Air Plan Revision; Limited Approval and Limited Disapproval; California; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, 40959-40961 [2021-16110]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
the human environment. This rule
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges and is
categorically excluded from further
review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter
3, Table3–1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental
Consideration nor a Memorandum for
the Record are required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 117.391
[Amended]
2. Amend § 117.391 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.391
Chicago River.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The Amtrak Bridge, mile 3.77, is
authorized to operate remotely and open
to the intermediate position on signal,
unless a request for a full opening is
received by the drawtender. The bridge
is required to operate a marine radio.
*
*
*
*
*
M.J. Johnston,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2021–15986 Filed 7–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0601; FRL–8689–02–
R9]
Air Plan Revision; Limited Approval
and Limited Disapproval; California;
Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management
District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing the limited
approval and limited disapproval of a
revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District (YSAQMD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from solvent
cleaning and degreasing operations.
Under the authority of the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act), this action
simultaneously approves a local rule
that regulates these emission sources
and directs California to correct rule
deficiencies.
DATES: This rule will be effective on
August 30, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket No.
SUMMARY:
Local agency
Rule #
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
YSAQMD .........................................................
We proposed a limited approval
because we determined that this rule
improves the SIP and is largely
consistent with the relevant CAA
requirements. We simultaneously
proposed a limited disapproval because
the following rule provision conflicts
with section 110 and part D of the Act.
The provision at section 110.6 of the
rule exempts solvent degreasing
operations that are subject to National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) requirements at 40
CFR part 63 Subpart T regulating
halogenated solvent cleaning.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Jul 29, 2021
Jkt 253001
2.31
PO 00000
Frm 00043
EPA–R09–OAR–2018–0601. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 972–3024 or by
email at lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and the EPA’s Response
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On February 25, 2021 (86 FR 11480),
the EPA proposed a limited approval
and limited disapproval of the following
rule that was submitted for
incorporation into the California SIP.
Rule title
Revised
Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing .................
CAA Section 182(b)(2) (‘‘Reasonably
available control technology’’) states:
‘‘The State shall submit a revision to the
applicable implementation plan to
include provisions to require the
implementation of reasonably available
control technology . . . .’’ While the
YSAQMD has been delegated the
authority to enforce the requirements in
40 CFR 63 Subpart T, this type of
delegation of authority to a district or
state does not place those requirements
or its emission limitations into the SIP.
Thus, this rule fails to implement RACT
for halogenated solvent cleaning in an
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40959
04/12/2017
Submitted
08/09/2017
enforceable SIP regulation. Our
proposed action contains more
information on the basis for this
rulemaking and on our evaluation of the
submittal.
II. Public Comments and the EPA’s
Response
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one comment
that was supportive of the proposed
action.
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
30JYR1
40960
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rule as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in sections
110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA
is finalizing a limited approval of the
submitted rule. This action incorporates
the submitted rule into the California
SIP, including those provisions
identified as deficient. As authorized
under section 110(k)(3) and 301(a), the
EPA is simultaneously finalizing a
limited disapproval of the rule. As a
result, the EPA must promulgate a
federal implementation plan under
section 110(c) unless we approve
subsequent SIP revisions that correct the
rule deficiencies within 24 months. In
addition, the offset sanction in CAA
section 179(b)(2) will be imposed 18
months after the effective date of this
action, and the highway funding
sanction in CAA section 179(b)(1) six
months after the offset sanction is
imposed. A sanction will not be
imposed if the EPA determines that a
subsequent SIP submission corrects the
identified deficiencies before the
applicable deadline.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
YSAQMD rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA because this action does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Jul 29, 2021
Jkt 253001
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities beyond those imposed by state
law.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to
the private sector, will result from this
action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, because the SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction, and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs
the EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. The EPA believes that this
action is not subject to the requirements
of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA lacks the discretionary
authority to address environmental
justice in this rulemaking.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 28,
2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
30JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 144 / Friday, July 30, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: July 22, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
ACTION:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(442)(i)(F)(4) and
(c)(503)(i)(D) to read as follows:
■
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(442) * * *
(i) * * *
(F) * * *
(4) Previously approved on April 28,
2015 in paragraph (c)(442)(i)(F)(2) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in (c)(503)(i)(D)(1), Rule
2.31, ‘‘Solvent Cleaning and
Degreasing,’’ revised on May 8, 2013.
