh
Area). See 40 CFR 81.339.
On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened
the 8-hour ozone standards, by revising
its level to 0.075 ppm averaged over an
8-hour period (2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS). On May 21, 2012, EPA
designated five marginal nonattainment
areas in Pennsylvania for the 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS: AllentownBethlehem-Easton, Lancaster, Reading,
the Philadelphia Area, and the
Pittsburgh Area. 77 FR 30088; see also
40 CFR 81.339.
On March 6, 2015, EPA announced its
revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for all purposes and for all
areas in the country, effective on April
6, 2015. 80 FR 12264. EPA has
determined that certain nonattainment
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
planning requirements continue to be in
effect under the revoked standard for
nonattainment areas under the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS, including RACT.
B. RACT Requirements for Ozone
The CAA regulates emissions of NOX
and VOC to prevent photochemical
reactions that result in ozone formation.
RACT is an important strategy for
reducing NOX and VOC emissions from
major stationary sources within areas
not meeting the ozone NAAQS.
Areas designated nonattainment for
the ozone NAAQS are subject to the
general nonattainment planning
requirements of CAA section 172.
Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides
that SIPs for nonattainment areas must
include reasonably available control
measures (RACM) for demonstrating
attainment of all NAAQS, including
emissions reductions from existing
sources through the adoption of RACT.
Further, section 182(b)(2) of the CAA
sets forth additional RACT requirements
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
41428
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
for ozone nonattainment areas classified
as moderate or higher. Section 182(b)(2)
of the CAA sets forth requirements
regarding RACT for the ozone NAAQS
for VOC sources. Section 182(f) subjects
major stationary sources of NOX to the
same RACT requirements applicable to
major stationary sources of VOC.1
Section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA
applies the RACT requirements in
section 182(b)(2) to nonattainment areas
classified as marginal and to attainment
areas located within ozone transport
regions established pursuant to section
184 of the CAA. Section 184(a) of the
CAA established by law the current
Ozone Transport Region (OTR)
comprised of 12 eastern states,
including Pennsylvania. This
requirement is referred to as OTR RACT.
As noted previously, a ‘‘major source’’
is defined based on the source’s
potential to emit (PTE) of NOX, VOC, or
both pollutants, and the applicable
thresholds differ based on the
classification of the nonattainment area
in which the source is located. See
sections 182(c)–(f) and 302 of the CAA.
Since the 1970’s, EPA has
consistently defined ‘‘RACT’’ as the
lowest emission limit that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the
application of the control technology
that is reasonably available considering
technological and economic feasibility.2
EPA has provided more substantive
RACT requirements through
implementation rules for each ozone
NAAQS as well as through guidance. In
2004 and 2005, EPA promulgated an
implementation rule for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS in two phases (‘‘Phase 1
of the 1997 Ozone Implementation
Rule’’ and ‘‘Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule’’). 69 FR 23951
(April 30, 2004) and 70 FR 71612
(November 29, 2005), respectively.
Particularly, the Phase 2 Ozone
Implementation Rule addressed RACT
statutory requirements under the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 70 FR 71652
(November 29, 2005).
On March 6, 2015, EPA issued its
final rule for implementing the 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS (‘‘the 2008 Ozone
SIP Requirements Rule’’). 80 FR 12264.
At the same time, EPA revoked the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective on April
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
1A
‘‘major source’’ is defined based on the
source’s potential to emit (PTE) of NOX or VOC, and
the applicable thresholds for RACT differs based on
the classification of the nonattainment area in
which the source is located. See sections 182(c)–(f)
and 302 of the CAA.
2 See December 9, 1976 memorandum from Roger
Strelow, Assistant Administrator for Air and Waste
Management, to Regional Administrators,
‘‘Guidance for Determining Acceptability of SIP
Regulations in Non-Attainment Areas,’’ and also 44
FR 53762 (September 17, 1979).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jul 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
6, 2015.3 The 2008 Ozone SIP
Requirements Rule provided
comprehensive requirements to
transition from the revoked 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS to the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, as codified in 40 CFR part 51,
subpart AA, following revocation.
Consistent with previous policy, EPA
determined that areas designated
nonattainment for both the 1997 and
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the time
of revocation, must retain
implementation of certain
nonattainment area requirements (i.e.,
anti-backsliding requirements) for the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS as specified
under section 182 of the CAA, including
RACT. See 40 CFR 51.1100(o). An area
remains subject to the anti-backsliding
requirements for a revoked NAAQS
until EPA approves a redesignation to
attainment for the area for the 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS. There are no
effects on applicable requirements for
areas within the OTR, as a result of the
revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. Thus, Pennsylvania, as a state
within the OTR, remains subject to
RACT requirements for both the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS and the 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS.
In addressing RACT, the 2008 Ozone
SIP Requirements Rule is consistent
with existing policy and Phase 2 of the
1997 Ozone Implementation Rule. In the
2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule,
EPA requires RACT measures to be
implemented by January 1, 2017 for
areas classified as moderate
nonattainment or above and all areas of
the OTR. EPA also provided in the 2008
Ozone SIP Requirements Rule that
RACT SIPs must contain adopted RACT
regulations, certifications where
appropriate that existing provisions are
RACT, and/or negative declarations
stating that there are no sources in the
nonattainment area covered by a
specific control technique guidelines
(CTG) source category. In the preamble
to the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements
Rule, EPA clarified that states must
provide notice and opportunity for
public comment on their RACT SIP
submissions, even when submitting a
certification that the existing provisions
remain RACT or a negative declaration.
3 On February 16, 2018, the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C.
Cir. Court) issued an opinion on the 2008 Ozone
SIP Requirements Rule. South Coast Air Quality
Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, 882 F.3d 1138 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
The D.C. Cir. Court found certain parts reasonable
and denied the petition for appeal on those. In
particular, the D.C. Cir. Court upheld the use of
NOX averaging to meet RACT requirements for 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS. However, the Court also
found certain other provisions unreasonable. The
D.C. Cir. Court vacated the provisions it found
unreasonable.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
States must submit appropriate
supporting information for their RACT
submissions, in accordance with the
Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule. Adequate
documentation must support that states
have considered control technology that
is economically and technologically
feasible in determining RACT, based on
information that is current as of the time
of development of the RACT SIP.
In addition, in the 2008 Ozone SIP
Requirements Rule, EPA clarified that
states can use weighted average NOX
emissions rates from sources in the
nonattainment area for meeting the
major NOX RACT requirement under the
CAA, as consistent with existing
policy.4 EPA also recognized that states
may conclude in some cases that
sources already addressed by RACT
determinations for the 1979 1-hour and/
or 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS may not need to
implement additional controls to meet
the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS RACT
requirement. See 80 FR 12278 and
12279 (March 6, 2015).