*
*
*
*
*
(503) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 2.31, ‘‘Solvent Cleaning and
Degreasing,’’ revised on April 12, 2017.
(2) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–16110 Filed 7–29–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 140501394–5279–02; RTID
0648–XB269]
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; 2021
Commercial Accountability Measure
and Closure for South Atlantic Blueline
Tilefish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Jul 29, 2021
Jkt 253001
NMFS implements an
accountability measure (AM) for
commercial blueline tilefish in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the
South Atlantic. Commercial landings of
blueline tilefish are projected to reach
the commercial sector annual catch
limit (ACL) by August 1, 2021.
Therefore, NMFS is closing the
commercial sector for blueline tilefish
in the South Atlantic EEZ on August 1,
2021, and it will remain closed until the
start of the next fishing year on January
1, 2022. This closure is necessary to
protect the blueline tilefish resource.
DATES: This temporary rule is effective
at 12:01 a.m., eastern time, on August 1,
2021, until 12:01 a.m., eastern time, on
January 1, 2022.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
DeVictor, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727–824–5305, email:
rick.devictor@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
snapper-grouper fishery of the South
Atlantic includes blueline tilefish and is
managed under the Fishery
Management Plan for the SnapperGrouper Fishery of the South Atlantic
Region (FMP). The South Atlantic
Fishery Management Council and
NMFS prepared the FMP, and the FMP
is implemented by NMFS under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by
regulations at 50 CFR part 622. All
weights in this temporary rule are given
in round weight.
As specified at 50 CFR
622.193(z)(1)(i), the commercial sector
ACL for blueline tilefish is 117,148 lb
(53,137 kg). The commercial AM for
blueline tilefish requires NMFS to close
the commercial sector when the its ACL
is reached, or is projected to be reached,
by filing a notification to that effect with
the Office of the Federal Register (50
CFR 622.193(z)(1)(i)). NMFS has
projected that for the 2021 fishing year,
the commercial sector ACL for South
Atlantic blueline tilefish will be reached
by August 1, 2021. Accordingly, the
commercial sector for South Atlantic
blueline tilefish is closed effective at
12:01 a.m., eastern time, on August 1,
2021, until 12:01 a.m., eastern time, on
January 1, 2022.
The operator of a vessel with a valid
Federal commercial vessel permit for
South Atlantic snapper-grouper having
blueline tilefish on board must have
landed and bartered, traded, or sold
such blueline tilefish prior to August 1,
SUMMARY:
For reasons set forth in the preamble,
EPA amends Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40
of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
§ 52.220
Temporary rule; closure.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
40961
2021. During the commercial sector
closure, all sale or purchase of blueline
tilefish is prohibited. The harvest or
possession of blueline tilefish in or from
the South Atlantic EEZ is limited to the
recreational bag and possession limits
specified in 50 CFR 622.187(b)(2) and
(c)(1), respectively, while the
recreational sector for blueline tilefish is
open. These bag and possession limits
apply in the South Atlantic on board a
vessel with a valid Federal commercial
or charter vessel/headboat permit for
South Atlantic snapper-grouper, and
apply to the harvest of blueline tilefish
in both state and Federal waters.
Classification
NMFS issues this action pursuant to
section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. This action is required by 50 CFR
622.193(z)(1)(i)), which was issued
pursuant to section 304(b) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and is exempt
from review under Executive Order
12866.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), there
is good cause to waive prior notice and
an opportunity for public comment on
this action, as notice and comment is
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest. Such procedures are
unnecessary because the regulations
associated with the closure of the
blueline tilefish commercial sector at 50
CFR 622.193(z)(1)(i) have already been
subject to notice and public comment,
and all that remains is to notify the
public of the closure. Prior notice and
opportunity for public comment are
contrary to the public interest because
there is a need to immediately
implement this action to protect
blueline tilefish, since the capacity of
the fishing fleet allows for rapid harvest
of the commercial sector ACL. Prior
notice and opportunity for public
comment would require time and would
potentially result in a harvest well in
excess of the established commercial
sector ACL.
For the aforementioned reasons, the
Acting Assistant Administrator also
finds good cause to waive the 30-day
delay in the effectiveness of this action
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: July 26, 2021.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–16207 Filed 7–26–21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\30JYR1.SGM
30JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 144 (Friday, July 30, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40959-40961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16110]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0601; FRL-8689-02-R9]
Air Plan Revision; Limited Approval and Limited Disapproval;
California; Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing the
limited approval and limited disapproval of a revision to the Yolo-
Solano Air Quality Management District (YSAQMD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns
emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from solvent cleaning
and degreasing operations. Under the authority of the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act), this action simultaneously approves a local rule that
regulates these emission sources and directs California to correct rule
deficiencies.
DATES: This rule will be effective on August 30, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0601. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-3024 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and the EPA's Response
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On February 25, 2021 (86 FR 11480), the EPA proposed a limited
approval and limited disapproval of the following rule that was
submitted for incorporation into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule # Rule title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YSAQMD................................ 2.31 Solvent Cleaning and 04/12/2017 08/09/2017
Degreasing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed a limited approval because we determined that this rule
improves the SIP and is largely consistent with the relevant CAA
requirements. We simultaneously proposed a limited disapproval because
the following rule provision conflicts with section 110 and part D of
the Act. The provision at section 110.6 of the rule exempts solvent
degreasing operations that are subject to National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requirements at 40 CFR part 63
Subpart T regulating halogenated solvent cleaning.
CAA Section 182(b)(2) (``Reasonably available control technology'')
states: ``The State shall submit a revision to the applicable
implementation plan to include provisions to require the implementation
of reasonably available control technology . . . .'' While the YSAQMD
has been delegated the authority to enforce the requirements in 40 CFR
63 Subpart T, this type of delegation of authority to a district or
state does not place those requirements or its emission limitations
into the SIP. Thus, this rule fails to implement RACT for halogenated
solvent cleaning in an enforceable SIP regulation. Our proposed action
contains more information on the basis for this rulemaking and on our
evaluation of the submittal.
II. Public Comments and the EPA's Response
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one comment that was supportive of the
proposed action.
[[Page 40960]]
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA is finalizing a
limited approval of the submitted rule. This action incorporates the
submitted rule into the California SIP, including those provisions
identified as deficient. As authorized under section 110(k)(3) and
301(a), the EPA is simultaneously finalizing a limited disapproval of
the rule. As a result, the EPA must promulgate a federal implementation
plan under section 110(c) unless we approve subsequent SIP revisions
that correct the rule deficiencies within 24 months. In addition, the
offset sanction in CAA section 179(b)(2) will be imposed 18 months
after the effective date of this action, and the highway funding
sanction in CAA section 179(b)(1) six months after the offset sanction
is imposed. A sanction will not be imposed if the EPA determines that a
subsequent SIP submission corrects the identified deficiencies before
the applicable deadline.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
YSAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those
imposed by state law.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to
State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will
result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction, and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with the CAA.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address environmental
justice in this rulemaking.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 28, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
[[Page 40961]]
Dated: July 22, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA amends Part 52, Chapter
I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(442)(i)(F)(4) and
(c)(503)(i)(D) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(442) * * *
(i) * * *
(F) * * *
(4) Previously approved on April 28, 2015 in paragraph
(c)(442)(i)(F)(2) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(503)(i)(D)(1), Rule 2.31, ``Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing,''
revised on May 8, 2013.
* * * * *
(503) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 2.31, ``Solvent Cleaning and Degreasing,'' revised on
April 12, 2017.
(2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-16110 Filed 7-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P