C. Applicability of RACT Requirements
in Pennsylvania
As indicated earlier, RACT
requirements apply to any ozone
nonattainment areas classified as
moderate or higher (serious, severe or
extreme) under CAA sections 182(b)(2)
and 182(f). Pennsylvania has
outstanding ozone RACT requirements
for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. The entire Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania is part of the OTR
established under section 184 of the
CAA and thus is subject statewide to the
RACT requirements of CAA sections
182(b)(2) and 182(f), pursuant to section
184(b).
At the time of revocation of the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS (effective April 6,
2015), only two moderate
nonattainment areas remained in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for this
standard, the Philadelphia and the
Pittsburgh Areas. As required under
EPA’s anti-backsliding provisions, these
4 EPA’s NO RACT guidance ‘‘Nitrogen Oxides
X
Supplement to the General Preamble’’ (57 FR
55620; November 25, 1992) encouraged states to
develop RACT programs that are based on ‘‘area
wide average emission rates.’’ Additional guidance
on area-wide RACT provisions is provided by EPA’s
January 2001 economic incentive program guidance
titled ‘‘Improving Air Quality with Economic
Incentive Programs,’’ available at https://
www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/
documents/eipfin.pdf. In addition, as mentioned
previously, the D.C. Cir. Court upheld the use of
NOX averaging to meet RACT requirements for 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS. South Coast Air Quality
Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, No. 15–1115 (D.C. Cir. February
16, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
two moderate nonattainment areas
continue to be subject to RACT under
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Given
its location in the OTR, the remainder
of the Commonwealth is also treated as
moderate nonattainment area under the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for any
planning requirements under the
revoked standard, including RACT. The
OTR RACT requirement is also in effect
under the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS throughout the
Commonwealth, since EPA did not
designate any nonattainment areas
above marginal for this standard in
Pennsylvania. Thus, in practice, the
same RACT requirements continue to be
applicable in Pennsylvania for both the
1997 and 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS. RACT must be
evaluated and satisfied as separate
requirements under each applicable
standard.
RACT applies to major sources of
NOX and VOC under each ozone
NAAQS or any VOC sources subject to
CTG RACT. Which NOX and VOC
sources in Pennsylvania are considered
‘‘major’’ and are therefore subject to
RACT is dependent on the location of
each source within the Commonwealth.
Sources located in nonattainment areas
would be subject to the ‘‘major source’’
definitions established under the CAA
based on the area’s current
classification(s). In the case of
Pennsylvania, sources located outside of
moderate or above ozone nonattainment
areas, as part of the OTR, shall be
treated as if these areas were moderate.
In Pennsylvania, the SIP program is
implemented primarily by the PADEP,
but also by local air agencies in
Philadelphia County (the City of
Philadelphia’s Air Management Services
[AMS]) and Allegheny County, (the
Allegheny County Health Department
[ACHD]). These agencies have
implemented numerous RACT
regulations and source-specific
measures in Pennsylvania to meet the
applicable ozone RACT requirements.
Historically, statewide RACT controls
have been promulgated by PADEP in
Pennsylvania Code Title 25—
Environmental Resources, Part I—
Department of Environmental
Protection, Subpart C—Protection of
Natural Resources, Article III—Air
Resources, (25 Pa. Code) Chapter 129.
AMS and ACHD have incorporated by
reference Pennsylvania regulations, but
have also promulgated regulations
adopting RACT controls for their own
jurisdictions. In addition, AMS and
ACHD have submitted, through PADEP,
separate source-specific RACT
determinations as SIP revisions for
sources within their respective
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jul 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
jurisdictions, which have been
approved by EPA. See 40 CFR
52.2020(d)(1).
States were required to make RACT
SIP submissions for the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS by September 15, 2006.
PADEP submitted a SIP revision on
September 25, 2006, certifying that a
number of previously approved VOC
RACT rules continued to satisfy RACT
under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
for the remainder of Pennsylvania.5
PADEP has met its obligations under the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for its CTG
and non-CTG VOC sources. See 82 FR
31464 (July 7, 2017). RACT control
measures addressing all applicable CAA
RACT requirements under the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS have been
implemented and fully approved in the
jurisdictions of ACHD and AMS. See 78
FR 34584 (June 10, 2013) and 81 FR
69687 (October 7, 2016). For the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS, states were
required to submit RACT SIP revisions
by July 20, 2014. On May 16, 2016,
PADEP submitted a SIP revision
addressing RACT for both the 1997 and
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in
Pennsylvania. Specifically, the May 16,
2016 SIP submittal intended to satisfy
sections 182(b)(2)(C), 182(f), and 184 of
the CAA for both the 1997 and 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS for Pennsylvania’s
major NOX and VOC non-CTG sources,
except ethylene production plants,
surface active agents manufacturing,
and mobile equipment repair and
refinishing.6
D. EPA’s Conditional Approval for
Pennsylvania’s RACT Requirements
Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone
NAAQS
On May 16, 2016, PADEP submitted
a SIP revision addressing RACT for both
the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in Pennsylvania. PADEP’s May
16, 2016 SIP revision intended to
address certain outstanding VOC CTG
RACT and major NOX RACT
requirements under the CAA for both
standards. The SIP revision requested
approval of Pennsylvania’s 25 Pa. Code
129.96–100, Additional RACT
Requirements for Major Sources of NOX
and VOCs (the ‘‘presumptive’’ RACT II
rule). Prior to the adoption of the RACT
II rule, Pennsylvania relied on the NOX
and VOC control measures in 25 Pa.
Code 129.92–95, Stationary Sources of
5 The September 15, 2006 SIP submittal initially
included Pennsylvania’s certification of NOX RACT
regulations; however, NOX RACT portions were
withdrawn by PADEP on June 27, 2016.
6 EPA’s conditional approval of PADEP’s May 16,
2016 SIP revision covered relevant sources located
in both Philadelphia and Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41429
NOX and VOCs, (the RACT I rule) to
meet RACT for major sources of VOC
and NOX. The requirements of the
RACT I rule remain in effect and
continue to be implemented as RACT.7
On September 26, 2017, PADEP
submitted a supplemental SIP revision
which committed to address various
deficiencies identified by EPA in
PADEP’s May 16, 2016 ‘‘presumptive’’
RACT II rule SIP revision.
On May 9, 2019, EPA conditionally
approved the RACT II rule based on
PADEP’s September 26, 2017
commitment letter.8 See 84 FR 20274. In
EPA’s final conditional approval, EPA
noted that PADEP would be required to
submit, for EPA’s approval, SIP
revisions to address any facility-wide or
system-wide averaging plan approved
under 25 Pa. Code 129.98 and any caseby-case RACT determinations under 25
Pa. Code 129.99. PADEP committed to
submitting these additional SIP
revisions within 12 months of EPA’s
final conditional approval, specifically
May 9, 2020.
Therefore, as authorized in CAA
section 110(k)(3) and (k)(4),
Pennsylvania was required to submit
the following as case-by-case SIP
revisions, by May 9, 2020, for EPA’s
approval as a condition of approval of
25 Pa. Code 128 and 129 in the May 16,
2016 SIP revision: (1) All facility-wide
or system-wide averaging plans
approved by PADEP under 25 Pa. Code
129.98 including, but not limited to, any
terms and conditions that ensure the
enforceability of the averaging plan as a
practical matter (i.e., any monitoring,
reporting, recordkeeping, or testing
requirements); and (2) all sourcespecific RACT determinations approved
by PADEP under 25 Pa. Code 129.99,
including any alternative compliance
schedules approved under 25 Pa. Code
129.97(k) and 129.99(i); the case-by-case
RACT determinations submitted to EPA
for approval into the SIP should include
any terms and conditions that ensure
the enforceability of the case-by-case or
source-specific RACT emission
limitation as a practical matter (i.e., any
monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping, or
testing requirements). See May 9, 2019
(84 FR 20274). Through multiple
7 These requirements were initially approved as
RACT for Pennsylvania under the 1979 1-hour
ozone NAAQS. The RACT I Rule was approved by
EPA into the SIP on March 23, 1998. 63 FR 13789.
8 On August 27, 2020, the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals issued a decision vacating EPA’s approval
of three provisions of Pennsylvania’s presumptive
RACT II rule applicable to certain coal-fired power
plants. Sierra Club v. EPA, No. 19–2562 (3rd Cir.
August 27, 2020). None of the sources in this
proposed rulemaking are subject to the three
presumptive RACT II provisions at issue in that
Sierra Club decision.
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
41430
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
submissions between 2017 and 2020,
PADEP has submitted to EPA for
approval various SIP submissions to
implement its RACT II case-by-case
determinations and averaging plans.
This proposed rulemaking is based on
EPA’s review of one of these SIP
revisions.
II. Summary of SIP Revisions
In order to satisfy a requirement from
EPA’s May 9, 2019 conditional
approval, PADEP has submitted to EPA,
SIP revisions addressing case-by-case
RACT requirements for major sources in
Pennsylvania subject to 25 Pa. Code
129.99. As noted in Table 1 of this
document, on May 7 2020, PADEP
submitted to EPA, a SIP revision
pertaining to Pennsylvania’s case-bycase NOX and/or VOC RACT
determinations for sources located at
numerous major NOX and VOC emitting
facilities located in the Commonwealth.
PADEP provided documentation in its
SIP revisions to support its case-by-case
RACT determinations for affected
emission units at each major NOX and
VOC emitting facilities subject to 25 Pa.
Code 129.99.
In the Pennsylvania RACT SIP
revision, PADEP included a case-bycase RACT determination for the
existing emissions units at each of these
major sources of NOX and/or VOC that
required a source specific RACT
determination. In PADEP’s RACT
determinations an evaluation was
completed to determine if previously
SIP-approved, case-by-case RACT
requirements (herein referred to as
RACT I) were more stringent and
required to be retained in the sources
Title V air quality permit and
subsequently, the Federally-approved
SIP, or if the new case-by-case RACT
requirements are more stringent and
supersede the previous Federallyapproved provisions.
EPA, in this action, is taking action on
sources at twenty-four major NOX and/
or VOC emitting facilities in
Pennsylvania, subject to Pennsylvania’s
case-by-case RACT requirements, as
summarized in Table 2.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 2—TWENTY-FOUR MAJOR NOX AND/OR VOC SOURCES IN PENNSYLVANIA SUBJECT TO CASE-BY-CASE RACT II
UNDER THE 1997 AND 2008 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS
Major source (county)
1-Hour ozone
RACT source?
(RACT I)
Major source
pollutant
(NOX and/or
VOC)
Anvil International, LLC (formerly Grinnell Corporation) (Lancaster) ..................................
Yes .................
VOC ...............
ArcelorMittal Plate LLC Conshohocken Plant (formerly Bethlehem Lukens Plate) (Montgomery).
Braskem America Inc. Marcus Hook (formerly Epsilon Products Co.—Marcus Hook)
(Delaware).
Buck Co Inc. Quarryville (formerly Buck Company Inc) (Lancaster) ..................................
Yes .................
NOX and VOC
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Calumet Karns City Refining LLC (formerly Penreco—Karns City) (Butler) .......................
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Clarion Bathware Marble (Clarion) ......................................................................................
No ..................
VOC ...............
Domtar Paper Company Johnsonburg Mill (formerly Willamette Industries, Johnsonburgh
Mill) (Elk).
Exelon Generation Company LLC Croydon Generating Station (formerly PECO Energy
Co.—Croydon Generating Station) (Bucks).
Georgia-Pacific Panel Products LLC Mt. Jewell MDF Plant (McKean) ..............................
Yes .................
NOX and VOC
Yes .................
NOX ................
Yes .................
NOX and VOC
GE Transportation Grove City Engine (formerly GE Transportation Systems) (Mercer) ....
Yes .................
NOX and VOC
GrafTech USA LLC St Marys (formerly The Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc) (Elk) ...............
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Haysite Reinforced Plastics LLC Erie (Erie) ........................................................................
No ..................
VOC ...............
INMETCO Ellwood City (formerly The International Metals Reclamation Co) (Lawrence)
Yes .................
NOX and VOC
International Waxes Inc Farmers Valley (formerly Petrowax Refining) (McKean) ..............
Yes .................
NOX and VOC
Jeld Wen Fiber Division PA (Bradford) ...............................................................................
Yes .................
NOX and VOC
Mars Wrigley Confectionery US LLC Elizabethtown (Lancaster) ........................................
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Molded Fiber Glass Company Union City (formerly Molded Fiber Glass) (Erie) ................
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Monroe Energy LLC Trainer (formerly Conoco Phillips Company) (Delaware) ..................
Yes .................
NOX and VOC
Nova Chemicals Company Beaver (formerly Nova Chemicals, Inc.) (Beaver) ..................
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Sasol Chemicals USA LLC (formerly Merisol Antioxidants LLC) (Venango) ......................
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Silberline Manufacturing Company Lincoln Drive Plant (formerly Silberline Manufacturing
Co) (Schuylkill).
Superior Tube Company Lower Providence (formerly Superior Tube Company) (Montgomery).
Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility (Lehigh) .......................................................................
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Yes .................
VOC ...............
Unknown * ......
VOC ...............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jul 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
RACT II permit
(effective date)
36–05019
(2/1/2019)
46–00011
(1/26/2018)
23–00012
(3/2/2020)
36–05053
(4/1/2020)
10–027H
(11/29/2018)
16–00133
(12/19/2020)
24–00009
(2/25/2020)
09–00016
(4/11/2018)
42–158R
(1/2/2019)
43–00196
(11/7/2019)
24–00012
(5/1/2019)
25–00783
(7/24/2019)
37–00243
(12/6/2019)
42–00011
(2/21/2020)
08–00003
(9/21/2018)
36–05142
(7/18/2019)
25–00035
(2/5/2020)
23–00003
(6/5/2017)
04–00033
(4/2/2020)
61–00011
(2/16/2020)
54–00041
(3/16/2020)
46–00020
(2/5/2020)
39–00069
(10/24/2017)
41431
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—TWENTY-FOUR MAJOR NOX AND/OR VOC SOURCES IN PENNSYLVANIA SUBJECT TO CASE-BY-CASE RACT II
UNDER THE 1997 AND 2008 8-HOUR OZONE NAAQS—Continued
Major source (county)
1-Hour ozone
RACT source?
(RACT I)
Major source
pollutant
(NOX and/or
VOC)
Victaulic Forks Facility (Northampton) .................................................................................
Unknown ** ....
VOC ...............
RACT II permit
(effective date)
48–0009
(10/24/2017)
* PADEP records indicate that Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility may have been subject to RACT I requirements because PADEP technical
review memos and operating permits issued to the facility in the past reference RACT I requirements. However, in reviewing the facility’s files,
PADEP could not produce a RACT I permit nor any files specific to the issuance of RACT I. Furthermore, RACT I requirements were never incorporated into the Pennsylvania SIP for Victaulic Alburtis. See PADEP comment and response document dated January 2020.
** PADEP records indicate that Victaulic Forks Facility may have been subject to RACT I requirements because PADEP technical review
memos and operating permits issued to the facility in the past reference RACT I requirements. However, in reviewing the facility’s files, PADEP
could not produce a RACT I permit nor any files specific to the issuance of RACT I. Furthermore, RACT I requirements were never incorporated
into the Pennsylvania SIP for Victaulic Forks. See PADEP comment and response document dated January 2020.
The case-by-case RACT
determinations submitted by PADEP
consist of an evaluation of all
reasonably available controls at the time
of evaluation for each affected emissions
unit, resulting in a PADEP
determination of what specific control
requirements, if any, satisfy RACT for
that particular unit. The adoption of
new or additional controls or the
revisions to existing controls as RACT
were specified as requirements in new
or revised Federally enforceable permits
(hereafter RACT II permits) issued by
PADEP to the source. The RACT II
permits, which revise or adopt
additional source-specific controls, have
been submitted as part of the
Pennsylvania RACT SIP revisions for
EPA’s approval in the Pennsylvania SIP
under 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1). The RACT
II permits submitted by PADEP are
listed in the last column of Table 2 of
this document, along with the permit
effective date, and are part of the docket
for this rulemaking, which is available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
Docket No. EPA–R03–OAR–2021–
0380.9 EPA is proposing to incorporate
by reference in the Pennsylvania SIP,
via the RACT II permits, source-specific
RACT determinations under the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for
certain sources at major NOX and VOC
emitting facilities.10
III. EPA’s Evaluation of SIP Revisions
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
After thorough review and evaluation
of the information provided by PADEP
for sources at twenty-four major NOX
and/or VOC emitting facilities in
9 The RACT II permits are redacted versions of a
facility’s Federally enforceable permits and reflect
the specific RACT requirements being approved
into the Pennsylvania SIP.
10 While the prior SIP-approved RACT I permit
will remain part of the SIP, this RACT II rule will
incorporate by reference the RACT II requirements
through the RACT II permit and clarify the ongoing
applicability of specific conditions in the RACT I
permit.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:12 Jul 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
Pennsylvania included in its SIP
revision submittal, EPA finds that
PADEP’s case-by-case RACT
determinations and conclusions
provided are reasonable and
appropriately considered technically
and economically feasible controls,
while setting lowest achievable limits.
EPA finds that the proposed sourcespecific RACT controls for the sources
subject to this rulemaking action
adequately meet the CAA RACT
requirements for the 1997 and 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS for the subject
sources of NOX and/or VOC in
Pennsylvania, as they are not covered by
or cannot meet Pennsylvania’s
presumptive RACT regulation.
EPA also finds that all the proposed
revisions to previously SIP approved
RACT requirements, under the 1979 1hour ozone standard (RACT I), as
discussed in PADEP’s SIP revisions,
will result in equivalent or additional
reductions of NOX and/or VOC
emissions and should not interfere with
any applicable requirement concerning
attainment or reasonable further
progress with the NAAQS or interfere
with other applicable CAA requirement
in section 110(l) of the CAA.
EPA’s complete analysis of PADEP’s
case-by-case RACT SIP revisions is
included in the TSD available in the
docket for this rulemaking action and
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket number
EPA–R03–OAR–2021–0380.
IV. Proposed Action
Based on EPA’s review, EPA is
proposing to approve the Pennsylvania
SIP revisions for case-by-case RACT
determinations for individual sources at
twenty-four major NOX and VOC
emitting facilities listed in Table 2 of
this document and incorporate by
reference in the Pennsylvania SIP, via
the RACT II permits, source specific
RACT determinations under the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
those sources. EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in
this document. These comments will be
considered before taking final action. As
EPA views each facility as a separable
SIP revision, should EPA receive
comment on one facility but not others,
EPA may take separate, final action on
the remaining facilities.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
source specific RACT determinations
via the RACT II permits as described in
Sections II and III—Summary of SIP
Revisions and EPA’s Evaluation of SIP
Revisions in this document. EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through
https://www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region III Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
41432
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 145 / Monday, August 2, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Jul 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed
rulemaking, addressing the NOX and
VOC RACT case-by-case requirements
for individual sources at twenty-four
facilities in Pennsylvania for the 1997
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, does
not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: July 22, 2021.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2021–16279 Filed 7–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
E:\FR\FM\02AUP1.SGM
02AUP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 145 (Monday, August 2, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41426-41432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16279]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0380; FRL-8694-01-R3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Plans; Pennsylvania;
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) Determinations for Case-
by-Case Sources Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve multiple state implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. These revisions were submitted by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) to
establish and require reasonably available control technology (RACT)
for twenty-four major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and/
or nitrogen oxides (NOX) pursuant to the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania's conditionally approved RACT regulations. In this
rulemaking action, EPA is proposing to approve source-specific (also
referred to as ``case-by-case'') RACT determinations for sources at
twenty-four major NOX and VOC emitting facilities submitted
by PADEP. These RACT evaluations were submitted to meet RACT
requirements for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS). This action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 1,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2021-0380 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Riley Burger, Permits Branch
(3AD10), Air & Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
The telephone number is (215) 814-2217.
[[Page 41427]]
Mr. Burger can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 7, 2020, PADEP submitted a revision
to its SIP to address case-by-case NOX and/or VOC RACT for
sources at numerous major NOX and VOC emitting facilities
located in the Commonwealth, including the twenty-four facilities in
this action. This SIP revision is intended to address the
NOX and/or VOC RACT requirements under sections 182 and 184
of the CAA for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Table 1 of this
document lists the SIP submittal date and the facilities included in
PADEP's submittal. Although submitted in one SIP revision by PADEP, EPA
views each facility as a separable SIP revision and may take separate
final action on one or more facilities.
For additional background information on Pennsylvania's
``presumptive'' RACT II SIP see 84 FR 20274 (May 9, 2019) and on
Pennsylvania's source-specific or ``case-by-case'' RACT determinations
see the appropriate technical support document (TSD) which is available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2021-
0380.
Table 1--PADEP SIP Submittals for Major NOX and/or VOC Sources in
Pennsylvania Subject to Source-Specific RACT Under the 1997 and 2008 8-
Hour Ozone Standard
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIP submittal date Major source (county)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5/7/2020................... Anvil International, LLC (formerly Grinnell
Corporation) (Lancaster).
ArcelorMittal Plate LLC Conshohocken Plant
(formerly Bethlehem Lukens Plate)
(Montgomery).
Braskem America Inc. Marcus Hook (formerly
Epsilon Products Co.--Marcus Hook)
(Delaware).
Buck Co Inc. Quarryville (formerly Buck
Company Inc) (Lancaster).
Calumet Karns City Refining LLC (formerly
Penreco--Karns City) (Butler).
Clarion Bathware Marble (Clarion).
Domtar Paper Company Johnsonburg Mill
(formerly Willamette Industries,
Johnsonburgh Mill) (Elk).
Exelon Generation Company LLC Croydon
Generating Station (formerly PECO Energy
Co.--Croydon Generating Station) (Bucks).
Georgia-Pacific Panel Products LLC Mt.
Jewell MDF Plant (McKean).
GE Transportation Grove City Engine
(formerly GE Transportation Systems)
(Mercer).
GrafTech USA LLC St Marys (formerly The
Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc) (Elk).
Haysite Reinforced Plastics LLC Erie
(Erie).
INMETCO Ellwood City (formerly The
International Metals Reclamation Co)
(Lawrence).
International Waxes Inc Farmers Valley
(formerly Petrowax Refining) (McKean).
Jeld Wen Fiber Division PA (Bradford).
Mars Wrigley Confectionery US LLC
Elizabethtown (Lancaster).
Molded Fiber Glass Company Union City
(formerly Molded Fiber Glass) (Erie).
Monroe Energy LLC Trainer (formerly Conoco
Phillips Company) (Delaware).
Nova Chemicals Company Beaver (formerly
Nova Chemicals, Inc.) (Beaver).
Sasol Chemicals USA LLC (formerly Merisol
Antioxidants LLC) (Venango).
Silberline Manufacturing Company Lincoln
Drive Plant (formerly Silberline
Manufacturing Co) (Schuylkill).
Superior Tube Company Lower Providence
(formerly Superior Tube Company)
(Montgomery).
Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility
(Lehigh).
Victaulic Forks Facility (Northampton).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
A. 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
Ground level ozone is not emitted directly into the air but is
created by chemical reactions between NOX and VOC in the
presence of sunlight. Emissions from industrial facilities, electric
utilities, motor vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors, and chemical
solvents are some of the major sources of NOX and VOC.
Breathing ozone can trigger a variety of health problems, particularly
for children, the elderly, and people of all ages who have lung
diseases such as asthma. Ground level ozone can also have harmful
effects on sensitive vegetation and ecosystems.
On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a standard for ground level ozone
based on 8-hour average concentrations. 62 FR 38856. The 8-hour
averaging period replaced the previous 1-hour averaging period, and the
level of the NAAQS was changed from 0.12 parts per million (ppm) to
0.08 ppm. EPA has designated two moderate nonattainment areas in
Pennsylvania under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, namely Philadelphia-
Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE (the Philadelphia Area) and
Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley (the Pittsburgh Area). See 40 CFR 81.339.
On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened the 8-hour ozone standards, by
revising its level to 0.075 ppm averaged over an 8-hour period (2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS). On May 21, 2012, EPA designated five marginal
nonattainment areas in Pennsylvania for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS:
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Lancaster, Reading, the Philadelphia Area,
and the Pittsburgh Area. 77 FR 30088; see also 40 CFR 81.339.
On March 6, 2015, EPA announced its revocation of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for all purposes and for all areas in the country,
effective on April 6, 2015. 80 FR 12264. EPA has determined that
certain nonattainment planning requirements continue to be in effect
under the revoked standard for nonattainment areas under the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS, including RACT.
B. RACT Requirements for Ozone
The CAA regulates emissions of NOX and VOC to prevent
photochemical reactions that result in ozone formation. RACT is an
important strategy for reducing NOX and VOC emissions from
major stationary sources within areas not meeting the ozone NAAQS.
Areas designated nonattainment for the ozone NAAQS are subject to
the general nonattainment planning requirements of CAA section 172.
Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that SIPs for nonattainment areas
must include reasonably available control measures (RACM) for
demonstrating attainment of all NAAQS, including emissions reductions
from existing sources through the adoption of RACT. Further, section
182(b)(2) of the CAA sets forth additional RACT requirements
[[Page 41428]]
for ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or higher. Section
182(b)(2) of the CAA sets forth requirements regarding RACT for the
ozone NAAQS for VOC sources. Section 182(f) subjects major stationary
sources of NOX to the same RACT requirements applicable to
major stationary sources of VOC.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A ``major source'' is defined based on the source's
potential to emit (PTE) of NOX or VOC, and the applicable
thresholds for RACT differs based on the classification of the
nonattainment area in which the source is located. See sections
182(c)-(f) and 302 of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA applies the RACT requirements in
section 182(b)(2) to nonattainment areas classified as marginal and to
attainment areas located within ozone transport regions established
pursuant to section 184 of the CAA. Section 184(a) of the CAA
established by law the current Ozone Transport Region (OTR) comprised
of 12 eastern states, including Pennsylvania. This requirement is
referred to as OTR RACT. As noted previously, a ``major source'' is
defined based on the source's potential to emit (PTE) of
NOX, VOC, or both pollutants, and the applicable thresholds
differ based on the classification of the nonattainment area in which
the source is located. See sections 182(c)-(f) and 302 of the CAA.
Since the 1970's, EPA has consistently defined ``RACT'' as the
lowest emission limit that a particular source is capable of meeting by
the application of the control technology that is reasonably available
considering technological and economic feasibility.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See December 9, 1976 memorandum from Roger Strelow,
Assistant Administrator for Air and Waste Management, to Regional
Administrators, ``Guidance for Determining Acceptability of SIP
Regulations in Non-Attainment Areas,'' and also 44 FR 53762
(September 17, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA has provided more substantive RACT requirements through
implementation rules for each ozone NAAQS as well as through guidance.
In 2004 and 2005, EPA promulgated an implementation rule for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS in two phases (``Phase 1 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule'' and ``Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone Implementation
Rule''). 69 FR 23951 (April 30, 2004) and 70 FR 71612 (November 29,
2005), respectively. Particularly, the Phase 2 Ozone Implementation
Rule addressed RACT statutory requirements under the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. See 70 FR 71652 (November 29, 2005).
On March 6, 2015, EPA issued its final rule for implementing the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (``the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule''). 80
FR 12264. At the same time, EPA revoked the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
effective on April 6, 2015.\3\ The 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule
provided comprehensive requirements to transition from the revoked 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS to the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, as codified in 40
CFR part 51, subpart AA, following revocation. Consistent with previous
policy, EPA determined that areas designated nonattainment for both the
1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS at the time of revocation, must retain
implementation of certain nonattainment area requirements (i.e., anti-
backsliding requirements) for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS as specified
under section 182 of the CAA, including RACT. See 40 CFR 51.1100(o). An
area remains subject to the anti-backsliding requirements for a revoked
NAAQS until EPA approves a redesignation to attainment for the area for
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. There are no effects on applicable
requirements for areas within the OTR, as a result of the revocation of
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Thus, Pennsylvania, as a state within the
OTR, remains subject to RACT requirements for both the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ On February 16, 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Cir. Court) issued an opinion
on the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule. South Coast Air Quality
Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, 882 F.3d 1138 (D.C. Cir. 2018). The D.C. Cir.
Court found certain parts reasonable and denied the petition for
appeal on those. In particular, the D.C. Cir. Court upheld the use
of NOX averaging to meet RACT requirements for 2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS. However, the Court also found certain other
provisions unreasonable. The D.C. Cir. Court vacated the provisions
it found unreasonable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addressing RACT, the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule is
consistent with existing policy and Phase 2 of the 1997 Ozone
Implementation Rule. In the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA
requires RACT measures to be implemented by January 1, 2017 for areas
classified as moderate nonattainment or above and all areas of the OTR.
EPA also provided in the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule that RACT
SIPs must contain adopted RACT regulations, certifications where
appropriate that existing provisions are RACT, and/or negative
declarations stating that there are no sources in the nonattainment
area covered by a specific control technique guidelines (CTG) source
category. In the preamble to the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA
clarified that states must provide notice and opportunity for public
comment on their RACT SIP submissions, even when submitting a
certification that the existing provisions remain RACT or a negative
declaration. States must submit appropriate supporting information for
their RACT submissions, in accordance with the Phase 2 of the 1997
Ozone Implementation Rule. Adequate documentation must support that
states have considered control technology that is economically and
technologically feasible in determining RACT, based on information that
is current as of the time of development of the RACT SIP.
In addition, in the 2008 Ozone SIP Requirements Rule, EPA clarified
that states can use weighted average NOX emissions rates
from sources in the nonattainment area for meeting the major
NOX RACT requirement under the CAA, as consistent with
existing policy.\4\ EPA also recognized that states may conclude in
some cases that sources already addressed by RACT determinations for
the 1979 1-hour and/or 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS may not need to
implement additional controls to meet the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS RACT
requirement. See 80 FR 12278 and 12279 (March 6, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ EPA's NOX RACT guidance ``Nitrogen Oxides
Supplement to the General Preamble'' (57 FR 55620; November 25,
1992) encouraged states to develop RACT programs that are based on
``area wide average emission rates.'' Additional guidance on area-
wide RACT provisions is provided by EPA's January 2001 economic
incentive program guidance titled ``Improving Air Quality with
Economic Incentive Programs,'' available at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/eipfin.pdf. In addition, as
mentioned previously, the D.C. Cir. Court upheld the use of
NOX averaging to meet RACT requirements for 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. South Coast Air Quality Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA, No. 15-1115
(D.C. Cir. February 16, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Applicability of RACT Requirements in Pennsylvania
As indicated earlier, RACT requirements apply to any ozone
nonattainment areas classified as moderate or higher (serious, severe
or extreme) under CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f). Pennsylvania has
outstanding ozone RACT requirements for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. The entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is part of the OTR
established under section 184 of the CAA and thus is subject statewide
to the RACT requirements of CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f), pursuant
to section 184(b).
At the time of revocation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (effective
April 6, 2015), only two moderate nonattainment areas remained in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for this standard, the Philadelphia and
the Pittsburgh Areas. As required under EPA's anti-backsliding
provisions, these
[[Page 41429]]
two moderate nonattainment areas continue to be subject to RACT under
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Given its location in the OTR, the
remainder of the Commonwealth is also treated as moderate nonattainment
area under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for any planning requirements
under the revoked standard, including RACT. The OTR RACT requirement is
also in effect under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS throughout the
Commonwealth, since EPA did not designate any nonattainment areas above
marginal for this standard in Pennsylvania. Thus, in practice, the same
RACT requirements continue to be applicable in Pennsylvania for both
the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. RACT must be evaluated and
satisfied as separate requirements under each applicable standard.
RACT applies to major sources of NOX and VOC under each
ozone NAAQS or any VOC sources subject to CTG RACT. Which
NOX and VOC sources in Pennsylvania are considered ``major''
and are therefore subject to RACT is dependent on the location of each
source within the Commonwealth. Sources located in nonattainment areas
would be subject to the ``major source'' definitions established under
the CAA based on the area's current classification(s). In the case of
Pennsylvania, sources located outside of moderate or above ozone
nonattainment areas, as part of the OTR, shall be treated as if these
areas were moderate.
In Pennsylvania, the SIP program is implemented primarily by the
PADEP, but also by local air agencies in Philadelphia County (the City
of Philadelphia's Air Management Services [AMS]) and Allegheny County,
(the Allegheny County Health Department [ACHD]). These agencies have
implemented numerous RACT regulations and source-specific measures in
Pennsylvania to meet the applicable ozone RACT requirements.
Historically, statewide RACT controls have been promulgated by PADEP in
Pennsylvania Code Title 25--Environmental Resources, Part I--Department
of Environmental Protection, Subpart C--Protection of Natural
Resources, Article III--Air Resources, (25 Pa. Code) Chapter 129. AMS
and ACHD have incorporated by reference Pennsylvania regulations, but
have also promulgated regulations adopting RACT controls for their own
jurisdictions. In addition, AMS and ACHD have submitted, through PADEP,
separate source-specific RACT determinations as SIP revisions for
sources within their respective jurisdictions, which have been approved
by EPA. See 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1).
States were required to make RACT SIP submissions for the 1997 8-
hour ozone NAAQS by September 15, 2006. PADEP submitted a SIP revision
on September 25, 2006, certifying that a number of previously approved
VOC RACT rules continued to satisfy RACT under the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for the remainder of Pennsylvania.\5\ PADEP has met its
obligations under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for its CTG and non-CTG
VOC sources. See 82 FR 31464 (July 7, 2017). RACT control measures
addressing all applicable CAA RACT requirements under the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS have been implemented and fully approved in the
jurisdictions of ACHD and AMS. See 78 FR 34584 (June 10, 2013) and 81
FR 69687 (October 7, 2016). For the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, states
were required to submit RACT SIP revisions by July 20, 2014. On May 16,
2016, PADEP submitted a SIP revision addressing RACT for both the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in Pennsylvania. Specifically, the May 16,
2016 SIP submittal intended to satisfy sections 182(b)(2)(C), 182(f),
and 184 of the CAA for both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for
Pennsylvania's major NOX and VOC non-CTG sources, except
ethylene production plants, surface active agents manufacturing, and
mobile equipment repair and refinishing.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The September 15, 2006 SIP submittal initially included
Pennsylvania's certification of NOX RACT regulations;
however, NOX RACT portions were withdrawn by PADEP on
June 27, 2016.
\6\ EPA's conditional approval of PADEP's May 16, 2016 SIP
revision covered relevant sources located in both Philadelphia and
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. EPA's Conditional Approval for Pennsylvania's RACT Requirements
Under the 1997 and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
On May 16, 2016, PADEP submitted a SIP revision addressing RACT for
both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in Pennsylvania. PADEP's May
16, 2016 SIP revision intended to address certain outstanding VOC CTG
RACT and major NOX RACT requirements under the CAA for both
standards. The SIP revision requested approval of Pennsylvania's 25 Pa.
Code 129.96-100, Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NOX
and VOCs (the ``presumptive'' RACT II rule). Prior to the adoption of
the RACT II rule, Pennsylvania relied on the NOX and VOC
control measures in 25 Pa. Code 129.92-95, Stationary Sources of NOX
and VOCs, (the RACT I rule) to meet RACT for major sources of VOC and
NOX. The requirements of the RACT I rule remain in effect
and continue to be implemented as RACT.\7\ On September 26, 2017, PADEP
submitted a supplemental SIP revision which committed to address
various deficiencies identified by EPA in PADEP's May 16, 2016
``presumptive'' RACT II rule SIP revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ These requirements were initially approved as RACT for
Pennsylvania under the 1979 1-hour ozone NAAQS. The RACT I Rule was
approved by EPA into the SIP on March 23, 1998. 63 FR 13789.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 9, 2019, EPA conditionally approved the RACT II rule based
on PADEP's September 26, 2017 commitment letter.\8\ See 84 FR 20274. In
EPA's final conditional approval, EPA noted that PADEP would be
required to submit, for EPA's approval, SIP revisions to address any
facility-wide or system-wide averaging plan approved under 25 Pa. Code
129.98 and any case-by-case RACT determinations under 25 Pa. Code
129.99. PADEP committed to submitting these additional SIP revisions
within 12 months of EPA's final conditional approval, specifically May
9, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ On August 27, 2020, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals
issued a decision vacating EPA's approval of three provisions of
Pennsylvania's presumptive RACT II rule applicable to certain coal-
fired power plants. Sierra Club v. EPA, No. 19-2562 (3rd Cir. August
27, 2020). None of the sources in this proposed rulemaking are
subject to the three presumptive RACT II provisions at issue in that
Sierra Club decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, as authorized in CAA section 110(k)(3) and (k)(4),
Pennsylvania was required to submit the following as case-by-case SIP
revisions, by May 9, 2020, for EPA's approval as a condition of
approval of 25 Pa. Code 128 and 129 in the May 16, 2016 SIP revision:
(1) All facility-wide or system-wide averaging plans approved by PADEP
under 25 Pa. Code 129.98 including, but not limited to, any terms and
conditions that ensure the enforceability of the averaging plan as a
practical matter (i.e., any monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping, or
testing requirements); and (2) all source-specific RACT determinations
approved by PADEP under 25 Pa. Code 129.99, including any alternative
compliance schedules approved under 25 Pa. Code 129.97(k) and
129.99(i); the case-by-case RACT determinations submitted to EPA for
approval into the SIP should include any terms and conditions that
ensure the enforceability of the case-by-case or source-specific RACT
emission limitation as a practical matter (i.e., any monitoring,
reporting, recordkeeping, or testing requirements). See May 9, 2019 (84
FR 20274). Through multiple
[[Page 41430]]
submissions between 2017 and 2020, PADEP has submitted to EPA for
approval various SIP submissions to implement its RACT II case-by-case
determinations and averaging plans. This proposed rulemaking is based
on EPA's review of one of these SIP revisions.
II. Summary of SIP Revisions
In order to satisfy a requirement from EPA's May 9, 2019
conditional approval, PADEP has submitted to EPA, SIP revisions
addressing case-by-case RACT requirements for major sources in
Pennsylvania subject to 25 Pa. Code 129.99. As noted in Table 1 of this
document, on May 7 2020, PADEP submitted to EPA, a SIP revision
pertaining to Pennsylvania's case-by-case NOX and/or VOC
RACT determinations for sources located at numerous major
NOX and VOC emitting facilities located in the Commonwealth.
PADEP provided documentation in its SIP revisions to support its case-
by-case RACT determinations for affected emission units at each major
NOX and VOC emitting facilities subject to 25 Pa. Code
129.99.
In the Pennsylvania RACT SIP revision, PADEP included a case-by-
case RACT determination for the existing emissions units at each of
these major sources of NOX and/or VOC that required a source
specific RACT determination. In PADEP's RACT determinations an
evaluation was completed to determine if previously SIP-approved, case-
by-case RACT requirements (herein referred to as RACT I) were more
stringent and required to be retained in the sources Title V air
quality permit and subsequently, the Federally-approved SIP, or if the
new case-by-case RACT requirements are more stringent and supersede the
previous Federally-approved provisions.
EPA, in this action, is taking action on sources at twenty-four
major NOX and/or VOC emitting facilities in Pennsylvania,
subject to Pennsylvania's case-by-case RACT requirements, as summarized
in Table 2.
Table 2--Twenty-Four Major NOX and/or VOC Sources in Pennsylvania Subject to Case-by-Case RACT II Under the 1997
and 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1-Hour ozone RACT source? Major source pollutant RACT II permit
Major source (county) (RACT I) (NOX and/or VOC) (effective date)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anvil International, LLC (formerly Yes....................... VOC....................... 36-05019
Grinnell Corporation) (Lancaster). (2/1/2019)
ArcelorMittal Plate LLC Conshohocken Yes....................... NOX and VOC............... 46-00011
Plant (formerly Bethlehem Lukens (1/26/2018)
Plate) (Montgomery).
Braskem America Inc. Marcus Hook Yes....................... VOC....................... 23-00012
(formerly Epsilon Products Co.-- (3/2/2020)
Marcus Hook) (Delaware).
Buck Co Inc. Quarryville (formerly Yes....................... VOC....................... 36-05053
Buck Company Inc) (Lancaster). (4/1/2020)
Calumet Karns City Refining LLC Yes....................... VOC....................... 10-027H
(formerly Penreco--Karns City) (11/29/2018)
(Butler).
Clarion Bathware Marble (Clarion)... No........................ VOC....................... 16-00133
(12/19/2020)
Domtar Paper Company Johnsonburg Yes....................... NOX and VOC............... 24-00009
Mill (formerly Willamette (2/25/2020)
Industries, Johnsonburgh Mill)
(Elk).
Exelon Generation Company LLC Yes....................... NOX....................... 09-00016
Croydon Generating Station (4/11/2018)
(formerly PECO Energy Co.--Croydon
Generating Station) (Bucks).
Georgia-Pacific Panel Products LLC Yes....................... NOX and VOC............... 42-158R
Mt. Jewell MDF Plant (McKean). (1/2/2019)
GE Transportation Grove City Engine Yes....................... NOX and VOC............... 43-00196
(formerly GE Transportation (11/7/2019)
Systems) (Mercer).
GrafTech USA LLC St Marys (formerly Yes....................... VOC....................... 24-00012
The Carbide/Graphite Group, Inc) (5/1/2019)
(Elk).
Haysite Reinforced Plastics LLC Erie No........................ VOC....................... 25-00783
(Erie). (7/24/2019)
INMETCO Ellwood City (formerly The Yes....................... NOX and VOC............... 37-00243
International Metals Reclamation (12/6/2019)
Co) (Lawrence).
International Waxes Inc Farmers Yes....................... NOX and VOC............... 42-00011
Valley (formerly Petrowax Refining) (2/21/2020)
(McKean).
Jeld Wen Fiber Division PA Yes....................... NOX and VOC............... 08-00003
(Bradford). (9/21/2018)
Mars Wrigley Confectionery US LLC Yes....................... VOC....................... 36-05142
Elizabethtown (Lancaster). (7/18/2019)
Molded Fiber Glass Company Union Yes....................... VOC....................... 25-00035
City (formerly Molded Fiber Glass) (2/5/2020)
(Erie).
Monroe Energy LLC Trainer (formerly Yes....................... NOX and VOC............... 23-00003
Conoco Phillips Company) (Delaware). (6/5/2017)
Nova Chemicals Company Beaver Yes....................... VOC....................... 04-00033
(formerly Nova Chemicals, Inc.) (4/2/2020)
(Beaver).
Sasol Chemicals USA LLC (formerly Yes....................... VOC....................... 61-00011
Merisol Antioxidants LLC) (Venango). (2/16/2020)
Silberline Manufacturing Company Yes....................... VOC....................... 54-00041
Lincoln Drive Plant (formerly (3/16/2020)
Silberline Manufacturing Co)
(Schuylkill).
Superior Tube Company Lower Yes....................... VOC....................... 46-00020
Providence (formerly Superior Tube (2/5/2020)
Company) (Montgomery).
Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility Unknown *................. VOC....................... 39-00069
(Lehigh). (10/24/2017)
[[Page 41431]]
Victaulic Forks Facility Unknown **................ VOC....................... 48-0009
(Northampton). (10/24/2017)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* PADEP records indicate that Victaulic Company Alburtis Facility may have been subject to RACT I requirements
because PADEP technical review memos and operating permits issued to the facility in the past reference RACT I
requirements. However, in reviewing the facility's files, PADEP could not produce a RACT I permit nor any
files specific to the issuance of RACT I. Furthermore, RACT I requirements were never incorporated into the
Pennsylvania SIP for Victaulic Alburtis. See PADEP comment and response document dated January 2020.
** PADEP records indicate that Victaulic Forks Facility may have been subject to RACT I requirements because
PADEP technical review memos and operating permits issued to the facility in the past reference RACT I
requirements. However, in reviewing the facility's files, PADEP could not produce a RACT I permit nor any
files specific to the issuance of RACT I. Furthermore, RACT I requirements were never incorporated into the
Pennsylvania SIP for Victaulic Forks. See PADEP comment and response document dated January 2020.
The case-by-case RACT determinations submitted by PADEP consist of
an evaluation of all reasonably available controls at the time of
evaluation for each affected emissions unit, resulting in a PADEP
determination of what specific control requirements, if any, satisfy
RACT for that particular unit. The adoption of new or additional
controls or the revisions to existing controls as RACT were specified
as requirements in new or revised Federally enforceable permits
(hereafter RACT II permits) issued by PADEP to the source. The RACT II
permits, which revise or adopt additional source-specific controls,
have been submitted as part of the Pennsylvania RACT SIP revisions for
EPA's approval in the Pennsylvania SIP under 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(1). The
RACT II permits submitted by PADEP are listed in the last column of
Table 2 of this document, along with the permit effective date, and are
part of the docket for this rulemaking, which is available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0380.\9\ EPA
is proposing to incorporate by reference in the Pennsylvania SIP, via
the RACT II permits, source-specific RACT determinations under the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for certain sources at major NOX
and VOC emitting facilities.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The RACT II permits are redacted versions of a facility's
Federally enforceable permits and reflect the specific RACT
requirements being approved into the Pennsylvania SIP.
\10\ While the prior SIP-approved RACT I permit will remain part
of the SIP, this RACT II rule will incorporate by reference the RACT
II requirements through the RACT II permit and clarify the ongoing
applicability of specific conditions in the RACT I permit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. EPA's Evaluation of SIP Revisions
After thorough review and evaluation of the information provided by
PADEP for sources at twenty-four major NOX and/or VOC
emitting facilities in Pennsylvania included in its SIP revision
submittal, EPA finds that PADEP's case-by-case RACT determinations and
conclusions provided are reasonable and appropriately considered
technically and economically feasible controls, while setting lowest
achievable limits. EPA finds that the proposed source-specific RACT
controls for the sources subject to this rulemaking action adequately
meet the CAA RACT requirements for the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS
for the subject sources of NOX and/or VOC in Pennsylvania,
as they are not covered by or cannot meet Pennsylvania's presumptive
RACT regulation.
EPA also finds that all the proposed revisions to previously SIP
approved RACT requirements, under the 1979 1-hour ozone standard (RACT
I), as discussed in PADEP's SIP revisions, will result in equivalent or
additional reductions of NOX and/or VOC emissions and should
not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or
reasonable further progress with the NAAQS or interfere with other
applicable CAA requirement in section 110(l) of the CAA.
EPA's complete analysis of PADEP's case-by-case RACT SIP revisions
is included in the TSD available in the docket for this rulemaking
action and available online at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket
number EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0380.
IV. Proposed Action
Based on EPA's review, EPA is proposing to approve the Pennsylvania
SIP revisions for case-by-case RACT determinations for individual
sources at twenty-four major NOX and VOC emitting facilities
listed in Table 2 of this document and incorporate by reference in the
Pennsylvania SIP, via the RACT II permits, source specific RACT
determinations under the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS for those
sources. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in
this document. These comments will be considered before taking final
action. As EPA views each facility as a separable SIP revision, should
EPA receive comment on one facility but not others, EPA may take
separate, final action on the remaining facilities.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference source specific RACT determinations via the RACT II permits
as described in Sections II and III--Summary of SIP Revisions and EPA's
Evaluation of SIP Revisions in this document. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735,
[[Page 41432]]
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rulemaking, addressing the
NOX and VOC RACT case-by-case requirements for individual
sources at twenty-four facilities in Pennsylvania for the 1997 and 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS, does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 22, 2021.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2021-16279 Filed 7-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
